June 27, 2025 • 34 mins
The jurors in the Sean “Diddy” Combs trial are scheduled to begin deliberating next week. Did prosecutors get the job done? What is next for the hip-hop mogul if convicted? National Correspondent RORY O’NEILL has the latest.
The European Space Agency says human settlement on Mars could happen within 15 years. The roadmap includes testing nuclear propulsion, sustainable life-support systems, and it’s a bold claim—but the science is catching up to the ambition. Futurist Kevin Cirilli joins us with the details.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, it's me Michael. Your morning show has heard live
from five to eight am Central, six to nine am Eastern,
three to six am Pacific on great radio stations like
News Radio eleven ninety k EX in Portland, News Talk
five point fifty k FYI, and Phoenix, Arizona Freedom one
oh four seven in Washington, d C. We'd love to
have you join us live in the morning, even take
us along on the drive to work, but better late
(00:21):
than never. Enjoy the podcast our end. Welcome to Friday,
June the twenty seventh. Youre Bell Low twenty twenty five
on the air and streaming live on your iHeartRadio app.
This is your morning show. Honor to serve you, I'm
Michael del Jerono Jeffrey keeping an eye on all the sounds,
read on the content if you're just waking up. The
Senate is hoping to start the debates and the process
(00:44):
for the big beautiful bill as early as today. Looks
like a little relief for those of us under the
heat dome. And boy have we been in Middle Tennessee.
It has been disgustingly hot and humid. Get about eight
to ten degrees of relief, but with it a lot
of severe thunderstorms cooling you off, which is causing havoc
(01:04):
with air travel. Supreme Court is set to issue rulings
on birthright citizenship in five other cases in its final
day of its term, as well as the jurors are
about to begin deliberation in the Shan Dinny Coombs Trail.
On both these stories and more is our very own
national correspondent Roary You Neil, Good morning, Rory.
Speaker 2 (01:24):
Hey there, Michael, good morning, Happy Friday.
Speaker 1 (01:27):
I guess you could say the Supreme Court out with
a bang, not a whimper.
Speaker 3 (01:30):
Well, certainly a lot on their to do list, so
it should be a flory of activity on a Friday.
You just love to work late on a Friday going
through some court rulings. Hey listen, Rory, but this is
one of the few days I can say this. Eight Central.
I've done today. Eight Central.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
That's it.
Speaker 3 (01:47):
But yeah, for you, the court rules at ten am,
so that's an Eastern time.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
That's when we'll get word from them.
Speaker 3 (01:54):
As you said, on issues like birthright citizenship, there's a
challenge about whether or not you have to prove your
age to access pornographic websites. The redistricting case in Louisiana
as well, So some pretty big cases all to be
decided we think today.
Speaker 1 (02:11):
All right, So for birthright citizenship, the first thing I
think would strike everybody is out is you mean this
hasn't come up yet?
Speaker 3 (02:18):
Well, this is the Trump Vikasa is the name of
the case, and it really began as a challenge to
the President's executive order ending birthright citizenship. So this is
actually a pretty fast track to get this here. They
had arguments in the case back in May. It'll be
curious to see who writes the opinion. Obviously what the
opinion is. But judging the folks over at scotus Blog
(02:40):
believe that because of the nature of the case and
the fact it is all fast tracked, that the Chief
Justice himself would likely be the author of the opinion.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
All right, and then for diddy colms, my goodness, we
have said this throughout. Is this a immoral, debaucherous, filthy
human being? Yes? But have they proved any of the
charges and they dropped some of the charges recently. But
just what will this jury be deliberating on and what
(03:08):
has effectively been laid out in the court room a
public opinion versus what's been laid out for the courtroom
jury to decide, looking like two different things.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Well, right, and look, we've all seen that video outside
the elevators in the hotel and it's disgusting to watch.
But he's not really charged with what happened there in
that video racketeering, conspiracy. He's got two counts of sex
trafficking by force, two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Look,
I've touched defense attorneys who say the prosecution did not
(03:39):
get the job done here, that there's a lot of
vague stuff surrounding it. To your point, yeah, he seems
to be a jerk, But does that get you in
a federal prison for the rest of your life, because
it's we got a lot more federal prisoness.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
And I guess, but I don't think this one's going
to keep you working late.
Speaker 1 (03:55):
But if there's a quick decision, you know the old
this is one of those that might be quick, it
might be not guilty.
Speaker 3 (04:05):
Right, And so we've got closing arguments from the defense
today and then the deliberations will start on Monday, you know,
and then juris do what juris do. It's been six
weeks more than thirty witnesses have testified, so it's a
matter of you know, let's see what they come up with.
But look, even if Sean Diddy Combs is found not guilty,
he will probably spend the rest of his life in
(04:26):
a courtroom. He's got something like seventy civil suits against him.
So you know, no matter what, the Justice Department isn't
done with them yet.
Speaker 1 (04:35):
And in this particular case, the civil looks easier to
get than the criminal. Roy great reporting. We'll talk to
you again in the third hour. All right, I want
to talk a little bit about this New York candidate.
I know that Red is watching closely the decision being
made by Andrew Cuomo. Democrats weren't given I mean, these
(04:57):
are just statements of fact. Democrats weren't given such great choices,
let's face it. So they have a former governor who
was caught in a COVID scandal with the elderly, not
to mention other scandals, and then you have and again
for some that will talk about the socialist aspect, and
(05:18):
certainly the justice socialist Democrats are on board with this guy.
I don't know that they know what they're playing with here,
but they're on board with this guy. So there's two
ways to look at this. Do you want to follow
this race as a justice Democrat takeover of the largest
inner city that will propel AOC forward in a presidential
(05:39):
race and really what I in my belief is bring
an end to the Democrat party? Or is this a
completely different, disguised movement. Had a listener the other day,
maybe been Roger. I don't know, say this reminds me
of what you're always saying. This isn't me saying this.
(06:01):
There are three types of Muslims today because there were
three types of Mohammed, and the disagreements over what example
to follow and who was the successor to Mohammed is
why you have these different factions of Muslims. And the
good news is a lot of Muslims followed the early
example of Mohammed, which was really just kind of a hodgepodge.
(06:23):
You took a little from Christianity, a little from Judaism,
and you know, he was just one of three hundred
and sixty five religions in Mecca. It was no big deal.
Then it started becoming a big deal. Then not so tolerant.
Then Gil's his uncle, then starts robbing caravans, then starts
talking about occupying, agitating, waging war, and in the end
(06:48):
his final example is a shiahatas bloodthirsty warrior. So what
do you have today? The same thing? Peace loving Muslims
as culture calls them. Cat Stevens one of the nicest
guys you'll ever meet, beast loving Muslim.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
Other political Muslim organizations not so nice.
Speaker 4 (07:15):
But they're very.
Speaker 2 (07:16):
Patient and they play for the long run.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
What does that mean, Well, they will tell you we
follow the example of Mohammad and we populate. It's an
issue for America because of abortion, because of global warming fears,
because of selfishness. Now because of the social dilemma. We
don't socialize a lot with other real human beings, so
we're getting more and more isolated, and the birth rate
(07:42):
is dangerously low. It will topple our entitlement programs. We
do not simply have enough people being born to work
to pay for those who are living longer. It is
a clear and present economic danger, but it is a
civilization danger ultimately, and the others that are coming here
(08:05):
and not assimilating, but are here to change you, which
is exactly what this mayoral candidate said live on television.
They are multiplying because they're following their example. The Christians
are called to do the same thing. I might add,
we're called to go forth into all nations to make disciples,
(08:25):
not conquer nations for world political dominance. But we're to
go into all nations and we are to go forth
and multiply.
Speaker 2 (08:34):
But we don't. They do. So that is what political
Islam does.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
It populates, then it infiltrates, then it agitates, then it
wages war, and it doesn't wait for fifty percent to
do it. So I am fascinated that the justice Democrats
don't know who they're sharing a bed with. It's interesting
(09:02):
the media doesn't know how to make the distinction. And
I think there's probably very few people in talk radio
that know how to make the distinction. This guy is
socialist or an Islamist. He's clearly an Islamist, and they
are very different because Islam is a form of government.
It is a system of justice, it is a system
of finance and taxation, and it is a system of life.
Speaker 2 (09:27):
And there are no rights.
Speaker 1 (09:30):
There are no religious freedoms, there are no speech freedoms,
there's no right of assembly freedoms. Now the same leftist
media that would speak against anybody pushing Christianity after all,
separation of the state. They don't even see this coming.
And this is a theocratic, a theocracy designed system, and
(09:56):
it's our largest city twenty five years after nine eleven
with a complete unknown. By the way, I gotta interrupt
myself and tell you, if you haven't seen the Bob
Dylan movie, it really is terrific. And I got to
tell you, at sixty years old, I never realized how
much I love Bob Dylan till right now. I'm like
listening to all the old songs. Lack a complete un noon,
(10:20):
lack of Rowlands, dune Zoran Mondani. He's only been a
US citizen for seven years, he's only been a lousy
assemblyman for three years, and now he's on all the
national shows like he's the set I joked earlier, like
he's the second coming of Barack Obama.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
Wait a minute, he might be the second coming of
Baraco Bulm.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
And at first you could look at it and say, well,
this is just a panderin fool, right, thirty dollars minimum wage.
Anybody who's ever run a busy, how are you gonna
eat in New York City with thirty dollars minimum wage?
Can you imagine that the bus boys are getting thirty
an hour. I don't even know what city grocery stores are,
(11:16):
but I can tell you that those that have tried
it in the past, the shells are empty. No police
guys holding a gun to your head. Somebody give me
a social worker.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
Immediately dial nine to one one. Those guy's in my house.
I think it's gonna kill me. And how does that
make you feel?
Speaker 4 (11:42):
Could you imagine the customer service and a government owned supermarket?
Speaker 1 (11:46):
Oh my gosh, all right, so it should be just ridiculous.
You know, no police, rent control for everyone. Well, that's
a story today. Luxury real estate brokers are all ready
to flee just over the thought of him winning. But
the nuance to the story for today would be okay.
(12:08):
So you didn't have a good choice. You had Andrew
Cuomo killed a lot of elderly mismanaging, COVID scandal, and
then you got this unknown Islamist that you think is
just a socialist, and so the whole socialist movement gets
behind him, and of course, in a low turnout, Brian Mary,
(12:30):
that's going to be all you need Bernie and AOC
and the Justice Democrats get behind you of him. So
now what do you do with Andrew Cuomo? And if
he comes back as an independent and start splitting independent votes,
does that pave the way for this guy? I would
say this, and Red and I had a bit of
a debate off the year, and I'm not willing. It's
(12:51):
not what I'm so positive on. I'm willing to fight
to the death over but my gut tells me, and
sometimes my gut takes a while to prove, but my
gut tells me this guy isn't going to win. But
he gets the conversation started. We have this big sitting
problem waiting to happen with these inner cities. I really
(13:12):
think that's the territory of the potential civil war out
of control leftist, chaotic inner cities. I mean, they could
make us broken enough to take down the whole economy,
but if it starts becoming one of these completely different
(13:33):
nations once you're inside the inner city, I think they
might want to try to use this guy as the
beginning of that movement. That's clearly part of their strategy,
and a lot of they're really bad ideas all mixed
in with it, and a lot of the socialist Democrat
movement mixed in. I don't sense he's going to win,
and I don't know. The turnout was so low in
the general and it did have the rank order system,
(13:56):
but I don't know how it plays out in the general.
But the question of the day is do you want
Andrew Cuomo in this race or out of it? And
by staying in it and coming back as an independent,
does he paved the way for the one thing I
would think he doesn't.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
Want, which is Zura and Mom Dommie. I think that's
a fascinating thing to look at.
Speaker 1 (14:12):
I have two other things next hour we're going to cover,
which I think are the believe me and I am
aware that we bombed and took out nuclear facilities, and
I'm aware that we negotiated a ceasefire about thirty hours
after doing that. And I still think it's the biggest
story of the week that no one's talking about.
Speaker 2 (14:28):
But that'll have to wait till next hour. It's your
Morning Show with Michael del Journo.
Speaker 1 (14:34):
Give me that last talkback on Kat Stevens and I'll
take a shot at it, and we have to continue
after the break. Kat Stevens is a peace loving Muslim,
the one that called for the death of Solomon Rossty.
Speaker 2 (14:47):
That's the one you're talking about, all right.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
So Cat Stevens, big time singer, converts to Islam, doesn't
sing for twenty years.
Speaker 2 (14:55):
He's starting to sing again.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
If you go back to those stories and they date
back to nineteen eighty nine, he doesn't say he would
kill Simon Salmon Rushti. He says there is no doubt
others who will. Meaning as a Muslim, his allegiances to
the Quran, which is of course anathetical to our system
(15:20):
of justice and citizenry because we're based on a Hebrew
you know, biblical view. So that is Listen, they all
end up in this like a political Muslim. Oh, ten seconds.
A political Muslim will eventually wage war. It's about when
it's time they have a process. They have to arrive
(15:41):
at a shiatiest even though they're going to lose in martyr,
they'll attack you immediately. So that's a good Muslim response. Oh,
I wouldn't do it because I'm a peace loving Muslim.
But there are a lot of Muslims who would and
would be right to based on the Quran and the DDID.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
This is Rebecca in spring Hill, Tennessee, and my morning
show is your morning show with my Michael del Jorno. Hi,
it's Michael.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
Your morning show can be heard live on great radio
stations across the country like wilm and w DOV and
Wilmington and Dover, Delaware, or wgst AM seven twenty the
voice in Middle Georgia.
Speaker 2 (16:19):
And we're going to need some blankets.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
News Radio six fifty k NI, Anchorage, Alaska. We'd love
to be a part of your morning routine. Now enjoy
the podcast. Thanks for bringing us along with you. This
is your morning show. I am Michael del Jorno, happy
and humble and honored to serve you. Jeffrey serving us
all up, controlling all the sounds. He'll be getting Kevin
Surreally on board in just about fifteen minutes from now.
(16:42):
Is it possible in fifteen years we could be living
on Mars. The road map includes nuclear propulsion, sustainable life
support systems. It's a bold claim, but science is catching
up with the ambition. It's now looking realistic. How realistic
We'll talk to the futurists about that in moments from now.
We We played a caller, and that was really unfair
in ninety seconds. But I don't yet, and especially thanks
(17:10):
to Donald Trump, I don't worry about jihadist Muslims. They
act immediate and irrational, and there's and there is no
nobody that wouldn't. We saw that after nine eleven. Nobody
wouldn't stand up against that, and they get pounded back
in time. Political Islam always concerns me more. How do
(17:33):
you boil a frog? Just turn up the heat a
little bit at a time and the frog will never jump.
I think of the Old Testament description my people perish
for lack of knowledge, that Hebrew word for parish is
actually they're overtaken. The ignorance of Islam in America is
the greatest danger, and political Islam, I think, is the
(17:57):
more realistic threat. That's where they populate, populate, which plays
on our birth rate crisis. They populate, they multiply, they infiltrate,
they agitate, and then they wage war as ye hottest
will kill innocent people today. And then there's peace loving
(18:25):
Muslims as culture calls them. The reason you have three
is because of the three examples of Mohammad. They don't
They're not exclusively different from each other, and they all
end up roughly in the same place. I'm going to
make a statement here, and I'm sure people are gonna
think I'm Islamophobic, but I'm just educated. If if you
(18:47):
believe in the God of the Old and New Testament,
Old and New Covenant, if you believe in Christ, Islam
is a threat to you because they're commanded to kill
you if you believe. Maybe you're not a Jesus Free,
(19:09):
maybe you're not, you know, a practicing Jew, but you
like all the things that come from Judaism and Christianity,
you know that gives you an innocent till proven guilty,
a due process, a freedom of religion or none. There's
no compulsion in our constitutions as you have to accept God.
(19:34):
But if you like freedom of speech, if you like
right of assembly, if you like a lot of the
things that come from it, Islam's an enemy for you
because what they believe, and they believe it's holy, and
they believe it's godly, and they believe it's worship. It's
completely anathetical to what you're living. It's a cultural incompatibility. Now,
(19:59):
how do you handle it? Compatibility? Well, wokeness would say
that anybody that speaks against it hates that person, and
I don't. I'm just explaining to you what they believe,
what they would tell you anymom would explain to you. Now,
the biggest problem is the conflating and then the confusion.
(20:23):
The conflating is when you treat a peace loving Muslim
the same way you would treat a political Islamist and
the same way you would treat as shihadist. That's not
good because they're called to do one of two things,
kill you or tax you. And the only peace is
when you're conquered. That would be peace for them, that
(20:45):
would be.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
Hell for you. And then the conflating.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
So if you don't know the difference between the three
types of Muhammed, you don't know the difference between the
three types of Muslims or Islamis, and you don't know
until they act, and when they act, it's too late,
and then all of them ultimately arrive at the same
place if they think that's the moment now in the case,
(21:13):
because this is why we're relevantly talking about it, a
it's New York City where nine to eleven took place
twenty five years ago, and you have an islam mist
not socialist and Islamist candidate who just won the Democrat primary,
and you've got strange bedfellows with socialist Democrats who want
to propel this into a nationwide phenomenon for our inner cities.
(21:36):
It is completely unaffordable. It is such it's not just
even pandering because it's so delusional. You're going to see,
like the governor, for example, Hochel, she's going to speak
against this guy. Why because New York City at eight
million people can bankrupt an entire state and you can't
(21:56):
have thirty dollars minimum wage. You can't tell entrepreneurs who
have made investments in one of the most secure investments
you can make, real estate, that they can't charge rent
at a certain rate. I don't even know where when
you get into city groceries and free childcare and free transportation,
(22:16):
how any of that could be afforded.
Speaker 2 (22:22):
And what the rest of the.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
State would have to pay in taxes to cover that
kind of nonsense in an interstate experiment is unthinkable. So
you're going to see, this guy's going to cause a
lot of problems. What are they going to try to
achieve with the problems? Make a martyr a hero out
of him. Maybe he doesn't end up being the governor
(22:45):
or the mayor of New York City, but maybe he
propels the movement in these inner cities. They're already anti cop,
they're already take from the rich, give to the poor,
text people to death. He has a different endgame than
the socialist Democrats. But right now, this is a guy
(23:05):
out of obscurity. He's only been a citizen for seven years.
He's a Shia Islamist who doesn't acknowledge Israel's right to exist.
Speaker 2 (23:16):
I got news for you. He doesn't acknowledge America's right
to exist.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
And he's not interested in a constitutional republic at all,
and he says as much. So will America focus on
his delusions of grandeur and promises of entitlement. I mean,
who wouldn't vote for autum have to pay for child journymore?
Speaker 2 (23:36):
Okay? Oh you're right, the bus for free.
Speaker 4 (23:38):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (23:39):
I'm gonna get a raise thirty dollars an hour to
be a bus boy, okay. And how many would vote
for that and put an office something very dangerous? Will
the impact be on the gouvenatorial race? Because if this
guy should happen to win. Well, Stephanik is going to
be running and I had to run a trajectory to
possible winning. Anyway, this would be more than enough to
(24:03):
defeat Hoko. So I guarantee you Hoko and Cuomo are
going to come out against this guy.
Speaker 2 (24:12):
The media is going to be on his.
Speaker 1 (24:13):
Side, the Socialist Democrats are going to be on a side,
but they're going to wage a war. Now, the biggest
question of the hour is does Andrew Cuomo, if he
really wants to stop this guy, get out of the
race so that he loses, or stay in the race
as an independent and potentially change and divide the vote
to where he can actually win.
Speaker 2 (24:34):
So I'm fascinated.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
I mean, and you guys kind of went into the
Islamist versus socialist angle. But what's really fascinating is what
a former governor and a sitting governor is going to
do to defeat this threat. And they won't even be
defeating it because they understand the Islamist threat. It's going
to be their own political and state threat. And how
(24:58):
is a world in a matrix going to view this?
And can this, even if he loses, become a trend
in other inner cities and all I'm saying that it's
not controversial. Ghost Wikipedia will educate you. Go study Mohammed's life,
(25:19):
Go study the Hidith, study the service, study history, study
their differences in who was Mohammed's successor.
Speaker 2 (25:30):
Discover the examples that she hottest.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Shia Muslim follows versus a Sunni political Muslim, understand Islam
because all Muslims are not Islamists, but all Islamists are Muslim.
Or just open your ears. We played a clip yesterday
(25:55):
in our Sounds of the Day. He makes it crystal
clear he's in islamis not a socialist, and how he
feels about America, Israel, and the world. But the fascinating
thing to watch is how it impacts the Stephonic gouvenatorial race.
Because I think Republicans are coming close in Jersey, in
New York anyway before this. This could be all it
(26:15):
takes to kick it over the top. The rest of
the state will rally because New York City will bankrupt
them if this guy does any of this stuff. I mean, Michael,
how does this happen in a city with the largest
number of Jewish people? Ignorance makes up Yeah, no, My
people perish for lack of knowledge, you're overtaken. I mean,
(26:37):
ignorance is not stupidity. I don't know what you're focused on,
but you're you're not focused on this. I always use
this analogy. I meanf we were talking chemistry right now,
I'm very ignorant, but talking about this, I'm very un ignorant.
So the question is this is this is a much
bigger thing. Now I'm gonna get to the other biggest
story of the week, bigger than the bombing, bigger than
(26:59):
the season fire.
Speaker 2 (27:01):
Coming up next half hour, This is Your Morning Show
with Michael del Chno.
Speaker 1 (27:07):
The Supreme Court five rulings today. They're going to wrap
up their final day of their nine month term, the
biggest being on birthright citizenship. The Senate hoping to start
debate on Trump's big beautiful bill. House members will get
their intel briefing on the Iran strikes, and I think
the Defense will have its closing arguments today, and then
(27:29):
everything goes to the jury in the Diddy comes case
on Monday. The European Space Agency says that human settlement
on Mars could happen within fifteen years. A blink, God willing,
I'll be alive to see this The roadmap includes testing
(27:49):
nuclear propulsion, sustainable life support systems, and it's a bold claim,
but science is catching up with these bold claims and ambitions.
And our futureist, Kevin Serillia is here with all the details.
Could this be possible. I'm going to see people living
on Mars in fifteen years.
Speaker 4 (28:06):
It is possible. And in fact, the ESA, as you mentioned,
they came out with this bombshell report. Of course the
mainstream media did not pick it up at all, but
they are saying that this is the path and this
is the trajectory that we are on, and if you
think about it, I mean, we've got the International Space Station,
We've got astronauts in space, and this would really be
(28:26):
the next depth. I'm really excited by this. I think
this is a great thing because it really is laying
out an official roadmap for human settlement in space, and
it says that there's going to be this sustained human
presence on Mars and it's achievable within fifteen years. This
is not a one off mission. They're talking about staying
(28:46):
and so in order to do that, the technology that
that will require is a mixture between artificial intelligence and
deploying three D printing, so the astronauts would not have
to land on Mars and build anything with their own hands.
It would kind of be turned key, for lack of
(29:07):
a better phrase, where they would show up and the
systems would already be built for them, or at least
the small foundations of them would be built. Because of
three D printing.
Speaker 1 (29:19):
Everything you bring up is going to be well, we'd
have to break it down. Let's start just in vision.
Everybody looks back, and when John F. Kennedy chose the
Moon and then explained in the famous Rice Beach why
the Moon, everybody felt like that's when the space program
really began to move in a direction. It began with
(29:41):
a reaction and chaos. The Soviets are ahead of us.
We got to get there, you know. And I would
presume that was for satellites and space supremacy, just like
we have air supremacy see supremacy, land supremacy. But when
he came up with the moon, just by saying the Moon,
that set the vision, which create the focus, which created
(30:02):
the actions, what set in motion the direction which arrived
at a destination. So what I'm hearing you say is
that's the biggest thing saying fifteen years Mars boom go.
That's probably what makes it most.
Speaker 4 (30:15):
Likely to happen, right precisely. And the Royal Society, which
is one of the oldest and most established, it's like
the establishment scientific community. They've been around since the sixteen hundreds.
They came out with the report last month. This blew
my mind. They said that the answer to whether or
not there is extra terrestrial life on a small level,
(30:37):
microbes or even bacteria on other parts of our Solar
system or elsewhere, that question could be answered in the
next thirty years, and that we will know in the
next thirty years whether that's true. So we're not talking
about little green men and you know, intelligent life, but no,
whether or not there is some type of other living
(30:58):
organisms in our solar system is going to be known.
I mean this week alone. I don't know if you
saw these pictures, the Viera Reuben Observatory pictures, I mean,
how do you know?
Speaker 1 (31:09):
I mean, but explain to them who haven't. But the
breakthrough of what.
Speaker 4 (31:16):
It is is the world's largest camera. It took the
largest pictures of the soul of our universe, and they
discovered billions emphasis on that galaxies So if you've ever
heard of Carl Sagan's or Sagan's Pale Blue Dot, and
when you zoom out and you see just how small
(31:37):
planet Earth is in the grand scheme of things, this
makes that look even smaller. And they're just magnificent. I mean,
it's I believe in God, and so how how can
you not look at something like that and not believe
in God? But but but but the technology and this
is I totally agree with what you're saying about the
(31:57):
JFK comparison and going to the moon. But the moon
is like a not even a half of a step
compared to where artificial intelligence, three D printing eventually quantum
computing in our lifetime and being able to identify the
parts that we should go And why should we want
to go? Let me let me try to pitch it
to listeners who are skeptical because you know, Katie Perry
(32:18):
kind of gave the space travel stuff a bad name.
But we should want to go because what we were
able to build with Planet Earth just from our technology,
from our energy, from our rare Earth minerals. Imagine what
we can discover on other planets, asteroids, moons, Imagine the
properties of life and the building blocks for life that
(32:39):
could push humans forward. By being able to do that,
and to go to Mars, we're going to have to
expand the supply chain. So the communication systems we're going
are going to have to become interplanetary, the energy systems
of traveling there are going to have to become interplanetary,
and the yes, economic supply chains and economic trade are
(33:02):
going to eventually become interplanetary.
Speaker 1 (33:06):
So closing modes, Kevin saireally, he's our futurist. What would
be on Mars in fifteen years, It's possible. Probably the
two biggest breakthroughs is the nuclear propulsion because of the
distance in getting us there, and then what is defined
by sustainable life support systems.
Speaker 2 (33:21):
I know, sixty seconds is not fair.
Speaker 4 (33:23):
Oh this is easy. It's like the four seasons of Mars.
You know what I'm saying. I mean, it's a spaces oasis.
That's That's what it means, is you want to be
living on Mars. And by the way, I'll go. Who's
ever listen I've been saying this all more. I will go.
I will happily be the Walt Kronkie to Mars. Just
send me and it'll be fun. I'll call in it
to this program and.
Speaker 2 (33:42):
Kevin fun Kevin, I will happily let you thank you.
Speaker 4 (33:47):
Yeah, a lot of people would a lot, but there's.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
You know, you're not gonna have much of you, but
you're gonna have a nice hotel and you're gonna get
there pretty reliably with nuclear propulsion. How close are we
do those two things and the ability for those two
things within fifteen years?
Speaker 4 (34:00):
They say, yeah, yeah, in the next fifteen years. Elon
Musk wants to go in the next five I hope
he does it. I think it'd be amazing.
Speaker 1 (34:07):
All Right, that's our futurest Kevin surreally with the reality
now in sight of Mars.
Speaker 2 (34:13):
We're all in this together. This is Your Morning Show
with Michael ndheld Joo
Hey, it's me Michael. Your morning show has heard live
from five to eight am Central, six to nine am Eastern,
three to six am Pacific on great radio stations like
News Radio eleven ninety k EX in Portland, News Talk
five point fifty k FYI, and Phoenix, Arizona Freedom one
oh four seven in Washington, d C. We'd love to
have you join us live in the morning, even take
us along on the drive to work, but better late
(00:21):
than never. Enjoy the podcast our end. Welcome to Friday,
June the twenty seventh. Youre Bell Low twenty twenty five
on the air and streaming live on your iHeartRadio app.
This is your morning show. Honor to serve you, I'm
Michael del Jerono Jeffrey keeping an eye on all the sounds,
read on the content if you're just waking up. The
Senate is hoping to start the debates and the process
(00:44):
for the big beautiful bill as early as today. Looks
like a little relief for those of us under the
heat dome. And boy have we been in Middle Tennessee.
It has been disgustingly hot and humid. Get about eight
to ten degrees of relief, but with it a lot
of severe thunderstorms cooling you off, which is causing havoc
(01:04):
with air travel. Supreme Court is set to issue rulings
on birthright citizenship in five other cases in its final
day of its term, as well as the jurors are
about to begin deliberation in the Shan Dinny Coombs Trail.
On both these stories and more is our very own
national correspondent Roary You Neil, Good morning, Rory.
Speaker 2 (01:24):
Hey there, Michael, good morning, Happy Friday.
Speaker 1 (01:27):
I guess you could say the Supreme Court out with
a bang, not a whimper.
Speaker 3 (01:30):
Well, certainly a lot on their to do list, so
it should be a flory of activity on a Friday.
You just love to work late on a Friday going
through some court rulings. Hey listen, Rory, but this is
one of the few days I can say this. Eight Central.
I've done today. Eight Central.
Speaker 2 (01:46):
That's it.
Speaker 3 (01:47):
But yeah, for you, the court rules at ten am,
so that's an Eastern time.
Speaker 2 (01:52):
That's when we'll get word from them.
Speaker 3 (01:54):
As you said, on issues like birthright citizenship, there's a
challenge about whether or not you have to prove your
age to access pornographic websites. The redistricting case in Louisiana
as well, So some pretty big cases all to be
decided we think today.
Speaker 1 (02:11):
All right, So for birthright citizenship, the first thing I
think would strike everybody is out is you mean this
hasn't come up yet?
Speaker 3 (02:18):
Well, this is the Trump Vikasa is the name of
the case, and it really began as a challenge to
the President's executive order ending birthright citizenship. So this is
actually a pretty fast track to get this here. They
had arguments in the case back in May. It'll be
curious to see who writes the opinion. Obviously what the
opinion is. But judging the folks over at scotus Blog
(02:40):
believe that because of the nature of the case and
the fact it is all fast tracked, that the Chief
Justice himself would likely be the author of the opinion.
Speaker 1 (02:48):
All right, and then for diddy colms, my goodness, we
have said this throughout. Is this a immoral, debaucherous, filthy
human being? Yes? But have they proved any of the
charges and they dropped some of the charges recently. But
just what will this jury be deliberating on and what
(03:08):
has effectively been laid out in the court room a
public opinion versus what's been laid out for the courtroom
jury to decide, looking like two different things.
Speaker 3 (03:18):
Well, right, and look, we've all seen that video outside
the elevators in the hotel and it's disgusting to watch.
But he's not really charged with what happened there in
that video racketeering, conspiracy. He's got two counts of sex
trafficking by force, two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Look,
I've touched defense attorneys who say the prosecution did not
(03:39):
get the job done here, that there's a lot of
vague stuff surrounding it. To your point, yeah, he seems
to be a jerk, But does that get you in
a federal prison for the rest of your life, because
it's we got a lot more federal prisoness.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
And I guess, but I don't think this one's going
to keep you working late.
Speaker 1 (03:55):
But if there's a quick decision, you know the old
this is one of those that might be quick, it
might be not guilty.
Speaker 3 (04:05):
Right, And so we've got closing arguments from the defense
today and then the deliberations will start on Monday, you know,
and then juris do what juris do. It's been six
weeks more than thirty witnesses have testified, so it's a
matter of you know, let's see what they come up with.
But look, even if Sean Diddy Combs is found not guilty,
he will probably spend the rest of his life in
(04:26):
a courtroom. He's got something like seventy civil suits against him.
So you know, no matter what, the Justice Department isn't
done with them yet.
Speaker 1 (04:35):
And in this particular case, the civil looks easier to
get than the criminal. Roy great reporting. We'll talk to
you again in the third hour. All right, I want
to talk a little bit about this New York candidate.
I know that Red is watching closely the decision being
made by Andrew Cuomo. Democrats weren't given I mean, these
(04:57):
are just statements of fact. Democrats weren't given such great choices,
let's face it. So they have a former governor who
was caught in a COVID scandal with the elderly, not
to mention other scandals, and then you have and again
for some that will talk about the socialist aspect, and
(05:18):
certainly the justice socialist Democrats are on board with this guy.
I don't know that they know what they're playing with here,
but they're on board with this guy. So there's two
ways to look at this. Do you want to follow
this race as a justice Democrat takeover of the largest
inner city that will propel AOC forward in a presidential
(05:39):
race and really what I in my belief is bring
an end to the Democrat party? Or is this a
completely different, disguised movement. Had a listener the other day,
maybe been Roger. I don't know, say this reminds me
of what you're always saying. This isn't me saying this.
(06:01):
There are three types of Muslims today because there were
three types of Mohammed, and the disagreements over what example
to follow and who was the successor to Mohammed is
why you have these different factions of Muslims. And the
good news is a lot of Muslims followed the early
example of Mohammed, which was really just kind of a hodgepodge.
(06:23):
You took a little from Christianity, a little from Judaism,
and you know, he was just one of three hundred
and sixty five religions in Mecca. It was no big deal.
Then it started becoming a big deal. Then not so tolerant.
Then Gil's his uncle, then starts robbing caravans, then starts
talking about occupying, agitating, waging war, and in the end
(06:48):
his final example is a shiahatas bloodthirsty warrior. So what
do you have today? The same thing? Peace loving Muslims
as culture calls them. Cat Stevens one of the nicest
guys you'll ever meet, beast loving Muslim.
Speaker 2 (07:10):
Other political Muslim organizations not so nice.
Speaker 4 (07:15):
But they're very.
Speaker 2 (07:16):
Patient and they play for the long run.
Speaker 1 (07:19):
What does that mean, Well, they will tell you we
follow the example of Mohammad and we populate. It's an
issue for America because of abortion, because of global warming fears,
because of selfishness. Now because of the social dilemma. We
don't socialize a lot with other real human beings, so
we're getting more and more isolated, and the birth rate
(07:42):
is dangerously low. It will topple our entitlement programs. We
do not simply have enough people being born to work
to pay for those who are living longer. It is
a clear and present economic danger, but it is a
civilization danger ultimately, and the others that are coming here
(08:05):
and not assimilating, but are here to change you, which
is exactly what this mayoral candidate said live on television.
They are multiplying because they're following their example. The Christians
are called to do the same thing. I might add,
we're called to go forth into all nations to make disciples,
(08:25):
not conquer nations for world political dominance. But we're to
go into all nations and we are to go forth
and multiply.
Speaker 2 (08:34):
But we don't. They do. So that is what political
Islam does.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
It populates, then it infiltrates, then it agitates, then it
wages war, and it doesn't wait for fifty percent to
do it. So I am fascinated that the justice Democrats
don't know who they're sharing a bed with. It's interesting
(09:02):
the media doesn't know how to make the distinction. And
I think there's probably very few people in talk radio
that know how to make the distinction. This guy is
socialist or an Islamist. He's clearly an Islamist, and they
are very different because Islam is a form of government.
It is a system of justice, it is a system
of finance and taxation, and it is a system of life.
Speaker 2 (09:27):
And there are no rights.
Speaker 1 (09:30):
There are no religious freedoms, there are no speech freedoms,
there's no right of assembly freedoms. Now the same leftist
media that would speak against anybody pushing Christianity after all,
separation of the state. They don't even see this coming.
And this is a theocratic, a theocracy designed system, and
(09:56):
it's our largest city twenty five years after nine eleven
with a complete unknown. By the way, I gotta interrupt
myself and tell you, if you haven't seen the Bob
Dylan movie, it really is terrific. And I got to
tell you, at sixty years old, I never realized how
much I love Bob Dylan till right now. I'm like
listening to all the old songs. Lack a complete un noon,
(10:20):
lack of Rowlands, dune Zoran Mondani. He's only been a
US citizen for seven years, he's only been a lousy
assemblyman for three years, and now he's on all the
national shows like he's the set I joked earlier, like
he's the second coming of Barack Obama.
Speaker 2 (10:42):
Wait a minute, he might be the second coming of
Baraco Bulm.
Speaker 1 (10:48):
And at first you could look at it and say, well,
this is just a panderin fool, right, thirty dollars minimum wage.
Anybody who's ever run a busy, how are you gonna
eat in New York City with thirty dollars minimum wage?
Can you imagine that the bus boys are getting thirty
an hour. I don't even know what city grocery stores are,
(11:16):
but I can tell you that those that have tried
it in the past, the shells are empty. No police
guys holding a gun to your head. Somebody give me
a social worker.
Speaker 2 (11:29):
Immediately dial nine to one one. Those guy's in my house.
I think it's gonna kill me. And how does that
make you feel?
Speaker 4 (11:42):
Could you imagine the customer service and a government owned supermarket?
Speaker 1 (11:46):
Oh my gosh, all right, so it should be just ridiculous.
You know, no police, rent control for everyone. Well, that's
a story today. Luxury real estate brokers are all ready
to flee just over the thought of him winning. But
the nuance to the story for today would be okay.
(12:08):
So you didn't have a good choice. You had Andrew
Cuomo killed a lot of elderly mismanaging, COVID scandal, and
then you got this unknown Islamist that you think is
just a socialist, and so the whole socialist movement gets
behind him, and of course, in a low turnout, Brian Mary,
(12:30):
that's going to be all you need Bernie and AOC
and the Justice Democrats get behind you of him. So
now what do you do with Andrew Cuomo? And if
he comes back as an independent and start splitting independent votes,
does that pave the way for this guy? I would
say this, and Red and I had a bit of
a debate off the year, and I'm not willing. It's
(12:51):
not what I'm so positive on. I'm willing to fight
to the death over but my gut tells me, and
sometimes my gut takes a while to prove, but my
gut tells me this guy isn't going to win. But
he gets the conversation started. We have this big sitting
problem waiting to happen with these inner cities. I really
(13:12):
think that's the territory of the potential civil war out
of control leftist, chaotic inner cities. I mean, they could
make us broken enough to take down the whole economy,
but if it starts becoming one of these completely different
(13:33):
nations once you're inside the inner city, I think they
might want to try to use this guy as the
beginning of that movement. That's clearly part of their strategy,
and a lot of they're really bad ideas all mixed
in with it, and a lot of the socialist Democrat
movement mixed in. I don't sense he's going to win,
and I don't know. The turnout was so low in
the general and it did have the rank order system,
(13:56):
but I don't know how it plays out in the general.
But the question of the day is do you want
Andrew Cuomo in this race or out of it? And
by staying in it and coming back as an independent,
does he paved the way for the one thing I
would think he doesn't.
Speaker 2 (14:08):
Want, which is Zura and Mom Dommie. I think that's
a fascinating thing to look at.
Speaker 1 (14:12):
I have two other things next hour we're going to cover,
which I think are the believe me and I am
aware that we bombed and took out nuclear facilities, and
I'm aware that we negotiated a ceasefire about thirty hours
after doing that. And I still think it's the biggest
story of the week that no one's talking about.
Speaker 2 (14:28):
But that'll have to wait till next hour. It's your
Morning Show with Michael del Journo.
Speaker 1 (14:34):
Give me that last talkback on Kat Stevens and I'll
take a shot at it, and we have to continue
after the break. Kat Stevens is a peace loving Muslim,
the one that called for the death of Solomon Rossty.
Speaker 2 (14:47):
That's the one you're talking about, all right.
Speaker 1 (14:50):
So Cat Stevens, big time singer, converts to Islam, doesn't
sing for twenty years.
Speaker 2 (14:55):
He's starting to sing again.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
If you go back to those stories and they date
back to nineteen eighty nine, he doesn't say he would
kill Simon Salmon Rushti. He says there is no doubt
others who will. Meaning as a Muslim, his allegiances to
the Quran, which is of course anathetical to our system
(15:20):
of justice and citizenry because we're based on a Hebrew
you know, biblical view. So that is Listen, they all
end up in this like a political Muslim. Oh, ten seconds.
A political Muslim will eventually wage war. It's about when
it's time they have a process. They have to arrive
(15:41):
at a shiatiest even though they're going to lose in martyr,
they'll attack you immediately. So that's a good Muslim response. Oh,
I wouldn't do it because I'm a peace loving Muslim.
But there are a lot of Muslims who would and
would be right to based on the Quran and the DDID.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
This is Rebecca in spring Hill, Tennessee, and my morning
show is your morning show with my Michael del Jorno. Hi,
it's Michael.
Speaker 1 (16:07):
Your morning show can be heard live on great radio
stations across the country like wilm and w DOV and
Wilmington and Dover, Delaware, or wgst AM seven twenty the
voice in Middle Georgia.
Speaker 2 (16:19):
And we're going to need some blankets.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
News Radio six fifty k NI, Anchorage, Alaska. We'd love
to be a part of your morning routine. Now enjoy
the podcast. Thanks for bringing us along with you. This
is your morning show. I am Michael del Jorno, happy
and humble and honored to serve you. Jeffrey serving us
all up, controlling all the sounds. He'll be getting Kevin
Surreally on board in just about fifteen minutes from now.
(16:42):
Is it possible in fifteen years we could be living
on Mars. The road map includes nuclear propulsion, sustainable life
support systems. It's a bold claim, but science is catching
up with the ambition. It's now looking realistic. How realistic
We'll talk to the futurists about that in moments from now.
We We played a caller, and that was really unfair
in ninety seconds. But I don't yet, and especially thanks
(17:10):
to Donald Trump, I don't worry about jihadist Muslims. They
act immediate and irrational, and there's and there is no
nobody that wouldn't. We saw that after nine eleven. Nobody
wouldn't stand up against that, and they get pounded back
in time. Political Islam always concerns me more. How do
(17:33):
you boil a frog? Just turn up the heat a
little bit at a time and the frog will never jump.
I think of the Old Testament description my people perish
for lack of knowledge, that Hebrew word for parish is
actually they're overtaken. The ignorance of Islam in America is
the greatest danger, and political Islam, I think, is the
(17:57):
more realistic threat. That's where they populate, populate, which plays
on our birth rate crisis. They populate, they multiply, they infiltrate,
they agitate, and then they wage war as ye hottest
will kill innocent people today. And then there's peace loving
(18:25):
Muslims as culture calls them. The reason you have three
is because of the three examples of Mohammad. They don't
They're not exclusively different from each other, and they all
end up roughly in the same place. I'm going to
make a statement here, and I'm sure people are gonna
think I'm Islamophobic, but I'm just educated. If if you
(18:47):
believe in the God of the Old and New Testament,
Old and New Covenant, if you believe in Christ, Islam
is a threat to you because they're commanded to kill
you if you believe. Maybe you're not a Jesus Free,
(19:09):
maybe you're not, you know, a practicing Jew, but you
like all the things that come from Judaism and Christianity,
you know that gives you an innocent till proven guilty,
a due process, a freedom of religion or none. There's
no compulsion in our constitutions as you have to accept God.
(19:34):
But if you like freedom of speech, if you like
right of assembly, if you like a lot of the
things that come from it, Islam's an enemy for you
because what they believe, and they believe it's holy, and
they believe it's godly, and they believe it's worship. It's
completely anathetical to what you're living. It's a cultural incompatibility. Now,
(19:59):
how do you handle it? Compatibility? Well, wokeness would say
that anybody that speaks against it hates that person, and
I don't. I'm just explaining to you what they believe,
what they would tell you anymom would explain to you. Now,
the biggest problem is the conflating and then the confusion.
(20:23):
The conflating is when you treat a peace loving Muslim
the same way you would treat a political Islamist and
the same way you would treat as shihadist. That's not
good because they're called to do one of two things,
kill you or tax you. And the only peace is
when you're conquered. That would be peace for them, that
(20:45):
would be.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
Hell for you. And then the conflating.
Speaker 1 (20:52):
So if you don't know the difference between the three
types of Muhammed, you don't know the difference between the
three types of Muslims or Islamis, and you don't know
until they act, and when they act, it's too late,
and then all of them ultimately arrive at the same
place if they think that's the moment now in the case,
(21:13):
because this is why we're relevantly talking about it, a
it's New York City where nine to eleven took place
twenty five years ago, and you have an islam mist
not socialist and Islamist candidate who just won the Democrat primary,
and you've got strange bedfellows with socialist Democrats who want
to propel this into a nationwide phenomenon for our inner cities.
(21:36):
It is completely unaffordable. It is such it's not just
even pandering because it's so delusional. You're going to see,
like the governor, for example, Hochel, she's going to speak
against this guy. Why because New York City at eight
million people can bankrupt an entire state and you can't
(21:56):
have thirty dollars minimum wage. You can't tell entrepreneurs who
have made investments in one of the most secure investments
you can make, real estate, that they can't charge rent
at a certain rate. I don't even know where when
you get into city groceries and free childcare and free transportation,
(22:16):
how any of that could be afforded.
Speaker 2 (22:22):
And what the rest of the.
Speaker 1 (22:23):
State would have to pay in taxes to cover that
kind of nonsense in an interstate experiment is unthinkable. So
you're going to see, this guy's going to cause a
lot of problems. What are they going to try to
achieve with the problems? Make a martyr a hero out
of him. Maybe he doesn't end up being the governor
(22:45):
or the mayor of New York City, but maybe he
propels the movement in these inner cities. They're already anti cop,
they're already take from the rich, give to the poor,
text people to death. He has a different endgame than
the socialist Democrats. But right now, this is a guy
(23:05):
out of obscurity. He's only been a citizen for seven years.
He's a Shia Islamist who doesn't acknowledge Israel's right to exist.
Speaker 2 (23:16):
I got news for you. He doesn't acknowledge America's right
to exist.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
And he's not interested in a constitutional republic at all,
and he says as much. So will America focus on
his delusions of grandeur and promises of entitlement. I mean,
who wouldn't vote for autum have to pay for child journymore?
Speaker 2 (23:36):
Okay? Oh you're right, the bus for free.
Speaker 4 (23:38):
Okay.
Speaker 1 (23:39):
I'm gonna get a raise thirty dollars an hour to
be a bus boy, okay. And how many would vote
for that and put an office something very dangerous? Will
the impact be on the gouvenatorial race? Because if this
guy should happen to win. Well, Stephanik is going to
be running and I had to run a trajectory to
possible winning. Anyway, this would be more than enough to
(24:03):
defeat Hoko. So I guarantee you Hoko and Cuomo are
going to come out against this guy.
Speaker 2 (24:12):
The media is going to be on his.
Speaker 1 (24:13):
Side, the Socialist Democrats are going to be on a side,
but they're going to wage a war. Now, the biggest
question of the hour is does Andrew Cuomo, if he
really wants to stop this guy, get out of the
race so that he loses, or stay in the race
as an independent and potentially change and divide the vote
to where he can actually win.
Speaker 2 (24:34):
So I'm fascinated.
Speaker 1 (24:35):
I mean, and you guys kind of went into the
Islamist versus socialist angle. But what's really fascinating is what
a former governor and a sitting governor is going to
do to defeat this threat. And they won't even be
defeating it because they understand the Islamist threat. It's going
to be their own political and state threat. And how
(24:58):
is a world in a matrix going to view this?
And can this, even if he loses, become a trend
in other inner cities and all I'm saying that it's
not controversial. Ghost Wikipedia will educate you. Go study Mohammed's life,
(25:19):
Go study the Hidith, study the service, study history, study
their differences in who was Mohammed's successor.
Speaker 2 (25:30):
Discover the examples that she hottest.
Speaker 1 (25:34):
Shia Muslim follows versus a Sunni political Muslim, understand Islam
because all Muslims are not Islamists, but all Islamists are Muslim.
Or just open your ears. We played a clip yesterday
(25:55):
in our Sounds of the Day. He makes it crystal
clear he's in islamis not a socialist, and how he
feels about America, Israel, and the world. But the fascinating
thing to watch is how it impacts the Stephonic gouvenatorial race.
Because I think Republicans are coming close in Jersey, in
New York anyway before this. This could be all it
(26:15):
takes to kick it over the top. The rest of
the state will rally because New York City will bankrupt
them if this guy does any of this stuff. I mean, Michael,
how does this happen in a city with the largest
number of Jewish people? Ignorance makes up Yeah, no, My
people perish for lack of knowledge, you're overtaken. I mean,
(26:37):
ignorance is not stupidity. I don't know what you're focused on,
but you're you're not focused on this. I always use
this analogy. I meanf we were talking chemistry right now,
I'm very ignorant, but talking about this, I'm very un ignorant.
So the question is this is this is a much
bigger thing. Now I'm gonna get to the other biggest
story of the week, bigger than the bombing, bigger than
(26:59):
the season fire.
Speaker 2 (27:01):
Coming up next half hour, This is Your Morning Show
with Michael del Chno.
Speaker 1 (27:07):
The Supreme Court five rulings today. They're going to wrap
up their final day of their nine month term, the
biggest being on birthright citizenship. The Senate hoping to start
debate on Trump's big beautiful bill. House members will get
their intel briefing on the Iran strikes, and I think
the Defense will have its closing arguments today, and then
(27:29):
everything goes to the jury in the Diddy comes case
on Monday. The European Space Agency says that human settlement
on Mars could happen within fifteen years. A blink, God willing,
I'll be alive to see this The roadmap includes testing
(27:49):
nuclear propulsion, sustainable life support systems, and it's a bold claim,
but science is catching up with these bold claims and ambitions.
And our futureist, Kevin Serillia is here with all the details.
Could this be possible. I'm going to see people living
on Mars in fifteen years.
Speaker 4 (28:06):
It is possible. And in fact, the ESA, as you mentioned,
they came out with this bombshell report. Of course the
mainstream media did not pick it up at all, but
they are saying that this is the path and this
is the trajectory that we are on, and if you
think about it, I mean, we've got the International Space Station,
We've got astronauts in space, and this would really be
(28:26):
the next depth. I'm really excited by this. I think
this is a great thing because it really is laying
out an official roadmap for human settlement in space, and
it says that there's going to be this sustained human
presence on Mars and it's achievable within fifteen years. This
is not a one off mission. They're talking about staying
(28:46):
and so in order to do that, the technology that
that will require is a mixture between artificial intelligence and
deploying three D printing, so the astronauts would not have
to land on Mars and build anything with their own hands.
It would kind of be turned key, for lack of
(29:07):
a better phrase, where they would show up and the
systems would already be built for them, or at least
the small foundations of them would be built. Because of
three D printing.
Speaker 1 (29:19):
Everything you bring up is going to be well, we'd
have to break it down. Let's start just in vision.
Everybody looks back, and when John F. Kennedy chose the
Moon and then explained in the famous Rice Beach why
the Moon, everybody felt like that's when the space program
really began to move in a direction. It began with
(29:41):
a reaction and chaos. The Soviets are ahead of us.
We got to get there, you know. And I would
presume that was for satellites and space supremacy, just like
we have air supremacy see supremacy, land supremacy. But when
he came up with the moon, just by saying the Moon,
that set the vision, which create the focus, which created
(30:02):
the actions, what set in motion the direction which arrived
at a destination. So what I'm hearing you say is
that's the biggest thing saying fifteen years Mars boom go.
That's probably what makes it most.
Speaker 4 (30:15):
Likely to happen, right precisely. And the Royal Society, which
is one of the oldest and most established, it's like
the establishment scientific community. They've been around since the sixteen hundreds.
They came out with the report last month. This blew
my mind. They said that the answer to whether or
not there is extra terrestrial life on a small level,
(30:37):
microbes or even bacteria on other parts of our Solar
system or elsewhere, that question could be answered in the
next thirty years, and that we will know in the
next thirty years whether that's true. So we're not talking
about little green men and you know, intelligent life, but no,
whether or not there is some type of other living
(30:58):
organisms in our solar system is going to be known.
I mean this week alone. I don't know if you
saw these pictures, the Viera Reuben Observatory pictures, I mean,
how do you know?
Speaker 1 (31:09):
I mean, but explain to them who haven't. But the
breakthrough of what.
Speaker 4 (31:16):
It is is the world's largest camera. It took the
largest pictures of the soul of our universe, and they
discovered billions emphasis on that galaxies So if you've ever
heard of Carl Sagan's or Sagan's Pale Blue Dot, and
when you zoom out and you see just how small
(31:37):
planet Earth is in the grand scheme of things, this
makes that look even smaller. And they're just magnificent. I mean,
it's I believe in God, and so how how can
you not look at something like that and not believe
in God? But but but but the technology and this
is I totally agree with what you're saying about the
(31:57):
JFK comparison and going to the moon. But the moon
is like a not even a half of a step
compared to where artificial intelligence, three D printing eventually quantum
computing in our lifetime and being able to identify the
parts that we should go And why should we want
to go? Let me let me try to pitch it
to listeners who are skeptical because you know, Katie Perry
(32:18):
kind of gave the space travel stuff a bad name.
But we should want to go because what we were
able to build with Planet Earth just from our technology,
from our energy, from our rare Earth minerals. Imagine what
we can discover on other planets, asteroids, moons, Imagine the
properties of life and the building blocks for life that
(32:39):
could push humans forward. By being able to do that,
and to go to Mars, we're going to have to
expand the supply chain. So the communication systems we're going
are going to have to become interplanetary, the energy systems
of traveling there are going to have to become interplanetary,
and the yes, economic supply chains and economic trade are
(33:02):
going to eventually become interplanetary.
Speaker 1 (33:06):
So closing modes, Kevin saireally, he's our futurist. What would
be on Mars in fifteen years, It's possible. Probably the
two biggest breakthroughs is the nuclear propulsion because of the
distance in getting us there, and then what is defined
by sustainable life support systems.
Speaker 2 (33:21):
I know, sixty seconds is not fair.
Speaker 4 (33:23):
Oh this is easy. It's like the four seasons of Mars.
You know what I'm saying. I mean, it's a spaces oasis.
That's That's what it means, is you want to be
living on Mars. And by the way, I'll go. Who's
ever listen I've been saying this all more. I will go.
I will happily be the Walt Kronkie to Mars. Just
send me and it'll be fun. I'll call in it
to this program and.
Speaker 2 (33:42):
Kevin fun Kevin, I will happily let you thank you.
Speaker 4 (33:47):
Yeah, a lot of people would a lot, but there's.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
You know, you're not gonna have much of you, but
you're gonna have a nice hotel and you're gonna get
there pretty reliably with nuclear propulsion. How close are we
do those two things and the ability for those two
things within fifteen years?
Speaker 4 (34:00):
They say, yeah, yeah, in the next fifteen years. Elon
Musk wants to go in the next five I hope
he does it. I think it'd be amazing.
Speaker 1 (34:07):
All Right, that's our futurest Kevin surreally with the reality
now in sight of Mars.
Speaker 2 (34:13):
We're all in this together. This is Your Morning Show
with Michael ndheld Joo
Popular Podcasts
Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club
Welcome to Bookmarked by Reese’s Book Club — the podcast where great stories, bold women, and irresistible conversations collide! Hosted by award-winning journalist Danielle Robay, each week new episodes balance thoughtful literary insight with the fervor of buzzy book trends, pop culture and more. Bookmarked brings together celebrities, tastemakers, influencers and authors from Reese's Book Club and beyond to share stories that transcend the page. Pull up a chair. You’re not just listening — you’re part of the conversation.
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com