Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hello everyone, It's Andy Everett. Thank you so much for
listening to Ticket seven sixty and to my radio show
from four pm to seven pm every day on Ticket
seven sixty Sports Radio AM seven sixty.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
To Ticket Now.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
Stay tuned for the podcast it's coming up next. Don't
forget to subscribe to Ticket seven sixty dot com. You
can also participate in the show vi our feedback talkback button.
Just hit that big red microphone icon at Ticket seven
sixty dot com on the iheartapp enjoy this podcast of
the Andy Ever Show. We're already to Wednesday. Welcome aboard.
(00:33):
Thank you for spending your day with us. Time to
get into all the sports stuff on this Wednesday, and
we have a jam pack show ahead today. It is
the eve of the US Open and our expert picks.
Scottie Scheffler won the PGA, Roy won the Masters. We're
one on one heading in to major number three on
the year. We'll be talking to some golf here in
(00:55):
a little bit so I'm Andy Everett along with audio
disseminator Shane Carter.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
I'm the producer of this show.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
Michael Partlett, who is very sleepy today because you did
not get enough rest last night.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
No, I did not get waken up by the storms
or something I did because my power went out.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
Oh that's nice. Yeah, power wit absolute power.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
You have a generator from absolute power, you'd being good,
good hands.
Speaker 3 (01:16):
I was thinking about it. I was like, man, this
would be one of those times where I need a generator.
It went out about uh in the morning, sitting there
just relaxing, and then you know, boom, complete darkness, and
I'm like, all right.
Speaker 2 (01:32):
Well you can't sleep in a hot room. Well that
and I'm like, all right, well, this is gonna suck.
Speaker 3 (01:37):
I was hopefully I'll come back on, and I'm a
very warm natured person as it is. So it didn't
come back on until about five thirty in the morning.
So I'm running on like three hours of sleep and
a bunch of energy drinks and five things.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
Dot Garrett does not want you to drink.
Speaker 3 (01:53):
And if Doc's listening, they are not working.
Speaker 1 (01:56):
Doc's gonna be on here in about fifteen minutes, said
he'll chastise you for too many energy drinks. So we'll
get into all of that coming up in a bit.
We've got Game three of the NBA Finals tonight, so
we'll be talking a lot about that here in the
next hour as the thunder and Pacers try to get
a game up on the other team. So we'll get
into to that in the six o'clock hour. We're going
(02:17):
to try to break down this house settlement thing a
little bit. The house settlement people fit a little bit
of a roadblock because six or eight female athletes at
Virginia I think it's eight. They have decided to appeal
the decision saying the only about ten percent of this
two point eight eight billion dollars is going to go
to fund women's nil deals. Now here's how I explain
(02:41):
this in a nutshell, and we'll delve into this a
little bit more. If you are an athlete at a
university and you're on scholarship, you get the same scholarship
parameters as the guys do. That's why most schools have
more women's programs than they do men's programs, because women
don't play collegiate football. And there's now eighty five scholarships
(03:02):
that are in the works with college football. We're told
that's going to go to one hundred and five and
pretty much eliminate walk on programs, but eighty five scholarships,
so you've got to use you've got to get more
sports so that you can because women's basketball, I think
has one scholarship more than men, and women's softball has
a couple of more scholarships than baseball does.
Speaker 2 (03:23):
And so on.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
But you need to have golf teams like UTSA for example,
they have soccer and volleyball that are women only, and
that's so that they can get more towards having equity,
and how they divide up those scholarships from football to
the other sports. The revenue sharing stuff, from what I
hear is that there was a period of time that
(03:45):
athletes from twenty sixteen up until now wanted to get
in I own money, and we're banned from doing so
because the nclague deemed it illegal. So what they're saying is,
we're going to pay you back for what we think
you could have gotten on the nil market with this
two point eight billion dollars. And they're doing some some
(04:06):
kind of an algorithm with math that only ten to
fifteen percent of that would go to women because that's
what they would have probably gotten. So the the catch
I think in this is going to be, Yes, women
get equal rights and equity amongst scholarships when it comes
to creating the programs. But when we're calculating, what you're
(04:27):
in il Worth is the guys are going to get
more than the girls did because with a few exceptions
of some women basketball players, maybe some gymnasts like that
that have made their way from college to the Olympics,
maybe a few track and field athletes, the majority of
the money that NCAA says that the athletes should have
(04:47):
been able to get would be the men.
Speaker 3 (04:50):
Yeah, it's it's it's kind of like a little bit
of you know how the WNBA is.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Yes, you know when we talk about the WNBA or women,
it's men's soccer.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
Yeah, men's soccer brings in eight billion dollars, women's soccer
brings in one hundred and fifty million. And women actually
get a bigger percentage of the revenue in women's soccer
than the guys do, but the men exponentially create more dollars.
Speaker 3 (05:13):
Yeah, I mean, I don't fault these these eight, these
eight young ladies. If nothing else, the worst thing they
can say is we tried, we tried, or hey, we
took it, and.
Speaker 1 (05:23):
Maybe they get fifteen or eighteen percent instead of ten
or twelve, maybe they get a little bit more. But
I think the whole idea of this is is that
when NIL first became something that people wanted to discuss,
it wasn't something.
Speaker 2 (05:37):
That I mean, you.
Speaker 1 (05:39):
Could go back and look at the NCAA basketball and
there's probably some Connecticut players and maybe some South Carolina
players in years that could have gotten in aile money
and did not get it. But for the most part,
it's men' men's basketball and football. Even the non rev
sports at most schools are not going to share most
(06:00):
of this revenue. This is going to go to football
and basketball players because that's where the major opportunities for
revenue sharing were. In the future, we may see more
and more revenue sharing opportunities and in IL deals for
girls sports and for women in college. But right now
I think that's what the judges understanding, and that's why
(06:23):
the ruling was what it was. As I mentioned, we'll
talk with Doc Garrett and we'll talk to you us
open coming up in a little bit. I guess every
website listens to us because yesterday we were talking about
OU and about the fact that I think O you
and Auburn and LSU and Mississippi and Texas, A and
M are schools that have a chance occasionally to win
(06:44):
the SEC, but year in and year out, it's going
to be Georgia in Texas and Alabama. Well, they wrote
an article today, I believe it was on CBS or
SI Sports that Brett Vinables better do better than six
and seven or he's going to be unemployed pretty quickly,
at least unemployed as the head coach at OU. I
don't see how you can do better than eight and four.
(07:05):
And I think not only is oh you in that vote,
but I think there's a lot of other schools in
the SEC that are in that vote simply because they're
not competing financially for the players. And the article went
on to say that Bob STIPs completely revamped his offense.
They've got a new offensive coordinator. I don't know who
the quarterback is. The guys they had last year were
(07:26):
average at best. So we'll talk more about that coming
up in a little bit. The Boys in the Desert
say the best odds for Kevin Durant are to come
to San Antonio. I know that Michael does not want
Kevin Durant to come to San Antonio and not because
it's a one year deal. One year deal you'd be
okay with, right, But Durant wants a two year extension
(07:47):
that would cost north of one hundred million dollars.
Speaker 2 (07:49):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (07:49):
One of the reports that came out was he wants
a two year extension worth one hundred and twenty million dollars,
so basically sixty milliear sixty million years.
Speaker 2 (08:02):
Well, here's my thought on that.
Speaker 1 (08:04):
The first thing I'm going to do this summer is
re signed Darreon, Deer and Fox to whatever that money is,
four years, two twenty or two twenty five, whatever the
number is. The second thing I'm gonna do is if
I can get Kevin Durant, I'm going to get some
money off my cap by doing it, because I've got
to trade somebody that's that's going to have that money.
If it's a one one for one deal. The only
(08:26):
trade that works with Kevin Durant is Vsell and kJ,
which I hope the Spurs don't have to do to
get kJ or to get Kevin Durant. I would like
for if they have to give up just one of them,
and then another team can throw in the money and
then there's draft picks and swaps and all this kind
of stuff. That's the way. I kind of like the
way the Spurs got deer in Fox.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
They didn't really have to give up a lot to
get deer in Fox or Harrison Bars or Harrison Barnes.
Either Harrison Barnes.
Speaker 3 (08:51):
It was just like the Kings were like, here's Spurs,
you can take Harrison Barnes.
Speaker 1 (08:55):
But basically deer and Fox cost them Zach Collins and Jones, right, Jones, Yeah,
and they they went to Chicago.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
They went to Chicago.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
Chicago supplied the Sacramento with Levine and the money, and
it was a pretty easy get to give Spirts give
up an obscure draft pick down the road, I would
not be I would be okay with given Durant two
years if I could get it under one hundred million.
I need to go like two years, We'll go fifty
five and forty and team option for the second year.
(09:26):
I don't know that Kevin Durant wants that. But here's
the problem. We always said, there's all this talk about, well,
he could go here, he could go there. If I'm
the Phoenix Suns, yeah, you're going to give me players
to match the salary. But I need draft picks because
I've squandered my picks with the Bradley Beal deal. I've
squandered my picks with other deals that I've made that
didn't work out. I need draft choices and I need
(09:46):
to get younger. So I've got Booker and I've got Beal,
and I can't really move either one of them. I
need a point guard and I need somebody that can
play in the post. We've got to play a little
bit differently. But I need draft picks. So we'll get
into that conversation coming up. Shane sent me an article
today that I am very happy to talk about college
basketball maybe making some major rules changes potentially as early
(10:09):
as this year. And the most major of rule changes
is going to quarters instead of halves. And it's been
something I've been talking about forever because well, I've been
talking about this back when Brooks Thompson was coaching at UTSA,
we were talking about it. The women went to this
in the twenty fifteen to sixteen season to go to quarters.
(10:29):
You now have the advancement of the ball in the
last minute of the game. If you call timeout, you
can move the ball. We'll have fewer defensive timeouts called
to stop the clock to set our defense. Nonsense, we
save those for offense. But the one rule that they're
thinking about adding to college basketball is continuation. Mean, well,
in the NBA, if you are fouled as you're shooting,
(10:53):
you get the continuation foul. In college, if I touch
you and you make any kind of move with that
other than immediately getting the ball to the glass, I'm
not going to give you the continuation.
Speaker 2 (11:04):
Really, there's no and ones.
Speaker 1 (11:06):
There are and ones, but it has to happen as
you're shooting. Whereas in the NBA, if I dribble into
the lane, you bump me in as I'm going up,
I may take a euro step or something, I get
the continuation. And the continuation rule could go into college basketball.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
I am all for that.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
So that's part of the discussion coming up today. Also,
the Cowboys are loving the fact that they may have
a second edge rusher. Uh Donovan, Let's see if I
can pronounce this is Ziriuku.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
Shane Donovan as a roku as Aku as a roku. Okay,
well I was I got part of it right.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
Donovan as a roku is somebody that they they like
and he may be a mini version of Micah Parsons.
But here's my question for Jerry, why are you waiting
to sign Micah? Can we just get this over with now?
Because you know that TJ. Watt's gonna get a deal,
and you know there's three other deals. You know the
(12:09):
guy in Cincinnati Hendrickson's gonna get is that? What is
Hendrickson Cincinnati? He's gonna get a deal. And all you're
doing is is my waiting is driving the price up.
Get the agent on the horn, give him a hundred
million dollars, let's go.
Speaker 3 (12:22):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
I know it's hard money, but it's gonna get harder
money if you wait till September like he did with
Dak last year.
Speaker 3 (12:28):
Here, here's here's the good thing though, at least on
Micah's perspective. And I was talking to somebody about this earlier,
is you know TJ. Watt is not in camp yet.
Trey Hendrickson has already said he's not gonna play for
the Bengals unless he gets a contract.
Speaker 2 (12:42):
Guess where Micah Parsons is. He's a training camp.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
He's at training He's not not participating in training camp,
but he's there.
Speaker 2 (12:48):
He's there, he's at least exactly he's at least.
Speaker 3 (12:51):
Still committed to the team, and he's not isolating himself.
We know what's gonna get done.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
When it's gonna get it's gonna get done. But like
last year, they signed Dak on this Sunday before the
first game. We don't need to wait that long.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
No, I think it was like two hours before the Yeah,
it was, it was.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
The game was at three and they signed at noon.
I mean, let's let's do that. We can do this
a little bit better. Jerry again on the horse here,
all right, let's talk to Doc Garrett. We'll do that next.
Speaker 2 (13:14):
On the tickets,
Hello everyone, It's Andy Everett. Thank you so much for
listening to Ticket seven sixty and to my radio show
from four pm to seven pm every day on Ticket
seven sixty Sports Radio AM seven sixty.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
To Ticket Now.
Speaker 1 (00:12):
Stay tuned for the podcast it's coming up next. Don't
forget to subscribe to Ticket seven sixty dot com. You
can also participate in the show vi our feedback talkback button.
Just hit that big red microphone icon at Ticket seven
sixty dot com on the iheartapp enjoy this podcast of
the Andy Ever Show. We're already to Wednesday. Welcome aboard.
(00:33):
Thank you for spending your day with us. Time to
get into all the sports stuff on this Wednesday, and
we have a jam pack show ahead today. It is
the eve of the US Open and our expert picks.
Scottie Scheffler won the PGA, Roy won the Masters. We're
one on one heading in to major number three on
the year. We'll be talking to some golf here in
(00:55):
a little bit so I'm Andy Everett along with audio
disseminator Shane Carter.
Speaker 2 (01:00):
I'm the producer of this show.
Speaker 1 (01:01):
Michael Partlett, who is very sleepy today because you did
not get enough rest last night.
Speaker 3 (01:06):
No, I did not get waken up by the storms
or something I did because my power went out.
Speaker 2 (01:11):
Oh that's nice. Yeah, power wit absolute power.
Speaker 1 (01:13):
You have a generator from absolute power, you'd being good,
good hands.
Speaker 3 (01:16):
I was thinking about it. I was like, man, this
would be one of those times where I need a generator.
It went out about uh in the morning, sitting there
just relaxing, and then you know, boom, complete darkness, and
I'm like, all right.
Speaker 2 (01:32):
Well you can't sleep in a hot room. Well that
and I'm like, all right, well, this is gonna suck.
Speaker 3 (01:37):
I was hopefully I'll come back on, and I'm a
very warm natured person as it is. So it didn't
come back on until about five thirty in the morning.
So I'm running on like three hours of sleep and
a bunch of energy drinks and five things.
Speaker 2 (01:51):
Dot Garrett does not want you to drink.
Speaker 3 (01:53):
And if Doc's listening, they are not working.
Speaker 1 (01:56):
Doc's gonna be on here in about fifteen minutes, said
he'll chastise you for too many energy drinks. So we'll
get into all of that coming up in a bit.
We've got Game three of the NBA Finals tonight, so
we'll be talking a lot about that here in the
next hour as the thunder and Pacers try to get
a game up on the other team. So we'll get
into to that in the six o'clock hour. We're going
(02:17):
to try to break down this house settlement thing a
little bit. The house settlement people fit a little bit
of a roadblock because six or eight female athletes at
Virginia I think it's eight. They have decided to appeal
the decision saying the only about ten percent of this
two point eight eight billion dollars is going to go
to fund women's nil deals. Now here's how I explain
(02:41):
this in a nutshell, and we'll delve into this a
little bit more. If you are an athlete at a
university and you're on scholarship, you get the same scholarship
parameters as the guys do. That's why most schools have
more women's programs than they do men's programs, because women
don't play collegiate football. And there's now eighty five scholarships
(03:02):
that are in the works with college football. We're told
that's going to go to one hundred and five and
pretty much eliminate walk on programs, but eighty five scholarships,
so you've got to use you've got to get more
sports so that you can because women's basketball, I think
has one scholarship more than men, and women's softball has
a couple of more scholarships than baseball does.
Speaker 2 (03:23):
And so on.
Speaker 1 (03:24):
But you need to have golf teams like UTSA for example,
they have soccer and volleyball that are women only, and
that's so that they can get more towards having equity,
and how they divide up those scholarships from football to
the other sports. The revenue sharing stuff, from what I
hear is that there was a period of time that
(03:45):
athletes from twenty sixteen up until now wanted to get
in I own money, and we're banned from doing so
because the nclague deemed it illegal. So what they're saying is,
we're going to pay you back for what we think
you could have gotten on the nil market with this
two point eight billion dollars. And they're doing some some
(04:06):
kind of an algorithm with math that only ten to
fifteen percent of that would go to women because that's
what they would have probably gotten. So the the catch
I think in this is going to be, Yes, women
get equal rights and equity amongst scholarships when it comes
to creating the programs. But when we're calculating, what you're
(04:27):
in il Worth is the guys are going to get
more than the girls did because with a few exceptions
of some women basketball players, maybe some gymnasts like that
that have made their way from college to the Olympics,
maybe a few track and field athletes, the majority of
the money that NCAA says that the athletes should have
(04:47):
been able to get would be the men.
Speaker 3 (04:50):
Yeah, it's it's it's kind of like a little bit
of you know how the WNBA is.
Speaker 2 (04:57):
Yes, you know when we talk about the WNBA or women,
it's men's soccer.
Speaker 1 (05:01):
Yeah, men's soccer brings in eight billion dollars, women's soccer
brings in one hundred and fifty million. And women actually
get a bigger percentage of the revenue in women's soccer
than the guys do, but the men exponentially create more dollars.
Speaker 3 (05:13):
Yeah, I mean, I don't fault these these eight, these
eight young ladies. If nothing else, the worst thing they
can say is we tried, we tried, or hey, we
took it, and.
Speaker 1 (05:23):
Maybe they get fifteen or eighteen percent instead of ten
or twelve, maybe they get a little bit more. But
I think the whole idea of this is is that
when NIL first became something that people wanted to discuss,
it wasn't something.
Speaker 2 (05:37):
That I mean, you.
Speaker 1 (05:39):
Could go back and look at the NCAA basketball and
there's probably some Connecticut players and maybe some South Carolina
players in years that could have gotten in aile money
and did not get it. But for the most part,
it's men' men's basketball and football. Even the non rev
sports at most schools are not going to share most
(06:00):
of this revenue. This is going to go to football
and basketball players because that's where the major opportunities for
revenue sharing were. In the future, we may see more
and more revenue sharing opportunities and in IL deals for
girls sports and for women in college. But right now
I think that's what the judges understanding, and that's why
(06:23):
the ruling was what it was. As I mentioned, we'll
talk with Doc Garrett and we'll talk to you us
open coming up in a little bit. I guess every
website listens to us because yesterday we were talking about
OU and about the fact that I think O you
and Auburn and LSU and Mississippi and Texas, A and
M are schools that have a chance occasionally to win
(06:44):
the SEC, but year in and year out, it's going
to be Georgia in Texas and Alabama. Well, they wrote
an article today, I believe it was on CBS or
SI Sports that Brett Vinables better do better than six
and seven or he's going to be unemployed pretty quickly,
at least unemployed as the head coach at OU. I
don't see how you can do better than eight and four.
(07:05):
And I think not only is oh you in that vote,
but I think there's a lot of other schools in
the SEC that are in that vote simply because they're
not competing financially for the players. And the article went
on to say that Bob STIPs completely revamped his offense.
They've got a new offensive coordinator. I don't know who
the quarterback is. The guys they had last year were
(07:26):
average at best. So we'll talk more about that coming
up in a little bit. The Boys in the Desert
say the best odds for Kevin Durant are to come
to San Antonio. I know that Michael does not want
Kevin Durant to come to San Antonio and not because
it's a one year deal. One year deal you'd be
okay with, right, But Durant wants a two year extension
(07:47):
that would cost north of one hundred million dollars.
Speaker 2 (07:49):
Yeah.
Speaker 3 (07:49):
One of the reports that came out was he wants
a two year extension worth one hundred and twenty million dollars,
so basically sixty milliear sixty million years.
Speaker 2 (08:02):
Well, here's my thought on that.
Speaker 1 (08:04):
The first thing I'm going to do this summer is
re signed Darreon, Deer and Fox to whatever that money is,
four years, two twenty or two twenty five, whatever the
number is. The second thing I'm gonna do is if
I can get Kevin Durant, I'm going to get some
money off my cap by doing it, because I've got
to trade somebody that's that's going to have that money.
If it's a one one for one deal. The only
(08:26):
trade that works with Kevin Durant is Vsell and kJ,
which I hope the Spurs don't have to do to
get kJ or to get Kevin Durant. I would like
for if they have to give up just one of them,
and then another team can throw in the money and
then there's draft picks and swaps and all this kind
of stuff. That's the way. I kind of like the
way the Spurs got deer in Fox.
Speaker 2 (08:45):
They didn't really have to give up a lot to
get deer in Fox or Harrison Bars or Harrison Barnes.
Either Harrison Barnes.
Speaker 3 (08:51):
It was just like the Kings were like, here's Spurs,
you can take Harrison Barnes.
Speaker 1 (08:55):
But basically deer and Fox cost them Zach Collins and Jones, right, Jones, Yeah,
and they they went to Chicago.
Speaker 2 (09:02):
They went to Chicago.
Speaker 1 (09:03):
Chicago supplied the Sacramento with Levine and the money, and
it was a pretty easy get to give Spirts give
up an obscure draft pick down the road, I would
not be I would be okay with given Durant two
years if I could get it under one hundred million.
I need to go like two years, We'll go fifty
five and forty and team option for the second year.
(09:26):
I don't know that Kevin Durant wants that. But here's
the problem. We always said, there's all this talk about, well,
he could go here, he could go there. If I'm
the Phoenix Suns, yeah, you're going to give me players
to match the salary. But I need draft picks because
I've squandered my picks with the Bradley Beal deal. I've
squandered my picks with other deals that I've made that
didn't work out. I need draft choices and I need
(09:46):
to get younger. So I've got Booker and I've got Beal,
and I can't really move either one of them. I
need a point guard and I need somebody that can
play in the post. We've got to play a little
bit differently. But I need draft picks. So we'll get
into that conversation coming up. Shane sent me an article
today that I am very happy to talk about college
basketball maybe making some major rules changes potentially as early
(10:09):
as this year. And the most major of rule changes
is going to quarters instead of halves. And it's been
something I've been talking about forever because well, I've been
talking about this back when Brooks Thompson was coaching at UTSA,
we were talking about it. The women went to this
in the twenty fifteen to sixteen season to go to quarters.
(10:29):
You now have the advancement of the ball in the
last minute of the game. If you call timeout, you
can move the ball. We'll have fewer defensive timeouts called
to stop the clock to set our defense. Nonsense, we
save those for offense. But the one rule that they're
thinking about adding to college basketball is continuation. Mean, well,
in the NBA, if you are fouled as you're shooting,
(10:53):
you get the continuation foul. In college, if I touch
you and you make any kind of move with that
other than immediately getting the ball to the glass, I'm
not going to give you the continuation.
Speaker 2 (11:04):
Really, there's no and ones.
Speaker 1 (11:06):
There are and ones, but it has to happen as
you're shooting. Whereas in the NBA, if I dribble into
the lane, you bump me in as I'm going up,
I may take a euro step or something, I get
the continuation. And the continuation rule could go into college basketball.
Speaker 2 (11:23):
I am all for that.
Speaker 1 (11:25):
So that's part of the discussion coming up today. Also,
the Cowboys are loving the fact that they may have
a second edge rusher. Uh Donovan, Let's see if I
can pronounce this is Ziriuku.
Speaker 2 (11:40):
Shane Donovan as a roku as Aku as a roku. Okay,
well I was I got part of it right.
Speaker 1 (11:49):
Donovan as a roku is somebody that they they like
and he may be a mini version of Micah Parsons.
But here's my question for Jerry, why are you waiting
to sign Micah? Can we just get this over with now?
Because you know that TJ. Watt's gonna get a deal,
and you know there's three other deals. You know the
(12:09):
guy in Cincinnati Hendrickson's gonna get is that? What is
Hendrickson Cincinnati? He's gonna get a deal. And all you're
doing is is my waiting is driving the price up.
Get the agent on the horn, give him a hundred
million dollars, let's go.
Speaker 3 (12:22):
Uh.
Speaker 1 (12:22):
I know it's hard money, but it's gonna get harder
money if you wait till September like he did with
Dak last year.
Speaker 3 (12:28):
Here, here's here's the good thing though, at least on
Micah's perspective. And I was talking to somebody about this earlier,
is you know TJ. Watt is not in camp yet.
Trey Hendrickson has already said he's not gonna play for
the Bengals unless he gets a contract.
Speaker 2 (12:42):
Guess where Micah Parsons is. He's a training camp.
Speaker 1 (12:45):
He's at training He's not not participating in training camp,
but he's there.
Speaker 2 (12:48):
He's there, he's at least exactly he's at least.
Speaker 3 (12:51):
Still committed to the team, and he's not isolating himself.
We know what's gonna get done.
Speaker 1 (12:56):
When it's gonna get it's gonna get done. But like
last year, they signed Dak on this Sunday before the
first game. We don't need to wait that long.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
No, I think it was like two hours before the Yeah,
it was, it was.
Speaker 1 (13:06):
The game was at three and they signed at noon.
I mean, let's let's do that. We can do this
a little bit better. Jerry again on the horse here,
all right, let's talk to Doc Garrett. We'll do that next.
Speaker 2 (13:14):
On the tickets,
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.