The Trump Smears Start Again

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Good morning Cooner country. Okay, my friends, this is beyond disgusting,
This is beyond despicable. Honestly, just when you thought the
Democrats could not go any freaking lower, well they did

(00:20):
it again yesterday. And I want to be perfectly clear
before I get to the actual story, that it is
no coincidence that this latest hoax, and it could be
really the most revolting hoax of all of the hoaxes
that they have perpetrated upon Trump and upon the American people.

(00:42):
This was clearly done to distract and deflect from what
took place late last night early this morning, which is
that the government shutdown is now officially over. The Senate
passed the continuing resolution. The House then passed the funding bill.

(01:03):
Six Democrats crossed the aisle to join the Republicans, and
President Trump officially signed it. What is it six seven
eight hours ago, basically late at night. So the government
shut down is now officially over. The Democrats have lost,
and it was a route, and it is now fracturing

(01:26):
and breaking and splitting their party, there's no question. And
so to distract from their humiliating defeat, to distract from
the fact of the pain that they deliberately inflicted upon
the American people a million federal employees going without a paycheck,

(01:47):
using snap food stamps hunger as a weapon. Over twenty
thousand flights canceled, putting the country through pain, suffering, miss
the damage they did to the economy, the damage they
did to the country, all of it because Chuck E

(02:09):
Chuck YU. Schumer is petrified of a challenge, a primary
challenge from Alexandria, Fidel Castro Cortes and the radical left
of his party, which demanded that he opposed Trump, wage
a scorched earth campaign no matter what, attack, attack, attack,

(02:30):
shut the government down in order to fight Trump, even
though Americans were held hostage for forty three days. So
to distract from this and the backlash and the blowback
that is now taking place, yesterday Democrats pulled a bait

(02:56):
and switch. There's no other way to put it. The
Democrats on the House Oversight Committee released several Jeffrey Epstein
emails in which in one of them listen to this,
they were essentially insinuating that President Trump was obviously close friends,

(03:24):
according to them, with the pedophile financier Gay with this pedophile,
and that in one of these emails that Epstein claims
victim number one spent many hours at my house with him.
And so it is an email whereby Epstein claims to

(03:47):
Jolaine Maxwell that I don't know why people aren't looking
at Trump because he was with and then there's a name.
It's the Democrats deliberately redact did the name and just
called it victim one. That this you know that Trump
had spent many hours at my house with this victim,

(04:11):
or this victim spent many hours at my house with
Trump to be more accurate. And so the insinuation was
that Trump was at Epstein's house and that he was
diddling underage girls, and that he engaged in inappropriate, illegal

(04:35):
sexual abuse and sexual activity, that he was a sexual predator. Now,
these emails, and there was about three of them, were
deliberately selectively leaked to the New York Times and this
is CNN, who then ran wild with it before the

(04:57):
actual documents themselves were made public, and so that created
a massive firestorm. Other media outlets followed, of course, the
moonbats on social media, especially Blue Sky, which is the
left's version of truth social they went wild with this
and before you know it, suddenly now everybody was saying

(05:21):
Trump was in bed with Epstein, Trump was at his
house frequently. Trump is now caught red handed having spent
hours and hours apparently alone with this so called victim
at Epstein's house. Wink wink, he was sleeping with underage girls. Lies, lies,

(05:50):
damned lies, and more lies. So the Republicans and the
White House, and I don't blame them, reacted with fire
and fury, and they released by the way, the Republicans
then said, release all of the documents. Twenty thousand of
them were released in a possession of the House Oversight Committee.

(06:11):
And then they started right away to point out the
emails that the Democrats had put out, that these were
cherry picked and very selectively withheld the name of the victim.
The name of the victim that the Democrats redacted was
Virginia Geoff. She's this poor woman that ended up committing

(06:33):
suicide earlier this year. She has now published her family
has published posthumously her memoir. She is one of the
most prominent victims of Jeffrey Epstein, who demanded that justice
be done and that she and other victims of him
and the pedophile network that he ran on his infamous

(06:53):
Epstein Island, that they be held accountable for their sex crimes,
rapes and violations of these poor, young, underage girls. So
you may say, well, okay, Jeff, so now we know
the name of the so called victim that the Democrats reducted,
Virginia Geoff. Well, here's the problem, as she states in

(07:16):
her memoir, as she stated under oath repeatedly, President Trump,
her words, not mine, never did anything wrong with me. Ever,
He never acted inappropriately. He never touched me inappropriately, He

(07:37):
never said anything inappropriately to me. In fact, she said,
all he ever was was kind, generous, and friendly to
me and my family. In other words, he was not
part of this pedophile network. He never sexually abused Virginia Geoff.
He never laid a finger on that poor woman. Virginia Geoff,

(08:02):
at sixteen years old, worked temporarily at Maro A Lago
as in the Spa at the spa some kind of
a spaw massuse. And so her father also worked at
mari A lago as a maintenance manager, and she was
briefly introduced to Trump. Trump said, you know great, have you?

(08:23):
Please keep working hard. I hear great things about you.
And then about a couple weeks later, she finally met
Julayne Maxwell, and it was Julaane Maxwell who convinced her
to leave marro A Lago and become Epstein's full time
massuse and to travel with them on his plane to

(08:45):
his island and around the world. And that's where they
abused this poor young girl and many like her. So
the Democrats did everything in their power now to release
three emails, selectively edited, selectively redacted, planted in the liberal

(09:07):
media to falsely smear, villainize Trump as a pedophile and
someone who abused this woman when they knew full well
who she was and what she said under oath, what
she told the Democrats, what she told Republicans, what she

(09:28):
said in her memoir. So what they did was they
released an email, in fact three of them, knowing that
they were lying, knowing that what they were insinuating was libelous.
It was to meet a smear, it was slanderous, and

(09:52):
all of this to distract from the fact that Trump
has broken them over the shutdown and they are now
being blamed. I gotta say this, my friends, what we're
now seeing with the Epstein files has nothing to do
with the Democrats or the media looking for truth or
justice for these poor victims. They are trying to use

(10:16):
the Epstein files desperately to go after Trump, to dirty Trump,
to taint Trump, to try to rope him into the
Epstein network so that they can discredit and delegitimize him
as some kind of a sexual pervert, a deviant, or
a pedophile. And if that means they have to lie,

(10:38):
then be it, so be it. And that's what they
were caught doing. Again, the same Democrats who had the
Epstein files under Obama for eight years, under Biden for
four years. If there was anything in those Epstein files
that in any way implicated Trump, they would have released

(11:02):
it a long time ago. To me is this is
beyond the pale. President Trump now I think needs to
sue CNN, the New York Times, anybody involved in this,
the liberal media, and I'm telling you the Democratic Party
the way he's suing the Baybay Say. And I'm going

(11:23):
to get to that in just a second. So six
point twenty now on the Great WRKO Jeff Cooner Boston's
bulldozer six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight.
Couple lines are open if you want to jump on.
This is now their latest hokes, and it's beyond as
I said, it's beyond disgusting. Really, there's a certain point

(11:45):
where you have to say enough is enough. And so
they selectively leaked several emails, as I said in my
opening monologue, that were written by Jeffrey Epstein to Julaane Maxwell. Well,
another one was this anti Trump really a journalist assassin

(12:06):
of Michael Wolfe, who's written several horrible books on Trump,
most of them packed with lies. And so they released
these emails, and in one of the emails, they deliberately
redact the name of one of the victims of Jeffrey Epstein,
and they just refer to this person as the unnamed

(12:27):
victim or victim number one, and they claim that this
unnamed victim was with Trump in Epstein's house for many hours,
and so, of course the implication couldn't be clearer that

(12:48):
Trump was part of Epstein's pedophile network of powerful men
who sexually prayed and abused young underage girls. And it
was like, wink wink, what's he doing? He was alone
with her in the house, in Epstein's house. Oh my god,
we got him, We got him. And it created this

(13:10):
media frenzy yesterday, I mean again, trying to revive the
Epstein scandal and make it seem as if Trump now
is now directly involved. He was one of the men
who was sleeping and having sex with underage girls. This
is it now time to impeach. We're going to overthrow him.

(13:31):
We've got a pedophile in the White House. Well, it
turns out that the unnamed victim the one they refused
to name in the email that they released. But the
Dems knew who she was, and of course the media
knew who she was. Was I kind of mispronounced her name.
This is how the media has been pronouncing her name,

(13:53):
but apparently in an interview, she gives the French pronunciation
of her name, So out of respect for her and
her family, it's Virginia Jeoff. Is it Gewfrey? Yet? Jewfrey?
Gew Frey? Virginia Gewfrey, And so Virginia Gewfrey passed away,

(14:17):
apparently committed suicide. Her family does not believe it. They
believe that Epstein's people and people close to Epstein wanted
to silence her and had her killed. In fact, months
before her suicide, she was involved in a bus accident
and which looked very strange, almost as if somebody wanted
to run her off the road, and she barely survived,

(14:40):
and then she kept telling people, I don't want to die.
I don't want to die. I don't want to die.
If something happens to me, she said, it's not suicide.
Well guess what. She ends up suiciding herself. So that's
ends up committing suicide. And her family is very suspicious. Frankly,
I'm very suspicious. Most of the world is very suspicious.

(15:02):
But let that go. She publishes a tell all memoir.
It's posthumously now published, and Virginia Giuffrey says in the memoir,
Trump never ever touched me, never did anything inappropriate to me,
never violated me. In fact, all he ever was when

(15:26):
I had that brief time I worked at mar A Lago.
He was very kind, He was very friendly, he was
very considerate, he was extremely professional. She also said it
under oath, so we know that she said repeatedly that
Trump never did anything wrong. So why release these selective

(15:49):
emails with the reduction deliberately in there? Because they wanted
to smear Trump again. They wanted to create the false
narrative that the president is a pedophile, that the president
was a buddy of Jeffrey Epstein, which is another lie.

(16:09):
He kicked Epstein out twenty years ago. He kicked them
out because he kept plucking young girls. In fact, it's
in one of these email exchanges, and Trump himself then
later admits he goes, look, this guy kept hitting on
my young girls. And I said stop, and the guy
wouldn't stop, and I said, get the hell out. I

(16:32):
don't want you and Julaine here. In fact, at one
point Trump blames blames Julainne Maxwell, specifically saying you're going
after young girls, You're grooming them, you're abusing them. It's wrong,
it's sick. Leave my people alone. So rather than being

(16:54):
wink wink complicit with Epstein and his sick pedophile net work,
he kicked them out of marrol Ago. He chased them out.
He wanted nothing to do with them, nothing to do
with Epstein, nothing to do with Julaine Maxwell, nothing to
do with Epstein Island. Now, this is very important. The

(17:16):
three Democrats on the House Oversight Committee who deliberately leaked
the selective and I believe false emails, there's no question
now these were edited emails, were Congressman Garcia, who's the
ranking member. But who's a rabbit at Robert Garcia, who's

(17:42):
a rabbit? Anti Trumper vice ranking member? Yep, Jasmine Crockett,
that lunatic, and Rocanna another left wing crazy who has
presidential ambitions in twenty twenty eight, two sixty eight sixty

(18:02):
eight is the number. Okay, the White House man, they
they gave it to the Democrats yesterday with both barrels.
Caroline Levitt, the Press secretary, just blasted the Democrats for
selectively leaking and obviously redacting key information from these Epstein emails,

(18:24):
the media for running wild with it and pushing it,
promoting it knowing that it was a blatant lie and
a smear and a slander, and look apparently now just
to show you how it's blown up in their face.
In one of these Epstein emails, Epstein in fact admits
that Trump kicked him out of mar Alago that in fact, furthermore,

(18:48):
he admits, this is to Michael Wolfe, the anti Trump,
you know, the Trump hating journalist. He basically says he
blamed Julaane Maxwell, saying, star up plucking these girls. I
know what you're doing with these girls. You're not gonna
touch my girls, get out. I don't want to see
you or Jeffrey here again. So not only you know,

(19:14):
does it not implicate Trump quite o contrere, as the
French would say. On the contrary, it completely exonerates Trump
and utterly blows up the narrative that the Democrats and
the media were trying to you know, craft and pedal
to the American people. Now I gotta say this, and

(19:35):
I want to start taking your calls. Six one, seven two, six, six,
sixty eight, sixty eight is the number. When is this
going to end? I mean there has to be consequences this,
you know, CNN, the New York Times, the Washington Post,
the Associated Press. I could go on and on. You

(19:56):
can't keep lying and slam ering and libeling and smearing
someone knowing that it's a lie when you know, we're
getting now into pedophile territory. When you start, you know,
implying that someone that the President of the United States
is a freaking pedophile who is at Jeffrey Epstein's house

(20:20):
diddling a sixteen year old girl, and it turns out
to be a complete pack of lies. I mean, there's
not a shred or a scintilla of truth to it.
There's got to be consequences. You can't just hide under
this shield of freedom of the press. Freedom of the
press comes with tremendous responsibilities and duties and obligations. One

(20:45):
of them is to be accurate, or at least attempt
to be accurate, attempt to be reporting what's factual and true.
But when they're in the business now of making stuff
up and deliberately intentionally making stuff up in order to
destroy and bring down a president, I'm sorry, there has

(21:06):
to be consequences. Now. In other democracies around the world,
they do have slander laws, they do have libel laws,
and there are checks and balances on an irresponsible, lying,
fake news media. And sometimes news organizations are fined or
they lose in you know, they get sued and they

(21:28):
have to cough up millions and millions, sometimes even tens
and tens of millions of dollars, and that financial check
and balance, that financial potential accountability is what keeps them,
in many ways, in check. The editor says to the journalist,
is there any truth to this? Because if there isn't,

(21:49):
we're gonna get our parents suit off, We're gonna lose
our shirt. So at least that provides a certain amount
of restraint. Now, it's not just CNN and the New
York Times. So let me ask all of you this,
should Trump sue CNN and the New York Times. I

(22:10):
say yes, I think it's long overdue, just like he's
suing the baybas Ay And I'm gonna get to them
in just a second. But the Jasmine Crocketts, the Robert Garcias,
the Roe Kannas, these are the three Democrats on the
House Oversight Committee that deliberately leaked this garbage, and that

(22:33):
they were the ones who redacted Virginia Giuffrey's name to
make it seem Oh my god, there was this victim.
Oh Trump was alone with her in the house for hours?
What the hell went on over there? No, if they
really were, if they had revealed right away it was

(22:54):
Virginia Geuffrey, then everybody would have said, well, no, many
times is this woman going to testify? How many books
is she going to write? How many times is she
going to say that Trump never ever ever touched her
inappropriately or did anything inappropriate to her or any of
the other girls that she knew, And that's it. It

(23:16):
would have been a non story. It would have been nothing,
but because they deliberately redacted the name, they thought there
it is. They've got their smoking bombshell. They've got them now.
They've got them right where they want them now. The BBC,
because laws in Britain are different than the laws in

(23:38):
the United States. In Britain you can actually really sue
the media for slander and libel. Unlike in this country.
It's very hard. You can do it, but it's very hard.
In England it's easier. The BBC now is in the
midst of a massive, massive scandal. Their top director has

(23:59):
had to resign, the head of the news division has
had to resign. It is a massive story across the
pond in Great Britain, and it involves a documentary that
the BBC pushed about January six, and they deliberately doctored

(24:19):
the audio of Trump's infamous speech January six. If you
remember when he told his supporters to go to the
Capitol to peacefully and patriotically let their voices be heard.
In fact, he didn't call for violence. He called for
the opposite of violence. But the BBC deliberately took those

(24:46):
words out and then edit it to make it seem
like he was telling them go in there and storm
the capitol, go there and riot. Roll cuts seventeen, Mike.

Speaker 2 (25:10):
We're gonna walk down to the Capitol and I'll be
there with you, and we fight.

Speaker 1 (25:17):
We fight like hell. So let me play it again. Okay,
let me play it again. You want to see how
deceptive and dishonest I mean. This is straight propaganda. This
is literally straight up propaganda. So I want to play
it again. This is now. This is what they're telling
the people of Britain that Trump said on January sixth,

(25:38):
Because the whole documentary is he's responsible. He lit the fire,
he urged everybody to go. He told them to storm
the capitol. He told them to riot. That's the entire
point of the BBC documentary. Well they got a big
problem his speech. Well that's okay, we'll just edit out

(26:00):
parts where Trump said please be peaceful and be nonviolent.
Let's just take that out. So here is exactly again
what they said in their documentary. Listen very carefully. It's
I gotta say it's very well done in terms of
the editing, how they put it all together, the packaging.

(26:20):
Roll cut seventeen, Mike, We're gonna walk.

Speaker 2 (26:25):
Down to the Capitol and I'll be there with you,
and we fight.

Speaker 1 (26:31):
We fight like hell. So people in Britain are watching
this and saying that son of a you know that,
sob how to hell did this guy win the election.
This guy's a straight up insurrectionist. Hell, he's a political arsonist.
He's a political terrorist. Okay, here is what Trump actually said,

(26:51):
roll cut seventeen A Mike, We're gonna walk.

Speaker 2 (26:56):
Down to the Capitol.

Speaker 1 (27:01):
And we'll get it. Cheer on our brave senators and
congressmen and women. The whole fight like hel was later
and that's what he said, peacefully and patriotically. I mean.
Now he's suing the BBC for one billion dollars, one

(27:24):
billion dollars. I hope he wins. If he wins this suit,
he bankrupts the BBC and takes out one of the
leading fake news media organizations in the world. I mean,
believe me, the fake news, the liberal media. This will
be a blow they'll never recover from. If Trump can

(27:45):
now take down the BBC, My question to you, should
he do the exact same kind of lawsuit? Now? Six
one seven, two sixty eight sixty eight is the number. Okay,
the Democrat thought this was going to be a major
political scandal that they were going to drive against President Trump.

(28:06):
It's now turning into a media scandal, and it is
you want to talk about blowback. This is very similar
now to what is happening in Britain with the BBC.
Two of their top leaders, in fact they're two top
leaders at the BBC have been forced to resign because
they wilfully deliberately edited Trump's January sixth speech to make

(28:31):
it look like he was calling for violence, rioting and
an insurrection, and so they doctored the tape. They literally
doctored the tape that they were showing their viewers, first
in a documentary and then in other news segments. And
it has exposed the massive institutional bias, really institutional hatred

(28:53):
for Trump at the BBC. Now they have a crisis
of credibility. Have something very similar taking place here in
the United States yesterday. I mean, now, look we're we're
going back to Russia Gate. You know, we're looking at
the way they covered up for Joe Biden the laptop

(29:14):
from Hell. I mean, the media has been lying to
us over and over and over and over again, but
the way they did it yesterday is on a level
with the BBC. And so you have these selective leaks,
a couple of Epstein emails by three prominent partisan, rabid Democrats,

(29:35):
anti Trump Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, and so
they leaked it, primarily to CNN in the New York Times,
who then wrote up these big stories claiming that there
was a bombshell email, that this was it, that it
tied Trump to Epstein and tied Trump in particular to
sexually abusing one of Epstein's underage victims, and the name

(30:02):
was deliberately redacted, it was withheld and unnamed victim, and
they went wild with it, and the moment CNN in
the New York Times went crazy with it. MSNBC followed
NBC News, CBS News, ABC, the Associated Press. This thing
was everywhere yesterday. Is the President a pedophile? That's basically

(30:27):
the narrative that they were now pushing. And of course
it turns out that the so called unnamed victim was
Virginia Giuffrey, who under oath and repeatedly said that Trump
never did anything wrong, never even touched her. The Democrats

(30:50):
knew this, the media knew this. They lied anyway, Now
my question to you, is it time now to pass
I don't care what you call it, a Media Accountability Act,
you know, an end Fake News Act, whatever it is.

(31:12):
But should there now be a law? And I know
there's the First Amendment, and of course no one respects
and revers it more than Jeff cooner, Hey, than the
cooner Man. But being a so called quote unquote media
outlet is not a license to lie. It's not supposed
to give you a license to just make stuff up

(31:35):
and to smear people and to slander people, and to
libel people and to destroy people. There has to be
journalistic responsibility and accountability. I mean, really, I mean you
know what prevents the media? No, really, I'm serious. Donald
Trump sleeps with pigs. You know Donald Trump visited a farm. Well,

(31:57):
according to our sources, he was sleeping with a pig,
or he had untoward relations with a goat. I'm just
I'm sorry. I'm not trying to be disgusting or vulgar.
But in other words, they can say anything knowing it's
a lie, and what no repercussions, no responsibilities, no consequences.

(32:19):
I don't think so. And when you're caught. Look, it's
not a question if they make a mistake. Everybody makes
a mistake. When you make a mistake, you make a retraction.
That's how they used to do it in the media.
Now there's no retraction. CNN's not retracting that story. The
New York Times is not retracting that story because their
goal and their mission, and they've openly said it is

(32:41):
to take down President Trump by any means necessary. So
they're not media anymore, by their own admission, they're propaganda,
as the Russians would say, their propaganda. Well, since one
is propaganda protected speed, which now this I want you

(33:06):
to hear all of this. Okay, you need to hear this.
By the way, Six one seven two six, six, sixty
eight sixty eight is the number. So you've really got
three players now in terms of Trump and this Epstein scandal,
because the media and the Democrats have been trying now
for the last couple of years. Oh my god, do

(33:27):
they want to rope him in and tie him to
Epstein and and and just tar him now as someone
who participated in Epstein's sex crimes and in his sex
trafficking network. So you've got Virginia Jeffrey, who, as I
said in her book under oath, Trump did nothing. Literally,

(33:51):
he did nothing. Okay, Then you have Julaane Maxwell, who
essentially was, I mean else to put this was Jeffrey
Epstein's pimp. I mean that she was the one that
was the go between between Epstein and his clients and
the underage girls that they were targeting, abusing and victimizing.

(34:14):
She knows where all the bodies are buried. She even
had an infamous black book. Now, she was asked repeatedly
by investigators, by the FBI, by the DJ she was
put under oath, and she said, according to her, that
Trump did nothing wrong. She said, I'm telling you he

(34:38):
never had sex with any of these girls. He never
touched these girls. He wasn't interested in these girls. That
there's no there there that the guy was. As far
as I know, he was a perfect gentleman. In fact,
that's the word that she used. He was always a
perfect gentleman. So Jelane Maxwell says, there's nothing to this.

(34:59):
But then there's the third and that's Jeffrey Epstein's own lawyer,
Alan Dershowitz, his own lawyer, and he has said repeatedly
and in fact he just said it again. And this
is I'm quoting now quote, I have all of the

(35:21):
Epstein stuff. Mean, I know, I've seen the files. I've
had access to the files, everything that's in the files.
I've got it all. And there isn't anything. And I
asked Epstein, this is now, Dershowitz, you know when he
was my Now, remember you're saying, well, jeff is any
breaching lawyer client confidentiality? Well, no, because that ends when

(35:47):
you die, When someone you know your client dies, you
can talk. So Dershowitz is now talking. So he said,
I have all of the Epstein stuff. There isn't anything.
And I asked Epstein directly while I was representing him,
whether Donald Trump was involved in any kind of unto

(36:08):
ward activity. And Epstein said no, Dershowitz. I pressed them
again and again, Jeffrey, if you have something anything on Trump,
now is the time to say it. Epstein told Dershowitz,
I have nothing, because there is nothing. Now you've got

(36:35):
the three principal players, okay, the three key people. You've
got the leading sex abuse victim. You've got the pimp,
the madam whatever you want to call her, Jelaine Maxwell,
and you've got Epstein's lawyer and You've got Epstein in
emails saying Trump did nothing wrong. Yet the media in

(37:03):
this country, the anti Trump, destroy fake news media is
so freaking corrupt. They are so reckless, so irresponsible, so dirty.
They hate Trump so much, honestly, they're so deranged again propaganda.

(37:27):
They don't even mention this, like in the New York
Times story. It's beyond disgusting. They don't even mention. But
you know, full disclosure, Epstein's lawyer said. Epstein said there
was nothing involving Trump. You know. Jelaine Maxwell repeatedly testified
under oath nothing involving Trump. Virginia Giuffrey said nothing involving Trump.

(37:51):
They don't even mention this. And so what they're trying
to do, it's a death of a thousand cuts. It's
smear and keep smearing, and just keep smearing, and just
keep lying, and just keep tainting him, and just keep
throwing more mud and more mud, and more mud and

(38:12):
more mud, and then hoping that you just create this perception,
this false narrative like they did with Russia. He's an
agent of Russia. He's an agent of Russia. He colluded
with Putin. And it's like Goebel's the big lie. You
just keep repeating a lie often enough people will begin

(38:33):
to accept its true. And they're trying to do it
now again because now they've got nothing. They just got
destroyed in the shutdown. Their party is unraveling in front
of our eyes during the midst of a civil war.
Pretty much AOC. I don't know if you saw the
interview she gave yesterday, she pretty much now said she's

(38:54):
primarying Chuck Schumer. By the way, she's now ahead in
polls if she was to primary him thirty percentage points.
You've got Zoron Mumdani, who now is doubling down on
communism in New York City. By the way, it looks
like Seattle now is going to elect their first ever

(39:15):
socialist mayor, their first ever communist mayor. Her name is
Katie Wilson. She's going to be the Mamdani of the
West Coast. So what I'm saying is, you now have
the radicalization of the Democratic Party, the fracturing of the
Democratic Party, all these recriminations against those Democrats that voted

(39:35):
to open up the shutdown, sorry to end the shutdown,
to open up the government. Fetterman now and I'm gonna
play this cut later is saying, you wouldn't believe now,
the death threats, I'm getting, the venom, the hatred, it's
really it's sickening. He says. The radical left wants me dead,

(39:57):
and they're telling me they want me dead, want to
do with Charlie Kirk on me. So this is what's
going on in the Democratic Party. So to distract and
deflect from all this, it's a bait and switch. Invent
can talk some phony story about Trump and Epstein, and
you distort and twist and edit these emails to make

(40:22):
it seem like something is there, when if you just
if you just release the entire email, you would realize
there's nothing there. Okay, one more and then I promise,
I'm going to go to the phone lines. Okay, this
is a crisis now in the media. I'm telling you,

(40:45):
they're they're not going to bounce back from this. They're
they're they're blowing themselves up. I don't know whether they
know it or not, but when you make yourself the
mouthpiece of a political party, then you're eventually going to
be seen the mouthpiece of a political party. And trust
and credibility and objectivity and independence. That's all gone, and

(41:11):
when trust and credibility are gone, you never get him back. Now,
Tim Burchett, Tennessee Republican, I want you to listen now
to this. The media and the Democrats have been screaming,
banging the drums now for how many months? Release the

(41:32):
Epstein files. Release all of the Epstein files. They're banging
their fists on the table. Release the files, release the files,
release the files, release the files. They're going on. It's
like a jihad. And you know they never cared for
Epstein before. In fact, under Obama they covered it up.
Under Biden they covered it up, which begs the question,

(41:56):
if you all cared so much about Epstein, why did
you just bury it under Biden under Obama? Because you know,
if they had anything even a midgeon of evidence that
Trump did anything close to anything wrong with any underage
girl or involving sex trafficking of any kind, my god,

(42:17):
they would have released it the second they saw it.
So you know something is up. They're not really interested
in justice, so but they keep going on. Release the files,
release the files, release the files. Here it is, okay.
You got to hear this, trust me, game, set match, checkmate, whatever.

(42:40):
Analogy you want to use. Congressman Timberschett brought yesterday, brought
a motion to bring the Epstein files to an immediate
House floor vote. He said, okay, I'm calling your bluff.

(43:00):
You guys want to see the Epstein file. Boom. So
he brings emotion. He says, no, I got the floor.
I'm calling now for emotion. Just release all of it, unredacted,
all of it, every file under the sun, everything. He says,

(43:21):
All I need is unanimous consent. If we get you.
In other words, everybody has to agree to it. So
if anyone voices, you know, so, if any so, if
but if one person objects, then that's it. We can't
move forward. So he goes to the Democrats. You give
me unanimous consent, which is what you say you want. Boom.

(43:44):
The Epstein files will be released in five minutes, all
of it, all of it. Okay. Here is what Tim
Congressman Burchett wrote. I just made a motion to bring it,
meaning the vote on the Epstein files. I just made

(44:04):
a motion to bring it straight to the He swears,
here to the floor. Okay, I just made a motion
to bring it straight to the floor. And they, meaning
the Democrats, blocked it. They blocked it. I tried to
do unanimous consent. I tried to get the Epstein files out,

(44:27):
get it straight to the floor to cut out all
of this nonsense. And you know, and the Democrats blocked it.
Oddly enough, now here they've had it for four years,
and they obviously if there was something there about Trump,
they would have released it. This is politics. It has
nothing to do with doing what's right. And it's Washington,

(44:49):
DC to a t. And again they ought to be
ashamed of themselves, but they're probably not. In plain English.
You want the Epstein file files here, it is on
a silver platter. All I need is unanimous consent. That's it.
So I get up on the House floor and I said,

(45:09):
do I have unanimous consent. If nobody says anything, it's out.
All you hear are Democrats saying nay, nay no, nay no,
nay no, meaning they blocked it. They don't want the
Epstein files to really be out because they know there's

(45:31):
no there there when it comes to Trump. When it
comes to the pedophile network, that's a different story. That's
why I want the Epstein files out because I want
to know who went to orgy Island. I want to
know who've victimized and prayed on these young girls. I
want justice for these young women. But the Democrats don't care.

(45:52):
That's why Burchette is sickened by this. You know, Burchette
is saying, I want to get these powerful men as well.
So let's get all the names out there and put
their lives under a microscope, and let's see if the
dj cans start arresting some of them. But the Democrats
don't care, the so called Party of Women and women's

(46:14):
rights and feminism, no, they just want to keep using
this issue to smear Trump, to lie about Trump. This
is all about trying to make Trump look bad. That's it.
That's what this is all about. So if anyone ever

(46:35):
says to you, oh, the Epstein files, Trump is hiding it.
The Republicans are trying to suppress it. No, the Democrats
literally voted now to block the release of the entire
Epstein files. They're liars and hypocrites to their core. Six

(46:57):
one seven. I'm sorry. It's beyond sick that our media
could be this corrupt, that the Democrats could be this
freaking corrupt, seriously, and that you don't give a damn
about justice for these poor young women. That this is
all just another sick tool, a sick way to try

(47:19):
to politically damage Trump, and you know he's innocent on this.
Aya yai a ya yaii. Trump should sue CNN, sue
The New York Times, suthe the Democratic Party and Republicans, now,
if they had any spine, pass a law that makes

(47:41):
it a crime for the media to lie. You lie,
and you deliberately engage in probyanda, it's going to cost you,
and it's going to cost you big. Agree, disagree. Andrea
in Rockport, thanks for holding in and welcome Jeff.

Speaker 3 (48:02):
They're very successful in their lives because the people who
call your show, including your wife, still believe that Trump
is a philanderer, that he cheated on all his wives,
so he's not a man of integrity. Well, I'm sorry,
he is a man of integrity. I watched him a lot,
and he has been married three times. I have friends
that have been married three times. But he never cheated
on one wife. Every single one of his wives, the

(48:24):
two wives before Milania loved him, thought nothing of them.
Trump himself did nothing but speak very highly of both
of his wives, and a woman scorned. Hell hath no
very fo A woman who's been cheated on is not
going to at least one of them is not going
to love him back. So he's not a philanderer. Maybe
he had an affair in between, but he really wasn't

(48:44):
the type. He was too busy working. He's not the
type to sit around with some young girl all day long.
That's just not his style. He likes to work, work, work,
He's always been like that, and he is a man
of integrity. Savage told a wonderful story about how his
mother went to a bakery in New York and some
guys I jumped her a grab's purse and ran. A
guy in a brig trunk truck ran after the guy

(49:05):
got the guy who stole the pocketbook and brought it
back to him. Trump was so moved that he found
out who the guy was. He gave him a reward,
and he offered him a job. And the guy, it
comes to find out that.

Speaker 1 (49:19):
The guy Andrea and you, we're up against the hardbreak.
Can you please hang on? I want you to finish
your story.