December 1, 2025 • 30 mins
War Crimes Allegations Against Trump
- Accusations: Democrats claim Trump’s administration committed war crimes by ordering strikes on drug boats and allegedly conducting follow-up strikes to kill survivors.
- Democratic Leaders’ Statements:
- Sen. Mark Kelly: Suggests second strikes could constitute war crimes; advocates military personnel should refuse unlawful orders.
- Sen. Tim Kaine: Questions legality of strikes, citing international law and lack of evidence against alleged traffickers.
- Sen. Chris Van Hollen: Argues actions could be murder if legal theory of armed conflict is invalid.
- Underlying Debate: Whether targeting narco-terrorists in international waters is lawful under U.S. and international law.
- Political Framing: Portrays Democrats as siding with criminals and undermining Trump for political gain.
Silicon Valley and the Great Reset
- Nicole Shanahan’s Whistleblower Claims:
- Describes a network of wealthy tech wives funding progressive causes under the guise of philanthropy.
- Suggests their money was “conscripted” to support global agendas like the Great Reset, climate change initiatives, and social justice movements.
- Criticizes the model as ineffective and harmful, claiming communities worsened despite massive funding.
- Mechanisms of Influence:
- NGOs, Hollywood, Davos connections, and elite social circles.
- Emotional appeals to wealthy women seeking purpose through philanthropy.
- Core Allegation: Philanthropy is being weaponized for political power and global control rather than genuine social improvement.
National Security & Vetting Failures
- Afghan evacuees admitted under Biden’s administration have inadequate vetting.
- Child brides are the among refugees
- Quotes Pam Bondi criticizing minimal vetting and warning of a backlog of 1.5 million cases.
Please Hit Subscribe to this podcast Right Now. Also Please Subscribe to the 47 Morning Update with Ben Ferguson and Verdict with Ted Cruz Wherever You get You're Podcasts. And don't forget to follow the show on Social Media so you never miss a moment! Thanks for Listening
X: https://x.com/benfergusonshow
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
There is a new hoax against Donald Trump, and it's
clearly an orchestrated plan by the Democrats. You've got to
give them credit where credits due. They'll never stop lying
to try to undermine Donald Trump. This time, they're now
accusing the president of war crimes. I wish I was joking,
I'm not. The Democratic Party hates Donald Trump so much
(00:23):
they're now wanting him to be charged with war crimes. Now,
what is the crime that the President of the United
States of America committed.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
It is apparently that he.
Speaker 1 (00:34):
Has gone after terris narco terras, you know, the ones
that are killing countless young people in this country with
FETNL and drug overdoses. Those guys. Yes, they're actually siding
with them over the President of the United States of America,
who has declared them narco terras and therefore has the
(00:54):
right to protect America from them. They're really angry about
one main issue, and that issue is the president ordering
the strikes on those narco terraces and the boats of
drugs that they're running into the United States of America
in international waters. They think now that not the terrorists
should be the ones that are locked up. No, no, no, no,
(01:16):
what they think is that the president of the United
States of America should be locked up for striking those boats.
I wish I was kidding. Senator Mark Kelly, the same
one who told you know, everyone in uniform to disobey
the president's order, had this to say on CNN's Stay
of the Union. Listen carefully the words he chooses to
(01:38):
describe the president's actions.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
Based on what you what CNN is reporting, with the
Washington Post is reporting. Do you believe if there was
a second strike to eliminate any survivors, that that constitutes
a war crime?
Speaker 4 (01:55):
It seems to if that is true, if what has
been reported is accurate, I've got serious concerns about anybody
in that chain of command stepping over a line that
they should never step over.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
We are not Russia, We're not a wreck.
Speaker 5 (02:14):
We hold ourselves to a very high standard of professionalism.
And this is where I'm really troubled about this is
because I have so much respect for people in the
United States Navy. I served in the Navy for twenty
five years, and there is no organization more professional than
Navy seals, and they should be revered. And that's why
I say, I hope what I've heard about this strike
(02:37):
is not accurate.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
You mentioned that you are a captain in the Navy.
If you receive that order, would you have carried it out?
Speaker 2 (02:43):
No?
Speaker 1 (02:44):
No, So there's yet again Senator Mark Kelly saying that
the strikes to kill drug boat traffickers can constitute a
war crime. It seems to if that's true, he claims,
and says he wouldn't have carried out that order yet again,
advocating for insubordination for members in our military to literally
(03:08):
go rogue. He's not the only one that is saying that.
Tim Kane, echoing other Democrats, says the first Caribbean boat
strike rises to the level of a war crime if
the story he says is true of what actually happened.
He went on Sunday's CBS Faced the Nation and said
(03:30):
the first military strike on an alleged drug boat in
the Caribbean rises to the level of a war crime.
The host saying, you're referring to the new Washington Post
report that says that Secretary head Seth called for everyone
on board the first suspected drug boat that was targeted
to be killed. When two people survived, the military went
(03:51):
back in reported with a follow up strike. What questions
do you have for the Pentagon about that situation? Tim
Kaine responding, Well, first, if that reporting is true, it's
a very clear violation of the DD's own laws of
war as well as international law is about the way
you treat people who are in that circumstance, and so
(04:12):
this rises to the level of a war crime if
it's true. And the question that we've been asking for
months or give us the evidence that the folks on
board were really narco traffickers. In one instance, there were
two survivors, one Colombian, one Ecuadorian and a different strike.
Instead of arresting them and prosecuting them, the US picked
(04:32):
them up and returned them to their home countries of origin,
where they were released. So if they were narco traffickers,
why would we do that? We need more evidence about that,
and we definitely need the administration to finally answer the
questions of why strike rather than interdict. If you know
where the ships are, you can interdict, and when you do,
(04:55):
you get evidence. You get individuals, you can squeeze them
to give testament against their high you get evidence with
the drug seizures. And finally, the other question that my
colleagues and I are deeply worried about is the entire
legal rationale for the strikes. We had to pry with
a crowbar after weeks and weeks out of this administration
to suppose legal rationale for the strikes international waters. It
(05:19):
was very shoddy. Because it's classified, I can't tell you
what's in it, but I can tell you it was
not at all pervasive that these are legal actions. And so,
together with a whole series of things, the early retirement
the head of Southcomb, the news at the south Comb's
lead attorneys said the strikes were not lawful, the decision
(05:41):
of allies like the UK to stop sharing intelligence with
the United States in this area because they believe the
strikes are illegal. It's time for Congress to reign in
a present who is deciding to wage war on his
own and says so, which is not what the Constitution allows.
So here's the new lie being put out by the Democrats.
(06:04):
They're now wanting you to believe that the President units
As America, who is keeping us safe from these narco terrorists,
is somehow breaking the law. It's also very interesting that
the narco terrists now best friend their legal counsel. Their
lawyers are literally the Democratic Party and that's not the
only one going on TV. Van Holland said the first
(06:27):
Caribbean boat strike either was a war crime or now
he says that the president flat out murdered the terrorists.
Listen to his words.
Speaker 6 (06:37):
Let me ask you about that Washington Post report on
the attack on that Venezuelan alleged drug vote. What do
you make of what happened there? Do you think there
was a war crime committed?
Speaker 7 (06:49):
Oh, I think it's very possible there was a war
crime committed. Of course, for it to be a war crime,
you have to accept the Trump administration's hold construct here
that were at witches were in armed inflict, at war
with this particular with the drug gangs. Of course they've
never presented the public with the information they've got here,
But it could be worse than that. Right, If that
(07:10):
theory is wrong, then it's plane murder.
Speaker 6 (07:15):
The first strike is murdered in that case.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
That's correct. That's correct.
Speaker 7 (07:18):
Well, I'm saying that it's it's either murder from the
first strike if their whole theory is wrong, and I
think you know the weight of the legal opinion here
is that they've concocted this ridiculous legal theory. But even
if you accept their legal theory, that it is a
war crime. And so I do believe that the Secretary
of Defense should be held accountable for giving those kind
(07:42):
of orders.
Speaker 6 (07:42):
And this is happening as of course, you have the
Secretary of Events also saying that he wants to bring
Senator Mark Kelly back to active duty to put him
before a court martial for telling members of the military
they shouldn't follow illegal orders. Let me ask you, if
that happens, Senator Kelly's one of your colleagues, how will
(08:02):
the Senate respond?
Speaker 7 (08:04):
Well, the Senate would be in uproar because this would
be a blatantly illegal act and another example of the
present's abuse of power. You know, the sixth that the
president is talking about are people who served our country,
unlike the president who decided not to go based on
a bone spur. Apparently, so we have here six real
(08:27):
folks who have been dedicated to our country in the military,
who simply cited the law of the land, which is
that our men and women in the military should follow
lawful orders, which clearly has become more important than ever
right now now that we have this disclosure about Secretary Hexseth,
essentially saying kill them all.
Speaker 8 (08:48):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (08:49):
So you listen there to Van Holland, he just accused
the President and Pete Headseth a murder and if not murder,
then war crimes. This is three top Democrats now clearly
doing this in an orchestrated manner, going out there and
(09:14):
saying that the president uniteds It's America. Defending the US
from Narco Terrace is something that you should be so
angry about that it should disqualify the President of the
United States of America from being the President of the
United States of America. This is exactly why so many
(09:35):
men and women should be standing behind this president, because
the Left will stop at nothing to try to take
down this president. All right, I want to move to
another important story, and this is a name that some
of you may remember from politics, but it's an important
person with a really big story, and it's about the
(09:59):
Silicon Valley funding of the radical left and the WO
agenda with billions of dollars. Nicole Shanahan is the ex
wife of the Google co founder, a guy by the
last name Brent. She has the former running mate, by
the way, of RFK Junior and someone who personally signed
(10:19):
nine figure philanthropy checks. She just went full whistle blower
on the entire Silicon Valley as she describes it, the
tech wife mafia, and how the tech wife mafia is used.
Now those are her exact words. I want you to
(10:40):
listen to what she had to say in this whistle
blower type interview where she talks about the corruption of
Silicon Valley and the corruption of the as she describes it,
the tech wife mafia and what they are doing to
influence your family, your kids, your grandkids, public education schools
(11:03):
at the highest level. It is truly shocking. Listen to
what she said.
Speaker 9 (11:10):
But what happened around the pandemic is that this whole
other segment, what I don't think many of the tech
mafia wives realize is that they were used to set
the groundwork for what was called like the Reset, what
(11:30):
is called generally as like the Reset by the Klaus Schwabs,
like the Reset, the great Reset. Yeah. They I mean
they openly talk about this great Reset. Yeah. So the
tech wive mafias, I believe, were kind of being conscripted
in many ways and their money, especially as being conscripted
in to set the groundwork for the Great Reset.
Speaker 3 (11:54):
Yeah, specifically through.
Speaker 9 (11:58):
Specifically through a network of non NGEO advisors, relationship with Hollywood,
relationship with Davos and their own companies. So if you
(12:20):
look at like who's on these boards, who hangs out
with each other, how these culture, how the culture of
tech wealth works like Silicon Valley tech wealth, and that
small group of people responsible for a huge amount of
money and a huge amount of envy NGO activity across
the United States. It's a really small group of people,
(12:42):
and it's a really small group of people making these
decisions and then and then completely blind to everything else
that's going on and how their groundwork is being used
to then enable these other policies, these great reset policies.
(13:04):
You know, what this group of women doesn't realize is
that in their haste, these women are all very busy.
They have multiple properties, they have tons of staff, they
have staff issues, chronic staff issues, Their kids are busy.
Their kids oftentimes have some health issues as well. A
(13:25):
lot of them have relationship issues with their husbands, and
a lot of them themselves are like medicated on SSRIs
and antidepressants and all of that because it's just overwhelming.
So it's chaos, and these women find their meaning through
(13:48):
their philanthropic work, and they find themselves like I would
find myself. That was my self worth, was my philanthropic work,
and I really believed in it. I really believe that
I was giving black communities a chance to rise up
out of oppression. I really believe that I was helping
(14:09):
Indigenous communities rise up out of oppression. And now that
I look back and see how all those grants are performing,
you know, because my version of successes, those communities are
actually uplifted. Yeah, not just more money pumped into them.
Not just more money. No, the problems of the community
have gotten worse. Crime in the community has gotten worse,
(14:30):
mental health in the Native community, the Indigenous community has
gotten worse. They will even say the Indigenous community will
even say that their biggest supporters in Congress have been Republicans,
but yet they continue to vote Democrat. Yeah right, I
mean that is that is this, It's like the whole
(14:53):
model is broken, the whole model makes everybody worse off,
and now we're contending with the freaking great reset that
we're now realizing is the terrible idea.
Speaker 3 (15:05):
Yeah, yeah, and.
Speaker 9 (15:06):
That many of our climate changes use are geoengineering issues. Yeah. Well,
which is like at the end of the day, they
always go to that, they're like, but climate change, and
then that really is the end all be all, Like
you have to let us do this because of climate change. Yeah,
social justice and climate change. It always boils down to
those two things, and it gets progressive women one hundred
(15:28):
percent of the time it does.
Speaker 3 (15:30):
It does.
Speaker 1 (15:31):
So let's just go back to some of the things
that she said. Number when she said, this is clear
groundwork being laid for the Great Reset. She says, their money,
especially was being conscripted through a network of non governmental
organizations advisors all right, Hollywood Davos and their own coming.
So this is a worldwide thing, she says. She said,
(15:53):
it's a group of really smart people, a small group
of people, completely blind to how their groundwork is being
used to enable these Great Reset policies. Then, she says,
these women find their meaning through philanthropic work, right, so
that would be a good thing. They don't realize they're
actually being used. I really believe I was helping black
(16:15):
communities and indigenous communities rise up, she said, But now
the problems have gotten worse. Crime is worth mental health worst.
The whole model is broken, she said. At the end
of the day, they always go but climate change, social
justice plus climate change against progressive women one hundred percent
of the time. Now, if you look at what this
(16:41):
really boils down to, this is the radical left, not
just in the United States of America, but the radical
left socialists, Marxists and communists around the world who have
figured out how to take other radicals that have billions,
these billionaires, and they connect with the wives and they say,
(17:03):
you can have a huge difference, and you can give
us all this money. And really what it's coming down to,
it's not actually helping people. It's about political power and control.
This is all about the great reset, and it's not
just in the United States of America. It goes back
to what she described in Davos, and by the way,
absolutely correct in what she's describing here. She is telling
(17:27):
you that what we've been warning you about is real,
and she was the one that was signing the checks,
and that she's also saying, look, a lot of us
are taking advantage of they see these women. They have
connections to billions of dollars or millions of dollars and
they're like, great, we got to get a piece of
(17:49):
that action. We got to get a piece of that.
And we'll go to these women and we'll tell them
that they're having and making a phenomenal impact, a phenomenal day.
Friends in people's lives. Just write us a chat, give
us the money in Bam. We're happy, we're good, everything's fine.
There's nothing wrong here. It's all good. And what really
(18:11):
ends up happening, as you heard her say there, as
she showed you, is they're taking the money for a
grand reset. I think this is one of those moments
where everyone should really, really really pay attention to what
was ces said there and see it for what it is.
(18:32):
She is telling you the game plan, she's telling you
how they're doing it. She's telling you what their overall
goal is. She was a part of it. When they
tell you what they're doing, believe them. Notice it's not
actually about all the work she thought she was getting done.
I think that's another really important part of this. What
(18:55):
you're hearing there and what she's telling you is I
also think extreme important. They're using what they say they're
going to use the money for, not even close to
what it actually is about. It is a total lie,
a lie that is made up, a lie that is
(19:16):
clearly made up just to get you on board, when
the reality is it's all about power and control. President
Trump now is warning all Americans about a real national
security threat. It is people coming into this country that
were unvetted from Afghanistan and other nations, including a wide
(19:40):
open border where people on the terrorists watch lists were
allowed to come in under the Biden administration. What are
Democrats saying after the attack on the National guardsmen and
another Afghan restrueg that has been arrested for planning a
terrorist attack, They're now saying the President is being a
racist for say exactly what needed to be said, that
(20:02):
there's a real national security threat in this country that
was allowed in here because a lack of vetting by
our government. I want to go back to the terror attack,
and I want to remind you that four years ago,
we knew that the Biden administration was lacking a vetting
process of Afghan nationals that were inviting in essence, terrorists
(20:26):
to come into our country that did actually happen. We
knew it was a problem, and we knew the administration
was lying about it. We also know Anthony Blincoln at
the time confirmed that child brides had been evacuated with
older men from Afghanistan into the United States of America,
yet again showing that there was a lack of vetting
(20:50):
of the people that were allowed to come into America.
I want you to listen to Tony Blinkin confirming child
bribes that were evacuated with older men from Afghanistan, and
we let it happen in this country. We didn't stop,
we didn't ask questions, and we did not vet them.
But first, I want to tell you about our friends
(21:10):
over Patriot Mobile. Every so often, something happens that reminds
us just how fragile our freedoms are. We can't afford
to take our rights for granted. We must draw a
line in the sand, and our friends at Patriot Mobile
have been doing just that for more than twelve years.
The truth is there is only one provider that boldly
(21:31):
stands in the gap for Americans who believe freedom is
we're fighting for, and that company is Patriot Mobile. Not
only are they leading the red economy, they're also outpacing
the competition and technology. Patriot Mobile is one of the
only carriers offering premium access to all three major US networks,
(21:51):
giving you nationwide coverage and service that you can count
on day after day. They also offer unlimited data plans,
mobile hotspots, international roaming, internet backup in so much more,
and switching has never been easier. You can activate in
minutes on your phone from your home or your office
and you keep your same number. You've got now keep
(22:13):
your same phone or upgrade to a new one. And
this is where the magic happens. Every month, about five
percent of your bill is given back to conservative causes
at no extra cost to you that stand up for
our First and our Second Amendment rights, the rights of
unborn children, and are wounded warriors and those that have
fought for a country and wear a badge. So take
(22:35):
a stand today and make a difference with every call
you make. Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson or nine
to seven to two Patriot. Use the promo code ferguson
for a free month of service as well. That's Patriotmobile
dot com slash ferguson or nine seven to two Patriot
and make the switch and make a difference with every
(22:57):
call you make. All right, So now we get to
this audio of Anthony Blincoln testifying in Congress Center Cruz
asking him questions about the lack of vetting of so
many people coming into this country from Afghanistan, including old
men with extremely young girls quote taking them as their wives.
Listen to this, But.
Speaker 10 (23:17):
I want to ask you flat out, did the State
Department give the Taliban a list or multiple list of
Americans and or Afghans that we wanted.
Speaker 2 (23:26):
Out those reports?
Speaker 8 (23:28):
And the idea that we would do anything to endanger
our citizens or anyone else at a time when we
were trying to save their lives, is flat out wrongs.
Speaker 2 (23:37):
Let me just like a yes or no, did you
give them?
Speaker 8 (23:39):
Let me get Let me be very clear, a senator,
if I may please thank you. In limited instances where
we were seeking to get a bus or a group
of people through a checkpoint, we gave a manifest to
the people at the checkpoint to demonstrate that those people
were expectedly.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
How many names were on the list.
Speaker 8 (24:00):
You gave it doesn't matter because they all.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
Dozen, the hundreds, thousands, give us some order of magnitude.
This happened in a handful of situations where to dozens.
So is it your testimony, it wasn't hundreds. I want
to understand, did you give them thousands of names?
Speaker 8 (24:12):
Now we did not, Okay, hundreds, not going to put
a number on it, but it was again.
Speaker 2 (24:17):
Why not?
Speaker 10 (24:17):
This is a hearing to discover how many names and
how many of those individuals you gave the Taliban the
name to have been targeted for torture or murder.
Speaker 8 (24:25):
Senator, by definition, these were in limited instances with a
bus or a group of people to get them through
a checkpoint. They got through the checkpoint.
Speaker 10 (24:34):
So not only did you fail to evacuate Americans and
Green card holders who were there, but you also brought
in tens of thousands of Afghans who had wholly inadequate vetting,
bringing many of them to the United States. And one
of the things that has done is that has brought
in a humanitarian crisis to America. Child marriage and domestic
(24:57):
abuse tragically or widespread in Afghanistan. According to the World
Health Organization, more than half of the women in Afghanistan
are married as child brides and ninety percent of women
are subject to domestic abuse ninety percent. On August twenty seventh,
according to public reports, you distributed internal documentation highlighting numerous
(25:20):
instances and intake centers of sexual abuse in which much
older grown Afghan males appeared with children. Young children claimed
they were their brides, claimed they were their wives, and
the document said the State Department urgently requested guidance.
Speaker 2 (25:39):
That was your word urgently.
Speaker 10 (25:42):
Subsequently, Department of Homeland Security said that it showed the
desperation of families that they were willing to give little
girls to grown men to be subject to sexual abuse
and child wives. My question is as follows, did you
receive that urgent guidance? How many child ldren have been
subject to sexual abuse? What have you done to rescue
(26:04):
young children from illegal and abusive relationships after being brought
to America by the State Department.
Speaker 8 (26:13):
Across the entire government, everyone involved in the evacuation effort,
whether it's at a transit point in one of the
countries that we negotiated with, whether it's here in the
United States at Dulles or Philadelphia or the military bases,
we have all of our officers at extreme vigilance to
look for and to deal with any cases or concerns
(26:39):
that he's.
Speaker 2 (26:40):
The urgent guidance And how many child guides have you seen?
Speaker 8 (26:43):
I don't know the specific guidance you're referring to. I'm
happy to look to look at it.
Speaker 2 (26:47):
So is there not urgency to discover its abuse?
Speaker 8 (26:52):
We could detect and deal with at any cases and
there have been, to my knowledge, a limited number of
cases where we have separated people because we were concerned.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
That they were how they are.
Speaker 8 (27:05):
The cases I'm aware of a handful.
Speaker 1 (27:08):
So this was a disaster that was predictable. This is
a disaster that is still unfolding because we don't know
how many people are actually in this country that should
have never been here, which brings me to the Trump administration.
They're having to clean up a massive national security threat,
which brings me to Attorney General Pam Bondi. She said
(27:30):
on this week's broadcast a Fox News Sunday that the
suspected shooter of the two National Guard troops in d
C not only should have never been in this country,
but host Martha McCollums said, quote, let's start with the
question of vetting. The Washington Post reported this counter terrorism
officials did that the Guard shooting suspect before he entered
(27:52):
the US. One of the individuals they talked to said
the suspect was vetted years ago before working with the
CIA inf Game Aanistan, and then again before he arrived
in the US in twenty twenty one. Those examinations involved
both the National counter Terrorism Center as well as the CIA.
So where are we in the tracking the path of
(28:13):
the suspect? What was something that was missed in the
vetting process? Or was he possibly radicalized once he got here?
Now listen closely to what Pam Bondi the AG said
in response. She said, quote, So, first, the one that
you talked about that happened days before the Thanksgiving shooting,
that one he was he had been through Operation Allies
(28:38):
Welcome program, minimal to little vetting. I was on the
phone last night with Secretary Christynome at length. They did
not do biometrics, they did not do social media. Now
they're clearly referring to the quote vetting process under the
Biden administration, which even when they claimed they vetted people,
(29:00):
it wasn't very good or even real even close to
what you should have done. Back to her comments, they
did very little, if minimal, vetting on all of these people.
And now, to take a step back, we have one
point five million backlog of people that have come into
our country. And as you said, these people are being radicalized.
(29:21):
We know that this shooter who shot her National guardsmen
in DC the day before Thanksgiving, he was radicalized. You're
going to hear a lot more about that. And these
people should have never been in our country. Under Joe Biden,
he opened our borders. Of course, MS thirteen TDA members
(29:42):
twenty minutes from where you are right now, Shannon, we
caught one of the worst MS thirteen members in the
country of the whole Eastern Seaboard top members, because Joe
Biden let him walk into our country. So you may
hear a narrative by the left that the this guy
was vetted and so something happened after the vetting was
(30:04):
done the right way. What we're actually learning is that
the vetting was a joke, that it was barely a
check your box type of vetting. It certainly was not
a vetting to keep us safe. And now this administration
is going to have to unwind and look back at
countless people that were led into this country that should
have never been here in the first place. Don't forget
(30:27):
to share this podcast, by the way, with your family
and your friends on social media wherever you can hit
that subscribe or auto download button, and I'll talk to
you again tomorrow
There is a new hoax against Donald Trump, and it's
clearly an orchestrated plan by the Democrats. You've got to
give them credit where credits due. They'll never stop lying
to try to undermine Donald Trump. This time, they're now
accusing the president of war crimes. I wish I was joking,
I'm not. The Democratic Party hates Donald Trump so much
(00:23):
they're now wanting him to be charged with war crimes. Now,
what is the crime that the President of the United
States of America committed.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
It is apparently that he.
Speaker 1 (00:34):
Has gone after terris narco terras, you know, the ones
that are killing countless young people in this country with
FETNL and drug overdoses. Those guys. Yes, they're actually siding
with them over the President of the United States of America,
who has declared them narco terras and therefore has the
(00:54):
right to protect America from them. They're really angry about
one main issue, and that issue is the president ordering
the strikes on those narco terraces and the boats of
drugs that they're running into the United States of America
in international waters. They think now that not the terrorists
should be the ones that are locked up. No, no, no, no,
(01:16):
what they think is that the president of the United
States of America should be locked up for striking those boats.
I wish I was kidding. Senator Mark Kelly, the same
one who told you know, everyone in uniform to disobey
the president's order, had this to say on CNN's Stay
of the Union. Listen carefully the words he chooses to
(01:38):
describe the president's actions.
Speaker 3 (01:40):
Based on what you what CNN is reporting, with the
Washington Post is reporting. Do you believe if there was
a second strike to eliminate any survivors, that that constitutes
a war crime?
Speaker 4 (01:55):
It seems to if that is true, if what has
been reported is accurate, I've got serious concerns about anybody
in that chain of command stepping over a line that
they should never step over.
Speaker 2 (02:11):
We are not Russia, We're not a wreck.
Speaker 5 (02:14):
We hold ourselves to a very high standard of professionalism.
And this is where I'm really troubled about this is
because I have so much respect for people in the
United States Navy. I served in the Navy for twenty
five years, and there is no organization more professional than
Navy seals, and they should be revered. And that's why
I say, I hope what I've heard about this strike
(02:37):
is not accurate.
Speaker 3 (02:38):
You mentioned that you are a captain in the Navy.
If you receive that order, would you have carried it out?
Speaker 2 (02:43):
No?
Speaker 1 (02:44):
No, So there's yet again Senator Mark Kelly saying that
the strikes to kill drug boat traffickers can constitute a
war crime. It seems to if that's true, he claims,
and says he wouldn't have carried out that order yet again,
advocating for insubordination for members in our military to literally
(03:08):
go rogue. He's not the only one that is saying that.
Tim Kane, echoing other Democrats, says the first Caribbean boat
strike rises to the level of a war crime if
the story he says is true of what actually happened.
He went on Sunday's CBS Faced the Nation and said
(03:30):
the first military strike on an alleged drug boat in
the Caribbean rises to the level of a war crime.
The host saying, you're referring to the new Washington Post
report that says that Secretary head Seth called for everyone
on board the first suspected drug boat that was targeted
to be killed. When two people survived, the military went
(03:51):
back in reported with a follow up strike. What questions
do you have for the Pentagon about that situation? Tim
Kaine responding, Well, first, if that reporting is true, it's
a very clear violation of the DD's own laws of
war as well as international law is about the way
you treat people who are in that circumstance, and so
(04:12):
this rises to the level of a war crime if
it's true. And the question that we've been asking for
months or give us the evidence that the folks on
board were really narco traffickers. In one instance, there were
two survivors, one Colombian, one Ecuadorian and a different strike.
Instead of arresting them and prosecuting them, the US picked
(04:32):
them up and returned them to their home countries of origin,
where they were released. So if they were narco traffickers,
why would we do that? We need more evidence about that,
and we definitely need the administration to finally answer the
questions of why strike rather than interdict. If you know
where the ships are, you can interdict, and when you do,
(04:55):
you get evidence. You get individuals, you can squeeze them
to give testament against their high you get evidence with
the drug seizures. And finally, the other question that my
colleagues and I are deeply worried about is the entire
legal rationale for the strikes. We had to pry with
a crowbar after weeks and weeks out of this administration
to suppose legal rationale for the strikes international waters. It
(05:19):
was very shoddy. Because it's classified, I can't tell you
what's in it, but I can tell you it was
not at all pervasive that these are legal actions. And so,
together with a whole series of things, the early retirement
the head of Southcomb, the news at the south Comb's
lead attorneys said the strikes were not lawful, the decision
(05:41):
of allies like the UK to stop sharing intelligence with
the United States in this area because they believe the
strikes are illegal. It's time for Congress to reign in
a present who is deciding to wage war on his
own and says so, which is not what the Constitution allows.
So here's the new lie being put out by the Democrats.
(06:04):
They're now wanting you to believe that the President units
As America, who is keeping us safe from these narco terrorists,
is somehow breaking the law. It's also very interesting that
the narco terrists now best friend their legal counsel. Their
lawyers are literally the Democratic Party and that's not the
only one going on TV. Van Holland said the first
(06:27):
Caribbean boat strike either was a war crime or now
he says that the president flat out murdered the terrorists.
Listen to his words.
Speaker 6 (06:37):
Let me ask you about that Washington Post report on
the attack on that Venezuelan alleged drug vote. What do
you make of what happened there? Do you think there
was a war crime committed?
Speaker 7 (06:49):
Oh, I think it's very possible there was a war
crime committed. Of course, for it to be a war crime,
you have to accept the Trump administration's hold construct here
that were at witches were in armed inflict, at war
with this particular with the drug gangs. Of course they've
never presented the public with the information they've got here,
But it could be worse than that. Right, If that
(07:10):
theory is wrong, then it's plane murder.
Speaker 6 (07:15):
The first strike is murdered in that case.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
That's correct. That's correct.
Speaker 7 (07:18):
Well, I'm saying that it's it's either murder from the
first strike if their whole theory is wrong, and I
think you know the weight of the legal opinion here
is that they've concocted this ridiculous legal theory. But even
if you accept their legal theory, that it is a
war crime. And so I do believe that the Secretary
of Defense should be held accountable for giving those kind
(07:42):
of orders.
Speaker 6 (07:42):
And this is happening as of course, you have the
Secretary of Events also saying that he wants to bring
Senator Mark Kelly back to active duty to put him
before a court martial for telling members of the military
they shouldn't follow illegal orders. Let me ask you, if
that happens, Senator Kelly's one of your colleagues, how will
(08:02):
the Senate respond?
Speaker 7 (08:04):
Well, the Senate would be in uproar because this would
be a blatantly illegal act and another example of the
present's abuse of power. You know, the sixth that the
president is talking about are people who served our country,
unlike the president who decided not to go based on
a bone spur. Apparently, so we have here six real
(08:27):
folks who have been dedicated to our country in the military,
who simply cited the law of the land, which is
that our men and women in the military should follow
lawful orders, which clearly has become more important than ever
right now now that we have this disclosure about Secretary Hexseth,
essentially saying kill them all.
Speaker 8 (08:48):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (08:49):
So you listen there to Van Holland, he just accused
the President and Pete Headseth a murder and if not murder,
then war crimes. This is three top Democrats now clearly
doing this in an orchestrated manner, going out there and
(09:14):
saying that the president uniteds It's America. Defending the US
from Narco Terrace is something that you should be so
angry about that it should disqualify the President of the
United States of America from being the President of the
United States of America. This is exactly why so many
(09:35):
men and women should be standing behind this president, because
the Left will stop at nothing to try to take
down this president. All right, I want to move to
another important story, and this is a name that some
of you may remember from politics, but it's an important
person with a really big story, and it's about the
(09:59):
Silicon Valley funding of the radical left and the WO
agenda with billions of dollars. Nicole Shanahan is the ex
wife of the Google co founder, a guy by the
last name Brent. She has the former running mate, by
the way, of RFK Junior and someone who personally signed
(10:19):
nine figure philanthropy checks. She just went full whistle blower
on the entire Silicon Valley as she describes it, the
tech wife mafia, and how the tech wife mafia is used.
Now those are her exact words. I want you to
(10:40):
listen to what she had to say in this whistle
blower type interview where she talks about the corruption of
Silicon Valley and the corruption of the as she describes it,
the tech wife mafia and what they are doing to
influence your family, your kids, your grandkids, public education schools
(11:03):
at the highest level. It is truly shocking. Listen to
what she said.
Speaker 9 (11:10):
But what happened around the pandemic is that this whole
other segment, what I don't think many of the tech
mafia wives realize is that they were used to set
the groundwork for what was called like the Reset, what
(11:30):
is called generally as like the Reset by the Klaus Schwabs,
like the Reset, the great Reset. Yeah. They I mean
they openly talk about this great Reset. Yeah. So the
tech wive mafias, I believe, were kind of being conscripted
in many ways and their money, especially as being conscripted
in to set the groundwork for the Great Reset.
Speaker 3 (11:54):
Yeah, specifically through.
Speaker 9 (11:58):
Specifically through a network of non NGEO advisors, relationship with Hollywood,
relationship with Davos and their own companies. So if you
(12:20):
look at like who's on these boards, who hangs out
with each other, how these culture, how the culture of
tech wealth works like Silicon Valley tech wealth, and that
small group of people responsible for a huge amount of
money and a huge amount of envy NGO activity across
the United States. It's a really small group of people,
(12:42):
and it's a really small group of people making these
decisions and then and then completely blind to everything else
that's going on and how their groundwork is being used
to then enable these other policies, these great reset policies.
(13:04):
You know, what this group of women doesn't realize is
that in their haste, these women are all very busy.
They have multiple properties, they have tons of staff, they
have staff issues, chronic staff issues, Their kids are busy.
Their kids oftentimes have some health issues as well. A
(13:25):
lot of them have relationship issues with their husbands, and
a lot of them themselves are like medicated on SSRIs
and antidepressants and all of that because it's just overwhelming.
So it's chaos, and these women find their meaning through
(13:48):
their philanthropic work, and they find themselves like I would
find myself. That was my self worth, was my philanthropic work,
and I really believed in it. I really believe that
I was giving black communities a chance to rise up
out of oppression. I really believe that I was helping
(14:09):
Indigenous communities rise up out of oppression. And now that
I look back and see how all those grants are performing,
you know, because my version of successes, those communities are
actually uplifted. Yeah, not just more money pumped into them.
Not just more money. No, the problems of the community
have gotten worse. Crime in the community has gotten worse,
(14:30):
mental health in the Native community, the Indigenous community has
gotten worse. They will even say the Indigenous community will
even say that their biggest supporters in Congress have been Republicans,
but yet they continue to vote Democrat. Yeah right, I
mean that is that is this, It's like the whole
(14:53):
model is broken, the whole model makes everybody worse off,
and now we're contending with the freaking great reset that
we're now realizing is the terrible idea.
Speaker 3 (15:05):
Yeah, yeah, and.
Speaker 9 (15:06):
That many of our climate changes use are geoengineering issues. Yeah. Well,
which is like at the end of the day, they
always go to that, they're like, but climate change, and
then that really is the end all be all, Like
you have to let us do this because of climate change. Yeah,
social justice and climate change. It always boils down to
those two things, and it gets progressive women one hundred
(15:28):
percent of the time it does.
Speaker 3 (15:30):
It does.
Speaker 1 (15:31):
So let's just go back to some of the things
that she said. Number when she said, this is clear
groundwork being laid for the Great Reset. She says, their money,
especially was being conscripted through a network of non governmental
organizations advisors all right, Hollywood Davos and their own coming.
So this is a worldwide thing, she says. She said,
(15:53):
it's a group of really smart people, a small group
of people, completely blind to how their groundwork is being
used to enable these Great Reset policies. Then, she says,
these women find their meaning through philanthropic work, right, so
that would be a good thing. They don't realize they're
actually being used. I really believe I was helping black
(16:15):
communities and indigenous communities rise up, she said, But now
the problems have gotten worse. Crime is worth mental health worst.
The whole model is broken, she said. At the end
of the day, they always go but climate change, social
justice plus climate change against progressive women one hundred percent
of the time. Now, if you look at what this
(16:41):
really boils down to, this is the radical left, not
just in the United States of America, but the radical
left socialists, Marxists and communists around the world who have
figured out how to take other radicals that have billions,
these billionaires, and they connect with the wives and they say,
(17:03):
you can have a huge difference, and you can give
us all this money. And really what it's coming down to,
it's not actually helping people. It's about political power and control.
This is all about the great reset, and it's not
just in the United States of America. It goes back
to what she described in Davos, and by the way,
absolutely correct in what she's describing here. She is telling
(17:27):
you that what we've been warning you about is real,
and she was the one that was signing the checks,
and that she's also saying, look, a lot of us
are taking advantage of they see these women. They have
connections to billions of dollars or millions of dollars and
they're like, great, we got to get a piece of
(17:49):
that action. We got to get a piece of that.
And we'll go to these women and we'll tell them
that they're having and making a phenomenal impact, a phenomenal day.
Friends in people's lives. Just write us a chat, give
us the money in Bam. We're happy, we're good, everything's fine.
There's nothing wrong here. It's all good. And what really
(18:11):
ends up happening, as you heard her say there, as
she showed you, is they're taking the money for a
grand reset. I think this is one of those moments
where everyone should really, really really pay attention to what
was ces said there and see it for what it is.
(18:32):
She is telling you the game plan, she's telling you
how they're doing it. She's telling you what their overall
goal is. She was a part of it. When they
tell you what they're doing, believe them. Notice it's not
actually about all the work she thought she was getting done.
I think that's another really important part of this. What
(18:55):
you're hearing there and what she's telling you is I
also think extreme important. They're using what they say they're
going to use the money for, not even close to
what it actually is about. It is a total lie,
a lie that is made up, a lie that is
(19:16):
clearly made up just to get you on board, when
the reality is it's all about power and control. President
Trump now is warning all Americans about a real national
security threat. It is people coming into this country that
were unvetted from Afghanistan and other nations, including a wide
(19:40):
open border where people on the terrorists watch lists were
allowed to come in under the Biden administration. What are
Democrats saying after the attack on the National guardsmen and
another Afghan restrueg that has been arrested for planning a
terrorist attack, They're now saying the President is being a
racist for say exactly what needed to be said, that
(20:02):
there's a real national security threat in this country that
was allowed in here because a lack of vetting by
our government. I want to go back to the terror attack,
and I want to remind you that four years ago,
we knew that the Biden administration was lacking a vetting
process of Afghan nationals that were inviting in essence, terrorists
(20:26):
to come into our country that did actually happen. We
knew it was a problem, and we knew the administration
was lying about it. We also know Anthony Blincoln at
the time confirmed that child brides had been evacuated with
older men from Afghanistan into the United States of America,
yet again showing that there was a lack of vetting
(20:50):
of the people that were allowed to come into America.
I want you to listen to Tony Blinkin confirming child
bribes that were evacuated with older men from Afghanistan, and
we let it happen in this country. We didn't stop,
we didn't ask questions, and we did not vet them.
But first, I want to tell you about our friends
(21:10):
over Patriot Mobile. Every so often, something happens that reminds
us just how fragile our freedoms are. We can't afford
to take our rights for granted. We must draw a
line in the sand, and our friends at Patriot Mobile
have been doing just that for more than twelve years.
The truth is there is only one provider that boldly
(21:31):
stands in the gap for Americans who believe freedom is
we're fighting for, and that company is Patriot Mobile. Not
only are they leading the red economy, they're also outpacing
the competition and technology. Patriot Mobile is one of the
only carriers offering premium access to all three major US networks,
(21:51):
giving you nationwide coverage and service that you can count
on day after day. They also offer unlimited data plans,
mobile hotspots, international roaming, internet backup in so much more,
and switching has never been easier. You can activate in
minutes on your phone from your home or your office
and you keep your same number. You've got now keep
(22:13):
your same phone or upgrade to a new one. And
this is where the magic happens. Every month, about five
percent of your bill is given back to conservative causes
at no extra cost to you that stand up for
our First and our Second Amendment rights, the rights of
unborn children, and are wounded warriors and those that have
fought for a country and wear a badge. So take
(22:35):
a stand today and make a difference with every call
you make. Patriot Mobile dot com slash ferguson or nine
to seven to two Patriot. Use the promo code ferguson
for a free month of service as well. That's Patriotmobile
dot com slash ferguson or nine seven to two Patriot
and make the switch and make a difference with every
(22:57):
call you make. All right, So now we get to
this audio of Anthony Blincoln testifying in Congress Center Cruz
asking him questions about the lack of vetting of so
many people coming into this country from Afghanistan, including old
men with extremely young girls quote taking them as their wives.
Listen to this, But.
Speaker 10 (23:17):
I want to ask you flat out, did the State
Department give the Taliban a list or multiple list of
Americans and or Afghans that we wanted.
Speaker 2 (23:26):
Out those reports?
Speaker 8 (23:28):
And the idea that we would do anything to endanger
our citizens or anyone else at a time when we
were trying to save their lives, is flat out wrongs.
Speaker 2 (23:37):
Let me just like a yes or no, did you
give them?
Speaker 8 (23:39):
Let me get Let me be very clear, a senator,
if I may please thank you. In limited instances where
we were seeking to get a bus or a group
of people through a checkpoint, we gave a manifest to
the people at the checkpoint to demonstrate that those people
were expectedly.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
How many names were on the list.
Speaker 8 (24:00):
You gave it doesn't matter because they all.
Speaker 2 (24:02):
Dozen, the hundreds, thousands, give us some order of magnitude.
This happened in a handful of situations where to dozens.
So is it your testimony, it wasn't hundreds. I want
to understand, did you give them thousands of names?
Speaker 8 (24:12):
Now we did not, Okay, hundreds, not going to put
a number on it, but it was again.
Speaker 2 (24:17):
Why not?
Speaker 10 (24:17):
This is a hearing to discover how many names and
how many of those individuals you gave the Taliban the
name to have been targeted for torture or murder.
Speaker 8 (24:25):
Senator, by definition, these were in limited instances with a
bus or a group of people to get them through
a checkpoint. They got through the checkpoint.
Speaker 10 (24:34):
So not only did you fail to evacuate Americans and
Green card holders who were there, but you also brought
in tens of thousands of Afghans who had wholly inadequate vetting,
bringing many of them to the United States. And one
of the things that has done is that has brought
in a humanitarian crisis to America. Child marriage and domestic
(24:57):
abuse tragically or widespread in Afghanistan. According to the World
Health Organization, more than half of the women in Afghanistan
are married as child brides and ninety percent of women
are subject to domestic abuse ninety percent. On August twenty seventh,
according to public reports, you distributed internal documentation highlighting numerous
(25:20):
instances and intake centers of sexual abuse in which much
older grown Afghan males appeared with children. Young children claimed
they were their brides, claimed they were their wives, and
the document said the State Department urgently requested guidance.
Speaker 2 (25:39):
That was your word urgently.
Speaker 10 (25:42):
Subsequently, Department of Homeland Security said that it showed the
desperation of families that they were willing to give little
girls to grown men to be subject to sexual abuse
and child wives. My question is as follows, did you
receive that urgent guidance? How many child ldren have been
subject to sexual abuse? What have you done to rescue
(26:04):
young children from illegal and abusive relationships after being brought
to America by the State Department.
Speaker 8 (26:13):
Across the entire government, everyone involved in the evacuation effort,
whether it's at a transit point in one of the
countries that we negotiated with, whether it's here in the
United States at Dulles or Philadelphia or the military bases,
we have all of our officers at extreme vigilance to
look for and to deal with any cases or concerns
(26:39):
that he's.
Speaker 2 (26:40):
The urgent guidance And how many child guides have you seen?
Speaker 8 (26:43):
I don't know the specific guidance you're referring to. I'm
happy to look to look at it.
Speaker 2 (26:47):
So is there not urgency to discover its abuse?
Speaker 8 (26:52):
We could detect and deal with at any cases and
there have been, to my knowledge, a limited number of
cases where we have separated people because we were concerned.
Speaker 2 (27:02):
That they were how they are.
Speaker 8 (27:05):
The cases I'm aware of a handful.
Speaker 1 (27:08):
So this was a disaster that was predictable. This is
a disaster that is still unfolding because we don't know
how many people are actually in this country that should
have never been here, which brings me to the Trump administration.
They're having to clean up a massive national security threat,
which brings me to Attorney General Pam Bondi. She said
(27:30):
on this week's broadcast a Fox News Sunday that the
suspected shooter of the two National Guard troops in d
C not only should have never been in this country,
but host Martha McCollums said, quote, let's start with the
question of vetting. The Washington Post reported this counter terrorism
officials did that the Guard shooting suspect before he entered
(27:52):
the US. One of the individuals they talked to said
the suspect was vetted years ago before working with the
CIA inf Game Aanistan, and then again before he arrived
in the US in twenty twenty one. Those examinations involved
both the National counter Terrorism Center as well as the CIA.
So where are we in the tracking the path of
(28:13):
the suspect? What was something that was missed in the
vetting process? Or was he possibly radicalized once he got here?
Now listen closely to what Pam Bondi the AG said
in response. She said, quote, So, first, the one that
you talked about that happened days before the Thanksgiving shooting,
that one he was he had been through Operation Allies
(28:38):
Welcome program, minimal to little vetting. I was on the
phone last night with Secretary Christynome at length. They did
not do biometrics, they did not do social media. Now
they're clearly referring to the quote vetting process under the
Biden administration, which even when they claimed they vetted people,
(29:00):
it wasn't very good or even real even close to
what you should have done. Back to her comments, they
did very little, if minimal, vetting on all of these people.
And now, to take a step back, we have one
point five million backlog of people that have come into
our country. And as you said, these people are being radicalized.
(29:21):
We know that this shooter who shot her National guardsmen
in DC the day before Thanksgiving, he was radicalized. You're
going to hear a lot more about that. And these
people should have never been in our country. Under Joe Biden,
he opened our borders. Of course, MS thirteen TDA members
(29:42):
twenty minutes from where you are right now, Shannon, we
caught one of the worst MS thirteen members in the
country of the whole Eastern Seaboard top members, because Joe
Biden let him walk into our country. So you may
hear a narrative by the left that the this guy
was vetted and so something happened after the vetting was
(30:04):
done the right way. What we're actually learning is that
the vetting was a joke, that it was barely a
check your box type of vetting. It certainly was not
a vetting to keep us safe. And now this administration
is going to have to unwind and look back at
countless people that were led into this country that should
have never been here in the first place. Don't forget
(30:27):
to share this podcast, by the way, with your family
and your friends on social media wherever you can hit
that subscribe or auto download button, and I'll talk to
you again tomorrow
Host
Ben Ferguson
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Male Room with Dr. Jesse Mills
As Director of The Men’s Clinic at UCLA, Dr. Jesse Mills has spent his career helping men understand their bodies, their hormones, and their health. Now he’s bringing that expertise to The Male Room — a podcast where data-driven medicine meets common sense. Each episode separates fact from hype, science from snake oil, and gives men the tools to live longer, stronger, and happier lives. With candor, humor, and real-world experience from the exam room and the operating room, Dr. Mills breaks down the latest health headlines, dissects trends, and explains what actually works — and what doesn’t. Smart, straightforward, and entertaining, The Male Room is the show that helps men take charge of their health without the jargon.