11-11-24 - 8am - Senate Orientation, Deportation and Hate Speech

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Mike, would it be safe to say now that Kamala
is a has ven diagram has been ven diagram?

Speaker 2 (00:11):
She was a big fan of ven diagrams, So now
she's a has been diagram?

Speaker 1 (00:16):
Well, she probably is. She says she's unburdened by whatever
it was or has been or is it going to be.
So No, I'm not gonna go to that. I wanna
go back for just a moment about young men because
I got a text message. And then Dragon has a
story over here on on his pile of goofball stuff

(00:39):
that I find interesting because maybe maybe there's a correlation
between the two. Maybe there's not. But Gurri Goo Goober
number fifty two thirteen writes this, Mike, I spend a
year at a hormone clinic. Our seventy year olds have
higher testosterone than our twenty year olds. Also, the access

(01:03):
to porn on phones. What you can get porn on
your phone?

Speaker 2 (01:09):
You can do that? Now, hang on, can you.

Speaker 1 (01:13):
Do some bubber music? I got to check things out. Also,
the access to porn on phones has caused many teens
and twenty somethings that cannot get aroused when they are
actually with a woman. Our boys are begging to know
the rules of life and how to succeed. They know
they're being lied to, a manipulated constantly, without a spiritual foundation.

(01:36):
They've left being taught the woke religion, and the election
proves it's a religion that's a brilliantly written text message.
Very good. Now, I don't know that this is exactly
in line with that, but I do think there's something
to it. This is where this dragon never uh. I

(02:05):
can't find a source, but here's the headline. One in
three that would be thirty percent. Uh. One in three
gen Z workers too scared to use office bathroom.

Speaker 2 (02:23):
They're literally scared.

Speaker 1 (02:24):
Post was a New York Post. Okay, they're literally scared,
you know. Sless. For a generation that likes expressing their emotions,
gen Z keeps a lot bottled up inside a whopping
one in three Zoomers is scared to use the bathroom
at the office. According to a recent study by online
bathroom applants purveyor QS Supplies, The UK based Bazaar surveyed

(02:49):
more than a thousand employees on their workplace low habits
and calculated the impact of bathroom breaks when company productivity.
They found that a surprising number of office workers are
reticent about going number two at their vocation station. According
to the study, one twelve employees has never pooped at work,
while thirty four percent are scared to use the facilities

(03:12):
at all. Many employees claimed holding it in caused them
to suffer from various health problems. In general, women were
more reticent about doing their business of their place of business,
and they got some photos to see. Zoomers are the
generation most likely to engage in bathroom stalling, marking one

(03:36):
of the myriad ways twenty somethings struggle at the workplace.
Eleven percent of gen Z employees claim they've never pooped
at work, while thirty six percent are reportedly scared to
do so. Now. I'm curious about the words scared to
do so. Now, I prefer not to do so, depending

(03:57):
on the time of day, because this building gets full
of people.

Speaker 2 (04:00):
I can get away with it. I'll not, but if
you have to, you have to have to right now.

Speaker 1 (04:06):
Sometimes I will if if it's if it's number two
out of courtesy and the building's busy, I'll go to
the basement because nobody uses it down there.

Speaker 2 (04:16):
Everybody uses the basement to go number two. My friend.

Speaker 3 (04:19):
Well, what I mean is they're much more private. It's
private because it's just one stall. One is just a
single restaurant, So I'll go down there. But even then
I rarely do it, because I well, I time my
poops to be considered of others. But I'm curious about
the word scared, because whether whether there's any correlation between

(04:43):
this thing about hormones and and toxic masculinity and low
team you know, young men, and unwillingness to just recognize
that it's a bodily function.

Speaker 2 (04:57):
Back in the days of high school though. Scared in
the high school bathrooms, I get that because those things
were never clean.

Speaker 1 (05:06):
Oh yeah.

Speaker 2 (05:07):
But here at work, I mean clean, well cleaner clean.

Speaker 4 (05:14):
Oh.

Speaker 1 (05:15):
Fox News is frozen, shocker we have did we not
pay the bill this month?

Speaker 2 (05:19):
It's frozen over here too, so it must be the
service that we're stealing from.

Speaker 1 (05:25):
Believable. Yeah, I mean high school. I just don't, you know, shockingly, dragon,
I just don't recall whether I did in high school
or not. That doesn't seem important for something I should
have kept somewhere in.

Speaker 2 (05:40):
My brain right.

Speaker 1 (05:42):
But work, I've always tried to be considerate, you know,
the best thing to do when you're traveling hospitals. They're
always the cleanest bathrooms anywhere.

Speaker 2 (05:53):
And I get a little red rope. If you have
any problems, you can just try that.

Speaker 1 (05:57):
They've got the red rope, We've got our problem, and
you can just walk right in. Particularly go sometimes don't
don't go through the er because most eers now have
magnetometers and you don't want to have to feel like
you're going through TSA just to go do number two.
Just go through the front, and by the way, while

(06:18):
you're there, hospital food is generally not that bad in the.

Speaker 2 (06:24):
Castle chaper too. It's cheaper too.

Speaker 1 (06:26):
That's help a lot cheaper. It's funny my mom mentioned
over the week I was talking to my mom over
the weekend, and she and her girlfriends now have a
new deal that they're doing. They used to go out
for breakfast, you know, like two or three times a week. Well,
the hospital administrator that she was talking to him at
church or something, and she was talking about how the

(06:47):
girls get together and go to breakfast, and he's like, well,
why don't you go to the come to the hospital
for breakfast. So now they're going to the hot and
so my mom's describing you know, Michael, I can get
two pieces of bacon, I can get an egg the
way I want it, a piece of toast, and free
coffee or tea, and you want to cust me. I

(07:10):
think she said two dollars. Isn't that great? So now
they all go to the hospital and think about it.
If one of them has a stroke or something, well
they're already there. They're already there. And if one of
them ends up in the hospital for some other reason,
doesn't have to disrupt their routine. They can still go

(07:31):
to the hospital. There's already there. Oh, good grief.

Speaker 2 (07:37):
Uh.

Speaker 1 (07:40):
Schumer is threatening. Schumer's doing a couple of things. First
and foremost, he has refused to invite Dave McCormick to
the Senate orientation, which I think is scheduled for this
week maybe sometime. I think I know it's before Thanksgiving.
The Senate orientation is for all the new senators to

(08:01):
come and just learn about you know, Hey, here's where
your office is going to be. Here's the key, here's
the key to the bathroom. You know, here's where you
get here, Here's where you get your stapler, Here's where
you do you know, it's just orientation. Here's get the
lay of the land orientation, just like freshman orientation. Literally,
just like freshman orientation. He's refusing in to invite Dave McCormick,

(08:25):
who has been declared the winner in the Pennsylvania Senate race,
because Bob Casey refuses to concede. Wait a minute, Chuck,
I thought we were supposed to respect the results of
an election.

Speaker 2 (08:41):
Is this an election denier?

Speaker 1 (08:43):
It could be somewhere on the spectrum between an election
denier and an insurrectionist h Chuck Schumer and Trump. This
shows And again I give credit to Susan Wiley for this,
not one hundred percent, but I would bet she because

(09:06):
she understands and of course Trump better understands the process
now too. Trump is now asking for recess appointments, and
he wants Schumer or whoever's going to end up being
the Senate majority leader to offer or to allow him, well,

(09:26):
he can do it anyway, but to recognize and approve
recess appointments so he can already get cabinet members in
place pending their confirmation. Here, brilliant move on his part.
But it turns out that we're going straight from having

(09:48):
the sick joke, Kamala Harris. As the borders are remember
that to a no nonsense patriot and the former ICE
Director Tom Homan. Yesterday, Trump announced an excellent choice. I've
known Tom for a long time, he said, and there

(10:08):
is nobody better at policing and controlling our borders. Likewise,
Tom Homan will be in charge of all deportation of
illegal aliens back to the country of origin. Congratulations to Tom.
I have no doubt he will do a fantastic and
long awaited for job. Well, if we keep thinking this serious,

(10:34):
we might be in for a revolutionary change of direction
in this country. Here's Holman on sixty minutes.

Speaker 5 (10:43):
We have seen one estimate that says it would cost
eighty eight billion dollars to deport a million people a year.

Speaker 1 (10:53):
I don't know if that's happened or not.

Speaker 5 (10:55):
Is that what American taxpayers should expect?

Speaker 1 (10:58):
What price you put on national security?

Speaker 5 (11:00):
Is there a way to carry out mass deportation without
separating families?

Speaker 1 (11:06):
Of course is families can be deported together. I love it.
That wonderful. Is there a way to do mass deportation
without separating families? Well, of course there is, you deport
them together. Sixty minutes. Does not know what to do

(11:28):
with that. That is amazing. Now, why is this deportation
even important? Slow death by tuberculosis had been, had been
past tense, virtually eradicated in this country, and then came

(11:50):
the Democrats. Reported cases of TB have shot up thirty
four percent between twenty twenty and twenty twenty three, that's
according to CDC, and cases reported, cases reported cases of
TB continued to rise. More than three quarters of the cases,
more than seventy five percent of new TB cases in

(12:14):
this country are foreign born people who picked up the
disease in their home country or traveled through countries that
have high tuberculosis rates. And you start adding tuberculosis to crime,
fentinyl a loss of social cohesion through demographic fragmentation, you

(12:35):
just add all of those, all of that to the
list of malfaction, malfunctioning Democrats that they've inflicted by opening
the border and enticing the dregs of the planets unlawfully
invade this country. Do you know that the TB, the
tuberculosis incident rate is sixty times higher in Haiti than

(12:58):
in the US. Now, considering that the Democrats Haitian colonization campaign.
The situation would be soon a lot worse if Trump
had not won. Tuberculosis kills more people than any other
infectious disease. Seventy five percent of new cases are from

(13:23):
foreign born illegal aliens. Now, given that equity is the
objective in this country, now, not public health, but equity,
TB in the United States may be seen by some
people as a good thing. If third world swims have TB,
then by golly, we ought to have it in this

(13:44):
country too, because that's equity, and that's you know, that's
social justice. If the rest of the world is going
to be a craphole country, then we ought to be
a craphole country too. That's equity. Remember Member Kamala Harris's
little campaign, did he from twenty nineteen twenty twenty?

Speaker 2 (14:05):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (14:05):
Yeah, we're all created equal, but we don't all end
up in the same place. We all need to end
up in the same place. So if you apply that
same philosophy to the soul of a nation, we need
to be like other crap whole countries. And that's exactly
what they're doing. And that's why Democrats have refused to

(14:25):
take the most obvious step against tuberculosis by securing the
border migrants that flood across the border illegally or that
enter with Biden's new you know parole app. The CBP
app get no screening whatsoever, zippo, zelt none, And the CBC,

(14:53):
the Centers for Disease Control, is missing in action about
screening and isolating the in affected before they bring the
disease to cities and towns all across the country, all
across the fruited plain. Now the Federal Health bureauweenie weenis
out there. Do keep some data, though, and if you
dig deep enough you can find it. CBC data shows

(15:16):
a whopping forty two percent increase in incidents of TB
among children ages five to fourteen in one year, and
those kids may show up in your school before they
get diagnosed. Innocent kids who have not had the chance
to vote against Democrats often fall victim to their destructive policies. Schools. Oh, Michael,

(15:43):
you know in our little town, we don't have a problem.
Do you have illegal aliens in your town? Because I
don't know that there is. I mean sure there, I'm
sure there is somewhere, but generally speaking, I doubt there's
a city anywhere in the country that doesn't have illegal
aliens in it. That's how bad you can't have. I

(16:06):
don't care whether the number is twelve million, twenty three million,
forty million, I don't care what the number is. You
get that many people there virtually cannot be any town
anywhere in the country that does not have illegal aliens.
And if their infection rate with TB is soaring, and

(16:26):
they're going to put those kids in school, and then
a nurse finally a kid shows up. He's hacking, he's weezing,
he's weak, got fever. Can't figure out maybe we all
send them to the nurse gets tested. Oh TB into school.

Speaker 2 (16:43):
Yes.

Speaker 5 (16:43):
Eating at hospital cafeterias is part of my retirement strategy
so that I can afford to be retired someday, not
yet someday.

Speaker 1 (16:55):
That's interesting How often you do it and you got
the same hospital every time? Or do you go do
you like, like, can you check a hospital menu before
you go? Like what's on the menu today?

Speaker 2 (17:07):
Hum?

Speaker 1 (17:08):
I hadn't thought about that. Howneyway, do you want to
go out thereat tonight? Let's go out to uh, let's
gout the hand shoots, Let's go out to the v A.
Let's go out to Let's go to a rose. Yeah,
let's go to Rose Medical. We're going to meet the
red beard over at Rose Medical today for dinner. Yeah.

(17:31):
Do you have a Do you have a nice pin
on the wall for dinner tonight for the rubber Chicken.
By the way, I'll be on Newsmax at.

Speaker 2 (17:44):
You why to talk.

Speaker 1 (17:47):
About the transition. Yeah. Well, apparently one of the Newsmax
uh producers listens to the weekend show and after I
finished Saturdays in which I talked about the transition, he
sent me an email and said, hey, we will want
you back on yet been on in a while. So
I said, sure, that's why I brought a sport code

(18:09):
in today. Do you think do you think I brought
a coat in? Just a dress up for you?

Speaker 2 (18:14):
That haven't even looked at to what the hell you're
wearing today? You got that blue shirt on? Who congratulations?

Speaker 1 (18:20):
Of course what you wear for TV? You don't wear
a white shirt. I started to put on a white
shirt this morning and realize, oh wait, man, I got
to be on TV. I got to be on the TV.
So news Max at ten thirty be twelve thirty. So
twelve thirty, ten thirty Mountain time. Where was I before

(18:46):
I got so rudely interrupted by a text message that
or I talked back that made me think about hospital food,
hospital food. Elections like we just went through really do

(19:06):
make it more difficult for Democrats to throttle or to
try to infringe on our right to free speech, at
least directly. They can still try to do it indirectly.
So now what they're doing is they're trying to hand
control over to globalist organizations like the United Nations and
the World Economic Forum over at the Gatestone Institute, which,

(19:30):
by the way, if you don't follow them, you really should.
They write this. On September twenty second, unnoticed by most Americans,
the Biden Harris administration adopted the U im Pact for
the Future. Oh, the U Impact for the Future. That's
an effort to transform global governance, which introduces the foundations

(19:53):
of a world government. They did so without any debate.
There is no media cover, There were no press releases,
there were no interviews about the Biden Harris administration surrender
of US sovereignty to the United Nations. These guys, these
people have got to go now to ensure that all

(20:14):
present and future United Nations and World Economic Forum agendas
can pass, you know, without bothering with pesky descending opinions.
They also passed all the member states. Now think about
the Star Wars bar scene, that is the United Nations.

(20:36):
They passed something called the Digital Global Compact as an
annex to the Umpact for the future. The Compact best
is best described as a new totalitarian tool of censorship.

(20:57):
So while and I'm not trying to throw rain on
our parade here, but Trump has an enormous job in
front of him, including you know, what we ought to
do is just d annex the United Nations. Why don't

(21:17):
we put it in a crab whole country, Like, why
don't we put it in Haiti? You know, it's an
economic development project. Let's go to Haiti and just say,
you know, we'll take the money that we get from
the building on the on the East River, we're gonna

(21:37):
lease that out in In fact, maybe the Trump organization
could take it over and we're gonna lease that building
out and use that money to construct a new building
import of Prince. Yeah, can't that be fantastic. So now
that'll be an economic development project. Or we could do
the same thing. And I want to know, Keev, how
about there. We could do it in Jakarta, We could

(22:00):
do it in I don't know. Just pick a crab
boat country somewhere I know, do it. Do it in
the Darien past, do it down there in Panama, do
it there. Back to the Digital Global Compact. Very near
the end of the Digital Global Compact, and paragraph thirty

(22:22):
is all you need to know about it. Quote we
must urgently counter and address all forms of hate speech
and discrimination, misinformation and disinformation. We will establish and maintain
robust risk, mitigation and redress measures hate speech. You see,

(22:48):
we are so accustomed to believing that our constitution and
it is, it's the Captain's it's it's the gold standard
for all constitutions worldwide. But just because we might be
the gold standard does not mean that everybody adopts the
gold standard. So when it says that Congress shall make

(23:10):
no law abridging freedom of speech, it means exactly that.
And so we have a robust heritage. It's built into
our DNA saying well we damn well, please now I
think we're losing it, not legally, well, in in some quarters, yes,

(23:31):
we are losing it legally, but generally speaking, we're losing
it just in terms of our culture. And hate speech,
just like hate crimes, I've always thought, has been one
of those kind of you know, kind of put your
foot in the door before they slam it shut. It's
kind of one of those littles just ooh, little inch

(23:52):
by inch of a way to control what people can say.
And the more you start detegrating hate speech. Now, look,
I don't like hate speech. I despise bigoted speech. But

(24:14):
I mean this very sincerely from the depths of my soul.
Do I mean this. I believe that everyone in this
country has a right to say the most bigoted things
you can possibly imagine. I support their right to do so.

(24:35):
In fact, I hope they go stand on the town
square and I hope they scream it with a bullhorn,
and then I hope people counter that bigoted hate speech
by pointing out just exactly how bigoted and hateful that
it is. But too many people, maybe some in these quarters,

(25:01):
that makes you uncomfortable, Well, then you ought to embrace
that uncomfortableness and recognize that maybe, just maybe you might
be part of the problem. Now, I don't think that
generally speaking, that this audience is part of that problem.
But now, in any large group of people, even among

(25:24):
our twelve listeners, there may be one of two, one
or two of you that are very uncomfortable with what
I just said. Hate speech, misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, whatever prefix
you want to put in front of the word information
or speech are all euphemism, and they are all euphemisms for

(25:44):
speech that all of those on the left, all of
the Marxists in our society, want to suppress. You cannot
have a society that freely embraces free speech and at
the same time be able to impose your Marxist communist
philosophy on this country. That's why you start off with

(26:07):
just hate. Listen, guys, what do we do? Well, let's
add hate to a crime, so that if someone goes
out and murders someone, it's still a murder, but if
they did it with hate, which I always find kind
of fascinating, because don't you really have to hate somebody
to go kill them, to snuff out their life. You

(26:29):
really got to have some anger in your heart, You
got to really be bigoted. But if you're a white
person and you decide that you don't like black people,
and so you're gonna go kill black people or Hispanic people,
or vice versa if you're a black person, because it works,
it works both directions. This is a bi directional This
is a multidirectional problem. If you're an Asian person that

(26:52):
hates white people or hates black people, and you go
out and kill them, and you do so based on
the color of their skin or their ethnicity or their
race or anything else, hey guys, let's make that and
let's make that an enhancement to the crime. And pretty
soon people will start to accept that, and they'll think, oh, yeah,
hate crimes, Why that personal to be put to death?

(27:16):
Except you can't. In Colorado, that person'll be put to death.
So now you've got a hate crime and the idea
that that crime and the penalty for that crime ought
to be enhanced because there was hate in someone's heart.
Really shazam. Now let's apply it to speech. Oh you

(27:41):
can't do it the next day. You've got to get
hate crimes kind of embedded and accepted, kind of like
and I don't even accepted, like I like, I don't
affirmatively accept it, but I recognize that, well, there it is,
and Is that a battle I want to go fight? Well,
maybe it is, maybe it isn't. I'll find it on

(28:03):
the air. But am I going to go lobby and
work and spend time and effort and money to reverse
it now? Maybe not? But after this break, I'll tell
you why. It is a slow march toward progressiveness.

Speaker 2 (28:18):
Good morning, guys.

Speaker 6 (28:19):
It makes complete sense that Brownie would be part of
the transition. I've been wondering when he would transition. It's
been just a matter of time. Good luck with that, Michelle,
how a good day has Yeah.

Speaker 1 (28:32):
I'm a pu pretty blockers, it don't seem to be working.

Speaker 2 (28:39):
Hasn't affected your voice at all, So it hasn't.

Speaker 3 (28:42):
Yet, but it might.

Speaker 1 (28:44):
You never know. No, nobody's gonna cut it off. It
ain't happening, and it still works. As long as it works,
you ain't cutting it off. And even when it quits working,
you're still not gonna cut it off. Just not just
not gonna happen. Back to censorship, The Marxis over at Google,

(29:09):
who exert an alarming degree of control over the Internet,
are on board with this globalist censorship. In twenty twenty
one twenty two, the United Nations entered into a partnership
with Google to ensure that their search engine only display
information that reflects you in perspectives. Now, to see how
this paid off for globalist groups like the United Nations,

(29:32):
try searching on climate change.

Speaker 2 (29:36):
Now.

Speaker 1 (29:36):
It may change from day to day, but in the
first twenty plus pages of results that come up on Google,
not a single one of those results deviates from the
United Nations World Economic Forum narrative, with almost all the
results only containing links to you in bodies or other
institutions that end up partnering with you in like the EU,
the World Bank, government websites, and of course the klarmat

(29:58):
alarmis articles from the Garden Guardian or the New York
Times or the APN Reuters. Suppressing dissenting opinion regarding the
global warming hopes is crucial because climate hysteria is just
simply a trojan horse for international collectivism and Americans. It's

(30:20):
their way of trying to get Americans enslaved to these
third world tyrants. Trump fortunately promises to push back against
the campaign to smether at free speech.

Speaker 4 (30:32):
We don't have free speech, then we just don't have
a free country.

Speaker 1 (30:36):
It's as simple as that.

Speaker 4 (30:38):
If this most fundamental right is allowed to perish, then
the rest of our rights and liberties will topple kiss
like dominoes, one.

Speaker 1 (30:46):
By one, they'll go down.

Speaker 4 (30:48):
That's why today I'm announcing my plan to shatter the
left wing censorship, resume, and to reclaim the right to
free speech for all Americans. And reclaim is a very
important word in this case, because they've taken it away.
In recent weeks, bombshell reports have confirmed that a sinister

(31:08):
group of deep state bureaucrats, Silicon Valley tyrants, left wing activists,
and depraved corporate news media.

Speaker 1 (31:16):
I think those adjudives he's using are I hate speech
in and of themselves. He's saying horrible things about These tyrants.

Speaker 4 (31:24):
Have been conspiring to manipulate and silence the American people.
They have collaborated to suppress vital information on everything from
elections to public health to censorship. Cartel must be dismantled
and destroyed, and it must happen immediately.

Speaker 1 (31:44):
And here's my plan.

Speaker 4 (31:46):
First, within hours of my inauguration, I will sign an
executive order banning any federal department or agency from colluding
with any organization, business, or person to censor limit categorize
or impede the lawful speech of American citizens. I will
then ban federal money from being used to label domestic

(32:09):
speech as miss or disinformation, and I will begin the
process of identifying and firing every federal bureaucrat who has
engaged in domestic censorship directly or indirectly, whether they are
the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Health Human Services,

(32:29):
the FBI, the DOJ, no matter who they are. Second,
I will order the Department of Justice to investigate all
parties involved in the new unlined censorship regime, which is
absolutely destructive and terrible, and to aggressively prosecute any and
all crimes identified.

Speaker 1 (32:53):
Go for it, Go for it.