April 21, 2025 • 39 mins
Listen to The Next-Gen Report live! Sundays at 7:00 p.m. on AM950, KPRC.
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who made a name for herself prosecuting Trump for supposedly lying about his properties to get favorable loans, receives a criminal referral from the DOJ for lying about her properties to get favorable loans. Ironic, right?
The Democratic Party has absolutely no issues to run on in the midterms, so their new policy is just, "Whatever Trump does, we oppose." That includes Trump deporting illegal alien members of MS-13 who abuse their wives.
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram, and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
New York Attorney General Letitia James, who made a name for herself prosecuting Trump for supposedly lying about his properties to get favorable loans, receives a criminal referral from the DOJ for lying about her properties to get favorable loans. Ironic, right?
The Democratic Party has absolutely no issues to run on in the midterms, so their new policy is just, "Whatever Trump does, we oppose." That includes Trump deporting illegal alien members of MS-13 who abuse their wives.
For the latest news, follow me on Instagram, and X:
@the.ethanbuchanan
@_ethanbuchanan
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:32):
Hey, good evening, everybody, welcome in pleasure to be with you.
If you tuned in for the Verdict with Ted Cruz,
I'm afraid you just missed it, just missed it so close.
Now you get me. Hi, my name is Ethan Buchannon.
This is the Next General Record. It's a pleasure to
be with you this evening. We have got a lot
to talk about. So don't tune out just because I'm
not said cruise. Stick around. We've got a really great show.
(00:52):
It's a pleasure to be here every Sunday night at seven.
If you want to get a little bit of background
after you listen to this episode line because you shouldn't
tune out, as I've already said, feel free to go
check out the podcast, The Next Gen Report. It's wherever
you get your podcasts. I'd love to have you listen.
You can find me on Twitter at Underscore Ethan Buchanan.
I'm very active there. That's my favorite place to go
(01:14):
and talk about all of the different issues that matter
and a lot of the issues that don't. There's a
lot of issues that really don't matter that I talk
about anyway. Frankly, because I'm a rambler. I'm a rambling man.
Let's open up tonight though, with something that does matter.
This is a breaking story that I think came out
on Thursday. Letitia James. Y'all remember her. She's the New
(01:37):
York Attorney General. She made a name for herself going
after Donald Trump. Right, we're all familiar with this, the
law fair that we saw for years. She was the
no one is above the la Letitia James. That's her. Well, surprise, surprise,
those words are coming back to haunt her. I want
to give you a quick reminder. The case that Letitia
James brought against Donald Trump is the one back in
(01:58):
twenty twenty two where he was based accused of inflating
the value of mar A Lago so that he could
then get better loans for his businesses. Right, and he
got found guilty of that. Some goofy judge and Goron
ruled that his mar A Lago property was worth fractions
and fractions of what it's actually worth. I mean, that's
(02:19):
a multi billion dollar property. They ruled that it was
worth maybe a couple million with an M. It's ridiculous.
It's a ridiculous on its face case. The reason I'm
bringing it up now is because the whole allegation was
that Donald Trump was basically lying about his properties. Here's
why that's important. Letitia James is now being accused of,
get this, lying about her properties. Here's the report from
(02:41):
the New York Post. Letitia James dodges questions about mortgage
fraud's scandal outside New York City home, pretends to be
on the phone. According to a letter obtained by the Post, James,
who draws an annual salary of two hundred and twenty
thousand dollars, allegedly falsified records to get a sweetheart home
loan for a Virginia property, actually loans ltiple properties for
Virginia properties she claimed as her principal residence in twenty
(03:04):
twenty three, while she was still serving as the New
York State prosecutor. Now, listen, I am no real estate expert,
but I'm fairly confident that you cannot be primarily living
in the state of Virginia while serving as the Attorney
General for the state of New York. I could be wrong.
I don't know how real estate works. I don't know
(03:25):
how the different policies of these two states work, but
I would imagine, and this is just me guessing. Because
I've never been in an attorney general I would imagine
that if you're the attorney general for a state, you
should probably live in that state, right. That seems fair
and reasonable. That seems like it should be a no brainer.
As far as I'm aware, Ken Paxton, the attorney General
for Texas, lives here in Texas. I'm not aware of
(03:48):
him moving to Oklahoma or something like that. So if
she's listing these Virginia properties as her primary estate, her
primary home, that's a little bit weird, right, That's worth
looking into it. At the very least, Why would you
list that as your primary residence. Now, I have no
problem with her owning properties in other states. I like
(04:09):
the idea of real estate investing. I hope to get
into it myself one day. If you want to use
some money from your main job as the attorney general
to buy some real estate in other parts of the countries,
and you know, maybe rent that out for a profit,
by all means, God bless you, go for it. But
if you're lying in order to do that for cheap okay,
well that's a problem. The allegation here is basically she's
(04:32):
lying on these forms to get sweetheart loans and mortgages
so that she can rake in extra profit from I
guess renting these places out. That's what seems to be happening.
But what this really tells me is, at the end
of the day, the prosecution against Donald Trump was not
the moral high ground stance that the luff was trying
to tell you. It was. This kind of makes the
case once and for all that all these different prosecutions
(04:55):
against Donald Trump were and always have been just politically motivated.
They tried to tell you this was all about making
sure nobody was above the law, But the lady telling
you that was essentially doing the same exact thing as
she's trying to prosecute Donald Trump for doing. What's really
funny here is to watch her basically unravel at this.
I mean, she gives me the vibes of somebody who
(05:16):
knows that they're caught. She's looking at this, she is
watching it all collapse. That's what it seems like. Take
a listen to this video from her press conference that
she did. She's trying to be all defiant and confidence,
but it really just seems like she's panicking. That's what
this looks like to me. Take a listen to this.
She sounds crazy here.
Speaker 2 (05:33):
Frankly, my mission is clear. I'm focused, I'm prepared, I'm ready.
I've been trained by the best. I went to Howard
University that overturned legal segregation in this country. I've been
taught in those classrooms with their good Marshall once taught
(05:55):
I'm not afraid of no President Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
We're ready for you.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
We're coming for you, We're standing up for you.
Speaker 1 (06:03):
We're fighting on. We're not going down.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
Sailing victory, my friends is claim.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
It's now and I'm not waiting four years.
Speaker 3 (06:12):
I'm waiting two.
Speaker 1 (06:14):
I tell us to speak about the name of h.
Speaker 3 (06:16):
King.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
Jeffries comes to bring us some rest. Come on, ladies,
it's up to us. We saved this democracy before, we'll
save it now.
Speaker 3 (06:26):
Let's go.
Speaker 1 (06:30):
Man, you were just indicted for mortgage fraud. What exactly
do you think is happening here? I mean this reads
like a civil rights rally. But you can see in
her face if you watch the video I reposted it yesterday,
go look at it on my ex page. You can
see the panic in her eyes as she screams, I
went to Howard University and she's pounding on her chest. Ladies,
(06:50):
We're gonna save democracy, ladies. What does ladies have to
do with it. You didn't get a criminal referral because
you're a woman. You got a criminal referral because you
were allegedly committing more fraud and lying about your primary residence. Again,
I don't know why she would do that, but it's
worth looking into. Right, that's not something you do on accident.
You don't mistakenly list your primary residence in the wrong state.
(07:13):
There's something going on here. But the real point is
the Democrats love to do this moral high ground act,
and they do it to great effect. Oftentimes I'll give
them credit for it, but what I want people to
understand is that it's lies. It's always lies. The same
people that are swearing up and down that they have
the moral high ground they never do. They're always doing
(07:33):
the same things, if not worse things as what they're
accusing the Republicans of. It's ridiculous and hopefully this is
kind of the last straw and we stop seeing that.
All right, stay tuned, we got a great show coming
up for you right after this break. Al Right, it
(08:13):
looks like we've got some pretty big tariff news. I
saw this a whole bunch on Twitter yesterday. Looks like
Ford is stopping shipments of Mustangs, Raptors, and Broncos to
China as retaliation to Beijing's tariffs on American goods. So basically,
what we're doing to China, China is trying to do
(08:34):
to us. Right, We're saying, hey, if you're gonna sell
your goods that you manufacture over there, you're gonna pay
a little bit extra because that's costing us manufacturing jobs. Right.
If we're buying goods from China, that means we're not
buying goods from the United States, which means goods aren't
being made in the United States, which means the people
who would be employed to make those goods they're not
getting employed. Right, everybody followed the concept here For some reason,
(08:57):
this is incredibly complicated to people my age, which may
there's no sense to me. This is common sense people think, think.
So essentially what's happened is Trump puts tariff on China,
China puts tariff on the United States. United States company
like Ford says, hey, we make a bunch of Fords
here in the United States, and we ship them over
to China. We're not gonna be doing that anymore because
it's not profitable. There's no money in it because we're
(09:17):
paying extra tariffs. We'll just sell our cars here in
the United States. We get more money here anyway. Now,
let me explain to you why this will, in the
long run, I think, be a good thing for you.
Let's say you're in the market for a car in
a couple of years. Down the road, Ford has a
bunch of cars that they didn't export to China, right,
So what does that mean? That means the supplies though, Now,
what do we know about pricing. Pricing is the intersection
(09:40):
of supply and demand, all right. Whatever the supply is,
whatever the demand is. Where those two lines cross, that's
the price. So if your supply goes way up and
your demand hasn't changed, what does that mean. It means
your price comes down because you got a bunch of
cars and you just got to sell them, all right,
So you start cutting deals left and right. Now we
have yet to see what some of the other market
factors are. But I'm looking at this and I'm saying, hey,
it looks like in a couple of months we'll have
(10:01):
some nice cheap forward trucks, maybe a little bit longer,
because again, Ford has extra supply.
Speaker 3 (10:07):
Now.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
Of course, current trends will have to continue for that
to really take effect. It looks like China and Trump
have been talking, so we could see a deal here
pretty soon. That's what Trump thinks. He said recently. Fox
News reported this that China has been calling them a lot,
and they're looking to make a deal in like the
next three weeks. That was his estimate three weeks. And
(10:29):
that makes perfect sense because listen, at the end of
the day, they need Americans to buy. They do. Their
entire economy is based off of them manufacturing and exporting.
That's where they get the vast majority of their money.
There's a strong argument to be made that if we
stop buying from them, that entire country completely collapses. So
despite Jijenping's big boy talk about how we're gonna keep
(10:51):
raising tariffs on the US as long as they raise
tariffs on us, they're scared right now. I almost guarantee
you they're scared right now. They want to say face,
but they want to cut a deal and more. I
imagine Trump's probably right. We're only a couple weeks away.
From some sort of big announcement with China. I mean,
as Trump points out, we have something that nobody else has,
and that's the American consumer. Now, the other big concern
(11:12):
with tariffs that we've heard from the left is that
this is basically going to ruin the United States standing
on the global stage. All of our allies are going
to start hating us because we're tariffing them, and they're
going to realign closer to China, and I will just
sell more to these other countries that basically cut the
United States out because of Donald Trump's tariffs. That's been
the concern. This was baseless the entire time. We all
(11:35):
have known this, but the left has kept pushing it,
and so here we are. What we found is that
actually the exact opposite is happening. All of these countries
are saying, Okay, yeah, you're right, we have been kind
of screwing you over on trade, putting massive tariffs on
your products that you haven't put on our products until
just now. And what we've actually seen is all these
(11:57):
other countries that are actually concerned with the long term
benefit of the Western world have actually said, okay, yeah,
we actually do need to kind of closer a ligne
and be more even. That's what we saw from Georgia Maloney,
who's the Prime Minister of Italy. She came and she
had a big sit down with Trump. This is, of course,
right after the Japanese trade team came and had a
(12:18):
big sit down with Trump. Shockingly, everybody's come to negotiate,
just like Donald Trump predicted. Who could have seen this coming? Anyway,
Here's what Georgia Maloney had to say. A reporter basically
tried to kind of goat her into, I guess, shooting
herself in the foot in terms of negotiations, because the
European Union and the European Trade Commission they've been talking
(12:40):
big about how terrible what Donald Trump is doing and
how they're gonna retaliate and stand up for themselves, and
Lottie Dotti da Georgia Maloney of Italy has been actually
trying to cut a deal. She's like, hey, we have
mutual interests. We're both you know, Western countries, we have
shared values, shared goals. Let's work together. Let's cut a deal.
And the reporter askwer, okay, well, what about the European
(13:02):
Trade Commission. You guys are a part of that what
then take a listen to her answer.
Speaker 4 (13:06):
Here the retaliatory tariffs that the European Commission has and
then suspended, are they still on the table if you
cannot make a deal with President trupt.
Speaker 3 (13:15):
I'm sure we can make a deal, and I'm here
to help on that I cannot locally deal in the
name of the European Union. My goal would be invited
President Trump to pay an efficient visit to Italy and
understand if there's a possibility when it comes to organize
also such a meeting with Europe. For I think the
(13:36):
best way is that we simply speak frankly about the
needs that every one of us is and.
Speaker 1 (13:42):
Find ourselves in the middle. For that's useful for all.
Speaker 3 (13:45):
I really somebody calls me such a Western nationalism. I
don't know if it is the right word, but I'm
sure that together we are stronger, and I have to.
Speaker 1 (13:57):
Find a way.
Speaker 3 (13:58):
I'm here to find the best way to make us
both stronger on the two shores.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
Of their Plante. I love that answer because she's just
sitting there like, of course we're gonna cut a deal.
What do you mean is this on the table if
we don't cut a deal? I don't know what's on
the table if we don't cut a deal, because we're
gonna cut a deal. We have shared interest we have
shared goals, we have shared history. This is one of
my favorite things about Georgia Maloney. She mentioned it just
then that people have been calling her a Western nationalist
(14:23):
just because she recognizes the shared history, shared values, and
shared interests of Western nations. The fact of the matter
is she's right about this. I want us all to
remember where the United States came from. The United States
is an offshoot, basically the child of the British Empire.
Where did the British Empire come from? It came directly
(14:45):
from the Roman Empire. It was the Roman Empire that
civilized Europe, civilized Great Britain, and led to the creation
of the British Empire. The British Empire expanded and led
to the creation of the United States, which is now
its own empire. I mean, just look at how our
government works and you can clearly see the deep historical
connections between our traditions and our way of government and Italy.
(15:08):
I tend to be of the opinion that it is
good and beneficial for us to closely align with countries
that sort of share our history and values and way
of doing things, like Italy does. I like that. So
if we can get people to detach as much as
possible from China, which is a communist, evil dictatorship, and
realign with countries that share our Western values, I think
(15:30):
that's a good thing. I think more Western countries should
be dependent on each other than they are on China.
And that's what we've sort of seen from behind the
scenes on all these tariffs, with all the big talking,
everybody still has been going and cutting deals with Donald
Trump because again, they want access to the American consumer.
We have so much money in the United States. The
average American is way richer than the average person from
(15:51):
most other countries. So if you want to sell more
of your product at the highest price, you come to
the United States. It's a no brainer. And so basically
what we've seen so far with these tariffs, and again
it's still early, so things could change, but I don't
think they will too much. What we've started to see
is sort of a global realignment away from Chinese manufacturing
and instead they're coming to the United States and looking
(16:12):
to make deals. And of course, on top of that,
we've had American manufacturing come back. I think that's more
great news. If people start buying our stuff, that would
be fantastic. If we can start cutting some trade deals
and maybe selling some Fords out to other countries like Italy.
I don't know. I don't know if they would want
a Ford truck. I don't know if their roads are
wide enough for it. But hell, they're be available if
(16:36):
they want them, and even if they don't want them,
Americans will still buy them. Right, Americans aren't gonna stop
buying Ford trucks anytime soon, especially not here in Texas.
It's the number one selling truck. We love Ford trucks,
it's insane. But hey, we might start getting cheaper Ford
trucks because the global demand is a little bit lower.
But we're gonna end up seeing from this long term
is exactly what I've been saying. We're gonna end up
(16:57):
seeing for a long time. We're gonna see the stock
market going up and down a little bit. Just don't
pan excel and you'll be fine. But long term, we're
gonna be way better off. We're gonna have more manufacturing
jobs in the United States. These Midwest towns that are
dirt poor all the time, good paying factory jobs will
go back to those towns. Those towns that they left
will create stronger partnerships with countries that actually share our values.
(17:21):
And hey, on top of that, we may actually end
up seeing some prices will get cheaper because there's less
global demand for them. Who knows. I mean, it's hard
to predict exactly where all this will go, exactly where
all the trips will fall. But one thing is for sure.
It's not gonna be a major economic disaster. It's not
gonna be the end of the world. You'll be fine.
You will You'll probably be better off. You'll almost definitely
(17:43):
be better off in the long term. So just hey,
think long term. Let's wait and see what happens six months,
a year, two years down the road. All right, stay tune, we.
Speaker 5 (17:50):
Got another segment coming right after this.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
All right, we got to talk a little bit more
about ki Abrego Garcia. I talked a lot about this
on the Wednesday podcast episode. Remember we're here Sundays at
seven live on AM nine fifty KPRC, but we do
a Wednesday podcast as well, kind of a bonus show,
so go check that out. And last Wednesday We talked
in depth about this guy and what's going on with this,
(18:37):
and the left will not let this go. I don't
understand this. I think it's a symptom of the fact
that they've really got nothing going on right now. Their
entire party platform right now, the Democrat Party platform is
essentially just whatever Trump is doing where against that. That's it.
That's their whole identity. They have no issues to run on.
Their big issue was abortion. That didn't win them anything.
(19:00):
People really don't care as much about that as they
were hoping they would. So now just whatever Trump does,
that's bad, and that's gonna be our whole personality. So
Trump deported this guy, Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He was an
illegal alien. We know that he's been portrayed as a
Maryland man, a Maryland father, Ladi Dodi Dad. I've heard
people online saying that he was in fact here legally,
(19:22):
that he was a citizen, even he's not a citizen.
He was not here legally. He was an illegal alien.
He was also a member of MS thirteen. I think
we're all familiar with what MS thirteen is, a very violent,
dangerous El Salvadorian street gang slash cartel terrible, terrible group
of people. We know this guy was a member of
MS thirteen. This is not disputed. The Left will dispute this,
(19:44):
but they don't back that up with anything. Meanwhile, we've
got two different judges that say, yes, he was a
member of MS thirteen. We've got pictures of him with
his MS thirteen gang tattoos. There are certain tattoos that
are associated with certain gangs. We know this, and we
know that this guy I had them. There's pictures of
him with the MS thirteen gang tattoos on his fingers.
Despite all of this, this guy has become a darling
(20:08):
for the left. I mean, we've got US senators going
to El Salvador to visit with this guy who has
been deported. They've done this whole bit about how maybe
El Salvador took this guy in and then just killed him.
Maybe Sakote, which is the big terrorist prison that El
Salvador has put their gang members in, maybe that's just
a big death camp, Lottie dot Ida. And so this
(20:30):
US senator went over there and he talked a big
game about how he was going to demand a meeting
with Naibukeley, who's the president of El Salvador and demand
to see proof of life. Take a listen to him
before he went on his trip. This was, I believe Wednesday.
This is him in the airport talking about what he's
gonna do here in El Salvador.
Speaker 6 (20:49):
I'm here at the airport. I'm about to board my
flight for San Salvador. The goal of this mission is
to let the Trump administration to let the government of
Al Salvador know that we are going to keep fighting
to bring Albrego Garcia home until he returns to his family.
I hope to meet with representatives of the government. I
(21:11):
hope to have the chance to actually see kill Mar
and see what his condition is. But we are going
to keep fighting because this is a miscarriage of justice.
The Supreme Court has ruled nine to zero, nine to
zero that he was illegally taken out of the country
and put in a prison in Al Salvador. And this
(21:34):
is about due process. This is about rule of law.
What bullies do is they begin by picking on the
most vulnerable. But if we get rid of the rule
of law, due process the United States, it's a short
road from there to tyranny.
Speaker 1 (21:48):
That's Maryland Senator Chris Van Holland blatantly mischaracterizing what the
Supreme courtse ht. That is not what the Supreme courtse said.
What the Supreme Court said is because Abrego Garcia had
a previous request that had been granted to be deported
to somewhere other than El Salvador. If El Salvador agrees
to release him, we have to facilitate his transportation back
(22:09):
to the United States so that we can then fill
out the paperwork to deport him somewhere else. He will
not be staying in the United States even if El
Salvador agrees to release him, which as we talked about
on Wednesday, they will not. And again, I have yet
to hear any argument as to why Garcia should be
in the United States. He's not a citizen, he's not
here legally. We know this. What right does he have
(22:31):
to be in the United States. No Democrat can answer
that question. Even if this guy wasn't a terrible person,
which he is and will get into that in a minute,
he still has no right to be in the United States.
He's in El Salvador. That's his home country, that's where
he belongs, that's where he's a citizen. That's where he
has the legal right to be, and he seems to
be doing fine for himself. He's not being starved to
(22:51):
death in a terrible El Salvadorian Nazi death camp, which
is what has been characterized. Chris van Holland posted an
image of him meeting with Abrago Garcia. He was allowed
to meet with a Brego Garcia, who is doing just fine.
He has not lost a bunch of weight. He's clearly
eating just fine. He's a plump guy for sure. He's
(23:11):
sitting down with Kilmar Abrego Garcia and he's doing just fine.
He posted on Twitter, along with a picture of him
with a Brigo Garcia. I said, my main goal of
this trip was to meet with Kilmar tonight I had
that chance. I have called his wife, Jennifer, to pass
along his message of love. I look forward to providing
a full update upon my return. All right, So, if
you only had Chris Van Holland's take here, it would
(23:34):
look like this guy is a great guy who should
never have been deported at all. But he should have
and he was. And here's the other thing. He was
not a great guy. This dude was, by all available accounts,
a terrible, terrible person. Again, we know that he's a
member of MS thirteen. We know that two different courts
have said that Van Holland posted on his Twitter. A
(23:55):
federal judge said, no evidence before the court connects at
Brego Garcia to M thirteen or any criminal organization. Two
other federal judges, immigration judges, I believe, both said, yeah,
he's a member of MS thirteen. This is not disputed.
And even if two federal judges hadn't said that, we've
got ample photos of Kilmore Garcia with clearly visible MS
(24:19):
thirteen gang tattoos on his fingers. So MS thirteen has
basically these code tattoos that are supposed to summarize MS
thirteen that they tattoo on their fingers. So one finger
will have the marijuana leaf and that represents the M
and MS thirteen. The other will have a smiley face
with crossed out eyes. That's the S in MS thirteen,
(24:41):
and then a cross for the one and a skull
for the three. This is well known to be the
marker of Hey, this guy's an MS thirteen member. This
is well known in El Salvador. It's not like Garcia
just got these tattoos and he didn't know that that's
what that was. He just thought they looked cool. No,
he's from El Salvador, grew up in this culture. He
(25:01):
knows what these tattoos mean. You don't get these unless
you're a member of MS thirteen. You just don't. So
even if two separate courts hadn't ruled that he was
a member of MS thirteen, we have these tattoos that
clearly show that he is a member of MS thirteen.
As if that wasn't bad enough, we now know that
he's also a wife beater. So the Left has been
going around portraying him as this family man who's just
(25:22):
in the United States in Maryland to make a living
for his family and you know, do right by his
wife and child, the wife who, by the way, we
now know he's been beating. At one point, this wife
had a protective order placed against him. Now the Left
has been carting her around, putting her on TV to
cry about the fact that her husband has been deported,
but she has no interest in talking about the fact
(25:44):
that she had a protective order placed against him because
he was beating her. She was actually asked about this
by ABC. She did an interview with ABC News and
the reporter asked her, Okay, so what about the fact
that you had a restraining order placed against your husband
or protective order? And she just completely dodges the question.
Speaker 7 (26:03):
I have to ask it you did take out a
temporary order of protection against your husband in twenty twenty one?
Were you in fear of your husband?
Speaker 8 (26:12):
Husband is alive?
Speaker 1 (26:14):
That's all I can say.
Speaker 7 (26:18):
Okay, then you know I'm not going to push on that, apparently,
but how much hope?
Speaker 1 (26:23):
Okay, that's not an answer at all. Are you in
fear of your husband? My husband is alive? That's all
I can say. What do you mean You've been going
around on national television telling everybody in the country you
want this criminal, illegal alien back in the country. Meanwhile,
this is the same guy that was beating you. We've
got the police reports. Again, this is undisputed. We have
(26:44):
the core documents. We know this happened. If you're going
to make the case that we should ignore the immigration
laws in this country so that we can bring a
man who beat you back into the United States, I
think it's fair to ask why. Some explanation here would
be nice. Why why should we bring this guy back?
But this is just where things get started. Turns out
(27:06):
this guy has got a decently sized rap sheet. Take
a listen to Donald Trump reading off all the facts
in the case about this guy, all of the reasons
that we don't want him in the country. Again. The
left will tell you this is just a Maryland father.
It's not. This guy is criminal. He's a vile person
and he should not be here. Take a listen here
from the President.
Speaker 8 (27:23):
In twenty nineteen, Garcia was issued a deportation order.
Speaker 1 (27:27):
When Garcia was originally arrested, he was wearing.
Speaker 8 (27:29):
A sweatshirt with rolls of money pouring out, an MSD
and an MS thirteen gang symbol that he was driving
with two other known violent MS thirteen gang members, two
of the most violent members that we know in the
MS thirteen gang of thoughts. In twenty twenty two, Garcia
(27:50):
was stopped by the Tennessee Highway patroller was found to
be transporting seven people from Texas to Maryland, and he
had no driver's license, driving violently. In twenty twenty and
twenty twenty one, Garcia's wife filed for a protective order
from him and said he was violent and abuse it
and really scary. This is the man that the Democrats
(28:13):
are wanting us to fly back from El Salvador to
be a happily ensconced member of the USA family.
Speaker 1 (28:21):
It's worth noting that MSNBC was carrying this press conference,
and the moment Donald Trump started reading off that list
of things that he had done wrong, they cut away.
They're actively trying to hide the fact that this guy
was a terrible person because they want him in this country.
I don't know why. I don't understand why they want
him in this country, but they do. This is the
Democrat Party. This is who they're going to bat for.
(28:43):
Kilmarro Brego Garcia, a wife beater, domestic abuser, MS thirteen
gang member. I don't get it, but hey, let's see
how this works out for you. Make this your entire
personality and see what you win in the midterms. All Right,
stay tune. We got one more secment coming up right
after this break. All Right. I told you a little
(29:16):
bit ago. The left's whole identity right now is whatever
Trump is doing, we're doing the opposite. That includes fighting
the rising rates of autism. I know, I was just
as surprised as you were, but that's the left's whole thing. Now.
We want every kid to have autism. I guess. So
here's how this came about. RFK Junior came out and he's,
(29:37):
you know, his whole thing is, we need to figure
out why so many more children now than in previous
years have autism the rates keep skyrocketing. Is that linked
to maybe the fluoride in the water where the only
country that has this massive autism problem. Where the only
country that is doing fluoride in the water. We know
we're eating unhealthy things. What is that doing to us?
(29:57):
What's the connection here? We've got to figure this out.
That's RFK Junior's whole thing. So he goes out the
other day and he gives this big press conference about
autism and it rising and how bad it is that
we have so many children with such severe autism in
the United States. I want you to take a listen
to this press conference, and then we're going to dig
into the leftist reaction to this press conference, because nothing
(30:19):
that RFK Junior says here is controversial, and yet the
left wants to crucify him for this. Take a listen.
Speaker 4 (30:26):
This is an individual tragedy as well. Autism destroys families.
More importantly, it destroys our greatest resource, which are our children.
These are children who should not be who should not
be suffering like this. These are kids who, many of them,
were fully functional and regressed because of some environmental exposure
(30:50):
into autism when they're two years old. And these are
kids who will never pay taxes, they'll never hold a job, Bob,
I'll never play baseball, they'll never write a poem, they'll
never go out on a date. Many of them will
never use a toilet unassisted. And we have to recognize
(31:14):
we are doing this to our children.
Speaker 1 (31:16):
Okay, obviously this is true and bad. There are huge
numbers of nonverbal, debilitatingly autistic people. It's a tragedy and
it's bad, and we've got to figure out why it
keeps happening and why it's happening more and more. This
shouldn't be controversial, but if you're the left and your
entire personality is anything Trump or the Trump administration says,
we're going to go to all out war to confront
(31:39):
this is RFK Junior just committed a carnal sin. For
two days, they've been talking about this clip and how
terrible it is. Somebody reposted it and said I'm just
seeing this now. These kinds of comments coming from a
cabinet secretary are totally unacceptable. It's obvious that RFK Junior
views autistic people as sub human. He views autism as
(31:59):
something shane. It's not okay. Did RFK Junior say that
in that clip? No he didn't, And there's not like
there's missing context. I'm playing you the direct clip that
he reposted. Everything you heard is what this guy saw.
Did rf K Junior say that, No he didn't. What
he said was this is a tragedy, and it is sure.
(32:19):
There are some high functioning autistic people who are able
to live normal lives in society, maybe even above normal,
because they've been able to hone their autism in order
to benefit off of it. That does happen. And if
you're one of those people, great, RFK Junior is clearly
not talking about you. Somebody else commented, I have at
least four students in one of my college classes who
(32:42):
have spoken about their autism. They are scholars, artist, producers,
et cetera. It's incredibly insulting to categorize them as RFK
Junior did. Okay if you think RFK Junior is talking
about those people. You're an idiot, you just are. He's
clearly not referring to those people. He is clearly referring
to the people in the United States who do exist,
who are debilitatingly autistic, nonverbal types. They cannot function because
(33:05):
of how severe their autism is. That's what he's talking about.
That's obviously who he's talking about. But the Left is
trying to pull a controversy out of nowhere. That's all
they do is they look for somebody to say something
completely normal and uncontroversial, and then the first thing in
their mind is how can we spark up national outrage
over this. It's absolutely ridiculous. But something that did come
(33:26):
out of this is I saw somebody talking about his
brother Eric, who does have debilitating autism. He actually brings
up the fact that, like, hey, you guys are trying
to crucify RFK Junior for saying something completely uncontroversial and true.
Here's why RFK Junior is actually completely right. Take a
listen to this clip.
Speaker 9 (33:44):
This is my brother Eric, Eric say hi.
Speaker 3 (33:47):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
Eric can't say hi. He's nonverbal.
Speaker 9 (33:50):
About twenty five thirty percent of people with autism like
Eric are nonverbal, and what we'd like to do is
just figure out why the rate of autism is increased
and get to the bottom of what causes autism.
Speaker 1 (34:04):
Eric sound good, Oh good good.
Speaker 9 (34:08):
Eric will never work a job, never pay taxes. And
my mom took care of him for thirty years, and
it's extremely tough, extremely tough burden for a mom to
take care of a child like Eric for thirty years,
when most people cannot take care of a child for
eighteen years as well as my mom did for myself
and Eric for thirty it's crazy and we just want
(34:29):
to figure out why. So this is what people with
autism are like. They're rarely like love on the spectrum.
It's just not like that. But fortunately we're at Saint
Augustine's Center for Living and Eric has a decent life
living here with all these animals.
Speaker 1 (34:47):
It's pretty good.
Speaker 9 (34:47):
Things turned out pretty well, but we'd still like to
figure out what causes it so that most people don't
have autism like Eric.
Speaker 1 (34:56):
That's who AREFK. Junior is talking about. He's not talking
about your gift friend in your college class who's really
good at math because of his autism and is living
a great life because he's a math genius. He's talking
about the people that can't function without constant supervision. I mean,
we've had cases of this that have made national headlines.
There's stories about a guy who was so autistic that
(35:17):
when his teacher in class tried to take his Nintendo switch,
he beat her nearly to death just because his brain
does not have the ability to function without that Nintendo switch. Obviously,
that's something that we don't want in society. We don't
want people to have to deal with that. So figuring
out what caused him to have that disease that I
(35:38):
think we can all agree he's a victim of that disease.
Nobody's saying he's a bad person because of this disease.
We're saying he's a victim. We need to figure out
what victimized him and how we can stop that from happening.
But that's controversial because the Left is desperate to find
anything to slam the Trump administration with, and again they
(36:00):
have nothing. This is not going to work for them.
This disappeared just as quickly as it arrived because people
realized this is stupid again. Trump and the Trump administration
is doing a whole bunch of things that I think
most Americans are on board with we want less people
to be suffering from autism. We want less illegal aliens, criminal,
(36:21):
violent illegal aliens in this country. We want American jobs
to come back, and for us to not be reliant
on China, who is a hostile power. For everything. This
isn't controversial, but what the left does is they cherry
pick individual cases. Oh, we accidentally sent this guy to
El Salvador when he should have been sent to a
different country. Oh. RK Junior said this thing that we
(36:42):
can totally cut out and misconstrue as him attacking people
with autism. And what they do is they try to
blow those up without context and make you hate Trump
for doing normal things. Make you hate the Trump administration
for doing normal things. I don't think it's going to work.
I just don't. Most people are smart enough to see
through that. You should be smart enough to see through that. Again,
(37:05):
go and look at the context, look at everything they're
not telling you about all of these instances where they
want you to be outrage, and what you'll find is
you probably shouldn't be all that outrage. Watch the portions
of the press conference that MSNBC cuts away from, and
what you're realize is everything they've been telling you for
years is a lie, all of it. Trump is not
(37:26):
half as controversial as they want him to be. But
they don't have any policies that they can run on,
and so they're going to run on Trump being controversial,
and they'll manufacture Trump being controversial in order to facilitate that.
That's what they've been doing for years. They're not going
to stop anytime soon. So don't fall for it. Just
don't listen to them. Tune into shows like this one
where we don't sensationalize, we give you the context and
(37:48):
we try to think long term. That will be the
ultimate death blow to the left. If all of America
does that, they will completely fall apart. And I think
we are seeing that. I think a lot of people
are finally starting to wake up. The mainstream media is
clearly losing their grip on society. That's why Trump has
a fifty four percent approval rating right now. According to
the Daily Mail. They did this poll. This came out
(38:09):
I think on actually Tuesday. Despite everything, despite the Left
claiming that Kilmar Albergado Garcia is a great person who
needs to be in this country and Trump is a villain,
for deporting him. Despite the left claiming that Trump is
going to destroy the global economy with tariffs, the claims
that Trump and the Trump administration hate autistic people and
see them as less than human, nobody's buying that. People
(38:32):
see what Trump is doing, they see the fact that
he's working for the American people, and they like it.
I like it. Hey, keep going, I'm all in here,
all right. That's all I've got for you this week. Again,
this is the Next Gen Report. Go listen to the podcast.
If you missed anything this episode, you can find me
on x Underscore Ethan Buchanan. I'd love to get in
touch with you. I hope you enjoyed the show. We'll
be back on Wednesday with more podcasts, and we'll be
(38:54):
back next Sunday at seven right here on AM nine
to fifty KPRC
Speaker 4 (39:00):
Home up there in school,
Hey, good evening, everybody, welcome in pleasure to be with you.
If you tuned in for the Verdict with Ted Cruz,
I'm afraid you just missed it, just missed it so close.
Now you get me. Hi, my name is Ethan Buchannon.
This is the Next General Record. It's a pleasure to
be with you this evening. We have got a lot
to talk about. So don't tune out just because I'm
not said cruise. Stick around. We've got a really great show.
(00:52):
It's a pleasure to be here every Sunday night at seven.
If you want to get a little bit of background
after you listen to this episode line because you shouldn't
tune out, as I've already said, feel free to go
check out the podcast, The Next Gen Report. It's wherever
you get your podcasts. I'd love to have you listen.
You can find me on Twitter at Underscore Ethan Buchanan.
I'm very active there. That's my favorite place to go
(01:14):
and talk about all of the different issues that matter
and a lot of the issues that don't. There's a
lot of issues that really don't matter that I talk
about anyway. Frankly, because I'm a rambler. I'm a rambling man.
Let's open up tonight though, with something that does matter.
This is a breaking story that I think came out
on Thursday. Letitia James. Y'all remember her. She's the New
(01:37):
York Attorney General. She made a name for herself going
after Donald Trump. Right, we're all familiar with this, the
law fair that we saw for years. She was the
no one is above the la Letitia James. That's her. Well, surprise, surprise,
those words are coming back to haunt her. I want
to give you a quick reminder. The case that Letitia
James brought against Donald Trump is the one back in
(01:58):
twenty twenty two where he was based accused of inflating
the value of mar A Lago so that he could
then get better loans for his businesses. Right, and he
got found guilty of that. Some goofy judge and Goron
ruled that his mar A Lago property was worth fractions
and fractions of what it's actually worth. I mean, that's
(02:19):
a multi billion dollar property. They ruled that it was
worth maybe a couple million with an M. It's ridiculous.
It's a ridiculous on its face case. The reason I'm
bringing it up now is because the whole allegation was
that Donald Trump was basically lying about his properties. Here's
why that's important. Letitia James is now being accused of,
get this, lying about her properties. Here's the report from
(02:41):
the New York Post. Letitia James dodges questions about mortgage
fraud's scandal outside New York City home, pretends to be
on the phone. According to a letter obtained by the Post, James,
who draws an annual salary of two hundred and twenty
thousand dollars, allegedly falsified records to get a sweetheart home
loan for a Virginia property, actually loans ltiple properties for
Virginia properties she claimed as her principal residence in twenty
(03:04):
twenty three, while she was still serving as the New
York State prosecutor. Now, listen, I am no real estate expert,
but I'm fairly confident that you cannot be primarily living
in the state of Virginia while serving as the Attorney
General for the state of New York. I could be wrong.
I don't know how real estate works. I don't know
(03:25):
how the different policies of these two states work, but
I would imagine, and this is just me guessing. Because
I've never been in an attorney general I would imagine
that if you're the attorney general for a state, you
should probably live in that state, right. That seems fair
and reasonable. That seems like it should be a no brainer.
As far as I'm aware, Ken Paxton, the attorney General
for Texas, lives here in Texas. I'm not aware of
(03:48):
him moving to Oklahoma or something like that. So if
she's listing these Virginia properties as her primary estate, her
primary home, that's a little bit weird, right, That's worth
looking into it. At the very least, Why would you
list that as your primary residence. Now, I have no
problem with her owning properties in other states. I like
(04:09):
the idea of real estate investing. I hope to get
into it myself one day. If you want to use
some money from your main job as the attorney general
to buy some real estate in other parts of the countries,
and you know, maybe rent that out for a profit,
by all means, God bless you, go for it. But
if you're lying in order to do that for cheap okay,
well that's a problem. The allegation here is basically she's
(04:32):
lying on these forms to get sweetheart loans and mortgages
so that she can rake in extra profit from I
guess renting these places out. That's what seems to be happening.
But what this really tells me is, at the end
of the day, the prosecution against Donald Trump was not
the moral high ground stance that the luff was trying
to tell you. It was. This kind of makes the
case once and for all that all these different prosecutions
(04:55):
against Donald Trump were and always have been just politically motivated.
They tried to tell you this was all about making
sure nobody was above the law, But the lady telling
you that was essentially doing the same exact thing as
she's trying to prosecute Donald Trump for doing. What's really
funny here is to watch her basically unravel at this.
I mean, she gives me the vibes of somebody who
(05:16):
knows that they're caught. She's looking at this, she is
watching it all collapse. That's what it seems like. Take
a listen to this video from her press conference that
she did. She's trying to be all defiant and confidence,
but it really just seems like she's panicking. That's what
this looks like to me. Take a listen to this.
She sounds crazy here.
Speaker 2 (05:33):
Frankly, my mission is clear. I'm focused, I'm prepared, I'm ready.
I've been trained by the best. I went to Howard
University that overturned legal segregation in this country. I've been
taught in those classrooms with their good Marshall once taught
(05:55):
I'm not afraid of no President Donald Trump.
Speaker 1 (05:59):
We're ready for you.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
We're coming for you, We're standing up for you.
Speaker 1 (06:03):
We're fighting on. We're not going down.
Speaker 2 (06:06):
Sailing victory, my friends is claim.
Speaker 1 (06:09):
It's now and I'm not waiting four years.
Speaker 3 (06:12):
I'm waiting two.
Speaker 1 (06:14):
I tell us to speak about the name of h.
Speaker 3 (06:16):
King.
Speaker 2 (06:16):
Jeffries comes to bring us some rest. Come on, ladies,
it's up to us. We saved this democracy before, we'll
save it now.
Speaker 3 (06:26):
Let's go.
Speaker 1 (06:30):
Man, you were just indicted for mortgage fraud. What exactly
do you think is happening here? I mean this reads
like a civil rights rally. But you can see in
her face if you watch the video I reposted it yesterday,
go look at it on my ex page. You can
see the panic in her eyes as she screams, I
went to Howard University and she's pounding on her chest. Ladies,
(06:50):
We're gonna save democracy, ladies. What does ladies have to
do with it. You didn't get a criminal referral because
you're a woman. You got a criminal referral because you
were allegedly committing more fraud and lying about your primary residence. Again,
I don't know why she would do that, but it's
worth looking into. Right, that's not something you do on accident.
You don't mistakenly list your primary residence in the wrong state.
(07:13):
There's something going on here. But the real point is
the Democrats love to do this moral high ground act,
and they do it to great effect. Oftentimes I'll give
them credit for it, but what I want people to
understand is that it's lies. It's always lies. The same
people that are swearing up and down that they have
the moral high ground they never do. They're always doing
(07:33):
the same things, if not worse things as what they're
accusing the Republicans of. It's ridiculous and hopefully this is
kind of the last straw and we stop seeing that.
All right, stay tuned, we got a great show coming
up for you right after this break. Al Right, it
(08:13):
looks like we've got some pretty big tariff news. I
saw this a whole bunch on Twitter yesterday. Looks like
Ford is stopping shipments of Mustangs, Raptors, and Broncos to
China as retaliation to Beijing's tariffs on American goods. So basically,
what we're doing to China, China is trying to do
(08:34):
to us. Right, We're saying, hey, if you're gonna sell
your goods that you manufacture over there, you're gonna pay
a little bit extra because that's costing us manufacturing jobs. Right.
If we're buying goods from China, that means we're not
buying goods from the United States, which means goods aren't
being made in the United States, which means the people
who would be employed to make those goods they're not
getting employed. Right, everybody followed the concept here For some reason,
(08:57):
this is incredibly complicated to people my age, which may
there's no sense to me. This is common sense people think, think.
So essentially what's happened is Trump puts tariff on China,
China puts tariff on the United States. United States company
like Ford says, hey, we make a bunch of Fords
here in the United States, and we ship them over
to China. We're not gonna be doing that anymore because
it's not profitable. There's no money in it because we're
(09:17):
paying extra tariffs. We'll just sell our cars here in
the United States. We get more money here anyway. Now,
let me explain to you why this will, in the
long run, I think, be a good thing for you.
Let's say you're in the market for a car in
a couple of years. Down the road, Ford has a
bunch of cars that they didn't export to China, right,
So what does that mean? That means the supplies though, Now,
what do we know about pricing. Pricing is the intersection
(09:40):
of supply and demand, all right. Whatever the supply is,
whatever the demand is. Where those two lines cross, that's
the price. So if your supply goes way up and
your demand hasn't changed, what does that mean. It means
your price comes down because you got a bunch of
cars and you just got to sell them, all right,
So you start cutting deals left and right. Now we
have yet to see what some of the other market
factors are. But I'm looking at this and I'm saying, hey,
it looks like in a couple of months we'll have
(10:01):
some nice cheap forward trucks, maybe a little bit longer,
because again, Ford has extra supply.
Speaker 3 (10:07):
Now.
Speaker 1 (10:07):
Of course, current trends will have to continue for that
to really take effect. It looks like China and Trump
have been talking, so we could see a deal here
pretty soon. That's what Trump thinks. He said recently. Fox
News reported this that China has been calling them a lot,
and they're looking to make a deal in like the
next three weeks. That was his estimate three weeks. And
(10:29):
that makes perfect sense because listen, at the end of
the day, they need Americans to buy. They do. Their
entire economy is based off of them manufacturing and exporting.
That's where they get the vast majority of their money.
There's a strong argument to be made that if we
stop buying from them, that entire country completely collapses. So
despite Jijenping's big boy talk about how we're gonna keep
(10:51):
raising tariffs on the US as long as they raise
tariffs on us, they're scared right now. I almost guarantee
you they're scared right now. They want to say face,
but they want to cut a deal and more. I
imagine Trump's probably right. We're only a couple weeks away.
From some sort of big announcement with China. I mean,
as Trump points out, we have something that nobody else has,
and that's the American consumer. Now, the other big concern
(11:12):
with tariffs that we've heard from the left is that
this is basically going to ruin the United States standing
on the global stage. All of our allies are going
to start hating us because we're tariffing them, and they're
going to realign closer to China, and I will just
sell more to these other countries that basically cut the
United States out because of Donald Trump's tariffs. That's been
the concern. This was baseless the entire time. We all
(11:35):
have known this, but the left has kept pushing it,
and so here we are. What we found is that
actually the exact opposite is happening. All of these countries
are saying, Okay, yeah, you're right, we have been kind
of screwing you over on trade, putting massive tariffs on
your products that you haven't put on our products until
just now. And what we've actually seen is all these
(11:57):
other countries that are actually concerned with the long term
benefit of the Western world have actually said, okay, yeah,
we actually do need to kind of closer a ligne
and be more even. That's what we saw from Georgia Maloney,
who's the Prime Minister of Italy. She came and she
had a big sit down with Trump. This is, of course,
right after the Japanese trade team came and had a
(12:18):
big sit down with Trump. Shockingly, everybody's come to negotiate,
just like Donald Trump predicted. Who could have seen this coming? Anyway,
Here's what Georgia Maloney had to say. A reporter basically
tried to kind of goat her into, I guess, shooting
herself in the foot in terms of negotiations, because the
European Union and the European Trade Commission they've been talking
(12:40):
big about how terrible what Donald Trump is doing and
how they're gonna retaliate and stand up for themselves, and
Lottie Dotti da Georgia Maloney of Italy has been actually
trying to cut a deal. She's like, hey, we have
mutual interests. We're both you know, Western countries, we have
shared values, shared goals. Let's work together. Let's cut a deal.
And the reporter askwer, okay, well, what about the European
(13:02):
Trade Commission. You guys are a part of that what
then take a listen to her answer.
Speaker 4 (13:06):
Here the retaliatory tariffs that the European Commission has and
then suspended, are they still on the table if you
cannot make a deal with President trupt.
Speaker 3 (13:15):
I'm sure we can make a deal, and I'm here
to help on that I cannot locally deal in the
name of the European Union. My goal would be invited
President Trump to pay an efficient visit to Italy and
understand if there's a possibility when it comes to organize
also such a meeting with Europe. For I think the
(13:36):
best way is that we simply speak frankly about the
needs that every one of us is and.
Speaker 1 (13:42):
Find ourselves in the middle. For that's useful for all.
Speaker 3 (13:45):
I really somebody calls me such a Western nationalism. I
don't know if it is the right word, but I'm
sure that together we are stronger, and I have to.
Speaker 1 (13:57):
Find a way.
Speaker 3 (13:58):
I'm here to find the best way to make us
both stronger on the two shores.
Speaker 1 (14:02):
Of their Plante. I love that answer because she's just
sitting there like, of course we're gonna cut a deal.
What do you mean is this on the table if
we don't cut a deal? I don't know what's on
the table if we don't cut a deal, because we're
gonna cut a deal. We have shared interest we have
shared goals, we have shared history. This is one of
my favorite things about Georgia Maloney. She mentioned it just
then that people have been calling her a Western nationalist
(14:23):
just because she recognizes the shared history, shared values, and
shared interests of Western nations. The fact of the matter
is she's right about this. I want us all to
remember where the United States came from. The United States
is an offshoot, basically the child of the British Empire.
Where did the British Empire come from? It came directly
(14:45):
from the Roman Empire. It was the Roman Empire that
civilized Europe, civilized Great Britain, and led to the creation
of the British Empire. The British Empire expanded and led
to the creation of the United States, which is now
its own empire. I mean, just look at how our
government works and you can clearly see the deep historical
connections between our traditions and our way of government and Italy.
(15:08):
I tend to be of the opinion that it is
good and beneficial for us to closely align with countries
that sort of share our history and values and way
of doing things, like Italy does. I like that. So
if we can get people to detach as much as
possible from China, which is a communist, evil dictatorship, and
realign with countries that share our Western values, I think
(15:30):
that's a good thing. I think more Western countries should
be dependent on each other than they are on China.
And that's what we've sort of seen from behind the
scenes on all these tariffs, with all the big talking,
everybody still has been going and cutting deals with Donald
Trump because again, they want access to the American consumer.
We have so much money in the United States. The
average American is way richer than the average person from
(15:51):
most other countries. So if you want to sell more
of your product at the highest price, you come to
the United States. It's a no brainer. And so basically
what we've seen so far with these tariffs, and again
it's still early, so things could change, but I don't
think they will too much. What we've started to see
is sort of a global realignment away from Chinese manufacturing
and instead they're coming to the United States and looking
(16:12):
to make deals. And of course, on top of that,
we've had American manufacturing come back. I think that's more
great news. If people start buying our stuff, that would
be fantastic. If we can start cutting some trade deals
and maybe selling some Fords out to other countries like Italy.
I don't know. I don't know if they would want
a Ford truck. I don't know if their roads are
wide enough for it. But hell, they're be available if
(16:36):
they want them, and even if they don't want them,
Americans will still buy them. Right, Americans aren't gonna stop
buying Ford trucks anytime soon, especially not here in Texas.
It's the number one selling truck. We love Ford trucks,
it's insane. But hey, we might start getting cheaper Ford
trucks because the global demand is a little bit lower.
But we're gonna end up seeing from this long term
is exactly what I've been saying. We're gonna end up
(16:57):
seeing for a long time. We're gonna see the stock
market going up and down a little bit. Just don't
pan excel and you'll be fine. But long term, we're
gonna be way better off. We're gonna have more manufacturing
jobs in the United States. These Midwest towns that are
dirt poor all the time, good paying factory jobs will
go back to those towns. Those towns that they left
will create stronger partnerships with countries that actually share our values.
(17:21):
And hey, on top of that, we may actually end
up seeing some prices will get cheaper because there's less
global demand for them. Who knows. I mean, it's hard
to predict exactly where all this will go, exactly where
all the trips will fall. But one thing is for sure.
It's not gonna be a major economic disaster. It's not
gonna be the end of the world. You'll be fine.
You will You'll probably be better off. You'll almost definitely
(17:43):
be better off in the long term. So just hey,
think long term. Let's wait and see what happens six months,
a year, two years down the road. All right, stay tune, we.
Speaker 5 (17:50):
Got another segment coming right after this.
Speaker 1 (18:15):
All right, we got to talk a little bit more
about ki Abrego Garcia. I talked a lot about this
on the Wednesday podcast episode. Remember we're here Sundays at
seven live on AM nine fifty KPRC, but we do
a Wednesday podcast as well, kind of a bonus show,
so go check that out. And last Wednesday We talked
in depth about this guy and what's going on with this,
(18:37):
and the left will not let this go. I don't
understand this. I think it's a symptom of the fact
that they've really got nothing going on right now. Their
entire party platform right now, the Democrat Party platform is
essentially just whatever Trump is doing where against that. That's it.
That's their whole identity. They have no issues to run on.
Their big issue was abortion. That didn't win them anything.
(19:00):
People really don't care as much about that as they
were hoping they would. So now just whatever Trump does,
that's bad, and that's gonna be our whole personality. So
Trump deported this guy, Kilmar Abrego Garcia. He was an
illegal alien. We know that he's been portrayed as a
Maryland man, a Maryland father, Ladi Dodi Dad. I've heard
people online saying that he was in fact here legally,
(19:22):
that he was a citizen, even he's not a citizen.
He was not here legally. He was an illegal alien.
He was also a member of MS thirteen. I think
we're all familiar with what MS thirteen is, a very violent,
dangerous El Salvadorian street gang slash cartel terrible, terrible group
of people. We know this guy was a member of
MS thirteen. This is not disputed. The Left will dispute this,
(19:44):
but they don't back that up with anything. Meanwhile, we've
got two different judges that say, yes, he was a
member of MS thirteen. We've got pictures of him with
his MS thirteen gang tattoos. There are certain tattoos that
are associated with certain gangs. We know this, and we
know that this guy I had them. There's pictures of
him with the MS thirteen gang tattoos on his fingers.
Despite all of this, this guy has become a darling
(20:08):
for the left. I mean, we've got US senators going
to El Salvador to visit with this guy who has
been deported. They've done this whole bit about how maybe
El Salvador took this guy in and then just killed him.
Maybe Sakote, which is the big terrorist prison that El
Salvador has put their gang members in, maybe that's just
a big death camp, Lottie dot Ida. And so this
(20:30):
US senator went over there and he talked a big
game about how he was going to demand a meeting
with Naibukeley, who's the president of El Salvador and demand
to see proof of life. Take a listen to him
before he went on his trip. This was, I believe Wednesday.
This is him in the airport talking about what he's
gonna do here in El Salvador.
Speaker 6 (20:49):
I'm here at the airport. I'm about to board my
flight for San Salvador. The goal of this mission is
to let the Trump administration to let the government of
Al Salvador know that we are going to keep fighting
to bring Albrego Garcia home until he returns to his family.
I hope to meet with representatives of the government. I
(21:11):
hope to have the chance to actually see kill Mar
and see what his condition is. But we are going
to keep fighting because this is a miscarriage of justice.
The Supreme Court has ruled nine to zero, nine to
zero that he was illegally taken out of the country
and put in a prison in Al Salvador. And this
(21:34):
is about due process. This is about rule of law.
What bullies do is they begin by picking on the
most vulnerable. But if we get rid of the rule
of law, due process the United States, it's a short
road from there to tyranny.
Speaker 1 (21:48):
That's Maryland Senator Chris Van Holland blatantly mischaracterizing what the
Supreme courtse ht. That is not what the Supreme courtse said.
What the Supreme Court said is because Abrego Garcia had
a previous request that had been granted to be deported
to somewhere other than El Salvador. If El Salvador agrees
to release him, we have to facilitate his transportation back
(22:09):
to the United States so that we can then fill
out the paperwork to deport him somewhere else. He will
not be staying in the United States even if El
Salvador agrees to release him, which as we talked about
on Wednesday, they will not. And again, I have yet
to hear any argument as to why Garcia should be
in the United States. He's not a citizen, he's not
here legally. We know this. What right does he have
(22:31):
to be in the United States. No Democrat can answer
that question. Even if this guy wasn't a terrible person,
which he is and will get into that in a minute,
he still has no right to be in the United States.
He's in El Salvador. That's his home country, that's where
he belongs, that's where he's a citizen. That's where he
has the legal right to be, and he seems to
be doing fine for himself. He's not being starved to
(22:51):
death in a terrible El Salvadorian Nazi death camp, which
is what has been characterized. Chris van Holland posted an
image of him meeting with Abrago Garcia. He was allowed
to meet with a Brego Garcia, who is doing just fine.
He has not lost a bunch of weight. He's clearly
eating just fine. He's a plump guy for sure. He's
(23:11):
sitting down with Kilmar Abrego Garcia and he's doing just fine.
He posted on Twitter, along with a picture of him
with a Brigo Garcia. I said, my main goal of
this trip was to meet with Kilmar tonight I had
that chance. I have called his wife, Jennifer, to pass
along his message of love. I look forward to providing
a full update upon my return. All right, So, if
you only had Chris Van Holland's take here, it would
(23:34):
look like this guy is a great guy who should
never have been deported at all. But he should have
and he was. And here's the other thing. He was
not a great guy. This dude was, by all available accounts,
a terrible, terrible person. Again, we know that he's a
member of MS thirteen. We know that two different courts
have said that Van Holland posted on his Twitter. A
(23:55):
federal judge said, no evidence before the court connects at
Brego Garcia to M thirteen or any criminal organization. Two
other federal judges, immigration judges, I believe, both said, yeah,
he's a member of MS thirteen. This is not disputed.
And even if two federal judges hadn't said that, we've
got ample photos of Kilmore Garcia with clearly visible MS
(24:19):
thirteen gang tattoos on his fingers. So MS thirteen has
basically these code tattoos that are supposed to summarize MS
thirteen that they tattoo on their fingers. So one finger
will have the marijuana leaf and that represents the M
and MS thirteen. The other will have a smiley face
with crossed out eyes. That's the S in MS thirteen,
(24:41):
and then a cross for the one and a skull
for the three. This is well known to be the
marker of Hey, this guy's an MS thirteen member. This
is well known in El Salvador. It's not like Garcia
just got these tattoos and he didn't know that that's
what that was. He just thought they looked cool. No,
he's from El Salvador, grew up in this culture. He
(25:01):
knows what these tattoos mean. You don't get these unless
you're a member of MS thirteen. You just don't. So
even if two separate courts hadn't ruled that he was
a member of MS thirteen, we have these tattoos that
clearly show that he is a member of MS thirteen.
As if that wasn't bad enough, we now know that
he's also a wife beater. So the Left has been
going around portraying him as this family man who's just
(25:22):
in the United States in Maryland to make a living
for his family and you know, do right by his
wife and child, the wife who, by the way, we
now know he's been beating. At one point, this wife
had a protective order placed against him. Now the Left
has been carting her around, putting her on TV to
cry about the fact that her husband has been deported,
but she has no interest in talking about the fact
(25:44):
that she had a protective order placed against him because
he was beating her. She was actually asked about this
by ABC. She did an interview with ABC News and
the reporter asked her, Okay, so what about the fact
that you had a restraining order placed against your husband
or protective order? And she just completely dodges the question.
Speaker 7 (26:03):
I have to ask it you did take out a
temporary order of protection against your husband in twenty twenty one?
Were you in fear of your husband?
Speaker 8 (26:12):
Husband is alive?
Speaker 1 (26:14):
That's all I can say.
Speaker 7 (26:18):
Okay, then you know I'm not going to push on that, apparently,
but how much hope?
Speaker 1 (26:23):
Okay, that's not an answer at all. Are you in
fear of your husband? My husband is alive? That's all
I can say. What do you mean You've been going
around on national television telling everybody in the country you
want this criminal, illegal alien back in the country. Meanwhile,
this is the same guy that was beating you. We've
got the police reports. Again, this is undisputed. We have
(26:44):
the core documents. We know this happened. If you're going
to make the case that we should ignore the immigration
laws in this country so that we can bring a
man who beat you back into the United States, I
think it's fair to ask why. Some explanation here would
be nice. Why why should we bring this guy back?
But this is just where things get started. Turns out
(27:06):
this guy has got a decently sized rap sheet. Take
a listen to Donald Trump reading off all the facts
in the case about this guy, all of the reasons
that we don't want him in the country. Again. The
left will tell you this is just a Maryland father.
It's not. This guy is criminal. He's a vile person
and he should not be here. Take a listen here
from the President.
Speaker 8 (27:23):
In twenty nineteen, Garcia was issued a deportation order.
Speaker 1 (27:27):
When Garcia was originally arrested, he was wearing.
Speaker 8 (27:29):
A sweatshirt with rolls of money pouring out, an MSD
and an MS thirteen gang symbol that he was driving
with two other known violent MS thirteen gang members, two
of the most violent members that we know in the
MS thirteen gang of thoughts. In twenty twenty two, Garcia
(27:50):
was stopped by the Tennessee Highway patroller was found to
be transporting seven people from Texas to Maryland, and he
had no driver's license, driving violently. In twenty twenty and
twenty twenty one, Garcia's wife filed for a protective order
from him and said he was violent and abuse it
and really scary. This is the man that the Democrats
(28:13):
are wanting us to fly back from El Salvador to
be a happily ensconced member of the USA family.
Speaker 1 (28:21):
It's worth noting that MSNBC was carrying this press conference,
and the moment Donald Trump started reading off that list
of things that he had done wrong, they cut away.
They're actively trying to hide the fact that this guy
was a terrible person because they want him in this country.
I don't know why. I don't understand why they want
him in this country, but they do. This is the
Democrat Party. This is who they're going to bat for.
(28:43):
Kilmarro Brego Garcia, a wife beater, domestic abuser, MS thirteen
gang member. I don't get it, but hey, let's see
how this works out for you. Make this your entire
personality and see what you win in the midterms. All Right,
stay tune. We got one more secment coming up right
after this break. All Right. I told you a little
(29:16):
bit ago. The left's whole identity right now is whatever
Trump is doing, we're doing the opposite. That includes fighting
the rising rates of autism. I know, I was just
as surprised as you were, but that's the left's whole thing. Now.
We want every kid to have autism. I guess. So
here's how this came about. RFK Junior came out and he's,
(29:37):
you know, his whole thing is, we need to figure
out why so many more children now than in previous
years have autism the rates keep skyrocketing. Is that linked
to maybe the fluoride in the water where the only
country that has this massive autism problem. Where the only
country that is doing fluoride in the water. We know
we're eating unhealthy things. What is that doing to us?
(29:57):
What's the connection here? We've got to figure this out.
That's RFK Junior's whole thing. So he goes out the
other day and he gives this big press conference about
autism and it rising and how bad it is that
we have so many children with such severe autism in
the United States. I want you to take a listen
to this press conference, and then we're going to dig
into the leftist reaction to this press conference, because nothing
(30:19):
that RFK Junior says here is controversial, and yet the
left wants to crucify him for this. Take a listen.
Speaker 4 (30:26):
This is an individual tragedy as well. Autism destroys families.
More importantly, it destroys our greatest resource, which are our children.
These are children who should not be who should not
be suffering like this. These are kids who, many of them,
were fully functional and regressed because of some environmental exposure
(30:50):
into autism when they're two years old. And these are
kids who will never pay taxes, they'll never hold a job, Bob,
I'll never play baseball, they'll never write a poem, they'll
never go out on a date. Many of them will
never use a toilet unassisted. And we have to recognize
(31:14):
we are doing this to our children.
Speaker 1 (31:16):
Okay, obviously this is true and bad. There are huge
numbers of nonverbal, debilitatingly autistic people. It's a tragedy and
it's bad, and we've got to figure out why it
keeps happening and why it's happening more and more. This
shouldn't be controversial, but if you're the left and your
entire personality is anything Trump or the Trump administration says,
we're going to go to all out war to confront
(31:39):
this is RFK Junior just committed a carnal sin. For
two days, they've been talking about this clip and how
terrible it is. Somebody reposted it and said I'm just
seeing this now. These kinds of comments coming from a
cabinet secretary are totally unacceptable. It's obvious that RFK Junior
views autistic people as sub human. He views autism as
(31:59):
something shane. It's not okay. Did RFK Junior say that
in that clip? No he didn't, And there's not like
there's missing context. I'm playing you the direct clip that
he reposted. Everything you heard is what this guy saw.
Did rf K Junior say that, No he didn't. What
he said was this is a tragedy, and it is sure.
(32:19):
There are some high functioning autistic people who are able
to live normal lives in society, maybe even above normal,
because they've been able to hone their autism in order
to benefit off of it. That does happen. And if
you're one of those people, great, RFK Junior is clearly
not talking about you. Somebody else commented, I have at
least four students in one of my college classes who
(32:42):
have spoken about their autism. They are scholars, artist, producers,
et cetera. It's incredibly insulting to categorize them as RFK
Junior did. Okay if you think RFK Junior is talking
about those people. You're an idiot, you just are. He's
clearly not referring to those people. He is clearly referring
to the people in the United States who do exist,
who are debilitatingly autistic, nonverbal types. They cannot function because
(33:05):
of how severe their autism is. That's what he's talking about.
That's obviously who he's talking about. But the Left is
trying to pull a controversy out of nowhere. That's all
they do is they look for somebody to say something
completely normal and uncontroversial, and then the first thing in
their mind is how can we spark up national outrage
over this. It's absolutely ridiculous. But something that did come
(33:26):
out of this is I saw somebody talking about his
brother Eric, who does have debilitating autism. He actually brings
up the fact that, like, hey, you guys are trying
to crucify RFK Junior for saying something completely uncontroversial and true.
Here's why RFK Junior is actually completely right. Take a
listen to this clip.
Speaker 9 (33:44):
This is my brother Eric, Eric say hi.
Speaker 3 (33:47):
Oh.
Speaker 1 (33:48):
Eric can't say hi. He's nonverbal.
Speaker 9 (33:50):
About twenty five thirty percent of people with autism like
Eric are nonverbal, and what we'd like to do is
just figure out why the rate of autism is increased
and get to the bottom of what causes autism.
Speaker 1 (34:04):
Eric sound good, Oh good good.
Speaker 9 (34:08):
Eric will never work a job, never pay taxes. And
my mom took care of him for thirty years, and
it's extremely tough, extremely tough burden for a mom to
take care of a child like Eric for thirty years,
when most people cannot take care of a child for
eighteen years as well as my mom did for myself
and Eric for thirty it's crazy and we just want
(34:29):
to figure out why. So this is what people with
autism are like. They're rarely like love on the spectrum.
It's just not like that. But fortunately we're at Saint
Augustine's Center for Living and Eric has a decent life
living here with all these animals.
Speaker 1 (34:47):
It's pretty good.
Speaker 9 (34:47):
Things turned out pretty well, but we'd still like to
figure out what causes it so that most people don't
have autism like Eric.
Speaker 1 (34:56):
That's who AREFK. Junior is talking about. He's not talking
about your gift friend in your college class who's really
good at math because of his autism and is living
a great life because he's a math genius. He's talking
about the people that can't function without constant supervision. I mean,
we've had cases of this that have made national headlines.
There's stories about a guy who was so autistic that
(35:17):
when his teacher in class tried to take his Nintendo switch,
he beat her nearly to death just because his brain
does not have the ability to function without that Nintendo switch. Obviously,
that's something that we don't want in society. We don't
want people to have to deal with that. So figuring
out what caused him to have that disease that I
(35:38):
think we can all agree he's a victim of that disease.
Nobody's saying he's a bad person because of this disease.
We're saying he's a victim. We need to figure out
what victimized him and how we can stop that from happening.
But that's controversial because the Left is desperate to find
anything to slam the Trump administration with, and again they
(36:00):
have nothing. This is not going to work for them.
This disappeared just as quickly as it arrived because people
realized this is stupid again. Trump and the Trump administration
is doing a whole bunch of things that I think
most Americans are on board with we want less people
to be suffering from autism. We want less illegal aliens, criminal,
(36:21):
violent illegal aliens in this country. We want American jobs
to come back, and for us to not be reliant
on China, who is a hostile power. For everything. This
isn't controversial, but what the left does is they cherry
pick individual cases. Oh, we accidentally sent this guy to
El Salvador when he should have been sent to a
different country. Oh. RK Junior said this thing that we
(36:42):
can totally cut out and misconstrue as him attacking people
with autism. And what they do is they try to
blow those up without context and make you hate Trump
for doing normal things. Make you hate the Trump administration
for doing normal things. I don't think it's going to work.
I just don't. Most people are smart enough to see
through that. You should be smart enough to see through that. Again,
(37:05):
go and look at the context, look at everything they're
not telling you about all of these instances where they
want you to be outrage, and what you'll find is
you probably shouldn't be all that outrage. Watch the portions
of the press conference that MSNBC cuts away from, and
what you're realize is everything they've been telling you for
years is a lie, all of it. Trump is not
(37:26):
half as controversial as they want him to be. But
they don't have any policies that they can run on,
and so they're going to run on Trump being controversial,
and they'll manufacture Trump being controversial in order to facilitate that.
That's what they've been doing for years. They're not going
to stop anytime soon. So don't fall for it. Just
don't listen to them. Tune into shows like this one
where we don't sensationalize, we give you the context and
(37:48):
we try to think long term. That will be the
ultimate death blow to the left. If all of America
does that, they will completely fall apart. And I think
we are seeing that. I think a lot of people
are finally starting to wake up. The mainstream media is
clearly losing their grip on society. That's why Trump has
a fifty four percent approval rating right now. According to
the Daily Mail. They did this poll. This came out
(38:09):
I think on actually Tuesday. Despite everything, despite the Left
claiming that Kilmar Albergado Garcia is a great person who
needs to be in this country and Trump is a villain,
for deporting him. Despite the left claiming that Trump is
going to destroy the global economy with tariffs, the claims
that Trump and the Trump administration hate autistic people and
see them as less than human, nobody's buying that. People
(38:32):
see what Trump is doing, they see the fact that
he's working for the American people, and they like it.
I like it. Hey, keep going, I'm all in here,
all right. That's all I've got for you this week. Again,
this is the Next Gen Report. Go listen to the podcast.
If you missed anything this episode, you can find me
on x Underscore Ethan Buchanan. I'd love to get in
touch with you. I hope you enjoyed the show. We'll
be back on Wednesday with more podcasts, and we'll be
(38:54):
back next Sunday at seven right here on AM nine
to fifty KPRC
Speaker 4 (39:00):
Home up there in school,
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com