March 24, 2025 • 37 mins
Did you know autopens can pardon people, or that democracy is not free elections and majority rule, or that the astronauts were not stranded in space for 9 months because the last Administration was playing politics? There were a lot of revelations in this week's "did they really just say that" sound clips.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Did you know auto pens can pardon people, or that
democracy is not free elections and majority rule, or that
the astronauts were not stranded in space for nine months
because the last administration was playing politics. There were a
lot of revelations in this week's Did they really just
say that?
Speaker 2 (00:16):
Sound clips? I'm Nancy Shack, I'm Ben Parker. This is news.
Speaker 3 (00:19):
Bye, I'm so high to follow up on the mining autopen?
Speaker 4 (00:36):
Are those executive orders?
Speaker 3 (00:37):
Those partings from the president?
Speaker 5 (00:39):
Now?
Speaker 4 (00:39):
Nolan point, Well.
Speaker 6 (00:41):
I think so it's not my decision.
Speaker 4 (00:43):
That'll be up to accord.
Speaker 6 (00:45):
But I would say that the Nolan one because I'm
sure Biden didn't have any idea that it would take
you place.
Speaker 7 (00:51):
So the first thing I want to say is democracy
is about more than real elections and majority rules. It's
about people who believe in what already rights.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
And splashdown Crew nine back on Earth. Those poor bastards.
They're up there for nine months orbiting around the Earth
in the space station. And this was the full uh.
This was the full cut from mission control as the
(01:22):
space capsule splashdown right off the coast of Tallahassee, Florida
in the Gulf of America.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
Cut seven A, and we're going to stand by for
splashdown located in the Gulf of America, off the coast
of Tallahassee, Florida, and splashdown Crew nine back on Earth.
Speaker 8 (01:56):
In space Freedom splashdown, and.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
We see main shoots.
Speaker 8 (02:01):
Cut Nick, Alex Butch Sonny on behalf of SpaceX.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
Welcome home, God bless him. Butch and Sonny were supposed
to be up there for a week. That was ten months,
but they were up there for ten months. And it's
interesting because apparently there was a way for them to
come home earlier than being up there for ten months.
(02:27):
Elon Musk said that he offered to go get them
and bring them back, but that was rebuffed. Cut number seven.
Speaker 8 (02:38):
We definitely offered to return the astronauts earlier. There's no
question about that. The astronauts were only supposed to be
there for eight days and they've been there for almost
ten months, so obviously that doesn't make any sense. SpaceX
could have brought the astionals back after a few months
at most, and we made that offer to the Biden administration.
(03:02):
It was rejected for political reasons, and that's just a fact.
Speaker 4 (03:07):
I wondered if Elon Musk.
Speaker 5 (03:09):
Remember a long time Well wasn't that long ago, but
I mean relatively speaking, a long time ago.
Speaker 4 (03:13):
We put that car up in space.
Speaker 2 (03:15):
No, actually I don't remember that.
Speaker 4 (03:17):
Yeah, there was a car.
Speaker 5 (03:17):
They launched the car into space, okay, and it's floating
around up there, and I just thought, hey.
Speaker 2 (03:21):
Use the car.
Speaker 4 (03:22):
He used the car.
Speaker 2 (03:23):
Use the car.
Speaker 4 (03:23):
I mean, what the hell bring it back?
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Well, people are saying, no, why, what do you mean?
Political reasons as simple as this. Elon Musk was a
darling of the Democrats until he discovered he had an
epiphany that they were actually screwing with the American people,
and he decided to support Donald Trump. Once that happened,
he was persona on gratis so when he offered to
(03:45):
bring back the astronauts Butch and Sonny, who were stuck
up there because they're Boeing Starliner, which was you know,
builds under the auspices of the Biden administration and the
Pete Boudajig, the Secretary of Transportation that spent most of
(04:05):
his time on pregnancy leave or basically creating androgynist crash
test dummies. Pay was paying no attention, not holding everybody's
feet to the fire. On quality control. The Boeing Starliner
could not be used because it was broken, and so Musk,
who by this time was supporting Donald Trump, said I
can go get them, bring them back.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
But Biden administration.
Speaker 1 (04:27):
Didn't want that because that would look good on Biden,
I mean, look good on Elon Musk, and thereby, you know,
by association by Trump. So so they didn't do it.
Now people are saying, well, well, and the Democrats are
course are trying to backpedaling. No, no, no, there was
no politics. There, there was no politics. And this is
a funny cut. This is Scott Kelly, who is if
(04:48):
you don't know Mark Kelly. Scott Kelly and Mark Kelly
are twins, and they are both were both astronauts. Mark
Kelly is, in fact a US Senator from may Arizona,
was married to Congressman excuse me, Gifford, and so both
of them are rabid Democrats, very very Democrats. So Scott
Kelly was on Fox trying to say no, no, no, no,
(05:11):
the astronauts weren't stranded for politics. They weren't stranded. But
it sounds like he has no idea what the hell
he's talking about.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
Cut ten A.
Speaker 9 (05:20):
I was watching the previous your previous program of five,
and they're talking about abandoned and that they were stranded
by President Biden. That is not true. They have had
a spacecraft up there since September that was going to
bring them home. They've always had a ride home. And
the decision to keep them up there had nothing to
(05:41):
do with politics.
Speaker 4 (05:42):
It was just the fact.
Speaker 9 (05:43):
That you need crew members to operate the space station,
and they were the two that were there, and you
had to send up a vehicle with two empty seats,
so the safest thing to do was to just leave
them there. But they weren't stranded. They always had a
ride home.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
Okay, does that make sense to anybody would have to
have two empty seats? What do you think was in
the rocket that went up there? Two empty seats to
bring them home and somebody had to run it. Well,
there are other people there, they keep saying. So okay,
I mean it's garbage because they got caught doing something
atrocious for politics, leaving two people stranded in freaking space
(06:21):
for ten months because they didn't want to make Elon
Musk look good.
Speaker 2 (06:24):
That's what happened.
Speaker 5 (06:25):
By the way, I have a bone to pick. I'm
not going to ever let this go, but I'm not
going to keep harping on it either. So when I
first heard the other night when they were coming home
and they said they're going to splash down off the
coast of Tallahassee, I know, a geographic genius, but I'm like,
Tallahassee is not on the ocean, so you wouldn't Why
would you say off the coast of Tallahassee. That would
(06:46):
be like in Massachusetts, instead of saying off the coast
of Boston, saying off the coast of Brockton, Right, I mean,
Tallahassee is a little far away to be saying off
the coast of Tallassee.
Speaker 4 (06:54):
I get it.
Speaker 5 (06:55):
I mean, if you look at the map, Tallahassee's here,
you got some land, then there's the ocean.
Speaker 4 (06:59):
Sure, But I just.
Speaker 1 (07:01):
Actually my guess is I to guess it would just
simply be that it's the closest big landmark that people know.
Speaker 2 (07:07):
Yeah, I get it.
Speaker 4 (07:08):
I know, I show you on the map. So yeah,
it's kind of weird.
Speaker 5 (07:12):
Like I know, like if you were off the coast
of Tampa would out the coast of Tampa.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
But that's but I'm saying that that's probably the closest
big city get it, and that's why, or big landmark.
Speaker 5 (07:21):
Actually I suppose. But just saying off the coast of
Tallahasse sounds funny. It's funny, it does.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
It does sound funny.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
But what what was just fascinating to me was the
fact that you know, this hatred for Elon Musk began
before Doge and is part of the general democratic uh
dysphoria for Donald Trump and and anybody who supports him.
And that to me is just you know, it's an illness,
(07:49):
it's an out and that sickness, and.
Speaker 2 (07:52):
It's it's bizarre.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
And you see it not just in horrible decisions like
that one that was made during the Biden administration, but
do you see it now how the Democrats are kind
of unstable and they are and they are just going,
you know, off a cliff and they apparently are way, way, way,
(08:14):
way out of touch. And every day is a soundcut
showing how bizarre the Democrats are. I'll give you some examples.
This is by you know, we just missed this. This
is Governor Tim Walls. He's on with Gavin Newsom's podcasts
and he basically is talking about how the Democrats lost
(08:37):
young men and voters. And you would think that he's
talking to Gavin Newsom saying this is what because they're
both big Democrats, how do we get them back? But
that's not what he wants to do with those Democrats
that they've lost the young men and of minority and
so forth. Listen to where he thinks they should go.
Cut thirteen A.
Speaker 10 (08:55):
It's a natural reaction. I think it's one of the
reasons we're losing so many men. And again it's multaiet.
It's not just white men. We're losing them. We're losing
them to these guys online. We're losing the people that
I'm bringing on this podcast as well. It's why I
b these.
Speaker 4 (09:07):
Are bad guys though, these guys.
Speaker 10 (09:11):
But they exist, and we could deny the exist.
Speaker 4 (09:13):
They exist.
Speaker 10 (09:14):
Not only they exist, they persist and they're actually influencing
young kids every single day.
Speaker 4 (09:19):
Some of those guys back under a rock.
Speaker 10 (09:21):
I think we have to first understand what their motivations are.
I think we have to understand what they're actually doing.
I don't think that's a racism and misogyny. I think
there's a lot of that, but I don't think it's
exclusively that way, he.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
Wants to push those Democratic voters that defected to Donald
Trump under a rock, not how do we get them back,
Let's push them under a rock. It just shows he's
completely out of touch with the situation that his party
isn't and he's a little bit crazy. Then let we
have Chuck Schumer, Senator Chuck Schumer, who's getting hammered for
(09:54):
supporting the Continuing Resolution from the House, continuing resolution that
has pass the Senate and guarantees government funding until September.
And you went on the view on ABC and he
starts to mock Americans who want to keep their money
and don't want to have to give it back over
to the government.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
Cut eight.
Speaker 11 (10:14):
And you know what their attitude is. I made my
money all by myself. How dare your government take my
money from me. I don't want to pay taxes, or
I've built my company with my bare hands. How dare
your government tell me how I should treat my customers,
the land and water that I own, or my employees.
They hate government. Government's a barrier to people, a barrier
(10:38):
to stop them from doing things.
Speaker 4 (10:40):
They want to destroy it. We are not letting them
do it. And we're united.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
Okay, so God help you if you want to keep
the money that you earn. By the way, I think
that's an ad in the next election, you realize that.
Speaker 5 (10:53):
Right for the Republicans, by the way, I look, you
got to pay taxes, right, I mean, we do have
to on dark government. I think Schumer's wrong on the
part of, look, you can't take all the money. I
have no problem as a as a worker, I don't
have any problem paying taxes. It's when they start raising
them beyond belief and feeing people and and adding them.
Speaker 4 (11:15):
Well, that's actually the point.
Speaker 1 (11:16):
The point is he's making fun of people who say,
I worked hard to create my business.
Speaker 2 (11:20):
You got to be a little lighter on the load.
That's what he says.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
I'm saying people don't want to pay taxes. Well, he's
saying that. He's saying what they want to do. What
they don't want to do is they don't want they
don't like how much they have to pay because they
oh my god, they didn't.
Speaker 2 (11:34):
Just so, if you work hard.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
To create a business, that's you just it's not up
to you, Ben, you didn't worry.
Speaker 4 (11:39):
Well, that's what I'm saying.
Speaker 5 (11:40):
I'm saying Chuck Schumer is out of touch because people
aren't pissed about paying taxes, like I will pay my
taxes and most most people will. It's holy crap, you're
raising them again. You're taking them again for this, I
mean for stupid stuff, stuff, well, for stuff we don't
agree with. So I don't have a problem, and I
don't think most people have problem paying taxes. It's the
fact that you're still more and more.
Speaker 2 (12:01):
Yes, exactly.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
And he's making fun of those people who want to
keep more of their money making, not just saying he
disagrees with them, he's making fun of them. And then
we have Congress from in Jasmine Crockett I believe she's
from Texas, and she's speaking to a group of people
at an event called the I think it's something to
do with illegal immigrants, and she's telling them that we
need illegal immigrants because well, hey, they clean our hotels
(12:26):
and pick our food cut twenty.
Speaker 12 (12:29):
You are sending your kids to college to go and
work on them. Okay, well, guess who is working the
farms so that you can afford your food, so that
you can have food, so that you can have food. Now,
how many of you are looking to send your kids
into hospitality after this college education so.
Speaker 2 (12:46):
That they can go and make the bands at the hotels.
Speaker 12 (12:50):
How many of you are planning to send your kids
to college because that's what we do here.
Speaker 2 (12:54):
We send everybody couch.
Speaker 12 (12:55):
How many of you are planning to senior kids to
college so that they can then.
Speaker 2 (12:59):
Go and build these houses. So the reality is that
so long.
Speaker 12 (13:03):
As we live in a capitalist society, there's always going
to be someone or a group of people that will.
Speaker 2 (13:11):
Do work that someone of resianta want to do.
Speaker 12 (13:14):
These are the people that are really making us great
in this country.
Speaker 1 (13:17):
Oh my god, this is like, I mean, just completely
toned up. Has no idea that she just defended both
the legal aliens and Americans, no idea whatsoever. And then
let's get to the PSA results. Bill Clinton is speaking
at the World Forum on the Future of Democracy. This
isn't Berlin, and he comes out with this geman that
(13:39):
democracy is not just real elections and majority rule.
Speaker 2 (13:44):
I got news for you.
Speaker 1 (13:45):
That's actually the definition of democracy. Cut thirteen B.
Speaker 7 (13:49):
So the first thing I want to say is democracy
is about more than real elections and majority rule. It's
about people who believe in minority rights and individual rights
and restraints on everybody's power.
Speaker 2 (14:11):
Wow, we need to restrain everybody and make sure a
minority rules over the majority.
Speaker 1 (14:18):
Or I don't, but it's that is the frightening globalist view.
Democracy is not about majority rule and about re elections.
Speaker 2 (14:28):
That should tell you.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
And this is why the Democrats lost in twenty twenty four.
This right there, that attitude which is pervasive, and the
fact that they have no idea what it's like for
a majority of Americans on a daily basis, and why
they are offensive to a majority of Americans is why
President Trump want to Manda.
Speaker 5 (14:49):
And let's even go back. Let's go back to twenty sixteen,
which is when Donald Trump first became president. His wife,
Bill Clinton's wife, is why the Democrats lost. That whole
mentality of the Clinton machine, which which by the way,
did used to be a pretty powerful machine. Yeah, you know,
that's where this started. If you look for those who
(15:10):
want to blame people like I don't know how President
Trump got re elected once or twice for that. Well,
first of all, you got Biden who got him back
in the second time, and Kamala Harris and of course
Bill Clinton thrown off garbage like that twenty.
Speaker 4 (15:23):
Sixteen Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 5 (15:25):
You want to blame somebody if you hate Donald Trump,
if you hate Donald Trump, and you want to blame
somebody blame for Donald Trump and his run here in America. Yeah,
I mean, Hillary's got to be like right up near
the top of the list of why why Donald Trump
became who Donald Trump became.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
And they fixed that that year in twenty sixteen, they
fixed the primary to Alice Bernie Sanders, who I think
had such momentum could probably have beaten Trump if they
hadn't fixed it for Hillary.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
And you know, any Hillary was horrific.
Speaker 1 (15:56):
First of all, you had Madlin Albright coming out as
a Hillary Clinton proxy telling women that they were going
to go to hell if they didn't vote for Hillary Clinton.
Ben you had Hillary Clinton at a town hall where
a woman stood up and said, listen, I have a
real problem. I'm trying to buy healthcare. I've been all
over the healthcare website, the marketplace, the Obamaca market Well,
(16:18):
I can't find anything that I can afford.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
I'm in trouble.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
And she's her response was shop harder. And I mean,
this is the kind of attitude that she had that
she was entitled and basket.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
That's the big one.
Speaker 1 (16:31):
I almost thought, you're right, that was the biggest one,
calling half of Americans, you know, they belong in the
basket of deplorables.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
And it's like, okay, so we're deplorable. We don't.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
We can't, you know, because we can't afford healthcare. We're
not trying hard enough. And this is the crest she
I can't agree with you more. She is, in fact,
the reason why the Democrats thought in twenty sixteen and
then they were able to spin, you know, with the COVID,
I think was the undoing of President Trump. If COVID
(17:01):
hadn't happened, I think he would have done two terms
back to back because the economy was going very well.
Speaker 5 (17:07):
Talk about by the way, talk about not learning anything right.
First of all, Donald Trump, this isn't worth anything right,
not saying this is a sexist thing. It's just a
factual thing. Both of his wins came against females, which
is just fact.
Speaker 4 (17:19):
That's it.
Speaker 7 (17:19):
Ye.
Speaker 5 (17:21):
So you've got Hillary Clinton, as we just mentioned, doing
all that garbage and fixing the primaries and all of that.
Now fast forward to twenty twenty four. We fixed who
was going to be the Democratic nominee. Right, we threw
democracy aside and put Kamala in there. Who then her
(17:41):
and the rest of the basket of deplorables on the left,
they're throwing out insults left and right, insulting half of
the politics. Half again, they learned nothing, nothing, And so
if you want to look, you've got two events. Hillary
Clinton screwed it all up or her people and her
bind and then we got we I don't realize said we.
(18:05):
They got Donald Trump out of there, and then four
years after that they made all the same mistakes they
made they put him in the first place in twenty sixteen. Now,
I don't care if you love her hate Donald Trump,
but that's just a fact. They messed it up twice.
Speaker 1 (18:19):
Well, and the big mistake, and you alluded to it,
I think is huge, and that is both times in
twenty sixteen. In this time, they try to force the
party the country to support a woman. And I'm not
saying that a woman can't succeed as president or get
elected as president.
Speaker 2 (18:35):
I think she can.
Speaker 5 (18:36):
I'm glad you said that because you're a woman and
you can get away with that. When a man says
it it's kind of sexist. That's why I had to
prefer you.
Speaker 1 (18:41):
Yeah, and completely, I completely agree with that. But I
think a woman can, the right woman can. But you
cannot force a candidate down somebody's throat because.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
They check a box.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
Because when you do that, and that is the main,
their main, their main criteria, their main the thing that
they're bringing to the ticket is the fact that they're
checking off either as sexes, identity politics. You cannot force
that that American's throat. Now, another woman maybe could have
beaten Donald Trump, but not this woman. And they forced
(19:11):
this woman down the Democratic Party's rote and they ousted
Joe Biden and said primaries, what primaries, We're not going
to use primaries this year, and put Kamala Harrison there,
just like they ousted Bernie Sanders in twenty sixteen and
tried to force the country to take Hillary Clinton. Both times,
they're trying to force an identity candidate. That is not
to say that a woman cannot win the election and
(19:33):
do a superior job as president. She can, but it
has to be the right woman and the country has
to be behind her, and you can't force her because
she's a woman. She has to have the other things
too as well, which neither of these candidates do. She's
going to be smart, she's got to be with it,
and preferably she has to have some kind of feeling
for some of the harder issues. I'll tell you one
(19:54):
of my favorite things that Hillary Clinton said, which is
another reason why I think she failed. She's talking about
how voting she was good at state department stuff, which,
by the way, was state departments a disaster when she
was there. And as a senator, I think she passed
two pieces of legislation. One was about a post office
being renamed and the other one was something similar. And
Chuck Schumer she just signed on to his legislation. But
(20:16):
so she did nothing. And oh, she promised everybody in
New York because she was a senator from New York,
that she would bring in jobs, and they actually lost
jobs while she was in the US Senate. And then
on top of all of that, she is telling everybody
that don't worry, my husband, Bill will be in the
White House with me and he'll take care of the
money things. So she's saying she is no good at
(20:39):
the economy, which is, to be honest with you, seventy
five percent of the job of the president. But she
has her husband for that. And you're wondering why she lost.
I mean because you put it somebody who was not
qualified in there, just because she was a woman. And
you did it in twenty sixteen, and you did it
again in twenty twenty four. So maybe if you learn
a lesson, don't put somebody up just because they're a
(21:01):
glass ceiling breaker. That's not going to work. They have
to have the rest of the package. You cannot force it.
Speaker 5 (21:07):
It's all coming from the party who claims to be
the defenders of democracy. They they buried and threw under
the bus democracy a ton of times. By the way,
big fan of the Democratic Republic. I am, and it's
fine if they are. But they're obviously not. They say
it is. You know, actions speak louder than words. We
(21:27):
love democracy. Hey, watch what we do to democracy as
we toss it right under the bus and run it
over for or five times.
Speaker 2 (21:33):
It's it's amazing.
Speaker 1 (21:34):
Actually it's just it's and then and then on top
of all of that, they have the nerve to say
that Donald Trump's creating a constitutional crisis. Whenever they don't
Democrats don't get their way if there's a constitutional crisis,
basically is what they that they did screaming and then
add to you know, the hardship that the Democrats are
facing right now. DUDEO, no no fault but their own.
(21:55):
They have done this to themselves. It turns out that
the Bible administration was using an autopen, a mechanical pen
that traces the shadow of your signature. I used to
use them when I was up on Capitol Hill.
Speaker 4 (22:09):
You don't want to sign seventeen thousand things, yes, So.
Speaker 1 (22:11):
When you have Christmas cards, or you're sending out a
mass mailing or you know, a donor letter or whatever,
you will use the senators, congressman, and you know, the
cabinet members and the president vice president will use an
auto pen, which is there's a trace felt tip pen
traces your signature on a mechanical arm and that way,
(22:32):
you know, you don't get carpal tunnel syndrome in your
hand when you're trying to sign. But what you don't
do is you don't sign executive orders or pardons or
legislative acts with the autopen.
Speaker 4 (22:46):
You sign yourself.
Speaker 1 (22:47):
You sign yourself, and that's that's and there's usually a
big signing ceremony, and that's what you do, which.
Speaker 4 (22:53):
By the way, which does two things right.
Speaker 5 (22:56):
You can as you mentioned the ceremony, right, you get
to see the pomp and circumstances.
Speaker 4 (22:59):
Sign and everybody does pens.
Speaker 5 (23:01):
They hand out the pens they signed like a quarter
of the signature. And then here you're just a band.
Here's a yeah, exactly so. But the other thing is,
you know when when when a president or as you mentioned,
some of these other people sign something, you can watch them.
There's a look, I'm signing this, I want this toy.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
This is what I'm doing, doing this, I'm doing this,
this is me my decision.
Speaker 5 (23:24):
Right, if you use an auto pen, and I'm look,
most autopen things are done legit and whatever. But you can,
well Christmas time, nobody gives a crap.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
But that's what I'm saying. You may not care about
it doesn't mean it's legit, I guess.
Speaker 5 (23:36):
But but but in some cases, look at an auto pen. Hey,
some guy could just go in the back room and
start signing ship for the president. Hey it's the president signed.
Speaker 4 (23:43):
Oh, everybody gets anybody.
Speaker 1 (23:45):
And I can tell you that as as somebody working
I worked, I worked for Senator Eagleton. I worked for
Senator Abresk, and I worked for the Senate like Commute
on any affairs, and I had to use auto pens
in all three of those places.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (23:58):
I mean, I was told to use the a pen
on this I did by somebody. I have no idea
if the senators or if the head of the committee knew.
Speaker 2 (24:05):
What I was doing. I was told to do it
by my boss.
Speaker 5 (24:07):
I did you have side executive orders? Thank you for
doing that. So you can't use an autopen for something
big in effect.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
And by the way, just asn't aside. Do you know
who invented the autopen, Bill Clinton? No, Thomas Jefferson, really
look for him. Thomas Jefferson basically invented the Essentially the
incarnation of the autopen we used today is a little
bit different. There was no obviously there's no light involved
in a shadow. But what they did do is like,
(24:37):
for instance, the autopen that Jefferson used, it was like
your pen would be attached to a second pen, and
so when you wrote, the pen would write next to you,
and so it would do two copies. It was their
way of you know, making a second copy.
Speaker 4 (24:52):
More like a carbon copy signature.
Speaker 2 (24:54):
Yeah, he did that.
Speaker 1 (24:55):
And he also would put wet paper underneath something he
was writing on and so the ink would through and
create a carbon copy. Thomas Jefferson was a freaking genius.
Actually he did a lot of stuff. But I digress
in any event, so we yes, I'm sorry. So we
had this autopen controversy because it turns out and this
is from people in the Biden administration. Okay, this is
(25:16):
not this is this is not somebody from Trump's group
coming up.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
Hey, hey, wait a minute.
Speaker 1 (25:22):
This is people who were concerned at the time going
they're using that autopen for things that should not be used.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
And this came out.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
Now the cut you heard in the open is a
reporter asking President Trump on Air Force one. That's why
it's very hard to hear, but you can hear it
if you listen hard. It's they're on Air Force one,
and a reporter says, basically, so to follow up on
the Biden autopen, are those pardons that were signed by.
Speaker 2 (25:46):
The autopen now null and void?
Speaker 1 (25:49):
And President Trump responds, cut one.
Speaker 3 (25:54):
To follow up on the line, and the autopen are
those executive orders those partings from the president now Nolan will.
Speaker 4 (26:01):
I think so it's not my decision.
Speaker 6 (26:04):
That'll be up to Accord, but I would say that
the Nolan would because I'm sure Biden didn't have any
idea that it would take you Plaze and somebody who
was using an autopen to sign off and to give
partners to as an example, it's just one example, but
the JA six Unselect Committee they gave think of it,
(26:25):
they gave partons with anopen I don't think Biden knew
anything about it.
Speaker 4 (26:29):
I think that's the biggest deal right there.
Speaker 2 (26:31):
Exactly exactly.
Speaker 1 (26:32):
I think that what happens is they become fraudulent.
Speaker 2 (26:35):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
This has to be He's right, it has to be litigated.
It has to go right into the Supreme Court to
make the decision. But if somebody else has the autopen machine,
he didn't have to know anything about it, and without
proof that he knew about it, are they fraudulent or not?
Speaker 2 (26:46):
That's the question.
Speaker 5 (26:47):
If Joe was sitting there eating the bag of Cheetos
watching the auto pen sign all the pardons, then you'd
be all right, I'll find you.
Speaker 1 (26:52):
Just didn't want to sign because well still you still
still might be if he but you have a much
better case if you knew it was happening.
Speaker 2 (27:00):
But there's no proof he did know.
Speaker 4 (27:01):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (27:02):
And this is in the White House Press room, as
seen as Kaitlin Collins asks Carolyn Levitt, the White House
Press Secretary, have attorneys here at the White House told
President Trump that he has the legal authority to undo
the party. That's a different question. She's saying, you know,
I think what President Trump is saying is that they're fraudulent.
(27:23):
He's not going to undo them. They're fraudulent if he
didn't sign them, if they're signed by an autopen. And what
Caitlyn Collins is asking is like, well, is he going
to go back? And he's She's trying to put the
onus on Trump, saying, is he going to go back
and declare them null and void? That's cut one.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
Have attorneys here at.
Speaker 4 (27:40):
The White House told President Trump that.
Speaker 13 (27:42):
He is the legal authority to undo a pardon simply
because it was.
Speaker 10 (27:46):
Signed by autopen As he said.
Speaker 13 (27:49):
The President was begging the question that I think a
lot of journalists in this room should be asking about
whether or not the former president of the United States,
who I think we can all finally agree was cognitively impaired.
I know it took people some time to finally admit that,
but we all know that to be true, as evidence
by his disastrous debate performance against President Trump during the campaign.
(28:10):
I digress on that, but the President was raising the
point that did the president even know about these pardons?
Was his legal signature used without his consent or knowledge?
Speaker 1 (28:22):
Directly to your point, directly, that's the issue at hand.
Speaker 2 (28:26):
And then she went on to finish your response cut to.
Speaker 13 (28:29):
A not just the president or me raising those questions, Caitlin.
According to The New York Post, there are Biden officials
from the previous White House who raised those questions and
wondered if the President was even consulted about his legally
binding signature being signed onto documents. And so I think
it's a question that everybody in this room should be
looking into, because certainly that would propose perhaps criminal or
(28:53):
illegal behavior if staff members were signing the President of
the United States autograph without his consent.
Speaker 5 (29:00):
You know, it's not always the impropriety, it's the appearance
of impropriety that you know is really bad.
Speaker 4 (29:07):
Right, You don't know all the time, but if it looks.
Speaker 5 (29:10):
Like it's smelly and stinky, then everybody's gonna believe it's
smelly and stinky even if it wasn't.
Speaker 4 (29:14):
Here's the problem.
Speaker 5 (29:16):
If you're auto penning these pardons, what else a year
ago was autopened? Because now everything he signed that we
didn't see him sign at a desk, at a ceremony, you
could make the argument did he actually.
Speaker 1 (29:32):
Sign, Well, you can also make the argument he didn't
know what he was signing. Well, that's true, and if
you saw him and I think what you said is correct.
The appearance of impropriety is a big issue, but in
this case, the impropriety itself is also a big issue.
So this is two tiered. It's the appearance and it's
the impropriety. I think there's there's multiple things to be
litigated here, and they're going to have to do it
(29:52):
because there's a lot of there's a lot of things
that are are questionable now that we know that President
Biden was a lot worse than we thought he was,
that they kept it hidden, and that even the mainstream
media is now admitting to all of that.
Speaker 5 (30:07):
Here's one of the problems, and I want to say
this carefully, but it's almost at a point though, where
you might say, hoy much we could do about it,
because here's the problem. Just like with the Remember the
special counselor came out and said that when he talked
to Biden that Biden was an old sympathetic your man
and with you.
Speaker 1 (30:24):
Memory issue to charge right right, So if you're going.
Speaker 5 (30:27):
To look into this stuff, you certainly can't rely on
Joe Biden helping you by questioning him or so. I
don't know, I mean, is it even Let me ask
this question and you can respond to other people at home,
can scream with the radio, whatever, is it even really
worth pursuing at this point? It is because the guy
who's accused of it, or the guy whose auto signature
(30:48):
was is useless in any kind of testimony.
Speaker 1 (30:51):
It is worth pursuing because he is he is not
the only source of information.
Speaker 2 (30:55):
There are other sources of cocculus.
Speaker 1 (30:57):
And which are important and too. It's important to lay down,
I think, to judicate it so that it doesn't happen again,
so that it's known that don't even think about using
the autopen.
Speaker 5 (31:07):
Because if someone if someone accused me of using me
right now today, accused me of using an autopen or
an autopen being used to sign stuff. You could ask me, hey,
did you know they were using the autopen and I'd
be like, yeah, I knew they told me or no,
I didn't know, or who signed?
Speaker 4 (31:20):
What? What did I do?
Speaker 12 (31:22):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (31:22):
But you can't get that from a Captain Biden.
Speaker 1 (31:25):
No, but you can get it from the people around
Captain Biden. And that's who you're gonna have to talk to,
you don't. You don't get information from the murder victim
they're dead. You get it from everybody around them. And
the same thing is true here. Biden's autopen, So so
he could be you know exactly he could be. You
can take him out of the equation and still put
together a case from people around him.
Speaker 2 (31:43):
You don't have to talk to him directly.
Speaker 4 (31:44):
We need now, now, we need a movie. Yeah, auto Pen.
Speaker 2 (31:48):
I would love it. I would love it.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
You know, it's kind of like the Sharknado series.
Speaker 2 (31:51):
Yes, the auto pen. He's running across country signing things.
Is it their autopen or is it their real segment?
Speaker 4 (31:58):
Joe Biden just bought a house in wyom No idea.
Why it could.
Speaker 2 (32:02):
Be really Oh I'm loving this, this could be really good.
Speaker 1 (32:06):
We end we're ending each week because we don't have
bidenisms anymore because nobody's actually seen Joe Biden since he
left the White House. So I'm telling you, as soon
as he opens his mouth anywhere, I'm going to have
it for you.
Speaker 2 (32:16):
But he hasn't so.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
Lately.
Speaker 2 (32:19):
No, he left the auto pen behind.
Speaker 1 (32:22):
So it's we've been ending the show with the truth
or Troll, and we've been using President Trump. Doesn't have
to be President Trump, but President Trump is a master troller.
So he he is just ripe for truth or troll,
and he says these things and you have to stop
and think is he serious or is he just screwing
with me? And in this case, he's on Fox News.
(32:42):
He's doing an interview with Laura Ingram and he's talking
about you know, they're talking. The conversation was about selling,
you know, green cards, and how his plan is to
sell what he's what they're calling gold cards, because you're
going to sell for five million dollars to extremely wealthy
people who are responsible for multi million dollar investments in
the country, and who are going to bring top keep
(33:04):
top notch talent like Wharton graduates in the country, and
this will help pay her down our debt and help
create jobs in the US. That that's his plan, and
so this is what they're talking about. But he says
there might be an alternate name for that gold card.
Cut five all.
Speaker 14 (33:20):
Call it either the gold card. The problem is is
mini gold cards. Well, I will tell you what my
people want to call it. It'll drive you crazy, It'll
drive the left crazy. They want to call it the
Trump card because the Trump card sells much better than
the gold card.
Speaker 5 (33:36):
Huh, well, trump card is actually used in cards. I mean,
when you're playing cards and you're playing, say like spades,
you can you can trump.
Speaker 1 (33:43):
Is it going to Are they going to rename the
immigration status card as a Trump card or.
Speaker 2 (33:50):
Is it going to be the gold card as opposed
to the green cards?
Speaker 4 (33:52):
As funny as that is, as you think he is.
Speaker 2 (33:56):
You think it's a truck. Do you think it's not?
Speaker 4 (33:57):
Well, I mean, look, maybe somebody serious about it. Don't
get me wrong, I'm talking about him.
Speaker 2 (34:02):
I'm not talking about anybody.
Speaker 4 (34:03):
Well, people about.
Speaker 2 (34:04):
Invading Greenland too, But I don't think we're going.
Speaker 8 (34:06):
To do it.
Speaker 5 (34:07):
I think some of his people, as he says, my
people want to call it the Trump card. I think
that part's true. That's not true.
Speaker 4 (34:13):
I think that did.
Speaker 2 (34:14):
But that's not the question.
Speaker 1 (34:15):
The question is do you do you think they're going
to call it? No, yeah, I think they are. I
think they are going to because listen, Ace, we just
we just changed the name of Golf of Mexico to
Golf of America. I would not be really surprised if
all of a sudden, the Trump Card was your levels
on your immigration status.
Speaker 2 (34:33):
Of course, as soon as a Democrat gets back in office.
Speaker 4 (34:35):
They'll change it.
Speaker 1 (34:35):
Fact, but I think for I think for the next
couple of years, it might in fact be called the
Trump Card.
Speaker 2 (34:40):
I have the Trump Card.
Speaker 1 (34:42):
I think that was truth, and it's the first time
I thought he was telling the truth since we started
doing this, I think the rest have been completely troll
So I think this one could be true.
Speaker 12 (34:50):
We'll find out.
Speaker 4 (34:50):
Why don't the Gulf of Trump.
Speaker 2 (34:53):
I think he thought that was just his ghost too far.
Speaker 5 (34:56):
Instead of a renaming Denali Mount McKinley again, he could
have called it Mount Trump.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
Well, that I'd be more surprised.
Speaker 1 (35:02):
You know, I'm waiting for the for the for the
for Reagan Airport to become Trump Airport right now, by
the way, Washington or Dulles to become Trump Airport.
Speaker 5 (35:11):
Uh, now's the time, excuse me, now's the time uh
to get the Trump face up on Mount Rushmore because
probably no one else will.
Speaker 1 (35:19):
Do they we looked into cold and the mountain can't
handle another face.
Speaker 2 (35:23):
It's it faced out, it's face, it's faced out right as.
Speaker 1 (35:28):
As many maybe start a new mountain. Maybe North Dakota
could use the help. I think we started new a
new National park in North Dakota because they're pretty pissed
that South Dakota gets all the tororism, and so they
think it's down to the fact that because they have
North in their name.
Speaker 2 (35:40):
I think it's because they got Mount Rushmore. But it's
that's just me.
Speaker 5 (35:43):
Can we take can we you know we talked, they've
talked about invading Canada and Greenland and all these other
places that they're gonna take awaver.
Speaker 2 (35:49):
On the border. We can do like the Trump has anybody.
Speaker 5 (35:52):
Has anybody thought, why don't we just annex Eastern Island
and put presidential faces all over those those heads they
got popping out to the ground there.
Speaker 2 (36:00):
You want to go to Easter Island.
Speaker 1 (36:02):
No, I'm just I'm just saying you got where people
want to go, all you do is carve them. Yeah,
at least in North Dakota, they can just drive there.
Easter Island, they gotta get on a plane, a boat.
It's you know, it's a mask.
Speaker 4 (36:11):
By the way. I would, I would.
Speaker 5 (36:12):
I would make the argument that the average American just
in the middle of nowhere whatever, like the average person,
uh want to go on a vacation to Easter Island
or the Dakota's. I think people would say East Island,
give them a free I'd.
Speaker 2 (36:23):
Rather go to Dakota's because I want to see Matt Rushmore.
I've never seen it.
Speaker 4 (36:26):
I want to go in December.
Speaker 2 (36:27):
Well I prefer not to go in December, but I'll go.
I'm happy to go. I'll go with you know, I
got no problem. I'm happy to go to South Dakota.
I like to see the Black Hills. Anyway.
Speaker 1 (36:37):
If you think let me know if you think President
Trump is telling the truth or trolling when he says
that the new immigration set US will be called the
Trump Card. You can contact Ben and I on x
at news by three or on Facebook at news Byte.
We update and put a new episode up every single week,
so check back next week and see what our new
offerings are.
Speaker 2 (36:56):
Meanwhile, have a great week. I'm Nancy Shack.
Speaker 4 (36:59):
Have whatever, had a week you want? I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 2 (37:01):
This is Newspite
Did you know auto pens can pardon people, or that
democracy is not free elections and majority rule, or that
the astronauts were not stranded in space for nine months
because the last administration was playing politics. There were a
lot of revelations in this week's Did they really just
say that?
Speaker 2 (00:16):
Sound clips? I'm Nancy Shack, I'm Ben Parker. This is news.
Speaker 3 (00:19):
Bye, I'm so high to follow up on the mining autopen?
Speaker 4 (00:36):
Are those executive orders?
Speaker 3 (00:37):
Those partings from the president?
Speaker 5 (00:39):
Now?
Speaker 4 (00:39):
Nolan point, Well.
Speaker 6 (00:41):
I think so it's not my decision.
Speaker 4 (00:43):
That'll be up to accord.
Speaker 6 (00:45):
But I would say that the Nolan one because I'm
sure Biden didn't have any idea that it would take
you place.
Speaker 7 (00:51):
So the first thing I want to say is democracy
is about more than real elections and majority rules. It's
about people who believe in what already rights.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
And splashdown Crew nine back on Earth. Those poor bastards.
They're up there for nine months orbiting around the Earth
in the space station. And this was the full uh.
This was the full cut from mission control as the
(01:22):
space capsule splashdown right off the coast of Tallahassee, Florida
in the Gulf of America.
Speaker 2 (01:28):
Cut seven A, and we're going to stand by for
splashdown located in the Gulf of America, off the coast
of Tallahassee, Florida, and splashdown Crew nine back on Earth.
Speaker 8 (01:56):
In space Freedom splashdown, and.
Speaker 1 (02:00):
We see main shoots.
Speaker 8 (02:01):
Cut Nick, Alex Butch Sonny on behalf of SpaceX.
Speaker 1 (02:06):
Welcome home, God bless him. Butch and Sonny were supposed
to be up there for a week. That was ten months,
but they were up there for ten months. And it's
interesting because apparently there was a way for them to
come home earlier than being up there for ten months.
(02:27):
Elon Musk said that he offered to go get them
and bring them back, but that was rebuffed. Cut number seven.
Speaker 8 (02:38):
We definitely offered to return the astronauts earlier. There's no
question about that. The astronauts were only supposed to be
there for eight days and they've been there for almost
ten months, so obviously that doesn't make any sense. SpaceX
could have brought the astionals back after a few months
at most, and we made that offer to the Biden administration.
(03:02):
It was rejected for political reasons, and that's just a fact.
Speaker 4 (03:07):
I wondered if Elon Musk.
Speaker 5 (03:09):
Remember a long time Well wasn't that long ago, but
I mean relatively speaking, a long time ago.
Speaker 4 (03:13):
We put that car up in space.
Speaker 2 (03:15):
No, actually I don't remember that.
Speaker 4 (03:17):
Yeah, there was a car.
Speaker 5 (03:17):
They launched the car into space, okay, and it's floating
around up there, and I just thought, hey.
Speaker 2 (03:21):
Use the car.
Speaker 4 (03:22):
He used the car.
Speaker 2 (03:23):
Use the car.
Speaker 4 (03:23):
I mean, what the hell bring it back?
Speaker 1 (03:25):
Well, people are saying, no, why, what do you mean?
Political reasons as simple as this. Elon Musk was a
darling of the Democrats until he discovered he had an
epiphany that they were actually screwing with the American people,
and he decided to support Donald Trump. Once that happened,
he was persona on gratis so when he offered to
(03:45):
bring back the astronauts Butch and Sonny, who were stuck
up there because they're Boeing Starliner, which was you know,
builds under the auspices of the Biden administration and the
Pete Boudajig, the Secretary of Transportation that spent most of
(04:05):
his time on pregnancy leave or basically creating androgynist crash
test dummies. Pay was paying no attention, not holding everybody's
feet to the fire. On quality control. The Boeing Starliner
could not be used because it was broken, and so Musk,
who by this time was supporting Donald Trump, said I
can go get them, bring them back.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
But Biden administration.
Speaker 1 (04:27):
Didn't want that because that would look good on Biden,
I mean, look good on Elon Musk, and thereby, you know,
by association by Trump. So so they didn't do it.
Now people are saying, well, well, and the Democrats are
course are trying to backpedaling. No, no, no, there was
no politics. There, there was no politics. And this is
a funny cut. This is Scott Kelly, who is if
(04:48):
you don't know Mark Kelly. Scott Kelly and Mark Kelly
are twins, and they are both were both astronauts. Mark
Kelly is, in fact a US Senator from may Arizona,
was married to Congressman excuse me, Gifford, and so both
of them are rabid Democrats, very very Democrats. So Scott
Kelly was on Fox trying to say no, no, no, no,
(05:11):
the astronauts weren't stranded for politics. They weren't stranded. But
it sounds like he has no idea what the hell
he's talking about.
Speaker 2 (05:18):
Cut ten A.
Speaker 9 (05:20):
I was watching the previous your previous program of five,
and they're talking about abandoned and that they were stranded
by President Biden. That is not true. They have had
a spacecraft up there since September that was going to
bring them home. They've always had a ride home. And
the decision to keep them up there had nothing to
(05:41):
do with politics.
Speaker 4 (05:42):
It was just the fact.
Speaker 9 (05:43):
That you need crew members to operate the space station,
and they were the two that were there, and you
had to send up a vehicle with two empty seats,
so the safest thing to do was to just leave
them there. But they weren't stranded. They always had a
ride home.
Speaker 1 (05:58):
Okay, does that make sense to anybody would have to
have two empty seats? What do you think was in
the rocket that went up there? Two empty seats to
bring them home and somebody had to run it. Well,
there are other people there, they keep saying. So okay,
I mean it's garbage because they got caught doing something
atrocious for politics, leaving two people stranded in freaking space
(06:21):
for ten months because they didn't want to make Elon
Musk look good.
Speaker 2 (06:24):
That's what happened.
Speaker 5 (06:25):
By the way, I have a bone to pick. I'm
not going to ever let this go, but I'm not
going to keep harping on it either. So when I
first heard the other night when they were coming home
and they said they're going to splash down off the
coast of Tallahassee, I know, a geographic genius, but I'm like,
Tallahassee is not on the ocean, so you wouldn't Why
would you say off the coast of Tallahassee. That would
(06:46):
be like in Massachusetts, instead of saying off the coast
of Boston, saying off the coast of Brockton, Right, I mean,
Tallahassee is a little far away to be saying off
the coast of Tallassee.
Speaker 4 (06:54):
I get it.
Speaker 5 (06:55):
I mean, if you look at the map, Tallahassee's here,
you got some land, then there's the ocean.
Speaker 4 (06:59):
Sure, But I just.
Speaker 1 (07:01):
Actually my guess is I to guess it would just
simply be that it's the closest big landmark that people know.
Speaker 2 (07:07):
Yeah, I get it.
Speaker 4 (07:08):
I know, I show you on the map. So yeah,
it's kind of weird.
Speaker 5 (07:12):
Like I know, like if you were off the coast
of Tampa would out the coast of Tampa.
Speaker 1 (07:15):
But that's but I'm saying that that's probably the closest
big city get it, and that's why, or big landmark.
Speaker 5 (07:21):
Actually I suppose. But just saying off the coast of
Tallahasse sounds funny. It's funny, it does.
Speaker 2 (07:27):
It does sound funny.
Speaker 1 (07:28):
But what what was just fascinating to me was the
fact that you know, this hatred for Elon Musk began
before Doge and is part of the general democratic uh
dysphoria for Donald Trump and and anybody who supports him.
And that to me is just you know, it's an illness,
(07:49):
it's an out and that sickness, and.
Speaker 2 (07:52):
It's it's bizarre.
Speaker 1 (07:54):
And you see it not just in horrible decisions like
that one that was made during the Biden administration, but
do you see it now how the Democrats are kind
of unstable and they are and they are just going,
you know, off a cliff and they apparently are way, way, way,
(08:14):
way out of touch. And every day is a soundcut
showing how bizarre the Democrats are. I'll give you some examples.
This is by you know, we just missed this. This
is Governor Tim Walls. He's on with Gavin Newsom's podcasts
and he basically is talking about how the Democrats lost
(08:37):
young men and voters. And you would think that he's
talking to Gavin Newsom saying this is what because they're
both big Democrats, how do we get them back? But
that's not what he wants to do with those Democrats
that they've lost the young men and of minority and
so forth. Listen to where he thinks they should go.
Cut thirteen A.
Speaker 10 (08:55):
It's a natural reaction. I think it's one of the
reasons we're losing so many men. And again it's multaiet.
It's not just white men. We're losing them. We're losing
them to these guys online. We're losing the people that
I'm bringing on this podcast as well. It's why I
b these.
Speaker 4 (09:07):
Are bad guys though, these guys.
Speaker 10 (09:11):
But they exist, and we could deny the exist.
Speaker 4 (09:13):
They exist.
Speaker 10 (09:14):
Not only they exist, they persist and they're actually influencing
young kids every single day.
Speaker 4 (09:19):
Some of those guys back under a rock.
Speaker 10 (09:21):
I think we have to first understand what their motivations are.
I think we have to understand what they're actually doing.
I don't think that's a racism and misogyny. I think
there's a lot of that, but I don't think it's
exclusively that way, he.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
Wants to push those Democratic voters that defected to Donald
Trump under a rock, not how do we get them back,
Let's push them under a rock. It just shows he's
completely out of touch with the situation that his party
isn't and he's a little bit crazy. Then let we
have Chuck Schumer, Senator Chuck Schumer, who's getting hammered for
(09:54):
supporting the Continuing Resolution from the House, continuing resolution that
has pass the Senate and guarantees government funding until September.
And you went on the view on ABC and he
starts to mock Americans who want to keep their money
and don't want to have to give it back over
to the government.
Speaker 2 (10:13):
Cut eight.
Speaker 11 (10:14):
And you know what their attitude is. I made my
money all by myself. How dare your government take my
money from me. I don't want to pay taxes, or
I've built my company with my bare hands. How dare
your government tell me how I should treat my customers,
the land and water that I own, or my employees.
They hate government. Government's a barrier to people, a barrier
(10:38):
to stop them from doing things.
Speaker 4 (10:40):
They want to destroy it. We are not letting them
do it. And we're united.
Speaker 1 (10:43):
Okay, so God help you if you want to keep
the money that you earn. By the way, I think
that's an ad in the next election, you realize that.
Speaker 5 (10:53):
Right for the Republicans, by the way, I look, you
got to pay taxes, right, I mean, we do have
to on dark government. I think Schumer's wrong on the
part of, look, you can't take all the money. I
have no problem as a as a worker, I don't
have any problem paying taxes. It's when they start raising
them beyond belief and feeing people and and adding them.
Speaker 4 (11:15):
Well, that's actually the point.
Speaker 1 (11:16):
The point is he's making fun of people who say,
I worked hard to create my business.
Speaker 2 (11:20):
You got to be a little lighter on the load.
That's what he says.
Speaker 1 (11:23):
I'm saying people don't want to pay taxes. Well, he's
saying that. He's saying what they want to do. What
they don't want to do is they don't want they
don't like how much they have to pay because they
oh my god, they didn't.
Speaker 2 (11:34):
Just so, if you work hard.
Speaker 1 (11:35):
To create a business, that's you just it's not up
to you, Ben, you didn't worry.
Speaker 4 (11:39):
Well, that's what I'm saying.
Speaker 5 (11:40):
I'm saying Chuck Schumer is out of touch because people
aren't pissed about paying taxes, like I will pay my
taxes and most most people will. It's holy crap, you're
raising them again. You're taking them again for this, I
mean for stupid stuff, stuff, well, for stuff we don't
agree with. So I don't have a problem, and I
don't think most people have problem paying taxes. It's the
fact that you're still more and more.
Speaker 2 (12:01):
Yes, exactly.
Speaker 1 (12:02):
And he's making fun of those people who want to
keep more of their money making, not just saying he
disagrees with them, he's making fun of them. And then
we have Congress from in Jasmine Crockett I believe she's
from Texas, and she's speaking to a group of people
at an event called the I think it's something to
do with illegal immigrants, and she's telling them that we
need illegal immigrants because well, hey, they clean our hotels
(12:26):
and pick our food cut twenty.
Speaker 12 (12:29):
You are sending your kids to college to go and
work on them. Okay, well, guess who is working the
farms so that you can afford your food, so that
you can have food, so that you can have food. Now,
how many of you are looking to send your kids
into hospitality after this college education so.
Speaker 2 (12:46):
That they can go and make the bands at the hotels.
Speaker 12 (12:50):
How many of you are planning to send your kids
to college because that's what we do here.
Speaker 2 (12:54):
We send everybody couch.
Speaker 12 (12:55):
How many of you are planning to senior kids to
college so that they can then.
Speaker 2 (12:59):
Go and build these houses. So the reality is that
so long.
Speaker 12 (13:03):
As we live in a capitalist society, there's always going
to be someone or a group of people that will.
Speaker 2 (13:11):
Do work that someone of resianta want to do.
Speaker 12 (13:14):
These are the people that are really making us great
in this country.
Speaker 1 (13:17):
Oh my god, this is like, I mean, just completely
toned up. Has no idea that she just defended both
the legal aliens and Americans, no idea whatsoever. And then
let's get to the PSA results. Bill Clinton is speaking
at the World Forum on the Future of Democracy. This
isn't Berlin, and he comes out with this geman that
(13:39):
democracy is not just real elections and majority rule.
Speaker 2 (13:44):
I got news for you.
Speaker 1 (13:45):
That's actually the definition of democracy. Cut thirteen B.
Speaker 7 (13:49):
So the first thing I want to say is democracy
is about more than real elections and majority rule. It's
about people who believe in minority rights and individual rights
and restraints on everybody's power.
Speaker 2 (14:11):
Wow, we need to restrain everybody and make sure a
minority rules over the majority.
Speaker 1 (14:18):
Or I don't, but it's that is the frightening globalist view.
Democracy is not about majority rule and about re elections.
Speaker 2 (14:28):
That should tell you.
Speaker 1 (14:29):
And this is why the Democrats lost in twenty twenty four.
This right there, that attitude which is pervasive, and the
fact that they have no idea what it's like for
a majority of Americans on a daily basis, and why
they are offensive to a majority of Americans is why
President Trump want to Manda.
Speaker 5 (14:49):
And let's even go back. Let's go back to twenty sixteen,
which is when Donald Trump first became president. His wife,
Bill Clinton's wife, is why the Democrats lost. That whole
mentality of the Clinton machine, which which by the way,
did used to be a pretty powerful machine. Yeah, you know,
that's where this started. If you look for those who
(15:10):
want to blame people like I don't know how President
Trump got re elected once or twice for that. Well,
first of all, you got Biden who got him back
in the second time, and Kamala Harris and of course
Bill Clinton thrown off garbage like that twenty.
Speaker 4 (15:23):
Sixteen Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 5 (15:25):
You want to blame somebody if you hate Donald Trump,
if you hate Donald Trump, and you want to blame
somebody blame for Donald Trump and his run here in America. Yeah,
I mean, Hillary's got to be like right up near
the top of the list of why why Donald Trump
became who Donald Trump became.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
And they fixed that that year in twenty sixteen, they
fixed the primary to Alice Bernie Sanders, who I think
had such momentum could probably have beaten Trump if they
hadn't fixed it for Hillary.
Speaker 2 (15:54):
And you know, any Hillary was horrific.
Speaker 1 (15:56):
First of all, you had Madlin Albright coming out as
a Hillary Clinton proxy telling women that they were going
to go to hell if they didn't vote for Hillary Clinton.
Ben you had Hillary Clinton at a town hall where
a woman stood up and said, listen, I have a
real problem. I'm trying to buy healthcare. I've been all
over the healthcare website, the marketplace, the Obamaca market Well,
(16:18):
I can't find anything that I can afford.
Speaker 2 (16:20):
I'm in trouble.
Speaker 1 (16:20):
And she's her response was shop harder. And I mean,
this is the kind of attitude that she had that
she was entitled and basket.
Speaker 2 (16:30):
That's the big one.
Speaker 1 (16:31):
I almost thought, you're right, that was the biggest one,
calling half of Americans, you know, they belong in the
basket of deplorables.
Speaker 2 (16:37):
And it's like, okay, so we're deplorable. We don't.
Speaker 1 (16:40):
We can't, you know, because we can't afford healthcare. We're
not trying hard enough. And this is the crest she
I can't agree with you more. She is, in fact,
the reason why the Democrats thought in twenty sixteen and
then they were able to spin, you know, with the COVID,
I think was the undoing of President Trump. If COVID
(17:01):
hadn't happened, I think he would have done two terms
back to back because the economy was going very well.
Speaker 5 (17:07):
Talk about by the way, talk about not learning anything right.
First of all, Donald Trump, this isn't worth anything right,
not saying this is a sexist thing. It's just a
factual thing. Both of his wins came against females, which
is just fact.
Speaker 4 (17:19):
That's it.
Speaker 7 (17:19):
Ye.
Speaker 5 (17:21):
So you've got Hillary Clinton, as we just mentioned, doing
all that garbage and fixing the primaries and all of that.
Now fast forward to twenty twenty four. We fixed who
was going to be the Democratic nominee. Right, we threw
democracy aside and put Kamala in there. Who then her
(17:41):
and the rest of the basket of deplorables on the left,
they're throwing out insults left and right, insulting half of
the politics. Half again, they learned nothing, nothing, And so
if you want to look, you've got two events. Hillary
Clinton screwed it all up or her people and her
bind and then we got we I don't realize said we.
(18:05):
They got Donald Trump out of there, and then four
years after that they made all the same mistakes they
made they put him in the first place in twenty sixteen. Now,
I don't care if you love her hate Donald Trump,
but that's just a fact. They messed it up twice.
Speaker 1 (18:19):
Well, and the big mistake, and you alluded to it,
I think is huge, and that is both times in
twenty sixteen. In this time, they try to force the
party the country to support a woman. And I'm not
saying that a woman can't succeed as president or get
elected as president.
Speaker 2 (18:35):
I think she can.
Speaker 5 (18:36):
I'm glad you said that because you're a woman and
you can get away with that. When a man says
it it's kind of sexist. That's why I had to
prefer you.
Speaker 1 (18:41):
Yeah, and completely, I completely agree with that. But I
think a woman can, the right woman can. But you
cannot force a candidate down somebody's throat because.
Speaker 2 (18:50):
They check a box.
Speaker 1 (18:51):
Because when you do that, and that is the main,
their main, their main criteria, their main the thing that
they're bringing to the ticket is the fact that they're
checking off either as sexes, identity politics. You cannot force
that that American's throat. Now, another woman maybe could have
beaten Donald Trump, but not this woman. And they forced
(19:11):
this woman down the Democratic Party's rote and they ousted
Joe Biden and said primaries, what primaries, We're not going
to use primaries this year, and put Kamala Harrison there,
just like they ousted Bernie Sanders in twenty sixteen and
tried to force the country to take Hillary Clinton. Both times,
they're trying to force an identity candidate. That is not
to say that a woman cannot win the election and
(19:33):
do a superior job as president. She can, but it
has to be the right woman and the country has
to be behind her, and you can't force her because
she's a woman. She has to have the other things
too as well, which neither of these candidates do. She's
going to be smart, she's got to be with it,
and preferably she has to have some kind of feeling
for some of the harder issues. I'll tell you one
(19:54):
of my favorite things that Hillary Clinton said, which is
another reason why I think she failed. She's talking about
how voting she was good at state department stuff, which,
by the way, was state departments a disaster when she
was there. And as a senator, I think she passed
two pieces of legislation. One was about a post office
being renamed and the other one was something similar. And
Chuck Schumer she just signed on to his legislation. But
(20:16):
so she did nothing. And oh, she promised everybody in
New York because she was a senator from New York,
that she would bring in jobs, and they actually lost
jobs while she was in the US Senate. And then
on top of all of that, she is telling everybody
that don't worry, my husband, Bill will be in the
White House with me and he'll take care of the
money things. So she's saying she is no good at
(20:39):
the economy, which is, to be honest with you, seventy
five percent of the job of the president. But she
has her husband for that. And you're wondering why she lost.
I mean because you put it somebody who was not
qualified in there, just because she was a woman. And
you did it in twenty sixteen, and you did it
again in twenty twenty four. So maybe if you learn
a lesson, don't put somebody up just because they're a
(21:01):
glass ceiling breaker. That's not going to work. They have
to have the rest of the package. You cannot force it.
Speaker 5 (21:07):
It's all coming from the party who claims to be
the defenders of democracy. They they buried and threw under
the bus democracy a ton of times. By the way,
big fan of the Democratic Republic. I am, and it's
fine if they are. But they're obviously not. They say
it is. You know, actions speak louder than words. We
(21:27):
love democracy. Hey, watch what we do to democracy as
we toss it right under the bus and run it
over for or five times.
Speaker 2 (21:33):
It's it's amazing.
Speaker 1 (21:34):
Actually it's just it's and then and then on top
of all of that, they have the nerve to say
that Donald Trump's creating a constitutional crisis. Whenever they don't
Democrats don't get their way if there's a constitutional crisis,
basically is what they that they did screaming and then
add to you know, the hardship that the Democrats are
facing right now. DUDEO, no no fault but their own.
(21:55):
They have done this to themselves. It turns out that
the Bible administration was using an autopen, a mechanical pen
that traces the shadow of your signature. I used to
use them when I was up on Capitol Hill.
Speaker 4 (22:09):
You don't want to sign seventeen thousand things, yes, So.
Speaker 1 (22:11):
When you have Christmas cards, or you're sending out a
mass mailing or you know, a donor letter or whatever,
you will use the senators, congressman, and you know, the
cabinet members and the president vice president will use an
auto pen, which is there's a trace felt tip pen
traces your signature on a mechanical arm and that way,
(22:32):
you know, you don't get carpal tunnel syndrome in your
hand when you're trying to sign. But what you don't
do is you don't sign executive orders or pardons or
legislative acts with the autopen.
Speaker 4 (22:46):
You sign yourself.
Speaker 1 (22:47):
You sign yourself, and that's that's and there's usually a
big signing ceremony, and that's what you do, which.
Speaker 4 (22:53):
By the way, which does two things right.
Speaker 5 (22:56):
You can as you mentioned the ceremony, right, you get
to see the pomp and circumstances.
Speaker 4 (22:59):
Sign and everybody does pens.
Speaker 5 (23:01):
They hand out the pens they signed like a quarter
of the signature. And then here you're just a band.
Here's a yeah, exactly so. But the other thing is,
you know when when when a president or as you mentioned,
some of these other people sign something, you can watch them.
There's a look, I'm signing this, I want this toy.
Speaker 1 (23:20):
This is what I'm doing, doing this, I'm doing this,
this is me my decision.
Speaker 5 (23:24):
Right, if you use an auto pen, and I'm look,
most autopen things are done legit and whatever. But you can,
well Christmas time, nobody gives a crap.
Speaker 2 (23:32):
But that's what I'm saying. You may not care about
it doesn't mean it's legit, I guess.
Speaker 5 (23:36):
But but but in some cases, look at an auto pen. Hey,
some guy could just go in the back room and
start signing ship for the president. Hey it's the president signed.
Speaker 4 (23:43):
Oh, everybody gets anybody.
Speaker 1 (23:45):
And I can tell you that as as somebody working
I worked, I worked for Senator Eagleton. I worked for
Senator Abresk, and I worked for the Senate like Commute
on any affairs, and I had to use auto pens
in all three of those places.
Speaker 2 (23:58):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (23:58):
I mean, I was told to use the a pen
on this I did by somebody. I have no idea
if the senators or if the head of the committee knew.
Speaker 2 (24:05):
What I was doing. I was told to do it
by my boss.
Speaker 5 (24:07):
I did you have side executive orders? Thank you for
doing that. So you can't use an autopen for something
big in effect.
Speaker 1 (24:14):
And by the way, just asn't aside. Do you know
who invented the autopen, Bill Clinton? No, Thomas Jefferson, really
look for him. Thomas Jefferson basically invented the Essentially the
incarnation of the autopen we used today is a little
bit different. There was no obviously there's no light involved
in a shadow. But what they did do is like,
(24:37):
for instance, the autopen that Jefferson used, it was like
your pen would be attached to a second pen, and
so when you wrote, the pen would write next to you,
and so it would do two copies. It was their
way of you know, making a second copy.
Speaker 4 (24:52):
More like a carbon copy signature.
Speaker 2 (24:54):
Yeah, he did that.
Speaker 1 (24:55):
And he also would put wet paper underneath something he
was writing on and so the ink would through and
create a carbon copy. Thomas Jefferson was a freaking genius.
Actually he did a lot of stuff. But I digress
in any event, so we yes, I'm sorry. So we
had this autopen controversy because it turns out and this
is from people in the Biden administration. Okay, this is
(25:16):
not this is this is not somebody from Trump's group
coming up.
Speaker 2 (25:21):
Hey, hey, wait a minute.
Speaker 1 (25:22):
This is people who were concerned at the time going
they're using that autopen for things that should not be used.
Speaker 2 (25:29):
And this came out.
Speaker 1 (25:30):
Now the cut you heard in the open is a
reporter asking President Trump on Air Force one. That's why
it's very hard to hear, but you can hear it
if you listen hard. It's they're on Air Force one,
and a reporter says, basically, so to follow up on
the Biden autopen, are those pardons that were signed by.
Speaker 2 (25:46):
The autopen now null and void?
Speaker 1 (25:49):
And President Trump responds, cut one.
Speaker 3 (25:54):
To follow up on the line, and the autopen are
those executive orders those partings from the president now Nolan will.
Speaker 4 (26:01):
I think so it's not my decision.
Speaker 6 (26:04):
That'll be up to Accord, but I would say that
the Nolan would because I'm sure Biden didn't have any
idea that it would take you Plaze and somebody who
was using an autopen to sign off and to give
partners to as an example, it's just one example, but
the JA six Unselect Committee they gave think of it,
(26:25):
they gave partons with anopen I don't think Biden knew
anything about it.
Speaker 4 (26:29):
I think that's the biggest deal right there.
Speaker 2 (26:31):
Exactly exactly.
Speaker 1 (26:32):
I think that what happens is they become fraudulent.
Speaker 2 (26:35):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (26:35):
This has to be He's right, it has to be litigated.
It has to go right into the Supreme Court to
make the decision. But if somebody else has the autopen machine,
he didn't have to know anything about it, and without
proof that he knew about it, are they fraudulent or not?
Speaker 2 (26:46):
That's the question.
Speaker 5 (26:47):
If Joe was sitting there eating the bag of Cheetos
watching the auto pen sign all the pardons, then you'd
be all right, I'll find you.
Speaker 1 (26:52):
Just didn't want to sign because well still you still
still might be if he but you have a much
better case if you knew it was happening.
Speaker 2 (27:00):
But there's no proof he did know.
Speaker 4 (27:01):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (27:02):
And this is in the White House Press room, as
seen as Kaitlin Collins asks Carolyn Levitt, the White House
Press Secretary, have attorneys here at the White House told
President Trump that he has the legal authority to undo
the party. That's a different question. She's saying, you know,
I think what President Trump is saying is that they're fraudulent.
(27:23):
He's not going to undo them. They're fraudulent if he
didn't sign them, if they're signed by an autopen. And what
Caitlyn Collins is asking is like, well, is he going
to go back? And he's She's trying to put the
onus on Trump, saying, is he going to go back
and declare them null and void? That's cut one.
Speaker 2 (27:39):
Have attorneys here at.
Speaker 4 (27:40):
The White House told President Trump that.
Speaker 13 (27:42):
He is the legal authority to undo a pardon simply
because it was.
Speaker 10 (27:46):
Signed by autopen As he said.
Speaker 13 (27:49):
The President was begging the question that I think a
lot of journalists in this room should be asking about
whether or not the former president of the United States,
who I think we can all finally agree was cognitively impaired.
I know it took people some time to finally admit that,
but we all know that to be true, as evidence
by his disastrous debate performance against President Trump during the campaign.
(28:10):
I digress on that, but the President was raising the
point that did the president even know about these pardons?
Was his legal signature used without his consent or knowledge?
Speaker 1 (28:22):
Directly to your point, directly, that's the issue at hand.
Speaker 2 (28:26):
And then she went on to finish your response cut to.
Speaker 13 (28:29):
A not just the president or me raising those questions, Caitlin.
According to The New York Post, there are Biden officials
from the previous White House who raised those questions and
wondered if the President was even consulted about his legally
binding signature being signed onto documents. And so I think
it's a question that everybody in this room should be
looking into, because certainly that would propose perhaps criminal or
(28:53):
illegal behavior if staff members were signing the President of
the United States autograph without his consent.
Speaker 5 (29:00):
You know, it's not always the impropriety, it's the appearance
of impropriety that you know is really bad.
Speaker 4 (29:07):
Right, You don't know all the time, but if it looks.
Speaker 5 (29:10):
Like it's smelly and stinky, then everybody's gonna believe it's
smelly and stinky even if it wasn't.
Speaker 4 (29:14):
Here's the problem.
Speaker 5 (29:16):
If you're auto penning these pardons, what else a year
ago was autopened? Because now everything he signed that we
didn't see him sign at a desk, at a ceremony, you
could make the argument did he actually.
Speaker 1 (29:32):
Sign, Well, you can also make the argument he didn't
know what he was signing. Well, that's true, and if
you saw him and I think what you said is correct.
The appearance of impropriety is a big issue, but in
this case, the impropriety itself is also a big issue.
So this is two tiered. It's the appearance and it's
the impropriety. I think there's there's multiple things to be
litigated here, and they're going to have to do it
(29:52):
because there's a lot of there's a lot of things
that are are questionable now that we know that President
Biden was a lot worse than we thought he was,
that they kept it hidden, and that even the mainstream
media is now admitting to all of that.
Speaker 5 (30:07):
Here's one of the problems, and I want to say
this carefully, but it's almost at a point though, where
you might say, hoy much we could do about it,
because here's the problem. Just like with the Remember the
special counselor came out and said that when he talked
to Biden that Biden was an old sympathetic your man
and with you.
Speaker 1 (30:24):
Memory issue to charge right right, So if you're going.
Speaker 5 (30:27):
To look into this stuff, you certainly can't rely on
Joe Biden helping you by questioning him or so. I
don't know, I mean, is it even Let me ask
this question and you can respond to other people at home,
can scream with the radio, whatever, is it even really
worth pursuing at this point? It is because the guy
who's accused of it, or the guy whose auto signature
(30:48):
was is useless in any kind of testimony.
Speaker 1 (30:51):
It is worth pursuing because he is he is not
the only source of information.
Speaker 2 (30:55):
There are other sources of cocculus.
Speaker 1 (30:57):
And which are important and too. It's important to lay down,
I think, to judicate it so that it doesn't happen again,
so that it's known that don't even think about using
the autopen.
Speaker 5 (31:07):
Because if someone if someone accused me of using me
right now today, accused me of using an autopen or
an autopen being used to sign stuff. You could ask me, hey,
did you know they were using the autopen and I'd
be like, yeah, I knew they told me or no,
I didn't know, or who signed?
Speaker 4 (31:20):
What? What did I do?
Speaker 12 (31:22):
Yeah?
Speaker 4 (31:22):
But you can't get that from a Captain Biden.
Speaker 1 (31:25):
No, but you can get it from the people around
Captain Biden. And that's who you're gonna have to talk to,
you don't. You don't get information from the murder victim
they're dead. You get it from everybody around them. And
the same thing is true here. Biden's autopen, So so
he could be you know exactly he could be. You
can take him out of the equation and still put
together a case from people around him.
Speaker 2 (31:43):
You don't have to talk to him directly.
Speaker 4 (31:44):
We need now, now, we need a movie. Yeah, auto Pen.
Speaker 2 (31:48):
I would love it. I would love it.
Speaker 1 (31:49):
You know, it's kind of like the Sharknado series.
Speaker 2 (31:51):
Yes, the auto pen. He's running across country signing things.
Is it their autopen or is it their real segment?
Speaker 4 (31:58):
Joe Biden just bought a house in wyom No idea.
Why it could.
Speaker 2 (32:02):
Be really Oh I'm loving this, this could be really good.
Speaker 1 (32:06):
We end we're ending each week because we don't have
bidenisms anymore because nobody's actually seen Joe Biden since he
left the White House. So I'm telling you, as soon
as he opens his mouth anywhere, I'm going to have
it for you.
Speaker 2 (32:16):
But he hasn't so.
Speaker 1 (32:19):
Lately.
Speaker 2 (32:19):
No, he left the auto pen behind.
Speaker 1 (32:22):
So it's we've been ending the show with the truth
or Troll, and we've been using President Trump. Doesn't have
to be President Trump, but President Trump is a master troller.
So he he is just ripe for truth or troll,
and he says these things and you have to stop
and think is he serious or is he just screwing
with me? And in this case, he's on Fox News.
(32:42):
He's doing an interview with Laura Ingram and he's talking
about you know, they're talking. The conversation was about selling,
you know, green cards, and how his plan is to
sell what he's what they're calling gold cards, because you're
going to sell for five million dollars to extremely wealthy
people who are responsible for multi million dollar investments in
the country, and who are going to bring top keep
(33:04):
top notch talent like Wharton graduates in the country, and
this will help pay her down our debt and help
create jobs in the US. That that's his plan, and
so this is what they're talking about. But he says
there might be an alternate name for that gold card.
Cut five all.
Speaker 14 (33:20):
Call it either the gold card. The problem is is
mini gold cards. Well, I will tell you what my
people want to call it. It'll drive you crazy, It'll
drive the left crazy. They want to call it the
Trump card because the Trump card sells much better than
the gold card.
Speaker 5 (33:36):
Huh, well, trump card is actually used in cards. I mean,
when you're playing cards and you're playing, say like spades,
you can you can trump.
Speaker 1 (33:43):
Is it going to Are they going to rename the
immigration status card as a Trump card or.
Speaker 2 (33:50):
Is it going to be the gold card as opposed
to the green cards?
Speaker 4 (33:52):
As funny as that is, as you think he is.
Speaker 2 (33:56):
You think it's a truck. Do you think it's not?
Speaker 4 (33:57):
Well, I mean, look, maybe somebody serious about it. Don't
get me wrong, I'm talking about him.
Speaker 2 (34:02):
I'm not talking about anybody.
Speaker 4 (34:03):
Well, people about.
Speaker 2 (34:04):
Invading Greenland too, But I don't think we're going.
Speaker 8 (34:06):
To do it.
Speaker 5 (34:07):
I think some of his people, as he says, my
people want to call it the Trump card. I think
that part's true. That's not true.
Speaker 4 (34:13):
I think that did.
Speaker 2 (34:14):
But that's not the question.
Speaker 1 (34:15):
The question is do you do you think they're going
to call it? No, yeah, I think they are. I
think they are going to because listen, Ace, we just
we just changed the name of Golf of Mexico to
Golf of America. I would not be really surprised if
all of a sudden, the Trump Card was your levels
on your immigration status.
Speaker 2 (34:33):
Of course, as soon as a Democrat gets back in office.
Speaker 4 (34:35):
They'll change it.
Speaker 1 (34:35):
Fact, but I think for I think for the next
couple of years, it might in fact be called the
Trump Card.
Speaker 2 (34:40):
I have the Trump Card.
Speaker 1 (34:42):
I think that was truth, and it's the first time
I thought he was telling the truth since we started
doing this, I think the rest have been completely troll
So I think this one could be true.
Speaker 12 (34:50):
We'll find out.
Speaker 4 (34:50):
Why don't the Gulf of Trump.
Speaker 2 (34:53):
I think he thought that was just his ghost too far.
Speaker 5 (34:56):
Instead of a renaming Denali Mount McKinley again, he could
have called it Mount Trump.
Speaker 2 (35:00):
Well, that I'd be more surprised.
Speaker 1 (35:02):
You know, I'm waiting for the for the for the
for Reagan Airport to become Trump Airport right now, by
the way, Washington or Dulles to become Trump Airport.
Speaker 5 (35:11):
Uh, now's the time, excuse me, now's the time uh
to get the Trump face up on Mount Rushmore because
probably no one else will.
Speaker 1 (35:19):
Do they we looked into cold and the mountain can't
handle another face.
Speaker 2 (35:23):
It's it faced out, it's face, it's faced out right as.
Speaker 1 (35:28):
As many maybe start a new mountain. Maybe North Dakota
could use the help. I think we started new a
new National park in North Dakota because they're pretty pissed
that South Dakota gets all the tororism, and so they
think it's down to the fact that because they have
North in their name.
Speaker 2 (35:40):
I think it's because they got Mount Rushmore. But it's
that's just me.
Speaker 5 (35:43):
Can we take can we you know we talked, they've
talked about invading Canada and Greenland and all these other
places that they're gonna take awaver.
Speaker 2 (35:49):
On the border. We can do like the Trump has anybody.
Speaker 5 (35:52):
Has anybody thought, why don't we just annex Eastern Island
and put presidential faces all over those those heads they
got popping out to the ground there.
Speaker 2 (36:00):
You want to go to Easter Island.
Speaker 1 (36:02):
No, I'm just I'm just saying you got where people
want to go, all you do is carve them. Yeah,
at least in North Dakota, they can just drive there.
Easter Island, they gotta get on a plane, a boat.
It's you know, it's a mask.
Speaker 4 (36:11):
By the way. I would, I would.
Speaker 5 (36:12):
I would make the argument that the average American just
in the middle of nowhere whatever, like the average person,
uh want to go on a vacation to Easter Island
or the Dakota's. I think people would say East Island,
give them a free I'd.
Speaker 2 (36:23):
Rather go to Dakota's because I want to see Matt Rushmore.
I've never seen it.
Speaker 4 (36:26):
I want to go in December.
Speaker 2 (36:27):
Well I prefer not to go in December, but I'll go.
I'm happy to go. I'll go with you know, I
got no problem. I'm happy to go to South Dakota.
I like to see the Black Hills. Anyway.
Speaker 1 (36:37):
If you think let me know if you think President
Trump is telling the truth or trolling when he says
that the new immigration set US will be called the
Trump Card. You can contact Ben and I on x
at news by three or on Facebook at news Byte.
We update and put a new episode up every single week,
so check back next week and see what our new
offerings are.
Speaker 2 (36:56):
Meanwhile, have a great week. I'm Nancy Shack.
Speaker 4 (36:59):
Have whatever, had a week you want? I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 2 (37:01):
This is Newspite
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.