Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, Michael, concerning our pay for leaving the talkbacks. Uh,
I still haven't received my W two form yet and
April is quickly approaching.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
They're they're electronics, so you have to you have to
log in to work Day and download them.
Speaker 3 (00:16):
I figured they were just in the nail and we
can trust the USPS for our ballot.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
No, because with that, with that gigantic raise that you
and I got, I decided to go ahead and buy
the service from work Day.
Speaker 4 (00:30):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
So you need you just need to set your account
up and work Day uh and download your W two
And it's there. It's been there since like whatever the
deadline was, like January tenth or something. So it's been there.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
And if you're having problems with it, you can always
put in a trouble ticket, and you can.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
You can always scan the little QR code and put
in a trouble ticket. But Jimmy Christmas, I get tired
of all of them. You know, it's Friday. I'm in
a good mood.
Speaker 4 (00:55):
You know, it's you know, it is one of those
good days.
Speaker 5 (00:57):
Oh, here's some good news.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
Dylan came in and fixed the TV in here, so
we now have a TV in here that we can
play if we go to breaking news. So it's got
the DVR function back. So that is fantastic.
Speaker 4 (01:08):
That's great.
Speaker 3 (01:09):
As I was talking to him, I was like, hey,
do you know any updates or anything about the blinds.
He's like, I know nothing about it, but put it
in a ticket. I was like, there's a ticket out there.
So he's like, oh, well, maybe you know. I have
a meeting with Irby and everything next week, so I'll
bring that up and maybe they'll just say, here's one
hundred bucks, go to home depot, buy some blinds.
Speaker 5 (01:32):
So here, here's hoping. Here he's hoping, Well, okay, you don't.
Speaker 3 (01:39):
Stephen thoosed well, Dylan, who's here actually working on things.
He got the TV back in here, so he's actively
doing things and.
Speaker 2 (01:48):
Working and I've got all the confidence in the world
that he will bring it up. You lost me when
you said, oh, here's a hundred dollars, go to home depot,
just get some blinds.
Speaker 5 (01:59):
That's what they did with the other ones.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
And how long ago was that? And what have we
read in the financial statements about iHeartMedia. In the meantime,
we're doing great, Hey, can we push all our debt
payments for three years. Sometimes the news or not maybe
(02:25):
this isn't even news, but just sometimes you hear stories
that you just scratch your head and you think to yourself, why,
what were what were the meeting organizers thinking?
Speaker 4 (02:41):
And could they not? Now? Look?
Speaker 2 (02:43):
Look, I do speeches, and I get paid well for
doing speeches, and I love it, and quite frankly, I
want to do more of them. Uh, And I guess
my working on that. But and I don't think that
I would be qualified to go to Vegas for this
particular conference. But if I told you that there was
(03:03):
a conference in Las Vegas where one of the keynote
speakers was.
Speaker 4 (03:12):
Someone, uh, who would you pick?
Speaker 2 (03:16):
If the conference was the human x AI which stands
for artificial intelligence For those of you who aren't quite
awake yet, who would you pick for the human x
AI conference in Vegas?
Speaker 4 (03:30):
Drag? Anybody you'd want to.
Speaker 3 (03:32):
From my mind first goes to uh Elon Musk because
he's working on those brain chips, right. He also is
dealing with a lot of AI stuff with Tesla and
the robots and everything. So that's that's where my gut
goes first.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
And I thought, and I can't name them all, but
there's Mark Anderson, There's Elon Musk, There's there there are
several other like five top names would say that are
really into AI. Now, a lot of others are, like,
you know, Microsoft is yeah, you know, so there are
a lot of different people that you would think of.
(04:13):
They resorted to Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3 (04:17):
Wait what, I wasn't quite awake say say that again
for an AI conference.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
Calamamala Harris, Kamala Harris.
Speaker 4 (04:31):
And she I only have a minute.
Speaker 2 (04:37):
I shouldn't tell you that because you'll start clicking out
the radio immediately.
Speaker 4 (04:41):
I only have a minute.
Speaker 2 (04:42):
In sixteen seconds of her presentation, it is she seems slightly.
Speaker 4 (04:51):
Inebriated, as usual as usual.
Speaker 2 (04:55):
One time she told us how much she loves Dorito's
and honked about you know, I would love it if
there would be an investment of resources in solving the
affordable housing issue in America.
Speaker 4 (05:04):
Okay, well whatever.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
A consultant must have told her that constantly bringing up
her fondness for asbestos coded cardboard chips makes her seem human, because,
after all, this is the human x AI conference. Her
affection under affection for ever increasing government investment in housing
(05:32):
is probably truly heartfelt outside of a San Francisco bathhouse.
Maybe nowhere has a higher percentage of Democrat voters than
you know, maybe a housing project. I don't know how much.
My guess is a former vice president. I mean, you know,
Obama and Clinton, they'll get a million bucks. They'll they'll
(05:57):
get you know, six figures easily. I don't think she
got six figures. But my guess is she got a
quarter of a mill. She got half a mill, you know,
I don't know.
Speaker 6 (06:10):
And for that so I was willing to give up
whatever might be the trackings of Kamala Harris's particular, I
fondness for nacho chees Dorito's for the sake of getting
a big bag of Dorito's as I watched the oscars.
Speaker 4 (06:29):
That's the consumer behavior, and that's right.
Speaker 6 (06:31):
But here's the thing.
Speaker 5 (06:35):
At what point do we also.
Speaker 7 (06:38):
Uplift and highlight the consumer's right to also expect And.
Speaker 5 (06:44):
You can debate with me if it should be right.
Speaker 4 (06:46):
I think it should to.
Speaker 7 (06:48):
Expect that the innovation would also be weighted in terms
of solving.
Speaker 6 (06:55):
Their everyday problems.
Speaker 7 (06:58):
Which are beyond my craving for reados, what about whatever?
Speaker 4 (07:04):
And I know the work is happening around.
Speaker 7 (07:06):
You know, scientific discoveries, for example, to cure long standing diseases.
But I'm going to throw out another one and you
all again, please get back to me and information you have.
Speaker 4 (07:16):
I would love it.
Speaker 7 (07:17):
If there would be an investment of resources in solving
the affordable housing issue in America, like help you with that, help.
Speaker 2 (07:25):
You with that, help me with that, a cry for help,
a desperate cry for help. So there you have it.
So this program can only go upwards from here. I
(07:47):
have no idea moving right along. You know, I love
New Mexico, home of the undisclosed location. But when it
comes to crow, Democrats believe in reward. They don't believe
in punishment. House Democrats in the New Mexico Pullit Bureau
(08:08):
voted on Saturday this past Saturday, passed to pass House
Bill two fifty five. It's a controversial measure that includes
a provision to give violent juvenile offenders violent juvenile offenders
up to two thousand dollars per month in taxpayer funded stipends.
(08:32):
Now I have sitting on my desk right now, my
property tax bill for New Mexico, which I quite frankly
think I think it might be passed due. I'm not
quite sure, but you know, it's one of those things
that I'll just pay it whenever I pay it. And
compared to the property taxes in Colorado, it's not that much,
but nonetheless it's money I'd rather go spend on something
(08:53):
else than two thousand dollars per month taxpayer stipends for
violent offenders. Now, the beneficiaries would include individuals who committed
violent crimes such as manslaughter and aggravated assault.
Speaker 4 (09:08):
This is nothing more than an incentivation of crime.
Speaker 2 (09:14):
Manslaught, agg aggravated assault, which you know, the legal definition
of that is when you beat somebody up because you're mad,
you're just aggravated at them. That's aggravated assault. That's going
to cost taxpayers in New Mexico millions of dollars. Criminals
get the carrots. As foot of sticks story says well.
House Built two fifty five sailed through the House. The
(09:35):
same group of Democratic lawmakers on the House Consumer and
Public Affairs Committee voted to the table House Built one
thirty four, effectively killing that bill.
Speaker 4 (09:44):
House Built one thirty four.
Speaker 2 (09:46):
Aimed to ensure that miners who commit violent crimes, including
first degree murder, face meaningful consequences. New Mexico allows juveniles
who commit even the most tenous crimes to be released
by their eighteenth to twenty first birthday, regardless of the
severity of their offenses. They I don't know that they
(10:11):
might be done egging on BLM riots. But Democrats seem
to always side with the criminals against the rest of us.
So think about what they did in New Mexico. So
the decision to advance House Bill two fifty five, providing
up to two thousand dollars a month stipends. Now, I
(10:34):
want you to twenty four thousand dollars a year if
you commit a violent crime like manslaughter or aggravated assault
twenty fourth.
Speaker 4 (10:43):
Out, we're gonna pay a criminal.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
So the decision to advance that bill while killing the
House Bill that would say, listen, you commit a violent crime,
you're actually going to stay in prison and serve your
prison term and not be released on your eighteenth or
twenty first birthday. There is a wave of rising juvenile
(11:08):
crime in New Mexico, and the move also comes after
failed attempts to strengthen penalties for federal traffickers. House Democrats
voted down House Built two seventy four, which would have
imposed harshest sentences on major drug traffickers responsible for fueling
the opioid epidemic. I don't know, but it seems to me,
(11:30):
since we started out talking about insanity, Kamala Harris that
this proves insanity. You vote for more of the same,
You're going to get more of the same. You keep
doing the same thing over and over and over and
expecting you a different result. Was it Einstein or somebody
else said that that is the very definition of insanity.
(11:50):
We live in an insane world, an utterly insane world.
So in looking for my Michael Brown minute last night,
I ran across this story. Just as long as we're doing
dumb ass raym Friday. You probably I vaguely remembered this
when I read about it, but if you'd asked me, hey,
(12:11):
is this, maybe I wouever we called it or not.
But in twenty nineteen, there was a huge controversy in
Colorado because there's no mechanism. For example, the Colorado Bar Association,
in conjunction with the Colorado Supreme Court, oversees disciplinary actions
against lawyers, but there is no similar procedure, or there's
(12:36):
no similar organization or anything to oversee judges, including Colorado
State Supreme Court judges. Well, the Denver Post of all places, surprisingly,
of course, that's now six years ago, did an investigation
in which they found that a former court administrator had
(12:58):
awarded one of her employees a two and a half
million dollar contract in order to keep that employee quiet
about sexual harassment and other misconduct by judges. So it
was a big deal at the time. Now, when that occurred,
(13:18):
there was no ombudsman. There was no organization or process
by which we could oversee judges and adjudicate with due
process any allegations of misconduct. So the Marxists at the
poly Bureau took action. By golly, this is why the
Denver postess you know what, you know what it is.
Speaker 4 (13:38):
They got caught, Some of their comrades on the.
Speaker 2 (13:42):
Judiciary got caught, so they feel like they got to
take action. So what did they do. They created an
office of the Umbudsman, whose sole responsibility is to oversee
misconduct of judges to adjudicate. So if there are you know,
a lawyer, a party to a case, a court employee,
(14:05):
somebody you know, a reporter, anybody that discovers misconduct against judges,
in Colorado, there would be a place to go in
which you could have that misconduct investigated and with due
process adjudicated. So they passed a bill. The bill created
a five person selection board, two Republicans, two Democrats, and
(14:27):
a judge. Interestingly, a judge to be appointed by Governor
Jared Polis. So this five person board, two individuals, you know,
maybe me or Dragon and then maybe you and somebody else,
you know, two by Democrats and two by Republicans, and
then the governor, who nominates and puts judges in those positions,
(14:50):
would then select one of US crony judges to be
on this five member selection board. The board was supposed
to begin meeting in January, wary of twenty twenty four.
They had a deadline of March twenty twenty four to
(15:11):
hire non budsmen. Now, Colorido faces a one point five
billion dollar budget shortfall somewhere in that area. So some
little you know twink down at the pull up Bureau
is going line item by line out in by line item,
trying to find places to cut and he comes across
(15:31):
a four hundred thousand dollars line item that no one
has ever spent the money, No one has ever requested
a This goes back to twenty twenty four. No one
this year has in has requested a refunding of that
for you know, give us another four hundred thousand dollars,
(15:53):
or now give us five hundred thousand dollars, because you know,
it's a new year. We get we have to have
more money, because you can never do anything the same
amount of money, have to have more. So this little
twig's looking at it and thinking to himself, Oh, I
wonder what this is. And he digs around and he realizes, Oh,
it's from when in twenty twenty three they created this
(16:14):
board that was supposed to hire non budsmen to oversee judges,
and nothing's been done. Now, remember they had a deadline
of March of twenty twenty four to hire a non
budsmen checks computer Friday March fourteen, twenty twenty five. So
(16:40):
now one year and two weeks later, nobody's been appointed.
The budget was never spent, there are no employees, there's
no mbudsmen, there is no oversight, and so what do
they decide to do, even though oh, it's the law
(17:02):
that we were to have this judicial oversight at least
as of the last reporting, which was yesterday. I always
put that caveat in because who knows, maybe they've got
me tapped and they know I'm going to talk about
this today. So last night they introduced a bill and
or they suddenly decided to appoint somebody. But at least
(17:23):
as of last night, not a damn thing's been done,
nothing at all, no budget, didn't spend any money, never
even appointed anybody to the five member board. So if
you don't have a five member board to search and
hire someone to be the on budgeman, then obviously, using
(17:44):
Kamala Harris's artificial intelligence, we have no on budgment, no
on budgmen, no oversight of judges.
Speaker 4 (17:54):
So what was my point? Vote more vote from more
of the same, and you'll get more of the same.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
Yeah, I'm sure they'll take that four hundred thousand dollars
to scratch it out. And now they've reduced the one
point five billion dollar deficit by four hundred thousand dollars
and we still have no judicial.
Speaker 1 (18:11):
Overs Michael, Michael, I wasn't sure I could afford to
leave you this talk back because after listening free over
the radio on the air and using the free.
Speaker 5 (18:22):
iHeart app.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
I was just trying to pay for what I need.
But then hey if I if I add in the
weekend with Michael Brown, I think I can bundle and save.
I'll just pay for what I need, bundle and save.
I wish I could do that in other parts of
my life. Have a great Friday, Michael, Michael.
Speaker 2 (18:41):
Yeah, we're the liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty, whatever of or
where the progressive who somebody bundles and saves you. Yeah,
I think that's the progressive one. Is that's the progressive one.
And this is a progressive program And I'm a progressive
at heart.
Speaker 5 (18:54):
A progressive station, a progressive.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
Station, that's exactly right, Denver's Talk station members Progressive Falk Stations,
six thirty KHW. So yeah, you can, you can bundle
and save, and there is a package and again that
is all available to you on workday. You just need
to go pick your benefits. So just like Dragon and
I had to pick our benefits, you got to pick
your benefits. And trust me, there's a plethora of benefits
(19:19):
listening to these two programs. In fact, it's don't shake
your head like that.
Speaker 5 (19:25):
Well, for one, it lowers your you know blood pressure.
Speaker 2 (19:30):
If there was ever a program that lowers your blood pressure.
This has got to be it right, This has got
to be it.
Speaker 3 (19:38):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
Someone just sent me this to protest Donald Trump's policies.
Rosie o'donald moved to a country that is ninety one race,
has an official language, requires voter I d to vote,
and is seventy five percent Christian. Good old Rosie. I
(20:01):
wish Rosie.
Speaker 3 (20:02):
Well, I'll believe she's serious when she changes her citizenship.
Speaker 2 (20:06):
Well what I heard, I don't think would you accept
that she acquired her Irish citizenship so she's dual citizen? Yes,
she went halfway, Dragon, she went halfway. And then I
heard some names yesterday. Here's the funny thing. Most of
the names I didn't recognize, So I know the way.
(20:29):
It's just because I'm culturally deprived when it comes to Hollywood.
Speaker 5 (20:32):
Oh, is these other celebrities moving?
Speaker 2 (20:34):
No, there were some that have already moved, that actually
moved back, you know, after twenty sixteen. But I think
most of them were either bead or seedlisters out of Hollywood,
and they're only like three or four.
Speaker 4 (20:47):
Don't get me wrong. It wasn't like there was a.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
Mass migration, and they my guess is they most of
them were retiring.
Speaker 4 (20:54):
Do they move for reasons other than the election?
Speaker 5 (20:56):
I'll let the door hit you with a good Lord
splitch you.
Speaker 4 (20:59):
I've not heard that one.
Speaker 2 (21:00):
What don't let the door hit you when the good
Lord lord split you?
Speaker 4 (21:07):
When is that when the good Lord splits you?
Speaker 5 (21:09):
Where do you have a split? Michael?
Speaker 2 (21:14):
Oh, wow, I've never heard that. You've taught me something today.
Totally worthless. But nonetheless, you did tell me your head
you think of it at some point in you know,
so there'll be somewhere we're all use it, and I'll
think that's son of a bit. We're gonna talk a
(21:36):
little We're gonna talk a little bit about Greenland later
in the day, but let's go to Antarctica right now.
Speaker 4 (21:43):
One way.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
By the way, somebody asked me on the text line
about the story that I did yesterday about them building
the eight mile highway in the Amazon Raiding rainforest. Well,
you ask for the coordinates. I don't have the coordinates,
but I I'm sure if you go on Google Earth. Well, again,
it depends on how often they take the satellite photos.
(22:08):
But there are stories all over the interwebs. In fact,
this morning I heard Fox News doing it, and Fox
News Masters of the obvious. We're talking about they're building
a I think it's four lanes, eight miles. They're going
to pave it. I don't know whether there's gonna be concrete, asphalt,
(22:29):
or a combination of both. It's certainly not going to
be graveled, because we don't want to gravel, you know,
breaking the windshields or their Bentleys as they go from
or their land Rovers as they go from one place
to another. But then Fox started talking about how, oh,
eight miles must be the distance from the nearest landing
strip for the jets so that they can they can
(22:53):
exit the jets and then get into their SUVs and
drive the eight miles. I think, Dragon I could easily
hike eight miles. We could easily hike eight miles even
in the Amazon rainforest and get to our destination. But
think of the utter hypocrisy of what they're doing. It
(23:15):
is so hypocritical, and the locals are apparently really pissed off.
I had a friend that just made a trip, not
just it's been like a month now, made a trip
down the Amazon. But he didn't do it. I mean
he travels solo and he didn't do it with a tour.
He literally found a local boat where and he sent
(23:38):
me photos. I should put this, put them up on
the website. But a local boat you sleep in a
hammock and you pull off on the side of the
river to eat breakfast and lunch where the locals will
cook breakfast and lunch for you.
Speaker 4 (23:55):
And then I don't whether you have dinner or not.
Speaker 2 (23:57):
But it's a rickety, old wooden boat me and it
looked like it looked like something out of some Vietnam
War movie of you know, some you know, the the
viet Cong trying to sneak down out of Cambodi or whatever.
It's so bizarre. Anyway, back to Antarctica. So one way,
that one way, in addition to the rainforest, that we
know that there's a climate crisis that requires this massive
(24:20):
expansion of big government. And yes, if somebody's texting me
yes so they can control us. Is that according to
the government Antarctica Again, this is according to the government.
This comes from NASA, which we're gonna talk about NASA
in a minute. Antarctica is losing ice mass parentheses, melting
(24:44):
I'm glad to explain that to us. At an average
rate of about one hundred and fifty billion tons per
year adding to sea level rise, Now that is a
completely meaningless sentence to me. I don't first of all,
one hundred and fifty billion tons per year?
Speaker 4 (25:04):
Well, is that above normal? Is that normal? Is that
below normal?
Speaker 2 (25:09):
And when you think about the the world is what
ninety five water? So if you add one hundred and
fifty billion tons of ice that melts into water, and
it says adding to sea level rise. Notice how they
don't tell you anything about it. There's no perspective on
that whatsoever. It's it's like, okay, I've drank half my
(25:31):
first diet coke today.
Speaker 4 (25:32):
If I go into the.
Speaker 2 (25:33):
Kitchen, that that refrigerator dragon has got to get cleaned up,
and I take the scoop and I put some ice
in here, or as the ice melts, I don't perceptibly
see the level of liquid in the in the MacDonald's
cup rising. So what is one hundred and fifty billion
tons per year mean? And how much does does that
(25:55):
add to sea level?
Speaker 3 (25:56):
And just did a quick search here as to the
oceans contained and estimated one point three five times ten
to the eighteenth metric tons of water.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
So one hundred and fifty billion tons is like the
little speck of dust over here on the console.
Speaker 3 (26:19):
That's a one three five followed by eighteen zeros tons
of chater.
Speaker 2 (26:29):
So one hundred and fifty billion tons is a spec
is literally you what it is? It's you and me
standing on the edge of a glacier in Antarctica and
taking a whiz. Probably that's what it is. That's that's
how much it's going to rise. But then I read
this sensational new discoveries arising from long forgotten early aerial photographs,
(26:52):
indicate that ice has remained stable and even grown slightly
since the nineteen thirties over a two thousand kilometers stretch
of East Antarctica. In a recent paper published in Nature Communications,
researchers from the University of Copenhagen came to their conclusions
by tracking glacial movement in an area with as much
(27:16):
ice as the Greenland Ice Sheet. Excuse me, now, this
Antarctic news is not terribly surprising. It continues. What warming
there has been on the west side is directly on
top of a large number of volcanoes. Footnote here some
(27:37):
volcano in Alaska, girl, dad is apparently they're concerned it
might erupt. So I'm just you know, in case you're
you know, drunk in a stupor and not paying attention
to the news, you may have a volcano eruption in
Alaska and we don't want that because it's going to
cause pollution. A recent paper from sane in Palvan he
(28:00):
found that Antarctic antarcticas sea ice has modestly expanded. Of
finding that seems to confirm the work on the ice
shelf increases between two thousand and nine and twenty nineteen.
Warming has been nearly nonexistent for over seventy years. State
sing in Paulvani claimate fluctuations. They're truly being politicized to
(28:24):
do what you know, the answer, to advance the expansion
of government at the expense of the individual. Collectivism, Marxism, communism.
No advocate of government growth can be taken at face value,
particularly on this issue, naturally, including the government itself NASA,
(28:48):
which is the source of that information.
Speaker 4 (28:50):
Happy Pie Day today three fourteen. Pie. I like pie.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
You think somebody make us What if we could get
the googer's make us a pie and get it here
before the end of the show. What kind of pie
do you want?
Speaker 3 (29:05):
Dragon, I don't think you can make a good, decent
pie in that amount of time.
Speaker 4 (29:11):
Oh, I think they could.
Speaker 5 (29:14):
Just a couple of hours.
Speaker 4 (29:16):
Oh yeah, bake it three point fifty four? What you know? Now,
I'm really kind of genuinely curious.
Speaker 2 (29:25):
How long does it take to I know prep takes
a while, right, but the actual baking thirty minutes, forty
five minutes or so? I think forty five max. But
I what do I know? Ask me in the last
time I baked the pie?
Speaker 5 (29:39):
When's the last time he baked the pie?
Speaker 4 (29:41):
I can tell you that.
Speaker 2 (29:42):
I can't even tell you the last time I Michael
waved a frozen pie.
Speaker 5 (29:48):
Pot pies counts, Oh pot pie?
Speaker 2 (29:51):
Haven't had a pot pie in ages. Oh there's a
healthy meal right there, a pot.
Speaker 5 (29:57):
Pie gravy on the ends.
Speaker 4 (29:58):
That yeah.
Speaker 2 (30:00):
Article six of the United States Constitution, Clause two says
this this Constitution and the Laws of the United States,
which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties
made or which shall be made under the authority of
the United States, shall be the supreme law of the
Land the supremacy clause. Now, if we didn't have the
(30:24):
supremacy clause, we would have chaos.
Speaker 4 (30:27):
Oh, wait a minute, we do have chaos.
Speaker 2 (30:30):
The State of Washington filed a lawsuit against the Adams
County Sheriff's Office, not Colorado, with Washington and Adams County
this past Monday for violating the Keep Washington Working Act,
which established the state as a sanctuary for illegal aliens.
Speaker 4 (30:49):
Now, wait a minute.
Speaker 2 (30:53):
Democrats know the laws that they inflict or detrimental, or
they wouldn't give them such incongruous names. To Keep Washington
Working Act, that's what established sanctuary status in Washington. You'll
naming a law that unconstitutionally displaces American workers with foreigners,
that the invaders, I'm sorry, the newcomers. The Keep Washington
(31:18):
Working Act is comparable calling to exactly like calling the
Green New Deal spending blowout, the Inflation Reduction Act. I mean,
there are any number of acts that you could think
of that are so misappropriately named because they went to
hide from unsuspecting goober's what they're really doing. So the
(31:43):
Adams County Sheriffs of the Adams County, Washington Sheriff's Office
is being sued for upholding federal law. The lawsuit alleges
that deputies have unlawfully held people in custody based solely
on their immigration status, and have quote gone out of
their way to enable.
Speaker 4 (32:03):
Federal immigration agents, you know, the.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
GESTAPO, to interview or question people in custody, including transporting
people in county vehicles express me expressly for that purpose.
I just find that allegation hilarious. They actually used county
vehicles to transport illegal aliens to a detention facility. What
(32:27):
are you supposed to do? Call uber, hey, uber? Uh, yeah,
we need an uber X here. We need room for
a deputy sheriff to sit in the back seat with
the guy who's gonna have handcuffs on, and we need
to take, you know, take us from the county courthouse
to a detention facility. You know, when you think about
when Fort Sumter was fired on what did Lincoln do,
(32:50):
he responded forcefully, he's imputant leftists defying federal immigration law
in the face of what's really a foreign invasion. That's
kind of the modern equivalent. I think the lawsuit sides
with foreign invaders against the United States government.
Speaker 4 (33:07):
Washington.
Speaker 2 (33:07):
You might say Washington State, much like any other sanctuary state,
is engaged in acting as a state of insurrection. Yes,
they're insurrectionists. We haven't heard that word in a long time.
I thought this time we'd get it back in our vernacular.
Washington State, Colorado, all states of Insurrection,
Hey, Michael, concerning our pay for leaving the talkbacks. Uh,
I still haven't received my W two form yet and
April is quickly approaching.
Speaker 2 (00:11):
They're they're electronics, so you have to you have to
log in to work Day and download them.
Speaker 3 (00:16):
I figured they were just in the nail and we
can trust the USPS for our ballot.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
No, because with that, with that gigantic raise that you
and I got, I decided to go ahead and buy
the service from work Day.
Speaker 4 (00:30):
Wow.
Speaker 2 (00:30):
So you need you just need to set your account
up and work Day uh and download your W two
And it's there. It's been there since like whatever the
deadline was, like January tenth or something. So it's been there.
Speaker 3 (00:42):
And if you're having problems with it, you can always
put in a trouble ticket, and you can.
Speaker 2 (00:45):
You can always scan the little QR code and put
in a trouble ticket. But Jimmy Christmas, I get tired
of all of them. You know, it's Friday. I'm in
a good mood.
Speaker 4 (00:55):
You know, it's you know, it is one of those
good days.
Speaker 5 (00:57):
Oh, here's some good news.
Speaker 3 (00:59):
Dylan came in and fixed the TV in here, so
we now have a TV in here that we can
play if we go to breaking news. So it's got
the DVR function back. So that is fantastic.
Speaker 4 (01:08):
That's great.
Speaker 3 (01:09):
As I was talking to him, I was like, hey,
do you know any updates or anything about the blinds.
He's like, I know nothing about it, but put it
in a ticket. I was like, there's a ticket out there.
So he's like, oh, well, maybe you know. I have
a meeting with Irby and everything next week, so I'll
bring that up and maybe they'll just say, here's one
hundred bucks, go to home depot, buy some blinds.
Speaker 5 (01:32):
So here, here's hoping. Here he's hoping, Well, okay, you don't.
Speaker 3 (01:39):
Stephen thoosed well, Dylan, who's here actually working on things.
He got the TV back in here, so he's actively
doing things and.
Speaker 2 (01:48):
Working and I've got all the confidence in the world
that he will bring it up. You lost me when
you said, oh, here's a hundred dollars, go to home depot,
just get some blinds.
Speaker 5 (01:59):
That's what they did with the other ones.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
And how long ago was that? And what have we
read in the financial statements about iHeartMedia. In the meantime,
we're doing great, Hey, can we push all our debt
payments for three years. Sometimes the news or not maybe
(02:25):
this isn't even news, but just sometimes you hear stories
that you just scratch your head and you think to yourself, why,
what were what were the meeting organizers thinking?
Speaker 4 (02:41):
And could they not? Now? Look?
Speaker 2 (02:43):
Look, I do speeches, and I get paid well for
doing speeches, and I love it, and quite frankly, I
want to do more of them. Uh, And I guess
my working on that. But and I don't think that
I would be qualified to go to Vegas for this
particular conference. But if I told you that there was
(03:03):
a conference in Las Vegas where one of the keynote
speakers was.
Speaker 4 (03:12):
Someone, uh, who would you pick?
Speaker 2 (03:16):
If the conference was the human x AI which stands
for artificial intelligence For those of you who aren't quite
awake yet, who would you pick for the human x
AI conference in Vegas?
Speaker 4 (03:30):
Drag? Anybody you'd want to.
Speaker 3 (03:32):
From my mind first goes to uh Elon Musk because
he's working on those brain chips, right. He also is
dealing with a lot of AI stuff with Tesla and
the robots and everything. So that's that's where my gut
goes first.
Speaker 2 (03:48):
And I thought, and I can't name them all, but
there's Mark Anderson, There's Elon Musk, There's there there are
several other like five top names would say that are
really into AI. Now, a lot of others are, like,
you know, Microsoft is yeah, you know, so there are
a lot of different people that you would think of.
(04:13):
They resorted to Kamala Harris.
Speaker 3 (04:17):
Wait what, I wasn't quite awake say say that again
for an AI conference.
Speaker 2 (04:26):
Calamamala Harris, Kamala Harris.
Speaker 4 (04:31):
And she I only have a minute.
Speaker 2 (04:37):
I shouldn't tell you that because you'll start clicking out
the radio immediately.
Speaker 4 (04:41):
I only have a minute.
Speaker 2 (04:42):
In sixteen seconds of her presentation, it is she seems slightly.
Speaker 4 (04:51):
Inebriated, as usual as usual.
Speaker 2 (04:55):
One time she told us how much she loves Dorito's
and honked about you know, I would love it if
there would be an investment of resources in solving the
affordable housing issue in America.
Speaker 4 (05:04):
Okay, well whatever.
Speaker 2 (05:06):
A consultant must have told her that constantly bringing up
her fondness for asbestos coded cardboard chips makes her seem human, because,
after all, this is the human x AI conference. Her
affection under affection for ever increasing government investment in housing
(05:32):
is probably truly heartfelt outside of a San Francisco bathhouse.
Maybe nowhere has a higher percentage of Democrat voters than
you know, maybe a housing project. I don't know how much.
My guess is a former vice president. I mean, you know,
Obama and Clinton, they'll get a million bucks. They'll they'll
(05:57):
get you know, six figures easily. I don't think she
got six figures. But my guess is she got a
quarter of a mill. She got half a mill, you know,
I don't know.
Speaker 6 (06:10):
And for that so I was willing to give up
whatever might be the trackings of Kamala Harris's particular, I
fondness for nacho chees Dorito's for the sake of getting
a big bag of Dorito's as I watched the oscars.
Speaker 4 (06:29):
That's the consumer behavior, and that's right.
Speaker 6 (06:31):
But here's the thing.
Speaker 5 (06:35):
At what point do we also.
Speaker 7 (06:38):
Uplift and highlight the consumer's right to also expect And.
Speaker 5 (06:44):
You can debate with me if it should be right.
Speaker 4 (06:46):
I think it should to.
Speaker 7 (06:48):
Expect that the innovation would also be weighted in terms
of solving.
Speaker 6 (06:55):
Their everyday problems.
Speaker 7 (06:58):
Which are beyond my craving for reados, what about whatever?
Speaker 4 (07:04):
And I know the work is happening around.
Speaker 7 (07:06):
You know, scientific discoveries, for example, to cure long standing diseases.
But I'm going to throw out another one and you
all again, please get back to me and information you have.
Speaker 4 (07:16):
I would love it.
Speaker 7 (07:17):
If there would be an investment of resources in solving
the affordable housing issue in America, like help you with that, help.
Speaker 2 (07:25):
You with that, help me with that, a cry for help,
a desperate cry for help. So there you have it.
So this program can only go upwards from here. I
(07:47):
have no idea moving right along. You know, I love
New Mexico, home of the undisclosed location. But when it
comes to crow, Democrats believe in reward. They don't believe
in punishment. House Democrats in the New Mexico Pullit Bureau
(08:08):
voted on Saturday this past Saturday, passed to pass House
Bill two fifty five. It's a controversial measure that includes
a provision to give violent juvenile offenders violent juvenile offenders
up to two thousand dollars per month in taxpayer funded stipends.
(08:32):
Now I have sitting on my desk right now, my
property tax bill for New Mexico, which I quite frankly
think I think it might be passed due. I'm not
quite sure, but you know, it's one of those things
that I'll just pay it whenever I pay it. And
compared to the property taxes in Colorado, it's not that much,
but nonetheless it's money I'd rather go spend on something
(08:53):
else than two thousand dollars per month taxpayer stipends for
violent offenders. Now, the beneficiaries would include individuals who committed
violent crimes such as manslaughter and aggravated assault.
Speaker 4 (09:08):
This is nothing more than an incentivation of crime.
Speaker 2 (09:14):
Manslaught, agg aggravated assault, which you know, the legal definition
of that is when you beat somebody up because you're mad,
you're just aggravated at them. That's aggravated assault. That's going
to cost taxpayers in New Mexico millions of dollars. Criminals
get the carrots. As foot of sticks story says well.
House Built two fifty five sailed through the House. The
(09:35):
same group of Democratic lawmakers on the House Consumer and
Public Affairs Committee voted to the table House Built one
thirty four, effectively killing that bill.
Speaker 4 (09:44):
House Built one thirty four.
Speaker 2 (09:46):
Aimed to ensure that miners who commit violent crimes, including
first degree murder, face meaningful consequences. New Mexico allows juveniles
who commit even the most tenous crimes to be released
by their eighteenth to twenty first birthday, regardless of the
severity of their offenses. They I don't know that they
(10:11):
might be done egging on BLM riots. But Democrats seem
to always side with the criminals against the rest of us.
So think about what they did in New Mexico. So
the decision to advance House Bill two fifty five, providing
up to two thousand dollars a month stipends. Now, I
(10:34):
want you to twenty four thousand dollars a year if
you commit a violent crime like manslaughter or aggravated assault
twenty fourth.
Speaker 4 (10:43):
Out, we're gonna pay a criminal.
Speaker 2 (10:46):
So the decision to advance that bill while killing the
House Bill that would say, listen, you commit a violent crime,
you're actually going to stay in prison and serve your
prison term and not be released on your eighteenth or
twenty first birthday. There is a wave of rising juvenile
(11:08):
crime in New Mexico, and the move also comes after
failed attempts to strengthen penalties for federal traffickers. House Democrats
voted down House Built two seventy four, which would have
imposed harshest sentences on major drug traffickers responsible for fueling
the opioid epidemic. I don't know, but it seems to me,
(11:30):
since we started out talking about insanity, Kamala Harris that
this proves insanity. You vote for more of the same,
You're going to get more of the same. You keep
doing the same thing over and over and over and
expecting you a different result. Was it Einstein or somebody
else said that that is the very definition of insanity.
(11:50):
We live in an insane world, an utterly insane world.
So in looking for my Michael Brown minute last night,
I ran across this story. Just as long as we're doing
dumb ass raym Friday. You probably I vaguely remembered this
when I read about it, but if you'd asked me, hey,
(12:11):
is this, maybe I wouever we called it or not.
But in twenty nineteen, there was a huge controversy in
Colorado because there's no mechanism. For example, the Colorado Bar Association,
in conjunction with the Colorado Supreme Court, oversees disciplinary actions
against lawyers, but there is no similar procedure, or there's
(12:36):
no similar organization or anything to oversee judges, including Colorado
State Supreme Court judges. Well, the Denver Post of all places, surprisingly,
of course, that's now six years ago, did an investigation
in which they found that a former court administrator had
(12:58):
awarded one of her employees a two and a half
million dollar contract in order to keep that employee quiet
about sexual harassment and other misconduct by judges. So it
was a big deal at the time. Now, when that occurred,
(13:18):
there was no ombudsman. There was no organization or process
by which we could oversee judges and adjudicate with due
process any allegations of misconduct. So the Marxists at the
poly Bureau took action. By golly, this is why the
Denver postess you know what, you know what it is.
Speaker 4 (13:38):
They got caught, Some of their comrades on the.
Speaker 2 (13:42):
Judiciary got caught, so they feel like they got to
take action. So what did they do. They created an
office of the Umbudsman, whose sole responsibility is to oversee
misconduct of judges to adjudicate. So if there are you know,
a lawyer, a party to a case, a court employee,
(14:05):
somebody you know, a reporter, anybody that discovers misconduct against judges,
in Colorado, there would be a place to go in
which you could have that misconduct investigated and with due
process adjudicated. So they passed a bill. The bill created
a five person selection board, two Republicans, two Democrats, and
(14:27):
a judge. Interestingly, a judge to be appointed by Governor
Jared Polis. So this five person board, two individuals, you know,
maybe me or Dragon and then maybe you and somebody else,
you know, two by Democrats and two by Republicans, and
then the governor, who nominates and puts judges in those positions,
(14:50):
would then select one of US crony judges to be
on this five member selection board. The board was supposed
to begin meeting in January, wary of twenty twenty four.
They had a deadline of March twenty twenty four to
(15:11):
hire non budsmen. Now, Colorido faces a one point five
billion dollar budget shortfall somewhere in that area. So some
little you know twink down at the pull up Bureau
is going line item by line out in by line item,
trying to find places to cut and he comes across
(15:31):
a four hundred thousand dollars line item that no one
has ever spent the money, No one has ever requested
a This goes back to twenty twenty four. No one
this year has in has requested a refunding of that
for you know, give us another four hundred thousand dollars,
(15:53):
or now give us five hundred thousand dollars, because you know,
it's a new year. We get we have to have
more money, because you can never do anything the same
amount of money, have to have more. So this little
twig's looking at it and thinking to himself, Oh, I
wonder what this is. And he digs around and he realizes, Oh,
it's from when in twenty twenty three they created this
(16:14):
board that was supposed to hire non budsmen to oversee judges,
and nothing's been done. Now, remember they had a deadline
of March of twenty twenty four to hire a non
budsmen checks computer Friday March fourteen, twenty twenty five. So
(16:40):
now one year and two weeks later, nobody's been appointed.
The budget was never spent, there are no employees, there's
no mbudsmen, there is no oversight, and so what do
they decide to do, even though oh, it's the law
(17:02):
that we were to have this judicial oversight at least
as of the last reporting, which was yesterday. I always
put that caveat in because who knows, maybe they've got
me tapped and they know I'm going to talk about
this today. So last night they introduced a bill and
or they suddenly decided to appoint somebody. But at least
(17:23):
as of last night, not a damn thing's been done,
nothing at all, no budget, didn't spend any money, never
even appointed anybody to the five member board. So if
you don't have a five member board to search and
hire someone to be the on budgeman, then obviously, using
(17:44):
Kamala Harris's artificial intelligence, we have no on budgment, no
on budgmen, no oversight of judges.
Speaker 4 (17:54):
So what was my point? Vote more vote from more
of the same, and you'll get more of the same.
Speaker 2 (18:00):
Yeah, I'm sure they'll take that four hundred thousand dollars
to scratch it out. And now they've reduced the one
point five billion dollar deficit by four hundred thousand dollars
and we still have no judicial.
Speaker 1 (18:11):
Overs Michael, Michael, I wasn't sure I could afford to
leave you this talk back because after listening free over
the radio on the air and using the free.
Speaker 5 (18:22):
iHeart app.
Speaker 1 (18:23):
I was just trying to pay for what I need.
But then hey if I if I add in the
weekend with Michael Brown, I think I can bundle and save.
I'll just pay for what I need, bundle and save.
I wish I could do that in other parts of
my life. Have a great Friday, Michael, Michael.
Speaker 2 (18:41):
Yeah, we're the liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty, whatever of or
where the progressive who somebody bundles and saves you. Yeah,
I think that's the progressive one. Is that's the progressive one.
And this is a progressive program And I'm a progressive
at heart.
Speaker 5 (18:54):
A progressive station, a progressive.
Speaker 2 (18:56):
Station, that's exactly right, Denver's Talk station members Progressive Falk Stations,
six thirty KHW. So yeah, you can, you can bundle
and save, and there is a package and again that
is all available to you on workday. You just need
to go pick your benefits. So just like Dragon and
I had to pick our benefits, you got to pick
your benefits. And trust me, there's a plethora of benefits
(19:19):
listening to these two programs. In fact, it's don't shake
your head like that.
Speaker 5 (19:25):
Well, for one, it lowers your you know blood pressure.
Speaker 2 (19:30):
If there was ever a program that lowers your blood pressure.
This has got to be it right, This has got
to be it.
Speaker 3 (19:38):
Uh.
Speaker 2 (19:39):
Someone just sent me this to protest Donald Trump's policies.
Rosie o'donald moved to a country that is ninety one race,
has an official language, requires voter I d to vote,
and is seventy five percent Christian. Good old Rosie. I
(20:01):
wish Rosie.
Speaker 3 (20:02):
Well, I'll believe she's serious when she changes her citizenship.
Speaker 2 (20:06):
Well what I heard, I don't think would you accept
that she acquired her Irish citizenship so she's dual citizen? Yes,
she went halfway, Dragon, she went halfway. And then I
heard some names yesterday. Here's the funny thing. Most of
the names I didn't recognize, So I know the way.
(20:29):
It's just because I'm culturally deprived when it comes to Hollywood.
Speaker 5 (20:32):
Oh, is these other celebrities moving?
Speaker 2 (20:34):
No, there were some that have already moved, that actually
moved back, you know, after twenty sixteen. But I think
most of them were either bead or seedlisters out of Hollywood,
and they're only like three or four.
Speaker 4 (20:47):
Don't get me wrong. It wasn't like there was a.
Speaker 2 (20:48):
Mass migration, and they my guess is they most of
them were retiring.
Speaker 4 (20:54):
Do they move for reasons other than the election?
Speaker 5 (20:56):
I'll let the door hit you with a good Lord
splitch you.
Speaker 4 (20:59):
I've not heard that one.
Speaker 2 (21:00):
What don't let the door hit you when the good
Lord lord split you?
Speaker 4 (21:07):
When is that when the good Lord splits you?
Speaker 5 (21:09):
Where do you have a split? Michael?
Speaker 2 (21:14):
Oh, wow, I've never heard that. You've taught me something today.
Totally worthless. But nonetheless, you did tell me your head
you think of it at some point in you know,
so there'll be somewhere we're all use it, and I'll
think that's son of a bit. We're gonna talk a
(21:36):
little We're gonna talk a little bit about Greenland later
in the day, but let's go to Antarctica right now.
Speaker 4 (21:43):
One way.
Speaker 2 (21:44):
By the way, somebody asked me on the text line
about the story that I did yesterday about them building
the eight mile highway in the Amazon Raiding rainforest. Well,
you ask for the coordinates. I don't have the coordinates,
but I I'm sure if you go on Google Earth. Well, again,
it depends on how often they take the satellite photos.
(22:08):
But there are stories all over the interwebs. In fact,
this morning I heard Fox News doing it, and Fox
News Masters of the obvious. We're talking about they're building
a I think it's four lanes, eight miles. They're going
to pave it. I don't know whether there's gonna be concrete, asphalt,
(22:29):
or a combination of both. It's certainly not going to
be graveled, because we don't want to gravel, you know,
breaking the windshields or their Bentleys as they go from
or their land Rovers as they go from one place
to another. But then Fox started talking about how, oh,
eight miles must be the distance from the nearest landing
strip for the jets so that they can they can
(22:53):
exit the jets and then get into their SUVs and
drive the eight miles. I think, Dragon I could easily
hike eight miles. We could easily hike eight miles even
in the Amazon rainforest and get to our destination. But
think of the utter hypocrisy of what they're doing. It
(23:15):
is so hypocritical, and the locals are apparently really pissed off.
I had a friend that just made a trip, not
just it's been like a month now, made a trip
down the Amazon. But he didn't do it. I mean
he travels solo and he didn't do it with a tour.
He literally found a local boat where and he sent
(23:38):
me photos. I should put this, put them up on
the website. But a local boat you sleep in a
hammock and you pull off on the side of the
river to eat breakfast and lunch where the locals will
cook breakfast and lunch for you.
Speaker 4 (23:55):
And then I don't whether you have dinner or not.
Speaker 2 (23:57):
But it's a rickety, old wooden boat me and it
looked like it looked like something out of some Vietnam
War movie of you know, some you know, the the
viet Cong trying to sneak down out of Cambodi or whatever.
It's so bizarre. Anyway, back to Antarctica. So one way,
that one way, in addition to the rainforest, that we
know that there's a climate crisis that requires this massive
(24:20):
expansion of big government. And yes, if somebody's texting me
yes so they can control us. Is that according to
the government Antarctica Again, this is according to the government.
This comes from NASA, which we're gonna talk about NASA
in a minute. Antarctica is losing ice mass parentheses, melting
(24:44):
I'm glad to explain that to us. At an average
rate of about one hundred and fifty billion tons per
year adding to sea level rise, Now that is a
completely meaningless sentence to me. I don't first of all,
one hundred and fifty billion tons per year?
Speaker 4 (25:04):
Well, is that above normal? Is that normal? Is that
below normal?
Speaker 2 (25:09):
And when you think about the the world is what
ninety five water? So if you add one hundred and
fifty billion tons of ice that melts into water, and
it says adding to sea level rise. Notice how they
don't tell you anything about it. There's no perspective on
that whatsoever. It's it's like, okay, I've drank half my
(25:31):
first diet coke today.
Speaker 4 (25:32):
If I go into the.
Speaker 2 (25:33):
Kitchen, that that refrigerator dragon has got to get cleaned up,
and I take the scoop and I put some ice
in here, or as the ice melts, I don't perceptibly
see the level of liquid in the in the MacDonald's
cup rising. So what is one hundred and fifty billion
tons per year mean? And how much does does that
(25:55):
add to sea level?
Speaker 3 (25:56):
And just did a quick search here as to the
oceans contained and estimated one point three five times ten
to the eighteenth metric tons of water.
Speaker 2 (26:11):
So one hundred and fifty billion tons is like the
little speck of dust over here on the console.
Speaker 3 (26:19):
That's a one three five followed by eighteen zeros tons
of chater.
Speaker 2 (26:29):
So one hundred and fifty billion tons is a spec
is literally you what it is? It's you and me
standing on the edge of a glacier in Antarctica and
taking a whiz. Probably that's what it is. That's that's
how much it's going to rise. But then I read
this sensational new discoveries arising from long forgotten early aerial photographs,
(26:52):
indicate that ice has remained stable and even grown slightly
since the nineteen thirties over a two thousand kilometers stretch
of East Antarctica. In a recent paper published in Nature Communications,
researchers from the University of Copenhagen came to their conclusions
by tracking glacial movement in an area with as much
(27:16):
ice as the Greenland Ice Sheet. Excuse me, now, this
Antarctic news is not terribly surprising. It continues. What warming
there has been on the west side is directly on
top of a large number of volcanoes. Footnote here some
(27:37):
volcano in Alaska, girl, dad is apparently they're concerned it
might erupt. So I'm just you know, in case you're
you know, drunk in a stupor and not paying attention
to the news, you may have a volcano eruption in
Alaska and we don't want that because it's going to
cause pollution. A recent paper from sane in Palvan he
(28:00):
found that Antarctic antarcticas sea ice has modestly expanded. Of
finding that seems to confirm the work on the ice
shelf increases between two thousand and nine and twenty nineteen.
Warming has been nearly nonexistent for over seventy years. State
sing in Paulvani claimate fluctuations. They're truly being politicized to
(28:24):
do what you know, the answer, to advance the expansion
of government at the expense of the individual. Collectivism, Marxism, communism.
No advocate of government growth can be taken at face value,
particularly on this issue, naturally, including the government itself NASA,
(28:48):
which is the source of that information.
Speaker 4 (28:50):
Happy Pie Day today three fourteen. Pie. I like pie.
Speaker 2 (28:58):
You think somebody make us What if we could get
the googer's make us a pie and get it here
before the end of the show. What kind of pie
do you want?
Speaker 3 (29:05):
Dragon, I don't think you can make a good, decent
pie in that amount of time.
Speaker 4 (29:11):
Oh, I think they could.
Speaker 5 (29:14):
Just a couple of hours.
Speaker 4 (29:16):
Oh yeah, bake it three point fifty four? What you know? Now,
I'm really kind of genuinely curious.
Speaker 2 (29:25):
How long does it take to I know prep takes
a while, right, but the actual baking thirty minutes, forty
five minutes or so? I think forty five max. But
I what do I know? Ask me in the last
time I baked the pie?
Speaker 5 (29:39):
When's the last time he baked the pie?
Speaker 4 (29:41):
I can tell you that.
Speaker 2 (29:42):
I can't even tell you the last time I Michael
waved a frozen pie.
Speaker 5 (29:48):
Pot pies counts, Oh pot pie?
Speaker 2 (29:51):
Haven't had a pot pie in ages. Oh there's a
healthy meal right there, a pot.
Speaker 5 (29:57):
Pie gravy on the ends.
Speaker 4 (29:58):
That yeah.
Speaker 2 (30:00):
Article six of the United States Constitution, Clause two says
this this Constitution and the Laws of the United States,
which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties
made or which shall be made under the authority of
the United States, shall be the supreme law of the
Land the supremacy clause. Now, if we didn't have the
(30:24):
supremacy clause, we would have chaos.
Speaker 4 (30:27):
Oh, wait a minute, we do have chaos.
Speaker 2 (30:30):
The State of Washington filed a lawsuit against the Adams
County Sheriff's Office, not Colorado, with Washington and Adams County
this past Monday for violating the Keep Washington Working Act,
which established the state as a sanctuary for illegal aliens.
Speaker 4 (30:49):
Now, wait a minute.
Speaker 2 (30:53):
Democrats know the laws that they inflict or detrimental, or
they wouldn't give them such incongruous names. To Keep Washington
Working Act, that's what established sanctuary status in Washington. You'll
naming a law that unconstitutionally displaces American workers with foreigners,
that the invaders, I'm sorry, the newcomers. The Keep Washington
(31:18):
Working Act is comparable calling to exactly like calling the
Green New Deal spending blowout, the Inflation Reduction Act. I mean,
there are any number of acts that you could think
of that are so misappropriately named because they went to
hide from unsuspecting goober's what they're really doing. So the
(31:43):
Adams County Sheriffs of the Adams County, Washington Sheriff's Office
is being sued for upholding federal law. The lawsuit alleges
that deputies have unlawfully held people in custody based solely
on their immigration status, and have quote gone out of
their way to enable.
Speaker 4 (32:03):
Federal immigration agents, you know, the.
Speaker 2 (32:05):
GESTAPO, to interview or question people in custody, including transporting
people in county vehicles express me expressly for that purpose.
I just find that allegation hilarious. They actually used county
vehicles to transport illegal aliens to a detention facility. What
(32:27):
are you supposed to do? Call uber, hey, uber? Uh, yeah,
we need an uber X here. We need room for
a deputy sheriff to sit in the back seat with
the guy who's gonna have handcuffs on, and we need
to take, you know, take us from the county courthouse
to a detention facility. You know, when you think about
when Fort Sumter was fired on what did Lincoln do,
(32:50):
he responded forcefully, he's imputant leftists defying federal immigration law
in the face of what's really a foreign invasion. That's
kind of the modern equivalent. I think the lawsuit sides
with foreign invaders against the United States government.
Speaker 4 (33:07):
Washington.
Speaker 2 (33:07):
You might say Washington State, much like any other sanctuary state,
is engaged in acting as a state of insurrection. Yes,
they're insurrectionists. We haven't heard that word in a long time.
I thought this time we'd get it back in our vernacular.
Washington State, Colorado, all states of Insurrection,
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Las Culturistas with Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang
Ding dong! Join your culture consultants, Matt Rogers and Bowen Yang, on an unforgettable journey into the beating heart of CULTURE. Alongside sizzling special guests, they GET INTO the hottest pop-culture moments of the day and the formative cultural experiences that turned them into Culturistas. Produced by the Big Money Players Network and iHeartRadio.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com