September 8, 2025 • 31 mins
President Trump threatens to invade Chicago, RFK, Jr. survives a coup attempt, and Rosie O'Donnell has to give a mea culpa to MAGA. Pigs are flying this week as you will hear in our "did they really just say that" clips.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
President Trump threatens to invade Chicago. RFK Junior survives a
coup attempt, and Rosie O'Donnell has to give a maya
koppa to Maga. Pigs are flying this week, as you
will hear, and I did they really just say that?
Clips I'm Nancy Shack.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
This is news bite.
Speaker 4 (00:27):
Mind them on Chicago though, Well, we're going in.
Speaker 5 (00:30):
I didn't say when we're going in. I have an
obligation when we lose. When twenty people are killed over
the last two and a half weeks and seventy five
are shot with bullets.
Speaker 6 (00:42):
Mister Kennedy, you hired a man named David Geyer to
conduct this study.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
Is that correct?
Speaker 7 (00:48):
No?
Speaker 6 (00:49):
See, so you choose to know a lot when you
want to know a lot. You're It's incredible, mister Kennedy
the Senator.
Speaker 7 (00:57):
Hi, everybody, it's Rosie o'donald's Star of the Flints. I
did not do my due diligence before I made that
emotional statement. I assumed, like most shooters, they followed a
standard mo O and had standard NRA love and kind
of gun people.
Speaker 2 (01:15):
Hi, Ambrosia Donald and I approved this message.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
Oh my gosh, she what she's apologizing for, and that is,
by the way, she's doing that video from Ireland, because
I remember she moved to Ireland. Donald Trump was arrested
in twenty was elected not a resident, in the last election.
But she's what she's apologizing for, is she she put
this video up that they have since taken down that
(01:41):
the Minneapolis Catholic school shooter was a MAGA hat wearing
conservative as we know, and we knew it the day
of the shooting.
Speaker 8 (01:52):
It was not.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
It was a trans woman who was deeply disturbed and
hated conservatives and Donald Trump. But that didn't stop Rosie
o'donald from putting up a die tribe against MAGA and
conservatives and how they were responsible for the dead school
children in Minneapolis. And then here's what happened. So she
dropped that bomb. And then she says that she went
(02:16):
away for a few days and came back. I think
that's a bullfaced lie. I think she was there and
thought she could get away with the lie and promoting this.
But even her followers have had enough of people lying
to them and responded pretty viciously on social media, telling
her are you sleeping nuts? It was again it was
(02:37):
a trans woman, and it hated Trump that the magazines
on the weapon said killed Trump.
Speaker 9 (02:42):
I mean, it's just.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
And so she found that if she wanted to, you know,
retain any followers, she had to apologize. I think that's
what made her apologize, not coming back and finding out
that she was wrong. She knew she was wrong. She
jumped a conclusion, and she never we're not even talking
due diligence. She did no diligence in regard to finding
(03:05):
out the truth. She just made this bias, prejudiced assumption
and didn't care if she was right or wrong. And
so this is this is the quote apology. It's not
really an apology. It's kind of weird. This is what
she said when she came back thirty two A.
Speaker 7 (03:19):
Hi, everybody, it's Rosi O'Donnell, star of the Flintstones. Listen,
I have a call. Sort. I know it happens, get
run down, you know. Anyway, I know a lot of
you were very upset about the video I made before
I went away. H for a few days, I didn't
go online and haven't seen them till today.
Speaker 9 (03:41):
But you are right.
Speaker 7 (03:42):
I did not do my due diligence before I made
that emotional statement, and I said things about the shooter
that were incorrect. I assumed, like most shooters, they followed
a standard mo O and had standard you know feelings
of you know, NRA lovin kind of gun people. Anyway,
(04:07):
the truth is I messed up, and when you mess up,
you fess up. I'm sorry. This is my apology video,
and I hope it's enough.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
Okay, I need to point something out me too. Standard feelings,
standard NRA loving There's no such thing when it comes
to shooters. And this is not the first trans shooter
that's been there. There's no standard shooter. Most shooters are
not conservative. Most shooters aren't anything. It's very idiosyncratic for
whatever happened.
Speaker 9 (04:34):
No, there is no.
Speaker 1 (04:36):
History of a whole series of conservatives out there shooting
people up.
Speaker 9 (04:40):
That does not happen.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
So in her apology, she's spreading another lie in the
middle of it, and and that's not really an apology.
I'm so sorry that I smeared a whole bunch of people.
Speaker 8 (04:50):
Let me do it again.
Speaker 9 (04:51):
That's what she just did.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
So Okay, a couple quick things. One, I agree with
what you said was partly what I was going to say.
There isn't this this widespread mo of conservative people going
out there just like any other crime. Sometimes people are
one way or another politically whatever. But first of all,
I mean, and she mentioned the NRA, which generally are
(05:14):
conservative people, but not everybody in the NRA is a conservative.
Some people just like guns or want to support gun rights.
And that's another thing. Most people that I know, well
everybody I know, but most people in the NRA are not.
They're lawabiding gun owners who do it for their freedom.
They support the Second Amendment, they support the right to
(05:35):
own weapons. And it's not like people go, yeah, I'm
gonna join the NRAs, who I can shoot people? Nobody
does that. In fact, most of the people who do
these shootings, most.
Speaker 8 (05:44):
I say, they're not ANRA member, right.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
They're just going and getting guns and shooting up the place.
Whether they're right.
Speaker 1 (05:50):
Now, Remember it's a very law abiding that's why they
join the NRAL.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
Of course, lawabiding gun owners, ladies and gentlemen, they don't.
First of all, if you're a law abiding gun owner,
you don't shoot people because that violates the whole Laura
body thing. Anyway, All right now, I also have to
say this, and I don't know exactly what Rosie said,
but a lot of people came out that day. And
every time there's a shooting, we see it constantly right away,
(06:15):
and it could be your friends, it could be a
Hollywood celebrity, it could be a sports star, politician, whatever.
We always see right away people making assumption, well, the
shoot or this, and the shoot or that and the shooter,
and ninety five percent of the time it's freaking wrong.
Here's what you need to do, people, wait and find
out what the hell is actually going on before you
start saying, well, he's black, well, he's white, Well, he's conservative,
(06:37):
Well he's this, well he's that, Well he's got to
be this, he's got to just shut the hell up,
and freaking wait, oh my god. None of these people.
None of these people would make good police. I'll tell
you that, because you investigate before you make a statement
about anything.
Speaker 1 (06:50):
Well, you're assuming their purpose is to disseminate the truth.
Speaker 9 (06:53):
It's not.
Speaker 1 (06:53):
Their purpose is to disseminate hysteria and do that you
don't need.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
The truth, Well, of course, no, no, let's go nuts.
And if, of course, when you have especially a celebrity,
like a lot of times, if just Joe blow says something.
Maybe it doesn't matter as much. But when celebrities and
politicians and all these other lunatics start babbling about stuff,
it's not just them saying it. Their fans pick it up,
they repeat it, and all of a sudden, what is
that old line about the truth isn't even out of
(07:20):
bed by the time the lives have gone halfway around
the world.
Speaker 1 (07:22):
Or whatever, don't have its pansy time a lie has
gone around.
Speaker 2 (07:25):
Right, So so these celebrities say that crap, it spreads
like wildfire. Meantime, the truth is over here going Wait
a second, that was going on here? So yeah, it's
just just shut up and wait for the freaking unless
you're one of the people who have investigated it, shut
up until we hear from the people who've investigated it.
Speaker 8 (07:42):
Thank you feel better now?
Speaker 2 (07:44):
No, but I mean I feel better than I did,
but barely.
Speaker 9 (07:47):
Yeah, I know.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
I'm sure there's more coming, right, I'll be angry.
Speaker 9 (07:50):
Well, here's the thing.
Speaker 1 (07:51):
I don't think she'll learn from her mistake. I think
she'll do it again and again again, Because I said before,
her purpose is not to dissemineate the truth on any
level her her she's a fear monger. She's a fear
monger and hysteric and that's what she wants to put
out there. But she's here's my hope for the future, though,
and her the response to her made me hopeful. People
called her on it, not you or me, people who
(08:13):
follow her. Her peeps called her on it.
Speaker 2 (08:16):
Her peeps call her on the fact that she identified
herself as a star of the Flintstones.
Speaker 1 (08:20):
That's a that's a to me of everything, of all
her body of work, that's what she picked. You know.
It's like, granted it's not exactly a list crap out there,
but still there's.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
She was actually pretty good in the league of their own.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
I mean, that would be the thing I would think
about her.
Speaker 2 (08:35):
I mean, she had her own show and I didn't
particularly care for it, but she had a lot of
things that she could have said, box.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
Office disasters, the way the Flintstones lost money. Why would
you put that? I don't know, but that just shows
you how bad her judgment is.
Speaker 2 (08:49):
I Rosie O'Donnell of a terrible movie. How are you
how about that?
Speaker 8 (08:52):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (08:53):
Wells follow me, but yeah, her her followers, the people
who like Rosie o'donald are the ones who called her
on it, and that gives me hope for the future,
So that that that there is hope for truth in
the American way.
Speaker 9 (09:04):
You know what else gave me hope.
Speaker 1 (09:06):
This week, which was really kind of interesting. I'm not
a fan of RFK Junior. I mean I don't I
don't hate.
Speaker 2 (09:13):
Him, but.
Speaker 9 (09:15):
I've never gone, oh goodie, RFK.
Speaker 1 (09:17):
I mean I think he was a very inspired choice
for Health and Human Services secretary because he has been
so vocal and he has been the subject of a
lot of censorship. People try to have tried to shut
him up because he is not afraid to go to
speak truth to power, and he's not afraid to go
(09:37):
up against the big boys, big pharm, of big food,
which he has done as Secretary of Health and Human Services.
He's gone up against big pharma, big food, the dye
thing they just got, you know, medical records on block.
He's done a lot of good things, and he's making
a lot of people very nervous. And what's happening is
Big Pharma is calling in their chips. They don't want
(09:59):
RFK Junior to stay in Health and Human Services because
he is uncovering the bodies he is writing a lot
of wrongs, and he is showing where the data has
been manipulated. And big Farmers are very uncomfortable about all this.
So there is a concerted effort to get RFK Junior
(10:19):
out of out of office at the Secretary Office. As
a matter of fact, a whole slew of Health and
Human Services employees, which when we call deep staters, has
signed a letter this week saying, please make him resign.
We don't want him in the office anymore. And these people,
a lot of them, owe their paychecks directly to Big Pharma.
Speaker 9 (10:42):
And they're not the only ones.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
There are a bunch of people up on Capitol Hill
who get huge donations from Big Pharma, and they too
have been called in to try to remove RFK Junior.
What they forget, and what most people forget until they
see him in action, is this guy is when you
come up against him and he's armed with the truth.
(11:04):
If he has the truth on his side, which he
does in this particular case, there is nobody he is
not afraid to give it right back. And there were
fireworks this week in the hearing up on up on
Capitol Hill. It was fascinating. I have two examples for
you one. You heard it a little bit in the open.
This is RFK Junior talking to Senator Ben Ray Luhan
(11:27):
and Luhan.
Speaker 9 (11:30):
Does this very bizarre trying.
Speaker 1 (11:32):
He's trying to set up a gotcha moment and it
just kind of explodes on him to the point where
RFK Junior is basically laughing in his face.
Speaker 6 (11:40):
Cut thirty one, mister Kennedy, you hired a man named
David Geyer to conduct this study?
Speaker 2 (11:46):
Is that correct?
Speaker 6 (11:47):
No, is mister David Dyer working for HHS.
Speaker 10 (11:53):
He's a contractor, but he's a conducting study.
Speaker 2 (11:56):
He's a contractor.
Speaker 10 (11:58):
He's a contractor.
Speaker 6 (11:58):
You know who works for you?
Speaker 2 (11:59):
Mister k Yeah.
Speaker 6 (12:01):
Did you know he never went to medical school?
Speaker 10 (12:04):
He's not He's not or not he's not practicing medicine.
Speaker 6 (12:07):
Did you know that he got caught in Maryland and
was charged for practicing medicine without a medical license.
Speaker 10 (12:14):
He was charged by a medical board, sued the medical board,
and the medical board was found to have acted an
actual malicon was fined two point six million dollars by
a judge in Maryland for doing that.
Speaker 6 (12:27):
See, so you choose to know a lot when you
want to know a lot you're it's incredible identity.
Speaker 2 (12:34):
The senator, So I'm right there with the senator came
to a gunfight with a knife.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
He did it, really, I'm pretty sure it was a
Swiss army knife. So it was I mean, it was
just ridiculous. And he's not the only one. Our very
own senior senator from Massachusetts, Senator Elizabeth Warren had her
own reckoning with RFK Junior Cut thirty two.
Speaker 11 (12:56):
You promised that you would not take away vaccines from
anyone who wanted them. You just changed the classification of
the COVID vaccine.
Speaker 10 (13:07):
I'm not taking them away from people, Senator.
Speaker 11 (13:09):
It takes it away if you can't get it from
your pharmacy.
Speaker 10 (13:13):
Well, most Americans are going to be able to get
it from their pharmacy for free dollars. Most Americans will
be able to get it from their pharmacy.
Speaker 11 (13:21):
Question, is everyone who wants it? That was your promise.
I know I can't.
Speaker 10 (13:26):
I never promised that I was going to recommend products
with which there is no reindication. When you said, and
I know you've taken eight hundred and fifty five thousand
dollars from pharmaceutical company.
Speaker 11 (13:38):
Senator, did you hold up a big sign saying that
you were lying when you've said that, because you are
the one who said you would not take them away.
Speaker 10 (13:47):
Now, Senator, I'm not taking them away from a.
Speaker 9 (13:51):
Yeah, this is that they tried.
Speaker 3 (13:52):
But he's he's really good.
Speaker 1 (13:55):
He has the facts, and he knows the background of
all these people. He knew exactly what he was doing.
He was impressive.
Speaker 2 (14:00):
He preps for sure, and he's and he's he is
on the top of his game. I mean, he didn't
do well enough obviously with the public to do anything
in the presidential race, which of course he did run
for you. Look, I'm not positive, and I'm saying this
because I don't know which I'll always admit. I Look,
I think I believe that sometimes RFK goes a little
(14:22):
over the top, and he certainly does have his own
a bit of an agenda, right. I mean, I don't
know what. I don't study drugs, so I don't know
what's right, wrong or in between with with drugs. I
do take advice from my doctor or the CDC who
gives it to my doctor or whatever. So I don't
know if every every single solitary thing, JFK Junior says
(14:44):
is spot on right or more opinionated of his I
don't know that he outright lies. What I'm saying is
I'm not positive about it, but I am positive about this.
He's good at taking the knees out from the people
who are out to get him.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
He is he is, indeed, And I think think this
is just my reading of the situation. I think that
the Democrats who have been really on their back foot
lately because they just keep doing stupid things. I think
they're thinking, all of these senators and there's so much
more from that hearing, but.
Speaker 9 (15:13):
We'd have to sit here for two hours.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
There's really many, many, many good cuts from that hearing.
But I think they thought that this was a gotcha
moment that they could do to kind of, in one hand,
give the Trump administration a black eye and make themselves
look good. But instead they looked peevish, they look stupid,
and they look like they were on the take. And
that's because of RFK Junior's homework. As you said, he's
(15:36):
very good at doing prep work and responding to them.
And it's a bad week for the Democrats.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
That was not a.
Speaker 1 (15:42):
Shining example of Democrats behaving well. And neither was what's
going on in Chicago. I mean, they're just looking like
freaking idiots. And the problem that we have, or they have,
it's not our problem, is that President Trump is a
troller and when he sees Democrats behaving badly, he kind
(16:03):
of likes to egg him on to see if they'll
behave worse.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
He's like a shark when there's blood in the water.
Speaker 9 (16:08):
Yeah, that's a really good analogy.
Speaker 1 (16:09):
And so in Chicago has put plenty of blood in
the one and so he's just he's kind of like
rubbing his hands together.
Speaker 9 (16:17):
So in Chicago, we have this issue.
Speaker 1 (16:19):
Where crime is just exploding. People are dying. Over Labor
Day weekend, seven people were murdered and fifty four people
were shot. And that's not even all the crime, that's
just some of it. And here are the Democrats saying
we don't want national help like they gave to Washington,
d C. And by the way, just to point out,
(16:41):
the National Guard, at the present's request, went into DC
against Mayor Bowser's wish. She has now recanted that turned
around one hundred and eighty percent and said I'm so
glad they're here.
Speaker 9 (16:52):
This is working out so well. They can stay as long.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
As they want, and they've been extended past the thirty days.
Speaker 9 (16:58):
It's working really well for DC.
Speaker 1 (17:00):
So presidents, well, Chicago, you want some help.
Speaker 9 (17:02):
No, no, no, no, Why Because.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
If the Democrat elector or not elector, but elected officials
were to say yes to help, they would have to
do two things that they don't want to do. One
is they'd have to admit that there's a crime problem
which can be laid completely at their door. It's their
policies that have created this. And two, they'd have to
admit that their salvation is Donald Trump, which they would
rather jump off of the key bridge in order to
(17:28):
than admit that they don't want So those are two
things they refuse to do. They would rather put themselves
into a position where they are defending crime. They are
defending crime, which makes them look like blithering idiots, which,
as you have pointed out, are president. President Donald Trump
sees that blood in the water and goes, how can
(17:49):
I make them look worse? I know, I'll threaten to invade,
and I mean, it's it's a riot. So President Trump
says this cut fifty your mind a bun.
Speaker 5 (18:01):
Chicago, though, well, we're going in I didn't say when
we're going in. When you lose, Look, I have an obligation.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
This isn't a political thing.
Speaker 5 (18:10):
I have an obligation when we lose. When twenty people
are killed over the last two and a half weeks,
and seventy five are shot with bullets. So let me
tell you a little story about a place called DC
District of Columbia. Right here where we are. It's now
a safe zone. We have no crime. It's in such
(18:30):
great shape. You can go and actually walk with your children,
your wife, your husband. You can walk right down the
middle of the street. You're not going to be shot. Peter,
You're safe. Everyone likes you anyway, They probably wouldn't do it.
But it's so dangerous, and there are people in this
audience that you've suffered greatly. There are people in this
(18:50):
audience that have been mugged and hurt badly, and they
don't want to talk about it. Maybe you were very
brave in talking about it. You made quite an impression
on a lot of people. I appreciate.
Speaker 9 (19:00):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (19:01):
So he's we're gonna go. We're gonna go save Chicago
the way we save DC.
Speaker 9 (19:05):
It's safe.
Speaker 1 (19:05):
Now, what is the response to the people in Chicago. Well,
this is Chicago, Mayor Brandon Johnson, Cut twenty three.
Speaker 12 (19:11):
We have not called for this, Our people have not
asked for this, but nevertheless, we find ourselves having to
respond to this, and we find ourselves in a position
where we must take immediate, drastic action to protect our
people from federal overreach. Protecting Chicago will ensure that every
Chicagoan knows their rights, that every single family is prepared,
(19:36):
and every part of city government is directed to protect
the people of Chicago from federal action.
Speaker 1 (19:42):
So they have a right to be mugged, is what
he's saying.
Speaker 2 (19:46):
How about protecting people from being assaulted and murdered.
Speaker 1 (19:49):
Yeah, so, And where he says the people of Chicago
didn't ask for this, I don't think he asked the
people of Chicago, because here's one person of Chicago. This
is Chicago Alderman Ray Lopez. Ah, he doesn't agree with that.
Speaker 9 (20:02):
Cut twenty five.
Speaker 13 (20:03):
We should be working to make sure that we are
in coordination with each other. There's nothing stopping the mayor,
the City of Chicago, the governor or the state of
Illinois from picking up the phone and reaching out to
the President of the United States and saying what can
we do to be on the same page. We should
all be looking to continuously decrease the amount of victims
in our city and in our state, and instead we're
getting into this tip for social media back and forth nonsense,
(20:26):
which is only putting the people of Chicago and the
people of Illinois in the middle in the crosshairs of
the criminals who are going to use this time to
exploit and go crazy. As we're continuing to see this
weekend where we've had multiple mass shootings, multiple victims, and
no one wants to talk about them. I hear the
governor talking about an invasion and insurrection. I hear the
mayor writing useless orders against the federal government. But what
(20:48):
no one is talking about is if our crime stats
are decreasing, why can't we push with Donald Trump's help
and decrease them even more. How many victims are we
comfortable with? Because that's ultimately the sub text of what
the mayor and the governor are saying, is that we
are comfortable with the amount of victims we have right now.
We don't need to improve on our numbers any further
than that.
Speaker 2 (21:07):
Yeah, we're good, We're good with the numbers.
Speaker 9 (21:08):
Oh my god.
Speaker 2 (21:09):
Yeah, fine, I.
Speaker 1 (21:10):
Would hope that that's my alderman if I lived in
that area.
Speaker 2 (21:13):
Let me just quickly say this one. Okay, let's just
play the you don't want Donald Trump to bring in
the National Guard card? Okay, we don't want that, all right? Fine,
you know what, Fine, you don't want that, then what
are you gonna do about it? Get more police on
the street, hire more whatever you have to do, you
do it. But they're not doing that. See it's not
(21:35):
like they're saying we don't want the federal troops in
here because that looks bad for us. So here's what
we're gonna do. We're gonna hire fifty three more police
officers in Chicago, one hundred and seventeen more state troopers.
We've got a call out to blah blah blah. You're
not doing anything, so you can say you don't want that. Okay,
So what are you doing to make the people of
your city safer?
Speaker 8 (21:57):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (21:57):
Nothing, No, we're just gonna stand here. They So look,
I don't know if I was a mayor of a
big city or a governor of a state, if I
would be up on any President Trump or otherwise. Just
you know, throwing troops into my city. But then you've
got to come up with your own solution. You can't
just say we don't want that, but we're not going
(22:19):
to do anything.
Speaker 8 (22:21):
Oh but they can, oh so.
Speaker 1 (22:25):
And the problem is they look like jackass is doing it,
which at Alderman was pointing out, which President Trump pulls
out whenever he whenever he decides to poke them and
say are you seriously supporting crime?
Speaker 9 (22:35):
And that's that's what they're doing.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
I do have a I do have one other issue too,
and it kind of goes on both sides. Like even
with what Trump is doing, Okay, let's assume this works.
DC's looking better. They let's say they go into Chicago
or la or wherever they go. It doesn't matter. They're
not going to stay there forever that we know. So
somewhere along the line, whether it's generated by the Trump administration,
(22:57):
Trump himself, the governor's, the mayors, the police chiefs, the whoever,
there's got to be a discussion on Okay, when the
troops leave, how do we keep it safe. We don't
just want to. It's like when you're in a war zone,
right and you pull your troops out, you don't want
a vacuum to be filled by the bad guys. So
there does have to be a multi pronged approach here.
We clean it up, we get everything's good. Now what
(23:20):
do we do to keep it good? And that's the
thing I don't I wouldn't want to see any of
these cities go back to where they were a month
ago or whatever.
Speaker 9 (23:28):
I agree with you, I completely agree with you.
Speaker 1 (23:30):
So so you know that's the conundrum my next week,
for all we know, there could have been an invasion
of Chicago.
Speaker 9 (23:36):
We'll find out it'll happen.
Speaker 1 (23:38):
But you know it's it's Dems being crazy and following
an agenda that has nothing to do with anybody. And
crime is one of the areas that you see this happen.
Immigration is another area where you see them behaving bizarrely.
And a moment happened this past week on CBS in
regard to immigration that defies explanation. Just to give you back,
(24:00):
in case everybody didn't know, CBS just paid sixteen million
dollars to the Trump Library. Why because they got caught
editing Kamala Harris's sixty minutes interview right before the election,
which was deemed election interference and something that you know
a network is not supposed to do. So you'd think
they'd be really careful about editing things to to make
(24:25):
an artificial SoundBite in regard to issues that they don't
agree with. Well, no, they didn't learn anything. Because Christy Nome,
the Secretary of Homeland Security, was on CBS and she
was asked about Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the MS
thirteen gang member who beat his wife and is charged
(24:47):
with human trafficking out of Tennessee. And she was asked
about him, and she gave a response and was very
cogent thought of.
Speaker 3 (24:55):
But they edited it.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
They decided to change it because they didn't want all
the explanation out there. This is the version of Christino's
response that CBS faced the Nation aired cut one.
Speaker 14 (25:09):
And the one thing that we will continue to do
is to make sure that he doesn't walk free in
the United States of America.
Speaker 1 (25:15):
That's all they put out there. When she was asked
about Kilmar Abrego Garcia. What she actually said was this
fifty six A.
Speaker 14 (25:23):
This individual was a known human smuggler, a MS thirteen
gang member, an individual who was a wife beater, and
someone who was so perverted that he solicited nude photos
from minors, and even his fellow human traffickers told him
to knock it off. He was so sick in what
he was doing and how he was treating small children.
So he needs to never be in the United States
(25:46):
of America, and our administration is making sure we're doing
all that we can to bring him to justice.
Speaker 8 (25:51):
A little bit different. Don't you think she costs the
part we don't need, you know?
Speaker 1 (25:55):
So I mean that, and they learn nothing. They learned
nothing from having to pay sixteen dollars to the Trump Library,
now you know, Lord knows. And Christy Num did not
go quietly into that good night when she saw what
they did. She put them before and after up and
she's had a few public words. And for all I know,
the administration could sue CBS again because they're kind of
sue happy.
Speaker 2 (26:15):
They must have hired a bunch of the butcher's over
there who were good at to trimming the fat. Yeah,
well you cut this out, cut this out now here.
Speaker 9 (26:22):
I don't think they speak English.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
I think they just you know, edit for time as
opposed to what's actually what's sad?
Speaker 2 (26:28):
You wonder too, And I don't know the answer to this.
I'm just I'm just spitballing here. But you wonder if
because you've got look at a TV station or a
radio station. You have whole bunch of people working there, right.
You got the people who do the interviews, You got
the editors, You got the people who are in the
in the back room in the dark editing the stuff
out so we can get on TV. And then the
person who puts it onto You got all these people.
So is this I think I know the answer. But
(26:50):
so the guy who's sitting in the editing room going,
you know, can we got to make this fit because
you want to make sure the show runs the right
amount of time, so you do have to edit some
things here and there. But is the guy in there going,
I don't like what you said there? Or is some
for you know, higher up sitting over the shoulder, going yeah,
cut that yeah?
Speaker 1 (27:08):
Or is it an intern who has no idea what's right?
Speaker 2 (27:11):
Like who's who's making the order?
Speaker 1 (27:14):
That better start paying attention to who that is because
they're being called into account for it, and it's being
noticed when they when the things that they cut seem
to be work for one narrative and not another and
not for what the truth is. We end every week
with the truth ortroll. This week's truth or troll is
not Donald Trump, which is as unusual. I know the
President is a world class troller and we use him
(27:35):
a lot. But this week it's Joy Reid, former MSNBC
anchor who is on the Katie Fang podcast.
Speaker 9 (27:42):
And I cannot.
Speaker 1 (27:44):
Believe that someone seriously suggested this, and that's why it's
a truth or troll. But you tell me cut sixty seven.
Speaker 4 (27:52):
He's got these magical doctors who claimed that he was
shot in the ear, but his ear, I guess grew bad.
He had a du blow bandage on one minute, no
bandage the next. We can't get a medical record from
this alleged assassination he was supposed to shot.
Speaker 2 (28:04):
We have nothing.
Speaker 4 (28:05):
We've got nothing.
Speaker 14 (28:06):
Where's the anagative worthy investigative records.
Speaker 10 (28:09):
One day he said his Naxi pad on his ear,
the next day the ear is totally fine.
Speaker 4 (28:13):
It's fine. And I remember being in mainstream media where
we both used to work, saying, isn't it odd that
we've never asked for his medical records? And I got
in trouble for that, right so so you're not allowed
to even say, isn't that weird? We have more records.
I know more about the attempted Ford assassination Henry the
president Ford than I do about Donald Trump and the
(28:36):
Darryl Ford thing happed when I was a child, right,
and they put out more information almost immediately. We know
almost immediately, almost everything about Kennedy's assassination. I know more
about McKinley's assassination that I do about this attempted attempt
to assassinate Trump when he was a presidential kennedyate.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
Is she honestly saying he wasn't shot because that's what
I heard, that he wasn't shot. Is she trolling? Just
trolling the right? Because you know, can she be serious
by suggesting we I don't know about you. I saw
it live on TV, blood pouring off of his head,
the Secret Service surrounding him, and she's saying he wasn't shot.
Speaker 2 (29:15):
Well, he wasn't shot like Kennedy was shot.
Speaker 8 (29:18):
But yeah, I don't.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
And by the way, I thought the truth. I think
she's trolling there too, But I thought I thought the
truth or whole part was going to be if she
actually knew more about Gerald Ford's attempted assassination or JFK
or McKinley. And because I don't think she does. I
don't think she's I don't.
Speaker 1 (29:38):
Think she does either, but I think that there is.
She's intimating that President Trump wasn't shot, that he was,
that there was no it's all.
Speaker 8 (29:46):
Stage much like the Moonwalk.
Speaker 2 (29:48):
It never happened, right, And the guy and the guy
with the rifle who is now dead Kennedy assassination, he
was like a setup.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
And I would point out by the way that nobody
knows everything about the Kennedy assassination. With days we're still
arguing about the Kennedy assassination.
Speaker 2 (30:02):
So that's was there a grassy knoll where Trump was
that day or something grassy field? Okay, well that that
explains it. And again the guy who's the alleged shooter,
the one who's dead, Now, why is he dead if
Trump wasn't shot.
Speaker 1 (30:16):
Yeah, that's a I suspect the Secret Service. So yeah,
so I think it's a troll. I could be wrong.
Speaker 2 (30:22):
She's she's trying to buke up her. Yeah, she's she's
much like Rosie o'donald, and she's Look, we know when
a lot of these shows and hosts and different things.
They're they're preaching to the choir anyway, so they're not
She she don't give it. She don't give a crap.
Speaker 1 (30:39):
I almost a faud when she goes. Were you and
I used to work on the insta? Yeah, and you
couldn't maintain that job because you didn't tell the truth,
either of you. This is part of the problem. So
I think she's trolling you. Guys can let Benner I
know if you agree with this or not. You can
contact us on x at news by three or on
Facebook at news Bye. We upload a new episode every
single Monday, so please check back now Monday and see
(31:00):
what new offerings we have. Meanwhile, I have a great
week and stay away from the Grassy Knoll. This is
Nancy Shack.
Speaker 2 (31:05):
I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 3 (31:06):
This is news Bite
President Trump threatens to invade Chicago. RFK Junior survives a
coup attempt, and Rosie O'Donnell has to give a maya
koppa to Maga. Pigs are flying this week, as you
will hear, and I did they really just say that?
Clips I'm Nancy Shack.
Speaker 2 (00:13):
I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 3 (00:14):
This is news bite.
Speaker 4 (00:27):
Mind them on Chicago though, Well, we're going in.
Speaker 5 (00:30):
I didn't say when we're going in. I have an
obligation when we lose. When twenty people are killed over
the last two and a half weeks and seventy five
are shot with bullets.
Speaker 6 (00:42):
Mister Kennedy, you hired a man named David Geyer to
conduct this study.
Speaker 2 (00:47):
Is that correct?
Speaker 7 (00:48):
No?
Speaker 6 (00:49):
See, so you choose to know a lot when you
want to know a lot. You're It's incredible, mister Kennedy
the Senator.
Speaker 7 (00:57):
Hi, everybody, it's Rosie o'donald's Star of the Flints. I
did not do my due diligence before I made that
emotional statement. I assumed, like most shooters, they followed a
standard mo O and had standard NRA love and kind
of gun people.
Speaker 2 (01:15):
Hi, Ambrosia Donald and I approved this message.
Speaker 1 (01:19):
Oh my gosh, she what she's apologizing for, and that is,
by the way, she's doing that video from Ireland, because
I remember she moved to Ireland. Donald Trump was arrested
in twenty was elected not a resident, in the last election.
But she's what she's apologizing for, is she she put
this video up that they have since taken down that
(01:41):
the Minneapolis Catholic school shooter was a MAGA hat wearing
conservative as we know, and we knew it the day
of the shooting.
Speaker 8 (01:52):
It was not.
Speaker 1 (01:53):
It was a trans woman who was deeply disturbed and
hated conservatives and Donald Trump. But that didn't stop Rosie
o'donald from putting up a die tribe against MAGA and
conservatives and how they were responsible for the dead school
children in Minneapolis. And then here's what happened. So she
dropped that bomb. And then she says that she went
(02:16):
away for a few days and came back. I think
that's a bullfaced lie. I think she was there and
thought she could get away with the lie and promoting this.
But even her followers have had enough of people lying
to them and responded pretty viciously on social media, telling
her are you sleeping nuts? It was again it was
(02:37):
a trans woman, and it hated Trump that the magazines
on the weapon said killed Trump.
Speaker 9 (02:42):
I mean, it's just.
Speaker 1 (02:43):
And so she found that if she wanted to, you know,
retain any followers, she had to apologize. I think that's
what made her apologize, not coming back and finding out
that she was wrong. She knew she was wrong. She
jumped a conclusion, and she never we're not even talking
due diligence. She did no diligence in regard to finding
(03:05):
out the truth. She just made this bias, prejudiced assumption
and didn't care if she was right or wrong. And
so this is this is the quote apology. It's not
really an apology. It's kind of weird. This is what
she said when she came back thirty two A.
Speaker 7 (03:19):
Hi, everybody, it's Rosi O'Donnell, star of the Flintstones. Listen,
I have a call. Sort. I know it happens, get
run down, you know. Anyway, I know a lot of
you were very upset about the video I made before
I went away. H for a few days, I didn't
go online and haven't seen them till today.
Speaker 9 (03:41):
But you are right.
Speaker 7 (03:42):
I did not do my due diligence before I made
that emotional statement, and I said things about the shooter
that were incorrect. I assumed, like most shooters, they followed
a standard mo O and had standard you know feelings
of you know, NRA lovin kind of gun people. Anyway,
(04:07):
the truth is I messed up, and when you mess up,
you fess up. I'm sorry. This is my apology video,
and I hope it's enough.
Speaker 1 (04:16):
Okay, I need to point something out me too. Standard feelings,
standard NRA loving There's no such thing when it comes
to shooters. And this is not the first trans shooter
that's been there. There's no standard shooter. Most shooters are
not conservative. Most shooters aren't anything. It's very idiosyncratic for
whatever happened.
Speaker 9 (04:34):
No, there is no.
Speaker 1 (04:36):
History of a whole series of conservatives out there shooting
people up.
Speaker 9 (04:40):
That does not happen.
Speaker 1 (04:41):
So in her apology, she's spreading another lie in the
middle of it, and and that's not really an apology.
I'm so sorry that I smeared a whole bunch of people.
Speaker 8 (04:50):
Let me do it again.
Speaker 9 (04:51):
That's what she just did.
Speaker 2 (04:53):
So Okay, a couple quick things. One, I agree with
what you said was partly what I was going to say.
There isn't this this widespread mo of conservative people going
out there just like any other crime. Sometimes people are
one way or another politically whatever. But first of all,
I mean, and she mentioned the NRA, which generally are
(05:14):
conservative people, but not everybody in the NRA is a conservative.
Some people just like guns or want to support gun rights.
And that's another thing. Most people that I know, well
everybody I know, but most people in the NRA are not.
They're lawabiding gun owners who do it for their freedom.
They support the Second Amendment, they support the right to
(05:35):
own weapons. And it's not like people go, yeah, I'm
gonna join the NRAs, who I can shoot people? Nobody
does that. In fact, most of the people who do
these shootings, most.
Speaker 8 (05:44):
I say, they're not ANRA member, right.
Speaker 2 (05:47):
They're just going and getting guns and shooting up the place.
Whether they're right.
Speaker 1 (05:50):
Now, Remember it's a very law abiding that's why they
join the NRAL.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
Of course, lawabiding gun owners, ladies and gentlemen, they don't.
First of all, if you're a law abiding gun owner,
you don't shoot people because that violates the whole Laura
body thing. Anyway, All right now, I also have to
say this, and I don't know exactly what Rosie said,
but a lot of people came out that day. And
every time there's a shooting, we see it constantly right away,
(06:15):
and it could be your friends, it could be a
Hollywood celebrity, it could be a sports star, politician, whatever.
We always see right away people making assumption, well, the
shoot or this, and the shoot or that and the shooter,
and ninety five percent of the time it's freaking wrong.
Here's what you need to do, people, wait and find
out what the hell is actually going on before you
start saying, well, he's black, well, he's white, Well, he's conservative,
(06:37):
Well he's this, well he's that, Well he's got to
be this, he's got to just shut the hell up,
and freaking wait, oh my god. None of these people.
None of these people would make good police. I'll tell
you that, because you investigate before you make a statement
about anything.
Speaker 1 (06:50):
Well, you're assuming their purpose is to disseminate the truth.
Speaker 9 (06:53):
It's not.
Speaker 1 (06:53):
Their purpose is to disseminate hysteria and do that you
don't need.
Speaker 2 (06:57):
The truth, Well, of course, no, no, let's go nuts.
And if, of course, when you have especially a celebrity,
like a lot of times, if just Joe blow says something.
Maybe it doesn't matter as much. But when celebrities and
politicians and all these other lunatics start babbling about stuff,
it's not just them saying it. Their fans pick it up,
they repeat it, and all of a sudden, what is
that old line about the truth isn't even out of
(07:20):
bed by the time the lives have gone halfway around
the world.
Speaker 1 (07:22):
Or whatever, don't have its pansy time a lie has
gone around.
Speaker 2 (07:25):
Right, So so these celebrities say that crap, it spreads
like wildfire. Meantime, the truth is over here going Wait
a second, that was going on here? So yeah, it's
just just shut up and wait for the freaking unless
you're one of the people who have investigated it, shut
up until we hear from the people who've investigated it.
Speaker 8 (07:42):
Thank you feel better now?
Speaker 2 (07:44):
No, but I mean I feel better than I did,
but barely.
Speaker 9 (07:47):
Yeah, I know.
Speaker 2 (07:48):
I'm sure there's more coming, right, I'll be angry.
Speaker 9 (07:50):
Well, here's the thing.
Speaker 1 (07:51):
I don't think she'll learn from her mistake. I think
she'll do it again and again again, Because I said before,
her purpose is not to dissemineate the truth on any
level her her she's a fear monger. She's a fear
monger and hysteric and that's what she wants to put
out there. But she's here's my hope for the future, though,
and her the response to her made me hopeful. People
called her on it, not you or me, people who
(08:13):
follow her. Her peeps called her on it.
Speaker 2 (08:16):
Her peeps call her on the fact that she identified
herself as a star of the Flintstones.
Speaker 1 (08:20):
That's a that's a to me of everything, of all
her body of work, that's what she picked. You know.
It's like, granted it's not exactly a list crap out there,
but still there's.
Speaker 2 (08:31):
She was actually pretty good in the league of their own.
Speaker 1 (08:33):
I mean, that would be the thing I would think
about her.
Speaker 2 (08:35):
I mean, she had her own show and I didn't
particularly care for it, but she had a lot of
things that she could have said, box.
Speaker 1 (08:42):
Office disasters, the way the Flintstones lost money. Why would
you put that? I don't know, but that just shows
you how bad her judgment is.
Speaker 2 (08:49):
I Rosie O'Donnell of a terrible movie. How are you
how about that?
Speaker 8 (08:52):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (08:53):
Wells follow me, but yeah, her her followers, the people
who like Rosie o'donald are the ones who called her
on it, and that gives me hope for the future,
So that that that there is hope for truth in
the American way.
Speaker 9 (09:04):
You know what else gave me hope.
Speaker 1 (09:06):
This week, which was really kind of interesting. I'm not
a fan of RFK Junior. I mean I don't I
don't hate.
Speaker 2 (09:13):
Him, but.
Speaker 9 (09:15):
I've never gone, oh goodie, RFK.
Speaker 1 (09:17):
I mean I think he was a very inspired choice
for Health and Human Services secretary because he has been
so vocal and he has been the subject of a
lot of censorship. People try to have tried to shut
him up because he is not afraid to go to
speak truth to power, and he's not afraid to go
(09:37):
up against the big boys, big pharm, of big food,
which he has done as Secretary of Health and Human Services.
He's gone up against big pharma, big food, the dye
thing they just got, you know, medical records on block.
He's done a lot of good things, and he's making
a lot of people very nervous. And what's happening is
Big Pharma is calling in their chips. They don't want
(09:59):
RFK Junior to stay in Health and Human Services because
he is uncovering the bodies he is writing a lot
of wrongs, and he is showing where the data has
been manipulated. And big Farmers are very uncomfortable about all this.
So there is a concerted effort to get RFK Junior
(10:19):
out of out of office at the Secretary Office. As
a matter of fact, a whole slew of Health and
Human Services employees, which when we call deep staters, has
signed a letter this week saying, please make him resign.
We don't want him in the office anymore. And these people,
a lot of them, owe their paychecks directly to Big Pharma.
Speaker 9 (10:42):
And they're not the only ones.
Speaker 1 (10:44):
There are a bunch of people up on Capitol Hill
who get huge donations from Big Pharma, and they too
have been called in to try to remove RFK Junior.
What they forget, and what most people forget until they
see him in action, is this guy is when you
come up against him and he's armed with the truth.
(11:04):
If he has the truth on his side, which he
does in this particular case, there is nobody he is
not afraid to give it right back. And there were
fireworks this week in the hearing up on up on
Capitol Hill. It was fascinating. I have two examples for
you one. You heard it a little bit in the open.
This is RFK Junior talking to Senator Ben Ray Luhan
(11:27):
and Luhan.
Speaker 9 (11:30):
Does this very bizarre trying.
Speaker 1 (11:32):
He's trying to set up a gotcha moment and it
just kind of explodes on him to the point where
RFK Junior is basically laughing in his face.
Speaker 6 (11:40):
Cut thirty one, mister Kennedy, you hired a man named
David Geyer to conduct this study?
Speaker 2 (11:46):
Is that correct?
Speaker 6 (11:47):
No, is mister David Dyer working for HHS.
Speaker 10 (11:53):
He's a contractor, but he's a conducting study.
Speaker 2 (11:56):
He's a contractor.
Speaker 10 (11:58):
He's a contractor.
Speaker 6 (11:58):
You know who works for you?
Speaker 2 (11:59):
Mister k Yeah.
Speaker 6 (12:01):
Did you know he never went to medical school?
Speaker 10 (12:04):
He's not He's not or not he's not practicing medicine.
Speaker 6 (12:07):
Did you know that he got caught in Maryland and
was charged for practicing medicine without a medical license.
Speaker 10 (12:14):
He was charged by a medical board, sued the medical board,
and the medical board was found to have acted an
actual malicon was fined two point six million dollars by
a judge in Maryland for doing that.
Speaker 6 (12:27):
See, so you choose to know a lot when you
want to know a lot you're it's incredible identity.
Speaker 2 (12:34):
The senator, So I'm right there with the senator came
to a gunfight with a knife.
Speaker 1 (12:40):
He did it, really, I'm pretty sure it was a
Swiss army knife. So it was I mean, it was
just ridiculous. And he's not the only one. Our very
own senior senator from Massachusetts, Senator Elizabeth Warren had her
own reckoning with RFK Junior Cut thirty two.
Speaker 11 (12:56):
You promised that you would not take away vaccines from
anyone who wanted them. You just changed the classification of
the COVID vaccine.
Speaker 10 (13:07):
I'm not taking them away from people, Senator.
Speaker 11 (13:09):
It takes it away if you can't get it from
your pharmacy.
Speaker 10 (13:13):
Well, most Americans are going to be able to get
it from their pharmacy for free dollars. Most Americans will
be able to get it from their pharmacy.
Speaker 11 (13:21):
Question, is everyone who wants it? That was your promise.
I know I can't.
Speaker 10 (13:26):
I never promised that I was going to recommend products
with which there is no reindication. When you said, and
I know you've taken eight hundred and fifty five thousand
dollars from pharmaceutical company.
Speaker 11 (13:38):
Senator, did you hold up a big sign saying that
you were lying when you've said that, because you are
the one who said you would not take them away.
Speaker 10 (13:47):
Now, Senator, I'm not taking them away from a.
Speaker 9 (13:51):
Yeah, this is that they tried.
Speaker 3 (13:52):
But he's he's really good.
Speaker 1 (13:55):
He has the facts, and he knows the background of
all these people. He knew exactly what he was doing.
He was impressive.
Speaker 2 (14:00):
He preps for sure, and he's and he's he is
on the top of his game. I mean, he didn't
do well enough obviously with the public to do anything
in the presidential race, which of course he did run
for you. Look, I'm not positive, and I'm saying this
because I don't know which I'll always admit. I Look,
I think I believe that sometimes RFK goes a little
(14:22):
over the top, and he certainly does have his own
a bit of an agenda, right. I mean, I don't
know what. I don't study drugs, so I don't know
what's right, wrong or in between with with drugs. I
do take advice from my doctor or the CDC who
gives it to my doctor or whatever. So I don't
know if every every single solitary thing, JFK Junior says
(14:44):
is spot on right or more opinionated of his I
don't know that he outright lies. What I'm saying is
I'm not positive about it, but I am positive about this.
He's good at taking the knees out from the people
who are out to get him.
Speaker 1 (14:58):
He is he is, indeed, And I think think this
is just my reading of the situation. I think that
the Democrats who have been really on their back foot
lately because they just keep doing stupid things. I think
they're thinking, all of these senators and there's so much
more from that hearing, but.
Speaker 9 (15:13):
We'd have to sit here for two hours.
Speaker 1 (15:15):
There's really many, many, many good cuts from that hearing.
But I think they thought that this was a gotcha
moment that they could do to kind of, in one hand,
give the Trump administration a black eye and make themselves
look good. But instead they looked peevish, they look stupid,
and they look like they were on the take. And
that's because of RFK Junior's homework. As you said, he's
(15:36):
very good at doing prep work and responding to them.
And it's a bad week for the Democrats.
Speaker 2 (15:41):
That was not a.
Speaker 1 (15:42):
Shining example of Democrats behaving well. And neither was what's
going on in Chicago. I mean, they're just looking like
freaking idiots. And the problem that we have, or they have,
it's not our problem, is that President Trump is a
troller and when he sees Democrats behaving badly, he kind
(16:03):
of likes to egg him on to see if they'll
behave worse.
Speaker 2 (16:06):
He's like a shark when there's blood in the water.
Speaker 9 (16:08):
Yeah, that's a really good analogy.
Speaker 1 (16:09):
And so in Chicago has put plenty of blood in
the one and so he's just he's kind of like
rubbing his hands together.
Speaker 9 (16:17):
So in Chicago, we have this issue.
Speaker 1 (16:19):
Where crime is just exploding. People are dying. Over Labor
Day weekend, seven people were murdered and fifty four people
were shot. And that's not even all the crime, that's
just some of it. And here are the Democrats saying
we don't want national help like they gave to Washington,
d C. And by the way, just to point out,
(16:41):
the National Guard, at the present's request, went into DC
against Mayor Bowser's wish. She has now recanted that turned
around one hundred and eighty percent and said I'm so
glad they're here.
Speaker 9 (16:52):
This is working out so well. They can stay as long.
Speaker 1 (16:54):
As they want, and they've been extended past the thirty days.
Speaker 9 (16:58):
It's working really well for DC.
Speaker 1 (17:00):
So presidents, well, Chicago, you want some help.
Speaker 9 (17:02):
No, no, no, no, Why Because.
Speaker 1 (17:06):
If the Democrat elector or not elector, but elected officials
were to say yes to help, they would have to
do two things that they don't want to do. One
is they'd have to admit that there's a crime problem
which can be laid completely at their door. It's their
policies that have created this. And two, they'd have to
admit that their salvation is Donald Trump, which they would
rather jump off of the key bridge in order to
(17:28):
than admit that they don't want So those are two
things they refuse to do. They would rather put themselves
into a position where they are defending crime. They are
defending crime, which makes them look like blithering idiots, which,
as you have pointed out, are president. President Donald Trump
sees that blood in the water and goes, how can
(17:49):
I make them look worse? I know, I'll threaten to invade,
and I mean, it's it's a riot. So President Trump
says this cut fifty your mind a bun.
Speaker 5 (18:01):
Chicago, though, well, we're going in I didn't say when
we're going in. When you lose, Look, I have an obligation.
Speaker 2 (18:07):
This isn't a political thing.
Speaker 5 (18:10):
I have an obligation when we lose. When twenty people
are killed over the last two and a half weeks,
and seventy five are shot with bullets. So let me
tell you a little story about a place called DC
District of Columbia. Right here where we are. It's now
a safe zone. We have no crime. It's in such
(18:30):
great shape. You can go and actually walk with your children,
your wife, your husband. You can walk right down the
middle of the street. You're not going to be shot. Peter,
You're safe. Everyone likes you anyway, They probably wouldn't do it.
But it's so dangerous, and there are people in this
audience that you've suffered greatly. There are people in this
(18:50):
audience that have been mugged and hurt badly, and they
don't want to talk about it. Maybe you were very
brave in talking about it. You made quite an impression
on a lot of people. I appreciate.
Speaker 9 (19:00):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (19:01):
So he's we're gonna go. We're gonna go save Chicago
the way we save DC.
Speaker 9 (19:05):
It's safe.
Speaker 1 (19:05):
Now, what is the response to the people in Chicago. Well,
this is Chicago, Mayor Brandon Johnson, Cut twenty three.
Speaker 12 (19:11):
We have not called for this, Our people have not
asked for this, but nevertheless, we find ourselves having to
respond to this, and we find ourselves in a position
where we must take immediate, drastic action to protect our
people from federal overreach. Protecting Chicago will ensure that every
Chicagoan knows their rights, that every single family is prepared,
(19:36):
and every part of city government is directed to protect
the people of Chicago from federal action.
Speaker 1 (19:42):
So they have a right to be mugged, is what
he's saying.
Speaker 2 (19:46):
How about protecting people from being assaulted and murdered.
Speaker 1 (19:49):
Yeah, so, And where he says the people of Chicago
didn't ask for this, I don't think he asked the
people of Chicago, because here's one person of Chicago. This
is Chicago Alderman Ray Lopez. Ah, he doesn't agree with that.
Speaker 9 (20:02):
Cut twenty five.
Speaker 13 (20:03):
We should be working to make sure that we are
in coordination with each other. There's nothing stopping the mayor,
the City of Chicago, the governor or the state of
Illinois from picking up the phone and reaching out to
the President of the United States and saying what can
we do to be on the same page. We should
all be looking to continuously decrease the amount of victims
in our city and in our state, and instead we're
getting into this tip for social media back and forth nonsense,
(20:26):
which is only putting the people of Chicago and the
people of Illinois in the middle in the crosshairs of
the criminals who are going to use this time to
exploit and go crazy. As we're continuing to see this
weekend where we've had multiple mass shootings, multiple victims, and
no one wants to talk about them. I hear the
governor talking about an invasion and insurrection. I hear the
mayor writing useless orders against the federal government. But what
(20:48):
no one is talking about is if our crime stats
are decreasing, why can't we push with Donald Trump's help
and decrease them even more. How many victims are we
comfortable with? Because that's ultimately the sub text of what
the mayor and the governor are saying, is that we
are comfortable with the amount of victims we have right now.
We don't need to improve on our numbers any further
than that.
Speaker 2 (21:07):
Yeah, we're good, We're good with the numbers.
Speaker 9 (21:08):
Oh my god.
Speaker 2 (21:09):
Yeah, fine, I.
Speaker 1 (21:10):
Would hope that that's my alderman if I lived in
that area.
Speaker 2 (21:13):
Let me just quickly say this one. Okay, let's just
play the you don't want Donald Trump to bring in
the National Guard card? Okay, we don't want that, all right? Fine,
you know what, Fine, you don't want that, then what
are you gonna do about it? Get more police on
the street, hire more whatever you have to do, you
do it. But they're not doing that. See it's not
(21:35):
like they're saying we don't want the federal troops in
here because that looks bad for us. So here's what
we're gonna do. We're gonna hire fifty three more police
officers in Chicago, one hundred and seventeen more state troopers.
We've got a call out to blah blah blah. You're
not doing anything, so you can say you don't want that. Okay,
So what are you doing to make the people of
your city safer?
Speaker 8 (21:57):
Oh?
Speaker 2 (21:57):
Nothing, No, we're just gonna stand here. They So look,
I don't know if I was a mayor of a
big city or a governor of a state, if I
would be up on any President Trump or otherwise. Just
you know, throwing troops into my city. But then you've
got to come up with your own solution. You can't
just say we don't want that, but we're not going
(22:19):
to do anything.
Speaker 8 (22:21):
Oh but they can, oh so.
Speaker 1 (22:25):
And the problem is they look like jackass is doing it,
which at Alderman was pointing out, which President Trump pulls
out whenever he whenever he decides to poke them and
say are you seriously supporting crime?
Speaker 9 (22:35):
And that's that's what they're doing.
Speaker 2 (22:36):
I do have a I do have one other issue too,
and it kind of goes on both sides. Like even
with what Trump is doing, Okay, let's assume this works.
DC's looking better. They let's say they go into Chicago
or la or wherever they go. It doesn't matter. They're
not going to stay there forever that we know. So
somewhere along the line, whether it's generated by the Trump administration,
(22:57):
Trump himself, the governor's, the mayors, the police chiefs, the whoever,
there's got to be a discussion on Okay, when the
troops leave, how do we keep it safe. We don't
just want to. It's like when you're in a war zone,
right and you pull your troops out, you don't want
a vacuum to be filled by the bad guys. So
there does have to be a multi pronged approach here.
We clean it up, we get everything's good. Now what
(23:20):
do we do to keep it good? And that's the
thing I don't I wouldn't want to see any of
these cities go back to where they were a month
ago or whatever.
Speaker 9 (23:28):
I agree with you, I completely agree with you.
Speaker 1 (23:30):
So so you know that's the conundrum my next week,
for all we know, there could have been an invasion
of Chicago.
Speaker 9 (23:36):
We'll find out it'll happen.
Speaker 1 (23:38):
But you know it's it's Dems being crazy and following
an agenda that has nothing to do with anybody. And
crime is one of the areas that you see this happen.
Immigration is another area where you see them behaving bizarrely.
And a moment happened this past week on CBS in
regard to immigration that defies explanation. Just to give you back,
(24:00):
in case everybody didn't know, CBS just paid sixteen million
dollars to the Trump Library. Why because they got caught
editing Kamala Harris's sixty minutes interview right before the election,
which was deemed election interference and something that you know
a network is not supposed to do. So you'd think
they'd be really careful about editing things to to make
(24:25):
an artificial SoundBite in regard to issues that they don't
agree with. Well, no, they didn't learn anything. Because Christy Nome,
the Secretary of Homeland Security, was on CBS and she
was asked about Maryland man Kilmar Abrego Garcia, the MS
thirteen gang member who beat his wife and is charged
(24:47):
with human trafficking out of Tennessee. And she was asked
about him, and she gave a response and was very
cogent thought of.
Speaker 3 (24:55):
But they edited it.
Speaker 1 (24:56):
They decided to change it because they didn't want all
the explanation out there. This is the version of Christino's
response that CBS faced the Nation aired cut one.
Speaker 14 (25:09):
And the one thing that we will continue to do
is to make sure that he doesn't walk free in
the United States of America.
Speaker 1 (25:15):
That's all they put out there. When she was asked
about Kilmar Abrego Garcia. What she actually said was this
fifty six A.
Speaker 14 (25:23):
This individual was a known human smuggler, a MS thirteen
gang member, an individual who was a wife beater, and
someone who was so perverted that he solicited nude photos
from minors, and even his fellow human traffickers told him
to knock it off. He was so sick in what
he was doing and how he was treating small children.
So he needs to never be in the United States
(25:46):
of America, and our administration is making sure we're doing
all that we can to bring him to justice.
Speaker 8 (25:51):
A little bit different. Don't you think she costs the
part we don't need, you know?
Speaker 1 (25:55):
So I mean that, and they learn nothing. They learned
nothing from having to pay sixteen dollars to the Trump Library,
now you know, Lord knows. And Christy Num did not
go quietly into that good night when she saw what
they did. She put them before and after up and
she's had a few public words. And for all I know,
the administration could sue CBS again because they're kind of
sue happy.
Speaker 2 (26:15):
They must have hired a bunch of the butcher's over
there who were good at to trimming the fat. Yeah,
well you cut this out, cut this out now here.
Speaker 9 (26:22):
I don't think they speak English.
Speaker 1 (26:23):
I think they just you know, edit for time as
opposed to what's actually what's sad?
Speaker 2 (26:28):
You wonder too, And I don't know the answer to this.
I'm just I'm just spitballing here. But you wonder if
because you've got look at a TV station or a
radio station. You have whole bunch of people working there, right.
You got the people who do the interviews, You got
the editors, You got the people who are in the
in the back room in the dark editing the stuff
out so we can get on TV. And then the
person who puts it onto You got all these people.
So is this I think I know the answer. But
(26:50):
so the guy who's sitting in the editing room going,
you know, can we got to make this fit because
you want to make sure the show runs the right
amount of time, so you do have to edit some
things here and there. But is the guy in there going,
I don't like what you said there? Or is some
for you know, higher up sitting over the shoulder, going yeah,
cut that yeah?
Speaker 1 (27:08):
Or is it an intern who has no idea what's right?
Speaker 2 (27:11):
Like who's who's making the order?
Speaker 1 (27:14):
That better start paying attention to who that is because
they're being called into account for it, and it's being
noticed when they when the things that they cut seem
to be work for one narrative and not another and
not for what the truth is. We end every week
with the truth ortroll. This week's truth or troll is
not Donald Trump, which is as unusual. I know the
President is a world class troller and we use him
(27:35):
a lot. But this week it's Joy Reid, former MSNBC
anchor who is on the Katie Fang podcast.
Speaker 9 (27:42):
And I cannot.
Speaker 1 (27:44):
Believe that someone seriously suggested this, and that's why it's
a truth or troll. But you tell me cut sixty seven.
Speaker 4 (27:52):
He's got these magical doctors who claimed that he was
shot in the ear, but his ear, I guess grew bad.
He had a du blow bandage on one minute, no
bandage the next. We can't get a medical record from
this alleged assassination he was supposed to shot.
Speaker 2 (28:04):
We have nothing.
Speaker 4 (28:05):
We've got nothing.
Speaker 14 (28:06):
Where's the anagative worthy investigative records.
Speaker 10 (28:09):
One day he said his Naxi pad on his ear,
the next day the ear is totally fine.
Speaker 4 (28:13):
It's fine. And I remember being in mainstream media where
we both used to work, saying, isn't it odd that
we've never asked for his medical records? And I got
in trouble for that, right so so you're not allowed
to even say, isn't that weird? We have more records.
I know more about the attempted Ford assassination Henry the
president Ford than I do about Donald Trump and the
(28:36):
Darryl Ford thing happed when I was a child, right,
and they put out more information almost immediately. We know
almost immediately, almost everything about Kennedy's assassination. I know more
about McKinley's assassination that I do about this attempted attempt
to assassinate Trump when he was a presidential kennedyate.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
Is she honestly saying he wasn't shot because that's what
I heard, that he wasn't shot. Is she trolling? Just
trolling the right? Because you know, can she be serious
by suggesting we I don't know about you. I saw
it live on TV, blood pouring off of his head,
the Secret Service surrounding him, and she's saying he wasn't shot.
Speaker 2 (29:15):
Well, he wasn't shot like Kennedy was shot.
Speaker 8 (29:18):
But yeah, I don't.
Speaker 2 (29:22):
And by the way, I thought the truth. I think
she's trolling there too, But I thought I thought the
truth or whole part was going to be if she
actually knew more about Gerald Ford's attempted assassination or JFK
or McKinley. And because I don't think she does. I
don't think she's I don't.
Speaker 1 (29:38):
Think she does either, but I think that there is.
She's intimating that President Trump wasn't shot, that he was,
that there was no it's all.
Speaker 8 (29:46):
Stage much like the Moonwalk.
Speaker 2 (29:48):
It never happened, right, And the guy and the guy
with the rifle who is now dead Kennedy assassination, he
was like a setup.
Speaker 1 (29:55):
And I would point out by the way that nobody
knows everything about the Kennedy assassination. With days we're still
arguing about the Kennedy assassination.
Speaker 2 (30:02):
So that's was there a grassy knoll where Trump was
that day or something grassy field? Okay, well that that
explains it. And again the guy who's the alleged shooter,
the one who's dead, Now, why is he dead if
Trump wasn't shot.
Speaker 1 (30:16):
Yeah, that's a I suspect the Secret Service. So yeah,
so I think it's a troll. I could be wrong.
Speaker 2 (30:22):
She's she's trying to buke up her. Yeah, she's she's
much like Rosie o'donald, and she's Look, we know when
a lot of these shows and hosts and different things.
They're they're preaching to the choir anyway, so they're not
She she don't give it. She don't give a crap.
Speaker 1 (30:39):
I almost a faud when she goes. Were you and
I used to work on the insta? Yeah, and you
couldn't maintain that job because you didn't tell the truth,
either of you. This is part of the problem. So
I think she's trolling you. Guys can let Benner I
know if you agree with this or not. You can
contact us on x at news by three or on
Facebook at news Bye. We upload a new episode every
single Monday, so please check back now Monday and see
(31:00):
what new offerings we have. Meanwhile, I have a great
week and stay away from the Grassy Knoll. This is
Nancy Shack.
Speaker 2 (31:05):
I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 3 (31:06):
This is news Bite
Popular Podcasts
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show
The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show. Clay Travis and Buck Sexton tackle the biggest stories in news, politics and current events with intelligence and humor. From the border crisis, to the madness of cancel culture and far-left missteps, Clay and Buck guide listeners through the latest headlines and hot topics with fun and entertaining conversations and opinions.