September 12, 2024 • 29 mins
In this episode, Lisa and Congressman Chip Roy discuss the recent debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, highlighting media bias and the candidates' performances. Lisa criticizes the media for favoring Harris and urges Trump to be more assertive in challenging her policies. Congressman Roy agrees, emphasizing the lack of substance in Harris's proposals and the importance of voter integrity. He advocates for the SAVE Act, which requires proof of citizenship for voter registration. The episode also delves into immigration issues, with Lisa & Rep. Roy expressing concerns about the impact of current policies on American workers and communities. The Truth with Lisa Boothe is part of the Clay Travis & Buck Sexton Podcast Network - new episodes debut every Monday & Thursday.
Follow Clay & Buck on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/clayandbuck
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
I'm sure a lot of us are having the same
thoughts after watching the debate. We know because in the
Media Research Center that ABC's coverage of Kamala Harris has
been one hundred percent positive while their coverage of Donald
Trump has been ninety three percent negative.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
Well, we saw that during the debate.
Speaker 1 (00:20):
David Muhror and Lindsey Davis might as well have been
wearing Kamala for President t shirts. If they incredible hold
what they were wearing, I'm sure it would be under there.
They kept intervening to fact check Donald Trump. They pressed
Donald Trump multiple times. Guess how many times they fact
checked Kamala Harris zero. Guess how many times they pressed
(00:42):
Kamala Harris for follow ups zero. They let her get
away with lying about things like Charlottesville.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
We know that it's been debunked.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
Donald Trump outright said that he condemned the neo Nazis
and the KKK. She lied about the blood bath comment.
He was talking about what she would do to the
automobile industry with her push for electric vehicles.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
So it was tough.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
It was a three against one environment for Donald Trump. Now,
I will say you could tell that she did her
homework as I tweeted out, she studied her lines, she
remembered her lines, but she doesn't know what any of
them mean. That's a challenge with Kamala Harris. Not only
would she represent a continuation of the same failed policies
of Joe Biden, but we know that she's further the left.
(01:26):
She said that her values haven't changed. Those values make
her to the left of Bernie Sanders. She should be
in a commune with him in Vermont, not in the
White House. Bernie Sanders when I meet the press recently
saying that she was a progressive, she's just trying to
moderate for the general election.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
She really offered no solutions last night.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
It took her forever to even put up any policy
positions on her website. We know that she stole a
lot of those policy positions from Joe Biden. And then
beyond that, some of the things that she's put forward
have been slammed by her own sarrogates. You look at
things like taxing unrealized gains. Well, Representative Ocanna went on
CNBC slamming that, saying that's not a good idea, we don't.
Speaker 2 (02:03):
Need to do that. Well, he's her arrogate.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
Or her ideas to for price controls pretty much universally slammed,
even by liberal outlets as well. But she studied, she
did her homework. We could tell that. As much as
I love Donald Trump, I want him to win this selection.
He has to win this election election. I don't want
to see America with another four years of what we
have been put through. I don't think the Republic could
(02:26):
survive that. But he was undisciplined, he did miss opportunities.
Now it is challenging when it's three against one. No
one else is going to prosecute this case against Kamala Harris.
The media is not going to do it, as they
pointed out earlier one hundred percent positive of coverage from ABC.
They're not going to do it. The media wants her
to win. It's all resting on his shoulders. He's got
to be the guy taking the case against Kamala Harris.
(02:47):
The irony and what frustrated me is her standing there
and saying, look, I'm running a people powered campaign.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
My campaign's all about the people. No, it's not. You
were installed, lady.
Speaker 1 (02:56):
You were installed in backroom dealing between billion dollar donors
in party elites and even black Lives Matter Marxist group,
which she should celebrate because her dad was a Marxist.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
She's a Marxist.
Speaker 1 (03:07):
But they even said of the process that a twenty
four hour process of talking to party bosses is not democratic,
nor is it a process democrats should be part of,
continuing by saying, we do not live in a dictatorship.
Delegates are not oligarchs. So the idea that she is
running a people powered campaign is such a lie. Donald
Trump should have said, you know what, I'm a billionaire.
I didn't need this. I ran in twenty sixteen because
(03:30):
I care about the direction of the country. I'm a patriot,
and that's why I'm doing it again, after all the
abuse that I've taken, what you put my family through,
I'm still running for the people. He is the people
powered candidate, not her, But.
Speaker 2 (03:42):
She was allowed to lie.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
The only thing that gives me hope about the takeaway
from the debate is you look at some recent polling
by the New York Times and finding that sixty one
percent of Americans say they want the next president to
bring major change, and a majority of voters believe that
Donald Trump is the change candidate. Or just get down
to the basic question of am I better off now
under this current administration or was I better off under
(04:06):
Donald Trump? And the answer is clearly Donald Trump. There's
also a New York Times article where they talk to
some undecided voters, and some of those voters said things like, well,
when Trump was in office, not going to lie, I
was living way better. I've never been so down as
in the past four years. It's been so hard for me.
Another person also said that they did not see much
of a difference between Biden and Kamala Harris and that
(04:27):
they wanted change. So all hope is not lost. You know,
I'm not gonna lie and say that it was a
great night for us. That was a great night for
Donald Trump. Now we'll make a material impact on the election,
I don't think so, but you know, onward and upward. Right,
this is an important election. So we've just got to pray,
we've got to get out and vote, and you know,
we've got to look alive and take this very seriously,
(04:49):
and take her seriously too, because she's clearly putting in
the work and doing the homework. All right, So moving
on from that, I just you know, how to get
that off my chest. But Anyways, we're going to cover
that debate with Congressman Ship Roy of Texas. We're also
going to talk about a crucial piece of legislation that
he has been fighting for. And you know, it's also
another thing that's frustrating, is so much a public policy
is common sense. Yet the Democrats continue to ignore common sense,
(05:12):
which really makes you believe the whole point, the whole intention,
the whole design is to destroy your country. He's been
fighting for this Stave Act and literally all it does
is require new voters to submit proof of United States
citizenship like a passport or a birth certificate in order
to register to vote. Isn't it something that we should
all stand for. Wouldn't that make sense to make sure
(05:35):
that only American citizens are voting? So why has there
been so much resistance to it? What does that tell
you about the intentions of importing millions of illegal aliens
to the United States. But we're going to get into
all of this with Congressman Shiproy, the debate and why
he's fighting so hard for the Stave Act.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Stay tuned, Congressman Ship Roy, A lot has.
Speaker 1 (06:03):
Gained until last time you came on the pod of
the podcast. We are looking at an entirely new world
since an assassination attempt, and entirely new Democrat ticket. You know,
I assumed you watched the debate last night. I found
myself infuriated at it. And we saw the Media Research
(06:23):
Center recently, did you know surveys a study finding that
ABC's coverage of Kamala Harris has been one hundred percent positive. Well,
there were coverage of Donald Trump's been ninety three percent negative.
I mean that was on display last night. What are
your takeaways from the debate.
Speaker 3 (06:40):
Well, I mean, I think everybody watching it could see
the questions by ABC were as saltballs for Kamalan for
you know, obviously they were trying to, you know, ask
point of questions of prosident Trump at you know, but
we knew that going in, right, I mean, that is
one of those things that you know and you go
to expect. There's a reason that they wanted to reject
a five debate. They you know that they only accepted
(07:02):
the terms of this one. So you know, like my
takeaway is, I think we're gonna we're pretty much at
the status quo ante. I think where we are is
where we were heading into the debate. I don't think
he moved the needle one way or the other whole
lot in either direction. I don't think there was much
that was gonna I think it was going to take
a breakout moment of something huge to crack through the
(07:23):
news to shift the debate. The people that want by
President Harris are lockedloaded, even to want President Trump are
locked and loaded. Then we're we're fighting over the stuff
in the middle in a handful of states. Right, That's
just the nature of this election. Anybody with a political
pulse knows that. I think, Uh, I think the vice
president offered no real substance. That's nothing uh new. This
(07:45):
is what we expect out of the vice president. If
you follow it, you're a conservative. I think, uh before
President Trump offered substance on a lot of key issues
that were important. I do think there were a couple
of things that I wish you would knocked it out
of the park. On the set up on the borderscore
the immigration question, you know, as opposed to talking about
the the rallies and stuff. I would rather come in
(08:06):
punching and swinging on the border. But but I look,
at the end of the day, there was a very
clear distation here. Somebody is to actually secure the border
and somebody's not. She got away with lies like I'm
not going to bay your guns, but she literally put
out a statement a few days before, I'm going to
bang your result weapon, you know, which is you know,
eighty cint of an ar and so forth. So it's
just normal. It's what we would expect. We're status quo
anti and we got to turn the boat out. It's
(08:27):
going to be a ground game. Boat turn out, get
your people to the polls to make sure you beat
the other side. That's what this is going to boil down.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
To word Trump benefits is the fact that you know,
one just on the basic question, are you better off
now under this administration or you have better off utter Trump?
And then you know, secondly, we had the New York
Times Ciena poll recently finding that six percent sixty one
percent of Americans say the next president needs to bring
major change, and then finding that, you know, Donald Trump,
(08:53):
which candidate represents major change? Fifty three percent, Donald Trump,
Kamala Harris twenty five percent. And I don't know if
she did an off in last night's to be one
to separate herself from Joe Biden or too, as you
pointed out, laying out any sort of groundwork that she's
the change candidate.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
Right, Yeah, it is a good point. She obviously knows
she used to do that because she made that statement
that you know, you're not running against Joe Biden or
whatever I'm paraphrasing whatever that was. And so it's clear
that that was pre planned, right the way everything she
said was pre planned. I mean, it was very clearly
was scripted. So that that's those are tells, and I
think that's actually important. I think somebody had an interesting
(09:31):
observation that by on the race question, rather than just
you know, kind of lap you know, kind of lapping
it off in Kamala haristyle, she went straight to the
central park, you know, five, she went to some of
the other issues, which somebody observed, Hey, that I think
she's concerned that President Trump is stealing some of the
black mail boat and and and black boats. So I
(09:52):
think I think there were some tells throughout the entirety
of the debate. I think your observation is correct that
she didn't, you know, the needle of demonstrating she's going
to be some agent of change. So you've just got
kind of record versus record, and I do think that
inures to the to President Trump's advantage. And you know, look,
there are very clear distinctions about where he would take
(10:13):
the country versus her. Again, my concern is the people
watching the debates for the most part, you know a
lot of them have decided, So it's it's the it's
the undecided, or more importantly, it's like, who are you
turning out? It's the enthusiasm level, right, Those will drive
the numbers in November, and that's we got to just
make sure we amp the enthusiasm as we're.
Speaker 2 (10:34):
Headed in November. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (10:36):
I thought his best line to me was when he
was talking about, well, I'm a different kind of president.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
I fire people.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
When she got bringing up the people who have worked
for him saying negative things about him, and you know,
he was like, well, I fire people, you know.
Speaker 3 (10:52):
Yeah, don't. I thought that was actually I agree with you.
I'm sorry I mean to interrupt you. I agree with you.
I thought that was the best moment's strongest moment because
of your perceives that war were the American people to
weaponize against the people. They've fired nobody. They're they're very
pro all of deuocracy and the folks that aren't doing
a good job, they don't care. And frankly, it's like
my orks, they stand fully behind my work list, they
(11:13):
stand fully behind you know, all of these folks, I mean,
other than the Secret Service had resigning literally after a
former president was shot, and only because she resigned, they
didn't fire. You know, they haven't really removed that. You know,
no one's been removed, nobody's left. So I agree with you.
I also thought his answer was actually pretty strong on
(11:35):
where he landed on abortion, from the standpoint of explaining
Roe versus Way and explaining the nine months reality and
trying to put that back on Vice President Harris, because
Vice Resident Harris is a really really radical position. Democrats
have a really really radical position, And I thought the
President did a pretty good job flipping that back on
the bats. Different people are going to disagree on that
(11:57):
that issue is thorny, but I thought it was important
that he flip that back around on that.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
We've got more with Congressman ship Roy, But first, as
we approach the one year mark of the horrific events
of October seventh in Israel, the International Fellowship of Christians
and Jews invites you to join them in Flags of Fellowship,
an opportunity for Christians to remember the victims, honor the heroes,
pray for those still held hostage, and highlight the unwavering
(12:23):
support of Christians for Israel and the Jewish people. On
October six thousands of Christians will be praying for those
impacted by the war and planning flags across America to
honor the victims of October seventh, join us and letting
the world know that Christians stand with Israel. Your generous
donation today will not only provide a flag symbolizing your
support and churchyards across America, but it will also support
(12:47):
the Fellowship's ongoing emergency efforts in the Holy Land. We
cannot stay silent, We cannot stay on the sidelines as
anti Semitism spreads like wildfire.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
Israel needs you now.
Speaker 1 (12:57):
Visit support IFCJ dot org to stand in solidarity with
the Jewish people. That's one word. Support I f CJ
dot org. Support I f CJ dot org. You know,
I feel like, what's so frustrating about where we are
as a society right now? And you know why things
(13:18):
are so bad? I feel like a lot of public
policy is just common sense. And and to ignore common
sense like the Biden administration has, like so many Democratic
governors or Democratic mayors have, it has to be intentional, right,
And I know you've been fighting for this bill in
Congress called the Save Act, which to me just seems
(13:40):
like common sense that you have to have some sort
of proof of being United States citizen in order to vote.
Yet it has been met with such you know, arty,
with with you know, with so much resistance. You know,
tell us about the Save Act and why is it
being met with any resistance whatsoever?
Speaker 3 (14:03):
Well, so it's a really good question. And let me
go back to the thing you said, which I think
is really important, the lack of common sense. And you'll
go back and remember that in Are found It, right,
Thomas Paine wrote common sense. I think what maybe a
year before or roughly the declaration in that timeframe, uh,
And it was really hitting the ground in terms of
publication and printing into January before the July independence I remember, correctly,
(14:28):
in my time. And my point is it common sense
is something that's important and we lack it as a country,
as a society, and then certainly politically, certainly in Washington
and you know, it's common sense to spend only the
money that you take a right. It is common sense
to secure your country as a sovereign antion. It's the
first order of government. Right to secure your border, secure
(14:51):
your country against invasion. It's common sense to you know,
enforce the law, have bad guys in jail, keep your
streets safe. It's common sense that only citizens should vote.
I mean, it's it's actually the bare minimum you would
expect a country, right, you would. Somebody made a good
example yesterday in one of the areas when we were
in that we had a hearing on the say back
(15:12):
to the Judiciary Committee yesterday, somebody made a really good
point that said, you wouldn't allow the board of directors
of say, you know Microsoft, They wouldn't. You wouldn't allow them,
you know, people that aren't stockholders to come in and
run the board. Right. And yet you know, we yet
as a country, we're allowing non citizens to vote. And
(15:34):
it's happening. It's clearly happening with studies and information that
we see the voter roles cleaning off. We have the
Secretary of State of Florida testifying yesterday that he doesn't
have the information in the data from the Better Government
to do his job to check the roles, and so
the bill is pretty common sense. It would just say
that we would provide the tools to make sure that
only American citizens can vote. It would require it, which
(15:55):
which is important given all the jurisdictions like Oakland and
San Francisco and DC New York are trying to actively
register non citizen voters. And so, you know, we passed
it unanimously by our Republicans in July. We had five
Democrats who joined us.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (16:09):
By the way, importantly, three of them or Hispanic and
one of them happens to be black. Uh, it's not
a racial you know issue. And so we got that passed.
But the center we'll move it. So the only question
now is whether we will leverage the spending fight to
try to force such an obvious issue. President Trump wanted
to pick a fight. President Trump put out that we
should have the Save Act plus the cee R. You know,
(16:31):
so we set out to try to make that happen.
We had a area yesterday we set up the bill. Unfortunately,
I don't think we've got the votes to get it there,
but we'll see. It's we're figuring figuring that out as
we speak.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
Well, you know, and those on the left will say,
you know, look, this is not a big issue. This
is not happening in any sort of numbers that would
change an outcome of an election. You know, YadA, YadA, YadA.
But we've seen even in places like Virginia where Governor
Glenn Youngkin you know, said recently that he had issued
an executive order moving three hundred and three non citizens
who had quote unquote accidentally or maliciously attempted to register
(17:07):
to vote.
Speaker 2 (17:08):
Well, six thousand votes.
Speaker 1 (17:09):
I mean, you look, in some of these states, like
you know, Wisconsin or whatever, the outcomes are determined by
like twenty thousand votes. So six thousand votes makes a
material difference in a lot of these states which are
ultimately going to be you know, extremely close, So that
does matter. So I guess, you know, why do you
think they go to such lengths to say that this
(17:31):
isn't happening when we have evidence that you know, legal
immigrants or legal aliens or foreign or whatever are registered.
Speaker 2 (17:37):
Non citizens are registering to.
Speaker 3 (17:39):
Vote because they know they are, they want them to,
and all they want is cover long enough to get
it to the place where they can guarantee either will
never pass laws or rules that will restrict the ability
of non citizens to vote.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
That's it.
Speaker 3 (17:53):
They know it, they want it, and they don't want
to interfere with trying to continue to build up what
they believe was a voter base for them. I've never
accepted the premise that, you know, oh, Hispanic voters are
always necessarily going to be a Democrat or whatever. I've
always believed that we can win on the things we
(18:14):
believe it. But I will say this, it does matter
people who follow the law, who are citizens who didn't
just come here because someone's good, you know, promising them
amnesty or promising them a handout. And I think it's
really important to point out yesterday the hearing we had,
we had several Hispanic female witnesses who were testifying because
(18:36):
they lost loved ones or were working with people who
had lost loved ones Hispanic who were killed at the
hands of people released into the United States. We had
a woman named Alexis Nunge. Her daughter, Josh was murdered.
Her daughter was twelve years old. Her daughter was twelve
years old, almost the exact same age as my daughter.
(18:58):
She was murdered by two Venezuelans who targeted her and
preyed on her and her mama. Alexis is a baby herself.
I mean, she's twenty stink seven or eight, and she
chose life by the way, when she was pregnant as
a teenager. She raised this girl, and this girl got
murdered by people released in the United States by this administration. Now,
(19:23):
I know that's an issue that's separate from the point
about voting, but it's not. This is all related. My
Democratic colleagues do not care that Americans are in dangered
and they do not care that our sovereignty is undermined
because for them it's political. But meanwhile, you've got these
Hispanic women testify that their parents came here and did
it the right way. Their parents came here to follow
(19:44):
the rule of wall. Their parents came here and refused
handouts because they wanted to make their own way. One
woman testified to that, So my dad didn't take welfare chets,
he didn't take you know, whatever the government in it,
because he came here at believing that he had to
make your own way in this country. For those people,
I would open the floodgates and open the doors, because
that is the American dream. As Milton Friedman said, I'll
(20:06):
take everybody you want, bring them here. You can't have
a welfare state. I know that's a lot, at least
I know that's a lot rolled into one, but it's
all the same thing.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
Well, it's also just about protecting American citizens, you know. Period,
We've got more with Congressman Roy, but first and these
uncertain times, rising crime in America's neighborhoods endangers the safety
of loved ones. Nearly fifty years ago, with just two
hundred and twenty eight dollars their entire savings, Saber's founders
set out to make the world safer Today. Saber is
the number one made in the USA pepper spray brand,
(20:38):
trusted by law enforcement and families across America. As a
family owned business, they understand the importance of protecting your
loved ones, introducing the Saber pepper projectile launcher, a less lethal,
fast loading, no recoil solution delivering powerful stopping power up
to one hundred and seventy five feet.
Speaker 2 (20:57):
The real advantage even if.
Speaker 1 (20:59):
You miss yes, it creates a six foot pepper cloud,
causing intense sensory irritation which can overwhelm anyone in its path,
giving you and your family the opportunity to protect yourselves
and your home.
Speaker 2 (21:11):
But Saber doesn't stop there.
Speaker 1 (21:13):
In addition to their pepper spray and pepper gel, Saber
offers stun guns for personal protection and Barren Mountain Lion
spray for outdoor adventurers.
Speaker 2 (21:22):
They also provide essential home.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
Security items like door security bars and door and window
alarms for security your entryways. Protect yourself and your family
with Sabers full range of defense sprays, home security tools,
and exclusive launcher bundles. Visit sa b R radio dot
com or call eight four four eight two four safe today.
(21:46):
That's eight four four eight two four safe. So we
know that you know, America is incredibly diverse, you know,
so many racists, so many ethnic backgrounds. You know. So
it's just about protecting a Americans period, and from this
unfairness of absorbing all these people who shouldn't be here
when you know, Americans are living. Majority Americans are living
(22:09):
paycheck to paycheck, you know, when they're having to put
groceries on their credit cards. Yet we're being forced to,
you know, put up people who shouldn't be here and
it is, you know, making a difference in the sense of,
you know, we look at this data from the Bureau
of Labor and Statistics, and we show that foreign born
workers in the United States are you have gained This
was recently six one hundred and thirty seven thousand jobs year.
(22:30):
Of year native born workers lost roughly two hundred and
ninety nine thousand. The foreign born or immigrant population has
hit records highs in the United States fifteen zero point
six percent of the US total population. Now and then
the tell and kind of you know, Democrats have given
themselves away a bit when you've got someone like Representative
Yavette Clark, who not too long ago stated that her
(22:52):
district can absorb a significant number of these migrants, adding
I need more people in my district just for redistricting purpose.
Is so, you know, they tell us that, you know,
American citizens aren't being replaced, but then they admit that
they can absorb more migrants for redistricting purposes. We look
at these jobs that are being taken by foreign workers,
(23:12):
and then we know that the foreign born of the
immigrant population continues to increase. How is that good for
American citizens?
Speaker 3 (23:21):
Well, it's not ho Lisa. And one thing that I'll
put out there for your websteners is my staff compiled
a report that we entitled America Invaded that we put
out about three days ago, four days ago, and it
is a compilation of the impacts of the open borders
(23:43):
and a lot of stuff you're referring to, But it
talks about those Americans have been dead or injured, the
Americans that are paying the price to the States, and
all of a sudden they're having to do the mind
nights to have been endangered or abused or lost by
this administration. Three hundred and twenty thousand illistration can't find
now again, some of them are safe, some of them aren't,
(24:04):
and the Inspector General says that the DHS has no
idea where they are. But importantly to your point, the
remaking of America that whole section, and we have a
lot of data in there, and I've heard people to
go find it. But the remaking of America is about
the fact that we have roughly fifty million foreign born
people in the United States. Thirty million of them, give
(24:25):
or take, are non citizens. So you've got over ten
percent or pushing ten percent non citizen population. You have
sixteen and a half pushing seventeen percent of foreign born population.
That's the highest we've ever had, and it's growing with
this administration dumping people in the United States. That's happening
at a time where we're not teaching our kids. But
(24:46):
we used to teach our kids that America is great,
the Western civilization is strong, that God exists, the Bill
of Rights are important, that free enterprise is good, that
you're supposed to go out and work hard. The government's
not supposed to just give you stuff and provide for me.
We're not doing that anymore. So this isn't a cultural thing.
Democrats want to make it about race and that kind
of it is a cultural thing. At the same point,
(25:07):
at who we are in Western civilization has nothing to
do with where you're from or your background, has to
do with whether you buy into the American dream of
the work that it takes to do it. That's what's happening,
that's what's real. These numbers are atrocious, criminals, terrorists, people
being let under our streets. But it's also that it
is a just massive shift in our fire population. And look,
(25:28):
I don't like go down the road all this like
rabbit trail stuff, and like with what's going on with
the Haitians in Springfield, Ohio. I'm not there and I
don't know what's happening with animals and all that stuff.
What I know is twenty thousand Haitians descended on a
town or sixty thousand people. What the hell do you
think is happening? Right? The people in Springfield are the
ones trying to figure out how to make it work.
(25:49):
They have people the streets and they're parks, they's schools
or hospitals, they're cops, Like, what the hell are they
supposed to do? That's the real story.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
Before we go on one thing.
Speaker 1 (26:00):
Obviously, it's infuriating for her or to try to be
on the offense on immigration and the border when Biden
and you know, she's the borders are when they've led
in tens of millions of people by toys, by desire,
by design, in you know, completely eroding all the protections
Donald Trump put in to protect the southern border. But
(26:22):
for her to run on the border bill and say
that Donald Trump railroaded that. But what was not mentioned
during the debate last night is that would have set
a daily minimum of thousands of illegal aliens coming to
the United States on a daily basis, and that is
why it was railroaded that numbers should be zero. We
shouldn't be letting any legal aliens into the United States.
What do you wish was conveyed last night about the
(26:44):
current border crisis? And you know, what did you make
of her trying to, you know, talk about Donald saying
Donald Trump railroaded this, you know, quote unquote bipartisan bill.
Speaker 3 (26:55):
Yeah, this is where I mean again, and I think
that set up. We're biased. We knew that going in.
I think President was very clearly distinct from Kamala Harris.
He did a good job on a number of different fronts,
and you picked out a cop level it. I think
the area where there was a lot of you know,
left on the cutting room floor, if you will that.
(27:17):
I wish you would have punched harder. I would have
punched right back on that issue about her fake bill
and the Democrats fake bill. I would have hit that
really hard. You the Vice President worked directly with Senate
Democrats to want to codify your failed programs. That's what
that was. You were trying to make permanent the failures
(27:39):
of your administration. To make this the open borders and perpetuity.
Republicans rightly opposed it long before I settle anything about it. Yeah,
I posed it because the American people opposed it. That's
why I run it. And I would have pounded that,
and I would have talked about some of the specifics
kind of buying five thousand a day, endless asylum, endless
abuse parole, the same parole, and I would have pivoted, Really,
(28:02):
are the same parole that has been used to release
an individual onto our streets that killed lacoln Route, to
release an individual on our streets that killed Jocelyn Nunger,
to release an individual on our streets that killed Rachel Mritt,
to release an individual on our streets that killed Kayla Hampleton.
And I would have gone person by person. I would
have talked about the proof who's wanted now for twenty
(28:24):
three murders of prew was released found in Buffalo. I
would have pounded the rock on Sentinel. I would have
talked about the central bombs. I would have mentioned people
by name, and I would have jammed it down her
freaking throat. I wish that didn't happen.
Speaker 1 (28:38):
I do too, you know, I don't know if there
will be another debate, but you know, I hope Republicans
continue to make the case and articulate the case that
you just did heading into to November. Fifth Congressman Ship, Roy,
It's always great to have you on this show. You're
a busy man, so I really appreciate you making the time.
Speaker 3 (28:54):
Oh it's a pleasure. Thanks for what you do. Keep
up the good work and we'll do it again soon.
Take care of listen.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
That was congressman ship role of Texas. Appreciate him for
taking the time to come on the show. Appreciate you
guys at home for listening every Monday and Thursday, but
you can listen throughout the week. Oh to thank John,
Cassie and my producer for putting the show together.
Speaker 2 (29:10):
Until next time.
I'm sure a lot of us are having the same
thoughts after watching the debate. We know because in the
Media Research Center that ABC's coverage of Kamala Harris has
been one hundred percent positive while their coverage of Donald
Trump has been ninety three percent negative.
Speaker 2 (00:18):
Well, we saw that during the debate.
Speaker 1 (00:20):
David Muhror and Lindsey Davis might as well have been
wearing Kamala for President t shirts. If they incredible hold
what they were wearing, I'm sure it would be under there.
They kept intervening to fact check Donald Trump. They pressed
Donald Trump multiple times. Guess how many times they fact
checked Kamala Harris zero. Guess how many times they pressed
(00:42):
Kamala Harris for follow ups zero. They let her get
away with lying about things like Charlottesville.
Speaker 2 (00:50):
We know that it's been debunked.
Speaker 1 (00:52):
Donald Trump outright said that he condemned the neo Nazis
and the KKK. She lied about the blood bath comment.
He was talking about what she would do to the
automobile industry with her push for electric vehicles.
Speaker 2 (01:04):
So it was tough.
Speaker 1 (01:05):
It was a three against one environment for Donald Trump. Now,
I will say you could tell that she did her
homework as I tweeted out, she studied her lines, she
remembered her lines, but she doesn't know what any of
them mean. That's a challenge with Kamala Harris. Not only
would she represent a continuation of the same failed policies
of Joe Biden, but we know that she's further the left.
(01:26):
She said that her values haven't changed. Those values make
her to the left of Bernie Sanders. She should be
in a commune with him in Vermont, not in the
White House. Bernie Sanders when I meet the press recently
saying that she was a progressive, she's just trying to
moderate for the general election.
Speaker 2 (01:40):
She really offered no solutions last night.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
It took her forever to even put up any policy
positions on her website. We know that she stole a
lot of those policy positions from Joe Biden. And then
beyond that, some of the things that she's put forward
have been slammed by her own sarrogates. You look at
things like taxing unrealized gains. Well, Representative Ocanna went on
CNBC slamming that, saying that's not a good idea, we don't.
Speaker 2 (02:03):
Need to do that. Well, he's her arrogate.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
Or her ideas to for price controls pretty much universally slammed,
even by liberal outlets as well. But she studied, she
did her homework. We could tell that. As much as
I love Donald Trump, I want him to win this selection.
He has to win this election election. I don't want
to see America with another four years of what we
have been put through. I don't think the Republic could
(02:26):
survive that. But he was undisciplined, he did miss opportunities.
Now it is challenging when it's three against one. No
one else is going to prosecute this case against Kamala Harris.
The media is not going to do it, as they
pointed out earlier one hundred percent positive of coverage from ABC.
They're not going to do it. The media wants her
to win. It's all resting on his shoulders. He's got
to be the guy taking the case against Kamala Harris.
(02:47):
The irony and what frustrated me is her standing there
and saying, look, I'm running a people powered campaign.
Speaker 2 (02:52):
My campaign's all about the people. No, it's not. You
were installed, lady.
Speaker 1 (02:56):
You were installed in backroom dealing between billion dollar donors
in party elites and even black Lives Matter Marxist group,
which she should celebrate because her dad was a Marxist.
Speaker 2 (03:06):
She's a Marxist.
Speaker 1 (03:07):
But they even said of the process that a twenty
four hour process of talking to party bosses is not democratic,
nor is it a process democrats should be part of,
continuing by saying, we do not live in a dictatorship.
Delegates are not oligarchs. So the idea that she is
running a people powered campaign is such a lie. Donald
Trump should have said, you know what, I'm a billionaire.
I didn't need this. I ran in twenty sixteen because
(03:30):
I care about the direction of the country. I'm a patriot,
and that's why I'm doing it again, after all the
abuse that I've taken, what you put my family through,
I'm still running for the people. He is the people
powered candidate, not her, But.
Speaker 2 (03:42):
She was allowed to lie.
Speaker 1 (03:44):
The only thing that gives me hope about the takeaway
from the debate is you look at some recent polling
by the New York Times and finding that sixty one
percent of Americans say they want the next president to
bring major change, and a majority of voters believe that
Donald Trump is the change candidate. Or just get down
to the basic question of am I better off now
under this current administration or was I better off under
(04:06):
Donald Trump? And the answer is clearly Donald Trump. There's
also a New York Times article where they talk to
some undecided voters, and some of those voters said things like, well,
when Trump was in office, not going to lie, I
was living way better. I've never been so down as
in the past four years. It's been so hard for me.
Another person also said that they did not see much
of a difference between Biden and Kamala Harris and that
(04:27):
they wanted change. So all hope is not lost. You know,
I'm not gonna lie and say that it was a
great night for us. That was a great night for
Donald Trump. Now we'll make a material impact on the election,
I don't think so, but you know, onward and upward. Right,
this is an important election. So we've just got to pray,
we've got to get out and vote, and you know,
we've got to look alive and take this very seriously,
(04:49):
and take her seriously too, because she's clearly putting in
the work and doing the homework. All right, So moving
on from that, I just you know, how to get
that off my chest. But Anyways, we're going to cover
that debate with Congressman Ship Roy of Texas. We're also
going to talk about a crucial piece of legislation that
he has been fighting for. And you know, it's also
another thing that's frustrating, is so much a public policy
is common sense. Yet the Democrats continue to ignore common sense,
(05:12):
which really makes you believe the whole point, the whole intention,
the whole design is to destroy your country. He's been
fighting for this Stave Act and literally all it does
is require new voters to submit proof of United States
citizenship like a passport or a birth certificate in order
to register to vote. Isn't it something that we should
all stand for. Wouldn't that make sense to make sure
(05:35):
that only American citizens are voting? So why has there
been so much resistance to it? What does that tell
you about the intentions of importing millions of illegal aliens
to the United States. But we're going to get into
all of this with Congressman Shiproy, the debate and why
he's fighting so hard for the Stave Act.
Speaker 2 (05:54):
Stay tuned, Congressman Ship Roy, A lot has.
Speaker 1 (06:03):
Gained until last time you came on the pod of
the podcast. We are looking at an entirely new world
since an assassination attempt, and entirely new Democrat ticket. You know,
I assumed you watched the debate last night. I found
myself infuriated at it. And we saw the Media Research
(06:23):
Center recently, did you know surveys a study finding that
ABC's coverage of Kamala Harris has been one hundred percent positive. Well,
there were coverage of Donald Trump's been ninety three percent negative.
I mean that was on display last night. What are
your takeaways from the debate.
Speaker 3 (06:40):
Well, I mean, I think everybody watching it could see
the questions by ABC were as saltballs for Kamalan for
you know, obviously they were trying to, you know, ask
point of questions of prosident Trump at you know, but
we knew that going in, right, I mean, that is
one of those things that you know and you go
to expect. There's a reason that they wanted to reject
a five debate. They you know that they only accepted
(07:02):
the terms of this one. So you know, like my
takeaway is, I think we're gonna we're pretty much at
the status quo ante. I think where we are is
where we were heading into the debate. I don't think
he moved the needle one way or the other whole
lot in either direction. I don't think there was much
that was gonna I think it was going to take
a breakout moment of something huge to crack through the
(07:23):
news to shift the debate. The people that want by
President Harris are lockedloaded, even to want President Trump are
locked and loaded. Then we're we're fighting over the stuff
in the middle in a handful of states. Right, That's
just the nature of this election. Anybody with a political
pulse knows that. I think, Uh, I think the vice
president offered no real substance. That's nothing uh new. This
(07:45):
is what we expect out of the vice president. If
you follow it, you're a conservative. I think, uh before
President Trump offered substance on a lot of key issues
that were important. I do think there were a couple
of things that I wish you would knocked it out
of the park. On the set up on the borderscore
the immigration question, you know, as opposed to talking about
the the rallies and stuff. I would rather come in
(08:06):
punching and swinging on the border. But but I look,
at the end of the day, there was a very
clear distation here. Somebody is to actually secure the border
and somebody's not. She got away with lies like I'm
not going to bay your guns, but she literally put
out a statement a few days before, I'm going to
bang your result weapon, you know, which is you know,
eighty cint of an ar and so forth. So it's
just normal. It's what we would expect. We're status quo
anti and we got to turn the boat out. It's
(08:27):
going to be a ground game. Boat turn out, get
your people to the polls to make sure you beat
the other side. That's what this is going to boil down.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
To word Trump benefits is the fact that you know,
one just on the basic question, are you better off
now under this administration or you have better off utter Trump?
And then you know, secondly, we had the New York
Times Ciena poll recently finding that six percent sixty one
percent of Americans say the next president needs to bring
major change, and then finding that, you know, Donald Trump,
(08:53):
which candidate represents major change? Fifty three percent, Donald Trump,
Kamala Harris twenty five percent. And I don't know if
she did an off in last night's to be one
to separate herself from Joe Biden or too, as you
pointed out, laying out any sort of groundwork that she's
the change candidate.
Speaker 3 (09:09):
Right, Yeah, it is a good point. She obviously knows
she used to do that because she made that statement
that you know, you're not running against Joe Biden or
whatever I'm paraphrasing whatever that was. And so it's clear
that that was pre planned, right the way everything she
said was pre planned. I mean, it was very clearly
was scripted. So that that's those are tells, and I
think that's actually important. I think somebody had an interesting
(09:31):
observation that by on the race question, rather than just
you know, kind of lap you know, kind of lapping
it off in Kamala haristyle, she went straight to the
central park, you know, five, she went to some of
the other issues, which somebody observed, Hey, that I think
she's concerned that President Trump is stealing some of the
black mail boat and and and black boats. So I
(09:52):
think I think there were some tells throughout the entirety
of the debate. I think your observation is correct that
she didn't, you know, the needle of demonstrating she's going
to be some agent of change. So you've just got
kind of record versus record, and I do think that
inures to the to President Trump's advantage. And you know, look,
there are very clear distinctions about where he would take
(10:13):
the country versus her. Again, my concern is the people
watching the debates for the most part, you know a
lot of them have decided, So it's it's the it's
the undecided, or more importantly, it's like, who are you
turning out? It's the enthusiasm level, right, Those will drive
the numbers in November, and that's we got to just
make sure we amp the enthusiasm as we're.
Speaker 2 (10:34):
Headed in November. Yeah.
Speaker 1 (10:36):
I thought his best line to me was when he
was talking about, well, I'm a different kind of president.
Speaker 2 (10:43):
I fire people.
Speaker 1 (10:45):
When she got bringing up the people who have worked
for him saying negative things about him, and you know,
he was like, well, I fire people, you know.
Speaker 3 (10:52):
Yeah, don't. I thought that was actually I agree with you.
I'm sorry I mean to interrupt you. I agree with you.
I thought that was the best moment's strongest moment because
of your perceives that war were the American people to
weaponize against the people. They've fired nobody. They're they're very
pro all of deuocracy and the folks that aren't doing
a good job, they don't care. And frankly, it's like
my orks, they stand fully behind my work list, they
(11:13):
stand fully behind you know, all of these folks, I mean,
other than the Secret Service had resigning literally after a
former president was shot, and only because she resigned, they
didn't fire. You know, they haven't really removed that. You know,
no one's been removed, nobody's left. So I agree with you.
I also thought his answer was actually pretty strong on
(11:35):
where he landed on abortion, from the standpoint of explaining
Roe versus Way and explaining the nine months reality and
trying to put that back on Vice President Harris, because
Vice Resident Harris is a really really radical position. Democrats
have a really really radical position, And I thought the
President did a pretty good job flipping that back on
the bats. Different people are going to disagree on that
(11:57):
that issue is thorny, but I thought it was important
that he flip that back around on that.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
We've got more with Congressman ship Roy, But first, as
we approach the one year mark of the horrific events
of October seventh in Israel, the International Fellowship of Christians
and Jews invites you to join them in Flags of Fellowship,
an opportunity for Christians to remember the victims, honor the heroes,
pray for those still held hostage, and highlight the unwavering
(12:23):
support of Christians for Israel and the Jewish people. On
October six thousands of Christians will be praying for those
impacted by the war and planning flags across America to
honor the victims of October seventh, join us and letting
the world know that Christians stand with Israel. Your generous
donation today will not only provide a flag symbolizing your
support and churchyards across America, but it will also support
(12:47):
the Fellowship's ongoing emergency efforts in the Holy Land. We
cannot stay silent, We cannot stay on the sidelines as
anti Semitism spreads like wildfire.
Speaker 2 (12:56):
Israel needs you now.
Speaker 1 (12:57):
Visit support IFCJ dot org to stand in solidarity with
the Jewish people. That's one word. Support I f CJ
dot org. Support I f CJ dot org. You know,
I feel like, what's so frustrating about where we are
as a society right now? And you know why things
(13:18):
are so bad? I feel like a lot of public
policy is just common sense. And and to ignore common
sense like the Biden administration has, like so many Democratic
governors or Democratic mayors have, it has to be intentional, right,
And I know you've been fighting for this bill in
Congress called the Save Act, which to me just seems
(13:40):
like common sense that you have to have some sort
of proof of being United States citizen in order to vote.
Yet it has been met with such you know, arty,
with with you know, with so much resistance. You know,
tell us about the Save Act and why is it
being met with any resistance whatsoever?
Speaker 3 (14:03):
Well, so it's a really good question. And let me
go back to the thing you said, which I think
is really important, the lack of common sense. And you'll
go back and remember that in Are found It, right,
Thomas Paine wrote common sense. I think what maybe a
year before or roughly the declaration in that timeframe, uh,
And it was really hitting the ground in terms of
publication and printing into January before the July independence I remember, correctly,
(14:28):
in my time. And my point is it common sense
is something that's important and we lack it as a country,
as a society, and then certainly politically, certainly in Washington
and you know, it's common sense to spend only the
money that you take a right. It is common sense
to secure your country as a sovereign antion. It's the
first order of government. Right to secure your border, secure
(14:51):
your country against invasion. It's common sense to you know,
enforce the law, have bad guys in jail, keep your
streets safe. It's common sense that only citizens should vote.
I mean, it's it's actually the bare minimum you would
expect a country, right, you would. Somebody made a good
example yesterday in one of the areas when we were
in that we had a hearing on the say back
(15:12):
to the Judiciary Committee yesterday, somebody made a really good
point that said, you wouldn't allow the board of directors
of say, you know Microsoft, They wouldn't. You wouldn't allow them,
you know, people that aren't stockholders to come in and
run the board. Right. And yet you know, we yet
as a country, we're allowing non citizens to vote. And
(15:34):
it's happening. It's clearly happening with studies and information that
we see the voter roles cleaning off. We have the
Secretary of State of Florida testifying yesterday that he doesn't
have the information in the data from the Better Government
to do his job to check the roles, and so
the bill is pretty common sense. It would just say
that we would provide the tools to make sure that
only American citizens can vote. It would require it, which
(15:55):
which is important given all the jurisdictions like Oakland and
San Francisco and DC New York are trying to actively
register non citizen voters. And so, you know, we passed
it unanimously by our Republicans in July. We had five
Democrats who joined us.
Speaker 1 (16:08):
Uh.
Speaker 3 (16:09):
By the way, importantly, three of them or Hispanic and
one of them happens to be black. Uh, it's not
a racial you know issue. And so we got that passed.
But the center we'll move it. So the only question
now is whether we will leverage the spending fight to
try to force such an obvious issue. President Trump wanted
to pick a fight. President Trump put out that we
should have the Save Act plus the cee R. You know,
(16:31):
so we set out to try to make that happen.
We had a area yesterday we set up the bill. Unfortunately,
I don't think we've got the votes to get it there,
but we'll see. It's we're figuring figuring that out as
we speak.
Speaker 1 (16:43):
Well, you know, and those on the left will say,
you know, look, this is not a big issue. This
is not happening in any sort of numbers that would
change an outcome of an election. You know, YadA, YadA, YadA.
But we've seen even in places like Virginia where Governor
Glenn Youngkin you know, said recently that he had issued
an executive order moving three hundred and three non citizens
who had quote unquote accidentally or maliciously attempted to register
(17:07):
to vote.
Speaker 2 (17:08):
Well, six thousand votes.
Speaker 1 (17:09):
I mean, you look, in some of these states, like
you know, Wisconsin or whatever, the outcomes are determined by
like twenty thousand votes. So six thousand votes makes a
material difference in a lot of these states which are
ultimately going to be you know, extremely close, So that
does matter. So I guess, you know, why do you
think they go to such lengths to say that this
(17:31):
isn't happening when we have evidence that you know, legal
immigrants or legal aliens or foreign or whatever are registered.
Speaker 2 (17:37):
Non citizens are registering to.
Speaker 3 (17:39):
Vote because they know they are, they want them to,
and all they want is cover long enough to get
it to the place where they can guarantee either will
never pass laws or rules that will restrict the ability
of non citizens to vote.
Speaker 2 (17:53):
That's it.
Speaker 3 (17:53):
They know it, they want it, and they don't want
to interfere with trying to continue to build up what
they believe was a voter base for them. I've never
accepted the premise that, you know, oh, Hispanic voters are
always necessarily going to be a Democrat or whatever. I've
always believed that we can win on the things we
(18:14):
believe it. But I will say this, it does matter
people who follow the law, who are citizens who didn't
just come here because someone's good, you know, promising them
amnesty or promising them a handout. And I think it's
really important to point out yesterday the hearing we had,
we had several Hispanic female witnesses who were testifying because
(18:36):
they lost loved ones or were working with people who
had lost loved ones Hispanic who were killed at the
hands of people released into the United States. We had
a woman named Alexis Nunge. Her daughter, Josh was murdered.
Her daughter was twelve years old. Her daughter was twelve
years old, almost the exact same age as my daughter.
(18:58):
She was murdered by two Venezuelans who targeted her and
preyed on her and her mama. Alexis is a baby herself.
I mean, she's twenty stink seven or eight, and she
chose life by the way, when she was pregnant as
a teenager. She raised this girl, and this girl got
murdered by people released in the United States by this administration. Now,
(19:23):
I know that's an issue that's separate from the point
about voting, but it's not. This is all related. My
Democratic colleagues do not care that Americans are in dangered
and they do not care that our sovereignty is undermined
because for them it's political. But meanwhile, you've got these
Hispanic women testify that their parents came here and did
it the right way. Their parents came here to follow
(19:44):
the rule of wall. Their parents came here and refused
handouts because they wanted to make their own way. One
woman testified to that, So my dad didn't take welfare chets,
he didn't take you know, whatever the government in it,
because he came here at believing that he had to
make your own way in this country. For those people,
I would open the floodgates and open the doors, because
that is the American dream. As Milton Friedman said, I'll
(20:06):
take everybody you want, bring them here. You can't have
a welfare state. I know that's a lot, at least
I know that's a lot rolled into one, but it's
all the same thing.
Speaker 1 (20:15):
Well, it's also just about protecting American citizens, you know. Period,
We've got more with Congressman Roy, but first and these
uncertain times, rising crime in America's neighborhoods endangers the safety
of loved ones. Nearly fifty years ago, with just two
hundred and twenty eight dollars their entire savings, Saber's founders
set out to make the world safer Today. Saber is
the number one made in the USA pepper spray brand,
(20:38):
trusted by law enforcement and families across America. As a
family owned business, they understand the importance of protecting your
loved ones, introducing the Saber pepper projectile launcher, a less lethal,
fast loading, no recoil solution delivering powerful stopping power up
to one hundred and seventy five feet.
Speaker 2 (20:57):
The real advantage even if.
Speaker 1 (20:59):
You miss yes, it creates a six foot pepper cloud,
causing intense sensory irritation which can overwhelm anyone in its path,
giving you and your family the opportunity to protect yourselves
and your home.
Speaker 2 (21:11):
But Saber doesn't stop there.
Speaker 1 (21:13):
In addition to their pepper spray and pepper gel, Saber
offers stun guns for personal protection and Barren Mountain Lion
spray for outdoor adventurers.
Speaker 2 (21:22):
They also provide essential home.
Speaker 1 (21:24):
Security items like door security bars and door and window
alarms for security your entryways. Protect yourself and your family
with Sabers full range of defense sprays, home security tools,
and exclusive launcher bundles. Visit sa b R radio dot
com or call eight four four eight two four safe today.
(21:46):
That's eight four four eight two four safe. So we
know that you know, America is incredibly diverse, you know,
so many racists, so many ethnic backgrounds. You know. So
it's just about protecting a Americans period, and from this
unfairness of absorbing all these people who shouldn't be here
when you know, Americans are living. Majority Americans are living
(22:09):
paycheck to paycheck, you know, when they're having to put
groceries on their credit cards. Yet we're being forced to,
you know, put up people who shouldn't be here and
it is, you know, making a difference in the sense of,
you know, we look at this data from the Bureau
of Labor and Statistics, and we show that foreign born
workers in the United States are you have gained This
was recently six one hundred and thirty seven thousand jobs year.
(22:30):
Of year native born workers lost roughly two hundred and
ninety nine thousand. The foreign born or immigrant population has
hit records highs in the United States fifteen zero point
six percent of the US total population. Now and then
the tell and kind of you know, Democrats have given
themselves away a bit when you've got someone like Representative
Yavette Clark, who not too long ago stated that her
(22:52):
district can absorb a significant number of these migrants, adding
I need more people in my district just for redistricting purpose.
Is so, you know, they tell us that, you know,
American citizens aren't being replaced, but then they admit that
they can absorb more migrants for redistricting purposes. We look
at these jobs that are being taken by foreign workers,
(23:12):
and then we know that the foreign born of the
immigrant population continues to increase. How is that good for
American citizens?
Speaker 3 (23:21):
Well, it's not ho Lisa. And one thing that I'll
put out there for your websteners is my staff compiled
a report that we entitled America Invaded that we put
out about three days ago, four days ago, and it
is a compilation of the impacts of the open borders
(23:43):
and a lot of stuff you're referring to, But it
talks about those Americans have been dead or injured, the
Americans that are paying the price to the States, and
all of a sudden they're having to do the mind
nights to have been endangered or abused or lost by
this administration. Three hundred and twenty thousand illistration can't find
now again, some of them are safe, some of them aren't,
(24:04):
and the Inspector General says that the DHS has no
idea where they are. But importantly to your point, the
remaking of America that whole section, and we have a
lot of data in there, and I've heard people to
go find it. But the remaking of America is about
the fact that we have roughly fifty million foreign born
people in the United States. Thirty million of them, give
(24:25):
or take, are non citizens. So you've got over ten
percent or pushing ten percent non citizen population. You have
sixteen and a half pushing seventeen percent of foreign born population.
That's the highest we've ever had, and it's growing with
this administration dumping people in the United States. That's happening
at a time where we're not teaching our kids. But
(24:46):
we used to teach our kids that America is great,
the Western civilization is strong, that God exists, the Bill
of Rights are important, that free enterprise is good, that
you're supposed to go out and work hard. The government's
not supposed to just give you stuff and provide for me.
We're not doing that anymore. So this isn't a cultural thing.
Democrats want to make it about race and that kind
of it is a cultural thing. At the same point,
(25:07):
at who we are in Western civilization has nothing to
do with where you're from or your background, has to
do with whether you buy into the American dream of
the work that it takes to do it. That's what's happening,
that's what's real. These numbers are atrocious, criminals, terrorists, people
being let under our streets. But it's also that it
is a just massive shift in our fire population. And look,
(25:28):
I don't like go down the road all this like
rabbit trail stuff, and like with what's going on with
the Haitians in Springfield, Ohio. I'm not there and I
don't know what's happening with animals and all that stuff.
What I know is twenty thousand Haitians descended on a
town or sixty thousand people. What the hell do you
think is happening? Right? The people in Springfield are the
ones trying to figure out how to make it work.
(25:49):
They have people the streets and they're parks, they's schools
or hospitals, they're cops, Like, what the hell are they
supposed to do? That's the real story.
Speaker 2 (25:57):
Before we go on one thing.
Speaker 1 (26:00):
Obviously, it's infuriating for her or to try to be
on the offense on immigration and the border when Biden
and you know, she's the borders are when they've led
in tens of millions of people by toys, by desire,
by design, in you know, completely eroding all the protections
Donald Trump put in to protect the southern border. But
(26:22):
for her to run on the border bill and say
that Donald Trump railroaded that. But what was not mentioned
during the debate last night is that would have set
a daily minimum of thousands of illegal aliens coming to
the United States on a daily basis, and that is
why it was railroaded that numbers should be zero. We
shouldn't be letting any legal aliens into the United States.
What do you wish was conveyed last night about the
(26:44):
current border crisis? And you know, what did you make
of her trying to, you know, talk about Donald saying
Donald Trump railroaded this, you know, quote unquote bipartisan bill.
Speaker 3 (26:55):
Yeah, this is where I mean again, and I think
that set up. We're biased. We knew that going in.
I think President was very clearly distinct from Kamala Harris.
He did a good job on a number of different fronts,
and you picked out a cop level it. I think
the area where there was a lot of you know,
left on the cutting room floor, if you will that.
(27:17):
I wish you would have punched harder. I would have
punched right back on that issue about her fake bill
and the Democrats fake bill. I would have hit that
really hard. You the Vice President worked directly with Senate
Democrats to want to codify your failed programs. That's what
that was. You were trying to make permanent the failures
(27:39):
of your administration. To make this the open borders and perpetuity.
Republicans rightly opposed it long before I settle anything about it. Yeah,
I posed it because the American people opposed it. That's
why I run it. And I would have pounded that,
and I would have talked about some of the specifics
kind of buying five thousand a day, endless asylum, endless
abuse parole, the same parole, and I would have pivoted, Really,
(28:02):
are the same parole that has been used to release
an individual onto our streets that killed lacoln Route, to
release an individual on our streets that killed Jocelyn Nunger,
to release an individual on our streets that killed Rachel Mritt,
to release an individual on our streets that killed Kayla Hampleton.
And I would have gone person by person. I would
have talked about the proof who's wanted now for twenty
(28:24):
three murders of prew was released found in Buffalo. I
would have pounded the rock on Sentinel. I would have
talked about the central bombs. I would have mentioned people
by name, and I would have jammed it down her
freaking throat. I wish that didn't happen.
Speaker 1 (28:38):
I do too, you know, I don't know if there
will be another debate, but you know, I hope Republicans
continue to make the case and articulate the case that
you just did heading into to November. Fifth Congressman Ship, Roy,
It's always great to have you on this show. You're
a busy man, so I really appreciate you making the time.
Speaker 3 (28:54):
Oh it's a pleasure. Thanks for what you do. Keep
up the good work and we'll do it again soon.
Take care of listen.
Speaker 1 (28:58):
That was congressman ship role of Texas. Appreciate him for
taking the time to come on the show. Appreciate you
guys at home for listening every Monday and Thursday, but
you can listen throughout the week. Oh to thank John,
Cassie and my producer for putting the show together.
Speaker 2 (29:10):
Until next time.
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show News
Hosts And Creators
Clay Travis
Buck Sexton
Show Links
WebsiteNewsletterPopular Podcasts
1. Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
2. Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
3. Crime Junkie
If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people.