3-15-25 The Weekend Hour 1: Dropping Truth Bombs on Expulsion of Mahmoud Khalil

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Goo night. Michael Brown joins me here, the former FEMA
director talk.

Speaker 2 (00:03):
Show host Michael Brown.

Speaker 3 (00:04):
Brownie, no, Brownie, You're doing a heck of a job.

Speaker 1 (00:07):
The Weekend with Michael Brown. Hey broadcasting live from Denver, Colorado.
It's the Weekend with Michael Brown. Really happy to have
you with me. Happy to have you joining the program today.
So you know, we got rules of engagement. There are
rules you got to follow, just like everything else in life.
I'm like the government. I got these rules and regulations
you gotta follow, and if you don't, they'll be criminal
and civil penalty. So make sure you pay attention to

(00:27):
them first and foremost. If you want to interact with
the program, the easiest way to do it, whether you're
listening live, or you're listening to an affiliate that maybe
carries it like we are one of our local affiliates
here carries it later on Sunday also, or maybe you're
listening to the podcast whenever you're listening, or even when
you're not listening, you're driving down the highway and you
think about something you want to tell me the message

(00:48):
that the number on your message app is three three
ones zero three three three ones zero three keyword is
Mike or Michael, and you can tell me anything or
ask me anything. And then if you want to follow
me on social media, that's real easy. The most active
social media platform that I use while I want. You
can find me on Facebook too and Instagram. But I'm
more active on x formerly known as Twitter than i

(01:09):
am anything else. So go follow me on X at
Michael Brown USA. Go do that right now. Chop chop,
quit waiting, Go do it right now. I'm sure and
I know if you listened to me during the week,
you've already heard this, But I really want to go
through it again because the meat not because of you,
but because the media is driving me crazy about this,
and it has to do with the detention and the

(01:31):
pending deportation of this Yahoo by the name of Mahu Khalil.
He's a Palestinian graduate student at Columbia University. Have you
ever stopped and thought to yourself, like, how has Columbia
become the epicenter of all this anti Semitic, anti Jew
hatred and all these protests. I was having lunch with

(01:51):
my lawyer, don't it's always frightful when you have to
get to lunch with your lawyer, because having lunch with
my lawyer this week, and he brought a couple of
his partners with it with him. And they're all very
smart people, a lot smarter than I am. But don't
tell them I said that. And we're we're talking about,
you know, world events, and we're solving all the world's problems,
and Columbia came up, and I just kind of wandered

(02:13):
out loud the same question, Why Columbia. I mean, you've
got NYU, You've got Barnard College, You've got you've got
U c l A. Berkeley. I mean, you know, in
the sixties, that was the hot bed of all the protests.
And by the way, you think about UC Berkeley in
the sixties, what was that all about? Free speech? Yeah?
First Amendment rights? But but well, I guess occasionally they

(02:35):
would occupy a building too, and then Governor Reagan Donald
Reagan would then come and sit down and talk with
them and tell them, uh, get your butts out of here,
we're going to arrest you. And he told the regions
the same thing, which is hilarious. Oh, almos, seems like
we've got somebody like that now too. His name's what
Donald Donald duck. Oh no, Donald Trump. That guy, Yeah,

(02:57):
that guy. But anyway, so I'm really wondering. And if
you have a theory about what about why Columbia is
the center of the universe when it comes to this
anti Semitic crap going on in the country, then let
me know. But one theory that we tossed around was

(03:17):
because and I know this sounds well to some people,
might sound racist, but to me, it sounds like too
much of a generalization, and that is so many Jews
in New York, and to narrow it down in terms
of demographics, so many liberal Jews in New York. Because
if you stop and think about the protests, I did

(03:40):
a double tap when I heard this, So you know,
the protests. At one point, I shouldn't say the protests,
but a some protesters made their way over to Fifth
Avenue in Manhattan and then occupied Trump Tower. So I'm
just mining my own business. I got the news on
the background and then I hear something about the people
that are occupying Trump Tower, that are protesting the detention

(04:06):
and the pending deportation of Mahummu Khalil, are a bunch
of Jewish students, And I kind of did one of
those literally did when of those double takes? And you know,
you kind of look around at the TV or the
radio whatever it is, like what did you say? And
I did that? And then as I listened to more

(04:27):
of the story, I realized, well, of course, because I mean,
I've been to Israel, I don't know, several times, and
I've got lots of Jewish friends, which is always uncomfortable
to say. It's like saying, well, I got a lot
of black friends. I got a lot of the Hispanic friends.
I got a lot of gay friends. It's such a
stupid thing, it's but you know, but in this case,
because they're Jews, I need to tell you I know

(04:48):
a lot of Jews. I know a lot of liberal Jews.
I know a lot of conservative Jews. But it makes
sense when you step back and realize that Israel and
Judy is for that matter, it is not some hegemony,
it's not some you know, behemoth that is all of

(05:08):
oneset mind liberal Jews, conservative Jews, you know, gay Jews,
straight Jews. Any any sort of demographic that you want
to put somebody in, you can put Jews in those
same demographics. So it does make sense that a bunch
of really stupid what should I say, stupid non thinking

(05:32):
liberal Jews would go occupy Trump Tower supporting someone who
espouses the theory of river to the from the river
to the sea, from the complete destruction of Israel, wiping
Israel from the face of the earth. That those are
the useful idiots that Mark's talked about, and those are

(05:53):
the useful idiots that are that we're protesting in Trump Tower.
Then I so now I'm kind of painting and attention
to the story. We'll get back to mackmou Khalil in
just a second. You got to follow along here, You've
got to follow along. So I'm thinking, because the news
then talks about you know, they got talking heads. They're
saying one thing and everybody's got a different position on it.

(06:17):
It's okay to walk into Trump Tower carrying a sign protesting.
It is not okay when you as a group occupy
Trump Tower. And I'm talking about the lobby. But when
you occupy the lobby, and if you've ever been in
Trump Tower, you go in and there's this huge lobby,
there's some retail shops, there used to be a when

(06:39):
you first walked in, like kind of behind the escalator.
There used to be a restaurant. There was a restaurant,
coffee shop and things. Because Trump Tower is both it's
a mixed juice tower, it's commercial office space and its
residential space. But now they're blocking the escalator, they're blocking
people from going and coming to and from work. They're
blocking people they are trying to get into the retail places.

(07:01):
And that's when you cross the line. Because now you're
not protesting. I mean, you could walk in as a
sole individual and stand in the corner and I don't know,
preach the gospel or you know, put on your little
monk outfit and talk about it's the end of the world,
you know, Hari Krishna here, give me some money and everything.
I'll be fine. Do whatever you want to do, and

(07:22):
nobody's going to complain about that. But when you start
blocking private property, and when you start that's actually a
public area. But when you start blocking that public area
and prevent people from conducting their business, going to their
offices or even getting to the elevators to go to
their residences or whatever, now you've crossed the line. But

(07:43):
I find it fascinating that there's this is such a
classic example of the useful idiots that Mark's talked about,
that the very anti Semites that are protesting at Columbia.
These liberal Jews go to Trump Tower because oh Trump bad,
Orange Man bad, and they protest there supporting Mockmood Khalil,

(08:07):
the very guy whose organization and the philosophy and the
mission of his organization, and he does have an organization
is the destruction of Israel and the elimination of Jews
from the face of the earth. I mean, that's just
that's just some kind of stupid. That's really some kind
of stupid. So let's talk about Mockmood Khalil and whether

(08:31):
or not his his detention and pending deportation is lawful.
It's unlawful because I want you to understand the subtle
legal differences that apply here. You're listening to The Weekend
with Michael Brown. Glad to have you doing that. Be
sure and follow me on Exit's at Michael Brown USA
and go subscribe to the podcast on your podcast app,

(08:51):
search for the Situation with Michael Brown. Hit that subscribe
button that will automatically download all of the weekday program
and the weekend program. I'll be right back. Hey, welcome
back to the weekend with Michael Brown. Glad to have
you with me. Text line numbers three three one zero
three three three one zero three. The keywords are Mike

(09:13):
or Michael either one. So get busy, chop chop. So
let's go back to Mack Mood Khalil. He's this Palestinian
graduate student at Columbia University and he's ignited this firestorm,
and I find it fascinating that there's even any controversy
over this. He was arrested by Immigrations and Customs Enforcement
back on March ninth, that's now what been six days ago,

(09:37):
and the allegations are that he's been engaging in activities
that align with HAMAS, which is a designated foreign terrorist organization.
So here's Trump DHS in which ICE and CBP are
a part of, who have promised that they're going to
crack down on all those people to support terrorist affiliated organizations.

(10:00):
Legal commentators, activists, political figures have all, pardon me, have
all been debating, I think theoretically, whether that action is
constitutionally or legally permissible. I'm telling you unequivocally it is.

(10:22):
Now I know, I know lawyer, I can go find
a lawyer. Right now, that we'll argue until the cows
come home that I'm wrong, but on this one, bring
it on, because I'm ready. The administration, the President has
not only the authority to revoke Khalil's green card, because
that's important to remember, he first got a visa. Now,

(10:43):
you know, maybe forgive me if I'm if I'm I'm
not trying to be condescending here, but forgive me if
I'm getting it too simple. But I want to. I
really want you to understand the process. So some Yahoo
in Lebanon, I forget where Kulil's from. But wherever he's from,
let's just say it's Lebanon, or Yemen or Saudi Arabia,

(11:05):
wherever it might be. But it's a country that requires
a visa to come to the to come here. It's
not the United Kingdom or say Australia. So he wants
to come here, he first has to get let's say,
a tourist visa. A tourist visa does not give you
the right to stay here. For example, when I travel

(11:25):
to a foreign country and I'm traveling, even when I
was traveling as the under secretary, and I had a
diplomatic and an official passport, I still had to have
a visa to go to certain countries. That visa that
might have caused a diplomatic firestorm, but that visa could
have been revoked by let's just say Russi, because Russia
is in the news right now. So every time I
would go to Russia, I would use my diplomatic or

(11:49):
official passport, but I would also have to have a
visa within that passport to allow me entry into the country.
That entry into the country was permanent. At any time,
for any or no reason, the Russians could revoke that
and send me packing back home. The same is true here.

(12:11):
So Khalil gets a student visa to come to this country.
He then gets a green card. Okay, well, that just
gives him temporary permanent status. It's a form of a visa,
is all it is. It says, oh, you can live
here and work here, but it doesn't give you a

(12:31):
right to stay here forever. You still have to comply
with the terms of the visa and the green card.
The Trump administration has the absolute authority to revoke his
green card and remove him from this country, and that
action is grounded in existing immigration law. Supreme Court precedent

(12:58):
and quite frankly, a national security interest. Let me explain
so under the Immigration if you've listened to me for
any length of time, you know that I've talked quite
a bit about the Immigration and Nationality Act. It was
first enacted in like nineteen thirty four or something. It's
been around forever. You can find it if you're interested,

(13:19):
you can go read it yourself. It's at Title eight
of the US Code, Section twelve twenty seven is the
first place to look. So go look at Title eight,
section twelve twenty seven. That specific clause says that lawful
permanent residents a green card holder are removable if they
fall under specific categories of inadmissibility. And I think the

(13:41):
relevant one here is Title eight, section eighteen. If you
really want to write this down, this is fine. But
eighteen twelve paragraph A, sub section three, paragraph B, which
deems the portable any alien, which is the legal term
for someone here on a visa or a Green card,

(14:02):
who is engaged in terrorist activities, represented or supported a
terrorist organization, or received training from such an entity. Now,
it further goes on in another sub section and establishes
that an alien whose presence that the Secretary of State
believes to have serious adverse foreign policy consequences can also

(14:25):
be removed. Well, given that this YAHOO is the leader
of an active of an organization that is aligned with AMAS,
he fits squarely within those statutory provisions. So his green
card revocation and his removal are all well within the
executive branch's authority. Now here's where I find you. Know,

(14:47):
I am pretty much an absolutist when it comes to
free speech. I believe that when it says that Congress
shall make no law abridging the writer free speech, that's
exactly what the Constitution means, just like I believe in
the Second Amendment when it says that the right to
keep him bare arms shall not be infringed, that's what
it means. But a lot of people argue that because

(15:08):
he was protesting. Now, don't get ahead of yourself. That
they will argue that just because he was protesting, that
deporting him or detaining him somehow violates his First Amendment rights.
And they think that's really true because he's an outspoken

(15:28):
leader of some pro Palestinian protest at Columbia. Well, wait
a minute, your right of free speech has no bearing
on whether or not you happen to be pro Palestinian
or anti Palestinian. There was a time when the American
Civil Civil Liberties Union really did believe in free speech,
and they actually you know, represented And there's a great case,

(15:52):
I forget the name of the PLAINUS, but something versus Skokie, Illinois,
where the Nazis wanted to march and a group wanted
to stop them from marching. In the Supreme Court said no,
you can't. They a right. They have a right to
walk down the sidewalk, walk down, you know, an easement
of public easement, and they have a right to you know,
wave their swastikas as long as they don't violate any laws.

(16:17):
And the ACLU represented them, and that was upheld. So
while it's true that a legal permanent resident enjoys certain
constitutional protections, those rights are neither absolute nor co extensive
with those of US citizens, particularly when you're putting someone
in a category a subcategory of immigration and national security.

(16:42):
So in a case called Turner versus Williams, it's it's
a nineteen oh four case. I mean, this is long
held precedent, that case underscored. Congress has brought authority to
exclude listen closely to exclude in other words, not even
left him in the country to begin with, or to

(17:04):
remove an alien in other words, you know, you went
to the embassy in Moscow and the immigration officer there said, Okay, yeah,
you seem like a nice person. I'll let you in.
Here's your visa. And then you get to New York,
or you get to Chicago, you get to LA and
then you start engaging in anti American activities. Well you

(17:25):
can be expelled for that. You can be removed, the
legal term is removed, and you can remove someone who
is not a citizen based on ideological grounds. So a
non citizen can be expelled for advocating beliefs that are
deemed to be inimical to our national security. Oh yeah,

(17:46):
well there's more to go. Hangti. This is the weekend
with Michael Brown. Remember if you like what we do
on the weekend, you can also hear me on the
weekdays from six to ten mountain time on your iHeart app.
Just search for six thirty khow and you listen to
me live from six to ten mountain time. We'll be
right back tonight. Michael Brown joins me here.

Speaker 2 (18:07):
The former FEMA Director of talk show host Michael Brown.

Speaker 1 (18:10):
Brownie, No, Brownie, you're doing a heck of a job
the weekend with Michael Brown. Hey, so we came with
Michael Brown. Glad to have you with me. I appreciate
you tuning in. The text line number is three three
one zero three key words Mike or Michael go follow
me on X. It's at Michael Brown USA, at Michael
Brown USA. So we're talking about Mark mood Khalil, this

(18:30):
Palestinian that's been organizing and creating all this havoc and
quite frankly, let me just be upfront and breaking the
law at Columbia University. So they've decided you're out of here.
It's time to go. And so they they first detained
him and they moved him to a detention facility in Louisiana,

(18:52):
which that really pissed off the people on the left.
But I'll explain why. I think I know why they
did it. They don't report this, but I think having
been inside DHS, I think I understand why they did it.
And I'll explain that in just a minute. But let's
go back to the legal aspects, because I sincerely want
you to be able to make this argument when somebody
approaches you and says, oh, look, there's damn people in

(19:14):
the Trump administration that are violating this guy's rights. He
has a right to free speech. Now, he has a
right to free speech. But that's not why he's been arrested.
See this is another let me just put a footnote
in here. This is another example of how the cabal
wants to drive a narrative so that you know, if you,
as a conservative, get attacked by somebody on the left

(19:36):
that says, hey, listen, how can you put up with this?
This guy's just exercising his right of free speech. No
he is not. He's violating New York law. He's violating
federal law. And we'll get to how he's doing that
in just a minute. But I want to establish a
baseline to help you understand that even if he wasn't

(19:58):
violating the law, the Supreme Court just may make you uncomfortable.
I understand that. But then unless it's the law when
someone comes here on a visa or a green card,
they are subject to being deported on ideological grounds, then

(20:19):
let me give you a really well, this is pretty
wack a doodle, I think, but let me give you
another what you might consider to be a wacka doodle example.
So somebody comes here on a visa from Beijing. Now
more likely than not, if you live in Beijing, you
somehow are connected to the Chinese Communist Party. You come

(20:41):
to this country, you decide to enroll up. We picked
on UCLA, You cla Berkeley, I don't care pick on
any college. You go to that college, you organize a
communist organization of some sort, and then you start advoting
for the overthrow of our constitutional republic. Now you're not

(21:05):
an American citizen, you're a visitor here on a visa.
If you're advocating for the overthrow of the US government
on ideological grounds as a member of the Chinese Communist Party,
that alone is enough for us to say, you know what,
we don't want you in this country. By you're out
of here. Now. Does that make you uncomfortable, because I

(21:28):
imagine from many people that makes them uncomfortable because because
your mind immediately goes well. But we believe in free speech,
and people can believe what they want to believe. Now
our citizens can. But why would we import people into
this country that are coming here because they want to
destroy the country? Now, if you're born here. I know

(21:51):
this is nuanced. But if you're born here and you
are raised by a bunch of yahoos, and you decide
that you want to fund them, to use a phrase
of a foreign president, you want to fundamentally transform this
nation from a constitutional republic into some sort of social
welfare state, then I have to battle you in the
battleground of ideas, because you're a citizen and you're entitled

(22:14):
to think what you think. Now, the other guy, the
Chinese Communist Party guy, he's entitled to think what he thinks,
but he's not entitled because he's not a citizen. He's
not entitled to come out here and espouse that. Now,
let's take the US citizen. If the US citizen wants
to fundamentally transform US from a constitutional republic into some
sort of communist country, then that can be thought in

(22:35):
the battleground of ideas. However, if the American citizen takes
that to the streets to protest and goes to oh,
I don't know, let's say, Keennesshaw, Wisconsin, or goes to Minneapolis, Minnesota,
and starts burning down the discount tire store, starts burning

(22:56):
down the Walgreens or the CVS starts overturning police cars. Oh,
now you've crossed the line. Yeah, you're advocating to turn
us into a communist regime, and you're also engaging in vandalism,
destruction of private property, destruction of public property. You've incited violence,

(23:20):
So you've committed crimes. So now you're going to be
tried for those crimes and hopefully convicted and thrown in jail,
not because you wanted to turn us into a communist regime,
but because you crossed the line of the rule of
law and engaged in criminal activity. So go back to

(23:42):
Turner versus Williams nineteen oh four. For what, now, one
hundred and some years, we've been living under this law
that says you can exclude or remove an alien based
on his ideological grounds. Then fast forward to twenty ten
in Holder versus Humanitarian Law Project, the Supreme Court upheld

(24:07):
prohibitions on material support to terrorist organizations, even when they
did that in the form of speech. When you think
about what Khalil is doing, his actions undoubtedly provided material
support for Hamas. How you may, Michael tell me how

(24:31):
well financial contributions, raising money, logistics, logistical aid, and explicit
endorsement of Hamas. So as a result of all of that,
under the holder case brought by the way, brought by
and defended by the Obama regime, then Khalil's activities are

(24:52):
not protected speech under the First Amendment. This is really
a lot simpler. But the ball wants you to believe
believe otherwise, They want you to believe that somehow this
is old Trump once again, is just he's being a
dictator and he's stomping on somebody's free speech rights. No, no,
but the Trump administrations rely once on national security interests.

(25:15):
That's just additional constitutional justification because the courts have long
recognized that the executive branch. And this has been my
point all along about during the Biden years. If you
listen to me for the four years during the Biden administration,
every time that kream abduljah bar cream, Jean Pierre would
go to the briefing room, to the press room and

(25:37):
talk about we need the Republicans to pass legislation, we
need the Congress to do their part. No, you don't,
because the president has the authority under the Immigration and
Naturalization Act to close the border whenever he wants to.
He can limit immigration whenever he wants to. He can
exclude certain countries whenever he wants to. Congress for decades

(26:02):
has given the executive branch, specifically the President, and through
the President, the Secretary of State, brought authority to limit who, where,
and when people come to this country. And the proof
of that is. And Trump gave the speech before Congress
and was giving the numbers, how they've dropped, like by

(26:25):
ninety five, ninety six, ninety eight percent. And in some
places there are no crossings, illegal crossings whatsoever. And he said,
turns out you didn't need a new law, you just
needed a new president. That was a brilliant statement. Whoever
wrote that for him, brilliant, absolutely brilliant. Now there are

(26:46):
people who oppose Mackmood's removal, and they keep using a
case from nineteen forty five Bridges versus Wickson, And in
that case it limited the deportation of legal residents because
they were affiliated with the Communist Party, emphasizing the need
for a higher burden of proof in such cases. But

(27:08):
let's say that that's true. That case does not preclude
removal when clear statutory grounds exist, particularly when national security
concerns are implicated. So unlike in the Bridges case, where
they were trying to deport based on political beliefs alone,
Khalil's case involves direct affiliation with Hamas, an organization which

(27:34):
I know I told you a bazillion times and you
know has been designated a terrorist organization under US law.
So his removal aligns more closely with the rationale that
was argued during the Obama administration than it does in
the Bridges cases going back to nineteen forty five. Then

(27:54):
I would just ask you this, Do you really think
it was the intention of Congress when they gave the
breast the president these broad authorities to limit people who
can and cannot come into this country, that, oh, we
have to be politically correct. No, it was that you
can look at national security interests, you can look at

(28:17):
what they're doing to materially support someone whose philosophy is
to destroy this country, and you can say we don't
want you to hear you when you came here on
a visa. That is a contract, and that contract said
in essence, if you don't adhere to our standards, if

(28:38):
you don't adhere to our beliefs, if you don't adhere
to our laws, then we can send you packing back home.
And that's what they're doing here, and I say, hellelujah,
it's about time. It's the Weekend with Michael Brown. Be
sure and subscribe to the podcast on your podcast app.
Search for the Situation with Michael Brown. When you find

(28:58):
that hit that subscribe by and you might leave a
five star review too. That will get you all five
days of the weekday program plus this weekend program. Hang tied,
I'll be right back. Hey, welcome back to the Weekend
with Michael Brown. Glad to have you with me, broadcasting
live from Denver, Colorado. Go follow me on exits at
Michael Brown USA at Michael Brown USA. So, as this

(29:22):
legal battle unfolds, Khalil's case is going to probably serve
as a test of the limits of free speech for
non citizens and also the extent of the executive branches
authority and national security deportations. And they are going to
be advocacy groups, special interest groups that will continue to
challenge Trump's policies. Well, I'm fine with that, continue to

(29:45):
challenge them. But what I'm more concerned, generally concerned about
is that the people listen to my program during the
weekday or the weekend doesn't make any difference to me.
I mean, I want you to listen to all of it.
But the point is I want people that listen to
this program to understand that when you get when you

(30:08):
get stuck listening to someone kind of yell at you
or trying to persuade you that, oh my gosh, this
is all about free speech. It is not all about
free speech. Listen to Senator Senator Rubio. Listen to Secretary
of State Rubio as he's grilled by a reporter on
this very issue.

Speaker 2 (30:28):
President Trump appealed to a lot of Americans during his
campaign on free speech arguments and not suppressing speech before,
especially from the government. But your revocation of the green card,
to many is seen as one of the most anti
speech actions a secretary can take with him.

Speaker 1 (30:48):
Let me just pause it for one second. Notice the
premise of this cabal reporters question. You know, Trump campaign
on all this free speech stuff, and this seems to
be one of the most anti free speech actions that you,
as the Secretary of State could take, or the president
could take using your powers. So the premise is you're

(31:12):
doing this and you're violating the free speech Remember what
my rule is, and this is a real you need
to live by. Whether you're in a courtroom or you're
having a debate with friends. Listen to the premise of
the question. Never at face value accept the premise unless
it is a valid premise. Here it's a totally invalid premise.

Speaker 2 (31:35):
Its powers out of your response when you enter.

Speaker 3 (31:38):
This is an important point, and I'm glad you asked
this question. When you come to the United States as
a visitor, which is what a visa is, which is
how this individual entered this country as on a visitor's visa. Okay,
you are here as a visitor. We can deny you
that visa. We can deny you that if you tell
us when you apply. Hi, I'm trying to get into
the United States on a student visa. I am a
big supporter of hamas a murder barbaric group that kidnaps children,

(32:03):
that rapes teenage girls, that takes hostages, that allows them
to die in captivity, that returns more bodies than live hostages.
If you tell us that you are in favor of
a group like this, and if you tell us when
you apply for your visa, and by the way, I
intend to come to your country as a student and
rile up all kinds of anti Jewish student, anti Semitic activities,
I intend to shut down your universities.

Speaker 2 (32:24):
If you told us all.

Speaker 3 (32:25):
These things when you applied for a visa, we would
deny your visy.

Speaker 1 (32:27):
Bingo, Oh, he's not done yet. He's just dropping truth
bombs here. But that goes back to my procedure that
I wanted you to understand. You walk into an embassy
in Moscow or in Mecca or wherever, and you apply
for a visa and you say all of those things,
you would be denied the visa. If I applied for

(32:50):
a visa to Moscow to go to Russia and I
said at the Russian embassy in Houston or in DC that, oh,
by the way, I'm going to Moscow because I want
to foment anti Putin you know activity, Well, one that
would be stupid, but two, they wouldn't let me in.

(33:11):
And if I did go, I'd probably never come back.
But they would probably deny me that because well, we
don't want you here. We don't allow that. And they're
a communist country. We're a constitutional republic, and in this
republic we have the right to determine who comes here
and doesn't come here. You know, I tell my local audience.

(33:33):
You know the prequels to the Yellowstone series. There's one
called nineteen twenty three. If you're not watching, you should
go watch it because there's one of the most recent
episodes involves a woman who's falling in love with one
of the sons of the ranchers that wants to come
to this country, and she ends up in Ellis Island
and it shows her being questioned about communical diseases, being

(33:59):
able to support yourself, all the things that are still
in our laws, which we ignore. Rubio continues, hope we would.

Speaker 3 (34:06):
If you actually end up doing that once you're in
this country on such a visa, we will revoke it.
And if you end up having a green card, not citizenship,
but a green card as a result of that visa
while you're here in those activities, we're going to kick
you out. It's as simple as that. This is not
about free speech. This is about people that don't have
a right to be in the United States. To begin with,
No one has a right to a student visa. No

(34:27):
one has a right to a green card.

Speaker 1 (34:28):
By the way, so.

Speaker 3 (34:29):
When you apply for a student visa or any visa
enter the United States. We have a right to deny
you for virtually any reason. But I think being a
supporter of Hamas and coming into our universities and turning
them upside down and being complicit and what are clearly
crimes of vandalization complicit in shutting down learning institutions.

Speaker 1 (34:47):
There a kid, don't gloss over that, because this is
what you need to throw back in the face of
those who would argue that, oh, this is all you're
denying him as free speech rights. What would we do
to an America citizen who did exactly the same thing.
I'm not talking about. I'm talking about now a real
lawful jurisdiction, not where you have a George Soros appointed

(35:08):
district attorney, but in a real law and order county
or real law and order jurisdiction. What would we do
to somebody who did these things.

Speaker 3 (35:16):
To our universities and turning them upside down and being
complicit and what are clearly crimes of vandalization complicit in
shutting down learning institutions.

Speaker 1 (35:25):
Eric, what will we do to American citizens who did that?
We'd prosecute them for breaking the law.

Speaker 3 (35:30):
Kids at these schools that can't go to class. You
pay all this money to these high priced schools that
are supposed to be of a great esteem, and you
can't even go to class. You're afraid to go to
class because these lunatics are running around with covers on
their face, screaming terrifying things. If you told us that's
what you intended to do when you came to America,
we would have never let you in. And if you
and if you do it once you get in, we're
going to revoke it and kick you out.

Speaker 1 (35:51):
Bing go truth bombs right there, One last thing before
we go to break. So they take Khalil and rather
than take him to the detention center, which is in
the federal facility. There's a federal courthouse, federal building in
Lower Manhattan, near ground zero, there's a detention facility there.

(36:13):
Will rather than take him there, they took him to
a detention facility in Louisiana. Absolutely lawful to do so,
but why would they do it, Because if they took
him to Lower Manhattan, it is situated such there's more
room for larger crowds and you're going to have more riots,

(36:36):
more damage, more problems. So just take him out of
the state. Absolutely lawful to do that. Don't let anybody
tell you otherwise. It's weakening with Michael Brown. Go follow
me on ex It's at Michael Brown USA. Hang tight,
I'm coming right back.