All Episodes

July 15, 2025 27 mins

In this edition of RELEASE THE TRENDSTEIN FILES, Jack and Miles discuss MAGA spiraling over the Epstein cover-up (feat. Trump, Charlie Kirk and the usual suspects), SCOTUS letting Trump cook the DoE, US ambassador to Malaysia Nick Adams being very unpopular in Malaysia (and in general), WeTransfer's wild new terms of service and much more!

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hello the Internet, and welcome to this episode of Release
the Trends steam file, Release them, release them. My name
is Jack. That over there is mister Miles Cray.

Speaker 2 (00:10):
Hey, Kevin Spacey's out here also saying release them. Oh yeah,
but he's like, I was on the flight logs but
did not inhale. Yeah exactly, And it's like, but you
still did other stuff outside of Epstein, dude, but I'm
not in Epstein files.

Speaker 3 (00:28):
So but I'm not in the bad parts of it.
You shure you sure about that?

Speaker 1 (00:33):
You sure about that? Ke Republicans?

Speaker 2 (00:38):
Uh. So, the Democrats I think did a good one.
They Democrats. So what they're good at, I would say.

Speaker 1 (00:44):
Is sometimes using the republicans stupidity against them. And they
just forced the Republicans to move to block the release
of the Epstein files. So the Republicans are now on
wax all except one Republican in the House.

Speaker 3 (01:01):
Yeah, this was on the House, I believe in the
Rules Committee.

Speaker 2 (01:05):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (01:05):
Yeah, all but one had to be like, yeah, we're
we don't want to see that stuff. Everybody nobody wants
to keep talking about Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaker 2 (01:15):
Yeah, We're over it. Like this was the way they
did it. Was they were trying to attach it to
a crypto bill when they're like, I don't know, maybe
this this kind of has everything. It's like your crypto legislation,
your Epstein file stuff. Only one the one Republican was
Ralph Norman from South Carolina, and he said to Axiosquol,

(01:35):
the public's been asking for it. I think there are files.
All of a sudden, not to have files is a
little strange. We'll see how it plays out. I think
the President will do the right thing. This guy is
actually so dumb. He doesn't think Trump is in.

Speaker 1 (01:45):
Them, right, he doesn't know he's being that.

Speaker 3 (01:48):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:49):
I guess there's these files the people are calling the
Shipyestein files.

Speaker 3 (01:54):
Yeah, not happen. That's a little weird. I'm sure.

Speaker 2 (01:56):
I'm sure the President will do Okay. I don't know
why he wouldn't want him out unless he, you know, like.

Speaker 1 (02:00):
He's so dumb that like it seems like he's playing dumb.
He's I know, right, he's like I don't know, because
like they were saying back there that there were a
thing in this closed door meeting, but now when we're
out here, they're saying that it's not a thing. Yeah,
and so I don't know. I think the President will
do the right thing. I'm just gonna put the ball
in his court. Should be easy, Yeah, Samon Man tough

(02:22):
one because.

Speaker 3 (02:23):
He's in them. Yeah. Charlie Kirk has along with that.

Speaker 4 (02:29):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (02:30):
Yeah, he's similar energy where he so he at his
turning point USA Conference had the conversation and then at
one point was like, all right, I'm done talking about
the Epstein Files. He's saying, yeah, And all the headlines
where Charlie Kirk says, I'm done talking about the Epstein Files.

(02:50):
And all the people who watch his show or whatever,
his like White Supremacy rant vlog that has a microphone
in it like a radio show, they fucking lipped out
when he was acting like I'm gonna do I'm gonna
toe the fucking administration line here and act like this
is a nothing Berger hambiergear.

Speaker 3 (03:11):
And this is this morning.

Speaker 2 (03:13):
Absolutely just flailing trying to explain what he actually meant.
And if you just listen for just listen to how
tense his voice is, you will get to a part
where he's audibly swallowing like a fucking stressed out cartoon character.

Speaker 1 (03:29):
Swallow on earth.

Speaker 3 (03:32):
But here he is clarifying it. But I'm not about it, Kirk.
So this is what I said yesterday.

Speaker 5 (03:40):
He's waving some twenty of this last weekend at our
event about Epstein. Restly, I'm done about talking about Epstein
for the time being. Nobody, not a single news outlet
said for the time being but did not include that
second part of the sentence. I'm going to trust my
friends of the administration, true, true, trust cash but well,
Dan Bongino, jd Vance, it's their ball, it's their possession.

(04:04):
I'm gonna trust my friends of the government to do
what needs to be done. I've said plenty this weekend,
and the ball is in their hands. Here comes to
Goals commentary on it. That's fine, we have escalatory action.

Speaker 1 (04:22):
Don't you read my statement?

Speaker 6 (04:25):
Man?

Speaker 2 (04:26):
You know when the fucking blow, like the drip just
numbs your throat and you gotta like use your whole
chest to just even swallow a little bit of spit
because working, Yeah, it's that or that or I don't know, dude,
but yeah, I said for the time being. I mean, really, though,
the the real part that is relevant is that you
said you're done talking about it.

Speaker 1 (04:45):
And that you're gonna trust your friends in the government. Yeah,
which the whole point that everybody's making right now is like,
we don't trust the government because they're doing some highly
suspect ship with the Epstein files.

Speaker 3 (04:57):
Mm hmmm hmm.

Speaker 1 (04:58):
So for now, I'm gonna trust them until tomorrow morning,
when I'm not gonna trust them anymore because you guys
got mad at me. Why is everybody so mad at me?

Speaker 3 (05:09):
Goal I'm just towing the line.

Speaker 2 (05:12):
This is wild, man, I'm telling I mean, like, to
your point, the Democrats, aside from all the many other
things they should be doing, they should really just keep
pressing the fucking Epstein button over and over and over
and over again, because the more they keep it, I mean,
like they're not letting up. And you can tell, especially
with this Charlie Kirk thing, They're truly at this point
where they're like, what the fuck, dude, I don't even

(05:34):
know what. I tried to act like I was done
talking about it, but even casually and now I'm getting
fucking killed.

Speaker 1 (05:40):
Oh man.

Speaker 3 (05:41):
It's a it's a tough one to be in. It's
a tough Why do it?

Speaker 1 (05:44):
Because this would now make it so that any journalist
who is able to fucking break what's in the Epstein
files would like win a Pulitzer, Like it's no longer
you can no longer be like too tawdry, Like everybody
else know what the fuck in the like is The
New York Times, the Washington Post? Are they not covering
it just because that one investigative journalist who led the

(06:07):
Panama Paper's investigation died in a car bomb? And they're
just like, we don't won it with these people.

Speaker 2 (06:12):
I wish they looked at what they were doing as
even that sort of dangerous.

Speaker 3 (06:17):
They're just like, bro, we know what side we're on.

Speaker 2 (06:20):
We're not We're not going to report on this because
that's gonna upend that has the potential to upend, like
powerful structures and people that are in positions of power
if it is in fact, I mean, if we're gonna
say that the association with Epstein and at the very
least with Trump seems quite murky to use terms.

Speaker 3 (06:41):
That will not get me in legal trouble.

Speaker 1 (06:43):
But you see the New York Times, you know how
they have that ethicist column where it's like, ask the
ethicist if you're okay in what you're doing on a
daily basis. Somebody wrote in and was like, my husband's
family has an investment in real estate. One of the
real state investments is in an ice holding facility?

Speaker 3 (07:04):
Am I cool?

Speaker 1 (07:05):
And the New York Times athesis was like, yeah, man,
we're good here, Like yeah, they were just like, you know,
if you weren't invested in it, it wouldn't change anything.

Speaker 3 (07:16):
So what the fuck?

Speaker 2 (07:19):
Yes, Like, I can't believe they're laundering people's conscience now
for shit like.

Speaker 3 (07:25):
This, Well look aldlording facility. What the fuck is go
wing on? Oh well that's anyway.

Speaker 1 (07:34):
I do feel like that is what their job is
is primarily like the voice of the status quo and
to keep it moving you know.

Speaker 2 (07:43):
Yeah, yeah, yeah, well of course because they don't want to,
because then that also makes people be like, well, I'm
invested in companies that are part that build private prisons.

Speaker 3 (07:53):
Is that okay to profit off of my stock port?

Speaker 1 (07:56):
If you're not investing in them, somebody else is going to,
so you might as well get while the good you
know what I'm saying. So is it okay that I
find the phrase alligator Alcatraz like kind of cute and funny?

Speaker 2 (08:09):
Yes?

Speaker 1 (08:09):
Yes, fine, that's totally fine, and.

Speaker 3 (08:12):
And you can take it from me, Nancy Pelosi. Okay,
I know about this stuff. It's fine, it's fine. Yeah.

Speaker 1 (08:20):
Anyways, New York Times doing their work. What's the latest
from the Supreme Court?

Speaker 2 (08:25):
Miles ah Man, Well, you know, so Trump is basically
doing this thing he we've this has been articulated for
ages now, especially with Project twenty twenty five, is that
they want the Department of Education to go away because
they want no standard for anything. And you can have ignorant,
no public most Yeah, and then you can flip them
all to charters or whoever gets the money. They can

(08:47):
teach whatever the fuck they want, and you can have
you can have a multiverse of historical.

Speaker 3 (08:52):
Realities and educational realities in the United States.

Speaker 2 (08:55):
So Trump's been firing like hundreds of DOE Department of
Edge Location workers as like a way to sort of
like pick it apart so it doesn't function anymore. And
the firing has been obviously like this got taken up
by the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court was basically like, yeah,
that's fine, you can continue to fire these people. But

(09:16):
the thing that they're pointing out is he's firing the
people that basically have to implement the legally required programs
and services. So without them, it's like that old meme.
Without the people that legally implement them, you can't implement them.
And then therefore these services are legally required. However they're fired.

Speaker 3 (09:39):
But the people that implement them are they legally required? Aha?

Speaker 1 (09:43):
Oh no, that would be pretty straightforward. Like I don't know,
in any other circumstance, I feel like that would be
pretty straightforward.

Speaker 2 (09:49):
Yeah, ye said aha, I said, ah, so yeah soon. Yeah,
this is death by a thousand cuts now the Education department.
So all right, yeah, Linda McMahon, you know, she's she's
probably going to be off and running with her campaign
of destruction Jesus Christ. So yeah, I mean it's like

(10:10):
we're already the situation with our educational system is already
so precarious, and it's like truly hanging by a few threads,
and you have teachers and instructors that are so underpaid
that you have people there because they actually are so
committed to the idea of educating younger people so they
can flourish in life. And now in terms of like

(10:32):
the governmental body that used to, you know, try and
standardize things and make discrimination and that kind of thing
a thing of the past now you know.

Speaker 1 (10:41):
Oh yeah the Department of Education. Huh okay, well we
can't have that. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (10:46):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (10:47):
So it's just like, I mean, it's it's like, you know,
this is just like everything we read every fucking day
of from this administration, like.

Speaker 3 (10:55):
Oh that fundamental like pillar of our whatever made the
government kind of like worth it. That's gone too.

Speaker 1 (11:05):
No, okay, all right, yeah, yeah, all gone.

Speaker 2 (11:08):
Let's take a quick break and we'll be back, because
I mean, yes, the Department of Education is bad, but
at least we can rest on the fact that they're
probably not fucking up US Malaysian relations. We'll be right
back to check on that fact.

Speaker 1 (11:31):
And we're back. And we are in a sensitive time
for US Malaysian relations, according to people who pay attention
to that sort of thing. And in light of that,
Trump has just appointed a new US ambassador to Malaysia,
and it is Nick Adams aka Alpha King.

Speaker 3 (11:52):
Yep, Alpha King. Stupid. This guy. I thought he was
a parody.

Speaker 1 (12:02):
It really, it's the hardest to tell the difference between
parody and reality with with this guy, because like some
of the ship he says is legitimately unintentionally hillious.

Speaker 2 (12:13):
The way he insists, like I eat fucking you know,
Hooters four to six times a week.

Speaker 3 (12:22):
Okay, is that real? That's what he posts?

Speaker 2 (12:25):
Wow, Okay, this is just to give you an idea
of like what he posts, right, this is the kind
of ship that Nick Adams posts.

Speaker 1 (12:32):
Quote.

Speaker 2 (12:33):
Also, he's he's Australian, so he's another He's that variety
of maga azsie dipshit who's like just so horny for
American racism that like they just like they show up
here and they're like, I'm here to do the Lord's.

Speaker 1 (12:45):
Work Australian racism.

Speaker 2 (12:49):
I go to hoodahs, I eat rare steakes, I lift
extremely heavy whites. I read the Bible every night. I
am pursued by copious amounts of women. I am wildly successful.
I have the physique of a great god. I have
an r Q of over one hundred eighty. I am
extremely charismatic. They height these that's right, and.

Speaker 3 (13:13):
He's trying to do that.

Speaker 2 (13:14):
Yeah, yeah, exactly, you're swaged different, you know what I mean.

Speaker 1 (13:19):
That's that's so amazing. Yeah, there's another just to be
like to be make going to Hooters. Part of your
identity is so like eleven year old coded.

Speaker 3 (13:31):
I mean to be fair.

Speaker 2 (13:32):
Taco Bell is our personality, and I think that is
the more adult choice.

Speaker 3 (13:36):
That is the more adult, because that is the more
he's really wiping up to be.

Speaker 1 (13:40):
No, actually, just audibly swallow. I don't know. Taco Bell
is delicious, and I go to Hooters, and therefore I
am man.

Speaker 3 (13:53):
I am man.

Speaker 2 (13:54):
Yeah, mine is I go to Taco Bell. Therefore I
have diarrhea a lot.

Speaker 1 (13:59):
I go to Taco Bell, and therefore I have low
self esteem. Yeah, and that's I'm just trying to give
you a larger portrait, a larger understanding of where my personality.

Speaker 3 (14:08):
He goes on.

Speaker 2 (14:09):
This is this is another post quote my ideal woman
ten out of ten, lar maintenance, strong Trump supporter, no
desire to interfere with my foursomes, picks me up from
Hooters whenever I've had few too many domestics with the boys.
Has dinner ready at five pm? Aren't you just at Hooters?
Dickhead doesn't ask questions when I'm out light with the boys.

(14:30):
So you want your mother.

Speaker 3 (14:34):
Something.

Speaker 2 (14:35):
It sounds like this isn't a relationship but a domestic
worker because there's really nothing about sex aside from their appearance.
It sounds like you just need a like a or something.
Yeah yeah, yeah, lar maintenance as well. Might just after
you throw toss them Brooklyn in Bosh, just throw it

(14:56):
in the sink there quick rinse ready to go. Uh
but yeah, this guy is now the fucking ambassador to
or you know he he's been nominated.

Speaker 1 (15:06):
Now he's just an influencer, right yeah, like, no, no
reason that he should be the ambassador that.

Speaker 2 (15:12):
He So he used to hold office in Australia. Okay,
and when he did, here's Australia. Hey, they really don't
send their best, do they? They really don't send their best.

Speaker 3 (15:26):
He goes on.

Speaker 2 (15:27):
He's like, so he was he was in charge of
this municipality, Ashfield, and there was an avian flu situation.
This was his This was his solution to avian flu,
which was basically kill the pigeons. He said, Ashfield should
be inhospitable to pigeons. It said avian influenza does not
respect borders. I'm not an expert, I'm not an accountant

(15:48):
and I'm certainly not a pis controller. Don't ask me
about procedure. What I would like to see is no
pigeons in our area. Wow, so that's easy.

Speaker 3 (15:57):
Uh. He also again he hates multi cold trialism. Uh.
And then he got this is from his Wikipedia quote.
He ran into political.

Speaker 2 (16:05):
Trouble because his attempts to launch himself as a motivational
speaker in the US meant that he was frequently absent
from council meetings. A journalist asked what his story was,
Adams answered with a tirade of abuse, and he was
consequently suspended from Liberal part from the Liberal Party for
six months.

Speaker 3 (16:20):
So yeah, he he's just too guy.

Speaker 1 (16:23):
He's too damned sensitives these days to deal with the
real alpha king, Like.

Speaker 2 (16:27):
He did you see the there's the guy who is
also been nominated to be the ambassador of Singapore.

Speaker 3 (16:34):
But he's like a like an orthopedic surgeon, like and
he just golfs me Trump.

Speaker 2 (16:39):
Yeah he This is Tammy Duckworth grilling him just on
the basics, right, It's like, you're gonna be the fucking
ambassador to Singapore. Okay, here's a basic question. These are
the fucking people that are being nominated. This is doctor
and Johnny Sinha, what.

Speaker 4 (16:58):
Us holding the Austin chairmanship into Oh for Singapore, can
you name one thing?

Speaker 2 (17:01):
Okay, what she's talking about is Ossian That is like
the block of Asian countries that she's referring to, and
that Singapore will be the chair. So along with that
being the head of the chair of that block means X,
Y and Z. What does that mean specifically? Okay, this
is his answer.

Speaker 4 (17:16):
A role that they would have to play as Ossian Chair.

Speaker 3 (17:18):
What will well?

Speaker 7 (17:19):
There? You know that that there this is a This
Ascian chair is not only one country, there are ten countries.

Speaker 3 (17:28):
The Asian chair is one country, but.

Speaker 7 (17:30):
There are ten countries involved as Ascian group.

Speaker 4 (17:34):
Not answering my question, You're not answering my question, sir,
Can you name one thing that will be of critical
importance to Singapore as Ossian chair?

Speaker 2 (17:43):
A role?

Speaker 3 (17:44):
There are many things. Can you name one?

Speaker 7 (17:46):
Defense?

Speaker 3 (17:46):
Economics, those are very broad. Name an issue? Great, I
don't think. Okay, that's crazy, Jesus, like you know what
you cooked?

Speaker 2 (18:01):
Fam? I feel bad for your dumb ass right now.
I'm so sorry. What do you know about Wu tank clan? Well,
it's spelled with w uh huh and name album name,
name a song, rap right, Okay, you know what never
mind sir.

Speaker 6 (18:22):
Trade trade Okay, you just described so it is part
of there are countries involved, right, yeah, No, I'm asking
you like, you're so you're.

Speaker 2 (18:35):
Be working as a big major role What would your
role like? What would the jobs be the countries?

Speaker 3 (18:43):
Right?

Speaker 1 (18:44):
Trade?

Speaker 2 (18:45):
Oh, the actual panic that you're you're acting right now
is killing me.

Speaker 1 (18:51):
It can be so uncomfortable. Defense. No, I'm sorry, defense, defense,
all right, we transfer, just got so this is the
thing that's happened a couple of times. Actually, yeah, you
know a company like it happened to Adobe, it happened
to drop Box, where they update their terms of service

(19:14):
with language that would suggest that they can use anything
that you are like sending via we transfer and like
it belongs to them now that they can use it
however the fuck they want, because that's what the terms
of service say.

Speaker 2 (19:33):
Right.

Speaker 1 (19:35):
Content that is covered by you hereby grant us a perpetual, worldwide,
non exclusive, royalty free, transferable, sub licensable license to use
your content for the purpose of operating, developing, commercializing, and
improving the service we transfer or new technologies or services,
including to improve performing of machine learning models that enhance

(19:57):
our content moderation process in a course with the Privacy
and Cookie Policy. Such license includes the right to reproduce, distribute, modify, prepare,
derivative works based upon broadcast, communicate to the public, publicly, display,
and perform content. That's all the stuff that they can
do with what what you're we transferring. This is just

(20:20):
a This is like as being like anything that you
send through the mail is ours, Like they don't do shit.
So anyways, people were like, this seems fucked up. Like
artists and people who use we transfer were like, guys,
we might want to like get to the bottom of
this before you start using we transfer again. And they

(20:43):
were like, Okay, we're going to update our terms. And
their explanation was that they had made the language easier
to understand, oh, to avoid confusion.

Speaker 3 (20:55):
Mm hm.

Speaker 1 (20:56):
So that's just and this is also what Adobe did.
It's also drop off. It's almost like there's a playbook
where you ask for insane like rights to whatever the
fuck right to do whatever you want with the intellectual
property of the people who are using your product, and
then when they push back and be like, oh god,

(21:17):
you guys, I feel so sorry for you. You're so confused.

Speaker 3 (21:20):
You didn't read it. Can you read?

Speaker 1 (21:23):
Are you exactly?

Speaker 3 (21:24):
Oh? I know we had a literacy problem in this country.
I didn't think it was that bad. I'm so sorry.

Speaker 1 (21:29):
We've updated the clause on Tuesday, as we've seen this
passage may have caused confusion for our customers.

Speaker 2 (21:35):
Okay, but now it says you give us a royalty
free license to use your content for the burs operating,
developing and improving the service. Like yeah, there's still be like,
we're gonna use it.

Speaker 1 (21:46):
So it's just they basically ask for the same thing,
but like after insulting you, being like, we're you guys
are confused and we feel sorry for you, but we'll
update the language just to make you happier. I guess yeah.

Speaker 2 (21:59):
Oh some of you guys are lawyers, right, and now
you're redlining it.

Speaker 3 (22:03):
Okay, okay, okay, right right.

Speaker 1 (22:05):
It's just I I just we can never forget the
Disney tried to get out of paying for the wrongful
death of a person who was accidentally served food they
were allergic to at a restaurant yep, by being like,
you signed our terms of service when you signed up
for Disney Plus, so you can't sue us. Yeah, thanks xoxo,

(22:29):
Yeah Disney, xoxo Disney when you sign up for a
trial of Disney, for a trial of Disney plus. So
if you think that like they aren't lying when they're like, guys,
this is you're reading way too much into this thing
that we're explicitly saying. Yeah, we're explicitly describing how we're
going to take all of your rights away.

Speaker 2 (22:51):
They're absolutely going to point to the sign when you
come with a lawsuit they go, I don't know if
you caught that part.

Speaker 1 (22:58):
The one thing that prevent and that and would presumably
prevent this is that it like gets reported on and
it's like really bad pr for the company, and hopefully
companies continue to do that reporting. But I don't know,
it feels like we're not headed in a way in
a direction of more corporate accountability. No a headache into

(23:19):
the future.

Speaker 2 (23:19):
No no, no, no, no, no, that's how you's got
to get angry at the corporations, folks.

Speaker 3 (23:23):
Yeah, really feels like that's where we're headed. We're there.

Speaker 2 (23:28):
I mean, like everything is just such a constant fuck
you to like regular and just a person lands Hey,
if you talk on this phone, I own your voice.

Speaker 3 (23:37):
I own your mind.

Speaker 1 (23:40):
Intellectual property. Yeah, because you texted about it.

Speaker 3 (23:43):
Were you going with my leg hair? What?

Speaker 2 (23:46):
Well, when you put on these Wrangler genes, you signed over, Like,
what the fuck you're going with my light leg hair?
This is the way you go with my leg hair?
Clubs my leg you mean mine? Uh uh, I'm not
anymore after you signed.

Speaker 3 (24:03):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (24:04):
Anyways, those are some of the things that are trending
on this Tuesday, July fifteenth. Oh. Also, Trump's ankles got
real fat. People are worried. Do you see that. No,
he's like wearing he's wearing dress shoes and like his
ankles are like spilling over the sides of the dress shoes.
Oh god, oh no, so that's Oh, that can be healthy.

Speaker 2 (24:28):
He looks like when you try and put like like
the wrong shoes on a doll, Like those shoes are
made for a smaller doll, Like, don't try and get
them on them.

Speaker 3 (24:37):
Fucking don't put it on that doll.

Speaker 1 (24:39):
Yeah.

Speaker 2 (24:40):
Oh, this guy's always been falling apart. He just recently did.
I don't know if you saw the thing. He was
just demanding that AOC and Jasmine Crockett take IQ tests
and like.

Speaker 1 (24:50):
I mean, you didn't know that from David.

Speaker 2 (24:51):
No, but he justifies it in this senile old man way,
where then this was said quote, I took a real
test at Well to Read Medical Center and I aced it.

Speaker 3 (24:59):
Now it's time for them.

Speaker 1 (24:59):
To a test.

Speaker 2 (25:00):
Like it's purely in this like senile old man. Like, well,
I had to do the test. Now you do the test,
you know if this is elephant?

Speaker 1 (25:08):
That was Yeah, that was the test that he had
to do. Right where they he was bragging about how
he used it, and they were saying they've never seen
anybody who was better at acing this test. And then
like people showed the test and it was like, is
this a lion or an elephant?

Speaker 3 (25:21):
I'm telling you the president couldn't handle being in a
room alone with Jasmine Crockett for five minutes.

Speaker 1 (25:28):
No, God, that would make great TV. But no, he would.

Speaker 3 (25:32):
He would.

Speaker 2 (25:33):
He would look like when he's spent, when he's mature too.
He went in that room with all the taxidermied animals
and he's like, he's like woman of color just fucking
coming at me with this spicy mouth.

Speaker 3 (25:45):
He'd be like, yeah, save.

Speaker 2 (25:47):
Me, No, don't worry about it. You are not Also,
you're not okay, how about this. They should agree and
they'd be like, hey, y'all, we're all going to take
an IQ test together on ESPN.

Speaker 3 (25:58):
Oh yeah, they on, they should judo that shit whoop
his ass?

Speaker 1 (26:05):
Yeah, well in the ogon baby camera angles in all directions. Yep, no,
no pieces, no exactly, Yeah yeah, yep.

Speaker 2 (26:15):
But again that's a nice I'm glad that his instincts
are still there to try and create alternative headlines too.

Speaker 3 (26:20):
Why are you like trying to hide the Epstein files?

Speaker 7 (26:23):
Maam?

Speaker 1 (26:23):
Yeah, yeah, all right. Those are some of the things
that are trending on this July fifteenth. We are back
tomorrow with a whole last episode of the show. Until then,
be kind to each other, be kind to yourselves, get
your vaccines where you still can get your flu shots,
don't do nothing about white supremacy, and we will talk
to you all tomorrow, right bye.

Speaker 2 (26:44):
The Daily Zeitgeist is executive produced by Catherine Law, co
produced by Bae Wayne.

Speaker 3 (26:50):
Co produced by Victor Wright

Speaker 5 (26:52):
Co written by j M McNab, and edited and engineered
by Brian Jeffries.

The Daily Zeitgeist News

Advertise With Us

Follow Us On

Hosts And Creators

Jack O'Brien

Jack O'Brien

Miles Gray

Miles Gray

Show Links

StoreAboutRSSLive Appearances

Popular Podcasts

24/7 News: The Latest

24/7 News: The Latest

The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.

Crime Junkie

Crime Junkie

Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.