Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Colorado is free. You are free to leave. You know.
Speaker 2 (00:08):
Sometimes you ask for certain things and you get more
than you bargain for. You get way more than you
bargain for.
Speaker 1 (00:16):
All right, let's go back. I want to go back
to the fire. Now here's sorry. But we do get
what we pay for.
Speaker 2 (00:23):
Well, that's true, we do it, yes, right, Well, they
get the most glorious honor of all of being a voice.
Speaker 3 (00:29):
On this program, you know, get what they pay for.
Speaker 2 (00:32):
Right, they get to be part of the roes. So
to give you a roadmap of what may happen this hour,
I think something very historical is going to happen starting
at nine point thirty eastern, and that is a former
president of the United States of America and the president
elect of the United States of America that happens to
(00:53):
be the same person. Donald Trump is going to be
sentenced in a Manhattan courtroom room on thirty four felony charges. Now,
Judge Marshawan, who is I think horribly conflicted in this
case and should have had I don't know whether any
(01:18):
judicial commission complaints have been filed against him or not,
but someone should, including maybe Trump himself, but he should
have disqualified himself. He should have recused himself from this case,
but he failed to do so, refused to do so.
And I understand it's up to the judges to make
those decisions, but I think it's pretty clear that he
had a clear conflict of interest in this case because
(01:41):
his daughter was actively involved in fundraising for Kamala Harris
and for Joe Biden. In fact, the judge himself even
contributed to the Biden campaign, and this case was going
on during the campaign. So the judge should have said
he should have accused himself, but set to acide for Nonetheless,
(02:01):
in a case that I believe is I think most
legal lawyers believe will be overturned on appeal. Nonetheless, his
appeal for a stay to the US Supreme Court was
denied at about six pm our time last night, so
the case, the sentencing will proceed. Unlike the jury trial,
(02:25):
which the judge refused to allow cameras in, would only
allow courtroom sketch artists, and there was no audio made
that has been.
Speaker 1 (02:35):
Made publicly available, this same judge.
Speaker 2 (02:39):
For purely political reasons, will now allow the audio of
this sentencing to take place. We're assuming that Fox or
ABC or someone will carry it and we will dip
into it when it starts, and I want to carry
it live. Here's why I want you to hear, because
(03:03):
here's how here's how a sentencing usually takes place. You know,
they'll they'll call the the.
Speaker 1 (03:11):
Court to order. The judge will come in and be seated.
Speaker 2 (03:15):
He'll ask if you know the state's ready to proceed,
if the defense is ready to proceed, and then he'll
probably read at least a summary of the indictment. He'll,
you know, reiterate that the jury has found him guilty.
Now Trump's going to be down at mar Lago joining
this hearing by zoom or FaceTime or something. And unlike
(03:43):
the trial, the judge is now going to speak, and
I think he's going.
Speaker 1 (03:48):
To lambast Trump.
Speaker 2 (03:51):
I think he's going to reading the Riot Act because
this is his opportunity. Why, you know, this is how
a sentence normally occurs. A judge will, you know, chastise
a defendant for ignoring the law, violating the law. You know,
a jury of your peers has found you guilty. And
(04:12):
now I'm going to sentence you, you know, to hanging by
you know, to your by your toenails and blah blah blah.
He's going to be He's going to be a complete
a hole about it, which is why he's decided, unlike
the trial, to have the audio. And I cannot I mean,
this is a historic moment, and I cannot imagine that
(04:34):
the networks or the cables are not going to carry this. Now,
Dragon raises a great point, this is only going to
be audio. I don't think he's allowing cameras in the courtroom,
just audio. So I'm not quite sure how the networks
and the cables are going to carry it. But I
can't imagine. Say, won't you think MSNBC is not going
(04:55):
to carry this? You think ABC or Fox is not
going to carry this, I'll be shocked if they don't.
So we're going to dip into it so that you
can hear the audio.
Speaker 1 (05:06):
Two.
Speaker 2 (05:08):
Now, I want to say this about what you're going
to hear. It's all political. It's design. Marshon has lost.
He may have won the conviction, but he lost the war.
And that scene in Trump's electoral college count, it's seen
in the popular vote count. It's seen in that the
(05:30):
people of this country rejected the Marxist progressive politics of
the Democrats, and they said, we went this guy back.
Only the second time in American history has this happened,
and so Mircheon has to get his final digs in.
And I think it's despicable, absolutely despicable. I also think
it's despicable that you I'm not surprised, but I think
(05:51):
it's despicable of the United States Supreme Court refused to
grant the stay.
Speaker 1 (05:56):
Now, I will also argue, in.
Speaker 2 (06:00):
Fact, this is why we be telling trumpeh he or
my client, don't worry about it. You've won the war.
You're the freaking president of the United States of America.
So in ten days you're going to be sworn in
at noon and you will be the forty seventh president
of the United States of America. No one can take
(06:25):
that away. Oh, Democrats want to try, and they certainly
tried in the first term. But while you may have
wanted a stay of the sentencing until your second term
is over, at least now, while your term is proceeding
(06:48):
and you are the president of the United States of America,
you can now appeal that verdict. And I do believe
I agree with Jonathan Turley, I agree with Alan Dershowitz.
I agree with all of these legal experts, these legal beagles,
(07:10):
that have said it is more likely than not that
this verdict is going to be overturned. There was so
much reversible error. Tell me how you allow a jury
to pick and choose which crimes you violated in order
to get to the state crime. That has to be unanimous.
So you have a non unanimous verdict on state charges
(07:34):
or federal charges in order to get to the state charge.
It's just it's it's a kangaroo court. So we're going
to hear that, assuming that one of the networks or
Fox or one of the cables carries it and we
can dip into it. Now, let's go back to the
fires for a moment. I want you to think back
(07:56):
to September eleventh, one eleven, the New York Fire Department,
in all of their turnout gear, weighing sixty eighty one
hundred pounds, started their stairwell ascent up the twin towers
in order to try to save lives. We have every
(08:21):
September eleventh we have out at Red Rocks, a memorial
where firefighters come from all over the country and they
walk up and down the steps or they'll find a
building and they'll walk up up the stairwells of an
office building to replicate and to honor what those firefighters
did that day. I want you to think about news
(08:45):
stories that you have heard where firefighters have gone into
burning buildings at the risk of their own lives in
order to save the life of another. This is why
first responders are honored. This is why first responders are
recognize as putting their lives on the line in order
to save us. It's astonishing what these men and women do. Now,
(09:11):
let's go to the LA Fire Department. The Los Angeles
Fire Department Assistant Chief Christine Larson, who looks to me
to weigh some two hundred and fifty pounds plus, says,
when people's houses are burning down, they want a firefighter
to show up who looks like them. But it gets
(09:33):
even worse. It's absolutely one of the most astonished things
that I've ever heard a peutative firefighters say.
Speaker 4 (09:47):
Here she is you want to see somebody that responds
to your house, your emergency, whether it's a medical call
or a fire call, that looks like you. It gives
that person a little bit more ease knowing that somebody
might understand their situation. She's strong enough to do this?
Or you couldn't carry my husband out of a fire,
in which my response is he got himself from the
wrong place. If I have to carry him out of
(10:08):
a fire, you couldn't.
Speaker 1 (10:12):
Carry my Did you hear that? She asks?
Speaker 2 (10:17):
She lowers her voice so the music is a little loud.
This is an official This is an official LA Fire
Department video. She's overweight. I don't know whether she should
carry me at one hundred and seventy five pounds. I
don't know whether she could carry me out of a
(10:38):
burning building, let alone up or downstairs. But she asks rhetorically,
is she strong enough to do this? Or you couldn't
carry my husband out of a fire, to which she says, well,
what my response would be is he got himself in
(11:01):
the wrong place. If I have to carry him out
of the fire. What that is the antithesis of everything
that firefighters across.
Speaker 1 (11:15):
This firefighters across the world stand for.
Speaker 2 (11:20):
They take this job because they want to save your property,
they want to save your ass. So would she dare
say that to an elderly person that can't escape at
burning building. This woman needs to have her fat ass
fired immediately.
Speaker 4 (11:41):
If you want to see somebody that responds to your house,
your emergency, whether it's a medical call or a fire call,
that looks like.
Speaker 2 (11:48):
You, No, actually, I don't give a rats ass. I
want them to be well trained. I want them to
have the physical strength. I want them to have the training,
the skills, and the ability to fight the fire, put
the fire out, save my ass. If they need to
help my dogs get out of the house, do whatever
they need to do, because that's the job you signed
up for. This wokeness bull crap has got to stop.
(12:15):
This is DEI on steroids, and this is the result
that you get when you're more concerned about what somebody
looks like, about their skin color, about what kind of
genitals they have, then whether or not they have the merit,
the skills, the talent, the ability to do the job.
Speaker 4 (12:36):
You want to see somebody that responds to your house,
your emergency, whether it's a medical call or a fire call,
that looks like you. It gives that person a little
bit more ease knowing that somebody might understand their situation better.
Is she strong enough to do this? Or you couldn't
carry my husband out of a fire, which my response is,
he got himself in the wrong place. If I have
to carry him out of a fire. You want to
(13:01):
see something.
Speaker 2 (13:02):
She's victim shaming. She's victim blaming. You know, many people
can't get out of the fire, smoke inhalation, they pass out,
they can't find their way out. Have you ever been
in fortunately I have. I have been in those training
buildings where they put all the turnout gear on you
(13:25):
and they fill the room. They put you in the
middle of the room, fill the room with smoke, not
real smoke, but you know the kind of dry eyes
like smoke, and you can't find your way out.
Speaker 5 (13:38):
I was.
Speaker 2 (13:40):
I thought to myself, I got the turnout gear, I
got the oxygen on. The smoke starts to fill the room,
and I think to myself, Okay, this is an exercise.
They're taping me, they can see me, they know exactly
what they're doing. And even if I can't get out
of the room, I'm not going to die. And yet,
(14:01):
as the smoke began to fill the room, and then
I started to find my way to find the door
to get out, I started to panic. My heart started
to raise. I'm sure my blood pressure sword I became disoriented,
You can't find you can't do it. Now you can
learn to do it. But imagine you in your home,
(14:26):
Imagine your elderly mother or grandmother, your uncle, whoever it
might be. Imagine your children. And this fat ass says, well,
my response would be if you got if I have
to carry you out of a burning house, you put
yourself in the wrong place. Really mm hmm, oh, I'm sorry, Oh,
(14:53):
I see it. These are starting to play. This is
simply amazing. Now I want to go to the mayor
of Los Angeles because you know, we laugh about Joe
Biden and all of the you know, he just he
just reads from the teleprompter and and he says what
the tele prompter says. Repeat the line. Well, listen to
(15:15):
the LA Mayor, Karen Bass giving telling residents that if
they need emergency help or shelter to go to this
website right what's the what's the website right now?
Speaker 6 (15:30):
If you need help, emergency information, resources and shelter is available.
All of this can be found at URL. Los Angeles.
Together is how we will get through this through the
heroicism of our firefighters, the vigilant.
Speaker 2 (15:49):
You can find that website at U are L. She
pulled to Biden, this incompetent boob that was off on
the taxpayer funded trip to Ghana, while she had already
issued an emergency declaration for her city, knowing that it
had the possibility of burning, decided instead because oh, she's
(16:11):
a black woman, so she better go to Ghana to
see the you know, the inauguration of a black president
in Ghana. While uh, and again it's THEI on steroids.
Speaker 3 (16:22):
At least she said, you are L instead of Earl.
Speaker 2 (16:25):
You can go to Earl, you can go to Hell,
go to Uurl and then we wonder why La is
burning to the ground.
Speaker 1 (16:39):
I've got one more I.
Speaker 2 (16:40):
Want to play for you. I don't know if I
I won't be able to get through all of it.
But Gavin Newsom yesterday was confronted by a woman whose
home had burned to the ground. Now, anytime that, anytime
that I was in a disasters, I had not only
(17:02):
my cell phone, but I had a satellite phone. Now
why did my security detail which Gavin Newsom has also
why did they always make certain that I had a
satellite phone with me in addition to my cell phone
and I was carried because when fires blow through someplace,
or a hurricane blows through someplace, or you know, towers
(17:23):
come down. On nine to eleven, cell tower cell service
goes out too. Wait till you hear this. It's such
a coincidence. Going through URL is also how I get
to Michael says go here dot com. But we tell
you go to Michael says, go here dot com. We
(17:44):
don't say go to URL. We know the difference.
Speaker 1 (17:52):
She doesn't dragging to hear anything on the satellite feeds.
Speaker 3 (17:56):
Just some crowd noise or room noise, or however you
want to put it.
Speaker 2 (17:59):
Yes, I see the courtroom hasn't. They haven't, at least
neither both CNN and Fox are ready to start talking
about it. So we may just have to dip into
it in the middle of this segment. But I think
it's important enough that I do want you to hear it.
So let's go back to Gavin Newsom. This will definitely
(18:20):
be at some point if he ever runs for president.
This will be in a commercial. You know how we've
caught Kamala Harris on the plane supposedly talking on her
cell phone on her iPhone, and she's got the wired earbuds,
but they're not plugged into the phone and she's pretending
to talk. What is it about fake phone calls? Gavin
(18:44):
Newsom is in the middle of this war zone, in
the middle of this disaster where all of this. You know,
I'm sure cell service is spotty at best. Now Verizon
AT and T T Mobile and the other carriers may
have got out and some cows in there the cellular
on wheels, but my guess is pretty spotty. And he
(19:07):
pulls a fast one. Here's the encounter between Governor Newsom
and the victim of these fires.
Speaker 6 (19:15):
Federal Fiah lives.
Speaker 2 (19:16):
Your Governor, that was.
Speaker 1 (19:18):
My daughter's school.
Speaker 2 (19:19):
Governor, can you tell me what you're going to do?
Speaker 1 (19:21):
I'm punters.
Speaker 5 (19:22):
I'm literally talking to the president right now to specifically
answer me.
Speaker 2 (19:28):
Now, do you think for a minute that if he
has the President of the United States of America on
his phone, that he's going to put the phone down
away from his ear and start talking to a woman. No,
he's going to ask his detail or a staffer, would
(19:50):
you please talk I have or the staffer should step in,
because the staffer would know that he's talking to the
president of the United States, and you don't hang up
on the President.
Speaker 1 (20:02):
You just don't do it. Am.
Speaker 3 (20:04):
I the only one that's a little bit shocked as
to how easily she was able to walk up to
him and get that close to him. He's the governor
of the freaking state of California, and.
Speaker 2 (20:13):
It's in the middle of a disaster when people are
shocked from mad, crazy, angry, crazy everything, and she strolls
right up and nobody does the thing. Oh, ma'am, I'm sorry,
I can't talk to you right now. I'm busy talking
to the president. And he kind of taps his phone
(20:34):
as if to say, like, right here is Joe Biden's
right here on this phone.
Speaker 3 (20:37):
I know a lot of people are upset with the
I'm literally on the phone with him, but you know,
people don't use literally as in literally literally, so that
I know people are gonna get upset about that. But
my opinions, stop it on that crap, and the court
has it's now nine thirty sixtiestern time, and of course
the court has not started on time yet.
Speaker 2 (21:00):
Going live here, governor.
Speaker 6 (21:02):
That was my daughter's school, governor.
Speaker 2 (21:04):
But to me, were you going to do?
Speaker 5 (21:05):
I heard on my counter I'm literally talking to the
president right now to specifically answer the question of what
we can do for you.
Speaker 1 (21:13):
And your daughter? Can I hear it? Can I hear
your call? Because I don't believe it?
Speaker 2 (21:17):
See this is wonderful. Can I hear the call? Because
I don't believe it?
Speaker 1 (21:22):
Now?
Speaker 2 (21:22):
Of course she should never have been allowed to even
ask that question. If indeed he was on the phone
with the president, he could have just turned around. The
staff or the detail could have stepped in and said, ma'am,
the governor's on the phone with the president. Just step back,
will be with you in just a moment.
Speaker 1 (21:41):
But no, I'm sorry.
Speaker 5 (21:43):
Can I just literally I've tried five times. That's why
I'm walking around to make.
Speaker 2 (21:47):
The Oh wait a minute, I thought he said he
was literally on the phone with the president.
Speaker 1 (21:52):
I thought too.
Speaker 2 (21:52):
Now he says, I've been trying for five times now
to get hold of the president.
Speaker 1 (21:58):
Huh, the President take care call? And she says, I
love this woman too.
Speaker 3 (22:05):
She's just a regular woman.
Speaker 1 (22:06):
He's just a regular woman. That's fantastic.
Speaker 2 (22:09):
So why won't that you've been trying, You've tried five times,
Why won't the president take your call? See, I'm telling you,
this is a this is a campaign commercial.
Speaker 1 (22:18):
Can I hear it? Can I hear your call? I
don't believe it.
Speaker 5 (22:23):
I'm sorry, can I there's literally I've tried five times.
That's why I'm walking around to make it see. And
then here's the other key. This is why I picked
up on the SAT phone. I've literally been walking around
trying to find cell surface. You know how it's like
you put your phone up in the air, like, oh here,
can I get this? Can I get a bar somewhere?
Can I get a bar?
Speaker 3 (22:40):
No? I don't have the newest iteration of the iPhone,
but I'm pretty sure that newest iteration is a sat phone.
Speaker 2 (22:51):
But an all due fairness dragon, it's only for emergency calls.
I don't think. I think it only connects you with
nine one one. Yeah, I don't think you like I.
If I'm stuck up in the Indian Peaks wilderness and
there's no cell service, I don't think I can use
the satellite function to call you.
Speaker 3 (23:09):
And that's just for arguments sake that he may have
the newest interaction and he may have the news and
he may not.
Speaker 1 (23:15):
I don't know, right, but again.
Speaker 2 (23:17):
They should be able to simply step into the car
or reach into the car or just hand him his
SAT phone. What I never I was never anywhere even
outside of the disaster zone without having a satellite phone available.
And I was just a lowly under secretary. He's the
freaking governor of the largest state in state in the
(23:37):
state of the United States.
Speaker 1 (23:39):
Takly a car because it's not going through this. I
have to get cell service. Let's get it. Let's get it.
Speaker 2 (23:45):
I want to be here when you call the President.
Speaker 1 (23:47):
I appreciate it.
Speaker 5 (23:47):
I'm doing that right now, and it's to immediately get rembursements,
individual assistance and to help you.
Speaker 1 (23:53):
I get I'm so sorry, especially for your daughter. I
have the four kids.
Speaker 4 (24:00):
One who went to school there.
Speaker 1 (24:02):
They lost their homes.
Speaker 6 (24:03):
They lost two homes because they were living in one
building another.
Speaker 3 (24:07):
Please tell me, tell me what are you going to
do with the president?
Speaker 5 (24:10):
Right now, we're getting we're getting the resources to help rebuild.
Speaker 1 (24:13):
With getting the water in the hydrants.
Speaker 5 (24:17):
That's all.
Speaker 1 (24:17):
Literally.
Speaker 4 (24:18):
Is it going to be different next time?
Speaker 2 (24:21):
I love that question too well. Is it going to
be different next time? Which is an admission that hey,
this has happened lots of times before, it's going to
happen again.
Speaker 1 (24:31):
Is it going to be different next time. Of course,
what are you going to do?
Speaker 4 (24:37):
Feel the hydrants?
Speaker 1 (24:38):
I would fill them up personally.
Speaker 2 (24:39):
You know that I would fill up the hydrance myself.
Speaker 3 (24:45):
But would you do that?
Speaker 1 (24:47):
I would do whatever I can, but you're not.
Speaker 2 (24:49):
I see the Do you know there's water dripping over there?
Speaker 1 (24:52):
Governor, there's water coming out there?
Speaker 6 (24:54):
You can use it.
Speaker 1 (24:55):
I appreciate it.
Speaker 5 (24:56):
I'm going to make the call to address everything I
can right now, making sure can I have an opportunity
to at least tell people you're doing what you're saying
you're doing.
Speaker 1 (25:07):
Could somebody have a contract? Thank you for.
Speaker 3 (25:14):
That wonderful I've got that video posted at Michael says,
excuse me, I've got that video posted at r L.
Speaker 1 (25:19):
Yes, go to you r L just in your search
bar right now.
Speaker 2 (25:23):
Go try it. Go try it because that you know. Hey, listen,
the mayor says, if you need help, go to U
r L. So just type in. In fact, let me
just pull up a tab here and let me just type,
uh you are L.
Speaker 1 (25:39):
Yeah.
Speaker 2 (25:39):
I we'll take a break early too, but hang on,
let me see you are you are l oh just
gets me a summary a U r L uniform Resource
Locator is the address of a unique resource on the Internet.
It's one of the key mechanisms used by browsers to
retrieve public published resources such as HTML pages or CSS documents, images,
(26:03):
and so on. In theory, each valid UURL points to
a unique resource. Go to URL if you want to
see that video just now. Dragon, let's take a break
early and see what happens in the court room.
Speaker 1 (26:13):
Michael Dragon, I'm from the south. Earl goes in your car,
you know, go to earl, you get earl.
Speaker 2 (26:23):
I need two courts. Earl in the car right now?
Could you get me some earl here? We're looking for
some earl. So let me give you a CAVIA status
report of where we are. So I'm see CNN doesn't
tell us much, but Fox News has a box that
says prosecutors tell Mersehawan they agree with unconditional discharge. So
(26:48):
they were previously looking over the probation report, which I
find freaking hilarious. I would love to read the probation
report because in a standard Fellony probation report you would
have the probation officer would be discussing things like the
likelihood of the defendant to cross state lines. I don't
(27:12):
know whether this president would ever cross the state line
or not. Maybe, So the possibility it's possible, I'll grant
you it's possible. What's the likelihood of him fleeing the country,
you know, going to a foreign country.
Speaker 3 (27:27):
Again, possible?
Speaker 1 (27:29):
Possible.
Speaker 2 (27:30):
Yeah, Then what's the likelihood that he would disassociate himself
and not be seen with or socialized with criminals, thugs, dictators,
you know, like Kim Jong un or Vladimir Putin. In fact,
I think he's already announced he may be violating his
(27:51):
probation because he intends to sit down with Vladimir Putin
En Ji Jing Bing, both who are human rights abusers,
are criminals in my mind, So that ought to be
a pretty interesting Oh and what about his ability to
find a job, a job that will pay him enough
(28:13):
that he can be self sufficient and not rely upon
the state for support. Well, that one's kind of a
ying and yang.
Speaker 3 (28:20):
Because he's got those skills from McDonald's or a garbage truck.
Speaker 2 (28:24):
Or the garbage truck, he's going to make a fairly
good salary. But at the same time that he's making
what I consider to be a fairly good salary four
hundred thousand plus a year. He's also going to be
living off the taxpayers. They're going to provide him housing
rent free, and then they're even going to pay for
him to coach his second home, which is part of
another lawsuit that says it's only worth eighteen Did you
(28:46):
hear Trump on He was doing some interview and he
was going on about the stupid trial Latitia James is
the attorney general, where he was accused of misleading the
banks about the value of mar Lago and as other properties.
And he said, you know, they said that Marlogo was
only worth eighteen million dollars. And he pointed up and said, hell,
(29:08):
that chandelier up there's worth eighteen million dollars.
Speaker 3 (29:11):
That's funny.
Speaker 1 (29:12):
That was a lout.
Speaker 2 (29:14):
So I would love to see this probation report anything new.
Steinlass acknowledges that any other conditional discharge has the potential
to interfere with Trump.
Speaker 1 (29:26):
Oh, that must be one of the prosecutors.
Speaker 2 (29:28):
That anything other than a conditional discharge. Steinlass notes that
the probation officer who interviewed Trump for the probation report
that Trump believed he was above the law.
Speaker 1 (29:40):
Good grief.
Speaker 2 (29:43):
We live in an insane world, an absolute insane world.
Someone let me find the text. I always like to
give people credit, dude, Yes, gooble number eight zero three zero.
I think you're absolutely right, Michael. Not being a lawyer,
(30:04):
I'm not sure, But wouldn't a judge be confirming that
the entire case is political by imposing an unconditional release,
After all, all they wanted was the conviction, just as
the impeachment was for the tag only.
Speaker 1 (30:18):
Yeah. I think so.
Speaker 2 (30:20):
This is why we're proceeding with the sentencing today, and
it calls into question the court's decision not to invocus Stay,
although I argue that, you know, trying to find the
silver lining. The silver lining is that means the appeal
could literally literally talk I'm literally talking to you, dragon,
(30:41):
I'm literally talking to the president right now. It means
that literally, literally you could literally start literally the appeal
literally this afternoon if you wanted to, as soon as
this is literally over. I literally, I'm telling you the truth.
Eighty eight seventy seven, says Michael. Literally you were right.
Oh he didn't say that, Michael. You were right when
(31:03):
you said Trump would be the forty eighth president. According
to the Democrats, Trump will be the forty eighth president,
the forty ninth president, the fiftieth president, because remember the
Democrats campaigned on that Trump would never leave office if
he got.
Speaker 1 (31:14):
Elected, and thought about that, that's pretty damn good. Seventy
four to.
Speaker 2 (31:21):
Thirty one, Michael, thanks for the great job you do
each morning. Well, we don't need the rest of the
you know, dragon, we don't need the rest of the text.
Speaker 3 (31:27):
That's just something tells me. I haven't looked yet, but
something tells me you need to keep reading.
Speaker 1 (31:34):
Michael, thanks for the great job you do each morning.
Speaker 3 (31:36):
But no, there's no attention what comes after the butt?
Speaker 1 (31:40):
Now?
Speaker 2 (31:41):
I literally never said that. Legal question, read Trump, his
thirty four fellon and he's come from thirty four falsified
business records?
Speaker 1 (31:49):
Correct? Correct? Is this an inflation of charges? Yes?
Speaker 2 (31:52):
Would it be similar to charging someone with thirty four
counts of assault battery if they punched somebody thirty four times? Yes,
except that they're trying to claim that the thirty four
payments counted as thirty four payments to what was that
guy's named, Michael Cohen? Was that the lawyer or anyway,
(32:12):
whoever the lawyer was. I think it was Michael Cohen,
thirty four separate crimes is what they're trying to argue.
I think it's all of one. But I think you
raise an excellent question. Oh, this is a good one.
Seventeen thirteen, Michael. Is this the gag order case? Yes,
(32:36):
probation question Mark should immediately violate any in all court orders.
Speaker 1 (32:41):
Oh. I think so too.
Speaker 2 (32:43):
In fact, I don't think the judge will as bad
as I think this judge is. I don't think the
gag order can withstand the finality of the conviction. He
can say anything he wants to. He's a convicted felon.
You can not impose a gag order, and that would
be now be a violation of US First Amendment rights
(33:04):
because the legal problem that existed no longer exists. It's done,
It's done. Seventeen thirteen, Michael. Since this judge has proven
he is no respect for the law or civil rights,
he should he meaning the judge should be treated with
no respect by President Trump. Trump came very close to that. Now,
(33:26):
Remember the gag order only applied to the judge's daughter,
and I think to the district attorney.
Speaker 1 (33:33):
It did not apply to the judge.
Speaker 2 (33:35):
Because the judge knew that was probably just one step
too far in terms of the Fourth Amendment. But yes,
Trump should come out and just blast them and announce
that they have. In fact, I would be surprised if
they don't already have the appeal ready to go, and
they should file that appeal with the Now, remember this
(33:57):
goes first to the New York Supreme Court, because what
we think is a Supreme court New York calls their
appellate court stupid. New Yorkers can even get that right.
So hang tight, let me get back. If they've started
the audio portion. We'll play the audio portion, because this
truly is a historic moment.
Speaker 1 (34:17):
I'll be right back