November 5, 2025 • 21 mins
Bloomberg personal finance reporter Suzanne Woolley is back on Merryn Talks Your Money. She discusses her latest in the 'Where to Invest' series, where investment experts share suggestions on where they'd put $1 million right now. Ideas include precious metals, luxury real estate and healthcare.
https://www.bloomberg.com/features/how-to-invest-a-million-dollars-q4-2025/?srnd=undefined
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:02):
Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Welcome to Marin Talks Your Money, the Personal finance edition
of Marin Talks Money, where we talk about the best
strategies for making the most of your money. I'm Maren
Zum said Webb, and this week I am welcoming back
to the show Bloomberg Personal Finance and investing reporter Suzanne Willie. Welcome, Suzann.
Speaker 3 (00:32):
Great to be here.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
Wow, it's a difficult time to think about what to
invest in, isn't it. So it's lucky that we have
your go tos. I mean, we're sitting here on we
and there's been a wonderful run in markets, and now
this seems like a little bit of an AI wabble
going on, and there's more and more talk about is
it a bubble? Will there be a crash? What will happen?
What do I invest in if I can't invest in AI?
Because AI is the only thing in the world to
invest in, et cetera.
Speaker 3 (00:58):
Exactly exactly. And goal yeah, gorblingbling.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
But hanging in there, hanging in there around four thousand gold. Yeah,
everything's going to be fine with gold surely. Anyway, you
have been out there interviewing again, asking people who really
work every day in the markets what they are investing
in or what they would invest in, and also crucially,
(01:23):
what they do if we just gave him a million
bugs and told them they could do whatever they wanted
with it. That's the most interesting bit of all this,
I think. I mean, you know, we're instead of on't
we and what they think about metals and all that
kind of thing, But what we're really interested in is
what they do with a million bugs.
Speaker 3 (01:36):
Exactly right.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
Let's talk about your first interviewe alexandri So Tavatsi, who
is from pict A Wealth Management, and he is a
man after my own heart because for him, the future
is metaled.
Speaker 3 (01:52):
Right, Yes, yeah, he is really focused on a structural
ball market in raw materials. I mean, his his line.
You know, the infrastructure of the future is being built
today and it's metal intensive, so you know, we're seeing
record demand for materials like copper and lithium materials. They
sort of give you access to the physical backbone of
(02:12):
tomorrow's economy. He likes asset heavy companies in the space,
so companies that have like significant physical assets like smelters, refineries,
land in real estate. You know, in part this is
because they provide an inflation hedge as commodity prices rise.
So he would deploy the one million into three buckets.
He'd put about half in a diversified group of global
(02:33):
mining companies with exposure to copper, aluminum, nickel, and rare earths.
And that's because he calls them the building blocks for
grid upgrades, for electric vehicles and battery storage. And then
he'd put about thirty percent to direct commodity ETFs, again
copper aluminum and an array of battery components. Further, he
(02:55):
likes their inflationary status and they provide a good sort
of or direct play on metal prices. For the final
twenty percent, he went just target public companies that are
sort of the picks and shovels needed to build energy infrastructure.
Grid connections, power inverters, storage systems, all of these sort
of basic building blocks of the infrastructure that we're going
(03:15):
to you know, no doubt be needing well out into
the future.
Speaker 2 (03:19):
Yeah, I mean, this is so interesting. It's something that
we talk about on the podcast a lot. We talk
about will there be a commodity supercycle? We talk about
inflation and how you had you against inflation, and in particular,
over the last year or so, we've been talking about
the price of AI companies. So if you buy a
company that are directly involved in the AI revolution, it's
going to be extremely expensive on every single valuation measure.
(03:42):
So true, the companies that allow the AI company to
even begin to exist, the companies that produce the metals
and the products that allow the grid to be upgraded
and data system data centers to exist, etc. You can
buy those for all there's nothing, So it makes so
(04:03):
little sense. So this strategy, to me, it seems incredibly sensible.
You want to be invested in the future, but you
don't want to pay a pee of seventy times to
be invested in the future. You'd rather pay a pe
of ten to fifteen times even less than some of
these cases, to be exposed to the building blocks behind
that technological revolution.
Speaker 3 (04:24):
Absolutely, I think it's a really sort of solid argument.
And with AI today getting in where the prices are,
it just seems kind of insane to me.
Speaker 2 (04:35):
Yeah. Now, Alexandra, he also as as I Alexandra, he
has in his mind AI across the board, I'd say,
because when you asked him what he'd do with a
million dollars outside this more conventional investment approach. He immediately
shifted to worrying about the disruption to any work or
careers that his children might have in future, and the
(04:57):
need to give them some kind of cushion.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
Right.
Speaker 3 (05:00):
Yeah, that's a great point he did, you know. He
talked about how young men and women today entry the
labor for us, are confronting these massive challenges of technological change,
you know, geopolitical order being reshaped. So he would give
the one million to his kids and sort of free
them up to focus, he said, on the opportunities of today,
rather than the uncertainties of tomorrow, to sort of free
(05:21):
them from worries related to potential work disruptions. So it
was it was a really interesting way to spend the money,
given what his main entry was about.
Speaker 2 (05:30):
Yeah, it's interesting, isn't it, giving your kids a gift
of freedom.
Speaker 3 (05:33):
I would take that.
Speaker 2 (05:33):
Yeah, although for another podcast, of course, giving your children
too much money can hamper them horribly. You have to
find this sweet spot, don't you, between taking away a
good bit of the pain, but also leaving them in
need enough to drive them to self fulfillment. We all know,
the miserable trust fund kid.
Speaker 3 (05:52):
Yeah, and if they have the sort of money all
their lives and they don't encounter sort of any sort
of difficulties, you know, how did they develop resilience?
Speaker 2 (06:01):
Well, resilience and self fulfillment. That's what we all need anyway,
Not for this podcast is that. That's a different one.
In fact, we should do a different one. We should
do a podcast on inheriting wealth.
Speaker 3 (06:11):
That would be great.
Speaker 2 (06:12):
Not just on how much is been going to be inherited?
Can we talk about that all the time, but the
emotional and productivity sound of inheriting wealth. Okay, stand by
for that one, listeners. But let's move on to fat.
Let's stick with luxury. Then you spoke to Chloe Duanchi,
head of macro and investment strategy at the Rockefeller Global
(06:34):
Family off as well about they know what they're doing,
and she was all about luxury real estate.
Speaker 3 (06:39):
Yes, she was saying that there's a lot of interesting
opportunities unfolding in some of the more niche thematic corners
of luxury real estate development, such as premium student housing
at state universities in the US and in really high resorts.
Because as we know, while the average US consumer, the
low income consumers under pressure, and we're starting of seeing
(07:01):
cracks show up and the financial pictures there the market
looks very different at the top of the income spectrum.
We had that statistic out of Moodies about how much
of consumer spending. I think it was about fifty percent
of all consumer spending in the second quarter was done
by the top ten percent of US earners, and that
(07:22):
is huge. So that is an area where spending by
affluent households, it's far more stable against across cycles, she
was saying, and that resilience is what people will pay
a premium on, which makes a lot of sense to me.
She thinks that part of the story to her real
estate development idea is the supply vacuum that we saw
(07:42):
created by a number of years of limited new construction,
when new builds virtually froze during twenty twenty two and
twenty twenty four. So she's playing this sort of collision
between scarce new supply coupled with sort of steady if
not improving demand and student housing. You know, she says
(08:03):
that at first, I thought she was going to say, oh,
premium student housing. I thought she was going to say
like I don't know Harvard or Yeah or some of
the really elite opportunities. But she was still saying, like,
very good flagship state schools with big sports teams have
seen risily enrollment and a lot of growth, but the
supply of student housing hasn't kept pace, even as rents
(08:23):
have popped up quite nicely. And it's not an imbalance.
It's likely to go away soon because to be a
player in this space in student housing, you have to
have a lot of history with that area. You have
to sort of know the local politics, you have to
know what the local entitlements are. You really have to
sort of it's a very specialized niche. So you can't
(08:45):
sort of easily parachute in.
Speaker 2 (08:48):
It's interesting them and it's not for everyone. I mean,
how do you invest in that? In student housing in
the US. You don't want to go out and buy
a student student house if you haven't got a student
at that universities, So you need to find some kind
of fund or a collective vical for that.
Speaker 3 (09:04):
You need to find a private fund or basically you
need to work with somebody like you know, like Rockefeller,
you know, a high end you know, private wealth office
that will have access to some of these players.
Speaker 2 (09:15):
And the other thing that she talked about was experience
is as the new STATA symbol. We don't want stuff anymore.
We want experiences that we can put all over our
social media and effectively get a longer term return from right.
And therefore the idea is that you should maybe have
a look at some way of investing in luxury resorts
and the developers that create those luxury results. Again, that's
(09:35):
not for everyone, is the no.
Speaker 3 (09:37):
But I mean it is an area where as you'd imagine,
you know, the imboulnce between supply and demand is very big,
and you know, it's very difficult to create one of
these new luxury resorts. They want to be in amazing
locations that often have sort of you know, environmental concerns,
and so it's an area where there's going to be
(09:58):
no supply lot for sure. And you know, like she said,
you have to partner with an uber specialized operator. And
some asset managers will take external capital into private credit
or private equity, but you know, specialized players that have
for prietary capital will sometimes take outside money. But it's
(10:20):
not really something that you and I are going to
go racing into I don't think.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
Your third one. You go through a lot of these
people's who said, this must be an awful lot of
telephone calls. That's so interesting. This is Ron Sanchez. He's
with Vaduciary Trust Co. Internationally. He's the chief investment officer
and he he starts out in your conversation saying exactly
the right thing, which is there isn't actually know he's wrong.
He says there aren't quick chief investment ideas or opportunities
(10:58):
today give her. In the third year of the double
digit pricing increases to the S and B five hundred,
Ron Ron look abroad. It's not compulsory to covers in
the US. Other options are available. You could look at
the UK, where you know we're pretty key. Try emerging markets.
There's all kinds of opportunities out there. Other alternatives are available.
Speaker 3 (11:20):
I think there was a little home bias there.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
Looking inside, Ron does find something that opportunities are narrow,
that's leg but they exist in healthcare.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
He focuses on healthcare. He you know, like like you
and like many people, is you know, concerned about the
S and P and the level at which it's trading.
And so he's you know, looking for more looking sort
of digging deeper to find more active opportunities in the
investment space. And I mean his point is that for
(11:56):
a lot of reasons, you know, regulatory issues, drug person concerns,
healthcare has struggled. And so he thinks it's trading at
an attractive it's trading at an attractive multiple, it's trading
at a discount to the broad market that is much
more than it has been in recent history. And he
(12:17):
also thinks, so from a risk management standpoint, maybe being
in healthcare isn't a bad idea compared to you know,
being in say Nvidia and Microsoft and such a concentrated
bed on tech in the SMP. He notes, you know,
Navidia and Microsoft combined to make up nearly fifty percent
of the index, but the entire healthcare sector is nine
(12:38):
percent of the index.
Speaker 2 (12:39):
That is a really interesting stat isn't it.
Speaker 3 (12:42):
Yes, and so, and he also notes that it's one
of the most diversified sectors in the SMP, with everything
from drug companies to biotech to equipment makers and so on.
And I thought, you know, the really good point was, yes,
they're in near term challenges for sure, but the demand
for healthcare services and drugs is not going away. Well,
in the long run, it's not going to go away.
You know, I have aging populations here and many of
(13:04):
the major countries around the world, so demand is only
going to become greater. So he feels like there's some
growth opportunities in healthcare. But also it's a bit of
a defensive play.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
Fair enough, fair enough, and quite interesting. You know, if
you're looking for looking for any kind of value inside
the US, that's probably an interesting place to look. But interestingly,
when it comes to us saying to him, what would
you do with a million dollars outside conventional investment? Again,
he's giving it the kid too.
Speaker 3 (13:34):
I know, I know he he thinks. You know, he
said home ownership is the first step towards financial security,
and so he would you know, he's talked about it
with his kids, and starter homes are increasingly out of reach,
so he would try to help close family members.
Speaker 2 (13:50):
I mean, it's so interesting, Suzanne. I'm sure that we're
not allowed to talk about your nice contact like this,
but pretty I'm guessing this man has already had an
opportunity to give money to his children.
Speaker 4 (14:00):
Yeah, I don't I don't know so, I mean, I'm
always surprised when people, when people who you think it
probably already made these plans, probably already have something in
place for their children, exactly, give them a million bucks
and they give the kids more.
Speaker 2 (14:12):
What about the holidays. I know, last time we spoke,
everyone was going on holiday with a million dollars.
Speaker 3 (14:17):
I know, I have to say it was it was.
It was more fun last time, you know, we were
talking about we were fantasizing about where we would go
in the Greek riviera.
Speaker 1 (14:25):
Yeah, I mean, I wonder if this, if all these
people saying that they give them money to their children,
it suggests you know, when previously, even a few months ago,
and we were talking, we say to people, you want
a million bucks, what do you can't do it?
Speaker 2 (14:39):
They'll be like, well, who, I'm going on holiday. And
now you're saying the same thing to them, and thinking
like then they're saying, oh, things are difficult, things are tight.
It's a gary out there and giving it the kids.
Is this giving us some kind of anecdotal sense of
a shift in the way people are feeling in the US.
Speaker 3 (14:53):
It's interesting. I think it probably is. I mean, there's
this sentiment shift and there's just you know, so much
uncertain tea, and we've got the shutdown, you know, the
government shutdown grinding on. I think it's sort of a
lot is very unsettled, and I think it's just as
time goes on. It's been people have felt deeply unsettled
(15:15):
for a long period of time. And I think it's
even you know, seeping into the minds of people who
probably would not be particularly concerned about their own financial picture,
but it just makes everyone feel sort of vulnerable to change,
to some sort of like worrying about some sort of
like negative change. And so I think sort of that
the maybe it's the lens at which people are viewing
(15:36):
the world is just a bit darker now, and they're
feeling more you.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
Know, protective and about the kids.
Speaker 3 (15:44):
Yes, worried about the opportunities. I mean, you know, you
see AI taking a lot of taking a fair amount
of you know, entry level jobs, and I think that
is sort of a very leads to a very fundamental
uneasy about what your kids' opportunities are going to be
like going forward.
Speaker 2 (16:04):
Definitely right, But we do have we have one participant
here who had a slightly different view on how to
spend his million dollars. I think, you know, we'll be
keener on him. We'll come to a million dollars in
a minute. But this one is Nick Frillinghausen, co Chief
Investment Officer of Equities at the Chiltern Trust, and he
has a slightly different idea a game we're own property here,
but kind of the opposite to luxury property.
Speaker 3 (16:26):
Right, yes, I mean his you're right, it's another real
estate idea. And he says it's a patient idea. It's
not an idea expects to take off immediately, but over
the next three years. He thinks home repair and the
home repair and remodeling space will be interesting. He has
exposure to the leading companies in this area, the sort
(16:48):
of what we call in the US the big category
category killer companies, as well as in the paintent codings industry.
And his feeling is that we've been in a housing
of session for years with affordability at all time lows,
and we probably have a shortage right now, like three
to five to four million homes in this country. Existing
home turnover is only about four million homes a year,
(17:12):
which is a thirty year low. Typically it would be
more like five million or six million, or a peak
I think it was even seven million. You know, a
lot of people are, as we know, locked into their
homes because they have these low mortgage rates. But he
thinks that if mortgage rates go about one hundred or
one hundred and fifty basis points lower, that we're likely to
see a big unlock in terms of pent up demand.
(17:33):
Because every time, he says, you see the tenure treasury
flirt with around four percent, you see an uptick in
mortgage refinancings and first time home buyer applications. So he
thinks these businesses are really good values and that when
we've kind of cycles like this and we've seen mortgage
rates fall, these companies have sort of a coiled spring
kind of dynamic going on in terms of the margins
(17:54):
they can earn. So these are you know, these are
not like sexy companies, but they're companies that are embedded
in our daily lives. You know, you paint your house,
you know, you fix up your deck, you do all
of these things. And he feels like a lot of
people aren't focused on this area. He blames it mainly
on because so many money is so much money is
(18:14):
flowing into the same ten to twelve names, you know,
tech names in the S and P. Five hundred. He
thinks that if interest rates go lower, these stocks will
do well, and also it'll lead to, as many people think,
a broadening out of what actually works in the stock market.
Speaker 2 (18:29):
Did you mention any stock name produces on when he
talked about this.
Speaker 3 (18:32):
He doesn't mention stock names just as a matter of policy.
But I can speculate about what I would imagine they are.
I mean, my guess would be when he talks about
dominant companies and paints and coding, it makes me think
of Sherwin Williams. That's a very big name here. And
then when I think of the sort of what we
call sort of category killer big home remodel of repair companies,
(18:54):
I think of the likes of Home Depot and Lows.
So those would be my essens, but they are not
names that he gave me.
Speaker 2 (19:02):
Okay, interesting, right onwards. I don't know why you and
I are going on holiday with Nick and his million dollars.
Speaker 3 (19:09):
Well, I really loved his idea. Well, I love the
idea of giving money to kids. His idea again, he's
really into experiences and he would take his family ten
to twelve members of his family, particularly his parents who
are in their mid eighties, on one of those around
the world high end private jet journeys where you just
(19:30):
jet around in your own private jet, and he would
go to all these bucket list destinations that you would
like to go to, but the tiquol a lifetime to achieve,
you know. So he'd go to anchor Wat and Machu
Pichu and Nepal and India, and he'd go to Uganda
to see the mountain gorillas and to Japan, which anyway,
(19:51):
I love this idea.
Speaker 2 (19:54):
Thirty to thirty five days, Nick, come on, yes, I mean, Matt,
you Pitchiba. The time you finished queuing for tickets, you're
two days.
Speaker 3 (20:02):
In Well, Marrion, you know, we only gave him a
million bucks. So he actually priced this out and he
figured it would take him about thirty to thirty five days,
and he factored the number of people, so you know,
he could only take thirty or thirty five days for
only allowing him to splurt with a million bucks.
Speaker 2 (20:21):
I tell you what, thirty five days on a private
jet with your family, maybe maybe it's enough.
Speaker 3 (20:25):
Oh that's a really good point, Maren.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
That's enough.
Speaker 3 (20:27):
I think I might pay to break up that.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
We will go for five days each. I think it
would be absolutely wonderful.
Speaker 3 (20:37):
Oh, I love this idea.
Speaker 2 (20:39):
I entered in the jet a falcon. I go the
do detail, detail, details, details, wonderful. Okay, so there you go, metals, healthcare,
lots of property, give the money to your kids, and
I gay self a private jet. And that's what you
do with a million dollars these days. Then, thank you
(21:00):
very much. Indeed, thanks Miren, thanks for listening to this
week's Maren Talk to Your Money. If you like us show, rate, review,
and subscribe wherever you listen to your podcast. This episode
was produced by Someersadi and Roses, and questions and comments
on this show and all our shows are always welcome.
Our show email is Merrior Money at Bloomberg dot net
Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.
Speaker 2 (00:17):
Welcome to Marin Talks Your Money, the Personal finance edition
of Marin Talks Money, where we talk about the best
strategies for making the most of your money. I'm Maren
Zum said Webb, and this week I am welcoming back
to the show Bloomberg Personal Finance and investing reporter Suzanne Willie. Welcome, Suzann.
Speaker 3 (00:32):
Great to be here.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
Wow, it's a difficult time to think about what to
invest in, isn't it. So it's lucky that we have
your go tos. I mean, we're sitting here on we
and there's been a wonderful run in markets, and now
this seems like a little bit of an AI wabble
going on, and there's more and more talk about is
it a bubble? Will there be a crash? What will happen?
What do I invest in if I can't invest in AI?
Because AI is the only thing in the world to
invest in, et cetera.
Speaker 3 (00:58):
Exactly exactly. And goal yeah, gorblingbling.
Speaker 2 (01:02):
But hanging in there, hanging in there around four thousand gold. Yeah,
everything's going to be fine with gold surely. Anyway, you
have been out there interviewing again, asking people who really
work every day in the markets what they are investing
in or what they would invest in, and also crucially,
(01:23):
what they do if we just gave him a million
bugs and told them they could do whatever they wanted
with it. That's the most interesting bit of all this,
I think. I mean, you know, we're instead of on't
we and what they think about metals and all that
kind of thing, But what we're really interested in is
what they do with a million bugs.
Speaker 3 (01:36):
Exactly right.
Speaker 2 (01:38):
Let's talk about your first interviewe alexandri So Tavatsi, who
is from pict A Wealth Management, and he is a
man after my own heart because for him, the future
is metaled.
Speaker 3 (01:52):
Right, Yes, yeah, he is really focused on a structural
ball market in raw materials. I mean, his his line.
You know, the infrastructure of the future is being built
today and it's metal intensive, so you know, we're seeing
record demand for materials like copper and lithium materials. They
sort of give you access to the physical backbone of
(02:12):
tomorrow's economy. He likes asset heavy companies in the space,
so companies that have like significant physical assets like smelters, refineries,
land in real estate. You know, in part this is
because they provide an inflation hedge as commodity prices rise.
So he would deploy the one million into three buckets.
He'd put about half in a diversified group of global
(02:33):
mining companies with exposure to copper, aluminum, nickel, and rare earths.
And that's because he calls them the building blocks for
grid upgrades, for electric vehicles and battery storage. And then
he'd put about thirty percent to direct commodity ETFs, again
copper aluminum and an array of battery components. Further, he
(02:55):
likes their inflationary status and they provide a good sort
of or direct play on metal prices. For the final
twenty percent, he went just target public companies that are
sort of the picks and shovels needed to build energy infrastructure.
Grid connections, power inverters, storage systems, all of these sort
of basic building blocks of the infrastructure that we're going
(03:15):
to you know, no doubt be needing well out into
the future.
Speaker 2 (03:19):
Yeah, I mean, this is so interesting. It's something that
we talk about on the podcast a lot. We talk
about will there be a commodity supercycle? We talk about
inflation and how you had you against inflation, and in particular,
over the last year or so, we've been talking about
the price of AI companies. So if you buy a
company that are directly involved in the AI revolution, it's
going to be extremely expensive on every single valuation measure.
(03:42):
So true, the companies that allow the AI company to
even begin to exist, the companies that produce the metals
and the products that allow the grid to be upgraded
and data system data centers to exist, etc. You can
buy those for all there's nothing, So it makes so
(04:03):
little sense. So this strategy, to me, it seems incredibly sensible.
You want to be invested in the future, but you
don't want to pay a pee of seventy times to
be invested in the future. You'd rather pay a pe
of ten to fifteen times even less than some of
these cases, to be exposed to the building blocks behind
that technological revolution.
Speaker 3 (04:24):
Absolutely, I think it's a really sort of solid argument.
And with AI today getting in where the prices are,
it just seems kind of insane to me.
Speaker 2 (04:35):
Yeah. Now, Alexandra, he also as as I Alexandra, he
has in his mind AI across the board, I'd say,
because when you asked him what he'd do with a
million dollars outside this more conventional investment approach. He immediately
shifted to worrying about the disruption to any work or
careers that his children might have in future, and the
(04:57):
need to give them some kind of cushion.
Speaker 1 (04:59):
Right.
Speaker 3 (05:00):
Yeah, that's a great point he did, you know. He
talked about how young men and women today entry the
labor for us, are confronting these massive challenges of technological change,
you know, geopolitical order being reshaped. So he would give
the one million to his kids and sort of free
them up to focus, he said, on the opportunities of today,
rather than the uncertainties of tomorrow, to sort of free
(05:21):
them from worries related to potential work disruptions. So it
was it was a really interesting way to spend the money,
given what his main entry was about.
Speaker 2 (05:30):
Yeah, it's interesting, isn't it, giving your kids a gift
of freedom.
Speaker 3 (05:33):
I would take that.
Speaker 2 (05:33):
Yeah, although for another podcast, of course, giving your children
too much money can hamper them horribly. You have to
find this sweet spot, don't you, between taking away a
good bit of the pain, but also leaving them in
need enough to drive them to self fulfillment. We all know,
the miserable trust fund kid.
Speaker 3 (05:52):
Yeah, and if they have the sort of money all
their lives and they don't encounter sort of any sort
of difficulties, you know, how did they develop resilience?
Speaker 2 (06:01):
Well, resilience and self fulfillment. That's what we all need anyway,
Not for this podcast is that. That's a different one.
In fact, we should do a different one. We should
do a podcast on inheriting wealth.
Speaker 3 (06:11):
That would be great.
Speaker 2 (06:12):
Not just on how much is been going to be inherited?
Can we talk about that all the time, but the
emotional and productivity sound of inheriting wealth. Okay, stand by
for that one, listeners. But let's move on to fat.
Let's stick with luxury. Then you spoke to Chloe Duanchi,
head of macro and investment strategy at the Rockefeller Global
(06:34):
Family off as well about they know what they're doing,
and she was all about luxury real estate.
Speaker 3 (06:39):
Yes, she was saying that there's a lot of interesting
opportunities unfolding in some of the more niche thematic corners
of luxury real estate development, such as premium student housing
at state universities in the US and in really high resorts.
Because as we know, while the average US consumer, the
low income consumers under pressure, and we're starting of seeing
(07:01):
cracks show up and the financial pictures there the market
looks very different at the top of the income spectrum.
We had that statistic out of Moodies about how much
of consumer spending. I think it was about fifty percent
of all consumer spending in the second quarter was done
by the top ten percent of US earners, and that
(07:22):
is huge. So that is an area where spending by
affluent households, it's far more stable against across cycles, she
was saying, and that resilience is what people will pay
a premium on, which makes a lot of sense to me.
She thinks that part of the story to her real
estate development idea is the supply vacuum that we saw
(07:42):
created by a number of years of limited new construction,
when new builds virtually froze during twenty twenty two and
twenty twenty four. So she's playing this sort of collision
between scarce new supply coupled with sort of steady if
not improving demand and student housing. You know, she says
(08:03):
that at first, I thought she was going to say, oh,
premium student housing. I thought she was going to say
like I don't know Harvard or Yeah or some of
the really elite opportunities. But she was still saying, like,
very good flagship state schools with big sports teams have
seen risily enrollment and a lot of growth, but the
supply of student housing hasn't kept pace, even as rents
(08:23):
have popped up quite nicely. And it's not an imbalance.
It's likely to go away soon because to be a
player in this space in student housing, you have to
have a lot of history with that area. You have
to sort of know the local politics, you have to
know what the local entitlements are. You really have to
sort of it's a very specialized niche. So you can't
(08:45):
sort of easily parachute in.
Speaker 2 (08:48):
It's interesting them and it's not for everyone. I mean,
how do you invest in that? In student housing in
the US. You don't want to go out and buy
a student student house if you haven't got a student
at that universities, So you need to find some kind
of fund or a collective vical for that.
Speaker 3 (09:04):
You need to find a private fund or basically you
need to work with somebody like you know, like Rockefeller,
you know, a high end you know, private wealth office
that will have access to some of these players.
Speaker 2 (09:15):
And the other thing that she talked about was experience
is as the new STATA symbol. We don't want stuff anymore.
We want experiences that we can put all over our
social media and effectively get a longer term return from right.
And therefore the idea is that you should maybe have
a look at some way of investing in luxury resorts
and the developers that create those luxury results. Again, that's
(09:35):
not for everyone, is the no.
Speaker 3 (09:37):
But I mean it is an area where as you'd imagine,
you know, the imboulnce between supply and demand is very big,
and you know, it's very difficult to create one of
these new luxury resorts. They want to be in amazing
locations that often have sort of you know, environmental concerns,
and so it's an area where there's going to be
(09:58):
no supply lot for sure. And you know, like she said,
you have to partner with an uber specialized operator. And
some asset managers will take external capital into private credit
or private equity, but you know, specialized players that have
for prietary capital will sometimes take outside money. But it's
(10:20):
not really something that you and I are going to
go racing into I don't think.
Speaker 2 (10:37):
Your third one. You go through a lot of these
people's who said, this must be an awful lot of
telephone calls. That's so interesting. This is Ron Sanchez. He's
with Vaduciary Trust Co. Internationally. He's the chief investment officer
and he he starts out in your conversation saying exactly
the right thing, which is there isn't actually know he's wrong.
He says there aren't quick chief investment ideas or opportunities
(10:58):
today give her. In the third year of the double
digit pricing increases to the S and B five hundred,
Ron Ron look abroad. It's not compulsory to covers in
the US. Other options are available. You could look at
the UK, where you know we're pretty key. Try emerging markets.
There's all kinds of opportunities out there. Other alternatives are available.
Speaker 3 (11:20):
I think there was a little home bias there.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
Looking inside, Ron does find something that opportunities are narrow,
that's leg but they exist in healthcare.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
He focuses on healthcare. He you know, like like you
and like many people, is you know, concerned about the
S and P and the level at which it's trading.
And so he's you know, looking for more looking sort
of digging deeper to find more active opportunities in the
investment space. And I mean his point is that for
(11:56):
a lot of reasons, you know, regulatory issues, drug person concerns,
healthcare has struggled. And so he thinks it's trading at
an attractive it's trading at an attractive multiple, it's trading
at a discount to the broad market that is much
more than it has been in recent history. And he
(12:17):
also thinks, so from a risk management standpoint, maybe being
in healthcare isn't a bad idea compared to you know,
being in say Nvidia and Microsoft and such a concentrated
bed on tech in the SMP. He notes, you know,
Navidia and Microsoft combined to make up nearly fifty percent
of the index, but the entire healthcare sector is nine
(12:38):
percent of the index.
Speaker 2 (12:39):
That is a really interesting stat isn't it.
Speaker 3 (12:42):
Yes, and so, and he also notes that it's one
of the most diversified sectors in the SMP, with everything
from drug companies to biotech to equipment makers and so on.
And I thought, you know, the really good point was, yes,
they're in near term challenges for sure, but the demand
for healthcare services and drugs is not going away. Well,
in the long run, it's not going to go away.
You know, I have aging populations here and many of
(13:04):
the major countries around the world, so demand is only
going to become greater. So he feels like there's some
growth opportunities in healthcare. But also it's a bit of
a defensive play.
Speaker 2 (13:16):
Fair enough, fair enough, and quite interesting. You know, if
you're looking for looking for any kind of value inside
the US, that's probably an interesting place to look. But interestingly,
when it comes to us saying to him, what would
you do with a million dollars outside conventional investment? Again,
he's giving it the kid too.
Speaker 3 (13:34):
I know, I know he he thinks. You know, he
said home ownership is the first step towards financial security,
and so he would you know, he's talked about it
with his kids, and starter homes are increasingly out of reach,
so he would try to help close family members.
Speaker 2 (13:50):
I mean, it's so interesting, Suzanne. I'm sure that we're
not allowed to talk about your nice contact like this,
but pretty I'm guessing this man has already had an
opportunity to give money to his children.
Speaker 4 (14:00):
Yeah, I don't I don't know so, I mean, I'm
always surprised when people, when people who you think it
probably already made these plans, probably already have something in
place for their children, exactly, give them a million bucks
and they give the kids more.
Speaker 2 (14:12):
What about the holidays. I know, last time we spoke,
everyone was going on holiday with a million dollars.
Speaker 3 (14:17):
I know, I have to say it was it was.
It was more fun last time, you know, we were
talking about we were fantasizing about where we would go
in the Greek riviera.
Speaker 1 (14:25):
Yeah, I mean, I wonder if this, if all these
people saying that they give them money to their children,
it suggests you know, when previously, even a few months ago,
and we were talking, we say to people, you want
a million bucks, what do you can't do it?
Speaker 2 (14:39):
They'll be like, well, who, I'm going on holiday. And
now you're saying the same thing to them, and thinking
like then they're saying, oh, things are difficult, things are tight.
It's a gary out there and giving it the kids.
Is this giving us some kind of anecdotal sense of
a shift in the way people are feeling in the US.
Speaker 3 (14:53):
It's interesting. I think it probably is. I mean, there's
this sentiment shift and there's just you know, so much
uncertain tea, and we've got the shutdown, you know, the
government shutdown grinding on. I think it's sort of a
lot is very unsettled, and I think it's just as
time goes on. It's been people have felt deeply unsettled
(15:15):
for a long period of time. And I think it's
even you know, seeping into the minds of people who
probably would not be particularly concerned about their own financial picture,
but it just makes everyone feel sort of vulnerable to change,
to some sort of like worrying about some sort of
like negative change. And so I think sort of that
the maybe it's the lens at which people are viewing
(15:36):
the world is just a bit darker now, and they're
feeling more you.
Speaker 2 (15:40):
Know, protective and about the kids.
Speaker 3 (15:44):
Yes, worried about the opportunities. I mean, you know, you
see AI taking a lot of taking a fair amount
of you know, entry level jobs, and I think that
is sort of a very leads to a very fundamental
uneasy about what your kids' opportunities are going to be
like going forward.
Speaker 2 (16:04):
Definitely right, But we do have we have one participant
here who had a slightly different view on how to
spend his million dollars. I think, you know, we'll be
keener on him. We'll come to a million dollars in
a minute. But this one is Nick Frillinghausen, co Chief
Investment Officer of Equities at the Chiltern Trust, and he
has a slightly different idea a game we're own property here,
but kind of the opposite to luxury property.
Speaker 3 (16:26):
Right, yes, I mean his you're right, it's another real
estate idea. And he says it's a patient idea. It's
not an idea expects to take off immediately, but over
the next three years. He thinks home repair and the
home repair and remodeling space will be interesting. He has
exposure to the leading companies in this area, the sort
(16:48):
of what we call in the US the big category
category killer companies, as well as in the paintent codings industry.
And his feeling is that we've been in a housing
of session for years with affordability at all time lows,
and we probably have a shortage right now, like three
to five to four million homes in this country. Existing
home turnover is only about four million homes a year,
(17:12):
which is a thirty year low. Typically it would be
more like five million or six million, or a peak
I think it was even seven million. You know, a
lot of people are, as we know, locked into their
homes because they have these low mortgage rates. But he
thinks that if mortgage rates go about one hundred or
one hundred and fifty basis points lower, that we're likely to
see a big unlock in terms of pent up demand.
(17:33):
Because every time, he says, you see the tenure treasury
flirt with around four percent, you see an uptick in
mortgage refinancings and first time home buyer applications. So he
thinks these businesses are really good values and that when
we've kind of cycles like this and we've seen mortgage
rates fall, these companies have sort of a coiled spring
kind of dynamic going on in terms of the margins
(17:54):
they can earn. So these are you know, these are
not like sexy companies, but they're companies that are embedded
in our daily lives. You know, you paint your house,
you know, you fix up your deck, you do all
of these things. And he feels like a lot of
people aren't focused on this area. He blames it mainly
on because so many money is so much money is
(18:14):
flowing into the same ten to twelve names, you know,
tech names in the S and P. Five hundred. He
thinks that if interest rates go lower, these stocks will
do well, and also it'll lead to, as many people think,
a broadening out of what actually works in the stock market.
Speaker 2 (18:29):
Did you mention any stock name produces on when he
talked about this.
Speaker 3 (18:32):
He doesn't mention stock names just as a matter of policy.
But I can speculate about what I would imagine they are.
I mean, my guess would be when he talks about
dominant companies and paints and coding, it makes me think
of Sherwin Williams. That's a very big name here. And
then when I think of the sort of what we
call sort of category killer big home remodel of repair companies,
(18:54):
I think of the likes of Home Depot and Lows.
So those would be my essens, but they are not
names that he gave me.
Speaker 2 (19:02):
Okay, interesting, right onwards. I don't know why you and
I are going on holiday with Nick and his million dollars.
Speaker 3 (19:09):
Well, I really loved his idea. Well, I love the
idea of giving money to kids. His idea again, he's
really into experiences and he would take his family ten
to twelve members of his family, particularly his parents who
are in their mid eighties, on one of those around
the world high end private jet journeys where you just
(19:30):
jet around in your own private jet, and he would
go to all these bucket list destinations that you would
like to go to, but the tiquol a lifetime to achieve,
you know. So he'd go to anchor Wat and Machu
Pichu and Nepal and India, and he'd go to Uganda
to see the mountain gorillas and to Japan, which anyway,
(19:51):
I love this idea.
Speaker 2 (19:54):
Thirty to thirty five days, Nick, come on, yes, I mean, Matt,
you Pitchiba. The time you finished queuing for tickets, you're
two days.
Speaker 3 (20:02):
In Well, Marrion, you know, we only gave him a
million bucks. So he actually priced this out and he
figured it would take him about thirty to thirty five days,
and he factored the number of people, so you know,
he could only take thirty or thirty five days for
only allowing him to splurt with a million bucks.
Speaker 2 (20:21):
I tell you what, thirty five days on a private
jet with your family, maybe maybe it's enough.
Speaker 3 (20:25):
Oh that's a really good point, Maren.
Speaker 2 (20:27):
That's enough.
Speaker 3 (20:27):
I think I might pay to break up that.
Speaker 2 (20:31):
We will go for five days each. I think it
would be absolutely wonderful.
Speaker 3 (20:37):
Oh, I love this idea.
Speaker 2 (20:39):
I entered in the jet a falcon. I go the
do detail, detail, details, details, wonderful. Okay, so there you go, metals, healthcare,
lots of property, give the money to your kids, and
I gay self a private jet. And that's what you
do with a million dollars these days. Then, thank you
(21:00):
very much. Indeed, thanks Miren, thanks for listening to this
week's Maren Talk to Your Money. If you like us show, rate, review,
and subscribe wherever you listen to your podcast. This episode
was produced by Someersadi and Roses, and questions and comments
on this show and all our shows are always welcome.
Our show email is Merrior Money at Bloomberg dot net
Host
Merryn Somerset Webb
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Ruthie's Table 4
For more than 30 years The River Cafe in London, has been the home-from-home of artists, architects, designers, actors, collectors, writers, activists, and politicians. Michael Caine, Glenn Close, JJ Abrams, Steve McQueen, Victoria and David Beckham, and Lily Allen, are just some of the people who love to call The River Cafe home. On River Cafe Table 4, Rogers sits down with her customers—who have become friends—to talk about food memories. Table 4 explores how food impacts every aspect of our lives. “Foods is politics, food is cultural, food is how you express love, food is about your heritage, it defines who you and who you want to be,” says Rogers. Each week, Rogers invites her guest to reminisce about family suppers and first dates, what they cook, how they eat when performing, the restaurants they choose, and what food they seek when they need comfort. And to punctuate each episode of Table 4, guests such as Ralph Fiennes, Emily Blunt, and Alfonso Cuarón, read their favourite recipe from one of the best-selling River Cafe cookbooks. Table 4 itself, is situated near The River Cafe’s open kitchen, close to the bright pink wood-fired oven and next to the glossy yellow pass, where Ruthie oversees the restaurant. You are invited to take a seat at this intimate table and join the conversation. For more information, recipes, and ingredients, go to https://shoptherivercafe.co.uk/ Web: https://rivercafe.co.uk/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/therivercafelondon/ Facebook: https://en-gb.facebook.com/therivercafelondon/ For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iheartradio app, apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.