April 11, 2025 • 53 mins
Alien abductions. Unexplained disappearances. Unsolved murders. In tonight's interview, the guys join the legendary, award-winning journalist Maggie Freleng to learn more about her newest podcast, Up and Vanished Weekly.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
From UFOs to psychic powers and government conspiracies. History is
riddled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or
learn the stuff they don't want you to know. A
production of Iheartrading.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Hello, welcome back to the show. My name is Matt,
my name is name. Our colleague Ben is on an adventure.
But you are you. You are here, and that makes
this stuff they don't want you to know. We're also
joined by our super producer Andrew. We're recalling him now,
Frank Train, Try Force Howard, and we are bringing new
(00:45):
energy to this episode because we are joined by someone very,
very special, someone we've been wanting to talk to for
quite a while, ever since we had a conversation with
Jason Flamm on this show. You might recognize her when
when you hear it for the first time from her
work as host and producer of Wrongful Conviction alongside Jason.
(01:06):
You might know her voice from the Pulitzer Prize winning
podcast Suave that we just saw Maria from Suave at
on AirFest very recently. You might also know her from
her work as an intern at the US Fish and
Wildlife Service.
Speaker 3 (01:22):
That's mainly where my background is.
Speaker 4 (01:25):
That's a deep cut.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
I know, hey, hey, hold on, hold on, you may,
but primarily you might know her from Up and Vanished Weekly,
the new true crime show that's a spin off of
Up and Vanished from Tenderfoot TV.
Speaker 5 (01:38):
Welcome, Maggie Freeling.
Speaker 4 (01:40):
Oh man, that was a lot to like keep keep
myself from yelling during But the deep cut fish and
wildlife is wild.
Speaker 3 (01:48):
It's important, well, especially in these are trying times where
that kind of stuff's getting wet, like eliminated entirely potentially. Oof.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
Yeah, that's why you're here, Maggie. Let's talk f so
and or wildlife.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
Start with wildlife favorite animal?
Speaker 4 (02:05):
Go, Oh my gosh, yeah, the fish and wildlife. I did.
I did. I wanted to go into conservation or like
conservation reporting something like that for a really long time.
And that's a really dark place to be in right now.
So I'm glad I didn't.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
Yeah, I wasn't choking though. That wasn't just a clever segue.
What is your favorite animal?
Speaker 4 (02:24):
What is my favorite animal? Oh my gosh, I mean
any kind of like cat.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
Okay, there we go, any fuel adjacent that's cool.
Speaker 5 (02:32):
All we're all big cat fans.
Speaker 2 (02:33):
We're just hanging out with Astrid here, that's Andrew's Katy Cat.
We've got a bunch of them running around. Look, we're
here to talk about up in Vanish Weekly because this
brand new show hits the listener. That's us, that's me
in particular, with a new either missing person's case, a
suspected homicide case, a case of historical importance when it
(02:57):
comes to that kind of thing, there are so many
to chew from when we were preparing to talk to
you today, Maggie abduction maybe in there. We've got a
short list of things we're going to talk about, but
just for everybody who's listening, before we fully get into
the show, we're also going to be talking about a
specific hair industry out of India that I learned about
(03:19):
when talking with Maggie a little while ago. And that
is a deep rabbit hole. That is probably a whole
other episode that we might have to bring you back
on for.
Speaker 5 (03:28):
Yes, but there's so many things we're going to talk
about today.
Speaker 2 (03:31):
We'll be right back after word from our sponsor with
Maggie Freeling.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
And we have returned with Maggie and we're gonna jump
right in to a pretty important case that I think
is a really good kind of conduit between up and
vanished weekly and stuff they don't want you to know,
which is the mysterious disappearance of Travis Walton in nineteen
seventy five. Travis vanished for five days in the fall
(04:06):
of that year and returned with some very interesting and
conspiracy adjacent claims. Maggie, what do you say we jump
right into that story and what these claims were? What
you think happened?
Speaker 4 (04:18):
Yeah, So, I guess have you guys covered this case?
Speaker 2 (04:20):
I forgot We have talked about Travis Walton when it
comes to abduction stories, right, so like kind of a
bit of an overview and we're talking years ago.
Speaker 3 (04:32):
Not a deep talk though, for sure.
Speaker 2 (04:33):
No, not at all. We have spoken with pain about
high Strange and this is one little thing that we
mentioned in that interview, but we've never actually looked at
the facts.
Speaker 4 (04:45):
Wow. Okay, so your listeners are going to love this
because this is one of those abduction cases that has
a lot of credibility to it because is it five
or six other people he was with actually saw him
hi allegedly be abducted. They saw it. This is what
they also say happened. And I find it so interesting
(05:07):
because these guys, Okay, so they're all friends, they're loggers,
they're in the woods together, and they literally see Travis
be abducted. So he goes missing and these guys come
back without their friend and they're instantly murder suspects. They
think they the police think they did something with him.
When they're trying to report him missing, they take polygraph tests.
(05:30):
I mean, these guys are suspects. They're about to go
to jail and be arrested for doing something to their friend.
And then he shows up five days later, I think
was it five days let me say, and yeah, five
days later and he's like, no, no, I was abducted.
And they're all like, see, see, we told you. And
(05:51):
even you know, watching documentaries and listening back to the
police and people who gave the polygraphs, they're like, it
is very difficult and I know this too, for six
people to tell the same story time and time again.
And that's what happens here. I mean, you know, Travis
tells what happened once he was on the ship, and
(06:12):
we could talk about that, but in terms of credibility,
I mean, that's it. You have six people telling the
same story. These guys were gonna go to jail. And
they're not saying like this is a joke or whatever.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
They're like, no, seriously, if you're kinda come up with
a cover story for murdering your friend, there are better ones.
Then we saw him get pulled up by a tractor
beam into the sky, or well, can you maybe tell
us a little bit about what they reported seeing, like,
you know, more than beyond just our friend was abducted.
There has to be some detail around that.
Speaker 5 (06:45):
Right, Yeah.
Speaker 4 (06:45):
So they're all in the woods, like we said, they're
loggers nineteen seventy five, and they all of a sudden, see,
they hear a noise and they see in a clearing
like a hovering craft. So Travis decides to walk towards
it and it kind of investigate what's happening, and really,
the next thing they know, they see him fly backwards
(07:07):
like he's you know, struck by a beam of light,
flies backwards and they run. When they return, he's gone.
Speaker 3 (07:14):
Like you do not.
Speaker 4 (07:17):
Maybe not walking towards as well.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
Yeah, exactly, And okay, so they're all aligned on this,
and they.
Speaker 4 (07:24):
Are one hundred person aligned. I mean they all see
the same thing, or say they see the same thing.
Speaker 2 (07:32):
Let's talk about how rare that is when it comes
to the cases you've looked at, not only for Up
and Vanish Weekly, but for some of the wrongful conviction
specific cases that you've looked at. Where are where there
are that number of individuals who are credible witnesses, who
are eyes on. They're not just people who are around,
(07:53):
you know, saw a little part of something that happened.
They all saw the same thing and they're reporting this.
I'm thinking about was listening to other episodes like Jennifer
Kesse's disappearance, which is one of the first episodes you
guys cover, where one of the best pieces of evidence
in that case that you've got is a piece of
actual video tape, but you can't actually make the person out.
(08:16):
And there's been no nothing has happened with that case
because you can't make the person out. But in this case,
you've got folks saying something, well, what do you do?
Speaker 5 (08:24):
Can you go?
Speaker 2 (08:25):
I don't know what do you do with a UFO? Like,
what is there anything? I just don't get it.
Speaker 4 (08:32):
Well that's so okay. So there's two things there. So
you asked about people telling the same story, So you know,
when you tell a lie, it is hard to remember
that lie because it is not a memory that you have.
So then the lie changes, right, That's when people's stories change.
They can't remember what they said, so they start changing.
(08:52):
These guys, all of them are telling the same story
separation time and time, separately and separate polygraphs. They all
passed the polygraphs. You know, we all know, you guys
talk about it. Polygraphs can't be admitted in court. They're
not particularly fallible. But six guys telling the same story,
(09:13):
all passing a polygraph can indicate something, you know. So
that is something that is really interesting to me about
this and Travis telling the same detailed story. You can
listen to it on High Strange Pain talks to Travis
Walton and he has vivid memories of being inside a spaceship.
Speaker 5 (09:36):
Oh god, well.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
Off, Mike. Before we started rolling, I mentioned that we
had to talk about this one if for only the
opportunity to discuss the nineteen eighties sci fi horror classic
Fire in the Sky, which I never saw when I
was younger, and only recently there's been this clip making
the rounds of this scene where do is being probed
(10:01):
in the face with these weird pneumatic tubes that are
shooting goo up his nose and these really horrifying aliens
hovering over and I swear to god, it's the scariest
thing I've ever seen. It's like total nightmare fuel. Is
there any like when we say that that film is
based on this occurrence, did he report being invaded in
(10:23):
this way? Bodily?
Speaker 4 (10:25):
Yeah? So he's missing for five days, right, and he does.
He explains things that happen on the ship, but he
says it only feels maybe like a couple hours. He
reappears about twenty miles away from where he went missing.
When he comes back to Earth and he notices he's
gone for five days, he has no idea. There's like
(10:46):
a time lapse. When he sees his brother, His brothers like,
feel your face, and he's got five days growth of beard.
So what happens in the ship somehow to him, maybe
he was unconscious for some of it. It feels a
brief period of time for how long he was missing.
But yes, so this is interesting. I'm sure you guys
know some of the races of aliens. But he reportedly
(11:10):
first sees like tall grays. It seems like one of
the grays. I believe it was tall grays, and when
he freaks out by them, he freaks out. He somehow
gets off the what's it called, like the operating table
or whatever. Another creature comes in that looks more humanoid.
I forget what the names of those species are that
(11:31):
he explained, but they kind of are like blonde and
look kind of like Greek gods or something. But that's
the other species, he explained, seeing which seems like they
kind of presented this more human looking person to him
to get him to calm down. But like I said, Payne,
talk to him. He got all these crazy details. He
relives it. I mean listening to him talk. Yeah, whatever
(11:55):
happened to him, he believes happened to him.
Speaker 5 (11:58):
Yep.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
You can hear him get emotional, and especially about how telling.
Speaker 5 (12:03):
This story has affected him.
Speaker 2 (12:05):
Right, he could have said when he got back that,
oh well, I made up that story and his life
could have probably been better because his like that's been
his The rest of his life has been that. Right,
It's almost like being trapped in some sort of hell.
And if he was just making up the story, then
(12:26):
you know, he is said out loud I wish.
Speaker 4 (12:28):
I wasn't living his entire identity. Is that alien guy
that was abducted like that? That sucks? Like he has
no he is not Travis Walton. He's not really a
person anymore? Is this objectified story? And I think that's
one of the things that's so interesting in these credible
abductions is none of these people want that attention. Why
(12:52):
would you want this kind of attention? It becomes harassment,
It ruins your life, Like, what is it Betty and
Barney White? Is that a name?
Speaker 5 (13:00):
Hill?
Speaker 4 (13:00):
Hill? They were an interracial couple back in segregation times fifties, sixties.
They did not want that attention at all.
Speaker 2 (13:12):
Yeah, they had such a weird situation where they were
recounting things well, going under some form of hypnosis, which
was really interesting. And some of the regression techniques that
we've talked about on the show before that you know,
are they're pretty questionable. But at the same time, it's like,
who knows, you know, you have to allow yourself to
(13:35):
suspend disbelief long enough to actually hear someone out right
or explore topics we think. But yeah, Betty and Barney Hill,
that's another situation where it just it's those two actually,
Travis Walton, Betty and Barney Hill are probably the two
that I can think of the top of my head
that are the most credible abduction stories. There's one there's
(13:57):
oh man, I can't remember her name. There's somebody who
was featured on a Netflix document.
Speaker 4 (14:02):
Or abducted in Manhattan or something.
Speaker 2 (14:05):
Yeah, that was fascinating, fascinating, but also you know, there's
conflicting stories with that one about who's telling the truth,
who's lying, and what are their motivations and all that stuff.
Speaker 4 (14:15):
So that one is kind of related to this in
the sense that there was like at least two dozen
witnesses right that see this woman levitate out her window
and be abducted. But then as the documentary goes on,
Sorry spoiler, you could skip ahead, but it was like
group think what is it called, Like they were influenced
(14:38):
to kind of remember this was what they were seeing
and their witness statements might not have been particularly credible,
I know, but we don't see that in this Travis
Walton case, right, Like these guys are all like, no, no, no,
this is what we saw.
Speaker 3 (14:53):
Adams just no reason to double down like that for
that long. It's really really fascinating. I just want to
add to that. And the Sky came out in nineteen
ninety three, not the eighties, and Travis Waltson is like
an extra. He plays citizen number three in Fire in
the Sky. And I don't know that it's a particularly
great movie, but the alien surgery scene is the stuff
(15:14):
of nightmares. So I highly recommended the very least looking
that one up. It's definitely one of the most horrific
alien abduction type scenes I've ever seen.
Speaker 5 (15:22):
It reminds me of the movie Jacob's.
Speaker 3 (15:23):
Ladder a lot like it's very early nineties absolute terror.
Speaker 4 (15:28):
That was actually you mentioned. I just want to bring
up one more thing that when he resurfaced five days later,
he had lost a ton of weight, was very very skinny.
Clearly it seemed like he had not eaten for days.
But when they did like blood work and checked on him,
(15:49):
his like levels were okay. Like it seemed like wherever
he was and whoever had him knew how to keep
him alive and knew how to keep him stable. Which
was one of those like weird little like how if
he did just disappear on his own, how did he
lose this much weight? To the point of starving but
(16:09):
still be totally fine internally.
Speaker 5 (16:13):
Yeah, it is really splating.
Speaker 2 (16:15):
Yeah, supplements, because well, you know, if you put yourself
in the mind of an investigator, like from a sheriff's
department or something, in the first days that this is happening,
you may think, oh, this guy looks like someone who
was lost in the woods for five days. But then
you get those tests done, like, oh, well, actually no,
he's got plenty of calcium.
Speaker 5 (16:34):
How why very weird.
Speaker 2 (16:40):
It's a really great example. Does up in Vanish Weekly
cover stories like this that are a little more out there.
Speaker 4 (16:48):
Sometimes we love to I love to especially, So there's
a couple others we're going to talk about today. One
of them is Richard Cox. He is a West Point
cadet who vanished into thin air, and one of the
leading theories is he went into the CIA, which I
know is something you guys love talking about.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
Oh wow, so a case based on the possibility that
someone cut all contacts and went somewhere else to work
for the outfit.
Speaker 4 (17:23):
Yeah, I'm really I'm actually very excited to hear y'all's
take on this one, because you probably know more about
going into the CIA than I do.
Speaker 2 (17:30):
Oh yeah, we've heard many a tale where somebody has,
you know, pretended to start a new job or something,
but they're actually going to work for the CIA. But
most of the instances we've seen people don't just cut
all contacts and then start working for the outfit somewhere.
Speaker 3 (17:48):
That's a really good point, Matt. And as you could imagine, folks,
we actually have the story that we're going to get
into where more or less just that happens. So let's
take a quick word from our sponsor and we back
with more from Maggie.
Speaker 2 (18:09):
And we've returned, let's jump into the story of Richard Cox. Maggie,
why don't you set us up with some of the details.
Speaker 4 (18:17):
Yeah, sure so. Richard Colvin Dick Cox enlisted in the army.
Speaker 3 (18:24):
Sure, sorry, please continue.
Speaker 4 (18:28):
I'm a child, a young man who enlisted in the
Army in nineteen forty six. So this is a historic case.
We are going way back to Cold War era CIA.
He enlisted nineteen forty eight in the West Point Military
Academy that is in New York. And he's a pretty
normal guy. He's writing home, he has a fiance and
(18:51):
life is good for him. So he receives a phone
call January seventh, nineteen fifty, to his dorm, and virtually
after that call, he's really never seen again. You know,
we'll go into detail, but that's kind of what happens.
He vanishes off the face of the earth.
Speaker 3 (19:10):
It's kind of a big deal to go to West Point.
I mean, we talk about it on the show a lot,
and certainly something that comes up in like the a
few Good Men type films of cinema. There is a
huge amount of prestige that goes into enlisting in West
Point Military Academy.
Speaker 5 (19:27):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (19:27):
For me, it feels like the equivalent of Ivy League. Yeah,
an Ivy League school, but for the military.
Speaker 4 (19:35):
I think the Richard Cox is the only west Point
cadet to ever vanish. Like, I think that was one
of the things that maybe made his case like really crazy.
Speaker 5 (19:47):
Wow.
Speaker 4 (19:48):
So January seventh, nineteen fifty, he gets a phone call
at his dorm and his roommate takes the call and
it's from a man named George, and he says, tell
him George called, He'll know who I am. We knew
each other in Germany. I'm here for a little while,
and tell him I'd like to get a bite to eat.
So Richard was deployed to Germany for a small amount
(20:10):
of time doing low level intelligence work. So this man
is saying they work together over there, but Richard tells
his roommate he has no idea. He doesn't know what George.
He doesn't know who the George is except his roommate
then says later on, he goes to meet a guy
named George. So things are really weird right now with
this George guy.
Speaker 2 (20:28):
Well, okay, so it sounds really secretive. And if there
is intelligence work that was done in Germany and it's
somebody actually reaching out with a fake name, you know,
to be like we need to be in contact again,
I can see this exact set of circumstances taking place right.
Speaker 4 (20:45):
Where he says he doesn't know this guy even though yeah, exactly.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
Yeah, So just at the beginning of January nineteen fifty,
when George comes back to West Point, if he's been
contacted by somebody in that world and starting some kind
of discussions, I can see him feeling off and maybe
even putting feelers out there, because wasn't he he He's
saying like he's dissatisfied with just life in general.
Speaker 5 (21:07):
Right now.
Speaker 4 (21:08):
Yeah, he comes back from Breake just a little dissatisfied,
like he's just not enamored with his life at West
Point anymore.
Speaker 2 (21:15):
Yeah, when he's got a fiance out there waiting for him,
he's got to be finished up.
Speaker 5 (21:20):
So you know, maybe to.
Speaker 2 (21:22):
The outside observer there in Richard's life, things are going great.
So it is a little it would seem.
Speaker 4 (21:27):
My roommate is the one who starts noticing things are
really off because he allegedly goes out with this guy
George comes back and is wasted, like he passes out
at his desk. His roommate's never seen this. He actually
took a photo of it that his roommate thought it
was so odd. He takes a photo of Richard wasted
at his desk. A short time later, Richard shoots up
(21:49):
from his desk like awake, stumbles into the stairwell, and
begins screaming incoherently the name Alice, Alice.
Speaker 3 (21:58):
Wait, so we got a George. Now he got an Alice?
Speaker 4 (22:00):
We got an Alice?
Speaker 3 (22:01):
Sounds like a what nineteen sixties sitcom or something like,
I'm like a married couple.
Speaker 2 (22:06):
This is wild and that is or isn't the name
of his fiance.
Speaker 4 (22:10):
It is not the name of his fiance.
Speaker 3 (22:11):
I did touch that, and the brief that you sent
very unusual. This is a new character that has entered
the chat.
Speaker 5 (22:17):
Oh dear.
Speaker 4 (22:18):
So his roommate's noticing that this guy George comes into
the picture and Richard is just acting very very bizarrely.
So a week later, Richard signs out of the dorm
and he's last seen by his roommate. He's supposedly heading
to dinner at an upscale hotel and he's going to
(22:42):
meet George that night. He misses curfew and is never
seen again. Whoa oh weak time between George showing up
and him going missing?
Speaker 2 (22:57):
Uh okay, can I I'm gonna put something out here.
Speaker 5 (23:02):
Maybe it's crazy, but I'm just putting it out here. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (23:05):
Project MK Ultra officially has its beginnings in the year
nineteen fifty, like right around there, just before you know,
it's kind of ramping up, I believe officially, if he's
acting that weird calling out for Alice, I don't know.
I'm just putting it out there.
Speaker 3 (23:22):
Maybe in Alaskaalice, you know, I mean, it sounds like
some LSD's involved.
Speaker 5 (23:27):
To me, that's all I'm saying.
Speaker 4 (23:29):
So I think there's something to that. Right, we're talking
Cold War era, this kind of like unknown body from Germany,
like they worked intelligence together. I think that it is
a very plausible theory that maybe George was a recruiter
(23:49):
for some three letter agency doing things overseas during the
Cold War.
Speaker 2 (23:55):
Yeah, oh yeah, for sure. We've talked about paper clip. Right,
That's one of the major projects that we've focused on
on this show before, which is the post World War
two bringing of scientists over and spies and all kinds
of people that the US specifically and other countries because
they did it too, thought that would be useful to
(24:17):
the United States military or scientific you know, establishment. In
some way, it does make me wonder because we'll never know,
nobody will ever know what work was being done, right, right,
and intelligence work could beat anything from gathering information on
somebody or a place or a program to doing some
(24:40):
other weird stuff.
Speaker 4 (24:42):
So some things when they searched his room that they found,
which maybe if he went into the CIA or went
to do something top secret, maybe he would have brought
with him. They found eighty seven dollars, which is about
thirteen hundred dollars to day, So he was leaving money,
he left some person, no belongings, unmailed letters, civilian clothes,
(25:05):
a watch. Those things could also point to foul play.
Speaker 5 (25:11):
Sure, yeah, I can see that.
Speaker 4 (25:15):
Would you leave those things if you were like packing
up to go to Germany to join and eat? Like
I really don't know, I'm asking you.
Speaker 3 (25:23):
Whenever their disappearance is like that and someone leaves behind
like you know, sizeable amount of money or like personal
items or you know, identification or things like that, it's
usually the first thing that is thought is that there's
foul play, that someone caught unaware and they left their
important stuff behind.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
Well, let's give it out. What what is the plausible
reason that any of us right now, if we were
gonna just take off from where we are, right where
we live, why would we leave cash money there? Because
that's something you can use no matter where you're going,
what you're doing, right, unless you're going to a different
(25:59):
country where you can use the currency.
Speaker 3 (26:01):
Yeah, but she could exchange. It's not true amount of money.
Speaker 4 (26:05):
Or if you want to throw people off to think
you were abducted and killed when you actually snuck into
a government agency.
Speaker 5 (26:14):
We have we have covered too much true crime?
Speaker 2 (26:17):
I think amongst us on this episode, I watch too
many episodes of things.
Speaker 5 (26:24):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (26:24):
Okay, so here's another possible lead. So a few years
after he disappears March nineteen fifty two, a buddy of
his from the army says that he bumped into Richard
in DC in a bus station. They talked, had a conversation,
(26:47):
and he believes, you know, this was Richard because when
he bumped into him two years after he went missing,
he didn't know Richard was missing. It's the fifties. We
didn't have Facebook and Instagram to announce when her friends
are missing. He didn't report seeing Richard this day until
nineteen fifty four, two years after he saw him, four
(27:09):
years after he went missing.
Speaker 2 (27:12):
Okay, but okay, let's say that really happened. Does that
mean he just went underground because his fiance never saw
him again, right, his family never saw him again. He's
just working for some Yeah, okay, so if he is
working for a newly formed intelligence agency, he is doing
(27:35):
that kind of stuff and he really does just cut ties.
How in the heck is he going to be anywhere
in the US walking around or do we think that's
a credible sighting.
Speaker 4 (27:47):
I think that is a credible sighting, and at least
when I spoke to Laura about this case, Laura Norton,
who does the Fall Line and she's investigated this case,
she believes that's a credible sighting. There is another sighting
in May of nineteen sixty, so ten years after he
allegedly vanishes, he is seen in Melbourne, Florida. So follow
(28:14):
me here. An FBI agent is on an undercover assignment
and is drinking with the contact. The contact is with
a man named R. C. Mansfield. Later, the man says
this is a fake name. His real name is Richard Cox. Okay,
so he intimates he's considered dead by the army and
(28:37):
his mother. An FBI stakeout is planned nine days later,
but the subject never shows. So this is an incident
that happens with an FBI agent. So an FBI guy
reports this, He meets this man RC. Mansfield's are going
to do a sting. It never happens. He admits he's
Richard Cox. Never heard from again? What so r C. Mansfield? Yeah,
(29:05):
Richard Cox.
Speaker 1 (29:06):
R C.
Speaker 4 (29:07):
And Mansfield is actually where Richard Cox was born. So
this sounds like a good pseudonym if this was him.
Speaker 5 (29:15):
Yeah, okay, wait, so is the good guy?
Speaker 3 (29:18):
Let's just.
Speaker 4 (29:20):
Good as in I think we found him.
Speaker 5 (29:22):
Yeah, I think this.
Speaker 2 (29:24):
Yeah, was the FBI stakeout to find.
Speaker 4 (29:31):
Unrelated related Okay, yeah, so this is like an unrelated
FBI thing. This FBI source is drinking with another source
who is with Richard Cox.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
Okay, ah, that is awfully strange. This whole thing feels
so weird I am internally now, I am leaning towards
somebody that an agency wanted just to have off the
books and a person who was ready and willing.
Speaker 5 (29:55):
To do that.
Speaker 4 (29:56):
So that's what I'm wondering from you guys, since you
guys cover a lot of this three letter agency top
secret things. Would you need to disappear somebody like this
in order to join the CIA?
Speaker 3 (30:11):
Not to join, right, doesn't seem that way. It seems
like you would do that if someone were, you know,
an enemy of some stripe or someone that had compromised
information or someone that you needed to probe, not in
like the like our first story, the UAP kind of way,
like that's when you disappear people is to take them
to a black site and like get information out of them.
You don't do that to your pals or.
Speaker 4 (30:34):
What if he was joining with his.
Speaker 3 (30:37):
Protection, Yeah, coach, sure, Okay, I.
Speaker 4 (30:41):
Like it because I do think he spoke a little German,
a little Russian.
Speaker 3 (30:45):
I mean, if it was during the Cold War and
he was hanging out, he might have picked up a
little of both.
Speaker 4 (30:49):
Yeah, no, he is in his room. They found a
letter to his friend talking about Russia and communism. WHOA,
So maybe he maybe is by.
Speaker 3 (31:01):
In which case he would have been disappeared exactly for that.
Speaker 2 (31:04):
Okay, well yes, yes, Well which side is he working for?
Which is like, how do you prove that? Because he
could be a turncoat turncoat you know, like you can
take as many times as one. Well no, but really,
and if you and if the CIA or any intelligence
agency wants someone who's truly a shadow, who doesn't exist
officially anywhere on paper, who isn't getting paid officially through
(31:26):
any payroll, somebody who can just go and do stuff
that the agency wants done that is off the books
and maybe even illegal, somebody like this is who you get.
Speaker 4 (31:37):
That's a great point. It is illegal, it is treason.
So yeah, they would want to I guess protect him
in that sense.
Speaker 2 (31:44):
Yeah, and if you can get him, you know, up
the ladder on the other side. We just talked recently
about spies and a couple of high level spies in
the US, like one guy who was working for the
US coming for a long time, but he was actually
working for the Cuban government for decades, like he was
just reporting back to the Cuban government for decades, but
(32:07):
he was I can't.
Speaker 5 (32:08):
Remember his name. We'll look that up and talk about
it here in a second.
Speaker 3 (32:10):
But well, just can I just add that if you're
thinking about this and this is interesting to you, we
do have an episode or maybe it was was a
whole episode about why so many spies have been getting
caught like yeah.
Speaker 4 (32:19):
They just did that. It was what Yeah, why are
so many?
Speaker 3 (32:23):
I think it's an important question and maybe a question
that's older than you might think.
Speaker 2 (32:27):
Yeah, yes, Manuel Roacha, by the way, is the gentleman's name.
Forty years as a Cuban agent.
Speaker 5 (32:38):
Wow, yeah, check that out.
Speaker 4 (32:40):
So one more thing that you guys probably know a
bit about. We mentioned how West Point's super prestigious. You
can't just go a wall either, like they don't let
that happen. So there was a very large search for
Richard Cox as well.
Speaker 2 (32:53):
Well, yeah, and everything you do is going to be
on campus there. When he's talking about going to get
a bite to eat or something, he's going to a
restaurant that's a part of an establishment on campus somewhere.
So it's not as it's like for all.
Speaker 3 (33:06):
Intents and purposes, being on a military base have basically.
Speaker 4 (33:09):
Yeah, you can't. You can't just walk off base and disappear.
You sign in at times, you're checked, you are, it's regimented,
you are training to be deployed. So yeah, there was
a huge search. I mean, and I guess that's a
question I have as well. The FBI was looking for him.
He was being sought by the FBI, the army. Would
(33:33):
the CIA communicate with the FBI to not search for him?
Speaker 2 (33:39):
Oh, that's a good question. I don't know.
Speaker 3 (33:42):
Wait, I don't put out a the opposite of an APB,
like yeah, like, hey.
Speaker 4 (33:47):
We have him, don't waste your okay.
Speaker 3 (33:50):
Don't waste your resources.
Speaker 4 (33:51):
Yeah, yeah, like like he's with us, don't Because they
they did. He was declared dead in nineteen fifty seven,
and there was an in tense search for this A
Wall cadet, because again, he was the only West Point
cadet to go missing from West Point ever.
Speaker 2 (34:11):
Wow, that's a that's nuts. So seven years until he
was declared dead, did the did intelligence services or the
army ever stop looking for him or do they still
look for him today?
Speaker 4 (34:25):
I don't. I think once you're declared dead, they don't
look for you.
Speaker 3 (34:28):
Okay, I can't.
Speaker 4 (34:29):
I can't confirm that. But at least with most missing
persons cases, in those kinds of cases, when you declare
someone dead, the case is closed. I don't know how
the military does it. Heard, Oh yeah, okay, here we
go nineteen seventy six, After searching Europe and North America,
the case is officially closed by the Department of the Army.
Speaker 2 (34:52):
Nineteen seventy six. Wow, so they left that open just
in the like in the case that he is found
somewhere doing something either he shouldn't be doing, or that
only a few, you know, key individuals know he's doing.
Speaker 4 (35:06):
So fast forward. In nineteen ninety six, a book comes
out called Oblivion, and it cites a CIA operative as
its source who claims that Richard Cox did work in
the intelligence field in Europe during the Cold war, and
it says he lived there until the nineteen nineties before
dying of cancer in Maryland.
Speaker 2 (35:28):
Oh wow, wait, so we can't Okay, so went and
did all that stuff, then he came back. Well, just
I guess to be with family that he disowned, and I.
Speaker 4 (35:39):
Guess, like I have so many questions, like where did
the fiance go?
Speaker 3 (35:43):
Like what if I might take a just a momentary
diversion from this story and just ask, have you heard
this notion that Jim Morrison is alive and living in
upstate New York and has been for you know, the
duration of his life since he faked his own death.
There's some document tree out that has like relatively compelling
proof of this.
Speaker 4 (36:03):
Yeah, he's with Paul McCartney when he faked his death.
Speaker 3 (36:06):
So we got a little thousands of.
Speaker 4 (36:08):
Young women getting killed because he was dead. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (36:11):
No, I really want to see whatever this documentary is
because I just I would, you know, as a pop
culture nerd and as like a you know, music nerd,
and also just a conspiracy nerd, I would love to
find proof positive that somebody successfully, somebody that public successfully
did a thing like that.
Speaker 4 (36:26):
It would just be years ago, years ago. I interviewed
this woman, Elizabeth Greenwood, and she wrote a book about
faking your own death because she was like, I need
to know if this is possible.
Speaker 3 (36:37):
We did. We talked to her as well, didn't we met?
What was the book called Ben's a Big Thing.
Speaker 4 (36:41):
Yeah, I think it's called Yes.
Speaker 3 (36:43):
A Million Percent. I don't know if we spoke to her,
but Ben Ben loves that book and talks about it
all the time.
Speaker 4 (36:47):
Great, So then your listeners will absolutely know how nearly
impossible it is to disappear yourself, especially these days. Maybe
nineteen fifties not so much, but when you have the
entire military government agency searching for you across continents.
Speaker 3 (37:04):
Don't like your chances.
Speaker 4 (37:06):
No, no. But one of the theories too, is that
he disappeared himself because there were some reports that he
was potentially gay and he was potentially seeing men secretively
and kind of. When he came back from spring break,
he realized he didn't want to be with his fiance.
Speaker 3 (37:25):
And spring break does it every time.
Speaker 4 (37:29):
Winter break, spring break, break, whatever. That is one of
the theories that you know, he went a wall to
go live a different life.
Speaker 3 (37:38):
Totally.
Speaker 2 (37:38):
I can okay, I can see that simply because of
the year that this was taking place in the military,
all of these things that that life, if that is
your identity and your life and you're stuck in all
of those, you know, different mechanisms that are controlling your life,
one of the only ways out is to disappear, like
really and truly, because you could probably get in trouble
(38:02):
at that time for that stuff.
Speaker 3 (38:04):
Not to be super heavy or anything. But my father,
who was born in nineteen thirty seven and would have
been in the military around the same time, after he
passed away, we found out that he was secretly gay,
and this was a secret that he had had to whatever,
choose to live with, choose to move past, whatever. But
(38:25):
the reality of it is he was not living his
truth and went on to you know, work in Methodist
churches as a choir director. He was from the opera
world after his military time and working on a military base,
et cetera. But I'm just saying I understand very personally
that terrifying thing to have to make you know, those
in those days, it just was not something that was okay,
(38:47):
and it absolutely could have been the kind of thing
that would lead someone who had the ability maybe more
so than someone like my dad to do.
Speaker 4 (38:54):
Mm hmm, wow. Wow, that's really that's an incredible story.
Speaker 5 (38:58):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (38:59):
Yeah, I think I think, you know, especially all of
us being born in the modern era, I think it's
also really difficult to fathom what life was like in
the fifties or someone who's gay. We're not even talking
about the eighties, you know, it's like the nineteen fifties. Yeah,
it was. Was it a did you just mention that
it was a crime.
Speaker 3 (39:19):
It wasn't a crime per se, but it was just
totally even in like you know, the opera community in
New York City, you know, which my dad was a
part of, it just was like either an open secret,
like I think maybe one one person folks might think
of as Leonard Bernstein, who you know, was as openly
gay as you could be in a world like that,
but even he had to be very very careful about it,
(39:40):
and you know, his wife kind of knew and allowed
him to live that part of his life. But my
dad wasn't as famous as Leonard Bernstein, so you know, anyway,
it's just yeah, it was absolutely not a crime per se,
but it was it could.
Speaker 4 (39:52):
Have been the kind of thing through don't don't tell, right.
Speaker 3 (39:56):
It's the kind of thing that could have ruined your career.
It's the kind of thing that could have ruined not
to mention, if you're in the military for all intents
and purposes, it is a crime. It's an absolute life ruiner,
for sure.
Speaker 4 (40:08):
Yeah. And I just did a quick search about it.
In the fifties, particularly in the military, and it says actually,
fueled by the Cold War, they actively discriminated and purged
LGBTQ plus individuals in the military, and this was known
as the lavender scare very specifically the Cold War.
Speaker 3 (40:25):
Do you recall that term?
Speaker 2 (40:26):
Ugh, yeah, Yeah, the Cold War caught up pretty much
anybody that was not in this cookie cutter shape of
what the military wanted, and anybody that didn't fit in
that shape, we are suspect of you because you could
be unhappy with the way our cookie cutter is shaped.
Speaker 5 (40:44):
Which makes sense, which.
Speaker 3 (40:46):
Is ironic considering we were meant to be the great
liberators of you know, the Jews under the Nazi regime,
who absolutely had that same kind of mentality about purging
queer people, about purging Jewish people, about pershing Romani people,
you know, and then we absolutely adopted pretty much a
maybe lighter but very similar approach to calling out the
(41:08):
unwonted element.
Speaker 2 (41:10):
Absolutely, then we got past it now in h.
Speaker 4 (41:16):
We're post post.
Speaker 3 (41:21):
Who was it that I was talking to recently, Not
to get off the topic too much, but I know
it was. It was my friend John Cameron Mitchell, who's
the guy that created Hedwig and the Angry Inch, And
he's just he's we've done some podcasting together and he's
a lovely person. And he came to Atlanta and I was
doing a talk and he mentioned the idea that he
came from a military background and that it was the
(41:42):
most in the I guess the seventies when he was
in it, it was the most inclusive situation he'd ever
been a part of, in that the generals, even when
they were told to get rid of gay and trans people,
they slow rolled it because it just didn't make sense,
what's the word operationally to have that kind of you know,
us versus them, Like if you're in, you're in. So
(42:04):
it would seem based on John, that the attitude within
the military has definitely actually changed.
Speaker 4 (42:09):
Which you're correct there. My partner who Matt has met,
he's a veteran, and he said, you know, when he
sees all these like new Trump Trumpian, you know, kicking
out trans people from the military, he was like, anyone
actually serving does not feel that way, Like anyone currently
(42:30):
serving actually loves having women in the military. He said,
those units are better regimented, like better at at their jobs.
So it's so fascinating. Yeah, not to get too off topic,
but none.
Speaker 3 (42:43):
I just think it's worth mentioning is the way things
have changed, and there are some positive changes in ideology,
even in a place that I was very surprised that
you might find that, you know it which military.
Speaker 4 (42:54):
So anyway, absolutely so Richard Cox, I don't know, Uh,
maybe George was his lover and they ran away together.
I feel like I lean more towards he went into
some agency.
Speaker 2 (43:07):
I feel like Richard and George is like the best
version of this story. That's the happiest outcome.
Speaker 4 (43:12):
That I think so too.
Speaker 2 (43:15):
The scariest one is that he's a shadow doing stuff
for the for the intelligence agencies that we never knew about.
Speaker 3 (43:22):
Did I miss who Alice is?
Speaker 4 (43:25):
No, we don't know who Alice is?
Speaker 3 (43:26):
Okay, okay, just a.
Speaker 4 (43:29):
Night terror and exactly we unclear I know in our
episode Laura, Laura mentions a couple hypotheses. So if y'all
want to listen to.
Speaker 3 (43:39):
That, absolutely always good to have some homework. I mean
that for folks at home to listen to if you
want to find out more about either of these stories.
I think we've got some great resources.
Speaker 4 (43:50):
Yeah, Laura, I think read oblivion. So she's she's really
up on all the theories around Richard Cox. And like
I said, Payne did high strange doctor Travis Walton exactly.
Speaker 3 (44:00):
Matt. Can I just applauge that you your self control
for not mentioning Elder scrolls on the second mention of
oblivion here, I just want to say, well done, sir.
Speaker 5 (44:10):
I have a map of it in my basement.
Speaker 3 (44:12):
Do you gifted me a map of l my guest
room which is up there with pride?
Speaker 2 (44:20):
Sorry, why don't be sorry.
Speaker 5 (44:22):
It's an amazing thing.
Speaker 3 (44:23):
I love it. It gives me joy. It makes me
think of you every time I look at it.
Speaker 2 (44:27):
Well, well, thanks, buddy, it gives me joy. On you
have it really quickly, Maggie, before we let you go,
if we if we step away from up in Vanish
Weekly and we think about your work on wrongful conviction.
And just as you're watching the news, as you're seeing
changes occurring right now, is there anything we should be
(44:49):
looking at or thinking about when it comes to individuals
either being incarcerated or individuals being you know, shipped out
of the country and maybe to a prison in Venezuela
or somewhere else. What should we be thinking about right now?
Speaker 4 (45:03):
Yeah, I think all of those things. I think one
of the things that I'm really thinking about is when
we're talking about wars overseas, we feel like they don't
impact us at home, and we are currently embroiled in
many situation overseas, But a lot of the technology that
we use over there to fight our quote enemies civilians,
(45:28):
we use here on our own people or we will
be using. So cop Cities is something I'm thinking about
a lot. And yeah, you guys an episode on Cop City.
Speaker 3 (45:39):
We talked about it in news episodes, and we're talking
about it as a very local, regional thing and a
cause here in the Atlanta area, also pertaining to deforestation
and just absolutely in Atlanta.
Speaker 4 (45:51):
Yeah, yeah, I mean, just the the technology is I
guess what I really want is what I'm trying to
say is the technologies that we are using and testing
overseas on civilian populations, on our quote enemies. These drones
that we saw that can just go into a building
and shoot people up. You don't need humans there. We
(46:12):
have robot dogs. Those are all coming here. And if
people don't think that our police will use those on us,
If people don't think that, you know, people with green cards,
you know, are now being deported, legal legal permanent residents
are being deported. If you don't think that can happen
to you, a citizen or.
Speaker 3 (46:33):
Speaking out for speaking out against a regime.
Speaker 4 (46:37):
So I think that's what I want people to think about.
Like when we're like, oh it's overseas that it doesn't matter,
Oh it's just happening to the brown people or the
green card holders, it will come for you. They test
it first to see what they can get away with.
And that's what I want people to think about. I
want you to go protest your cop cities. I want
you to protest all of these people being deported and
we don't even know who they are or what they
(46:59):
do it.
Speaker 2 (47:01):
Yeah, you know, we recently did an episode on the
disposition matrix that is actually I want to say something
that we had a little off in conversation with your
partner about, which is just how specifically the Obama administration
and every administration after that, and then into the before
(47:21):
the Bush administration, how they look at an individual person
and categorize them as leaning towards a terrorist organization or
being a member of a terrorist organization, or you know,
vulnerable to being influenced or that kind of thing, and
then how that system could be taken and used to
look at American citizens. And it feels pretty naive to
(47:44):
think that there isn't something like that, some kind of
way at looking at all of the people we know
as individuals, all the things we search, all the conversations
we have with the metadata, I mean, because we know
all that stuff's getting picked up now days with stellar
wind and all of these things.
Speaker 4 (48:03):
Like it's well, that's a great example twenty years ago
when what was it the Patriot Act, right, and we
think it's just to surveil terror We're just surveiling terrorists,
just those brown guys overseas. We're all being surveiled now, right,
twenty years ago it was just for the bad guys.
Now it's all of us, every single one of us.
(48:24):
So for people to think that they're not going to
just start snatching you up because something you posted on Twitter,
that's that's incredibly naive and absolute.
Speaker 3 (48:34):
And maybe this is naive or a little on the nose,
but it just it makes me think of this incredible
quote from a German pastor named Martin Emohler. I believe
this is displayed at the National Holocaust Museum, and it's First,
they came for the socialists, and I did not speak
out because I was not a socialist. Then they came
for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out
(48:54):
because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came
for the Jews, and I did not speak out because
I was not a Jew. Then they came from me,
and there was no one left to.
Speaker 4 (49:02):
Speak for me exactly.
Speaker 3 (49:04):
So coming all kind of makes me tear up a
little bit, y'all. It's it's heavy. I'm sorry it.
Speaker 4 (49:10):
Is, and it's sad because it's happened, it's already happened,
like and it's just happening again, and just it's just
a different form. This time. It's in a technology form,
you know, whereas last time it was like you know,
I'm talking about World War Two. It was like this
big military oc Gristapo exactly. Now it's in digital form.
Speaker 2 (49:33):
Yes, well, guys on that. Sorry, sorry, this very serious
important stuff, and it is it is worth your time
to think about, right, and maybe have a conversation with
somebody you care about about this thing. And and also, hey,
(49:54):
listen to some podcasts that aren't specifically about that stuff
or else all of us are going to go nuts.
So Maggie, tell us where people should go to hear
your shows, specifically Up and Vanish Weekly, and uh, just
learn more about what.
Speaker 5 (50:07):
You're up to.
Speaker 4 (50:07):
Yeah, you could find me on all platforms, Maggie Freeling,
and definitely search Up and Vanish Weekly. Follow it, rate it.
It's really exciting. We're doing a lot of fun new
stuff as the show progresses.
Speaker 2 (50:21):
I know a spoiler alert. I'm on at least one
of those episodes.
Speaker 4 (50:24):
Yeah, you are too, you are You're on the pin train, Noel,
do you want to come on? Please come on?
Speaker 3 (50:30):
Put me in coach. I'm always down. Nobody asks me
to be on stuff because I don't. I don't ask
to be on stuff, but just let this be known.
I'm always down to be on anything that you do,
Maggie for sure.
Speaker 4 (50:41):
Yeah. Well, I mean, any any strange case you want
to talk about. I mean we also have a list
of cases we could pitch you some or whatever.
Speaker 3 (50:48):
Well, Maggie, I'm super down to be on anything that
you are up to and would be honored. And let's uh,
what do they say, Let's let's let's talk offline. We'll
figure something out. But thank you so much for now
for joining us today to talk about these cases and
talk about all the cool stuff that you're working on.
Speaker 4 (51:04):
Thank you, guys. I have been a huge fan forever.
I listened weekly, Like I knew what your podcast was
last week, I.
Speaker 3 (51:11):
Didn't even know what it was.
Speaker 2 (51:13):
I know's that means a ton, though, Maggie, because we're
going really of everything you do.
Speaker 4 (51:18):
No, you guys are so fun and smart, and I
know your listeners are too, so I hope there is
some crossover, y'all. Please come submit cases to us, listen
to us. We love this this little pod family here.
Speaker 2 (51:33):
Hey, and if you want to reach out and contact us,
you can find us all over the internet, right, Noel.
Speaker 3 (51:39):
Yeah, you sure can. You can find us at the
handle conspiracy stuff, where we exist on Facebook with our
Facebook group. Here's where it gets crazy. On x FKA
Twitter and they're having some troubles over there here and
on YouTube where we have video CODs at Galore for
your perusing enjoyment. On Instagram and TikTok, who are also
having some trouble. We are the Spiracy Stuff Show. But wait,
(52:02):
there's more.
Speaker 2 (52:04):
There's no trouble besides the trouble you're about to create
at one eight three three STDWYTK that's our voicemail system.
When you call in, you've got three minutes, give yourself
a cool nickname and let us know if we can
use your name and message on the air. If you
got more to say than can fit in three minutes,
maybe you want to send us an attachment, maybe a
(52:24):
couple images of your kiddykat anything, Send us a good
old fashioned email.
Speaker 3 (52:28):
We are inspiracy atiheartradio dot com.
Speaker 2 (52:51):
Stuff they don't want you to know is a production
of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your face favorite shows.
From UFOs to psychic powers and government conspiracies. History is
riddled with unexplained events. You can turn back now or
learn the stuff they don't want you to know. A
production of Iheartrading.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Hello, welcome back to the show. My name is Matt,
my name is name. Our colleague Ben is on an adventure.
But you are you. You are here, and that makes
this stuff they don't want you to know. We're also
joined by our super producer Andrew. We're recalling him now,
Frank Train, Try Force Howard, and we are bringing new
(00:45):
energy to this episode because we are joined by someone very,
very special, someone we've been wanting to talk to for
quite a while, ever since we had a conversation with
Jason Flamm on this show. You might recognize her when
when you hear it for the first time from her
work as host and producer of Wrongful Conviction alongside Jason.
(01:06):
You might know her voice from the Pulitzer Prize winning
podcast Suave that we just saw Maria from Suave at
on AirFest very recently. You might also know her from
her work as an intern at the US Fish and
Wildlife Service.
Speaker 3 (01:22):
That's mainly where my background is.
Speaker 4 (01:25):
That's a deep cut.
Speaker 2 (01:26):
I know, hey, hey, hold on, hold on, you may,
but primarily you might know her from Up and Vanished Weekly,
the new true crime show that's a spin off of
Up and Vanished from Tenderfoot TV.
Speaker 5 (01:38):
Welcome, Maggie Freeling.
Speaker 4 (01:40):
Oh man, that was a lot to like keep keep
myself from yelling during But the deep cut fish and
wildlife is wild.
Speaker 3 (01:48):
It's important, well, especially in these are trying times where
that kind of stuff's getting wet, like eliminated entirely potentially. Oof.
Speaker 2 (01:56):
Yeah, that's why you're here, Maggie. Let's talk f so
and or wildlife.
Speaker 3 (02:03):
Start with wildlife favorite animal?
Speaker 4 (02:05):
Go, Oh my gosh, yeah, the fish and wildlife. I did.
I did. I wanted to go into conservation or like
conservation reporting something like that for a really long time.
And that's a really dark place to be in right now.
So I'm glad I didn't.
Speaker 3 (02:20):
Yeah, I wasn't choking though. That wasn't just a clever segue.
What is your favorite animal?
Speaker 4 (02:24):
What is my favorite animal? Oh my gosh, I mean
any kind of like cat.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
Okay, there we go, any fuel adjacent that's cool.
Speaker 5 (02:32):
All we're all big cat fans.
Speaker 2 (02:33):
We're just hanging out with Astrid here, that's Andrew's Katy Cat.
We've got a bunch of them running around. Look, we're
here to talk about up in Vanish Weekly because this
brand new show hits the listener. That's us, that's me
in particular, with a new either missing person's case, a
suspected homicide case, a case of historical importance when it
(02:57):
comes to that kind of thing, there are so many
to chew from when we were preparing to talk to
you today, Maggie abduction maybe in there. We've got a
short list of things we're going to talk about, but
just for everybody who's listening, before we fully get into
the show, we're also going to be talking about a
specific hair industry out of India that I learned about
(03:19):
when talking with Maggie a little while ago. And that
is a deep rabbit hole. That is probably a whole
other episode that we might have to bring you back
on for.
Speaker 5 (03:28):
Yes, but there's so many things we're going to talk
about today.
Speaker 2 (03:31):
We'll be right back after word from our sponsor with
Maggie Freeling.
Speaker 3 (03:42):
And we have returned with Maggie and we're gonna jump
right in to a pretty important case that I think
is a really good kind of conduit between up and
vanished weekly and stuff they don't want you to know,
which is the mysterious disappearance of Travis Walton in nineteen
seventy five. Travis vanished for five days in the fall
(04:06):
of that year and returned with some very interesting and
conspiracy adjacent claims. Maggie, what do you say we jump
right into that story and what these claims were? What
you think happened?
Speaker 4 (04:18):
Yeah, So, I guess have you guys covered this case?
Speaker 2 (04:20):
I forgot We have talked about Travis Walton when it
comes to abduction stories, right, so like kind of a
bit of an overview and we're talking years ago.
Speaker 3 (04:32):
Not a deep talk though, for sure.
Speaker 2 (04:33):
No, not at all. We have spoken with pain about
high Strange and this is one little thing that we
mentioned in that interview, but we've never actually looked at
the facts.
Speaker 4 (04:45):
Wow. Okay, so your listeners are going to love this
because this is one of those abduction cases that has
a lot of credibility to it because is it five
or six other people he was with actually saw him
hi allegedly be abducted. They saw it. This is what
they also say happened. And I find it so interesting
(05:07):
because these guys, Okay, so they're all friends, they're loggers,
they're in the woods together, and they literally see Travis
be abducted. So he goes missing and these guys come
back without their friend and they're instantly murder suspects. They
think they the police think they did something with him.
When they're trying to report him missing, they take polygraph tests.
(05:30):
I mean, these guys are suspects. They're about to go
to jail and be arrested for doing something to their friend.
And then he shows up five days later, I think
was it five days let me say, and yeah, five
days later and he's like, no, no, I was abducted.
And they're all like, see, see, we told you. And
(05:51):
even you know, watching documentaries and listening back to the
police and people who gave the polygraphs, they're like, it
is very difficult and I know this too, for six
people to tell the same story time and time again.
And that's what happens here. I mean, you know, Travis
tells what happened once he was on the ship, and
(06:12):
we could talk about that, but in terms of credibility,
I mean, that's it. You have six people telling the
same story. These guys were gonna go to jail. And
they're not saying like this is a joke or whatever.
Speaker 3 (06:25):
They're like, no, seriously, if you're kinda come up with
a cover story for murdering your friend, there are better ones.
Then we saw him get pulled up by a tractor
beam into the sky, or well, can you maybe tell
us a little bit about what they reported seeing, like,
you know, more than beyond just our friend was abducted.
There has to be some detail around that.
Speaker 5 (06:45):
Right, Yeah.
Speaker 4 (06:45):
So they're all in the woods, like we said, they're
loggers nineteen seventy five, and they all of a sudden, see,
they hear a noise and they see in a clearing
like a hovering craft. So Travis decides to walk towards
it and it kind of investigate what's happening, and really,
the next thing they know, they see him fly backwards
(07:07):
like he's you know, struck by a beam of light,
flies backwards and they run. When they return, he's gone.
Speaker 3 (07:14):
Like you do not.
Speaker 4 (07:17):
Maybe not walking towards as well.
Speaker 3 (07:19):
Yeah, exactly, And okay, so they're all aligned on this,
and they.
Speaker 4 (07:24):
Are one hundred person aligned. I mean they all see
the same thing, or say they see the same thing.
Speaker 2 (07:32):
Let's talk about how rare that is when it comes
to the cases you've looked at, not only for Up
and Vanish Weekly, but for some of the wrongful conviction
specific cases that you've looked at. Where are where there
are that number of individuals who are credible witnesses, who
are eyes on. They're not just people who are around,
(07:53):
you know, saw a little part of something that happened.
They all saw the same thing and they're reporting this.
I'm thinking about was listening to other episodes like Jennifer
Kesse's disappearance, which is one of the first episodes you
guys cover, where one of the best pieces of evidence
in that case that you've got is a piece of
actual video tape, but you can't actually make the person out.
(08:16):
And there's been no nothing has happened with that case
because you can't make the person out. But in this case,
you've got folks saying something, well, what do you do?
Speaker 5 (08:24):
Can you go?
Speaker 2 (08:25):
I don't know what do you do with a UFO? Like,
what is there anything? I just don't get it.
Speaker 4 (08:32):
Well that's so okay. So there's two things there. So
you asked about people telling the same story, So you know,
when you tell a lie, it is hard to remember
that lie because it is not a memory that you have.
So then the lie changes, right, That's when people's stories change.
They can't remember what they said, so they start changing.
(08:52):
These guys, all of them are telling the same story
separation time and time, separately and separate polygraphs. They all
passed the polygraphs. You know, we all know, you guys
talk about it. Polygraphs can't be admitted in court. They're
not particularly fallible. But six guys telling the same story,
(09:13):
all passing a polygraph can indicate something, you know. So
that is something that is really interesting to me about
this and Travis telling the same detailed story. You can
listen to it on High Strange Pain talks to Travis
Walton and he has vivid memories of being inside a spaceship.
Speaker 5 (09:36):
Oh god, well.
Speaker 3 (09:38):
Off, Mike. Before we started rolling, I mentioned that we
had to talk about this one if for only the
opportunity to discuss the nineteen eighties sci fi horror classic
Fire in the Sky, which I never saw when I
was younger, and only recently there's been this clip making
the rounds of this scene where do is being probed
(10:01):
in the face with these weird pneumatic tubes that are
shooting goo up his nose and these really horrifying aliens
hovering over and I swear to god, it's the scariest
thing I've ever seen. It's like total nightmare fuel. Is
there any like when we say that that film is
based on this occurrence, did he report being invaded in
(10:23):
this way? Bodily?
Speaker 4 (10:25):
Yeah? So he's missing for five days, right, and he does.
He explains things that happen on the ship, but he
says it only feels maybe like a couple hours. He
reappears about twenty miles away from where he went missing.
When he comes back to Earth and he notices he's
gone for five days, he has no idea. There's like
(10:46):
a time lapse. When he sees his brother, His brothers like,
feel your face, and he's got five days growth of beard.
So what happens in the ship somehow to him, maybe
he was unconscious for some of it. It feels a
brief period of time for how long he was missing.
But yes, so this is interesting. I'm sure you guys
know some of the races of aliens. But he reportedly
(11:10):
first sees like tall grays. It seems like one of
the grays. I believe it was tall grays, and when
he freaks out by them, he freaks out. He somehow
gets off the what's it called, like the operating table
or whatever. Another creature comes in that looks more humanoid.
I forget what the names of those species are that
(11:31):
he explained, but they kind of are like blonde and
look kind of like Greek gods or something. But that's
the other species, he explained, seeing which seems like they
kind of presented this more human looking person to him
to get him to calm down. But like I said, Payne,
talk to him. He got all these crazy details. He
relives it. I mean listening to him talk. Yeah, whatever
(11:55):
happened to him, he believes happened to him.
Speaker 5 (11:58):
Yep.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
You can hear him get emotional, and especially about how telling.
Speaker 5 (12:03):
This story has affected him.
Speaker 2 (12:05):
Right, he could have said when he got back that,
oh well, I made up that story and his life
could have probably been better because his like that's been
his The rest of his life has been that. Right,
It's almost like being trapped in some sort of hell.
And if he was just making up the story, then
(12:26):
you know, he is said out loud I wish.
Speaker 4 (12:28):
I wasn't living his entire identity. Is that alien guy
that was abducted like that? That sucks? Like he has
no he is not Travis Walton. He's not really a
person anymore? Is this objectified story? And I think that's
one of the things that's so interesting in these credible
abductions is none of these people want that attention. Why
(12:52):
would you want this kind of attention? It becomes harassment,
It ruins your life, Like, what is it Betty and
Barney White? Is that a name?
Speaker 5 (13:00):
Hill?
Speaker 4 (13:00):
Hill? They were an interracial couple back in segregation times fifties, sixties.
They did not want that attention at all.
Speaker 2 (13:12):
Yeah, they had such a weird situation where they were
recounting things well, going under some form of hypnosis, which
was really interesting. And some of the regression techniques that
we've talked about on the show before that you know,
are they're pretty questionable. But at the same time, it's like,
who knows, you know, you have to allow yourself to
(13:35):
suspend disbelief long enough to actually hear someone out right
or explore topics we think. But yeah, Betty and Barney Hill,
that's another situation where it just it's those two actually,
Travis Walton, Betty and Barney Hill are probably the two
that I can think of the top of my head
that are the most credible abduction stories. There's one there's
(13:57):
oh man, I can't remember her name. There's somebody who
was featured on a Netflix document.
Speaker 4 (14:02):
Or abducted in Manhattan or something.
Speaker 2 (14:05):
Yeah, that was fascinating, fascinating, but also you know, there's
conflicting stories with that one about who's telling the truth,
who's lying, and what are their motivations and all that stuff.
Speaker 4 (14:15):
So that one is kind of related to this in
the sense that there was like at least two dozen
witnesses right that see this woman levitate out her window
and be abducted. But then as the documentary goes on,
Sorry spoiler, you could skip ahead, but it was like
group think what is it called, Like they were influenced
(14:38):
to kind of remember this was what they were seeing
and their witness statements might not have been particularly credible,
I know, but we don't see that in this Travis
Walton case, right, Like these guys are all like, no, no, no,
this is what we saw.
Speaker 3 (14:53):
Adams just no reason to double down like that for
that long. It's really really fascinating. I just want to
add to that. And the Sky came out in nineteen
ninety three, not the eighties, and Travis Waltson is like
an extra. He plays citizen number three in Fire in
the Sky. And I don't know that it's a particularly
great movie, but the alien surgery scene is the stuff
(15:14):
of nightmares. So I highly recommended the very least looking
that one up. It's definitely one of the most horrific
alien abduction type scenes I've ever seen.
Speaker 5 (15:22):
It reminds me of the movie Jacob's.
Speaker 3 (15:23):
Ladder a lot like it's very early nineties absolute terror.
Speaker 4 (15:28):
That was actually you mentioned. I just want to bring
up one more thing that when he resurfaced five days later,
he had lost a ton of weight, was very very skinny.
Clearly it seemed like he had not eaten for days.
But when they did like blood work and checked on him,
(15:49):
his like levels were okay. Like it seemed like wherever
he was and whoever had him knew how to keep
him alive and knew how to keep him stable. Which
was one of those like weird little like how if
he did just disappear on his own, how did he
lose this much weight? To the point of starving but
(16:09):
still be totally fine internally.
Speaker 5 (16:13):
Yeah, it is really splating.
Speaker 2 (16:15):
Yeah, supplements, because well, you know, if you put yourself
in the mind of an investigator, like from a sheriff's
department or something, in the first days that this is happening,
you may think, oh, this guy looks like someone who
was lost in the woods for five days. But then
you get those tests done, like, oh, well, actually no,
he's got plenty of calcium.
Speaker 5 (16:34):
How why very weird.
Speaker 2 (16:40):
It's a really great example. Does up in Vanish Weekly
cover stories like this that are a little more out there.
Speaker 4 (16:48):
Sometimes we love to I love to especially, So there's
a couple others we're going to talk about today. One
of them is Richard Cox. He is a West Point
cadet who vanished into thin air, and one of the
leading theories is he went into the CIA, which I
know is something you guys love talking about.
Speaker 2 (17:07):
Oh wow, so a case based on the possibility that
someone cut all contacts and went somewhere else to work
for the outfit.
Speaker 4 (17:23):
Yeah, I'm really I'm actually very excited to hear y'all's
take on this one, because you probably know more about
going into the CIA than I do.
Speaker 2 (17:30):
Oh yeah, we've heard many a tale where somebody has,
you know, pretended to start a new job or something,
but they're actually going to work for the CIA. But
most of the instances we've seen people don't just cut
all contacts and then start working for the outfit somewhere.
Speaker 3 (17:48):
That's a really good point, Matt. And as you could imagine, folks,
we actually have the story that we're going to get
into where more or less just that happens. So let's
take a quick word from our sponsor and we back
with more from Maggie.
Speaker 2 (18:09):
And we've returned, let's jump into the story of Richard Cox. Maggie,
why don't you set us up with some of the details.
Speaker 4 (18:17):
Yeah, sure so. Richard Colvin Dick Cox enlisted in the army.
Speaker 3 (18:24):
Sure, sorry, please continue.
Speaker 4 (18:28):
I'm a child, a young man who enlisted in the
Army in nineteen forty six. So this is a historic case.
We are going way back to Cold War era CIA.
He enlisted nineteen forty eight in the West Point Military
Academy that is in New York. And he's a pretty
normal guy. He's writing home, he has a fiance and
(18:51):
life is good for him. So he receives a phone
call January seventh, nineteen fifty, to his dorm, and virtually
after that call, he's really never seen again. You know,
we'll go into detail, but that's kind of what happens.
He vanishes off the face of the earth.
Speaker 3 (19:10):
It's kind of a big deal to go to West Point.
I mean, we talk about it on the show a lot,
and certainly something that comes up in like the a
few Good Men type films of cinema. There is a
huge amount of prestige that goes into enlisting in West
Point Military Academy.
Speaker 5 (19:27):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (19:27):
For me, it feels like the equivalent of Ivy League. Yeah,
an Ivy League school, but for the military.
Speaker 4 (19:35):
I think the Richard Cox is the only west Point
cadet to ever vanish. Like, I think that was one
of the things that maybe made his case like really crazy.
Speaker 5 (19:47):
Wow.
Speaker 4 (19:48):
So January seventh, nineteen fifty, he gets a phone call
at his dorm and his roommate takes the call and
it's from a man named George, and he says, tell
him George called, He'll know who I am. We knew
each other in Germany. I'm here for a little while,
and tell him I'd like to get a bite to eat.
So Richard was deployed to Germany for a small amount
(20:10):
of time doing low level intelligence work. So this man
is saying they work together over there, but Richard tells
his roommate he has no idea. He doesn't know what George.
He doesn't know who the George is except his roommate
then says later on, he goes to meet a guy
named George. So things are really weird right now with
this George guy.
Speaker 2 (20:28):
Well, okay, so it sounds really secretive. And if there
is intelligence work that was done in Germany and it's
somebody actually reaching out with a fake name, you know,
to be like we need to be in contact again,
I can see this exact set of circumstances taking place right.
Speaker 4 (20:45):
Where he says he doesn't know this guy even though yeah, exactly.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
Yeah, So just at the beginning of January nineteen fifty,
when George comes back to West Point, if he's been
contacted by somebody in that world and starting some kind
of discussions, I can see him feeling off and maybe
even putting feelers out there, because wasn't he he He's
saying like he's dissatisfied with just life in general.
Speaker 5 (21:07):
Right now.
Speaker 4 (21:08):
Yeah, he comes back from Breake just a little dissatisfied,
like he's just not enamored with his life at West
Point anymore.
Speaker 2 (21:15):
Yeah, when he's got a fiance out there waiting for him,
he's got to be finished up.
Speaker 5 (21:20):
So you know, maybe to.
Speaker 2 (21:22):
The outside observer there in Richard's life, things are going great.
So it is a little it would seem.
Speaker 4 (21:27):
My roommate is the one who starts noticing things are
really off because he allegedly goes out with this guy
George comes back and is wasted, like he passes out
at his desk. His roommate's never seen this. He actually
took a photo of it that his roommate thought it
was so odd. He takes a photo of Richard wasted
at his desk. A short time later, Richard shoots up
(21:49):
from his desk like awake, stumbles into the stairwell, and
begins screaming incoherently the name Alice, Alice.
Speaker 3 (21:58):
Wait, so we got a George. Now he got an Alice?
Speaker 4 (22:00):
We got an Alice?
Speaker 3 (22:01):
Sounds like a what nineteen sixties sitcom or something like,
I'm like a married couple.
Speaker 2 (22:06):
This is wild and that is or isn't the name
of his fiance.
Speaker 4 (22:10):
It is not the name of his fiance.
Speaker 3 (22:11):
I did touch that, and the brief that you sent
very unusual. This is a new character that has entered
the chat.
Speaker 5 (22:17):
Oh dear.
Speaker 4 (22:18):
So his roommate's noticing that this guy George comes into
the picture and Richard is just acting very very bizarrely.
So a week later, Richard signs out of the dorm
and he's last seen by his roommate. He's supposedly heading
to dinner at an upscale hotel and he's going to
(22:42):
meet George that night. He misses curfew and is never
seen again. Whoa oh weak time between George showing up
and him going missing?
Speaker 2 (22:57):
Uh okay, can I I'm gonna put something out here.
Speaker 5 (23:02):
Maybe it's crazy, but I'm just putting it out here. Yeah.
Speaker 2 (23:05):
Project MK Ultra officially has its beginnings in the year
nineteen fifty, like right around there, just before you know,
it's kind of ramping up, I believe officially, if he's
acting that weird calling out for Alice, I don't know.
I'm just putting it out there.
Speaker 3 (23:22):
Maybe in Alaskaalice, you know, I mean, it sounds like
some LSD's involved.
Speaker 5 (23:27):
To me, that's all I'm saying.
Speaker 4 (23:29):
So I think there's something to that. Right, we're talking
Cold War era, this kind of like unknown body from Germany,
like they worked intelligence together. I think that it is
a very plausible theory that maybe George was a recruiter
(23:49):
for some three letter agency doing things overseas during the
Cold War.
Speaker 2 (23:55):
Yeah, oh yeah, for sure. We've talked about paper clip. Right,
That's one of the major projects that we've focused on
on this show before, which is the post World War
two bringing of scientists over and spies and all kinds
of people that the US specifically and other countries because
they did it too, thought that would be useful to
(24:17):
the United States military or scientific you know, establishment. In
some way, it does make me wonder because we'll never know,
nobody will ever know what work was being done, right, right,
and intelligence work could beat anything from gathering information on
somebody or a place or a program to doing some
(24:40):
other weird stuff.
Speaker 4 (24:42):
So some things when they searched his room that they found,
which maybe if he went into the CIA or went
to do something top secret, maybe he would have brought
with him. They found eighty seven dollars, which is about
thirteen hundred dollars to day, So he was leaving money,
he left some person, no belongings, unmailed letters, civilian clothes,
(25:05):
a watch. Those things could also point to foul play.
Speaker 5 (25:11):
Sure, yeah, I can see that.
Speaker 4 (25:15):
Would you leave those things if you were like packing
up to go to Germany to join and eat? Like
I really don't know, I'm asking you.
Speaker 3 (25:23):
Whenever their disappearance is like that and someone leaves behind
like you know, sizeable amount of money or like personal
items or you know, identification or things like that, it's
usually the first thing that is thought is that there's
foul play, that someone caught unaware and they left their
important stuff behind.
Speaker 2 (25:38):
Well, let's give it out. What what is the plausible
reason that any of us right now, if we were
gonna just take off from where we are, right where
we live, why would we leave cash money there? Because
that's something you can use no matter where you're going,
what you're doing, right, unless you're going to a different
(25:59):
country where you can use the currency.
Speaker 3 (26:01):
Yeah, but she could exchange. It's not true amount of money.
Speaker 4 (26:05):
Or if you want to throw people off to think
you were abducted and killed when you actually snuck into
a government agency.
Speaker 5 (26:14):
We have we have covered too much true crime?
Speaker 2 (26:17):
I think amongst us on this episode, I watch too
many episodes of things.
Speaker 5 (26:24):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (26:24):
Okay, so here's another possible lead. So a few years
after he disappears March nineteen fifty two, a buddy of
his from the army says that he bumped into Richard
in DC in a bus station. They talked, had a conversation,
(26:47):
and he believes, you know, this was Richard because when
he bumped into him two years after he went missing,
he didn't know Richard was missing. It's the fifties. We
didn't have Facebook and Instagram to announce when her friends
are missing. He didn't report seeing Richard this day until
nineteen fifty four, two years after he saw him, four
(27:09):
years after he went missing.
Speaker 2 (27:12):
Okay, but okay, let's say that really happened. Does that
mean he just went underground because his fiance never saw
him again, right, his family never saw him again. He's
just working for some Yeah, okay, so if he is
working for a newly formed intelligence agency, he is doing
(27:35):
that kind of stuff and he really does just cut ties.
How in the heck is he going to be anywhere
in the US walking around or do we think that's
a credible sighting.
Speaker 4 (27:47):
I think that is a credible sighting, and at least
when I spoke to Laura about this case, Laura Norton,
who does the Fall Line and she's investigated this case,
she believes that's a credible sighting. There is another sighting
in May of nineteen sixty, so ten years after he
allegedly vanishes, he is seen in Melbourne, Florida. So follow
(28:14):
me here. An FBI agent is on an undercover assignment
and is drinking with the contact. The contact is with
a man named R. C. Mansfield. Later, the man says
this is a fake name. His real name is Richard Cox. Okay,
so he intimates he's considered dead by the army and
(28:37):
his mother. An FBI stakeout is planned nine days later,
but the subject never shows. So this is an incident
that happens with an FBI agent. So an FBI guy
reports this, He meets this man RC. Mansfield's are going
to do a sting. It never happens. He admits he's
Richard Cox. Never heard from again? What so r C. Mansfield? Yeah,
(29:05):
Richard Cox.
Speaker 1 (29:06):
R C.
Speaker 4 (29:07):
And Mansfield is actually where Richard Cox was born. So
this sounds like a good pseudonym if this was him.
Speaker 5 (29:15):
Yeah, okay, wait, so is the good guy?
Speaker 3 (29:18):
Let's just.
Speaker 4 (29:20):
Good as in I think we found him.
Speaker 5 (29:22):
Yeah, I think this.
Speaker 2 (29:24):
Yeah, was the FBI stakeout to find.
Speaker 4 (29:31):
Unrelated related Okay, yeah, so this is like an unrelated
FBI thing. This FBI source is drinking with another source
who is with Richard Cox.
Speaker 2 (29:41):
Okay, ah, that is awfully strange. This whole thing feels
so weird I am internally now, I am leaning towards
somebody that an agency wanted just to have off the
books and a person who was ready and willing.
Speaker 5 (29:55):
To do that.
Speaker 4 (29:56):
So that's what I'm wondering from you guys, since you
guys cover a lot of this three letter agency top
secret things. Would you need to disappear somebody like this
in order to join the CIA?
Speaker 3 (30:11):
Not to join, right, doesn't seem that way. It seems
like you would do that if someone were, you know,
an enemy of some stripe or someone that had compromised
information or someone that you needed to probe, not in
like the like our first story, the UAP kind of way,
like that's when you disappear people is to take them
to a black site and like get information out of them.
You don't do that to your pals or.
Speaker 4 (30:34):
What if he was joining with his.
Speaker 3 (30:37):
Protection, Yeah, coach, sure, Okay, I.
Speaker 4 (30:41):
Like it because I do think he spoke a little German,
a little Russian.
Speaker 3 (30:45):
I mean, if it was during the Cold War and
he was hanging out, he might have picked up a
little of both.
Speaker 4 (30:49):
Yeah, no, he is in his room. They found a
letter to his friend talking about Russia and communism. WHOA,
So maybe he maybe is by.
Speaker 3 (31:01):
In which case he would have been disappeared exactly for that.
Speaker 2 (31:04):
Okay, well yes, yes, Well which side is he working for?
Which is like, how do you prove that? Because he
could be a turncoat turncoat you know, like you can
take as many times as one. Well no, but really,
and if you and if the CIA or any intelligence
agency wants someone who's truly a shadow, who doesn't exist
officially anywhere on paper, who isn't getting paid officially through
(31:26):
any payroll, somebody who can just go and do stuff
that the agency wants done that is off the books
and maybe even illegal, somebody like this is who you get.
Speaker 4 (31:37):
That's a great point. It is illegal, it is treason.
So yeah, they would want to I guess protect him
in that sense.
Speaker 2 (31:44):
Yeah, and if you can get him, you know, up
the ladder on the other side. We just talked recently
about spies and a couple of high level spies in
the US, like one guy who was working for the
US coming for a long time, but he was actually
working for the Cuban government for decades, like he was
just reporting back to the Cuban government for decades, but
(32:07):
he was I can't.
Speaker 5 (32:08):
Remember his name. We'll look that up and talk about
it here in a second.
Speaker 3 (32:10):
But well, just can I just add that if you're
thinking about this and this is interesting to you, we
do have an episode or maybe it was was a
whole episode about why so many spies have been getting
caught like yeah.
Speaker 4 (32:19):
They just did that. It was what Yeah, why are
so many?
Speaker 3 (32:23):
I think it's an important question and maybe a question
that's older than you might think.
Speaker 2 (32:27):
Yeah, yes, Manuel Roacha, by the way, is the gentleman's name.
Forty years as a Cuban agent.
Speaker 5 (32:38):
Wow, yeah, check that out.
Speaker 4 (32:40):
So one more thing that you guys probably know a
bit about. We mentioned how West Point's super prestigious. You
can't just go a wall either, like they don't let
that happen. So there was a very large search for
Richard Cox as well.
Speaker 2 (32:53):
Well, yeah, and everything you do is going to be
on campus there. When he's talking about going to get
a bite to eat or something, he's going to a
restaurant that's a part of an establishment on campus somewhere.
So it's not as it's like for all.
Speaker 3 (33:06):
Intents and purposes, being on a military base have basically.
Speaker 4 (33:09):
Yeah, you can't. You can't just walk off base and disappear.
You sign in at times, you're checked, you are, it's regimented,
you are training to be deployed. So yeah, there was
a huge search. I mean, and I guess that's a
question I have as well. The FBI was looking for him.
He was being sought by the FBI, the army. Would
(33:33):
the CIA communicate with the FBI to not search for him?
Speaker 2 (33:39):
Oh, that's a good question. I don't know.
Speaker 3 (33:42):
Wait, I don't put out a the opposite of an APB,
like yeah, like, hey.
Speaker 4 (33:47):
We have him, don't waste your okay.
Speaker 3 (33:50):
Don't waste your resources.
Speaker 4 (33:51):
Yeah, yeah, like like he's with us, don't Because they
they did. He was declared dead in nineteen fifty seven,
and there was an in tense search for this A
Wall cadet, because again, he was the only West Point
cadet to go missing from West Point ever.
Speaker 2 (34:11):
Wow, that's a that's nuts. So seven years until he
was declared dead, did the did intelligence services or the
army ever stop looking for him or do they still
look for him today?
Speaker 4 (34:25):
I don't. I think once you're declared dead, they don't
look for you.
Speaker 3 (34:28):
Okay, I can't.
Speaker 4 (34:29):
I can't confirm that. But at least with most missing
persons cases, in those kinds of cases, when you declare
someone dead, the case is closed. I don't know how
the military does it. Heard, Oh yeah, okay, here we
go nineteen seventy six, After searching Europe and North America,
the case is officially closed by the Department of the Army.
Speaker 2 (34:52):
Nineteen seventy six. Wow, so they left that open just
in the like in the case that he is found
somewhere doing something either he shouldn't be doing, or that
only a few, you know, key individuals know he's doing.
Speaker 4 (35:06):
So fast forward. In nineteen ninety six, a book comes
out called Oblivion, and it cites a CIA operative as
its source who claims that Richard Cox did work in
the intelligence field in Europe during the Cold war, and
it says he lived there until the nineteen nineties before
dying of cancer in Maryland.
Speaker 2 (35:28):
Oh wow, wait, so we can't Okay, so went and
did all that stuff, then he came back. Well, just
I guess to be with family that he disowned, and I.
Speaker 4 (35:39):
Guess, like I have so many questions, like where did
the fiance go?
Speaker 3 (35:43):
Like what if I might take a just a momentary
diversion from this story and just ask, have you heard
this notion that Jim Morrison is alive and living in
upstate New York and has been for you know, the
duration of his life since he faked his own death.
There's some document tree out that has like relatively compelling
proof of this.
Speaker 4 (36:03):
Yeah, he's with Paul McCartney when he faked his death.
Speaker 3 (36:06):
So we got a little thousands of.
Speaker 4 (36:08):
Young women getting killed because he was dead. Yeah.
Speaker 3 (36:11):
No, I really want to see whatever this documentary is
because I just I would, you know, as a pop
culture nerd and as like a you know, music nerd,
and also just a conspiracy nerd, I would love to
find proof positive that somebody successfully, somebody that public successfully
did a thing like that.
Speaker 4 (36:26):
It would just be years ago, years ago. I interviewed
this woman, Elizabeth Greenwood, and she wrote a book about
faking your own death because she was like, I need
to know if this is possible.
Speaker 3 (36:37):
We did. We talked to her as well, didn't we met?
What was the book called Ben's a Big Thing.
Speaker 4 (36:41):
Yeah, I think it's called Yes.
Speaker 3 (36:43):
A Million Percent. I don't know if we spoke to her,
but Ben Ben loves that book and talks about it
all the time.
Speaker 4 (36:47):
Great, So then your listeners will absolutely know how nearly
impossible it is to disappear yourself, especially these days. Maybe
nineteen fifties not so much, but when you have the
entire military government agency searching for you across continents.
Speaker 3 (37:04):
Don't like your chances.
Speaker 4 (37:06):
No, no. But one of the theories too, is that
he disappeared himself because there were some reports that he
was potentially gay and he was potentially seeing men secretively
and kind of. When he came back from spring break,
he realized he didn't want to be with his fiance.
Speaker 3 (37:25):
And spring break does it every time.
Speaker 4 (37:29):
Winter break, spring break, break, whatever. That is one of
the theories that you know, he went a wall to
go live a different life.
Speaker 3 (37:38):
Totally.
Speaker 2 (37:38):
I can okay, I can see that simply because of
the year that this was taking place in the military,
all of these things that that life, if that is
your identity and your life and you're stuck in all
of those, you know, different mechanisms that are controlling your life,
one of the only ways out is to disappear, like
really and truly, because you could probably get in trouble
(38:02):
at that time for that stuff.
Speaker 3 (38:04):
Not to be super heavy or anything. But my father,
who was born in nineteen thirty seven and would have
been in the military around the same time, after he
passed away, we found out that he was secretly gay,
and this was a secret that he had had to whatever,
choose to live with, choose to move past, whatever. But
(38:25):
the reality of it is he was not living his
truth and went on to you know, work in Methodist
churches as a choir director. He was from the opera
world after his military time and working on a military base,
et cetera. But I'm just saying I understand very personally
that terrifying thing to have to make you know, those
in those days, it just was not something that was okay,
(38:47):
and it absolutely could have been the kind of thing
that would lead someone who had the ability maybe more
so than someone like my dad to do.
Speaker 4 (38:54):
Mm hmm, wow. Wow, that's really that's an incredible story.
Speaker 5 (38:58):
Yeah.
Speaker 4 (38:59):
Yeah, I think I think, you know, especially all of
us being born in the modern era, I think it's
also really difficult to fathom what life was like in
the fifties or someone who's gay. We're not even talking
about the eighties, you know, it's like the nineteen fifties. Yeah,
it was. Was it a did you just mention that
it was a crime.
Speaker 3 (39:19):
It wasn't a crime per se, but it was just
totally even in like you know, the opera community in
New York City, you know, which my dad was a
part of, it just was like either an open secret,
like I think maybe one one person folks might think
of as Leonard Bernstein, who you know, was as openly
gay as you could be in a world like that,
but even he had to be very very careful about it,
(39:40):
and you know, his wife kind of knew and allowed
him to live that part of his life. But my
dad wasn't as famous as Leonard Bernstein, so you know, anyway,
it's just yeah, it was absolutely not a crime per se,
but it was it could.
Speaker 4 (39:52):
Have been the kind of thing through don't don't tell, right.
Speaker 3 (39:56):
It's the kind of thing that could have ruined your career.
It's the kind of thing that could have ruined not
to mention, if you're in the military for all intents
and purposes, it is a crime. It's an absolute life ruiner,
for sure.
Speaker 4 (40:08):
Yeah. And I just did a quick search about it.
In the fifties, particularly in the military, and it says actually,
fueled by the Cold War, they actively discriminated and purged
LGBTQ plus individuals in the military, and this was known
as the lavender scare very specifically the Cold War.
Speaker 3 (40:25):
Do you recall that term?
Speaker 2 (40:26):
Ugh, yeah, Yeah, the Cold War caught up pretty much
anybody that was not in this cookie cutter shape of
what the military wanted, and anybody that didn't fit in
that shape, we are suspect of you because you could
be unhappy with the way our cookie cutter is shaped.
Speaker 5 (40:44):
Which makes sense, which.
Speaker 3 (40:46):
Is ironic considering we were meant to be the great
liberators of you know, the Jews under the Nazi regime,
who absolutely had that same kind of mentality about purging
queer people, about purging Jewish people, about pershing Romani people,
you know, and then we absolutely adopted pretty much a
maybe lighter but very similar approach to calling out the
(41:08):
unwonted element.
Speaker 2 (41:10):
Absolutely, then we got past it now in h.
Speaker 4 (41:16):
We're post post.
Speaker 3 (41:21):
Who was it that I was talking to recently, Not
to get off the topic too much, but I know
it was. It was my friend John Cameron Mitchell, who's
the guy that created Hedwig and the Angry Inch, And
he's just he's we've done some podcasting together and he's
a lovely person. And he came to Atlanta and I was
doing a talk and he mentioned the idea that he
came from a military background and that it was the
(41:42):
most in the I guess the seventies when he was
in it, it was the most inclusive situation he'd ever
been a part of, in that the generals, even when
they were told to get rid of gay and trans people,
they slow rolled it because it just didn't make sense,
what's the word operationally to have that kind of you know,
us versus them, Like if you're in, you're in. So
(42:04):
it would seem based on John, that the attitude within
the military has definitely actually changed.
Speaker 4 (42:09):
Which you're correct there. My partner who Matt has met,
he's a veteran, and he said, you know, when he
sees all these like new Trump Trumpian, you know, kicking
out trans people from the military, he was like, anyone
actually serving does not feel that way, Like anyone currently
(42:30):
serving actually loves having women in the military. He said,
those units are better regimented, like better at at their jobs.
So it's so fascinating. Yeah, not to get too off topic,
but none.
Speaker 3 (42:43):
I just think it's worth mentioning is the way things
have changed, and there are some positive changes in ideology,
even in a place that I was very surprised that
you might find that, you know it which military.
Speaker 4 (42:54):
So anyway, absolutely so Richard Cox, I don't know, Uh,
maybe George was his lover and they ran away together.
I feel like I lean more towards he went into
some agency.
Speaker 2 (43:07):
I feel like Richard and George is like the best
version of this story. That's the happiest outcome.
Speaker 4 (43:12):
That I think so too.
Speaker 2 (43:15):
The scariest one is that he's a shadow doing stuff
for the for the intelligence agencies that we never knew about.
Speaker 3 (43:22):
Did I miss who Alice is?
Speaker 4 (43:25):
No, we don't know who Alice is?
Speaker 3 (43:26):
Okay, okay, just a.
Speaker 4 (43:29):
Night terror and exactly we unclear I know in our
episode Laura, Laura mentions a couple hypotheses. So if y'all
want to listen to.
Speaker 3 (43:39):
That, absolutely always good to have some homework. I mean
that for folks at home to listen to if you
want to find out more about either of these stories.
I think we've got some great resources.
Speaker 4 (43:50):
Yeah, Laura, I think read oblivion. So she's she's really
up on all the theories around Richard Cox. And like
I said, Payne did high strange doctor Travis Walton exactly.
Speaker 3 (44:00):
Matt. Can I just applauge that you your self control
for not mentioning Elder scrolls on the second mention of
oblivion here, I just want to say, well done, sir.
Speaker 5 (44:10):
I have a map of it in my basement.
Speaker 3 (44:12):
Do you gifted me a map of l my guest
room which is up there with pride?
Speaker 2 (44:20):
Sorry, why don't be sorry.
Speaker 5 (44:22):
It's an amazing thing.
Speaker 3 (44:23):
I love it. It gives me joy. It makes me
think of you every time I look at it.
Speaker 2 (44:27):
Well, well, thanks, buddy, it gives me joy. On you
have it really quickly, Maggie, before we let you go,
if we if we step away from up in Vanish
Weekly and we think about your work on wrongful conviction.
And just as you're watching the news, as you're seeing
changes occurring right now, is there anything we should be
(44:49):
looking at or thinking about when it comes to individuals
either being incarcerated or individuals being you know, shipped out
of the country and maybe to a prison in Venezuela
or somewhere else. What should we be thinking about right now?
Speaker 4 (45:03):
Yeah, I think all of those things. I think one
of the things that I'm really thinking about is when
we're talking about wars overseas, we feel like they don't
impact us at home, and we are currently embroiled in
many situation overseas, But a lot of the technology that
we use over there to fight our quote enemies civilians,
(45:28):
we use here on our own people or we will
be using. So cop Cities is something I'm thinking about
a lot. And yeah, you guys an episode on Cop City.
Speaker 3 (45:39):
We talked about it in news episodes, and we're talking
about it as a very local, regional thing and a
cause here in the Atlanta area, also pertaining to deforestation
and just absolutely in Atlanta.
Speaker 4 (45:51):
Yeah, yeah, I mean, just the the technology is I
guess what I really want is what I'm trying to
say is the technologies that we are using and testing
overseas on civilian populations, on our quote enemies. These drones
that we saw that can just go into a building
and shoot people up. You don't need humans there. We
(46:12):
have robot dogs. Those are all coming here. And if
people don't think that our police will use those on us,
If people don't think that, you know, people with green cards,
you know, are now being deported, legal legal permanent residents
are being deported. If you don't think that can happen
to you, a citizen or.
Speaker 3 (46:33):
Speaking out for speaking out against a regime.
Speaker 4 (46:37):
So I think that's what I want people to think about.
Like when we're like, oh it's overseas that it doesn't matter,
Oh it's just happening to the brown people or the
green card holders, it will come for you. They test
it first to see what they can get away with.
And that's what I want people to think about. I
want you to go protest your cop cities. I want
you to protest all of these people being deported and
we don't even know who they are or what they
(46:59):
do it.
Speaker 2 (47:01):
Yeah, you know, we recently did an episode on the
disposition matrix that is actually I want to say something
that we had a little off in conversation with your
partner about, which is just how specifically the Obama administration
and every administration after that, and then into the before
(47:21):
the Bush administration, how they look at an individual person
and categorize them as leaning towards a terrorist organization or
being a member of a terrorist organization, or you know,
vulnerable to being influenced or that kind of thing, and
then how that system could be taken and used to
look at American citizens. And it feels pretty naive to
(47:44):
think that there isn't something like that, some kind of
way at looking at all of the people we know
as individuals, all the things we search, all the conversations
we have with the metadata, I mean, because we know
all that stuff's getting picked up now days with stellar
wind and all of these things.
Speaker 4 (48:03):
Like it's well, that's a great example twenty years ago
when what was it the Patriot Act, right, and we
think it's just to surveil terror We're just surveiling terrorists,
just those brown guys overseas. We're all being surveiled now, right,
twenty years ago it was just for the bad guys.
Now it's all of us, every single one of us.
(48:24):
So for people to think that they're not going to
just start snatching you up because something you posted on Twitter,
that's that's incredibly naive and absolute.
Speaker 3 (48:34):
And maybe this is naive or a little on the nose,
but it just it makes me think of this incredible
quote from a German pastor named Martin Emohler. I believe
this is displayed at the National Holocaust Museum, and it's First,
they came for the socialists, and I did not speak
out because I was not a socialist. Then they came
for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out
(48:54):
because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came
for the Jews, and I did not speak out because
I was not a Jew. Then they came from me,
and there was no one left to.
Speaker 4 (49:02):
Speak for me exactly.
Speaker 3 (49:04):
So coming all kind of makes me tear up a
little bit, y'all. It's it's heavy. I'm sorry it.
Speaker 4 (49:10):
Is, and it's sad because it's happened, it's already happened,
like and it's just happening again, and just it's just
a different form. This time. It's in a technology form,
you know, whereas last time it was like you know,
I'm talking about World War Two. It was like this
big military oc Gristapo exactly. Now it's in digital form.
Speaker 2 (49:33):
Yes, well, guys on that. Sorry, sorry, this very serious
important stuff, and it is it is worth your time
to think about, right, and maybe have a conversation with
somebody you care about about this thing. And and also, hey,
(49:54):
listen to some podcasts that aren't specifically about that stuff
or else all of us are going to go nuts.
So Maggie, tell us where people should go to hear
your shows, specifically Up and Vanish Weekly, and uh, just
learn more about what.
Speaker 5 (50:07):
You're up to.
Speaker 4 (50:07):
Yeah, you could find me on all platforms, Maggie Freeling,
and definitely search Up and Vanish Weekly. Follow it, rate it.
It's really exciting. We're doing a lot of fun new
stuff as the show progresses.
Speaker 2 (50:21):
I know a spoiler alert. I'm on at least one
of those episodes.
Speaker 4 (50:24):
Yeah, you are too, you are You're on the pin train, Noel,
do you want to come on? Please come on?
Speaker 3 (50:30):
Put me in coach. I'm always down. Nobody asks me
to be on stuff because I don't. I don't ask
to be on stuff, but just let this be known.
I'm always down to be on anything that you do,
Maggie for sure.
Speaker 4 (50:41):
Yeah. Well, I mean, any any strange case you want
to talk about. I mean we also have a list
of cases we could pitch you some or whatever.
Speaker 3 (50:48):
Well, Maggie, I'm super down to be on anything that
you are up to and would be honored. And let's uh,
what do they say, Let's let's let's talk offline. We'll
figure something out. But thank you so much for now
for joining us today to talk about these cases and
talk about all the cool stuff that you're working on.
Speaker 4 (51:04):
Thank you, guys. I have been a huge fan forever.
I listened weekly, Like I knew what your podcast was
last week, I.
Speaker 3 (51:11):
Didn't even know what it was.
Speaker 2 (51:13):
I know's that means a ton, though, Maggie, because we're
going really of everything you do.
Speaker 4 (51:18):
No, you guys are so fun and smart, and I
know your listeners are too, so I hope there is
some crossover, y'all. Please come submit cases to us, listen
to us. We love this this little pod family here.
Speaker 2 (51:33):
Hey, and if you want to reach out and contact us,
you can find us all over the internet, right, Noel.
Speaker 3 (51:39):
Yeah, you sure can. You can find us at the
handle conspiracy stuff, where we exist on Facebook with our
Facebook group. Here's where it gets crazy. On x FKA
Twitter and they're having some troubles over there here and
on YouTube where we have video CODs at Galore for
your perusing enjoyment. On Instagram and TikTok, who are also
having some trouble. We are the Spiracy Stuff Show. But wait,
(52:02):
there's more.
Speaker 2 (52:04):
There's no trouble besides the trouble you're about to create
at one eight three three STDWYTK that's our voicemail system.
When you call in, you've got three minutes, give yourself
a cool nickname and let us know if we can
use your name and message on the air. If you
got more to say than can fit in three minutes,
maybe you want to send us an attachment, maybe a
(52:24):
couple images of your kiddykat anything, Send us a good
old fashioned email.
Speaker 3 (52:28):
We are inspiracy atiheartradio dot com.
Speaker 2 (52:51):
Stuff they don't want you to know is a production
of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,
Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your face favorite shows.
Stuff They Don't Want You To Know News
Hosts And Creators
Matt Frederick
Ben Bowlin
Noel Brown
Show Links
RSSStoreAboutLive ShowsPopular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com