September 24, 2025 • 15 mins
On Tuesday President Trump made his first visit to the globalist body in New York City in six years. He found it to be even more defective than when he last left.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:04):
Welcome to the Brian Munt Show, and thank you for listening.
It's time for today's top three takeaways. Helpful, useful, repeatable,
Trump's day.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
At the un the bars of a two state solution,
and the okay at the Kimmel and through the Kimmel
Here at the Onset. By the way, I'm not sure
the guy is altogether stable or well. I do get
that sense from him as well. The whole Kimmel situation.
So a very emotional man, that much is for sure.
(00:35):
But my baby, he's the building question. But anyway, So
about the Kimmel, Here's Fox's due Gusman.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
To find and tearful. Kimmel returned to late night TV
Tuesday night. He didn't apologize, but said he never intended
to make light of Charlie Kirk's murder. He also took
aim at President Trump, blaming him for his nearly week
long suspension.
Speaker 4 (00:54):
President of the United States made it very clear he
wants to see me and the hundreds of people who.
Speaker 5 (00:59):
Work here fired from our jobs.
Speaker 4 (01:01):
Our leader celebrates Americans losing their livelihoods because he can't
take a joke.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
You know, the more I think about it, you know
what the most ridiculous part of that statement. Is anything
stick out to you about just the absolute absurdity of
that statement, No, jil the hundreds of people that evidently
work on that show. I oh, you give me hundreds
(01:29):
of people and.
Speaker 5 (01:30):
What you come up with there can't be hundreds.
Speaker 2 (01:33):
Yeah, oh gosh, So anyway, yeah, yeah, so in the
grand scheme of things, yeah, it takes hundreds of people
for me to suck this bad every day. That's actually
the most ridiculous part of the whole the Kimmel situation.
So a couple things about that, going back to what
I mentioned last week, and I mean this with absolute sincerity.
(01:58):
There's no qualifying, there's no I could not care less
about any of this. Jimmy Kimmel has never, for thirty
seconds of my life, been somebody who I wanted to
tune into. I have never tuned into an episode of
(02:20):
his show. I never tuned into an episode of The
Man Show. I have never sampled anything other than when
his nonsense makes the news, then I will go and
look at the clip online and go okay to cover it.
Speaker 6 (02:35):
That is the extent of it.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Also, as I mentioned last week, I was very concerned
about the FCC I really was hoping that the FCC
wasn't using too heavy of a hand to axect an
outcome here. If you had good judgment by Sinclair and
good judgment by next star to say, you know what,
this guy sucks. The ratings are bad, and now he's
(03:00):
actually like slandering and lining to his viewers about an
assassination and then trying to make a joke out of it.
That's pretty bad if they are just using good judgments
saying get rid of great. But otherwise I just put
Kimmel into the bucket of all the other adject morons
out there that have opinions. That's the extent of Kimmel
(03:21):
for me, So I do not care, but to the
extent that people do, and that this is in the news,
aside for the hundreds of employees that he evidently has
on that show, according to him, to suck that bad,
you cannot make up the irony here. Kimmel is literally
(03:46):
on the day that the second Trump assassin was found
guilty in all charges, saying that Trump can't take a joke.
Speaker 6 (04:00):
To an assassination? Are you kidding me?
Speaker 2 (04:08):
What?
Speaker 6 (04:08):
You can't take a joke? Were you shot or something?
Speaker 5 (04:11):
Yeah? Actually, that did it again, that didn't occur to
any of the hundreds of employees.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
Exactly precisely, sir. Now you're really starting to put together
the full picture of it's just, oh my gosh, these people.
I can't I can't imagine being the person in life
who goes, hey, you know what I need right now
is some Jimmy KIMMELM explain stuff. But yeah, so and
(04:40):
stuff that actually matters in this world. What is the
purpose of the United Nations? My top takeaway for you today.
So on Tuesday, President Trump made his first visit to
the globalist body in New York City in six years.
He found it to be even more defective than when
he last left. When he arrived at the UN, his
escalator didn't work as planned, and neither did the teleprompter,
(05:02):
which actually does lead one to wonder whether there was
really a technical error or more of an intentional error.
Speaker 6 (05:08):
It's quite the coincidence.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
Nevertheless, President Trump, minus the teleprompter, went on to say
that since he retook office, he's already stopped seven wars
without any help from the UN. The wars he sided
as having ended, by the way, for those keeping score
between Cambodia and Thailand, Kosovo and Serbia, the Congo and Rwanda,
Pakistan and India, Israel and Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia and
(05:34):
Armenia and as Bazarstan. And he went on to say,
all I got from the United Nations was an escalator
that on the way up stopped right in the middle,
and then a teleprompter that didn't work.
Speaker 6 (05:48):
The United Nations wasn't there for us. They weren't there.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
That being the case, what is the purpose of the
United Nations?
Speaker 6 (05:58):
The EU and has never lived up to its potential?
Speaker 5 (06:01):
But I'm the example of it. We do all these
wars and we weren't helped by the UN.
Speaker 4 (06:05):
We weren't hurt by them, but we weren't help They
didn't do anything.
Speaker 2 (06:09):
Yeah, potential perhaps, But what dawned on mean, what I
was thinking as he was kind of going through this is,
I mean, you're right, but why why is it that
the UN is so awful? If you think about it,
a collaborative body of participants is only as good as
(06:29):
what the participants. Right, in this case, it's leaders. Look
around the world. I really was putting myself to the
mental test. How many truly great leaders of countries of
significance on the world stage. Do you see, I thought,
and I thought, and I thought about it, and I
(06:52):
could only come up with three Argentinas. I've your Melae,
who has his hands full would find an uphill political
battle in his country. Right now, You've got Italy's Georgia Maloney, who,
by the way, did most recently take a stand honored
Charlie Kirk while breaking with other European countries and refusing
to recognize the Palestinian state. More about that nonsense momentarily,
(07:16):
and speaking of which, the third would be Benjamin N. Yahoo,
though I mean, in as great as Nan Yahoo is,
the whole of Israel contains far less than half the
population of this state. I mean, Israel is a country
of fewer than ten million people. But that's about it.
Those story, that's it. There are others that are okay.
(07:41):
They are a couple that were decent. I'm not going
to say they're great leaders, though. So you have a
dearth of especially good leadership in the world stage, which
means the UN is a little more than a waste
of Manhattan real estate and greater than thirteen billion dollars
that we spend on it every year. Trump address warned
(08:01):
other countries of dangers of open borders, put Hamasa notice
about hostages while stating we have to stop the war
in Gaza, immediately called on Europe to do a lot
when it came to Ukraine. Specifically, while calling for peace
in Ukraine, he called out hypocritical European nations. They're still
buying Russian energy. I've covered this quite a bit. I mean,
(08:23):
it's just the biggest absurd thing. They sit there and
they weigh at the Ukrainian flag, but Putin and then
they buy Russian oil on fun the war machine. So
about that. After the address, while taking questions having met
with President Zelenski, Trump was asked if NATO countries should
(08:46):
shoot russ Russian aircraft invading Allied aerospace and he said, yeah, yeah,
So stand by for war news on that one, because
is Putin going to test it. But there's likely very
little that will come from that speech because the world
lacks the necessary leadership outside of Trump and if you
(09:07):
who actually are worth of darn to do what the
body should do. So yeah, what is the purpose other
than hosting a bunch of terrorist sponsors and super libs
in New York City, which takes me to my second takeaway,
the farce of a two state solution.
Speaker 6 (09:26):
I just up is down left his right.
Speaker 2 (09:29):
This is the spokesperson for the UN Secretary General.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
You will also stress that statehood for the Palestinians is
a right and not a reward, and denying.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
Statehood would be a gift to extremists everywhere.
Speaker 6 (09:42):
What what?
Speaker 2 (09:46):
Literally, if you reverse that pinhead statement, you would come
up with something that is accurate. That is how far
out of line on Hamas and Palestine the UN Secretary
General is so just this week, feckless and useless leaders
(10:08):
in the following countries have recognized the Palestinian state, Australia, Canada,
Portugal and the UK. Not that there's ever a good
time to cave to terrorists, however, how nice are these
people to cave and Russia Shana, Happy New Year, Israel,
go get them. You know, it's been a couple of
years since I broke down the farce of a two
state solution, but it's become hugely important yet again, as
(10:33):
supposed allies and world leaders been needs to terrorists. In
nineteen forty eight, under terms agreed to under the United
Nations General Assembly, the lands that comprise modern day Israel
and the current Palestinian territories were designated to create an
Arab territory and a Jewish state. On May fifteenth of
nineteen forty eight, Israel was officially recognized by the United
(10:56):
Nations as a state. The Palestinian territories were govern by
two nearby Arab countries, Egypt and Jordan. That continued until
June of nineteen sixty seven, when Israel's influence expanded in
the region, including holding an influence over what then became
known as the occupied Palestinian territories. The Israeli occupation and
disputed Palestinian territories continued until nineteen ninety three, when the
(11:19):
Israeli military withdrew from much of the territory and recognized
the Palestine Liberation Organization or PLO through the Oslo Accord.
At that point, the goal by many world leaders, including
Israel's government at the time, Israel was on board with
a two state solution. They said, yes, let's do this.
(11:41):
We recognized the PLO Oslo Accord, Let's do a two
state solution. What happened almost immediately, PLO leader Yasser Arafat
good guy, bad guy. This Arafat uh definitely a bad guy.
Speaker 6 (11:58):
Bad guy.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
He went, shoot, you're going to recognize us, sweet, and
he supported terror operations against Israel. As a result, Palestine
not officially recognized as a state by the United Nations,
and so the region continued to be viewed through the
prism of territories by the West. And what political movement
supplanted the terror sponsoring PLO as leaders of the Palestinian territories. Well,
(12:25):
of course, the even more radical terrorist organization HAMAS, which
was overwhelmingly voted into power by whom the Palestinian people
in two thousand and six when they got over seventy
five percent of the vote and were still supported by
at least seventy five percent of the Palestinian people at
(12:47):
the time of the October seventh, twenty twenty three.
Speaker 6 (12:50):
Attacks on Israel.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
So let's say for a minute Israel does eliminate Hamas,
which is a gigantic gift.
Speaker 6 (12:59):
But let's just say they got it all.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
My third takeaway for today, the Palestinian territories would go
back under the rule of what we do, this two
state thing. They go under the oh that's right, the
slightly less terroristic governance of the PLO which still exists,
by the way, these days led by Ma Mooda Bass
(13:23):
Joel ma Mooda Bass good guy, bad guy.
Speaker 5 (13:26):
Uh, definitely not a good guy. Not a good guy.
Speaker 6 (13:30):
Plo.
Speaker 5 (13:31):
Still not good people.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
And with three quarters of the Palaestinian population supportive of
Sharia law, which in short, for the purpose of this exercise,
means no Jews okay, Trea law equals no Jews okay?
Speaker 5 (13:50):
What then? What then?
Speaker 2 (13:53):
The only way there can be a two state solution
is that the Palestinian territories are replaced with non Palestinian people.
Speaker 6 (14:00):
Kind Of hard to.
Speaker 2 (14:02):
Have two states share of border when the people in
one state are like, hey, you know what I really
want to do, Go kill the people in the other
one and take that territory. Kind of hard. That's why
historically we've had this problem. You have the people in
one state and it's not Israel that want to kill
(14:22):
the people and the other one. If you acknowledge this
as two states, and here is the overarching point, because
a lot of this can be complicated for the average
uninformed person to get very simple question for you, what
is it that Hamas wants to see happen here? What
would Hamas want more than anything else with the United
(14:44):
Nations to be recognized as a state, right have Palestine
and recognized as a state. Now, if you do exactly
what Hamas wants you to do, joel good thing.
Speaker 5 (15:01):
Bad thing, Definitely a bad thing for Jews, I.
Speaker 2 (15:05):
Would say, for anybody who doesn't believe in it's true terrorism. Yeah, yeah,
doesn't stop there.
Speaker 5 (15:10):
By the way, you're right, you're right.
Speaker 2 (15:13):
If you do exactly what Hamas wants you to do,
really good chance you're not doing the right thing. And
that's what the UN Secretary General, these idiot leaders in
other countries, that's what they're doing. It is just oh
and by I mean principally establishing a palace sitting in state.
Speaker 6 (15:37):
It's actually less feasible than establishing Canada as a fifty
first state. At least the Canadians for the most part,
and can try to kill us.
Welcome to the Brian Munt Show, and thank you for listening.
It's time for today's top three takeaways. Helpful, useful, repeatable,
Trump's day.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
At the un the bars of a two state solution,
and the okay at the Kimmel and through the Kimmel
Here at the Onset. By the way, I'm not sure
the guy is altogether stable or well. I do get
that sense from him as well. The whole Kimmel situation.
So a very emotional man, that much is for sure.
(00:35):
But my baby, he's the building question. But anyway, So
about the Kimmel, Here's Fox's due Gusman.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
To find and tearful. Kimmel returned to late night TV
Tuesday night. He didn't apologize, but said he never intended
to make light of Charlie Kirk's murder. He also took
aim at President Trump, blaming him for his nearly week
long suspension.
Speaker 4 (00:54):
President of the United States made it very clear he
wants to see me and the hundreds of people who.
Speaker 5 (00:59):
Work here fired from our jobs.
Speaker 4 (01:01):
Our leader celebrates Americans losing their livelihoods because he can't
take a joke.
Speaker 2 (01:07):
You know, the more I think about it, you know
what the most ridiculous part of that statement. Is anything
stick out to you about just the absolute absurdity of
that statement, No, jil the hundreds of people that evidently
work on that show. I oh, you give me hundreds
(01:29):
of people and.
Speaker 5 (01:30):
What you come up with there can't be hundreds.
Speaker 2 (01:33):
Yeah, oh gosh, So anyway, yeah, yeah, so in the
grand scheme of things, yeah, it takes hundreds of people
for me to suck this bad every day. That's actually
the most ridiculous part of the whole the Kimmel situation.
So a couple things about that, going back to what
I mentioned last week, and I mean this with absolute sincerity.
(01:58):
There's no qualifying, there's no I could not care less
about any of this. Jimmy Kimmel has never, for thirty
seconds of my life, been somebody who I wanted to
tune into. I have never tuned into an episode of
(02:20):
his show. I never tuned into an episode of The
Man Show. I have never sampled anything other than when
his nonsense makes the news, then I will go and
look at the clip online and go okay to cover it.
Speaker 6 (02:35):
That is the extent of it.
Speaker 2 (02:36):
Also, as I mentioned last week, I was very concerned
about the FCC I really was hoping that the FCC
wasn't using too heavy of a hand to axect an
outcome here. If you had good judgment by Sinclair and
good judgment by next star to say, you know what,
this guy sucks. The ratings are bad, and now he's
(03:00):
actually like slandering and lining to his viewers about an
assassination and then trying to make a joke out of it.
That's pretty bad if they are just using good judgments
saying get rid of great. But otherwise I just put
Kimmel into the bucket of all the other adject morons
out there that have opinions. That's the extent of Kimmel
(03:21):
for me, So I do not care, but to the
extent that people do, and that this is in the news,
aside for the hundreds of employees that he evidently has
on that show, according to him, to suck that bad,
you cannot make up the irony here. Kimmel is literally
(03:46):
on the day that the second Trump assassin was found
guilty in all charges, saying that Trump can't take a joke.
Speaker 6 (04:00):
To an assassination? Are you kidding me?
Speaker 2 (04:08):
What?
Speaker 6 (04:08):
You can't take a joke? Were you shot or something?
Speaker 5 (04:11):
Yeah? Actually, that did it again, that didn't occur to
any of the hundreds of employees.
Speaker 2 (04:17):
Exactly precisely, sir. Now you're really starting to put together
the full picture of it's just, oh my gosh, these people.
I can't I can't imagine being the person in life
who goes, hey, you know what I need right now
is some Jimmy KIMMELM explain stuff. But yeah, so and
(04:40):
stuff that actually matters in this world. What is the
purpose of the United Nations? My top takeaway for you today.
So on Tuesday, President Trump made his first visit to
the globalist body in New York City in six years.
He found it to be even more defective than when
he last left. When he arrived at the UN, his
escalator didn't work as planned, and neither did the teleprompter,
(05:02):
which actually does lead one to wonder whether there was
really a technical error or more of an intentional error.
Speaker 6 (05:08):
It's quite the coincidence.
Speaker 2 (05:10):
Nevertheless, President Trump, minus the teleprompter, went on to say
that since he retook office, he's already stopped seven wars
without any help from the UN. The wars he sided
as having ended, by the way, for those keeping score
between Cambodia and Thailand, Kosovo and Serbia, the Congo and Rwanda,
Pakistan and India, Israel and Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia and
(05:34):
Armenia and as Bazarstan. And he went on to say,
all I got from the United Nations was an escalator
that on the way up stopped right in the middle,
and then a teleprompter that didn't work.
Speaker 6 (05:48):
The United Nations wasn't there for us. They weren't there.
Speaker 2 (05:53):
That being the case, what is the purpose of the
United Nations?
Speaker 6 (05:58):
The EU and has never lived up to its potential?
Speaker 5 (06:01):
But I'm the example of it. We do all these
wars and we weren't helped by the UN.
Speaker 4 (06:05):
We weren't hurt by them, but we weren't help They
didn't do anything.
Speaker 2 (06:09):
Yeah, potential perhaps, But what dawned on mean, what I
was thinking as he was kind of going through this is,
I mean, you're right, but why why is it that
the UN is so awful? If you think about it,
a collaborative body of participants is only as good as
(06:29):
what the participants. Right, in this case, it's leaders. Look
around the world. I really was putting myself to the
mental test. How many truly great leaders of countries of
significance on the world stage. Do you see, I thought,
and I thought, and I thought about it, and I
(06:52):
could only come up with three Argentinas. I've your Melae,
who has his hands full would find an uphill political
battle in his country. Right now, You've got Italy's Georgia Maloney, who,
by the way, did most recently take a stand honored
Charlie Kirk while breaking with other European countries and refusing
to recognize the Palestinian state. More about that nonsense momentarily,
(07:16):
and speaking of which, the third would be Benjamin N. Yahoo,
though I mean, in as great as Nan Yahoo is,
the whole of Israel contains far less than half the
population of this state. I mean, Israel is a country
of fewer than ten million people. But that's about it.
Those story, that's it. There are others that are okay.
(07:41):
They are a couple that were decent. I'm not going
to say they're great leaders, though. So you have a
dearth of especially good leadership in the world stage, which
means the UN is a little more than a waste
of Manhattan real estate and greater than thirteen billion dollars
that we spend on it every year. Trump address warned
(08:01):
other countries of dangers of open borders, put Hamasa notice
about hostages while stating we have to stop the war
in Gaza, immediately called on Europe to do a lot
when it came to Ukraine. Specifically, while calling for peace
in Ukraine, he called out hypocritical European nations. They're still
buying Russian energy. I've covered this quite a bit. I mean,
(08:23):
it's just the biggest absurd thing. They sit there and
they weigh at the Ukrainian flag, but Putin and then
they buy Russian oil on fun the war machine. So
about that. After the address, while taking questions having met
with President Zelenski, Trump was asked if NATO countries should
(08:46):
shoot russ Russian aircraft invading Allied aerospace and he said, yeah, yeah,
So stand by for war news on that one, because
is Putin going to test it. But there's likely very
little that will come from that speech because the world
lacks the necessary leadership outside of Trump and if you
(09:07):
who actually are worth of darn to do what the
body should do. So yeah, what is the purpose other
than hosting a bunch of terrorist sponsors and super libs
in New York City, which takes me to my second takeaway,
the farce of a two state solution.
Speaker 6 (09:26):
I just up is down left his right.
Speaker 2 (09:29):
This is the spokesperson for the UN Secretary General.
Speaker 1 (09:33):
You will also stress that statehood for the Palestinians is
a right and not a reward, and denying.
Speaker 2 (09:39):
Statehood would be a gift to extremists everywhere.
Speaker 6 (09:42):
What what?
Speaker 2 (09:46):
Literally, if you reverse that pinhead statement, you would come
up with something that is accurate. That is how far
out of line on Hamas and Palestine the UN Secretary
General is so just this week, feckless and useless leaders
(10:08):
in the following countries have recognized the Palestinian state, Australia, Canada,
Portugal and the UK. Not that there's ever a good
time to cave to terrorists, however, how nice are these
people to cave and Russia Shana, Happy New Year, Israel,
go get them. You know, it's been a couple of
years since I broke down the farce of a two
state solution, but it's become hugely important yet again, as
(10:33):
supposed allies and world leaders been needs to terrorists. In
nineteen forty eight, under terms agreed to under the United
Nations General Assembly, the lands that comprise modern day Israel
and the current Palestinian territories were designated to create an
Arab territory and a Jewish state. On May fifteenth of
nineteen forty eight, Israel was officially recognized by the United
(10:56):
Nations as a state. The Palestinian territories were govern by
two nearby Arab countries, Egypt and Jordan. That continued until
June of nineteen sixty seven, when Israel's influence expanded in
the region, including holding an influence over what then became
known as the occupied Palestinian territories. The Israeli occupation and
disputed Palestinian territories continued until nineteen ninety three, when the
(11:19):
Israeli military withdrew from much of the territory and recognized
the Palestine Liberation Organization or PLO through the Oslo Accord.
At that point, the goal by many world leaders, including
Israel's government at the time, Israel was on board with
a two state solution. They said, yes, let's do this.
(11:41):
We recognized the PLO Oslo Accord, Let's do a two
state solution. What happened almost immediately, PLO leader Yasser Arafat
good guy, bad guy. This Arafat uh definitely a bad guy.
Speaker 6 (11:58):
Bad guy.
Speaker 2 (12:00):
He went, shoot, you're going to recognize us, sweet, and
he supported terror operations against Israel. As a result, Palestine
not officially recognized as a state by the United Nations,
and so the region continued to be viewed through the
prism of territories by the West. And what political movement
supplanted the terror sponsoring PLO as leaders of the Palestinian territories. Well,
(12:25):
of course, the even more radical terrorist organization HAMAS, which
was overwhelmingly voted into power by whom the Palestinian people
in two thousand and six when they got over seventy
five percent of the vote and were still supported by
at least seventy five percent of the Palestinian people at
(12:47):
the time of the October seventh, twenty twenty three.
Speaker 6 (12:50):
Attacks on Israel.
Speaker 2 (12:53):
So let's say for a minute Israel does eliminate Hamas,
which is a gigantic gift.
Speaker 6 (12:59):
But let's just say they got it all.
Speaker 2 (13:01):
My third takeaway for today, the Palestinian territories would go
back under the rule of what we do, this two
state thing. They go under the oh that's right, the
slightly less terroristic governance of the PLO which still exists,
by the way, these days led by Ma Mooda Bass
(13:23):
Joel ma Mooda Bass good guy, bad guy.
Speaker 5 (13:26):
Uh, definitely not a good guy. Not a good guy.
Speaker 6 (13:30):
Plo.
Speaker 5 (13:31):
Still not good people.
Speaker 2 (13:34):
And with three quarters of the Palaestinian population supportive of
Sharia law, which in short, for the purpose of this exercise,
means no Jews okay, Trea law equals no Jews okay?
Speaker 5 (13:50):
What then? What then?
Speaker 2 (13:53):
The only way there can be a two state solution
is that the Palestinian territories are replaced with non Palestinian people.
Speaker 6 (14:00):
Kind Of hard to.
Speaker 2 (14:02):
Have two states share of border when the people in
one state are like, hey, you know what I really
want to do, Go kill the people in the other
one and take that territory. Kind of hard. That's why
historically we've had this problem. You have the people in
one state and it's not Israel that want to kill
(14:22):
the people and the other one. If you acknowledge this
as two states, and here is the overarching point, because
a lot of this can be complicated for the average
uninformed person to get very simple question for you, what
is it that Hamas wants to see happen here? What
would Hamas want more than anything else with the United
(14:44):
Nations to be recognized as a state, right have Palestine
and recognized as a state. Now, if you do exactly
what Hamas wants you to do, joel good thing.
Speaker 5 (15:01):
Bad thing, Definitely a bad thing for Jews, I.
Speaker 2 (15:05):
Would say, for anybody who doesn't believe in it's true terrorism. Yeah, yeah,
doesn't stop there.
Speaker 5 (15:10):
By the way, you're right, you're right.
Speaker 2 (15:13):
If you do exactly what Hamas wants you to do,
really good chance you're not doing the right thing. And
that's what the UN Secretary General, these idiot leaders in
other countries, that's what they're doing. It is just oh
and by I mean principally establishing a palace sitting in state.
Speaker 6 (15:37):
It's actually less feasible than establishing Canada as a fifty
first state. At least the Canadians for the most part,
and can try to kill us.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.