February 10, 2025 • 16 mins
Guest host Richard Syrett and citizen journalist Ashton Forbes discuss leaked U.S. military video of the moment Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 disappeared.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Now here's a highlight from coast to coast AM on iHeartRadio.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Begin discussing some of the more let's say common skeptical
arguments claiming this footage was fabricated. I don't know that
the orbs may be CGI or something like that. How
do you counter these arguments? What are they and how
do you counter them?
Speaker 3 (00:21):
Yeah, that's a great question, and I want to get
that out of the way because then we can go
talk about zero point energy and future humanity after that.
So the first one, Richard, is probably the debris. People say, hey,
but they found this debris. But as they pointed out
in our first segment, this debris was found in Africa,
(00:43):
but we were searching off the coast of Australia. In fact,
they're searching right now off the coast of Australia. So
how did that debris get there? Well, I gets it
drifted in the ocean. Problem is the currents flow to
the east in the majority of the search area. In fact,
they kind of flow east and upper around the coast
of our Australian back to the west. You go look
at the drift analysis. You guys can go google this
(01:04):
right now while you're listening, you'll see looking at the
ocean current model, that the bulk of the debris should
have washed ashore in Australia. Instead we're finding places like
South Africa, Tanzania. How's all the ten or so pieces
of debris that they found washing ashore in Africa? And
it's not enough to bree to even prove the plane crashed.
(01:27):
Even the flaperon which people say was this giant piece
of the plane is only about a seven foot piece
of one hundred foot wing it that's not even require
to land the airplane if you look it up. So
we didn't find enough debris to prove the plane crashed.
And you have to pick one or the other. This
is very important for anyone who wants to understand them
a Street seven zero investigation. Either you believe these satellite
(01:50):
things that we've been following to search in the South
Indian Ocean, or you believe the debris. It's one or
the other. It's a mutually exclusive our arm. Either the
debris is from MH three seven zero and something happened
at make three seven zero closer to Africa, or you
believe the satellite pings and the debris you must be
fake and then the satellite pings say well, somehow we've
(02:13):
just not been able to find anything in the South
Indian Ocean. To me, the answer is obvious. The satellite
pings were fraudulent, spoofed, misinterpreted, whatever you want to use,
not real, and the debris is real to in Africa,
and a much better location for that debris to have
gone in the water looking at the ocean currents is
not the South Indian Ocean. It's the Maldives and a
(02:36):
secret military base known as Diego Garcia. So that's the
first one I want people to understand. Also, the amount
of evidence in general for the videos being real versus
the videos being fake. It's overwhelming on the side of
them being real. I'll come back to that second, but
if you will also say, well, the clouds don't seem
(02:57):
to move in this satellite video you're looking at, and
if you actually speed it up, you can see the
clouds don't just move, but they evolve in terms of
changing shape in our perspective of them. You can see
parallax changes. So this shows that these are real, three
dimensional clouds we're looking at, which is important. The next
thing people say is that these are pictures of clouds
(03:19):
that some photographer took, and there was this Kim dot
com saga that happened. Well, what I want to point
out is that when we reverse image search the images
in question, they don't even show up before twenty sixteen
on the archives. So these videos are from twenty fourteen,
and as I pointed out, there's evidence that shows that
(03:39):
these require a three D render, including the clouds evolving,
but also when the zap happens to the plane in
the satellite video, the light reflects off the distant cloud
that's not next to it, which shows we're looking at
real lighting in a three dimensional environment, not a picture
of clouds. And of course we have two videos from
(04:00):
two completely different perspectives. They're perfectly in sync with one another,
which then nescess it takes a three D rendered environment,
which you can't have two D cloud pictures for that.
And I also want to point on more about the
cloud pictures is that they supposedly come from this set
that a photographer took. There are other images in the set.
They do go back in the Internet archive before the
(04:23):
videos in question are sorry that image through seven zero videos,
but not the supposed images that were used to make
the videos. Those ones are just missing somehow, and they
don't even reverse image search back to the website. If
your virtual image search these images that supposedly were used
to make the videos, they don't go back to the
website they're supposedly from. They go back to Reddit, and
(04:46):
supposedly a six day old Reddit account found them. So
the story makes no sense at all, And the story
for the videos being fake makes no sense at all
either in terms of like who made these because we
had one hundred and fifty thousand dollars bounty and real
bounty for someone to come forward with evidence that they
were the ones that hoaxed the videos that, how however,
they made them with like you know, the source work
(05:08):
that showed, as Kim dot com said, quote unquote, the
videos without the orgs in them, Like that's something that
you could prove that you did. Nobody ever came forward,
no one with any credible evidence whatsoever. One of the
last things people say as well is that they say
it's daytime in the videos, it's actually nighttime in both
of those videos. That whammy footage that I discussed works
(05:31):
day and night. They can change the lighting effects because
it's computer generated based on multiple sensors coming in. And
the reason why you film in thermal again is because
partially because you want good evidence and intelligence, but also
partially because it's nighttime in that video. That's why you
see all the noise in that video. That's not an effect.
That's a real thermal video, high grade military thermal video
(05:53):
at nighttime. Oh sorry. There is one last one, which
is they say that there was isn't there something about
a nineties video game? People remember that that was mentioned
by the Corridor crew. I think the Lower Lodge and
Amcwest also all mentioned this. It doesn't even match on
a single frame. In fact, nobody will even do a
pixel comparison because they all know that it doesn't match.
(06:16):
All these people know it doesn't actually match. It doesn't
have the same number of frames the asset. They claim
this Pyramania shackleve asset has seven frames in it, and
it's images of a real fire that somebody took and
they stacked it because it's an old effect. And the
zapp is actually only four frames, and they're claiming that
(06:36):
someone like modified that to get it to match. It
doesn't even even from just a basic comparison. It doesn't match.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
Did you have the visual effects visual effects people analyzed
by CGI people and so forth? Did you have them
analyze this video?
Speaker 3 (06:51):
So let's see who has looked at it. The people
that I have on my SIDEA there are certain people
that have supported it to have X expertise, Bob Greenier,
Professor Simon Holland as well, who's a science filmmaker. I've
had one of the podcasts I went on early on,
I think it was Pod Disclosure. He knows Jeffrey Ford,
(07:13):
who is one of the lead Marvel VFX or editors
with Marvel, and he had said that for something like this,
after watching the videos, it would take three to six
months minimum to like, you know, kind of figure out
how it should look through the storyboard, all the stuff
that would be required for something like that. And in
this case, the window of time is somewhere between four
(07:36):
days if you believe the description in the video that
says it was received March twelfth, or seventy two days
if you believed that the published day, which says May nineteen.
So I think it's reasonable to say that anybody with
CGI experience that many people have given their testimonials on
social media over the last year and a half to
(07:57):
support that the claim that it would be quite difficult
for anyone to make this, and if they did make it,
they would have to be a team most likely, not
just like an individual that's making this. And the big
problem is the requirements to make it are primarily not
just VFX. To make these videos, you have to have
knowledge of US military surveillance as well, including the case
(08:19):
is Whami footage. Even when I was exposing and researching
this just a few months ago, basically no one on
planet Earth knew that we had this, and some of
the stuff that I was looking at do go back
ten years, but very few people I think would have
been aware back then. And then the physics side of it,
when we're looking at we're looking at real physics, but
we're looking at this idea of physics of zero point energy,
(08:41):
where space is not empty, and that zero isn't really
necessarily the bottom, and that things like negative energy can
potentially be real. In fact, I think these videos, as
we're going to talk about in more segments, proved that
this idea of zero point energy is real. So you
have to have a lot of knowledge combine knowledge. So
(09:03):
unless someone like Eric W. Davis, who is like the
government's leading physicists on warp drives and wormholes, created these videos.
I just can't see anyone plane earth having the knowledge
and foresight. And then to include the whole story of
Image three seven zero, which the plane is still missing.
How would the person who hoaxed these videos even know
(09:24):
that we were never going to find the plane because
the moment we found the plane, the whole hoax would
be exposed. Now, I think that the hard true reality
is that these videos aren't fake, that they are real,
and they are the plane that we've been searching for
for almost eleven years now, and that they do answer
the questions that we've been wanting to know about, Well,
(09:46):
what are we hiding with ufopn on, what's the big stupit?
What's so dangerous and scary and dark that we can't
tell people? Well, when you watch those videos, it's pretty
damn scary and dark. I don't want those videos to
be real anymore than anybody else does in terms of
what that means about our universe, what our government's capable of,
and what we as humanity are capable of in this universe.
Speaker 2 (10:05):
So imagine they are real.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
For a moment.
Speaker 2 (10:07):
So then what happened to the people on board that plane?
Where did they go? And how is it that the satellite,
the satellites and the drones happened to be in the
right place at the right time to capture that on video.
Speaker 3 (10:26):
Yeah, and that it goes to the thing that people
say is why is it there and what's recording it?
And so again, part of the reason why that satellite
video is not like moving is you're not looking through
a satellite. They're just sending data to a relay satellite,
which is probably NROL twenty two, which is what you
see in the bottom left of the satellite video. It's
probably the relay satellite beaming all the data down. And
that's the reason why it doesn't look like that moves.
(10:48):
The only reason why they would have these assets they're
filming like this if you talk to anybody in the military,
is this is an operation. And that's the big dark
secret of the image three seven zero videos is that
why are they filming Because it's an operation that they
are doing on that plane that is human orbs that
we are seeing US military, US Navy. In fact, I'm
(11:11):
ready to pin this on the US Navy obviously probably
the CIA is involved as well. People like that not
super familiar with how the intel agencies work. But the
US Navy is doing this. They're recording with a drone
and they're recording with their WAMI footage, and this footage
got leaked on the internet. And then the true story
of the plane is that they probably concocted in an
(11:33):
emergency event on the plane in this case of fire,
so they forced the fire to happen in the plane.
Plane goes dark, turns around. Whose that's what you're going
to do in a fire event, which is very dangerous.
Try to land at the nearest airport, Penang Airport, it's
where the plane live. It's flying low. Who was seen
by about twenty different witnesses either on fire or flying low,
(11:54):
which is what you would do if the plane was
on fire, doesn't land at today. Probably was, and this
is completely speculative, but probably got some type of rendezvous
communication on a secure communication with the plane to say
come to this rendezvous point and you know, try to
land the plane here in the water and we'll you know,
(12:14):
fish out as many people as we can or something
like that. And it gets to that rendezvous point, which
is probably where we see the plane in the videos,
and I don't know if the pilot would in it
or not. A lot of people lasting because they see
the orbs. There's a lot of scenarios where the orbs
can potentially be invisible, so I can't say. But they
zapped the plane with those orbs, they pulled those orbs out,
(12:36):
and they were ready for and they were watching, And
I think what we're seeing in there is teleportation. It
could also people speculated could be cloaking. Could it be annihilation.
I don't think it's cloaking because the smoke stops, so
if it was just playing being cloaked, I think we
see the smoke, it could be annihilation potentially. But you know,
if we look at physics, we think that like you
(12:57):
can't create or destroy energy, like it just has to
be transferred. So that's a huge amount of mass we're
seeing in an airplane, So it's in my opinion unlikely
for it to be annihilation. What we're looking at there,
I think is a teleportation of a faster than light
superluminal travel. And it wouldn't surprised me to see that.
We have videos on the other side either, which is
(13:19):
spooky and just real quick I want to say as
well that that UFO hearing that happened, they claimed that
they have videos, like hundreds of thousands of videos of
UFO videos that they've just never shown anybody called immaculate
constellation I think they called it. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I
almost guaranteed these are like the Crown jewels, Like someone
stole the crown jewels from the dragon's dungeon and ran
(13:42):
away with them. And that's that makes three some zero videos.
But there's almost certainly other videos like this. So last
thing I'll say is why, well, it's counter espionage. If
you look at the people on board the plane, these
semiconductor engineers stick out like a sore thumb. There's twenty
of them. They're Chinese Nationals woroking for the American company
that is connected US Aerospace and Defense. They were working
(14:05):
on advanced sem are superconductive microchips. The NSA actually had
a report that we found showed that so they were
the motive and they were probably defecting to China bringing
some of the technology to China, and the United States
was through with it and was like we're gonna stop
that from happening. But in a spectacular way that sends
a message for them to not do it. Now, these
(14:28):
videos getting out destroys that because now you go from
a situation where you're laughing at your enemy, where you've
disappeared this plane and the world has no idea, none
the wiser. Now these videos are out, and now the
enemy knows not only did use that the plane, they
can figure out how you did it and reverse engineer it,
(14:50):
make their own or make their defenses against it as well.
Speaker 2 (14:54):
Why disappear the plane that way using this incredible technology?
Why not just shoot it out of the sky?
Speaker 3 (15:02):
Now that's the number one question, And I wonder did
somebody lose their job over that decision? Ultimately might be
considered the biggest blunder of all time. In fact, you
can have a strong argument that you could blame Obama
for that, like why are we wasting our time using
orbs on this airplane when you could just shoot a
rocket add or whatever you want to do. Now, I
think that people could have survived the actual orbing. If
(15:24):
this is a wormhole. It turns out human wormholes are
humanly traversible under the right conditions. And there's been a
lot of literature over the last four or five years
that support that notion, so humans could survive that part.
That's not the part I'm worried about. It's the fire part.
There was five hundred pounds of lithium ion batteries in
those planes. One of the side things I do is
(15:45):
try to expose people to dangers of lithium ion battery fires.
It's just one inhalation and it's game over. That's how
dangerous litium ion battery smoke is. That's why some was
certainly a lithium ion battery.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
Related to this point, Don't it possible it was a
rescue operation? Is it? Is it possible that we're trying
to rescue it? Is?
Speaker 3 (16:06):
It is possible? And when I used to push that
that notion, people would laugh at me. People would say,
there's no way, the US government, no chance it's a
rescue operation. But I used to think that until I
heard something called Diego Garcia Whistleblower, a letter to action
Forbes and you can find it actually on my YouTube
channel at just x fashion is all my social media,
(16:26):
but also my YouTube. Strongly recommend people listen to it,
because after I listened to that, I went, okay, yeah,
it wasn't a rescue operation. It's definitely an spionage event
or a counter espionage event. It's dark to think that,
but you know that's what It makes sense when you
think about the power of the technology.
Speaker 1 (16:48):
Listen to more Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at
one a m. Eastern and go to Coast to coastam
dot com for more
Now here's a highlight from coast to coast AM on iHeartRadio.
Speaker 2 (00:04):
Begin discussing some of the more let's say common skeptical
arguments claiming this footage was fabricated. I don't know that
the orbs may be CGI or something like that. How
do you counter these arguments? What are they and how
do you counter them?
Speaker 3 (00:21):
Yeah, that's a great question, and I want to get
that out of the way because then we can go
talk about zero point energy and future humanity after that.
So the first one, Richard, is probably the debris. People say, hey,
but they found this debris. But as they pointed out
in our first segment, this debris was found in Africa,
(00:43):
but we were searching off the coast of Australia. In fact,
they're searching right now off the coast of Australia. So
how did that debris get there? Well, I gets it
drifted in the ocean. Problem is the currents flow to
the east in the majority of the search area. In fact,
they kind of flow east and upper around the coast
of our Australian back to the west. You go look
at the drift analysis. You guys can go google this
(01:04):
right now while you're listening, you'll see looking at the
ocean current model, that the bulk of the debris should
have washed ashore in Australia. Instead we're finding places like
South Africa, Tanzania. How's all the ten or so pieces
of debris that they found washing ashore in Africa? And
it's not enough to bree to even prove the plane crashed.
(01:27):
Even the flaperon which people say was this giant piece
of the plane is only about a seven foot piece
of one hundred foot wing it that's not even require
to land the airplane if you look it up. So
we didn't find enough debris to prove the plane crashed.
And you have to pick one or the other. This
is very important for anyone who wants to understand them
a Street seven zero investigation. Either you believe these satellite
(01:50):
things that we've been following to search in the South
Indian Ocean, or you believe the debris. It's one or
the other. It's a mutually exclusive our arm. Either the
debris is from MH three seven zero and something happened
at make three seven zero closer to Africa, or you
believe the satellite pings and the debris you must be
fake and then the satellite pings say well, somehow we've
(02:13):
just not been able to find anything in the South
Indian Ocean. To me, the answer is obvious. The satellite
pings were fraudulent, spoofed, misinterpreted, whatever you want to use,
not real, and the debris is real to in Africa,
and a much better location for that debris to have
gone in the water looking at the ocean currents is
not the South Indian Ocean. It's the Maldives and a
(02:36):
secret military base known as Diego Garcia. So that's the
first one I want people to understand. Also, the amount
of evidence in general for the videos being real versus
the videos being fake. It's overwhelming on the side of
them being real. I'll come back to that second, but
if you will also say, well, the clouds don't seem
(02:57):
to move in this satellite video you're looking at, and
if you actually speed it up, you can see the
clouds don't just move, but they evolve in terms of
changing shape in our perspective of them. You can see
parallax changes. So this shows that these are real, three
dimensional clouds we're looking at, which is important. The next
thing people say is that these are pictures of clouds
(03:19):
that some photographer took, and there was this Kim dot
com saga that happened. Well, what I want to point
out is that when we reverse image search the images
in question, they don't even show up before twenty sixteen
on the archives. So these videos are from twenty fourteen,
and as I pointed out, there's evidence that shows that
(03:39):
these require a three D render, including the clouds evolving,
but also when the zap happens to the plane in
the satellite video, the light reflects off the distant cloud
that's not next to it, which shows we're looking at
real lighting in a three dimensional environment, not a picture
of clouds. And of course we have two videos from
(04:00):
two completely different perspectives. They're perfectly in sync with one another,
which then nescess it takes a three D rendered environment,
which you can't have two D cloud pictures for that.
And I also want to point on more about the
cloud pictures is that they supposedly come from this set
that a photographer took. There are other images in the set.
They do go back in the Internet archive before the
(04:23):
videos in question are sorry that image through seven zero videos,
but not the supposed images that were used to make
the videos. Those ones are just missing somehow, and they
don't even reverse image search back to the website. If
your virtual image search these images that supposedly were used
to make the videos, they don't go back to the
website they're supposedly from. They go back to Reddit, and
(04:46):
supposedly a six day old Reddit account found them. So
the story makes no sense at all, And the story
for the videos being fake makes no sense at all
either in terms of like who made these because we
had one hundred and fifty thousand dollars bounty and real
bounty for someone to come forward with evidence that they
were the ones that hoaxed the videos that, how however,
they made them with like you know, the source work
(05:08):
that showed, as Kim dot com said, quote unquote, the
videos without the orgs in them, Like that's something that
you could prove that you did. Nobody ever came forward,
no one with any credible evidence whatsoever. One of the
last things people say as well is that they say
it's daytime in the videos, it's actually nighttime in both
of those videos. That whammy footage that I discussed works
(05:31):
day and night. They can change the lighting effects because
it's computer generated based on multiple sensors coming in. And
the reason why you film in thermal again is because
partially because you want good evidence and intelligence, but also
partially because it's nighttime in that video. That's why you
see all the noise in that video. That's not an effect.
That's a real thermal video, high grade military thermal video
(05:53):
at nighttime. Oh sorry. There is one last one, which
is they say that there was isn't there something about
a nineties video game? People remember that that was mentioned
by the Corridor crew. I think the Lower Lodge and
Amcwest also all mentioned this. It doesn't even match on
a single frame. In fact, nobody will even do a
pixel comparison because they all know that it doesn't match.
(06:16):
All these people know it doesn't actually match. It doesn't
have the same number of frames the asset. They claim
this Pyramania shackleve asset has seven frames in it, and
it's images of a real fire that somebody took and
they stacked it because it's an old effect. And the
zapp is actually only four frames, and they're claiming that
(06:36):
someone like modified that to get it to match. It
doesn't even even from just a basic comparison. It doesn't match.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
Did you have the visual effects visual effects people analyzed
by CGI people and so forth? Did you have them
analyze this video?
Speaker 3 (06:51):
So let's see who has looked at it. The people
that I have on my SIDEA there are certain people
that have supported it to have X expertise, Bob Greenier,
Professor Simon Holland as well, who's a science filmmaker. I've
had one of the podcasts I went on early on,
I think it was Pod Disclosure. He knows Jeffrey Ford,
(07:13):
who is one of the lead Marvel VFX or editors
with Marvel, and he had said that for something like this,
after watching the videos, it would take three to six
months minimum to like, you know, kind of figure out
how it should look through the storyboard, all the stuff
that would be required for something like that. And in
this case, the window of time is somewhere between four
(07:36):
days if you believe the description in the video that
says it was received March twelfth, or seventy two days
if you believed that the published day, which says May nineteen.
So I think it's reasonable to say that anybody with
CGI experience that many people have given their testimonials on
social media over the last year and a half to
(07:57):
support that the claim that it would be quite difficult
for anyone to make this, and if they did make it,
they would have to be a team most likely, not
just like an individual that's making this. And the big
problem is the requirements to make it are primarily not
just VFX. To make these videos, you have to have
knowledge of US military surveillance as well, including the case
(08:19):
is Whami footage. Even when I was exposing and researching
this just a few months ago, basically no one on
planet Earth knew that we had this, and some of
the stuff that I was looking at do go back
ten years, but very few people I think would have
been aware back then. And then the physics side of it,
when we're looking at we're looking at real physics, but
we're looking at this idea of physics of zero point energy,
(08:41):
where space is not empty, and that zero isn't really
necessarily the bottom, and that things like negative energy can
potentially be real. In fact, I think these videos, as
we're going to talk about in more segments, proved that
this idea of zero point energy is real. So you
have to have a lot of knowledge combine knowledge. So
(09:03):
unless someone like Eric W. Davis, who is like the
government's leading physicists on warp drives and wormholes, created these videos.
I just can't see anyone plane earth having the knowledge
and foresight. And then to include the whole story of
Image three seven zero, which the plane is still missing.
How would the person who hoaxed these videos even know
(09:24):
that we were never going to find the plane because
the moment we found the plane, the whole hoax would
be exposed. Now, I think that the hard true reality
is that these videos aren't fake, that they are real,
and they are the plane that we've been searching for
for almost eleven years now, and that they do answer
the questions that we've been wanting to know about, Well,
(09:46):
what are we hiding with ufopn on, what's the big stupit?
What's so dangerous and scary and dark that we can't
tell people? Well, when you watch those videos, it's pretty
damn scary and dark. I don't want those videos to
be real anymore than anybody else does in terms of
what that means about our universe, what our government's capable of,
and what we as humanity are capable of in this universe.
Speaker 2 (10:05):
So imagine they are real.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
For a moment.
Speaker 2 (10:07):
So then what happened to the people on board that plane?
Where did they go? And how is it that the satellite,
the satellites and the drones happened to be in the
right place at the right time to capture that on video.
Speaker 3 (10:26):
Yeah, and that it goes to the thing that people
say is why is it there and what's recording it?
And so again, part of the reason why that satellite
video is not like moving is you're not looking through
a satellite. They're just sending data to a relay satellite,
which is probably NROL twenty two, which is what you
see in the bottom left of the satellite video. It's
probably the relay satellite beaming all the data down. And
that's the reason why it doesn't look like that moves.
(10:48):
The only reason why they would have these assets they're
filming like this if you talk to anybody in the military,
is this is an operation. And that's the big dark
secret of the image three seven zero videos is that
why are they filming Because it's an operation that they
are doing on that plane that is human orbs that
we are seeing US military, US Navy. In fact, I'm
(11:11):
ready to pin this on the US Navy obviously probably
the CIA is involved as well. People like that not
super familiar with how the intel agencies work. But the
US Navy is doing this. They're recording with a drone
and they're recording with their WAMI footage, and this footage
got leaked on the internet. And then the true story
of the plane is that they probably concocted in an
(11:33):
emergency event on the plane in this case of fire,
so they forced the fire to happen in the plane.
Plane goes dark, turns around. Whose that's what you're going
to do in a fire event, which is very dangerous.
Try to land at the nearest airport, Penang Airport, it's
where the plane live. It's flying low. Who was seen
by about twenty different witnesses either on fire or flying low,
(11:54):
which is what you would do if the plane was
on fire, doesn't land at today. Probably was, and this
is completely speculative, but probably got some type of rendezvous
communication on a secure communication with the plane to say
come to this rendezvous point and you know, try to
land the plane here in the water and we'll you know,
(12:14):
fish out as many people as we can or something
like that. And it gets to that rendezvous point, which
is probably where we see the plane in the videos,
and I don't know if the pilot would in it
or not. A lot of people lasting because they see
the orbs. There's a lot of scenarios where the orbs
can potentially be invisible, so I can't say. But they
zapped the plane with those orbs, they pulled those orbs out,
(12:36):
and they were ready for and they were watching, And
I think what we're seeing in there is teleportation. It
could also people speculated could be cloaking. Could it be annihilation.
I don't think it's cloaking because the smoke stops, so
if it was just playing being cloaked, I think we
see the smoke, it could be annihilation potentially. But you know,
if we look at physics, we think that like you
(12:57):
can't create or destroy energy, like it just has to
be transferred. So that's a huge amount of mass we're
seeing in an airplane, So it's in my opinion unlikely
for it to be annihilation. What we're looking at there,
I think is a teleportation of a faster than light
superluminal travel. And it wouldn't surprised me to see that.
We have videos on the other side either, which is
(13:19):
spooky and just real quick I want to say as
well that that UFO hearing that happened, they claimed that
they have videos, like hundreds of thousands of videos of
UFO videos that they've just never shown anybody called immaculate
constellation I think they called it. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I
almost guaranteed these are like the Crown jewels, Like someone
stole the crown jewels from the dragon's dungeon and ran
(13:42):
away with them. And that's that makes three some zero videos.
But there's almost certainly other videos like this. So last
thing I'll say is why, well, it's counter espionage. If
you look at the people on board the plane, these
semiconductor engineers stick out like a sore thumb. There's twenty
of them. They're Chinese Nationals woroking for the American company
that is connected US Aerospace and Defense. They were working
(14:05):
on advanced sem are superconductive microchips. The NSA actually had
a report that we found showed that so they were
the motive and they were probably defecting to China bringing
some of the technology to China, and the United States
was through with it and was like we're gonna stop
that from happening. But in a spectacular way that sends
a message for them to not do it. Now, these
(14:28):
videos getting out destroys that because now you go from
a situation where you're laughing at your enemy, where you've
disappeared this plane and the world has no idea, none
the wiser. Now these videos are out, and now the
enemy knows not only did use that the plane, they
can figure out how you did it and reverse engineer it,
(14:50):
make their own or make their defenses against it as well.
Speaker 2 (14:54):
Why disappear the plane that way using this incredible technology?
Why not just shoot it out of the sky?
Speaker 3 (15:02):
Now that's the number one question, And I wonder did
somebody lose their job over that decision? Ultimately might be
considered the biggest blunder of all time. In fact, you
can have a strong argument that you could blame Obama
for that, like why are we wasting our time using
orbs on this airplane when you could just shoot a
rocket add or whatever you want to do. Now, I
think that people could have survived the actual orbing. If
(15:24):
this is a wormhole. It turns out human wormholes are
humanly traversible under the right conditions. And there's been a
lot of literature over the last four or five years
that support that notion, so humans could survive that part.
That's not the part I'm worried about. It's the fire part.
There was five hundred pounds of lithium ion batteries in
those planes. One of the side things I do is
(15:45):
try to expose people to dangers of lithium ion battery fires.
It's just one inhalation and it's game over. That's how
dangerous litium ion battery smoke is. That's why some was
certainly a lithium ion battery.
Speaker 2 (15:58):
Related to this point, Don't it possible it was a
rescue operation? Is it? Is it possible that we're trying
to rescue it? Is?
Speaker 3 (16:06):
It is possible? And when I used to push that
that notion, people would laugh at me. People would say,
there's no way, the US government, no chance it's a
rescue operation. But I used to think that until I
heard something called Diego Garcia Whistleblower, a letter to action
Forbes and you can find it actually on my YouTube
channel at just x fashion is all my social media,
(16:26):
but also my YouTube. Strongly recommend people listen to it,
because after I listened to that, I went, okay, yeah,
it wasn't a rescue operation. It's definitely an spionage event
or a counter espionage event. It's dark to think that,
but you know that's what It makes sense when you
think about the power of the technology.
Speaker 1 (16:48):
Listen to more Coast to Coast AM every weeknight at
one a m. Eastern and go to Coast to coastam
dot com for more
The Best of Coast to Coast AM News
Host
George Noory
Popular Podcasts
Math & Magic: Stories from the Frontiers of Marketing with Bob Pittman
How do the smartest marketers and business entrepreneurs cut through the noise? And how do they manage to do it again and again? It's a combination of math—the strategy and analytics—and magic, the creative spark. Join iHeartMedia Chairman and CEO Bob Pittman as he analyzes the Math and Magic of marketing—sitting down with today's most gifted disruptors and compelling storytellers.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Breakfast Club
The World's Most Dangerous Morning Show, The Breakfast Club, With DJ Envy And Charlamagne Tha God!