The Charlie Kirk Show, June 27, 2025

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Of time.

Speaker 2 (00:00):
We're going to follow the law, We're going to make
those decisions, and we're going to do what's right in
the bounds of the law.

Speaker 3 (00:05):
And then didn't ask the justices to rule on the
merits of the birthright Citizenship band just for explanation purposes.

Speaker 2 (00:12):
Why sure, because that's going to come down in October
in the separate This was huge because it's indirectly impacted today.
As I said, it's now it's case by case. Let
me reiterate of the thirty five of the forty nationwide
injunctions filed against this president against his executive authority as

(00:32):
president of the United States, thirty five of them came
from Maryland, DC, Massachusetts, California, Washington. And that's crazy, these
five districts. So, yes, it indirectly impacts us. It will
be a separate decision in October. Next question, mister President,
a question for you, sir.

Speaker 4 (00:52):
Do you believe this ends the power of the lower
court judges to stop your agenda? Do you see this
as a full green light for your agenda going forward?

Speaker 5 (00:59):
Well, you'd have to really speak to the lawyers about that.
But this is really also a decision based on common sense.

Speaker 6 (01:05):
It didn't work the other way.

Speaker 5 (01:06):
It was a disaster with somebody from a certain location
in a very liberal state, or a liberal judge or
a liberal group of judges could tie up a whole
country for years because their decision would sometimes take years
to overturn.

Speaker 6 (01:21):
We've overturned many of the decisions, but it would take
years to do it.

Speaker 5 (01:24):
And we have to act quickly when it comes to
a legal immigration. We have murderers, killers, we have drug dealers,
we have what they've allowed to come into our country
should never be forgotten. It should never be forgotten what
they've done to our country, and we have to be
able to act very quickly, and we're going to do that.

Speaker 4 (01:42):
Then you, sir, I know that you praised her and
her opinion here in this case. She has taken some
heat though from some of your supporters who have lad
with her week squishy a rattled law professor.

Speaker 7 (01:55):
What is your take on that?

Speaker 6 (01:56):
Do you think about that?

Speaker 5 (01:57):
I just have great respect for I always have, and
her decision was brilliantly written today from all accounts.

Speaker 1 (02:05):
Transgender President, what would you say to Americans fear that
this is more and more concentration of power in the
White House?

Speaker 6 (02:15):
And executive. This way, it brings back the Constitution. This
is what it's all about. And this is really the
opposite of that. I mean, the question is fine, but
this is the opposite. The Constitution has been brought back
so much. Eagle crossings in the border are zero now zero.
Does everyone hear that?

Speaker 5 (02:43):
I like him, he's working the cameras.

Speaker 8 (02:49):
President tends to engage leaders from South America.

Speaker 9 (02:56):
Only stand.

Speaker 6 (02:58):
Do that anyway? I do that and if you have.

Speaker 10 (03:02):
A respection of meeting some presidents from South America as a.

Speaker 5 (03:05):
Result something as an example, not South America, but NATO
over the weekend. They have great respect for our country.
Now they did things that nobody thought was possible. They
took funding from two percent to five percent. Nobody thought
they had paid the two percent, and now they're paying
the five percent.

Speaker 6 (03:22):
It's over a trillion dollars more a year.

Speaker 5 (03:24):
Think of that, a trillion dollars. Nobody thought that could happen.
That's a different group of people, different countries. But we
get along with a lot of countries. We are respected again.
Our country, the US is respected again, was not respected
six months ago.

Speaker 11 (03:42):
Yes, you have a deadline coming up on trade in
two weeks.

Speaker 6 (03:47):
Which country contree on terrace.

Speaker 11 (03:51):
Which countries, if any, are close to appreeans with the administry.

Speaker 6 (03:54):
Well, that's an interesting question.

Speaker 5 (03:55):
UH, we've made a deal with China, We've made a
deal with uh probably for or five different countries. With
the UK was a great deal for both, and we're
in the process of making some others. But ultimately infect
Scott is here, Howard Luttnik. These two guys have been
doing an incredible job and the people that work with
them have been doing.

Speaker 6 (04:14):
An incredible job.

Speaker 5 (04:15):
But you know, we have two hundred countries, you could
say two hundred countries plus.

Speaker 6 (04:19):
We can't do that.

Speaker 5 (04:20):
So at a certain point over the next week and
a half or so or maybe before, we're going to
send out a letter. We talked to many of the
countries and we're just going to tell them what they
have to pay to do business in the United States.
And it's going to go very quickly.

Speaker 6 (04:34):
But some of the.

Speaker 5 (04:35):
Bigger countries or India, I think we're going to reach
a deal where we have the right to go in
and trade. Right now, it's restricted. You can't walk in there,
you can't even think about it. We're looking to get
a full trade barrier dropping, which is unthinkable and I'm
not sure that that's going to happen, but as of
this moment, we've agreed to that go into Indian trade.

(04:55):
We're going to be trading in China. That's going to
come a little bit down the road, but we're going
to be trading.

Speaker 1 (05:02):
Every day.

Speaker 12 (05:03):
There is a battle for your mind, raging information coming
from every angle, but the will to the sieve, fear not.
You found the place for truth, the voice.

Speaker 6 (05:12):
Of a generation that still has the will.

Speaker 12 (05:14):
To believe in the greatest country in the history of
the world. This is the Charlie Kirk Show. Fuck a lot.
Here we go on.

Speaker 1 (05:26):
Okay, everybody, we're here at the Bitcoin dot Com Studio.
That's the Bitcoin dot Com Studio. We're gonna strike to
President Trump's press conference. We're just gonna cut live. This
is such a big day. There's nothing I can say
that is nearly as important as the President. Let's listen
live to the President of the United States.

Speaker 6 (05:40):
No, no, wait, wait, just listen. They came up with
something that delayed the credit.

Speaker 5 (05:45):
That are great pilots and these great America I mean,
they want talent. That was and they hit it right
down in the spot fifty two thousand feet. Think of
this dark, no moon, You couldn't see a thing. And
they hit the refrigerator door. As they say, that's the
size of target and overwhelmingly, and it's amazing what was done.

Speaker 6 (06:06):
We're the only ones they could.

Speaker 5 (06:07):
Have done it, and we took out the two of
the other sites also in addition to that, we finished
them off.

Speaker 6 (06:13):
That was very evil intention.

Speaker 5 (06:16):
I believe that, and again time will tell, but I
don't believe that they're going to go back into nuclear
anytime soon. They spent over a trillion dollars on nuclear
and they never got it together and nothing was moved
from the site. By the way, to do that is
very dangerous. It's very very heavy material. Those cars were
most likely the cars of masons because they were pouring

(06:38):
concrete at the top at the hatch as you know,
the hats going into the nuclear site. They wanted to
reinforce it and they had some masons there pouring concrete.
By the way, that concrete was obliterated. It hit exactly
at the concrete it was. I don't think it had
a chance to dry. But everything's down there, it's under

(06:58):
millions of tons of rock, yes, of the.

Speaker 2 (07:08):
States, countries and the headisphere.

Speaker 13 (07:10):
So why haven't you get.

Speaker 5 (07:11):
Consuled temporary protective status to that country?

Speaker 6 (07:13):
Was it part of the deal?

Speaker 5 (07:14):
Well, we'll take a look. We've had a great relationship
with El salvad Or. They have a fantastic leader. They
built a massive prison system and I don't.

Speaker 6 (07:24):
Know exactly why, but it's a hell of a system.

Speaker 5 (07:26):
And we bring people there and when they go there,
they don't get out, and frankly, when they hear they
have to go there, they become very nice people. They
become very nice people. It's a tough system, but it's
a brilliant system. And uh, it's a system done by
a very very good leader. And we'll talk about El
salvad a lot of respect.

Speaker 14 (07:49):
For the Attorney general as you go into negotiations and
talks with their own. Are you demanding not only that
there would be no uranian production inside of your own
but also that you will would turn over all existing
stockpiles of iranion.

Speaker 5 (08:03):
Well, you know, we're a little early for that, but
something like that. Yeah, we'll do something like that. Let
me say that I've been saying for twenty five years,
even as a civilian, you cannot let them have a
nuclear weapon, and that's what happened.

Speaker 6 (08:17):
It's been obliterated.

Speaker 5 (08:18):
It would be years before they could ever get going,
and I really think it's probably the last thing they
have to recover from a hell of a tough war.

Speaker 14 (08:26):
Would you also be demanding that the IAEA have full
rights to inspect in Iran.

Speaker 5 (08:31):
Or somebody, yeah, or somebody that we respect, including ourselves.

Speaker 14 (08:35):
And a question for both the prins and the Attorney
General under birthright citizenship.

Speaker 1 (08:39):
If this is implemented, who would.

Speaker 14 (08:41):
Be tasked with actually vetting citizenship and how like would
this be a situation where you have nurses and doctors
checking for citizenship of parents or This.

Speaker 2 (08:51):
Is all pending litigation. It's going to be decided in
October by the Supreme Court, and we'll discuss that after
the litigation.

Speaker 14 (08:59):
If you haven't documented baby, would that baby then be
an enforcement priority?

Speaker 2 (09:05):
The violent criminals in our country are the priority. Now,
let me put it in perspective. Today marked the two thousand,
seven hundred and eleventh arrest in our country of TDA members.

Speaker 6 (09:19):
Just TDA.

Speaker 2 (09:20):
Everyone in this room agrees they're one of the most
violent criminal organizations in the world and the Biden administration
let them walk into our country, walk into our country.
For the last four years, two thousand, seven hundred and
eleven of them today have been arrested in our country.
That is the priority of Donald Trump. That is the

(09:40):
priority of this country of homely insecurity of all of
our lawyers of FBI. That's the priority that will be
discussed in October when the Supreme Court hopefully rules in
our favor, and we're very confident of that. But you
should all feel safer now that President Trump can deport
all of these all of these gangs, and not one
district court judge can think they're an emperor over this

(10:04):
administration and his executive powers. And why the people of
the United States elected him.

Speaker 6 (10:11):
I this might add one thing.

Speaker 5 (10:13):
And you know, they used birthright citizenship, some of the
worst people, some of the cartels to get people into
our country. Just so you know, and again I say,
if you look at the end of the Civil War
the eighteen hundreds, it was a very turbulent time.

Speaker 6 (10:26):
If you take the end day.

Speaker 5 (10:27):
Was it eighteen sixty nine or whatever, but you take
that exact day, that's when the case was filed and
the case ended shortly thereafter. This has to do with
the babies of slaves, very very obviously, and I.

Speaker 6 (10:41):
Think we're going to win. People didn't. I don't think
they went about discussing it right.

Speaker 5 (10:44):
I came along and we we looked and we said,
wait a minute, this is wrong. We've been looking at
birthright citizenship wrong for years. But they've used that. The
cartels have used birthright citizenship to get very bad people in.
And what Pam's doing, and what Todd and everybody else
what they're doing and all over FBI ice Border Patrol.
These are incredible people. They're trying to keep our country

(11:08):
safe and they don't want to have people come in.
This is just another way that they get illegal immigrants
into our country, and in some cases, very very bad ones.

Speaker 6 (11:17):
Go ahead, pident on.

Speaker 11 (11:19):
Your tax bill if I could for a moment. Senators
are racing to rewrite parts of it right now after
the Senate Parliamentarian ruled that sections of it were outside
of the process that they're using to get this through.
Do you think that senators should respect the decisions of
the parliamentarian And what have you personally done in the
last forty eight hours to try and get Republican Senators

(11:41):
who are against the bill to a.

Speaker 5 (11:42):
Yes, Well, look, it's a great bill. It's a massive
tax cut. If it's not approved, your taxes will go
by sixty eight percent.

Speaker 6 (11:51):
Think of that sixty eight record, the highest in the history.

Speaker 5 (11:54):
The Democrats won't approve it only because politically it's so
good for the Republicans. The Democrats aren't approved it, But
think of what they're not approving. They're not approving border security.
We've done a great job at the border, but we
have to add some war. We have to do various things.
We have no money for that. We have no money
for the border. We have no money for so many things.

(12:14):
But if the Democrats, it'll be interesting to see if
we get any Democrat, Well we should. If I were
a Democrat, I would absolutely maybe Fetterman, because he seems
to be the most sensible one lately. If I were
a Democrat, I would vote for this bill all day long,
because it's tax cuts and so many other things that
are common sense. They're basic things. I think they're doing fine.

(12:36):
The Parliamentarian has been a little difficult, and I would
say that I disagree with the Parliamentarian on some things
and in other ways he's been fine, but we'll have
to say it's a big issue.

Speaker 6 (12:48):
I will tell you this.

Speaker 5 (12:49):
If that bill doesn't pass, the country will get a
sixty eight sixty eight percent tax increase.

Speaker 6 (12:55):
So think of this.

Speaker 5 (12:57):
You're a Democrat and you vote against it, you're voting
in favor because essentially you're voting in favor the largest
tax hike.

Speaker 6 (13:05):
In the history of our country. And you can't do that.

Speaker 5 (13:08):
In addition, we're cutting costs by one point seven trillion
dollars and it won't affect anybody.

Speaker 6 (13:13):
It's just fraud, waste, and abuse.

Speaker 9 (13:18):
A leading mister President, a leading global economists, just at
a one to eighty and says, your tariff plan, you
may have smarted everybody with it.

Speaker 6 (13:26):
What is your message? I love this, I love this question.
This is the favorite. This is the best question I've.

Speaker 5 (13:32):
Ever been asked, because I've been going through abuse for
years on this because as you know, we're taking in
hundreds of billions of dollars, no inflation whatsoever.

Speaker 9 (13:44):
Mister President, what is your message to critics? You think
your tariff plan will cause a recession.

Speaker 6 (13:48):
I think they should go back to business school. It's
so obvious, it's so obvious.

Speaker 5 (13:53):
I mean we're taking in billions and billions of dollars
from China and a lot of other countries we took in.
I had a call from somebody in the house and
high official Sir, we have a problem. We don't know
what to do. The books are a mess, I said,
what do I mean by the books? The books, the money?
The money coming in is.

Speaker 1 (14:12):
Okay, everybody, I need to tell you about one of
our partners here. Then we'll get back to the President
of the United States and his press conference. Reliefactor dot
com one hundred percent drug free relief Factor. Check it
out right now. If you guys are in pain, you
guys can get out of pain easily at relieffactor dot com.
If pain is affecting you, see how relief Factor can
get you back to living the life on your terms
one where you say yes a lot more. Relief Factor

(14:33):
is a daily supplement that fights pain naturally. So give
relief Factor three week quick start to try. It's only
nineteen ninety five, so take a look at it right
now at reliefactor dot com for less than a dollar
a day. Just go to relief factor dot com or
call one eight hundred four relief. See how with less
pain you could say yes to more of everything that
you want. Again, developed by doctors, Relief Factors unique formula

(14:54):
of natural ingredients doesn't just mask pain, helps reduce or
eliminate it, whether it's backneck, joints, muscles. Relief Factor can
help you, as it has for so many others. Just
go to relief Factor dot com. That is relief factor
dot com. So take a look at it right now
at relief factor dot com. Email us as always freedom
at charliekirk dot com and subscribe to the Charliekirkshow podcast page.

(15:18):
Our podcast is doing extraordinarily well. And when you guys
take out your phone and subscribe to our podcast, you
guys can be part of this very successful program. Get
your tickets right now to the Student Action Summit. That's
SAS twenty twenty five dot com. That is two weeks
from today we kick off SaaS SAS twenty twenty five
dot com. President Trump's press conference continues. Let's continue to listen.

Speaker 5 (15:48):
Some countries are very angry because they've been ripping us
off for years. They've been making billions and billions of dollars.
There was nobody to negotiate with they could do whatever
they want. They charge just terrifs, by the way, at
numbers that we've never seen before, and we ended up
losing much more than a trillion dollars a year a
trillion dollars a year to on trade. And now they

(16:10):
are being met with a force that's far greater.

Speaker 6 (16:12):
Than them, and they don't like it.

Speaker 5 (16:14):
So they're upset because instead of making you know, five
billion dollars, they're going.

Speaker 6 (16:20):
To break even or they'll make a little bit. I
want to be nice, they'll make a little bit, or
we'll make a little bit.

Speaker 5 (16:25):
It's a big difference. Yeah, please go, But Redress, is there.

Speaker 15 (16:32):
Any more information on the special prosecutor?

Speaker 6 (16:35):
So many Americans still.

Speaker 2 (16:36):
Have questions about the twenty twenty.

Speaker 15 (16:37):
Election, And speaking of rogue judges, or would you consider
appointing somebody at DOJ maybe to investigate the judges that
allowed for the political persecution of you, you're family, and
your supporters during the Biden administration?

Speaker 6 (16:49):
I love you? Who are you?

Speaker 15 (16:51):
On per from Lindel TV.

Speaker 5 (16:53):
Well, it's just a very nice question and it's not
a set up. I have no idea who you are,
but I appreciate that question. All I can say is
we're not here for that. I hope so I hope
they're doing the thing because that election was rigged and
stolen and we can't allow that to happen.

Speaker 6 (17:09):
You know a lot of people tell me, sir, you
just one of the greatest.

Speaker 1 (17:23):
Okay, everybody, welcome back. Email us as always. Freedom at
Charliekirk dot com, at the bitcoin dot com studio, buy, sell,
trade bitcoin at bitcoin dot com, your place, your home
of democratized finance. Let's listen more to President Trump, to people.

Speaker 5 (17:40):
That were murderers eleven thousand, eight hundred and eighty eight
to be exact murderers.

Speaker 6 (17:45):
And we've captured.

Speaker 5 (17:46):
Many of those murderers and we're bringing them back, or
some of them are so dangerous that we don't even
want to bring them back.

Speaker 6 (17:52):
We're afraid they're going to try and come back in.

Speaker 5 (17:54):
But he allowed people to come into this country, people
from mental institutions, insane asylums, that's a mental institution on steroids,
people from mental institutions, a gang members, drug dealers, people
oh jails being emptied out into our country. Venezuela emptied out.
It's almost its entire prison population into our country, but

(18:17):
I don't want to blame them. Many countries have done that.

Speaker 6 (18:20):
The Congo. You know, we have a.

Speaker 5 (18:22):
Great press conference coming up later and it's the Congo
and Rwanda. You know, they were fighting for years and
it was machetes, it was vicious. It was as vicious
people's heads being chopped off. And I have a man
who's very good in that part of the world, very smart,
and put them together and we're signing a peace treaty today,

(18:44):
first time in many years.

Speaker 6 (18:45):
They're gonna have peace. And that's a big deal. You know.
We talk about Russia and we're gonna work.

Speaker 5 (18:51):
We're working that one President Putin called up and he said,
I'd love to help you with Iran.

Speaker 6 (18:57):
I said, do me a favor. I'll handle a round
on help me with a Russia. We got to get that.

Speaker 5 (19:02):
One settled, and I think something's going to happen there.
But we did some We did some great work India
and Pakistan.

Speaker 6 (19:10):
I was going to be a maybe nuclear We did that.
We did a lot of work. I don't know if
there's ever been a president that's done much more.

Speaker 5 (19:17):
Serbia Kosovo is going to go at It going to
be a big war. I said, you go at it,
there's no trade with the United States. They said, well,
maybe we won't.

Speaker 6 (19:26):
Go at it.

Speaker 5 (19:27):
That's what happened with India and Pakistan. I was negotiating
with both of them, and I said to Scott, I
said to Howard, cancel all deals with India and Pakistan.
They're not trading with us because they're in a war.
They call back, what do we do? I said, look,
you want to have trade with the United States, it's great,
but you want to go and start using nuclear weapons

(19:49):
on each other.

Speaker 6 (19:50):
We're not going to allow that. And they both agreed.
Both have great leaders, they both agreed not to do it.
So we did a lot. But I appreciate that question.

Speaker 2 (20:04):
Thank you so much.

Speaker 6 (20:05):
Thank you Range, Thank you, mister President.

Speaker 2 (20:07):
I was just speaking with Sindor Ron Johnson on the
One Big Beautiful Bill.

Speaker 8 (20:11):
And he says he really wants to get to yes
for you and.

Speaker 6 (20:14):
Get this accomplished. Yes, he's a good man, but he also.

Speaker 2 (20:16):
Said that he needs more time and he is not
certain that the July fourth deadline is Well, then.

Speaker 5 (20:20):
He's not such a good because he's a good man.
Ron Johnson's doing a good job. He's very committed. Every
Republican senator is committed, and you know, you could have
a couple of grandstandards and all fair news, you could
have somebody else. And it's very dangerous because our country
would go from being the most successful country in the
world to who knows what happens with the sixty eight

(20:41):
percent think of it, sixty eight percent tax increase that
was given by the Democrats because they like high taxes.

Speaker 6 (20:48):
I don't know what happened.

Speaker 5 (20:49):
You know, all my life i'd grow up and I'd
watch politicians talking, let's say, oh, it's fun, and they
were always saying, we will cut your taxes. We will
cut your tax I never heard it. They say we
will raise your taxes, and they elect people like this
guy in New York that maybe has a chance. I
find it hard to believe, but he maybe has a chance.
They want to raise your taxes, so they want to

(21:10):
see a sixty eight percent tax increase. That's more money
than anybody could afford. You'd go into a depression if
that ever happened. So I think there's a lot of
pressure to get that approved.

Speaker 6 (21:24):
Is the July fourth deadline?

Speaker 7 (21:25):
To you, it's important.

Speaker 5 (21:27):
That's not the end all I'm looking no longer, but
we'd like to get it done by that time, if possible.
And look, we have a lot of very committed people,
and they feel very strongly about a subject, subjects that
you're not even thinking about that are important to Republicans.
The problem we have is that it's a great bill,
it's a popular bill, but we'll get no Democrats only

(21:48):
because they don't want to vote for Trump.

Speaker 6 (21:50):
If that bill was their bill, Oh, they would be
so happy.

Speaker 5 (21:54):
It's so great for a military, it's great for everything,
and they would normal vote. But because the hatred of Trump,
they have Trump derangement syndrome.

Speaker 6 (22:04):
At levels never seen before.

Speaker 5 (22:06):
And instead of voting for a tax cut, they're voting
for a tax increase of sixty eight percent. They're voting
to destroy social security, destroy Medicare, and destroy Medicaid. And
we're voting to make them perfect and to make them better,
make them stronger and better. They're going to destroy Medicaid
and they're going to destroy Medicare and social Security will follow.

(22:29):
If you vote for the Democrats, you're dead on those
three things, thank you.

Speaker 2 (22:36):
Mister President.

Speaker 16 (22:36):
On a related subject, many Democrats have said that they
are not going to support crypto bills in Congress only
because of you and your family's personal crypto ventures, and
these votes are in some cases needed to pass. Are
you open to the idea of pulling away from your
personal crypto ventures just for the next few years if
that helps get these crypto bills passed in the next

(22:57):
few months.

Speaker 5 (22:58):
Well, it's a very funny thing, crypto. So I became
a fan of crypto and.

Speaker 6 (23:02):
To me, it's an industry.

Speaker 17 (23:16):
Welcome to this Real America's Voice news break.

Speaker 6 (23:18):
I'm Terrence Bates.

Speaker 17 (23:20):
The issue of President Trump's executive order on birthright citizenship
remains in question despite the Supreme Court's ruling.

Speaker 6 (23:27):
Today on that issue.

Speaker 17 (23:29):
In short, the High Court ruled to to limit the
use of nationwide injunctions by federal judges, which in effect
reigns in their ability to issue sweeping orders that affect
the entire country, not just their district. The case was
raised to the land's highest court after injunctions were filed
blocking the President's executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship.

(23:50):
In their ruling, though the justices did not address the
constitutionality of the President's order itself, which seeks to clarify
the fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of birthright citizenship.

Speaker 5 (24:01):
Ending birthright citizenship, which now comes to the fore, that
was meant for the babies of slaves. It wasn't meant
for people trying to scam the system and come into
the country on a vacation. This was, in fact, it
was the same date, the exact same date, the end
of the Civil war.

Speaker 6 (24:17):
It was meant for the.

Speaker 5 (24:18):
Babies of slaves, and is so clean and so obvious.
But this lets us go there and finally win that
case because hundreds of thousands of people are pouring into
our country under birthright citizenship and it wasn't meant for
that reason.

Speaker 17 (24:32):
Attorney General Pam Bondi says she expects the ruling on
birthright citizenship itself to come down in a separate decision
in October. The administration, as you just heard, argues that
babies born in the United States to parents who are
in the country illegally should and do not have the
right of citizenship. Meantime, President Trump putting on his peacemaker

(24:52):
in chief hat again this afternoon as he hosts the
foreign ministers of Congo and Rwanda in the Oval Office.

Speaker 5 (24:59):
The Congo you know We have a great press conference
coming up later, and it's the Congo and Rwanda.

Speaker 6 (25:07):
You know, they were fighting for years and it was machetes,
it was vicious. It was as vicious people's heads being
chopped off. And I have a man who's very good
in that part of the world, very smart, and.

Speaker 5 (25:20):
Put them together and we're signing a peace treaty today,
first time in many years. They're gonna have peace, and
that's a big deal.

Speaker 17 (25:28):
One of the primary incentives for peace in the region
is creating an environment where American businesses will be more
willing to invest. Eastern Congo, where much of the fighting
has been focused, is home to many valuable resources, including
rare memorals like tantalem and tungsten.

Speaker 6 (25:43):
That's a quick chicking.

Speaker 12 (25:59):
The hardest working radio show in the business at the
Charlie Kirkshow.

Speaker 1 (26:04):
I love President Trump. She says, if a run are
you from Iran? This is so good America. Small businesses
rely on TikTok to succeed, helping them attract more customers
and drive more growth, from small batchsellers to fast growing brands.
Seventy four percent of business on TikTok say it helps
them scale by hiring more employees, boosting sales, and expanding
new locations, like Arizona Taco King, who grew from a

(26:25):
mom and pop taco cart to two thriving restaurants. With TikTok,
small businesses are thriving, finding their customers and expanding. Learn
more about TikTok's contribution to the US economy. Go to
TikTok Economic Impact dot Com. That is TikTok Economic impact
dot Com. Again from dan O Seasonings who went from
a one man team to forty five who supported dozens
of hard working families, TikTok allows you to expand your business.

(26:49):
We have gone so viral on TikTok. We reach hundreds
of millions of people a week and billions of people
a month. It's really been one of our extraordinary platforms.
Go to TikTok Economic impact dot Com that is TikTok
Economic Impact dot Com. Portions of our program are brought
to you in part by TikTok Economic Impact dot Com. You

(27:11):
could say that we have really been able to shake
the matrix via TikTok TikTok Economic Impact dot Com. President
Donald Trump wants to save TikTok. Actually and that's a
good segue to his press conference. Let's listen in.

Speaker 6 (27:24):
With great people.

Speaker 5 (27:24):
Okay, congratulations.

Speaker 8 (27:30):
A couple of very different questions.

Speaker 2 (27:32):
One is Rwanda nineteen ninety four, as you grew up
in New York, all your how holorific.

Speaker 8 (27:36):
Those are texts where our congratulations on that treaty.

Speaker 6 (27:40):
There are talks that.

Speaker 5 (27:41):
Perhaps that's going to take place today at three o'clock
in the Oval Office, we're gonna have a signing with
Rwanda and the Congo. So I'm a little out of
my league in that one because I didn't know too
much about it.

Speaker 6 (27:52):
I knew one thing.

Speaker 5 (27:52):
They were going at it for many years and with machetes.
It is one of the worst, one of the worst
wars that anyone's ever seen. And I just happened to
have somebody that was able to get it settled. I mean,
just a brilliant person who is very comfortable in that
part of the world. It's a very dangerous part of
the world. They said, are you uncomfortable there? People are

(28:13):
being killed, school children are being raided and killed. And
I don't even want to say how, but as viciously
as I've ever heard, are you uncomfortable?

Speaker 9 (28:22):
No?

Speaker 5 (28:23):
That's the part of the world that I know very comfortable.
Was able to get them together and sell it. And
not only that, we're getting for the United States a
lot of the mineral.

Speaker 6 (28:32):
Rights from the Congo. It's part of it.

Speaker 5 (28:34):
They're so honored to be here. They never thought they'd
be coming to it. Look, this is a very tough
part of the world. They never thought. They were just
telling me they never thought they'd ever be coming to
the White House. And they're so honored, and so we're
gonna give a great, big reception. But that's after many
years of fighting. It's a great thing. That's at three o'clock.

Speaker 1 (28:51):
I believe, sir, Are you concerned at all about secretnicular sites?

Speaker 9 (28:58):
And you ran welly.

Speaker 6 (29:01):
Nuclear said yes.

Speaker 5 (29:03):
Can I tell you. They're exhausted and Israel's exhausted too,
And I dealt with both of them and they both
wanted it settled, both of them, and we did a
great job. But they're exhausted. The last thing they're thinking
about right now is no clear you know what they're
thinking of. They're thinking about tomorrow, trying to live. It's

(29:25):
such a mess. It's such a mess. The place was
bombed to hell and no, I'm not worried about it
at all. And I'm putting out a little statement. I'm
gonna respond to the Iotolda's statement, uh yesterday that we.

Speaker 6 (29:40):
Won the war.

Speaker 5 (29:42):
We won the war, and I said, look, you're a
man of great faith, man who's highly respected in this country.
You have to tell the truth. You got beat to
hell and Israel was beat up too. They were both
beat up and it was a great time to end
and it was quick. They got the hate out. There's
a lot of hate, a lot of hate. It would

(30:03):
be greater if they didn't have that hate. But the
last thing they're thinking about is nuclear weapons right now.

Speaker 6 (30:13):
Thank you, miss the President.

Speaker 10 (30:15):
Aristow with NTD, Resister Media with Pop Times, thank you
so much for doing this.

Speaker 7 (30:19):
It is very refreshing for all of us.

Speaker 1 (30:22):
Room.

Speaker 6 (30:22):
So it's refreshing, very refreshing.

Speaker 10 (30:25):
Yes, I understand what your man, So thank you so
much for coming out here.

Speaker 5 (30:30):
Other than Caroline Job, you're referring to the past administration,
not to Caroline.

Speaker 7 (30:36):
Yes, back to the ruling today, if you don't mind.

Speaker 4 (30:39):
So you have almost talked about winning for the American people.

Speaker 6 (30:43):
How do you think today's ruling will enable you to
further deliver.

Speaker 11 (30:46):
For American families and workers across the country, and not
only when it comes to immigration, also when it comes
to trade energy.

Speaker 7 (30:52):
What actions are most eager you moved on?

Speaker 5 (30:54):
Well, I think taking power away from these absolutely crazy
radical left judges is a tremendous This is such a
big day.

Speaker 6 (31:04):
This is such a big day. It's like it's.

Speaker 5 (31:07):
Sort of sad because we're doing the signing at three
o'clock and I you know, this may very well dominate
the signing of a big war that was going on.

Speaker 6 (31:14):
And really affecting the continent of think of it.

Speaker 5 (31:17):
The entire continent of Africa is big effect and were settling.
We're settling that war today and this will probably be
a headline. But this is a very big moment and
it gives gives power back to people that you'd have it,
including Congress, including the presidency. And it only takes bad
power away from judges. It takes bad power, sick power,

(31:41):
and unfair power. And it's really going to be It
is a very monumental decision.

Speaker 6 (31:46):
Yeah, please.

Speaker 18 (31:48):
On July ninth. Is that July ninth day a set
for tariffs to stand? Or could they could there.

Speaker 5 (31:55):
Be we can do whatever we want. We could extend it,
we could make it shorter.

Speaker 6 (31:59):
I'd like to make it.

Speaker 5 (32:00):
I'd like to just send letters out to everybody. Congratulations,
you're paying twenty five percent. He's a much nicer person than.

Speaker 6 (32:12):
So how do you finish it up?

Speaker 18 (32:13):
Were you considering for the Federal Reserve then? And are
you speeding up that process?

Speaker 5 (32:18):
Oh, he's terrible, he's terrible. I mean, I have a
list of things. We're like thirty eight on the list
we pay. You know, Cameroon and different places are paying.

Speaker 6 (32:28):
The same as us.

Speaker 5 (32:30):
Because you know, you have somebody sets a rate at
four percent of four and a half percent. It's hard
to go out and say we should be paying one
percent when you have your so called experts doing that.
And the sad part is, you know, as per the
question that you asked about tariffs, we've had the tariffs
and we have less inflation than we had before. What

(32:50):
we have is a hell of a lot more money,
a hell of a lot more income, and we shouldn't.

Speaker 6 (32:54):
Be paying a rate like that.

Speaker 5 (32:55):
In other words, when we pay a rate, I'll say,
each point is the equivalent of three hundred billion dollars.
So if we had it down three points, because I
think we should be at one. You have Switzerland is
at zero point twenty five in other words, twenty five
percent of one percent, and they're the number one right now.

Speaker 6 (33:16):
But we should be the number one. And soon you're.

Speaker 5 (33:18):
Gonna have I believe, I think you're gonna have where
the people will pay the you know, we'll pay like
we had a few years ago, where you put up money,
you loan money, and I mean you actually instead of paying,
you get paid.

Speaker 6 (33:32):
I love that.

Speaker 5 (33:33):
I don't know if it's any good, but I love
it where you put up money and you get paid.

Speaker 6 (33:38):
But we should be in a category, so we should
be at the top of the list, not toward the
bottom of the list.

Speaker 5 (33:43):
But we have a man who's not a smart man,
and he probably has Trump de arrangement syndrome, and he's
just not a smart person. What he's doing, though, he's
hurting us for years to come. Because if we borrow
money at two points higher than we should be.

Speaker 6 (33:57):
Paying, that's six hundred billion dollars.

Speaker 5 (34:01):
When you say those numbers are a bad rights good,
So it's two points would be about six hundred actually
more than that, but about six hundred billions, or because
the guy doesn't want to lower the rates. He's doing
the service very dissert and then he goes up to
talk too.

Speaker 6 (34:14):
I'd like to see costs come down. You know.

Speaker 5 (34:16):
He gets up and he does this little thing for
five minutes, and he goes out, and he goes back
to the beach.

Speaker 6 (34:20):
He goes I'd like to see costs come down.

Speaker 5 (34:22):
Well, he could lower the interest costs by nine hundred
billion dollars a year.

Speaker 6 (34:27):
All he has to do his lower rates.

Speaker 5 (34:29):
And everybody's saying I was watching some of the business
shows today and they're saying, you know, Trump's right, he
should really be cutting. The country's doing well. We have
no inflation now despite him. We're doing great. But if
we got the rates down, we would be a rocket ship.
So I think that'll be it. And I just want
to thank everybody. This is a really big day we've had.

(34:51):
We've had a big week. You know, we've had a
big week. We've had a lot of victories this week.
NATO was a tremendous victory. The war was a tremendous look.
We were talking about this for thirty years, about Iran
being nuclear, and.

Speaker 6 (35:05):
All I said, is it will not be nuclear and
it's not going to be nuclear.

Speaker 5 (35:10):
And then I want to give credit to a lot
of people, most importantly to our great military.

Speaker 6 (35:15):
Boy. They put out that fire.

Speaker 5 (35:17):
Once that happened, once those bombs got dropped, that war
was over.

Speaker 6 (35:21):
That war was over. But I just want to compliment them.

Speaker 5 (35:24):
Incredible, the general and all of his generals, Pete haig
Seth was great. They will and now I want to
compliment Pam. A lot of genius went into this. You know, people,
if you don't say it exactly right, if the Supreme
Court doesn't get it because it's incorrectly spoken about, and
that happens, a lot of cases are lost because they

(35:45):
don't they don't say the right words. But I want
to correct She's going to go down as a great
attorney general. I may change in my mind about that.
I don't know, maybe some day else have calls. I
was only kidding. She's going to go down as a
great attorney general. This was a tremendous win. And we've
had this wins, but this was a tremendous win today.
So I just want to congratulate you and Todd and
your whole staff, very brilliant people and we can't forget

(36:08):
John Sower, who is with U is a medical emergency
within his family, so he's taking care of that, and
we said absolutely.

Speaker 6 (36:16):
So I just want to thank everybody very much.

Speaker 1 (36:18):
Thank you, okay everybody that By the way, President Donald
Trump was a ten in that press conference. Watching him
for over a decade, he was in total control. He
was calm, he was collected, he was focused, he was

(36:40):
intense where necessary. And one of my favorite moments. We
have to replay this. I think we have the tape.
It's five sixty eighth. He says, you want to keep going.
President Donald Trump is a man for the moment, and
it is a huge contrast versus Trump. One. Trump won,
as he says, he was the hunted. Now he is
the hunter. He was constantly under attack, and Trump won.
He had Jim Acosta trying to get clicks. So much

(37:03):
better that briefing room is now that we got a
Costa out of there. I think he's out of there,
and you got a couple friendlies in the room. And
President Trump, he has such poise and stoicism and just
command of the audience. Let's play cut five sixty.

Speaker 5 (37:18):
Eight should By the way, so many questions, should we
keep this going, Pamily.

Speaker 6 (37:27):
This is the opposite of Biden.

Speaker 5 (37:29):
Biden would take a half a question and he'd leave
without answering it.

Speaker 6 (37:35):
Because you tell me when he gets boring.

Speaker 1 (37:39):
And President Donald Trump was there for over an hour,
and he was funny. He said, you know, five percent
of presidents get killed, and you got bull riders and
you got people that it's point zero one percent. He
enjoys being president. And that is such a difference than
what we saw in Trump one. I'm sure he enjoyed
being president Trump one, but he was so relentlessly under
attack and we thought the world was falling apart when

(38:00):
we did not hold on to the White House and
Trump one, and now it is. It's remarkable what we're
seeing joining us now is May Mailman, White House Deputy
Assistant to the President and senior policy strategist. We're just
going to go straight through the breaks here and the
live reads can wait. May, great to see you major
victory today on the Supreme Court. You're doing wonderful work,

(38:22):
by the way, May, helping this agenda every day, So
congratulations on that, and also congratulations on this major decision
from the Supreme Court. Tell us all about it.

Speaker 7 (38:30):
May, yeah, this is a huge day.

Speaker 10 (38:35):
You know you are optimistic, but even I wasn't this optimistic.

Speaker 7 (38:39):
This is amazing.

Speaker 10 (38:40):
So for years President Trump has been essentially told what
to do by random, unelected district court judges, more than
half of all nationwide injunctions that have ever taken place
or against President Trump, everything from judges telling him he
needs to put transgender people in the mill harry, how
he needs to run his immigration everything from the wall

(39:04):
to who's deported top to Biden nationwide injunctions, and it
was not the same when Trump was out of office,
and conservative judges often restrained themselves. So the Title nine case,
which many people will remember, the conservative states sued and
did pause Biden's illegal Title nine rewrite in those states,

(39:27):
but not nationwide until, of course, we came in and
said we're not doing that anymore.

Speaker 7 (39:32):
So this is a really huge day.

Speaker 1 (39:34):
May hold that thought. We're going to just ten seconds.
We have to segue off radio. May mail an amazing
victory at the Supreme Court. President Trump in total command
back in ten seconds, and so May just go deeper

(39:57):
into this for our audience. This means that if they're
is an injunction, it will only pertain to the district
that the injunction was authored in. Is this the end
of all nationwide injunctions?

Speaker 5 (40:08):
Oh?

Speaker 10 (40:09):
Of course the left is going to try and weasel
around this. So this case particularly pertained to birthright citizenship. Obviously,
on day one, President Trump said illegal aliens, their children
don't automatically become citizens. It's set up a little system
in order to do that. And a lot of people sued.
So three different courts said, we're not just going to

(40:30):
say that this law is illegal as pertains to who
is in front of us. We're going to say that
this executive order is illegal everywhere, for everyone, for all time.
And so the Supreme Court said, no, you're not going
to do that. Now, there are still some open questions.
So for example, if a group of ten states sue,
can you enjoin the executive order in those ten states

(40:54):
and for anybody who passes through that state? You know,
there are ways to make this broad. Then there's the
class action approach. So of course the left is going
to keep trying to push this, keep trying to push this. However, yes,
it is true that today nationwide injunctions that are just
sweeping we don't like you, Trump, so we're going to
stop you from doing what you would like to do

(41:15):
because I'm a district court judge and I'm bored that
practice is over.

Speaker 1 (41:22):
And the profundity and the significance of this is that
this was all happening in like five different jurisdictions, and
the original intent of the Constitution was never to have
a singular district court judge be able to sweep the
entire nation repeatedly. And so what other then executive orders

(41:44):
does this potentially free up that are now enjoined.

Speaker 10 (41:49):
Yeah, so this is going to have a huge impact.
Let's just take for example, some of our policies that
have said we're not going to spend money on hospitals
transgender procedures for minors that gets enjoyed. We've also said
we're not that's a big one. We've also said, for example,

(42:09):
that we're not going to fund transgender procedures in prison.
So these sorts of things, these cultural issues, I think
are going to move forward.

Speaker 6 (42:18):
Now.

Speaker 10 (42:18):
The Supreme Court has done an oak has done a
pretty good job of lacking these district court judges when
they get too far. So, for example, we had judges
say that you can't deport people to third countries. And
the Supreme Court said, no, you can. But it has
been a repeated, repeated, repeated going up to the Supreme Court,
and the Supreme Court basically says, this is not how

(42:40):
it's supposed to be. There's not supposed to be an
emergency every single time that affects the entire nation. Parties
need to individually sue and then they can get relief
for those parties and some people will win and some
people will lose, and that'll percolate up the Supreme Court
and they'll be.

Speaker 7 (42:56):
Able to look and see what are the.

Speaker 10 (42:58):
Different reasonings that we have, how is the law being interpreted,
what do we need to fix? So this is really
good for process, for the American people, This is good
for the Supreme Court, for people to trust the opinions
that are coming out of there, because they will be
more thoughtful, they'll have more information. This isn't net positive
for everybody, and of course the Descent does not see

(43:19):
it that way.

Speaker 1 (43:20):
Stay right there, May Mailman. We'll be right back in
about trentsec. Okay, everybody, welcome back. We have May Mailmon
from the White House. She does a phenomenal job. She
is really accomplishing a lot. So, May do you have
any thoughts on the descent against Katanji Brown Jackson. It

(43:42):
was just pure judicial savagery. I mean, this is at quote,
this is the whole descent. We will not dwell on
Justice Jackson Jackson's argument, which is at odds with more
than two centuries worth of precedent, Not to mention the
Constitution itself. We observe only this, Justice Jackson decries an
imperial executive while embracing an imperial judiciary. Look, I gotta

(44:06):
be honest that Amy Cody Barrett is not always with us.
But this was a phenomenal sharp Usually dissents or multiple
pages long, and they're deep. This is one paragraph that
goes right after KBJ your thoughts, May.

Speaker 10 (44:20):
Mailman, Yeah, so Justice Barrett, as you're saying, has not.

Speaker 1 (44:26):
Always Oh we have a frozen May Mailman. So she
was about to get into something that hopefully her video
feed on freezes in a second. While that we're waiting
for that. I want to encourage you guys, go to
Alan Jackson Ministries. We're honored to be partnering with Alan

(44:47):
Jackson Ministries, and today I want to tell you about
one of the books that they wrote. It's called God
Bless America Again. God Bless America again. We cannot forget
our past. Go to Alan Jackson dot com slash Charlie
for free shipping on God Bless America again, mays with
this may please continue. Sorry your feed frous for a second.

Speaker 7 (45:03):
Yeah, sorry about that.

Speaker 10 (45:04):
So Justice Jackson obviously has not been consistent in being brave,
and yet she's been consistent in being concerned about an
overstep of judicial power. And so really she is a
gast that Justice Jackson thinks, and this is what Justice
Jackson wrote down on paper, that she thinks that the

(45:27):
job of a judge is to stop Trump, is to
see any time that executive is doing something that that
judge believes is against the law and stop it.

Speaker 7 (45:38):
But that's not the case.

Speaker 10 (45:40):
So one, there are rules that apply to judges too.
You as a judge have the judicial power, you don't
have policy making power.

Speaker 7 (45:48):
I don't like this. I think these people should be
getting that.

Speaker 10 (45:50):
You can't just step in and say that you as
a judge have limited powers to decide cases and controversies.
This is in the constitution cases and controvers which means
between the parties that are in front of you, issues
that are in front of you, and Justice Jackson cares
none about that. Now, the founders did care about that,
and there were certainly models out there that said before

(46:12):
laws can take effect, before an executive can act, they
have to ask the judiciary for permissions. Hey can I
do this? And the judiciary can say yes or no.
That is not our system. Our system is three equal
branches and for the judiciary to not be a super
branch that sits over everybody and tells everybody what to do.

Speaker 7 (46:30):
There are certain rules.

Speaker 10 (46:31):
Justice Jackson does not care about those rules, and she
has no basis for it.

Speaker 7 (46:35):
She just doesn't like it.

Speaker 10 (46:36):
And so Justice Barrett very rightly says, you know what,
at least the other two liberals pointed to laws underpinning
why they disagree. You don't you just want to tell
Trump what to do? And that's insane and it is
a remarkable opinion from Justice Barrett.

Speaker 1 (46:55):
It is. And may I want to keep you for
a couple more minutes if that's okay. I know that
we have Packscott jewels, but the audience is loving this.
Can you speak more broadly to the policy portfolio that
the president is pushing that I know that you're working
on with Stephen Miller. In regards to immigration. We must
have the immigration, Customs and Enforcement back, have their back,
and we do on this program. How does these legal

(47:17):
decisions impact our ability to be able to do mass
deportations and what cases are you most closely looking at
so that we can have expedited removal of alien invaders.

Speaker 10 (47:28):
Yeah, the American people voted overwhelmingly for border security, but
they also voted for interior enforcement. Because if you can
cross the border and make it into the country and
then it's oh, there's no there's no recourse for you,
then you do not have a closed border border security.
Interior enforcement is national security. And so the cases that

(47:49):
this is going to affect are many. It is going
to affect whether Biden had any authority to basically create
fake immigration laws to say you can CBP one your
way into this country. It's going to affect continue to
affect cases like the ones that I mentioned, where can
individuals be removed to It's going to affect authorities that

(48:09):
you can use money that you can use to detain
people and.

Speaker 7 (48:13):
To build the wall.

Speaker 10 (48:15):
There is a countless application for immigration law here, even
things like the student visas, whether or not the executive
has authority to take away student visas when the law
says so, but judges don't like that. And so today's
a really great day for the separation of powers and
for limited judicial power.

Speaker 1 (48:33):
Well, I hope, and look suntact. We're going to keep
going a couple more minutes, but I hope the radio
audience understands that they want to have a ceremonial executive.
They just want a ribbon cutting executive where the president
welcomes Super Bowl champions and Little League World Series kids
and there come to the White House and they get
dinners and they just smile and wave, and all of
a sudden, you have no power. We have three co

(48:53):
equal branches co equal. We do not have judicial supremacy
or legislative supremacy. Stay right there, May mail and we
back in about ten seconds. Subscribe to our podcast for
the full conversation. Okay, May Mailman is with us, So

(49:17):
May we can you talk a little bit to the
strategy this sha Kanaw executive order strategy that the president developed,
which was that he signed a lot of executive orders early.
The brilliance of doing this early in the term was
that we knew there was going to be a flurry
of legal challenges, but to adjudicate those in the first
six to nine months instead of going into year two, three,

(49:38):
or four is a brilliant strategy. It's so smart, it's
so wise, because we're going to see more and more
of these very well tailored and sometimes legally provocative executive
orders figured out earlier than later, so that we can
then govern for the remainder of the administration, not fight
in the courts the entire administration may.

Speaker 10 (50:01):
Charlie, this is my favorite issue, so thanks for bringing
it up.

Speaker 7 (50:04):
And you were there during transition.

Speaker 10 (50:06):
You saw how hard people were working, because this change
is something that matters to us. So during one point zero,
my personal experience was there was a regulation we were trying
to get past, and I said, hey, can I see
you draft of this in six months? And they laughed
at me. The agency laughed at me and said, no,
this will take years. And sure enough, the public charge

(50:26):
regulation did not come out for several years. And even
though we were successfully litigating that case, it was so
late in the term that by the time that we
were ready to take it to the Supreme court, there
was a change in administration, and so of course Biden
took it down.

Speaker 7 (50:42):
And this was something that says.

Speaker 10 (50:43):
In order to come here, you have to basically be
able to pay your way a little bit and not
be a huge drag on society. So now during Trump
two point zero, the lesson that we have learned is no,
you can do things quickly. We know this because when
during COVID we did do things quickly. We saw the
deep state work with us. They were so excited to
do some.

Speaker 7 (51:02):
Of these things.

Speaker 10 (51:03):
And then also we saw Biden worked really quickly, so
it is absolutely possible. And we just said this is
we're not taking no for an answer this time.

Speaker 7 (51:10):
We're going to move quickly.

Speaker 1 (51:12):
And everyone understands. So the speed and the rapidity because
we know legal challenges are coming, and so they're going
to come, so you brace for impact early. So, for
example and Trump one point zero, one of the biggest
legal accomplishments that not come I think till like year
two and a half for three, which was remain in
Mexico on the border, and it took us like two

(51:34):
years to finally get it through. This time, we're building
on a strong legal basis for the border, which is
one of the reasons why the border's totally secure because
we did all that legal work and Trump won. You see,
we worked through the courts in the thicket and we
did all that, so then day one we could just
re implement everything we already did. President Trump signs documents
cartels for in terror's organization remain in Mexico and with
franton tariffs boom, military declaration. Next thing, you know, we

(51:57):
have zero people coming across the southern border. Speak to
how we sometimes have to let this play out and
then the good stuff is really going to start rolling
in the coming years now that we navigate through the
frustrating but necessary component of the third branch of government.

Speaker 10 (52:14):
Yeah, and this ruling is going to help alleviate some
of the frustration. But basically, the executive orders come out,
you have rogue parties and you have rogue judges in
joining them, and there's a low point, you know, there's
a point where you feel like the things that you
wanted aren't happening and what are you going to do
about it? And the Supreme Court has been good with

(52:34):
overturning some of that, but really some of it is
a slog the Supreme Court does not sit every day
to answer every single one of our questions, and so
it requires building that case, picking the right cases, finding
the best arguments, and taking that to the Supreme Court. Now,
those are going to be taken next term. So when
the Supreme Court reconvenes in October, those cases are all

(52:54):
in front of them.

Speaker 7 (52:55):
And it's on a strong posture.

Speaker 10 (52:57):
Those are our best cases, those are our best our humans.
And so it leaves still three years essentially to go
implement the rest of the agenda and solidify them, make
that get our wins in Congress, and to really execute
and change the course of the country, because that is
what this presidency is about. It's not about racking up

(53:20):
minor wins. It's about changing the trajectory of.

Speaker 1 (53:23):
Our nations, saving the civilization. Last question here, may I
want you to brag on what the president you Stephen,
have done on the border. It's unlike anything we've ever
seen before. We have to repeat it every day. I
don't think we're doing good enough job of beating the
drum of success on the border. How did you do it?
And what operationally is the truth of what is not
happening on the southern border.

Speaker 10 (53:44):
Yeah, so the border is a signature success. And the
fact that people aren't talking about it anymore is because
things aren't going wrong right, things are going right. And
so what you see when the numbers are zero, what
does that mean? Zero means that there are no god away.
There's nobody that we're tracking via drone saying that they
get away. Every single person is and there are some

(54:08):
illegal crossers, but they are detained and then they are deported.
And that is not only a success. So that's not
just a success of our border patrol agents. That's also
a success of Marco Rubio and our state department. Because
people didn't accept their migrants back when it was Biden,
because they said, no, we don't want our criminal and
Biden said, okay. But now we say, you will take

(54:30):
back your citizens. And people know not to mess with
Trump and not to mess with our new era of
American greatness. And so border security is so much more
than just the infrastructure there or the wall or the people.
It is American power that's being asserted again.

Speaker 1 (54:48):
May congratulations, come back soon. You're terrific. May mailman from
the administration, wonderful job. Thanks so much. Thanks Charlie email
us Freedom at Charlie Kirk dot com. We'll be right back.

Speaker 3 (55:14):
They said gen Z would stay silent, that we'd back down,
that we'd forget what's worth fighting for. But this generation remembers,
we remember truth, we remember freedom, and now we rise.

Speaker 1 (55:29):
This is more than a conference.

Speaker 3 (55:30):
It's a call to action to reclaim the future, to
ignite a movement that cannot be ignored. Student Action Summit
twenty twenty five featuring the boldest voices in the fight.
Charlie Kirk, Secretary Pete Hegsa Tucker Carlson, Steve Benn, Brett Cooper,
Secretary Christy no Riley Gaines, Brandon Tate, Jack Pisoba, Laura Ing,

(55:52):
Meghan Kell, Greg Guttfeldt, Tom Holman, Congressman Byron Donalds, Russell Brand,
Savannah Christi joined thousands of students, future leaders, and freedom fighters.
This is the battleground of ideas. This is the Student
Action Summit. Register now at SAS twenty twenty five dot com.

Speaker 1 (56:12):
That is SAS twenty twenty five dot com. We have
Real America's voice that will be there. We'll be doing
our shows. Steve Bannon will be there, Jack Pisovak will
be there really excited about it. We have Megan Kelly,
Christin nom Pete Hegseth, we have Donald Trump Junior. As
I mentioned, Steve Bannon, the biggest speakers in the entire movement,
Greg Guttfeld. It's going to be an extraordinary event. SAS
twenty twenty five dot com two weeks from today, SAS

(56:35):
twenty twenty five dot com. That is SAS twenty twenty
five dot com. Okay, it's my favorite hour of the week.
I love this. Last week was a little unusual, but
it was still great. We had some very contrarian opinions,
I would say the least, but hey, that's what it's
all about. It's our members call, where you guys are

(56:56):
allowed on the program. It's members dot Charlie Kirk dot com.
Is members dot Charliekirk dot com to join the program.
I want to try to get to questions that I've
never asked before, Daisy, if we can, if we can
try to go to first time questioners. If possible, let's
go to Patrick Patrick, Happy Friday, Thank you for being
a member. What's on your mind?

Speaker 6 (57:16):
First?

Speaker 19 (57:17):
God bless America and God bless President Trump.

Speaker 1 (57:20):
For the huge win in.

Speaker 19 (57:23):
The Supreme Court today and that was just huge, incredible.

Speaker 1 (57:26):
Amen.

Speaker 19 (57:28):
So my question, I've been reading your book on woke ism,
and I watched the video of Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson,
and I think as a threat to America, I think
the biggest threat isn't so much Democrats but rhinos, fake Republicans.
What's your opinion on how we handle the rhinos and

(57:49):
what's also your opinion of the video if you've seen
it of Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson.

Speaker 1 (57:54):
Yeah, So I'll answer the Ted and Tucker one. So
I think we commented on this on thought crime. I'm
friends with both of them. I'm very careful to ever
shoot inside the tent unless it's Lindsay Graham and James
Langfort or John Bolton or Liz Cheney. That's a whole
different threshold when they're just not with us. But I'm
very careful, especially where Ted is with us on almost
every issue right Tucker. Ted is with us on the border,

(58:18):
he's with us on abortion, he's with us with guns,
he's with us on the Constitution. I will say, if
you listen to the long form discussion between Ted Cruz
and Tucker. I think Ted did a better job of
representing his position than some of the clips would have
necessarily portrayed him as now at Tucker got at very
important points. However, anytime we're considering war, we should know

(58:40):
a lot about what we are doing, not just like oh,
I don't study population tables. Senator Cruz, I've known you
for a while. You should know that. You should know
it's ninety two million people. You should know the intricacies
of the Persian people. You're US senator calling for regime change,
and that's not a gotcha question. We have put you
there to know a lot about stuff, especially basic stuff
about kun trees that you talk a lot about. But

(59:03):
I will say though, that when Ted Cruz was using
a biblical basis for backing Israel, he did not do
the best possible job. And again, I am very close
to a lot in the dispensational world Jack Hibbs, for example,
Who's a dear friend and mentor of mine, James Cadiz.

(59:23):
I am far from a theologian. I know the theology,
let's just say minimally well. At best, I could be
conversant about it. But even I know Genesis twelve three,
and I know the context about it. And even better
argument would have been Ezekiel thirty six, thirty seven, thirty eight,
which prophesies about how Jews are scattered all across the
world and they'll be reconstituted back into a nation. A

(59:45):
better argument to be made would have been about the
land rights given to Israel and the eternal promise given
to Israel, and kind of, in my opinion, kind of
clumsily walking around not even knowing Genesis twelve three was
not the best present of what even Ted Cruz was
trying to say. Now, I will say this as I
am more in Tucker's camp when it comes to foreign

(01:00:08):
policy without a shadow of a doubt, and I'm probably
more in Ted Cruz's camp when it comes from a
theological perspective. And so I try to create a third way,
which is I'm friends with both. And the third way
is that I do believe that we as Christians have
some and to what extent that is, some obligation to
bless Israel, and we have an obligation to, you know,

(01:00:30):
God's chosen people. But also there's an argument to be
made that in Galatians three sixteen, we as Christians are
also the new Israel, and so I think that there
is a third way outside of just the yelling at
each other on this issue, which is that we should
always serve America and America first, and our obligation is
to America, but understand some of these theological issues as well.

(01:00:51):
So what all that to say? As you know on
this program, I'm very war weary. I think our intel
agencies have led us astray the last twenty years. I
think Racq was a disaster. I think Libya was a disaster.
I think Syria was a disaster, and Afghanistan was a disaster.
And what was very interesting is that President Trump he
pioneered a third way. He's not an isolationist, he's not

(01:01:11):
an interventionist. And that third way is one of prudence, decisive,
quick violent action, and no permanent war. To your other question,
you asked about what do we do to keep our
rhinos accountable. That's one of the reasons why I'm actually
staying an extra day in Kentucky on Monday. If anyone
listening to this right now lives in the great state
of Kentucky, I am doing an event with Nate Morris.

(01:01:34):
We had Nate on this program. Nate is a business guy,
He is not a Neocon. He is running against the
McConnell mafia. He is the only Senate candidate who is
outwardly and vocally running up against the McConnell mafia for
that open Senate seat. And so I'm doing an event
with Nate Morris because I think it's important that we
lend our voice and our activism and our platform to

(01:01:54):
try and change the US Senate for the better. It
is by far the most broken institution. The House is broken,
but the Senate is far more broken. And in my
personal opinion, I believe that Nate Morris is the best
candidate there. And look, people can disagree on that, but
we should all agree we need someone who is not
part of that McConnell tribe. So if you guys want

(01:02:14):
to come to that event, we're going to post all
the details at charliekirk dot com. That is Charlie Kirk
dot com. If you want to come see me on
Monday in one of the suburbs outside of Louisville. I'll
be in Louisville actually for a unrelated family event happening
on Sunday. Okay, thank you for your question and really
appreciate you being a member. Josh, what's on your mind?

(01:02:35):
Josh members dot Charliekirk dot com. That is, members dot
Charlie Kirk dot com. Josh, what's on your mind?

Speaker 6 (01:02:39):
Hey?

Speaker 1 (01:02:40):
How's it go on?

Speaker 20 (01:02:40):
I wanted to ask about AI and education specifically. My
view is that I don't think AI should be allowed
in education, especially not high school, and then I don't
think it should be in college either. But you know,
I'm open minded. I could be convinced either way, but
I want to hear your thoughts and I can add
a little bit.

Speaker 1 (01:02:59):
After your question is should AI be involved in higher education?
Is that right? Like AI as teachers or AIS supplemental technology?

Speaker 20 (01:03:07):
Should should students be allowed to use it and to
complete their assignments and things like that?

Speaker 1 (01:03:11):
So great question. I have a very direct theory on this.
There's no getting away from AI, so students should learn
how to use it. However, we have to make sure
that students still have the capacity to think, still have
students the capacity to write without AI. So here's how
to think I think the way should work. You can
do all of your study, all of your preparation at

(01:03:33):
home with AI, but every teacher in America should carve
out time that there are in class tests without phones,
without laptops, and just a pen or a pencil and
a piece of paper. If you want to use AI
as a preparatory tool, if you want to use AI
as a tutor at home, God bless you, that's fine.

Speaker 18 (01:03:53):
Great.

Speaker 1 (01:03:53):
But the assignment that should weigh the heaviest, and I
hope every teacher listening to this understands this, the assignment
that should have the most weight for your grade should
be a non technology in class test where students have
to prove that they can still write with their hand,
not on a laptop, no internet connection, and pure confiscation

(01:04:14):
of all the phones. Put your phones in this, Put
your phones in the bucket, Put your phones in the bag.
We're closing it.

Speaker 6 (01:04:20):
Boom.

Speaker 1 (01:04:21):
Here's a piece of paper, Here is your pen, here's
a pencil. And by the way, bring back cursive while
we're at it. Cursive is good for the brain. Cursive
is very good for the brain. It is a lot
of studies show that if you're able to write curse,
if you're more creative, you're more analytical, you're more fair minded.
So let's let's keep this topic going off out of
the break and I know this is not the best argument,

(01:04:41):
but if you cannot read the Declaration of Independence, our
educational system has failed you. I'm sorry just the way
it is. If you cannot read the declaration, our education
system has failed you. Great questions. Stay right there. I
have more to say about that. Relieffactor dot com one
hundred percent drug free relief Factor. Check it out right now.
If you guys have every day aches and pains like
having of always say says no, no, you can't do that. No,

(01:05:02):
don't play your favorite sport. No, you better sit this
one out. No, it's no way to live. So if
pain is affecting you, see how relief Factor can help
you get back to living your life, go to reliefactor
dot com. It's a daily supplement that fights pain naturally.
So go to reliefactor dot com. That is relieffactor dot com.
So give the three week quick started trithally nineteen ninety five.
That is relieffactor dot com, relief Factor dot com. So

(01:05:24):
check it out right now at relieffactor dot com. Email
us as always freedom at Charliekirk dot com and subscribe
to the Charlie Kirkshow podcast. We have so many members
we're gonna blitz right through the breaks, at least on
this break. So stay right there. We'll be back in
about ten seconds. We are back. My daughter is wearing

(01:06:09):
a Cubs jersey. Can you say, go Cubs? She says,
go Cubs. All I have to say is that the
Cubs split with the Cardinals. It's been a fun summer.
That the Cubs are actually good. It gives us, gives
us something to look at and to watch. You know,
people say, oh, the Dodgers are crushing. If forget the Dodgers,

(01:06:30):
the Cubs are America's team. Everyone knows that. Okay, everyone
knows okay. To finish the thought, cursive has many benefits
the brain find motor skills, memory learning, neural connections, functional specialization,
sensory inner integration, understanding words. So I'm big in cursive.
But to answer your question more completely, that you should

(01:06:50):
allow the students to go home to use AI as
much as they want, because AI can actually be a
very very good thinking partner and a very good tutor.
I do it all the time. For example, when I
was preparing for the program the other day, and I
want to learn more about Islam. I spent an hour
with chat GPT just asking questions about Islam. Do they
believe that Mohammed is sinless? Do they believe that Muhammad

(01:07:12):
is the greatest person I ever lived? Was Mohammad? And
the Quran? And what is a hadith? I can get
so much quicker on chat GPT if I want to learn,
So I don't use chat GPT to like, oh you
know right there, that's a bunch of bs. Instead, it's
like help with research. So, for example, when I was
doing research for my upcoming book about the Sabbath, oh
my goodness, it was so much more helpful than just
going through endless Google searches. I was like, can you

(01:07:33):
please find the three Bible verses that talk about the Sabbath.
I think I'm remembering correctly. It's an exodus and the
difference that it is in Deuteronomy. It's a tool, and
it was It was a maximalization for me. And so
if students use it as a tool to actually become
better human beings, great, but they need to prove that
they become better human beings. They need to prove Josh
your thoughts.

Speaker 20 (01:07:54):
Oh sorry, So my main thing is is like you,
the way you use it is very discretionary. But obviously
a lot of the kids that are using it nowadays
they don't have that type of discretion. And that's where
I see a big issue is like how how can
you teach them like to like what what's your method
to teach them? Like If this is how you should

(01:08:15):
be using AI, this is how you should right question.

Speaker 1 (01:08:18):
So the parenting plus the teacher, but also you need
the forcing function of the test. Without AI, they will
learn how to use AI for the better if all
of a sudden they are locked in a room and
there is no technology and their entire grade is weighted
on what they're about to write on that piece of paper. Yes,
and by the way, teachers want to be paid a

(01:08:38):
ton of money, maybe we should start expecting something of them.
Teachers should start to teach kids. Here's how you use
AI for the good. Like I just described right, use
it as a thinking partner on one topic. I can
learn more about something because I asked the critical questions right,
Because there's like very specific things that I want to
know about Islam. For example, I say, list the top
the Islamic countries and tell me which ones a lot

(01:09:00):
female general mutilation. And I say, even say, create a chart. Listen,
fifty Islamic countries their GDP per capita, their total GDP,
whether or not they have robust private property right, separation
of powers, whether that they have freedom of speech? Can
you insult the prophet Muhammad? Can you know? And basically
there's a whole chart that is created, and then I'm
able to study and then ask more questions. So basically,

(01:09:23):
chat GPT allows me to become a better spokesperson, a
better thinker, not as a replacement, but it involves thinking.
It actually involves thinking on my side, and then I
have to remember it. And even sometimes if I do
an hour chat GPT, this is what I do, is
that I'll then I'll say, now create a test of
everything I just learned. I com and paste it. I

(01:09:43):
send it to Danny, I send it to Mike. I say, guys, test,
print this out, put it on my desk, and I
take the test after an hour of working with chat GPT.
So then I internalize it, so then I have to
take a test again. So what it's done for me,
it makes me better at my Q and a's on campus.
You know, it's funny some of these kids come up
to the mic and they have they have AI in
their hand and they're trying to I now have to

(01:10:06):
debate AI. Which again, if for me to be a
debate AI, I have to sometimes use it, you could say,
to become better at what I do. Great question, Thanks
so much. We'll be back in ten seconds. Welcome back everybody.

(01:10:28):
We are here at the Bitcoin dot Com Studio, that
is the Bitcoin dot Com studio. Matt is a member
members dot Charliekirk dot com if you want to join
this program, Matt, what is on your mind?

Speaker 13 (01:10:40):
Hey Charlie, good afternoon and on.

Speaker 6 (01:10:42):
The East coast.

Speaker 13 (01:10:43):
Thank you for all you do as always, and my
question was around this birthright citizenship situation. Obviously we've got
a good initial ruling out of SCOTUS today, but I
think you know, the law is not always you know,
the only way to get victory is we have to
kind of push public opinion, think to between now and
then gets the final ruling. I think there's a there's

(01:11:05):
an option or opportunity there simply around black Americans to say, look,
they're essentially devaluing your ancestors slavery because this was not
designed for people to come on vacation or hop across
the border, have a baby that system has to pay for,
and then there are citizen equally to you. And you know,
I just think if we message around this properly, we
can we can make this decision.

Speaker 21 (01:11:25):
Happen, and you know, codify it as well.

Speaker 1 (01:11:28):
Right, So there's lots of that question, and so I
think the most important thing about codification and to codify
is involving Congress. Is involving Congress to actually codify these victories,
because otherwise it's just one one simple executive order after

(01:11:50):
the other. Now, the long term solution is actually getting
the congressional kind of committee on board. Now, regarding birthrights,
did you know that in twenty twenty three, there were
between two hundred and twenty five thousand and two hundred
and fifty thousand babies born into illegal immigrants. That's more
than the babies born in all but two US states

(01:12:11):
taken individually. It's also more than the number of babies
born into legal legal non citizens per the Center for
Immigration Studies. Right now, there are reports of expectant mothers
who are either illegal or in the United States under
temporary parole lining up for pre term sea sections to
beat President Trump's cut off date, which was back in February.

(01:12:31):
This was written back in January.

Speaker 6 (01:12:33):
Wow.

Speaker 1 (01:12:34):
Now, just so you know that two Supreme Court cases
upheld that the Fourteenth Amendment excludes citizens of foreign countries
born in the United States. The Fourteenth Amendment did not
originally grant citizenship to American Indians. Why not because they
were considered to hold allegiances to tribal nations and were
only partially considered to be subject to the jurisdiction of
the government. This was always about children of slaves. It

(01:12:56):
was always about slave children, not some CCP birth tourists.
And let me repeat, two Supreme Court cases upheld the
Fourteenth Amendment explicitly excludes the citizens of foreign countries born
in the United States, the Slaughterhouse cases in Elk v. Wilkins.
So what exactly is the case that they point to. Well,

(01:13:17):
the one that they point to is in the late
eighteen hundreds, like eighteen ninety seven, there was a quite
the Wong Kim arc case was about the children of
legal residents? Are the children of legal residents US citizens?
The United States Supreme Court has actually not weighed in
on whether in recent memory or recent times on the

(01:13:41):
children of illegal aliens. That is the brilliance of President
Trump's Birthright Citizenship executive order. The left just reached for
this and took it, and nobody stopped them. Let me repeat,
the left reached for this and George W. Bush didn't
stopped them. Ronald Reagan did not stopped them. Way, Just
so we're clear, a lot of people love Reagan. Reagan

(01:14:03):
was good at a lot of stuff, but he was
terrible on immigration. I'm sorry to break your kind of
mythology of Reagan. He was awful. He did amnesty, he
was big on giving people citizenship. Reagan's good intentions the
not equal good public policy gave us no fault, divorce,
and a lot of debt. Reagan did some good stuff,
but he was not the hero A lot of people

(01:14:23):
necessarily think helue California. Oh yeah, No, he helped destroy
California without a doubt, and he knows it, and he
said it back. He said it was one of his
greatest regrets. The Fourteenth This is from the Senate floor
debating the fourteenth Amendment.

Speaker 6 (01:14:36):
Quote.

Speaker 1 (01:14:36):
The fourteenth Amendment will not, of course, include persons born
in the United States who are foreigners, aliens who belonged
to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers of credit
to the government of the United States, but will include
very other class of persons. So understand President Trump's brilliance here.
He is forcing this case to the top of the
US Supreme Court. He is forcing this case in a

(01:14:59):
very very quick a way. And so I gotta I
gotta be I gotta be honest that if we are
able to strip away birthright citizenship, if we are away
to if we are able to strip away this sort
of scam, this will be a mass destabilization in a
way that of the American left in a way that

(01:15:20):
we could never imagined. Thank you for being a member,
and thank you for your time. Yes, final thought, really much.
Twenty second.

Speaker 21 (01:15:25):
Yes, the big incentive, that's the big incentive right there is,
oh my gosh, you show up and we'll get make
money onto the table, drop the babymatic citizen, and then
Poland benefits off of the child that's now a citizen.
So they legals do get benefits off of the children
they have here when they show up.

Speaker 1 (01:15:40):
Well said, thank you so much and thanks for being
a member. Okay, we have the next member coming up,
but that will be after the break. Let's take this break, guys,
and then we'll come back after that. So email us
Freedom at Charliekirk dot com. Get your tickets to the
student actions. Somebody that's sas twenty twenty five dot com
sas twenty twenty five dot com register now says two
dot com. Email us is always Freedom at Charliekirk dot

(01:16:03):
com and subscribe to our podcast. We'll be right back.

Speaker 12 (01:16:23):
One percent American maid and darn proud of it.

Speaker 6 (01:16:28):
The Charlie Kirk Show.

Speaker 1 (01:16:29):
All right, Two things, then we'll get back to our
wonderful members. Number One, I have to read this statement
from President Trump. Then we'll get to TikTok's humble he is.
President Trump is a tend today. He is so locked
in it is just it's hot. It's as good as
it gets.

Speaker 6 (01:16:46):
Quote.

Speaker 1 (01:16:46):
Why would the so called supreme leader I have told
Ali Kamani of the war torn country of Iran say
so blatantly and foolishly that he won the war with
Israel when he knows his statement is a lie. It
is not so as a man of great faith not
supposed to lie. Woo his country was decimated, his three
evil nuclear sites were obliterated. I knew exactly where he

(01:17:08):
was sheltered and would not let Israel or the US
armed forces, by the greatest and most powerful in the world,
terminate his life. In all caps, I saved him from
a very ugly and ignominous death. Now that is not
a word you hear every day. He does not have
to say thank you, President Trump. In fact, in the
final act of war, I demanded that Israel bring back
a very large group of planes which are headed directly

(01:17:31):
to Tehran looking for a big day. Perhaps the final knockout.
Tremendous damage would have ensued and many Iranians would have
been killed. It was going to be the biggest attack
of the war by far. During the last few days,
I was working on the possible removal of sanctions and
other things which would have given a much better chance
to Iran at a full, fast and complete recovery. The
sanctions are biting, but no, Instead I get hit with

(01:17:52):
a statement of anger, hatred and disgust and immediately dropped
all work on SANCSUS relief and more. Iran has to
get back into the world order. His vocab choices, his
diction is amazing back into the world order flow or
things will only get worse for them. They're always so angry, hostile,
and unhappy, kind of like the American Left, and look

(01:18:14):
at what it has gotten. A burned out, blown up
country with no future, a decimated military, a horrible economy,
and death all caps around them, all around them. They
have no hope and will only get worse. I wish
the leadership of a round would realize you often get
more with all caps honey than you do with vinegar,

(01:18:34):
and then all caps peace. I'm telling you there will
never be another like Trump. This is It's as good
as it gets. He is. He is, you know how
sometimes you get to use his word the flow state.
He's just kind of been flow states. And he's got
the hot hand. You just got to feed the hot hand.
You just got to feed it. He is just he

(01:18:56):
is Michael Jordan Game six. He is the goat. He's
the greatest of all time. America's small businesses rely on
TikTok to succeed, helping them attract more customers and drive
more growth from small betsellers to fast growing brands. Seventy
four percent of business on TikTok say it's helped them
scale like Arizona Taco King, who grew from a mom
and pop taco card to three thriving driving rust two

(01:19:17):
thriving restaurants in just the year, or Coco Asante. We
go viral on TikTok and in fact, TikTok is one
of the places that is our most effective place of
being able to get the message out, including this clip
right here which went super viral on TikTok, and it
is more applicable than ever and lay out this. Let's

(01:19:38):
go to this one about let me see here, it's
so many let's go to five sixty six.

Speaker 7 (01:19:46):
Why don't you believe that white pri witge exists?

Speaker 2 (01:19:48):
I just want to get your understanding first and then
we could go from there.

Speaker 1 (01:19:51):
Well, let's just is there anything that you can't do
that I can do?

Speaker 8 (01:19:55):
No, we could do the same things.

Speaker 2 (01:19:56):
If we put our eyes to it, good.

Speaker 1 (01:19:58):
Then there's no white privilege. That singular video has like
one hundred million views. Pretty simple, short to the point,
TikTok economic impact dot Com. We are reaching the next
generation on TikTok TikTok Economic Impact dot Com, finding our
customers and expanding learn more about TikTok's contribution of the
US economy portion of the Charlie Kirkshaw are brought to
in part by TikTok economic impact dot Com. One of

(01:20:18):
the main reasons we're able to reach young people is
because of our embracing of that app joining us. Now,
who do we have? The name is Cleopatra and you
are the first Cleopatra I've ever met. Thank you for
being a member. What's on your mind?

Speaker 8 (01:20:33):
Hi, Charlie. I am an author and I've published fourteen
fiction books.

Speaker 6 (01:20:38):
Wow.

Speaker 8 (01:20:38):
I'm currently drafting my first nonfiction book titled The Rebellious Generation.
So my question is to ask what advice you have
for researching slash writing nonfiction.

Speaker 1 (01:20:49):
Wow. So, first of all, you have fourteen fiction books.
What is your name?

Speaker 6 (01:20:54):
Uh?

Speaker 8 (01:20:55):
My author name is Cleopatra Margo and that's with a
t at end of Margo And.

Speaker 1 (01:21:01):
Uh, oh, I see you. Yeah, you got a you
got a big cannon here. You've written a lot. Wow.
How are these books perform?

Speaker 2 (01:21:10):
Uh?

Speaker 7 (01:21:10):
Pretty good.

Speaker 8 (01:21:11):
Actually, I'm in the process of rebranding them right now,
my three newest ones. So that's been kind of like
over the last six to seven months, I've been kind
of like pulling back from marketing and refocusing on just
like revamping them a little bit.

Speaker 1 (01:21:25):
But yeah, so you have, You've written fourteen books, you
have three thousand ratings on good Reads. That's a big deal.
I mean, that's that's real. So before I go further,
what genre do you usually write on here? And how
did you get your start writing this many fiction books?

Speaker 8 (01:21:44):
So I was homeschooled from fifth grade on, so I've
always loved to read and write. And so back in
twenty seventeen, I was able to meet Jeanette Oak, who
kind of pioneered the Christian fiction genre. My family and
I traveled out and we went to like the reunion
for one of her one of her books was turned
into a show, and so that's when I kind of

(01:22:06):
got my start writing fiction. So I write currently, I
write classic contemporary lakeside fiction. But my first series, I'm
from Nebraska, so my first series is based in like
my hometown of where I came from.

Speaker 1 (01:22:19):
It's amazing, Cleopatra Margot, that's phenomenal. So your question was
how do you research nonfiction? So what what topic are
you going after in your nonfiction work?

Speaker 8 (01:22:30):
So I'm titling at the rebellious generation. I'm kind of
talking about the whole mentality of like I'm calling it needum,
which means kind of just like worshiping this self over God,
and how people are so unentitled to their own opinion
and not you know, absolute truth. And so that's kind
of the topic that I'm writing about.

Speaker 1 (01:22:52):
So as far as the research, try to find original
source documents and peer either peer reviewed or widely accepted studies.
AI can help, but be careful. AI can have a
lot of slop in it, so you've got to double
check it's work, So I'd be very careful with that.
It can help you as long as a thinking partner
of what you are trying to accomplish. Though, as I
mentioned in a prior segment, but original source documents are

(01:23:14):
the best possible thing to do, especially if you're trying
to look for data or surveys. It's going to take time.
Research of a book is sometimes the deepest, most time
intensive component of it. Blake did all the research and
kind of compiling of my last book on right wing revolution,
and it took him probably twenty to thirty hours of research.
And so Margo, if you'd like, I can connect you

(01:23:35):
on an email with Blake, and he can help you
kind of put that together. It is right wing revolution
and it's a heavy amount of research and reading. Just
on the research side of things. I was just saying
the research, Blake, not the writing. Blake says it took
a lot more than that. I said twenty to thirty
hours of research. Maybe it'sok, even more than that a research,
but it's a huge labor so maybe he took one

(01:23:58):
hundred hours of research. Oh anyway, thank you so much,
Margo for your time. I really appreciate it. Okay, I
should say clear Patrick, Margot so and and what's on
your mind? Thanks for being remember members dot Charliekirk dot
com and what's on your mind? Okay, Hi Charlie. I've

(01:24:29):
been aware of the Senate this is her question. Charlie.
I've been aware of the Senate parliamentarian's power for some time,
and I'm surprised MAGA didn't notice it much before this.
I know you said not to worry too much, but
it seems me that Thune could and should have removed
this deep state appoint te of Harry Reid in twenty twelve,
particularly in light of the change in the Fifth Republican Party.
We're no longer interested in the Renal Party. Is there

(01:24:52):
potential for Thune to remove her? If not, can VP
pants advance override it. It's a great question. Look, I
did a whole program on it yesterday. Things are mildly
improving with this parliamentarian Elizabeth McDonough, but we are still
a ways out from having the declarative decisions that we
need from her that are consistent with our policy agenda.

(01:25:13):
I do not think that dismissal should be off the table.
I think that if we have a repeated ridiculous, grotesque
pattern of behavior from McDonough, dismissal can happen from Fune
or basically JD. They can make the call. But understand
that if we dismiss too arbitrarily, I know no one
wants to hear this, there will be a revolt from
Lindsay Graham and Susan Collins because they're institutionalists. You can't

(01:25:37):
lose those guys, and you don't want to. You don't
want to have a revolt on one side. And then
you could potentially turn her into a martyr where she
could go to the New York Times. She should go
to CNN all of a sudden, she'll say that, you know,
the Trump administration is trying to do illegal stuff. So
we're trying to be reserved. We're trying to hold our
capal power before we before, but as it reaches that level.

(01:25:59):
There was a tweet sent out yesterday, so let me
read this tweet here. Let me see here where is it.
It was from the Vice President's office that sent it
to me, So this is from the VP's office. No,
let me just really quick. Senate Republicans are walking out
their lunch with a pep in their step regarding the

(01:26:21):
parliamentarian and Medicaid provisions. Quote. I feel much better after lunch.
It looks like there are issues that can be resolved.
So remember what I told you guys yesterday. A lot
of these issues can actually be solved with a wording change. Okay,
let's get to the next question here. Members dot Charliekirk
dot com. That is, members dot Charliekirk dot com. Lisa, Lisa,

(01:26:42):
thank you for being a member. What is on your mind?

Speaker 22 (01:26:46):
Hi, Charlie, I just now saw your interview with Harmy Dylan,
and I'm not an attorney and I have not listened
to the entire interview. But and she may have some
process or game plan. She's from californiay'all. So did she
explain why the DOJ is handling a performative issue at
the Orange County level and not the civil rights issue

(01:27:08):
from a federal level. Our civil rights are being violated
here in California, but in many and most states across
the United States. The US Constitution and Article one, Section two,
the House of Representatives shall be composed of members chosen
every second year by the people of the several states,
that's not happening. Not only are there non citizens voting

(01:27:32):
here in Orange County, one out of every five vote
is either a non citizen, ineligible or simply does not exist.
Our voting system is tainted. And if it's tainted in
any way, our civil rights are being violated.

Speaker 6 (01:27:48):
Do you agree?

Speaker 18 (01:27:49):
Yes?

Speaker 1 (01:27:50):
I do. It depends to the extent, and I mean
it depends on how many of these phantom and fake
voters actually are. And I think Harmie Dillon is uniquely
positioned to be a look into this, which, of course
is a disenfranchisement of people civil rights. I mean, Andrew
lives in California. A lot of our friends live in California,
and if people who are voting who should not be voting,

(01:28:11):
like illegal aliens and illegal citizens, then that is disenfranchising
your right to vote. So I think we should give
her Meat Dylan all the possible firepower and backing that
we can't.

Speaker 22 (01:28:22):
So she has all of our support, as does Bill
of Sali and Michael Gates.

Speaker 1 (01:28:27):
What part of California are you from?

Speaker 7 (01:28:30):
San Clementi?

Speaker 22 (01:28:31):
Southern California?

Speaker 1 (01:28:32):
It's beautiful. You live in Paradise. Isn't it terrible what
they've done to California. It's just a tragedy.

Speaker 7 (01:28:37):
Breaks my heart.

Speaker 22 (01:28:37):
But I stand up paddle board almost every day.

Speaker 1 (01:28:40):
God bless you and make sure you find a good church.

Speaker 6 (01:28:42):
So God bless you. I do, you've been to it.

Speaker 23 (01:28:46):
John Randalls, Oh, you.

Speaker 1 (01:28:47):
Go to a great church Astraano. You're in a great church.
John Randall's the greatest. I'll tell you he is. He's
one of the best pastors.

Speaker 8 (01:28:53):
We are very very blessed.

Speaker 1 (01:28:55):
And yeah, I mean and John Randall's a big surfer too,
so that's uh, yes, big stuff. God bless you. Thank
you so much, lovely question. We have Alan Jackson Ministries, right,
We're honored to be partnering with Alan Jackson Ministries, and
today I want to tell you about a book by
Pastor Allan that you'll want to read. It's called God
Bless America Again. It tell us the truth about our history,

(01:29:16):
how our nation was formed on biblical principles, and the
importance of protecting our Judeo Christian foundations as we move forward.
God has given us an assignment to bring our faith
into our world today. And here's the catch. It starts
with focusing on our own attitudes. When you take time
to understand how God is consistently blessed America, pouring his
grace and mercy on us over and over again, will
give you hope for the days ahead. It's called God

(01:29:36):
Bless America Again. Will sharpen your perspective what it means
to bring God's truth into our nation today. Go to
Alan Jackson dot com, slash Charlie and God Bless America Again.
That is Alan Jackson dot com, slash Charlie, Alan Jackson
dot com slash Charlie. Email us as always freedom at
charliekirk dot com and subscribe to the Charlie Kirkshow podcast.

(01:29:57):
We're going to go straight through the breaks, stay there.
Subscribe to our podcast. Okay, Greg, thank you for being

(01:30:19):
a member members dot Charliekirk dot com. Greg, what is
on your mind?

Speaker 6 (01:30:24):
Yeah, Hi Charlie.

Speaker 24 (01:30:27):
My family's businesses down the street from Jack Hibbs Church
was the greatest.

Speaker 1 (01:30:32):
I shout Hi him out earlier this hour. Phenomenal Bible teacher.

Speaker 24 (01:30:37):
And I know you were. You were here recently, but
just didn't work out my schedule for me to try
to fight the crowds to go see you. Crazy California.

Speaker 6 (01:30:46):
Here we are.

Speaker 24 (01:30:47):
So my question is kind of on the immigration issue,
Like I think we've watered down what it means to
be an American, or at least we're not talking about
what it means to be an American, and we've lost
our community, Like we don't. I don't feel like we
we love our neighbors. We don't look out for each other,
we don't ask questions, we don't we don't have each

(01:31:08):
other's phone numbers. We're scared to knock on doors, Like
you know, if I don't text somebody first, or they
don't know that I'm coming and I knock on their door,
they even gonna answer, Like I'm in the neighbor. You know,
we don't you know, we should have concern for our
neighbors and look out for each other.

Speaker 6 (01:31:26):
What do we do?

Speaker 23 (01:31:27):
We got to bring that back.

Speaker 24 (01:31:28):
I don't know if it's the church. I know you
talk a lot about spirituality in the church and going
to church and getting back to those roots. But I
think we need to get back to saying yes, ma'am,
yes or no, thank you, you know, clean up our language,
clean up our attitudes towards each other. And maybe church
is where it's at.

Speaker 6 (01:31:47):
I'm not sure.

Speaker 1 (01:31:49):
I totally saw a couple A couple thoughts. I totally agree.
Ever since we've had mass immigration, we've had breakdown in
social trust, social cohesion. We our schools or hospitals, our socials,
servis is our flooded and we are a nation of strangers.
We lock our doors and we keep our head down
on the phone. Now a lot of this is just phones. Honestly,
a lot of this is just smartphones and the supercomputers
in our pocket that we're staring at all day long.

(01:32:11):
Is that people increasingly do not have in real life experiences.
And it should be the church, and it should be
a bottom up, grassroots revival. Of us demanding better, that
we shouldn't have to be staring at this things all
day long, that we should get to know our neighbors
by name, and that we should have block parties and
make food and meals for our neighbor. I mean, I'm
in a unique position where I get I know my neighbors,
and my neighbors are awesome, But we've gone out of

(01:32:32):
our way to get to know our neighbors, know their birthdays,
know their kids' names, know their struggles. And it could
be something as simple as you should be proactive to
your neighbor, like, hey, can I pray for you? Can
I send over a meal? Find someone in your local
community that might be a new mom, and be like,
I'm just going to provide meals for you one night
a week for a couple months. There's so much, you see.

(01:32:53):
The Gospel of Jesus Christ can be synthesized to four words,
love God and love people, and we're doing bad with
both right now in America. We have to do a
better job of loving people, of being unafraid to serve others.
This is what makes Christianity the greatest of all the faiths.

(01:33:14):
Because we're told to die to ourself, to Christ, and
to serve others, even if it's at an expense to ourself.
It's a very harsh teaching, a very difficult teaching, and
so I completely agree. I would like to think that
mass deportations will help, as we should do it. But
this has been a trend for a long time. Bowling
Alone was a big book on this, but a lot
of this really became noticeable in the nineteen nineties and

(01:33:35):
we're seeing it crescendo every year. Great questions, stay right there, Okay, everybody.
I want to tell you guys about TikTok, TikTok. We
have a lot to make up with TikTok. I want
to tell you guys TikTok economic impact dot com. It's

(01:33:57):
because we keep on blowing through the breaks and President
Trumpet he's on doing press conferences TikTok economic impact dot
com while TikTok with TikTok small business are thriving. Here's
another one. Let's go to cut five sixty five. It's
all about immigration that went viral on TikTok five sixty five.

Speaker 4 (01:34:15):
What would you say, are there long term or short
term consequences of mass illegal immigration on social services and
the economy.

Speaker 1 (01:34:21):
Yeah, I mean it will flood schools, flood hospitals. But
even more than that, it's the destruction of the rule
of law, and it's an insult to your family that
followed the law. Your family came here the right way
and filled out the paperwork and waited your turn. You
did not cut in line. Yeah, so we have to
make a decision. Are we going to be a country
that follows and honors the rules or rewards rule breakers?

(01:34:42):
And we teach our kids at two years old rule
breakers get punished, don't cut in line, wait your turn.
Yet when it comes to immigration, we act as if
it's something totally different. We want people like your family
to come here the right way, legally, not breaking in line,
and then all of a sudden getting rewards because of that.

Speaker 6 (01:34:58):
Amen.

Speaker 1 (01:34:59):
Thank you, thank you, so thank you. That one viral
on TikTok, amongst many others, were able to reach the
next generation on TikTok is TikTok economic impact dot com.
But TikTok small businesses are thriving, finding their customers and
expanding learn more about their contribution. You don't have to
love TikTok, but you have to acknowledge what we're able
to do and to reach that next generation. We are
winning the youth vote. Go to TikTok economic impact dot com.

(01:35:20):
That's TikTok economic impact dot com portion of this program.
We're brought to you in part by TikTok economic Impact
dot Com. Jean Claude, I know Jean Claude. I wonder
if this is the same Jean Claude. Thank you for
your member members dot Charliekirk dot com. What's on your mind?

Speaker 19 (01:35:33):
Hi?

Speaker 14 (01:35:33):
Can you hear me?

Speaker 6 (01:35:34):
Yes?

Speaker 1 (01:35:35):
How are you good? Uh?

Speaker 13 (01:35:37):
I saw you at Amfest.

Speaker 25 (01:35:38):
I don't think I'm the same one you met because.

Speaker 6 (01:35:40):
I didn't need you there.

Speaker 1 (01:35:43):
Uh, probably on your mind.

Speaker 25 (01:35:45):
I live in Washington State, on the eastern side of
the state. I don't expect you to come here and
say my state, but I just want to know if
I were to really try and do something, what would
it be and what are the chances anything could happen here?

Speaker 1 (01:36:00):
Washington is a big lift, I'll be honest. That is
that is a heavy one. Are you from eastern Washington?

Speaker 7 (01:36:07):
Yeah, the Tri Cities area.

Speaker 1 (01:36:09):
That's where Emmakate lives. Yeah, we went and visited. We
went to Washington State University, and I did an event
in Musca, Iowa, and so it is very well received there.
And so I suppose the best thing, look is, you
have to start local. I don't want to try to
mislead you. Saving Washington is a huge endeavor, but find
other people that agree with you. And unless you, you know,

(01:36:30):
really want to make this your task, we would welcome
you with open arms in Arizona because every new activist
and every new patriot in Arizona is so welcome. I'm
not saying I don't want to say give up on Washington,
but I can tell you that it is probably not
the greatest use of an activist time to try to
flip a deep blue state. When we have states that

(01:36:50):
are ready to become the next Florida. We can take
Arizona off the battleground map. Heading in the twenty twenty
eight We need to win the governor's race, Andy Biggs,
we need when the age race, secretary of state race.
We have two Democrat senators. We are going to fortify
and turn Arizona into a blood red, deep red state.
We're well on our way to do that. Thank you
so much, man, really appreciate it all right. Last question

(01:37:11):
of the week it'll be Ashton Ashton members dot Charliekirk
dot com. What's on your mind, hy Charlie. How you
doing good? How are you good?

Speaker 23 (01:37:22):
Funny enough? I'm also from Washington States. That's kind of funny.

Speaker 1 (01:37:25):
I'm on the west side though. Okay, very good.

Speaker 23 (01:37:29):
Yeah, So I had a really quick question just I've
followed you for a while and I know throughout the
various stages you went through when you were building tournament
but USA. I was just kind of curious, as someone
just like looking at starting smaller companies with the family
and friends, what did you do for medical medical insurance?

(01:37:49):
Because I talk with a lot of people here and
it's like, oh, you know, if you want to get
any kind of medical insurance, it's any good.

Speaker 1 (01:37:55):
You have to work for a big company. You can't
do it.

Speaker 12 (01:37:57):
On your own.

Speaker 1 (01:37:58):
It's kind of a thing out here.

Speaker 23 (01:38:00):
Curious What was your advice and what.

Speaker 1 (01:38:01):
Steps did you take when you were working your way?
How old are you?

Speaker 8 (01:38:05):
Twenty one?

Speaker 1 (01:38:06):
Yeah, So don't love Obamacare, but if your parents have
health insurance, you're allowed to stay on your parents plan
up until you're twenty six. If I'm not mistaken. I
don't know if your parents have health insurance or not,
but as far as being an entrepreneur, you can go
on the public exchange and you can go on the market.
This is a big problem. The open exchange is awful
for entrepreneurs. You get totally hosed if you have to

(01:38:27):
go by your own health insurance on the open exchange.
We need a whole recalibration of our health insurance way
of thinking things, unfortunately, is way too tied to your employer.
And for sole proprietors, entrepreneurs, business owners, they you just
get crushed. If you're kind of like an entrepreneur. You're
not part of a major conglomeration. So I know that
doesn't fully answer your question. But again I'm not a

(01:38:48):
huge fan of Obamacare, but one provision does allow you
to stay on your parents' plan until you're twenty six.
So our healthcare system is one that nobody would create,
but it's almost impossible to dismand let me repeat that again,
it's our healthcare system is one that almost no one
would create, but it's almost impossible to dismantle. Thank you
so much, and God bless you have a great weekend.

(01:39:12):
What a week President Trump had a great week. No
troops on the ground, no nukes for Iran Supreme Court victory.
Shabbat Shalom, God bless you guys. We'll see you on Monday.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}The Charlie Kirk Show, June 27, 2025

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

The Charlie Kirk Show, June 27, 2025

Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club