Who is Worse: The Democrats or the BBC?

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number. Okay, my friends, um, let me ask you.
It is the Kooner Country Pole Question of the Day
sponsored by Marios Marios Quality Roofing, Siding and Windows. What

(00:23):
do you think is the bigger scandal? A Democrat attempts
to smear Trump with Epstein b the BBC editing fraud
of Trump's January sixth speech. What do you think is
the bigger scandal? Because remember the BBC editing fraud scandal

(00:50):
is Trump is now suing them for a billion dollars.
It has led to the top two people at the
BBC being fired. And really, now the BBC is in
app salute turmoil. I mean it's now peace after peace,
article after article exposing the institutional bias and anti Trump
hatred that pervades all of its coverage. I mean, the

(01:13):
BBC has taken a massive blow over the last what
is it now, four or five days since the scandal erupted?
This one is just fresh, it's yesterday. But let me
ask you again, what do you think is the bigger scandal?
A Democrat attempts to smear Trump with Epstein b BBC

(01:35):
the fraud edit of the fraudulent edit of Trump's January
sixth speech. I'll be honest with you, both are disgustingly egregious.
They're outrageous. They should lead to pretty much everybody being
fired who push this story. But one said he'd you know,

(01:58):
he caused a riot or called for a riot and
called for an attack on the Capitol. That's essentially what
the BBC was accusing Trump by doctoring his speech and
taking out the words that he said to make it
seem like he said the very opposite of what he
actually did say. But what they did yesterday was they

(02:20):
insinuated that Trump is a pedophile who molested underage girls. Now,
to me, outside of having sex with goats, you know,
like sex with animals, cannibalism, maybe I don't know what's
worse than that. So if I was voting, but again

(02:43):
it's up to you Kooner Country obviously, because I don't vote,
you vote, I would go with a. I think it's
actually worse than the BBC media scandal. But that's me.
I want to hear from you. You can vote on
our web pay w r ko dot com slash cooner

(03:03):
w r ko dot com slash Cooner k u h
And is in national Er. You can also vote via
X and I'm always very active on X. My handle
there all one word at the Cooner report k u
h And as in national Er, Jack in New Hampshire.

(03:25):
Thanks for holding Jack and welcome.

Speaker 2 (03:28):
Hey, Jeff, thank you so much for having me this morning.
I really appreciate that.

Speaker 1 (03:33):
My pleasure jobs.

Speaker 2 (03:36):
You are a saint, my man. After listening to Bill
from Sudbury, you've got the patience of a saint. I
mean the Okay, I really had a problem there, But
basically what I'm calling about is that I think there
should be some accountability, definitely for the media. Just as

(03:56):
an example of something, I tried to reach out to
some source to get some truth, some unbiased news. So
I reached out to Sam and I thought they would
be really good, but I just removed them from my
phone last night because it appears that each and every

(04:19):
story that has anything to do with Trump is like
they're smearing them and it's so frustrating to me. And
I'm going to say this, the journalist of today could
definitely take a lesson from Walter Cronkite and Hotly Brinkley
report those are the journalists that I grew up with,

(04:43):
and I could be wrong, but it seems as though
they just put the news out there and they didn't,
you know, smear. There was no dishonesty, there was no
lack of integrity. It was good journalism. I don't know.
I could be wrong with that, but that's what I
grew up with and that's what I'd like to see today.
But I think there needs to be accountability because it's

(05:04):
just so sad. And the one more thing I want
to add, there was a gentleman on the internet that
got a special tour in the White House and I
guess there's a room there. Trump only allows certain people
to visit. And this guy was so full of positive excitement.

(05:26):
He was told he cannot define to the public anything
that he saw, but he said, if the people could
see what this room was and what was there, would
definitely have an impact on the negativity of this man,
who's our commander in chief, who I love my wife

(05:46):
and I love daily. I don't care what anybody says.
I think action speaks louder than words. And Donald Trump
is a man of integrity, of honor. He's a good man.
I got his book, by the way, his magazine of
his testimony growing up. A lot of people don't know
this stuff that I read, so I just want to
share that, Jeff, I love Trump and it's just terrible

(06:10):
what the uh mainstream media and the Democrats are doing
to trying to smear this man so.

Speaker 1 (06:16):
Well, they're lying, Like what we have to understand is
what's changed in the media. And I'm not glamorizing the
media of the past.

Speaker 2 (06:23):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (06:23):
You know, Cronkite, for example, was a liberal, but he
tried to be a fair objective journalist. That's the point.
Six one seven two, six, six, sixty eight, sixty eight
is the number. Okay. I just got this text message
from Sandy about our pole question and again the Pole
question sponsored by the Cooner Country Pole Question of the

(06:45):
Day sponsored by Marios Marios quality roofing, siding and windows.
What's worse? Hey, what scandal is worse? A? The Democrat
attempts to smear Trump with Epstein b the Massive Now scandal,

(07:07):
the fallout from the BBC being caught deliberately editing words
that Trump said at his famous January sixth speech. They
just edited them out so to make it seem like
that Trump was actually calling for everyone to storm the Capitol.
And as I said, top people at BBC now are

(07:28):
being fired. There's a formal investigation going on, the government
is heading the investigation. The BBC's in a full blown crisis.
And so Sandy, because I said, I think it's a
personally you're talking about the president of the United States.
The insinuation was yesterday spearheaded by CNN, the New York
Times from the leak of the Democratic you know, the

(07:49):
Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, that Trump essentially was
diddling an underage girl. He was having sex with an
underage girl at Jeffrey Epstein's home. And of course it
turns out to have been a massive lie, and they
were exposed and caught peddling this massive lie. So to me,
my argument is, well, if I was voting, I would say, hey,
why because I don't think there's anything worse than pedophilia,

(08:13):
and that's what they're trying to smear the president. Now
with Sandy writes, well, yeah, it's maybe a worse crime,
i e. You know, implying that the president is a pedophile.
But she writes to me, look at who's doing it.
The BBC is a revered, formally trusted media outlet, and

(08:37):
the other is an unhinged political party. Doesn't that mean
that the bb scandal, that the BBC scandal is worse. Well,
that's why you can go either way on this. But
I can just tell you this. I mean, it's not
the New York Times in this country for the left,
for liberals, the equivalent of the BBC in Britain. I mean,

(09:02):
the BBC has always been known as a very left
wing or liberal media organization. Now they were thought to
be respectable, accurate, you know, for all their biases, serious,
and now they're just cheap propagandists who literally are doctoring quotes.

(09:22):
Did they just just they just doctored the quote. It's
completely in. What they've done is completely indefensible. But what
The New York Times did, as far as I'm concerned,
is just as bad. They took an email given to
them by the by the Democrat Party, by the Democrats
on the House Oversight Committee, an Epstein email to Jolaine

(09:44):
Maxwell of all people, and they what they and it
says unnamed victim or victim number one spent hours at
Epstein's house with Trump, and they took that and they
ran wild with it, basically pretty much accusing the president

(10:08):
of having sex with an underage What are the underage
sex victims of epstein? Knowing full well that the so
called the name that they redacted was Virginia Geffrey. And
as I've said repeatedly, now I don't want to be
a broken record. Who under ath said Trump did nothing wrong,
who repeatedly has said Trump did nothing wrong, Who wrote

(10:31):
in her book that Trump did nothing wrong. Now the
Democrats know that that Virginia Jeffrey said Trump, Trump is innocent,
and the media knows that Trump, that Virginia Jeffray said
Trump is completely innocent. So they knowingly pushed a story
that was defamatory, that was a lie, in order to smear, villainize, demonize,

(10:59):
an ultimate destroy Trump. Now, look, we're not even talking
about They're implying that he's having sex with another woman,
he's being unfaithful to his wife. Honestly, they're not even
implying that he's having being serviced by an intern, say
ill a Bill Clinton in the Oval office. Bad as
that is. They're saying he's a pedophile. They're saying he

(11:21):
was sleeping with a sixteen year old girl like wink wink.
They were alone in Epstein's house, just the two of them,
for hours. Wink wink. How does the media come back
from this? The only difference that I see, to be honest,

(11:46):
is that the people of Great Britain are not as
cynical and jaded as we are. This is a massive
media scandal. This should knock out the New York Times.
This should knock out CNN, This should knock out the
Associated Press, This should knock out NBC, ABC, CBS News.
They should be done MSNBC. I mean the filth that

(12:07):
they were putting out yesterday based on this bogus report.
Never mind the Democrats. That goes without saying. If I'm
President Trump, I'm telling you right now, you're gonna become
I'm telling if his people are listening, please, you got
to listen to me on this. You're gonna win your
billion dollar lawsuit against the BBC. My advice now is

(12:30):
you do another billion dollar lawsuit, this time against the
New York Times, against CNN, against you know, all the
big networks, everybody who carried this drek, this garbage. I'm sorry,
this crap. This is stuff. Now we're talking. This is
gutter journalism. You're gonna be a multi you're already a

(12:55):
multi billionaire. Well, now you're gonna make several more billion dollars.
You go ahead with this lawsuit. I'm telling you they're finished.
They're done. All you got to do is keep saying
I'm a pedophile. That's what you alleged, that's what you insinuated.
You give me a retraction, a formal retraction, or I'm

(13:17):
telling you you're going out of business, Like enough is enough?
Am I wrong? Six one seven two six six sixty eight?
Sixty eight is the number? Okay? Now, I want to
ask all of you this, on top of everything else,
should Trump sue? Should we have a libel law or
laws on the books that hold the media accountable when

(13:41):
they deliberately lie and smear and malign someone by putting
out blatantly false information that they know to be false,
like what they did yesterday regarding Epstein and Trump. Now
I want to ask a different question as well, on
top of all this, is there any one in the
liberal media that you trust? Is there any liberal newspaper,

(14:07):
any liberal news site, any liberal media outlet, any liberal journalist,
any liberal pundit. Is there anyone where you say, Okay,
I disagree with them, but they're not propagandists. They're not
Bill and Sudbury. They're not just lying hacks who are

(14:29):
unhinged and deranged because of their hatred for Trump. Is
there anything out there in the media that you see
positive or that you like, or that you even read
on a regular basis. I want to hear from you.
Six one seven two six six sixty eight sixty eight

(14:52):
Anthony in New Hampshire. Thanks for holding Anthony, and welcome.

Speaker 3 (14:58):
Well, Jeff.

Speaker 4 (14:59):
Thank you for how me as always.

Speaker 3 (15:03):
But I think that you're wrong on the pole question.

Speaker 1 (15:08):
Because Anthony, can you hang on for again? You sound
this is not you, This is on our end ark.
I believe this is our computer. Uh. You sound like
a robot, like you know, like from Star Wars C
three PO or R two D two. So I want
to I want you to sound like a human being, Anthony.
Did we fix the problem, Mike? Anthony? Can you just

(15:29):
continue talking? Anthony?

Speaker 5 (15:34):
Can you hear me?

Speaker 1 (15:35):
Yes? Okay, you sound like a person again. So you
think I'm wrong on the poll question, which is fine,
obviously you're entitled to your opinion. Anthony. Please why go ahead.

Speaker 3 (15:45):
Because I can give you hundreds of cases every year
for the last fifty years of people being caught having
sex with underage people. How many cases through our history
as a country, can you pin? And you said a riot, but.

Speaker 5 (16:04):
That's not what they're calling it, an insurrection on a president.

Speaker 3 (16:10):
So I think that an.

Speaker 5 (16:11):
Insurrection caused by a president is far worse than being
accused of being a pedophile. He was supposedly using his
right wing shock troops to overthrow a government.

Speaker 3 (16:29):
That doesn't happen every day, jeff that doesn't And.

Speaker 5 (16:33):
The fact that the BBC used AI to cut and
selectively put out a message that convinces both right leaning
and left leaning people that the president was causing an insurrection.
But getting back to the topic of the day, which

(16:54):
is the Jeffrey Epstein.

Speaker 1 (16:55):
File, Anthony, can you do me a favor. I'm up
against the break. I promise I'm gonna come back to you.
Six one seven two six, six sixty eight sixty eight
is the number. Okay, We're gonna go right back to
Anthony in New Hampshire. Anthony, I just want to read
this text because I think it sets you up for
your second point really well, and By the way, you

(17:17):
can text the cooner man seven zero four seven zero
seven zero four seven zero. This is from six one
seven Jeff. Dems need another distraction, so they're pushing the
Epstein hoax with and this is all in caps zero
evidence Trump never did this. There are no witnesses, no documents,

(17:45):
not a shred of proof. It's the same mo invent
a narrative and then fake news runs with it. They
can't win on the issues, can't say this out cloud basically,
let me clean it up film. So there fhim. I

(18:09):
hear you. Six one seven, Anthony, So you were saying
you think that what the BBC did was worse because
they're accusing Trump of, you know, spearheading and leading an insurrection.

Speaker 2 (18:21):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (18:21):
And you know, pedophilia has been with us for a
very long time and many people are engaging it. So
the accusation that a president would actually, you know, lead
a violent attack on the Capitol, you're saying, is even worse.
It's a worse media scandal, a worse lie than what
the media are now saying about Trump and Epstein. And

(18:43):
you want to talk about the Epstein scandal, go ahead.
The floor is yours, well.

Speaker 6 (18:48):
Jeff, they manufactured evidence, the BBC did, and they used
Trump's own words to do it, Whereas, just like you
just said, there's no of Trump.

Speaker 4 (19:01):
So people get accused, like I said all the time,
and some of those people have proven innocent, just like.

Speaker 3 (19:09):
We're proving that Trump is innocent now.

Speaker 4 (19:11):
But getting back to the topic of the day, what's
much worse than what the Democrats have done?

Speaker 7 (19:18):
Bill in sidebury This pictures.

Speaker 4 (19:22):
Of Bill Clinton being massaged by Virginia Goufrey in an airport.
There's evidence, hard evidence of him being on the flight
logs going to the island over twenty six different times.

Speaker 3 (19:36):
And this all came out years ago.

Speaker 4 (19:40):
And who is the special guest honored Speaker at the
twenty twenty.

Speaker 5 (19:44):
Four convention for Kamala Harris None other than Bill Clinton himself.

Speaker 4 (19:49):
So your party's got a big problem, Anthony.

Speaker 1 (19:55):
Do you think this Epstein hoax is it gonna have
legs the way the Russia hoax did. Both were fake,
both were false, Both were narratives pushed by you know,
lies pushed by the media. Uh And the Russia hoax
damaged Trump a lot, at least for the first half

(20:15):
of his presidency. Do you think it's going to have
the same effect. Or do you think the American people
now are onto what the media is all about.

Speaker 7 (20:24):
Just the American people are onto what they're doing with
the Epstein files. The Democrats aren't because they're using the
tool of the scandal. The difference between the Russia hoax
and the insurrection is that this.

Speaker 4 (20:40):
Actual people that came forward that stated.

Speaker 3 (20:44):
Under oath that this is what's happened. Uh, you had.

Speaker 5 (20:49):
The CIA testify, you had the FBI testify that Russia
Gate was.

Speaker 3 (20:55):
True, and that there was all this evidence that we
never got presented.

Speaker 4 (20:59):
But you had supposed people even in the Senate like
Shifty Shift himself the pencil that geek coming.

Speaker 5 (21:09):
Forward and saying I got all this proof.

Speaker 3 (21:11):
I have it. You can't see it because it's classified.
But they had evidence allegedly.

Speaker 7 (21:18):
We all know that they don't have evidence on Trump
on this Epstein stuff.

Speaker 3 (21:23):
Or else they would have already used.

Speaker 4 (21:24):
It against him because they've done everything else to manufacture
these things.

Speaker 3 (21:30):
Why wouldn't they have manufactured.

Speaker 5 (21:32):
The proof when they had the proof on a sex scandal.
That's why Bill and Sudbury's choking on his own comments because.

Speaker 3 (21:42):
He can't prove anything. He has nothing.

Speaker 5 (21:45):
He doesn't have anybody coming forward in the government saying, oh,
I read that. I read this and it said for
sure that Trump did this because they know damn well
they're going to get their butt sued.

Speaker 1 (22:00):
Anthony dropped the mic. I mean really dropped the mic.
You nailed it, You absolutely nailed it. There is no proof,
there are no witnesses, there's not a shred of documentation.
There's not a scentilla of evidence. And they know it.
And I'm telling you it's not working. It's already blown
up in their face. Anthony, thank you so much for

(22:21):
that call. Bill in Walpole. Thanks for holding Bill and welcome.

Speaker 8 (22:28):
Thank you Jeff for having me. I wanted to call
and keep on focus, and with all the different calls
you had today, they've been very, very target. I'm not
going to try to answer your poll question because I
want to get this out. I was out in the
West for five weeks and I was with some people
who are dear you know. I even had you on

(22:51):
out there on the on my telephone every day. Didn't
want to miss you. This fellow that I was visiting
said to me, in almost like a parting shot, you know, Bill,
we only believe the news that comes from ABC, CBS, NBC,

(23:11):
DNN and MSNBC. And I went, you know what, until
we can change the way they give the news to
these people, we can't do anything. Really, that's just my
take on it. We can't destroy those media as we
have to make sure they start giving true news. And

(23:34):
I think there was something you mentioned earlier in your show,
not today, that there was a bill it was Johnson
something or other bill. It was taken off by one
of the what was either Clinton or Obama earlier. It
was put on to give the truth in media and

(23:55):
it was supposed to be put back on the book.

Speaker 1 (23:57):
That's right. Yeah, the smith is called bill is called
the Smith Month Act m U n D as in
Donald t is in Thomas the Smith Month Act, and
that it literally made propaganda the media spewing or expressing
propaganda a crime. They would lose their license, they would

(24:21):
not be able to stay on the air or be
able to be a newspaper or whatever. They would no
longer it's it would be it's barred, it would be banned.
And Obama rescinded and revoked the Smith Month Act. And
one of the things It's not just me. Others are putting.
We're putting as much pressure as we can on the
President to restore the Smith Month Act. And I think

(24:46):
that would go a long way towards reigning in the
fake news media. But you know, Bill, and I promise
I'll let you finish your point. You know, I think
part of what's happening is, yeah, maybe your liberal friends
are like, oh, oh, we believe the mainstream media. The
mainstream media is dying. And I don't just mean because
the country doesn't believe them anymore. I mean they're literally

(25:08):
financially dying. CNN now has only three hundred thousand listeners.
I'm not trying to brag. I just want to give
you an example. We have several million people who listen
to this show every show, streaming numbers across the entire country.
So when I see someone like Marjorie Taylor Green, I'm

(25:30):
just going to give that as an example, where she's
running to do an interview on CNN, I ask myself
two questions, Why are you running to the enemy that
have done everything in their power, specifically to Marjorie Taylor Green,
but to MAGA in general, to destroy you, to insult you,
to delegitimize you, to I mean to literally to completely

(25:53):
and utterly discredit you. Why do you run to them like,
I mean, I don't know, do you are you? Some
thing is there's something sado masochistic like why would you?
Because by going on their programs, you know, by going
on CNN, you're giving them a legitimacy that they don't deserve.
And the second point is you're going now on a

(26:16):
network that has one tenth in this case, you know,
you listen to me, you view them, but they have
a viewership one tenth whatever, a listenership one tenth of
Just I'm just giving you example my show. Now, you
look at whatever you think of these podcasters, whether you
like them or not. Tucker Carlson has almost twenty million,

(26:39):
Megan Kelly almost twenty million, Joe Rogan almost twenty million.
I'm not saying you should listen to them. What I'm
saying is you're talking about podcasters the new media, whose
reach whose audience is literally ten, fifteen, twenty times bigger

(27:01):
then say a CNN or an MSNBC or even the
nightly news. So they're like the dinosaur media. They're dying
and this is their problem build. They're in a catch
twenty two. The only people now that watch them are
die hard left wing anti trumpers. That's not just MSNBC,

(27:23):
that's CNN, that's ABC News, CBS News, NBC News. Now
they're so intolerant, they don't want to hear the truth.
They don't want to hear both sides. They don't want
to hear what's really happening. All they want to hear
is Trump, evil, Maga, evil Republicans evil in a wash

(27:45):
rints repeat, And so the editors know that, their sponsors
know that, their reporters know that. So all they have
to do is say say, look, we got to feed
our customers. So okay, the epstein, well, we know it's
a hoax. Feed it to them because they want to
believe is a pedophile. So feed it to them, but

(28:07):
it's a lie. Feed it to them. Now, Yes, it's
keeping their customers happy, but every day they lose more
customers because like now, it's everywhere they lied. They lied.
They deliberately rect redacted Virginia Jeoffrey's Jeffray's name, and now

(28:30):
they're like, well, no, Trump had nothing to do with her.
She even said it, he had nothing to do with her.
So you see their credibility keeps going down. It's like
a doom loop. They can't pull out of it. That's
their problem. Now give it about another three five years.
They're done. CNN is going to go from three hundred

(28:52):
thousand to two fifty to two hundred to one fifty
to one hundred, and you're done. NBC their Morning show,
which is supposed to be here. I'm just being honest
with you. The morning show carries your entire station, whether
it's TV or radio. The Morning show is what they

(29:12):
call the boat that lifts the boat that lifts all tides. O. Sorry,
the tide that lifts all boats. Forgive me. So the
morning show is the anchor Morning Joe Scarborough with that,
you know, clown Mika Brzhinski. They're under seventy thousand viewers.
Do you know what seventy thousand viewers is? In TV?

(29:35):
You give away the advertising for free. I'm not kidding.
That means you're so low that advertisers won't even pay,
so you just give it away for free. Now, they
keep subsidizing it because they want to use it as
a tool to go after Republicans. But after a while

(29:57):
it's a money losing enterprise, so they're going bankrupt or
like the dinosaurs, they're dying out. That's why I think
they know they're in trouble. They know they're in big trouble, Bill,
and that's why they fear us. And that's why now
the Democrats and the Left have embraced censorship, cancel culture.

(30:18):
They have to. They have to suppress the truth because
the truth is their mortal enemy. Final word to you, Bill.

Speaker 8 (30:27):
Yes, well, I guess I don't really have much final
word after that. I think you hit every point that
I was going to talk about. My father was a
promo pow. He talked about the things they did in
Germany to tell the public there during the war that
they never even mentioned about the murder of the Jews
and all the death camps they made. The American Allies

(30:52):
were told to bring all of the Germans up to
the camps and show them places like Auschwitz, and they
otherwise would never have believed it. When I finished hearing
my father say that, I said, isn't it nice? I
was like five or six or seven, isn't it nice?
We can trust that our forms of news? And he

(31:12):
land basted me up one side down the other. He said,
you believe none of what you're hear half of what
you see, and you go and you He didn't say
that your news. He said, screen your news and find
someone of note, listen to them, and then go see
how it's reported. Now. At the time, I got all
kinds of things I could say about how much work
that would have been and all. I won't get into that,

(31:33):
but what he basically said, that's the only way you're
going to tell whether the news sources are right, basically
in a nutshell. Twenty sixteen, I went through that process.
I was not a Trump hater, but I certainly did
love him and I but I went to a Trump
rally up in Manchester, my first one, and when I
got there, look expecting four to six hundred people there.

(31:55):
The building was wrapped four times with people and they
then you know how big the Manchester building is? Up there,
there was eleven thousand people inside four thousand outside. That's
my first lie that I uncovered. People have to go
and see it for themselves, the ones that aren't believing it,
and we want to not make this country divided. So

(32:16):
when I tell people actually like people like Bill in
Sudbury there. I don't even talk to him. I mean,
I would say, make sure I don't blame you for
the way you feel. Because you're getting your news somewhere else,
and you're getting you're being victimized. Go and study and
figure out how to find your news sources and believe them.

Speaker 1 (32:39):
I'm going to end, well, Bill, Look, you're an independent man,
you're an independent thinker. You're obviously a citizen, a patriot,
and that's how you'd look and judge everything, and that's
the way I think everybody should. Where I would just
slightly respectfully disagree with you, and I think overall I'm
with you all the way as you say, well, you know,

(32:59):
even the liberals are being victimized, and you're half right.
They I don't think they even realized there, because they're
being brainwashed. They're being constantly indoctrinated and brainwashed. The problem
now is that they're becoming so rabid, so intolerant, so hateful,
that were becoming their victims. And let me I'll and
thank you for that call, Bill, and you will say, Jeff,

(33:21):
what do you mean by that? They're starting now to
embrace violence. There's no question now they cheered on the
two attempted assassinations of Trump. They cheered on the assassination
of Charlie Kirk. You're seeing poll after poll after poll
where now by majorities, Democrats openly tell pollsters they want

(33:43):
to kill their political opponents. They re elected j Joe reelected.
They elected Jay Jones to be the state attorney general
in Virginia, even though repeatedly he said he fantasized, he
had homicidal fantasies about murder ring Republicans two bullets to
the head and then killing their children in the arms

(34:05):
of their mother. And he was supported by not just
the eventual now governor of Virginia, but by the entire
National Democratic Party. Now forget that, because you're going to say, well, Jeff,
they're you know, they're they're there. They hate Conservatives, they
hate Republicans, but they don't hate fellow Democrats. Okay, listen

(34:26):
out of this. One of the senators that voted to
reopen the government on the Democrat side was Pennsylvania Senator
John Fetterman. As you know, he suffered a stroke, a
debilitating stroke. In fact, he basically couldn't communicate. He was
in communicado, could barely muttered, you know, utter two words.

(34:48):
He was debilitated for at least a couple of years,
and they still elected him in Pennsylvania because he crossed
the aisle along with seven others to join with Republicans
to end this disastrous shutdown. And also because he has occasionally,
and I mean occasionally, disagreed with his party on Hamas.

(35:13):
He doesn't like Hamas, he condemns anti Semitism. He tends
to side with Israel in the conflict with Hamas. And
that's pretty much it and the shutdown. Other than that,
he's a conventional liberal Democrat. I want you to listen
to him now. He goes on CNN with Dana Bash,

(35:36):
and he's got a book out, a memoir where he
says that the people who are most venomous that attack
him are not conservatives. He goes the worst people who
viciously slander me and threaten me and my family. They
don't come from the right. They come from the radical left.

(35:58):
Roll cut twenty.

Speaker 9 (35:59):
Mike, as a connoisseur, I can confirm that the most poisonous,
the bitterest is from the far left. That is pretty
remarkable to hear you say that as an elected Democrat.

Speaker 10 (36:15):
Why you know it's been it's just been my personal
experience on this thing. And when I asked my digital team,
I said, you know, you're we're on all the platforms,
you know, really, what's what's kind of the harshest, what's
kind of the most personal. And the answer was immediate.
They said, oh, Blue Sky.

Speaker 1 (36:32):
So Blue Sky is the Democrats or liberal version of
truth social and it's a hate I mean, it's a
hate social media platform. Listen now to Fetterman telling Dana
Bash you want to know what they say about me
on Blue Sky and in other liberal chatrooms roll cut
twenty one, Mike.

Speaker 10 (36:53):
And the difference is, I mean, the right would say
really rough things and names, you know, some names I
won't re heat on TV. But but but the the
on the lift, it was like they want me to die,
or that we're cheering for your next stroke, or that's
terrible that depression wants Why couldn't it depression one? And

(37:13):
I hope your kids find you. Uh, I mean they
even have like the graphic a gift there. They have
like a stroke you know, you know in your head
and sharing it there.

Speaker 1 (37:28):
They're wishing him dead in the most sick, morbid ways. Imaginable.
I hope you're you know, your kids find you dead.
And this is coming allegedly from his own left wing allies.
So what I'm saying is they're so programmed now with
hate that now they're wishing death on fellow Democrats who

(37:52):
don't tow the line. By the way, this is what
happened during the French Revolution, It's what happened during the
Bolshevik Revelution. They eventually turn on their own, They start
to devour one another.