October 30, 2024 • 28 mins
Inside the early voting to discern who it favors
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hi, it's me Michael.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Your morning show can be heard on great stations across
the country like Talk Radio eleven ninety in Dallas, Fort Worth,
Freedom one oh four point seven and Washington, DC and
five point fifty KFYI and Phoenix, Arizona. We'd love to
be a part of your morning routine or take us
along on the drive to work, but as we always say,
better late than never. Enjoy the podcast two.
Speaker 3 (00:20):
Three, starting your morning off right, A new way of talk,
a new way of understanding.
Speaker 4 (00:27):
Because we're in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael gil Jordan.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
It's been a short campaign since the takeover of Kamala
Harris of the Democratic ticket, and she gave her final
address last night.
Speaker 5 (00:46):
I will enact the first ever federal bank and on
price gounging on groceries, PAP, the price of insulin, and
limit out of pocket prescription and costs for all Americans.
I will fight to make sure that hard working Americans
(01:08):
can actually afford a place to live.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
We are. I don't know how she plans to provide
housing for everybody.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
I don't know that.
Speaker 2 (01:15):
Insulin is on everybody's mind. But that was as specific
as she got it. Was as if she's more worried
about her base than she was undecided voters. Undecided voters
want to feel like they know her. I don't think
they know her any better this morning. They wanted to
see her take some accountability for what has not worked
(01:37):
in their administration and specifically how she would be different,
and it was never delivered. As I've said a million
times this morning, this was style over substance at a
time where substance was her closing argument or should have been.
And if she was in the lead, great speech. This
is great for hiding in plain sight. Not so good
(02:00):
if you're losing nationally in in every swing state as
she is. This came from Kathy Michael, or actually from Michael,
I should say, you were talking about the Democrats plan
after the election. Have you heard about the DoD's Directive
fifty two forty one. This directive was recently amended in
(02:20):
late September to allow the military to be used to
assist local lo and granting them the authority to use
lethal force in the event of civil unrest. Well, look,
we've talked about this before. This campaign is now being
so poorly executed. I'm wondering if that's the plan to lose,
And they keep setting the table. Remember the classic Sololensky tactic,
(02:43):
that which you're accusing your opponent of, you're doing.
Speaker 6 (02:48):
So.
Speaker 2 (02:48):
They keep talking about an enemy's list, and nobody knows
that there is such an enemy list that Donald Trump
actually has.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
Maybe they have an enemy's list.
Speaker 2 (03:03):
And they keep talking about Donald Trump's going to use
the military against anybody that disagrees with him. Donald Trump's
given no signs of that, and he was president for
four years and never did that. Are they planning that?
Remember in the shadow campaign to save the Democracy, that
was the plan. If hiding Joe Biden didn't work, they
were going to create an insurrection. David Sana he's joining
(03:27):
us in the American Policy Roundtable. It does seem like
I asked you this question just yesterday. If that was
their plan in twenty twenty if they lost, Is that
their plan in twenty twenty four if she loses. Because
that speech was not a closing argument, addressing undecided voters,
giving them what they want, the difference between her and Joe,
specifically what she would do beyond insulin and price gouging.
(03:49):
It's not a serious speech and a serious closing argument.
It makes me wonder if their real play is after
she loses. Should we be concerned with that? I think
your I think your mute is on. Ah, I know
your mute is on. I'm looking there.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
You not talk? Now there you go? Should we be concerned?
Speaker 4 (04:15):
Well, I think you nailed once again.
Speaker 6 (04:19):
The impression that I had listening to this speech was
like a bunch of kids at the pool in the summertime,
at the swimming pool. And she kept walking around the
pool and she would stick her toe in, but she
wasn't going to jump in. There was a hesitancy, there
was an essence, there was a distance between her and
the reality of embracing the moment in this speech that
(04:42):
she was talking at it. She was talking at those people.
She wasn't talking with them.
Speaker 2 (04:48):
And by the way, for an opening argument, at the
convention with a great theatrical backdrop, you can't have a
better one than the White House off in the distance
between two flags. I mean, visually it was stunning, like
the convention. But the Convention is an opening argument. You
can get away with being vague. This is closing argument.
Now it's time to review all the evidence, give all
the witness testimony, give all the specifics and ask for
(05:10):
a verdict that she didn't do. It was almost as
if it wasn't even designed for the undecided voter, but
more for the black vote. She's lost, the Hispanic vote,
She's lost. Pressing on abortion, pressing on boogie man. This
was not a serious speech.
Speaker 4 (05:25):
Well.
Speaker 6 (05:25):
I found the speech baffling, I really did. I just
thought to myself, this is just plain weird. And I
kept asking myself who's she talking to? And I'm not
sure she knew who she was talking to. I thought, also,
it was very odd the choice of the location in
the evening, and could we have taken a test there
to see how many people either work for the government
(05:46):
or a family member works for the governments?
Speaker 1 (05:48):
That was at it?
Speaker 4 (05:50):
Yeah, come on, I talk about a home game.
Speaker 1 (05:54):
It's just it was very, very weird, David.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
It was so bad. Remember she probably do you think
she wrote it? Of course not. Do you really think
she wrote the speech?
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Of course?
Speaker 4 (06:08):
Not?
Speaker 1 (06:08):
Okay, so of course.
Speaker 2 (06:09):
So this is what her handlers, the same handlers that
wrote her speech for the convention, the same handlers that
give her talking points for every rally, The same people
sent her out to read this. I'm telling you this
was so untargeted, so unsubstantive, so bad that it looks
intentional to me. And if it looks intentional, their play
(06:31):
is for her to lose. And they're pulling the Solodinski
because they have an enemy list. They're pulling a Sololinsky
because they plan to use the military against people that
oppose them. They played the Donald Trump won accept losing
because they plan to not accept losing. This was their
plan in twenty twenty if Biden didn't win, when they
used COVID in the shadow campaign, And I am dead convinced.
(06:52):
Now this is their play. This election doesn't end on
election day, it just begins.
Speaker 6 (06:57):
Well, I think they've gotten multiple ways to go with this,
but that speech was just plain weird. Furthermore, why is
it that no one's asking the question why is she
making her closing argument a week before the election's over?
Speaker 4 (07:13):
Is she not going to work the next six days?
Speaker 1 (07:15):
Oh, she's off working today. This was just That's why
I said, all right, so if.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
If you were up early when we first started, I
was like, Okay, what is this really designed to do?
Speaker 1 (07:26):
This is designed like.
Speaker 2 (07:28):
The whole stupid comedian's line First of all, in Puerto Rico,
they have a sanitation issue. This administration should be solving
that issue and they're not. They should be helping this
in trapped island that's buried in its own garbage. Instead
of solving it, they're hijacking it to try to get
you to not think about all the people that were
on stage at Madison Square Garden or all the people
(07:49):
that were outside, and how unify this looks like America's party.
You got the Kennedy saying this isn't the party of
my uncle or my father, wasn't even a party for
me and forced me out. You got Telsey, who was
a presidential Democratic candidate, saying I'm now a Republican, let
alone supporting Donald Trump. So this was trying to upstage
that this was the answer to Madison Square Garden.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
I don't think it was even an answer to Joe Rogan.
Speaker 2 (08:15):
JD.
Speaker 4 (08:16):
Vanseill handled that.
Speaker 6 (08:17):
Have you have you ever seen a presidential candidate take
the last week off? Have you ever seen a presidential
candidate make their last closing argument a week before voting ends?
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Well, but she's not, I mean she's out today, she's
out in Uh, she's going to be in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,
and then again in Madison, Wisconsin. But that just speaks
to what you're really ultimately saying is this was staged,
and it was staged not to be a final argument.
Because she's going to continue to make the argument this week,
it has to be that it was to address the base,
(08:50):
because it certainly didn't address undecided voters, and it certainly
is in her final address.
Speaker 6 (08:55):
Okay, now I've got my biggest question, and I mean
this one has nothing to do with us being on
the radio. I wanted to jump through my phone to
find you last night when I heard Joe Biden's talk
and Joe Biden, the President of the United States, the
President of the United States, called half the American voting population.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
Garbage last night, garbage, garbage.
Speaker 4 (09:18):
All I could hear was you saying garbage.
Speaker 1 (09:20):
That's all I got.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
My teacher, which, by the way, I think Keith Andrews.
He reminded me it was Mickey Masborough because I could
never remember his name. Deplorables was deplorable because Hillary wasn't
calling Donald.
Speaker 4 (09:31):
You irredeemable, deplorable, you Michael del Journal.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
Irredeemable, deplorable, But It wasn't Donald Trump, it was anybody
that supports him or votes for him. That was the
biggest mistake. They have since taken it to Nazis and
now Joe Biden. Last night garbage, Now Joe Biden again?
So bad? Is this cognitive impairment or is this a
bitter guy that really wants her to lose and wasn't
even invited to last night. I think that was intentional,
but Biden keeps sabotaging every step of the way.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
I don't think that was a misspeak.
Speaker 6 (10:01):
Okay, so we got the Puerto Rican joke and the
whole world goes nuts, and Trump immediately says, don't know,
the guy shouldn't have been there. I'm sure somebody's gonna
get fired for doing all that. Okay, that stupid.
Speaker 4 (10:12):
It happens. That's why you don't have comedians.
Speaker 1 (10:14):
Okay, David, this is all they've got a week before
in election. They're losing.
Speaker 6 (10:18):
But but within minutes, everybody says that was wrong, shouldn't
have done it, don't overreact. Well, we don't believe that
about Puerto Rico. You all know that that guy made
a big mistake. He won't get a second chance Okay,
the President of the United States called the American publics
seventy five million people garbage, and where was Kamala Harris
within five minutes resigning from the vice presidency, saying, I
(10:41):
won't be a part of an administration that calls half
the American people garbage.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
I don't want anything to do with that. Yet has
he set a peep?
Speaker 2 (10:50):
She was honored to serve with him, is what she said.
But she'll be different because these are different times. There's
been noreak of break.
Speaker 6 (10:56):
Because I'm about to have I'm about to have a
hemorrhage here, just take a break.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
Okay, Yeah, I mean this is but again, the rat
that I smell is this is so bad. It's intentional Puerto.
Speaker 3 (11:08):
Rico, where I'm in my home state of Delaware.
Speaker 4 (11:10):
Could he be intention can put together?
Speaker 6 (11:13):
The only garbage I see float down there is his supporters,
his his demonization.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
So is the final address Kamala's style over substance, nothing
speech Joe Biden calling everybody that doesn't support him garbage
that in the name of joy and unity? Or the
real final say be the vice presidential candidate Ja Da
Vance Today.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
With Joe Rogan, This is your morning show with Michael
del Trono.
Speaker 1 (11:48):
Hi'm Michael.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
We'd love to have you listen every weekday morning to
your morning show live, even take us along with you
on the drive to work. We can be heard on
great radio stations like one oh four ninth The Patriot
in Saint Louis, or Talk Radio ninety eight point three
in fifteen ten WLAC in Nashville and News Talk by
fifty Kate f Yi Phoenix, Arizona. Love to be a
part of your morning routine, but we're always grateful you're here.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
Now enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
Slimbaud would always say it was style all overside.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
There was no specifics whatsoever.
Speaker 2 (12:17):
It was actually so bad that I am now more
suspicious than ever that when they talk about an enemy's list,
they're the one that has one. When they talk about
using the military against its own citizens, they're the ones
that are planning to do it.
Speaker 1 (12:32):
This was so bad of a speech.
Speaker 2 (12:35):
It rereaked of they wanted to lose, because their real
play is for after she loses. We're gonna go inside
some of the polling numbers that were we've been looking
at with David Zonadi in a moment. But first Aaron
Rayali is here. Aaron, this has never happened for me,
my sports bookie from the Your Morning Show Sports book,
Big John. He actually complimented you earlier today.
Speaker 1 (12:57):
Listen.
Speaker 7 (12:57):
So Aaron real one hundred percent right. The contract goes
higher and lower depending on the news out there about
the election. The way to go was buying the call
options when his stock got beat up. And that's what
every smart investor did. I bought this sixteen strike price
(13:18):
the stocks at fifty.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
You could pick a number. If he wins, isn't he
beautiful for him?
Speaker 2 (13:25):
He got the issue inside and out. Get everybody up
to speak to what we were talking about. There is
sports betting. It took me forever in the early hour
to remember this because I don't believe in any of this.
It's nothing but destroying families' lives. But DraftKings, for example,
you can go on DraftKings and you can just gamble
and bet who you think is gonna win with odds,
Kamala Harris or Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
This is completely different.
Speaker 8 (13:47):
This is different. So it's different in the sense that
it's a derivative contract. It's traded under the derivative unit
of whether it be Calshi or Polymarket or robin Hood.
And this actually comes this week of amazing because calsh
which is another trading platform, it won this like crucial
ruling with the CFTC. So they try to hault trading
(14:08):
on election outcomes. But this quote unquote event based market,
the event being the presidential election, is now live. And
what you do is you have this derivative unit, and
it's a contract, so it has a payment date, it
says who the parties will pay, it has values, it
has obligations of the parties. It's anything. It's like a
swap or an option or a forward, anything of those.
(14:30):
But they're traded on the exchange. They're over the counter,
and essentially what happens is you get paid out based
on the contract. And long story short, these predictive markets
have Harris winning the popular vote but Trump winning the election. Ye,
this doesn't mean it's like betting on a pony, you know,
the lead pony, the pony that's probably gonna win is
(14:52):
the reason. You know, the the markets are performing, But
it doesn't mean the pony will win.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
Here's the issue.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
At this point in twenty sixteen, Hillary was and it
was breaking towards Trump.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
People forget that. Now he closed a huge gap because
of underpolling.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
But at this point, five six days out in twenty sixteen,
Clinton was up four point three nationally, Biden was up
seven point nine at this time in twenty twenty, today
Donald Trump is up zero point four.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
Now, remember when Hillary was up four point three. Donald
Trump went on to win.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
He did not win the national vote, but he went
on to win the electoral college.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
But this is different.
Speaker 2 (15:29):
He's not down four point three and he's not down
seven point nine. The toughest derivative to consider is can
she pull off the popular vote?
Speaker 1 (15:36):
But the electoral college seems like a no brainer. Right now. Anyway,
he's leading every swing stake.
Speaker 8 (15:42):
Indeed, yeah, listen, it's it's gonna be hard. Listen. These
predictive markets don't mean that this is going to happen.
But unlike a pole, which is essentially just like a
snapshot in time, this is a forward looking thing. And
then in the argument that like, oh this can be
manipulated because someone can come in and swoop up all
the trades, well, they're actually rolling this out to only
(16:03):
like the volume is very low. They're not opening it
to everyone.
Speaker 4 (16:07):
The contracts allow customers to.
Speaker 8 (16:08):
Trade like on the outcome of this specific event, but
only in small numbers, so it's hard to like to
sway it one way or the other.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
What's the bottom line take away from this that now
we're even you know that this is this is probably
going to be the new norm, right, we'll probably do
this four years from now, eight four years from.
Speaker 8 (16:24):
Now probably, And I don't I don't necessarily think it's bad.
I just think it's another form of betting. Like you
could have done it under the table, or you could
do it on a trading platform. It's all the same thing.
And listen, if you tell a trader they're betting, they
freak out my friends and I'm like, oh, it's betting,
just with like more jargon and a couple.
Speaker 4 (16:41):
Of different guardrails.
Speaker 8 (16:42):
They're like, no, no, Like, listen, poker is the really
skilled game betting. Nonetheless, it's not like an insult.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
It just it is what it is.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
Can you imagine if all the mobsters came back to life,
they take a look around and go, wait a minute,
the government everybody's gambling right out in the open, right
from their their living room sofa.
Speaker 1 (17:00):
What this prostitution? Is legal. Now what what? You can
smoke marijuana?
Speaker 8 (17:05):
Now wait, they're out of business. They're out of business.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
The United States culture and government has become the mob
of the nineteen twenties.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
Go figure, Aaron, you have a great day. We'll talk
again tomorrow.
Speaker 8 (17:17):
You two friends.
Speaker 2 (17:17):
You got a compliment from Big John, our bookie man.
I've never even John, I've never even got Why don't
you give him the I adore you? You know the
I adore You have a great day. We'll talk again tomorrow.
Always love to talk about gambling right before David's and Audio.
It's he's probably the only one that hates the topic
more than me. But it's strange times. I wanted to
(17:38):
just give you the latest polling. So in Pennsylvania, this
is the real clear politics average, and it's growing because
the latest polls are getting higher and higher. Like in Pennsylvania,
we had an Atlas poll that came out yesterday and
Donald Trump is leading by three in Pennsylvania. Arizona has
Hairs up one in a CNN poll. Atlas has Trump
(17:59):
up four in Arizona, Nevada, CNN has Trump up one.
Trafalgar has it a dead heat, and Atlas has Trump
up one. So all of these are within the margin
of er clearly. But if you do the real clear
average on all of these. Pennsylvania he's leading by zero
point six percent. North Carolina he's leading by one. Georgia
(18:21):
he's leading by two point four. Remember Georgia. North Carolina
is es central for Donald Trump's path. Arizona, Donald Trump
is up by two point two. Wisconsin, he's up by
zero point six on paper by average. Harris is up
a half a point in Michigan. That's the only swing
state where she even has a slight lead. Nevada, Trump
is up by zero point five with days to go. David,
(18:43):
what do you glean into this looks very different from
twenty twenty and twenty sixteen.
Speaker 6 (18:47):
You and Donald Trump seem to be wanting to talk
about Alphonse Capone?
Speaker 1 (18:51):
Does he calls them Alfonse not Olt, just.
Speaker 6 (18:56):
So you would know who's from New York and who
is an Alphont Capone? Okay, Yeah, what a great What
a great illustration you just gave if they all came back,
what would that? Can you imagine that?
Speaker 1 (19:08):
Seriously?
Speaker 4 (19:09):
What an interesting point of view.
Speaker 6 (19:11):
Okay, what's beginning to happen now is ten days ago
you and I were talking about the dangers of playing
projections inside the margins of error. Now more data is
coming in, and this is beginning to remind me of
the years that you and I have spent on election
night together working with the team at ivoters dot com
that has county by county in key swing states and
(19:32):
keep precing data that it has enabled us over the
years to at least stay competitive with the major networks
and sometimes get the call before they have it because
we have more people on the ground.
Speaker 2 (19:43):
So in certain places, well in twenty sixteen, we knew
it was over three hours before the networks did it,
and apparently eight hours before Hillary was willing to admit it.
Speaker 4 (19:52):
Well, and you called it.
Speaker 6 (19:53):
You had the courage to call it on air, and
which made a whole lot of people a lot more relieved.
I'm not sure whether they were that excited about the
outcome or just about the fact that someone could actually
say it was finally over. But now we're to the
place where the data is beginning to become more predictive
with certainty, and the thing that we're watching is the
pattern of the voting. We've got to remember, everybody's comparing
(20:16):
to twenty twenty, this was Biden in the basement, and
this was over fifty percent of the vote coming in
by mail.
Speaker 4 (20:23):
I don't think you're going to see.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
That this year.
Speaker 6 (20:27):
I think you're going to see a major shift to
in person early voting. And Florida right now is the
Bellweather leading that number with hard data.
Speaker 2 (20:36):
That's happening so and by the way, Trump is the Republicans.
We presume Republicans are voting predominantly for Donald Trump. It's
been almost a two to one advantage from the beginning.
On early voting. We said the twenty twenty election was
shadow campaign. You know, the mail in vote. This was
going to be known for the early vote. And that
(20:57):
assumes that you know election day will play out. Election
day plays out. Where we closed in our last segment
was elections are all about turnout. An election is turnout
is always driven by an energy and enthusiasm. It would
stand a reason we can't see hard turns in polling
like we used to. Although I think you're starting to
see a turn in polling. We actually have one, but
(21:17):
you have to almost kind of discern it and feel
it and peel the onion several layers to kind of
get a feel for where it's headed. It's definitely heading
in Donald Trump's direction, that's for sure. And if that
closing argument was to address either Madison Square Garden or
that trajectory, I don't even think it was designed to
do that. But talk to us about just kind of
(21:38):
like in a final say what you see kind of
playing out and how it affects election day.
Speaker 6 (21:44):
Well, what's going to happen now is if people who
are as incensed as I am about the President of
the United States calling half the American elector at garbage,
if they wake up and ask everyone else, did you
hear what I heard? Than what we're liable to see?
Is the kind of break that we've been wondering about
(22:06):
and when will it come? Because that comment is actually
as despicable, if not more despicable, that when Hillary Clinton
called her opponents irredeemable and called them deplorables. He called
the supporters of Donald Trump garbage. Now, I'm an independent.
I'm not going to tell you who I'm voting for.
That's not my job, and I'm not going to tell
you who to vote for. But I can tell you
(22:27):
this as a historian, as someone who's studied the Life
of Washington and written on the Life of Washington, and
published on the Life of Washington, and spent a lifetime
studying the American presidency.
Speaker 4 (22:38):
No one has ever done that.
Speaker 2 (22:40):
But it is so bad from people that just pulled
off the shadow campaign four years ago that I smell
a rat. I think they want to lose this race,
and I think their play is everything they're warning Donald
Trump is going to do to justify them doing it,
because they planned to do it four years ago, and
they planned to do it after this election. Let me
tell you something. This whole drama begins once the votes
(23:02):
are counted, not. It doesn't end after Their big play
is after she loses.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
You will not. You can't write a worst speech. She
delivered it fine, and the setting was glorious.
Speaker 2 (23:16):
Somebody has set this woman up to fail, and they
picked her because they knew she would fail.
Speaker 1 (23:22):
I smell a rat, David.
Speaker 4 (23:24):
All I can hear is you saying garbage. That's all
I can hear.
Speaker 7 (23:28):
Somewhat.
Speaker 2 (23:28):
I'm sure Mickey Masborow has long since gone to the
Rainbow Bridge.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
But yes, garbage, You're all gobbage.
Speaker 6 (23:37):
This is Debo Morris from our little town of Franklin, Tennessee.
Speaker 3 (23:41):
My morning show is your morning show with Michael dale Jordan.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
Thanks for bringing us along with you. This is your
morning show. I'm Michael del Jordan. If you're just waking up,
President Biden called everyone that's gonna vote for Donald Trump garbage.
How do you feel about that? The glorables first Donald Trump?
Tens of millions, it's being estimated at forty million. I
think it'll end up being closer with tweets and retweets
to sixty million people reached. And now here comes jd Vance,
(24:09):
your vice presidential candidate, a man of great eloquence and substance.
Maybe that's the final say, moreover than Kamala's speech last night,
which struck everybody as kind of that's a teleprompter speech.
But for those that have been begging to know more
about her, I don't think they feel like they know
her any better. For those who want to see her
(24:29):
take accountability for the mistakes the Biden Harris administration has made,
she certainly didn't. And if it was to draw a
specific difference between her and Joe Biden, she didn't even try.
And as far as giving you any specificity other than
insulin and price gouging.
Speaker 1 (24:47):
I don't think you got it either.
Speaker 2 (24:49):
I don't even think it was designed to be a
closing argument undecided voters other than a shaky bass. And
I got to tell you, I did fall asleep the
Yankees were winning Rory O'Neil, but I had to go
Findie Nonny, and I was surprised when I woke up
and the Bats continued and they won eleven to four.
But I just finally because you brought it up as
a bitter Red Sox fan, Oh my gosh, that is
(25:10):
the most unbelievable video.
Speaker 1 (25:12):
I had to laugh out loud.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
So they grab Mookie Bets's glove, they hang on to
his arm, then they open his glove against his will
and reach it the ball.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
I don't even think you call that interference. That was
a mugging.
Speaker 9 (25:24):
Yeah, I mean, good thing he wasn't hurt. I mean
that really could have. Yeah, that was on a whole
other direction. Any chance to give you to bash of Yankees.
But then and then they so they kicked him out.
But then I think they're allowed to come back tonight.
They should be banned.
Speaker 1 (25:39):
Uh you see, and I find it charming. Um Joe
Biden no, I'm joking. Come on, relax, your team steaks. Okay, sorry,
you shouldn't have traded the babe. What do you want
from me? H?
Speaker 7 (25:56):
No?
Speaker 2 (25:56):
But seriously, uh, deplorable? That was not a good moment
for Hillary Clinton. Nazi and garbage now from Joe Biden?
This is this Joe Biden misspeaking? Or do you think
Joe's a little bitter and doing stuff like this on purpose?
Speaker 1 (26:11):
I wouldn't credit him that much being that makive. HELLI
so you're going with senile? Well yeah you can.
Speaker 9 (26:20):
You can argue the apostrophes in the other place if
you continue the quote on.
Speaker 1 (26:24):
But yeah, I mean a bad look. Shouldn't have said
it so last week?
Speaker 2 (26:28):
Last week it was jail Trump. This week it's everybody
that votes for him is garbage?
Speaker 1 (26:32):
All right? That was a very good would you make
of comma? The speech?
Speaker 2 (26:34):
It didn't even look like it was very effectively written
for the true undecided. Looked more concerned with the base
that she wasn't for, right, don't Yeah.
Speaker 9 (26:43):
All the things you laid out, I don't think that's
what the speech was for. I think it was just
a general, raw, raw speech to finally close the deal
with her supporters already. I don't think she was. I
don't think the goal was to suddenly convert people, especially
not when you're doing it, you know, against a World
Series game, you know, So I don't. Yeah, I'm not
sure what the speech was for, to be honest with you,
(27:05):
but I think you were trying to. You said a
pretty high bar for the laundry list of things that
you wanted to hear.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
I don't think that was the plan.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
I was setting the bar of what people that are
undecided or saying concerns them about her, and she didn't
really address those, so that would have been an opportunity
to do it. MSNBC actually believes that her appearance with
thirty thousand people for Beyonce, most of which left to
Scrundle because Beyonce didn't sing, is far more powerful than
sitting down with Joe Rogan and reaching forty million and
now here comes Jade Vance. I don't think they've reading
(27:35):
the tea leaves right about where people influential, where the
influence really is, because I think this is powerful.
Speaker 1 (27:40):
So what does she do? Does she go on?
Speaker 9 (27:43):
Well, if they're depending on a woman vote, I don't
think Joe Rogan helps her, so I can see that logic.
Speaker 1 (27:49):
Get what they say that she wanted a time limit
of an hour. Yeah, that's what it was. Yeah it
was a stumbling block.
Speaker 2 (27:55):
But in thirty seconds or less. Higher education costs coming down,
actually how much.
Speaker 9 (28:01):
Interesting report from the college boards are showing that things
are actually trending in the right direction when you add
in all the state aid. They're saying that after grant
aid is applied, the average student would pay about twenty
five hundred bucks a year for their college education. Now
this is just the grades, the coursework. All the other
costs though, like the food and board and the books themselves.
(28:23):
The fees they're still going up, but the core costs
are coming down for college students.
Speaker 3 (28:28):
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael Nheld. Show Now
Hi, it's me Michael.
Speaker 2 (00:01):
Your morning show can be heard on great stations across
the country like Talk Radio eleven ninety in Dallas, Fort Worth,
Freedom one oh four point seven and Washington, DC and
five point fifty KFYI and Phoenix, Arizona. We'd love to
be a part of your morning routine or take us
along on the drive to work, but as we always say,
better late than never. Enjoy the podcast two.
Speaker 3 (00:20):
Three, starting your morning off right, A new way of talk,
a new way of understanding.
Speaker 4 (00:27):
Because we're in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael gil Jordan.
Speaker 2 (00:35):
It's been a short campaign since the takeover of Kamala
Harris of the Democratic ticket, and she gave her final
address last night.
Speaker 5 (00:46):
I will enact the first ever federal bank and on
price gounging on groceries, PAP, the price of insulin, and
limit out of pocket prescription and costs for all Americans.
I will fight to make sure that hard working Americans
(01:08):
can actually afford a place to live.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
We are. I don't know how she plans to provide
housing for everybody.
Speaker 1 (01:14):
I don't know that.
Speaker 2 (01:15):
Insulin is on everybody's mind. But that was as specific
as she got it. Was as if she's more worried
about her base than she was undecided voters. Undecided voters
want to feel like they know her. I don't think
they know her any better this morning. They wanted to
see her take some accountability for what has not worked
(01:37):
in their administration and specifically how she would be different,
and it was never delivered. As I've said a million
times this morning, this was style over substance at a
time where substance was her closing argument or should have been.
And if she was in the lead, great speech. This
is great for hiding in plain sight. Not so good
(02:00):
if you're losing nationally in in every swing state as
she is. This came from Kathy Michael, or actually from Michael,
I should say, you were talking about the Democrats plan
after the election. Have you heard about the DoD's Directive
fifty two forty one. This directive was recently amended in
(02:20):
late September to allow the military to be used to
assist local lo and granting them the authority to use
lethal force in the event of civil unrest. Well, look,
we've talked about this before. This campaign is now being
so poorly executed. I'm wondering if that's the plan to lose,
And they keep setting the table. Remember the classic Sololensky tactic,
(02:43):
that which you're accusing your opponent of, you're doing.
Speaker 6 (02:48):
So.
Speaker 2 (02:48):
They keep talking about an enemy's list, and nobody knows
that there is such an enemy list that Donald Trump
actually has.
Speaker 1 (02:58):
Maybe they have an enemy's list.
Speaker 2 (03:03):
And they keep talking about Donald Trump's going to use
the military against anybody that disagrees with him. Donald Trump's
given no signs of that, and he was president for
four years and never did that. Are they planning that?
Remember in the shadow campaign to save the Democracy, that
was the plan. If hiding Joe Biden didn't work, they
were going to create an insurrection. David Sana he's joining
(03:27):
us in the American Policy Roundtable. It does seem like
I asked you this question just yesterday. If that was
their plan in twenty twenty if they lost, Is that
their plan in twenty twenty four if she loses. Because
that speech was not a closing argument, addressing undecided voters,
giving them what they want, the difference between her and Joe,
specifically what she would do beyond insulin and price gouging.
(03:49):
It's not a serious speech and a serious closing argument.
It makes me wonder if their real play is after
she loses. Should we be concerned with that? I think
your I think your mute is on. Ah, I know
your mute is on. I'm looking there.
Speaker 1 (04:08):
You not talk? Now there you go? Should we be concerned?
Speaker 4 (04:15):
Well, I think you nailed once again.
Speaker 6 (04:19):
The impression that I had listening to this speech was
like a bunch of kids at the pool in the summertime,
at the swimming pool. And she kept walking around the
pool and she would stick her toe in, but she
wasn't going to jump in. There was a hesitancy, there
was an essence, there was a distance between her and
the reality of embracing the moment in this speech that
(04:42):
she was talking at it. She was talking at those people.
She wasn't talking with them.
Speaker 2 (04:48):
And by the way, for an opening argument, at the
convention with a great theatrical backdrop, you can't have a
better one than the White House off in the distance
between two flags. I mean, visually it was stunning, like
the convention. But the Convention is an opening argument. You
can get away with being vague. This is closing argument.
Now it's time to review all the evidence, give all
the witness testimony, give all the specifics and ask for
(05:10):
a verdict that she didn't do. It was almost as
if it wasn't even designed for the undecided voter, but
more for the black vote. She's lost, the Hispanic vote,
She's lost. Pressing on abortion, pressing on boogie man. This
was not a serious speech.
Speaker 4 (05:25):
Well.
Speaker 6 (05:25):
I found the speech baffling, I really did. I just
thought to myself, this is just plain weird. And I
kept asking myself who's she talking to? And I'm not
sure she knew who she was talking to. I thought, also,
it was very odd the choice of the location in
the evening, and could we have taken a test there
to see how many people either work for the government
(05:46):
or a family member works for the governments?
Speaker 1 (05:48):
That was at it?
Speaker 4 (05:50):
Yeah, come on, I talk about a home game.
Speaker 1 (05:54):
It's just it was very, very weird, David.
Speaker 2 (05:58):
It was so bad. Remember she probably do you think
she wrote it? Of course not. Do you really think
she wrote the speech?
Speaker 1 (06:07):
Of course?
Speaker 4 (06:08):
Not?
Speaker 1 (06:08):
Okay, so of course.
Speaker 2 (06:09):
So this is what her handlers, the same handlers that
wrote her speech for the convention, the same handlers that
give her talking points for every rally, The same people
sent her out to read this. I'm telling you this
was so untargeted, so unsubstantive, so bad that it looks
intentional to me. And if it looks intentional, their play
(06:31):
is for her to lose. And they're pulling the Solodinski
because they have an enemy list. They're pulling a Sololinsky
because they plan to use the military against people that
oppose them. They played the Donald Trump won accept losing
because they plan to not accept losing. This was their
plan in twenty twenty if Biden didn't win, when they
used COVID in the shadow campaign, And I am dead convinced.
(06:52):
Now this is their play. This election doesn't end on
election day, it just begins.
Speaker 6 (06:57):
Well, I think they've gotten multiple ways to go with this,
but that speech was just plain weird. Furthermore, why is
it that no one's asking the question why is she
making her closing argument a week before the election's over?
Speaker 4 (07:13):
Is she not going to work the next six days?
Speaker 1 (07:15):
Oh, she's off working today. This was just That's why
I said, all right, so if.
Speaker 2 (07:22):
If you were up early when we first started, I
was like, Okay, what is this really designed to do?
Speaker 1 (07:26):
This is designed like.
Speaker 2 (07:28):
The whole stupid comedian's line First of all, in Puerto Rico,
they have a sanitation issue. This administration should be solving
that issue and they're not. They should be helping this
in trapped island that's buried in its own garbage. Instead
of solving it, they're hijacking it to try to get
you to not think about all the people that were
on stage at Madison Square Garden or all the people
(07:49):
that were outside, and how unify this looks like America's party.
You got the Kennedy saying this isn't the party of
my uncle or my father, wasn't even a party for
me and forced me out. You got Telsey, who was
a presidential Democratic candidate, saying I'm now a Republican, let
alone supporting Donald Trump. So this was trying to upstage
that this was the answer to Madison Square Garden.
Speaker 1 (08:10):
I don't think it was even an answer to Joe Rogan.
Speaker 2 (08:15):
JD.
Speaker 4 (08:16):
Vanseill handled that.
Speaker 6 (08:17):
Have you have you ever seen a presidential candidate take
the last week off? Have you ever seen a presidential
candidate make their last closing argument a week before voting ends?
Speaker 2 (08:27):
Well, but she's not, I mean she's out today, she's
out in Uh, she's going to be in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,
and then again in Madison, Wisconsin. But that just speaks
to what you're really ultimately saying is this was staged,
and it was staged not to be a final argument.
Because she's going to continue to make the argument this week,
it has to be that it was to address the base,
(08:50):
because it certainly didn't address undecided voters, and it certainly
is in her final address.
Speaker 6 (08:55):
Okay, now I've got my biggest question, and I mean
this one has nothing to do with us being on
the radio. I wanted to jump through my phone to
find you last night when I heard Joe Biden's talk
and Joe Biden, the President of the United States, the
President of the United States, called half the American voting population.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
Garbage last night, garbage, garbage.
Speaker 4 (09:18):
All I could hear was you saying garbage.
Speaker 1 (09:20):
That's all I got.
Speaker 2 (09:20):
My teacher, which, by the way, I think Keith Andrews.
He reminded me it was Mickey Masborough because I could
never remember his name. Deplorables was deplorable because Hillary wasn't
calling Donald.
Speaker 4 (09:31):
You irredeemable, deplorable, you Michael del Journal.
Speaker 2 (09:34):
Irredeemable, deplorable, But It wasn't Donald Trump, it was anybody
that supports him or votes for him. That was the
biggest mistake. They have since taken it to Nazis and
now Joe Biden. Last night garbage, Now Joe Biden again?
So bad? Is this cognitive impairment or is this a
bitter guy that really wants her to lose and wasn't
even invited to last night. I think that was intentional,
but Biden keeps sabotaging every step of the way.
Speaker 1 (09:58):
I don't think that was a misspeak.
Speaker 6 (10:01):
Okay, so we got the Puerto Rican joke and the
whole world goes nuts, and Trump immediately says, don't know,
the guy shouldn't have been there. I'm sure somebody's gonna
get fired for doing all that. Okay, that stupid.
Speaker 4 (10:12):
It happens. That's why you don't have comedians.
Speaker 1 (10:14):
Okay, David, this is all they've got a week before
in election. They're losing.
Speaker 6 (10:18):
But but within minutes, everybody says that was wrong, shouldn't
have done it, don't overreact. Well, we don't believe that
about Puerto Rico. You all know that that guy made
a big mistake. He won't get a second chance Okay,
the President of the United States called the American publics
seventy five million people garbage, and where was Kamala Harris
within five minutes resigning from the vice presidency, saying, I
(10:41):
won't be a part of an administration that calls half
the American people garbage.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
I don't want anything to do with that. Yet has
he set a peep?
Speaker 2 (10:50):
She was honored to serve with him, is what she said.
But she'll be different because these are different times. There's
been noreak of break.
Speaker 6 (10:56):
Because I'm about to have I'm about to have a
hemorrhage here, just take a break.
Speaker 2 (10:59):
Okay, Yeah, I mean this is but again, the rat
that I smell is this is so bad. It's intentional Puerto.
Speaker 3 (11:08):
Rico, where I'm in my home state of Delaware.
Speaker 4 (11:10):
Could he be intention can put together?
Speaker 6 (11:13):
The only garbage I see float down there is his supporters,
his his demonization.
Speaker 2 (11:18):
So is the final address Kamala's style over substance, nothing
speech Joe Biden calling everybody that doesn't support him garbage
that in the name of joy and unity? Or the
real final say be the vice presidential candidate Ja Da
Vance Today.
Speaker 3 (11:32):
With Joe Rogan, This is your morning show with Michael
del Trono.
Speaker 1 (11:48):
Hi'm Michael.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
We'd love to have you listen every weekday morning to
your morning show live, even take us along with you
on the drive to work. We can be heard on
great radio stations like one oh four ninth The Patriot
in Saint Louis, or Talk Radio ninety eight point three
in fifteen ten WLAC in Nashville and News Talk by
fifty Kate f Yi Phoenix, Arizona. Love to be a
part of your morning routine, but we're always grateful you're here.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
Now enjoy the podcast.
Speaker 2 (12:11):
Slimbaud would always say it was style all overside.
Speaker 1 (12:15):
There was no specifics whatsoever.
Speaker 2 (12:17):
It was actually so bad that I am now more
suspicious than ever that when they talk about an enemy's list,
they're the one that has one. When they talk about
using the military against its own citizens, they're the ones
that are planning to do it.
Speaker 1 (12:32):
This was so bad of a speech.
Speaker 2 (12:35):
It rereaked of they wanted to lose, because their real
play is for after she loses. We're gonna go inside
some of the polling numbers that were we've been looking
at with David Zonadi in a moment. But first Aaron
Rayali is here. Aaron, this has never happened for me,
my sports bookie from the Your Morning Show Sports book,
Big John. He actually complimented you earlier today.
Speaker 1 (12:57):
Listen.
Speaker 7 (12:57):
So Aaron real one hundred percent right. The contract goes
higher and lower depending on the news out there about
the election. The way to go was buying the call
options when his stock got beat up. And that's what
every smart investor did. I bought this sixteen strike price
(13:18):
the stocks at fifty.
Speaker 1 (13:19):
You could pick a number. If he wins, isn't he
beautiful for him?
Speaker 2 (13:25):
He got the issue inside and out. Get everybody up
to speak to what we were talking about. There is
sports betting. It took me forever in the early hour
to remember this because I don't believe in any of this.
It's nothing but destroying families' lives. But DraftKings, for example,
you can go on DraftKings and you can just gamble
and bet who you think is gonna win with odds,
Kamala Harris or Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
This is completely different.
Speaker 8 (13:47):
This is different. So it's different in the sense that
it's a derivative contract. It's traded under the derivative unit
of whether it be Calshi or Polymarket or robin Hood.
And this actually comes this week of amazing because calsh
which is another trading platform, it won this like crucial
ruling with the CFTC. So they try to hault trading
(14:08):
on election outcomes. But this quote unquote event based market,
the event being the presidential election, is now live. And
what you do is you have this derivative unit, and
it's a contract, so it has a payment date, it
says who the parties will pay, it has values, it
has obligations of the parties. It's anything. It's like a
swap or an option or a forward, anything of those.
(14:30):
But they're traded on the exchange. They're over the counter,
and essentially what happens is you get paid out based
on the contract. And long story short, these predictive markets
have Harris winning the popular vote but Trump winning the election. Ye,
this doesn't mean it's like betting on a pony, you know,
the lead pony, the pony that's probably gonna win is
(14:52):
the reason. You know, the the markets are performing, But
it doesn't mean the pony will win.
Speaker 1 (14:57):
Here's the issue.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
At this point in twenty sixteen, Hillary was and it
was breaking towards Trump.
Speaker 1 (15:04):
People forget that. Now he closed a huge gap because
of underpolling.
Speaker 2 (15:07):
But at this point, five six days out in twenty sixteen,
Clinton was up four point three nationally, Biden was up
seven point nine at this time in twenty twenty, today
Donald Trump is up zero point four.
Speaker 1 (15:21):
Now, remember when Hillary was up four point three. Donald
Trump went on to win.
Speaker 2 (15:24):
He did not win the national vote, but he went
on to win the electoral college.
Speaker 1 (15:28):
But this is different.
Speaker 2 (15:29):
He's not down four point three and he's not down
seven point nine. The toughest derivative to consider is can
she pull off the popular vote?
Speaker 1 (15:36):
But the electoral college seems like a no brainer. Right now. Anyway,
he's leading every swing stake.
Speaker 8 (15:42):
Indeed, yeah, listen, it's it's gonna be hard. Listen. These
predictive markets don't mean that this is going to happen.
But unlike a pole, which is essentially just like a
snapshot in time, this is a forward looking thing. And
then in the argument that like, oh this can be
manipulated because someone can come in and swoop up all
the trades, well, they're actually rolling this out to only
(16:03):
like the volume is very low. They're not opening it
to everyone.
Speaker 4 (16:07):
The contracts allow customers to.
Speaker 8 (16:08):
Trade like on the outcome of this specific event, but
only in small numbers, so it's hard to like to
sway it one way or the other.
Speaker 2 (16:16):
What's the bottom line take away from this that now
we're even you know that this is this is probably
going to be the new norm, right, we'll probably do
this four years from now, eight four years from.
Speaker 8 (16:24):
Now probably, And I don't I don't necessarily think it's bad.
I just think it's another form of betting. Like you
could have done it under the table, or you could
do it on a trading platform. It's all the same thing.
And listen, if you tell a trader they're betting, they
freak out my friends and I'm like, oh, it's betting,
just with like more jargon and a couple.
Speaker 4 (16:41):
Of different guardrails.
Speaker 8 (16:42):
They're like, no, no, Like, listen, poker is the really
skilled game betting. Nonetheless, it's not like an insult.
Speaker 1 (16:49):
It just it is what it is.
Speaker 2 (16:50):
Can you imagine if all the mobsters came back to life,
they take a look around and go, wait a minute,
the government everybody's gambling right out in the open, right
from their their living room sofa.
Speaker 1 (17:00):
What this prostitution? Is legal. Now what what? You can
smoke marijuana?
Speaker 8 (17:05):
Now wait, they're out of business. They're out of business.
Speaker 2 (17:09):
The United States culture and government has become the mob
of the nineteen twenties.
Speaker 1 (17:14):
Go figure, Aaron, you have a great day. We'll talk
again tomorrow.
Speaker 8 (17:17):
You two friends.
Speaker 2 (17:17):
You got a compliment from Big John, our bookie man.
I've never even John, I've never even got Why don't
you give him the I adore you? You know the
I adore You have a great day. We'll talk again tomorrow.
Always love to talk about gambling right before David's and Audio.
It's he's probably the only one that hates the topic
more than me. But it's strange times. I wanted to
(17:38):
just give you the latest polling. So in Pennsylvania, this
is the real clear politics average, and it's growing because
the latest polls are getting higher and higher. Like in Pennsylvania,
we had an Atlas poll that came out yesterday and
Donald Trump is leading by three in Pennsylvania. Arizona has
Hairs up one in a CNN poll. Atlas has Trump
(17:59):
up four in Arizona, Nevada, CNN has Trump up one.
Trafalgar has it a dead heat, and Atlas has Trump
up one. So all of these are within the margin
of er clearly. But if you do the real clear
average on all of these. Pennsylvania he's leading by zero
point six percent. North Carolina he's leading by one. Georgia
(18:21):
he's leading by two point four. Remember Georgia. North Carolina
is es central for Donald Trump's path. Arizona, Donald Trump
is up by two point two. Wisconsin, he's up by
zero point six on paper by average. Harris is up
a half a point in Michigan. That's the only swing
state where she even has a slight lead. Nevada, Trump
is up by zero point five with days to go. David,
(18:43):
what do you glean into this looks very different from
twenty twenty and twenty sixteen.
Speaker 6 (18:47):
You and Donald Trump seem to be wanting to talk
about Alphonse Capone?
Speaker 1 (18:51):
Does he calls them Alfonse not Olt, just.
Speaker 6 (18:56):
So you would know who's from New York and who
is an Alphont Capone? Okay, Yeah, what a great What
a great illustration you just gave if they all came back,
what would that? Can you imagine that?
Speaker 1 (19:08):
Seriously?
Speaker 4 (19:09):
What an interesting point of view.
Speaker 6 (19:11):
Okay, what's beginning to happen now is ten days ago
you and I were talking about the dangers of playing
projections inside the margins of error. Now more data is
coming in, and this is beginning to remind me of
the years that you and I have spent on election
night together working with the team at ivoters dot com
that has county by county in key swing states and
(19:32):
keep precing data that it has enabled us over the
years to at least stay competitive with the major networks
and sometimes get the call before they have it because
we have more people on the ground.
Speaker 2 (19:43):
So in certain places, well in twenty sixteen, we knew
it was over three hours before the networks did it,
and apparently eight hours before Hillary was willing to admit it.
Speaker 4 (19:52):
Well, and you called it.
Speaker 6 (19:53):
You had the courage to call it on air, and
which made a whole lot of people a lot more relieved.
I'm not sure whether they were that excited about the
outcome or just about the fact that someone could actually
say it was finally over. But now we're to the
place where the data is beginning to become more predictive
with certainty, and the thing that we're watching is the
pattern of the voting. We've got to remember, everybody's comparing
(20:16):
to twenty twenty, this was Biden in the basement, and
this was over fifty percent of the vote coming in
by mail.
Speaker 4 (20:23):
I don't think you're going to see.
Speaker 1 (20:26):
That this year.
Speaker 6 (20:27):
I think you're going to see a major shift to
in person early voting. And Florida right now is the
Bellweather leading that number with hard data.
Speaker 2 (20:36):
That's happening so and by the way, Trump is the Republicans.
We presume Republicans are voting predominantly for Donald Trump. It's
been almost a two to one advantage from the beginning.
On early voting. We said the twenty twenty election was
shadow campaign. You know, the mail in vote. This was
going to be known for the early vote. And that
(20:57):
assumes that you know election day will play out. Election
day plays out. Where we closed in our last segment
was elections are all about turnout. An election is turnout
is always driven by an energy and enthusiasm. It would
stand a reason we can't see hard turns in polling
like we used to. Although I think you're starting to
see a turn in polling. We actually have one, but
(21:17):
you have to almost kind of discern it and feel
it and peel the onion several layers to kind of
get a feel for where it's headed. It's definitely heading
in Donald Trump's direction, that's for sure. And if that
closing argument was to address either Madison Square Garden or
that trajectory, I don't even think it was designed to
do that. But talk to us about just kind of
(21:38):
like in a final say what you see kind of
playing out and how it affects election day.
Speaker 6 (21:44):
Well, what's going to happen now is if people who
are as incensed as I am about the President of
the United States calling half the American elector at garbage,
if they wake up and ask everyone else, did you
hear what I heard? Than what we're liable to see?
Is the kind of break that we've been wondering about
(22:06):
and when will it come? Because that comment is actually
as despicable, if not more despicable, that when Hillary Clinton
called her opponents irredeemable and called them deplorables. He called
the supporters of Donald Trump garbage. Now, I'm an independent.
I'm not going to tell you who I'm voting for.
That's not my job, and I'm not going to tell
you who to vote for. But I can tell you
(22:27):
this as a historian, as someone who's studied the Life
of Washington and written on the Life of Washington, and
published on the Life of Washington, and spent a lifetime
studying the American presidency.
Speaker 4 (22:38):
No one has ever done that.
Speaker 2 (22:40):
But it is so bad from people that just pulled
off the shadow campaign four years ago that I smell
a rat. I think they want to lose this race,
and I think their play is everything they're warning Donald
Trump is going to do to justify them doing it,
because they planned to do it four years ago, and
they planned to do it after this election. Let me
tell you something. This whole drama begins once the votes
(23:02):
are counted, not. It doesn't end after Their big play
is after she loses.
Speaker 1 (23:10):
You will not. You can't write a worst speech. She
delivered it fine, and the setting was glorious.
Speaker 2 (23:16):
Somebody has set this woman up to fail, and they
picked her because they knew she would fail.
Speaker 1 (23:22):
I smell a rat, David.
Speaker 4 (23:24):
All I can hear is you saying garbage. That's all
I can hear.
Speaker 7 (23:28):
Somewhat.
Speaker 2 (23:28):
I'm sure Mickey Masborow has long since gone to the
Rainbow Bridge.
Speaker 1 (23:32):
But yes, garbage, You're all gobbage.
Speaker 6 (23:37):
This is Debo Morris from our little town of Franklin, Tennessee.
Speaker 3 (23:41):
My morning show is your morning show with Michael dale Jordan.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
Thanks for bringing us along with you. This is your
morning show. I'm Michael del Jordan. If you're just waking up,
President Biden called everyone that's gonna vote for Donald Trump garbage.
How do you feel about that? The glorables first Donald Trump?
Tens of millions, it's being estimated at forty million. I
think it'll end up being closer with tweets and retweets
to sixty million people reached. And now here comes jd Vance,
(24:09):
your vice presidential candidate, a man of great eloquence and substance.
Maybe that's the final say, moreover than Kamala's speech last night,
which struck everybody as kind of that's a teleprompter speech.
But for those that have been begging to know more
about her, I don't think they feel like they know
her any better. For those who want to see her
(24:29):
take accountability for the mistakes the Biden Harris administration has made,
she certainly didn't. And if it was to draw a
specific difference between her and Joe Biden, she didn't even try.
And as far as giving you any specificity other than
insulin and price gouging.
Speaker 1 (24:47):
I don't think you got it either.
Speaker 2 (24:49):
I don't even think it was designed to be a
closing argument undecided voters other than a shaky bass. And
I got to tell you, I did fall asleep the
Yankees were winning Rory O'Neil, but I had to go
Findie Nonny, and I was surprised when I woke up
and the Bats continued and they won eleven to four.
But I just finally because you brought it up as
a bitter Red Sox fan, Oh my gosh, that is
(25:10):
the most unbelievable video.
Speaker 1 (25:12):
I had to laugh out loud.
Speaker 2 (25:13):
So they grab Mookie Bets's glove, they hang on to
his arm, then they open his glove against his will
and reach it the ball.
Speaker 1 (25:21):
I don't even think you call that interference. That was
a mugging.
Speaker 9 (25:24):
Yeah, I mean, good thing he wasn't hurt. I mean
that really could have. Yeah, that was on a whole
other direction. Any chance to give you to bash of Yankees.
But then and then they so they kicked him out.
But then I think they're allowed to come back tonight.
They should be banned.
Speaker 1 (25:39):
Uh you see, and I find it charming. Um Joe
Biden no, I'm joking. Come on, relax, your team steaks. Okay, sorry,
you shouldn't have traded the babe. What do you want
from me? H?
Speaker 7 (25:56):
No?
Speaker 2 (25:56):
But seriously, uh, deplorable? That was not a good moment
for Hillary Clinton. Nazi and garbage now from Joe Biden?
This is this Joe Biden misspeaking? Or do you think
Joe's a little bitter and doing stuff like this on purpose?
Speaker 1 (26:11):
I wouldn't credit him that much being that makive. HELLI
so you're going with senile? Well yeah you can.
Speaker 9 (26:20):
You can argue the apostrophes in the other place if
you continue the quote on.
Speaker 1 (26:24):
But yeah, I mean a bad look. Shouldn't have said
it so last week?
Speaker 2 (26:28):
Last week it was jail Trump. This week it's everybody
that votes for him is garbage?
Speaker 1 (26:32):
All right? That was a very good would you make
of comma? The speech?
Speaker 2 (26:34):
It didn't even look like it was very effectively written
for the true undecided. Looked more concerned with the base
that she wasn't for, right, don't Yeah.
Speaker 9 (26:43):
All the things you laid out, I don't think that's
what the speech was for. I think it was just
a general, raw, raw speech to finally close the deal
with her supporters already. I don't think she was. I
don't think the goal was to suddenly convert people, especially
not when you're doing it, you know, against a World
Series game, you know, So I don't. Yeah, I'm not
sure what the speech was for, to be honest with you,
(27:05):
but I think you were trying to. You said a
pretty high bar for the laundry list of things that
you wanted to hear.
Speaker 1 (27:12):
I don't think that was the plan.
Speaker 2 (27:13):
I was setting the bar of what people that are
undecided or saying concerns them about her, and she didn't
really address those, so that would have been an opportunity
to do it. MSNBC actually believes that her appearance with
thirty thousand people for Beyonce, most of which left to
Scrundle because Beyonce didn't sing, is far more powerful than
sitting down with Joe Rogan and reaching forty million and
now here comes Jade Vance. I don't think they've reading
(27:35):
the tea leaves right about where people influential, where the
influence really is, because I think this is powerful.
Speaker 1 (27:40):
So what does she do? Does she go on?
Speaker 9 (27:43):
Well, if they're depending on a woman vote, I don't
think Joe Rogan helps her, so I can see that logic.
Speaker 1 (27:49):
Get what they say that she wanted a time limit
of an hour. Yeah, that's what it was. Yeah it
was a stumbling block.
Speaker 2 (27:55):
But in thirty seconds or less. Higher education costs coming down,
actually how much.
Speaker 9 (28:01):
Interesting report from the college boards are showing that things
are actually trending in the right direction when you add
in all the state aid. They're saying that after grant
aid is applied, the average student would pay about twenty
five hundred bucks a year for their college education. Now
this is just the grades, the coursework. All the other
costs though, like the food and board and the books themselves.
(28:23):
The fees they're still going up, but the core costs
are coming down for college students.
Speaker 3 (28:28):
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael Nheld. Show Now
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
Today’s Latest News In 4 Minutes. Updated Hourly.
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.