July 21, 2025 • 38 mins
Border Tsar Tom Homan faces down an ICE protester, President Biden's doc takes the fifth, and Alan Dershowitz says he knows who is on the Epstein list! People are laying down the law this week in our "did they really just say that" cuts.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Borders our, Tom Holman face its down an ice protester,
President Biden's doctor takes the fifth, and Alan Dershowitz says
he knows who's on the Epstein list because he's seen it.
People are laying down the law this week on our
Did they really just say that cuts?
Speaker 2 (00:15):
I'm Nancy Shack, I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
This is newspite.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
This guy who lives in his mother's basement. Nor is
it that surprises me? You don't have purple hair and
a nose's drink. Get out of here, your loser, I
guarantee you. He sits down the peak.
Speaker 4 (00:41):
Were you ever told to lie about the President's Hall
of the Advicey Council?
Speaker 5 (00:44):
I must respectfully declined to answer based upon the physician
patient privilege and in reliance somebody right under the fifth
end of the Constitution.
Speaker 6 (00:52):
And the day I was affused, I said I want
every document app because I knew every document would prove
I was inna day. So let me tell you, I
know for a fact mention being suppressed, and they're being
suppressed to protect individuals.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
I know the names of the individuals, So let's go.
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Yeah, Well that's Professor Alan Dershowitz. He's a professor emeritus
from Harvard Law. And if you remember, there was an
accusation many years ago that Professor Dershowitz had been a
guest of Jeffrey Epstein's. Turns out that that was a
case of mistaken identity.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
Who looks like Alan Dershwitz.
Speaker 1 (01:27):
He's the only one I know, but apparently there's more
than one. But before it was settled, the good professor
filed a lawsuit. And as he's explaining there and has
he'll explained the cut. He got to look at all
the documents. Cut number three.
Speaker 6 (01:42):
This is not an opinion, this is a fact I
have seen.
Speaker 2 (01:45):
Remember, I was.
Speaker 1 (01:45):
Accused falsely, and ultimately I was completely cleared.
Speaker 6 (01:50):
The woman admitted that she may have mistook me for
somebody else that withdrew all of her lawsuits.
Speaker 2 (01:54):
And so from day one, from the day I.
Speaker 6 (01:56):
Was accused, I said, I want every document out because
I knew every document prove I was innocent.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
So let me tell you.
Speaker 6 (02:02):
I know for a fact documents are being suppressed, and
they're being suppressed to protect individuals. I know the names
of the individuals. I know why they're being suppressed. I
know who's suppressing them. But I'm bound by confidentiality from
a judge and cases, and I can't disclose what I know.
But I hand to God, I know I know the
(02:23):
names of people whose files are being suppressed in order
to protect them.
Speaker 2 (02:28):
And that's wrong.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
But wait a minute, ben, I thought that there was
no list. Isn't that what our Attorney General, Pam Bondi said.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
There's no list, no list. What's nothing to see here?
Speaker 1 (02:39):
Please churn us out that a card carrying member of
the Bar Association who's an officer of the court, has
personally seen the list. The truth revealed. But we don't
get to see the list yet because according to the
current Department of Justice, there is no list, and there's
a fight going on at the Department of Justice right
now regarding it. You've got Dan Bongino, he's deputy FBI director.
(03:01):
He tried to he tried to leverage Pambondi into giving
up the list by saying, either give up the list
or I'm out of here. And so far he's still there.
So I don't know what's happening, but it's certainly a bruhaha,
and it has turned maga. It's vicious against the president.
Speaker 2 (03:21):
Yeah, it's first of all, regardless of how many people
are on the list, where the list is, who has
the list, if there ever was a list, if there
even is a list anymore, whatever the case may be, Right,
all this is fuel and lots of it for the
conspiracy fires, and these will burn forever. By the way,
it doesn't even matter at this point because we've seen
(03:41):
all this before with different topics and different things over
the years. Right, if they come out with a list,
some people are gonna be like, that's not even the
real list. If they don't come out with a list, well,
why isn't there a list? We know there was a list.
So I mean, no matter what happens from this point forward,
the conspiracy fires not only will be burning, they will
be raging for long past our lifetimes.
Speaker 1 (04:04):
So you're saying, well, probably name the truth.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Well, I mean we might know the truth, but there'll
be a lot of people who don't believe that it
is the truth.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
That's absolutely I think that's absolutely accurate.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
Yeah, I mean it's you know, you think about pick
a conspiracy doesn't matter. Let's pick JFK, Right, because that's
a good that's a good Walking on the moon walking
on the Well, I'm pretty sure we've solved that one.
But here I'm not sure we have.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
There's still people go, yeah, it was a set, it's
not capricorn one, and it stayed with them.
Speaker 2 (04:29):
All right, well we'll do walking on the moon. So
walking on the moon. Let's assume we know the truth
right now, we walked on the moon, okay, and and
so so that is that is the truth. A lot
of people don't believe that's the truth. And if and
if somebody came out with evidence that we didn't walk
in the moon and that was the truth, then there'd
be a whole bunch of people would be like, that's
(04:49):
not the truth. We walked in the movie. So this
is one of those uh you know jfk assassination aliens
in Roswell, New Mexico. Uh, you pick pick pick the one.
There's a billion of them. Anyway, this is another one
of those that it doesn't even matter if we know
the truth. If the truth gets out there, there'll be
people who'll be like, well, that's not the truth. I mean,
that's just not the truth. So this buckle up or
(05:12):
don't buckle up. But this is never going away ever.
Ever ever, in the history of efvers, I don't.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
Think people understand how difficult it is to keep a secret, because,
for instance, in the Moon analogy one, eighteen men if
you know, theoretically, if you believe NASA and you're lying eyes,
twelve men have walked on the moon. Eighteen men have
been to the moon. At least I think it's closer
to twenty four who have circled the moon and not
(05:39):
didn't get down, so I mean, didn't go to the surface.
So you really think that all those people and their
families would have kept a secret like that, Oh seriously,
And I don't think that could have happened.
Speaker 2 (05:51):
No, But and then you can extend that beyond and
all the people who were involved in the mission. Yeah,
and then you can I just saw something the other day.
There are the landers still up there, right, they didn't
told that home with with triple A the bottom the No,
that's right, the landing portion of.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
The land spider legs are still and they're supposedly supposed mirror.
Speaker 2 (06:15):
Yes, that's why the moon glows because of the.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
Now you just started a new conspiracy.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
Congratulations. But so so they're still up there, and and
I've seen flag pictures that supposedly are the landers. So
everybody who's not even just the people involved in the
actual moon landings, but everybody involved in the support everybody
who's flown by the moon. Everybody will fly by the moon.
(06:41):
You know, we have a lot of people going up
there and flying by. Nowadays it's more popular than it
than it ever was before. You know, you've got the
Chinese and the India and all these places. They're all
going up there, They're all flying around the moon. They're
all doing stuff. So all these people are lying, all
of them, and and as as you mentioned, and all
their families and all the you know, all the support staff,
all the yap. Nope, please, we went to the moon,
(07:04):
you know, I don't I.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
Think there's an Epstein list of Alan Dershowitz tells me
he's seen it, then he's seen it. I don't know
whether it still exists. Who knows who tore what up.
But if ire Van BONDI I go have a chat
with Alan Dershowitz and see if he's got anything left
over from his lawsuit that she can take a look at.
But they should do.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
So, can you subpoena Alan Dershowitz's brain is memory.
Speaker 1 (07:24):
Yeah, you can't. Actually you can't down you can actually
so so that that does exist.
Speaker 2 (07:31):
Alan, here's a legal pad. I want you to write
down everything you can remember about.
Speaker 1 (07:35):
What that would be. That would be good talking about
the truth. The Congress was looking for a little bit
of truth this week from President Biden's physician. He was asked, stops, okay,
I get your gafa. You're very you're sort of a
gafa there. He was asked this in front of Congress
(07:56):
cut ten c.
Speaker 4 (07:58):
Were you ever told to lie about the President's health?
Speaker 5 (08:00):
Of the advice the Council, I must respectfully decline to
answer based upon the physician patient privilege and in the
reliance on my right under the Fifth Mend of the Constitution.
I am not a lawyer. I must follow my lawyer's
advice in this matter.
Speaker 4 (08:13):
Let the record reflect that doctor O'Connor has invoked the
Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination. Doctor O'Connor, please be
very clear. Are you declining to answer the question put
to you solely on the ground that you believe the
answer will incriminate you.
Speaker 5 (08:25):
I'm the advice the Council. I must respectfully decline to
answers based upon the physician's patient privilege and in reliance
on my right under the Fifthmendment of the Constitution. I
am not a lawyer, and I must rely on my
lawyer's advice.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
In this matter.
Speaker 4 (08:41):
Doctor O'Connor, did you ever believe the President was unfit
to execute his duties as president.
Speaker 5 (08:48):
On the adviceive Council. I must respectfully decline to answer
based on the physician patient privilege and in reliance in
my right under the fifth Endmit of the Constitution. I'm
not a lawyer, and I must follow my ace.
Speaker 7 (09:00):
In this matter.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
So that was doctor Kevin like a like a like
a que card there because you said the same thing.
Speaker 1 (09:06):
Yeah he did. My guess is yes his attorney if
he's a good attorney, and he is says yes every answer.
It's like what is your name? This is how you answer.
You don't tell your client to pick and choose when
you're when you give them advice to take the fifth
it's from the moment they say hello to you. You
don't let the client decide where the legal boundaries are.
(09:28):
That has to be something that the attorneys will work out.
So every response from your client has to be the fifth.
But here's the thing about that. That was doctor Kevin O'Connor.
He is or was President Biden's personal physician. But here's
the thing before, before you go any further priv you know,
if the question is regarding uh, what did you think,
(09:54):
then that absolutely is patient confidentiality. That's your doctor's opinion.
That's between did you tell it? That's but to ask
if you've ever lied, that's not covered by patient confidentially.
So the first part of that answer means nothing. The
second part, however, yes, they're taking the fifth. That's really
(10:15):
interesting because invoking the fifth is the problem with doing
it is that you really only do it if you
think there is a possibility that you could be charged
with a criminal enterprise. So you don't take the fifth
if they if somebody's just asking you questions regarding your
(10:38):
patient records, you take unless you poison them or something.
You take the fifth only if you're trying to cover
something that is nefarious.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
Well here's here's and perfect example would be, Okay, what
condition did Joe Biden have? Can't tell you?
Speaker 1 (10:55):
Can't tell you? That's patient confidence.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
Where you ever asked to lie about Joe Biden's condition.
Can tell you, Yeah, I can tell.
Speaker 1 (11:02):
But not gonna because it couldn't. It could in fact,
because that one, if you, if you, that one could
lead to conspiracy charges. So that's why you're shaking the
fifth on that particular question.
Speaker 2 (11:13):
Well, here we talked about conspiracy, conspiracy theories, right as
soon as you take the fifth in any case, right,
and this was the one we're talking about. Yeah, all
of a sudden, boom, you've just divided half the country. Well,
of course he took the fifth. You know why he
took the fifth. He took the fifth because he's lying,
because he's a sack of crappit.
Speaker 1 (11:29):
Well, there you go, and so that was so don't
go there. So that's so this is the point that
the chairman of the committee, James Comer, makes cut number five.
Speaker 8 (11:40):
I can tell you exactly what happened. Uh, Doctor O'Connor.
Uh pleaded the fifth Amendment. And I'm gonna I'm gonna
read the first two questions that were asked, were you
ever told to lie about the president's health? He pleaded
the fifth Amendment. He would not answer that question. The
(12:03):
second question, did you ever believe President Biden was unfit
to execute his duties. Again, President Biden's White House position
pleaded the Fifth Amendment. This is unprecedented, and I think
that this adds more fuel to the fire that there
was a cover up. I believe that this adds legitimacy
(12:24):
to the Tapper book and the other books that are
in the works that are about to come out that
shows there was a lot of suspicious activity taking place
in the White House with respect to the president's health.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
But now to your point, he made exactly what you
were saying, is that it gives kind of an indisha
of guilt. It's not supposed to, but it does. But
and you would think, wouldn't you between you and me,
and that anybody who hears that goes what they believe
he's hiding something. Right, Well, the Democrats to this is
why I stopped you before, because I want Congresswoman Jasmine
(12:59):
Crockett to make your second point. Democrats don't care that
that is the normal indition that a Republican doctor in there.
Absolutely they would be with you, but it isn't. It's
the doctor protecting their their candidate or their former candidate,
Joe Biden. So according to them, what's a little Fifth Amendment.
(13:20):
Cut six.
Speaker 9 (13:22):
It's kind of astounding to hear someone say if you
invoke the Fifth Amendment, that is only because you are guilty.
We have a constitutional right that anyone who maybe under
fire can invoke.
Speaker 1 (13:34):
Yeah, we do. And here's the thing with that. That
doesn't say. That amendment doesn't say invoke this and you
are free, invoke this and no harm shall come to you.
It says you don't have to testify against yourself. That's
what that amendment is.
Speaker 2 (13:49):
Doesn't mean we can't somehow prove that you worry.
Speaker 1 (13:52):
It doesn't mean that the implication of taking it means
that you are innocent. But Chief continued to six say.
Speaker 9 (13:59):
It's kind of ad to hear someone I think that
he did what any good lawyer would advise him to do.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
If he had a crime. Sure, I don't tell my
I wouldn't tell my client unless there is a possibility
of them being charged with a crime. To take the
fath I mean, because you are in fact doing exactly
what you said, you are leaving them open to a
lot of unpleasant innuendo. You only take that if the
option of testifying the other side of that is going
(14:29):
to get you into trouble. But she doesn't seem to
see that six sy Please.
Speaker 9 (14:34):
I didn't see Joe Biden every single day, but I
did have an opportunity to interact with the president. I
never had a concern he may get fumbled up by words.
But that's not anything new and it's not anything that
came with age. We know that this is someone that
was born with a stutter that ultimately had to get
over it when.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
He was a US senator. He didn't go around stuttering.
He didn't. He may have been born the stutter. He
worked it out. But it was last year year of presidency.
I want you to hear. This is from a video
that was put out by the by the Republicans, but
it was not edited. It's got a music bed, but
it wasn't edited. This was the commander in chief and
(15:13):
the last year of his presidency. Cut number seven.
Speaker 10 (15:16):
We owe these truths to be self evident. Oh man,
and women are creative, but go you know the you
know the thing. America is a nation that can be
defined in a single word. I was going to foot
him foot excuse me, foothills of the MLAs with shijingping
see no see nos so long I n I'll say
(15:38):
it can never be secure. We'll never forget lying around,
And I said him lying around. Actually, it is noteworthy
that the percentage of women who registered to vote and
cashed the ballot is consistently higher than the percentage of
the men who do so. End the quote, repeat the line, well,
(16:00):
lady and effect the strategy to mobilize true in an
act summer the pressure, I miss him.
Speaker 1 (16:06):
That's not because of a stutter. Where was there a
stutter issue in it? That was cognitive issues and so
you know, so the Democrats are like, oh my god,
that's what we're defending. And on top of it, the
doctor just came out and pled the fifth because when
asked if he lied. I don't know how you spin
that with a straight face. But Jasmin Crockett, you know,
(16:29):
managed to do it with it with straight face. But
I don't know how. She's going to have to meet
her maker someday and explain why she was lining both
faces to the American people.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
Couple of things here. First of all, we hear all
the time about people pleading the fifth. Fine, yeah, I once,
just once, just once. I'd like to hear somebody stand
up in Congress, or in court or somewhere else to go. Listen,
I'm gonna plead the first, and I'm going to sing
like a canary here just so you know, like nobody
ever pleads the first, right, they just talk. Also, somebody's
(16:58):
got to plead the twenty first, the repeal of prohibition,
and say I'm just going to start drinking. I'm taking
the twenty first starting vers is gone.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
So that's why you don't really, you know, see that anymore.
Speaker 8 (17:09):
But he's but.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
Here's so two quick things about the doctor in a
more serious manner. One, he's sitting on a fence here,
first of all, and I'm not defending him or not
defending him. I'm just saying as a doctor, right, And
his lawyer says, do this, read this card and read
it three times if you have to, because that's what
he did. If he well, if he were to admit
(17:32):
let's let's say he was asked to lie and he
admits all that, and he was he's a lion, sack
of banana heads whatever I mean. You know, his medical
license could be in jeopardy. Certainly would go before a
medical board or some other crap at the very least. Secondly,
the question isn't well, it is to a degree. The
question they asked is were you ever asked to lie
(17:56):
about the President's health? I think more importantly is did
you ever lie about the President's health?
Speaker 1 (18:02):
Well? You know, And the interesting thing is the reason
why I suspect they didn't ask the question because that
is asking somebody to absolutely incriminate themselves, And so I
wouldn't answer that question if I were. You know, nobody answered.
Speaker 2 (18:16):
I'm just saying, ask the question.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
No, I get it, But I think there's a reason
why it wasn't asked because that was one of those
gotcha You know, you're asking somebody deliberately, so they were
trying to catch their questions where they could possibly have
been answered without somebody incriminating themselves.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Because were you ever asked to lie? Could be yes
or could be no.
Speaker 1 (18:34):
But and it doesn't mean you did it. It just
means you were asked. So you're asking about other people's culpability.
That's why it was calchra.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
Well, even if you weren't asked to lie, right, did
you lie?
Speaker 1 (18:43):
That's why it wasn't asked. That's what I'm saying. I
get it.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
No, So either way, either answer to were you asked?
Speaker 1 (18:49):
But yeah, exactly. So they were asking questions where the
answer was not a confession. That's what they were looking for.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
Maybe they'll catch them later. And that's why those.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
Questions were worded the way they were, because they could
be answered without incriminating yourself. So but they had decided that, Nope,
we're not going to go there. I don't know.
Speaker 2 (19:08):
Maybe he was none of it. Look, we're not doctors,
and we had these conversations at nauseam and when when
the president was the president. Look, anybody with half a
brain knows there was something wrong. Do we know what
was wrong?
Speaker 11 (19:22):
No?
Speaker 2 (19:23):
Does his doctor even know what was wrong? Maybe the
doctor doesn't even know completely what was wrong. The brain's
an interesting place. So but but look, here's what. Here's
why I all know something was being done or said
or something.
Speaker 1 (19:35):
And people are saying, well, what, who cares? Now he's
not on office. There's a reason why this is important,
and that is because certain things that he did and
office are now given what his mental acuity was, are
now suspect of being from him. He was the elected
president of the I sense, regardless of what his state was,
he it was it was up to him to do it.
(19:57):
And if he didn't do it. There's nobody who can
take your place unless you remove him under the twenty
fifth and put the put the vice president in there.
So that's basically what we're talking about here. So why
is this a problem now? Why are we asking why
is he? Why is the doctor taking the fifth now?
Because amongst other things, there is the autopen. President Trump
(20:22):
will tell you why it's important. Cut eleven A.
Speaker 11 (20:26):
You're talking about the auto pen. Look, the autopen I
think is maybe one of the biggest scandals that we've
had in fifty to one hundred years. This is a
tremendous scandal. And I know the people on the other
side of the desk, that resolute desk. Unfortunately he used
it before me.
Speaker 8 (20:45):
But you know, we have our choice of seven desks.
Speaker 11 (20:48):
You're all beautiful, but I chose the resolute and so
did he unfortunately. But the people on the other side
of the resolute desk, I know them, Lisa, the whole group,
and then no good, there's sick people. And I guarantee
he knew nothing about what he was signing. I guarantee it.
Speaker 1 (21:11):
And that's the problem. So those pardons that ones that
he didn't sign, we don't know that he even asked
to have them sign executive orders that bear his signature
weren't his. They were done by autopen. And so it's
okay for the president to designate somebody to use the
autopen on his behalf to sign things like pardons and
(21:31):
executive orders. Generally speaking, pardons aren't done like that. Though
generally speaking, the president actually signs the pardons who are
not done by autopen, but he can, but he never
gave the order for these things to be signed, and
so that means somebody else was basically exercising the executive
power of the presidency who wasn't elected. And that's a crime.
(21:56):
And this is why it's important, and this is why,
even though he's out of office, we need now to
see who is calling the shots, because there's a criminality here,
and there are certain things that should be and can
be undone if they weren't done by the president, the
elected president at the time. That's why this is important.
Speaker 2 (22:12):
Hold on, I'm going to put another conspiracy book on
the shelf, because here's another one. I mean, you know,
I don't know, it's it's sometimes it's funny. Sometimes, Look,
we've all gotten caught up in a conspiracy theory in
our lives, even if it was some minuscule thing daily basis,
we happened every day, sure, and some people more than others, obviously,
but it you know, and in some ways it's funny.
(22:34):
But in some ways it's like our entire lives, our
entire system of government, our entire everything seems to be
running via conspiracy theories, which is kind of why we're
in the backwards ass mess were in as it is.
You know, it used to be fun with Elvis isn't dead.
Oh oh they saw aliens out in in Nevada.
Speaker 1 (22:55):
Oh, you know, I've always wanted to go to area,
even the you know.
Speaker 2 (22:58):
Even the JFK assassinate, which obviously was serious for the country,
but that's kind of like who shot JFK? Who shot JR?
Speaker 1 (23:06):
Second shot? But now it's like every it doesn't matter,
everything is right, yeah, and has made it worse of course. Yeah,
social media stuff.
Speaker 2 (23:18):
You know, immediately even if it's not true, and by
the time it gets untangled as not true, everybody.
Speaker 1 (23:24):
To give them some credit when they don't really deserve
that much credit. But but but to give them some cred.
They're trying to figure out what the hell's going on here? Sure?
And what happened in the Biden administration. They want to know,
you know, who who has signed the pardons, Who was
it who let all the illegal aliens in the executive
orders that let the you know, and who was who
is making these decisions? Was it President Biden or was
(23:47):
it some progressive puppet master, because whoever they are, you know,
they have a lot of explaining to do, and they
are they are currently trying to figure out where the
line can be drawn between legal actions that were done
by President Biden and illegal actions that were done by
(24:08):
somebody who was not President Biden. And that's why, which
everybody else by the way, which is everybody else. Yeah,
Jill Biden does not have the power to write executive
Ji Biden, nobody has only him, and and and in
lacking any kind of move from Congress or the invocation
of a constitutional amendment, the vice president can't do it either.
(24:30):
So it's basically up to just Biden. So that's what
we're trying to figure out. And it affects everything. It
affects everything that the President Biden, in particular in the
last two years and really in the last year of
his presidency did, and currently the flashpoint for this argument
over what's been allowed what's happened to us is immigration.
(24:53):
That's the biggest class point that I see really right now,
because you have the Democrats trying to do too one,
distract away from as you heard Jasmine Crockett try to
do away from the legality of what the Biden administration did,
and trying to create ire against the current occupant of
the White House, and that's been around immigration. I'm sure
(25:17):
there's other things, too many many issues, but immigration is
the one that's going on now. So the Democrats are
trying to die on the hill of immigration in an
effort to get people away from what was happening in
the Biden administration and in the last year of it.
And you see that every day now. And the problem
that they what they are doing is they're lighting a
(25:37):
match to the US They're ready to burn it down
in order to save it, basically in order to save themselves,
I should say. And the mess that they've made of everything.
And you can see this every day with various things
that are going on, and the worst of it's been
lately in California and in Texas regarding immigration and a
(25:58):
perfect example of people who are out of control, Democrats,
out of control in an effort to make immigration a
into some kind of holocaust which it isn't is Mayor
Karen Bass La. Mayor Karen Bass who actually got tried
to interfere in an ICE rate and tried to interfere
(26:21):
with federal agents rounding up illegal aliens. No legal aliens
were here, Nobody with a green card, nobody who was
supposed to be here, nobody who jumps on the hoops.
These are illegal aliens and a lot of them were criminal,
illegal aliens on top of the already established criminality of
being here illegally. This was her at an ICE at
(26:42):
an ICE rate cut twenty one.
Speaker 12 (26:44):
A comment, they need to leave, and they need to
leave right now.
Speaker 1 (26:57):
Accept. Yeah, they weren't going to be leaving soon. They
were doing their job. They had federal warrants they were
carrying out. They were legally there doing what they legally can.
But this is the garbage that the Democrats are putting
out there and their friends in the mainstream media are
(27:18):
putting out there. These raids are illegal, They're not. These
are federally these are federal laws passed by Congress that
these are federal agents supporting the federal laws. They have
the right to be there, it's their job to be there.
Yet you have people like mayor baths and here are
sunny houstin of the view trying to get people upset
and to think that this is not legal. Cut fourteen.
(27:39):
If they would do their.
Speaker 7 (27:40):
Jobs the way that I think they should be doing
their jobs, which is unmasked, without disappearing people from the streets,
I don't think that the public would feel as endangered
because if someone approaches my loved one who's undocumented with
a mask, how.
Speaker 1 (27:56):
Do I know that their actual law enforcement? How do
I know that they work for ICE.
Speaker 2 (28:00):
So that's one thing I'll.
Speaker 7 (28:03):
There's actually people who have impersonated Price exactly. They don't
show IDs that they're not dressed appropriately, they're not flagged,
and they're masked. And so in my world, if you
mask yourself because you don't want to be seen, because
you don't want to be seen, because there will be
a reckoning for some of the actions that law enforcement,
(28:24):
actual law enforcement have done.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
I don't recall her saying that the ANTIFA and Black
Lives Matter people should take off their masks. They were masked.
But by the way, the Ice officers do it because
a lot of them are undercover officers and if you
expose their faces then they get harmed or their families
get harmed because they can't be identified when they're undercover.
That is, that is one of the big problems. But
(28:46):
also you heard her disappearing people off the street, like
they're going out and just taking American citizens and disappearing
them off the streets. CNN did the same thing, Tiffany
cross Cut twenty two.
Speaker 13 (28:55):
We don't know if they were looking for someone, We
don't know if they arrested anybody, but clearly whoever they
were looking for, there was no one but there for kids. Well,
this is I think this is the challenge I have
with with even talking about this. We are normalizing a
government agency disappearing people. We are normalizing. We're talking about
it like it's no big deal that they are kidnapping
people and transporting them to concentration camps, both domestic and foreign.
(29:19):
That is not that's kind of insulting to I think
it's insulting what they're doing. It is not insulting to Jewish. Hell,
I'm finally insulting that you could even fix your mouth
to defend this gas.
Speaker 1 (29:31):
It doesn't matter.
Speaker 13 (29:33):
It's a concentration camp what they're doing. And they are
disappearing people, claiming that these are people who have committed
the most harsh crimes. But according to the reporting, less
than ten percent of these people have committed harsh crimes.
So to do the victim Olympics and decide who had
it worse, I can tell you I can participate in
that too. And everybody who says, oh, this is not
the America, I know, I can guarantee you it is
the America.
Speaker 1 (29:53):
First of all, who's giving her those numbers? Her assistant,
because that's that's utter a bull bleeps. There's no there's
no proof that that's what it is. And not that,
but the Department of Homeland Securities put out the numbers.
They're going after criminals, they're not going after innocent people
walking down the street. Nobody's disappearing anybody. And it is
completely offensive to compare it to the Holocaust and disappearing people.
(30:15):
And you heard what she said. What she did is
she went on try to viciously attack the moment who said,
wait a minute, this is not the Holocaust. There are
no Ovens here. Oh my god, that woman. You know,
if she could have hit her, I think she would.
They're into violence, and they're creating a sense of violence
against federal officers and against law abiding people. And this
(30:35):
is the point that Tom Homan was making. He was
on Fox, Who's trying to explain, you can protest all
you want, got no problem with your protesting. You can't
interfere with officers or drum up violence against them. Cut
number eight.
Speaker 14 (30:48):
People were welcome to protests. They have their First Amendment rights,
grew up. They can't cross that line. They can't impede
us from doing our job. That's a felony. They certainly
can't put arms, put hands on an agent that's a family.
So what happened in California is just another example of
protesters becoming criminals. And they've been in bolden by even
(31:08):
members of Congress who compare Ice to Nazis and races
and terrorists. I mean, the rhetoric is so high, and
I said two months ago it's going to end up
with a loss of life, and we had one the
other day in Texas and it's not over. I mean,
the rhetoric has to end.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
Yeah, by the way I you know, ice look for
a solution to problems, because that's what I do. So
the one in the Tiffany cross cut that we played
and she referenced to the Olympics. Here's my idea. This
is brilliant. She came up with a brilliant idea. Didn't
even know it. Let's have the let's let's run this
(31:46):
ice raid thing like the Olympics. We're going to give
all of them a medal and then send them back
to their country. Right, isn't that what they do? They
give you a medal and then you go back to
your country.
Speaker 1 (31:59):
So mayor would like you to add money to that.
So she wants to.
Speaker 2 (32:03):
So you give him a medal and you send them
back to their country. That we just solve the whole
problem one word. And it's like, yeah, don't try to
round them up, just just just like the Olympics, give
him a medal center the country.
Speaker 1 (32:13):
Well, I got to say, Tom Holman is just done
with this. He's just so freaking surprise.
Speaker 2 (32:18):
That he hasn't been done a long time ago.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
He's a badass, I gotta say. And he's just like
so he was given a speech. You heard it in
the open, and there was a protester, Heckler, and he's
even she's just done with these numb nuts. Cut number
ten C.
Speaker 12 (32:32):
There got morens like this are the country?
Speaker 3 (32:36):
This guy, this guy one Norse were like the surface nation.
This guy ain't got the balls to be a nice officer?
Do you ever got the ball? Pretty a born chorg
This guy lives in his mother's basement. On is it
that surprised me? You don't have purple hair and her
nose ring. Get out of here, your loser.
Speaker 15 (33:05):
And very and you're such a badass beating me off
stage in thirteen minutes and fifty second, I guarantee you.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
He sits down the peak.
Speaker 1 (33:22):
Them's fighting words.
Speaker 2 (33:24):
I'm putting money on home.
Speaker 1 (33:25):
Yeah yeah, I mean and how many? I mean? Usually
Tom Hommon just goes to whatever and just moves on
his way. But he is just freaking done with us.
Why because his agents are getting hurt now, people are attacking.
In fact, this past week somebody, an agent's family was attacked.
So it's like that's that's and here we have, in
(33:46):
this particular case, the vice president. The vice president was
walking through Disneyland and got yeah, not really cut eleven
mister Vice President, we support immigrants, support America. We support immigrants,
(34:07):
We support America. I thought California with violence, it's obnoxious.
I mean, I'm pretty sure Jade Vance supports immigrants in
America too.
Speaker 11 (34:19):
I do.
Speaker 2 (34:19):
I know you do.
Speaker 1 (34:20):
I think we all do. This is the stupidity level
is huge among these people. It's just it's just massive.
But this is this is what the Democrats have wrought
in order to one increase their base because I think
the legal immigrants will will vote Democrat one and two.
It deflects from the fact that their their demand in
(34:41):
the White House for four years was non compassmentus and
has a lot to we have to figure out.
Speaker 2 (34:48):
I'm sure I have to please fIF I don't know.
If I don't know, I'm not sure. Okay, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (34:54):
You got it.
Speaker 2 (34:54):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (34:55):
So we end every week with the truth control. This
week we're doing the same thing. This is President Trump
speaks to reporters and he's asked that the Washington Commander
should change their name back to the Redskins. Uh. You
can hear his response, cut one bee, the Commander's changed
the name back to Redskins.
Speaker 11 (35:13):
Well, you want me to make a controversial statement.
Speaker 10 (35:16):
I would.
Speaker 12 (35:18):
I wouldn't have changed, but that.
Speaker 11 (35:21):
Sarah just doesn't have the same It doesn't have.
Speaker 2 (35:24):
The same ring to me. But you know, winning can
make everything sound good.
Speaker 12 (35:28):
So if they win, all of.
Speaker 11 (35:29):
A sudden, the commander sounds good. But I wouldn't have
changed in it.
Speaker 1 (35:32):
I don't know if he's if you serious, would he
have or is he poking the DEI crowd? I just
want to poke him for the hell of it.
Speaker 2 (35:39):
The question, of course, was would you change the name
back to the Redskins, which he never really answered. He
said I wouldn't have changed He said I would, I
wouldn't have. Well, but he said I wouldn't have changed it.
That that was what I said.
Speaker 1 (35:49):
He would have changed to begin with. But in the
end he goes, but I would, Yes, I would change
it back.
Speaker 2 (35:52):
Well, yeah, I don't know if you for it.
Speaker 1 (35:55):
By the way, I'm a I'm a Washingtonian. I absolutely
positively have been furious that it's changed, because you know what,
the native tribes in the area said, we like the Redskins.
Change it back.
Speaker 2 (36:06):
Well, a lot of these, these these woke crowds that
are changing not only names of NFL teams, but of
other teams and high school teams. Makot right, they have.
Speaker 1 (36:14):
Nothing to do with they're virtue signaling correct.
Speaker 2 (36:16):
And and there are a lot of people who who
as you mentioned, there's a lot of Native American groups
that are proud of these names. Some of them. I mean, obviously,
you know.
Speaker 1 (36:26):
The Navajos went to Dan Snyder and said, you know,
call it after us. How about wind Talkers, which I
loved because first that was the code breaking group during
World War II, those Native American I absolutely loved it,
and I thought that was stupendous. But of course you
went with the commanders. But here's something that I heard
that just killed me, and that is there was a Karen.
(36:47):
You know, I'm sorry to everybody whose named Karen's not obnoxious,
but there was a Karen who was talking about this,
and this is something that's always irritated me when they
did when they changed the name, and she's she was
going on about how you know, it was insulting, and
she said, Share thought it was insulting, and since Share
was a Native American, then then obviously that was true.
(37:10):
But here's the thing. Shear's Armenian shere has nothing to
do with. I mean, she sang a song called half
Breed in her but that was She's not Indian, not
on any level. Is she native American, not even one
one million, she is warned. She's not even as Native
American as Senator Elizabeth Warning.
Speaker 2 (37:27):
She called gypsy.
Speaker 1 (37:30):
She's an Armenian from from Van Nuys or something. So
it's like and so because she I'm like, oh my god,
she doesn't even know what a Native American is.
Speaker 2 (37:39):
I got it, So I got it again. Solutions right here,
because uh, the Washington Redskins, Okay, we got rid of that.
Do we bring it back?
Speaker 1 (37:47):
Maya?
Speaker 2 (37:47):
Maybe they do someday, but but but for right now,
no Commander's terrible name, especially if you were a Redskins fan.
Here we go, Washington Armenians, Okay, Boom.
Speaker 1 (37:59):
I like it better than the commanders. I can tell
you that, right.
Speaker 2 (38:01):
The Armenians, Yeah, I'm good. And chaer could sing the
national anthem and all of their all their games.
Speaker 1 (38:07):
Every time they come out. She could sing alf read
and there you go, wear a headdress. How's that everybody?
Speaker 10 (38:13):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (38:13):
It works for everybody.
Speaker 2 (38:14):
Too bad, Sonny, he's not allowed to see this.
Speaker 1 (38:16):
I know, let me know If that works for you
guys too, You can contact Ben and I on x
at newsby three or on Facebook at news Byte. We
upload a new episode every single Monday, so check back
next week and see what new offerings we have for you. Meanwhile,
have a great week, and whatever you do, don't take
the fifth.
Speaker 2 (38:33):
I'm Nancy shack Oh, take a fifth of I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 1 (38:37):
This is news
Borders our, Tom Holman face its down an ice protester,
President Biden's doctor takes the fifth, and Alan Dershowitz says
he knows who's on the Epstein list because he's seen it.
People are laying down the law this week on our
Did they really just say that cuts?
Speaker 2 (00:15):
I'm Nancy Shack, I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
This is newspite.
Speaker 3 (00:30):
This guy who lives in his mother's basement. Nor is
it that surprises me? You don't have purple hair and
a nose's drink. Get out of here, your loser, I
guarantee you. He sits down the peak.
Speaker 4 (00:41):
Were you ever told to lie about the President's Hall
of the Advicey Council?
Speaker 5 (00:44):
I must respectfully declined to answer based upon the physician
patient privilege and in reliance somebody right under the fifth
end of the Constitution.
Speaker 6 (00:52):
And the day I was affused, I said I want
every document app because I knew every document would prove
I was inna day. So let me tell you, I
know for a fact mention being suppressed, and they're being
suppressed to protect individuals.
Speaker 2 (01:03):
I know the names of the individuals, So let's go.
Speaker 1 (01:07):
Yeah, Well that's Professor Alan Dershowitz. He's a professor emeritus
from Harvard Law. And if you remember, there was an
accusation many years ago that Professor Dershowitz had been a
guest of Jeffrey Epstein's. Turns out that that was a
case of mistaken identity.
Speaker 2 (01:25):
Who looks like Alan Dershwitz.
Speaker 1 (01:27):
He's the only one I know, but apparently there's more
than one. But before it was settled, the good professor
filed a lawsuit. And as he's explaining there and has
he'll explained the cut. He got to look at all
the documents. Cut number three.
Speaker 6 (01:42):
This is not an opinion, this is a fact I
have seen.
Speaker 2 (01:45):
Remember, I was.
Speaker 1 (01:45):
Accused falsely, and ultimately I was completely cleared.
Speaker 6 (01:50):
The woman admitted that she may have mistook me for
somebody else that withdrew all of her lawsuits.
Speaker 2 (01:54):
And so from day one, from the day I.
Speaker 6 (01:56):
Was accused, I said, I want every document out because
I knew every document prove I was innocent.
Speaker 2 (02:01):
So let me tell you.
Speaker 6 (02:02):
I know for a fact documents are being suppressed, and
they're being suppressed to protect individuals. I know the names
of the individuals. I know why they're being suppressed. I
know who's suppressing them. But I'm bound by confidentiality from
a judge and cases, and I can't disclose what I know.
But I hand to God, I know I know the
(02:23):
names of people whose files are being suppressed in order
to protect them.
Speaker 2 (02:28):
And that's wrong.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
But wait a minute, ben, I thought that there was
no list. Isn't that what our Attorney General, Pam Bondi said.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
There's no list, no list. What's nothing to see here?
Speaker 1 (02:39):
Please churn us out that a card carrying member of
the Bar Association who's an officer of the court, has
personally seen the list. The truth revealed. But we don't
get to see the list yet because according to the
current Department of Justice, there is no list, and there's
a fight going on at the Department of Justice right
now regarding it. You've got Dan Bongino, he's deputy FBI director.
(03:01):
He tried to he tried to leverage Pambondi into giving
up the list by saying, either give up the list
or I'm out of here. And so far he's still there.
So I don't know what's happening, but it's certainly a bruhaha,
and it has turned maga. It's vicious against the president.
Speaker 2 (03:21):
Yeah, it's first of all, regardless of how many people
are on the list, where the list is, who has
the list, if there ever was a list, if there
even is a list anymore, whatever the case may be, Right,
all this is fuel and lots of it for the
conspiracy fires, and these will burn forever. By the way,
it doesn't even matter at this point because we've seen
(03:41):
all this before with different topics and different things over
the years. Right, if they come out with a list,
some people are gonna be like, that's not even the
real list. If they don't come out with a list, well,
why isn't there a list? We know there was a list.
So I mean, no matter what happens from this point forward,
the conspiracy fires not only will be burning, they will
be raging for long past our lifetimes.
Speaker 1 (04:04):
So you're saying, well, probably name the truth.
Speaker 2 (04:07):
Well, I mean we might know the truth, but there'll
be a lot of people who don't believe that it
is the truth.
Speaker 1 (04:11):
That's absolutely I think that's absolutely accurate.
Speaker 2 (04:14):
Yeah, I mean it's you know, you think about pick
a conspiracy doesn't matter. Let's pick JFK, Right, because that's
a good that's a good Walking on the moon walking
on the Well, I'm pretty sure we've solved that one.
But here I'm not sure we have.
Speaker 1 (04:25):
There's still people go, yeah, it was a set, it's
not capricorn one, and it stayed with them.
Speaker 2 (04:29):
All right, well we'll do walking on the moon. So
walking on the moon. Let's assume we know the truth
right now, we walked on the moon, okay, and and
so so that is that is the truth. A lot
of people don't believe that's the truth. And if and
if somebody came out with evidence that we didn't walk
in the moon and that was the truth, then there'd
be a whole bunch of people would be like, that's
(04:49):
not the truth. We walked in the movie. So this
is one of those uh you know jfk assassination aliens
in Roswell, New Mexico. Uh, you pick pick pick the one.
There's a billion of them. Anyway, this is another one
of those that it doesn't even matter if we know
the truth. If the truth gets out there, there'll be
people who'll be like, well, that's not the truth. I mean,
that's just not the truth. So this buckle up or
(05:12):
don't buckle up. But this is never going away ever.
Ever ever, in the history of efvers, I don't.
Speaker 1 (05:17):
Think people understand how difficult it is to keep a secret, because,
for instance, in the Moon analogy one, eighteen men if
you know, theoretically, if you believe NASA and you're lying eyes,
twelve men have walked on the moon. Eighteen men have
been to the moon. At least I think it's closer
to twenty four who have circled the moon and not
(05:39):
didn't get down, so I mean, didn't go to the surface.
So you really think that all those people and their
families would have kept a secret like that, Oh seriously,
And I don't think that could have happened.
Speaker 2 (05:51):
No, But and then you can extend that beyond and
all the people who were involved in the mission. Yeah,
and then you can I just saw something the other day.
There are the landers still up there, right, they didn't
told that home with with triple A the bottom the No,
that's right, the landing portion of.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
The land spider legs are still and they're supposedly supposed mirror.
Speaker 2 (06:15):
Yes, that's why the moon glows because of the.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
Now you just started a new conspiracy.
Speaker 2 (06:21):
Congratulations. But so so they're still up there, and and
I've seen flag pictures that supposedly are the landers. So
everybody who's not even just the people involved in the
actual moon landings, but everybody involved in the support everybody
who's flown by the moon. Everybody will fly by the moon.
(06:41):
You know, we have a lot of people going up
there and flying by. Nowadays it's more popular than it
than it ever was before. You know, you've got the
Chinese and the India and all these places. They're all
going up there, They're all flying around the moon. They're
all doing stuff. So all these people are lying, all
of them, and and as as you mentioned, and all
their families and all the you know, all the support staff,
all the yap. Nope, please, we went to the moon,
(07:04):
you know, I don't I.
Speaker 1 (07:05):
Think there's an Epstein list of Alan Dershowitz tells me
he's seen it, then he's seen it. I don't know
whether it still exists. Who knows who tore what up.
But if ire Van BONDI I go have a chat
with Alan Dershowitz and see if he's got anything left
over from his lawsuit that she can take a look at.
But they should do.
Speaker 2 (07:20):
So, can you subpoena Alan Dershowitz's brain is memory.
Speaker 1 (07:24):
Yeah, you can't. Actually you can't down you can actually
so so that that does exist.
Speaker 2 (07:31):
Alan, here's a legal pad. I want you to write
down everything you can remember about.
Speaker 1 (07:35):
What that would be. That would be good talking about
the truth. The Congress was looking for a little bit
of truth this week from President Biden's physician. He was asked, stops, okay,
I get your gafa. You're very you're sort of a
gafa there. He was asked this in front of Congress
(07:56):
cut ten c.
Speaker 4 (07:58):
Were you ever told to lie about the President's health?
Speaker 5 (08:00):
Of the advice the Council, I must respectfully decline to
answer based upon the physician patient privilege and in the
reliance on my right under the Fifth Mend of the Constitution.
I am not a lawyer. I must follow my lawyer's
advice in this matter.
Speaker 4 (08:13):
Let the record reflect that doctor O'Connor has invoked the
Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination. Doctor O'Connor, please be
very clear. Are you declining to answer the question put
to you solely on the ground that you believe the
answer will incriminate you.
Speaker 5 (08:25):
I'm the advice the Council. I must respectfully decline to
answers based upon the physician's patient privilege and in reliance
on my right under the Fifthmendment of the Constitution. I
am not a lawyer, and I must rely on my
lawyer's advice.
Speaker 1 (08:38):
In this matter.
Speaker 4 (08:41):
Doctor O'Connor, did you ever believe the President was unfit
to execute his duties as president.
Speaker 5 (08:48):
On the adviceive Council. I must respectfully decline to answer
based on the physician patient privilege and in reliance in
my right under the fifth Endmit of the Constitution. I'm
not a lawyer, and I must follow my ace.
Speaker 7 (09:00):
In this matter.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
So that was doctor Kevin like a like a like
a que card there because you said the same thing.
Speaker 1 (09:06):
Yeah he did. My guess is yes his attorney if
he's a good attorney, and he is says yes every answer.
It's like what is your name? This is how you answer.
You don't tell your client to pick and choose when
you're when you give them advice to take the fifth
it's from the moment they say hello to you. You
don't let the client decide where the legal boundaries are.
(09:28):
That has to be something that the attorneys will work out.
So every response from your client has to be the fifth.
But here's the thing about that. That was doctor Kevin O'Connor.
He is or was President Biden's personal physician. But here's
the thing before, before you go any further priv you know,
if the question is regarding uh, what did you think,
(09:54):
then that absolutely is patient confidentiality. That's your doctor's opinion.
That's between did you tell it? That's but to ask
if you've ever lied, that's not covered by patient confidentially.
So the first part of that answer means nothing. The
second part, however, yes, they're taking the fifth. That's really
(10:15):
interesting because invoking the fifth is the problem with doing
it is that you really only do it if you
think there is a possibility that you could be charged
with a criminal enterprise. So you don't take the fifth
if they if somebody's just asking you questions regarding your
(10:38):
patient records, you take unless you poison them or something.
You take the fifth only if you're trying to cover
something that is nefarious.
Speaker 2 (10:47):
Well here's here's and perfect example would be, Okay, what
condition did Joe Biden have? Can't tell you?
Speaker 1 (10:55):
Can't tell you? That's patient confidence.
Speaker 2 (10:57):
Where you ever asked to lie about Joe Biden's condition.
Can tell you, Yeah, I can tell.
Speaker 1 (11:02):
But not gonna because it couldn't. It could in fact,
because that one, if you, if you, that one could
lead to conspiracy charges. So that's why you're shaking the
fifth on that particular question.
Speaker 2 (11:13):
Well, here we talked about conspiracy, conspiracy theories, right as
soon as you take the fifth in any case, right,
and this was the one we're talking about. Yeah, all
of a sudden, boom, you've just divided half the country. Well,
of course he took the fifth. You know why he
took the fifth. He took the fifth because he's lying,
because he's a sack of crappit.
Speaker 1 (11:29):
Well, there you go, and so that was so don't
go there. So that's so this is the point that
the chairman of the committee, James Comer, makes cut number five.
Speaker 8 (11:40):
I can tell you exactly what happened. Uh, Doctor O'Connor.
Uh pleaded the fifth Amendment. And I'm gonna I'm gonna
read the first two questions that were asked, were you
ever told to lie about the president's health? He pleaded
the fifth Amendment. He would not answer that question. The
(12:03):
second question, did you ever believe President Biden was unfit
to execute his duties. Again, President Biden's White House position
pleaded the Fifth Amendment. This is unprecedented, and I think
that this adds more fuel to the fire that there
was a cover up. I believe that this adds legitimacy
(12:24):
to the Tapper book and the other books that are
in the works that are about to come out that
shows there was a lot of suspicious activity taking place
in the White House with respect to the president's health.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
But now to your point, he made exactly what you
were saying, is that it gives kind of an indisha
of guilt. It's not supposed to, but it does. But
and you would think, wouldn't you between you and me,
and that anybody who hears that goes what they believe
he's hiding something. Right, Well, the Democrats to this is
why I stopped you before, because I want Congresswoman Jasmine
(12:59):
Crockett to make your second point. Democrats don't care that
that is the normal indition that a Republican doctor in there.
Absolutely they would be with you, but it isn't. It's
the doctor protecting their their candidate or their former candidate,
Joe Biden. So according to them, what's a little Fifth Amendment.
(13:20):
Cut six.
Speaker 9 (13:22):
It's kind of astounding to hear someone say if you
invoke the Fifth Amendment, that is only because you are guilty.
We have a constitutional right that anyone who maybe under
fire can invoke.
Speaker 1 (13:34):
Yeah, we do. And here's the thing with that. That
doesn't say. That amendment doesn't say invoke this and you
are free, invoke this and no harm shall come to you.
It says you don't have to testify against yourself. That's
what that amendment is.
Speaker 2 (13:49):
Doesn't mean we can't somehow prove that you worry.
Speaker 1 (13:52):
It doesn't mean that the implication of taking it means
that you are innocent. But Chief continued to six say.
Speaker 9 (13:59):
It's kind of ad to hear someone I think that
he did what any good lawyer would advise him to do.
Speaker 1 (14:07):
If he had a crime. Sure, I don't tell my
I wouldn't tell my client unless there is a possibility
of them being charged with a crime. To take the
fath I mean, because you are in fact doing exactly
what you said, you are leaving them open to a
lot of unpleasant innuendo. You only take that if the
option of testifying the other side of that is going
(14:29):
to get you into trouble. But she doesn't seem to
see that six sy Please.
Speaker 9 (14:34):
I didn't see Joe Biden every single day, but I
did have an opportunity to interact with the president. I
never had a concern he may get fumbled up by words.
But that's not anything new and it's not anything that
came with age. We know that this is someone that
was born with a stutter that ultimately had to get
over it when.
Speaker 1 (14:53):
He was a US senator. He didn't go around stuttering.
He didn't. He may have been born the stutter. He
worked it out. But it was last year year of presidency.
I want you to hear. This is from a video
that was put out by the by the Republicans, but
it was not edited. It's got a music bed, but
it wasn't edited. This was the commander in chief and
(15:13):
the last year of his presidency. Cut number seven.
Speaker 10 (15:16):
We owe these truths to be self evident. Oh man,
and women are creative, but go you know the you
know the thing. America is a nation that can be
defined in a single word. I was going to foot
him foot excuse me, foothills of the MLAs with shijingping
see no see nos so long I n I'll say
(15:38):
it can never be secure. We'll never forget lying around,
And I said him lying around. Actually, it is noteworthy
that the percentage of women who registered to vote and
cashed the ballot is consistently higher than the percentage of
the men who do so. End the quote, repeat the line, well,
(16:00):
lady and effect the strategy to mobilize true in an
act summer the pressure, I miss him.
Speaker 1 (16:06):
That's not because of a stutter. Where was there a
stutter issue in it? That was cognitive issues and so
you know, so the Democrats are like, oh my god,
that's what we're defending. And on top of it, the
doctor just came out and pled the fifth because when
asked if he lied. I don't know how you spin
that with a straight face. But Jasmin Crockett, you know,
(16:29):
managed to do it with it with straight face. But
I don't know how. She's going to have to meet
her maker someday and explain why she was lining both
faces to the American people.
Speaker 2 (16:36):
Couple of things here. First of all, we hear all
the time about people pleading the fifth. Fine, yeah, I once,
just once, just once. I'd like to hear somebody stand
up in Congress, or in court or somewhere else to go. Listen,
I'm gonna plead the first, and I'm going to sing
like a canary here just so you know, like nobody
ever pleads the first, right, they just talk. Also, somebody's
(16:58):
got to plead the twenty first, the repeal of prohibition,
and say I'm just going to start drinking. I'm taking
the twenty first starting vers is gone.
Speaker 1 (17:05):
So that's why you don't really, you know, see that anymore.
Speaker 8 (17:09):
But he's but.
Speaker 2 (17:11):
Here's so two quick things about the doctor in a
more serious manner. One, he's sitting on a fence here,
first of all, and I'm not defending him or not
defending him. I'm just saying as a doctor, right, And
his lawyer says, do this, read this card and read
it three times if you have to, because that's what
he did. If he well, if he were to admit
(17:32):
let's let's say he was asked to lie and he
admits all that, and he was he's a lion, sack
of banana heads whatever I mean. You know, his medical
license could be in jeopardy. Certainly would go before a
medical board or some other crap at the very least. Secondly,
the question isn't well, it is to a degree. The
question they asked is were you ever asked to lie
(17:56):
about the President's health? I think more importantly is did
you ever lie about the President's health?
Speaker 1 (18:02):
Well? You know, And the interesting thing is the reason
why I suspect they didn't ask the question because that
is asking somebody to absolutely incriminate themselves, And so I
wouldn't answer that question if I were. You know, nobody answered.
Speaker 2 (18:16):
I'm just saying, ask the question.
Speaker 1 (18:17):
No, I get it, But I think there's a reason
why it wasn't asked because that was one of those
gotcha You know, you're asking somebody deliberately, so they were
trying to catch their questions where they could possibly have
been answered without somebody incriminating themselves.
Speaker 2 (18:30):
Because were you ever asked to lie? Could be yes
or could be no.
Speaker 1 (18:34):
But and it doesn't mean you did it. It just
means you were asked. So you're asking about other people's culpability.
That's why it was calchra.
Speaker 2 (18:40):
Well, even if you weren't asked to lie, right, did
you lie?
Speaker 1 (18:43):
That's why it wasn't asked. That's what I'm saying. I
get it.
Speaker 2 (18:46):
No, So either way, either answer to were you asked?
Speaker 1 (18:49):
But yeah, exactly. So they were asking questions where the
answer was not a confession. That's what they were looking for.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
Maybe they'll catch them later. And that's why those.
Speaker 1 (18:59):
Questions were worded the way they were, because they could
be answered without incriminating yourself. So but they had decided that, Nope,
we're not going to go there. I don't know.
Speaker 2 (19:08):
Maybe he was none of it. Look, we're not doctors,
and we had these conversations at nauseam and when when
the president was the president. Look, anybody with half a
brain knows there was something wrong. Do we know what
was wrong?
Speaker 11 (19:22):
No?
Speaker 2 (19:23):
Does his doctor even know what was wrong? Maybe the
doctor doesn't even know completely what was wrong. The brain's
an interesting place. So but but look, here's what. Here's
why I all know something was being done or said
or something.
Speaker 1 (19:35):
And people are saying, well, what, who cares? Now he's
not on office. There's a reason why this is important,
and that is because certain things that he did and
office are now given what his mental acuity was, are
now suspect of being from him. He was the elected
president of the I sense, regardless of what his state was,
he it was it was up to him to do it.
(19:57):
And if he didn't do it. There's nobody who can
take your place unless you remove him under the twenty
fifth and put the put the vice president in there.
So that's basically what we're talking about here. So why
is this a problem now? Why are we asking why
is he? Why is the doctor taking the fifth now?
Because amongst other things, there is the autopen. President Trump
(20:22):
will tell you why it's important. Cut eleven A.
Speaker 11 (20:26):
You're talking about the auto pen. Look, the autopen I
think is maybe one of the biggest scandals that we've
had in fifty to one hundred years. This is a
tremendous scandal. And I know the people on the other
side of the desk, that resolute desk. Unfortunately he used
it before me.
Speaker 8 (20:45):
But you know, we have our choice of seven desks.
Speaker 11 (20:48):
You're all beautiful, but I chose the resolute and so
did he unfortunately. But the people on the other side
of the resolute desk, I know them, Lisa, the whole group,
and then no good, there's sick people. And I guarantee
he knew nothing about what he was signing. I guarantee it.
Speaker 1 (21:11):
And that's the problem. So those pardons that ones that
he didn't sign, we don't know that he even asked
to have them sign executive orders that bear his signature
weren't his. They were done by autopen. And so it's
okay for the president to designate somebody to use the
autopen on his behalf to sign things like pardons and
(21:31):
executive orders. Generally speaking, pardons aren't done like that. Though
generally speaking, the president actually signs the pardons who are
not done by autopen, but he can, but he never
gave the order for these things to be signed, and
so that means somebody else was basically exercising the executive
power of the presidency who wasn't elected. And that's a crime.
(21:56):
And this is why it's important, and this is why,
even though he's out of office, we need now to
see who is calling the shots, because there's a criminality here,
and there are certain things that should be and can
be undone if they weren't done by the president, the
elected president at the time. That's why this is important.
Speaker 2 (22:12):
Hold on, I'm going to put another conspiracy book on
the shelf, because here's another one. I mean, you know,
I don't know, it's it's sometimes it's funny. Sometimes, Look,
we've all gotten caught up in a conspiracy theory in
our lives, even if it was some minuscule thing daily basis,
we happened every day, sure, and some people more than others, obviously,
but it you know, and in some ways it's funny.
(22:34):
But in some ways it's like our entire lives, our
entire system of government, our entire everything seems to be
running via conspiracy theories, which is kind of why we're
in the backwards ass mess were in as it is.
You know, it used to be fun with Elvis isn't dead.
Oh oh they saw aliens out in in Nevada.
Speaker 1 (22:55):
Oh, you know, I've always wanted to go to area,
even the you know.
Speaker 2 (22:58):
Even the JFK assassinate, which obviously was serious for the country,
but that's kind of like who shot JFK? Who shot JR?
Speaker 1 (23:06):
Second shot? But now it's like every it doesn't matter,
everything is right, yeah, and has made it worse of course. Yeah,
social media stuff.
Speaker 2 (23:18):
You know, immediately even if it's not true, and by
the time it gets untangled as not true, everybody.
Speaker 1 (23:24):
To give them some credit when they don't really deserve
that much credit. But but but to give them some cred.
They're trying to figure out what the hell's going on here? Sure?
And what happened in the Biden administration. They want to know,
you know, who who has signed the pardons, Who was
it who let all the illegal aliens in the executive
orders that let the you know, and who was who
is making these decisions? Was it President Biden or was
(23:47):
it some progressive puppet master, because whoever they are, you know,
they have a lot of explaining to do, and they
are they are currently trying to figure out where the
line can be drawn between legal actions that were done
by President Biden and illegal actions that were done by
(24:08):
somebody who was not President Biden. And that's why, which
everybody else by the way, which is everybody else. Yeah,
Jill Biden does not have the power to write executive
Ji Biden, nobody has only him, and and and in
lacking any kind of move from Congress or the invocation
of a constitutional amendment, the vice president can't do it either.
(24:30):
So it's basically up to just Biden. So that's what
we're trying to figure out. And it affects everything. It
affects everything that the President Biden, in particular in the
last two years and really in the last year of
his presidency did, and currently the flashpoint for this argument
over what's been allowed what's happened to us is immigration.
(24:53):
That's the biggest class point that I see really right now,
because you have the Democrats trying to do too one,
distract away from as you heard Jasmine Crockett try to
do away from the legality of what the Biden administration did,
and trying to create ire against the current occupant of
the White House, and that's been around immigration. I'm sure
(25:17):
there's other things, too many many issues, but immigration is
the one that's going on now. So the Democrats are
trying to die on the hill of immigration in an
effort to get people away from what was happening in
the Biden administration and in the last year of it.
And you see that every day now. And the problem
that they what they are doing is they're lighting a
(25:37):
match to the US They're ready to burn it down
in order to save it, basically in order to save themselves,
I should say. And the mess that they've made of everything.
And you can see this every day with various things
that are going on, and the worst of it's been
lately in California and in Texas regarding immigration and a
(25:58):
perfect example of people who are out of control, Democrats,
out of control in an effort to make immigration a
into some kind of holocaust which it isn't is Mayor
Karen Bass La. Mayor Karen Bass who actually got tried
to interfere in an ICE rate and tried to interfere
(26:21):
with federal agents rounding up illegal aliens. No legal aliens
were here, Nobody with a green card, nobody who was
supposed to be here, nobody who jumps on the hoops.
These are illegal aliens and a lot of them were criminal,
illegal aliens on top of the already established criminality of
being here illegally. This was her at an ICE at
(26:42):
an ICE rate cut twenty one.
Speaker 12 (26:44):
A comment, they need to leave, and they need to
leave right now.
Speaker 1 (26:57):
Accept. Yeah, they weren't going to be leaving soon. They
were doing their job. They had federal warrants they were
carrying out. They were legally there doing what they legally can.
But this is the garbage that the Democrats are putting
out there and their friends in the mainstream media are
(27:18):
putting out there. These raids are illegal, They're not. These
are federally these are federal laws passed by Congress that
these are federal agents supporting the federal laws. They have
the right to be there, it's their job to be there.
Yet you have people like mayor baths and here are
sunny houstin of the view trying to get people upset
and to think that this is not legal. Cut fourteen.
(27:39):
If they would do their.
Speaker 7 (27:40):
Jobs the way that I think they should be doing
their jobs, which is unmasked, without disappearing people from the streets,
I don't think that the public would feel as endangered
because if someone approaches my loved one who's undocumented with
a mask, how.
Speaker 1 (27:56):
Do I know that their actual law enforcement? How do
I know that they work for ICE.
Speaker 2 (28:00):
So that's one thing I'll.
Speaker 7 (28:03):
There's actually people who have impersonated Price exactly. They don't
show IDs that they're not dressed appropriately, they're not flagged,
and they're masked. And so in my world, if you
mask yourself because you don't want to be seen, because
you don't want to be seen, because there will be
a reckoning for some of the actions that law enforcement,
(28:24):
actual law enforcement have done.
Speaker 1 (28:25):
I don't recall her saying that the ANTIFA and Black
Lives Matter people should take off their masks. They were masked.
But by the way, the Ice officers do it because
a lot of them are undercover officers and if you
expose their faces then they get harmed or their families
get harmed because they can't be identified when they're undercover.
That is, that is one of the big problems. But
(28:46):
also you heard her disappearing people off the street, like
they're going out and just taking American citizens and disappearing
them off the streets. CNN did the same thing, Tiffany
cross Cut twenty two.
Speaker 13 (28:55):
We don't know if they were looking for someone, We
don't know if they arrested anybody, but clearly whoever they
were looking for, there was no one but there for kids. Well,
this is I think this is the challenge I have
with with even talking about this. We are normalizing a
government agency disappearing people. We are normalizing. We're talking about
it like it's no big deal that they are kidnapping
people and transporting them to concentration camps, both domestic and foreign.
(29:19):
That is not that's kind of insulting to I think
it's insulting what they're doing. It is not insulting to Jewish. Hell,
I'm finally insulting that you could even fix your mouth
to defend this gas.
Speaker 1 (29:31):
It doesn't matter.
Speaker 13 (29:33):
It's a concentration camp what they're doing. And they are
disappearing people, claiming that these are people who have committed
the most harsh crimes. But according to the reporting, less
than ten percent of these people have committed harsh crimes.
So to do the victim Olympics and decide who had
it worse, I can tell you I can participate in
that too. And everybody who says, oh, this is not
the America, I know, I can guarantee you it is
the America.
Speaker 1 (29:53):
First of all, who's giving her those numbers? Her assistant,
because that's that's utter a bull bleeps. There's no there's
no proof that that's what it is. And not that,
but the Department of Homeland Securities put out the numbers.
They're going after criminals, they're not going after innocent people
walking down the street. Nobody's disappearing anybody. And it is
completely offensive to compare it to the Holocaust and disappearing people.
(30:15):
And you heard what she said. What she did is
she went on try to viciously attack the moment who said,
wait a minute, this is not the Holocaust. There are
no Ovens here. Oh my god, that woman. You know,
if she could have hit her, I think she would.
They're into violence, and they're creating a sense of violence
against federal officers and against law abiding people. And this
(30:35):
is the point that Tom Homan was making. He was
on Fox, Who's trying to explain, you can protest all
you want, got no problem with your protesting. You can't
interfere with officers or drum up violence against them. Cut
number eight.
Speaker 14 (30:48):
People were welcome to protests. They have their First Amendment rights,
grew up. They can't cross that line. They can't impede
us from doing our job. That's a felony. They certainly
can't put arms, put hands on an agent that's a family.
So what happened in California is just another example of
protesters becoming criminals. And they've been in bolden by even
(31:08):
members of Congress who compare Ice to Nazis and races
and terrorists. I mean, the rhetoric is so high, and
I said two months ago it's going to end up
with a loss of life, and we had one the
other day in Texas and it's not over. I mean,
the rhetoric has to end.
Speaker 2 (31:23):
Yeah, by the way I you know, ice look for
a solution to problems, because that's what I do. So
the one in the Tiffany cross cut that we played
and she referenced to the Olympics. Here's my idea. This
is brilliant. She came up with a brilliant idea. Didn't
even know it. Let's have the let's let's run this
(31:46):
ice raid thing like the Olympics. We're going to give
all of them a medal and then send them back
to their country. Right, isn't that what they do? They
give you a medal and then you go back to
your country.
Speaker 1 (31:59):
So mayor would like you to add money to that.
So she wants to.
Speaker 2 (32:03):
So you give him a medal and you send them
back to their country. That we just solve the whole
problem one word. And it's like, yeah, don't try to
round them up, just just just like the Olympics, give
him a medal center the country.
Speaker 1 (32:13):
Well, I got to say, Tom Holman is just done
with this. He's just so freaking surprise.
Speaker 2 (32:18):
That he hasn't been done a long time ago.
Speaker 1 (32:20):
He's a badass, I gotta say. And he's just like
so he was given a speech. You heard it in
the open, and there was a protester, Heckler, and he's
even she's just done with these numb nuts. Cut number
ten C.
Speaker 12 (32:32):
There got morens like this are the country?
Speaker 3 (32:36):
This guy, this guy one Norse were like the surface nation.
This guy ain't got the balls to be a nice officer?
Do you ever got the ball? Pretty a born chorg
This guy lives in his mother's basement. On is it
that surprised me? You don't have purple hair and her
nose ring. Get out of here, your loser.
Speaker 15 (33:05):
And very and you're such a badass beating me off
stage in thirteen minutes and fifty second, I guarantee you.
Speaker 2 (33:20):
He sits down the peak.
Speaker 1 (33:22):
Them's fighting words.
Speaker 2 (33:24):
I'm putting money on home.
Speaker 1 (33:25):
Yeah yeah, I mean and how many? I mean? Usually
Tom Hommon just goes to whatever and just moves on
his way. But he is just freaking done with us.
Why because his agents are getting hurt now, people are attacking.
In fact, this past week somebody, an agent's family was attacked.
So it's like that's that's and here we have, in
(33:46):
this particular case, the vice president. The vice president was
walking through Disneyland and got yeah, not really cut eleven
mister Vice President, we support immigrants, support America. We support immigrants,
(34:07):
We support America. I thought California with violence, it's obnoxious.
I mean, I'm pretty sure Jade Vance supports immigrants in
America too.
Speaker 11 (34:19):
I do.
Speaker 2 (34:19):
I know you do.
Speaker 1 (34:20):
I think we all do. This is the stupidity level
is huge among these people. It's just it's just massive.
But this is this is what the Democrats have wrought
in order to one increase their base because I think
the legal immigrants will will vote Democrat one and two.
It deflects from the fact that their their demand in
(34:41):
the White House for four years was non compassmentus and
has a lot to we have to figure out.
Speaker 2 (34:48):
I'm sure I have to please fIF I don't know.
If I don't know, I'm not sure. Okay, I don't know.
Speaker 1 (34:54):
You got it.
Speaker 2 (34:54):
I don't know.
Speaker 1 (34:55):
So we end every week with the truth control. This
week we're doing the same thing. This is President Trump
speaks to reporters and he's asked that the Washington Commander
should change their name back to the Redskins. Uh. You
can hear his response, cut one bee, the Commander's changed
the name back to Redskins.
Speaker 11 (35:13):
Well, you want me to make a controversial statement.
Speaker 10 (35:16):
I would.
Speaker 12 (35:18):
I wouldn't have changed, but that.
Speaker 11 (35:21):
Sarah just doesn't have the same It doesn't have.
Speaker 2 (35:24):
The same ring to me. But you know, winning can
make everything sound good.
Speaker 12 (35:28):
So if they win, all of.
Speaker 11 (35:29):
A sudden, the commander sounds good. But I wouldn't have
changed in it.
Speaker 1 (35:32):
I don't know if he's if you serious, would he
have or is he poking the DEI crowd? I just
want to poke him for the hell of it.
Speaker 2 (35:39):
The question, of course, was would you change the name
back to the Redskins, which he never really answered. He
said I wouldn't have changed He said I would, I
wouldn't have. Well, but he said I wouldn't have changed it.
That that was what I said.
Speaker 1 (35:49):
He would have changed to begin with. But in the
end he goes, but I would, Yes, I would change
it back.
Speaker 2 (35:52):
Well, yeah, I don't know if you for it.
Speaker 1 (35:55):
By the way, I'm a I'm a Washingtonian. I absolutely
positively have been furious that it's changed, because you know what,
the native tribes in the area said, we like the Redskins.
Change it back.
Speaker 2 (36:06):
Well, a lot of these, these these woke crowds that
are changing not only names of NFL teams, but of
other teams and high school teams. Makot right, they have.
Speaker 1 (36:14):
Nothing to do with they're virtue signaling correct.
Speaker 2 (36:16):
And and there are a lot of people who who
as you mentioned, there's a lot of Native American groups
that are proud of these names. Some of them. I mean, obviously,
you know.
Speaker 1 (36:26):
The Navajos went to Dan Snyder and said, you know,
call it after us. How about wind Talkers, which I
loved because first that was the code breaking group during
World War II, those Native American I absolutely loved it,
and I thought that was stupendous. But of course you
went with the commanders. But here's something that I heard
that just killed me, and that is there was a Karen.
(36:47):
You know, I'm sorry to everybody whose named Karen's not obnoxious,
but there was a Karen who was talking about this,
and this is something that's always irritated me when they
did when they changed the name, and she's she was
going on about how you know, it was insulting, and
she said, Share thought it was insulting, and since Share
was a Native American, then then obviously that was true.
(37:10):
But here's the thing. Shear's Armenian shere has nothing to
do with. I mean, she sang a song called half
Breed in her but that was She's not Indian, not
on any level. Is she native American, not even one
one million, she is warned. She's not even as Native
American as Senator Elizabeth Warning.
Speaker 2 (37:27):
She called gypsy.
Speaker 1 (37:30):
She's an Armenian from from Van Nuys or something. So
it's like and so because she I'm like, oh my god,
she doesn't even know what a Native American is.
Speaker 2 (37:39):
I got it, So I got it again. Solutions right here,
because uh, the Washington Redskins, Okay, we got rid of that.
Do we bring it back?
Speaker 1 (37:47):
Maya?
Speaker 2 (37:47):
Maybe they do someday, but but but for right now,
no Commander's terrible name, especially if you were a Redskins fan.
Here we go, Washington Armenians, Okay, Boom.
Speaker 1 (37:59):
I like it better than the commanders. I can tell
you that, right.
Speaker 2 (38:01):
The Armenians, Yeah, I'm good. And chaer could sing the
national anthem and all of their all their games.
Speaker 1 (38:07):
Every time they come out. She could sing alf read
and there you go, wear a headdress. How's that everybody?
Speaker 10 (38:13):
Yeah?
Speaker 1 (38:13):
It works for everybody.
Speaker 2 (38:14):
Too bad, Sonny, he's not allowed to see this.
Speaker 1 (38:16):
I know, let me know If that works for you
guys too, You can contact Ben and I on x
at newsby three or on Facebook at news Byte. We
upload a new episode every single Monday, so check back
next week and see what new offerings we have for you. Meanwhile,
have a great week, and whatever you do, don't take
the fifth.
Speaker 2 (38:33):
I'm Nancy shack Oh, take a fifth of I'm Ben Parker.
Speaker 1 (38:37):
This is news
Popular Podcasts
Fudd Around And Find Out
UConn basketball star Azzi Fudd brings her championship swag to iHeart Women’s Sports with Fudd Around and Find Out, a weekly podcast that takes fans along for the ride as Azzi spends her final year of college trying to reclaim the National Championship and prepare to be a first round WNBA draft pick. Ever wonder what it’s like to be a world-class athlete in the public spotlight while still managing schoolwork, friendships and family time? It’s time to Fudd Around and Find Out!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.