October 7, 2024 • 25 mins
This week Cal talks about messy state politics, bear attacks, noisy waters, and listener mail.
Connect with Cal and MeatEater
MeatEater on Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, and Youtube Clips
Subscribe to The MeatEater Podcast Network on YouTube
Shop Cal's Week in Review Merch
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:10):
From Meat Eaters World News headquarters in Bozeman, Montana. This
is Cow's Week in Review with Ryan cow Calai. Here's cal.
A nineteen year old duck hunter in Wisconsin, says he
and his hunting buddies were surrounded by wolves last weekend,
as he was forced to kill one with his twelve
gage shotgun. Chase Meltin told local outlet wjf W that
(00:34):
he and his friends had set up their blind and
decoys at a spot near Saint Germain and we're waiting
for the ducks to arrive. But as daylight started to break,
one of Melton's hunting partners saw what he thought was
a deer. When Meltain looked closer, he realized the silhouetted
animal was actually a wolf. Melton and his friends tried
to make noise to scare the canines away, but they
didn't budge. One got within five yards of the trio,
(00:56):
and another nearby hunter told local media that he saw
fire five wolves around the blind and four more in
the area. Melton kept as cool until one of the
wolves came towards them and didn't stop. The young hunter
says he didn't want to shoot the wolf, but he
felt like he and his friends were in danger, so
he took his shotgun loaded with waterfowl shot I'm assuming
steal number twos eh maybe and hit the wolf in
(01:19):
the face at close range. The Wisconsin dn R confirmed
in an email with meat Eater that Meltain killed the
wolf and called game wardens right away. Biologists arrived on
the scene later that morning, and they say the investigation
is ongoing. Since wolves are still listed as federally endangered
in Wisconsin, that investigation will involve the US Fish and
Wildlife Service and will let you know if we hear
(01:41):
any updates. Meanwhile, the incident has sparked quite a debate
among outdoor folks in Wisconsin, some of which you can
see for yourself in the comments section of this article
over at the meat eater dot com. Wisconsin deer hunters
aren't happy with how wolves are being managed in their state,
and many blame wolves for load deer numbers up nor
What's more, twenty hunting dogs have been killed by wolves
(02:03):
so far this year, and another seven have been injured.
The DNR estimates that there are nearly one thousand wolves
in Wisconsin, the majority of which are located in the
northern third of the state. The agency says they don't
have any records of a wolf killing or injuring a person,
though they frequently kill livestock and pets. This week we've
got noises, elections, inde or near death experience, and so
(02:28):
much more. But first I'm going to tell you about
my week, and my week well, it's interesting as always.
Last night I attended a political event highlighting the value
of Montana's stream access law. A panel of speakers with
various ties and viewpoints to stream access spoke, and then
(02:48):
in an ideal world, we'd have had all candidates running
for office show up and reassure us that Montana's stream
access law is something that is so valuable to voters
in my mind, and tourists who spend money with Montana
businesses that fear not stream access is not a bargaining chip.
(03:09):
But instead of that happening, only the Democratic Canada's showed up,
which is great that they took advantage of this opportunity
because it is such kind of like a ride or
die Montana issue, But it greatly frustrates me that we
didn't get everybody there. Now to give you some inside
Montana perspective on the politics in the state. By and large,
(03:31):
our Democrats are fairly conservative, and although the Republican Party
platform clearly states that the Montana Republican Party supports relinquishing
federally managed public lands to the states in order to
secure statehood equality and provide for better management of public lands,
we support the granting of federally managed public lands to
(03:52):
the state and development of a transition plan for the
timely and orderly transfer. Any lands transferred from the federal
government to the state shall be administered for the purpose
in which they are conveyed, while maintaining public access and usage.
We support the release of expired wilderness study areas. We
support maintaining and increasing access within federal lands in Montana.
(04:14):
Even though that's the Republican Party platform, most Montana Republicans
know that the overwhelming majority of Montanas do not support
land transfer and hold our federally managed public lands as
one of our greatest assets. In fact, increasingly so, as
everything else in the state has gotten so damned expensive
(04:35):
that us normal Montana kids are basically only going to
have federally managed public lands. It's a don't mess with
this type of issue in the state, and I gotta say, unfortunately,
you don't see a lot of Republicans trying to increase
access to federal lands through corner crossing, which would be
like the easiest of the low hanging fruit if they
were serious about that part of the Republican platform too.
(04:58):
Now that being said, the vast majority of Republicans in
the state, even though that's part of the Republican platform,
they do not push that issue because it's just a
non starter with again, the overwhelming majority of voters in
this state. Right How they justify living under that platform,
(05:20):
I don't know. Is it kind of like having a
dearly loved, well intentioned, charitable, yet kind of racist old
person in your family where you occasionally have to say, hey,
ignore them. They're truly quite nice, they love everybody. They
just come from an age where they can't not use
(05:41):
certain racist colloquialisms. I don't know. I do know that
there's an example out there. Our incumbent United States Representative
Ryan Zinki did break quite famously with the Republican Party
over the inclusion of that land transfer language in the
Republican Party platform, which is a very classy thing to do.
(06:04):
So that example does exist. Out there. But to go
back to last night, I was impressed with all the speakers.
They did a great job. In particular, there's a gentleman
there who did take the time to remind everybody that
even if you weren't going to vote for somebody who
was there last night, it's your job to hold your
elected officials accountable, whether they're a Democrat or Republican, an
(06:28):
independent or whatever. Our job is to hold those people accountable,
to get them to vote correctly, to act correctly in
our best interests. And that's whether you vote for them
or not after election day, right, So that is something
worth bringing up. I'm going to keep bringing it up.
(06:48):
Our job never ends gang whether you vote for him
or not. The onus is on us to call rite
in and say, hey, this is what's important. You better
act accordingly. Moving on to the noise complaint desk. If
you've ever felt like our modern world is just too noisy,
(07:08):
you're not alone. Killer whales are with you. A new
study published in the scientific journal Global Change Biology has
found that vessel noise can significantly hamper a killer whale's
ability to find and capture food. Orcas, which is the
more friendly name for killer whales use echolocation to see
their prey. This is the same biological technology that bats
(07:29):
used to fly in the dark. They emit high frequency clicks,
and that sound bounces off objects and tells the whales
where they are located. Scientists wanted to know whether the
rumble and churn from ocean going vessels might disrupt this ability.
Not surprisingly, it does. They attached sensors to the whales
that recorded their movements as well as the sounds the
whales made and heard. For every one decibel increase in
(07:53):
maximum noise level, there is a four percent increase in
the odds of searching for prey by both sexes, a
fifty eight percent decrease in the odds of pursuit by females,
in a twelve and a half percent decrease in the
odds of prey capture by both sexes. In other words,
the noisier the ocean got, the more difficult it was
for the whales to capture prey. Females with calves tended
(08:15):
to delay hunting until the ocean quieted down, while males
tried to push through the noise but weren't as successful.
This is obviously a bigger problem in areas with high
boat traffic, but whales often hunt near the coast where
these boats also travel. Whether any regulatory changes occur as
the result of this study is unlikely, but it offers
another important data point as we work to live alongside
(08:38):
the animals that make the natural world so darn cool.
Moving on to the solar desk. A few months ago,
I told you about a new proposal by the Bureau
of Land Management to open up more acreage to solar
farms and streamline the approval process. Many of you express
concern about this proposal because solar panels aren't great wildlife habitat.
(09:00):
You wondered about the location of these farms and whether
they would interfere with wild species or migration routes. We
can speculate about this all day, but the only way
we're going to know or have a chance to impact
the situation is by keeping an eye on the BLM.
The good news is that as a federal agency, they
have to give the public notice about much of what
they do. Last week, that's exactly what the BLM did.
(09:23):
They submitted for public comment a rule that would set
aside just over eleven five hundred acres in Lapause County
in western Arizona for three solar farm projects. The Scoro
Solar Project would take up about four thousand acres, the
Parker Solar Project would take up about two thousand acres,
and the Eagle Eyed Solar Project would take up about
fifty six hundred acres. Under this rule, these acres will
(09:47):
be segregated from the operation of public land laws. This
basically means the BLM won't be approving any new uses
for the next two years while they study whether or
not these areas would make good solar farms. Whether or
not hunt and anglers should support or repose these solar
farms is best determined by the people who live there.
Looking at satellite images of these areas, they appear to
(10:08):
be a desert environment located near Interstate ten. They aren't
the kind of lush habitat hunters and anglers worry will
be covered with solar panels. But then again, I don't
live there. Local residents probably know something I don't. This
county is home to part of the Kafa and Sebela
National Wildlife Refuges. Maybe these solar farms will harm the
(10:28):
wildlife in these areas. Maybe not. But if you live
in Lapause County. You'll want to weigh in. We'll post
a link over at the meat eater dot com forward
slash col where you can comment. Moving on to the
pandemic desk. Whitetail seasons are ramping up in states across
the country, but Indiana is seeing an unusually high number
(10:49):
of dead deer, and not from arrows or bullets. The
Indiana Department of Natural Resources reports that a quote significant
EHD event is affecting Allen, Porter, and Wabash Counties. EHD
stands for epizootic camorrhagic disease, as a viral disease that
mainly affects whitetail. Is most often found in Midwestern states
(11:10):
and is spread by a biting insect called imidge. Now
this gets conflated with blue tongue all the time. EHD
and blue tongue are slightly different. Real close cases pop
up in Indiana every year, but some outbreaks are more
severe than others. As of the middle of last month,
the DNR had received one hundred and three reports of
dead or sick deer in Allen County, two hundred and
(11:31):
seventy nine reports in Porter County, and one hundred and
twenty two reports in Wabash County. The problem has gotten
so bad that the DNR has decided to lower the
bonus antlerless deer quotas from two to one in the
affected counties to offset the losses from EHD. In Porter County,
the Northwest Indiana Paddling Association actually called off a canoe
(11:52):
trip on the east branch of the Little Calumet River
because event organizers had found dozens of deer carcasses along
the river. Deer that can train EHD often have a fever,
so they seek water to drink and try to cool off.
They're often found floating in rivers and lakes, and hunters
that kill deer with EHD often do so near water.
Biologists with the DNR are quick to point out that
(12:13):
even though this year's outbreak in these counties is bad,
it's not as bad as a twenty twenty two outbreak
in Franklin County. That year, the agency received three hundred
and forty five reports of sick or dead deer in
a county with only twenty three thousand residents. After the
deer season was over, the DNR estimated a seventy percent
reduction in the country's deer population, with EHD responsible for
(12:35):
about sixty percent of the reduction. The good news is
that deer populations can bounce back from these outbreaks, especially
with some timely management decisions. Hunters also don't have to
worry about contracting EHD from an infected deer, so the
meat is still edible. Reports of infections usually die down
as the weather gets colder, in the insects that spread
the virus die big. Thanks to listener Harry Wainwright for
(12:58):
sending us that story. Moving on to the bear attack Desk,
a third archery hunter this big game season has been
attacked by a grizzly bear, this time in Wyoming. The
Cowboys State Daily reports that Land and Clement and some
friends were hunting elk in a remote area of the
Upper Green River basin last week. Clement had set up
(13:20):
near a large boulder where he believed the elk might
walk by within bow range. He'd only been sitting there
a few minutes when he heard and saw three bears
coming down the hill from above him. They hadn't smelled
or seen him, and so the thirty one year old
hoped the sow and two cubs would keep walking past.
They almost did. The bears were only about ten yards
away and still hadn't seen him. Clement had his ten
(13:40):
millimeter glock pistol unholstered and pointed towards the bears, but
he didn't fire because he wasn't sure if the bears
would attack. Unfortunately, even having the weapon trained at the
bear before it charged wasn't enough to stop it. The
sow charged Clement and sank her teeth into his left thigh.
He managed to get off a few rounds as the
bear charged, but as gripped his leg and began to
(14:01):
shake him like a rag doll, he realized his pistol
wasn't firing. It had jammed, and the bear was still alive. Incredibly,
Clement told the Cowboys State Daily that he managed to
clear the jam even with the six hundred pound animal
on top of him. Once I cleared the jam, I
put the gun as close to its head as I
could and shot a couple more times. He said, it
let go and rolled off me. I knew that I
(14:21):
had killed that bear. With the bear dead and the
adrenaline still pumping, Clement staggered down the mountain, calling for help.
His hunting buddies weren't far away, and before long one
of them found him leaning against a tree. They helped
him walk for more than a mile before they reached
a place where he could get into a side by side.
He was treated at the Pinedale Clinic and is expected
to make a full recovery. Clement, who is from North
(14:42):
Georgia but travels to Wyoming frequently to hunt, hasn't had
great luck with gris. In a close encounter during another hunt,
he says a griz came within fifteen yards of him
and looked him right in the eyes. It either wasn't
scared enough to attack or had better things to do,
because it ran away. In a different incident, Clement and
his father were charged by grizzly as they were walking
out from a hunt and knocked Clement to the ground,
(15:05):
but kept running and didn't come back. To have three
close encounters with adult grizzlies might sound unlucky, but there's
a glass half full way to look at this. Clement
is still alive after all three incidents, and he has
even more reasons to believe he has some kind of
divine protection. As he was stumbling down the mountain after
his latest attack, He looked down at his handgun and
(15:25):
realized it had jammed again, which means he got a
couple lucky rounds out in between his jams. He might
want to invest in a different handgun moving forward, but
he can see why he thinks that luck is on
his side. All three bear attacks on archery hunters this
year have followed a similar storyline. In Idaho, a hunter
was bitten by a grizz but only sustained non life
(15:46):
threatening injuries after he and his hunting partner killed it
with their handguns. Same story in Montana, where two hunters
shot and killed a sow and injured a cub with
pistol rounds after the adult female charged him. Hard to say, gang,
whether or not bear spray would have been a better choice,
or standing up and making sure that those bears knew
you were there as soon as you saw him hindsight,
(16:07):
which is always twenty twenty. Moving on to an extended
edition of the mail Bag Desk. Lots of good emails
from listeners this week, and I wanted to highlight a
couple first. Scott Baker wrote in with some thoughts on
the new Michigan deer hunting rules. We covered last week
for those who didn't listen, the Natural Resources Commission for
the Minton State decided to prohibit hunters in the youth
(16:30):
and disabled hunting seasons from taking antler deer, but Scott
doesn't by their reasoning. He points out that in twenty
twenty three, only five one hundred and thirty three bucks
were taken during the Youth, Liberty and Independence hunts, which
represents just three point three percent of the total bucks
harvested across Michigan. The idea that making this change would
(16:50):
increase the dough harvest, which is what the commission hoped
to do, seems a little less reasonable in the light
of these numbers. The rule might not impact the deer herd,
but Syott believes it will impact the people these hunts
were designed to help. He writes, quote for Liberty and
Independence hunters, many are veterans dealing with post war physical
or mental injuries, and the ability to harvest a buck
(17:12):
can be a deeply meaningful experience. For young, mentored hunters,
being able to shoot a buck can create lifelong memories
and inspire a passion for the outdoors and wildlife conservation.
As a father of three, this was a big blow
to the younger hunters in our family, none of which
have begged a trophy buck during the youth season. Big
thanks to Scott for taking the time to write in
(17:33):
and share his thoughts. If you live in Michigan and
have a different take, feel free to write in askcall
at the meeater dot com. Listener Justin Young wrote in
with some concerning news out of Illinois. A real estate
developer in the town of Alton is pushing to transform
the town's Mississippi riverfront into a tourist destination, complete with
(17:55):
kayak rentals, bike paths, restaurants, and of course, pickleball courts.
That probably doesn't sound too bad for residents of the
Saint Louis suburb, but the developer isn't stopping there. Leaders
of the outfit known as Alton Works are pushing the
federal government to create the Great Rivers National Park along
the waterway. They say creating a national park along the
same riverfront they want to develop would drive even more
(18:18):
investment and growth and turn Alton, Illinois into a real
tourist destination. Problem is, according to Justin, the plan right
now would see this national park absorb one hundred and
thirty five thousand acres and one hundred and forty four
miles of shoreline along the Mississippi, Missouri, and Illinois rivers.
He says, quote almost every community along the river has
(18:40):
spoken out against this proposal for the national park. The
major issue is the loss of hunting and fishing rights
on the rivers and the already established public land under
state control. Justin acknowledges that some national parks allow hunting
and fishing, though most do not, and he's not opposed
to a national park in general, but he doesn't like
the idea of a big developer coming in and dictating
(19:01):
how these acres should be used. Quote. The surrounding communities
are fearful that our voices will not be heard in
this matter. We do not want this company to come
in and raise land prices, take our hunting rights, and
change our way of life. It's worth noting that, according
to on X, seventy five of the total four hundred
and nineteen units managed by the National Park Service allows
(19:23):
some form of recreational subsistence or tribal hunting. In terms
of size, However, those seventy five units make up sixty
percent of the National Park system. It's unclear right now
what the regulations would look like in this new national park,
especially since some of the acres are controlled by the state.
I don't know the ins and outs of public land
hunting in this area, so I'm going to reserve judgment
(19:44):
until i learn more. But I will say on its
face that using a federal land designation to make your
real estate project more profitable does sound like a money
maker for you. The Alton Works founders, a couple named
Jane and John Simmons, have on their website a photo
of themselves with Illinois Governor JB. Pritzker, who attended their
company's ribbon cutting ceremony. If the governor attends your ribbon
(20:05):
cutting ceremony, you have some serious political influence. We'll see
if these developers can turn that political influence into a
national park. But if you like to hunt and fish
in the Saint Louis area, this is one you'll want
to pay attention to. Big thanks to Justin for sending
this one in. A few weeks ago, I asked my
Minnesota listeners to let me know if they go Upland
(20:26):
bird hunting and participate in the state's bird hunting Diary initiative.
This initiative is asking upland hunters to keep detailed logs
of their observations so the state can have more robust
information on the bird populations. I'm happy to say that
listener Mike Eaton answered the call. He went hunting in
northern Minnesota with a fellow firefighter and new hunter named Bradford.
(20:49):
Mike said the theme of the weekend was quote fair
opportunity and minimal success. That describes a lot of upland
grouse hunting in my experience, but the pair was still
able to bag a few rough grouse. Mike also sent
me a copy of the diary he filled out for
the Minnesota DNR. He recorded where he was, whether the
land was public or private, his target species, how long
he hunted, how many times he flushed a bird, how
(21:11):
old the birds were, and a few other data points.
It doesn't look like it took too much time, and
when the DNR collects all that info from hunters across
the state, they'll have a much deeper understanding of how
upland species are doing. Big Atta Boy goes out to
Mike and Bradford and any other Minnesota hunters who took
time to give back and make sure the DNR has
(21:32):
what they need to make good management decisions. Because you
participated in citizen science, you're going out there anyway and
you're helping the resource. It's amazing. Join these folks who
are in the lead right now for a new final
rise upland bird vest and remember, I'm gonna throw in
some awesome FHF cal Amo pouches too. Lastly, to circle
(21:58):
back with a Paul politics related email, and this one
is about the Montana Stream Access rally. I enjoyed the event,
but it has me once again grappling with the intersection
of partisan politics and conservation. Our elected officials obviously have
a huge impact on conservation, land access, and many other
issues important to outdoorsmen and women. Politics and these issues
(22:23):
are not mutually exclusive. However, in today's heated political climate,
it feels harder and harder to engage friends and family
in conversations around issues impacting hunters and anglers. People often
share a common stance on the issues, but as soon
as political candidates get involved, they shut down. What advice
(22:44):
do you have for navigating conversations around conservation with other
passionate outdoor recreationists in a way that is productive but
doesn't enable politics to be an elephant in the room.
It's a great question, you know, off and we say
policy not politics. And the way we lose right is
(23:05):
by saying, oh, you voted for that person by default
or de facto you agree with their policy because you've
voted for them. That's definitely not how it works. We
can vote for different people. Unfortunately, in my opinion my
view here, like party line voting is crazy and ineffective
in a lot of ways, but policies do matter, and
(23:30):
where you can meet in the middle, even if you're
diametrically opposed with who to vote for. Right is agreement
on policy like what should happen, And when we're talking
about outdoor recreation, hunting, fishing, we agree on so much
more than we disagree on. And when you part ways
with whoever you're speaking with, the agreement that you need
(23:53):
to have Right is like we're going to both lobby
on behalf of this policy. I or you may come
at it from a hey, I didn't vote for you,
but like it or not, you represent me. This is
an area that I need you to step up on,
or you're saying, hey, I did vote for you. I
am in support of you on these other issues. But
(24:16):
right here you are crossing the line. You're not getting it.
Do not do this, and that's just kind of like
the simple fact of how this stuff works. And you
got to be consistent, and you got to participate. You
don't weigh in, you can't wrestle. That's all I got
for you this week. Thank you so much for listening.
Remember to write in to ask c. A L. That's
(24:38):
ask Cal at the Meat Eater dot com and let
me know what's going on in your neck of the woods.
Thanks again, talk to you next week.
From Meat Eaters World News headquarters in Bozeman, Montana. This
is Cow's Week in Review with Ryan cow Calai. Here's cal.
A nineteen year old duck hunter in Wisconsin, says he
and his hunting buddies were surrounded by wolves last weekend,
as he was forced to kill one with his twelve
gage shotgun. Chase Meltin told local outlet wjf W that
(00:34):
he and his friends had set up their blind and
decoys at a spot near Saint Germain and we're waiting
for the ducks to arrive. But as daylight started to break,
one of Melton's hunting partners saw what he thought was
a deer. When Meltain looked closer, he realized the silhouetted
animal was actually a wolf. Melton and his friends tried
to make noise to scare the canines away, but they
didn't budge. One got within five yards of the trio,
(00:56):
and another nearby hunter told local media that he saw
fire five wolves around the blind and four more in
the area. Melton kept as cool until one of the
wolves came towards them and didn't stop. The young hunter
says he didn't want to shoot the wolf, but he
felt like he and his friends were in danger, so
he took his shotgun loaded with waterfowl shot I'm assuming
steal number twos eh maybe and hit the wolf in
(01:19):
the face at close range. The Wisconsin dn R confirmed
in an email with meat Eater that Meltain killed the
wolf and called game wardens right away. Biologists arrived on
the scene later that morning, and they say the investigation
is ongoing. Since wolves are still listed as federally endangered
in Wisconsin, that investigation will involve the US Fish and
Wildlife Service and will let you know if we hear
(01:41):
any updates. Meanwhile, the incident has sparked quite a debate
among outdoor folks in Wisconsin, some of which you can
see for yourself in the comments section of this article
over at the meat eater dot com. Wisconsin deer hunters
aren't happy with how wolves are being managed in their state,
and many blame wolves for load deer numbers up nor
What's more, twenty hunting dogs have been killed by wolves
(02:03):
so far this year, and another seven have been injured.
The DNR estimates that there are nearly one thousand wolves
in Wisconsin, the majority of which are located in the
northern third of the state. The agency says they don't
have any records of a wolf killing or injuring a person,
though they frequently kill livestock and pets. This week we've
got noises, elections, inde or near death experience, and so
(02:28):
much more. But first I'm going to tell you about
my week, and my week well, it's interesting as always.
Last night I attended a political event highlighting the value
of Montana's stream access law. A panel of speakers with
various ties and viewpoints to stream access spoke, and then
(02:48):
in an ideal world, we'd have had all candidates running
for office show up and reassure us that Montana's stream
access law is something that is so valuable to voters
in my mind, and tourists who spend money with Montana
businesses that fear not stream access is not a bargaining chip.
(03:09):
But instead of that happening, only the Democratic Canada's showed up,
which is great that they took advantage of this opportunity
because it is such kind of like a ride or
die Montana issue, But it greatly frustrates me that we
didn't get everybody there. Now to give you some inside
Montana perspective on the politics in the state. By and large,
(03:31):
our Democrats are fairly conservative, and although the Republican Party
platform clearly states that the Montana Republican Party supports relinquishing
federally managed public lands to the states in order to
secure statehood equality and provide for better management of public lands,
we support the granting of federally managed public lands to
(03:52):
the state and development of a transition plan for the
timely and orderly transfer. Any lands transferred from the federal
government to the state shall be administered for the purpose
in which they are conveyed, while maintaining public access and usage.
We support the release of expired wilderness study areas. We
support maintaining and increasing access within federal lands in Montana.
(04:14):
Even though that's the Republican Party platform, most Montana Republicans
know that the overwhelming majority of Montanas do not support
land transfer and hold our federally managed public lands as
one of our greatest assets. In fact, increasingly so, as
everything else in the state has gotten so damned expensive
(04:35):
that us normal Montana kids are basically only going to
have federally managed public lands. It's a don't mess with
this type of issue in the state, and I gotta say, unfortunately,
you don't see a lot of Republicans trying to increase
access to federal lands through corner crossing, which would be
like the easiest of the low hanging fruit if they
were serious about that part of the Republican platform too.
(04:58):
Now that being said, the vast majority of Republicans in
the state, even though that's part of the Republican platform,
they do not push that issue because it's just a
non starter with again, the overwhelming majority of voters in
this state. Right How they justify living under that platform,
(05:20):
I don't know. Is it kind of like having a
dearly loved, well intentioned, charitable, yet kind of racist old
person in your family where you occasionally have to say, hey,
ignore them. They're truly quite nice, they love everybody. They
just come from an age where they can't not use
(05:41):
certain racist colloquialisms. I don't know. I do know that
there's an example out there. Our incumbent United States Representative
Ryan Zinki did break quite famously with the Republican Party
over the inclusion of that land transfer language in the
Republican Party platform, which is a very classy thing to do.
(06:04):
So that example does exist. Out there. But to go
back to last night, I was impressed with all the speakers.
They did a great job. In particular, there's a gentleman
there who did take the time to remind everybody that
even if you weren't going to vote for somebody who
was there last night, it's your job to hold your
elected officials accountable, whether they're a Democrat or Republican, an
(06:28):
independent or whatever. Our job is to hold those people accountable,
to get them to vote correctly, to act correctly in
our best interests. And that's whether you vote for them
or not after election day, right, So that is something
worth bringing up. I'm going to keep bringing it up.
(06:48):
Our job never ends gang whether you vote for him
or not. The onus is on us to call rite
in and say, hey, this is what's important. You better
act accordingly. Moving on to the noise complaint desk. If
you've ever felt like our modern world is just too noisy,
(07:08):
you're not alone. Killer whales are with you. A new
study published in the scientific journal Global Change Biology has
found that vessel noise can significantly hamper a killer whale's
ability to find and capture food. Orcas, which is the
more friendly name for killer whales use echolocation to see
their prey. This is the same biological technology that bats
(07:29):
used to fly in the dark. They emit high frequency clicks,
and that sound bounces off objects and tells the whales
where they are located. Scientists wanted to know whether the
rumble and churn from ocean going vessels might disrupt this ability.
Not surprisingly, it does. They attached sensors to the whales
that recorded their movements as well as the sounds the
whales made and heard. For every one decibel increase in
(07:53):
maximum noise level, there is a four percent increase in
the odds of searching for prey by both sexes, a
fifty eight percent decrease in the odds of pursuit by females,
in a twelve and a half percent decrease in the
odds of prey capture by both sexes. In other words,
the noisier the ocean got, the more difficult it was
for the whales to capture prey. Females with calves tended
(08:15):
to delay hunting until the ocean quieted down, while males
tried to push through the noise but weren't as successful.
This is obviously a bigger problem in areas with high
boat traffic, but whales often hunt near the coast where
these boats also travel. Whether any regulatory changes occur as
the result of this study is unlikely, but it offers
another important data point as we work to live alongside
(08:38):
the animals that make the natural world so darn cool.
Moving on to the solar desk. A few months ago,
I told you about a new proposal by the Bureau
of Land Management to open up more acreage to solar
farms and streamline the approval process. Many of you express
concern about this proposal because solar panels aren't great wildlife habitat.
(09:00):
You wondered about the location of these farms and whether
they would interfere with wild species or migration routes. We
can speculate about this all day, but the only way
we're going to know or have a chance to impact
the situation is by keeping an eye on the BLM.
The good news is that as a federal agency, they
have to give the public notice about much of what
they do. Last week, that's exactly what the BLM did.
(09:23):
They submitted for public comment a rule that would set
aside just over eleven five hundred acres in Lapause County
in western Arizona for three solar farm projects. The Scoro
Solar Project would take up about four thousand acres, the
Parker Solar Project would take up about two thousand acres,
and the Eagle Eyed Solar Project would take up about
fifty six hundred acres. Under this rule, these acres will
(09:47):
be segregated from the operation of public land laws. This
basically means the BLM won't be approving any new uses
for the next two years while they study whether or
not these areas would make good solar farms. Whether or
not hunt and anglers should support or repose these solar
farms is best determined by the people who live there.
Looking at satellite images of these areas, they appear to
(10:08):
be a desert environment located near Interstate ten. They aren't
the kind of lush habitat hunters and anglers worry will
be covered with solar panels. But then again, I don't
live there. Local residents probably know something I don't. This
county is home to part of the Kafa and Sebela
National Wildlife Refuges. Maybe these solar farms will harm the
(10:28):
wildlife in these areas. Maybe not. But if you live
in Lapause County. You'll want to weigh in. We'll post
a link over at the meat eater dot com forward
slash col where you can comment. Moving on to the
pandemic desk. Whitetail seasons are ramping up in states across
the country, but Indiana is seeing an unusually high number
(10:49):
of dead deer, and not from arrows or bullets. The
Indiana Department of Natural Resources reports that a quote significant
EHD event is affecting Allen, Porter, and Wabash Counties. EHD
stands for epizootic camorrhagic disease, as a viral disease that
mainly affects whitetail. Is most often found in Midwestern states
(11:10):
and is spread by a biting insect called imidge. Now
this gets conflated with blue tongue all the time. EHD
and blue tongue are slightly different. Real close cases pop
up in Indiana every year, but some outbreaks are more
severe than others. As of the middle of last month,
the DNR had received one hundred and three reports of
dead or sick deer in Allen County, two hundred and
(11:31):
seventy nine reports in Porter County, and one hundred and
twenty two reports in Wabash County. The problem has gotten
so bad that the DNR has decided to lower the
bonus antlerless deer quotas from two to one in the
affected counties to offset the losses from EHD. In Porter County,
the Northwest Indiana Paddling Association actually called off a canoe
(11:52):
trip on the east branch of the Little Calumet River
because event organizers had found dozens of deer carcasses along
the river. Deer that can train EHD often have a fever,
so they seek water to drink and try to cool off.
They're often found floating in rivers and lakes, and hunters
that kill deer with EHD often do so near water.
Biologists with the DNR are quick to point out that
(12:13):
even though this year's outbreak in these counties is bad,
it's not as bad as a twenty twenty two outbreak
in Franklin County. That year, the agency received three hundred
and forty five reports of sick or dead deer in
a county with only twenty three thousand residents. After the
deer season was over, the DNR estimated a seventy percent
reduction in the country's deer population, with EHD responsible for
(12:35):
about sixty percent of the reduction. The good news is
that deer populations can bounce back from these outbreaks, especially
with some timely management decisions. Hunters also don't have to
worry about contracting EHD from an infected deer, so the
meat is still edible. Reports of infections usually die down
as the weather gets colder, in the insects that spread
the virus die big. Thanks to listener Harry Wainwright for
(12:58):
sending us that story. Moving on to the bear attack Desk,
a third archery hunter this big game season has been
attacked by a grizzly bear, this time in Wyoming. The
Cowboys State Daily reports that Land and Clement and some
friends were hunting elk in a remote area of the
Upper Green River basin last week. Clement had set up
(13:20):
near a large boulder where he believed the elk might
walk by within bow range. He'd only been sitting there
a few minutes when he heard and saw three bears
coming down the hill from above him. They hadn't smelled
or seen him, and so the thirty one year old
hoped the sow and two cubs would keep walking past.
They almost did. The bears were only about ten yards
away and still hadn't seen him. Clement had his ten
(13:40):
millimeter glock pistol unholstered and pointed towards the bears, but
he didn't fire because he wasn't sure if the bears
would attack. Unfortunately, even having the weapon trained at the
bear before it charged wasn't enough to stop it. The
sow charged Clement and sank her teeth into his left thigh.
He managed to get off a few rounds as the
bear charged, but as gripped his leg and began to
(14:01):
shake him like a rag doll, he realized his pistol
wasn't firing. It had jammed, and the bear was still alive. Incredibly,
Clement told the Cowboys State Daily that he managed to
clear the jam even with the six hundred pound animal
on top of him. Once I cleared the jam, I
put the gun as close to its head as I
could and shot a couple more times. He said, it
let go and rolled off me. I knew that I
(14:21):
had killed that bear. With the bear dead and the
adrenaline still pumping, Clement staggered down the mountain, calling for help.
His hunting buddies weren't far away, and before long one
of them found him leaning against a tree. They helped
him walk for more than a mile before they reached
a place where he could get into a side by side.
He was treated at the Pinedale Clinic and is expected
to make a full recovery. Clement, who is from North
(14:42):
Georgia but travels to Wyoming frequently to hunt, hasn't had
great luck with gris. In a close encounter during another hunt,
he says a griz came within fifteen yards of him
and looked him right in the eyes. It either wasn't
scared enough to attack or had better things to do,
because it ran away. In a different incident, Clement and
his father were charged by grizzly as they were walking
out from a hunt and knocked Clement to the ground,
(15:05):
but kept running and didn't come back. To have three
close encounters with adult grizzlies might sound unlucky, but there's
a glass half full way to look at this. Clement
is still alive after all three incidents, and he has
even more reasons to believe he has some kind of
divine protection. As he was stumbling down the mountain after
his latest attack, He looked down at his handgun and
(15:25):
realized it had jammed again, which means he got a
couple lucky rounds out in between his jams. He might
want to invest in a different handgun moving forward, but
he can see why he thinks that luck is on
his side. All three bear attacks on archery hunters this
year have followed a similar storyline. In Idaho, a hunter
was bitten by a grizz but only sustained non life
(15:46):
threatening injuries after he and his hunting partner killed it
with their handguns. Same story in Montana, where two hunters
shot and killed a sow and injured a cub with
pistol rounds after the adult female charged him. Hard to say, gang,
whether or not bear spray would have been a better choice,
or standing up and making sure that those bears knew
you were there as soon as you saw him hindsight,
(16:07):
which is always twenty twenty. Moving on to an extended
edition of the mail Bag Desk. Lots of good emails
from listeners this week, and I wanted to highlight a
couple first. Scott Baker wrote in with some thoughts on
the new Michigan deer hunting rules. We covered last week
for those who didn't listen, the Natural Resources Commission for
the Minton State decided to prohibit hunters in the youth
(16:30):
and disabled hunting seasons from taking antler deer, but Scott
doesn't by their reasoning. He points out that in twenty
twenty three, only five one hundred and thirty three bucks
were taken during the Youth, Liberty and Independence hunts, which
represents just three point three percent of the total bucks
harvested across Michigan. The idea that making this change would
(16:50):
increase the dough harvest, which is what the commission hoped
to do, seems a little less reasonable in the light
of these numbers. The rule might not impact the deer herd,
but Syott believes it will impact the people these hunts
were designed to help. He writes, quote for Liberty and
Independence hunters, many are veterans dealing with post war physical
or mental injuries, and the ability to harvest a buck
(17:12):
can be a deeply meaningful experience. For young, mentored hunters,
being able to shoot a buck can create lifelong memories
and inspire a passion for the outdoors and wildlife conservation.
As a father of three, this was a big blow
to the younger hunters in our family, none of which
have begged a trophy buck during the youth season. Big
thanks to Scott for taking the time to write in
(17:33):
and share his thoughts. If you live in Michigan and
have a different take, feel free to write in askcall
at the meeater dot com. Listener Justin Young wrote in
with some concerning news out of Illinois. A real estate
developer in the town of Alton is pushing to transform
the town's Mississippi riverfront into a tourist destination, complete with
(17:55):
kayak rentals, bike paths, restaurants, and of course, pickleball courts.
That probably doesn't sound too bad for residents of the
Saint Louis suburb, but the developer isn't stopping there. Leaders
of the outfit known as Alton Works are pushing the
federal government to create the Great Rivers National Park along
the waterway. They say creating a national park along the
same riverfront they want to develop would drive even more
(18:18):
investment and growth and turn Alton, Illinois into a real
tourist destination. Problem is, according to Justin, the plan right
now would see this national park absorb one hundred and
thirty five thousand acres and one hundred and forty four
miles of shoreline along the Mississippi, Missouri, and Illinois rivers.
He says, quote almost every community along the river has
(18:40):
spoken out against this proposal for the national park. The
major issue is the loss of hunting and fishing rights
on the rivers and the already established public land under
state control. Justin acknowledges that some national parks allow hunting
and fishing, though most do not, and he's not opposed
to a national park in general, but he doesn't like
the idea of a big developer coming in and dictating
(19:01):
how these acres should be used. Quote. The surrounding communities
are fearful that our voices will not be heard in
this matter. We do not want this company to come
in and raise land prices, take our hunting rights, and
change our way of life. It's worth noting that, according
to on X, seventy five of the total four hundred
and nineteen units managed by the National Park Service allows
(19:23):
some form of recreational subsistence or tribal hunting. In terms
of size, However, those seventy five units make up sixty
percent of the National Park system. It's unclear right now
what the regulations would look like in this new national park,
especially since some of the acres are controlled by the state.
I don't know the ins and outs of public land
hunting in this area, so I'm going to reserve judgment
(19:44):
until i learn more. But I will say on its
face that using a federal land designation to make your
real estate project more profitable does sound like a money
maker for you. The Alton Works founders, a couple named
Jane and John Simmons, have on their website a photo
of themselves with Illinois Governor JB. Pritzker, who attended their
company's ribbon cutting ceremony. If the governor attends your ribbon
(20:05):
cutting ceremony, you have some serious political influence. We'll see
if these developers can turn that political influence into a
national park. But if you like to hunt and fish
in the Saint Louis area, this is one you'll want
to pay attention to. Big thanks to Justin for sending
this one in. A few weeks ago, I asked my
Minnesota listeners to let me know if they go Upland
(20:26):
bird hunting and participate in the state's bird hunting Diary initiative.
This initiative is asking upland hunters to keep detailed logs
of their observations so the state can have more robust
information on the bird populations. I'm happy to say that
listener Mike Eaton answered the call. He went hunting in
northern Minnesota with a fellow firefighter and new hunter named Bradford.
(20:49):
Mike said the theme of the weekend was quote fair
opportunity and minimal success. That describes a lot of upland
grouse hunting in my experience, but the pair was still
able to bag a few rough grouse. Mike also sent
me a copy of the diary he filled out for
the Minnesota DNR. He recorded where he was, whether the
land was public or private, his target species, how long
he hunted, how many times he flushed a bird, how
(21:11):
old the birds were, and a few other data points.
It doesn't look like it took too much time, and
when the DNR collects all that info from hunters across
the state, they'll have a much deeper understanding of how
upland species are doing. Big Atta Boy goes out to
Mike and Bradford and any other Minnesota hunters who took
time to give back and make sure the DNR has
(21:32):
what they need to make good management decisions. Because you
participated in citizen science, you're going out there anyway and
you're helping the resource. It's amazing. Join these folks who
are in the lead right now for a new final
rise upland bird vest and remember, I'm gonna throw in
some awesome FHF cal Amo pouches too. Lastly, to circle
(21:58):
back with a Paul politics related email, and this one
is about the Montana Stream Access rally. I enjoyed the event,
but it has me once again grappling with the intersection
of partisan politics and conservation. Our elected officials obviously have
a huge impact on conservation, land access, and many other
issues important to outdoorsmen and women. Politics and these issues
(22:23):
are not mutually exclusive. However, in today's heated political climate,
it feels harder and harder to engage friends and family
in conversations around issues impacting hunters and anglers. People often
share a common stance on the issues, but as soon
as political candidates get involved, they shut down. What advice
(22:44):
do you have for navigating conversations around conservation with other
passionate outdoor recreationists in a way that is productive but
doesn't enable politics to be an elephant in the room.
It's a great question, you know, off and we say
policy not politics. And the way we lose right is
(23:05):
by saying, oh, you voted for that person by default
or de facto you agree with their policy because you've
voted for them. That's definitely not how it works. We
can vote for different people. Unfortunately, in my opinion my
view here, like party line voting is crazy and ineffective
in a lot of ways, but policies do matter, and
(23:30):
where you can meet in the middle, even if you're
diametrically opposed with who to vote for. Right is agreement
on policy like what should happen, And when we're talking
about outdoor recreation, hunting, fishing, we agree on so much
more than we disagree on. And when you part ways
with whoever you're speaking with, the agreement that you need
(23:53):
to have Right is like we're going to both lobby
on behalf of this policy. I or you may come
at it from a hey, I didn't vote for you,
but like it or not, you represent me. This is
an area that I need you to step up on,
or you're saying, hey, I did vote for you. I
am in support of you on these other issues. But
(24:16):
right here you are crossing the line. You're not getting it.
Do not do this, and that's just kind of like
the simple fact of how this stuff works. And you
got to be consistent, and you got to participate. You
don't weigh in, you can't wrestle. That's all I got
for you this week. Thank you so much for listening.
Remember to write in to ask c. A L. That's
(24:38):
ask Cal at the Meat Eater dot com and let
me know what's going on in your neck of the woods.
Thanks again, talk to you next week.
Popular Podcasts
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
Crime Junkie
If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people.