September 20, 2023 • 27 mins
Dad Jokes Explained
Jokes sourced and curated from reddit.com/r/dadjokes. Joke credits: ark1024, Hot_Historian1066, Brent_Forrest, UrbanCyclerPT, stevewezzz, GrayingMantis, Mii_On_My_Wii, pyrethedragon, YogurtWenk, OctoberFire1, UrbanCyclerPT, ilikesidehugs, fritofarmdale, FrequentlyOdd, electragladiator, ajd416, Zenmedic, houndoom92, 9Lives_, Joe-_-King
Explanations from OpenAI ChatGPT API with proprietary prompts.
This podcast is produced by Klassic Studios
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Welcome to this edition of the Dad Jokes Explained episode.
My name is Graham Plass and I'm the producer of
the Daily Dad Jokes podcast. Each week, we examine a
set of dad jokes and explain what makes them so funny.
I aim is to arm you with information on delivering
your own dad jokes to your friends and family so
you can further spread the laughs and groans. Let's get
(00:22):
to it.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
My wife found letters I have been hiding, proving that
I was cheating on her. Now she refuses to play
scrabble with me.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
The humor in this joke lies in a clever misdirection
and play on words. Initially, when it's mentioned that my
wife found letters I have been hiding, your mind is
led to think of secret love letters or communication with
another person, indicating an affair a serious issue. However, the punchline,
now she refuses to play scrabble with Mick, turns everything around.
(00:57):
There are letters, I'm not romantic correspondences, but physical alphabet
tiles used in the game of scrubble. The term cheating
also takes on a different meaning here. Instead of infidelity
as initially implied, it refers to unfair gameplay. So Essentially,
what seemed like a grave confession about marital betrayal ends
up being just about board game shenanigans. This unexpected twist
(01:19):
generates laughter due to its surprise element and relief from
initial tension created by misleading context.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
The adjective for metal is metallic, but not so for iron,
which is ironic.
Speaker 1 (01:35):
The humor in this joke is derived from a clever
play on words and the unexpected twist at the end.
At first, it sets up a logical puttern. The adjective
from metal is metoic, which leads you to anticipate that
iron would follow suit with ironic. However, instead of following
this expected linguistic pattern, it deliberately breaks it by pointing
out that ironic it does not describe something made of iron,
(01:57):
but rather refers to an outcome opposite to what was
expected or in ended. This sudden shift creates an amusing incongruity. Furthermore,
there's also humor in the pun like use of ironic,
where its common meaning pertaining to irony collides with its
anticipated meaning relating to iron. It's this playful subversion of
our language, expectations, and norms that makes us chuckle.
Speaker 2 (02:19):
How many Germans does take to screw in light bulb?
One Germans very efficient and no sense of humor.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
The humor in this joke is rooted in cultural stereotypes
and the unexpected deviation from a traditional light bulb joke
set up, typically how many people does it take to
screw in a light bulb? Jokes follow the structure where
an exaggerated number of individuals from a certain group are
required for such simple task, highlighting some stereotypical characteristic or
behavior of that group. The punchline often relies on exaggerating inefficiency, clumsiness,
(02:55):
or complexity. However, this particular joke subverts these expectations by
stating that only one German is needed due to their efficiency,
playing into stereotype about Germans being methodical and efficient workers.
This surprise element adds humor as it breaks away from
anticipated pattern. Then comes another twist and no sense of humor.
Here's where we see self referential metahumor at work. It
(03:17):
pokes fun at its own nature as well as reinforcing
yet another stereotype suggesting that Germans lack humor, which isn't true.
So the very act of telling this straight faced punchline
becomes ironically funny because it's making fun both itself and
typical cultural cliches.
Speaker 2 (03:33):
How come the Hulk doesn't lose his pants when he
transforms because the scientific experiments altered as genes.
Speaker 1 (03:45):
The humor in this joke comes from a clover pun
and comic book law. The setup question, how come the
Hulk doesn't lose his pants when he transforms? Plays on
our knowledge of the Marvel character Hulk. When Bruce Banner
turns into the gigantic green monster known as the Hulk,
despite his massive size increase and destructive behavior, curiously enough,
his pants always remain intact. This has been a source
(04:06):
of amusement for comic fans over years, because logically those
clothes should rip apart due to sudden expansion during transformation process.
So this already sets up an expectation that there will
be some humorous or absurd explanation behind it. Then we
get to punch wine because scientific experiments altered his genes.
Here's where punning steps in. Genes sounds exactly like genes,
(04:27):
which are parts of DNA responsible for traits inheritance including
physical characteristics, height, high color, etc. In case of Bruce
Banner or Wholk, it was indeed alteration at genetic level
caused by gamma radiation exposure that gave him ability to
transform into superhuman creature, but instead using word a genes,
joke uses homophone agenes, which also refers Trouser's linking back
(04:49):
initial query about why Holt's pants never tear off. This
linguistic playfulness, coupled with unexpected twist, creates comical effect, making
us laugh at its cleverness while also providing fictitious answer
for long ste and In comic book Mystery.
Speaker 2 (05:02):
The new sweater I ordered had a lot of static,
so I called the company to return it. They offered
to send me a new one free of charge.
Speaker 1 (05:15):
The humor in this joke revolves around a clever use
of double ntundra. When the speaker mentions that the newly
ordered sweater had a lot of static, we naturally understand
this demeanor was causing an electrical charge, which can happen
with certain types of material when they rub against other surfaces,
a common and annoying problem. But then comes to punchwine.
They offered to send me a new one free of charge.
(05:36):
Here's where the linguistic trickery steps in the phrase of
free of charger is commonly used to indicate something given
without requiring payment. However, within context set by set up
line about static electricity, which involves electric charges, it suddenly
acquires second meaning, implying that replacement sweater will be devoid
any such electrical issue. So what makes us chuckle here
(05:57):
is unexpected shift from mundane customer service scenario into pun
filled play on words, where same expression serves two different
meanings simultaneously depending upon its context. Moreover, there's also subtle
irony at work as companies offer unintentionally addresses initial complaint
literally rather than metaphorically, adding another layer amusement through absurdity
situation created by homonymic confusion between financial and physical charge.
(06:19):
This intricate blend wordplay and situational comedy forms call humor
behind dad joke, making a smile at its witty twistiness.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
What happens if you don't pay your exources and bill
you get repossessed?
Speaker 1 (06:36):
The humor in this joke hingers on the dual meaning
of the word repossessed. In a typical context, if you
fail to pay for an item or service, there's a
risk that it may be taken back or repossessed by
whoever provided it. This is often associated with tangible goods
like cars and houses. However, within the specific context of exocism,
which involves expelling evil spirits from people who are believed
(06:58):
to be possessed, this term on another humorous commotation, if
one doesn't pay their exoscism bill is pust set up
line of joke than punchline states they all get a repossessed.
This implies not just simple retrieval property to non payment,
but rather more amusingly suggests that person will become possessed
again by demonic entity. Hence we see clever interplay between
mundane financial consequence repossession, and supernatural outcome demonic possession. Moreover,
(07:24):
there's also an underlying absurdity at work here. The idea
that even spiritual services such as exosisms come with bills
and potential penalties adds another layer of ridiculousness, which enhances
comedic effect. So what tickles our funny bone here is
unexpected merging these two disparate realms finance and spirituality via
punning around term a repossession, thereby turning serious situation into
laughable scenario through its witty, incongrudy.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
What do you call someone who believes they'll find love
with a corpse? A? Hopeless and necromantic.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
The humor in this joke is primarily derived from a pun,
which is a form of word play that exploits multiple
meanings of terms for an intended humorous or rhetorical effect.
The set up question, what do you call someone who
believes they all find love with a corpse? Leads us
to anticipate some sort of answer, drawing on the macabre
theme introduced when we get to the punchline the hopeless nechromatic.
It's clear that this expectation has been met, but not
(08:20):
in quite the way one might expect. Here. Necromatic a
sounds very similar to a necromancer, which refers to someone
who supposedly communicates with and can control dead bodies, aligning
perfectly with our set up scenario about seeking love among corpses. However,
instead just using term a necromancer, joke combines in another
familiar phrase, hopeless romantic someone who idealizes romance and persistently
(08:43):
seeks true love despite failures, creating new hybrid word necro
mancer plus roman tick equals and necromatic. This clover fusion
transforms otherwise grim topic into something amusing by juxtaposing concept
eternal search for romance against unlikely backdropped death and decay.
So what makes us laugh here? Unexpected merging these two
disparate themes via linguistic creativity, thereby turning grotesque situation into
(09:06):
chuckleworthy scenario through its witty incongruity.
Speaker 2 (09:10):
How many politicians does it take to screw in a
light bulb? Don't know because they prefer to gaslight.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
The humor in this joke is derived from a clever
political satire and the play on words. The setup follows
a traditional light bulb joke format, which usually involves an
exaggerated number of individuals required to perform a simple task,
often poking fun at their inefficiency or incompetence. However, here
comes the twist with don't know because they prefer to gaslight.
(09:43):
Instead of providing an expected numerical answer or making fun
of politicians inefficiency as would be typical in such jokes,
it takes a sharp turn into social commentary territory by
using term a gaslight. Gaslighting is psychological manipulation tactic where
person makes others question their own perception reality, causing them
doubt facts and trust manipulators version events. Instead, it's frequently
(10:04):
associated with politics, where leaders might use misinformation or deceitful
strategies maintain power manipulate public opinion. So punchline implies that
politicians are more interested in manipulating people's per sections, like
gaslab alters one's visibility darkness, rather than simply fixing problems,
as screwing Newbold would do. This unexpected shift from lighthearted
jest into insightful critique creates humorous surprise while also offering
(10:27):
biding commentary on political behavior, making us laugh. Its witty
subversion standard light bulb joke formula coupled sharp societal observation.
Speaker 2 (10:36):
Why did the nun go to a mail strip club?
She was seeking guy dance?
Speaker 1 (10:44):
The humor in this joke is primarily derived from a
clever pun in the juxtaposition of contrasting elements The setup.
Why did the nun go to a mail strip club?
Creates an unexpected scenario, as it involves a nun typically
associated with chastity and religious devotion, visiting a place that
generally considered risky or even inappropriate by societal standards. This
(11:05):
incongruity itself generates some amusement because it defies our usual
expectations about behavior fitting for someone of her vocation. It
also raises curiosity about possible punchline which would justify such
unlikely action on part of None. Then comes to punchline,
she was seeking god dance. At first glance, guy dancer
seems like straightforward reference to males stripty's performances one might
(11:26):
expect at such venue. However, upon closer inspection we realize
this more at play here. Guy dance one said quickly
enough sounds remarkably similar to a guidance, which is something
nuns or any religious individuals are often sought for, providing
spiritual direction or advice people need in their life journey.
So what initially appeared as simple statement in fact turns
(11:47):
out the linguistic trick where two distinctly different phrases sound
almost identical. So essentially, what makes us chuckle here isn't
just surprising situation, but rather its resolution through wordplay, where
mundane act seeking entertainment gets transformed into vine quest guidance
via homophonic twist. This witty blends situational comedy and punning
forms care humor behind dad joke, making us smile at
(12:07):
its clever subversion norms while offering playful commentary on religion
and spirituality.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
How do you get a country girl's attention? Attractor?
Speaker 1 (12:19):
The humor in this joke stems from a play on
words and cultural stereotypes. The set up line, how do
you get a country girl's attention? Leads us to anticipate
some kind of strategy or action that would be particularly
appealing or noticeable to someone living in the countryside. When
we reach the punchline attractor, it initially seems like an
odd answer. However, when pronounced quickly enough, our tractor a
(12:41):
sounds very similar to attractor, which is what one might
use metaphorically speaking as means of drawing interest or gaining
attention from someone. This pun works because tractors are commonly
associated with rural life and farming, thus fitting into stereotype
about country girls being interested in such things. Yet at
the same time, it also plays off our understanding word
attractor or within context, attracting someone's notice, making for clever
(13:03):
linguistic twist. Moreover, there's additional layer humor derived unexpected simplicity
solution provided instead complex courtship rituals, just simple presence farm
machinery being sufficient, this absurd reductionism adds another sprinkle comedy
by turning conventional wisdom about attraction it's head through playful
exaggeration typical rural lifestyle elements. So essentially what tickles funnybone
(13:25):
here isn't merely witty pun but rather combination homophonic wordplay,
attractor a versus attractor coupled amusing subversion, dating norms via
stereotypical depiction countryside preferences, thereby creating chuckleworthy scenario through its
creative incongruity. Now for a quick break, stay tuned for
more dad joke explanations.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
What did cannibals serve at the beginning of a dinner party? Handshakes?
Speaker 1 (13:56):
The humor in this joke is derived from the clever
play on words and a macabre twist. The set up line,
what do cannibals serve at the beginning of a dinner
party prompts us to anticipate some sort of unusual or
gruesome food item that would be served by cannibals, who
are known for consuming human flesh. However, when we reach
the punchline handshakes, it takes an unexpected turn. Here's where
(14:17):
punning steps in handshakes are typically seen as a common
social etiquette during introductions or greetings at gatherings like dinner parties,
but within context set up by reference to cannibalism, terms
suddenly acquires new literal meanings, suggesting that actually offer hands
of their victims as appetizers. This interpretation transforms an otherwise
benign gesture into something morbidly amusing due it's double antandra
(14:39):
handshake are serving both as friendly greeting and potential menu item.
This creative fusion between ordinary social convention and horrifying dietary
habits creates humorous contrasts, which tickles our funny bone. Furthermore,
there is also underlying absurdity imagining such formal dining customs
being observed among cannibals. This jextaposition between civilized manners and
seven which practices adds another layer comedy through its stark
(15:02):
in congruity, enhancing overall comedic effect, thereby making us chuckle
at witty blend wordplay dark humor.
Speaker 2 (15:09):
My son gets so sensitive whenever I ask how he's
doing in his intro to Braille class. I guess it's
a touchy subject.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
The humor in this joke is primarily based on a
pun and the playfulness of language. The set up line,
my son gets so sensitive whenever I ask how he's
doing in his intro to Braille class leads us to
anticipate some sort of emotional response or issue related with
the Sun's feelings about his performance or progress. However, when
we reach the punchline, I guess it's a touchy subject,
what initially seemed like an emotional reaction takes on another
(15:44):
meaning due to clever wordplay. In common usage, tucchier refers
to something that can easily upset someone or cause them
discomfort when brought up simultaneously, though within context set by
reference Braille tactile writing system used visually impaired people where
they feel raised outs identified letters and numbers. Term touchy
acquires additional literal senses. Learning read Braille indeed involves lot
(16:04):
touching with fingertips. So essentially, what makes us laugh here
isn't gest really pun, but rather its resolution through double
and tanbre where single phrase serves two different meanings simultaneously
depending upon its context. One indicating sensitivity towards topic, color
reflecting physical aspect involved process reading Braille Moreover, there's also
subtle irony at work here. While discussing sensitivity emotional we
(16:26):
end up preferring tactile sensation, adding another layer amusement through
unexpected connection between these two disparate interpretations, term are touchy.
This intricate blend linguistic creativity situational comedy forms call humor
behind dad joke making us smile it smart twistiness.
Speaker 2 (16:42):
What concert only costs forty five cents fifty cent featuring Nickelback.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
The humor in this joke emerges from a combination of
pop culture references, mathematical calculation, and clever wordplay. The set up,
what concert only costs forty five cents incites curiosity, as
it's unusual to associate the cost of a concert with
such a low amount, especially when expressed in coins rather
than notes. In the punchline fifty cent featuring Nickelback, we
are presented with names of two well known music acts
(17:17):
wrapper fifty cent and rock band and Nickelback. Here's where
both math and punning come into play. If you interpret
these names literally instead their usual context as artist monikers,
they could represent monetary values. Fifty cent for being half
dollar and a nickelbacker implying return five cents, since nickel
is u dot es coin worth five pennies. So if
you were to attend hypothetical show headline by them based
(17:37):
on these literal interpretations, then your total expense would indeed
be forty five cents, subtracting nickel or five cent refund
from initial fifty cent charge. This unexpected fusion between musical
entertainment realm and everyday financial transactions creates comical scenario which
tickles our funny bund. Furthermore, there's also underlying absurdity imagining
world class performers charging such nominal fees for their gigs.
(18:00):
This juxtaposition between perceived high valley celebrity performances versus trivial
ticket price adds another sprinkle comedy through its stark incongruity,
enhancing overall comedic effect, thereby making us chuckle at whitty
blend pop culture trivia numerical.
Speaker 2 (18:12):
Jest why do the French eat snails because they don't
like fast food?
Speaker 1 (18:25):
The humor in this joke arises from a clever cultural
stereotype and an unexpected play on words. The set up line,
why do the French eat snails? Leads us to anticipate
some sort of gastronomic explanation, as it's well known that
askago cooked land snails is a traditional dish in French cuisine. However,
the punchline because they don't like fast food provides an
(18:45):
amusing twist. Here's where punning steps in fast food typically
refers to quick service restaurants selling ready to eat meals,
yet within context set by reference to snails known for
their slow pace, term fast acquires additional literal sense, implying
speed rather than convenience or preparation time. So essentially, what
makes us chuckle here is in chest witty pun but
(19:06):
its resolution through double and tandra, where single phrase serves
two different meanings simultaneously depending upon its context, one indicating
type of meal, other reflecting velocity associated with animal mentioned Moreover,
there is also subtle irony at work here. While discussing
culinary preferences, we end up preferring natural characteristics creature being consumed,
adding another layer amusement through unexpected connection between these two
(19:27):
disparate interpretations term are fast. This intricate blend linguistic creativity,
situational comedy forms care humor behind dad joke making us
smile it smart twistiness. Furthermore, there's an underlying satire about
fast food culture versus traditional cuisines, which adds another dimension
of wood into this chest. It subtly pokes fun at
how certain societies may prioritize speed and convenience over savoring
(19:49):
delicacies that require time and patience, both for preparation and consumption,
there by offering playful commentary on contrasting food habits across cultures,
enhancing overall comedic effect.
Speaker 2 (20:00):
Is worse than raining cats and dogs hailing taxies.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
The humor in this joke is rooted in the clever
use of idiomatic expressions in a pun. The set up line,
do you know what is worse than raining cats and dogs?
References an English idiom or raining cats and dogs, which
means it's raining heavily. This phrase evokes imagery of a
chaotic weather scenario, setting up for an anticipated response that
would presumably involve some other extreme or unpleasant meteorological condition. However,
(20:37):
the punchline, hailing taxis delivers amusement through unexpected wordplay. Here
we see a homophonic pun at work. Hail can mean
both precipitation in form of ice pellets, aligning with our
initial weather related expectation, as well as flagging down taxi
cabs on street an entirely different context. So, instead of
continuing along line severe storm conditions as one might expect
(20:58):
based on set up line, joke takes sharp turn into
urban hustle bustle scenario where trying to get cab can
indeed be frustrating experience, hence potentially a worser than heavy rainstorm.
What adds another layer humor, he ad juxtaposition between natural
phenomena human made inconvenience, creating comical contrast which tickles our
funny bone. Furthermore, there's also underlying absurdity imagining taxicabs literally
(21:19):
falling from sky like halstones. This exaggerated mental image further
enhances comedic effect, making us chuckle at witty blend linguistic
creativity and situational comedy.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
My wife and I got into a fight because I
said she didn't wear enough mascara. I made matters worse
by suggesting we make up.
Speaker 1 (21:43):
The humor in this joke arises from a play on
words and the clever use of hominins. The setup line,
my wife and I got into a fight because I
said she didn't wear enough mascara creates an initial conflict
situation around cosmetics, specifically mascara. However, the punchline I made
matters worse by suggest testing we make up provides amusement
through linguistic dexterity. Here, a makeuper is used as a
(22:05):
pun with dual meanings depending upon its context. In one sense,
it refers to cosmetic products like lipstick or eyeliner, including
aforementioned mascara, which continues theme introduced and set upline, while
simultaneously it also means reconciling after argument or dispute. So
what's amusing here is a merely witty wordplay, but rather,
how same term our makeup as serves two different yet
interrelated purposes within single narrative, first causing disagreement than offering
(22:28):
solution for resolution. Moreover, there's also subtle irony at work here.
While intention behind speaker's suggestion was likely pacifying situation as
implied by common usage or making up due to unfortunate
choice words, given their ongoing tiff about cosmetics, it inadvertently
escalates tension. Instead, this unintended consequence adds another layer comedy
through situational irony, thereby making us chuckle at smart twistiness
(22:52):
and inadvertent miscommunication resulting from homonymic confusion.
Speaker 2 (22:56):
You know what really gets my goat? Livestock thieves.
Speaker 1 (23:04):
The humor in this joke arises from the clever use
of an idiomatic expression and a literal interpretation. The set
up line, you know what really gets my goat employs
a common English idiom, which means something that annoys or
irritates someone. This sets up an expectation for the listener
to hear about some sort of pet peeve or annoyance. However,
with the punchline livestock thieves, there's a humorous shift from
(23:26):
figurative language to literal meaning. Instead of revealing an irritating
habit or situation, as one might anticipate based on initial phrase,
it amusingly suggests actual theft of goats. Here we see
comedy emerging out homonymic ambiguity. Where I get my goat
I can either indicate sorce irritation figuratively or refers straightforward
act acquiring someone's goat literally. So what was initially understood
(23:49):
as metaphorical complaint turns out be factual statement about farmilated crime.
There's also additional layer humor derived unexpected simplicity solution provided
instead complex psychological triggers. It's just simple, like Pilfridge deemed
sufficient cause frustration. This absurd reductionism adds another sprinkle comedy
by turning conventional wisdom about annoyances it's head through playful
(24:09):
exaggeration rural lifestyle elements. So essentially, what tickles Funnybone here
isn't merely witty wordplay, but rather combination linguistic creativity and
situational comedy, where mundane annoyance gets transformed into laughable scenario
involving livestock larceny, there by creating chuckleworthy narrative through its
creative in congruity.
Speaker 2 (24:27):
You know what video game character sucks? Herbie.
Speaker 1 (24:41):
The humor in this joke hinjas on the dual meaning
of the words sucks and a reference to popular video
game culture. The setup you know what video game character
sucks leads us into thinking that we're about to hear
criticism or disapproval regarding a particular gaming figure. However, when
we get to the punchline Kobe, it's clear that there's
more play here than initially meets the eye. Kirby is
(25:03):
an iconic character from Nintendo who is known for his
unique ability to inhale objects and enemies, essentially a sucking
other men. So, rather than using a suksa in its
common derogatory sense indicating something bad or sappa, it has
been cleverly deployed here with its literal definition pertaining vacuum
like action, which aligned perfectly with Kirby's signature move. This
unexpected shift from anticipated negative critique into factual statement about
(25:26):
character's gameplay mechanic creates humorous surprise while also providing playful
commentary on well known feature within gaming community. Moreover, there's
another layer of amusement derived from how such an ocius
turn like a suck gets recontextualized within specific realm of
video games, adding further dimensionality comedy through niche pop culture trivia,
thereby making us chuckle at smart blend linguistic dexterity and
(25:46):
gamer knowledge.
Speaker 2 (25:49):
Why did the film developer get fired? In decent exposure?
Speaker 1 (25:56):
The humor in this joke is primarily derived from a
pun which cleverly utilizes to terms that of different meanings
within specific contexts. The set up line, why did the
film developer get fired prompts us to anticipate some sort
of professional failing or mishap related to the process of
developing photographic film. However, the punchline in decent exposure deliver's
amusement through an unexpected play on words. In photography terminology,
(26:20):
exposure refers to amount of light pro unit area reaching
photographic film or censor, its crucial factor in determining how
pictures turn out. If not done correctly, over or under exposed,
images can be too dark or light, ruining their quality simultaneously,
though in decent exposure is also a legal term referring
crime involving person publicly displaying part's body considered private, causing
(26:42):
offense others, So instead just indicating technical error as one
might expect based on initial query about job performance that
amusingly suggests scandalous behavior leading dismissal, what enhances comedic effect
Here merging these two disparate realms photography and law via
punning around term or exposure whist dick trickery transforms otherwise
serious situation into laughable scenario through its witty incongruity, making
(27:05):
us chuckle at smart blend industry specific juggon and societal norms.
Another episode of dad Jokes explained in the books. Use
these jokes as inspiration and keep the dad joke tradition alive.
I'm Graham, Class and buy for Now. This episode is
produced by Classic Studios. See the show notes page for
(27:26):
sources and credits. Check out our other podcasts in our
network at classicstudios dot com.
Welcome to this edition of the Dad Jokes Explained episode.
My name is Graham Plass and I'm the producer of
the Daily Dad Jokes podcast. Each week, we examine a
set of dad jokes and explain what makes them so funny.
I aim is to arm you with information on delivering
your own dad jokes to your friends and family so
you can further spread the laughs and groans. Let's get
(00:22):
to it.
Speaker 2 (00:24):
My wife found letters I have been hiding, proving that
I was cheating on her. Now she refuses to play
scrabble with me.
Speaker 1 (00:37):
The humor in this joke lies in a clever misdirection
and play on words. Initially, when it's mentioned that my
wife found letters I have been hiding, your mind is
led to think of secret love letters or communication with
another person, indicating an affair a serious issue. However, the punchline,
now she refuses to play scrabble with Mick, turns everything around.
(00:57):
There are letters, I'm not romantic correspondences, but physical alphabet
tiles used in the game of scrubble. The term cheating
also takes on a different meaning here. Instead of infidelity
as initially implied, it refers to unfair gameplay. So Essentially,
what seemed like a grave confession about marital betrayal ends
up being just about board game shenanigans. This unexpected twist
(01:19):
generates laughter due to its surprise element and relief from
initial tension created by misleading context.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
The adjective for metal is metallic, but not so for iron,
which is ironic.
Speaker 1 (01:35):
The humor in this joke is derived from a clever
play on words and the unexpected twist at the end.
At first, it sets up a logical puttern. The adjective
from metal is metoic, which leads you to anticipate that
iron would follow suit with ironic. However, instead of following
this expected linguistic pattern, it deliberately breaks it by pointing
out that ironic it does not describe something made of iron,
(01:57):
but rather refers to an outcome opposite to what was
expected or in ended. This sudden shift creates an amusing incongruity. Furthermore,
there's also humor in the pun like use of ironic,
where its common meaning pertaining to irony collides with its
anticipated meaning relating to iron. It's this playful subversion of
our language, expectations, and norms that makes us chuckle.
Speaker 2 (02:19):
How many Germans does take to screw in light bulb?
One Germans very efficient and no sense of humor.
Speaker 1 (02:32):
The humor in this joke is rooted in cultural stereotypes
and the unexpected deviation from a traditional light bulb joke
set up, typically how many people does it take to
screw in a light bulb? Jokes follow the structure where
an exaggerated number of individuals from a certain group are
required for such simple task, highlighting some stereotypical characteristic or
behavior of that group. The punchline often relies on exaggerating inefficiency, clumsiness,
(02:55):
or complexity. However, this particular joke subverts these expectations by
stating that only one German is needed due to their efficiency,
playing into stereotype about Germans being methodical and efficient workers.
This surprise element adds humor as it breaks away from
anticipated pattern. Then comes another twist and no sense of humor.
Here's where we see self referential metahumor at work. It
(03:17):
pokes fun at its own nature as well as reinforcing
yet another stereotype suggesting that Germans lack humor, which isn't true.
So the very act of telling this straight faced punchline
becomes ironically funny because it's making fun both itself and
typical cultural cliches.
Speaker 2 (03:33):
How come the Hulk doesn't lose his pants when he
transforms because the scientific experiments altered as genes.
Speaker 1 (03:45):
The humor in this joke comes from a clover pun
and comic book law. The setup question, how come the
Hulk doesn't lose his pants when he transforms? Plays on
our knowledge of the Marvel character Hulk. When Bruce Banner
turns into the gigantic green monster known as the Hulk,
despite his massive size increase and destructive behavior, curiously enough,
his pants always remain intact. This has been a source
(04:06):
of amusement for comic fans over years, because logically those
clothes should rip apart due to sudden expansion during transformation process.
So this already sets up an expectation that there will
be some humorous or absurd explanation behind it. Then we
get to punch wine because scientific experiments altered his genes.
Here's where punning steps in. Genes sounds exactly like genes,
(04:27):
which are parts of DNA responsible for traits inheritance including
physical characteristics, height, high color, etc. In case of Bruce
Banner or Wholk, it was indeed alteration at genetic level
caused by gamma radiation exposure that gave him ability to
transform into superhuman creature, but instead using word a genes,
joke uses homophone agenes, which also refers Trouser's linking back
(04:49):
initial query about why Holt's pants never tear off. This
linguistic playfulness, coupled with unexpected twist, creates comical effect, making
us laugh at its cleverness while also providing fictitious answer
for long ste and In comic book Mystery.
Speaker 2 (05:02):
The new sweater I ordered had a lot of static,
so I called the company to return it. They offered
to send me a new one free of charge.
Speaker 1 (05:15):
The humor in this joke revolves around a clever use
of double ntundra. When the speaker mentions that the newly
ordered sweater had a lot of static, we naturally understand
this demeanor was causing an electrical charge, which can happen
with certain types of material when they rub against other surfaces,
a common and annoying problem. But then comes to punchwine.
They offered to send me a new one free of charge.
(05:36):
Here's where the linguistic trickery steps in the phrase of
free of charger is commonly used to indicate something given
without requiring payment. However, within context set by set up
line about static electricity, which involves electric charges, it suddenly
acquires second meaning, implying that replacement sweater will be devoid
any such electrical issue. So what makes us chuckle here
(05:57):
is unexpected shift from mundane customer service scenario into pun
filled play on words, where same expression serves two different
meanings simultaneously depending upon its context. Moreover, there's also subtle
irony at work as companies offer unintentionally addresses initial complaint
literally rather than metaphorically, adding another layer amusement through absurdity
situation created by homonymic confusion between financial and physical charge.
(06:19):
This intricate blend wordplay and situational comedy forms call humor
behind dad joke, making a smile at its witty twistiness.
Speaker 2 (06:27):
What happens if you don't pay your exources and bill
you get repossessed?
Speaker 1 (06:36):
The humor in this joke hingers on the dual meaning
of the word repossessed. In a typical context, if you
fail to pay for an item or service, there's a
risk that it may be taken back or repossessed by
whoever provided it. This is often associated with tangible goods
like cars and houses. However, within the specific context of exocism,
which involves expelling evil spirits from people who are believed
(06:58):
to be possessed, this term on another humorous commotation, if
one doesn't pay their exoscism bill is pust set up
line of joke than punchline states they all get a repossessed.
This implies not just simple retrieval property to non payment,
but rather more amusingly suggests that person will become possessed
again by demonic entity. Hence we see clever interplay between
mundane financial consequence repossession, and supernatural outcome demonic possession. Moreover,
(07:24):
there's also an underlying absurdity at work here. The idea
that even spiritual services such as exosisms come with bills
and potential penalties adds another layer of ridiculousness, which enhances
comedic effect. So what tickles our funny bone here is
unexpected merging these two disparate realms finance and spirituality via
punning around term a repossession, thereby turning serious situation into
laughable scenario through its witty, incongrudy.
Speaker 2 (07:47):
What do you call someone who believes they'll find love
with a corpse? A? Hopeless and necromantic.
Speaker 1 (07:58):
The humor in this joke is primarily derived from a pun,
which is a form of word play that exploits multiple
meanings of terms for an intended humorous or rhetorical effect.
The set up question, what do you call someone who
believes they all find love with a corpse? Leads us
to anticipate some sort of answer, drawing on the macabre
theme introduced when we get to the punchline the hopeless nechromatic.
It's clear that this expectation has been met, but not
(08:20):
in quite the way one might expect. Here. Necromatic a
sounds very similar to a necromancer, which refers to someone
who supposedly communicates with and can control dead bodies, aligning
perfectly with our set up scenario about seeking love among corpses. However,
instead just using term a necromancer, joke combines in another
familiar phrase, hopeless romantic someone who idealizes romance and persistently
(08:43):
seeks true love despite failures, creating new hybrid word necro
mancer plus roman tick equals and necromatic. This clover fusion
transforms otherwise grim topic into something amusing by juxtaposing concept
eternal search for romance against unlikely backdropped death and decay.
So what makes us laugh here? Unexpected merging these two
disparate themes via linguistic creativity, thereby turning grotesque situation into
(09:06):
chuckleworthy scenario through its witty incongruity.
Speaker 2 (09:10):
How many politicians does it take to screw in a
light bulb? Don't know because they prefer to gaslight.
Speaker 1 (09:23):
The humor in this joke is derived from a clever
political satire and the play on words. The setup follows
a traditional light bulb joke format, which usually involves an
exaggerated number of individuals required to perform a simple task,
often poking fun at their inefficiency or incompetence. However, here
comes the twist with don't know because they prefer to gaslight.
(09:43):
Instead of providing an expected numerical answer or making fun
of politicians inefficiency as would be typical in such jokes,
it takes a sharp turn into social commentary territory by
using term a gaslight. Gaslighting is psychological manipulation tactic where
person makes others question their own perception reality, causing them
doubt facts and trust manipulators version events. Instead, it's frequently
(10:04):
associated with politics, where leaders might use misinformation or deceitful
strategies maintain power manipulate public opinion. So punchline implies that
politicians are more interested in manipulating people's per sections, like
gaslab alters one's visibility darkness, rather than simply fixing problems,
as screwing Newbold would do. This unexpected shift from lighthearted
jest into insightful critique creates humorous surprise while also offering
(10:27):
biding commentary on political behavior, making us laugh. Its witty
subversion standard light bulb joke formula coupled sharp societal observation.
Speaker 2 (10:36):
Why did the nun go to a mail strip club?
She was seeking guy dance?
Speaker 1 (10:44):
The humor in this joke is primarily derived from a
clever pun in the juxtaposition of contrasting elements The setup.
Why did the nun go to a mail strip club?
Creates an unexpected scenario, as it involves a nun typically
associated with chastity and religious devotion, visiting a place that
generally considered risky or even inappropriate by societal standards. This
(11:05):
incongruity itself generates some amusement because it defies our usual
expectations about behavior fitting for someone of her vocation. It
also raises curiosity about possible punchline which would justify such
unlikely action on part of None. Then comes to punchline,
she was seeking god dance. At first glance, guy dancer
seems like straightforward reference to males stripty's performances one might
(11:26):
expect at such venue. However, upon closer inspection we realize
this more at play here. Guy dance one said quickly
enough sounds remarkably similar to a guidance, which is something
nuns or any religious individuals are often sought for, providing
spiritual direction or advice people need in their life journey.
So what initially appeared as simple statement in fact turns
(11:47):
out the linguistic trick where two distinctly different phrases sound
almost identical. So essentially, what makes us chuckle here isn't
just surprising situation, but rather its resolution through wordplay, where
mundane act seeking entertainment gets transformed into vine quest guidance
via homophonic twist. This witty blends situational comedy and punning
forms care humor behind dad joke, making us smile at
(12:07):
its clever subversion norms while offering playful commentary on religion
and spirituality.
Speaker 2 (12:13):
How do you get a country girl's attention? Attractor?
Speaker 1 (12:19):
The humor in this joke stems from a play on
words and cultural stereotypes. The set up line, how do
you get a country girl's attention? Leads us to anticipate
some kind of strategy or action that would be particularly
appealing or noticeable to someone living in the countryside. When
we reach the punchline attractor, it initially seems like an
odd answer. However, when pronounced quickly enough, our tractor a
(12:41):
sounds very similar to attractor, which is what one might
use metaphorically speaking as means of drawing interest or gaining
attention from someone. This pun works because tractors are commonly
associated with rural life and farming, thus fitting into stereotype
about country girls being interested in such things. Yet at
the same time, it also plays off our understanding word
attractor or within context, attracting someone's notice, making for clever
(13:03):
linguistic twist. Moreover, there's additional layer humor derived unexpected simplicity
solution provided instead complex courtship rituals, just simple presence farm
machinery being sufficient, this absurd reductionism adds another sprinkle comedy
by turning conventional wisdom about attraction it's head through playful
exaggeration typical rural lifestyle elements. So essentially what tickles funnybone
(13:25):
here isn't merely witty pun but rather combination homophonic wordplay,
attractor a versus attractor coupled amusing subversion, dating norms via
stereotypical depiction countryside preferences, thereby creating chuckleworthy scenario through its
creative incongruity. Now for a quick break, stay tuned for
more dad joke explanations.
Speaker 2 (13:45):
What did cannibals serve at the beginning of a dinner party? Handshakes?
Speaker 1 (13:56):
The humor in this joke is derived from the clever
play on words and a macabre twist. The set up line,
what do cannibals serve at the beginning of a dinner
party prompts us to anticipate some sort of unusual or
gruesome food item that would be served by cannibals, who
are known for consuming human flesh. However, when we reach
the punchline handshakes, it takes an unexpected turn. Here's where
(14:17):
punning steps in handshakes are typically seen as a common
social etiquette during introductions or greetings at gatherings like dinner parties,
but within context set up by reference to cannibalism, terms
suddenly acquires new literal meanings, suggesting that actually offer hands
of their victims as appetizers. This interpretation transforms an otherwise
benign gesture into something morbidly amusing due it's double antandra
(14:39):
handshake are serving both as friendly greeting and potential menu item.
This creative fusion between ordinary social convention and horrifying dietary
habits creates humorous contrasts, which tickles our funny bone. Furthermore,
there is also underlying absurdity imagining such formal dining customs
being observed among cannibals. This jextaposition between civilized manners and
seven which practices adds another layer comedy through its stark
(15:02):
in congruity, enhancing overall comedic effect, thereby making us chuckle
at witty blend wordplay dark humor.
Speaker 2 (15:09):
My son gets so sensitive whenever I ask how he's
doing in his intro to Braille class. I guess it's
a touchy subject.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
The humor in this joke is primarily based on a
pun and the playfulness of language. The set up line,
my son gets so sensitive whenever I ask how he's
doing in his intro to Braille class leads us to
anticipate some sort of emotional response or issue related with
the Sun's feelings about his performance or progress. However, when
we reach the punchline, I guess it's a touchy subject,
what initially seemed like an emotional reaction takes on another
(15:44):
meaning due to clever wordplay. In common usage, tucchier refers
to something that can easily upset someone or cause them
discomfort when brought up simultaneously, though within context set by
reference Braille tactile writing system used visually impaired people where
they feel raised outs identified letters and numbers. Term touchy
acquires additional literal senses. Learning read Braille indeed involves lot
(16:04):
touching with fingertips. So essentially, what makes us laugh here
isn't gest really pun, but rather its resolution through double
and tanbre where single phrase serves two different meanings simultaneously
depending upon its context. One indicating sensitivity towards topic, color
reflecting physical aspect involved process reading Braille Moreover, there's also
subtle irony at work here. While discussing sensitivity emotional we
(16:26):
end up preferring tactile sensation, adding another layer amusement through
unexpected connection between these two disparate interpretations, term are touchy.
This intricate blend linguistic creativity situational comedy forms call humor
behind dad joke making us smile it smart twistiness.
Speaker 2 (16:42):
What concert only costs forty five cents fifty cent featuring Nickelback.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
The humor in this joke emerges from a combination of
pop culture references, mathematical calculation, and clever wordplay. The set up,
what concert only costs forty five cents incites curiosity, as
it's unusual to associate the cost of a concert with
such a low amount, especially when expressed in coins rather
than notes. In the punchline fifty cent featuring Nickelback, we
are presented with names of two well known music acts
(17:17):
wrapper fifty cent and rock band and Nickelback. Here's where
both math and punning come into play. If you interpret
these names literally instead their usual context as artist monikers,
they could represent monetary values. Fifty cent for being half
dollar and a nickelbacker implying return five cents, since nickel
is u dot es coin worth five pennies. So if
you were to attend hypothetical show headline by them based
(17:37):
on these literal interpretations, then your total expense would indeed
be forty five cents, subtracting nickel or five cent refund
from initial fifty cent charge. This unexpected fusion between musical
entertainment realm and everyday financial transactions creates comical scenario which
tickles our funny bund. Furthermore, there's also underlying absurdity imagining
world class performers charging such nominal fees for their gigs.
(18:00):
This juxtaposition between perceived high valley celebrity performances versus trivial
ticket price adds another sprinkle comedy through its stark incongruity,
enhancing overall comedic effect, thereby making us chuckle at whitty
blend pop culture trivia numerical.
Speaker 2 (18:12):
Jest why do the French eat snails because they don't
like fast food?
Speaker 1 (18:25):
The humor in this joke arises from a clever cultural
stereotype and an unexpected play on words. The set up line,
why do the French eat snails? Leads us to anticipate
some sort of gastronomic explanation, as it's well known that
askago cooked land snails is a traditional dish in French cuisine. However,
the punchline because they don't like fast food provides an
(18:45):
amusing twist. Here's where punning steps in fast food typically
refers to quick service restaurants selling ready to eat meals,
yet within context set by reference to snails known for
their slow pace, term fast acquires additional literal sense, implying
speed rather than convenience or preparation time. So essentially, what
makes us chuckle here is in chest witty pun but
(19:06):
its resolution through double and tandra, where single phrase serves
two different meanings simultaneously depending upon its context, one indicating
type of meal, other reflecting velocity associated with animal mentioned Moreover,
there is also subtle irony at work here. While discussing
culinary preferences, we end up preferring natural characteristics creature being consumed,
adding another layer amusement through unexpected connection between these two
(19:27):
disparate interpretations term are fast. This intricate blend linguistic creativity,
situational comedy forms care humor behind dad joke making us
smile it smart twistiness. Furthermore, there's an underlying satire about
fast food culture versus traditional cuisines, which adds another dimension
of wood into this chest. It subtly pokes fun at
how certain societies may prioritize speed and convenience over savoring
(19:49):
delicacies that require time and patience, both for preparation and consumption,
there by offering playful commentary on contrasting food habits across cultures,
enhancing overall comedic effect.
Speaker 2 (20:00):
Is worse than raining cats and dogs hailing taxies.
Speaker 1 (20:14):
The humor in this joke is rooted in the clever
use of idiomatic expressions in a pun. The set up line,
do you know what is worse than raining cats and dogs?
References an English idiom or raining cats and dogs, which
means it's raining heavily. This phrase evokes imagery of a
chaotic weather scenario, setting up for an anticipated response that
would presumably involve some other extreme or unpleasant meteorological condition. However,
(20:37):
the punchline, hailing taxis delivers amusement through unexpected wordplay. Here
we see a homophonic pun at work. Hail can mean
both precipitation in form of ice pellets, aligning with our
initial weather related expectation, as well as flagging down taxi
cabs on street an entirely different context. So, instead of
continuing along line severe storm conditions as one might expect
(20:58):
based on set up line, joke takes sharp turn into
urban hustle bustle scenario where trying to get cab can
indeed be frustrating experience, hence potentially a worser than heavy rainstorm.
What adds another layer humor, he ad juxtaposition between natural
phenomena human made inconvenience, creating comical contrast which tickles our
funny bone. Furthermore, there's also underlying absurdity imagining taxicabs literally
(21:19):
falling from sky like halstones. This exaggerated mental image further
enhances comedic effect, making us chuckle at witty blend linguistic
creativity and situational comedy.
Speaker 2 (21:30):
My wife and I got into a fight because I
said she didn't wear enough mascara. I made matters worse
by suggesting we make up.
Speaker 1 (21:43):
The humor in this joke arises from a play on
words and the clever use of hominins. The setup line,
my wife and I got into a fight because I
said she didn't wear enough mascara creates an initial conflict
situation around cosmetics, specifically mascara. However, the punchline I made
matters worse by suggest testing we make up provides amusement
through linguistic dexterity. Here, a makeuper is used as a
(22:05):
pun with dual meanings depending upon its context. In one sense,
it refers to cosmetic products like lipstick or eyeliner, including
aforementioned mascara, which continues theme introduced and set upline, while
simultaneously it also means reconciling after argument or dispute. So
what's amusing here is a merely witty wordplay, but rather,
how same term our makeup as serves two different yet
interrelated purposes within single narrative, first causing disagreement than offering
(22:28):
solution for resolution. Moreover, there's also subtle irony at work here.
While intention behind speaker's suggestion was likely pacifying situation as
implied by common usage or making up due to unfortunate
choice words, given their ongoing tiff about cosmetics, it inadvertently
escalates tension. Instead, this unintended consequence adds another layer comedy
through situational irony, thereby making us chuckle at smart twistiness
(22:52):
and inadvertent miscommunication resulting from homonymic confusion.
Speaker 2 (22:56):
You know what really gets my goat? Livestock thieves.
Speaker 1 (23:04):
The humor in this joke arises from the clever use
of an idiomatic expression and a literal interpretation. The set
up line, you know what really gets my goat employs
a common English idiom, which means something that annoys or
irritates someone. This sets up an expectation for the listener
to hear about some sort of pet peeve or annoyance. However,
with the punchline livestock thieves, there's a humorous shift from
(23:26):
figurative language to literal meaning. Instead of revealing an irritating
habit or situation, as one might anticipate based on initial phrase,
it amusingly suggests actual theft of goats. Here we see
comedy emerging out homonymic ambiguity. Where I get my goat
I can either indicate sorce irritation figuratively or refers straightforward
act acquiring someone's goat literally. So what was initially understood
(23:49):
as metaphorical complaint turns out be factual statement about farmilated crime.
There's also additional layer humor derived unexpected simplicity solution provided
instead complex psychological triggers. It's just simple, like Pilfridge deemed
sufficient cause frustration. This absurd reductionism adds another sprinkle comedy
by turning conventional wisdom about annoyances it's head through playful
(24:09):
exaggeration rural lifestyle elements. So essentially, what tickles Funnybone here
isn't merely witty wordplay, but rather combination linguistic creativity and
situational comedy, where mundane annoyance gets transformed into laughable scenario
involving livestock larceny, there by creating chuckleworthy narrative through its
creative in congruity.
Speaker 2 (24:27):
You know what video game character sucks? Herbie.
Speaker 1 (24:41):
The humor in this joke hinjas on the dual meaning
of the words sucks and a reference to popular video
game culture. The setup you know what video game character
sucks leads us into thinking that we're about to hear
criticism or disapproval regarding a particular gaming figure. However, when
we get to the punchline Kobe, it's clear that there's
more play here than initially meets the eye. Kirby is
(25:03):
an iconic character from Nintendo who is known for his
unique ability to inhale objects and enemies, essentially a sucking
other men. So, rather than using a suksa in its
common derogatory sense indicating something bad or sappa, it has
been cleverly deployed here with its literal definition pertaining vacuum
like action, which aligned perfectly with Kirby's signature move. This
unexpected shift from anticipated negative critique into factual statement about
(25:26):
character's gameplay mechanic creates humorous surprise while also providing playful
commentary on well known feature within gaming community. Moreover, there's
another layer of amusement derived from how such an ocius
turn like a suck gets recontextualized within specific realm of
video games, adding further dimensionality comedy through niche pop culture trivia,
thereby making us chuckle at smart blend linguistic dexterity and
(25:46):
gamer knowledge.
Speaker 2 (25:49):
Why did the film developer get fired? In decent exposure?
Speaker 1 (25:56):
The humor in this joke is primarily derived from a
pun which cleverly utilizes to terms that of different meanings
within specific contexts. The set up line, why did the
film developer get fired prompts us to anticipate some sort
of professional failing or mishap related to the process of
developing photographic film. However, the punchline in decent exposure deliver's
amusement through an unexpected play on words. In photography terminology,
(26:20):
exposure refers to amount of light pro unit area reaching
photographic film or censor, its crucial factor in determining how
pictures turn out. If not done correctly, over or under exposed,
images can be too dark or light, ruining their quality simultaneously,
though in decent exposure is also a legal term referring
crime involving person publicly displaying part's body considered private, causing
(26:42):
offense others, So instead just indicating technical error as one
might expect based on initial query about job performance that
amusingly suggests scandalous behavior leading dismissal, what enhances comedic effect
Here merging these two disparate realms photography and law via
punning around term or exposure whist dick trickery transforms otherwise
serious situation into laughable scenario through its witty incongruity, making
(27:05):
us chuckle at smart blend industry specific juggon and societal norms.
Another episode of dad Jokes explained in the books. Use
these jokes as inspiration and keep the dad joke tradition alive.
I'm Graham, Class and buy for Now. This episode is
produced by Classic Studios. See the show notes page for
(27:26):
sources and credits. Check out our other podcasts in our
network at classicstudios dot com.
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Therapy Gecko
An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.