June 30, 2025 • 29 mins
Trump surprises everyone most of all Iran, CNN tries to take the credit away and Democratic congresswoman proves she has no grasp of basic arithmetic. There were some shocking moments on full display with this week's "did they really just say that" cuts.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Trump surprises everyone, most of all are on CNN, tries
to take the credit away, and Democratic Congressman proves she
has no grasp of basic arithmetic. There are some shocking
moments on full display with this week's Did they really
just say that cuts? I'm Nancy Shack, I've Ben Parker,
this is Newspye.
Speaker 2 (00:31):
A short time ago, the US military carried out massive
precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the
Iranian regime, Bordeaux, Natance, and Esfahan.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
What we are told is that as of now, this
Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, it does conclude at this point
that those underground facilities, including the centrifuges, including the highly
enriched uranium that everyone has been talking so much about,
those are largely in tact.
Speaker 4 (01:00):
The poll behind you, behind our ranking member, it adds
up to one hundred and ten percent. Just wanted to clarify.
Is it meant to add up to one hundred and ten
percent or is.
Speaker 5 (01:08):
That an error?
Speaker 1 (01:10):
It was embarrassing, Actually an embarrassing moment. That was a
representative Brian Jack of Georgia.
Speaker 5 (01:17):
Must be that new math. What is that common core
or something? Somebody somebody added the boxes.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
Wrong well, actually this was it was very very This
is during a hearing, and that was Congressman Brian Jack
of Georgia asking another congressman, a Democratic rap Melanie Stansbury,
about a giant visual aid she had brought onto the floor,
a big, huge poster in pink with big black letters
(01:44):
that was supposed to demonstrate the disapproval ratings regarding President
Trump and some policy or whatever, huge huge thing, and
the numbers just didn't add up, which didn't escape the
notice of the other congressman on the panel. Cut three sixteen, just.
Speaker 4 (02:01):
Appoint of clarification the pole behind you, behind our ranking member.
It adds up to one hundred and ten percent. Just
wanted to clarify. Is it meant to add up to
one hundred and ten percent or is that an error?
Speaker 5 (02:12):
Yep, yeah, I do.
Speaker 6 (02:14):
This is from a Quinnipiac poll that was held two
weeks ago, and this is the data that was provided.
There's a wealth of information, including information about Donald Trump's
falling poll numbers. So you should take a look. Thanks.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
Now, you bet the gentleman yields and it still adds
up to one hundred and ten percent.
Speaker 1 (02:33):
That's a fake poll right there. Yeah, I don't blame her,
Maybe me, what the hell that was Marjorie Taylor Green
at the end, by the way.
Speaker 5 (02:40):
Maybe instead of a prop with all the numbers on it,
she should have brought a calculator.
Speaker 1 (02:46):
She can't pronounce quinnipiac, which was interesting since it was
a pole she was supposed to be. You think somebody
would have explained the pronunciation before she got onto the floor.
And the amazing thing is that nobody in her office,
not just congress Woman herself obviously she didn't, but nobody
in her office, none of them, when they're making up
this poster, not even the intern who actually made the poster,
(03:09):
realize that it didn't add up. Nobody took the time.
Speaker 5 (03:12):
And this is maybe they were rounding up.
Speaker 1 (03:14):
This is indicative, well, that would only make it worse.
That rounding up would only make it worse. This, this
is indicative of the callousness and carelessness of the Democrat
caucus in Congress. They don't care, they did. They never
check to see if something's right. They just go with
it if it fits their narrative. And that was an
absolute positive example of that. And talk about embarrassing.
Speaker 5 (03:38):
I can't believe one hundred and ten percent of people
hate Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (03:40):
Is yeah, yeah, basically yeah. I mean that is just
one of those this is what you know, this is
what we're paying for these people.
Speaker 5 (03:49):
It's embarrassing whenever it happens. I mean, I don't care
if they were comparing you know, policies or or even
matter what the poll is or eggs or the price
of she got.
Speaker 7 (04:00):
She she's caught out in this.
Speaker 1 (04:01):
She can't even add two and two, and she gets
snotty about it. She's like, this was from quintape whatever
their name is, and they say nobody likes s Donald Trump.
It's like, and I like Marjorie Taylor Green at the end,
I'm not a huge fan of hers. But she's like, yeah,
it's still one hundred and ten.
Speaker 5 (04:16):
Percent up there. This is a bad poll. Well yeah,
and that's the problem with the answer that the the
other congress person gets by the way Dansbury. People people
make mistakes. I mean, let's be clear about that. People
do make mistakes. But she didn't want to own it.
She's like, well, I don't know, you're a poster.
Speaker 8 (04:32):
You brought it out.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
You're the one who's making everybody look at it.
Speaker 5 (04:36):
Sorry, we did that oh my god, oops, my bad,
or some ny above other than it's kind of like,
look at me, I don't know what to do, but
it's still right. You didn't fix the problem. You didn't
explain why it's one hundred and ten percent. You just
kind of.
Speaker 1 (04:51):
Because she can't add. So it's like, you know, you
made yourself look stupid, you made your office look stupid,
and you made the Democrat caucus look really stupid.
Speaker 5 (04:59):
Well, Marjorie Tayler Green, I wanted it out again a second.
Speaker 8 (05:01):
To have Marjorie Taylor Green, of all the people, for
Marjorie Green to really to put yourself in a position
where she could basically bitch slap you in public, is
you know, with.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
No repercussions, is really embarrassing. Oh my. Now, that, of
course was not the big story of the week.
Speaker 9 (05:26):
You know.
Speaker 1 (05:26):
The big story of the week was, well, the President
told us, or the President actually didn't really mean it
when he said he needed two weeks to decide what
to do about Iran. It turns out he didn't need
that much time at all. Cut number one.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
A short time ago, the US military carried out massive
precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the
Iranian regime, Fo dou Natance and Esfahan. Everybody heard those
names for years as they built this horribly destructive enterprise.
(06:07):
Our objective was the destruction of irans nuclear enrichment capacity
and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the
world's number one state sponsor of terror.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
I wonder what happened to the property values in Isfahan
on Saturday.
Speaker 5 (06:23):
I'm not sure they were all that high anyway, but
I probably fell.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
I'm not sure that there was I'm sure there was
people living there who had to work at the facility.
But by the way, you know, we gave them notice
to get people out, and they did. They got people out.
They just couldn't get their nuclear stuff out, which was
the whole point of it.
Speaker 5 (06:41):
But Israel.
Speaker 1 (06:42):
Israel was so happy that basically they kissed President Trump
on the mouth. Cut seven.
Speaker 10 (06:48):
Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear
facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United
States will change history. In Operation Rising Line, Israel has
done truly amazing things, But in Tonight's action against Iran's
nuclear facilities, America has been truly unsurpassed. It has done
(07:14):
what no other country on Earth could do. History will
record that President Trump acted to deny the world's most
dangerous regime the world's most dangerous weapons. His leadership today
has created a pivot of history that can help lead
the Middle East and beyond to a future of prosperity
(07:36):
and peace.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
I think if Donald Trump weren't married to Bibi Netna,
who would propose.
Speaker 5 (07:41):
Come over here, give you big hug. By the way,
mister President Israel not only thinks you were correct, we
believe you were one hundred and ten percent correct.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
Yeah, there you go, absolutely positively. So this was all
very exciting. Everything happened one after the other. Then that
the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hagsath, and the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs came out. That's a General Dan Kine,
he was an Air Force general, came out and gave
a basically a blow by blow of the operation, which
(08:10):
I found fascinating, not just because it was interesting the
kind of coordination that our military had to have, but
because you don't normally see the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs coming out and giving you operational details of the
super secret mission that did what it did. And so
I'm thinking as I'm listening to him. There's another reason
(08:33):
behind transparency that he's doing this, and I think basically
it had to do with look Chi, look putin see
what we can do?
Speaker 5 (08:41):
Do you?
Speaker 1 (08:41):
I really want to bleep with us. I'm pretty sure
that's what was going on, but it's just a guest
on my part. But here's the chairman.
Speaker 11 (08:46):
Fourteen B At approximately six forty pm Eastern Standard time
two ten am a Ran time, the lead B two
dropped two GBU fifty seven massive ordnance penetrator weapons on
the first of several aim points at four Doh. As
the President stated last night. The remaining bombers then hit
(09:09):
their targets as well, with a total of fourteen mops
dropped against two nuclear target areas. All three Iranian nuclear
infrastructure targets were struck between six forty pm and seven
zho five pm Eastern time. Again, that's about two ten
in the morning local time in Iran, with the Tomahawk
(09:32):
missiles being the last to strike at Esfahan. To ensure
we retain the element of surprise throughout the operation.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Yeah, I'm pretty sure they were surprised by those Somemhawk missiles.
Speaker 12 (09:44):
Oops.
Speaker 1 (09:44):
Yeah, yeah, But it was. There was you know, it
was quite a feat what they did. And the question
arose from this because this was such a it was
a surprise attack. There was deception involved, which was very
well done. You know, they sent out groups of stealth
bombers off of the mainland of the United States, out
(10:06):
of the Midwest, sent one group one way, one group
the other way, and you know, Iran watched the wrong group,
so they did a faint Never mind President Trump saying
he needed two weeks when it looks like he needed,
you know, twelve hours to make up his mind. So
there was a lot going on there. So the big
question became after that is are we basically at war now?
(10:29):
Did we just sign up to have war with Iran?
And our Secretary of State Marco Rubio was on Fox
with Maria Bartiromo and he says, no, no, we're not.
Cut twenty five, are we now at war with Iran?
Speaker 9 (10:44):
No, we're not. This is not a war against Iran.
This is this is very simple.
Speaker 6 (10:48):
You know.
Speaker 9 (10:49):
Sixty seven days ago, the President of the United States
sent the Iranians a letter and it said, you're not
going to have nuclear weapons, You're not going to have
a militarized nuclear program. Let's negotiate. I want to do
this diplomatically, want to do this peacefully. They played, they
tried to play him along the way they've played every
American president for the last thirty five years. And you know,
the President told them, if we don't get a deal,
(11:09):
which is what we wanted, then I'll have to handle
it differently. And that's what he did last night. He
handled it differently. But that was an Iranian choice. We
didn't make that choice.
Speaker 5 (11:16):
They did sent him a letter. Yeah, here's a letter.
Speaker 1 (11:20):
You got sixty days on the sixty first. It's not
going to be pleasant. And it wasn't.
Speaker 5 (11:23):
I started thinking about getting a letter. You know, you
used to get those envelopes in the mail from Dick
Clark and the publisher's clearinghouse. You may have already won, Yes,
you may have already lost. President Jump should have sent
a letter to a rend saying you may have already
been bombed. You may already be bombed. It was very issue.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
It was very interesting in that even people on CNN,
all the military analysts were just so impressed with how
this administration carried everything out. This is Mark Kimmitt, He's
a retired brigadier general on CNN cut fifty three.
Speaker 3 (11:53):
I'm wondering what you make of this announcement by the
President and the decision to act.
Speaker 13 (11:58):
Now, well, I'm fascinated and candidly I'm impressed. I never
really could understand what the two week pause meant or
what it was for. What was left to negotiate, What
were we going to expect the opinians to offer. In
many ways, it was much like a Trump deal. I mean,
(12:18):
he's trying to make a deal to buy an apartment,
but all of a sudden, the apartment was destroyed, So
where's the negotiation. So I think the use of deception
and trickery in this case, first of all, was successful.
The second of all, saved the potential loss of American lives.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
Yeah, it was most European countries, most anybody who has
who's been concerned about Iran or has any military background,
was just gobsmacked at how brilliant the operation was and
how it went with no American lives being lost whatsoever.
But that was not enough to impress a number of Democrats.
(12:58):
A few of them were to be tied, like Congressman
Rocana Cut thirty.
Speaker 14 (13:03):
Now you've put American troops at risk. Now you're wasting
billions of our dollars because we're sending more troops to
the Middle East. What did you accomplish? And why are
you oblivious to the American people who are sick of
these wars?
Speaker 1 (13:17):
The thing is, the American troops weren't put at risk.
No American was hurt or even fired at, apparently, and
the world is saved from a horrible situation. I'm wondering
if I wish I could ask Congressman Rocana, is it
not a bigger risk to let around have nukes than
to go in and take them out from twenty thousand
(13:38):
feet with stealth bombers. I mean, which one holds the
higher risk? I'm pretty sure it's the nukes. Isn't it
sad that this is so predictable?
Speaker 7 (13:46):
Now?
Speaker 5 (13:46):
Though you know it doesn't matter what the president or
any president does, you all of a sudden going to
get I said to my wife, we're watching the president
does speak the other night after this happened, and I said, well,
we'll be hearing from a with the Democrats about how
terrible this was and blah blah blah, and that is
the case, and it's kind of sad that that we
(14:09):
were in that position. Now, I know there has to
be a check in of balance and you've got to
make sure that things were done properly, and there's you know,
but there's it's almost like instantaneous, like President Trump has
announced whatever that's terrible. We hate that.
Speaker 1 (14:22):
It's horrible without a knee jerk reaction, right, knee jerk.
Speaker 5 (14:25):
And like the next day or a couple of weeks
or hey, we're going to have a hearing, we do
have to find out. I get it. Look, I think
there should be a check int of balance in this country.
There is, and there should be, but this, yeah, the
knee jerk reaction is pretty pathetic.
Speaker 7 (14:39):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
The only ones who don't seem to like, you know
what happened to are one the your audience and two
the Democrats. Everybody in the world, the wrest of the
world is has this huge sigh of relief. Which there's
an example. It's the Native Secretary General Mark Root. I mean,
as soon as he saw Trump, this is what he said,
cut number nine.
Speaker 12 (14:58):
I just went to recognize your decisive action on Iran.
Speaker 7 (15:03):
Thank you.
Speaker 12 (15:03):
You are a man of strength, but you're also a
man of peace, and the fact that you are now
also successful in getting the ceasefire done between Israel and Iran.
I really want to comment you Forge, thank you, and
I think this is supported for the whole world.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
It is important for the whole What I don't see
where the problem was here. Past presidents have said that
if Iran persists in developing nuclear weapons, that they would
be bombed. Past Democrat presidents have said that that they
would do that. As a matter of fact, Hillary Clinton,
one of the most outspoken critics of President Trump and
(15:38):
former former contestant for the president back back in twenty sixteen,
has said the same thing. This is her when she's
running for president, promising that she would in fact bomb
Iran if they kept going on the nuclear path. Cut
one O three and.
Speaker 15 (15:54):
I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president,
we will attack Iran whatever stage of developed that they
might be in their nuclear weapons program in the next
ten years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an
attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them.
That's a terrible thing to say, but those people who
(16:15):
run around need to understand that because that perhaps will
deter them from doing something that would be reckless, foolish and.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
Tragic, which is exactly so. Donald Trump does exactly what
Hillary Clinton promised you would do, and it's a bad thing.
Speaker 5 (16:31):
There are there just are some people who, regardless of
what happens, will not give credit to Donald Trump. And look,
I know a lot of people don't like Donald Trump.
NATO has not been the hugest fan of Donald Trump
over his now two presidencies, and yet there's the leader
of NATO praising him. There has been some praise from
(16:52):
other places where you're maybe a little surprised, And you
mentioned that the guy on CNN who made the comments, Hey, look,
you cannot like Donald Trump and still praise him or congratulate, appreciate,
appreciate a job well done. When a job is well done,
you don't have to always say that's terrible.
Speaker 1 (17:13):
The Trump dysphoria has become so deeply entrenched, and to
what you were speaking about earlier, the knee jerk reactions
do the people who have them a huge disservice because
it makes you look like an idiot, like you couldn't like.
Your credibility is completely destroyed because you can't recognize a
job well done when it is. And the worst example
(17:35):
of this that has happened this past week has to
be the network CNN when they got no traction on
that and they weren't happy with their military end listening
this was good, this is this is good, and they're like, ah,
they pulled him, didn't see him again. And then when
they got no traction on the bombing is bad thing.
Because most Americans approved of it, thought it was a
it was a good thing, they decided to go down
(17:58):
a different road. They decided to say, okay, so the
bombing's okay, but they did a bad job at the bombing.
The bombing didn't do the job. Cut number eleven.
Speaker 3 (18:08):
What we are told is that as of now, this
Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, it does conclude at this point,
again it is still very early that those underground facilities,
including the centrifuges, including the highly enriched uranium that everyone
has been talking so much about, those are largely intact now.
Of course, this does stand at odds with what President
Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have been
(18:30):
saying in recent days about the impact of these US
military strikes. Of course, President Trump said it was totally obliterated,
and Secretary Hexth did as well.
Speaker 1 (18:39):
Now here's the thing about this, there's multiple issues here.
First of all, what they did is they quote have
a anonymous source who leaked a top secret damage report,
which by the way, is called a low confidence report
because it gives the range it can give the destruction
could have been from the low range, high range, and
(19:00):
the report doesn't tell you where it is because it's
only was done within like eight hours of the whole thing,
but saying it could have been anywhere within there. We
know now that it was the high range. It was
very well done. But that's not what CNN is telling you.
CNN is taking their anonymous source who broke the law
with the top secret report, and by the way, the
FBI is looking into who did that and putting it
(19:22):
out there to take away from President Trump the credit
for destroying the nuclear program.
Speaker 5 (19:27):
Well, which would be important, by the way, if anybody
watched CNN anymore. Yeah, that's true.
Speaker 1 (19:31):
So and President I mean, so what they're they hate
him so much they can't stand that he got credit
for something that was well done. So they tried to
take away from the efficacy of the bombing, and President
Trump had something to say about that cut three ZHO one.
Speaker 7 (19:47):
I think it's been completely demolished.
Speaker 16 (19:49):
I think the reason we're here is because those pilots
just be two pilots.
Speaker 7 (19:53):
Did an unbelievable job.
Speaker 16 (19:55):
And you know, the fake news like CNN in particular,
they're trying to you know, they're trying to say, well, well,
I agree that it was destroyed, but maybe not that destroyed.
You know what they're doing, they're really hurting great pilots
that put their lives in the line. CNN is scum
and so is MSDNC. They're all and frankly the networks
aren't much better. It's all fakes. But they should not
(20:17):
have done that by those pilots hit their targets. Those
targets were obliterated, and the pilots should be given credit.
Speaker 7 (20:23):
Then not after the pilots are after me. They want
to try and to meet it.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
I agree with them. They're after him, so they denigrate
the pilot. I think that was absolutely accurate. What was
amazing to me is you have a president, you know,
calling a network scum, but he wasn't thrue. He was
still pissed off. And I just want you to keep
this in your mind's eye when you listen to the
next cup. At the very end of it, you're going
to hear him talk directly to CNN and MSNBC. He
(20:48):
looks directly into the camera, which he doesn't normally do
when he said the end of the cut, you're about
to hear three ozho one.
Speaker 16 (20:53):
A aaran will never rebuild it zukli from there, absolutely not.
That place is under rock. That place is demolished. The
B two pilots did their job. They did it better
than anybody could even imagine. They hit late in the evening,
it was dark with no moon, and they hit that
target with every one of.
Speaker 7 (21:12):
Those things, and that place is gone.
Speaker 16 (21:14):
But when I see CNN all night long, they're trying
to say, well, maybe it wasn't really as demolished as
we thought. There was demolished, and you take a look
at the pinpricks and you see that place is gone.
And I will say, I think CNN or to apologize
to the pilots of the V twos. I think that
MSD and CEO to apologize. I think these guys, really,
(21:36):
these networks and these cable networks are real losers.
Speaker 7 (21:41):
You really are you're realizing.
Speaker 1 (21:43):
At the end. And it wasn't just you know, President
Trump that took events. The whole team that pulled off
this great this great feat was very pissed off. In fact,
Secretary of State Mark Rubio, who is with President Trump
in the Hague for NATO's summit meeting, had some words
(22:06):
to say about it as well. Three oh seven.
Speaker 9 (22:08):
These leakers are professional stabbers, That's what they are. They
go out and they read this stuff and then they
tell you what it says against the law, but they
characterize it for you in a way that absolutely faults.
There's no way Iron comes to the table of somehow
nothing had happened. This was complete and total obliteration.
Speaker 5 (22:26):
They're in bad shape.
Speaker 9 (22:27):
They are way behind today compared to where they were
just seven days ago.
Speaker 1 (22:30):
Because of what the President did a market I liked
his point, and President Trump also made it a NATO too,
is if no destruction had been had, why would Iron
negotiate a piece. They only negotiate a piece.
Speaker 5 (22:42):
Because they because they're in pieces.
Speaker 1 (22:45):
They're in piece because they're in pieces. They are now
ineffective because of the attack. So who do you believe?
Do you believe CNN? Who has Trump dysphoria, and who's
dealing with an anonymous source, who's leaking top secret information?
Or do you believe President Trump, Secretary of State Mark
or Rubio. That's where the question comes down.
Speaker 5 (23:03):
By the way, one of the immediate things, not the immediate,
but one of the first things that went through my
mind after this all happened. If you remember back to
the late seventies and right around the timer, right before
President Reagan came into office, Iran of course had hostages
and were everybody. Everybody, everybody really was united against Iran
(23:26):
in the United States. And is Vince Vance and the
Valiants had a song rip off of Barbara Ann by
the Beatles, I mean by the Beach Boys, bomb Bomb
Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran.
Speaker 1 (23:38):
Yeah, And I was thinking that that I've used it
as intro.
Speaker 5 (23:41):
I'm sure you have. I said it to my sister,
But my first thought was, huh, finally, because we did
bomb them. I mean, they have been hit before for
various reasons, but this this was you know, that song
probably should have been playing in the back round when
the President spoke, because they did.
Speaker 1 (23:59):
Bob I'm thinking I'm thinking more along lines. It was
probably in some in the background of the B two
stealth Fighters everything over.
Speaker 5 (24:07):
Bomb Yeah, exactly right.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
Yeah, those are actually nice planes. They did a tour
thing of them. And you know there's there's a place
for a nap, which you need, I think if you've
got if you're flying eighteen hours, there's a fridge, there's
a little microwave, so they can have some frills. I think,
no movies, you know, they do like you to pay attention.
But the but yeah, so it's because you got guys
(24:31):
who did what they did. They flew eighteen hours in
a bomber and a a a stealth bomber, which means
it wasn't like a seven forty seven You could get
up and jog around the aisles. So you have to
make you need to be able to stretch out a
little bit, you need to be able to feed them.
And there's a bathroom on board. So so these are
all you know, God bless them.
Speaker 5 (24:50):
And did you know that being a B.
Speaker 1 (24:53):
Two stealth fighter pilot is more difficult than becoming an astronaut.
Really it's more more competitive than being an astronaut, which
is amazing.
Speaker 5 (25:03):
Does that mean more people want to bomb things than
go to the moon?
Speaker 1 (25:07):
I think it means there are fewer B twelve B
two twelve. Yeah, there was. There are fewer B two
stealth bombers, and there are rockets basically, so they're not
that many of them, and most of them are in
the most of them are in the Midwest, hanging out,
hanging out here.
Speaker 5 (25:20):
Do I get my hands on one of those?
Speaker 7 (25:22):
You know?
Speaker 1 (25:22):
Are the beautiful?
Speaker 5 (25:23):
I I just wanted for the place to sleep and eat.
Speaker 1 (25:25):
When I when I was in Washington, d C. If
you went out to Dallas Airport, periodically you would see
a stealth bomber come through there. It was. They were
just amazing things.
Speaker 5 (25:36):
To say, like kind of look like a very big
peregrine falcons.
Speaker 1 (25:40):
They do, actually they do. They're they're very, very very cool.
So we like to end every week with a truth
or troll. This week is no different this one. Yeah,
I know it's President Trump. Yes, he is the king
troller of all time. I think so more often than
not it will be him, but it doesn't have to be,
but it is.
Speaker 5 (25:59):
This week.
Speaker 1 (26:00):
He's on Air Force one and he's asked by a
reporter if he's called Governor Waltz after the shootings that
occurred in Minnesota where a guy that was his aid,
somebody he hired, shot and killed two one legislator and
her husband, and shot and critically injured another legislator and
(26:21):
his wife. And he basically was not impressive in the
aftermath of that. And so he was asked by a reporter.
President Trump was if he's called Governor Waltz and here's
his response, cut five on Minnesota.
Speaker 3 (26:37):
There are a lot of the porific details that came
out today about the suspect who's been charged. There Have
you called the governor yet or been able to speak
to any of them?
Speaker 17 (26:44):
I don't really call him. He appointed this guy to
a position. I think the governor of Minnesota is so
whacked out. I'm not calling Why would I call him?
I could call him, say hi, how you doing. The
guy doesn't have a clue. He's a best so you know,
I could be nice to him, But why waste time?
Speaker 1 (27:05):
What do you think is he is this what he
really thinks of Tim Walls? Or is he just is
this a political move too? Is he trolling Walls?
Speaker 5 (27:12):
I feel like I have to say this, but I
don't know why. But what happened in Minnesota horrible However,
I think President Trump's dead serious. I think he does
think wolves is is a waste of space and a
ding dong. You know, we can have a political argument
about whether he is or not, but that's not the point.
The point is I think President Trump said exactly what
(27:33):
he thinks of Walls.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
I'm coming to believe that President Trump, generally speaking, says
exactly what he thinks.
Speaker 5 (27:39):
For the most part of me. He likes to poke
the bear occasionally, and and we do. We have had
times where we we thought he was trolling. I don't
think he was trolling that. If he was trolling, I
don't think. First of all, I don't think he would
have said it like that, and and secondly, I really
don't think he has any place that is in his
heart really for Walls or Kamala Harris for that matter.
I think what he says things about them that he
(28:01):
thinks they're knuckleheads, he means it. And of course he
ran against them, and he thought he was way better
than the knuckleheads and wealth so did the American people.
Speaker 1 (28:11):
I think that's true. Actually, I think that's very true,
and it's been it's he has he periodically. I think
poke's peak people. But you can usually tell if you're
looking at him because he smiles. He gives a little
wry smile. But I agree with you in this particular case.
I think, in fact, he thinks that Tim Walls is.
Speaker 16 (28:31):
Just a.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Dodo, just a Dodo head, and I think he would disagree.
Speaker 5 (28:36):
Look, if he didn't think that, I think he would
have picked up the phone. He might have had to
hold his nose a little because he doesn't like him.
But I think he thinks he's an idiot. And I
think that whole thing at the end where he says
it'd be a waste of time, I think he thinks
it would have been. He'd rather played a game of Solitaire
than call Tim Walls.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
Yeah, I completely agree with you. I think that's exactly
what happened. But maybe other people do not agree with us.
And you are more than welcome to let us know.
You can contact us on x at news by three
or on Facebook at news Byte. We upload a new
episode every Monday, so check back next Monday and see
what new offerings we have. Meanwhile, have a great and
safe week. I'm Nancy Shack.
Speaker 5 (29:12):
I'm one hundred and ten percent Ben Parker.
Speaker 1 (29:14):
This is news bite,
Trump surprises everyone, most of all are on CNN, tries
to take the credit away, and Democratic Congressman proves she
has no grasp of basic arithmetic. There are some shocking
moments on full display with this week's Did they really
just say that cuts? I'm Nancy Shack, I've Ben Parker,
this is Newspye.
Speaker 2 (00:31):
A short time ago, the US military carried out massive
precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the
Iranian regime, Bordeaux, Natance, and Esfahan.
Speaker 3 (00:45):
What we are told is that as of now, this
Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, it does conclude at this point
that those underground facilities, including the centrifuges, including the highly
enriched uranium that everyone has been talking so much about,
those are largely in tact.
Speaker 4 (01:00):
The poll behind you, behind our ranking member, it adds
up to one hundred and ten percent. Just wanted to clarify.
Is it meant to add up to one hundred and ten
percent or is.
Speaker 5 (01:08):
That an error?
Speaker 1 (01:10):
It was embarrassing, Actually an embarrassing moment. That was a
representative Brian Jack of Georgia.
Speaker 5 (01:17):
Must be that new math. What is that common core
or something? Somebody somebody added the boxes.
Speaker 1 (01:21):
Wrong well, actually this was it was very very This
is during a hearing, and that was Congressman Brian Jack
of Georgia asking another congressman, a Democratic rap Melanie Stansbury,
about a giant visual aid she had brought onto the floor,
a big, huge poster in pink with big black letters
(01:44):
that was supposed to demonstrate the disapproval ratings regarding President
Trump and some policy or whatever, huge huge thing, and
the numbers just didn't add up, which didn't escape the
notice of the other congressman on the panel. Cut three sixteen, just.
Speaker 4 (02:01):
Appoint of clarification the pole behind you, behind our ranking member.
It adds up to one hundred and ten percent. Just
wanted to clarify. Is it meant to add up to
one hundred and ten percent or is that an error?
Speaker 5 (02:12):
Yep, yeah, I do.
Speaker 6 (02:14):
This is from a Quinnipiac poll that was held two
weeks ago, and this is the data that was provided.
There's a wealth of information, including information about Donald Trump's
falling poll numbers. So you should take a look. Thanks.
Speaker 3 (02:27):
Now, you bet the gentleman yields and it still adds
up to one hundred and ten percent.
Speaker 1 (02:33):
That's a fake poll right there. Yeah, I don't blame her,
Maybe me, what the hell that was Marjorie Taylor Green
at the end, by the way.
Speaker 5 (02:40):
Maybe instead of a prop with all the numbers on it,
she should have brought a calculator.
Speaker 1 (02:46):
She can't pronounce quinnipiac, which was interesting since it was
a pole she was supposed to be. You think somebody
would have explained the pronunciation before she got onto the floor.
And the amazing thing is that nobody in her office,
not just congress Woman herself obviously she didn't, but nobody
in her office, none of them, when they're making up
this poster, not even the intern who actually made the poster,
(03:09):
realize that it didn't add up. Nobody took the time.
Speaker 5 (03:12):
And this is maybe they were rounding up.
Speaker 1 (03:14):
This is indicative, well, that would only make it worse.
That rounding up would only make it worse. This, this
is indicative of the callousness and carelessness of the Democrat
caucus in Congress. They don't care, they did. They never
check to see if something's right. They just go with
it if it fits their narrative. And that was an
absolute positive example of that. And talk about embarrassing.
Speaker 5 (03:38):
I can't believe one hundred and ten percent of people
hate Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (03:40):
Is yeah, yeah, basically yeah. I mean that is just
one of those this is what you know, this is
what we're paying for these people.
Speaker 5 (03:49):
It's embarrassing whenever it happens. I mean, I don't care
if they were comparing you know, policies or or even
matter what the poll is or eggs or the price
of she got.
Speaker 7 (04:00):
She she's caught out in this.
Speaker 1 (04:01):
She can't even add two and two, and she gets
snotty about it. She's like, this was from quintape whatever
their name is, and they say nobody likes s Donald Trump.
It's like, and I like Marjorie Taylor Green at the end,
I'm not a huge fan of hers. But she's like, yeah,
it's still one hundred and ten.
Speaker 5 (04:16):
Percent up there. This is a bad poll. Well yeah,
and that's the problem with the answer that the the
other congress person gets by the way Dansbury. People people
make mistakes. I mean, let's be clear about that. People
do make mistakes. But she didn't want to own it.
She's like, well, I don't know, you're a poster.
Speaker 8 (04:32):
You brought it out.
Speaker 1 (04:33):
You're the one who's making everybody look at it.
Speaker 5 (04:36):
Sorry, we did that oh my god, oops, my bad,
or some ny above other than it's kind of like,
look at me, I don't know what to do, but
it's still right. You didn't fix the problem. You didn't
explain why it's one hundred and ten percent. You just
kind of.
Speaker 1 (04:51):
Because she can't add. So it's like, you know, you
made yourself look stupid, you made your office look stupid,
and you made the Democrat caucus look really stupid.
Speaker 5 (04:59):
Well, Marjorie Tayler Green, I wanted it out again a second.
Speaker 8 (05:01):
To have Marjorie Taylor Green, of all the people, for
Marjorie Green to really to put yourself in a position
where she could basically bitch slap you in public, is
you know, with.
Speaker 1 (05:13):
No repercussions, is really embarrassing. Oh my. Now, that, of
course was not the big story of the week.
Speaker 9 (05:26):
You know.
Speaker 1 (05:26):
The big story of the week was, well, the President
told us, or the President actually didn't really mean it
when he said he needed two weeks to decide what
to do about Iran. It turns out he didn't need
that much time at all. Cut number one.
Speaker 2 (05:43):
A short time ago, the US military carried out massive
precision strikes on the three key nuclear facilities in the
Iranian regime, Fo dou Natance and Esfahan. Everybody heard those
names for years as they built this horribly destructive enterprise.
(06:07):
Our objective was the destruction of irans nuclear enrichment capacity
and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the
world's number one state sponsor of terror.
Speaker 1 (06:19):
I wonder what happened to the property values in Isfahan
on Saturday.
Speaker 5 (06:23):
I'm not sure they were all that high anyway, but
I probably fell.
Speaker 1 (06:27):
I'm not sure that there was I'm sure there was
people living there who had to work at the facility.
But by the way, you know, we gave them notice
to get people out, and they did. They got people out.
They just couldn't get their nuclear stuff out, which was
the whole point of it.
Speaker 5 (06:41):
But Israel.
Speaker 1 (06:42):
Israel was so happy that basically they kissed President Trump
on the mouth. Cut seven.
Speaker 10 (06:48):
Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear
facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United
States will change history. In Operation Rising Line, Israel has
done truly amazing things, But in Tonight's action against Iran's
nuclear facilities, America has been truly unsurpassed. It has done
(07:14):
what no other country on Earth could do. History will
record that President Trump acted to deny the world's most
dangerous regime the world's most dangerous weapons. His leadership today
has created a pivot of history that can help lead
the Middle East and beyond to a future of prosperity
(07:36):
and peace.
Speaker 1 (07:37):
I think if Donald Trump weren't married to Bibi Netna,
who would propose.
Speaker 5 (07:41):
Come over here, give you big hug. By the way,
mister President Israel not only thinks you were correct, we
believe you were one hundred and ten percent correct.
Speaker 1 (07:50):
Yeah, there you go, absolutely positively. So this was all
very exciting. Everything happened one after the other. Then that
the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hagsath, and the Chairman of
the Joint Chiefs came out. That's a General Dan Kine,
he was an Air Force general, came out and gave
a basically a blow by blow of the operation, which
(08:10):
I found fascinating, not just because it was interesting the
kind of coordination that our military had to have, but
because you don't normally see the Chairman of the Joint
Chiefs coming out and giving you operational details of the
super secret mission that did what it did. And so
I'm thinking as I'm listening to him. There's another reason
(08:33):
behind transparency that he's doing this, and I think basically
it had to do with look Chi, look putin see
what we can do?
Speaker 5 (08:41):
Do you?
Speaker 1 (08:41):
I really want to bleep with us. I'm pretty sure
that's what was going on, but it's just a guest
on my part. But here's the chairman.
Speaker 11 (08:46):
Fourteen B At approximately six forty pm Eastern Standard time
two ten am a Ran time, the lead B two
dropped two GBU fifty seven massive ordnance penetrator weapons on
the first of several aim points at four Doh. As
the President stated last night. The remaining bombers then hit
(09:09):
their targets as well, with a total of fourteen mops
dropped against two nuclear target areas. All three Iranian nuclear
infrastructure targets were struck between six forty pm and seven
zho five pm Eastern time. Again, that's about two ten
in the morning local time in Iran, with the Tomahawk
(09:32):
missiles being the last to strike at Esfahan. To ensure
we retain the element of surprise throughout the operation.
Speaker 1 (09:41):
Yeah, I'm pretty sure they were surprised by those Somemhawk missiles.
Speaker 12 (09:44):
Oops.
Speaker 1 (09:44):
Yeah, yeah, But it was. There was you know, it
was quite a feat what they did. And the question
arose from this because this was such a it was
a surprise attack. There was deception involved, which was very
well done. You know, they sent out groups of stealth
bombers off of the mainland of the United States, out
(10:06):
of the Midwest, sent one group one way, one group
the other way, and you know, Iran watched the wrong group,
so they did a faint Never mind President Trump saying
he needed two weeks when it looks like he needed,
you know, twelve hours to make up his mind. So
there was a lot going on there. So the big
question became after that is are we basically at war now?
(10:29):
Did we just sign up to have war with Iran?
And our Secretary of State Marco Rubio was on Fox
with Maria Bartiromo and he says, no, no, we're not.
Cut twenty five, are we now at war with Iran?
Speaker 9 (10:44):
No, we're not. This is not a war against Iran.
This is this is very simple.
Speaker 6 (10:48):
You know.
Speaker 9 (10:49):
Sixty seven days ago, the President of the United States
sent the Iranians a letter and it said, you're not
going to have nuclear weapons, You're not going to have
a militarized nuclear program. Let's negotiate. I want to do
this diplomatically, want to do this peacefully. They played, they
tried to play him along the way they've played every
American president for the last thirty five years. And you know,
the President told them, if we don't get a deal,
(11:09):
which is what we wanted, then I'll have to handle
it differently. And that's what he did last night. He
handled it differently. But that was an Iranian choice. We
didn't make that choice.
Speaker 5 (11:16):
They did sent him a letter. Yeah, here's a letter.
Speaker 1 (11:20):
You got sixty days on the sixty first. It's not
going to be pleasant. And it wasn't.
Speaker 5 (11:23):
I started thinking about getting a letter. You know, you
used to get those envelopes in the mail from Dick
Clark and the publisher's clearinghouse. You may have already won, Yes,
you may have already lost. President Jump should have sent
a letter to a rend saying you may have already
been bombed. You may already be bombed. It was very issue.
Speaker 1 (11:38):
It was very interesting in that even people on CNN,
all the military analysts were just so impressed with how
this administration carried everything out. This is Mark Kimmitt, He's
a retired brigadier general on CNN cut fifty three.
Speaker 3 (11:53):
I'm wondering what you make of this announcement by the
President and the decision to act.
Speaker 13 (11:58):
Now, well, I'm fascinated and candidly I'm impressed. I never
really could understand what the two week pause meant or
what it was for. What was left to negotiate, What
were we going to expect the opinians to offer. In
many ways, it was much like a Trump deal. I mean,
(12:18):
he's trying to make a deal to buy an apartment,
but all of a sudden, the apartment was destroyed, So
where's the negotiation. So I think the use of deception
and trickery in this case, first of all, was successful.
The second of all, saved the potential loss of American lives.
Speaker 1 (12:37):
Yeah, it was most European countries, most anybody who has
who's been concerned about Iran or has any military background,
was just gobsmacked at how brilliant the operation was and
how it went with no American lives being lost whatsoever.
But that was not enough to impress a number of Democrats.
(12:58):
A few of them were to be tied, like Congressman
Rocana Cut thirty.
Speaker 14 (13:03):
Now you've put American troops at risk. Now you're wasting
billions of our dollars because we're sending more troops to
the Middle East. What did you accomplish? And why are
you oblivious to the American people who are sick of
these wars?
Speaker 1 (13:17):
The thing is, the American troops weren't put at risk.
No American was hurt or even fired at, apparently, and
the world is saved from a horrible situation. I'm wondering
if I wish I could ask Congressman Rocana, is it
not a bigger risk to let around have nukes than
to go in and take them out from twenty thousand
(13:38):
feet with stealth bombers. I mean, which one holds the
higher risk? I'm pretty sure it's the nukes. Isn't it
sad that this is so predictable?
Speaker 7 (13:46):
Now?
Speaker 5 (13:46):
Though you know it doesn't matter what the president or
any president does, you all of a sudden going to
get I said to my wife, we're watching the president
does speak the other night after this happened, and I said, well,
we'll be hearing from a with the Democrats about how
terrible this was and blah blah blah, and that is
the case, and it's kind of sad that that we
(14:09):
were in that position. Now, I know there has to
be a check in of balance and you've got to
make sure that things were done properly, and there's you know,
but there's it's almost like instantaneous, like President Trump has
announced whatever that's terrible. We hate that.
Speaker 1 (14:22):
It's horrible without a knee jerk reaction, right, knee jerk.
Speaker 5 (14:25):
And like the next day or a couple of weeks
or hey, we're going to have a hearing, we do
have to find out. I get it. Look, I think
there should be a check int of balance in this country.
There is, and there should be, but this, yeah, the
knee jerk reaction is pretty pathetic.
Speaker 7 (14:39):
Yeah.
Speaker 1 (14:39):
The only ones who don't seem to like, you know
what happened to are one the your audience and two
the Democrats. Everybody in the world, the wrest of the
world is has this huge sigh of relief. Which there's
an example. It's the Native Secretary General Mark Root. I mean,
as soon as he saw Trump, this is what he said,
cut number nine.
Speaker 12 (14:58):
I just went to recognize your decisive action on Iran.
Speaker 7 (15:03):
Thank you.
Speaker 12 (15:03):
You are a man of strength, but you're also a
man of peace, and the fact that you are now
also successful in getting the ceasefire done between Israel and Iran.
I really want to comment you Forge, thank you, and
I think this is supported for the whole world.
Speaker 1 (15:18):
It is important for the whole What I don't see
where the problem was here. Past presidents have said that
if Iran persists in developing nuclear weapons, that they would
be bombed. Past Democrat presidents have said that that they
would do that. As a matter of fact, Hillary Clinton,
one of the most outspoken critics of President Trump and
(15:38):
former former contestant for the president back back in twenty sixteen,
has said the same thing. This is her when she's
running for president, promising that she would in fact bomb
Iran if they kept going on the nuclear path. Cut
one O three and.
Speaker 15 (15:54):
I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president,
we will attack Iran whatever stage of developed that they
might be in their nuclear weapons program in the next
ten years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an
attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them.
That's a terrible thing to say, but those people who
(16:15):
run around need to understand that because that perhaps will
deter them from doing something that would be reckless, foolish and.
Speaker 1 (16:23):
Tragic, which is exactly so. Donald Trump does exactly what
Hillary Clinton promised you would do, and it's a bad thing.
Speaker 5 (16:31):
There are there just are some people who, regardless of
what happens, will not give credit to Donald Trump. And look,
I know a lot of people don't like Donald Trump.
NATO has not been the hugest fan of Donald Trump
over his now two presidencies, and yet there's the leader
of NATO praising him. There has been some praise from
(16:52):
other places where you're maybe a little surprised, And you
mentioned that the guy on CNN who made the comments, Hey, look,
you cannot like Donald Trump and still praise him or congratulate, appreciate,
appreciate a job well done. When a job is well done,
you don't have to always say that's terrible.
Speaker 1 (17:13):
The Trump dysphoria has become so deeply entrenched, and to
what you were speaking about earlier, the knee jerk reactions
do the people who have them a huge disservice because
it makes you look like an idiot, like you couldn't like.
Your credibility is completely destroyed because you can't recognize a
job well done when it is. And the worst example
(17:35):
of this that has happened this past week has to
be the network CNN when they got no traction on
that and they weren't happy with their military end listening
this was good, this is this is good, and they're like, ah,
they pulled him, didn't see him again. And then when
they got no traction on the bombing is bad thing.
Because most Americans approved of it, thought it was a
it was a good thing, they decided to go down
(17:58):
a different road. They decided to say, okay, so the
bombing's okay, but they did a bad job at the bombing.
The bombing didn't do the job. Cut number eleven.
Speaker 3 (18:08):
What we are told is that as of now, this
Defense Intelligence Agency assessment, it does conclude at this point,
again it is still very early that those underground facilities,
including the centrifuges, including the highly enriched uranium that everyone
has been talking so much about, those are largely intact now.
Of course, this does stand at odds with what President
Donald Trump and Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth have been
(18:30):
saying in recent days about the impact of these US
military strikes. Of course, President Trump said it was totally obliterated,
and Secretary Hexth did as well.
Speaker 1 (18:39):
Now here's the thing about this, there's multiple issues here.
First of all, what they did is they quote have
a anonymous source who leaked a top secret damage report,
which by the way, is called a low confidence report
because it gives the range it can give the destruction
could have been from the low range, high range, and
(19:00):
the report doesn't tell you where it is because it's
only was done within like eight hours of the whole thing,
but saying it could have been anywhere within there. We
know now that it was the high range. It was
very well done. But that's not what CNN is telling you.
CNN is taking their anonymous source who broke the law
with the top secret report, and by the way, the
FBI is looking into who did that and putting it
(19:22):
out there to take away from President Trump the credit
for destroying the nuclear program.
Speaker 5 (19:27):
Well, which would be important, by the way, if anybody
watched CNN anymore. Yeah, that's true.
Speaker 1 (19:31):
So and President I mean, so what they're they hate
him so much they can't stand that he got credit
for something that was well done. So they tried to
take away from the efficacy of the bombing, and President
Trump had something to say about that cut three ZHO one.
Speaker 7 (19:47):
I think it's been completely demolished.
Speaker 16 (19:49):
I think the reason we're here is because those pilots
just be two pilots.
Speaker 7 (19:53):
Did an unbelievable job.
Speaker 16 (19:55):
And you know, the fake news like CNN in particular,
they're trying to you know, they're trying to say, well, well,
I agree that it was destroyed, but maybe not that destroyed.
You know what they're doing, they're really hurting great pilots
that put their lives in the line. CNN is scum
and so is MSDNC. They're all and frankly the networks
aren't much better. It's all fakes. But they should not
(20:17):
have done that by those pilots hit their targets. Those
targets were obliterated, and the pilots should be given credit.
Speaker 7 (20:23):
Then not after the pilots are after me. They want
to try and to meet it.
Speaker 1 (20:27):
I agree with them. They're after him, so they denigrate
the pilot. I think that was absolutely accurate. What was
amazing to me is you have a president, you know,
calling a network scum, but he wasn't thrue. He was
still pissed off. And I just want you to keep
this in your mind's eye when you listen to the
next cup. At the very end of it, you're going
to hear him talk directly to CNN and MSNBC. He
(20:48):
looks directly into the camera, which he doesn't normally do
when he said the end of the cut, you're about
to hear three ozho one.
Speaker 16 (20:53):
A aaran will never rebuild it zukli from there, absolutely not.
That place is under rock. That place is demolished. The
B two pilots did their job. They did it better
than anybody could even imagine. They hit late in the evening,
it was dark with no moon, and they hit that
target with every one of.
Speaker 7 (21:12):
Those things, and that place is gone.
Speaker 16 (21:14):
But when I see CNN all night long, they're trying
to say, well, maybe it wasn't really as demolished as
we thought. There was demolished, and you take a look
at the pinpricks and you see that place is gone.
And I will say, I think CNN or to apologize
to the pilots of the V twos. I think that
MSD and CEO to apologize. I think these guys, really,
(21:36):
these networks and these cable networks are real losers.
Speaker 7 (21:41):
You really are you're realizing.
Speaker 1 (21:43):
At the end. And it wasn't just you know, President
Trump that took events. The whole team that pulled off
this great this great feat was very pissed off. In fact,
Secretary of State Mark Rubio, who is with President Trump
in the Hague for NATO's summit meeting, had some words
(22:06):
to say about it as well. Three oh seven.
Speaker 9 (22:08):
These leakers are professional stabbers, That's what they are. They
go out and they read this stuff and then they
tell you what it says against the law, but they
characterize it for you in a way that absolutely faults.
There's no way Iron comes to the table of somehow
nothing had happened. This was complete and total obliteration.
Speaker 5 (22:26):
They're in bad shape.
Speaker 9 (22:27):
They are way behind today compared to where they were
just seven days ago.
Speaker 1 (22:30):
Because of what the President did a market I liked
his point, and President Trump also made it a NATO too,
is if no destruction had been had, why would Iron
negotiate a piece. They only negotiate a piece.
Speaker 5 (22:42):
Because they because they're in pieces.
Speaker 1 (22:45):
They're in piece because they're in pieces. They are now
ineffective because of the attack. So who do you believe?
Do you believe CNN? Who has Trump dysphoria, and who's
dealing with an anonymous source, who's leaking top secret information?
Or do you believe President Trump, Secretary of State Mark
or Rubio. That's where the question comes down.
Speaker 5 (23:03):
By the way, one of the immediate things, not the immediate,
but one of the first things that went through my
mind after this all happened. If you remember back to
the late seventies and right around the timer, right before
President Reagan came into office, Iran of course had hostages
and were everybody. Everybody, everybody really was united against Iran
(23:26):
in the United States. And is Vince Vance and the
Valiants had a song rip off of Barbara Ann by
the Beatles, I mean by the Beach Boys, bomb Bomb
Bomb Bomb Bomb Iran.
Speaker 1 (23:38):
Yeah, And I was thinking that that I've used it
as intro.
Speaker 5 (23:41):
I'm sure you have. I said it to my sister,
But my first thought was, huh, finally, because we did
bomb them. I mean, they have been hit before for
various reasons, but this this was you know, that song
probably should have been playing in the back round when
the President spoke, because they did.
Speaker 1 (23:59):
Bob I'm thinking I'm thinking more along lines. It was
probably in some in the background of the B two
stealth Fighters everything over.
Speaker 5 (24:07):
Bomb Yeah, exactly right.
Speaker 1 (24:09):
Yeah, those are actually nice planes. They did a tour
thing of them. And you know there's there's a place
for a nap, which you need, I think if you've
got if you're flying eighteen hours, there's a fridge, there's
a little microwave, so they can have some frills. I think,
no movies, you know, they do like you to pay attention.
But the but yeah, so it's because you got guys
(24:31):
who did what they did. They flew eighteen hours in
a bomber and a a a stealth bomber, which means
it wasn't like a seven forty seven You could get
up and jog around the aisles. So you have to
make you need to be able to stretch out a
little bit, you need to be able to feed them.
And there's a bathroom on board. So so these are
all you know, God bless them.
Speaker 5 (24:50):
And did you know that being a B.
Speaker 1 (24:53):
Two stealth fighter pilot is more difficult than becoming an astronaut.
Really it's more more competitive than being an astronaut, which
is amazing.
Speaker 5 (25:03):
Does that mean more people want to bomb things than
go to the moon?
Speaker 1 (25:07):
I think it means there are fewer B twelve B
two twelve. Yeah, there was. There are fewer B two
stealth bombers, and there are rockets basically, so they're not
that many of them, and most of them are in
the most of them are in the Midwest, hanging out,
hanging out here.
Speaker 5 (25:20):
Do I get my hands on one of those?
Speaker 7 (25:22):
You know?
Speaker 1 (25:22):
Are the beautiful?
Speaker 5 (25:23):
I I just wanted for the place to sleep and eat.
Speaker 1 (25:25):
When I when I was in Washington, d C. If
you went out to Dallas Airport, periodically you would see
a stealth bomber come through there. It was. They were
just amazing things.
Speaker 5 (25:36):
To say, like kind of look like a very big
peregrine falcons.
Speaker 1 (25:40):
They do, actually they do. They're they're very, very very cool.
So we like to end every week with a truth
or troll. This week is no different this one. Yeah,
I know it's President Trump. Yes, he is the king
troller of all time. I think so more often than
not it will be him, but it doesn't have to be,
but it is.
Speaker 5 (25:59):
This week.
Speaker 1 (26:00):
He's on Air Force one and he's asked by a
reporter if he's called Governor Waltz after the shootings that
occurred in Minnesota where a guy that was his aid,
somebody he hired, shot and killed two one legislator and
her husband, and shot and critically injured another legislator and
(26:21):
his wife. And he basically was not impressive in the
aftermath of that. And so he was asked by a reporter.
President Trump was if he's called Governor Waltz and here's
his response, cut five on Minnesota.
Speaker 3 (26:37):
There are a lot of the porific details that came
out today about the suspect who's been charged. There Have
you called the governor yet or been able to speak
to any of them?
Speaker 17 (26:44):
I don't really call him. He appointed this guy to
a position. I think the governor of Minnesota is so
whacked out. I'm not calling Why would I call him?
I could call him, say hi, how you doing. The
guy doesn't have a clue. He's a best so you know,
I could be nice to him, But why waste time?
Speaker 1 (27:05):
What do you think is he is this what he
really thinks of Tim Walls? Or is he just is
this a political move too? Is he trolling Walls?
Speaker 5 (27:12):
I feel like I have to say this, but I
don't know why. But what happened in Minnesota horrible However,
I think President Trump's dead serious. I think he does
think wolves is is a waste of space and a
ding dong. You know, we can have a political argument
about whether he is or not, but that's not the point.
The point is I think President Trump said exactly what
(27:33):
he thinks of Walls.
Speaker 1 (27:35):
I'm coming to believe that President Trump, generally speaking, says
exactly what he thinks.
Speaker 5 (27:39):
For the most part of me. He likes to poke
the bear occasionally, and and we do. We have had
times where we we thought he was trolling. I don't
think he was trolling that. If he was trolling, I
don't think. First of all, I don't think he would
have said it like that, and and secondly, I really
don't think he has any place that is in his
heart really for Walls or Kamala Harris for that matter.
I think what he says things about them that he
(28:01):
thinks they're knuckleheads, he means it. And of course he
ran against them, and he thought he was way better
than the knuckleheads and wealth so did the American people.
Speaker 1 (28:11):
I think that's true. Actually, I think that's very true,
and it's been it's he has he periodically. I think
poke's peak people. But you can usually tell if you're
looking at him because he smiles. He gives a little
wry smile. But I agree with you in this particular case.
I think, in fact, he thinks that Tim Walls is.
Speaker 16 (28:31):
Just a.
Speaker 1 (28:33):
Dodo, just a Dodo head, and I think he would disagree.
Speaker 5 (28:36):
Look, if he didn't think that, I think he would
have picked up the phone. He might have had to
hold his nose a little because he doesn't like him.
But I think he thinks he's an idiot. And I
think that whole thing at the end where he says
it'd be a waste of time, I think he thinks
it would have been. He'd rather played a game of Solitaire
than call Tim Walls.
Speaker 1 (28:52):
Yeah, I completely agree with you. I think that's exactly
what happened. But maybe other people do not agree with us.
And you are more than welcome to let us know.
You can contact us on x at news by three
or on Facebook at news Byte. We upload a new
episode every Monday, so check back next Monday and see
what new offerings we have. Meanwhile, have a great and
safe week. I'm Nancy Shack.
Speaker 5 (29:12):
I'm one hundred and ten percent Ben Parker.
Speaker 1 (29:14):
This is news bite,
Popular Podcasts
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
24/7 News: The Latest
The latest news in 4 minutes updated every hour, every day.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.