1. ⚖️ DOJ Investigation into Black Lives Matter
- The Department of Justice is reportedly investigating BLM Global Network Foundation for potential misuse of donations received during the 2020 racial justice protests.
- Allegations include:
- Purchase of a $6 million mansion.
- Hosting personal parties at the property.
- Lack of transparency in financial reporting.
- The investigation began under the Biden administration and gained renewed attention under Trump.
- BLM denies being the target of a criminal probe and claims commitment to transparency.
2. 💰 Precious Metals & Interest Rates
- Kurt Elliott discusses how the Federal Reserve’s interest rate cuts are boosting gold and silver markets.
- Key points:
- Silver surged to $54/oz, then corrected.
- Demand is rising due to upcoming 401(k) rule changes allowing alternative assets like crypto, real estate, and metals.
- London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) is reportedly out of silver, raising concerns about supply chain disruptions.
- Elliott speculates that China and India may be strategically withholding silver to undermine London’s dominance in global metals trading.
3. 🕵️ Jack Smith & DOJ Subpoenas of Trump Media
- Devin Nunes and Donald Trump accuse Special Counsel Jack Smith of abusing power by subpoenaing Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG) banking records.
- Allegations include:
- Subpoenas issued for records before TMTG existed.
- Surveillance of over 400 Trump-linked individuals.
- Lack of transparency and potential constitutional violations.
- Rep. Jim Jordan criticizes the DOJ and FBI for redactions and lack of accountability, calling for depositions and investigations into the scope and legality of the subpoenas.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
The Department of Justice, we now have learned, is investigating
Black Lives Matter Why for the misuse they're saying of donations.
The Justice Department is probing whether Black Lives Matter defrauded
donors who sent the organization millions of dollars during the
racial justice protests in twenty twenty. This coming from the
(00:23):
Associated Press. We also know that federal law enforcement authorities
have issued subpoenas and served a search warrant as part
of an investigation into Black Lives Matter. The Global Network Foundation, Inc.
That helped ignite the protests in US cities following the
death of George Floyd in Minnesota in May of twenty twenty.
(00:46):
That coming again from anonymous sources. Now, protests in some
locations resulted in deaths, lots of rioting, looting, fires, and
extensive property destruction. According to the Associated Press, it was
not clear if the investigation would result in criminal charges,
(01:06):
but its mere existence invites fresh scrutiny to a movement
that in recent years has faced criticism about its public
accounting of donations it has received. The Justice Department, by
the way, has declined to comment on the report. Why
because clearly they're working on this and they don't want
to tip anyone off. Now, the investigation actually began, just
(01:30):
so you understand the timeline here in the Biden administration that,
according to one of the AP sources, and has received
renewed attention during the Trump administration. The BOM Foundation said
it took in over ninety million dollars in donations following
the highly publicized death of George Floyd, who was seen
(01:52):
on that viral video struggling to breathe under the knee
of a white Minneapolis police officer who was later convicted
of murder. Now, critics have accused the nonprofit foundation of
not being forthcoming about how it was spending the donations
that they were receiving that were in the tens of
millions of dollars. Critics of the organization have looked at
(02:14):
a very shocking moment in twenty twenty two when it
was learned that some of the funds that were raised
in the name of George Floyd actually went to purchase
a six million dollar mansion in Los Angeles, six bedrooms,
six baths, a swimming pool, and other luxury amenities. The
(02:35):
co founder of BLM also admitted that she used the
group's six million property to host personal parties. The BLM
leader later resigned in twenty twenty three after much of
the information I've just told you went public.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
The Associated Press also reports.
Speaker 1 (02:54):
That no prior investigations into the nonprofits finances have quote
yielded proof of impropriety. The latest federal form filing, the
Wire Service reported, shows that BOM Foundation had twenty eight
million in assets for the fiscal year ending June twenty
twenty four. The current investigation is reportedly being run out
(03:16):
of the US Attorney's Office for the Central District of
California in LA. In his statement to the AP on Thursday,
the foundation said it is not a target of any
federal criminal investigation, saying, quote, we remain committed to full transparency, accountability,
and the responsible stewardship of resources dedicated to building a
(03:40):
better future for black communities. The Black Lives Matter slogan
that first emerged back in twenty thirteen after the acquittal
of Neighborhood Watch volunteer George Zimmerman, who fatally shot his
seventeen year old Trayvon Martin in Florida, is what was
legally ruled a standard ground case. It was the death
(04:01):
the following year of Michael Brown who was shot as
he charged a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. That made
the slogan black Lives Matter a national and later a
worldwide rallying cry for leftists social justice. So here we
are now the DOJ seeming to do the job that
should have been done under the Biden administration, looking into
(04:23):
the misuse of the donations that were in the name
of social justice but in reality may have been going
just to buy luxury houses for the people at the
top of the Black Lives Matter organization. You may have
noticed that the Fed met and they did something with
interest rates. It has now had a pretty big impact
on the market, and that includes gold and silver. Joining
(04:46):
me now to talk about what this can mean for
your retirement. Your four oh one k is Kurt Elliott
with Kurt Elliott Precious Metals.
Speaker 2 (04:52):
Kurt.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
So, the Fed did what Donald Trump has been asking
for and saying is long overdue. They cut interest rates
again by another quarter point. That is good news and
theory for a lot of Americans. What is it doing
in the markets? What's it doing with gold and silver?
Speaker 3 (05:07):
Well, whenever you lower interest rates, it should stimulate the economy, right, Ben,
I mean, this is this is why Trump wants it done.
Speaker 4 (05:14):
He knows this, and it did just that.
Speaker 3 (05:18):
So so gold and silver doing really well. Silver had
come off of its high last week. It hit fifty
four dollars an ounce, very over bought. Literally technically it
was very overbought because it went up so fast, so furious.
You know, it is up about nineteen percent in two weeks.
(05:40):
Then it needed to correct, right, So it came down
five dollars in a matter of four or five days,
and people thought, oh the world isn't what's up? Silver
is supposed to go up, you know what it is
because the bed lowered interest rates. Gold and silver respond
very well to interest rate reductions because for silver, that
(06:03):
means the economy is going to grow, right, It's like
when when you lower the cost of borrowing. When you
when you lower that, people are going to spend more.
And silver more than anything. Is A is a manufacturing medal,
not a financial medal like gold. It's a it's a
manufacturing medal. So the propensity for growth, for usage, for
extra demand is there. And silver did the turnaround and
(06:25):
it's honest, way back up again. I mean, these these
markets spend. These precious metals markets are like buoys in
the ocean. You just can't keep them down right.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Now, it's it really is incredible, and it's like you said,
this is a world trading market.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
When it comes to gold and silver.
Speaker 1 (06:45):
There's also some changes that are coming to how you
can can invest in and deal with gold and silver
in your retirement account. That deadliner or that that I
guess door opening is coming very soon, and so there
also seems to be a lot of movement there as well.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
A lot of movement, and that's part of the demand,
right because once that happens the first week in February,
when when you know for your listeners who don't know,
it's part of the executive order signed on August seventh
to democratization of alternative assets. In four to one case,
it's going to allow cryptocurrency direct and indirect ownership of commodities,
(07:21):
which golden silver is a commodity, and real estate in a.
Speaker 4 (07:24):
Four to oh one k then it's a twelve trillion.
Speaker 3 (07:27):
Dollar market, like we've talked about before. So people, if
you wait until after that kind of marketplace opens its door, well,
prices are going to be way high, right, So people
are getting in now in anticipation of that. And that's
one thing that I tell investors all the time is
I would rather be one or two or three months
(07:50):
early than a day late. And something as fundamentally massive
as this is, it's always better to be early than
a day late because daylight you might run out of inventory.
You don't know what's going to happen. In fact, London.
We have to remember this. In the financial world, financial
world and in the precious metals world, all roads lead
(08:14):
to London. They do for every single country. All roads
lead to London. Well, London is for all intents and
purposes out of silver. They've depleted their free flow silver supply. Well,
you know, for investors it's like, okay, we can lock
in silver prices, but maybe it's going to be delayed
delivery because refineries now are basically going flat inventory. They're
(08:39):
not holding anything because the cost of carrying is too high,
so they're manufacturing on demand. This is where it gets tricky.
Speaker 5 (08:47):
Ben.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
That doesn't work if you're Tesla or Lockheed Martin and
you're making missiles and torpedoes or your Sony and you're
making flat screen TVs, having a one to two months
lay in delivery times because the exchange is out could
mean the life or death of their company. Or if
(09:08):
you're an investor, yeah, it's a pain point at stressful.
It's like, am I ever going to get myself? It's
different when you're talking about a company.
Speaker 4 (09:15):
So what are they going to do.
Speaker 3 (09:18):
When London runs out? I have a feeling they're going
to start going directly to the source. They're going to
go to the refineries of the world and say, hey,
look we know if at silver sixty dollars ounce, we're
going to offer eighty, we'll offer a hundred, we'll offer
one hundred and twenty. We need to be at the
top of the queue because we're not going to pay
for it, We're just going to pass it on to
(09:39):
the consumer. This is economics one oh one, and it's
the lifeblood of your company needs a commodity that the
exchange ran out of, They're going to skip the exchange
and go directly to the source, the refinery and get
it that way because the lifeblood of the company depends
on it. And this is what happens in an industrialized
(10:03):
world where silver is needed for electronics and AI chips
and cryptocurrency, mining and electronics and electric vehicles and everything
that we use right now. If you don't have it,
you don't have the product. And those companies can't manufacture,
so they will find it and we as holders get
(10:23):
to ultimately sell into that strength. And that's the amazing
part of all of us. To me, there's hope in
this message.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
And hope is the other aspect of this.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
I think that people are really wanting to ask, is
looking forward in the future, where do we see, for example,
gold and silver going knowing that there is a lack
of silver in different parts of the world right now,
and it's being bought up for so many different things.
Speaker 3 (10:47):
Yeah, I mean it's being bought up for everything that
we just mentioned. But we're still in a war torn economy,
right This is a war economy that we're in when
you look at what's happening with Russian and Ukraine and
in the Middle East. And I mean, so missiles and
torpedoes need silver, nuclear power needs silver, solar power needs silver,
electric vehicles need silver, all electronic circuit boards and AI
(11:08):
chips need silver. Right, So it's like I don't see
any of those things diminishing in demand in fact, I
only see them increasing in demand. It's like, oh wait,
there's a problem. Supply isn't increasing. Supply is actually diminishing. Right,
So when you when you look at what's happening London
(11:31):
being out of silver because they have to now buy
it on the open market to fulfill the over selling
that they've done. This is how they've manipulated the markets
for decades. This is not a new thing. Then what's
new is they've actually run out. You can't manipulate something
where you have no inventory, because if somebody wants it,
(11:53):
you could say, well, play with the paper price, we'll
sort it, we'll do this, we'll do that. But ultimately,
if you have no inventory and there's an exchange for
physicals and the manufacturers of the world needed, they're going
to start offering any price and London could go bankrupt
over this. By London, I'm talking about the LBMA, the
London Bulliant Marketing Association, where all the metals are stored.
(12:17):
Well does China care? Literally, this is a question we
answer ourselves, well, why wouldn't they just sell? They have silver,
they've been buying it so as comets still of India,
but all roads lead to London. If it's not in
the right place, it can't be fulfilled. So why don't
they release it? Well, because maybe they want to squeeze
London out of business. Maybe they want to say, hey, look,
(12:43):
we want to take over the Western financial banking system.
We want to take over the supplies of gold and
silver in that supply chain globally and have it go
to the Shanghai gold extent. So I don't think that
China is in this for profit. I think they're in
this to destroy London as the gold and silver capital
of the world. And they're doing a pretty good job
at it.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
Yeah, they really are.
Speaker 1 (13:04):
Finally for this and for anybody listening right now, if
you want to get more information about what we're talking
about here, you can go to k e PM dot
com Kurt Elliott Precious Metals k e p M dot
com Kurt. When you're looking into the holidays here, what
traditionally do you see with gold and silver over the holidays?
(13:24):
And also if you combine that in with the rules
that are about to change retirement accounts, it's going to
change when it comes to crypto and also gold and silver.
Is that going to change things over the next ninety days.
Speaker 3 (13:35):
Well, generally during the holidays, it's low volume trading, you know,
the markets kind of come down a little bit. I
don't see that that's going to be the case this year.
This year is something completely different again. The fundamentals of
what's going on. Are there going to be tariffs on
strategic metals or are there not? Is there going to
(13:56):
be continued war or is there not? What about consuming public?
Are they going to keep spending or not. There's so
much different this year that I don't see a downturn
in metals prices really during this holiday season like we
normally see. Then you add to that the black swamp
of the executive order and gold and silver being available
(14:17):
for four to one k is, you know, if the
administrators will allow it, you know, each company. I mean,
we've got a lot of built up demand. This holiday
season I believe is going to be different.
Speaker 2 (14:28):
It's gonna be very different.
Speaker 1 (14:30):
Don't forget if you want to find out more about
what they do at Kurt Elliott. I just bought into
some more silver recently. I've got some ten ounce bars
I'm looking at right now point nine nine nine fine
silver ten troy ounces. They also have book bars as
well that are one hundred ounces. I have one of
those as well. It is an incredible investment tool and
(14:52):
you can see what it's been doing. You can find
out more from them. K E p M dot com.
That's k E p M dot com. I'm Kurt Elliott
Precious Metals. Check them out there.
Speaker 5 (15:02):
Kurt.
Speaker 2 (15:02):
Always a pleasure and I really appreciate you coming on.
Speaker 3 (15:05):
Oh you bet, it's my pleasure.
Speaker 1 (15:08):
Now all of this is happening while there's another story
that is breaking, another shocking story, and it deals with
Jack Smith. Devin Nunyez is now exposing Jack Smith and
telling us that they sought Trump media bank records, is
what we're being told Donald Trump saying these thugs should
be investigated. Trump Media and Technology Group Corporation TMTG CEO
(15:35):
and former Congressman Devin Nunyez on Thursday accused former special
counsel Jack Smith of wielding a shockingly broad secret subpoena
for the banking records of the Trump Media Empire, despite
the company not even existing at the time of his
underlying investigation. Tm TG was among the more four hundred
(16:01):
Trump linked individuals in organizations that were spied on as
part of special counsel Jack Smith's investigation of President Donald Trump. Specifically,
the Smith team issued as shockingly broad and secret subpoena
for our banking records. Nunez says in a statement on
True Social saying, quote, this is a stunning abuse of
(16:24):
power against a private business and are hundreds of thousands
of retail investors, especially since Trump Media did not even
exist at the time of the events that Jack Smith
was supposedly investigating. Nou Neez called for answers from both
(16:44):
the Securities and Exchange Commission, the SEC and JP Morgan
Chase on whether they were aware of the subpoena and
whether bank records were actually leaked. According the subpoena issued
to JP Morgan Chase, image of which none is shared
on social media platform, the demand covers any and all
(17:06):
records in your possession, custody or control for all accounts
and or trust accounts in the name of bearing the signature,
authority of, or with the ability to be accessed by
the named parties below listing TMTG among the named entities.
The subpoena spans the time period from September one, twenty twenty,
(17:30):
to October thirty first of twenty twenty one, and requests
an extensive array of records, including checking and saving account statements,
opening documents, wire transfers, ACCH payments, credit and debit memos,
loan and mortgage payments, safe deposit box records, debit card
(17:53):
transaction histories, IP addresses, cookie data, and other account inquiry metadata.
In other words, a full blown fishing expedition by the
DOJ and the FBI. Meanwhile, Smith's investigation, initiated by the
Attorney General Meyrick Garland in November of twenty twenty two,
(18:16):
has drawn intense scrutiny. The probe encompasses Trump's handling of
classified documents, efforts they lied about to overturn the twenty
twenty election, and alleges obstruction of justice and other matters.
In recent weeks, the Senate Judiciary Committee leaked documents showing
Smith's team issued one hundred and ninety seven subpoenas covering
(18:36):
at least four hundred and thirty individuals and entities as
part of an investigation dubbed Arctic Frost.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
GOP.
Speaker 1 (18:44):
Lawmakers have accused Smith of improperly targeting members of Congress
and others, and Smith's Council nonetheless defended the approach as
quote entirely proper and lawful. We'll see where this goes,
but there's a very good chance this is the tip
of the Arctic frost iceberg. All right, I want to
(19:06):
play for you now something else, and this is how
we're finding out so much about the corruption of Jack
Smith and how he sought the media record, the Trump
media bank records, among others, including one hundred and sixty
other Republicans that were apparently spied on for no damn reason.
Gretav Ancestern on Newsmax had Jim Jordan on to talk
(19:27):
about this, and she started with Donald Trump's true social
post about what we're now learning. I want you to
listen closely to this conversation.
Speaker 6 (19:35):
These thugs should all be investigated and put in prison.
A disgrace to humanity. Deranged Jack Smith is a criminal
end quote shamed of the hout Judiciary committee that released
those files. Hile carsman, Jim Jordan joins me, good evenings, sir,
and do have all the FBI files.
Speaker 5 (19:51):
On this, well, we hope, but we're going to continue
to work with Director Patel and get every piece of
information we can. God bless the cash and and of
course Pam Bondi, because they've been night and day difference
between them and what we have with Mary Garland and
Christopher Ray. But I think the big takeaway here is
how much broader and more expansive this was. It wasn't
(20:12):
just that they took the phone of a sitting member
of Congress when they took Scott Perry's phone. It wasn't
just that they spied on eight United States Senators. Now
we learn it's over one hundred and fifty individuals, key
people in the Trump administration, key people that they went after,
getting communications, phone records, bank records, all kinds of things
(20:32):
they were going after. This is how expansive Artie Frost
started out, and how it even expanded even more when
Jack Smith was named special counsel and when he took
over the investigation. And finally I would say this, Greta,
this is why we want to talk to Jack Smith.
Why we've asked him to come in for a deposition
as soon as possible. We got to ask him questions
(20:53):
because we've already deposed two of his deputies, and they
took the fifth seventy one and seventy three times mister Brad,
mister Wyndham exercised their fift Amendment liberties, wouldn't answer questions
like was this all political? Were you going after this
to undermine and hurt President Trump in a political way?
How about any other people you surveilled or spied on
(21:13):
that in addition to the eight United States senators. Both
of those questions they wouldn't answer. So we want to
talk to Jack Smith, the guy who ran the investigation,
find out what kind of answers he'll give us.
Speaker 6 (21:24):
Do when they went after all these records of these people,
did they have a warrant? Did they get one from
the grand jury or assigned warrant from a judge? Do
they have a warrant? Or were they just being cowboys
and going through these people, these records of these the targets.
Speaker 5 (21:39):
Again, questions will ask. I think they did have a warrant.
I think they moved that way. But we want to
we want to figure all this out. We knew that
Jack Smith had, you know, put the gagolder on President Trump.
We knew we had raided Mara Lago. We knew that
one of one of Jack Smith's deputies confronted a lawyer
for one of the defendants and looked like the offering me.
(22:00):
It's kind of almost a bribe situation. He said, we
thought you were interested in this judge position. We didn't
know you were a Trump guy, you know, kind of
hint hint, wink wink when when they talked to Stanley Woodward.
So there's all this that went on, But the big
takeaways for me are eight United States senators, a sitting
member of Congress they took the phone up, and two
of his deputies whom we've already to post, who wouldn't
(22:20):
answer our questions. So that's why we want to talk
to Jacksonith. You know what, the other thing.
Speaker 6 (22:24):
Choices when you look at the breath of investigation like
this with you know, over one hundred and fifty or
even if you go to the lower number that you
just you just listed, is that they didn't indict or
charge any of these people. So you get sort of
the idea that they were just looking for every thing
every place you know that you know, you know, what
could possibly be a legitimate reason if they didn't if
they didn't strike gold on anybody.
Speaker 5 (22:47):
Yeah, I think I think you're right they were. I
think this was political. I think this was the Left
saying we're going to go after these people. We're going
to use this whole alternate elector uh reason as as
the base for why we're doing this investigation. We saw
the one email, but between it looked like between an
agent and a and a source talking about former cheapest
(23:10):
staff Mark Meadows was involved in some kind of treasonous activity,
which was just ridiculous. So this was the mindset. I
think it also gets to that who are these folks
in the FBI who are putting these emails together saying
that there's there's there's reason to believe that the cheapest
staff to the president of the United States was engaged
in treason this behavior that's just ridiculous. But that reason said,
(23:33):
and it makes no sense.
Speaker 6 (23:35):
I hate them when these reason to believe. Okay, the
documents that you believe had a lot of black spots
on them, a lot of redactions. Is that something you
did or the FBI did. And the reason that matters
is because you really can't read those documents unless, I mean,
you know, for full transparency. Why is everything being kept
a secret? Basically there's no I mean, if we want
to uncover what happened you know, to give it, you know,
(23:56):
put to find out if anything dirty was done. We
really need to do. We need to be able to
read everything, and nobody should be running for cover with
doing redactions.
Speaker 5 (24:04):
We didn't put the redactions on. That's how they came
from the Justice Department. You're right, we need to have
we need to be able to read it all in
full context. But I would go a step further and
say the name's under there, I actually want to ask
them questions. I want to find out, like, who's this
source giving this look? To me when I read it, it
looks like under the redaction to be the source. And
(24:26):
then the agent who's getting the information. I want to
know who that source is. I want to know who
that agent is saying these ridiculous things that get put
in an email and sent to someone else as part
of this investigation. So I think it's even more than that,
not just who those what those names are. I want
to talk to those people. I want to ask them questions.
So that's that's where I think we try to go next.
Speaker 6 (24:45):
Well, that's the starter. The starter is to find out
who they are. Were the redactions done during the Trump
administration or during the Brenda Biden administration or the Trump administration.
And who I mean, who is it? Someone up in
some room with a big black marker someplace. I mean,
who's doing these things?
Speaker 5 (25:01):
Well, I think it's just I think got standard practice
at the Justice which.
Speaker 6 (25:05):
Is not good. Which is not good. That's not good.
Speaker 5 (25:08):
I mean, And I don't know which one. I don't
know which FBI did it. My gut tells me it
was probably That's how the documents were in the ray
FBI that Director Patel has gotten his hands on now
and giving to us. But I don't know that, but
that'd be my guess. But my understanding is that's just
standard names, phone numbers of agents, phone numbers and sources
(25:31):
names and sort of. That's just standard how they do it.
But we want to know now because we saw how
broad and how expansive this is. We want to know
who those people are so we can ask them questions.
Speaker 6 (25:40):
Well, if you're then involved in investigation, especially a government person,
you don't have your name not blackened out so that
we can see who it is. We can see who's
doing what I get if it's a confidential source, it's
going to get shot on the street or something. If
we reveal it. But the fact that some way and
I'm told, I'm always told that's the way it's done, well,
that's never satisfied me because that usually means it's sort
of like, well, I think so classified in this town
(26:01):
because that's the way it's done. But that's where the
lack of transparency, you know, And we could get to that.
We could get to the end of this very quickly
if we could read everything and see it, and even
if they turned it over to you unredacted, it would
be good. I mean, I realized maybe it won't turn
it into the public, but you know, I don't know
how you do an investigation when you can't get all
the material.
Speaker 5 (26:19):
Well, we're working on finding out what the name is
underneath those those those those black lines. We want to
know who the name is or what the name is.
We want to know who that individual is, so again
we can we can ask them questions like where did
they I think, particularly that the email I keep citing,
I won't know who that source is because I think
it's the source that they were using. Who was the
person alleging that the former chiefest staff was engaged? That's
(26:42):
just just the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
Speaker 6 (26:44):
Well, do you know what though, But it's a little
bit like when they were using that guy Steel as
a source. They kept using it wouldn't tell. But if
anyone had pulled, if anyone had investigated Steel, you wouldn't
have used him as a source, you know. But if
you just say the person, say source, and black it out,
there's no way to challenge whether it's someone who has
good information or if someone's got an ax to grind
or whatever.
Speaker 5 (27:03):
You know, that's right, and not to mention the sub
sources that Steele was using, who would just further complicates
it means there's more lies than that ridiculous dossier that
they relied on to get warrants to go spaw on
a presidential campaign. No great point, and it's again, this
all now has come all getting exposed goes clear back
(27:24):
to twenty sixteen when they spider. That's when it all started,
and we're starting to unravel at all. So that and
the reason we want to unravel it all and hold
people accountable is so that it doesn't happen again.
Speaker 6 (27:35):
Well, if I were if I were a government employer
or anybody, and I found out that they were doing
that to me without a warrant from a judge or
from a grand jury, I would sue from a constitution
of rights being violated because I tell you one thing.
Speaker 5 (27:46):
You get.
Speaker 6 (27:46):
First of all, you get a big chunk of change
under the government. Secondly, you get a lot of discovery,
You get a lot of information you know, and we
find out what the government is doing and not doing.
Chairman Jim Jordan, thank you sir.
Speaker 1 (27:56):
You listen to Jim Jordan there and you hear what
he had to say. It is true, incredible they were
able to do this and abuse the power of the government.
The good news is Donald Trump is making it very
clear there is going to be accountability for people that
abuse their power in the last administration or any administration
if there's evidence of major wrongdoing. Don't forget to share
(28:20):
this podcast, by the way, with your family and your
friends on social media wherever you can hit that subscribe
or auto download button and I'll talk to you again tomorrow.
The Department of Justice, we now have learned, is investigating
Black Lives Matter Why for the misuse they're saying of donations.
The Justice Department is probing whether Black Lives Matter defrauded
donors who sent the organization millions of dollars during the
racial justice protests in twenty twenty. This coming from the
(00:23):
Associated Press. We also know that federal law enforcement authorities
have issued subpoenas and served a search warrant as part
of an investigation into Black Lives Matter. The Global Network Foundation, Inc.
That helped ignite the protests in US cities following the
death of George Floyd in Minnesota in May of twenty twenty.
(00:46):
That coming again from anonymous sources. Now, protests in some
locations resulted in deaths, lots of rioting, looting, fires, and
extensive property destruction. According to the Associated Press, it was
not clear if the investigation would result in criminal charges,
(01:06):
but its mere existence invites fresh scrutiny to a movement
that in recent years has faced criticism about its public
accounting of donations it has received. The Justice Department, by
the way, has declined to comment on the report. Why
because clearly they're working on this and they don't want
to tip anyone off. Now, the investigation actually began, just
(01:30):
so you understand the timeline here in the Biden administration that,
according to one of the AP sources, and has received
renewed attention during the Trump administration. The BOM Foundation said
it took in over ninety million dollars in donations following
the highly publicized death of George Floyd, who was seen
(01:52):
on that viral video struggling to breathe under the knee
of a white Minneapolis police officer who was later convicted
of murder. Now, critics have accused the nonprofit foundation of
not being forthcoming about how it was spending the donations
that they were receiving that were in the tens of
millions of dollars. Critics of the organization have looked at
(02:14):
a very shocking moment in twenty twenty two when it
was learned that some of the funds that were raised
in the name of George Floyd actually went to purchase
a six million dollar mansion in Los Angeles, six bedrooms,
six baths, a swimming pool, and other luxury amenities. The
(02:35):
co founder of BLM also admitted that she used the
group's six million property to host personal parties. The BLM
leader later resigned in twenty twenty three after much of
the information I've just told you went public.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
The Associated Press also reports.
Speaker 1 (02:54):
That no prior investigations into the nonprofits finances have quote
yielded proof of impropriety. The latest federal form filing, the
Wire Service reported, shows that BOM Foundation had twenty eight
million in assets for the fiscal year ending June twenty
twenty four. The current investigation is reportedly being run out
(03:16):
of the US Attorney's Office for the Central District of
California in LA. In his statement to the AP on Thursday,
the foundation said it is not a target of any
federal criminal investigation, saying, quote, we remain committed to full transparency, accountability,
and the responsible stewardship of resources dedicated to building a
(03:40):
better future for black communities. The Black Lives Matter slogan
that first emerged back in twenty thirteen after the acquittal
of Neighborhood Watch volunteer George Zimmerman, who fatally shot his
seventeen year old Trayvon Martin in Florida, is what was
legally ruled a standard ground case. It was the death
(04:01):
the following year of Michael Brown who was shot as
he charged a police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. That made
the slogan black Lives Matter a national and later a
worldwide rallying cry for leftists social justice. So here we
are now the DOJ seeming to do the job that
should have been done under the Biden administration, looking into
(04:23):
the misuse of the donations that were in the name
of social justice but in reality may have been going
just to buy luxury houses for the people at the
top of the Black Lives Matter organization. You may have
noticed that the Fed met and they did something with
interest rates. It has now had a pretty big impact
on the market, and that includes gold and silver. Joining
(04:46):
me now to talk about what this can mean for
your retirement. Your four oh one k is Kurt Elliott
with Kurt Elliott Precious Metals.
Speaker 2 (04:52):
Kurt.
Speaker 1 (04:52):
So, the Fed did what Donald Trump has been asking
for and saying is long overdue. They cut interest rates
again by another quarter point. That is good news and
theory for a lot of Americans. What is it doing
in the markets? What's it doing with gold and silver?
Speaker 3 (05:07):
Well, whenever you lower interest rates, it should stimulate the economy, right, Ben,
I mean, this is this is why Trump wants it done.
Speaker 4 (05:14):
He knows this, and it did just that.
Speaker 3 (05:18):
So so gold and silver doing really well. Silver had
come off of its high last week. It hit fifty
four dollars an ounce, very over bought. Literally technically it
was very overbought because it went up so fast, so furious.
You know, it is up about nineteen percent in two weeks.
(05:40):
Then it needed to correct, right, So it came down
five dollars in a matter of four or five days,
and people thought, oh the world isn't what's up? Silver
is supposed to go up, you know what it is
because the bed lowered interest rates. Gold and silver respond
very well to interest rate reductions because for silver, that
(06:03):
means the economy is going to grow, right, It's like
when when you lower the cost of borrowing. When you
when you lower that, people are going to spend more.
And silver more than anything. Is A is a manufacturing medal,
not a financial medal like gold. It's a it's a
manufacturing medal. So the propensity for growth, for usage, for
extra demand is there. And silver did the turnaround and
(06:25):
it's honest, way back up again. I mean, these these
markets spend. These precious metals markets are like buoys in
the ocean. You just can't keep them down right.
Speaker 1 (06:37):
Now, it's it really is incredible, and it's like you said,
this is a world trading market.
Speaker 2 (06:43):
When it comes to gold and silver.
Speaker 1 (06:45):
There's also some changes that are coming to how you
can can invest in and deal with gold and silver
in your retirement account. That deadliner or that that I
guess door opening is coming very soon, and so there
also seems to be a lot of movement there as well.
Speaker 3 (06:58):
A lot of movement, and that's part of the demand,
right because once that happens the first week in February,
when when you know for your listeners who don't know,
it's part of the executive order signed on August seventh
to democratization of alternative assets. In four to one case,
it's going to allow cryptocurrency direct and indirect ownership of commodities,
(07:21):
which golden silver is a commodity, and real estate in a.
Speaker 4 (07:24):
Four to oh one k then it's a twelve trillion.
Speaker 3 (07:27):
Dollar market, like we've talked about before. So people, if
you wait until after that kind of marketplace opens its door, well,
prices are going to be way high, right, So people
are getting in now in anticipation of that. And that's
one thing that I tell investors all the time is
I would rather be one or two or three months
(07:50):
early than a day late. And something as fundamentally massive
as this is, it's always better to be early than
a day late because daylight you might run out of inventory.
You don't know what's going to happen. In fact, London.
We have to remember this. In the financial world, financial
world and in the precious metals world, all roads lead
(08:14):
to London. They do for every single country. All roads
lead to London. Well, London is for all intents and
purposes out of silver. They've depleted their free flow silver supply. Well,
you know, for investors it's like, okay, we can lock
in silver prices, but maybe it's going to be delayed
delivery because refineries now are basically going flat inventory. They're
(08:39):
not holding anything because the cost of carrying is too high,
so they're manufacturing on demand. This is where it gets tricky.
Speaker 5 (08:47):
Ben.
Speaker 3 (08:47):
That doesn't work if you're Tesla or Lockheed Martin and
you're making missiles and torpedoes or your Sony and you're
making flat screen TVs, having a one to two months
lay in delivery times because the exchange is out could
mean the life or death of their company. Or if
(09:08):
you're an investor, yeah, it's a pain point at stressful.
It's like, am I ever going to get myself? It's
different when you're talking about a company.
Speaker 4 (09:15):
So what are they going to do.
Speaker 3 (09:18):
When London runs out? I have a feeling they're going
to start going directly to the source. They're going to
go to the refineries of the world and say, hey,
look we know if at silver sixty dollars ounce, we're
going to offer eighty, we'll offer a hundred, we'll offer
one hundred and twenty. We need to be at the
top of the queue because we're not going to pay
for it, We're just going to pass it on to
(09:39):
the consumer. This is economics one oh one, and it's
the lifeblood of your company needs a commodity that the
exchange ran out of, They're going to skip the exchange
and go directly to the source, the refinery and get
it that way because the lifeblood of the company depends
on it. And this is what happens in an industrialized
(10:03):
world where silver is needed for electronics and AI chips
and cryptocurrency, mining and electronics and electric vehicles and everything
that we use right now. If you don't have it,
you don't have the product. And those companies can't manufacture,
so they will find it and we as holders get
(10:23):
to ultimately sell into that strength. And that's the amazing
part of all of us. To me, there's hope in
this message.
Speaker 2 (10:30):
And hope is the other aspect of this.
Speaker 1 (10:32):
I think that people are really wanting to ask, is
looking forward in the future, where do we see, for example,
gold and silver going knowing that there is a lack
of silver in different parts of the world right now,
and it's being bought up for so many different things.
Speaker 3 (10:47):
Yeah, I mean it's being bought up for everything that
we just mentioned. But we're still in a war torn economy,
right This is a war economy that we're in when
you look at what's happening with Russian and Ukraine and
in the Middle East. And I mean, so missiles and
torpedoes need silver, nuclear power needs silver, solar power needs silver,
electric vehicles need silver, all electronic circuit boards and AI
(11:08):
chips need silver. Right, So it's like I don't see
any of those things diminishing in demand in fact, I
only see them increasing in demand. It's like, oh wait,
there's a problem. Supply isn't increasing. Supply is actually diminishing. Right,
So when you when you look at what's happening London
(11:31):
being out of silver because they have to now buy
it on the open market to fulfill the over selling
that they've done. This is how they've manipulated the markets
for decades. This is not a new thing. Then what's
new is they've actually run out. You can't manipulate something
where you have no inventory, because if somebody wants it,
(11:53):
you could say, well, play with the paper price, we'll
sort it, we'll do this, we'll do that. But ultimately,
if you have no inventory and there's an exchange for
physicals and the manufacturers of the world needed, they're going
to start offering any price and London could go bankrupt
over this. By London, I'm talking about the LBMA, the
London Bulliant Marketing Association, where all the metals are stored.
(12:17):
Well does China care? Literally, this is a question we
answer ourselves, well, why wouldn't they just sell? They have silver,
they've been buying it so as comets still of India,
but all roads lead to London. If it's not in
the right place, it can't be fulfilled. So why don't
they release it? Well, because maybe they want to squeeze
London out of business. Maybe they want to say, hey, look,
(12:43):
we want to take over the Western financial banking system.
We want to take over the supplies of gold and
silver in that supply chain globally and have it go
to the Shanghai gold extent. So I don't think that
China is in this for profit. I think they're in
this to destroy London as the gold and silver capital
of the world. And they're doing a pretty good job
at it.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
Yeah, they really are.
Speaker 1 (13:04):
Finally for this and for anybody listening right now, if
you want to get more information about what we're talking
about here, you can go to k e PM dot
com Kurt Elliott Precious Metals k e p M dot
com Kurt. When you're looking into the holidays here, what
traditionally do you see with gold and silver over the holidays?
(13:24):
And also if you combine that in with the rules
that are about to change retirement accounts, it's going to
change when it comes to crypto and also gold and silver.
Is that going to change things over the next ninety days.
Speaker 3 (13:35):
Well, generally during the holidays, it's low volume trading, you know,
the markets kind of come down a little bit. I
don't see that that's going to be the case this year.
This year is something completely different again. The fundamentals of
what's going on. Are there going to be tariffs on
strategic metals or are there not? Is there going to
(13:56):
be continued war or is there not? What about consuming public?
Are they going to keep spending or not. There's so
much different this year that I don't see a downturn
in metals prices really during this holiday season like we
normally see. Then you add to that the black swamp
of the executive order and gold and silver being available
(14:17):
for four to one k is, you know, if the
administrators will allow it, you know, each company. I mean,
we've got a lot of built up demand. This holiday
season I believe is going to be different.
Speaker 2 (14:28):
It's gonna be very different.
Speaker 1 (14:30):
Don't forget if you want to find out more about
what they do at Kurt Elliott. I just bought into
some more silver recently. I've got some ten ounce bars
I'm looking at right now point nine nine nine fine
silver ten troy ounces. They also have book bars as
well that are one hundred ounces. I have one of
those as well. It is an incredible investment tool and
(14:52):
you can see what it's been doing. You can find
out more from them. K E p M dot com.
That's k E p M dot com. I'm Kurt Elliott
Precious Metals. Check them out there.
Speaker 5 (15:02):
Kurt.
Speaker 2 (15:02):
Always a pleasure and I really appreciate you coming on.
Speaker 3 (15:05):
Oh you bet, it's my pleasure.
Speaker 1 (15:08):
Now all of this is happening while there's another story
that is breaking, another shocking story, and it deals with
Jack Smith. Devin Nunyez is now exposing Jack Smith and
telling us that they sought Trump media bank records, is
what we're being told Donald Trump saying these thugs should
be investigated. Trump Media and Technology Group Corporation TMTG CEO
(15:35):
and former Congressman Devin Nunyez on Thursday accused former special
counsel Jack Smith of wielding a shockingly broad secret subpoena
for the banking records of the Trump Media Empire, despite
the company not even existing at the time of his
underlying investigation. Tm TG was among the more four hundred
(16:01):
Trump linked individuals in organizations that were spied on as
part of special counsel Jack Smith's investigation of President Donald Trump. Specifically,
the Smith team issued as shockingly broad and secret subpoena
for our banking records. Nunez says in a statement on
True Social saying, quote, this is a stunning abuse of
(16:24):
power against a private business and are hundreds of thousands
of retail investors, especially since Trump Media did not even
exist at the time of the events that Jack Smith
was supposedly investigating. Nou Neez called for answers from both
(16:44):
the Securities and Exchange Commission, the SEC and JP Morgan
Chase on whether they were aware of the subpoena and
whether bank records were actually leaked. According the subpoena issued
to JP Morgan Chase, image of which none is shared
on social media platform, the demand covers any and all
(17:06):
records in your possession, custody or control for all accounts
and or trust accounts in the name of bearing the signature,
authority of, or with the ability to be accessed by
the named parties below listing TMTG among the named entities.
The subpoena spans the time period from September one, twenty twenty,
(17:30):
to October thirty first of twenty twenty one, and requests
an extensive array of records, including checking and saving account statements,
opening documents, wire transfers, ACCH payments, credit and debit memos,
loan and mortgage payments, safe deposit box records, debit card
(17:53):
transaction histories, IP addresses, cookie data, and other account inquiry metadata.
In other words, a full blown fishing expedition by the
DOJ and the FBI. Meanwhile, Smith's investigation, initiated by the
Attorney General Meyrick Garland in November of twenty twenty two,
(18:16):
has drawn intense scrutiny. The probe encompasses Trump's handling of
classified documents, efforts they lied about to overturn the twenty
twenty election, and alleges obstruction of justice and other matters.
In recent weeks, the Senate Judiciary Committee leaked documents showing
Smith's team issued one hundred and ninety seven subpoenas covering
(18:36):
at least four hundred and thirty individuals and entities as
part of an investigation dubbed Arctic Frost.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
GOP.
Speaker 1 (18:44):
Lawmakers have accused Smith of improperly targeting members of Congress
and others, and Smith's Council nonetheless defended the approach as
quote entirely proper and lawful. We'll see where this goes,
but there's a very good chance this is the tip
of the Arctic frost iceberg. All right, I want to
(19:06):
play for you now something else, and this is how
we're finding out so much about the corruption of Jack
Smith and how he sought the media record, the Trump
media bank records, among others, including one hundred and sixty
other Republicans that were apparently spied on for no damn reason.
Gretav Ancestern on Newsmax had Jim Jordan on to talk
(19:27):
about this, and she started with Donald Trump's true social
post about what we're now learning. I want you to
listen closely to this conversation.
Speaker 6 (19:35):
These thugs should all be investigated and put in prison.
A disgrace to humanity. Deranged Jack Smith is a criminal
end quote shamed of the hout Judiciary committee that released
those files. Hile carsman, Jim Jordan joins me, good evenings, sir,
and do have all the FBI files.
Speaker 5 (19:51):
On this, well, we hope, but we're going to continue
to work with Director Patel and get every piece of
information we can. God bless the cash and and of
course Pam Bondi, because they've been night and day difference
between them and what we have with Mary Garland and
Christopher Ray. But I think the big takeaway here is
how much broader and more expansive this was. It wasn't
(20:12):
just that they took the phone of a sitting member
of Congress when they took Scott Perry's phone. It wasn't
just that they spied on eight United States Senators. Now
we learn it's over one hundred and fifty individuals, key
people in the Trump administration, key people that they went after,
getting communications, phone records, bank records, all kinds of things
(20:32):
they were going after. This is how expansive Artie Frost
started out, and how it even expanded even more when
Jack Smith was named special counsel and when he took
over the investigation. And finally I would say this, Greta,
this is why we want to talk to Jack Smith.
Why we've asked him to come in for a deposition
as soon as possible. We got to ask him questions
(20:53):
because we've already deposed two of his deputies, and they
took the fifth seventy one and seventy three times mister Brad,
mister Wyndham exercised their fift Amendment liberties, wouldn't answer questions
like was this all political? Were you going after this
to undermine and hurt President Trump in a political way?
How about any other people you surveilled or spied on
(21:13):
that in addition to the eight United States senators. Both
of those questions they wouldn't answer. So we want to
talk to Jack Smith, the guy who ran the investigation,
find out what kind of answers he'll give us.
Speaker 6 (21:24):
Do when they went after all these records of these people,
did they have a warrant? Did they get one from
the grand jury or assigned warrant from a judge? Do
they have a warrant? Or were they just being cowboys
and going through these people, these records of these the targets.
Speaker 5 (21:39):
Again, questions will ask. I think they did have a warrant.
I think they moved that way. But we want to
we want to figure all this out. We knew that
Jack Smith had, you know, put the gagolder on President Trump.
We knew we had raided Mara Lago. We knew that
one of one of Jack Smith's deputies confronted a lawyer
for one of the defendants and looked like the offering me.
(22:00):
It's kind of almost a bribe situation. He said, we
thought you were interested in this judge position. We didn't
know you were a Trump guy, you know, kind of
hint hint, wink wink when when they talked to Stanley Woodward.
So there's all this that went on, But the big
takeaways for me are eight United States senators, a sitting
member of Congress they took the phone up, and two
of his deputies whom we've already to post, who wouldn't
(22:20):
answer our questions. So that's why we want to talk
to Jacksonith. You know what, the other thing.
Speaker 6 (22:24):
Choices when you look at the breath of investigation like
this with you know, over one hundred and fifty or
even if you go to the lower number that you
just you just listed, is that they didn't indict or
charge any of these people. So you get sort of
the idea that they were just looking for every thing
every place you know that you know, you know, what
could possibly be a legitimate reason if they didn't if
they didn't strike gold on anybody.
Speaker 5 (22:47):
Yeah, I think I think you're right they were. I
think this was political. I think this was the Left
saying we're going to go after these people. We're going
to use this whole alternate elector uh reason as as
the base for why we're doing this investigation. We saw
the one email, but between it looked like between an
agent and a and a source talking about former cheapest
(23:10):
staff Mark Meadows was involved in some kind of treasonous activity,
which was just ridiculous. So this was the mindset. I
think it also gets to that who are these folks
in the FBI who are putting these emails together saying
that there's there's there's reason to believe that the cheapest
staff to the president of the United States was engaged
in treason this behavior that's just ridiculous. But that reason said,
(23:33):
and it makes no sense.
Speaker 6 (23:35):
I hate them when these reason to believe. Okay, the
documents that you believe had a lot of black spots
on them, a lot of redactions. Is that something you
did or the FBI did. And the reason that matters
is because you really can't read those documents unless, I mean,
you know, for full transparency. Why is everything being kept
a secret? Basically there's no I mean, if we want
to uncover what happened you know, to give it, you know,
(23:56):
put to find out if anything dirty was done. We
really need to do. We need to be able to
read everything, and nobody should be running for cover with
doing redactions.
Speaker 5 (24:04):
We didn't put the redactions on. That's how they came
from the Justice Department. You're right, we need to have
we need to be able to read it all in
full context. But I would go a step further and
say the name's under there, I actually want to ask
them questions. I want to find out, like, who's this
source giving this look? To me when I read it, it
looks like under the redaction to be the source. And
(24:26):
then the agent who's getting the information. I want to
know who that source is. I want to know who
that agent is saying these ridiculous things that get put
in an email and sent to someone else as part
of this investigation. So I think it's even more than that,
not just who those what those names are. I want
to talk to those people. I want to ask them questions.
So that's that's where I think we try to go next.
Speaker 6 (24:45):
Well, that's the starter. The starter is to find out
who they are. Were the redactions done during the Trump
administration or during the Brenda Biden administration or the Trump administration.
And who I mean, who is it? Someone up in
some room with a big black marker someplace. I mean,
who's doing these things?
Speaker 5 (25:01):
Well, I think it's just I think got standard practice
at the Justice which.
Speaker 6 (25:05):
Is not good. Which is not good. That's not good.
Speaker 5 (25:08):
I mean, And I don't know which one. I don't
know which FBI did it. My gut tells me it
was probably That's how the documents were in the ray
FBI that Director Patel has gotten his hands on now
and giving to us. But I don't know that, but
that'd be my guess. But my understanding is that's just
standard names, phone numbers of agents, phone numbers and sources
(25:31):
names and sort of. That's just standard how they do it.
But we want to know now because we saw how
broad and how expansive this is. We want to know
who those people are so we can ask them questions.
Speaker 6 (25:40):
Well, if you're then involved in investigation, especially a government person,
you don't have your name not blackened out so that
we can see who it is. We can see who's
doing what I get if it's a confidential source, it's
going to get shot on the street or something. If
we reveal it. But the fact that some way and
I'm told, I'm always told that's the way it's done, well,
that's never satisfied me because that usually means it's sort
of like, well, I think so classified in this town
(26:01):
because that's the way it's done. But that's where the
lack of transparency, you know, And we could get to that.
We could get to the end of this very quickly
if we could read everything and see it, and even
if they turned it over to you unredacted, it would
be good. I mean, I realized maybe it won't turn
it into the public, but you know, I don't know
how you do an investigation when you can't get all
the material.
Speaker 5 (26:19):
Well, we're working on finding out what the name is
underneath those those those those black lines. We want to
know who the name is or what the name is.
We want to know who that individual is, so again
we can we can ask them questions like where did
they I think, particularly that the email I keep citing,
I won't know who that source is because I think
it's the source that they were using. Who was the
person alleging that the former chiefest staff was engaged? That's
(26:42):
just just the most ridiculous thing I've ever heard.
Speaker 6 (26:44):
Well, do you know what though, But it's a little
bit like when they were using that guy Steel as
a source. They kept using it wouldn't tell. But if
anyone had pulled, if anyone had investigated Steel, you wouldn't
have used him as a source, you know. But if
you just say the person, say source, and black it out,
there's no way to challenge whether it's someone who has
good information or if someone's got an ax to grind
or whatever.
Speaker 5 (27:03):
You know, that's right, and not to mention the sub
sources that Steele was using, who would just further complicates
it means there's more lies than that ridiculous dossier that
they relied on to get warrants to go spaw on
a presidential campaign. No great point, and it's again, this
all now has come all getting exposed goes clear back
(27:24):
to twenty sixteen when they spider. That's when it all started,
and we're starting to unravel at all. So that and
the reason we want to unravel it all and hold
people accountable is so that it doesn't happen again.
Speaker 6 (27:35):
Well, if I were if I were a government employer
or anybody, and I found out that they were doing
that to me without a warrant from a judge or
from a grand jury, I would sue from a constitution
of rights being violated because I tell you one thing.
Speaker 5 (27:46):
You get.
Speaker 6 (27:46):
First of all, you get a big chunk of change
under the government. Secondly, you get a lot of discovery,
You get a lot of information you know, and we
find out what the government is doing and not doing.
Chairman Jim Jordan, thank you sir.
Speaker 1 (27:56):
You listen to Jim Jordan there and you hear what
he had to say. It is true, incredible they were
able to do this and abuse the power of the government.
The good news is Donald Trump is making it very
clear there is going to be accountability for people that
abuse their power in the last administration or any administration
if there's evidence of major wrongdoing. Don't forget to share
(28:20):
this podcast, by the way, with your family and your
friends on social media wherever you can hit that subscribe
or auto download button and I'll talk to you again tomorrow.
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Ruthie's Table 4
For more than 30 years The River Cafe in London, has been the home-from-home of artists, architects, designers, actors, collectors, writers, activists, and politicians. Michael Caine, Glenn Close, JJ Abrams, Steve McQueen, Victoria and David Beckham, and Lily Allen, are just some of the people who love to call The River Cafe home. On River Cafe Table 4, Rogers sits down with her customers—who have become friends—to talk about food memories. Table 4 explores how food impacts every aspect of our lives. “Foods is politics, food is cultural, food is how you express love, food is about your heritage, it defines who you and who you want to be,” says Rogers. Each week, Rogers invites her guest to reminisce about family suppers and first dates, what they cook, how they eat when performing, the restaurants they choose, and what food they seek when they need comfort. And to punctuate each episode of Table 4, guests such as Ralph Fiennes, Emily Blunt, and Alfonso Cuarón, read their favourite recipe from one of the best-selling River Cafe cookbooks. Table 4 itself, is situated near The River Cafe’s open kitchen, close to the bright pink wood-fired oven and next to the glossy yellow pass, where Ruthie oversees the restaurant. You are invited to take a seat at this intimate table and join the conversation. For more information, recipes, and ingredients, go to https://shoptherivercafe.co.uk/ Web: https://rivercafe.co.uk/ Instagram: www.instagram.com/therivercafelondon/ Facebook: https://en-gb.facebook.com/therivercafelondon/ For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iheartradio app, apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.