Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:17):
Alrighty, hey, welcome back. Hope you tuned in to the
best of segment that we did on Sunday, picked some
highlights from across the podcast and aired those on Sunday evening.
Because I was out of town. I was at an event,
great event, historical reenactment, had a great time. Couldn't have
enjoyed it more. I wish I was back already, So
(00:40):
we did a best of segment on the Live Sunday
show instead, again because I was out of town. I
hope you guys have been listening to that. It's a
great time doing that show live, and of course I'll
be back live again next Sunday, so tune in Sunday
seven am, nine to fifty KPRC. It's always a great time.
All right, We've got some breaking news that we need
to get to hear you guys. Remember Joe Biden. He's
(01:02):
the corpse that was the President of the United States
for the last four years. Believe it or not, he's
still alive.
Speaker 2 (01:10):
I know.
Speaker 1 (01:11):
It shocks me too. I was surprised. I didn't see
it coming, Frankly, I really didn't. But he's still alive,
and for whatever reason, he came back out and did
a big speech yesterday. I don't know why. I don't
know what the purpose of that was. He'd achieved nothing.
You are not a figure anymore. You don't matter. Your
(01:32):
opinions and thoughts don't matter. You used to be the
president of the United States, and even when you were
the president of the United States, your thoughts and opinions
didn't matter because you weren't the one running your administration.
Your staffers were. We all know this now. It's become
blatantly obvious over the several months since Trump has been
in office that Joe Biden was not piloting the ship,
(01:55):
so he hasn't been relevant basically since he stopped being
Barack Obama's VP. Why in the world would he go
out and give a speech. He's eighty billion years old,
He's not running for anything ever again, and even if
he did, he would lose. So why is he still
being trotted out by the Democrat Party? What's the purpose
of that? You know, he didn't make the decision to
(02:16):
go give that speech because he can't make decisions. He's
not physically capable of doing that. So who made the
decision for him to go out and why? I think
it was probably the Democrat leads, and I think they
probably did it because they're trying to claw something that
sort of resembles leadership from their basket of useless, stupid candidates.
Because again, I can't stress this enough, the Democrat Party
(02:36):
has got nothing and nobody going on right now. They've
been trying to trot out like AOC and Bernie Sanders
on some big tour and they keep talking about how
they're drawing all these big crowds. The jig is up
with that. You drew a bunch of big crowds with
Kamala Harris and nobody voted for you. And even if
you did manage to get enthusiasm behind AOC and Bernie Sanders,
(02:59):
you know what, go ahead and run those two candidates,
or one of the two, on a presidential ticket, and
let me know how that works out for you. Go
try to pitch AOC's weird brand of socialism to middle
class workers that just voted for Donald Trump and are
now all getting their jobs back because of tariffs. Let
me know how that works out. Honestly, I want you
to do it, because let's take an off year and
(03:21):
just get an easy political victory. Right, Let's not have
to work too hard for it, So go ahead and
do that. But anyway, let's take a quick listen to
what Joe Biden had to say yesterday. He got out
there and he immediately started complaining, as Democrats do, about
how terrible and horrible Donald Trump's term has already been.
(03:41):
We're so early in the term and he's already done
so much damage. It's so horrible. The man should have
been sleeping, bless his heart, but he wasn't.
Speaker 2 (03:52):
Take a listen under days, this through administration has made
so much dammings, so much destruction. It's kind of breathtaking.
It could happen that soon if taken a hasht to
Socialecurity Administration pushing just seven thousand employees, seven thousand out
(04:14):
the door in that time, including the most seasoned officials.
Now they're getting ready to push south long out the door.
Speaker 1 (04:22):
Now, if you're just listening to that and you're kind
of hearing those inflections in his voice, it almost sounds
like he's kind of getting ready to shed a tear
for these career officials that have lost their job at
the Social Security Administration. If you watch the video, you
can see he's just trying to stay awake. This man
does not look any more alive than he did when
he was the president of the United States. Again, he
(04:44):
should have been asleep, but instead he's in Chicago giving
a political speech for what purpose, to what end? What
are you going to do about it, Joe Biden. Nothing.
You're not going to run for anything. You're a thousand
years old. Nobody's going to vote for you. That's why
you dropped out of the race last year. I mean,
he's still just as bad as he was in twenty
twenty four. I mean, he's locked in on that teleprompter.
(05:08):
He's trying so hard to focus on it and read
what it says. There's no life in this speech at all.
There's no life in him at all. The man has died.
He's died. He's been dead for a long time. And
at this point, I don't understand what the purpose of
the Democrats trotting him back out is, but they did,
and they got him to kind of parrot their narrative
(05:29):
about how terrible it is that all these federal employees
are losing their jobs. So what does he actually say there?
He starts talking about how he's done all this damage
to the Social Security administration. By firing all these people,
he's destroyed it. And he pointed to that as how
it's an example of Donald Trump destroying the United States
(05:51):
and doing extreme damage in a short amount of time. Well,
let me ask you this, has anybody that's relying on
Social Security not gotten a check? I haven't heard even
a single anecdotal story about some poor old lady who's
relying on Social Security for her fixed income and now
she's not getting it, and oh, no, what am I
gonna do. I've heard a lot of Democrats saying, oh,
(06:13):
this is gonna happen, It's gonna be so terrible, But
it hasn't happened yet. Again, no anecdotal stories, let alone
any actual data. So has Donald Trump actually done any
real damage to the Social Security Administration or has he
done damage to the bureaucrats that are relying on that
as a jobs program? Now, maybe I just haven't been
made aware of the case. So I would encourage you.
(06:35):
If you're out there and you're listening to this and
you stopped getting your Social Security check because Donald Trump
fired some goober in DC, by all means, speak up.
Let's get to the bottom of this. I will personally
put my voice out there and try to get you
your money, because that is your taxpayer money you paid
into the Social Security system. You deserve to get it.
(06:55):
But again, not one single person has come forward and
said that. One. We've rooted out the fraud, We've rooted
out all the people that shouldn't have been getting checks.
But I have yet to see a single shred of
evidence that anyone that should be getting Social Security isn't
anymore because of Donald Trump. So again, Joe Biden, I
ask you this, what damage has Donald Trump done? Oh? No,
(07:18):
the stock market is down. We've been over that a
thousand times. It'll come back up. Calm down. I recognize
that all your billionaire buddies who donated to your campaign
are upset about that. But listen, the Americans that are
about to start getting their manufacturing jobs back, they're excited
because that's what we've seen start to happen. American manufacturing
is actually coming back up thanks to the tariffs. We'll
(07:38):
dig into that in the next segment. Listen, we will
be right back. Stay tuned through a quick ad break,
and we will dig into more of all of this.
Thank you very much. This is a piece that I
(08:18):
got a kick out of. Recently, to escape the grind,
young people turn to many retirements. What is a many retirement,
you may ask, Well, don't worry. This article answers that question.
Marina Cassar wasn't sure what to call the three month
break she took after quitting her job. All Right right
(08:38):
there in the first line we get this ridiculous piece
of new young people's slang explained to us. It's called
being unemployed, Marina Cassauer. I hope I helped. This is
just you're unemployed, that's all it is. You don't need
a slang term for that. If you want to just
be unemployed for three months, because listen, you worked hard
at a good paying job, and we're able to save
up a decent amount of money, so you can afford
(08:59):
to just take a break from work for a few
months and just kind of live off your savings for
a while while you kind of catch back up with yourself. Listen,
I'm fine with that. I don't see any problem with that.
You don't need a cool slang term for it. You
just don't. You don't need to call it a mini retirement.
You haven't many retired. You're just not getting a job
right now. You're just unemployed. That's all it is. God,
(09:22):
I hate young people slang. As a young person, the
most annoying thing we do is everything has to have
its own little trendy term. Stop it. You're unemployed. Don't
try to make it sound cool. If you want to
be unemployed, that's fine, but you don't need a slang
term for it. You just don't. But hey, that's a
good segue onto our next topic. It's kind of a
job's topic. I teased it in the first segment. We've
(09:42):
got jobs coming back to the United States of America.
We do thanks to Trump's tariffs. Presumably something that Joe
Biden would say, Donald Trump is using to ruin the
United States of America unprecedented damage or what have you
in his speech that he gave last night. But surprise, surprise,
even Democrats, hardline leftist Democrats are actually coming to the table,
(10:07):
and you know, kind of concurring with Trump that like, hey,
we do need to bring back American manufacturing and maybe
tariffs is a way to do that. Here's Michigan Governor
Gretchen Whitmeyer throwing her support behind Donald Trump's tariffs. Just
so we're on the same page here. Gretchen Whitmyer is
very much a leftist leftist, but Donald Trump won Michigan
(10:28):
because he appealed to the working class people in Michigan
and said, hey, we're gonna get you some good paying
jobs back. And so here's Gretchen Whitmeyer finally kind of
bending the need to Trump and being like, yeah, you're right,
we need to bring back American manufacturing. We can't keep
relying on cheap Chinese goods being shipped into the United
States on the cheap. Take a listen to this.
Speaker 3 (10:47):
I understand the motivation behind the tariffs, and I can
tell you here's where President Trump and I do agree.
We do need to make more stuff in America, more
cars and chips, more steel and ships.
Speaker 1 (11:01):
We do need fair trade, fair trade. I like the
sound of that. I want to point that out specifically
because it's something that I think we've kind of missed.
We've heard a lot about how Donald Trump is sort
of destroying free trade and how much the United States
has benefited from trade, and at the same time, the
right is saying, no, the United States hasn't benefited from
(11:22):
free trade. We've been taken advantage of because of free trade.
They're both kind of right. Both arguments are the left
and the right. Free trade I think would benefit the
United States of America. I think it would benefit everybody
if you could just trade and everybody gets the best
product for the best price. I think that would be great.
The right is correct when they say we've been taken
(11:44):
advantage of by that. I would say we haven't been
taken advantage of by free trade because we haven't had
free trade. The right is correct when they say that
we've been taken advantage of, but they're incorrect when they
say it's because of free trade. We haven't had free trade.
Countries have been able to come in and trade with
us for free. We've had sort of one way free trade.
(12:05):
This is something I talked with EJ. And Tony about yesterday.
He's an economist with the Heritage Foundation, and I was
basically asking him, you know, we've got all these tariffs
that we're just now putting on countries, but they've had
tariffs on US forever. So he's that really free trade
and he's like, no, it's just sort of like one
(12:25):
way free trade. Free trade works both ways. You can
come sell your stuff to us. We can come sell
our stuff to you. That's free trade. We have not
had that. I think this is my opinion. Donald Trump
is trying to force free trade, actual legit two way
free trade by imposing these really high tariffs. And listen here,
that will benefit the United States if we actually do
(12:49):
have free trade. If Donald Trump hikes these tariffs up,
forces these countries to the negotiating table, and we come
out with a deal that's one to one legitimate free trade,
the United States would benefit immensely from that because obviously
there would be good competition for business. That's good. It
brings prices down and quality up. And second of all,
here in the United States, we make great stuff, and
(13:10):
there are other markets internationally that I'm sure would have
an interest in our stuff. I'm sure there are people
I've talked about this before in other countries that would
be interested in American cars because we make great cars.
I'm sure there are people out there, maybe in China,
that would love to buy a sofa from Mattress Mac.
I bet you they're out there because Max sells great furniture.
But we can't sell American made furniture in other countries
(13:32):
because we'll get hit with a really big tariff. It's
just not profitable anymore. And so in other countries. In Japan,
for example, Japanese people buy Japanese products and they sell
Japanese products to the United States of America. They're not
buying American products at all. I think if we had
actual free trade, that math would change and we would
benefit greatly from that. American manufacturing would come back and
(13:54):
people would make good money off of it. We're already
seeing that. By the way, one of the most important
things for the future is going to be, you know,
high tech computer chips. That's obvious. AI is the future,
whether we like it or not. Even if it's not
the future, even if computer technology goes in a different
direction because something happens, God forbid, the AI tries to
kill us or what have you, We're still going to
(14:15):
have computers. They'll still run on ships. In Video makes
some of the most amazing and powerful computer chips on
the market today. I know because I have one in
my PC right now. I'm recording onto an Invidia Actually
it's a graphics card, so I'm not recording onto it.
But if I was recording a video, it would be
recording onto that chip. I use it to play video games.
(14:35):
It's amazing. The graphics on my video games look spectacular.
Because Navidia makes great chips, and they're expensive. Even if
they're being made in Taiwan or whatever country Navidia makes
them in, those could be being made by Americans. Americans
could be reaping the benefit of the fact that there's
an amazing piece of technology that a lot of Americans use,
(14:55):
and that technology needs to not only be sold in
the United States but also built here. How amazing would
that be if all of the money in that industry
was benefiting the United States of America, that would be great.
And thanks to tariffs, that is going to start happening.
Nvidia is going to start manufacturing chips here in the
United States, and a lot of that investment is actually
(15:17):
even going to come into Texas. Here is Caroline Levitt,
Trump's press secretary making that announcement that like, hey, this
major industry is coming into the United States. Take a listen.
Speaker 4 (15:27):
For the first time ever, chip making giant Navideo will
produce AI supercomputers entirely in the United States as part
of its pledge to produce fifty billion dollars worth of
AI infrastructure in our country over the next four years.
Speaker 1 (15:41):
You think that happens without Trump's tariffs. No, of course
it doesn't. And if it was, why didn't it earlier?
I mean, I imagine this is going to be the next
argument from the left is all of this was going
to happen anyway. Trump didn't have anything to do with it,
because that's always the maneuver. Trump does something, the left
tells you it's gonna be a disaster, and then it
works out, and then left says it was gonna work
(16:03):
out anyway. Trump didn't do that, Yes he did. Shut
the hell up. If this manufacturing was gonna come to
the United States without Donald Trump, why didn't it. I'm
calling that argument out now because I see it in
the future. I'm calling it now. Give it a few weeks,
you'll start hearing that from the left. I guarantee it.
I guarantee it, and it's gonna be obnoxious as hell,
but we're gonna have to deal with it. We're gonna
(16:24):
have to deal with it, all right. Let me read
you real quick, Greg Abbott's statement announcing that a whole
bunch of that investment was gonna come here into Texas.
He tweeted this out yesterday. He said, congratulations to Nvidia
on their Texas sized AI investment in Houston and Dallas. Houston,
h Town. That's jobs for you. Isn't that amazing? Think
(16:46):
about how much that's going to help the Houston economy,
the Texas economy. This is great. All right. Here's the
official statement. Austin Governor Greg Abbott today congratulated in Nvidia
on the announced construction of two super computer manufacturing facilities
in Texas in partnership with fox Conn in Houston and
Winstrom in Dallas. Production at both facilities is expected to
(17:08):
ramp up in twelve to fifteen months. That's less than
two years. That's awesome. Texas is where the future of
innovation is building, said Governor Greg Gabbott. I congratulate in
video on their Texas sized investment in Houston and Dallas
and support their first ever all American made AI supercomputers. Again,
stuff like this just gets my state pride really going.
(17:29):
I've said this once and I've said it again. The
future is going to be awesome. I really believe that.
I think we're gonna have a lot of really cool
technology that's gonna be neat in the future, and I'm
excited to see it. I'm even more excited that it's
going to be made in America, and I'm even more
more excited that it's going to be made in Texas
and h Town where the space city We're gonna be
the AI city. This is amazing. Thank you Donald Trump
(17:51):
for doing this. Donald Trump did this. Cry about it.
All right, we'll be right back.
Speaker 5 (18:17):
All right, let's talk about this meeting between Naib Bukeley,
President of l Salvador, and Donald's John Trump, Junior President
of the United States of America.
Speaker 1 (18:29):
I have made no bones about this. I like Nai
Bukeley quite a bit. Naim Bukeyley and Javier Malay of
Argentina are probably right up next to Donald Trump from
my second and third favorite world leaders right now, in
no particular order, in no particular order. Both of them
I like quite a bit for different reasons. I could
put either one of them in that second or third spot.
(18:50):
It's really flip of a coin. I like them both
quite a bit. The left hates Nai Bukeley, and we'll
get into that why they hate him. One of the
biggest reasons they hate him is he looked at El
Salva and he said, hey, this is a nation that
frankly sucks. We're riddled with crime, We're controlled by cartels.
We have one of the highest murder rates, if not
the highest murder rate in the world. People are fleeing
(19:12):
El Salvador in South America in order to go to
the United States because of what a terrible craphole country.
Speaker 2 (19:18):
This is.
Speaker 1 (19:19):
What if we just took all those criminals and threw
them in jail. What if we took all the corrupt
elected officials that were sort of aiding and abetting all
these criminals and threw them in jail too. What if
we actually just solve this problem, Because believe it or not,
you can't actually just solve problems. Naibukeley has proved this
(19:40):
in Al Salvador. It's become a tourist destination. It's become
one of the safest countries in the world, just because
Nai Bukeley came into office and said, Yeah, I'm just
not gonna accept the fact that we have to live
in a crime little crap hole anymore. I'm just not. No,
We're gonna build a massive super prison and we're going
to take all of these criminals, all of these career
(20:01):
cartel members, and we're going to throw all of them
in this prison that frankly sucks. This prison does suck.
I would hate to go there. I would hate to
go there. I wouldn't even want to tour this place.
I've seen Trump officials go and actually see this place.
I wouldn't even do that. I would not do that.
I would not even go just look around, just because
(20:21):
of how awful this place looks to me. But I
recognize that that's what's necessary. If you want to deter criminals,
you have to have real, harsh, unenjoyable punishments that you
publicly subject criminals to so that everybody else sees that
and thinks, you know what, maybe doing crime isn't worth it,
Maybe I'll be a good citizen. That's how you bring
crime rates down massively. We know that because that's what
(20:43):
Naive Bukeley did and it worked. And so Donald Trump
came into office and he saw all these criminals that
we had in the United States, many of them from
El Salvador, many of them gang members that were fleeing
Naibu Keley came here and started doing their crime here
in the United States, and Trump said, okay, these are
all illegal aliens. They're not supposed to be here in
the United States. Most of them are savage criminals. Anyway,
(21:05):
Let's just send them back to El Salvador. Cut a
deal with Bookeley and have him just house them in
this terrible prison. And that's exactly what's happened, and it worked.
People stopped trying to cross illegally into the United States
for the most part, in huge numbers. People realized, Hey,
this is just not worth it. I don't want to
end up in this terrible Elsavador in prison. I don't
(21:26):
want to end up in wherever else I might get
sent by Donald Trump if they catch me crossing the
border illegally. I'm just gonna stay home. And that's why
since Donald Trump took office, border crossings have dropped by
something like a ninety plus percent. That's great. That works
the Left because they want the open borders, hates Trump
for this, and they hate Bookeley for it too. They
paint Bukeley as some dictator that's just throwing thousands of
(21:50):
people in jail indiscriminately, imprisoning so many thousands of people.
I want you to take a listen, because Bookeley came
to the White House met with Donald Trump. It was great.
Lots of great moments, we'll get into it. One of
my favorites was this moment where naibu Keley actually addresses
this and he talks about how like, listen, yeah, I
threw thousands of people in jail, but I have liberated
(22:11):
millions of people who are now able to live free
in El Salvador because they're not constantly worrying about getting
murdered by cartels. Take a listen to this. This is honestly,
this is so great. This is a fantastic response.
Speaker 6 (22:24):
We're very happy, and we're very eager to help. We
know that you have a crime problem, a travelism problem
that you need help for, and we're small country, but
we can help. We good And we actually turned the
murder capital of the world that was the journal's college,
(22:45):
right murdered capital of the world, into the city's country
the West a hemistry. And you know they sometimes they
say that we in prison thousands. I like to say
that we actually deliberated in millions. So you know, like,
it is very good.
Speaker 1 (23:02):
Who gave him that line?
Speaker 7 (23:03):
Do you think I can use it?
Speaker 1 (23:06):
That is a great line. I love that because that's
exactly what has happened. You had people that were being
terrorized by cartels like MS thirteen, by murderous gangs, and
Naibukeley just stepped in and said, hey, we're not going
to deal with this. And the left hates that. Their
whole thing is we want the crime. I don't know why.
I have no idea why that's their thing, but we
see that all the time. We just talked to April
(23:27):
Gire about that activists left wing judges here in Harris
County just releasing criminals. Ni Bukele stood up and said, hey,
we're not going to do that. We're going do incarcerat criminals,
en mass all of the criminals, and we're just going
to put a stop to the grime. All right, So
let's talk a little bit about how Trump has started
deporting people into Elsalvador. Again, thank you Naibukeley for allowing
(23:48):
us to do this. It's been a big help on
behalf of all of America, even the ones that really
don't appreciate it. Thank you. It means a lot to
us that you've been doing this. So there's this case
of this El Salvadorian illegal alien who was living in
Maryland illegally. The media keeps portraying him as a Maryland man.
He's not a Maryland man. He's an El Salvadorian man
(24:09):
who has been adjudicated to be a member of MS thirteen.
Multiple courts have found him to be a member of
MS thirteen. Now, this guy has had his due process.
He's been through the ringer, We've arrested him, he's gone
through the courts, court hearings, court hearings, Lad Dad DII
da as I understand it, and don't take my word
as gospel here, but this is a very convoluted legal case.
(24:31):
But as I understand it, this is what has happened.
These courts have ruled that he is a member of
MS thirteen. He is an illegal alien, he is not
allowed to be here, and he is deportable. Get him
out of the country. Now. I believe one specific immigration
court said that you just have to send him back
to somewhere other than El Salvador, because he had requested that,
(24:52):
and for whatever reason that got granted. I'm pretty sure
that's what happened. Accidentally, he got sent back to El Salvador.
And the Left has lost their mind about this. They
have portrayed this as Donald Trump accidentally deported somebody who
was supposed to be in the United States. That's not
what happened. They accidentally sent this guy to El Salvador.
He is an L Salvadorian national. But he had had
(25:13):
some request to not be sent to El Salvador. That
was granted, and then they sent him to El Salvador. Anyway,
and now the left has lost their mind about this,
and now I think the Supreme Court has said that, hey,
if El Salvador releases him, the United States has to
facilitate his return. And naibu Keley in that meeting with
Donald Trump just said, We're not gonna facilitate the release
(25:33):
of him. He's an MS thirteen member. Under El Salvadoran policy,
members of MS thirteen, which is a dangerous cartel, get
sent to this supermax prison. He's a member of MS thirteen.
He's an L Salvadorian national. El Salvador got custody of
him because of what Donald Trump did, and so they
threw him in prison where he belongs. The Supreme Court
cannot compel Naibukele to release this prisoner. The Supreme Court
(25:56):
cannot compel the Trump administration to force El Salvador to
release this prisoner, because that's a matter of foreign policy,
and the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over foreign policy.
That is purely within the hands of the commander in chief.
But the narrative from the left is just this is
some Marilyn man that accidentally got deported because the Trump
administration is I don't know, I guess evil and racist,
(26:18):
and he needs to be returned right now, and Trump
has to do this. Here's Stephen Miller, the I guess
Deputy White House Chief of Staff, I think he is.
Here's Stephen Miller basically saying, yeah, all of this is lies.
Even if he wasn't in that El Salvadorian supermax prison,
he still wouldn't be allowed in the United States. Take
a listen to this.
Speaker 8 (26:36):
He is not legally even allowed to be in our
country under the due process that these democrats so veterate
for illegal invaders. It is legally impermissible for him to
have one more minute in this country.
Speaker 1 (26:51):
And again, you've seen the videos floating around the internet
of his wife crying and like, hold on, Kilmar, We're
still with you. Who God is still with you? Laudi
Da di dah and they're basically trying to make the
case like, oh, look, how sad his family is. This
was a paperwork error. He never should have been deported.
It was a paperwork error. He should have been deported.
(27:12):
I think technically he shouldn't have been sent to Ali Salvador,
but that is where he belongs. It is. I'm glad
he's there. I don't care how many ridiculous videos you
show me of people crying about it. I don't care
about all the bleeding hearts on the left about oh
what about his wife and family. I'm sorry you married
a criminal. I'm sorry you married a member of MS thirteen.
(27:32):
That sucks for you. That is tough. You are gonna
have to deal with that. But you're gonna have to
deal with that, and you're gonna have to deal with
that without him, because I don't care how many people
you marry or how many kids you have here in
the United States, if you're an illegal immigrant and a
verified member. Multiple courts have found that he is a
member of MS thirteen. You can find the documents online.
I'm looking at him right now. Courts have ruled that
(27:54):
he is a member of MS thirteen and a deportable
illegal alien. Get him out, Get him out, no sympathy.
He simply does not belong in the United States of America.
And thank you to Naib Bukeley for taking him back
into his home country and throwing him in a supermax
prison where he belongs. And then when all the leftist
(28:15):
reporters in the White House go crying on their hands
and knees begging for you to let him out, you
just say no, as you should, because we as the
United States, have an interest in making sure that career
criminals are not in our country, and Naib Bukeley has
an interest in making sure that when career criminals from
(28:35):
his country may get back into his country, they get
thrown in prison, probably for life. Because this guy does
not sound like a good dude. The Left is going
to try to make you cry about this. It's the
emotional appeal. Ignore it, ignore it. Safety first, All right,
we'll be right back. We got one more segment, all right.
(29:22):
I've made no bones about the fact that I'm kind
of a space nerd, specifically a space x nerd. I
think what Elon Musk is doing right now with space travel,
nobody else is doing. Nobody else is coming close. NASA
is light years behind Elon Musk. They are, they are,
and none of these other private companies are coming anywhere
close except maybe Blue Origin. Blue Origin is owned by
(29:44):
Jeff Bezos. He's, of course, the guy who owns Amazon.
He's also been digging into the space industry. He did
something amazing. I'll give him credit where it's due. Jeff
Bezos didn't do something amazing. It wasn't the space thing.
It wasn't the space thing. Th kind of met. But
what Blue Origin did manage to do is get six
(30:06):
individual women to all be on time to the same thing.
That's impressive. That is impressive. I have but one fiance
and I love her to death, but her functionality sometimes
is questionable. We'll say that her functionality is questionable on occasion.
(30:27):
On occasion, she has her moments, but sometimes she's lated
at things. I think a lot of guys out there
can relate to this. I think most men, be you
married or dating or engaged as I am, I think
most people can kind of concur Yeah, we've had some
functionality problems with our significant others. That's fine. Listen, ladies,
(30:48):
you've got a lot going on, all right. There's no
shame in that. Props to you forgetting where you get
when you get there. Okay, full respect. But the fact
that Jeff Bezos was able to get six women all
on the same vehicle at the same time to go
to the same place and they were all on time, Hey,
you gotta give it to him. Hats off to the
(31:09):
man he did it. Well done. We all envy you,
we're all proud of you. Well well done, sir, Well done.
All right, but let's actually talk about the space mission.
This is being played up as something that was kind
of like a super big moment for I guess space traveler,
what have you, because it was the first all female
space crew and Katie Perry of all people, was on it,
(31:32):
and it's just a big deal. So what did this
space crew do? Literally nothing, literally nothing. They got in
this rocket, they wrote it up, I believe, into the
upper atmosphere. I don't think they actually ever left the atmosphere,
and then they just wrote it back down. The thing
was on autopilot or being piloted by other people the
(31:52):
entire time. None of these six women that they put
in this spacecraft actually did anything on the spacecraft other
than look out the window. That's it. That's all they did.
But this is being called the first all female space crew.
Ladi dadi da. They didn't even go into space. They
were in the lower atmosphere, and normally I wouldn't care.
(32:13):
Normally I wouldn't care or say, oh, look at that,
Jeff Bezos did something, goofy whatever, what else is new?
But the media, as they always do, is now trying
to force this onto people. They're trying to make it
a thing when it is not a thing. And that's
why Katy Perry was on this. She brings the star
power right, She's Katy Perry. She did the Super Bowl
(32:35):
years ago. She had a couple of good songs back
in like the late twenty tens. Wow, nobody actually cares
about this, but they're forcing it down on our throats.
They're trying to get us to care about this, and
Katy Perry, for the record, is being ridiculous about this.
Take a listen to Katy Perry right after she landed
back on the ground after not technically going into space
(32:56):
on a rocket that she was just sitting in, not
actually doing it. Take a listen to this.
Speaker 9 (33:02):
It is the highest high and it is surrender to
the unknown, trust and this whole journey is not just
about going to space. It's the training, it's the team,
it's the whole thing. I could have recommend this experience more.
(33:23):
This is like up there with all the you know,
different tools that I've learned in my life, from meditation
to the Hoffmann process. This is up there because what
you're doing is you're fine. You're like really finding the
love for yourself because you've got to trust in yourself
on this journey. And then you're feeling the love when
you come down for sure, and you're feeling that strength.
(33:45):
So I feel really connected to that strong, divine feminine
right now.
Speaker 1 (33:50):
By the way, you're such a badass. I loved it.
Speaker 3 (33:51):
The month of April You're like, I'm going to space
and I'm launching my tour.
Speaker 1 (33:54):
Wow, you're such a badass, Katy Perry, You're so amazing.
Speaker 7 (33:57):
Wow.
Speaker 1 (33:58):
She was in space for all of ten minutes, ten
minutes and twenty one seconds to be exact. And you
might think, okay, well, if you see the video, you
saw that she got on the ground and she kissed
the ground and she said, I'll never take gravity for
granted again. She experienced three to four minutes of weightlessness
above the car man line. So what groundbreaking thing did
(34:18):
this quote unquote crew actually experience Because I mean people
are calling this the first all female crew. It's not
a crew. They didn't do anything. They went on a ride.
That's what they did. Again, I can't streuss this enough.
None of them were actually operating any equipment on that spaceship,
on that rocket that they rode. They were just on
(34:39):
a ride. This is something my friend Kenny Webster pointed
out on Twitter, I believe on Monday. He said, hey,
they're a crew. I mean, if they want to go
to space and whatnot. Fine, if they want to ride
their rocket up into space, who cares? Why not? Again,
I really shouldn't care about this. I only care about
this because the media wants me to care about this.
So since you're trying so hard to tell me how
great this is, I'm just going to point out to
you this is actually kind of stupid. And again I
(35:02):
wouldn't even bring it up if they just did it
and then went home and this wasn't being shoved down
my face twenty four to seven. But since it happened
on Monday, this is all I've heard about when it
comes to space travel, and they didn't even travel into
space really, they just went really high into the air
in a rocket for ten minutes and then fell back
down to Earth. They didn't leave the atmosphere. And then
(35:23):
she carries on about how connected she felt to the
divine feminine. What the hell is even that? The divine feminine?
The divine feminine? What I've seen some people on Twitter,
in their kind of religious circles on Twitter talking about
how this is Katy Perry trying to say that God
is a woman. That may have been what she meant,
I don't know. It kind of reads to me like
(35:44):
what she's saying is like this is like a divine
feminine feeling, which I mean, hey, you were a passenger princess.
That's what my fiance does whenever we go anywhere together.
She just sits in the car and looks out the window.
That's exactly what Katy Perry did. She sat in the
rocket ship and looked out the window. So if that's
the peak divine feminine experience, I'll give you that, Katy Perry.
(36:05):
You did do that, You did do that. I don't know, man,
this is all just really stupid. It's designed to push
the feminist narrative. I don't know if there's another objective
behind this. I think this is just kind of Jeff
Bezos trying to get a pat on the back from
the woke left because he's, you know, spent some of
his political capital with them when he went to the
(36:25):
Trump inauguration, was being buddy buddy with the Donald right
after he won. So maybe he's trying to win some
of those points back. I don't know. But again, why
is the media pushing this? We don't care. Nobody actually
cares about this. Nobody does unless you're just a crazed
Katy Perry fan, which I don't even know if she
has crazed fans. I think she just has casual enjoyers
(36:47):
of some of her songs. She's not anywhere near Taylor
Swift in terms of Star Park. I don't know why
am I even talking about this. This is so stupid.
I hate the fact that this is a major story
in society to the point where I have to talk
about it. I should not be talking about this. This
is irrelevant. That's my point here. None of this matters.
This was a waste of everyone's time and money, all right,
(37:07):
let's end with this teacher complaining about her students getting deported.
I don't know where she teaches or what she's in
San Francisco, that's all I know. And she's complaining about
four of her students getting deported. Take a listen to this,
just letting.
Speaker 7 (37:19):
Everyone know that there's deportations going on in San Francisco.
Four of my students got deported yesterday, one of them
for a parking ticket, the other one for getting on
the bus and not paying, and the other two we
don't even know. We don't nothing, but they were all
(37:41):
docked for criminal activity, potential criminal activity, and there's nothing
we can do. My job is to help these students.
There's nothing I can do except tell them get a
lawyer with what money?
Speaker 1 (37:58):
Okay again, good, I'm glad these people got deported. They're
not supposed to be here. But I want to address
something that she says. She says one of her students
got deported for a parking ticket. One of her students
got deported for getting on the bus and not paying. Okay,
First of all, if you're parking somewhere, you shouldn't you
should be punished for that parking ticket. Good, if you
got on the bus and didn't pay, you should be
punished for that's that's good as well. That's not why
(38:20):
your students got deported. They didn't get deported because they
didn't pay a parking ticket or because they got on
the bus and didn't pay. They got deported because they
came into this country illegally. That's why they got deported.
It's not for these other things. That may be how
they popped up on the radar, but they got deported
because they illegally crossed the border. They never should have
(38:40):
been here in the first place, and so I'm glad
they got deported. We can't make exceptions to our immigration laws.
We just can't. I don't care what your SOB story is,
all right, That's all I've got. Thank you very much
for listening. We'll be back Sunday at seven on AM
nine to fifty KPRC, or catch the podcast of that
show on Monday. Thanks for listening.