Trust in institutions

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
This is a podcast from WOOR.

Speaker 2 (00:03):
It is the Jesse Kelly Show. Let's have some fun
on a Thursday. You have almost done at the end
of the week. Is in sight and it's going to
be an awesome night tonight on The Jesse Kelly Show.

(00:23):
No guests as of now. I have a bunch of
things I want to talk about, a bunch of emails
I want to catch up with. We are going to talk.
We touched on this a bit last night. We're gonna
talk about institutional trust. Merrick Garland spoke today whining about
people attacking the DOJ, and we're about to have a
long talk not just about that specifically, but about how

(00:47):
we need to operate, why we need to operate that
way to take on the communists who run the country.
We're gonna discuss how they take our tax dollars and
attack us with it. Why DEI is huge business, Why
plugging a border hole after the fact is not enough
it's too late. All that drug dealers going to jail

(01:09):
because they can't stay off Instagram, and so much more
coming up on the world famous Jesse Kelly's Show. Now,
I want you to imagine something. I want you to
imagine this me. I love cheeseballs. Everyone knows I love cheeseballs.
Have you ever been in a store, You've seen the

(01:30):
huge tub of cheeseballs. We have one of those at
all times here in the studio. In fact, we have
more than one, lots of the time. I'm a cheeseball lover. Now,
just just stay with me. I'm going somewhere with this. Now,
let's say, let's say I not only love cheeseballs, I

(01:53):
want them all to myself. When I buy a tub,
I just want to sit and I want to eat
them all myself. And that's true. I don't want to
share with anybody. I just want them to be my cheeseballs.
But Chris, he goes right by the store where they
sell the cheeseballs, and I start giving Chris money so
he can stop, buy some cheeseballs and bring the cheeseballs

(02:16):
into the studio. Chris stops the first time we need cheeseballs.
He buys a top of cheeseballs, and on the way
to work, he sticks his filthy fingers in there and
he eats twenty of the cheeseballs. On the way to work,
I look at the top of cheeseballs. I said, Chris,
what are you doing? You ate my cheeseballs. You're not

(02:37):
allowed to touch the cheeseballs. Why'd you eat my cheeseballs?
The next time we need cheeseballs, I give Chris money, Chris,
go get me some cheeseballs. Don't eat any cheeseballs. Chris
gets to work with the cheeseballs. Twenty thirty cheeseballs missing again. Gosh, Chrits,
you ate the cheese balls again. What are you doing?

(02:58):
Next time cheeseballs shows up, cheeseballs are gone. Next time
I give Chris money gets cheeseballs, he shows up, cheeseballs
are gone. Let me ask you something. Chris is filthy,
habits his thieving ways of stealing my cheeseballs. What is
the fuel that gives Chris what he needs to commit

(03:24):
this dastardly act of fevery? What is it? What is
the thing that does it? Chris is pointing at me,
and you're right, it's me. It's my fault. What what
am I doing? I'm trusting him. I keep in trusting
Chris with my money and with my cheeseballs, and he
is taking that trust and he's abusing me with it.

(03:49):
My trust is what is fueling Chris's ongoing criminal enterprise.
Me my trust is the fuel. Without my trust, without
me giving Chris that money and sending him to get
the cheeseballs. Without that, he can't steal my cheeseballs. It
is a He is one hundred percent dependent on my trust.

(04:11):
If I starve him of that, he starves. That's how
it works. Now, let's talk about what Merrick Garland said today,
And I want you to understand what Merret Garland said
today is frightening if you read between the lines. Merritt

(04:33):
Garland got up and made an announcement almost seemed like
it was out of nowhere for us.

Speaker 3 (04:42):
Adhering to these policies, principles, and norms in everything we
do is how we fulfill the promise that is foundational
to our democracy that all people will be protected equally
under the law, and that all people will be held
accountable equally.

Speaker 1 (05:01):
Under the law.

Speaker 3 (05:03):
Our norms are a promise that we will fiercely protect
the independence of this Department from political interference in our
criminal investigations. Our norms are a promise that we will
not allow this Department to be used as a political weapon.

(05:25):
And our norms are a promise that we will not
allow this nation to become a country where law enforcement
is treated as an apparatus of politics.

Speaker 2 (05:42):
That was Merrick Garland today. What's he saying? Merrick Garland today,
almost out of nowhere, got up and gave a speech
about the sanctity of law enforcement. He's done this before.
Why today? Look, this is the kind of thing he's
done before, but out of the blue, he cared, He

(06:05):
got up and gave this announcement today. A law enforcement's
under attack. Well, law enforcements not political. We're being attacked.
We're being attacked. You're attacking us. We're being attacked. He
said stuff like this.

Speaker 3 (06:14):
Remember this, These repeated attacks on the Justice Department are
unprecedented and they are unfounded. These attacks have not and
they will not influence our decision making.

Speaker 2 (06:31):
It's time to talk about why he would make this
announcement today, and it's time to have a longer talk
about that. Trust First, let me just get this out
of the way, and we're not going to spend a
bunch of time on this because this part's just the theory.
I bet you I'm right, though, Merritt Garland is getting
up to make this announcement today because Merrick Garland the

(06:54):
DOJ in conjunction with the FBI. I bet you money
they're getting ready to announce some indictments arrests of people
who have been a little too critical of the Justice
Department or FBI. I bet you're about to see a

(07:15):
DOJ crackdown if you will. They'll of course cite threats.
There were threats. This guy was issuing threats. But this
will be in an effort to silence and intimidate anyone
on the right trying to complain a little too loudly
about the fact that the DOJ is an evil, weaponized

(07:37):
Stazi like agency that should no longer exist in any
form the way it exists now. Chris said, they're coming
after you. I don't care. They probably are coming after me.
Screw you. If you are, come on and come on
and get some that's fine with me. I don't care.
But mark my words, it's just a theory. This is

(07:58):
Merrick Garland prepping the ground for upcoming DOJ indictments that
will pretty much all be on right wingers somewhere. They'll
cite threats and they'll use it as a massive press
conference opportunity to act as if you are exactly what

(08:18):
they want you to be, a domestic terrorist. Remember, always,
always remember, your government is turning its guns inwards against you.
This is happening all across the West, Canada, Australia, UK,
you name it. But the American government is slowly but
surely turning all of its guns inward against you. They

(08:40):
have bent over backwards, forwards, left and right to try
to classify you as a domestic terrorist. The reason they've
tried to do that is if you get the official
legal designation of a domestic terrorist, then they can do
to you what they've done against terrorists all over the world.

(09:03):
They can use the law enforcement apparatus, DOJ, military, you
name it. They can use anything and everything against domestic terrorists, now,
can't they. This is a long game ongoing up to
turn any opposition to the Democrats as being dangerous domestic

(09:24):
terrorists who can be attacked at will, tapped at will,
abused at will by the Justice Department of the United
States of America. I believe Merrick Darland got up and
gave that announcement today because more indictments are coming for
people on the right, and they're going to use it

(09:44):
to create the illusion in the minds of liberal AMT.
Peggy that you're not just a republican and anti communist,
a conservative, whatever you call yourself, that you're a threat
to national security and therefore they can do anything they
want to you. Now, that's just my thing about this.
Let's move on and talk about the trust portion. This

(10:05):
is going to be hard for some to hear, but
we have to have the talk. Hang on, Miss Something
podcast a Jesse Kelly Show on a Thursday, and do
not forget that Tomorrow. Tomorrow is an ask Doctor Jesse Friday,
all three hours dedicated to you. Ask me anything. Does

(10:28):
it even have to be political? Ask me anything you want,
but you have to email it in and get it
in now. Jesse at Jesse Kellyshow dot com. Jesse at
Jesse Kellyshow dot com. Merreck Garland gets up today gives
this announcement. I'm not going to play the whole thing again.
Our law enforce about.

Speaker 3 (10:48):
Norms are a promise that we will fiercely protect the
independence of this department from political infit.

Speaker 2 (10:59):
I already told you my theory that I believe that
means more indictments are coming against right wingers, so they
can further the narrative that you are a dangerous domestic
terrorist who should be abused by the FBI. That's why
he gave that press conference today. I bet you money
I'm right about that. But setting that part of it aside,
do you remember last night, I'm gonna play the thing

(11:20):
in its entirety. It's like four and a half minutes long,
but I'm gonna play it all because this is really
going to be the jumping off point for what we're
about to discuss. Your trust is what fuels the beast.
Remember when I said this, You can save this country
or you can trust in its corrupt institutions. But you

(11:44):
absolutely cannot do both. You cannot. You cannot save the
country and trust what the FBI says. You cannot save
the country and trust the media. You cannot save the
country and trust. Pick your institution, maybe it's maybe it's
your alma mater, Harvard, whatever. You can save the country,

(12:06):
or you can trust your institution. If here's how they
use it. They conquer the institutions, and then the conquered institution,
instead of doing what it's supposed to do, it does
the bidding of the system. And if you're sitting there

(12:27):
as someone who still trusts the institution but the institutions
working against you, you don't have a prayer a prayer.
And it's not that I want you to be a
distrustful cynic, but when you hear anything from our institutions anymore,
you need to make sure your first response is they're lying. Oh,

(12:51):
they're probably lying. Another great example actually from the debate,
Another great example here right here.

Speaker 4 (12:56):
Crime here is up and through the roof. Despite their
fraudil statements that they made. Crime in this country is
through the roof. And we have a new form of crime.
It's called migrant crime, and it's happening at levels that
nobody thought possible than Trump.

Speaker 1 (13:10):
As you know, the FBI says, overall violent crime is
actually coming down in this country.

Speaker 2 (13:14):
But ah, as you know, the FBI says, vindent crime
is coming down. Well, the FBI is lying, and they
know they're lying because the major crime centers, as Trump
goes on to try to explain over the moderator, the
highest crime areas stopped reporting to the FBI. The FBI

(13:38):
knows this, yet they put out these crime statistics. So
quote journalists like David Muhr and Lindsay Lip injections can
get up there and say, well, the FBI said it's
going down. They conquer the institutions, so they can take
the credibility of that institution and use it as a

(14:01):
weapon against you. Again, I'm not trying to make you
king cynic, but this goes back to the recent Russia
DOJ thing that half the right was interested in jumping
on board with. Why do you trust the DOJ? Why
do you trust the FBI? The first instinct is their lying.

(14:24):
They have earned that and if you give them trust,
here's what you need to understand. If you give them
your trust, well, no, I mean they're not all lying. Well,
the great men and women on the ground, well, I
mean it's not everybody. If you're trying to do this
contortion thing where you're just trying to bend and twist

(14:46):
just right to give them a little bit of credibility,
but you don't get it. The credibility you give them
is the fuel that keeps them going. The only true
power we have a against corrupt institutions is to remove
all credibility of the institution. Your brother who's in the FBI,

(15:12):
should be laughed at when he tells people that mocked
scorned your mom who's in the FBI, should be mocked
and scorned. It's not because I want anything to happen
to your mom or your brother. It's because once the

(15:32):
public has gotten to that level of distrust in the institution,
then you have stripped the institution itself of all of
its power. You see. But if you still give them
any of your trust, then what you're doing is you're
fueling the evil people who use the institution they've conquered

(15:57):
against you. You have got to let it go. The
institutions you loved and admired I loved and admired, they're gone.
They've been conquered by filthy communists. Now we have to
let them know we don't trust them anymore. And now
this is back to being me. Live and understand that.

(16:22):
That is another reason why evil monsters like Merrit Garland
get up and give these speeches about how the Justice
Department and we are a normal place and we won't
accept these attacks and we can't. Merit Garland, Joe Biden, Kamala, Harris,
Christopher Ray, you name the institution, they all know, they

(16:48):
know that your trust is necessary for them to continue.
Without the credibility we give them, they are powerless. They
mean nothing. So we're gonna discuss Merrick Garland, the DOJ,
the FBI. We're gonna walk down memory lane. You want
to walk down memory lane with me? Next, it's the

(17:10):
Jesse Kelly Show on a Thursday. Merrick Garland got up
today and talk about the Justice Department. The Justice Apartment
is not a political thing like he always talks about.
And we are having a long talk about institutional trust.
Before I go down memory lane with you with Merrick

(17:30):
Garland the DOJ, I'm gonna ask you a question and
we'll revisit this. Think about somebody on the right in
politics you dislike. Maybe it's me, Maybe it's someone else
on the radio or television. Maybe it's a writer, blogger, podcaster,

(17:53):
you know what, Let's make it a politician. Any politicians
on the right you dislike. They'll question about it and
let me ask you. Tomorrow morning, you wake up and
Merrick Garland announces that the Department of Justice has indicted
that person for bribery. The North Koreans paid them a

(18:14):
bunch of gold to criticize Joe Biden. You're reading it.
You're reading the indictment. It's very fancy looking official DOJ
seal and oh my gosh, there's an US attorney, and
that is your instinct to believe them. After all, it's
about somebody you don't like, and it is the DOJ.

(18:36):
I mean, I know they've been politicized, but look at
how a fish show it all looks. Would you believe them?
Let's walk down memory lane, shall we? Do you remember
Josh Holly and its extensive questioning of Merrick Garland.

Speaker 5 (18:53):
Prosecutors do, but parents don't. General Garland, do you think
that a parent who looks at the thirteen different federal
crimes that your Justice Department has identified they might be
subject to and prosecuted for, like making annoying phone calls?
Do you think that they're going to feel that they're
welcome to speak up at a school board meeting?

Speaker 2 (19:11):
How about? I've been a pause on that for a moment.
In fact, I'll start it over, but I know the
point's been made, but I really can't drive this point
home far enough. What happened after Roe versus Wade was overturned.
This is not about abortion, so it's not about that.
But What happened after Roe versus Wade was overturned is

(19:32):
equivalent to something that would happen in any third world dictatorship.
In this country, Roe versus Wade was overturned, and in
response to that, the communists in the Justice Department used
an obscure Bill Clinton era law called the Face Act

(19:54):
that had never really been used. They went digging through
America's laws found one they could use, and the Department
of Justice started arresting pro lifers. Just want to remind
you that, and back to what Holly was talking about,
this might be the most astounding thing in the world.

(20:15):
Merrick Garland should be in federal prison for the rest
of his life. Parents began showing up this is a
couple years ago, at school boards and making their voices
heard in ways they'd never done before. This was the
wake up of the norms. Maybe you're one of those norms,
and good for you. I'm glad you woke up. And
parents started to get angry about the COVID madness, about
the anti white filth and schools and parents started showing

(20:37):
up and get loud, and these videos started circulating online,
and all of a sudden, this little fefdom of education
that the Communists have held forever was threatened and the
White House got worried about it. And all this is documented.
So if you're one of the hate listeners, take your
hate and shove it. All this is documented. The White
House coordinated with the Teachers' Union to send Merrit Garland

(21:00):
and a letter, and Merrick Garland used the letter. The
Attorney General of the United States of America used a
letter from the unions and the White House to send
the Counter Terrorism Division of the FBI after angry school
board parents. Remember Friend of the show, former FBI special

(21:24):
agent Steve Friend, who's listening right now. I love you, Steve.
You're the man, buddy. Remember what he said. He was
pulled off of child pornography cases. He was trying to
take down these filthy monsters to attack kids, and Merrick
Garland's DOJ sent him after school board parents. Keep that

(21:45):
in mind as you listen to this. Let's start it again.
Prosecutors do, but parents don't. General Garland, do you think
that a parent who looks at the thirteen different federal
crimes that your Justice Department has identified they might be
subject to and prosecuted for, like making annoying phone calls.
Do you think that they're going to feel that they're

(22:06):
welcome to speak up at a school board meeting? How
about this one? They could be prosecuted for using the internet.
I guess that would be Facebook in a way that
might cause emotional distress to a victim. Is that is
that a crime of violence?

Speaker 1 (22:17):
Senator? I haven't seen the memo that your why haven't out?
And I don't And even from the description, it doesn't
sound like it was addressed to parents, but you.

Speaker 5 (22:26):
No, it wasn't address top parents. It was a just
a prosecutors. That's the problem. Why haven't you seen the memo?

Speaker 3 (22:31):
I don't know why I haven't. I don't look at
every I have. I do not get every memo that
every US attorney sends out.

Speaker 5 (22:38):
But if you're a wait, wait, wit, don't don't? I
just want to be sure I understand this. This This
is a memorandum that collects thirteen different federal crimes parents.

Speaker 2 (22:47):
Could be charged with.

Speaker 5 (22:48):
It has United States Department of Justice on the top
of it. And you're telling me you haven't seen it.

Speaker 1 (22:54):
Who's a memo from, Senator?

Speaker 5 (22:56):
The United States Department of Justice, United States Attorney for
the District of Monteah.

Speaker 1 (23:00):
I have not seen a memo from the District of Montana.

Speaker 2 (23:03):
I'm not high enough priority for you.

Speaker 1 (23:05):
That's not the question.

Speaker 5 (23:06):
I don't it is the question. Answer my question. Is
it not a high enough priority for you? When you're
threatening parents with thirteen different federal crimes? These aren't crimes
of violence. You've testified today, you're focused on violence. That's
not what your US attorneys they work for you. That's
not what they're saying. You haven't seen it because it's
not a high enough priority or.

Speaker 1 (23:25):
What question a priority? No one has sent me that memo,
So I haven't seen any.

Speaker 5 (23:29):
What do you mean no one has sent you the memoy?
You run the United States Department of Justice, do you not?

Speaker 1 (23:33):
Or one hundred and fifteen thousand employees of the Department
of Justice.

Speaker 5 (23:38):
Indeed, and you are in charge of every one of them,
and this is a sufficiently important.

Speaker 2 (23:42):
Case that you is the DOJ. And Merrick Arland, of
course knew about the memo. Don't think for a second
he didn't know. Every time he gets busted doing something
truly evil, he tries to do the same thing. But
he knew. Institutional trust. Ask the question again. I'll probably
ask it a few times. Tomorrow the Department of Justice

(24:05):
announces an indictment against some right winger. You happen to
hate someone on our side, you dislike, you really dislike
this person again, maybe it's me. Tomorrow they announced an
indictment that that person's been caught taking bribes from the
North Koreans to to insult Joe Biden. Do you believe them?
It's going to look very official, I promise, just like

(24:28):
this memo did they just described it's gonna look so official.
It's gonna have DJ at the top man, it's gonna
ben when you read it. Who They're gonna have witnesses,
and it's gonna look it's gonna look so bad. Are
you going to believe them? That's an important question, you see,

(24:48):
because that trust you give them, that's what they use
to attack you. And I want to remind you we're
gonna move on to other things Merrick Garland has done,
but I brought the US up earlier. I want to
remind you that the Justice Department of the United States
of America sent the counter terrorism heads of the FBI

(25:09):
after school board parents, and they did this based on
a letter for a sentence.

Speaker 6 (25:16):
You said, in recent months, there's been a disturbing spike
and harassment, intimidation, threats of violence. Yes, when did you
first review the data showing this so called disturbing uptick?

Speaker 1 (25:25):
So I read the letter and we have been seeing
over time threat.

Speaker 2 (25:29):
Oh whoa, whoa woa. I didn't ask you.

Speaker 6 (25:31):
So you read the letter, that's that's your source.

Speaker 1 (25:33):
So let me be clear. This is not a prosecution.

Speaker 6 (25:37):
Or is there some study, some efforts, some investigations someone
did that said there's been a disturbing uptake, or you
just take the words of the National school Board Association.

Speaker 1 (25:44):
When the National school Board Association, which represents thousands of
school boards and school board members, says that there are
these kinds of threats when we read in the newspapers
reports of threats of violence, when that is in the
context of threats of laveuge.

Speaker 6 (25:58):
This source for this for the very first line in
your in your mouth, tim, the gentleman has expired.

Speaker 2 (26:07):
Oh I forgot. He also cited, well, we read in
the newspapers. The Attorney General of the United States of
America sent the FBI after school board parents because he
read it in the newspapers. In the school board union
sent him a letter. Don't ever trust them. They use
your trust against you. We will continue down memory lane.

(26:30):
You probably already remember all this though, because your brain
is working great, because you have been taking your Chalk right,
your natural herbal supplements from Chok. From the hardcore anti
communists at Chalk, you see, Chalk understands something. They understand
that we the individual, we need to be stronger, smarter.

(26:53):
They understand that TA levels are too low in dudes.
They understand energy levels in ladies. It's getting too low
and it doesn't have to be that way. Get a
male Vitality stack in your body. I took mine again
this morning. Female Vitality Stack in your body. I didn't
take that, but Chris probably did. Go get your stack
from Chalk. They have litpowder for the mornings. They have

(27:15):
Chad Mode. If you're looking for a natural pre workout
and the stuff works so good, you won't even need
ninety days and you'll feel great. Go get a subscription.
Chalk dot com promo code Jesse. Choq dot com promo
code Jesse. We'll be back feeling a little stocky fu.
It is the Jesse Kelly Show, Rocking Out with Phil

(27:38):
Collins here on a Thursday night, reminding you you can
email the show and you should. You're asked Doctor Jesse
questions for tomorrow Jesse at jesse kellyshow dot com. Having
a long talk about Merrick Garland, the DOJ, and more specifically,
how the institutions use the trust you give them as

(27:59):
the fuel for them to attack you. Without your trust,
they become powerless. Merrick Garland gets up, Oh my gosh,
we are the norm to us.

Speaker 3 (28:13):
Adhering to these policies, principles and norms in everything we
do is how we fulfill the promise that is foundational
to our democracy that all people will be protected equally
under the law, and that all people will be held
accountable equally under the law.

Speaker 2 (28:33):
Really, huh, All people will be protected equally and all
people will be held accountable equally. Let's talk about the
face acting I just brought up. Remember that. Remember the
Face Act was a Bill Clinton law that hadn't been

(28:54):
enforced forever. It's just an old obscure law. There a
bunch of them on the books.

Speaker 5 (28:58):
You know.

Speaker 2 (28:58):
There are states where you can it will be executed
for stealing someone's horse. There are all kinds of old
laws on the books. It's just one of those things
that happens. After Rovers's way got overturned, the baby murdering
demons on the left got angry. They were angry about that,
and they went digging through the books. They went digging
through the laws of America to try to find a

(29:21):
law they could use. This is what your justice department did,
Merrick Garland's Justice department. They went digging through the laws
of America to try to find a law they could
use to justify the arrest and imprisonment of pro life
activists as revenge for Roe versus Wade being overturned, and
they began to round them up and throw them in prison.

(29:42):
They sent an entire swat team to Mark House's house,
pointing rifles in the face of his wife and children.
This is after Mark Good point Chris had offered to
turn himself in peacefully. They said, no, no, no, no no,
We'd rather stick a gun in your face. We haven't
eighty nine eighty nine year old woman currently, she's previously

(30:03):
lived in a communist prison camp in Europe. She will
live out the rest of her days in an American
federal prison because Merrick Garlands doj attacked her. Of course,
after Roe versus Wade was overturned, the street animals on
the left began to fire bomb pregnancy centers, and miraculously

(30:23):
they kept getting away.

Speaker 1 (30:24):
With those who are attacking the pregnancy resources centers, which
is a horrid thing to do. Are doing this at
night in the dark.

Speaker 2 (30:34):
Well, it's at night, it's in the dark. Look, they're
attacking courthouses.

Speaker 7 (30:40):
Let me ask you about assaults on federal property in
places other than Washington, d C. Portland, for instance, Seattle.
Do you regard assaults on federal courthouses or other federal
property as acts of domestic extremism domestic terrorism?

Speaker 1 (30:54):
Well, a senator, my own definition, it's just about the
same as the statutory definition is a use of violence
or threats of violence, an attempt to disrupt democratic processes.
So an attack on a courthouse while in operation trying
to prevent judges from actually deciding cases, that plainly is

(31:18):
domestic extremism domestic terrorism. An attack simply on a government
property at night or any other kind of circumstances is
a clear crime and a serious one, and should be punished.
I don't mean I don't know enough of about the
facts of the example you're talking about. But that's where

(31:39):
I draw the line. One is both are criminal, but
one is a core attack on our democratic institutions.

Speaker 2 (31:49):
And yet he gets up in front of you. Did
it again today. But this is an older one gets
up in front of you and tries to say this.

Speaker 3 (31:58):
These repeated attacks on the Justice Department are unprecedented and
they are unfounded. These attacks have not and they will
not influence our decision making.

Speaker 2 (32:13):
Why is he saying it? Because Merrick Garland and the
other communists know they need your trust. They have to
have it. Without it, they're powerless. Remember David Weiss. Remember this,
Remember David Weiss. Maybe you don't remember the name specifically,
but David Weiss was a special counsel. He's been a

(32:34):
lifelong Communist tack and he's a special counsel. Merrick Garland
put in charge of investigating Hunter Biden, of prosecuting Hunter Biden,
and David Weiss tried to get Hunter Biden not only
off Scott free for the crimes he was charged for,
the Special Council who was supposed to be going after him,
tried to protect him and tried to get him immunity

(32:57):
from all future crimes. And if it wasn't for a
judge and delaware recognizing it and throwing it out, Hunter
Biden would have got off with a slap on the
wrist in future immunity from all crimes. Merrick Garland, Attorney
General of the United States of America, is supposed to
be completely independent from the Special Council. Hey, Merreck, are
you independent not?

Speaker 8 (33:16):
I'm just saying under oath today, your testimony is you
have not had any discussions with mister Weiss about this matter.

Speaker 3 (33:21):
Under oath, my testimony today is that I promised that
the Senate I would not intrude in his investigation. I
do not intend to discuss the Internal Justice Department deliberations,
whether or not I had them.

Speaker 8 (33:36):
Oh okay, So your testimony today is you're not going
to tell us whether you've had discussions with mister Weiss.

Speaker 3 (33:41):
My testimony today is I told the committee that I
would not interfere. I made clear that mister Weiss would
have the authority to bring cases that he thought were appropriate.
Mister Weiss's writer.

Speaker 2 (33:56):
Of course, do you understand the lawyer speak? You know
what he's saying. He was not independent. Of course, he
communicated and coordinated with the special counsel. He used his
position as Attorney General of the United States of America
to attack his political enemies and to protect his political friends.

(34:19):
He appointed a special counsel who he knew would work
on behalf of the bidens. He communicated and coordinated with
said special counsel. Couldn't even deny it. Honestly, this is
an embarrassing level of denial. At least lie to me
with something I'm just saying.

Speaker 8 (34:34):
Under oath today, your testimony is you have not had
any discussions with mister Weiss about this matter.

Speaker 3 (34:39):
Under oath, my testimony today is that I promised that
the Senate I would not intrude in him his investigation.
I do not intend to discuss the internal.

Speaker 2 (34:51):
That's Merrit Garland, the DOJ, and Merritt Garland gives press
conferences routinely, gave another one today about how important it is.
But you not attack the DOJ. Hey don't impune the DOJ.
We would never be political.

Speaker 1 (35:10):
This has been a podcast from wor