11-11-24 - 9am - Border Czar and Campaign Refunds

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Michael, I'm kind of worried though.

Speaker 2 (00:03):
I really don't want to supplement your hospital food.

Speaker 1 (00:08):
So is this being subsidized.

Speaker 2 (00:10):
Food for those that pay health insurance or who's really
actually paying the differential in the cost.

Speaker 1 (00:16):
I'm sure it's really not a free lunch.

Speaker 3 (00:20):
There is no free lunch. Somebody's paying for that differential somewhere,
So I don't know who it is, but I'm sure
it's some one. The costly cafeteria is built into their
into their business model, and they they recoup the well,

(00:41):
I don't know, maybe they actually get costs, maybe they're
costs or less. Maybe they get.

Speaker 1 (00:46):
Well when they charge eighteen here bucks for an aspirin,
I think they can probably.

Speaker 3 (00:50):
Offset the jello that you get in the in the cafeteria. Yeah.
I want to go by for just a moment for
Tom Holman, who's the new borders are, because he apparently
was on Fox this morning and have a few things

(01:11):
to say, and I just want you to have a
chance to hear hear what he said, because you should
have been listening to me instead of them. Let's start with.

Speaker 4 (01:18):
This big news from overnight. A Fox News lords president
collects Trump's new cabinet is starting to take shape because overnight,
while you were sleeping, he tapped Tom Holman to be
his Borders Are Trump.

Speaker 5 (01:33):
Saying, quote, there is nobody better at policing and controlling
our borders. Likewise, Tom Holman will be in charge of
all deportation of illegal aliens back to their country of origin.

Speaker 6 (01:46):
You work with the President to come up with this
job description. So let's hear from him in his first
interview after the major announcement incoming. Borders Are Tom Holman, Tom,
congratulations to you.

Speaker 3 (01:56):
It's bad for us. We lose as a contributor.

Speaker 6 (01:59):
We went into the the sision and the position.

Speaker 7 (02:04):
Well, look, I've been on the I've been on this
network four years complaining about what this administration did to
this border. I've been yelling the streaming about it. Tell
them what they need to do and fix it. So
when the President asked me, would you come back and
fix it? Of course it has to be a hips
for if I didn't.

Speaker 3 (02:18):
So look, I'm honored.

Speaker 7 (02:19):
The President has to come back and helps solve this
national security crisis.

Speaker 3 (02:24):
So I'm looking forward to it.

Speaker 7 (02:25):
And look, I love Fox, I love the family there,
and but I think I think the calling is is clear.

Speaker 3 (02:32):
I got to go back and hop because.

Speaker 7 (02:34):
Every morning I get up every morning I'm pissed off
from out whether this administration did to the most security boarder.

Speaker 3 (02:38):
In my lifetime. So I'm gonna go back and do
what I can't fix it.

Speaker 8 (02:41):
So Tom, let's talk about that the job. Because you're
not an amateur. You've been doing this for years. You
are beat up.

Speaker 3 (02:47):
Also, you work the border before with overt eyes. You've
done it all.

Speaker 8 (02:52):
What does the process look like? Because I think some
people get the impression that you're shooting from your hip,
but you know what you're doing here, right.

Speaker 3 (03:00):
I know exactly what I'm doing.

Speaker 7 (03:01):
And look, this is the second time I came out
of retirement for this president, and because it matters, And look,
I was a border triligion. I wore that uniform and
I'm probably that I wore that uniform. So and I
was an ice agent. I was the first life director.
I actually came up through the ranks. So the twenty
thousand men and women that worked for me, I didn't
ask someone to do anything I didn't do myself.

Speaker 3 (03:22):
I was one of them.

Speaker 7 (03:23):
So look, I know the border, and I know there's
a lot of great patrons, like I shut my phone
off Friday night because I couldn't handle the phone calls
that Texas in the emails from thousands of ICE agents
and borderitual agents excited about the rumor I'm coming back,
but more importantly that thousands of retired agents, retired Board

(03:44):
of tu Agians, retired military that want to come in
and volunteer to help the president secure the border and
do this deportation offers.

Speaker 3 (03:51):
So I've been off to grid for three days.

Speaker 7 (03:53):
It's because I couldn't handle all the phone calls and
plus of the death Tress Roulin and I'm my family's
not at home right now because that's starting.

Speaker 3 (04:02):
But all that's what we're going to do with. They're
not going to bully me away, they're not going to
shut me up. They're not going to make me go away.

Speaker 7 (04:07):
This is the biggest national security vulnerability this nation since
it is nine to eleven.

Speaker 3 (04:12):
We have to fix it. Wow, pretty strong words. Now,
the proof, of course, is going to be in the pudding.
And how he's is he going to accomplish that?

Speaker 4 (04:27):
Well, he continues, and it's one of the reasons Condala
Harris lost and Donald Trump won. So Tom you just
mentioned deportations. I know during the last Trump administration when
you were there, they did have the large scale work
site essentially raids where they would go into a place
and there would be hundreds of people who are in

(04:48):
the country illegally. I know in sixty minutes a couple
of weeks ago, you said that those would continue under
Donald Trump and the next administration. What do you have planned, Well,
I know, don't want to give away the whole game book,
but you do have deportations, mass workplace stuff planned, any
other kind of category of deportations of interesting.

Speaker 7 (05:12):
Look as the president, as the President said on stage
many times, which I agree with one hundred percent, that's
going to be the thing was there in the first administration,
which is a hell a lot more of them, because
ten million people have mentioned this country legally under by
administration or they actually let into this country even though
it's violation of federal law. Who they've been doing the
abuse of the profs already. But look, I've been clear

(05:32):
at President Trumpting clear public safety threats and national security
threats will be the priority because they have to be.
They propose the most dangers of this country. So We're
going to prioritize those groups, those who always have final orders.

Speaker 3 (05:45):
Had those I had.

Speaker 7 (05:46):
Due process and great tax payer of Spence and the
federal judge as you must go home, and they didn't.

Speaker 3 (05:51):
They became a fugitive.

Speaker 7 (05:53):
And as the part of work site where do like
operations have to happen. Here's why I see where do
we find most victims of sex trafficking and forced labor
trafficking at work sites? And the Biden administration shut down
Worse Sights on one point to say we care about
sex trafficking and human trafficking, say shut down worst land enforcement,
which is one of the main areas we find the.

Speaker 3 (06:14):
Victims of this. I want to add one more thing,
another priority.

Speaker 7 (06:17):
Business administration has lost over three hundred thousand children that
were smuggling as touched by criminal cartels. They can't find.
That's another priority. We need to save these children because
some of these children in forced labor, so many children
a sex trafficking, some of these children living life on
hell every day.

Speaker 3 (06:33):
And when need you save these children again back of
their families. Good for him? I mean, that's the kind
of attitude that it's going to take to then start
carrying out those things that are going to be very
difficult to do. You know.

Speaker 5 (06:49):
Tom, First of all, congratulations to you, and I'm so
glad for the border patrol that morale is already being lifted.
They have just been beaten down by the policies of
this last administration. I'm really encouraged by what you're saying,
because I think the toughest part of your job isn't
the deportation. It's dealing with the propaganda from the other

(07:10):
side saying that what you're doing is not is not compassionate,
that it's not humanitarian, and what do you plan to do.
I'm glad you mentioned the three hundred thousand children that
are missing, but how are you going to deal with
those kinds of attacks?

Speaker 8 (07:26):
Even though you know that this.

Speaker 5 (07:27):
Open border has led to sex trafficking of children and
an exponential increase of child labor, illegal child labor.

Speaker 7 (07:38):
Frankly, I don't care what people think about me, especially
the lesson. Again, you know, when you have a historic crisis,
a crisis is Picture's what they need to know. When
you have a crisis is overwhelms the borderatrol, where the
majority of bortual are no longer in patrol. They're making sandwiches,
you're changing diapers and making baby for the or they
making hospital runs and making airport runs. When you take

(08:00):
most of border trades's off of borders dealers, humanitarian crisis.
That's when a fat mall comes across the killer quarter
million Americans. That's when a sex trafficking has increased six
hundred percent. That's why no suspected terrorist has crossed this country.
They've had a record of people on terrace washers been.

Speaker 3 (08:15):
The rest of the sun border.

Speaker 7 (08:16):
That's why you have over two million guidaways. How many
of them came our country sponsor and terror. So I
don't care where anybody's opinion is illegu immigration. When you
create a crisis, this pig, all these other bad things happen.
That's where you have to secure the border. And I
don't care if you probably came a Democrat or independent.
Border security is national security, which you all be on
the same side that I've been saying this for the

(08:38):
last couple of years, and directly the FBI actually reason me.

Speaker 3 (08:42):
I don't respect him greatly, but he agrees me.

Speaker 7 (08:44):
The Southwest Board is the biggest national security vulnerability this
nation's ever seen, he sees more bread flags down ever
before we have to secure the border. And as far
as the people want to push back on a reporting
the people, what is the option you have a right
to claim asylum, you haven't right.

Speaker 3 (08:59):
To see a judge. We make that happen.

Speaker 7 (09:01):
But at the end of that due process and the
judge that you must go home, then we have to
take them home. And because if we're not, what the
hell are we doing? If the judges order doesn't mean anything,
then shut down the immigration court, take the board to
draw off the boarder. There's no consequences dating the loss
of this country. We'll give you a fair shake, You'll
give it a chance of claim asylum. But due process

(09:23):
doesn't mean squat If the found decision of the court
isn't isn't carried out, what is the option let them
all stay?

Speaker 3 (09:30):
Because if that's the option.

Speaker 7 (09:31):
You want, you're never going to fix this on the
border because you send to message the whole world come
to the United States, enter country lead, which is a crime.
Don't show up a court, or show up the court
didn't or removal, but you still.

Speaker 3 (09:42):
Get to stay. You know, that's going to be a
huge challenge because and they are. You may not like it,
but they are entitled to due process even if they
came here illegally. I mean, murderers get due process, rapists
get due process. People across the border illegally they commit
a crime still get due process. So now the huge

(10:06):
question is going to be where's the Where are the resources?
And by resources, I mean not just money, but the
personnel and unfortunately the attorneys. Where are you going to
get them all? And that's where Congress is going to
have to step up to the plate. That's where a
Senate majority and that's why the Senate Majority leader appointment

(10:27):
is so vote is so important because that's the kind
of legislation that's got to get rammed through. And then
it's got to have the flexibility. So if you want
to bring people out of retirement judges or former immigration
attorneys to act as judges, whatever it is, you've got
to just rapidly surge that entire infrastructure so that all

(10:54):
these people that they start to identify can get a
quick here, and then once the hearing's concluded, then you
have to have the infrastructure in place to actually physically
deport them at the same time that you're doing all
of that, you've got to start putting all of that
manpower that he talked about the ICE agents. This was

(11:18):
always one of my beefs about they're too busy processing paper.
They're too busy, you know, changing diapers. They're too busy
making sure there's enough baby formula there's there. They're too
busy doing things other than securing the border. So it's
a complete revolutionary change in how they've been doing business
for the past, well even during some of the Trump years,

(11:40):
because it started under Obama. Well actually it started longer
than that, but it took off like a rocket during
during the Obama administration. So Congress, and this is where
you're going to come in. Congress is going to have
to act to provide those resources, or Trump's going to
have to take some of the existing money that is,

(12:03):
say in the Inflation Reduction Act or in the Infrastructure
Bill wherever it might be, and start reallocating that to ICE,
to CBP so that they can start surging all of
this personnel in infrastructure to get these things done. Now,
Holmes got the right act, Holmes's got the absolutely the
right attitude, but he's going to need resources. You cannot

(12:27):
do everything that he's talking about doing with existing personnel.
We already have a b I don't have a story
in front of me, but Colorado Sun or Denver Gazette
or somebody has a story that I looked at over
the weekend about the backlog in Colorado seven thousand cases.
I think there was approximately seven thousand cases. So if

(12:50):
you have a seven thousand case backlog for asylum seekers
just in Colorado alone, then you need additional administry of
immigration judges. You need additional immigration attorneys on both sides,
on the DOJ side and on the defense side for
the illegal aliens, because again, whether you like it or not,

(13:13):
they're entitled to do process and then you're going to
have to expedite those hearings. So, now, if you've ever
practiced immigration law in your entire life, get in line
to be a volunteer. If you've ever been a judge,
you've taken senior status somewhere, volunteer to be an immigration

(13:35):
judge for two days a week, five days a week,
whatever it might be, and get rid of that back law.
Because once you just start doing those things, even if
those things that everything I just described takes time, the
minute that people that are on their way here, or

(13:58):
the people that are already here start to see actual
actionable things taking place, you'll have a phenomenon known as
self deportation because they don't want to go through that process.
The criminals themselves, some of which not all, but some

(14:21):
of them will start to self deport too, because they
don't want to end up in an American prison. That'd
rather run loose in Nicaragua. Well go back to Nicaraguan,
run loose, Go back to Ecuador, go back to Venezuela,
go back to Haiti. I don't care. Just wherever you work,
wherever you want to go, I don't care. Just get
out of here. Some of that will actually start to
occur on its own spontaneously. It's just like it's just

(14:50):
self combustible.

Speaker 1 (14:51):
Just boom, yeah, I guess he's got to.

Speaker 6 (14:55):
You had to build a wall, and you got to
stop sanctuary cities.

Speaker 3 (14:59):
Both times.

Speaker 6 (14:59):
The Democrat that's uh stopped every time they every time
he went forward to gum you up in court.

Speaker 3 (15:05):
You have to give it away.

Speaker 6 (15:06):
But is there a plan if sanctuary cities these city
councils don't allow the sanctuary cities to go away?

Speaker 3 (15:13):
Is there a plan B us.

Speaker 7 (15:16):
Well, I think, uh, look, it'd be great to have
local law enforcement assist the ice because you know, one
thing we're hearned during nine to eleven report was we
shouldn't have stow pipes law enforcements working law enforcement. But
you know there's two things. Number One, under President Trump,
he was swooning the sanctuary cities. Theo J see sanctuary
city's pulling time or funds. Of course, date one when

(15:37):
Joe Bike came in obviously stopped that lawsuit.

Speaker 3 (15:39):
So that has to be put back in place.

Speaker 7 (15:42):
And look, I've seen I've seen some of these democratic
governments and they're going to stand in the way.

Speaker 3 (15:46):
They're going to they're going to make a hard force.

Speaker 7 (15:48):
Well you know a suggestion, if you're not gonna help
us get the hell all the way, we're going to
do it.

Speaker 3 (15:53):
So if we can't get assistance.

Speaker 7 (15:55):
From New York City, and I may have, we may
have to double the number eight decend in New York
City because we're going to do the job.

Speaker 3 (16:02):
We're going to the job with out here or with you.
But it's much easier to rest the bad guy.

Speaker 7 (16:07):
Like I just said, we're constrant on public st touch
of human and national charity Charney. It's much easier to
rest the bad guy in the jail. Give us assess
the workers I and that we've been kicked out of.

Speaker 3 (16:17):
Let us get the bad guy in jail.

Speaker 7 (16:19):
It's safer for the ailing, it's safer for the officer,
it's safer for the community. But if you haven't releasing
bad guys that, if you want to receive bad guys
out the community, then we want have to go find them,
which puts you offer at risk, puts a community at risk,
and puts you know, in bomb linings. It's no one
century sins or sansuris for criminals. And the life keeps saying,

(16:39):
but we want victims and witnesses of the crime to
feel safe, come to the police environment knowing we don't
work her life.

Speaker 3 (16:45):
Let and they'll be able to do that. They can
claim sanctuary city status all they want, but when the
Fed step in, hey, we need to we need to manifest,
so to speak, who's in your jail. What's their citizenship
if you know it, if you don't know it, well,
we're going to presume that they're not American citizens. And

(17:06):
what's they're cry what have they been charged with? Yeah,
give us access to it. Oh baby, here comes the fund.

Speaker 2 (17:12):
Michael. Do you think there was voter fraud in twenty twenty?
According to all the statistics, it looks like that year
was crazy high voter turnout. In fact, it looks like
more votes were turned in than registered voters.

Speaker 3 (17:32):
I'm not going to go down that rabbit hole except
to say this. I've talked about that before. I talked
about it last week. There's a graph floating around all
over the place with a red line of Crida bargra
red line across the middle that shows the extraordinary number
of votes for Joe Biden in twenty twenty, and this

(17:54):
fairly consistent line for both Democrats and Republicans both before
and in this election. And the only conclusion I can
draw is it raises questions. Now, there's fraud in every election.

(18:15):
There's no election in this country or elsewhere that doesn't
have fraud involved. So you'd have to be a complete
idiot to not look at the chart and at least
question why the aberration? What was the aberration? But anybody
that tells you that the aberration is X Y and

(18:39):
Z ask them to say, or ask them show me
the money, show me the proof, what is it. You
can draw any number of conclusions or inferences, not conclusions.
You can draw any number of inferences from that, and

(19:01):
you can draw any number of inferences from the numbers.
Forget the graph, just the raw numbers. But you have
to take take into consideration it was a COVID election. Yeah,
there's fraud in every election, and you had you had
Trump who was not supposed to be there in the

(19:23):
first place. He should not have been. Democrats say he
should never been in the first place, and it should
not have been running for reelection, it should have been
Hillary Clinton. So you have all of these factors that
go into that, into those numbers. People will study that
for years, if not decades, and at some point we'll

(19:43):
know the truth. Until then, speculation baseline is this, there's
always fraud. The number is odd, and it makes people
who look at those numbers, just the raw numbers, and
go why. No one's been able to explain to me why.

(20:05):
But just because someone can explain to you why, doesn't
mean that you should then just jump to your conclusion.
I'm not saying you, but just anyone's anybody that I
should jump to my conclusion that well, this is why
or your conclusion that that is why, because nobody knows.

(20:26):
I'm want to talk it. But this really has nothing
to do with that, he said. It has to do
with the election. You know, when you make a contribution
to a campaign, you are required by federal election law
to provide your name and your employment, and that goes

(20:47):
into the FEC database and you can go and that
is well, technically you're supposed to do it for everybody.
But you know, you're at a rally and someone's passing
a plate like a church and you throw in twenty dollars.
Nobody's going to walk up to you and say, hey,
fill this format and tell me you know your name

(21:07):
and your and your employment. But if you write a check,
you're a check for two hundred dollars or over two
hundred dollars, then they are supposed to collect the name
and your your employer, you know, and your employer might
be retired, Mine would be broadcaster, pop show host, whatever,

(21:29):
or it might be lawyer, then any number of things
like a pittlemark. And then when you are every campaign
is supposed to have some infrastructure in place to check
the validity of those contributions because sometimes you'll you'll find

(21:52):
a pattern that says, oh, wait a minute, these are
all actually coming from another source, and we need to
kind of audit those. And then if it comes from
an illegal source or they've given you know, a two
year old in the same family gave five thousand dollars
when dad and mom have already given five thousand dollars.

(22:14):
Now you've exceeded the limits. We got to refund that
from because a two year old is not capable of
making a contribution the Trump campaign. Oh and let me
back up one more factor. There are different political action committees.
There's the Official Campaign Committee, there's the DNC and the RNC.

(22:39):
Then they're all these affiliated and unaffiliated packs that raise money.
The Democrats. Their preferred fundraising platform is an organization called
Act Blue. An Act Blue is a central clearinghouse for
every for all Democrats. Almost all Democrats use Act Blue

(22:59):
as their fundraising mechanism. Now ActBlue itself will act on
behalf of other candidates and other political action committees. And
so if you look closely at some of the fundraising
emails that you get or text messages, if you dis
deep enough, you'll see it really comes from Act blue.
On behalf of somebody else, another pack, or another organization.

(23:26):
ActBlue has a horrific track record of illegal campaign contributions. Now,
the Trump campaign in this last cycle so far I
can't speak up until over the weekend, but through the
weekend had issued thirty one ten twenty thirty plus one

(23:47):
thirty one refunds. The Harris campaign has already processed and
astonishing ten thousand, eight hundred and twenty one refunds, and
all of those contributions were handled through their preferred fundraising platform,
Act Blue, which has a glaring lact of any sort

(24:12):
of quality assurance, quality controls, any sort of vetting, or
anything else about. They're just a money raising machine, that's
all they are. And the absence of any real verification
raises really serious concerns, legal concerns about where the donation's genuine.
Were they manipulated or something even more troubling, illegal foreign sources,

(24:38):
any number of things. Well, some people have done some reporting,
and there are some examples. Laine McWilliams Lamee McWilliams, a
California resident engaged in a really weird cycle of giving
money and then requesting money back, sometimes on the same day.

(25:03):
Lane McWilliams tops the charts of those ten thousand plus refunds,
having received one hundred and one refunds. On November thirty,
twenty twenty three. Lane got multiple refunds, a pattern that
continued into early twenty twenty four, culminating in the final
set of refunds on February twenty five of this year. Now,

(25:24):
what would explain that behavior? Is he indecisive? Oh I
gave some money, and oh now I don't have money,
I don't have enough money for lunch. I want I
want my contribution back. Is the indecisive or is this
something calculated? Diane Gregory from Texas got ninety one refunds.
Donald Madison from Washington got eighty five refunds, and they're

(25:45):
all the same patterns. Something's going on. In total, the
Harris campaign to date has refunded five million, two hundred
and thirty four three hundred and five dollars and thirty
three cents. The average refunds is a probab from me
four hundred and eighty three dollars and seventy two cents,
which is clearly above the reporting requirement of more than

(26:06):
two hundred dollars per person. The largest single refund twenty
one thousand, seven hundred dollars to somebody named Joseph Boyle
of Oregon. The smallest positive refund one dollar Jim windleken Massachusetts.
Now there's something bizarre going on here. It's kind of

(26:26):
like the numbers. The number of refunds raises questions. So
far there is no definitive answer as to why this
extraordinary amount of refunds and is there something the ferry
is going on. It's go back to the talk back

(26:47):
about fraud in the twenty twenty election, the eighty one
million votes or whatever that number was. Whatever. Remember how
we used to count excess deaths during COVID. Now we're
talking about excess votes, and here we're talking about excess refunds.
It simply raises the question why what's going on here?

(27:10):
When you have refunds that span from literally one dollar
to tens of thousands of dollars, Then that tells you
that Act Blue does not have any sort of systems
or processes in place to identify donors, to do a
check on those donors, and no mechanism for verifying the
legitimacy of the donations, meaning that anybody listen closely. Anybody

(27:36):
that has a prepaid debit card could make a contribution
using whatever name, address, or employer they choose. So if
I'm a Democrat machine, I'm a Democrat operative and I
have already let's say I'm a wealthy donor, I've already

(27:57):
maxed out. Oh, I could go by the bazillion debit cards.
I could order one hundred thousand debit cards with five
hundred dollars or two hundred and fifty dollars on each
one and then pass them out. Or I could just

(28:17):
take them and use that debit card and fill in
Dragon Redbeard, executive producer Michael Brown, lawyer Michael Brown, talk
show host Michael Brown, author Michael Brown, speaker Michael Brown,

(28:38):
clause I retired, Michael Brown, dumbass, Michael Brown, whatever, And
I can just use that credit card, that debit card
number to make multiple contributions in essence from the same person,
just using fraudulary using other people's names. Just as an

(28:58):
example of what could have been going on, go back
to mister Lane one hundred and eighty three thousand, six
six hundred and thirty three dollars eighty eight cents in
refunds Now that's not an anomaly. That's not an aberration.
That's a systematic pattern that raises serious questions about the

(29:22):
integrity of campaign financing. When comparing refunds state by state,
California takes the lead two hundred and sixty one refunds
by ak Blue to the Hairs campaign in California, followed
by New York with eight hundred and thirty seven, in

(29:43):
Texas seven hundred and fifty two. So now you've got
widespread across the country, concentrated in three major states where
a lot of rich people live. You've got a numeric distribution. Well,
all of that demands answers, the potential, and it demands

(30:07):
that I take a break. Rannie.

Speaker 6 (30:09):
Hell, if you waited till today to getting that fridge,
you could have got ten percent.

Speaker 3 (30:19):
Yeah, well, why don't you go get it for me?
Why don't I just cancel the order and dragon you
start to go fund me to get me a new refrigerator.

Speaker 1 (30:29):
He's got a truck. He'd definitely pick it up.

Speaker 3 (30:31):
I know, sure, right, and he could install it too,
probably because I ain't installing you. The sales guy looks
at me like and should I be offended by this?
I assume you want us to install it. I did.
I wasn't offended by it, because I was like, of

(30:52):
course I want you installed. You think you think I'm
gonna go try to find a pair of pliers and
a wrench, and I'm gonna try to do this myself.
Are you kidding me?

Speaker 1 (30:59):
Guess plug in a water line? How difficult can it be?

Speaker 3 (31:02):
There?

Speaker 1 (31:02):
Michael?

Speaker 3 (31:06):
Do you know what you're talking to? I can change
a flat time, and I can change the oil. I
can put the windshield, wash your fluid in the right reservoir.
I know not to put it in the like the
you know, the coolant or the radiator, and you know
I know that I know where the jack is.

Speaker 1 (31:29):
Do you even own a toolbox?

Speaker 3 (31:31):
Yes, I own a toolbox.

Speaker 1 (31:33):
Are there tools in it?

Speaker 3 (31:34):
A few?

Speaker 1 (31:35):
And you've used them?

Speaker 3 (31:37):
Yes. The most prominent one I've used that has the
most use is a hammer.

Speaker 1 (31:43):
Screwdriver, screwdriver.

Speaker 3 (31:46):
I have a pair of pliers, I have a couple
of wrenches. I've got some Alan wrenches. I got I
got two sets of Alan wrenches.

Speaker 1 (31:53):
Given multiple choice, you could probably name all of the
tools in the toolbox.

Speaker 7 (31:58):
Uh.

Speaker 3 (31:59):
Yes, let's see. Uh, A couple of pair of two
pairs of pliers, different sizes, Three or four different wrenches,
different sizes, Alan wrenches, two sets of those, a metric
and whatever. The other one's called standard. UH screwdriver's flat
headed phillips, both some long handled, some short handled, some

(32:20):
different sizes of tips, you know, heads on the end.
UH A ball ping hammer, a regular hammer. I've got
a hack saw. I have a regular saw. And they're
still all brand new in the package. Nope, Nope, they've
they've everything.

Speaker 1 (32:41):
The camera took them out and put them in the toolbox.

Speaker 7 (32:43):
No.

Speaker 3 (32:43):
No, everything in that toolbox has at some point in
its in its existence from the hardware store to the toolbox,
has been used at least once by me. Yes, yes,
now did it the job? Did it get the job done?

(33:04):
I plead the Fifth on that, I plead the I
can name the tools, but I'm never going I have
a Fifth Amendment right against self incrimination about whether or
not the tools actually completed the job for which they
were intended to complete. That's why you have this, and
that's why you go on and you call the handyman.

(33:28):
You call Chris, Hey, Chris, can you come over and
fix this for me? What have you done well. I
started doing this and then I can't quite get into
here and it doesn't fit, and I'm just and Tamer's
screaming at me because I'm cussing and mad and throwing
a fit, and so move on. I'll finish the Act

(33:48):
Blue story tomorrow because it really does raise some serious
questions about campaign. For now,