March 5, 2025 • 15 mins
On Tuesday night, President Donald Trump appeared before a joint session of Congress for the first time since the start of his second term. It was his fifth such appearance, and he celebrated what he saw as early wins in his first 43 days back in office — and spoke about what’s next on his agenda.
Bloomberg Businessweek national correspondent Josh Green and Big Take DC host Saleha Mohsin explore what the speech reveals about Trump’s vision for trade, the US economy and America’s role in geopolitics.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. On Tuesday night, President
Donald Trump appeared before a joint session of Congress for
the first time since the start of his second term.
He used the speech to deliver a message, we.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
Have accomplished more in forty three days, and most administrations
accomplished in four years or eight years, and we are
just getting started.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
It felt like an indoor Maga rally, with tons of
cheering and pandering and boasting from Donald Trump and a
lot of angry protesting from Democrats.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
Josh Green is a senior correspondent for Bloomberg BusinessWeek.
Speaker 3 (00:44):
No music and no dancing, but plenty of fireworks, you know,
security scuffle, Democrats getting dragged out. Mister Green, take your seat,
Take your seat, sir, take your seat, Remove this gentleman
from the chamber. I mean, it really did remind me
of a Trump rally, but it was a partisan speech,
(01:04):
sneering and making fun of his opponents and basically dancing
on their electoral grave as he boasted about all the
things that he's done in his first few weeks in office.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
We just talked about the spectacle was their substance last night.
Speaker 3 (01:16):
I didn't feel like there's a whole lot of new substance.
Trump definitely ticked through the things that he's done in
the early days, whether it's closing down the borders or
blowing up a lot of DEI programs, shutting agencies like USAID.
But I didn't hear a lot that was new, and
that surprised me a little bit. I also didn't hear
a lot about the economy, which I expected would be
more of a focal point of the speech.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
And it was not from Bloomberg's Washington bureau. This is
the Big Take DC podcast. I'm Salia Molsen today on
the show Trump's fifth Joint Address to Congress, Josh Green
and I explore what the president's speech reveals about how
(01:58):
he's approaching his second from his vision for trade in
the US economy to America's role in geopolitics. So you
and I covered the first term really closely, so we
know that in an instant Trump can undo something that
he's planned. Based on what we heard last night, what
(02:18):
do you think were some of the top foreign policy
points that he is trying to focus on for his
second term.
Speaker 3 (02:24):
Well, it didn't sound to me like he was wavering
or about to change his mind on ending the war
in Ukraine. I mean, he campaigned on bringing what he
called peace to Ukraine. Had a big blow up with
Zelenski in the Oval office.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Earlier today, I received an important letter from President Zelenski
of Ukraine. The letter raids Ukraine is ready to come
to the negotiating table as soon as possible to bring
lasting peace Closer.
Speaker 3 (02:50):
To me, he just sort of continued the themes that
he talked about in the campaign. If I'm going to
bring peace quickly, We're not going to waste American treasure abroad.
European allies are going to have to step up.
Speaker 2 (03:00):
It's hard to believe that they wouldn't have stopped it
and said at some point, come on, let's equalize. You
got to be equal to us.
Speaker 3 (03:06):
That's pretty much par for the course, I think, with
what people were expecting. So no curveballs there.
Speaker 1 (03:11):
So let's move on to something that Trump does tout
as a unique policy in as administration, tariffs. Josh, should
we get any substance or did we hear more? Just
managing a narrative.
Speaker 3 (03:20):
The whole speech to me felt like a public messaging campaign,
but definitely the lines about tariffs, like I'm hearing competing
messages from the Trump administration about what it is they
intend to do. I mean, Trump has been very straightforward about,
you know, he's imposing these new tariffs he did yesterday,
but other figures in administration like Howard Lutnik are making
noises about, well, you know, maybe we're going to roll
(03:41):
those back, maybe we're going to reduce them. And I
think trying to quell some of the market panic that
we've seen over the last week, it's mixed messages, is
not clear who is setting the tone here or who
investors should listen to, And I think that element of
chaos is going to help defeed a lot of the
market swings that we've seen literally day to day s
and p is up one and a half percent one day,
(04:04):
down one and a half percent the next, up on.
You know, it's just sort of a roller coaster ride
that doesn't show any signs to me off slowing down
anytime soon. What stood out the most to me, though,
was that Trump did concede just a tiny bit that
there's gonna be economic.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
Pain, there'll be a little disturbance, But.
Speaker 3 (04:20):
Then he followed up with the very Trumpian line, Oh
but we're not bothered by that, or we don't care
about that.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
But we're okay with that. It won't be much well.
Speaker 3 (04:29):
I think that remains to be seen whether Americans care
or not, because there's a lot of indications in the
polls already the consumers are unhappy with inflation. They don't
think Trump is focused on the economy and a new
regiment of tariffs that royals the economy and increase his prices.
I think is not going to go down politically as
well as Trump and some of his allies seed to
assume it will. I mean thematically. Trump has always been
(04:51):
consistent in telling the story about tariffs the most economists
would say is wrong. Trump believes they're a way to
generate ex geral revenue for the US government, that they
might replace income taxes, that they're a way that he
can kind of exert strength and power over global markets,
whereas most economists would say, well, all that's going to
do is create cost increases that are going to be
(05:12):
passed on the US consumers, which is the opposite of
what voters, especially voters who voted for Trump in November,
are looking for him to achieve. So I think one
of the reasons that markets have been royal too much,
that the entire Trump rally that we saw in the
weeks and months after his victory in November has all
been disappeared, is that there isn't any kind of clarity
(05:33):
on these issues, and Trump didn't provide a lot of
it last night.
Speaker 1 (05:36):
So was there anything that surprised you about Trump's speech?
Speaker 3 (05:38):
Yeah, that really was. I think the thing that jumped
out to me most of all was how much he
focused right from the get go on culture war issues
and not the economic issues that, to me are the
biggest questions of the creatoring stock market. The new tariff
regimes he instituted just hours before the speech or sure
on the back burner for Trump, And as I thought
(05:59):
about it, it seems to me that's because the stuff that
Trump is able to do unilaterally and successfully, things like saying,
according to government, there are only two genders. You know,
we're going to wipe out DEI, We're going to win
this war on woke. There are fights that he can
draw and fight and win on his own terms that
Democrats can't stop, and that the public, at least accordion polls,
is largely supportive of, whereas if the discussion were about
(06:22):
inflation or grocery prices or the price of eggs, which
have doubled since last year. Trump doesn't really have that
much good news to point to, and instead what he
did was for fallback on blaming Biden and the Biden
administration over and over and over again for a lot
of the economic problems that he and his administration have
not yet been able to solve.
Speaker 1 (06:40):
We'll dig into economic issues, and what we learned about
is proposed solutions. After the break, I've been talking to
Bloomberg Senior correspondent Josh Green about the policy substance that
came through and Trump's joint address to Congress on Tuesday night.
(07:01):
I asked Josh about the issues facing the US economy, inflation,
the expiration of Trump's twenty seventeen tax cuts, and the deficit.
We heard a lot yesterday where Trump was blaming former
President Joe Biden for inflation problems and any other cracks
in the current state of the economy.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
Joe Biden especially let the price of eggs get out
of control.
Speaker 1 (07:24):
Which is interesting because it was actually pretty strong. Yes,
there were problems, but we're not in a recession. Growth
has been strong inflation is the biggest problem. At what
point is it no longer Biden's economy. It is Trump's
economy and he can't really blame the last guy.
Speaker 3 (07:39):
Yeah, it's a good question. I mean my kind of
like got sense just having been a creature of Washington
for so many years and lived through so many presidential
administrations that you get about six months and after that,
memories fade. People aren't thinking about the last guy, and
they start to get grumpy and unhappy, and talking to
some Trump advisors and people around him, that's the rough
(08:00):
timeline I think that they're looking at. I had these
discussions less in terms of like tariffs and economic policy
and more in terms of foreign policy. A number of
Trump's advisors were pushing him to move forward on a
peace deal over Ukraine sooner rather than later. Originally, I
think the timeline had been to do something in Saudi
Arabia and May, and a lot of Trump advisors I
(08:21):
spoke to at the Times that that's too late. By
that point, Ukraine will be Trump's problem, not Biden's problem,
and we want to do something sooner, and we saw
that begin to happen. I think the same timeline basically
holds in economic issues too, that if we don't see
inflation and grocery prices come down, and certainly if we
see them begin to rise as a reaction to tariffs,
(08:43):
then I think Trump is going to have a really
difficult political problem because at the end of the day,
he's a powerful president with a Republican Congress, but his
margin in the House is three seats, and midterm elections
are looming, and it's one.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
Of those rare moments where Americans are paying attention to
what the government's doing because it's directly hitting their wallets.
The other one is it is tax filing season. The
minute there is any kind of snapfoo in Americans getting
their tax refunds, that could cost some problems and unhappiness
too that could emerge in polls and in economic data.
So let's talk about DOGE, which Trump talked about a lot.
(09:19):
All the so called waste that DOGE has apparently found.
We don't know how much of what Trump said of
how many millions or maybe billions have been cut is accurate.
That's what DOGE is saying. Bloomberg's reported that, for example,
dough sometimes double or triple accounts contracts that it cuts.
They're claiming to cut fifty five billion dollars in governments spending.
(09:41):
Our reporting found that their cuts actually total less than
nine billion dollars. What is all this cutting supposed to
add up to.
Speaker 3 (09:48):
If you looked at the speech last night, especially it's
on Doge, I think a lot of it is performative.
The bottom line budgetary numbers, the size of the cuts
are quite small in comparison both to the size of
this federal budget and to the two trillion dollars that
Elon Musk originally said he would be able to cut
from the budget. If we're talking about nine billion dollars
(10:10):
or even fifty five billion dollars, which seems to have
been an inflated Doze figure, this is a drop in
the ocean when it comes to the federal budget. And
yet doge in Elon's actions and his cuts and his
assaults on various agencies have really been the main story
of the second Trump administration over the last six or
eight weeks. From a kind of public messaging the standpoint,
(10:31):
it's interesting because again, if you look at polls, people
are generally pretty happy with the idea that there's a
doze out there, that's attacking government waste. But if it
begins to cut things like the IRS and it slows
down Taxtra funds, or his Democrats have been suggesting, it
breaks the Social Security payment system and suddenly old ladies
(10:52):
don't get their Social Security checks, then I think there's
going to be a backlash, a serious political packlash. But
that hasn't happened yet, and so in the meantime, I
think those serves for Trump as a kind of illustration
of all the things that he is doing and cutting.
And I thought one of the most effective passages in
his speech was when he ticked through descriptions of some
(11:13):
of the programs that Elon Musk had zeroed out.
Speaker 2 (11:17):
Just listen to some of the appalling waste. We have
already identified twenty two billion dollars from HHS to provide
free housing and cars for illegal aliens.
Speaker 3 (11:31):
DEI initiatives, and obscure African countries that Trump claimed he'd
never heard.
Speaker 2 (11:35):
Of, eight million dollars to promote LGBTQI plus in the
African nation of Lesuto, which nobody has ever heard of.
Speaker 3 (11:46):
It was an effective bit of theater, I think, to
sort of illustrate to an ordinary viewer who isn't following
this stuff at any kind of a clinical level, that
the government is full of expensive, wasteful programs and that
Donald Trump and on Musk are going in there and
slashing them in a way that will ultimately benefit the
US economy and help with their pocketbook issues. I think
(12:07):
connecting those actual dots and seeing an effect on the economy,
on unemployment, on inflation, on people's kind of day to
day earning power isn't going to be easy to do
because I'm not sure there is going to be much
of one.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
When he was taking through the list of cuts, it
was millions. The national deficit is thirty six trillion dollars, so,
like you're saying, it is a drop in the ocean.
He's talked about extending some of the twenty seventeen tax cuts,
but he's also said I want to bring down the deficit.
Is that math going to add up? Can Doge fine
enough save inches to make up for all of the
budget ads, you know, taxes and other programs that he
(12:41):
wants to bring in.
Speaker 3 (12:42):
Yeah, I really don't see how it can, especially given
what we've seen from Doge in these early weeks and months,
where we're talking about, you know, ten billion dollars or
twenty billion dollars, that's not enough to kind of create
budgetary savings that would pay for any kind of a
tax cut. Trump is an administration have a lot of
balls in the air in terms of claims. They've made,
(13:03):
promises they made about what they're going to deliver, including
last night, But they haven't passed a budget deal. They
haven't ironed out what's going to be in the tax cut,
they haven't ironed out how they're going to pay for
the tax cut, and at the end of the day,
those numbers have to pencil out.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
So let's wrap up what we learned from last night.
What's your biggest takeaway of what the next almost four
years will look like.
Speaker 3 (13:26):
The biggest takeaway from me is that Trump isn't backing
down at all from any of his campaign promises. That
he is charging ahead, even as there are clear signs
in the economy, in the stock market, and public polls
that people are beginning to have a lot of trepidation
about how he's proceeding in what it is that he's doing.
So the big question for me, I would say, over
(13:48):
the next six months to a year is is something
important going to break our Social Security payments suddenly going
to disappear? Is you know the a BULLA team that
Elon Musk cuts a doge suddenly going to have a
catastrophic effect if there's some kind of new pandemic. Does
a government shutdown, if one were to occur two weeks
(14:08):
from now, cause a kind of blowback that changes the
political standing that Trump and Republicans have right now. To me,
it sort of feels like that moment when Wiley Coyote
shoots off the cliff and you can see that he's
about the fall, but it hasn't happened yet, and maybe
it won't. Maybe Trump can pull it off and do
something magical. But the takeaway I had from last night
really was that he hasn't changed his views, his plans,
(14:32):
or his intentions at all over the first two months
of his presidency and wants to kind of keep plowing
ahead and exactly the direction that he said he would.
Speaker 1 (14:41):
All right, thanks so much for joining all's pleasure. This
is the big take DC from Bloomberg News. I'm sale Emosion.
This episode was produced by Julia Press. It was edited
by Aaron Edwards and Justin sink. It was fact checked
by Audriana Tapia and mixed and designed by Alex Suguira.
(15:02):
Our senior producer is Naomi Shaven and our senior editor
is Elizabeth Ponso. Our executive producer is Nicole Beamster Bower.
Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts. If you like
this episode, make sure to subscribe and review The Big
Take DC Wherever you listen to podcasts, it helps people
find the show. Thanks for listening.
Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. On Tuesday night, President
Donald Trump appeared before a joint session of Congress for
the first time since the start of his second term.
He used the speech to deliver a message, we.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
Have accomplished more in forty three days, and most administrations
accomplished in four years or eight years, and we are
just getting started.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
It felt like an indoor Maga rally, with tons of
cheering and pandering and boasting from Donald Trump and a
lot of angry protesting from Democrats.
Speaker 1 (00:40):
Josh Green is a senior correspondent for Bloomberg BusinessWeek.
Speaker 3 (00:44):
No music and no dancing, but plenty of fireworks, you know,
security scuffle, Democrats getting dragged out. Mister Green, take your seat,
Take your seat, sir, take your seat, Remove this gentleman
from the chamber. I mean, it really did remind me
of a Trump rally, but it was a partisan speech,
(01:04):
sneering and making fun of his opponents and basically dancing
on their electoral grave as he boasted about all the
things that he's done in his first few weeks in office.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
We just talked about the spectacle was their substance last night.
Speaker 3 (01:16):
I didn't feel like there's a whole lot of new substance.
Trump definitely ticked through the things that he's done in
the early days, whether it's closing down the borders or
blowing up a lot of DEI programs, shutting agencies like USAID.
But I didn't hear a lot that was new, and
that surprised me a little bit. I also didn't hear
a lot about the economy, which I expected would be
more of a focal point of the speech.
Speaker 1 (01:38):
And it was not from Bloomberg's Washington bureau. This is
the Big Take DC podcast. I'm Salia Molsen today on
the show Trump's fifth Joint Address to Congress, Josh Green
and I explore what the president's speech reveals about how
(01:58):
he's approaching his second from his vision for trade in
the US economy to America's role in geopolitics. So you
and I covered the first term really closely, so we
know that in an instant Trump can undo something that
he's planned. Based on what we heard last night, what
(02:18):
do you think were some of the top foreign policy
points that he is trying to focus on for his
second term.
Speaker 3 (02:24):
Well, it didn't sound to me like he was wavering
or about to change his mind on ending the war
in Ukraine. I mean, he campaigned on bringing what he
called peace to Ukraine. Had a big blow up with
Zelenski in the Oval office.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Earlier today, I received an important letter from President Zelenski
of Ukraine. The letter raids Ukraine is ready to come
to the negotiating table as soon as possible to bring
lasting peace Closer.
Speaker 3 (02:50):
To me, he just sort of continued the themes that
he talked about in the campaign. If I'm going to
bring peace quickly, We're not going to waste American treasure abroad.
European allies are going to have to step up.
Speaker 2 (03:00):
It's hard to believe that they wouldn't have stopped it
and said at some point, come on, let's equalize. You
got to be equal to us.
Speaker 3 (03:06):
That's pretty much par for the course, I think, with
what people were expecting. So no curveballs there.
Speaker 1 (03:11):
So let's move on to something that Trump does tout
as a unique policy in as administration, tariffs. Josh, should
we get any substance or did we hear more? Just
managing a narrative.
Speaker 3 (03:20):
The whole speech to me felt like a public messaging campaign,
but definitely the lines about tariffs, like I'm hearing competing
messages from the Trump administration about what it is they
intend to do. I mean, Trump has been very straightforward about,
you know, he's imposing these new tariffs he did yesterday,
but other figures in administration like Howard Lutnik are making
noises about, well, you know, maybe we're going to roll
(03:41):
those back, maybe we're going to reduce them. And I
think trying to quell some of the market panic that
we've seen over the last week, it's mixed messages, is
not clear who is setting the tone here or who
investors should listen to, And I think that element of
chaos is going to help defeed a lot of the
market swings that we've seen literally day to day s
and p is up one and a half percent one day,
(04:04):
down one and a half percent the next, up on.
You know, it's just sort of a roller coaster ride
that doesn't show any signs to me off slowing down
anytime soon. What stood out the most to me, though,
was that Trump did concede just a tiny bit that
there's gonna be economic.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
Pain, there'll be a little disturbance, But.
Speaker 3 (04:20):
Then he followed up with the very Trumpian line, Oh
but we're not bothered by that, or we don't care
about that.
Speaker 2 (04:25):
But we're okay with that. It won't be much well.
Speaker 3 (04:29):
I think that remains to be seen whether Americans care
or not, because there's a lot of indications in the
polls already the consumers are unhappy with inflation. They don't
think Trump is focused on the economy and a new
regiment of tariffs that royals the economy and increase his prices.
I think is not going to go down politically as
well as Trump and some of his allies seed to
assume it will. I mean thematically. Trump has always been
(04:51):
consistent in telling the story about tariffs the most economists
would say is wrong. Trump believes they're a way to
generate ex geral revenue for the US government, that they
might replace income taxes, that they're a way that he
can kind of exert strength and power over global markets,
whereas most economists would say, well, all that's going to
do is create cost increases that are going to be
(05:12):
passed on the US consumers, which is the opposite of
what voters, especially voters who voted for Trump in November,
are looking for him to achieve. So I think one
of the reasons that markets have been royal too much,
that the entire Trump rally that we saw in the
weeks and months after his victory in November has all
been disappeared, is that there isn't any kind of clarity
(05:33):
on these issues, and Trump didn't provide a lot of
it last night.
Speaker 1 (05:36):
So was there anything that surprised you about Trump's speech?
Speaker 3 (05:38):
Yeah, that really was. I think the thing that jumped
out to me most of all was how much he
focused right from the get go on culture war issues
and not the economic issues that, to me are the
biggest questions of the creatoring stock market. The new tariff
regimes he instituted just hours before the speech or sure
on the back burner for Trump, And as I thought
(05:59):
about it, it seems to me that's because the stuff that
Trump is able to do unilaterally and successfully, things like saying,
according to government, there are only two genders. You know,
we're going to wipe out DEI, We're going to win
this war on woke. There are fights that he can
draw and fight and win on his own terms that
Democrats can't stop, and that the public, at least accordion polls,
is largely supportive of, whereas if the discussion were about
(06:22):
inflation or grocery prices or the price of eggs, which
have doubled since last year. Trump doesn't really have that
much good news to point to, and instead what he
did was for fallback on blaming Biden and the Biden
administration over and over and over again for a lot
of the economic problems that he and his administration have
not yet been able to solve.
Speaker 1 (06:40):
We'll dig into economic issues, and what we learned about
is proposed solutions. After the break, I've been talking to
Bloomberg Senior correspondent Josh Green about the policy substance that
came through and Trump's joint address to Congress on Tuesday night.
(07:01):
I asked Josh about the issues facing the US economy, inflation,
the expiration of Trump's twenty seventeen tax cuts, and the deficit.
We heard a lot yesterday where Trump was blaming former
President Joe Biden for inflation problems and any other cracks
in the current state of the economy.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
Joe Biden especially let the price of eggs get out
of control.
Speaker 1 (07:24):
Which is interesting because it was actually pretty strong. Yes,
there were problems, but we're not in a recession. Growth
has been strong inflation is the biggest problem. At what
point is it no longer Biden's economy. It is Trump's
economy and he can't really blame the last guy.
Speaker 3 (07:39):
Yeah, it's a good question. I mean my kind of
like got sense just having been a creature of Washington
for so many years and lived through so many presidential
administrations that you get about six months and after that,
memories fade. People aren't thinking about the last guy, and
they start to get grumpy and unhappy, and talking to
some Trump advisors and people around him, that's the rough
(08:00):
timeline I think that they're looking at. I had these
discussions less in terms of like tariffs and economic policy
and more in terms of foreign policy. A number of
Trump's advisors were pushing him to move forward on a
peace deal over Ukraine sooner rather than later. Originally, I
think the timeline had been to do something in Saudi
Arabia and May, and a lot of Trump advisors I
(08:21):
spoke to at the Times that that's too late. By
that point, Ukraine will be Trump's problem, not Biden's problem,
and we want to do something sooner, and we saw
that begin to happen. I think the same timeline basically
holds in economic issues too, that if we don't see
inflation and grocery prices come down, and certainly if we
see them begin to rise as a reaction to tariffs,
(08:43):
then I think Trump is going to have a really
difficult political problem because at the end of the day,
he's a powerful president with a Republican Congress, but his
margin in the House is three seats, and midterm elections
are looming, and it's one.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
Of those rare moments where Americans are paying attention to
what the government's doing because it's directly hitting their wallets.
The other one is it is tax filing season. The
minute there is any kind of snapfoo in Americans getting
their tax refunds, that could cost some problems and unhappiness
too that could emerge in polls and in economic data.
So let's talk about DOGE, which Trump talked about a lot.
(09:19):
All the so called waste that DOGE has apparently found.
We don't know how much of what Trump said of
how many millions or maybe billions have been cut is accurate.
That's what DOGE is saying. Bloomberg's reported that, for example,
dough sometimes double or triple accounts contracts that it cuts.
They're claiming to cut fifty five billion dollars in governments spending.
(09:41):
Our reporting found that their cuts actually total less than
nine billion dollars. What is all this cutting supposed to
add up to.
Speaker 3 (09:48):
If you looked at the speech last night, especially it's
on Doge, I think a lot of it is performative.
The bottom line budgetary numbers, the size of the cuts
are quite small in comparison both to the size of
this federal budget and to the two trillion dollars that
Elon Musk originally said he would be able to cut
from the budget. If we're talking about nine billion dollars
(10:10):
or even fifty five billion dollars, which seems to have
been an inflated Doze figure, this is a drop in
the ocean when it comes to the federal budget. And
yet doge in Elon's actions and his cuts and his
assaults on various agencies have really been the main story
of the second Trump administration over the last six or
eight weeks. From a kind of public messaging the standpoint,
(10:31):
it's interesting because again, if you look at polls, people
are generally pretty happy with the idea that there's a
doze out there, that's attacking government waste. But if it
begins to cut things like the IRS and it slows
down Taxtra funds, or his Democrats have been suggesting, it
breaks the Social Security payment system and suddenly old ladies
(10:52):
don't get their Social Security checks, then I think there's
going to be a backlash, a serious political packlash. But
that hasn't happened yet, and so in the meantime, I
think those serves for Trump as a kind of illustration
of all the things that he is doing and cutting.
And I thought one of the most effective passages in
his speech was when he ticked through descriptions of some
(11:13):
of the programs that Elon Musk had zeroed out.
Speaker 2 (11:17):
Just listen to some of the appalling waste. We have
already identified twenty two billion dollars from HHS to provide
free housing and cars for illegal aliens.
Speaker 3 (11:31):
DEI initiatives, and obscure African countries that Trump claimed he'd
never heard.
Speaker 2 (11:35):
Of, eight million dollars to promote LGBTQI plus in the
African nation of Lesuto, which nobody has ever heard of.
Speaker 3 (11:46):
It was an effective bit of theater, I think, to
sort of illustrate to an ordinary viewer who isn't following
this stuff at any kind of a clinical level, that
the government is full of expensive, wasteful programs and that
Donald Trump and on Musk are going in there and
slashing them in a way that will ultimately benefit the
US economy and help with their pocketbook issues. I think
(12:07):
connecting those actual dots and seeing an effect on the economy,
on unemployment, on inflation, on people's kind of day to
day earning power isn't going to be easy to do
because I'm not sure there is going to be much
of one.
Speaker 1 (12:19):
When he was taking through the list of cuts, it
was millions. The national deficit is thirty six trillion dollars, so,
like you're saying, it is a drop in the ocean.
He's talked about extending some of the twenty seventeen tax cuts,
but he's also said I want to bring down the deficit.
Is that math going to add up? Can Doge fine
enough save inches to make up for all of the
budget ads, you know, taxes and other programs that he
(12:41):
wants to bring in.
Speaker 3 (12:42):
Yeah, I really don't see how it can, especially given
what we've seen from Doge in these early weeks and months,
where we're talking about, you know, ten billion dollars or
twenty billion dollars, that's not enough to kind of create
budgetary savings that would pay for any kind of a
tax cut. Trump is an administration have a lot of
balls in the air in terms of claims. They've made,
(13:03):
promises they made about what they're going to deliver, including
last night, But they haven't passed a budget deal. They
haven't ironed out what's going to be in the tax cut,
they haven't ironed out how they're going to pay for
the tax cut, and at the end of the day,
those numbers have to pencil out.
Speaker 1 (13:18):
So let's wrap up what we learned from last night.
What's your biggest takeaway of what the next almost four
years will look like.
Speaker 3 (13:26):
The biggest takeaway from me is that Trump isn't backing
down at all from any of his campaign promises. That
he is charging ahead, even as there are clear signs
in the economy, in the stock market, and public polls
that people are beginning to have a lot of trepidation
about how he's proceeding in what it is that he's doing.
So the big question for me, I would say, over
(13:48):
the next six months to a year is is something
important going to break our Social Security payments suddenly going
to disappear? Is you know the a BULLA team that
Elon Musk cuts a doge suddenly going to have a
catastrophic effect if there's some kind of new pandemic. Does
a government shutdown, if one were to occur two weeks
(14:08):
from now, cause a kind of blowback that changes the
political standing that Trump and Republicans have right now. To me,
it sort of feels like that moment when Wiley Coyote
shoots off the cliff and you can see that he's
about the fall, but it hasn't happened yet, and maybe
it won't. Maybe Trump can pull it off and do
something magical. But the takeaway I had from last night
really was that he hasn't changed his views, his plans,
(14:32):
or his intentions at all over the first two months
of his presidency and wants to kind of keep plowing
ahead and exactly the direction that he said he would.
Speaker 1 (14:41):
All right, thanks so much for joining all's pleasure. This
is the big take DC from Bloomberg News. I'm sale Emosion.
This episode was produced by Julia Press. It was edited
by Aaron Edwards and Justin sink. It was fact checked
by Audriana Tapia and mixed and designed by Alex Suguira.
(15:02):
Our senior producer is Naomi Shaven and our senior editor
is Elizabeth Ponso. Our executive producer is Nicole Beamster Bower.
Sage Bauman is Bloomberg's head of podcasts. If you like
this episode, make sure to subscribe and review The Big
Take DC Wherever you listen to podcasts, it helps people
find the show. Thanks for listening.
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.