June 26, 2025 • 47 mins
SEGMENT 1: HEGSETH GIVES MEDIA A MASSIVE ORDNANCE PENETRATOR
SEGMENT 2: NEW THEORY: TWO SHOOTERS IN BUTLER, PA
SEGMENT 3: LEFT FIRMLY ENTRENCHED IN TEXAS
SEGMENT 4: MAKE AMERICA HEALTHY MOVEMENT MAKING STRIDES
SEGMENT 5: GRANT GIVES FINAL THOUGHTS
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:20):
Well, good evening, everyone, Welcome to Stinchfield. I saw one
of the most amazing press conferences I've ever seen, and
I've been doing TV for decades. Okay, Secretary of Defense
Pete Haigseth along with the Chairman of Joint Chiefs of
Staff Dan raising Kine, laying it out now, we have
some big problems right now. The big problem is who
(00:41):
in the world leaked this classified document that claimed no
damage was done in Iran when inside that class of
a document there was all kinds of information saying hey,
this is too early to assess. The media didn't tell
you that part of the document. And then we've got
a mainstream media everything they can do to try to
(01:02):
discredit President Trump and our United States military literally rooting
against America. Pete Egxeth called them out on this.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
You have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes.
You have to hope maybe they weren't effective. Maybe the
way the Trump administration's representative isn't true. So let's take
half truths, spun information, leaked information, and then spin it,
spin it in every way we can to try to
(01:29):
cause doubt and manipulate the mind, the public mind over
whether or not our brave pilots were successful.
Speaker 1 (01:39):
I'm going to tell you he's right, and I've got proof.
They root against America. And I spent some time in
the mainstream media, and I can tell you newsrooms across
the country are filled with America haters. Just watch this.
Speaker 3 (01:52):
The Defense Intelligence Agency has assessed that the core components
of Arond's nuclear program are largely intact.
Speaker 4 (02:00):
Does that mean that it is non accurate to say
the nuclear weapons program at large was decimated?
Speaker 1 (02:06):
Correct? I think that is a very fair assessment.
Speaker 5 (02:08):
Rual.
Speaker 6 (02:08):
This is very in line with Donald Trump's belief that
he can bend reality to his will.
Speaker 7 (02:14):
The DiiA found, according to this report, that that undermines
what President Trump has been saying.
Speaker 5 (02:19):
They did not fundamental pride.
Speaker 1 (02:21):
It goes on and on and on. I don't need
to play the rest for you. You get the idea.
Here's the reality. Pete hag Seth spelled out what actually
was in that leaked report. Listen very closely again.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
It was preliminary a day and a half after the
actual strike. When it admits itself in writing that it
requires weeks to accumulate the necessary data to make such
an assessment, it's preliminary.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
It points out that it's not been.
Speaker 2 (02:48):
Coordinated with the intelligence community at all. There's low confidence
in this particular report, it says in the report. There
are gaps in the information. It says in the report.
Multiple inchpin assumptions are what this assessment a lynchpin assumption.
Speaker 1 (03:04):
You know what that is.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
It means your entire premise is predicated on a lynch pin.
If you're wrong, everything else is wrong.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
Now do you think the mainstream media mentioned any of
those things? No, because their sole goal isn't to report
the truth as to discredit President Trump and the United
States military and America at large. So what do they
focus on instead of the amazing mission carried out by
very brave men and women, boys and bombers as I
(03:35):
and Pete Haig Seth and many others like to call them.
This is what they focus on.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
See, this is the kind of thing the press does. Right,
of course, the chairman mentioned a female bomber pilot. That's fantastic.
She's fantastic, she's a hero. I want more female bomber pilots.
I hope men and women of our country sign up
to do such brave and audacious things. But when you
spin it as because I say our boys and bombers
as a common phrase, I'll keep saying things like that,
whether they're men or women. Very proud of that female pilot,
(04:03):
just like I'm very proud of those male pilots. And
I don't care if it's a male or a female
in that cockpit, and the American people don't care. But
it's the obsession with race and gender in this department
that's changed priorities, and we don't do that anymore.
Speaker 1 (04:17):
We don't play your little games. He literally got a
question for the mainstream media. Why did you say we
congratulate our boys, boys and bombers. He got a question
for that. Yes, there was a female military pilot. God
bless her, God bless everybody involved in this. I don't
care who's flying the plane as long as they're the
best at their job. Now here's what the media should
(04:39):
focus on. Some unbelievable planning that quite frankly goes back decades.
This is Raisin Kine.
Speaker 4 (04:47):
The cap was forcibly removed by the first weapon and
the main shaft was uncovered weapons two, three, four five.
We're tasked to enter the main shaft, moved down into
the complex at greater than one thousand feet per second
(05:07):
and explode in the mission space.
Speaker 1 (05:11):
Fifteen years. They had been building these bunker busters for
this very reason, literally with Iran in their focus for
fifteen years until the day they needed them. That day
came and by and Larges has been a huge success,
though we did expose the Left. I'm very troubled by
this leak and I want to bring in now Freedom
(05:32):
Caucus Member Republican Wisconsin Congressman Tom Tiffany is with us. Congressman,
It's great to have you back on the program. Good
to be with you there, Grant, Congressman. They're saying this
leak may have come from Congress. Are you hearing anything
about where the leak came from and how we root
out who is the one that leaked it?
Speaker 6 (05:51):
I haven't, but you know, the White House has been
pretty effective since they came in just five short months
ago about finding out who is leaking, who is putting
information out.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
They keep it tight.
Speaker 5 (06:03):
They run a tight ship over there in the White House.
Speaker 6 (06:06):
I'm hoping they find it and if we need to
help here in Congress to find out if someone from Congress,
a staffer or a member has done that we should
help out and find out who This is unacceptable.
Speaker 1 (06:20):
In a perfect world, I want Congress to have the
information they need to make decisions to vote on legislature,
whatever else it may be, to keep America safe. That's
in a perfect world. The White House is talking about
limiting some of the classified information going to members of
Congress now because of this. What's your thought on that possibility?
(06:40):
They have to think about it.
Speaker 6 (06:41):
Think about some of the members that we have in Congress.
Think about Eric Swalwell, the guy that had a paramour
who was a Chinese spy and then served on intelligence
and probably was leaking. Think about Adam Schiff. Do you
think he'd have any hesitation doing something for political gain.
They have proven that themselves brazen.
Speaker 4 (07:01):
In that matter.
Speaker 6 (07:02):
They will do whatever they can to retain power, to
come back into power. I think to ask the question
is to answer it. They will do anything the ends
justify the means.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
Yeah, it is very sad. And again it gets back
to this notion. Just like the media we talked about,
America is not being put first. It's their own power,
it's their own agenda. Very very sad. I want to
move now to the big, beautiful bill. President trumbelled a
big needing today, brought everybody together, let's get this through.
This is the President talking.
Speaker 8 (07:35):
About that cut fifty and according to the Council of
Economic Advisors, these reforms will protect or create more than
seven million jobs, add three point one percent to economic growth,
to reduce taxes for the typical American by nearly fifteen percent,
and increase take home pay for the normal family off
(07:55):
by at least thirteen thousand dollars.
Speaker 1 (07:57):
And that takes place immediately. That's not mad, right, come
to that guide back there, right, that's pretty good. Congressman.
What do you see as the prospects of this bill
coming out of the Senate? Back to you guys, how
big a fight is there going to be? What's word
up there on the hill?
Speaker 6 (08:16):
Yeah, I hope that we can get it done, but
it will take the White House's involvement. Obviously, President Trump
has been predisposed with dealing with issues with Iran and
just all the other stuff that's going on around the world,
going to the NATO summit, But the White House will
have to get fully engaged down They're going to need
to be the arbiter. But for me, we have to
(08:36):
keep the framework that was in place that got some
deficit reduction. We do not have a revenue problem here
in Washington.
Speaker 3 (08:43):
D C.
Speaker 6 (08:43):
We've got a spending problem. So I hope the Senate
does not gut the spending reductions we put in place.
Speaker 1 (08:50):
And one other thing that I'm watching.
Speaker 6 (08:51):
Very closely, grant they got to make sure these green
energy subsidies are sunset and the way we did it
in the House after sixty days of signing bill, because
green energy, as the President knows very well, will undermine
our grid and if we do not have low cost.
Speaker 1 (09:11):
Reach its full potential.
Speaker 6 (09:13):
And that's one thing I'm watching very closely. I sure
hope the Senate doesn't make any changes to that provision
we sent to them from the House.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
One of the things that we on this program were
one of the first to expose or at least sound
the alarm on is this Harry Reid appointed Senate parliamentarian.
I warned it was earlier in this week. I think
it was started on Monday. I warned about this woman,
and sure enough today she strikes down provisions that would
block quote gender affirming care being paid for by the
(09:46):
government and then illegals getting free health care through Medicaid.
This is a Harry Reid appointee. I think she's one
of the most powerful deep staters in the country that's
unelected in Washington. What do we do about that? These
are two very important provisions in here. We don't want
to be paying for sex changes for people, especially children.
Speaker 6 (10:07):
Yeah, well, you're represcient when you said that earlier this week.
It is the height of absurdity to see this same
parliamentarian rule virtually everything in order back in twenty twenty one.
In twenty twenty two with the so called Inflation Reduction Act,
she had no objections to the stuff that they were
(10:29):
doing then with Medicare and Medicaid. But boy, now she's
got dozens of concerns when we're trying to do a
Republican bill. I just say to the senators, don't be
hiding behind the skirts of the parliamentarian and saying, oh.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
We can't do anything. You can deal with this.
Speaker 6 (10:47):
You are the senator, the elected senator from your state.
Don't let an unelected bureaucrat make the decisions for you
and say, oh, gosh, I couldn't do anything about it.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
Because you can.
Speaker 6 (11:00):
You can overrule the parliamentarian, and it's about time the
Senate starts doing it.
Speaker 1 (11:06):
Yeah, you raise a very good point. My biggest concern
on this is that with a wink and a nod,
some of these Rhino Republican senators are actually grateful to
this parliamentarian. I hope John Thune can fire her. I mean,
they run the Senate, they ought to hire somebody that
they want to be parliamentarian. I'll give you the last word, Congressman.
Speaker 6 (11:24):
Yeah, Trent Lotte did it back in two thousand and one.
This person is just making judgment calls and she's showing
very poor a judgment. And I mean some of these
decisions are just absurd, as you said, continuing to fund
food stamps and medicated for illegal aliens that we can't
deal with that, and a.
Speaker 1 (11:43):
Reconciliation bill that's ridiculous.
Speaker 6 (11:46):
It's time for the Senate to act and send a
bill back to us, and I challenge him send it
a better bill to us that has even more pro
growth policies in it and more deficit reduction. Send that
back to us in the House.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
Well, I'm gonna keep my fingers crossed. Unfortunately, I'm not
gonna hold my breath because I'm not convinced they're going
to do that, but I would love if they did.
The Congress and Tom Tiffany, thank you so much for
coming on. I appreciate you, sir.
Speaker 6 (12:15):
Great to be here at Grant.
Speaker 1 (12:17):
Absolutely good seeing you as well. All Right, that's the
kind of fighter we end up in Washington. There are others,
you know. I say, an organization takes on the attitude
of its leader, and President Trump surely has an attitude.
He's got a confidence about him. Well, Kerry Lake is
now running Voice of America. This organization's turned out to
(12:38):
be a complete disaster. Well, she took the battle to
the left in a Foreign Relations Committee hearing where she
raised the alarms and all the Congress that wanted to
do one in particular was called Kerry Lake a two
time loser. Well she won this battle.
Speaker 9 (12:54):
They could literally put out a lie about anybody here,
and I know you've been the victim of that.
Speaker 5 (13:00):
You know you've been the victim.
Speaker 9 (13:00):
I remember the stories about you where they said you
had a gay lover, and those were going to.
Speaker 1 (13:07):
Mister chairman, chairman. Can I all right, I hope you honor.
Speaker 5 (13:11):
What you just gave is a caution to everyone, and
I moved those words meant to telling you that those
kind of lies and you said those were lies. Those
kind of lies could.
Speaker 9 (13:21):
Be broadcast today on VOA, and you couldn't pick up
the phone Representative Stanton and call them and say, hey,
you're putting out lies about me.
Speaker 1 (13:31):
I remember that rumor about Representative Stanton, and she makes
her point. That is the fighter that we get in Washington,
d C. With Carrie Lake now Voice of America, I
had no idea this was the national security risk that
it is infiltrated by foreign nationals. I don't know if
there were spies. I don't know if they had access
(13:53):
to computer systems that were connected back to Washington, d C.
But listen more from Kerry Lake testifying for Congress.
Speaker 9 (14:01):
Over the past fifteen to twenty years, the agency has
become a significant national security risk. They hire a shockingly
high number of foreign nationals, and they conduct subpar security
vetting so bad that top intelligence agencies revoked this agency's
ability to do even the most basic background checks. So
many of USAGM's hires come from countries hostile to the
(14:23):
United States.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
Did you have any idea that Voice of America, which
has broadcast outlets literally throughout the globe was such a
security risk. I had no idea. I want to bring
in with me now Trump Administration, Senior Advisor for the
US Agency for Global Media. Our Front Carry Lake is
with us, Kerrie. It is great to have you back
on the program.
Speaker 5 (14:48):
Good to be back with you. Grant all right.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
I literally was like shocked when I'm listening to you
lay this out. What was this like for you? Once
you got in to Voice America, you start to see
this and maybe let our viewers know about what you
actually uncovered.
Speaker 9 (15:06):
Well back in December, when President Trump called me and
said I want you to help kind of reform this
agency and lead the Voice of America, I thought this
would be great. I'd love to make sure that we're
putting out proper story, the real story of America to
the globe, which is what this agency is supposed to do.
Speaker 5 (15:20):
And I started to do some research and realized that
this place was a mess. I mean, not only did
they have a history of.
Speaker 9 (15:26):
Hiring foreign nationals that are hostile to our country, who
would then come in and tell America's story rather than
hiring Americans to tell America's story. People who actually lived here,
grew up here, understand our culture and our history. They
bring in an exorbitant number of foreign nationals that are
hostile by breaking the.
Speaker 5 (15:46):
Rules of the visa system to bring them in, and
we've all seen it.
Speaker 9 (15:50):
The coverage they put out has not been in line
with our long term strategy and foreign policy. It's often
been anti American. And then I learned about this firewall
which prevents even the management at US Agency for Global
Media from having any input into what the content is.
So if they are running anti American content, I can't
(16:12):
call to the newsroom and say hey, stop doing that
or have any say in it, because they have a
editorial firewall that they put in place. But yet we've
learned that management at VOA, in the newsroom and the
Mandarin Service or VOA, have been meeting at the Chinese
Embassy here in Washington, DC and allowing CCP officials to
(16:34):
dictate what kind of program we put out and what
our programming says about China.
Speaker 5 (16:39):
It's appalling that this is happening.
Speaker 9 (16:41):
So I gave that example to Congressman Greg Stanton, who
took his five minutes in questioning me and rather than
talking about Wow, how do we stop this threat to
national security? How do we get them back on tracks
so they're not a bad mouthing America around the world.
How do we make sure they're not wasting and pilfering.
Eric is hardered tax dollars. He chose to go off
(17:03):
on an election tangent trying to call me a liar.
So I used an example about a story that many
years ago was out there about Representative Stanton and accusing
him of having a gay lover.
Speaker 5 (17:14):
And I use that as an example.
Speaker 9 (17:16):
I said, they could run that story right now, and
you could not pick up the phone and call them
and say, hey, please don't run that it's not true,
because they could then sue him for a firewall, an
editorial firewall lawsuit against him.
Speaker 5 (17:31):
So it's just crazy what's going on there.
Speaker 9 (17:33):
Not to mention Grant, they're wasting a fortunate taxpayer dollars
on things like bribery, a quid pro quo. They were
paying African affiliates to run via way programming and to
sweeten the pot, as they said, they were paying them
money to run the programming. And the guy who was
(17:53):
behind this actually wrote in his own handwriting next.
Speaker 5 (17:56):
To the ledger and the budget quid pro quo.
Speaker 9 (17:58):
They spent eight hundred fifty thousand dollars in American taxpayer
money for.
Speaker 5 (18:03):
A New York music show.
Speaker 9 (18:04):
They spent one hundred thousand dollars to sponsor an an
Afghan cricket team, and the list goes on and on
and on. The bottom line is President Trump has brought
me in and he's asked me if I will help
write the ship here, and that's what we're working to do.
Speaker 1 (18:22):
All right, So it sounds like it, I mean, obviously
mind blowing here. You talked about now I listened to
your testimony Russian nationals that were writing anti American work
that then go to work for VOA. Talk about Cuban
nationals also anti American going to work. So I guess
the question is can you overturn that firewall? Is there
(18:45):
a way to turn that around? Does President Trump have
the ability to write an executive order saying hey, this
whole thing, we're changing the way we do business here.
Speaker 9 (18:54):
This was a midnight add into an NDAA piece of legislation.
They snuck it in to make it absolutely impossible to
reform this agency. And it was snuck into NDAA piece
of legislation and we can't.
Speaker 5 (19:10):
Get it out.
Speaker 9 (19:10):
It would take an Act of Congress to get it out.
And this is why President Trump has called for us
to reduce this agency to a statutory.
Speaker 5 (19:17):
Minimum, and we have done that. It's down to a
four languages that we.
Speaker 9 (19:21):
Are broadcasting to in addition to broadcasting to Cuba as well.
Speaker 5 (19:26):
And of course the Democrats are throwing a fit. They're
throwing a fit.
Speaker 9 (19:30):
And we've actually reduced the labor force over there. We've
reduced it by eighty five percent. We've cut fourteen hundred
positions at the agency, and we're running lean and mean
right now with the intention of making sure that we're
covering the stories we need to cover in the languages
that are statutorily required, but not doing a whole bunch
(19:50):
of extra stuff that's not required by law. And then
President wants to eliminate the agency starting in October in
fiscal year twenty twenty six.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Let me play another clip from you during the hearing,
a cut to for the guys behind the glass, and
then get you to expand on this.
Speaker 9 (20:07):
I told these stories to people and many times they say, Wow,
this place sounds like a crime scene. And I Frankly,
have just learned that it is indeed a crime scene.
We've learned that there is an active investigation going on
at VOA for a series of threatening phone calls that
have been coming out going after one of your colleagues,
(20:29):
a sitting member of Congress, with year's worth of threatening
phone calls, and they've discovered that those phone calls were
coming from inside the Voice of America.
Speaker 1 (20:40):
Terry, what is this the mafia? What is that about?
Speaker 5 (20:44):
I'm glad you picked up on that.
Speaker 9 (20:46):
I thought that was a bombshell today, and all I
heard was crickets from the Democrats. They weren't even curious
about it, probably because they expected that those threatening phone calls,
those threats in the phone calls were made at a
Republican and they would be right if they were, assuming
that it was a Republican, a very popular Republican representative
(21:06):
who was on the receiving end of threatening phone calls
from the way I understand what was told to me
over the course of a couple of years, coming from
phones at the Voice of America. And so there's an
active investigation going on, and I hope they catched the culprit. Apparently,
these phone calls were made from October of twenty three
right up until January of twenty five.
Speaker 5 (21:29):
And it's just sickening.
Speaker 9 (21:31):
And it makes sense because if you looked at the
programming and the messaging that was going out, besides it
being many times anti American, it was almost always pushing
toward the globalist agenda. The CCP agenda was pushing toward,
oftentimes a liberal agenda. I mean, for example, when everybody
(21:51):
and their brother finally the light bulb went off and
realized that Joe Biden had some major cognitive issues, especially
after that debate with President Trump, everybody started reporting on
it except VOA. It took them several days to finally
admit there was something wrong. They put out two days
after President Trump was inaugurated this January. Two days later,
(22:12):
they put out a graphic on air showing President Trump
with a swastika and blazoned over his face.
Speaker 5 (22:18):
This is just outrageous.
Speaker 9 (22:20):
And then during the last election, they ran a campaign
basically a campaign ad for Joe Biden to their Urdu language,
which is actually seen by folks in Michigan, and at
the end of that piece, Joe Biden asked for their votes.
This is not the way VOA is supposed to be run.
And this is why we need to eliminate the agency.
(22:41):
Take whatever we can salvage from VOA, if there is anything,
and I believe we need to move it back over
to the State Department. The last time Voice of America
was successful at telling America's story is when it was
housed under the Department of State, where they had guardrails
up so that the messaging that was going out was
in line with our foreign policy. Every American should be
(23:02):
for that. Democrats should be for that. And I can
tell you what, the taxpayers don't want to put one
more penny into this agency until we're running it correctly,
all right, real quick, and you.
Speaker 1 (23:14):
Know the State Department, Mark or Rubio has his hands
his work cut out for him to root the liberals
and radicalism out of that agency. But lastly, what can
you say to people real quick if you can, that
are worried about these stories of meeting at the CCP embassy?
Is that over with? Are we foreign nationals that are dangerous,
(23:34):
could be spies? Can we get them out of this agency?
Or we able to at least protect ourselves from a
national security risk? Here? Real quick? If you can carry well.
Speaker 9 (23:45):
You know, just last week we put out a riff
a reduction of force, and six hundred and thirty nine
additional folks were told they will be terminated. So fourteen
hundred positions have been eliminated. But we can't fire people
by We can only remove positions, so there's a chance
that there could be some near dwells that are still there.
(24:06):
We're going to try to get to the bottom of
who's doing what, who's influenced.
Speaker 5 (24:10):
By the CCP, and see where we can go with that.
Speaker 9 (24:12):
But I agree with President Trump, this entire agency is
rotten and it needs to be eliminated. And then we
can pick up the pieces from there and as I said,
pull over any assets to house under the Public Diplomacy
Bureau over at the Department of State where guess what,
they actually have a Global Media Bureau over there as well,
and that makes sense to put it there. So we'll
(24:33):
see what we can do. We need Congress to help out.
We need Congress to get behind this plan and actually
write the ship.
Speaker 1 (24:40):
Yeah, we sure do. Well, we have complete faith with you,
Kerry Lake, to help us get to that point and
protect American assets. That's why President Trump has you there.
It's always great to see you. Please keep up the fight.
I know you will and let us know how this
all plays out.
Speaker 5 (24:55):
I will thank you Grant absolutely, all right.
Speaker 1 (24:58):
I appreciate having her on very busy, especially after that
testimony in Congress. All right, folks, listen. If you are
dealing with back taxes or miss the April fifteenth deadline,
don't wait. The IRS is rapidly stepping up enforcement. But
there's good news. Tax Network USA is here to help.
Whether you're self employed, run a business, or your books
(25:20):
are a complete mess. Their team knows how to cut
through the chaos and find solutions that work. Your consultation
is always free, and getting ahead of the problem could
help you avoid harsh penalties, wage garnishments, or surprise bank levies.
Take the first step call one in undred nine oh
five eight thousand, or visit TNUSA dot com, forward slash
(25:40):
rev and right now, in honor of our nation's birthday,
Tax Network USA is offering ten percent off all services
through July fourth. Go to TNUSA dot com forward slash
rev to get started. All right, coming on next. There
is a theory out there that two shooters we're on
the ground in Butler, Pennsylvania. Yes, two shooters. We speak
(26:04):
to the man who says he has the facts and
the proof. That's next. Welcome back everyone. There are a
few stories that continue to fester in my mind. That
is the Butler, Pennsylvania assassination, attempted assassination of President Trump,
(26:29):
and this Matthew Crooks who is now shot dead. Say
the FBI accused of trying to kill President Trump and
shooting him in his ear. As we all know and
can remember that video. But the question remains, was it
really Was it really Thomas Matthew Crooks on that roof?
(26:53):
Maybe maybe not? According to a new documentary out called
Who Shot Trump? Watch this.
Speaker 3 (27:00):
Nine to twenty pm? But how is that possible? The
police didn't even question Crook's father until over two hours
later at eleven forty pm. For all the FEDS new
it could be Thomas Crook's father's body on the roof
of AGR at nine to twenty pm. The FBI has
never said they took fingerprints from the body, but even
(27:23):
if they did, Thomas Crooks would had to have been
fingerprinted some other time in his life before July thirteenth
for his fingerprints to be on file.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
There's other strange occurrences here like DNA.
Speaker 3 (27:40):
Listen again, DNA tests take days and you have to
have a reference sample for comparison. That means they would
need a known sample of Thomas Crook's DNA or a
blood relative, and the FBI didn't have either of those
things at nine to twenty pm on the thirteenth.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
There's a couple other big questions, one being could there
have been another shooter in all of this? Now? I
want to tackle some of this with the executive producer
of the new movie that is coming out in July
called Who Shot Trump? JD. Wilcox is with us. JD.
Welcome to the program.
Speaker 5 (28:19):
Hello Grant, it's great to meet you.
Speaker 1 (28:22):
JD. I asked you. I said, look, obviously, Thomas Crooks,
the way I put it to you, isn't running around anymore.
We're pretty sure he's dead. You responded to me, saying,
are we explain to me why you can respond that way?
Speaker 7 (28:40):
I think anybody who wants to investigate this attempted assassination,
which should start with the basic questions. The government says,
Thomas Crooks is the lone gunman. How do we know
the government says that the body on the roof of
AGR belongs to Thomas Matthew Crooks. How do we know.
As far as I can tell, the federal governments, the FBI,
(29:03):
and the Congressional Task Force have provided no evidence that
that body is Promise Matthew Crooks. I'm not saying it isn't.
I'm just saying, show me the proof. And they've never made.
What about any proof?
Speaker 1 (29:17):
What about the family? I mean, wouldn't the family be saying, well,
it's not my son. He's alive, and well he's playing
video games in the basement.
Speaker 7 (29:25):
I'd love for the Crooks family to say that that
body is their son. But I can't find any statement
of any kind that the family has made. They've hired
a very high priced lawyer, but they've saved silent, and
as far as I can tell, there was never even
a funeral or any kind of memorial service. Oh and
by the way, the body was quickly cremated with the
(29:47):
express permission of the FBI a couple of days after
the assassination attempt. So we can't even take that body
back now and do DNA testing to find out who
it really is because it's been destroyed.
Speaker 1 (30:01):
The cremation was very odd in my mind that it
happened so quick. Now, part of your documentary, you spent
a lot of money. You had experts come in, and
you did three D graphing of the site. You we'll
show some video of what you actually did. Now, after
you and your experts review this, go ahead and put
it up, guys, if you can. After you and your
(30:21):
experts review these three D images that you create, you
raised the question and you say, you may have proof.
I put may in there, but you may have proof
that there was a second shooter. Lay this out for me.
Speaker 7 (30:36):
Okay, So what the viewers are seeing right now is
the photogrammetry model that we created based on the Butler
Farm Show.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
And this isn't Google Earth.
Speaker 7 (30:47):
We actually had specialists photographs and scanned the entire area
with lasers, and then we assembled all that data inside
a computer, and the computer creates a hyper accurate three
D model of the entire area, all the buildings, the bleachers,
all the farm equipment that was placed to prevent snipers
(31:07):
from shooting at Trump. This view that you're looking at
right here shows just sort of a general view from
the fence line between the Butler Farm Show and AGR.
But I also sent you another picture that shows what
the shooter would have seen from his perch on the
AGR roof. I don't know if you have that, but
if you go to that one of the interest, that's
(31:28):
it right there, so if you can so, I know
it's hard to see that great figure standing on the stage.
That's President Trump down there. And this is much better
than the shooter could see because this is magnified. This
is about ten x magnification. The shooter would have been
ten times farther away, so Trump would have been even
(31:51):
smaller on the stage. And this picture from our model
answers a big question that I've had for a long time.
How come crooks shoots Trump when he's standing, but when
he's laying on the stage with a whole bunch of
Secret Service personnel piled on top of them, Trump doesn't
get shot again, and none of the Secret Service people
get shot again. And that's because you can see from
(32:13):
this picture. When Trump is laying down on the stage,
this grand stands and this farm equipment actually block that
shooter's view of Trump, so he couldn't shoot Trump when
Trump is lying on the stage. That's why he ended
up shooting. Corey comparator, who's in those stands between Trump
and the shooter.
Speaker 1 (32:32):
And what leads you to believe then that there was
another shooter that would have shot atch President Trump?
Speaker 5 (32:41):
Excellent question.
Speaker 7 (32:42):
So in looking at this three D model, we not
only found places that shooters couldn't shoot from, but we
found several that they could shoot from, And then we
started investigating those possibilities. If a shooter could be here,
do we have any evidence that they were there? And
we have uncovered for sick and photographic evidence of one
(33:03):
bullet that could not have been fired from the perch
on top of AGR where the dead body was found.
There's at least at least one bullet that could not
have come from that area, and we would present that
evidence in the movie. And it's not my theory, it's
not my feeling. It's hard photographic evidence and trajectories that
(33:25):
we've traced back. So there's really once you see the evidence,
you won't be able to argue it's it's just science
and math. It's not my friend with the facts, and.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
I understand why you would hold that back. The movie's
coming out, So one bullet that doesn't add up sounds
to me like John F. Kennedy situation here with a
bullet out of nowhere. You got this one bullet that
doesn't add up. The FBI, you believe, and real quick
if you can for me, has done all the same
mapping you did, which would mean they know everything you know.
(33:58):
You now believe there is a cover up in all
of this, even after my friend Cash Hotel said k's closed.
Real quick, if you can, you believe there's a cover up.
Speaker 7 (34:08):
We have a source that informed us that the FBI
did the same photogrammetry that we did. They created the
same models that we have. And if I know that
there's evidence, strong evidence of a second shooter, that means
the FBI knows it and they've been sitting on that
evidence for almost a year, just as I had. I
did my photogramma tree in September. They did theirs in July.
(34:31):
So they've had that knowledge even longer than I have,
and their model is probably even better. So they know
what I know, and I know there's evidence of a
second shooter. The FBI, you know, maybe they're hiding this
from Cash Hotel. I can't believe that he knows what
I know, and he wouldn't say something about it. But
if he doesn't know, he'll know on July thirteenth when
(34:52):
we show this to the world, all right.
Speaker 1 (34:54):
And that's going to be shown not far from where
I broadcast from, in the famous Texas Theater I mentioned JFK.
That's where OZ was ultimately found. I appreciate you coming
on JD. Will Cox and giving us a little preview
of this. We'll be watching July thirteenth when Who Shot
Trump comes out, premiering at the Texas Theater right here
in Dallas, Texas. Jay Wilcox, thank you, Thank you, sir.
(35:16):
All Right, all right, folks, you need to learn about
energized health and intercellular hydration. Supercharge your energy, boost your
immune system, and dramatically increase your brain function, look and
feel the years younger through a simple and natural process.
Don't believe me. Go to energizedhealth dot com and check
out hundreds of amazing testimonials. Energized Health offers a one
hundred percent money back guarantee. They're a plus rated and
(35:39):
have helped thousands over twenty years. Go to energizehealth dot com.
While you are there, check out their Freemaster class that's
energizedhealth dot com. All right, the left has entrenched themselves
into Texas politics. Heed this warning. Next, folks, wokeism has
(36:07):
infected all levels of education. But when you expect wokeism
to really have infected education in Texas, well, this is
the case. I want to pull out a cut from
ut Austin, University of Texa in Austin Department of Women's
and Gender Sexuality Studies. Tax Payer money goes to this stuff.
Transgender and non binary individuals, especially black and LATINX trans people,
(36:32):
face staggering barriers to healthcare, including fear of discrimination, mistreatment,
and lack of support from medical providers on trans and
gender affirming care, to name a few. This is what
they're teaching wrong, wrong. So why does the state legislature,
which is overwhelmingly Republican in Texas step in and stop
(36:54):
this from happening? Well, I want to bring in now
Texas State House Representative Republican Brian Harrison is with us. Representative.
It's great to have you back on the program. Always
great to be with you from my friend. All right,
So could the legislature have stopped.
Speaker 10 (37:11):
Us unequivocally and you said something at the top that
I need to parse out a little bit. You said
the Texas legislature is overwhelmingly a Republican. That's true, but
it is not overwhelmingly conservative. But the Texas voters, Texas
is a republican state. We re elected President Trump with
a fourteen point mandates, and we have a reputation, as
(37:32):
you know, for leading in individual liberty and freedom and
small government and conservative values. But here's the facts that
America needs to understand. For far too many years, the
Texas government has been simply coasting on that reputation. And
the reality is hard working, patriotic, freedom loving Texans are
being taxed out of their homes for what to fund
the Biden Harris agenda, even though voters overwhelmingly rejected them
(37:54):
at the ballot box.
Speaker 1 (37:55):
And what do I mean by that?
Speaker 5 (37:57):
What I mean is just the example you showed.
Speaker 10 (37:58):
Our public universities in the state of Texas are run
by radical progressive leftists. They are off the rails. It's
like the inmates are running the asylum. The University of Texas,
University of Houston, Texas A and m University of Texas,
San Antonio. Almost every major public university in the state
of Texas has not just a course, but an entire
undergraduate program in LGBTQ transgender studies. My alma mater, Texas
(38:23):
A and N has entire courses to train the next
generation of government DEI staff, and the University of Texas
just earlier this year announced they were going to give
free free socialism right free college to families that make
up to one hundred thousand dollars a year, even if
you're illegal aliens, to come to the University of Texas
and study transgender studies. This is off the rails. The
(38:46):
voters of Texas are being betrayed. I actually, I think
it's one of the biggest forms of a voter for
aud in America. Texas voters voter for Republicans, but we've
got the Austin Uni Party liberal swamp taxing them out
of their homes to fund a woke left progressive of agenda.
And I'm doing everything I can to stop it.
Speaker 1 (39:02):
All Right, you could go through when you see the
radicalism spelled out literally in the syllabus, the course descriptions,
the descriptions of the programs, all of it. Do you
offer up a bill to say, hey, we need to
defund this from our state universities. And then what do
your fellow Republicans say.
Speaker 10 (39:21):
I filed bill after bill to end taxpayer funded DEI,
bill after bill to end transgender and doctrination in our
public universities. And it's not the Democrats who stop it.
It's the so called Republicans in the Texas House who
put motions on the floor to table or not even
to bring up every single one of those bills. And
I'll just give you one more example. My office obtained
(39:41):
a syllabus again from the University of Texas where the
professor was coercing students in order to get higher grades.
She was coercing than male students to go to public
clothing stores and try on at least three articles.
Speaker 5 (39:57):
Of women's clothing.
Speaker 10 (39:58):
The same thing for the women. She was worse than
the female students to go to a public clothing score
and put on three articles of men's clothing and if
they did that, you would get a higher grade. This
is transgender ideology on steroids, and Texas taxpayers are funding it.
Will We're going to be called into a special session
because we did nothing to ban transgender in doctrination in
our universities in the last five months. In the regular session,
(40:20):
but I will file every single one of my bills
to end taxpayer funded DEI and transgender.
Speaker 5 (40:25):
In doctrination in the state of Texas.
Speaker 10 (40:26):
When we go back to special session in two weeks,
I hope Governor Rabbit puts it on the call so
we can finally ban these things.
Speaker 1 (40:31):
But here's the reality.
Speaker 10 (40:32):
We should have banned this nonsense years ago. Just one
more example, hardworking Texans. Just the legislature, all Republicans voted
to take one point five billion dollars, take it out
of their hardworking back pockets and put it in the hands.
Speaker 5 (40:45):
Of liberal Hollywood.
Speaker 1 (40:47):
That's right.
Speaker 10 (40:47):
The Texas government is bribing California companies and Hollywood to
move to Texas and using taxpayer funds to do it.
It's an absolute outrage, and I appreciate you helping us
brain transparency to it.
Speaker 1 (40:59):
Absolutely. And there's a fine line there, because I understand
they got Louisiana, Oklahoma bringing in all these movies. Many
of them were getting some at least not as woke
movies being made, so you want to make sure that
the right movies. There's a fine line there. But this
bribery of students to dress up like the opposite sex.
If this happened to my son, who's sixteen years old,
(41:21):
if God forbid he goes to one of these universities
and his bribed like that, he's strong enough to say
I'm not doing it. But there's a lot of kids
that aren't strong enough to say they're not doing it.
And that's outrageous. She ought to be investigated and stripped
of her position at that university. I'll tell you what,
Brian Harrison, you always bring me great stories. Anytime you
got something, you just keep emailing me and we'll keep
(41:42):
bringing you on.
Speaker 10 (41:43):
Buddy, Well, I appreciate you helping open the eyes not
just to everyone here in Texas, but across America. God
bless you, grant, God bless the great day of Texas,
and God bless America.
Speaker 1 (41:52):
Amen to that, all right, folks, to make America Healthy
again movement is gaining ground among major food producers. We
get into this next. Doctor Peter McCullough is with us. Folks.
Have you heard of the organization, the Global Alliance for
(42:14):
Vaccine Immunization. It's called gov GETS. Who the head of
it is? Bill Gates? Okay, RFK Junior with a big
announcement regarding that that.
Speaker 11 (42:24):
America has provided in funding since two thousand and one,
and I'll tell you how to start taking vaccine safety seriously.
Consider the best science available, even when the science contradicts
established paradigms. Until that happens, the United States won't contribute
more to GOBY define success not just in terms of
(42:44):
the number of vaccines delivered, but on their rigorously measured
overall impacts. Business as usual is over, unaccountable, and OPEG
policy making is over.
Speaker 1 (42:57):
The most important part of that is no more funding
from the United States for GOVI this is a good
thing I want to bring in now, world renowned doctor,
chief scientific officer over at the Wellness Company. My friend
doctor Peter McCullough is with us. Doc. Great to have
you back on. Thank you all right. I asked you
on my podcast in Shield just this week. Should we
(43:19):
be upset with RFK Junior? This obviously is probably a
pretty decent move your thoughts. I agree?
Speaker 3 (43:26):
You know.
Speaker 12 (43:26):
It turns out Bill Gates just stepped in with over
a billion dollars now to GABY the Global Vaccine Alliance.
Gates seems to be hell bent on global mass vaccination.
Why would a philanthro capitalist be so focused on vaccines.
Gas has said there is no investment that gives him
(43:47):
a better return than vaccines.
Speaker 1 (43:51):
All right, so RK Junior makes this move, But we
still have the COVID vaccine on the market. This is
not safe. I've told people over and over again. I
have people I trust, you, other doctors at the wellness company.
It's not safe. Why is it still on the market.
No one knows.
Speaker 12 (44:12):
Grant, it hasn't been pulled off the market in any country.
Right now, USA Fax is reporting huge numbers of COVID
nineteen vaccines are just dumped down the drain.
Speaker 5 (44:24):
Billions of American.
Speaker 12 (44:25):
Taxpayer dollars going for vaccines for nothing because Americans.
Speaker 1 (44:29):
Don't want them. Doc, first and foremost, you were a cardiologist.
If I have my facts straight, myer chorditis, the enlarging
of the heart, I'm sure I oversimplify it is a
side effect of these vaccines. They now say it in
the commercial for the vaccines may cause enlargement of heart.
We were told this was craziness. These were totally safe
(44:50):
when these first came out. They now say it on
a commercial they're selling the vaccine.
Speaker 12 (44:55):
We're talking my charditis, heart damage that leads to cardiac
arrestaur a heart grant. They haven't gone far enough. They
should put a black box warning down these products. If
they're going to stay on the market, they have to
warn people that they could take the shot, get heart
damage and die of a cardiac arrest.
Speaker 1 (45:12):
All right, what is that a black box warning? That
first question? Second question? Should the Attorney General be investigating
how this all went down?
Speaker 5 (45:21):
Black box warning is the most serious warning.
Speaker 2 (45:24):
You know.
Speaker 12 (45:24):
There are plenty of black box warnings on all kinds
of drugs. I'll give you an example, you Lorik, it's
a popular drug for gout. It's got a black box
warning from cardiovascular death. There are fatal cases of mylcreditis.
I presented them in the US Senate. It's in the
record May twenty first, twenty twenty five. Grand black box
warnings have to get on these package inserts, and you
(45:47):
know what. Package inserts are subject to regulatory law and
the Department of Justice. I think there should be an
investigation because the FDA is involved in obscuring the risks of.
Speaker 5 (45:59):
The to the public.
Speaker 1 (46:02):
Are you upset with what appears to be the lack
of investigations of holding anybody accountable from the doctor faucies
of the world and beyond by this Justice Department, the FBI, etc.
Speaker 12 (46:13):
We're long overdue for special consuls special counsels on the
investigating the origins of stars Kobe two, suppression of treatment,
and the disastrous vaccine program. We need three separate investigations.
Speaker 5 (46:25):
Long overdue.
Speaker 1 (46:27):
It isn't that the truth. We've got special counsels on everything,
it seems like, and yet nothing on this. And then
it goes back to boy big Farmer gives an awful
lot of money to these lawmakers. I'm sure that has
something to do with it. Doctor Peter McCullough. I appreciate
the truth that you and all the other doctors over
the Wellness Company offer up for us. Thank you, sir
for coming on. Thank you all right, folks, I mean it.
(46:49):
The Wellness Company is a great company. I'm proud to
align myself with them. Here's what you do to go
get this spike detox Okay, very important. You got the
emergency metap kit with prescription medications to keep you and
your family safe. There's also the parasite cleansed. Those are
just three of literally dozens of products TWC dot Health
(47:10):
Forward slash voice. Use the promo code voice at checkout
to save ten percent off of your order. That's TWC
dot Health Forward slash Voice. I'm back in a flash
with some final thoughts. All right, welcome back everyone. Such
(47:31):
a packed show. We're already finished with it. That's gonna
do it for us. Don't forget my website Grandstinsfield dot com.
Follow me on social media Stinchfield seventeen seventy six on
just about every social media platform. Please, if you're watching,
like and share the program Stinchfield's Army Rolls. We'll see
you tomorrow night
Well, good evening, everyone, Welcome to Stinchfield. I saw one
of the most amazing press conferences I've ever seen, and
I've been doing TV for decades. Okay, Secretary of Defense
Pete Haigseth along with the Chairman of Joint Chiefs of
Staff Dan raising Kine, laying it out now, we have
some big problems right now. The big problem is who
(00:41):
in the world leaked this classified document that claimed no
damage was done in Iran when inside that class of
a document there was all kinds of information saying hey,
this is too early to assess. The media didn't tell
you that part of the document. And then we've got
a mainstream media everything they can do to try to
(01:02):
discredit President Trump and our United States military literally rooting
against America. Pete Egxeth called them out on this.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
You have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes.
You have to hope maybe they weren't effective. Maybe the
way the Trump administration's representative isn't true. So let's take
half truths, spun information, leaked information, and then spin it,
spin it in every way we can to try to
(01:29):
cause doubt and manipulate the mind, the public mind over
whether or not our brave pilots were successful.
Speaker 1 (01:39):
I'm going to tell you he's right, and I've got proof.
They root against America. And I spent some time in
the mainstream media, and I can tell you newsrooms across
the country are filled with America haters. Just watch this.
Speaker 3 (01:52):
The Defense Intelligence Agency has assessed that the core components
of Arond's nuclear program are largely intact.
Speaker 4 (02:00):
Does that mean that it is non accurate to say
the nuclear weapons program at large was decimated?
Speaker 1 (02:06):
Correct? I think that is a very fair assessment.
Speaker 5 (02:08):
Rual.
Speaker 6 (02:08):
This is very in line with Donald Trump's belief that
he can bend reality to his will.
Speaker 7 (02:14):
The DiiA found, according to this report, that that undermines
what President Trump has been saying.
Speaker 5 (02:19):
They did not fundamental pride.
Speaker 1 (02:21):
It goes on and on and on. I don't need
to play the rest for you. You get the idea.
Here's the reality. Pete hag Seth spelled out what actually
was in that leaked report. Listen very closely again.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
It was preliminary a day and a half after the
actual strike. When it admits itself in writing that it
requires weeks to accumulate the necessary data to make such
an assessment, it's preliminary.
Speaker 3 (02:46):
It points out that it's not been.
Speaker 2 (02:48):
Coordinated with the intelligence community at all. There's low confidence
in this particular report, it says in the report. There
are gaps in the information. It says in the report.
Multiple inchpin assumptions are what this assessment a lynchpin assumption.
Speaker 1 (03:04):
You know what that is.
Speaker 2 (03:05):
It means your entire premise is predicated on a lynch pin.
If you're wrong, everything else is wrong.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
Now do you think the mainstream media mentioned any of
those things? No, because their sole goal isn't to report
the truth as to discredit President Trump and the United
States military and America at large. So what do they
focus on instead of the amazing mission carried out by
very brave men and women, boys and bombers as I
(03:35):
and Pete Haig Seth and many others like to call them.
This is what they focus on.
Speaker 2 (03:41):
See, this is the kind of thing the press does. Right,
of course, the chairman mentioned a female bomber pilot. That's fantastic.
She's fantastic, she's a hero. I want more female bomber pilots.
I hope men and women of our country sign up
to do such brave and audacious things. But when you
spin it as because I say our boys and bombers
as a common phrase, I'll keep saying things like that,
whether they're men or women. Very proud of that female pilot,
(04:03):
just like I'm very proud of those male pilots. And
I don't care if it's a male or a female
in that cockpit, and the American people don't care. But
it's the obsession with race and gender in this department
that's changed priorities, and we don't do that anymore.
Speaker 1 (04:17):
We don't play your little games. He literally got a
question for the mainstream media. Why did you say we
congratulate our boys, boys and bombers. He got a question
for that. Yes, there was a female military pilot. God
bless her, God bless everybody involved in this. I don't
care who's flying the plane as long as they're the
best at their job. Now here's what the media should
(04:39):
focus on. Some unbelievable planning that quite frankly goes back decades.
This is Raisin Kine.
Speaker 4 (04:47):
The cap was forcibly removed by the first weapon and
the main shaft was uncovered weapons two, three, four five.
We're tasked to enter the main shaft, moved down into
the complex at greater than one thousand feet per second
(05:07):
and explode in the mission space.
Speaker 1 (05:11):
Fifteen years. They had been building these bunker busters for
this very reason, literally with Iran in their focus for
fifteen years until the day they needed them. That day
came and by and Larges has been a huge success,
though we did expose the Left. I'm very troubled by
this leak and I want to bring in now Freedom
(05:32):
Caucus Member Republican Wisconsin Congressman Tom Tiffany is with us. Congressman,
It's great to have you back on the program. Good
to be with you there, Grant, Congressman. They're saying this
leak may have come from Congress. Are you hearing anything
about where the leak came from and how we root
out who is the one that leaked it?
Speaker 6 (05:51):
I haven't, but you know, the White House has been
pretty effective since they came in just five short months
ago about finding out who is leaking, who is putting
information out.
Speaker 1 (06:02):
They keep it tight.
Speaker 5 (06:03):
They run a tight ship over there in the White House.
Speaker 6 (06:06):
I'm hoping they find it and if we need to
help here in Congress to find out if someone from Congress,
a staffer or a member has done that we should
help out and find out who This is unacceptable.
Speaker 1 (06:20):
In a perfect world, I want Congress to have the
information they need to make decisions to vote on legislature,
whatever else it may be, to keep America safe. That's
in a perfect world. The White House is talking about
limiting some of the classified information going to members of
Congress now because of this. What's your thought on that possibility?
(06:40):
They have to think about it.
Speaker 6 (06:41):
Think about some of the members that we have in Congress.
Think about Eric Swalwell, the guy that had a paramour
who was a Chinese spy and then served on intelligence
and probably was leaking. Think about Adam Schiff. Do you
think he'd have any hesitation doing something for political gain.
They have proven that themselves brazen.
Speaker 4 (07:01):
In that matter.
Speaker 6 (07:02):
They will do whatever they can to retain power, to
come back into power. I think to ask the question
is to answer it. They will do anything the ends
justify the means.
Speaker 1 (07:16):
Yeah, it is very sad. And again it gets back
to this notion. Just like the media we talked about,
America is not being put first. It's their own power,
it's their own agenda. Very very sad. I want to
move now to the big, beautiful bill. President trumbelled a
big needing today, brought everybody together, let's get this through.
This is the President talking.
Speaker 8 (07:35):
About that cut fifty and according to the Council of
Economic Advisors, these reforms will protect or create more than
seven million jobs, add three point one percent to economic growth,
to reduce taxes for the typical American by nearly fifteen percent,
and increase take home pay for the normal family off
(07:55):
by at least thirteen thousand dollars.
Speaker 1 (07:57):
And that takes place immediately. That's not mad, right, come
to that guide back there, right, that's pretty good. Congressman.
What do you see as the prospects of this bill
coming out of the Senate? Back to you guys, how
big a fight is there going to be? What's word
up there on the hill?
Speaker 6 (08:16):
Yeah, I hope that we can get it done, but
it will take the White House's involvement. Obviously, President Trump
has been predisposed with dealing with issues with Iran and
just all the other stuff that's going on around the world,
going to the NATO summit, But the White House will
have to get fully engaged down They're going to need
to be the arbiter. But for me, we have to
(08:36):
keep the framework that was in place that got some
deficit reduction. We do not have a revenue problem here
in Washington.
Speaker 3 (08:43):
D C.
Speaker 6 (08:43):
We've got a spending problem. So I hope the Senate
does not gut the spending reductions we put in place.
Speaker 1 (08:50):
And one other thing that I'm watching.
Speaker 6 (08:51):
Very closely, grant they got to make sure these green
energy subsidies are sunset and the way we did it
in the House after sixty days of signing bill, because
green energy, as the President knows very well, will undermine
our grid and if we do not have low cost.
Speaker 1 (09:11):
Reach its full potential.
Speaker 6 (09:13):
And that's one thing I'm watching very closely. I sure
hope the Senate doesn't make any changes to that provision
we sent to them from the House.
Speaker 1 (09:22):
One of the things that we on this program were
one of the first to expose or at least sound
the alarm on is this Harry Reid appointed Senate parliamentarian.
I warned it was earlier in this week. I think
it was started on Monday. I warned about this woman,
and sure enough today she strikes down provisions that would
block quote gender affirming care being paid for by the
(09:46):
government and then illegals getting free health care through Medicaid.
This is a Harry Reid appointee. I think she's one
of the most powerful deep staters in the country that's
unelected in Washington. What do we do about that? These
are two very important provisions in here. We don't want
to be paying for sex changes for people, especially children.
Speaker 6 (10:07):
Yeah, well, you're represcient when you said that earlier this week.
It is the height of absurdity to see this same
parliamentarian rule virtually everything in order back in twenty twenty one.
In twenty twenty two with the so called Inflation Reduction Act,
she had no objections to the stuff that they were
(10:29):
doing then with Medicare and Medicaid. But boy, now she's
got dozens of concerns when we're trying to do a
Republican bill. I just say to the senators, don't be
hiding behind the skirts of the parliamentarian and saying, oh.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
We can't do anything. You can deal with this.
Speaker 6 (10:47):
You are the senator, the elected senator from your state.
Don't let an unelected bureaucrat make the decisions for you
and say, oh, gosh, I couldn't do anything about it.
Speaker 1 (10:58):
Because you can.
Speaker 6 (11:00):
You can overrule the parliamentarian, and it's about time the
Senate starts doing it.
Speaker 1 (11:06):
Yeah, you raise a very good point. My biggest concern
on this is that with a wink and a nod,
some of these Rhino Republican senators are actually grateful to
this parliamentarian. I hope John Thune can fire her. I mean,
they run the Senate, they ought to hire somebody that
they want to be parliamentarian. I'll give you the last word, Congressman.
Speaker 6 (11:24):
Yeah, Trent Lotte did it back in two thousand and one.
This person is just making judgment calls and she's showing
very poor a judgment. And I mean some of these
decisions are just absurd, as you said, continuing to fund
food stamps and medicated for illegal aliens that we can't
deal with that, and a.
Speaker 1 (11:43):
Reconciliation bill that's ridiculous.
Speaker 6 (11:46):
It's time for the Senate to act and send a
bill back to us, and I challenge him send it
a better bill to us that has even more pro
growth policies in it and more deficit reduction. Send that
back to us in the House.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
Well, I'm gonna keep my fingers crossed. Unfortunately, I'm not
gonna hold my breath because I'm not convinced they're going
to do that, but I would love if they did.
The Congress and Tom Tiffany, thank you so much for
coming on. I appreciate you, sir.
Speaker 6 (12:15):
Great to be here at Grant.
Speaker 1 (12:17):
Absolutely good seeing you as well. All Right, that's the
kind of fighter we end up in Washington. There are others,
you know. I say, an organization takes on the attitude
of its leader, and President Trump surely has an attitude.
He's got a confidence about him. Well, Kerry Lake is
now running Voice of America. This organization's turned out to
(12:38):
be a complete disaster. Well, she took the battle to
the left in a Foreign Relations Committee hearing where she
raised the alarms and all the Congress that wanted to
do one in particular was called Kerry Lake a two
time loser. Well she won this battle.
Speaker 9 (12:54):
They could literally put out a lie about anybody here,
and I know you've been the victim of that.
Speaker 5 (13:00):
You know you've been the victim.
Speaker 9 (13:00):
I remember the stories about you where they said you
had a gay lover, and those were going to.
Speaker 1 (13:07):
Mister chairman, chairman. Can I all right, I hope you honor.
Speaker 5 (13:11):
What you just gave is a caution to everyone, and
I moved those words meant to telling you that those
kind of lies and you said those were lies. Those
kind of lies could.
Speaker 9 (13:21):
Be broadcast today on VOA, and you couldn't pick up
the phone Representative Stanton and call them and say, hey,
you're putting out lies about me.
Speaker 1 (13:31):
I remember that rumor about Representative Stanton, and she makes
her point. That is the fighter that we get in Washington,
d C. With Carrie Lake now Voice of America, I
had no idea this was the national security risk that
it is infiltrated by foreign nationals. I don't know if
there were spies. I don't know if they had access
(13:53):
to computer systems that were connected back to Washington, d C.
But listen more from Kerry Lake testifying for Congress.
Speaker 9 (14:01):
Over the past fifteen to twenty years, the agency has
become a significant national security risk. They hire a shockingly
high number of foreign nationals, and they conduct subpar security
vetting so bad that top intelligence agencies revoked this agency's
ability to do even the most basic background checks. So
many of USAGM's hires come from countries hostile to the
(14:23):
United States.
Speaker 1 (14:26):
Did you have any idea that Voice of America, which
has broadcast outlets literally throughout the globe was such a
security risk. I had no idea. I want to bring
in with me now Trump Administration, Senior Advisor for the
US Agency for Global Media. Our Front Carry Lake is
with us, Kerrie. It is great to have you back
on the program.
Speaker 5 (14:48):
Good to be back with you. Grant all right.
Speaker 1 (14:51):
I literally was like shocked when I'm listening to you
lay this out. What was this like for you? Once
you got in to Voice America, you start to see
this and maybe let our viewers know about what you
actually uncovered.
Speaker 9 (15:06):
Well back in December, when President Trump called me and
said I want you to help kind of reform this
agency and lead the Voice of America, I thought this
would be great. I'd love to make sure that we're
putting out proper story, the real story of America to
the globe, which is what this agency is supposed to do.
Speaker 5 (15:20):
And I started to do some research and realized that
this place was a mess. I mean, not only did
they have a history of.
Speaker 9 (15:26):
Hiring foreign nationals that are hostile to our country, who
would then come in and tell America's story rather than
hiring Americans to tell America's story. People who actually lived here,
grew up here, understand our culture and our history. They
bring in an exorbitant number of foreign nationals that are
hostile by breaking the.
Speaker 5 (15:46):
Rules of the visa system to bring them in, and
we've all seen it.
Speaker 9 (15:50):
The coverage they put out has not been in line
with our long term strategy and foreign policy. It's often
been anti American. And then I learned about this firewall
which prevents even the management at US Agency for Global
Media from having any input into what the content is.
So if they are running anti American content, I can't
(16:12):
call to the newsroom and say hey, stop doing that
or have any say in it, because they have a
editorial firewall that they put in place. But yet we've
learned that management at VOA, in the newsroom and the
Mandarin Service or VOA, have been meeting at the Chinese
Embassy here in Washington, DC and allowing CCP officials to
(16:34):
dictate what kind of program we put out and what
our programming says about China.
Speaker 5 (16:39):
It's appalling that this is happening.
Speaker 9 (16:41):
So I gave that example to Congressman Greg Stanton, who
took his five minutes in questioning me and rather than
talking about Wow, how do we stop this threat to
national security? How do we get them back on tracks
so they're not a bad mouthing America around the world.
How do we make sure they're not wasting and pilfering.
Eric is hardered tax dollars. He chose to go off
(17:03):
on an election tangent trying to call me a liar.
So I used an example about a story that many
years ago was out there about Representative Stanton and accusing
him of having a gay lover.
Speaker 5 (17:14):
And I use that as an example.
Speaker 9 (17:16):
I said, they could run that story right now, and
you could not pick up the phone and call them
and say, hey, please don't run that it's not true,
because they could then sue him for a firewall, an
editorial firewall lawsuit against him.
Speaker 5 (17:31):
So it's just crazy what's going on there.
Speaker 9 (17:33):
Not to mention Grant, they're wasting a fortunate taxpayer dollars
on things like bribery, a quid pro quo. They were
paying African affiliates to run via way programming and to
sweeten the pot, as they said, they were paying them
money to run the programming. And the guy who was
(17:53):
behind this actually wrote in his own handwriting next.
Speaker 5 (17:56):
To the ledger and the budget quid pro quo.
Speaker 9 (17:58):
They spent eight hundred fifty thousand dollars in American taxpayer
money for.
Speaker 5 (18:03):
A New York music show.
Speaker 9 (18:04):
They spent one hundred thousand dollars to sponsor an an
Afghan cricket team, and the list goes on and on
and on. The bottom line is President Trump has brought
me in and he's asked me if I will help
write the ship here, and that's what we're working to do.
Speaker 1 (18:22):
All right, So it sounds like it, I mean, obviously
mind blowing here. You talked about now I listened to
your testimony Russian nationals that were writing anti American work
that then go to work for VOA. Talk about Cuban
nationals also anti American going to work. So I guess
the question is can you overturn that firewall? Is there
(18:45):
a way to turn that around? Does President Trump have
the ability to write an executive order saying hey, this
whole thing, we're changing the way we do business here.
Speaker 9 (18:54):
This was a midnight add into an NDAA piece of legislation.
They snuck it in to make it absolutely impossible to
reform this agency. And it was snuck into NDAA piece
of legislation and we can't.
Speaker 5 (19:10):
Get it out.
Speaker 9 (19:10):
It would take an Act of Congress to get it out.
And this is why President Trump has called for us
to reduce this agency to a statutory.
Speaker 5 (19:17):
Minimum, and we have done that. It's down to a
four languages that we.
Speaker 9 (19:21):
Are broadcasting to in addition to broadcasting to Cuba as well.
Speaker 5 (19:26):
And of course the Democrats are throwing a fit. They're
throwing a fit.
Speaker 9 (19:30):
And we've actually reduced the labor force over there. We've
reduced it by eighty five percent. We've cut fourteen hundred
positions at the agency, and we're running lean and mean
right now with the intention of making sure that we're
covering the stories we need to cover in the languages
that are statutorily required, but not doing a whole bunch
(19:50):
of extra stuff that's not required by law. And then
President wants to eliminate the agency starting in October in
fiscal year twenty twenty six.
Speaker 1 (20:00):
Let me play another clip from you during the hearing,
a cut to for the guys behind the glass, and
then get you to expand on this.
Speaker 9 (20:07):
I told these stories to people and many times they say, Wow,
this place sounds like a crime scene. And I Frankly,
have just learned that it is indeed a crime scene.
We've learned that there is an active investigation going on
at VOA for a series of threatening phone calls that
have been coming out going after one of your colleagues,
(20:29):
a sitting member of Congress, with year's worth of threatening
phone calls, and they've discovered that those phone calls were
coming from inside the Voice of America.
Speaker 1 (20:40):
Terry, what is this the mafia? What is that about?
Speaker 5 (20:44):
I'm glad you picked up on that.
Speaker 9 (20:46):
I thought that was a bombshell today, and all I
heard was crickets from the Democrats. They weren't even curious
about it, probably because they expected that those threatening phone calls,
those threats in the phone calls were made at a
Republican and they would be right if they were, assuming
that it was a Republican, a very popular Republican representative
(21:06):
who was on the receiving end of threatening phone calls
from the way I understand what was told to me
over the course of a couple of years, coming from
phones at the Voice of America. And so there's an
active investigation going on, and I hope they catched the culprit. Apparently,
these phone calls were made from October of twenty three
right up until January of twenty five.
Speaker 5 (21:29):
And it's just sickening.
Speaker 9 (21:31):
And it makes sense because if you looked at the
programming and the messaging that was going out, besides it
being many times anti American, it was almost always pushing
toward the globalist agenda. The CCP agenda was pushing toward,
oftentimes a liberal agenda. I mean, for example, when everybody
(21:51):
and their brother finally the light bulb went off and
realized that Joe Biden had some major cognitive issues, especially
after that debate with President Trump, everybody started reporting on
it except VOA. It took them several days to finally
admit there was something wrong. They put out two days
after President Trump was inaugurated this January. Two days later,
(22:12):
they put out a graphic on air showing President Trump
with a swastika and blazoned over his face.
Speaker 5 (22:18):
This is just outrageous.
Speaker 9 (22:20):
And then during the last election, they ran a campaign
basically a campaign ad for Joe Biden to their Urdu language,
which is actually seen by folks in Michigan, and at
the end of that piece, Joe Biden asked for their votes.
This is not the way VOA is supposed to be run.
And this is why we need to eliminate the agency.
(22:41):
Take whatever we can salvage from VOA, if there is anything,
and I believe we need to move it back over
to the State Department. The last time Voice of America
was successful at telling America's story is when it was
housed under the Department of State, where they had guardrails
up so that the messaging that was going out was
in line with our foreign policy. Every American should be
(23:02):
for that. Democrats should be for that. And I can
tell you what, the taxpayers don't want to put one
more penny into this agency until we're running it correctly,
all right, real quick, and you.
Speaker 1 (23:14):
Know the State Department, Mark or Rubio has his hands
his work cut out for him to root the liberals
and radicalism out of that agency. But lastly, what can
you say to people real quick if you can, that
are worried about these stories of meeting at the CCP embassy?
Is that over with? Are we foreign nationals that are dangerous,
(23:34):
could be spies? Can we get them out of this agency?
Or we able to at least protect ourselves from a
national security risk? Here? Real quick? If you can carry well.
Speaker 9 (23:45):
You know, just last week we put out a riff
a reduction of force, and six hundred and thirty nine
additional folks were told they will be terminated. So fourteen
hundred positions have been eliminated. But we can't fire people
by We can only remove positions, so there's a chance
that there could be some near dwells that are still there.
(24:06):
We're going to try to get to the bottom of
who's doing what, who's influenced.
Speaker 5 (24:10):
By the CCP, and see where we can go with that.
Speaker 9 (24:12):
But I agree with President Trump, this entire agency is
rotten and it needs to be eliminated. And then we
can pick up the pieces from there and as I said,
pull over any assets to house under the Public Diplomacy
Bureau over at the Department of State where guess what,
they actually have a Global Media Bureau over there as well,
and that makes sense to put it there. So we'll
(24:33):
see what we can do. We need Congress to help out.
We need Congress to get behind this plan and actually
write the ship.
Speaker 1 (24:40):
Yeah, we sure do. Well, we have complete faith with you,
Kerry Lake, to help us get to that point and
protect American assets. That's why President Trump has you there.
It's always great to see you. Please keep up the fight.
I know you will and let us know how this
all plays out.
Speaker 5 (24:55):
I will thank you Grant absolutely, all right.
Speaker 1 (24:58):
I appreciate having her on very busy, especially after that
testimony in Congress. All right, folks, listen. If you are
dealing with back taxes or miss the April fifteenth deadline,
don't wait. The IRS is rapidly stepping up enforcement. But
there's good news. Tax Network USA is here to help.
Whether you're self employed, run a business, or your books
(25:20):
are a complete mess. Their team knows how to cut
through the chaos and find solutions that work. Your consultation
is always free, and getting ahead of the problem could
help you avoid harsh penalties, wage garnishments, or surprise bank levies.
Take the first step call one in undred nine oh
five eight thousand, or visit TNUSA dot com, forward slash
(25:40):
rev and right now, in honor of our nation's birthday,
Tax Network USA is offering ten percent off all services
through July fourth. Go to TNUSA dot com forward slash
rev to get started. All right, coming on next. There
is a theory out there that two shooters we're on
the ground in Butler, Pennsylvania. Yes, two shooters. We speak
(26:04):
to the man who says he has the facts and
the proof. That's next. Welcome back everyone. There are a
few stories that continue to fester in my mind. That
is the Butler, Pennsylvania assassination, attempted assassination of President Trump,
(26:29):
and this Matthew Crooks who is now shot dead. Say
the FBI accused of trying to kill President Trump and
shooting him in his ear. As we all know and
can remember that video. But the question remains, was it
really Was it really Thomas Matthew Crooks on that roof?
(26:53):
Maybe maybe not? According to a new documentary out called
Who Shot Trump? Watch this.
Speaker 3 (27:00):
Nine to twenty pm? But how is that possible? The
police didn't even question Crook's father until over two hours
later at eleven forty pm. For all the FEDS new
it could be Thomas Crook's father's body on the roof
of AGR at nine to twenty pm. The FBI has
never said they took fingerprints from the body, but even
(27:23):
if they did, Thomas Crooks would had to have been
fingerprinted some other time in his life before July thirteenth
for his fingerprints to be on file.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
There's other strange occurrences here like DNA.
Speaker 3 (27:40):
Listen again, DNA tests take days and you have to
have a reference sample for comparison. That means they would
need a known sample of Thomas Crook's DNA or a
blood relative, and the FBI didn't have either of those
things at nine to twenty pm on the thirteenth.
Speaker 1 (28:02):
There's a couple other big questions, one being could there
have been another shooter in all of this? Now? I
want to tackle some of this with the executive producer
of the new movie that is coming out in July
called Who Shot Trump? JD. Wilcox is with us. JD.
Welcome to the program.
Speaker 5 (28:19):
Hello Grant, it's great to meet you.
Speaker 1 (28:22):
JD. I asked you. I said, look, obviously, Thomas Crooks,
the way I put it to you, isn't running around anymore.
We're pretty sure he's dead. You responded to me, saying,
are we explain to me why you can respond that way?
Speaker 7 (28:40):
I think anybody who wants to investigate this attempted assassination,
which should start with the basic questions. The government says,
Thomas Crooks is the lone gunman. How do we know
the government says that the body on the roof of
AGR belongs to Thomas Matthew Crooks. How do we know.
As far as I can tell, the federal governments, the FBI,
(29:03):
and the Congressional Task Force have provided no evidence that
that body is Promise Matthew Crooks. I'm not saying it isn't.
I'm just saying, show me the proof. And they've never made.
What about any proof?
Speaker 1 (29:17):
What about the family? I mean, wouldn't the family be saying, well,
it's not my son. He's alive, and well he's playing
video games in the basement.
Speaker 7 (29:25):
I'd love for the Crooks family to say that that
body is their son. But I can't find any statement
of any kind that the family has made. They've hired
a very high priced lawyer, but they've saved silent, and
as far as I can tell, there was never even
a funeral or any kind of memorial service. Oh and
by the way, the body was quickly cremated with the
(29:47):
express permission of the FBI a couple of days after
the assassination attempt. So we can't even take that body
back now and do DNA testing to find out who
it really is because it's been destroyed.
Speaker 1 (30:01):
The cremation was very odd in my mind that it
happened so quick. Now, part of your documentary, you spent
a lot of money. You had experts come in, and
you did three D graphing of the site. You we'll
show some video of what you actually did. Now, after
you and your experts review this, go ahead and put
it up, guys, if you can. After you and your
(30:21):
experts review these three D images that you create, you
raised the question and you say, you may have proof.
I put may in there, but you may have proof
that there was a second shooter. Lay this out for me.
Speaker 7 (30:36):
Okay, So what the viewers are seeing right now is
the photogrammetry model that we created based on the Butler
Farm Show.
Speaker 1 (30:45):
And this isn't Google Earth.
Speaker 7 (30:47):
We actually had specialists photographs and scanned the entire area
with lasers, and then we assembled all that data inside
a computer, and the computer creates a hyper accurate three
D model of the entire area, all the buildings, the bleachers,
all the farm equipment that was placed to prevent snipers
(31:07):
from shooting at Trump. This view that you're looking at
right here shows just sort of a general view from
the fence line between the Butler Farm Show and AGR.
But I also sent you another picture that shows what
the shooter would have seen from his perch on the
AGR roof. I don't know if you have that, but
if you go to that one of the interest, that's
(31:28):
it right there, so if you can so, I know
it's hard to see that great figure standing on the stage.
That's President Trump down there. And this is much better
than the shooter could see because this is magnified. This
is about ten x magnification. The shooter would have been
ten times farther away, so Trump would have been even
(31:51):
smaller on the stage. And this picture from our model
answers a big question that I've had for a long time.
How come crooks shoots Trump when he's standing, but when
he's laying on the stage with a whole bunch of
Secret Service personnel piled on top of them, Trump doesn't
get shot again, and none of the Secret Service people
get shot again. And that's because you can see from
(32:13):
this picture. When Trump is laying down on the stage,
this grand stands and this farm equipment actually block that
shooter's view of Trump, so he couldn't shoot Trump when
Trump is lying on the stage. That's why he ended
up shooting. Corey comparator, who's in those stands between Trump
and the shooter.
Speaker 1 (32:32):
And what leads you to believe then that there was
another shooter that would have shot atch President Trump?
Speaker 5 (32:41):
Excellent question.
Speaker 7 (32:42):
So in looking at this three D model, we not
only found places that shooters couldn't shoot from, but we
found several that they could shoot from, And then we
started investigating those possibilities. If a shooter could be here,
do we have any evidence that they were there? And
we have uncovered for sick and photographic evidence of one
(33:03):
bullet that could not have been fired from the perch
on top of AGR where the dead body was found.
There's at least at least one bullet that could not
have come from that area, and we would present that
evidence in the movie. And it's not my theory, it's
not my feeling. It's hard photographic evidence and trajectories that
(33:25):
we've traced back. So there's really once you see the evidence,
you won't be able to argue it's it's just science
and math. It's not my friend with the facts, and.
Speaker 1 (33:35):
I understand why you would hold that back. The movie's
coming out, So one bullet that doesn't add up sounds
to me like John F. Kennedy situation here with a
bullet out of nowhere. You got this one bullet that
doesn't add up. The FBI, you believe, and real quick
if you can for me, has done all the same
mapping you did, which would mean they know everything you know.
(33:58):
You now believe there is a cover up in all
of this, even after my friend Cash Hotel said k's closed.
Real quick, if you can, you believe there's a cover up.
Speaker 7 (34:08):
We have a source that informed us that the FBI
did the same photogrammetry that we did. They created the
same models that we have. And if I know that
there's evidence, strong evidence of a second shooter, that means
the FBI knows it and they've been sitting on that
evidence for almost a year, just as I had. I
did my photogramma tree in September. They did theirs in July.
(34:31):
So they've had that knowledge even longer than I have,
and their model is probably even better. So they know
what I know, and I know there's evidence of a
second shooter. The FBI, you know, maybe they're hiding this
from Cash Hotel. I can't believe that he knows what
I know, and he wouldn't say something about it. But
if he doesn't know, he'll know on July thirteenth when
(34:52):
we show this to the world, all right.
Speaker 1 (34:54):
And that's going to be shown not far from where
I broadcast from, in the famous Texas Theater I mentioned JFK.
That's where OZ was ultimately found. I appreciate you coming
on JD. Will Cox and giving us a little preview
of this. We'll be watching July thirteenth when Who Shot
Trump comes out, premiering at the Texas Theater right here
in Dallas, Texas. Jay Wilcox, thank you, Thank you, sir.
(35:16):
All Right, all right, folks, you need to learn about
energized health and intercellular hydration. Supercharge your energy, boost your
immune system, and dramatically increase your brain function, look and
feel the years younger through a simple and natural process.
Don't believe me. Go to energizedhealth dot com and check
out hundreds of amazing testimonials. Energized Health offers a one
hundred percent money back guarantee. They're a plus rated and
(35:39):
have helped thousands over twenty years. Go to energizehealth dot com.
While you are there, check out their Freemaster class that's
energizedhealth dot com. All right, the left has entrenched themselves
into Texas politics. Heed this warning. Next, folks, wokeism has
(36:07):
infected all levels of education. But when you expect wokeism
to really have infected education in Texas, well, this is
the case. I want to pull out a cut from
ut Austin, University of Texa in Austin Department of Women's
and Gender Sexuality Studies. Tax Payer money goes to this stuff.
Transgender and non binary individuals, especially black and LATINX trans people,
(36:32):
face staggering barriers to healthcare, including fear of discrimination, mistreatment,
and lack of support from medical providers on trans and
gender affirming care, to name a few. This is what
they're teaching wrong, wrong. So why does the state legislature,
which is overwhelmingly Republican in Texas step in and stop
(36:54):
this from happening? Well, I want to bring in now
Texas State House Representative Republican Brian Harrison is with us. Representative.
It's great to have you back on the program. Always
great to be with you from my friend. All right,
So could the legislature have stopped.
Speaker 10 (37:11):
Us unequivocally and you said something at the top that
I need to parse out a little bit. You said
the Texas legislature is overwhelmingly a Republican. That's true, but
it is not overwhelmingly conservative. But the Texas voters, Texas
is a republican state. We re elected President Trump with
a fourteen point mandates, and we have a reputation, as
(37:32):
you know, for leading in individual liberty and freedom and
small government and conservative values. But here's the facts that
America needs to understand. For far too many years, the
Texas government has been simply coasting on that reputation. And
the reality is hard working, patriotic, freedom loving Texans are
being taxed out of their homes for what to fund
the Biden Harris agenda, even though voters overwhelmingly rejected them
(37:54):
at the ballot box.
Speaker 1 (37:55):
And what do I mean by that?
Speaker 5 (37:57):
What I mean is just the example you showed.
Speaker 10 (37:58):
Our public universities in the state of Texas are run
by radical progressive leftists. They are off the rails. It's
like the inmates are running the asylum. The University of Texas,
University of Houston, Texas A and m University of Texas,
San Antonio. Almost every major public university in the state
of Texas has not just a course, but an entire
undergraduate program in LGBTQ transgender studies. My alma mater, Texas
(38:23):
A and N has entire courses to train the next
generation of government DEI staff, and the University of Texas
just earlier this year announced they were going to give
free free socialism right free college to families that make
up to one hundred thousand dollars a year, even if
you're illegal aliens, to come to the University of Texas
and study transgender studies. This is off the rails. The
(38:46):
voters of Texas are being betrayed. I actually, I think
it's one of the biggest forms of a voter for
aud in America. Texas voters voter for Republicans, but we've
got the Austin Uni Party liberal swamp taxing them out
of their homes to fund a woke left progressive of agenda.
And I'm doing everything I can to stop it.
Speaker 1 (39:02):
All Right, you could go through when you see the
radicalism spelled out literally in the syllabus, the course descriptions,
the descriptions of the programs, all of it. Do you
offer up a bill to say, hey, we need to
defund this from our state universities. And then what do
your fellow Republicans say.
Speaker 10 (39:21):
I filed bill after bill to end taxpayer funded DEI,
bill after bill to end transgender and doctrination in our
public universities. And it's not the Democrats who stop it.
It's the so called Republicans in the Texas House who
put motions on the floor to table or not even
to bring up every single one of those bills. And
I'll just give you one more example. My office obtained
(39:41):
a syllabus again from the University of Texas where the
professor was coercing students in order to get higher grades.
She was coercing than male students to go to public
clothing stores and try on at least three articles.
Speaker 5 (39:57):
Of women's clothing.
Speaker 10 (39:58):
The same thing for the women. She was worse than
the female students to go to a public clothing score
and put on three articles of men's clothing and if
they did that, you would get a higher grade. This
is transgender ideology on steroids, and Texas taxpayers are funding it.
Will We're going to be called into a special session
because we did nothing to ban transgender in doctrination in
our universities in the last five months. In the regular session,
(40:20):
but I will file every single one of my bills
to end taxpayer funded DEI and transgender.
Speaker 5 (40:25):
In doctrination in the state of Texas.
Speaker 10 (40:26):
When we go back to special session in two weeks,
I hope Governor Rabbit puts it on the call so
we can finally ban these things.
Speaker 1 (40:31):
But here's the reality.
Speaker 10 (40:32):
We should have banned this nonsense years ago. Just one
more example, hardworking Texans. Just the legislature, all Republicans voted
to take one point five billion dollars, take it out
of their hardworking back pockets and put it in the hands.
Speaker 5 (40:45):
Of liberal Hollywood.
Speaker 1 (40:47):
That's right.
Speaker 10 (40:47):
The Texas government is bribing California companies and Hollywood to
move to Texas and using taxpayer funds to do it.
It's an absolute outrage, and I appreciate you helping us
brain transparency to it.
Speaker 1 (40:59):
Absolutely. And there's a fine line there, because I understand
they got Louisiana, Oklahoma bringing in all these movies. Many
of them were getting some at least not as woke
movies being made, so you want to make sure that
the right movies. There's a fine line there. But this
bribery of students to dress up like the opposite sex.
If this happened to my son, who's sixteen years old,
(41:21):
if God forbid he goes to one of these universities
and his bribed like that, he's strong enough to say
I'm not doing it. But there's a lot of kids
that aren't strong enough to say they're not doing it.
And that's outrageous. She ought to be investigated and stripped
of her position at that university. I'll tell you what,
Brian Harrison, you always bring me great stories. Anytime you
got something, you just keep emailing me and we'll keep
(41:42):
bringing you on.
Speaker 10 (41:43):
Buddy, Well, I appreciate you helping open the eyes not
just to everyone here in Texas, but across America. God
bless you, grant, God bless the great day of Texas,
and God bless America.
Speaker 1 (41:52):
Amen to that, all right, folks, to make America Healthy
again movement is gaining ground among major food producers. We
get into this next. Doctor Peter McCullough is with us. Folks.
Have you heard of the organization, the Global Alliance for
(42:14):
Vaccine Immunization. It's called gov GETS. Who the head of
it is? Bill Gates? Okay, RFK Junior with a big
announcement regarding that that.
Speaker 11 (42:24):
America has provided in funding since two thousand and one,
and I'll tell you how to start taking vaccine safety seriously.
Consider the best science available, even when the science contradicts
established paradigms. Until that happens, the United States won't contribute
more to GOBY define success not just in terms of
(42:44):
the number of vaccines delivered, but on their rigorously measured
overall impacts. Business as usual is over, unaccountable, and OPEG
policy making is over.
Speaker 1 (42:57):
The most important part of that is no more funding
from the United States for GOVI this is a good
thing I want to bring in now, world renowned doctor,
chief scientific officer over at the Wellness Company. My friend
doctor Peter McCullough is with us. Doc. Great to have
you back on. Thank you all right. I asked you
on my podcast in Shield just this week. Should we
(43:19):
be upset with RFK Junior? This obviously is probably a
pretty decent move your thoughts. I agree?
Speaker 3 (43:26):
You know.
Speaker 12 (43:26):
It turns out Bill Gates just stepped in with over
a billion dollars now to GABY the Global Vaccine Alliance.
Gates seems to be hell bent on global mass vaccination.
Why would a philanthro capitalist be so focused on vaccines.
Gas has said there is no investment that gives him
(43:47):
a better return than vaccines.
Speaker 1 (43:51):
All right, so RK Junior makes this move, But we
still have the COVID vaccine on the market. This is
not safe. I've told people over and over again. I
have people I trust, you, other doctors at the wellness company.
It's not safe. Why is it still on the market.
No one knows.
Speaker 12 (44:12):
Grant, it hasn't been pulled off the market in any country.
Right now, USA Fax is reporting huge numbers of COVID
nineteen vaccines are just dumped down the drain.
Speaker 5 (44:24):
Billions of American.
Speaker 12 (44:25):
Taxpayer dollars going for vaccines for nothing because Americans.
Speaker 1 (44:29):
Don't want them. Doc, first and foremost, you were a cardiologist.
If I have my facts straight, myer chorditis, the enlarging
of the heart, I'm sure I oversimplify it is a
side effect of these vaccines. They now say it in
the commercial for the vaccines may cause enlargement of heart.
We were told this was craziness. These were totally safe
(44:50):
when these first came out. They now say it on
a commercial they're selling the vaccine.
Speaker 12 (44:55):
We're talking my charditis, heart damage that leads to cardiac
arrestaur a heart grant. They haven't gone far enough. They
should put a black box warning down these products. If
they're going to stay on the market, they have to
warn people that they could take the shot, get heart
damage and die of a cardiac arrest.
Speaker 1 (45:12):
All right, what is that a black box warning? That
first question? Second question? Should the Attorney General be investigating
how this all went down?
Speaker 5 (45:21):
Black box warning is the most serious warning.
Speaker 2 (45:24):
You know.
Speaker 12 (45:24):
There are plenty of black box warnings on all kinds
of drugs. I'll give you an example, you Lorik, it's
a popular drug for gout. It's got a black box
warning from cardiovascular death. There are fatal cases of mylcreditis.
I presented them in the US Senate. It's in the
record May twenty first, twenty twenty five. Grand black box
warnings have to get on these package inserts, and you
(45:47):
know what. Package inserts are subject to regulatory law and
the Department of Justice. I think there should be an
investigation because the FDA is involved in obscuring the risks of.
Speaker 5 (45:59):
The to the public.
Speaker 1 (46:02):
Are you upset with what appears to be the lack
of investigations of holding anybody accountable from the doctor faucies
of the world and beyond by this Justice Department, the FBI, etc.
Speaker 12 (46:13):
We're long overdue for special consuls special counsels on the
investigating the origins of stars Kobe two, suppression of treatment,
and the disastrous vaccine program. We need three separate investigations.
Speaker 5 (46:25):
Long overdue.
Speaker 1 (46:27):
It isn't that the truth. We've got special counsels on everything,
it seems like, and yet nothing on this. And then
it goes back to boy big Farmer gives an awful
lot of money to these lawmakers. I'm sure that has
something to do with it. Doctor Peter McCullough. I appreciate
the truth that you and all the other doctors over
the Wellness Company offer up for us. Thank you, sir
for coming on. Thank you all right, folks, I mean it.
(46:49):
The Wellness Company is a great company. I'm proud to
align myself with them. Here's what you do to go
get this spike detox Okay, very important. You got the
emergency metap kit with prescription medications to keep you and
your family safe. There's also the parasite cleansed. Those are
just three of literally dozens of products TWC dot Health
(47:10):
Forward slash voice. Use the promo code voice at checkout
to save ten percent off of your order. That's TWC
dot Health Forward slash Voice. I'm back in a flash
with some final thoughts. All right, welcome back everyone. Such
(47:31):
a packed show. We're already finished with it. That's gonna
do it for us. Don't forget my website Grandstinsfield dot com.
Follow me on social media Stinchfield seventeen seventy six on
just about every social media platform. Please, if you're watching,
like and share the program Stinchfield's Army Rolls. We'll see
you tomorrow night
Popular Podcasts
Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club
Welcome to Bookmarked by Reese’s Book Club — the podcast where great stories, bold women, and irresistible conversations collide! Hosted by award-winning journalist Danielle Robay, each week new episodes balance thoughtful literary insight with the fervor of buzzy book trends, pop culture and more. Bookmarked brings together celebrities, tastemakers, influencers and authors from Reese's Book Club and beyond to share stories that transcend the page. Pull up a chair. You’re not just listening — you’re part of the conversation.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com