Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:08):
A big day for the Supreme Court as they release
a bunch of their decisions and then head for the
hills and don't answer any questions.
Speaker 2 (00:15):
Also, the Bezos wedding it Actually, I think there.
Speaker 1 (00:18):
Is some interesting components to one of the world's richest
men getting married in Venice and New York real estate
developers are in a panic.
Speaker 2 (00:28):
I can only imagine.
Speaker 1 (00:29):
Why, and I wonder if any New York real estate
is going to be for sale in the next couple
months at a discount. All that more coming up on
this episode of Turning Point Tonight. My name is Joe Bob.
Thanks so much for tuning in. Together, we are charting
the course of America's cultural comeback.
Speaker 2 (00:43):
This is Turning Point Tonight.
Speaker 1 (00:44):
Now, before we get to our panel, of course, we're
going to discuss what's going on at the Supreme Court.
But I thought this was actually the most interesting one.
And I'm gonna argue with myself a little bit here
because trying to rationalize through all of the potential possibilities
that have happened with this ending, never ending injunctions decision
by the Supreme Court. Now, earlier in the day this
(01:06):
was reported as the birthright citizenship thing.
Speaker 2 (01:09):
Is that constitutional?
Speaker 1 (01:11):
Was it meant for children of slaves or was it
meant for Juan and Margharita who crossed the border and
had their kid here and bounced?
Speaker 2 (01:20):
Is that no? Okay?
Speaker 1 (01:21):
So that's a discussion that will be had at some point,
Pam Bondi said, probably around Octobers when the Supreme Court
will take that up. What I thought was really interesting, though,
is the real decision behind this in that the Supreme
Court said, okay, well, it can't just be one random
judge issuing injunctions that wipe out everything the president is
(01:41):
doing across the country. That is actually big news. Here's
where I argue with myself, that is great. President Trump
is doing what the American people voted him into office
to do. And well, that's kind of concerning because whether
you like it or not, there will be a Lib
president again someday, and I'm concerned that that Lib president
(02:04):
wield all of those powers that the executive branch has
with being able to do things without just sweeping injunctions
by a federal judge, and that concerns me.
Speaker 2 (02:14):
Where I argue with myself a third.
Speaker 1 (02:16):
Time is that, okay, well, maybe if that's the case,
freaking Congress will get their act together and do their
job so that the president doesn't have to do all
these executive orders, whether it's Trump, whether it's a Democrat,
whoever it is, because at the end of the day,
the only reason the president has these sweeping executive orders
from Obama to Trump to Biden back to Trump is
because Congress doesn't do their job. They're the least liked
(02:39):
branch of government by far, and maybe if they want
to stop the executive branch from taking all their power,
maybe they should take some of it back by again
doing their freaking job. Here to comments on that and
so much more is Mike Chrispy, who's a host on
rav and also Kendall Bailey, political conservative commentator. Guys think yes,
(03:00):
so rich are tuning in today, coming on today?
Speaker 2 (03:02):
Tuning in?
Speaker 1 (03:04):
Uh, Mike, I want to start with you here on
this injunctions thing. This is you know again, my mind
goes back and forth and back and forth on.
Speaker 2 (03:11):
Good idea, bad idea.
Speaker 1 (03:12):
Obviously, I want President Trump to not be hindered by
random judges. A federal judge decides that. I don't want
that to happen. At the same time, I'm not sure
if I want Libs to have that power. Is Congress
the only way to kind of go forward with this?
What are your thoughts?
Speaker 3 (03:28):
You know?
Speaker 4 (03:28):
I think that Congress obviously, over the last couple of
weeks have shown just how feckless and how weak they are.
They don't want to do anything because so many people
who are about to run for reelection are petrified of
super pac money coming in in swing districts.
Speaker 5 (03:45):
These people are trying to save their own hide.
Speaker 4 (03:47):
They're literally sitting there and doing nothing because they want
to preserve their own future. Meanwhile, our future right now
is being robbed blind from us before our very eyes.
So President Trump says, I'm going to do something about it.
I'm going to start enacting executive orders again. He had
four years to prepare for this next term and understand
what he could and couldn't do. So him and his
(04:09):
people have studied the law, and they're levying their legal
authority to do certain things under certain statutes. It's working
very well, and these judges are only doing it in
an attempt to slow it down. They know it won't stand.
They're doing it an attempt to slow it down. But
it is all because Congress is petrified of their own shadow.
So Republicans and Democrat members of Congress, forget about it.
(04:31):
We need to clean the house.
Speaker 2 (04:32):
Jobob groundhogs Congress.
Speaker 1 (04:34):
Is what I heard there, Kendall, I want to actually
play the audio from that clip and then get your reaction.
This is President Trump talking about the idea of ending
the endless injunction craziness going on with random federal judges.
Watch this, and I want your reaction.
Speaker 6 (04:49):
And thanks to this decision, we can now promptly file
to proceed with numerous policies that have been wrongly enjoined
on a nationwide basis. And some of the cases we're
talking about would be ending birthright citizenship, which now comes
to the fore that was meant for the babies of slaves.
It wasn't meant for people trying to scam the system
(05:11):
and come into the country on a vacation. Ending sanctuary
city funding, suspending refugee resettlement, freezing unnecessary funding, stopping federal
taxpayers from paying for transgender surgeries, and numerous other priorities
of the American people.
Speaker 1 (05:30):
So, Kendall, the politics and policy aside from who gets
to do what, what do we think about the President saying, hey, cool,
change are off. Let's rock and roll with what the
American people said. What are you looking forward to that
the Trump administration might use this new ability that they
have to do well.
Speaker 7 (05:47):
I think it's true. I mean, he took the words
right out of my mouth. This was for free slaves.
This is not for anchor babies. And I think we
need to stop incentivizing these illegals from coming over our
It was like at first, it was, you know, hey,
get you get a job when you come over here,
you get a paycheck, you get a free cell phone,
you get a really nice apartment, and now you can
(06:09):
have your child over here, and we're going to pay
for it. And that's absolutely absurd. I think President Trump
is an absolute boss, and I stand by him in
this decision.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
Yeah, a bunch of other rulings came out of the
Supreme Court. That wasn't the only one. But do you
think that's that has the biggest implications for the executive
branch going forward?
Speaker 2 (06:27):
Kendall.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
The Supreme Court also upheld Texas's age website verification laws
for going on adult websites. You know, as a parent,
what are your thoughts about that?
Speaker 7 (06:37):
Listen, I think it's a lovely idea, but I also
know that anybody can get anybody can get an ID
well except for Black people. I'm sorry.
Speaker 8 (06:46):
Remember black peoples, we can't have that because they can't vote,
and now they can't look at porn, which totally sucks
for them. Listen, what I think we need this boils
down to is we need to talk about educating instead
of restricting. I think the American, the average American consumer
of porn needs to know that it increases sexual aggression,
(07:10):
it harms your sexual function, and it increases marital infidelity
by three hundred percent. Looking at porn actually alters your
brain function and doesn't allow you to have those meaningful
relationships with people.
Speaker 7 (07:24):
I think that's what we need to be doing. We
need to be talking to people about the negative side
effects of porn instead of encouraging this just free sex
for all body count that we currently have in the
United States of America.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
Kendall, it was a very serious dietribe that you went
on that I totally agree with, but also the funniest
joke that I think I've heard on this so far.
Those poor black people that can't get ideas also can't
watch porn.
Speaker 7 (07:51):
Now, oh no, I know the tragedy, Mike.
Speaker 1 (07:56):
You know, here's what I'm curious about this, right all?
For the law, consider how do you enforce it? And
I genuinely don't know. Are there kind of like technical
ramifications that maybe concern you of, like how to actually
do this sort of thing?
Speaker 2 (08:08):
Get around it?
Speaker 5 (08:09):
Like?
Speaker 2 (08:09):
Is that how doable? Is this? Despite the fact that
we like the actual outcome of it?
Speaker 4 (08:16):
Well, I think the Conservative the Congressional Black Caucus rather
is going to hold a press conference tomorrow in response
to what Kendall is saying and say this is an
absolute outrage. How are people going to get equal access
to adult entertainment? I think they might take that on
in regards to that and a letny of other things.
(08:37):
But I mean, obviously, you know, unfortunately, the reality is
is that I think that people will try to get
around it, and I think that it all speaks to
a bigger conversation that we need to have about America
being dragged into this degenerate mindset where people's lives aren't
that valuable, they have a low self worth, they don't
(08:58):
feel like they need to go get a job or
start a family or of any type of sense of commitment.
So they get these cheap fixes. Okay, they get food
stamps to eat, they get subsidized Section eight housing, and
then they go on the internet and they find.
Speaker 5 (09:13):
Pirated porn for their pleasure.
Speaker 4 (09:15):
So it really is a sad state of affairs, and
it speaks to a larger overarching problem that whether it's
Republican or Democrat, no matter what state you're in, the
leftists have been successful, largely unfortunately, in degeneralizing our society,
our children.
Speaker 5 (09:32):
And it's going to need to be a big movement over.
I don't think it's gonna take one year.
Speaker 4 (09:35):
It might take two, three, or four or five to
shift the culture back to what we all know it
should be.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Yeah, this really is a big cultural issue masquerading as
a legal issue. And by the way, I feel like
I should just point out in case this is going
over people's head, we're all making fun of the idea
that Libs say that, well, requiring an idea is bad
for black people because they don't they can't get ideas.
That's ridiculous. Of course, every American can get an idea
(10:02):
if they sowed shoes and therefore vote and do all
the things that you would need with that ID. Kendall,
I want to ask you this too, because the Supreme
Court also came out six to three saying that you can't.
Speaker 2 (10:12):
Ban there are a lot of negatives here.
Speaker 1 (10:14):
You can't ban parents from opting out of lgpt Q,
alphabet letter people content in their school, specifically elementary schools.
Maryland was saying, hey, no, you can't opt your kid
out of this. Supreme Court says, yes, they can.
Speaker 7 (10:31):
Your thoughts there, you absolutely should be able to opt
them out. First of all, I don't think we should
even be opting in. It's disgusting. We need to be
sending our children to school to learn basics, math, science, history, history, history.
Right now, I would say a large portion of children
can't identify things that are on a map, but I
(10:52):
bet they could tell you what map stands for, as
in a minor attracted person. And that's vile, that's disgusting.
When when I send my child to school, I want
the basics taught, and when they come home, I will
talk to them. I will be their true North and
tell them that God created man and woman and that's
what his intention was, for man and women to be
(11:13):
married and to pro.
Speaker 1 (11:14):
Create Yeah, yeah, again, I really like this as a
ruling because you should be able to opt out if
you send your kids to government schools, you have one
hundred percent should be able to opt out of various
lessons in class.
Speaker 2 (11:27):
Mike, your thoughts on this.
Speaker 5 (11:30):
Well, you know, it is quite fascinating to me.
Speaker 4 (11:33):
How I think people in schools right now are missing
the greater agenda here, and it is that they're not
just doing this because they're trying to teach the kids
about sexuality. They are trying to dumb down the next
generation and make it so they are less productive, more
mentally unstable, and then what does that lead to?
Speaker 5 (11:55):
Leads them becoming future Democrat voters?
Speaker 4 (11:57):
Okay, so you make the kid mentally unstable because you
teach them such disgusting to prave material. They're not learning
about math and science or history. They're learning about sexuality.
In New Jersey, the state I live in, they start
learning about that in the second grade. It's terrible, it's disgusting.
So like, are these people say tactic.
Speaker 5 (12:15):
Or what's the deal?
Speaker 4 (12:16):
There is a higher force that is feeding them that,
and I think it is for a greater agenda to
raise a generation of stupider people, which results in more
liberal voters.
Speaker 2 (12:27):
Job.
Speaker 7 (12:28):
I do have a question though, when you opt your
child out, my concern is what are they going to
have them do? So they opt out of this program,
and now the teacher is pissed that that kid doesn't
have to participate, and then what do they do? They
have sit them in front of a show It's a
TV show or what.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
Yeah, you know, I don't know what that is, and
I think that's probably up to the local school districts.
But I guarantee you if they're put in front of
something that they also don't like, the parents don't like,
I would hope that the lawsuits would be inbound.
Speaker 2 (12:57):
So I guess we'll all see.
Speaker 1 (12:59):
But I'm overall, I think we all like the direction
here and hope it continues that way. Mike and Kendall
will be back after the break to discuss the bezos wedding.
I know, I know you're rolling your eyes in your head,
but also I do think there's some interesting elements there,
especially when you're talking about taxation versus spending.
Speaker 2 (13:18):
It's actually pretty interesting.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
Dogoya will be right back after the break.
Speaker 2 (13:27):
Got to admire what you've been able to do not.
Speaker 9 (13:30):
To weaponize, but to organize on these college campuses at
Turning Point USA. We've spent thirteen years building the machine,
and last year we sought payoff. Our grassroots army is
making a real difference. Help us keep the momentum going.
Donate today and keep TPUSA strong on campuses across America.
Speaker 10 (13:48):
And for a gift of any amount, you'll receive your
big Gov sucks cooler claim yours today.
Speaker 11 (13:56):
Student Action Summit twenty twenty five featuring the boldest voices
of the fight. Secretary Pete Hegset, Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson,
Steve ben Brett Cooper, Secretary Christine Noma, Riley Gaines, Brandon Tatum,
Jack Psoba, and Moore joined thousands of students, future leaders
and freedom fighters. This is the battleground of ideas. This
(14:17):
is the Student Action Summit. The future his hours to build.
Register now at SAS twenty twenty five dot com.
Speaker 1 (14:30):
Welcome back to Turning Point tonight. We're together. We are
charting the course of America's cultural comeback. Let's check in
with White House correspondent for Turning Point Monica, Paige Monica.
A lot of stuff going on today that's really interesting,
including possibly brokering peace around the world and not from
a war that you're consistently hearing about in the mainstream media.
Speaker 2 (14:49):
Tell us what happened at the White House today.
Speaker 12 (14:51):
Right, So, the President and his administration meeting with the
foreign ministers of both the Democratic Republic of the Congo
and Rwanda, who have been fighting for decades, coming here
to the White House to sign a peace steal. Now,
this is I think the third peace steal that these
two nations have been trying to sign over the course
of multiple decades. But this is gonna be the first
(15:14):
one of its kind right here at the White House.
The first peace deal, I believe, was called the Nairobi
Process and the second one was called the Luanda Agreement.
But given the fact that different kinds of rogue militias
kind of dominate that area, and given the fact that
Congo is very rich in minerals and other foreign countries
can benefit from those minerals, peace between those two nations
(15:34):
just really hasn't gone off with a hitch both of
those times. So hoping that President Trump can really make
this peace agreement stick between these two nations and we
can finally see yet another.
Speaker 11 (15:45):
Ceasefire.
Speaker 12 (15:46):
I guess you could call it or just end to
the fighting, because we saw it with India, Pakistan, Iran
and Israel soon Russia, Ukraine, and you know, we'll see
if this is just another one President Trump can check
off his box.
Speaker 2 (15:59):
Yeah, you know, this.
Speaker 1 (16:01):
Would be a big win if you could actually make
sure there's a piece in that war torn part of
the world, but also not often talked about a lot.
Speaking of war torn, that's probably a bit of an exaggeration.
The press briefing room this morning when President Trump came
out talking about the Scotis rulings.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
We've been talking about Scotis all today.
Speaker 1 (16:21):
This is kind of when they drop a lot of
their decisions and then head for the hills and don't
ask any questions.
Speaker 2 (16:26):
But President Trump had a press conference, you were in
the room. What is it like in there with those
types of things.
Speaker 1 (16:31):
Obviously Carolyn Levitt has these scheduled press briefings, and you know,
I feel like, from a viewer's perspective, I'd love to
hear your thoughts. It's more tame. But is this one
similar to that, these kind of impromptu.
Speaker 12 (16:44):
Ones, Well, this is the second impromptu briefing that the
President has held that we were aware of just minutes before,
less than an hour before we were notified, and you
could just see all the reporters kind of scrambling to
find a spot. At least in the Press Secretary's press briefings.
We were aware of them at least a day ahead
of time. But at this point when it comes to
(17:05):
the president, all decorum is out the window. Everyone is
screaming over each other. The hands go up immediately when
President Trump says, anybody have any questions? We knew what
was happening. Next, everyone's hands go up. The President can't
see you. We were all standing off to the side,
so I don't even know if he even got to
see me beyond the hands and the screaming. But it's
(17:25):
definitely a different kind of battle because you're trying to
get him to see you, you're trying to ask the question,
and then you've got all the legacy media sitting right
in front of you. But nonetheless, the President was very
happy with this ruling, of course, curbing the nationwide injunctions
placing the president to allow him to carry out the
duties that the people voted for him for. So it's
(17:45):
a very big win here at the White House, and
the President seemed to be in very good spirits when
he was talking about it with all of.
Speaker 1 (17:50):
Us, you know, from an outside perspective too, Like I
think we all kind of have seen pictures of the
White House pressing room.
Speaker 2 (17:56):
It's not super big.
Speaker 1 (17:58):
It's not this like big expansive space, and you kind
of just assume that, you know, the the nation's leading
media in the most powerful country in the world, wouldn't
act like a zoo. But yeah, it just seems like,
especially with this president, uh, you know, probably because he
actually takes press conferences on like the last guy, it
seems to be wild and crazy. But glad, glad you
(18:19):
made it out of their safe monica.
Speaker 5 (18:22):
Yeah, I know.
Speaker 12 (18:23):
It's it's always you. You could just never tell what
these kinds of things. You're kind of just on top
of everybody, and everyone's breathing on you, everyone's shouting in
your ear. It's not an enjoyable experience. Uh, but hey, listen,
we're just happy to hear be here and beal with
the president.
Speaker 1 (18:36):
Son say yeah at the end of the day though, Yeah,
at the end of the day, at least he's accessible
So that's that's good. Monica Page's turning point. White House Correspondence,
have a great weekend. We'll see you on Monday.
Speaker 12 (18:46):
Thanks guys, you too, Thank you.
Speaker 2 (18:48):
Now, I bet there's no show on this network. I
could be wrong, but if.
Speaker 1 (18:52):
I were to wager a guest that is talking about
the Bezos wedding of all things. But I do think
there's some interesting elements there. But before we get to that,
I got to tell you about Allfamilypharmacy dot Com. If
you got All Familypharmacy dot Com slash tonight and use
the code Tonight twenty, you can get twenty percent off
all of your ivermectin needs. Now, we've all been familiar
(19:12):
with ivermcnen for a while now, if you've got a
parasitic infection, COVID nineteen, whatever you've got, ivermectan is something
that you're gonna need to have on hand. A friend
of the show, good friend of the show you probably know,
very very well, told me that ivermactin saved her weekend. Friday,
kind of feeling like a little fever coming on, popped
a couple ivermectin and just had a fantastic weekend. Don't
(19:35):
know how that weekend would have turned out if she hadn't.
So if you need ivermecton Allfamilypharmacy dot com slash tonight,
use the code tonight twenty for twenty percent off. And
the biggest and I think most important thing is it
is a US based company. You don't want to order
stuff from around the world from who knows where, it's
just sending whatever they've got. You want a US based company.
(19:56):
All Family Pharmacy is that US based company. Go to
All Family Pharmacy dots slash tonight. Get your ivermectin at
twenty percent off when you use the code tonight twenty
Allfamily Pharmacy dot com slash tonight. Now, let's bring our
panel back. Host of Last Call, Mike Crispy and Kendall Bailey,
conservative commentator. Guys, the election of well, not election of
(20:19):
the primary win of Mam Danny Over in New York
City has a bunch of developers very very scared. I
was about to use the term going to the bathroom
in their pants, but I don't know if that's appropriate
for television developers horrified at this, mostly because he has
said we're gonna cap rent, which any economic person that
(20:40):
has past eleventh grade could tell you, Oh, well, you're
gonna restrict supply. How is that gonna make rent go down?
But I don't know if that factors into Mam Danny's
plan there, Mike, how is this gonna affect New York City?
You know, big developers saying we're out and that's not
talking even about the grocery store guys. Several of the
(21:00):
other financiers. It seems like it's a be a problem
for them.
Speaker 4 (21:04):
Yeah, So if you are a owner of a grocery store,
why would you operate in New York City. They're gonna
have government owned grocery stores, So the politicians are going
to control the supply of the food to the people.
Speaker 5 (21:18):
What could go wrong? We've never seen anything like that
in history before.
Speaker 4 (21:22):
And then also there seems to be Mandamie ran on
taxing people in whiter areas in the city more.
Speaker 5 (21:30):
So, what does that mean exactly?
Speaker 4 (21:32):
There's gonna be an ethnic cleansing of sorts in New
York City. They want white people to leave the city.
Speaker 5 (21:38):
It's a bizarre thing.
Speaker 4 (21:40):
So between those two factors of saying we're going to
tax whier areas more and we're going to take control
of the grocery system. I think that this city if
Mendomni gets in, and now I think it is about
a fifty to fifty chance because there is talk about
Eric Adams independent bid gaining steam. But if Mondambi gets in,
this city is done for. You know, New York City
(22:02):
used to be a city that elected moderates. Rudy Giuliani
was the mayor not long ago than Mike Bloomberg. Then
we went off the cliff, went to Blasio. We got
it back a little bit with more of a moderate
in Adams, and then Mondambi represents the worst of the worst.
And that's because Andrew Cuomo ran possibly the worst campaign ever.
Speaker 5 (22:19):
He's a disgrace as an Italian. He's a disgrace to Italians.
Speaker 4 (22:22):
We don't claim him ran the worst campaign ever, and
he's about to row in New York City because of it.
Speaker 1 (22:27):
I was gonna say, yeah, the only problem with the
whole campaign there it was against Andrew Cuomo, Like, all right,
can you find literally anybody else better? Uh, Kendall, there's
a huge irony here with the whole rent capping thing.
In twenty nineteen, there was a rent control cap on
stabilized unit units, and because of that rent control cap,
(22:47):
it's projected to cost the city two billion dollars in
tax revenue. In other words, if you cap rents like,
not only does that restrict supply, it also limits your
tax revenue, which you need a lot of to do
all the social things that he wants to do. What
is going through the minds of New Yorkers here that
they're they're putting this guy into office supposedly?
Speaker 2 (23:08):
Maybe I think.
Speaker 7 (23:10):
New Yorkers love it. I think New Yorkers are a
completely different breed. I think New Yorkers love it. I
feel like I should do this whole segment in a
New York accent. I mean, it's ridiculous there. This is
what they're voting for, this is what they asked for,
and yet we're surprised by it. Yeah, I mean we
have this this This is like a communist running society
(23:31):
that like, let them I feel like that's such a
popular phrase right now, let them let them run it
into the ground. And this is a perfect commercial for
for Republicans to say, let's not do that. Let's not
run our city that way. New York used to be beautiful.
People used to love to visit there. I mean, you know,
Alicia Keys wrote songs about New York and it's just
it's nasty. Now it's gross, and I think it's interesting,
(23:53):
Mike said, the whole You know, it used to be
tax the rich. Now they're like tax the whites. I
don't know if it's an insult or not. Are they
Are they coming for us because we're I mean again,
here comes Kendall. I sound so racist, but I'm like,
why are they coming after the whites? Is it because
we do have more money? Because we're busy working. I
don't know, don't don't live in New York. Everybody flee
New York.
Speaker 2 (24:13):
Yeah, it's it's gonna be really interesting to see there.
Speaker 1 (24:16):
In that Alicia Keys song, if you've ever walked across
the Brooklyn Bridge anytime past nine am, you hear it
quite a bit there, you know, speaking of speaking of
rich people, especially moving out of the city with this
new guy potentially coming in. This is probably the only
show that has covered any amount of this, but the
(24:36):
Bezos sweating. If you follow any sort of like cultural media,
you see this all over the place. There's a big
sign in Venice saying if you can rent out venice
you can pay more in tax, which is what I
actually would like to focus on. Right people talk about, hey,
tax Bezos all the money you want, Tax all the
rich people, all the money you want. And again I'm
not defending Bezos here necessarily, but what I do think
(24:58):
is if they spend money avishly, where does that money
go the people that provided the services and the products
for that money to get spent. I would rather Bezos
spend a billion dollars on whatever the heck he wants
that provides jobs for people, then have that billion dollars
taken from him the tax code and given to the
(25:20):
Washington DC swamp rants. Mike am I like taking crazy
pills here. That's just how I see it.
Speaker 4 (25:26):
That's a great point is that look at the way
in which we America have taken in more taxes than
ever every single year, and then the money just disappears.
Speaker 5 (25:37):
Obviously, we saw some of the work that Doge was doing.
Speaker 4 (25:40):
And then if you just want to take it back
to New York City for one minute, failed society, as
I call it, The last mayor before Adams build of Blasio,
his wife got nine hundred million dollars to combat homelessness
and all these problems like for public safety, and the
money evaporated. So Bezel's paid nine Let's say you paid million.
Speaker 5 (26:00):
Dollars extra in taxes to New York.
Speaker 4 (26:03):
There would have been a zero percent impact because the
last New York administration just magically made nine hundred million
dollars disappear.
Speaker 5 (26:11):
So you make a great point.
Speaker 4 (26:13):
It's much better and much more transparent when that money
goes into things like funding you know, the small businesses
and the people who make the flowers at the wedding
in Venice, and then people who are doing the catering,
and the waiters and the waitresses and the different vendors
for the foods. Yeah, you know that's better. That's what
we call capitalism. And Mondomini does it like that, and
seems like no prominent democrats these days like capitalism.
Speaker 5 (26:35):
Much of all.
Speaker 4 (26:36):
They just want more money for themselves so they could
lounder it through, similar to how we've seen in all
these big cities over the last number of years.
Speaker 1 (26:43):
Yeah, it seems to be a better way of doing things.
Just pay people for the work that they're doing rather
than confiscating money. Kendall, we shared a couple of pictures
there of the star studded guest list, in which Ivanka
Trump is also on that list. Ivanka and Jared are
also at that wedding, and somebody else. There's Oprah, right,
given how what she said on the campaign about the Trumps,
(27:05):
wouldn't this be like a stand for her to take.
I'm not going to sit in the room with those
evil people. Or I don't know, maybe was she just
blowing smoke up everybody's button. She doesn't actually hate people
as much as they want you to. Just trying to
enrich herself in her own political passions.
Speaker 7 (27:23):
I think she's being paid. I think she gets paid
to say certain things, just like all of them. I
will say, Avanka looked gorgeous. She looks beautiful and red.
I love that she wore red to the event. Of
course they had, you know, the Kardashians there too. It's
not a party that I would have wanted to attend.
I'm sure it was beautiful and lavish, but yeah, I mean,
people like Oprah run in different circles than the Trumps, clearly,
(27:48):
but I'm hoping, I'm hoping they can all put it
aside and enjoy what looks to be I mean it
looks to be a gorgeous wedding.
Speaker 1 (27:54):
Well yeah, and I just I hope people see that
and go Okay. So Oprah, when she was talking about
how bad these people are, go to a wedding with them,
So maybe she is full of crap.
Speaker 2 (28:05):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (28:05):
I hope that's what the takeaway is. Again, I'm not
sure anybody else on this network is covering the Bezos wedding,
but I'm glad we got to talk about it for
just a little bit. Mike, Chrispy, Kettle, Bailey, Guys, thanks
so much for taking the time.
Speaker 2 (28:17):
Enjoy the weekend. Thank you, thank you. Coming up next
year on.
Speaker 1 (28:21):
Turning Point Tonight, We've got a fascinating clip from Alex
Clark's Culture Apothecary podcast. Don't go away, We'll be right
back after the break.
Speaker 9 (28:38):
Got to admire what you've been able to do, not
to weaponize, but to organize on these college campuses.
Speaker 13 (28:44):
At Turning Point USA.
Speaker 9 (28:46):
We've spent thirteen years building the machine, and last year
we sought payoff. Our grassroots army is making a real difference.
Help us keep the momentum going. Donate today and keep
TPUSA strong on campuses across America.
Speaker 10 (28:58):
And for a gift of any amount, you'll receive your
big gove sucks cooler claim yours today.
Speaker 14 (29:11):
What do you think the Biblical role is in that
for a man when it comes to leadership, I think
a lot of people get caught up in Well that
just means I tell my wife what she can and
cannot do. Yeah, but you're saying a lot of other
stuff that some men might even be like, well, that's
not my job. My job is not to figure out bedtime.
That's my wife's job. Sure, so what's your opinion on it?
Speaker 15 (29:29):
Well, we're co labors and that you know, Like I
think the way I look at it is where the
responsibility lies. And so if things go south, like it's
my responsibility for what happened. And so it's not that
I'm I have to be the one that has all
the knowledge on all these topics or have to be
implementing all this stuff. Like my wife is brilliant and
super talented and so strong and so capable, and like
(29:50):
has changed my life for the better.
Speaker 2 (29:51):
Like I can't.
Speaker 15 (29:52):
I gotta be careful because I'll start crying if I
talk about it too much. But like she is like
she it's not a matter of value, Like she is
the most valuable thing. And so because of that, like
I want to honor her and protect her because she's
so valuable and because she's so important to our household.
It's not that she's incapable like that. That's such a
stupid and silly idea that I think again is our
(30:13):
culture uses to like twist the narrative a little bit
to where it gets men to be passive, which is
our default, and it gets women to take on more
than they can handle, and that destroys the family, and
that destroys a lot of things.
Speaker 2 (30:24):
And so it's such a deceptive.
Speaker 15 (30:26):
Way and manipulative way of tricking people and households into
not functioning the way I think God created us to function.
And the reality is is that I just take the
responsibility of things go south. But yeah, I mean we
want to both like we both have skill sets that
we use. We both have things that we're gifted in.
Loving your wife is our top responsibility and loving somebody
is as you know, it's not easy, and it's one
(30:46):
of those things that you have to put You don't
put yourself last, Like you still need to love yourself
and take care of yourself and then with that full
cup you can then pour it out on the people
that need to be loved and that you love. But
my wife, for her, it's like and she can speak
to this better than me, But for her, it's like
it's a respect issue, Like that's what's hard for her,
is like respecting her husband. And for me, it's hard
(31:08):
to love my wife.
Speaker 14 (31:09):
What are those moments where it's like, Ooh, it's difficult,
but like I need to respect them, And what do
those challenges look like?
Speaker 16 (31:14):
And then the challenge for you of loving.
Speaker 15 (31:16):
Her through that when I'm not respected, like and I
think this is how most guys are, Like we really
value respect probably more than love, Like I think if
we don't feel like people respect us for who we are,
like it really is just hard to be yourself and
it's hard to kind of be a good leader.
Speaker 16 (31:30):
What do you perceive is disrespect?
Speaker 15 (31:32):
If there is ever a moment where I'm like, this
is what I think we should do, and I've prayed
about it, like I've been considering all these things, and
this is what I feel God's calling us to do.
And you know, she has like a tone or she
talks to me in a way, it's just like dismissive
of my idea or it doesn't want to talk through
it with me or whatever like that. That to me
just feels like a stab in the heart, a little
bit of like this is something that you should trust
(31:55):
me enough to like talk about, you know.
Speaker 16 (31:57):
So she has a tone, maybe she's like a little
bit like I don't.
Speaker 14 (32:00):
Know, yeah yeh, or just yeah, dismissive or and so
how do you what does it look like for you
as a husband to love her through that?
Speaker 15 (32:07):
That's what really breaks it down, is because if I'm
able to love her even though I don't feel respected, like,
that's a true active love, you know. And for her,
if she doesn't feel loved and she still respects me,
that's a true active respect and love from her perspective.
And so I think the only thing that's really helped
us is if you can pray with your partner, pray
with your spouse. That seems to break all kind of
(32:28):
pride and walls that can come up that would prevent
you from doing those things, because it's super hard to
pray with your spouse. Like I'm not sure if you
guys have done it or if you if you've tried it,
But like truly, praying with your spouse is one of
the most important things. And I think there was a
stat they're looking at divorced couples, and out of the
like twelve hundred people they interviewed, I think less than
(32:51):
like two or one percent of the people that prayed
together got divorced. And I think that's just so impactful.
And there were some times when wife and I was
journey where we were really at odds and struggling, and
the one thing that I would break us out of
that was just praying together. And it's a cheat code,
Like it really is a cheat code. So I think
there's all these like theories and counseling ideas and probably
like couples counseling strategies you could use, but like for me,
(33:12):
that's the one thing that's worked every time.
Speaker 14 (33:13):
What are three things that almost every woman thinks is healthy,
but it's actually sabotaging.
Speaker 15 (33:18):
Her hormones over exercising, okay, under eating. The third thing
would be that food doesn't make a huge difference like
like what you're eating, you know, like it's all about
calories and not about the chemicals that you're consuming, it's
it's just more of like eating healthy in general compared
to the stan in American diet. It's like, well, I
eat salads and I you know, I watch I don't
drink a bunch of pop and I don't drink a
(33:40):
ton of alcohol, Like pretty healthy. But if you look
at if you don't know if you have food sensitivities
to like gluten or dairy or eggs or night shades,
and you're consuming these things and you're not getting enough
fat and protein in your diet, Like you could be
inflaming your body for these healthy foods that you're consuming,
and it's just creating this inflammatory cascade of events that
affect your monic andria that then prevent you from making energy.
(34:01):
That then you go to the gym and you have
no energy to pull from, and then you're not eating
enough protein to actually build muscle, and you're just creating
this adaptive it's called adaptive thermogenesis, which basically means it
slows down in metabolism to where now you start storing
fat by design because you body thinks you're in a
state of survival. And so women do that all the time,
or they don't sleep, they drink a much caffeine. They're
under eating. They go to the gym, they work out
(34:23):
really hard, but they're gaining weight or them When you say.
Speaker 16 (34:25):
Under eating, is that like women are not eating enough protein?
Speaker 15 (34:28):
Yeah, not even enough calories sometimes you know they're not
getting enough Yeah, not a fat and protein for sure,
but even like you know, like complex carbs can be healthy.
Like for women, I usually say about twenty percent of
your plate should be complex carbs. You know, like sweet
potatoes are my favorite carb. Like they're they're low on
the glycemic index, they stabilize really well, they can have
some benefit with your hormones, and they really help your thyroid. Like,
(34:48):
if there are a carb you're consuming, there's some good
fiber in there, Like it really can help to stabilize
blood sugar. It stabilizes your energy a little bit, and
then you can eat you know, high quality fat and protein.
And like if you're not doing that on a regular
basis and you're eating mostly carbs, like you're not going
to feel great. Or if you're going straight carnivore carni
work can be great temporarily, but long term it's kind
of hard to sustain. So there's kind of a balance
(35:09):
there that people have to figure out where they land.
But a lot of people see benefit when they do.
Carni workers are taken out a lot of the glyph is, say,
they're taking all the you know, the gluten proteins that
are modified. They're taking out a lot of the ultra
pasteurizeddairy that has no real benefit to it versus raw dairy,
which has benefit to it. And so they're doing a
lot of things that they see improvement with, but long
term it's hard to sustain.
Speaker 16 (35:27):
What are the benefits of raw milk versus pasteurized.
Speaker 15 (35:30):
So raw milk if you look at there was a
study they were looking at bacteria that was growing in
raw milk versus ultra pasteurized and a lot of people
thought you would see less harmful bacteria and the ultra
pasturiz because that's kind of reason that they do it.
So the study actually showed that ultra pasteurized was more
prone to harmful bacteria than the raw dairy because raw
(35:52):
dairy has natural fat in it, and fat is antimicrobial,
and so it protects against the bacteria from getting out
of balance.
Speaker 16 (36:00):
This is not what the mainstream media says.
Speaker 15 (36:01):
No, not at all, so like, but what I say is,
like you, raw dairy is great if you tolerate it well.
If you don't, like most of us, don't have lactase
to break down lactose, and so you get this like
negative immune system response if your body doesn't deal with
it well. And there's also like a casin protein that
you can have an allergy to that can be very
harmful for people. And so, like I always say, dairy
(36:23):
by itself, if it's raw, there's benefit to it if
you don't have a really really negative response to it.
If you have a negative response to it, probably best
to get your benefits from some other place. But if
you do okay with it it, raw dairy, in my opinion,
is best.
Speaker 14 (36:37):
What do you think about pregnant women drinking raw milk,
shooting oysters, having sush?
Speaker 15 (36:43):
I mean, I don't know, Like my wife has sushi
when she's pregnant a little bit. You know, she doesn't
go crazy with it. The whole concern is mercury, you know,
getting mercury toxicity. And I think occasionally here and there,
it's fine as long as you are detoxing well, Like
everybody doesn't detox heavy metals because your detox pathways are
blocked up, Like may not be a great idea.
Speaker 16 (37:00):
How do you know if your detox pathways are blocked.
Speaker 2 (37:02):
You feel sick?
Speaker 15 (37:02):
I mean you have congestion, you have rashes, you have
low energy. You eat something and you notice your energy
goes down after you consume it. You just don't recover well,
you're not You're getting sick often. Like all those things
are kind of signed to poor detoxication. A lot of
a lot of people have, you know, like automne conditions,
or they have skin rashes, or they have gut health issues,
(37:22):
like they're usually probably having detox symptoms poor detoxication issues.
And the problem is like we need to be daily
detox fires, Like we need to be something we do
all the time. It's not that you have to always
do like a huge detox every every month, like it
is throwing up. Yeah, right, Like those are all detoxes, right,
like drinking water, using sauna, exercising, sweating, like pooping, not
being constipated, Like those are those have to be done.
(37:44):
If you're not doing those things, like you're going to
be not detoxing well.
Speaker 11 (38:01):
The Student Action Summit twenty twenty five featuring the Boldest
voices in the fighting. Secretary Pete Hegset, Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson,
Steve Benn, Brett Cooper, Secretary Christy Milner, Riley Gains, Brandon Tatum,
Jack Pisoba, ten More joined thousands of students, future leaders
and freedom fighters. This is the battleground of ideas. This
(38:22):
is the Student Action Summit, the future his hours to
build Register now at SAS twenty twenty five dot com.
Speaker 2 (38:31):
Does anybody else get like just amped up?
Speaker 1 (38:33):
After seeing that? I feel like that's the best part
of these thirty points defense. I'm like, Yeah, let's go
up do stuff. Let's rock and roll baby, SAS twenty
twenty five dot com. Grab your tickets today. You're not
gonna want to miss out. It's in two weeks and
trust me, I think this thing will be to capacity.
So you want to go get your tickets today. SAS
twenty twenty five dot com and Tampa, Florida July eleventh
(38:55):
through the thirteenth. Don't miss out. It's gonna be a blast.
There's also a ton of other things going on on
the front and back end of that. I think blexit
is having an event. There's also the turning Point Academy,
that's having the Educators Summit. There's cls. It just a
ton of stuff. It doesn't need to be said over
and over again. There's so much going on in the
next month from Turning Point USA TPUSA dot com find
(39:18):
out any of that information in SAS twenty twenty five
dot com to find out how to get tickets to SaaS. Also,
you can email the show anytime you want, whether you
agree or whether you're wrong. We welcome all emails and too.
There's kind of a theme going on with the emails,
and I feel like I addressed yesterday of like, hey,
why do we talk about man Danny all that much?
Speaker 2 (39:36):
It's because, you know, you kind of have to. I
get it.
Speaker 1 (39:39):
I understand the idea that you don't want to give
these people name recognition. But at the same time, if
we the American people can't recognize and identify the biggest
problems in the ideas of our country, we have a
bigger problem than giving them name recognition.
Speaker 2 (39:54):
That's why we do it.
Speaker 1 (39:54):
That's a consistent email theme that I figured probably address
without further ado. I guess it's it's finny. We're having
some fun. These are a couple of clips. They're apropos
of nothing political, but I just think they're super fun
to watch. This first one. You know, there's too many
of these thematic videos that have just that are just
like I like justice. This isn't necessarily justice served, but
(40:16):
it is justice elongated. Dude getting arrested in the hotel
room tries to make a great escape.
Speaker 2 (40:23):
Watch this.
Speaker 7 (40:24):
You just keep putting your don't I.
Speaker 2 (40:35):
Love the cop too. Again, this is probably a stressful
situation for him.
Speaker 1 (40:39):
Hey man, don't don't test some tense up. I don't
have to, you know, get in any sort of altercation.
He bolts to the window.
Speaker 2 (40:45):
Where are you going?
Speaker 1 (40:47):
And then dude, what do you do after that? Right,
you've tried their escape mode. You tried to burst out
of the window. I don't know what story this is,
and I can't imagine what it ended. Well, had the
window actually broke. But when if that happens to you,
we just go, ah, chucks, I guess take me in.
I don't know what your reaction would be. Also, so
this next video is rather serious. Protests have taken to
(41:10):
the streets yet again. A friend of a high schooler,
Nick was grounded by his parents and his friends showed
up in full force to protest their displeasure.
Speaker 2 (41:22):
Watched this.
Speaker 4 (41:32):
Now.
Speaker 1 (41:33):
If you notice in that video there's a surprising few
amount of cars on fire. The protests seem peaceful, but
more updates on whether or not Nick's parents changed his
mind from ungrounding him. Good on the parents. There, ground
your kid if they're doing something wrong. Anyway, that's gonna
do it for us here at turning point tonight, today
and this week, have a fantastic weekend. Maybe unplug from
(41:55):
the things going on in the media world for a
little bit. Spend some time with the family. Go like
touch grass with your feet, do something fun. Charliekirk and
the Charlie Kirk Best of Charlie Kirks Show is going
to take us out. We will see you next week,
same time, sick week. Is it gonna be the same Yes,
and He's gonna be the same place on Monday. Have
a great weekend.
Speaker 17 (42:13):
God bless America.
Speaker 13 (42:27):
Okay, it's my favorite hour of the week. I love this.
Last week was a little unusual, but it was still great.
Speaker 9 (42:34):
We had some very contrarian opinions, I would say the least,
but hey, that's what it's all about. It's our members
call where you guys are allowed on the program. It's
members dot Charliekirk dot com. That is, members dot Charliekirk
dot com to join the program.
Speaker 13 (42:50):
I want to try to get.
Speaker 9 (42:51):
To questions that I've never asked before, Daisy, if we can,
if we can try to go to first time questioners,
If possible, let's go to Patrick Patrick, Happy fry do.
Thank you for being a member. What's on your mind?
Speaker 3 (43:04):
First, God bless America and God bless President Trump for
the huge win in the Supreme Court today and that
was just huge, incredible.
Speaker 13 (43:13):
Amen.
Speaker 3 (43:15):
So my question, I've been reading your book on woke ism,
and I watched the video of Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson,
and I think as a threat to America, I think
the biggest threat isn't so much Democrats but rhinos, fake Republicans.
What's your opinion on how we handle the rhinos and
(43:36):
what's also your opinion of the video if you've seen
it of Ted Cruz and Tucker Carlson.
Speaker 9 (43:42):
Yeah, so I'll answer the Ted and Tucker one. So
I think we commented on this on thought crime. I'm
friends with both of them. I'm very careful to ever
shoot inside the tent unless it's Lindsay Graham and James
Langford or John Bolton or Liz Cheney's that's a whole
different threshold when they're just not with us. But I'm
very I'm very careful, especially where Ted is with us
on almost every issue, right Tucker. Ted is with us
(44:05):
on the border, he's with us on abortion, he's with
us with guns, he's with us on the Constitution. I
will say, if you listen to the long form discussion
between Ted Cruz and Tucker, I think Ted did a
better job of representing his position than some of the
clips would have necessarily portrayed him as now at Tucker
got at very important points. However, anytime we're considering war,
(44:27):
we should know a lot about what we are doing,
not just like, oh, I don't study population tables. Senator Cruz,
I've known you for a while. You should know that.
You should know it's ninety two million people. You should
know the intricacies of the Persian people. You're US senator
calling for regime change, and that's not a gotcha question.
We have put you there to know a lot about stuff,
especially basic stuff about countries that you talk a lot about.
(44:50):
But I will say though, that when Ted Cruz was
using a biblical basis for backing Israel, he did not
do the best possible job. And again, I am very
close to a lot in the dispensational world Jack Hibbs,
for example, Who's a dear friend and mentor of mine,
James Cadiz. I am far from a theologian. I know
(45:12):
the theology, let's just say minimally well. At best, I
could be conversant about it. But even I know Genesis
twelve three, and I know the context about it. And
even better argument would have been Ezekiel thirty six, thirty seven,
thirty eight, which prophesies about how Jews are scattered all
across the world and they'll be reconstituted back into a nation.
(45:33):
A better argument to be made would have been about
the land rights given to Israel and the eternal promise
given to Israel. And kind of, in my opinion, kind
of clumsily walking around not even knowing Genesis twelve three
was not the best presentation of what even Ted Cruz
was trying to say. Now, I will say this as
I am more in Tucker's camp when it comes to
(45:55):
foreign policy, without a shadow of a doubt. And I'm
probably more in Ted Cruise's camp when it comes from
a theological perspective. And so I try to create a
third way, which is I'm friends with both. And the
third way is that I do believe that we as
Christians have some and with to what extent that is,
some obligation to bless Israel, and we have an obligation
(46:17):
to you know, God's chosen people. But also there's an
argument to be made that in Galatians three sixteen, we
as Christians are also the new Israel. And so I
think that there is a third way outside of just
the yelling at each other on this issue, which is
that we should always serve America and America first, and
our obligation is to America, but understand some of these
(46:37):
theological issues as well. So what all that to say?
As you know on this program, I'm very war weary.
I think our intel agencies have led us astray the
last twenty years. I think Iraq was a disaster. I
think Libya was a disaster. I think Syria was a disaster,
and Afghanistan was a disaster. And what was very interesting
is that President Trump he pioneered a third way. He's
not an isolationist, he's not an interventionist. And that third
(47:01):
way is one of prudence, decisive, quick violent action, and
no permanent war. To your other question, you asked about
what do we do to keep our rhinos accountable. That's
one of the reasons why I'm actually staying an extra
day in Kentucky on Monday. If anyone listening to this
right now lives in the great state of Kentucky, I
am doing an event with Nate Morris. We had Nate
(47:22):
on this program. Nate is a business guy. He is
not a Neocon. He is running against the McConnell mafia.
He is the only Senate candidate who is outwardly and
vocally running up against the McConnell mafia for that open
Senate seat.
Speaker 13 (47:35):
And so I'm doing an event with Nate.
Speaker 9 (47:36):
Morris because I think it's important that we lend our
voice and our activism and our platform to try and
change the US Senate for the better. It is by
far the most broken institution. The House is broken, but
the Senate is far more broken. And in my personal opinion,
I believe that Nate Morris is the best candidate there
and look, people can disagree on that, but we should
(47:58):
all agree we need someone who is not part of
that McConnell tribe. So if you guys want to come
to that event, we're going to post all the details
at charliekirk dot com.
Speaker 13 (48:07):
That is, Charliekirk dot com.
Speaker 9 (48:08):
If you want to come see me on Monday in
one of the suburbs outside of Louisville. I'll be in
Louisville actually for a unrelated family event happening on Sunday. Okay,
thank you for your question and really appreciate you being
a member. Josh, what's on your mind?
Speaker 13 (48:22):
Josh?
Speaker 9 (48:22):
Members got Charliekirk dot com. That is, members dot Charlie
kirk dot com. Josh, what's on your mind?
Speaker 3 (48:27):
Hey?
Speaker 5 (48:27):
How's the go on?
Speaker 18 (48:28):
I wanted to ask about AI and education specifically. My
view is that I don't think AI should be allowed
in education, especially not high school, and then I don't
think it should be in college either. But you know,
I'm open minded. I could be convinced either way, but
I want to hear your thoughts and I can add
a little bit after.
Speaker 9 (48:47):
So your question is should AI be involved in higher education?
Is that right, like AI as teachers or AI as
supplemental technology, should.
Speaker 18 (48:55):
Should students be allowed to use it as to complete
their assignments and things like that?
Speaker 9 (48:59):
So great, and I have a very direct theory on this.
There's no getting away from AI, so students should learn
how to use it. However, we have to make sure
that students still have the capacity to think, still have
students the capacity to write without AI.
Speaker 13 (49:15):
So here's how to think. I think the weight should work.
Speaker 9 (49:17):
You can do all of your study, all of your
preparation at home with AI, but every teacher in America
should carve out time that there are in class tests
without phones, without laptops, and just a pen or a
pencil and a piece of paper. If you want to
use AI as a preparatory tool, if you want to
use AI as a tutor at home, God bless you,
(49:40):
that's fine.
Speaker 2 (49:40):
Great.
Speaker 9 (49:41):
But the assignment that should weigh the heaviest, and I
hope every teacher listening to this understands this. The assignment
that should have the most weight for your grade should
be a non technology in class test where students have
to prove that they can still write with their hands,