All Episodes

April 16, 2025 34 mins

After losing White House, control in both chambers of Congress, polling shows democrats want to shift further left, not pivot towards center?? We ask YMS Sr. Contributor Dave Zanotti what this means for the future of the party, if there is one?!! 

Former President Joe Biden has been very quiet since leaving the White House, but now he is back, wading into the Social Security fray with his first public speech since being President. National Correspondent RORYO’NEILL looks at how Democrats feel about the return of Joe Biden, and he will recap Tuesday’s speech. 

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Mark as Played
Transcript

Episode Transcript

Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, it's Michael.

Speaker 2 (00:00):
I'm so glad you found the podcast, and don't forget
you can listen to your Morning Show live each weekday morning.
Your Morning Show can be heard in great cities like Youngstown, Ohio, Nashville, Tennessee,
Saint Louis, Sacramento, Phoenix, just to name a few. You
can find the your Morning Show city closest to you
on our website, Your Morningshow online dot com. And we're
glad you're here for the podcast.

Speaker 1 (00:21):
Enjoy starting your morning off right. A new way of talk,
a new way of understanding, because where in this together.
This is your Morning Show with michae Odell Chorman.

Speaker 2 (00:36):
You know there was a time if you wanted to
know what time it was, you had to call time
and temperature. Yeah, and when I was a kid in
Aunington Heights, Illinois, give it answered, don't sock it in
the sock socket in your bank First National Bank, Randhurst
Time seven oh six, downtown temperature.

Speaker 1 (00:56):
Forty three degrees and it would hang up.

Speaker 2 (00:58):
We used to call for if it's snowed, and if
they called off school, it would go no school, no schools.
Oh really, you had a line for that, We didn't.
You had to watch Ray Rayner to find out if
your school call.

Speaker 1 (01:08):
All time and ten, but if they called off school,
you got the no school.

Speaker 2 (01:11):
We are waiting on Bondie Pam Bondy to make an
announcement from the White House as karma has found its
way to New York Attorney General Letitia James.

Speaker 1 (01:25):
You know Letitia, nobody's above the law.

Speaker 2 (01:27):
Latitia, Well, she did some fraudulent things securing a bank loan.
The President is calling for her to step down as
Attorney general. Well, you live by law, fair, you die
by law. App And then we were talking about week
Martindale passing away at the age of ninety one. Listen,
just one thing we did great in America. It's game
show host. Now, let me tell you something. I have

(01:49):
noticed this with elderly parents that we care for. There
is something about the Game show network, like in hospitals
and stuff. They just they pop on there and they
never leave. It is like what you watch until you die.
They have all new game shows and they're all terrible,
and the hosts are all week and I'm thinking to myself, well,

(02:12):
what we need now is a game show network too,
where they just play the old game shows. Originally was
was now we needed too to be what originally was
because people like Bill Cullen, Bert Convey, Gene Rayburn, Alex Trebek,
Jim Lang, Alan Ludden, Richard Dawson, Bob Barker, Peter Marshall,

(02:34):
Chuck Woolery who died two years ago, they were all
the greatest. So when we were talking about Wink Martindale,
what came to mind was, is that the end of
the era? And it's not. I mean, Pat Say Jack
retired but is alive, and Bob you Banks from where
I was born Flint, Michigan, is still alive and well
at eighty seven years old. But it is an end

(02:56):
of an era. And Wink was just a wonderful, wonderful man.
So our thoughts and prayers are with his wife, his children,
and his family and all that loved him. He will
be missed. I know I'll miss him, all right. We've
kicked around a lot of polls in the last couple
of days and they all point to the same thing.
The Democrats lost because they were majoring in minors and

(03:17):
minoring in majors. They didn't care about the border, but
that was a major to the voters. They didn't care
about the economy that was a major to the voters,
and then they went too far woke, and for some reason,
the straw that broke the camel's back was biological men
playing sports against the women. And they go on to

(03:37):
lose the White House, They go on to lose control
of both Chambers of Commerce and the writings on the
wall the American people are here and your way left
over here. You got to pivot back towards them. But
what did the research yesterday show? No, they planned to
pivot left. Would the research today's show they planned to
get even more radical to the left or talk about

(04:00):
a failure of democracy? Thirty six percent of Liberal Democrats
support the same fact that four on a two hundred
and twelve of their elected officials voted for You can
do the reverse math. I know that's two hundred and
eight out of two hundred and twelve voting differently than

(04:26):
thirty six percent of their party that want illegals to
show ideas before they're elected. It's a pretty simple equation.
So it begs the question, after you lose control of
the House, the Senate, the White House, whose big idea

(04:50):
is it to go further left and not back towards center.
David Sinati's joining us. He is our senior contributor. I
made the bold prediction, and I think one or both
parties have be gone by the end of the decade.
This is all pointing to AOC is the air apparent
to Bernie Sanders, and now I guess Crockett is the

(05:10):
air apparent to the outrage. AOC role in the house is.

Speaker 1 (05:15):
The writing on the wall. This obvious of what's coming.

Speaker 3 (05:18):
Good morning, Michael, Good morning. I'm sorry for putting you
through this. Oh you're fine. Everyone, No, everyone, if you
forgive me, may I may I pull back the curtain
just a second.

Speaker 2 (05:27):
Because no think it's gonna get you thinking about Comcast again,
and I don't want that to happen.

Speaker 1 (05:34):
No, this wasn't Comcast.

Speaker 3 (05:35):
We went through eleven hours of that between Comcasts and
Apple yesterday and re establishing our Nashville studio. But this morning,
I've done what I've been doing for the last five months.
I set up our time to be together on Eastern
Standard time.

Speaker 1 (05:53):
You know, I've been meaning to ask you.

Speaker 2 (05:55):
I don't know how you do that because two of
the places you're at are Eastern, one is Central. Yes,
so what is your body? No, because that's true. I
know what that's like. Like if you know, like when
I my grandfather, when I was growing up, this was
my he My grandfather was my first great impression. And

(06:17):
I mean I could sound so much like him you
thought it was him. But everything was my time. So
my grandfather would be like, what's for dinner? Good, Well,
it's only three o'clock. At four o'clock my time, I'm
really eat you know because his body, even though he
was visiting us in the Central times on his body
was Eastern. Yeah, so I think you probably biologically you're

(06:39):
you're more eastern East Coast time.

Speaker 1 (06:41):
I think.

Speaker 3 (06:41):
Well, what I do is because our headquarters is in
Valley City, Ohio, I set all my clocks on that
time so that I remember there's a dozen people back
there waiting to talk to me today and I can't
let them down.

Speaker 1 (06:55):
But then all that should have had you here an
hour ago.

Speaker 3 (06:58):
Well, so what I do is I am I'm like
religious on setting my clock to make sure that we're
together in the mornings.

Speaker 1 (07:05):
It's just and I did that last night.

Speaker 3 (07:07):
It's just that after eleven hours of being in Comcast World.
I said it on Eastern. So thank you.

Speaker 1 (07:13):
I was actually, how was you? In thirty seconds? Here
we are? Yeah? No, So I was going to say
to you, you know folks, he didn't panic. No, I don't.
I've always got something to say.

Speaker 2 (07:22):
But I thought it was interesting, Like there's some things
I don't get, like going after Facebook.

Speaker 1 (07:27):
All right, So Facebook buys.

Speaker 2 (07:30):
Instagram and WhatsApp, All right, we're gonna call that monopoly.
Has anybody looked at Disney? Has anybody looked at Comcast?
Well said, there's just some things I don't get that
are going on. First of all, Facebook's dead to anybody
under fifty years old. Now it's really become the elderly
social media.

Speaker 1 (07:50):
Yeah, it's market cap makes it the sixth largest. I know,
I know, I know. I don't know how they in
the country. I don't know how they pulled up me
and Facebook bigger than Diney.

Speaker 2 (07:58):
But one of the things that we we've done before
in a podcast, I don't think people realize it, but
basically they can't pull it off anymore because they've all died.

Speaker 1 (08:06):
But you were.

Speaker 2 (08:08):
You weren't just down to what you would like to
lump is mainstream media or fake news. No, you had
three companies controlling the entire narrative of this country. Like
if you ever look at the umbrella, Okay, what's under Comcast?

Speaker 1 (08:25):
Hello?

Speaker 2 (08:25):
What's under Disney Hello? And then you know you get
to you know a couple of others and that's it.
You could you could really narrow it down to what
three the control all total?

Speaker 1 (08:35):
Six total?

Speaker 2 (08:36):
You get to the social media is yes, six total,
but you once put together, it's kind of like a
word looks like a word cloud. But when you see
everything that these three little arms can control, it's scary.

Speaker 3 (08:46):
And Facebook wasn't. Harvard University actually did the study. It's
a book that's about it's about two and a half
three inches deep. As far as the research they did
on this who controls the narrative in America?

Speaker 1 (08:56):
It's it's amazing. You know, the biggest narrative controller in
the whole world is Wicked.

Speaker 2 (09:02):
Well Red looked at me yesterday and I was thinking
Wikipedia and Snopes, because if you can control them in
a culture where there is no truth, right, you know,
that's that's how we've made the Supreme Court god now,
because well we don't have a god, so somebody, you know,
and the things we can't decide has becat.

Speaker 3 (09:21):
Stop the presses, all right, let the world know. That's
a really big statement you just made. Oh yeah, that's.

Speaker 2 (09:27):
Very significant, but so is what we're talking about, and
so they don't, which I will get to.

Speaker 1 (09:33):
Yeah, well I will answer your question.

Speaker 2 (09:35):
But you know, this is what we're living in. And
then we're going to pick on on Facebook and BlimE me,
I'm no Zuckerberg fan or any of the shenanigans he's
been playing and the billions and billions of his dollars
he's been using for his worldview and his political agenda.

Speaker 1 (09:51):
But I don't know how you compare this to any
of these others.

Speaker 3 (09:54):
Well, Zuckerberg is a tremendous example of what we've done
to ourselves in modern culture. We made a kid who
was angry about getting dumb by pretty girls at Harvard,
who created a website. We made him the first richest
billionaire in the history of the human planet. And what
he did was he turned us into his product. That

(10:14):
is basically the story of Facebook, and it's basically our
story how our technology is turning us into machines, into products,
into bots to be used by people. Now to your question, specifically,
this is the environment in which the new Democrats are
trying to function. And I would submit to you, Michael,
that they represent an atomized generation. They represent a group

(10:39):
of people under the age of forty. They're trying to
make their big transition from the ancients like Pelosi and
Shumer to the youngers. And by going to that next generation,
they are facing a group that is atomized in their
very soul. They are split into pieces and held together
by the phone in their hands. And this is the

(10:59):
problem that they're wrestling with.

Speaker 1 (11:03):
All right.

Speaker 2 (11:03):
So David is a NATTI senior contributor. He is the
CEO of the American Policy round Table, host of the
Public Square on two hundred stations, and presides over Eye voters.
All right, So one pole suggests they're out of step
with the American people. They need to pivot towards the center,
and they plan to go left. That's one piece. The
other piece is illegals voting and the Say Act. And

(11:24):
how many two thirds of America agrees on this and
even thirty six percent of liberals agree on this, but
only four out of two hundred and twelve Democrats voted
for it.

Speaker 1 (11:36):
I don't know how good of democracy, that is.

Speaker 2 (11:38):
But I'm watching Crockett become AOC, AOC becoming Bernie. Now
then mysteriously AOC now someddenly is nine point six million
dollars in fundraising. All right, So now they're playing her
up like a stateswoman because she's the air A parent.

Speaker 1 (11:55):
So I know the game here.

Speaker 2 (11:57):
They had won the party, they would have gotten the
their candidate as the nominee, and Bernie Sanders twice and
they got their legs cut out and then a third
time with Biden and Kamala Harris. But now they've got
a vice president of the DNC in their pocket who's
raising billions of dollars to target older out of touch

(12:18):
this David Hogg from Parkland. Yes, you know, target and
they'll be, they'll be, they'll be a void for that.
Get rid of these old people to stay till the
body tag.

Speaker 1 (12:28):
Yep. And watch that guy. That's the guy that's the
up and comer. So now they got a wolf in
the hen house. Can they pull it off? And it's
clear to me it's not going to be Bernie.

Speaker 2 (12:35):
Can Bernie make it any more clear to everyone it's AOC.

Speaker 1 (12:38):
He's handed the torture. They keep doing news conferences together.

Speaker 2 (12:41):
AOC is going to be their their run for presidential nominee.
The writing's on the wall, and this time they know
where the fight is.

Speaker 1 (12:49):
It's not in the media. They don't.

Speaker 2 (12:51):
They probably still control it, but it doesn't have any
influence anymore. It's not in technocracy because that's been blocked
on Twitter, but it is at the DNC. I that's
it's fun to watch. I actually think AOC right now,
based on right now, and a lot's got to happen.
She's the odds on favorite in my mind to be
the Democratic nominee for president of the United States. And

(13:12):
there's a lot of people who think I'm crazy. Trust me,
you might be new to this show, but every time
somebody thinks I'm crazy, we.

Speaker 1 (13:22):
Call it Doster del Journal. But I want to get
your take on that when we come back. It's your
Morning Show with Michael Del Journo.

Speaker 2 (13:31):
President wants Harvard University to apologize for anti semitism on campus.
This the day after he cuts two billion By the way,
do universities need our federal tax dollars support? With all
the money they have and all of their endowments. The
question to throw up into the air. David Sinati here
with us. After losing the White House control of both

(13:52):
chambers of Congress, polling suggests the Democrats plan to go
further left, not back towards the center.

Speaker 1 (13:58):
David Sanati.

Speaker 2 (13:59):
Fine, let's get to the question, what does this mean
for the future of the Democrat Party midterms twenty twenty
eight or if there is one.

Speaker 1 (14:07):
Well, it involves both parties. The Democrats are going to
go for it first.

Speaker 3 (14:10):
They have to, and that's what There is going to
be a huge break in both parties, and it's going
to be a generational break, and it's being underreported right now,
but it's coming. And you're seeing them recognizing the fact
that the only way back to power is to capture
the votes of the up and coming generation, and that's
the direction that they're going. The problem is that they've
still got the boomers and the boomers' kids, who are

(14:31):
the largest population base, who are sick and tired of
the Left.

Speaker 1 (14:35):
They're playing for a future that isn't here yet. Yes,
exactly right.

Speaker 3 (14:39):
But they're hoping that the pizazz in an open seat
election of their new flashy shiny objects will draw enough
votes away from the boomers and their kids, that they
can pull off a very narrow victory. The presidency will
be highly contested over the next twelve years because it's
a generational model that's happening, and they got to go first,
but the Republicans are going to have to go second.

(15:01):
And that's why who succeeds Donald Trump as the nominee
is a critical question.

Speaker 1 (15:05):
You normally do this. I'm gonna pull a david Sonati Red.

Speaker 2 (15:07):
What do you think in terms of Carvel, James Carvell
is calling on the party to abandon all this wokeness
and to kick them out of the party.

Speaker 1 (15:17):
Is he on the same side as Hog?

Speaker 2 (15:19):
Or Is Hog focused on age and he's focused on content?
But the focus is a one two punch in a sense.

Speaker 1 (15:30):
They are completely opposite from one another.

Speaker 2 (15:33):
Yeah, but it looks like they're on the same side
in terms of top But there's your old establishment Democrat
trying to go pivot to center. Here's Hog and Sanders
and AOC leading thirty percent of their party, but with
it the entire party, even.

Speaker 1 (15:51):
For their left. I think it's fascinating war.

Speaker 2 (15:53):
That the war is Carvill literally saying we don't want
you in the party.

Speaker 1 (15:58):
Yeah, we want you gone. And the question is going
to be they're competing for the money. Who gets the checks?

Speaker 2 (16:04):
Right now, AOC's got nine point six million dollars of
those checks. How obvious is it that she's the heir
apparent to the Socialist Democrat Party. When your morning show continues,
will you owe us over time for being late?

Speaker 1 (16:16):
Gotcha? This esteem the wrestler, a refugee from the People's
Republic of Minnesota. And my morning show is your morning
show with Michael del jornal.

Speaker 4 (16:34):
Hi.

Speaker 2 (16:34):
I'm Michael del Jorno and your morning show can be
heard live as it's happening five to eight am Central
at six to nine Eastern on great stations like six
point twenty WJDX and Jackson, Mississippi, or Akrons, News Talk
six forty WHLO and AKRON, Ohio and News Radio five
seventy WDAK and Columbus, Georgia. I'd love to be a
part of your morning routine.

Speaker 1 (16:54):
But we're glad you're here. Now enjoy the podcast.

Speaker 5 (16:57):
All I can think about when you talk about AOC
being the candidate is Gavin Newsom saying, girl, baby, girl.

Speaker 1 (17:04):
Don't even play.

Speaker 5 (17:06):
But I would really like to see her in a
debate with JD. Vance or Marco Rubio, because that would
be fun. First of all, let me get this straight.
Mary has a producer now that throws in live sound bites.

Speaker 1 (17:18):
Mary pays well, Mary is my favorite listener.

Speaker 2 (17:23):
No that look it for me. It's the writing on
the wall. She's the heir apparent. The torch has been passed,
Bernie keeps passing it to her. Nine point six million
dollars has been passed to her. She's now being presented
as the statesman. There's a void because the party doesn't
have a spokesperson other than Carvel saying, you know, you
got to throw all these wacky leftists out of our
party and pivot back to the center and let's wain

(17:44):
in some elections. Meanwhile, you got David Hogg. He's spending
you know, he's a co head of the DNC and
he's going to spend billions of dollars getting rid of
all the old people. So he's going to play the
age game. Carvell's trying to play the content game. The
Civil War is on and AOC is the new Bernie.

(18:05):
I mean, it's crazy. Here's the question for David Zanati
for this segment, and where does Joe fit into all this?

Speaker 6 (18:12):
Listen, I remember pulling in, pulling into the parking lot,
and I had never seen I'd never seen hardly any
black people and scranted.

Speaker 1 (18:22):
It's the time when I and.

Speaker 6 (18:23):
I was only going in fourth grade and I remember
seeing the kids going by at the time, called colored
kids on a bus going by. They never turned right
to go to Claimant High School. I wondered why, as
my mom, why so on Delaware's I'm not allowed to
go to school in public school with white kids.

Speaker 1 (18:41):
Honey.

Speaker 6 (18:43):
That sparked my sense of outraging a kid, just like
it does. I mean, and these young kids right here can.

Speaker 1 (18:49):
Tell you that Joe's talking segregation.

Speaker 2 (18:53):
And then and then of course you know you had
angry Joe misrepresenting what the president is doing.

Speaker 1 (19:00):
Uh.

Speaker 2 (19:00):
Yeah, seven thousand employees have been removed, but they weren't working.
This will free up more benefits to go to people.
Illegals have been sucking up the benefits and they shouldn't
be getting them. So unless you're for illegal immigrants and
gang members getting your Social Security money that you've paid
in for and you depend on nobody's robbing Social commits
stop Joe from doing the same, screams from previous speeches, and.

Speaker 6 (19:22):
Social security is more than the government program.

Speaker 4 (19:24):
It's a sacred promise. We made it a sacred promise,
all right.

Speaker 2 (19:30):
So, whether you're David Hogg or whether you're AOC Bernie
Sanders and the socialist Democrats ready to take this party
down and forever?

Speaker 1 (19:41):
What is that?

Speaker 2 (19:42):
What do either side of them do with Joe? They
don't want impact. Only the media would be into Joe.

Speaker 3 (19:49):
Michael, this is like a forty five record side A
and sib. Joe is going the old entitlement route right
In other words, who the blank to these people think
they are? Don't they know that we run this place
and I've spent my whole life with all of my
friends running this place. Who do you think you are?

Speaker 2 (20:04):
And hoggs saying look at this old fart, who does
he think he is?

Speaker 1 (20:07):
And look at the name of Hogg's organization. His organization
is leaders.

Speaker 3 (20:11):
We deserve a twenty five year old, entitled individual saying
we deserve better at the age of twenty five, your
grandparents and uncles and aunts and I would have buried
us in the backyard if we walked up and said,
we deserve a better America than you went out and fought.

Speaker 1 (20:25):
For in World War Two.

Speaker 2 (20:27):
And then in the middle is James Carvel saying, you
guys are all crazy. Man. We got to get back
to what the American people need and want and content.

Speaker 1 (20:35):
I mean, it is, it's pretty wild.

Speaker 2 (20:38):
I would call it a water gun fight, but I
mean it's a pretty and hitting each other in the crossfire.

Speaker 1 (20:43):
Well, and it is.

Speaker 3 (20:44):
It is a generational split that's happening. And understand that
it's not just a Democrat malady here.

Speaker 1 (20:51):
This is coming for the Republicans as well.

Speaker 3 (20:53):
This is a generational shift in the American political point
of view, and the people who navigated correctly are going
to have a wonderful opportunity to lead. But someone that
starts from the premise of leaders we deserve that entire
entitlement mindset.

Speaker 1 (21:07):
Of people under the age of thirty.

Speaker 2 (21:09):
You've got to be getting I don't think you realized
the biggest thing you just revealed. One did it without
saying it. They've already done it. Jd Vance, Marco Rubio,
Governor DeSantis. I mean, look at all the people in
this administration, rising stars.

Speaker 1 (21:23):
They've already done it.

Speaker 3 (21:25):
And the question is will they take the next step
or step on themselves.

Speaker 2 (21:30):
Well, Donald Trump, in as much as he is a
mission accomplished the border, and think of how long we
fought for voter identification, it's going to happen like a
breath now with this real act.

Speaker 1 (21:44):
But he's not without mistakes.

Speaker 2 (21:46):
You play with tariffs, you're playing with fire, and you're
playing with a fire the American people don't understand. And
I don't know if this is going to match what
you guys are you're starting a six week series on
the public square. But here's my take. My take is
they've conflated a lot of things, all right. And I
think you heard when John Decker, was it Decker and

(22:07):
Ei them back and forth on this or no, it
was Bonsome David Bonsen? Yes, okay. So there is a
difference between trade deficits tariffs and.

Speaker 1 (22:20):
Now I'm my first blank of the day, barriers.

Speaker 2 (22:26):
Yes, And the White House knows that this is an
area people don't get, and so they're just kind of
like lumping them all together. And so if you get tariffs,
what they're saying is very misleading or inaccurate. If you
don't get tariffs. Basically, they just kind of lumped it
all into one big ball and it can make sense
to you, but it's actually not accurate.

Speaker 1 (22:47):
David how Day and not today.

Speaker 2 (22:48):
Just to add to it, it was supposedly seventy five
countries that had come forward ready to renegotiate, which isolates
just China. Fine, but now we find out more than
ten sixty, more than ten sixty five, more than ten,
one more than ten, and they won't tell us who
the ten are or what they're offering tariffs. Could this

(23:13):
is either a mess or this is chess, one of
the two, and it's looking more like mess. And we
got an American people who don't understand even the issue.

Speaker 1 (23:23):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (23:23):
Well, there's a board game out there that's pretty popular
called Katan. I don't know if anybody on this team
ever plays it, but my kids forced me to play it,
and I hate it. I lose every time. It is
it's like chess, but it's like risk. It's on steroids.
It's got all of these lands and trades and coal
and wheat and coal but rocks, and it's a crazy game.

(23:45):
You build roads, you build houses, and then eventually somebody
pops up out of no one and says I won.

Speaker 1 (23:49):
That's what the tariff debate reminds me of.

Speaker 3 (23:52):
It's multi layered, moving all of the same direction, and
nobody's had any experience with it for over one hundred years.
And the reason is because since we go back to
nineteen thirteen, when we didn't have an income text tari
tariff's were a significant portion of raising revenue for the
federal government. Once Congress got the sixteenth Amendment, which is
really poorly written and has created trillions of dollars of

(24:15):
mischief on Capitol Hill. Once they got that power, they
realized it was much easier to text people than to
tax countries. So they just took the money from us
now to go backwards and to re educate everybody on
that is a very complicated process in very short order,
and the Trump team is not real good at schooling folks,
So they're doing what they think is best and letting

(24:35):
us catch up with them. That works great with DOJE
because they've got elon Musk interpreting, but they've got nobody
interpreting well on teriffs, and so they've got a problem.

Speaker 2 (24:43):
Do you want better if he's playing I like to
do Glenn Beck if.

Speaker 1 (24:48):
He's playing six dimensional chess.

Speaker 2 (24:51):
And this leads to let's get back to not something
radical and crazy and dangerous, but to how this country
did fund it self for over one hundred and fifty years.
In other words, we're going to go back to using
tariffs and breaking barriers and having other countries and imports
fund our federal government. After we get rid of the

(25:14):
fraud and the waste and reel in the spending to
eliminate taxation altogether, then you might be explaining where this
is headed or is this just trying to get manufacturing
because that's not going to happen quick enough to get results.
I don't even know if you can renegotiate these deals
within a year before the midterm election. I mean, then
there's the get away from tariffs in the economic understanding.

(25:37):
Just get to the political gamesmanship of this crazy board
game you're not playing. That could really backfire by the midterms.

Speaker 3 (25:45):
Well, and leaving people in the dust is never a
good political idea. I think they land this plane, however,
because what appears daily to be more apparent is that
this is about squaring off the United States with China
in a non shoe war. China is very aggressively conducting
a war on the free world, in absorbing the free

(26:07):
world's assets and its potential for future development. And Trump's aaunes,
which is diplomatically paralyzing and destabilizing, and they're using their
revenue and they have been for decades to build their military.
And the company that's caught in the middle is Apple,
which is intriguing because they're.

Speaker 1 (26:25):
Not bad people.

Speaker 3 (26:25):
They're caught in a bad, bad situation and watching them
trying to figure out how to move is interesting as well.
Apple's the biggest company market capitalization in the country, the
number one above everybody else. There was a time a
couple of years ago, they had more money in the
bank than the federal treasury.

Speaker 1 (26:42):
They are caught in the middle.

Speaker 3 (26:43):
They've got hundreds of thousands of employees in China and
that's where the phones come from.

Speaker 2 (26:48):
Well, just like if you developed a problem that couldn't
be resolved with Canada and Mexico, which I thought that
was all process and not destination, that'd be a big
problem for the automobile industry.

Speaker 3 (26:58):
Yes, And interesting enough, when you go to the top
one hundred companies in America, you don't find for to
general motors you do find Tesla. So we have got
a serious reawakening on what the facts are and what
the battle is. So if the terrified only ends up
with us squaring off on an economic competition with China,
that's great gain to make us aware of what we've

(27:20):
got to change. So it could be worth the journey,
but it's going to take a little bit more patience.

Speaker 1 (27:24):
Now.

Speaker 3 (27:24):
I don't know if the Trump people know this because
they don't talk to a lot of folks. I mean,
they talk to the press, but I don't know where.

Speaker 1 (27:30):
Their council is.

Speaker 3 (27:30):
They've got really good people up there, and they're not stupid.

Speaker 1 (27:34):
So we're just gonna have to see. What do you
think the American people misunderstand the most about tariffs? Uh? Wow?
I mean, just how to spell the word?

Speaker 3 (27:44):
Is it one R, two rs, one F two fs
And we don't even know how to spell the word.

Speaker 1 (27:47):
It's one R and two f's, isn't it? Yeah? One
a doubt read. But beyond that it only gets worse. Yeah, No,
wonder became a six six week series. All right?

Speaker 2 (28:03):
How dangerous is this to the Trump legacy? To the
handoff to the next I mean, basically, what I see now,
and I don't know what it's going to be, But
what I see now is the Republican Party is already gone.

Speaker 1 (28:17):
Let that soak in for two seconds. It's already gone.

Speaker 2 (28:21):
The Reagan Revolution has morphed with the Tea Party and
trump Ism, and primarily trump Ism, which is the morphing
of John F. Kennedy, Reagan Revolution and Tea Party to
become a new party. And we've seen that in the research.
It's already there. So that's the future establishment. Republican Party

(28:41):
is already gone. But it is just as I said.
They have flawlessly gone young without ever having to fight
for it or say it. They just became young and
focused on the issues that matter to the American people,
and they morphed back into this true conservative conglomerate of
Reagan Revolution, really Kennedy politics, Reagan Revolution, Tea Party, and

(29:06):
Trump isn't the Democrat Party. There's a war to be
fought from within. I see it, and it's just me.
The parasite looks today like it's going to win. So
the socialist Democrats are going to manage to take over
the Democrat Party, and the way they'll celebrate it is
AOC is their nominee because she's their apparent to Bernie Sanders.

(29:26):
But the problem is the parasite analogy. The parasite's going
to win, but by doing so kill the host. So
getting back to our main question, they're not pivoting to
the center and to the American people. They're going to
pivot further left. Is there a future for the Democrat Party?

Speaker 3 (29:41):
They're back hitting all on class envy and popular opinions
and making their candidate better from Central Cansting than whoever.

Speaker 1 (29:49):
The Republicans bring.

Speaker 3 (29:51):
Up, if the Trump administration delivers three big things in
four years, the American people are going to say thank God,
because they're very used to something different.

Speaker 1 (29:58):
And right now they're at one. They've got the border,
but they've.

Speaker 2 (30:01):
Got a lot riding on tariffs, and they still got
to get to the tax cuts.

Speaker 3 (30:04):
If they get that, If they get those two taxes
and the border secured, that's look, how much can a
president do with with? And this is where Congress has
got to step up. Johnson, where are you, Thoon? Where
are you?

Speaker 1 (30:16):
Now? Is the time to deliver on the numbers? Right now.

Speaker 2 (30:21):
Is Donald Trump Junior and his sister in law purchase
of Salem a sign of what their future is.

Speaker 1 (30:29):
It's not office, it's narrative. It's long play. Yeah, they're
they're in the long play. The Trump family is Javans.

Speaker 2 (30:37):
Or Marco Rubio, depending on which ends up on top,
is your next ticket. Maybe DeSantis in there. Well, it
may be a surprise. We still don't yet know.

Speaker 3 (30:45):
They've got at least a half a dozen people to
pick from and sort of the sort of the Democrats.
But remember it's going to be a generational look this time.

Speaker 2 (30:54):
David Sinnati is the host of the Public Square. If
you're more interested in what you need to know about tariffs,
that's six week process begins at the Public Square dot
com and on two hundred stations nationwide beginning this weekend. David,
I will act like I'm not going to see you,
but I'm going to see you on the golf course,
and you're back tomorrow.

Speaker 1 (31:10):
You just don't know it. This is your morning show
with Michael del Chrono.

Speaker 2 (31:17):
Well, former President Biden made his big comeback his first
public appearance and speech in.

Speaker 1 (31:23):
Chicallball is the administration.

Speaker 6 (31:26):
Has made so much done, so much dammies, and so
much destruction.

Speaker 1 (31:31):
It's kind of breath, taking his breath and mumble breathy, Joe,
give us a little more volume.

Speaker 6 (31:38):
And social security is more than the government program.

Speaker 4 (31:40):
It's a sacred promise. What we made a sacred promise?

Speaker 1 (31:45):
Thank you?

Speaker 2 (31:46):
Uh. And then we just had Pam Bondi And it
wasn't about the investigation and prosecution of Letitia James, the
New York Attorney General for mortgage fraud. It was to
announce that the administration is suing the State of Maine
for biological men playing in women's sports in their defiance
of the executive order in ruling. We'll have more on

(32:10):
both of those. Roy O'Neil is also here. Let's start
with he is here, right yep? Oh, okay, Hi, Rory.
I don't want to be over. First of all, I
don't make fun of elderly. I respect an honor them.
But this is the same Joe, the same rhetoric, the

(32:30):
same tone, the same delivery style. I just wonder what
anybody's other than the media interest in what Joe Biden
thinks is. But any surprises in the speech to you,
not particularly. He kept it mostly focused on social Security.
He was talking to a group of disabled advocates Essentially,
this group is run by the man who used to

(32:53):
run Social Security under President Biden, former Governor O'Malley. So
I think that was sort of doing a favor for
old friend to go make the speech. But this was
the first really big, high profile event for President Biden
since leaving office. He's accused the Trump administration of acting
like tech bros, move fast and break stuff, but the

(33:15):
administration was pretty quick to respond on x last night
on the Social Security account, they said that quote Biden
is lying to Americans unquote and said that President Trump
has repeatedly pledged to protect Social Security benefits.

Speaker 1 (33:29):
So, yeah, a little bit of a back and forth.

Speaker 2 (33:31):
Well that sounds like he said, she said, But what's
the reality. I mean, Okay, so they cut seven thousand employees,
but these are employees that were identified as not working
and or wasteful and overreach. And then as far as
cutting benefits, it was just two illegals, which would free
up more benefits for those that paid in over a lifetime. So,

(33:54):
you know, but I just wonder, is there any audience
for Joe Biden right now? I'm I'm watching the far
left of the party trying to take over the party.
The established owner of the party trying to get younger.
But there's no audience for Joe, is there?

Speaker 3 (34:06):
No, not particularly, But it's a party without a message
or a messenger, and in a vacuum.

Speaker 2 (34:12):
That's what happened, the suing of Maine. I'm sure that's
gonna be a big story. You're going to be covering
throughout the day and have Forest tomorrow and the karma
of the day for Letitia James, if nobody's above the law,
well here it comes mortgage fraud towards her and her
future is New York's Attorney General. But never a moment
without something to talk about, is there lately, even in

(34:35):
a holiday week, you know you think that as things were,
I'm in the Eastern spirit. In fact, we'll have our
good Friday address on Friday morning. Roy and Neil, great
job today, we'll talk again tomorrow.

Speaker 1 (34:44):
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael Nhild Joe Now,
Advertise With Us

Popular Podcasts

Dateline NBC

Dateline NBC

Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com

24/7 News: The Latest

24/7 News: The Latest

The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.

Therapy Gecko

Therapy Gecko

An unlicensed lizard psychologist travels the universe talking to strangers about absolutely nothing. TO CALL THE GECKO: follow me on https://www.twitch.tv/lyleforever to get a notification for when I am taking calls. I am usually live Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays but lately a lot of other times too. I am a gecko.

Music, radio and podcasts, all free. Listen online or download the iHeart App.

Connect

© 2025 iHeartMedia, Inc.