September 15, 2025 • 30 mins
Trump says its not my signature on the Epstein card , Homan says MSNBC is disgusting saying people are disappearing and a Karen says hand over that ball. There is a lot of arguing going on in this week's "did they really just say that" clips this week.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
President Trump says, it's not my signature on the Epstein card.
Borders are. Tom Holman says ms NBC is disgusting saying
people are disappearing, and Karen says, hand over that ball.
There is a lot of arguing going on this week,
and are did they really just say that clips I'm
Nancy shack Bear. This is news. Bye, it's not.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
My signature and it's not the way I speak. And
anybody that's covered me for a long time, No, that's
not my language. It's nonsense.
Speaker 3 (00:40):
And you used the term disappearing people.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
To the group that.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
Entially US citizens. US citizens get arrested every day. You
and citizens get rested by policts every day? Are they
being disappeared?
Speaker 5 (01:06):
Fightappeared, disappear?
Speaker 1 (01:11):
Yeah, that's a Karen. I don't know who she is.
There are a couple of theories out there. Who's as
to who she is. She's at a Phillies game. Well,
really and truly. So this kid is at the baseball game,
it's a big deal for his birthday with his dad.
There's a home run that lands near them, but not
directly in front of them, and the dad grabbed the
ball in the scrum and gave it to his son
(01:35):
on his birthday. Well, there was a woman that where
everybody's calling a Karen God to help people, whose name
actually is Karen nearby, who thought because the ball landed
closer to her that it was her ball, and she
basically assaulted him. She she's in his face screaming at him,
hand me the ball, and this guy who's trying to
set an example for his son, actually took the ball
(01:55):
away from his son and gave it to her, so
she'd stopped screaming at him, and people in this state
were screaming at her, going, you know, what the bleep
is wrong with you? And she's she's just fighting back
with them, and she was really badly behaved and taking
a ball away from a little boy on his birthday.
And so that's what you hear. Somebody's phone nearby got
it cut seventeen.
Speaker 5 (02:25):
After fight by.
Speaker 1 (02:28):
Shut up, Karen, you know, I mean, it's like, oh
my god. The team stood up. The team did they
brought the kid a whole bag of swag. Somebody who's
watching obviously told security people told the team they brought
him a whole bag of Philly swag and then brought
him back into the locker room where he got to
meet players and got a signed bat. So it turned
(02:50):
out being a fantastic birthday for him and he got
some great stuff. But oh my god, first of all,
to do that in public to a little boy, did
you need the ball that bad that she had to
break a little boy's heart? I mean, what the hell is?
And it has gone around the world, and it has
She's been misidentified a couple of times, and people who
(03:12):
are dead going it wasn't me. I swear to God,
it wasn't me. And but I don't know who she is.
But whoever she is, I hope she gets banned from
that part because that was just appalling behavior.
Speaker 6 (03:21):
You're going to have surgery to rearrange her face so
nobody can ever recognize her again, and she'll under a rock.
Speaker 1 (03:29):
I don't know if there was amber liquid involved in
that bad behavior, but it was, you know, talk about
setting a horrific example.
Speaker 5 (03:38):
I've been to baseball games many many times. I've been
to baseball games, yeah.
Speaker 6 (03:41):
And I've never gotten a ball. I came close. My
friend got one once. But here's the thing that drives
me crazy. Anyway, forget this. I mean, she actually marched
across the stands to confront the father. Just when like
forty three people all dive in the same place to
get a ball. I think to myself, it'd be neat
to get a ball, but I don't.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
Isn't that bad?
Speaker 5 (04:00):
No way.
Speaker 1 (04:01):
Well, so this is a funny story, and my husband
will be furious with me for telling it, but I
don't care. And so we were at a Red Sox game,
my husband, my sister in law, my brother in law,
and I had gotten tickets for everybody because my sister
in law lives in Texas and she is a huge
Red Sox fan because she grew up here and this
was something she loves to do. So we go, We're
(04:22):
sitting in right field and a foul ball comes right
at us and literally right at my husband.
Speaker 7 (04:29):
What is he?
Speaker 1 (04:29):
Does he catch the ball and handed to her? Does
he catch the ball? No, he goes into the fetal
position and lets it bounce off of him, and the
guys behind us are going, dude, you're supposed to catch
the ball. And to this day he's mortified over the
fact that he didn't. You know, somebody else caught the
ball and actually handed it to him, and he said no, no,
you got it. You keep it. But it was but
you know, it was like, like, honey, what the hell.
Speaker 6 (04:53):
Then every once in a while, you'll see one of
these highlights on the on the sports channel, or on
the local news or something, depending on where it happens.
There's some guys holding his baby and a beer and
he reaches up with one hand and grass.
Speaker 5 (05:05):
That guy's pretty cool.
Speaker 1 (05:06):
He is pretty cool. God help that baby. If you know,
it's like, wow, No, so it was. It was just
bad behavior, and it's it's it occurred to me that
there's a lot of bad behavior out there these days,
and and sometimes it's it's all from your perspective. Sometimes
it's no, everybody can agree. I think everybody agrees that
(05:27):
that Karen was bad behavior.
Speaker 6 (05:29):
She might even agree at this point.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
She might yeah, she might think now that she's sobered up,
if that was indeed, one of the issues go what
the hell did I do? But Democrats are accusing President
Trump of bad behavior. Essentially, what they're doing is it's
aws to do with the Epstein files. Now, the Epstein
files were under President Biden's DJ, under their control for years,
(05:52):
four years to be precife. Nothing ever can right nobody. Ever.
My guess is they looked at them. There was nothing
they could use to hurt the Republicans, so they went
on their marry way. Well, now that President Trump is
an office, they going, oh, he's obviously sitting on them
because he's hiding something that's not flattering to him. And
he's like, you had them for four years, you did nothing.
(06:15):
You tried to tell me that the Body administration would
not have taken whatever they could from that and tried
to smear him with it if something actually existed. Well,
this past week, the Democrats released what they said was
a birthday card that he had sent to Jeffrey Epstein
and President trum go is I never sent Jeffrey Epstein
a birthday card, and he was asked about it while
(06:36):
he was trying to get on a marine one the
other day. Cut one bee.
Speaker 5 (06:42):
It's not my.
Speaker 2 (06:42):
Signature, and it's not the way I speak, and anybody
that's covered me for a long time, no, that's not
my language. It's nonsense. And frankly, you're wasting your time.
All you do is trying to get off the great
successes DC in about two hundred other things we've done
that he is so successful. This is a great, great success,
and we have so many I don't think any president
(07:04):
in their first eight months has anywhere near the success.
Speaker 1 (07:08):
That we've had. Does it make sense to you? He's
saying that that the reason why they're working that keep
tossing Epstein out, even though they had the Epstein files
for four years and now they're doing it is to
deflect from the fact that he's doing a good job,
and they can't have that because that means they'll lose
the midterms and the presidential election after that, So they
(07:29):
have to distract, So they're using the Epstein files to distract.
He goes, that's I never signed that, that's not my signature.
Do you believe him, Benjamin I?
Speaker 6 (07:41):
I guess I do, because I think that you're right.
I think he's kind of right in the way, like
like my mental thoughts are. And I know people lie
all the time in different ways, But you're right. It's
not like the Epstein files just appeared out of nowhere yesterday.
They've been around long enough that if they're was the
quote unquote smoking gun in there when the Dems had
(08:04):
their hands on them or anti Trump people had their
hand whatever the case may be that, Yeah, it would
have come out earlier. So I kind of feel like,
I don't know where they got this card from. I
don't know how it ended up in there. I don't
I don't. I don't even know anything about.
Speaker 1 (08:18):
To steal dossier. How where did that come from? They
manufactured it fire so right, I don't know if I
don't know, just like you, where this came from. Right,
I can tell you now that if this had existed,
it was a bonafide birthday card in those files. You
don't think it would have come out during the presidential
election when Biden had control of the DOJ. I'm honest
(08:38):
to God, Seriously, I would like a Democrat to look
me in the face and tell me that they think
their party sat on this for four years, and especially
during a dog eat dog election that was that you know,
was fought tooth and nail. They didn't use this if
it was real and if they had it, which they
had to have if it was in the files.
Speaker 6 (08:58):
So really, somebody's going to take this the wrong way,
probably probably several people. And because I know there's a
lot of names in there, right, We've heard Prince, Prince
Andrew and the.
Speaker 1 (09:07):
Building We've seen photos of Prince Andrew right, and.
Speaker 6 (09:10):
Of course we've seen photos of Trump with Epstein or
near in.
Speaker 5 (09:13):
The public place. No, no, no, I get that.
Speaker 6 (09:15):
What I'm saying is, there's all these people associated with
left right center royalty, whatever the case may be. I
think investigators need to do whatever they need to do
because there are victims of Epstein.
Speaker 1 (09:28):
Don't you think they have been?
Speaker 5 (09:29):
I do.
Speaker 6 (09:30):
But my point was going to be this. I don't
want anybody to say, well, you were defending so and
so or so and so. I'm not defending any I
just wish this would go away. That's what I wish,
because I'm tired of here.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
This is what I'm saying to you. I'm saying this
is because the Democrats have nothing else, so they're trying
to create something, thinking, I know, let's do this out
of Epstein. And so they had these people who were
on victims of Epstein. We know basically who they are.
They have identified themselve those records of them. We know
(10:01):
who they are. The bidenminstrution knew who they were, and
so they had a press conference the other day on
the steps of Capital on the Capitol Capitol Hill and
It's interesting because they were asked who saw Trump doing what?
And you know what their response was, this killed me.
Chante Davies is victim of Jeffrey Epstein, said, you know
they never saw Trump, but you know who they did see,
(10:23):
Bill Clinton, just saying cut forty two.
Speaker 8 (10:27):
In two thousand and two, I was living in California,
a young woman with high aspirations of becoming an actress.
I was already beginning to make a name for myself
in the industry. A person I trusted, someone I thought
was a friend, invited me to meet a powerful woman
who could help advance my career. That woman happened to
be GILLN.
Speaker 1 (10:42):
Maxwell.
Speaker 8 (10:43):
I was asked to give her a massage, though I
had almost no experience, and when I did, she praised
me and promised introductions to someone enormously powerful, someone who
could change the course of my life. And that man
was Jeffrey Epstein. At first, I was an excited young
woman on top of the world. Epstein flew me to
his private island and he listened to my dreams, promised
to help. But his promises came with a catch. The
(11:04):
abuse began. He told me to keep it secret. He
manipulated me with quid pro quo I did not consent to,
but I felt I had no one to turn to.
He was too powerful. I was just one of the
many young women trapped in his orbit. I was even
taken on a trip to Africa with former President Bill
Clinton and other notable figures. In those moments, I realized
how powerless I was. If I spoke out, who would
(11:26):
believe me?
Speaker 1 (11:27):
Yeah, they've got nothing. The only time that Trump was
ever around mister Epstein apparently was in public. He actually
kicked him out of maur A Lago. He didn't like
what he saw in regard to Epstein dealing with some
of the staff there, and every time they try to
pin something on him, the victims got Yet, we never
had an issue with Trump. You know who issue with
(11:48):
Bill Clinton?
Speaker 5 (11:52):
Raped?
Speaker 1 (11:52):
No, she didn't. She was on a trip to Africa
with Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein. And meanwhile Clinton is saying, no,
I had nothing to do with Epstein. Well apparently not.
You were on a trip to Africa with him. So
I'm just saying, you know, if there was something there there,
don't you think they'd have it by now? And it
does seem that what President Trump said is desperation. I'm
(12:14):
trying to take him out because they just don't know
what else to do in regard to his success. They
can't deal with his success. And one of those big
successes is fighting crime, and that's really burning them up,
which I find very bizarre. The Democrats have put themselves
in a position where they are against crime fighting. How
(12:37):
does that happen? And you saw an example of this,
Tom Holman. Borders are Tom Holman is not himself putting
up with bad behavior. And he was on MSNBC with
Mika Brazinski and he got pushed back from her regarding Ice.
Ice came to Boston in order to round up criminal
(12:58):
illegal aliens. Now the governor of Massachusetts, Governor Healey, and
the mayor of Boston, Mayor Michelle wou are not supportive
of this. For whatever reason, they've decided that they don't
want to aid federal law enforcement in rounding up criminal illegals,
to the point where they've actually pushed out their misrepresented stories.
(13:19):
They said that Ice rated a church. Ice never rated
a church, has never rated a church. They will not
go into churches. There was a Ice vehicle a couple
blocks away from a church, and they took that picture
and tried to make it appear that Ice had rated
a church when they did not. So that's the story
that was going out there. Then Mika Brazinski is doing
(13:39):
this interview with Tom Homan and says, you are disappearing people.
She actually said to him, you're disappearing people and trying
to put it out there that they're acting like some
kind of fascist gestapo, grabbing people off the street and
making them disappear. Tom Holman had had enough.
Speaker 4 (13:57):
I also, with respect sir, thank you for the information
that you have shared on this show. But we would
appreciate all of the information, all of it, all of
the data.
Speaker 3 (14:09):
I've done this show several times. Every time on your show,
I speak with integrity, I speak with honesty, and I
speak with facts.
Speaker 5 (14:16):
The bottom line is, because of all.
Speaker 3 (14:17):
This falseartive and you using the term disappearing people.
Speaker 4 (14:23):
To the group, thatsentially.
Speaker 3 (14:26):
Citizens. US citizens get arrested every day. You and citizens
get rested by policts every day. Are they being disappeared?
Their laws are being they're being arrested, They're being put
in attention because they committed a CRIMINALI like what you're
doing we're enforcing the law and arresting people here in
violational law that a public stafty trusts.
Speaker 5 (14:48):
That's not disappearing people.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
That's enforcing the laws of this country and make this
country safer.
Speaker 1 (14:55):
I have no words for people like Mika. I mean,
she's pushing back against crime fighting.
Speaker 6 (15:00):
I've seen magic shows where they were disappearing people.
Speaker 1 (15:03):
Yeah, I have two, yeah, in Vegas, and it's it's
but in this case, you know, we're talking about the
streets of Boston and the streets of DC, and you know,
it's just amazing to me. They cannot wrap their head
around the fact that President Trump is doing what people
elected him to do, one of which is, you know,
fighting crime. And for instance, there is the Venezuelan drug
(15:23):
cartel boat story, which if if you've been under rock
and not paying attention, there was a gang or a
trender wagwa however you pronounce it boat that was trafficking
in drugs and the US military blew it up. So
by the.
Speaker 5 (15:41):
Way I saw, I saw the video.
Speaker 6 (15:44):
You know, they have the video, and it's it's that,
you know, it looks like they're using nighttime glasses that
type of thing, you know, So It's not like it's
not so crystal clear. It's like when you watch them
blow something up in Iran and they show a picture, Dge,
but I'm sorry, I'm watching. It's like it's like I'm
watching a video game.
Speaker 5 (16:02):
Yeah, hey they got the bad guy.
Speaker 6 (16:04):
Bang, Derek goes, did you earn another free life?
Speaker 1 (16:06):
Well here's the thing. Democrats say, this is terrible to
blow up a drug trafficking boat. How dare you here?
This is Illinois Democrat Senator Tammy Duckworth on MSNBC saying,
you know what that is, by the way, blowing up
that cartel drug boat. Well, he's just going to use
this too, ready for it, wait for this interfere with elections.
That's what blowing up the drug boat is all about.
(16:28):
Cut fourteen.
Speaker 7 (16:30):
No, it's not legal. I also think that this is
just the first step towards him potentially setting the groundwork
to do something within US territory. So he's doing in
international waters now, But you know what is he what's
next an American in our territory waters on US soil?
What exactly is next? I agree with you know, the
(16:50):
discussion has already been ongoing. This president is setting the
conditions so that he can actually unilaterally occupy the streets
of our cities and interfere in the next election, do
what he wants. And I am absolutely disgusted with my
Republican colleagues, who you know, on top of confirming the
likes of Peak Hegseth and and and uh uh you
know Secretary Kennedy, uh, are not holding them accountable. We
(17:13):
have a chance here to stop them. I hope that
my colleagues will step forward and stop them. But let's
see what what they're going to do. So far, all
they've done is been collaborators and co conspirators and the
Trump attempts to basically undermine the basic law and order
of our nation.
Speaker 6 (17:27):
So now we're going to start to we're going to
start going after criminals with with missiles in Lake Michigan.
Speaker 5 (17:33):
Is that what she's implying.
Speaker 1 (17:34):
More than that, she's saying that they're gonna they're gonna
arm people and make you vote for who they want to.
That's it's that selection interference Already flowing up a drug
cartel voat in international waters that belongs to Venezuela is bad,
by the way, That's what that's what a US Senator
just said.
Speaker 6 (17:51):
I'm all in Look, I am in favor of arresting criminals,
whether they be international drug dealers or pickpockets on the
streets of a major city, without violence, without guns, without missiles,
without anything. But there are times, there are times when
you have to go above and beyond. And this boat
thing in international waters was one of those times. We
(18:14):
gonna throw feathers at him.
Speaker 1 (18:16):
Yeah, bad, don't do that again. That's all you're supposed
to do, according to Senator Duck Earth. But it is
not only is it nonsensical, but periodically they come out
stating something that's just so hypocritical it makes your head spin.
I want to play this example that I still can't
get over this example. This is Congressman Jamie Raskin of Maryland.
(18:38):
It's really important. He is from Maryland and he is,
you know, a progressive liberal, and he absolutely hates Trump
and he has come out over and over again in
support of MS thirteen gang member also known as Maryland
Man Kilmar Abrigo Garcia, the guy who's used his wife
(19:00):
and it's charged with human trafficking in Tennessee, and god forbid,
we'd deport him as an illegal alien. He is an
illegal alien, but we shouldn't aport him. Jamie Raskin has
come out and supported him over and over and over again.
I want you to really listen closely to what Jamie
Raskin says about the Trump administration and how they are
overwhelmingly on the side of sex offenders and human traffickers.
(19:24):
This is Raskin, Congressman from Maryland, Home of Maryland Man,
the human trafficker who went after babies to the point
where other human traffickers told him to knock it off.
And he says, Trump is the guy that supports sex
offenders and human traffickers. Cut fifteen.
Speaker 9 (19:41):
The Trump administration has been systematically dismantling the anti human
trafficking and anti domestic violence programs and grants across the
federal government, human trafficking programs at the Department of State,
at the Department of Justice, at Health and Human Services, USAID,
you name it. And we've collected all of that, and
(20:03):
we're going to show people that this is an administration that
is on the side of the human traffickers and the
sex abusers. And if you look at Donald Trump's pardons,
and if you looked at various actions taken by the
Department of Justice. They are overwhelmingly on the side of
sexual offenders and human traffickers. So this is not like
one kind of lonely, discrete, one off episode we're talking about.
(20:27):
This is now becoming clear a whole system that the
Trump administration is committed to.
Speaker 1 (20:35):
Does it give you a headache? I mean seriously, because
this guy has been defending a human trafficker and an
abuser for the past six months and actually longer than that.
But it's Trump. It's Trump who supports human traffickers. They
just they're in such a ludicrous position in defending criminals
that I guess it appears to them they can't get
(20:58):
any more ludicrous. They just say anything that pops into
their head, hoping to God that somebody will actually think
that they're making sense. And that's bad what you just heard.
But what's really bad, the worst case I've seen in
a long time, a politicizing crime, trying to downgrade it,
trying to make it seem not important because Trump is
succeeding and fighting. It happened with this horrible, horrible killing
(21:22):
in Charlotte, North Carolina, with this beautiful girl, a Ukrainian
refugee is minding her own business on a train. A
repeat offender who is just let out with no bail
after assaulting somebody stabs her to death on the train
and on camera in front of everybody. There's no issue
that he did it. And well, President Trump mentioned it
(21:44):
the other day, cut to.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
A there was also a horrible killing recently in Charlotte
I talked about and so many.
Speaker 5 (21:51):
Others, and we will, We're going to get to the
end of it.
Speaker 2 (21:55):
And you know, when you have horrible killings, you have
to take horrible actions. And the actions that we take
are nothing.
Speaker 5 (22:02):
This cashless veil started.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
A wave in our country where a killer kills somebody
and that's out on the street by the afternoon, in
many cases going out and killing again, cashless bail.
Speaker 1 (22:16):
So he's talking about how horrible this is. Well, get
this okay. Over at CNN, they are bull bleep and
say that President Trump is using Irena Zarutzka's murder that
beautiful girl from the train as a political symbol to
call for more forceful punishments. I say, okay, what's wrong
(22:39):
with that? But this is their take on it. This
is Brian Stelter, cut fourteen.
Speaker 10 (22:42):
A most murders in the US never become national news.
This one's gone on attention for a couple of reasons.
Number one, first and foremost, the recent release of that
gruesome video. Second, the energy from pro Trump activists. They
picked up on this video from local news and ran
with it. It's a little bit like The Times and
civil rights groups have raised attention about police involved shootings.
(23:04):
In this case, it is Trump aligned influencers who are
posting up a storm about this case on social media.
Really over the weekend, Elon Musk, Charlie Kirk, other Trump
aligned figures succeeded in making this senseless death a symbol
of big city crime. We heard President Trump asked about
it yesterday when he was heading home from New York City.
He didn't seem to know much about it. He said
(23:24):
he would get briefed, and then today Trump did know
all about it. That's exactly what has happened here. This
story has trickled up from local news to social media
and now to the President's attention, and it's being used,
as you said, Brian, as a political symbol, with MAGA
media calling for more forceful punishments and more incarceration.
Speaker 1 (23:42):
Okay, I have no problem with that. First of all,
isn't that what a briefing is for, to explain everything
to the president things that happened during the day they
may not be aware of. One, I don't have a
problem with people briefing a president. And two, it was
a gruesome murder of an innocent, beautiful girl hanging, you know,
looking at her phone on a train, did nothing to anybody,
(24:03):
and this guy comes up and slits her throat, I mean,
honest to God, and there's a video of it. You
don't that by itself is not worthy of people's attention.
It's only getting attention because it's a call for stronger punishment.
And yes, it should be a call for stronger punishment.
What the hell is wrong with you? And he's not
(24:23):
the only one.
Speaker 6 (24:24):
By the way, about the only thing he said that
I agree with that that was right. Is yes, most
murders of the United States do not get attention, and
they probably should get more because a lot of people
get killed by people who shouldn't be on the street.
But this is ridiculous. Of course, we should be seeing
stuff like this. We should be knowing that some guy
(24:46):
or gal in some certain cases gets relieved Hey, if
they get arrested for a violent crime in their cashless
bab it's.
Speaker 1 (24:52):
Not alone with him. He was not the only one.
Here's Aaron Burnett cut fifteen a.
Speaker 7 (24:58):
Horrific new video of a Ukrainian refugees murder caught on camera.
Speaker 1 (25:01):
It is absolutely horrific.
Speaker 9 (25:03):
Trump is now seizing on this to push his nationwide crackdown.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Shame on you for using an example of a horrific
crime to support your crime crackdown. Seriously, what what are
you supposed to seize on the easter bunny egg roll
on the on the lawn. If that were the only
thing going on, we wouldn't have a crime crackdown, would we?
I mean, what the hell is wrong with these people?
They hate Trump so much that they're happy that they
(25:28):
God for you can't use that video of that girl
getting slaughtered on a train because then people would think
there's crime. That's what they just said.
Speaker 6 (25:35):
We don't want people getting angry that people are being
murdered on trains. What, Oh my god, we should we
should be outraged that that that that that happens. And outraged,
by the way, is one of my least favorite words.
But uh, it's you of course. Look, people should be
pissed off anytime someone gets murdered. And yes, like I said,
the only thing that that that that other guy said
(25:56):
that that was factually correct or that I thought was correct,
was you know, there are a lot of murders in
this country that go on unmentioned or what have you,
and everybody should get but get pissed. Listen, if if
some guy in your neighborhood or in your town or
next door town murder someone, or some woman murder someone,
doesn't matter, you should call for them to be sent
(26:17):
to jail for a very, very very long time, if
they even make it to jail in the first place.
Speaker 5 (26:22):
I'm a pro death penalty for starters.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
But President Trump wants a death penalty for this guy
that slaughtered that girl. I don't have a problem. It's
up to Jerry. I don't have a problem with That's
how they decide. A jury gets to decide that, and
I think it should be on the table for them.
Speaker 6 (26:36):
Is he is he free on bailigan? No, billy, Oh
they held him this time.
Speaker 1 (26:40):
They held him. Oh that's silly because this time the
judge let him go before. By the way, has no
legal degree, is not a lawyer, and she was a
she was a DEI appointment bought by Eric Holder.
Speaker 6 (26:50):
You know, it's it's all nice and well and good
and warm and fuzzy.
Speaker 5 (26:55):
Oh, this poor guy got arrested.
Speaker 6 (26:56):
We're gonna let him go on no bail because he
doesn't have any money, and we really feel better that
he would have to stay in jail when he really shouldn't.
You know, that might work for I don't know, a
shoplifter or you know, a graffiti artist or somebody who does.
People commit violent crime shouldn't first of all, probably shouldn't
be out on bail anyway. And they do have dangerousness
hearings in some places for them Massachusetts, yes, surprisingly enough,
(27:21):
but but they certainly shouldn't be freed on no bail.
I mean, I get it.
Speaker 1 (27:28):
Even his mother said, please keep him in jail, and
they didn't. Even his mother said he's dangerous. You can't
let him out because he beat his sister to a poll.
Speaker 5 (27:38):
Who doesn't have fights with their sister?
Speaker 1 (27:40):
There you go, so there you go, you go. So
I mean, this is to me, this is this is psychotic.
What the Democratic Party is sur very disturbed, very disturbing.
So we end every week with the Truth Control. This
week is President Trump, because he's so good at trolling.
In this case, he's on the White House song or
(28:00):
and a reporter asks him, are you considering attacking the
cartels the drug cartels inside of Venezuela. Another way of
putting that would be are we going to attack Venezuela?
So that's what he's asking the president. Where do you hear?
The President's answer cut to.
Speaker 10 (28:17):
Are you going to the ring.
Speaker 7 (28:18):
Unlacking inside of Venezuela?
Speaker 1 (28:21):
Do what?
Speaker 6 (28:22):
What are you gonna find out?
Speaker 1 (28:25):
Well, you're gonna find out.
Speaker 6 (28:26):
Well, I think that's the truth. You are going to
find out. We're either going to do it or we're
not gonna do it, and you'll find out when we
do it, don't do it?
Speaker 1 (28:32):
Well, I understand. But do you think he means to
attack Venezuela or do you think he's just poking the
bear there?
Speaker 6 (28:40):
I think he's poking the bear. I don't think any country,
and you know Colombia in various place.
Speaker 1 (28:44):
I don't think it's going to actually cross the border
into Venezuela.
Speaker 6 (28:47):
Right, Yeah, No, I forget the name of that movie
where they did it. Was one of the Jack Ryan
movies you know, Yeah, that Harrison Ford was in and
they did target drug dealers in other countries.
Speaker 1 (29:00):
Yeah, those are those are right. Well, I'm just saying
maybe seal black ops, Well.
Speaker 6 (29:04):
They were right, they were movies. They didn't attack the country,
though they attacked drug deals. So I think I think
it is perhaps, and I'm saying this, I think, so
don't go write a story about this. I think if
the president had the ability to take out a drug
farm or a drug cartel somewhere in some part of
the world without actually attacking the actual country, I think
(29:25):
you'd seriously consider it. But you know, obviously there's there's
a lot involved in that. I'm not saying the US
should be doing a lot of black ops with.
Speaker 1 (29:31):
The drug dealing, but if they're, if they're agreeing to it,
it's not an invasion.
Speaker 6 (29:35):
The president, Well then maybe he'll ask permission. But the
president is not going to Well, the question about you
is if he's going to do it is.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Yeah, the question is is he trolling? I think he's trolling.
I don't think he he's just because he's just saying
I think his intention is to do what he did
with that boat. Is if he finds any drug cartel
people outside the border of sovereign nation like that one was,
he's going to take it out and he did. And
he's not crossing anybody's border unless he has the permission
of that government. I think that's what you're I think
(30:06):
that's his intent. But he's just poking, he's just rattling
the cage. I have a problem with that.
Speaker 6 (30:09):
If you listen to the response verbatim, he's basically saying,
you'll find out.
Speaker 5 (30:14):
I think that's the truth. You'll find out.
Speaker 1 (30:16):
You will, So you can let us know if you
think we're going to find out whether President Trump's going
to invade Venezuela or not. You can you can contact
Ben and I on x at News by three or
on Facebook at Newsbye. We upload a new episode every
single Monday, so please check back next week and see
what new offerings we have. Meanwhile, have a great wait,
(30:36):
a great week. And I would stay out of Venezuela
if I.
Speaker 6 (30:39):
You know, if you want to fix this problem, you
send Philly's Karen down.
Speaker 5 (30:43):
To Venezuela to get the drugs.
Speaker 6 (30:45):
Those are my drugs.
Speaker 5 (30:46):
Give me those drugs, you bet.
Speaker 1 (30:47):
I'm Ben Parker, This is news bye,
President Trump says, it's not my signature on the Epstein card.
Borders are. Tom Holman says ms NBC is disgusting saying
people are disappearing, and Karen says, hand over that ball.
There is a lot of arguing going on this week,
and are did they really just say that clips I'm
Nancy shack Bear. This is news. Bye, it's not.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
My signature and it's not the way I speak. And
anybody that's covered me for a long time, No, that's
not my language. It's nonsense.
Speaker 3 (00:40):
And you used the term disappearing people.
Speaker 4 (00:45):
To the group that.
Speaker 3 (00:46):
Entially US citizens. US citizens get arrested every day. You
and citizens get rested by policts every day? Are they
being disappeared?
Speaker 5 (01:06):
Fightappeared, disappear?
Speaker 1 (01:11):
Yeah, that's a Karen. I don't know who she is.
There are a couple of theories out there. Who's as
to who she is. She's at a Phillies game. Well,
really and truly. So this kid is at the baseball game,
it's a big deal for his birthday with his dad.
There's a home run that lands near them, but not
directly in front of them, and the dad grabbed the
ball in the scrum and gave it to his son
(01:35):
on his birthday. Well, there was a woman that where
everybody's calling a Karen God to help people, whose name
actually is Karen nearby, who thought because the ball landed
closer to her that it was her ball, and she
basically assaulted him. She she's in his face screaming at him,
hand me the ball, and this guy who's trying to
set an example for his son, actually took the ball
(01:55):
away from his son and gave it to her, so
she'd stopped screaming at him, and people in this state
were screaming at her, going, you know, what the bleep
is wrong with you? And she's she's just fighting back
with them, and she was really badly behaved and taking
a ball away from a little boy on his birthday.
And so that's what you hear. Somebody's phone nearby got
it cut seventeen.
Speaker 5 (02:25):
After fight by.
Speaker 1 (02:28):
Shut up, Karen, you know, I mean, it's like, oh
my god. The team stood up. The team did they
brought the kid a whole bag of swag. Somebody who's
watching obviously told security people told the team they brought
him a whole bag of Philly swag and then brought
him back into the locker room where he got to
meet players and got a signed bat. So it turned
(02:50):
out being a fantastic birthday for him and he got
some great stuff. But oh my god, first of all,
to do that in public to a little boy, did
you need the ball that bad that she had to
break a little boy's heart? I mean, what the hell is?
And it has gone around the world, and it has
She's been misidentified a couple of times, and people who
(03:12):
are dead going it wasn't me. I swear to God,
it wasn't me. And but I don't know who she is.
But whoever she is, I hope she gets banned from
that part because that was just appalling behavior.
Speaker 6 (03:21):
You're going to have surgery to rearrange her face so
nobody can ever recognize her again, and she'll under a rock.
Speaker 1 (03:29):
I don't know if there was amber liquid involved in
that bad behavior, but it was, you know, talk about
setting a horrific example.
Speaker 5 (03:38):
I've been to baseball games many many times. I've been
to baseball games, yeah.
Speaker 6 (03:41):
And I've never gotten a ball. I came close. My
friend got one once. But here's the thing that drives
me crazy. Anyway, forget this. I mean, she actually marched
across the stands to confront the father. Just when like
forty three people all dive in the same place to
get a ball. I think to myself, it'd be neat
to get a ball, but I don't.
Speaker 1 (04:00):
Isn't that bad?
Speaker 5 (04:00):
No way.
Speaker 1 (04:01):
Well, so this is a funny story, and my husband
will be furious with me for telling it, but I
don't care. And so we were at a Red Sox game,
my husband, my sister in law, my brother in law,
and I had gotten tickets for everybody because my sister
in law lives in Texas and she is a huge
Red Sox fan because she grew up here and this
was something she loves to do. So we go, We're
(04:22):
sitting in right field and a foul ball comes right
at us and literally right at my husband.
Speaker 7 (04:29):
What is he?
Speaker 1 (04:29):
Does he catch the ball and handed to her? Does
he catch the ball? No, he goes into the fetal
position and lets it bounce off of him, and the
guys behind us are going, dude, you're supposed to catch
the ball. And to this day he's mortified over the
fact that he didn't. You know, somebody else caught the
ball and actually handed it to him, and he said no, no,
you got it. You keep it. But it was but
you know, it was like, like, honey, what the hell.
Speaker 6 (04:53):
Then every once in a while, you'll see one of
these highlights on the on the sports channel, or on
the local news or something, depending on where it happens.
There's some guys holding his baby and a beer and
he reaches up with one hand and grass.
Speaker 5 (05:05):
That guy's pretty cool.
Speaker 1 (05:06):
He is pretty cool. God help that baby. If you know,
it's like, wow, No, so it was. It was just
bad behavior, and it's it's it occurred to me that
there's a lot of bad behavior out there these days,
and and sometimes it's it's all from your perspective. Sometimes
it's no, everybody can agree. I think everybody agrees that
(05:27):
that Karen was bad behavior.
Speaker 6 (05:29):
She might even agree at this point.
Speaker 1 (05:31):
She might yeah, she might think now that she's sobered up,
if that was indeed, one of the issues go what
the hell did I do? But Democrats are accusing President
Trump of bad behavior. Essentially, what they're doing is it's
aws to do with the Epstein files. Now, the Epstein
files were under President Biden's DJ, under their control for years,
(05:52):
four years to be precife. Nothing ever can right nobody. Ever.
My guess is they looked at them. There was nothing
they could use to hurt the Republicans, so they went
on their marry way. Well, now that President Trump is
an office, they going, oh, he's obviously sitting on them
because he's hiding something that's not flattering to him. And
he's like, you had them for four years, you did nothing.
(06:15):
You tried to tell me that the Body administration would
not have taken whatever they could from that and tried
to smear him with it if something actually existed. Well,
this past week, the Democrats released what they said was
a birthday card that he had sent to Jeffrey Epstein
and President trum go is I never sent Jeffrey Epstein
a birthday card, and he was asked about it while
(06:36):
he was trying to get on a marine one the
other day. Cut one bee.
Speaker 5 (06:42):
It's not my.
Speaker 2 (06:42):
Signature, and it's not the way I speak, and anybody
that's covered me for a long time, no, that's not
my language. It's nonsense. And frankly, you're wasting your time.
All you do is trying to get off the great
successes DC in about two hundred other things we've done
that he is so successful. This is a great, great success,
and we have so many I don't think any president
(07:04):
in their first eight months has anywhere near the success.
Speaker 1 (07:08):
That we've had. Does it make sense to you? He's
saying that that the reason why they're working that keep
tossing Epstein out, even though they had the Epstein files
for four years and now they're doing it is to
deflect from the fact that he's doing a good job,
and they can't have that because that means they'll lose
the midterms and the presidential election after that, So they
(07:29):
have to distract, So they're using the Epstein files to distract.
He goes, that's I never signed that, that's not my signature.
Do you believe him, Benjamin I?
Speaker 6 (07:41):
I guess I do, because I think that you're right.
I think he's kind of right in the way, like
like my mental thoughts are. And I know people lie
all the time in different ways, But you're right. It's
not like the Epstein files just appeared out of nowhere yesterday.
They've been around long enough that if they're was the
quote unquote smoking gun in there when the Dems had
(08:04):
their hands on them or anti Trump people had their
hand whatever the case may be that, Yeah, it would
have come out earlier. So I kind of feel like,
I don't know where they got this card from. I
don't know how it ended up in there. I don't
I don't. I don't even know anything about.
Speaker 1 (08:18):
To steal dossier. How where did that come from? They
manufactured it fire so right, I don't know if I
don't know, just like you, where this came from. Right,
I can tell you now that if this had existed,
it was a bonafide birthday card in those files. You
don't think it would have come out during the presidential
election when Biden had control of the DOJ. I'm honest
(08:38):
to God, Seriously, I would like a Democrat to look
me in the face and tell me that they think
their party sat on this for four years, and especially
during a dog eat dog election that was that you know,
was fought tooth and nail. They didn't use this if
it was real and if they had it, which they
had to have if it was in the files.
Speaker 6 (08:58):
So really, somebody's going to take this the wrong way,
probably probably several people. And because I know there's a
lot of names in there, right, We've heard Prince, Prince
Andrew and the.
Speaker 1 (09:07):
Building We've seen photos of Prince Andrew right, and.
Speaker 6 (09:10):
Of course we've seen photos of Trump with Epstein or
near in.
Speaker 5 (09:13):
The public place. No, no, no, I get that.
Speaker 6 (09:15):
What I'm saying is, there's all these people associated with
left right center royalty, whatever the case may be. I
think investigators need to do whatever they need to do
because there are victims of Epstein.
Speaker 1 (09:28):
Don't you think they have been?
Speaker 5 (09:29):
I do.
Speaker 6 (09:30):
But my point was going to be this. I don't
want anybody to say, well, you were defending so and
so or so and so. I'm not defending any I
just wish this would go away. That's what I wish,
because I'm tired of here.
Speaker 1 (09:40):
This is what I'm saying to you. I'm saying this
is because the Democrats have nothing else, so they're trying
to create something, thinking, I know, let's do this out
of Epstein. And so they had these people who were
on victims of Epstein. We know basically who they are.
They have identified themselve those records of them. We know
(10:01):
who they are. The bidenminstrution knew who they were, and
so they had a press conference the other day on
the steps of Capital on the Capitol Capitol Hill and
It's interesting because they were asked who saw Trump doing what?
And you know what their response was, this killed me.
Chante Davies is victim of Jeffrey Epstein, said, you know
they never saw Trump, but you know who they did see,
(10:23):
Bill Clinton, just saying cut forty two.
Speaker 8 (10:27):
In two thousand and two, I was living in California,
a young woman with high aspirations of becoming an actress.
I was already beginning to make a name for myself
in the industry. A person I trusted, someone I thought
was a friend, invited me to meet a powerful woman
who could help advance my career. That woman happened to
be GILLN.
Speaker 1 (10:42):
Maxwell.
Speaker 8 (10:43):
I was asked to give her a massage, though I
had almost no experience, and when I did, she praised
me and promised introductions to someone enormously powerful, someone who
could change the course of my life. And that man
was Jeffrey Epstein. At first, I was an excited young
woman on top of the world. Epstein flew me to
his private island and he listened to my dreams, promised
to help. But his promises came with a catch. The
(11:04):
abuse began. He told me to keep it secret. He
manipulated me with quid pro quo I did not consent to,
but I felt I had no one to turn to.
He was too powerful. I was just one of the
many young women trapped in his orbit. I was even
taken on a trip to Africa with former President Bill
Clinton and other notable figures. In those moments, I realized
how powerless I was. If I spoke out, who would
(11:26):
believe me?
Speaker 1 (11:27):
Yeah, they've got nothing. The only time that Trump was
ever around mister Epstein apparently was in public. He actually
kicked him out of maur A Lago. He didn't like
what he saw in regard to Epstein dealing with some
of the staff there, and every time they try to
pin something on him, the victims got Yet, we never
had an issue with Trump. You know who issue with
(11:48):
Bill Clinton?
Speaker 5 (11:52):
Raped?
Speaker 1 (11:52):
No, she didn't. She was on a trip to Africa
with Bill Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein. And meanwhile Clinton is saying, no,
I had nothing to do with Epstein. Well apparently not.
You were on a trip to Africa with him. So
I'm just saying, you know, if there was something there there,
don't you think they'd have it by now? And it
does seem that what President Trump said is desperation. I'm
(12:14):
trying to take him out because they just don't know
what else to do in regard to his success. They
can't deal with his success. And one of those big
successes is fighting crime, and that's really burning them up,
which I find very bizarre. The Democrats have put themselves
in a position where they are against crime fighting. How
(12:37):
does that happen? And you saw an example of this,
Tom Holman. Borders are Tom Holman is not himself putting
up with bad behavior. And he was on MSNBC with
Mika Brazinski and he got pushed back from her regarding Ice.
Ice came to Boston in order to round up criminal
(12:58):
illegal aliens. Now the governor of Massachusetts, Governor Healey, and
the mayor of Boston, Mayor Michelle wou are not supportive
of this. For whatever reason, they've decided that they don't
want to aid federal law enforcement in rounding up criminal illegals,
to the point where they've actually pushed out their misrepresented stories.
(13:19):
They said that Ice rated a church. Ice never rated
a church, has never rated a church. They will not
go into churches. There was a Ice vehicle a couple
blocks away from a church, and they took that picture
and tried to make it appear that Ice had rated
a church when they did not. So that's the story
that was going out there. Then Mika Brazinski is doing
(13:39):
this interview with Tom Homan and says, you are disappearing people.
She actually said to him, you're disappearing people and trying
to put it out there that they're acting like some
kind of fascist gestapo, grabbing people off the street and
making them disappear. Tom Holman had had enough.
Speaker 4 (13:57):
I also, with respect sir, thank you for the information
that you have shared on this show. But we would
appreciate all of the information, all of it, all of
the data.
Speaker 3 (14:09):
I've done this show several times. Every time on your show,
I speak with integrity, I speak with honesty, and I
speak with facts.
Speaker 5 (14:16):
The bottom line is, because of all.
Speaker 3 (14:17):
This falseartive and you using the term disappearing people.
Speaker 4 (14:23):
To the group, thatsentially.
Speaker 3 (14:26):
Citizens. US citizens get arrested every day. You and citizens
get rested by policts every day. Are they being disappeared?
Their laws are being they're being arrested, They're being put
in attention because they committed a CRIMINALI like what you're
doing we're enforcing the law and arresting people here in
violational law that a public stafty trusts.
Speaker 5 (14:48):
That's not disappearing people.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
That's enforcing the laws of this country and make this
country safer.
Speaker 1 (14:55):
I have no words for people like Mika. I mean,
she's pushing back against crime fighting.
Speaker 6 (15:00):
I've seen magic shows where they were disappearing people.
Speaker 1 (15:03):
Yeah, I have two, yeah, in Vegas, and it's it's
but in this case, you know, we're talking about the
streets of Boston and the streets of DC, and you know,
it's just amazing to me. They cannot wrap their head
around the fact that President Trump is doing what people
elected him to do, one of which is, you know,
fighting crime. And for instance, there is the Venezuelan drug
(15:23):
cartel boat story, which if if you've been under rock
and not paying attention, there was a gang or a
trender wagwa however you pronounce it boat that was trafficking
in drugs and the US military blew it up. So
by the.
Speaker 5 (15:41):
Way I saw, I saw the video.
Speaker 6 (15:44):
You know, they have the video, and it's it's that,
you know, it looks like they're using nighttime glasses that
type of thing, you know, So It's not like it's
not so crystal clear. It's like when you watch them
blow something up in Iran and they show a picture, Dge,
but I'm sorry, I'm watching. It's like it's like I'm
watching a video game.
Speaker 5 (16:02):
Yeah, hey they got the bad guy.
Speaker 6 (16:04):
Bang, Derek goes, did you earn another free life?
Speaker 1 (16:06):
Well here's the thing. Democrats say, this is terrible to
blow up a drug trafficking boat. How dare you here?
This is Illinois Democrat Senator Tammy Duckworth on MSNBC saying,
you know what that is, by the way, blowing up
that cartel drug boat. Well, he's just going to use
this too, ready for it, wait for this interfere with elections.
That's what blowing up the drug boat is all about.
(16:28):
Cut fourteen.
Speaker 7 (16:30):
No, it's not legal. I also think that this is
just the first step towards him potentially setting the groundwork
to do something within US territory. So he's doing in
international waters now, But you know what is he what's
next an American in our territory waters on US soil?
What exactly is next? I agree with you know, the
(16:50):
discussion has already been ongoing. This president is setting the
conditions so that he can actually unilaterally occupy the streets
of our cities and interfere in the next election, do
what he wants. And I am absolutely disgusted with my
Republican colleagues, who you know, on top of confirming the
likes of Peak Hegseth and and and uh uh you
know Secretary Kennedy, uh, are not holding them accountable. We
(17:13):
have a chance here to stop them. I hope that
my colleagues will step forward and stop them. But let's
see what what they're going to do. So far, all
they've done is been collaborators and co conspirators and the
Trump attempts to basically undermine the basic law and order
of our nation.
Speaker 6 (17:27):
So now we're going to start to we're going to
start going after criminals with with missiles in Lake Michigan.
Speaker 5 (17:33):
Is that what she's implying.
Speaker 1 (17:34):
More than that, she's saying that they're gonna they're gonna
arm people and make you vote for who they want to.
That's it's that selection interference Already flowing up a drug
cartel voat in international waters that belongs to Venezuela is bad,
by the way, That's what that's what a US Senator
just said.
Speaker 6 (17:51):
I'm all in Look, I am in favor of arresting criminals,
whether they be international drug dealers or pickpockets on the
streets of a major city, without violence, without guns, without missiles,
without anything. But there are times, there are times when
you have to go above and beyond. And this boat
thing in international waters was one of those times. We
(18:14):
gonna throw feathers at him.
Speaker 1 (18:16):
Yeah, bad, don't do that again. That's all you're supposed
to do, according to Senator Duck Earth. But it is
not only is it nonsensical, but periodically they come out
stating something that's just so hypocritical it makes your head spin.
I want to play this example that I still can't
get over this example. This is Congressman Jamie Raskin of Maryland.
(18:38):
It's really important. He is from Maryland and he is,
you know, a progressive liberal, and he absolutely hates Trump
and he has come out over and over again in
support of MS thirteen gang member also known as Maryland
Man Kilmar Abrigo Garcia, the guy who's used his wife
(19:00):
and it's charged with human trafficking in Tennessee, and god forbid,
we'd deport him as an illegal alien. He is an
illegal alien, but we shouldn't aport him. Jamie Raskin has
come out and supported him over and over and over again.
I want you to really listen closely to what Jamie
Raskin says about the Trump administration and how they are
overwhelmingly on the side of sex offenders and human traffickers.
(19:24):
This is Raskin, Congressman from Maryland, Home of Maryland Man,
the human trafficker who went after babies to the point
where other human traffickers told him to knock it off.
And he says, Trump is the guy that supports sex
offenders and human traffickers. Cut fifteen.
Speaker 9 (19:41):
The Trump administration has been systematically dismantling the anti human
trafficking and anti domestic violence programs and grants across the
federal government, human trafficking programs at the Department of State,
at the Department of Justice, at Health and Human Services, USAID,
you name it. And we've collected all of that, and
(20:03):
we're going to show people that this is an administration that
is on the side of the human traffickers and the
sex abusers. And if you look at Donald Trump's pardons,
and if you looked at various actions taken by the
Department of Justice. They are overwhelmingly on the side of
sexual offenders and human traffickers. So this is not like
one kind of lonely, discrete, one off episode we're talking about.
(20:27):
This is now becoming clear a whole system that the
Trump administration is committed to.
Speaker 1 (20:35):
Does it give you a headache? I mean seriously, because
this guy has been defending a human trafficker and an
abuser for the past six months and actually longer than that.
But it's Trump. It's Trump who supports human traffickers. They
just they're in such a ludicrous position in defending criminals
that I guess it appears to them they can't get
(20:58):
any more ludicrous. They just say anything that pops into
their head, hoping to God that somebody will actually think
that they're making sense. And that's bad what you just heard.
But what's really bad, the worst case I've seen in
a long time, a politicizing crime, trying to downgrade it,
trying to make it seem not important because Trump is
succeeding and fighting. It happened with this horrible, horrible killing
(21:22):
in Charlotte, North Carolina, with this beautiful girl, a Ukrainian
refugee is minding her own business on a train. A
repeat offender who is just let out with no bail
after assaulting somebody stabs her to death on the train
and on camera in front of everybody. There's no issue
that he did it. And well, President Trump mentioned it
(21:44):
the other day, cut to.
Speaker 2 (21:45):
A there was also a horrible killing recently in Charlotte
I talked about and so many.
Speaker 5 (21:51):
Others, and we will, We're going to get to the
end of it.
Speaker 2 (21:55):
And you know, when you have horrible killings, you have
to take horrible actions. And the actions that we take
are nothing.
Speaker 5 (22:02):
This cashless veil started.
Speaker 2 (22:05):
A wave in our country where a killer kills somebody
and that's out on the street by the afternoon, in
many cases going out and killing again, cashless bail.
Speaker 1 (22:16):
So he's talking about how horrible this is. Well, get
this okay. Over at CNN, they are bull bleep and
say that President Trump is using Irena Zarutzka's murder that
beautiful girl from the train as a political symbol to
call for more forceful punishments. I say, okay, what's wrong
(22:39):
with that? But this is their take on it. This
is Brian Stelter, cut fourteen.
Speaker 10 (22:42):
A most murders in the US never become national news.
This one's gone on attention for a couple of reasons.
Number one, first and foremost, the recent release of that
gruesome video. Second, the energy from pro Trump activists. They
picked up on this video from local news and ran
with it. It's a little bit like The Times and
civil rights groups have raised attention about police involved shootings.
(23:04):
In this case, it is Trump aligned influencers who are
posting up a storm about this case on social media.
Really over the weekend, Elon Musk, Charlie Kirk, other Trump
aligned figures succeeded in making this senseless death a symbol
of big city crime. We heard President Trump asked about
it yesterday when he was heading home from New York City.
He didn't seem to know much about it. He said
(23:24):
he would get briefed, and then today Trump did know
all about it. That's exactly what has happened here. This
story has trickled up from local news to social media
and now to the President's attention, and it's being used,
as you said, Brian, as a political symbol, with MAGA
media calling for more forceful punishments and more incarceration.
Speaker 1 (23:42):
Okay, I have no problem with that. First of all,
isn't that what a briefing is for, to explain everything
to the president things that happened during the day they
may not be aware of. One, I don't have a
problem with people briefing a president. And two, it was
a gruesome murder of an innocent, beautiful girl hanging, you know,
looking at her phone on a train, did nothing to anybody,
(24:03):
and this guy comes up and slits her throat, I mean,
honest to God, and there's a video of it. You
don't that by itself is not worthy of people's attention.
It's only getting attention because it's a call for stronger punishment.
And yes, it should be a call for stronger punishment.
What the hell is wrong with you? And he's not
(24:23):
the only one.
Speaker 6 (24:24):
By the way, about the only thing he said that
I agree with that that was right. Is yes, most
murders of the United States do not get attention, and
they probably should get more because a lot of people
get killed by people who shouldn't be on the street.
But this is ridiculous. Of course, we should be seeing
stuff like this. We should be knowing that some guy
(24:46):
or gal in some certain cases gets relieved Hey, if
they get arrested for a violent crime in their cashless
bab it's.
Speaker 1 (24:52):
Not alone with him. He was not the only one.
Here's Aaron Burnett cut fifteen a.
Speaker 7 (24:58):
Horrific new video of a Ukrainian refugees murder caught on camera.
Speaker 1 (25:01):
It is absolutely horrific.
Speaker 9 (25:03):
Trump is now seizing on this to push his nationwide crackdown.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Shame on you for using an example of a horrific
crime to support your crime crackdown. Seriously, what what are
you supposed to seize on the easter bunny egg roll
on the on the lawn. If that were the only
thing going on, we wouldn't have a crime crackdown, would we?
I mean, what the hell is wrong with these people?
They hate Trump so much that they're happy that they
(25:28):
God for you can't use that video of that girl
getting slaughtered on a train because then people would think
there's crime. That's what they just said.
Speaker 6 (25:35):
We don't want people getting angry that people are being
murdered on trains. What, Oh my god, we should we
should be outraged that that that that that happens. And outraged,
by the way, is one of my least favorite words.
But uh, it's you of course. Look, people should be
pissed off anytime someone gets murdered. And yes, like I said,
the only thing that that that that other guy said
(25:56):
that that was factually correct or that I thought was correct,
was you know, there are a lot of murders in
this country that go on unmentioned or what have you,
and everybody should get but get pissed. Listen, if if
some guy in your neighborhood or in your town or
next door town murder someone, or some woman murder someone,
doesn't matter, you should call for them to be sent
(26:17):
to jail for a very, very very long time, if
they even make it to jail in the first place.
Speaker 5 (26:22):
I'm a pro death penalty for starters.
Speaker 1 (26:25):
But President Trump wants a death penalty for this guy
that slaughtered that girl. I don't have a problem. It's
up to Jerry. I don't have a problem with That's
how they decide. A jury gets to decide that, and
I think it should be on the table for them.
Speaker 6 (26:36):
Is he is he free on bailigan? No, billy, Oh
they held him this time.
Speaker 1 (26:40):
They held him. Oh that's silly because this time the
judge let him go before. By the way, has no
legal degree, is not a lawyer, and she was a
she was a DEI appointment bought by Eric Holder.
Speaker 6 (26:50):
You know, it's it's all nice and well and good
and warm and fuzzy.
Speaker 5 (26:55):
Oh, this poor guy got arrested.
Speaker 6 (26:56):
We're gonna let him go on no bail because he
doesn't have any money, and we really feel better that
he would have to stay in jail when he really shouldn't.
You know, that might work for I don't know, a
shoplifter or you know, a graffiti artist or somebody who does.
People commit violent crime shouldn't first of all, probably shouldn't
be out on bail anyway. And they do have dangerousness
hearings in some places for them Massachusetts, yes, surprisingly enough,
(27:21):
but but they certainly shouldn't be freed on no bail.
I mean, I get it.
Speaker 1 (27:28):
Even his mother said, please keep him in jail, and
they didn't. Even his mother said he's dangerous. You can't
let him out because he beat his sister to a poll.
Speaker 5 (27:38):
Who doesn't have fights with their sister?
Speaker 1 (27:40):
There you go, so there you go, you go. So
I mean, this is to me, this is this is psychotic.
What the Democratic Party is sur very disturbed, very disturbing.
So we end every week with the Truth Control. This
week is President Trump, because he's so good at trolling.
In this case, he's on the White House song or
(28:00):
and a reporter asks him, are you considering attacking the
cartels the drug cartels inside of Venezuela. Another way of
putting that would be are we going to attack Venezuela?
So that's what he's asking the president. Where do you hear?
The President's answer cut to.
Speaker 10 (28:17):
Are you going to the ring.
Speaker 7 (28:18):
Unlacking inside of Venezuela?
Speaker 1 (28:21):
Do what?
Speaker 6 (28:22):
What are you gonna find out?
Speaker 1 (28:25):
Well, you're gonna find out.
Speaker 6 (28:26):
Well, I think that's the truth. You are going to
find out. We're either going to do it or we're
not gonna do it, and you'll find out when we
do it, don't do it?
Speaker 1 (28:32):
Well, I understand. But do you think he means to
attack Venezuela or do you think he's just poking the
bear there?
Speaker 6 (28:40):
I think he's poking the bear. I don't think any country,
and you know Colombia in various place.
Speaker 1 (28:44):
I don't think it's going to actually cross the border
into Venezuela.
Speaker 6 (28:47):
Right, Yeah, No, I forget the name of that movie
where they did it. Was one of the Jack Ryan
movies you know, Yeah, that Harrison Ford was in and
they did target drug dealers in other countries.
Speaker 1 (29:00):
Yeah, those are those are right. Well, I'm just saying
maybe seal black ops, Well.
Speaker 6 (29:04):
They were right, they were movies. They didn't attack the country,
though they attacked drug deals. So I think I think
it is perhaps, and I'm saying this, I think, so
don't go write a story about this. I think if
the president had the ability to take out a drug
farm or a drug cartel somewhere in some part of
the world without actually attacking the actual country, I think
(29:25):
you'd seriously consider it. But you know, obviously there's there's
a lot involved in that. I'm not saying the US
should be doing a lot of black ops with.
Speaker 1 (29:31):
The drug dealing, but if they're, if they're agreeing to it,
it's not an invasion.
Speaker 6 (29:35):
The president, Well then maybe he'll ask permission. But the
president is not going to Well, the question about you
is if he's going to do it is.
Speaker 1 (29:45):
Yeah, the question is is he trolling? I think he's trolling.
I don't think he he's just because he's just saying
I think his intention is to do what he did
with that boat. Is if he finds any drug cartel
people outside the border of sovereign nation like that one was,
he's going to take it out and he did. And
he's not crossing anybody's border unless he has the permission
of that government. I think that's what you're I think
(30:06):
that's his intent. But he's just poking, he's just rattling
the cage. I have a problem with that.
Speaker 6 (30:09):
If you listen to the response verbatim, he's basically saying,
you'll find out.
Speaker 5 (30:14):
I think that's the truth. You'll find out.
Speaker 1 (30:16):
You will, So you can let us know if you
think we're going to find out whether President Trump's going
to invade Venezuela or not. You can you can contact
Ben and I on x at News by three or
on Facebook at Newsbye. We upload a new episode every
single Monday, so please check back next week and see
what new offerings we have. Meanwhile, have a great wait,
(30:36):
a great week. And I would stay out of Venezuela
if I.
Speaker 6 (30:39):
You know, if you want to fix this problem, you
send Philly's Karen down.
Speaker 5 (30:43):
To Venezuela to get the drugs.
Speaker 6 (30:45):
Those are my drugs.
Speaker 5 (30:46):
Give me those drugs, you bet.
Speaker 1 (30:47):
I'm Ben Parker, This is news bye,
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Cardiac Cowboys
The heart was always off-limits to surgeons. Cutting into it spelled instant death for the patient. That is, until a ragtag group of doctors scattered across the Midwest and Texas decided to throw out the rule book. Working in makeshift laboratories and home garages, using medical devices made from scavenged machine parts and beer tubes, these men and women invented the field of open heart surgery. Odds are, someone you know is alive because of them. So why has history left them behind? Presented by Chris Pine, CARDIAC COWBOYS tells the gripping true story behind the birth of heart surgery, and the young, Greatest Generation doctors who made it happen. For years, they competed and feuded, racing to be the first, the best, and the most prolific. Some appeared on the cover of Time Magazine, operated on kings and advised presidents. Others ended up disgraced, penniless, and convicted of felonies. Together, they ignited a revolution in medicine, and changed the world.