November 11, 2024 • 32 mins
Trump has mandate for change from voters and putting together the team to deliver it!
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hey, gang, it's me Michael. You can listen to your
morning show live. Make us a part of your morning
routine or your drive to work companion on great stations
like Talk Radio ninety eight point three and fifteen ten
WLAC in Nashville, Tuopelow's News and Talk one on one
point one and ten sixty WKMQ, and how about Talk
six fifty KSTE in Sacramento, California. Love to have you
(00:21):
listen live, but are grateful you're here now for the
podcast Enjoy Well.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Two three, starting your morning off right, A new way
of talk, a new way of understanding.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
Because we're in this together.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
This is your morning show with Michael Bill Chordan.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
Along the lines that we're in this together.
Speaker 4 (00:44):
I'm a little spooked all morning long whenever for those
of you listening. Let's say I'm finishing my segment and
I want the transition music to begin. I usually point
at Jeffrey, and I've been pointing at him all morning
long and all more long. The music's been starting when
I point, and I just realized, at no point have
you been able to see me today? Yeah, it's just
(01:06):
what I do that's a little beyond what you do.
That's scary. Well, are we that much?
Speaker 3 (01:13):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (01:13):
My gosh, my soulmate is a man hookingy hook any
bookiny Eight minutes after the r We are that good?
Aren't We should get a weekend show? Eight minutes after
the hour. Welcome to Veterans Day. November the eleventh, twenty
twenty four, we did a salute to veterans to kick
off our second hour. If you missed it, just a
shameless plug for our podcast, which you can find on
the premiere site or in the iHeart Podcast section under
(01:35):
your Morning Show Michael del Journa.
Speaker 3 (01:37):
We encourage you to listen to that.
Speaker 4 (01:38):
We want to welcome AM eleven fifty The Patriot k
EIB Rush used to always say excellence in broadcasting. Station
was named after Rush. K EIB eleven fifty The Patriot
in Los Angeles. Welcome to your morning show kitchen table.
I presume, though I can't see you, Chris Walker.
Speaker 3 (02:00):
Is here still trying to get hold of Chris. Oh,
I assumed wrongly. We are having technical difficulty.
Speaker 4 (02:07):
Technical difficulties there, So wait a minute. I'm like al
Pacino incentive woman. I'm in a doc that you can sense,
but not the caller one of the things that we've
been exploring all day long is just this whole concept
of the Democrats trying to figure out what happened. Some
are honest about it, some are still defiant about it.
Like watching sixty Minutes yesterday, it was almost comedic to
(02:31):
me in the serious sixty minute style they're trying to
and they were. They were literally trying to figure it out.
I mean they were, they were open to understanding, and
it was it was eye opening to watch because you're like,
oh my gosh, they really have been in such a bubble.
Now what have we been saying all along? Well, there's
(02:52):
a lot of your voting blocks that you are disconnected with.
You think you could just take them for granted and
ignore them and get away with it. But things aren't
going well on campus, things aren't going well in the
indoctrination efforts of K through twelve. And guess what, Somewhere
along the line, you've lost the youth vote. Now, frankly,
you've lost it to campus outreach, you've lost it to TikTok,
(03:15):
and you've lost it to podcasting, and you've lost it
to X. They're able to figure out what's really going on.
Now you have some other problems. You went too far left,
too far woke. I can tell you this young generation
has no problem with gays. You start going to identifying
as an animal and wanting to wear a tail and whiskers,
(03:38):
they think you're nots. You want to put a six
foot four two and forty pound born man now identifying
as a woman in a boxing ring with a woman
or in a pool.
Speaker 3 (03:51):
They think that's too far.
Speaker 4 (03:54):
So you've lived so long in your silo, so long
in your bubble, that you have disconnect Your border went
so far that you alienated Hispanic voting blocks and Black
voting blocks. And while you bragged about your gender imbalance
and gap, you didn't realize you had a male gap.
And then, in your late hour desperation to tell women
(04:17):
to lie to their husbands, what you didn't realize is
there were a lot of husbands lying to their wives.
Maybe or maybe America's outside the bubble. Maybe there's an awakening.
We were saying all along, the media is dead. I
call it the death of journalism.
Speaker 5 (04:34):
Now.
Speaker 4 (04:34):
The funny thing, like the movie in the sixth sense,
they don't realize they're dead. I see dead people and
they're everywhere, But The best part of the line was
the next part.
Speaker 3 (04:43):
And they don't know they're dead.
Speaker 4 (04:47):
That's Fox, that's CNN, that's MSNBC, that's ABC, NBCCBS, they
don't The Washington Post, the New York Times, they don't
know they're dead. The notion that they were playing the
debate and appearances on MSNBC and CNN and ABC and
ignoring Megan Kelly, ignoring Tucker Carlson, ignoring Joe Rogan. How
(05:13):
out of touch are you and your matrix in bubble?
They are just starting to figure out I got a
clip for you coming up. Oh, maybe things aren't about
radio and television anymore. Maybe it's about podcasts and did hello?
And of course the biggest challenge for the left is
going to be it's all of the above. And if
(05:34):
you follow the thirty seven symptoms that led to your death,
you missed the disease that was the cause of the death.
How they handle this post mortem is everything for if
they have any shot of coming back and being relevant
in four years.
Speaker 3 (05:49):
Now.
Speaker 4 (05:49):
Let me end with a warning to you on the right.
You still have to live your post Trump years and
you're in a matrix two, so be careful death your
witnessing and celebrating could be your own in four years.
But meantime, the numbers are in, and Donald Trump did win,
and he did win big, by a number I actually predicted,
(06:12):
and everyone thought I was crazy. I get a free
trip to Washington, DC thanks to my bet with John Decker.
Donald Trump got three hundred and twelve Electoral College votes
Kamala Harris two twenty six. The Senate ends up plus four,
not three as I predicted, but fifty three to forty six,
plus vance if necessary, and the House sits at two
hundred and seventeen, one away from two eighteen control with
(06:33):
ten outstanding races. We think it's going to come in
somewhere around two twenty two. Republicans will control the House,
the Senate, and the White House by a mandate of
the American people, Which leaves the only relevant question what
is Donald Trump plan to surround himself with in order
to enact this mandate for change and create the change
(06:55):
the American people asked him to? Republican consultant Chris Walker
is joining us?
Speaker 3 (07:00):
So you're a morning.
Speaker 4 (07:00):
Show contributor, Well, I can tell you Tom Holman's a
great start.
Speaker 5 (07:05):
Yeah, that's great news. I mean, I love seeing the
clips going around social media on him just saying, you self,
deportation is a thing and it can happen, and you know,
just he's owning it.
Speaker 3 (07:18):
It's great.
Speaker 4 (07:19):
So he makes history with the first ever female chief
of staff, Pat Summerl's daughter. That's Susie helped me, Susie Wiles. Yeah,
Susie Wiles. That's a very strong pick. That shows you.
I want to say hit number one for Donald Trump
two point zero. He knows that he allowed a lot
(07:41):
of nonsense in his first term, a lot of as
she would call circus members with access to the Oval office,
that's not going to happen. This is a woman who
orchestrated this unimaginable, unthinkable, victorious campaign, and she knows to
keep how to keep him on the rails, and to
show you the priory already of the border making Tom
home and the borders are expect nothing short of law
(08:05):
and order, and that means deportation as well.
Speaker 5 (08:07):
Right, absolutely absolutely, I mean that's I got to listen
to Tom at the Republican Convention in Milwaukee. He was on
a panel discussion, and goodness, he's just he's a no
nonsense former cop who you know, knows knows what it
takes the law and order. I think, I think it's
a great pick.
Speaker 3 (08:25):
Susie.
Speaker 5 (08:26):
You know she she ran a great campaign. You know
she was she part of the White House, he was staff.
Role is going to be how to manage and function
of this White House. I think Trump was was poorly
served by a couple of its former chiefs of staff,
just in the sense that you know, he he didn't
he didn't have people who understood how to communicate with
him and how to manage how he wants to see
things done. Susie has proven that she can do that
(08:48):
through this campaign and managing all kinds of crises, and
so I think I think it's a great pick, and
I think it's the first good step to what we're
going to see in his administration.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
Shows you the priority of managing the administration. It shows
the priority of addressing the border. Second priority has got
to be the economy. What might we hear next?
Speaker 5 (09:06):
You know, I think foreign policy is being bandied around
a lot. I mean, who is he going to pick
for defense and State and national intelligence? I mean, there's
so many foreign policy issues that that's going to be
left on a door step, whether it's you know, the
Middle East or whether it's Ukraine or you know, the
continued kind of not ascendence, but you know, a new
issue of China. So foreign policy is going to be
a key part of this administration, a key part of
(09:28):
who we pay. So you thought over the weekend that
he said that Vicky Haley and Mike Pompeio will not be.
Speaker 3 (09:33):
Part of the administration.
Speaker 5 (09:34):
So he's he's already laying a marker of saying I'm
going to be doing stuff differently than I did in
my first term. And you know, we'll see how that
shakes out.
Speaker 4 (09:43):
I think there are there's a sea of voices, there's
a sea of information. In most cases we're void understanding
and uh and a lot of.
Speaker 3 (09:52):
The information is wrong.
Speaker 4 (09:54):
Of the voices I respect, the most outspoken against Pompeo,
the most revealingly OUTSI spokan has been Tucker Carlson about
the assassination attempt on Julian Massage, among other things concerning Pompeo.
The Pompeo. What's going to strike people the most shocking?
What's the message it sends to you? Nicki Haley? We
(10:15):
get she went too far in the end, she came
along to try to encourage her supporters because a lot
of Democrats were counting on the same votes that went
to Nicki Haley not voting for Donald Trump. And of
course they did, and they would have had she been
gone even in the primaries. So that didn't pan out
for them, but it wasn't enough to give her a
(10:36):
place in the new administration. But Pompeo, that's a big matter.
That's somebody people had for, you know, Secretary of Defense
or for very key positions.
Speaker 3 (10:45):
Why do you think he's out?
Speaker 5 (10:48):
You know, it's a marker of saying if you have
a lot of DC experience, or you have grown or
have been part of, you know, the status quo of
the last twenty five years, your voice isn't going to
be heard as much. I don't think it's not unwelcome.
It's just who are you going to pick to lead?
Speaker 6 (11:09):
Who is going to be.
Speaker 5 (11:10):
The voice that's going to represent you in these departments
and really enact change. If you're part of the Washington
establishment over the last thirty years, you're not going to
be part of that change. And I think that's you know,
Trump's coming in with this mandate and you mentioned earlier.
I think that's part of the partly right. It's about
affecting change. It's about listening to the American people rather
than the status quotes continued. The Washington status quo needs
to be shaken up. And that's what the American people
(11:31):
are trying to say multiple elections, even with the Joe
Biden election. To a certain degree, if you're an incumbent,
you have an issue. The American people don't want you
to be, you know, just doing everything as normal.
Speaker 3 (11:42):
And I think that's what Trump's kind of saying physically.
Speaker 4 (11:44):
Chris Walker, Republican consultant and analyst and your morning show contributor,
you got your ear to the wall with the glass
in your hand.
Speaker 3 (11:52):
What are you hearing? In terms of RFK?
Speaker 4 (11:55):
We know he's going to be in charge of fixing
our food and looking at examined vaccinations and our health administration.
Is it Health and Human Services? Is it some kind
of czar? What's the role of Elon Musk? He's going
to kind of be the Charles Grodin that comes in
like in the movie Dave and fixes the books.
Speaker 3 (12:13):
What other names are you hearing?
Speaker 4 (12:14):
Because they seem to be moving very quickly and from
my view in terms of so far very effectively, Yeah, No,
with r K, my sense.
Speaker 5 (12:30):
Is it will be a non cabinet function. I think
there'll be a little bit more of a wider portfolio
where you know, you can kind of let him do
a traveling road show and really talk about, you know,
kind of these health issues that America really is facing,
whether it's our food supply, whether it's you know, pharmaceuticals
or other things. You know, that's not just one cabinet position,
(12:51):
that's a broader health goal. I would see some type
of white house role where you know, health is kind
of his key portfolio. You know, running department could be confining,
and I think a Senate confirmation would be check challenging
and problematic in of its own self, so that that
probably would say that.
Speaker 4 (13:07):
As well, we know it's a priority the border, and
he's addressed that his administration, he's addressed that. Next becomes
the Economy and Justice Department. Who are we looking at
for Attorney general? And who are we looking at for
Commerce secretary you know or Treasury.
Speaker 5 (13:28):
Yeah, there's a couple of you know, Wall Street guys
that have kind of been key to to you know,
Trump's re election team and economic stuff. I would anticipate
some of his New York network connections would be kind
of where he would look at for Treasury when it
comes to, you know, attorney general. There are a lot
(13:48):
of state ags that are really impressive. You know, I
wouldn't necessarily kind of suggest I know too much yet,
but I mean somebody like Jason Mires in Virginia would
be really good. But I think you know, Jason's kind
of got his eye on Virginia governor, so that mean
may not be basis Chris Cobak in Kansas and others.
I think there's there's some potential for for several of
those to be to be on the short list. I'd
(14:11):
heard that, you know, the essentially Governor Abbott in Texas
would be somebody could be thought of it. I think
Governorrabbit likes the job that he has, so part of
it too is like, Okay, there's names we talked about,
but who who wants to go to Washington and serve
and who feels like they're better, you know, serving in
the roles that they have so that given take right now.
My final one is more of a statement than a question.
But you know, I was one of the few people
(14:31):
that had the gut feeling that Donald Trump was leaning
towards Marco Rubio and that maybe Donald Trump Junior talked
him into JD.
Speaker 3 (14:37):
Bans.
Speaker 4 (14:38):
Turned out to be a good move with j D. Bans,
But that tells me that Marco Rubio can have anything
he wants. That's how high Donald Trump views him. I
got Rubio's secretary of State and I got caught in
secretary of Defense.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
How do you think I'm going to do.
Speaker 5 (14:53):
Well? Cotton said he's not doing the administration. So I
think you got fifty to fifty on that one. I
agree with you on Rubio.
Speaker 3 (14:58):
I think Rubio has.
Speaker 5 (14:59):
Been kind of in the of the front pork, but
I would I would think Rick Ronell isn't is kind
of a somebody to keep your eye on for State
as well. I think, you know, he was former ambassador
of Germany, you know, former director of National Intelligence. I
think he's very, very plugged into both the Tucker and
you know, Don Junior world. But I think Marcos certainly
is on that list as well. Uh, you know, our
(15:19):
home state Senator Bill Haggerty is also on that list
for State. But you know, we'll see how it all
stakes out.
Speaker 3 (15:25):
But you know, I agree with you.
Speaker 5 (15:27):
I think Marco's good, but I think Tom Protton would
be a good Defense secretary, but he has said that
he wants to stay in the Senate.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Del Chrono.
Speaker 7 (15:57):
Hi, my name is Bern Aaron, and my morning show
is your morning show with Michael del Jorno.
Speaker 4 (16:05):
You know, that's kind of been our big exploration today,
our journey of discovery. And I'm watching sixty Minutes and
they seem to be sensibly exploring how did this happen?
And you can hear for the first time the guy
on sixty Minutes, you know, asking questions like, you know,
how did we miss how important food prices were and
the border was? And of course it almost became comedic,
but they were genuinely trying to understand.
Speaker 3 (16:27):
I think they have to.
Speaker 4 (16:28):
I mean the media has to because what they're realizing
is their influence is dead. But it was dead going
into this election. They're just new to the table.
Speaker 5 (16:37):
You know.
Speaker 4 (16:38):
Red asked it a different way. He said, who heads
this party now? Can't be Joe he's gone. Can't be
Kamalas she just got demolished. Can't be Nancy. She's gone,
and she's the one that orchestrated Joe being gone and
anointed Kamala, and that was clearly a mistake. Schumer's not
in charge anymore. I mean, that'd be a lot to
(16:59):
give Hakeem Jeffries. He's just a minority leader in the
House that's headed to a Republican control of two twenty two.
Speaker 3 (17:05):
Who is it.
Speaker 4 (17:07):
Well, my answer is the same as who's been. It's
John Podesta, the same person that ran eight years of
the Clintons, eight years of the Obamas, in four years
of Kamala and Joe, and they're still cutting deals, still
trying to set up desperately an administrative state. They've ignored
the primary voters in three straight cycles now, twenty sixteen,
(17:32):
twenty twenty, and twenty four. They're parties at war with
itself and I think Podesta, Obama, Soros are still at
its head. They do have a player in Wes Moore.
So whether they really genuinely come to terms beyond symptoms
but with the disease that caused this defeat or not,
(17:56):
he's I think the play. As for who's really heading
it up, I assure you it's still John Podesta. Debbie's
in Arizona listening to k f YI.
Speaker 7 (18:05):
Hey Michael, this is Laura from Franklin, Tennessee. Was wondering
if you have any concerns about how easily the heads
of the Democratic Party have capitulated Trump's victory and if
you think they might have something planned to subvert it.
Speaker 8 (18:25):
Thanks for everything, all right.
Speaker 4 (18:27):
That's Laura, obviously not Debbie. I view these one on
one times as a time of just casual, intimate transparency.
I noticed when they were doing all the gambling and
as you were picking and buying these stocks if you will,
(18:49):
that you don't get paid until the vote is certified.
Could be just because that's not it's really technically not
real until that happens. It could be because they know something's common.
They have a way to win both ways early on
the Democrats led by Joe Biden. That's why, I mean,
(19:11):
you know the nonsense of Joe Biden stepping aside so
she can just shatter the gat glassying. There's gonna be
some great body language to watch today with Harrison Biden
at our Lincoln Cemetery.
Speaker 3 (19:22):
Uncomfortable, awkward. I don't think he's gonna do that. I
don't think.
Speaker 4 (19:29):
I really don't think that's the message they want to send,
that all we care about is gender. All we care
about is race. We don't care about serving the people,
providing prosperity, providing security, governing, leading. We just care about gender.
So we'll just do that so we have our first
female president. I think that would be far more revealing
than achieving. They seem to be very interested in a
(19:55):
peaceful transition, though there are symptoms otherwise, you know, as
Chuckie Schumer is not real interested in acknowledging Dave McCormick are.
There's still some votes to be counted in Philadelphia.
Speaker 3 (20:10):
Deny much.
Speaker 4 (20:14):
This little bit of nonsense over soda mayor, which is
just that nonsense. No, I think they're genuinely at a moment,
if they're honest with themselves, that they're looking at all
the reasons why they lost, to learn from it so
they don't lose next time. I still see them focused
on symptoms, not root cause they can't do. I think
(20:34):
they'll be Shenanigan. I don't know, we'll find out in
due time. I don't think it'd get very far, but
I always warn you it's very classic Sololenski classic Barack Obama.
Whatever they're accusing, they're planning to do, or are doing.
Speaker 3 (20:51):
Don't forget.
Speaker 4 (20:52):
In the Shadow Campaign to Save the Democracy, Time Magazine,
February fifteenth, twenty twenty one. Go read it, they brag
about how they stole the election, and in that plan
was insurrection because they had a struggle calling it off.
They were conditioning you with Antifa and Black Lives matters,
sort of an unnatural progression. And then they actually won
with an old man hiding in a basement, so they
(21:13):
had to call it off, and they pinned it on
Donald Trump. I think it would be a death blow.
I think they realized they got to take their loss
and learn from it and come back in four years.
How they learned from it, I have an eye on
I'm going to give you one final example in our
one on one time. This is a conversation on Media
(21:36):
Buzz on Fox, which is a show all about media bias,
and they're trying to explore how is it that these campaigns,
or the left, the Democrats campaign didn't see the transition
from legacy media to podcasting in digital.
Speaker 3 (21:56):
They're still playing an old game.
Speaker 4 (21:58):
That's usually something the Republicans do this time, the Democrats
did it. They still think everybody's getting their news from CNN, MSNBC, Fox, ABCNBCCBS.
Speaker 3 (22:06):
They don't.
Speaker 4 (22:08):
You could add them all up and it doesn't even
come to with one tenth of what Joe Rogan reaches,
and they chose not to be on Joe Rogan. So
this was the conversation with Megan Hayes. She's a former
Biden Harris operative. It's that same spirit of kind of
some are figuring it out, some are not. They still
(22:29):
don't understand it completely. They've been so living in the
matrix in bubble that they've been blind to this. It's
just dawning on them. Journalism is dead and the mainstream
media no longer has an audience or an influence. Listen
to Megan.
Speaker 9 (22:45):
So I think that there's a couple of things here.
I don't think that people are necessarily getting their news
anymore from mainstream media. I think they're getting it from podcasts.
So I think that we are talking to ourselves. We
are talking to an echo chamber. People who are lean
left and liberal tune into MS, people who lean right
tune into Fox. So we're not doing a service to
people to give people dissenting opinions on these different stations.
(23:05):
So I think that's part of the problem. I also
think that the media was reporting off what the polls
were saying. The polls were saying it was really close,
they were flawed, and they were also flowed to one
hundred percent, So I think that so when they were
reporting off the polls and they were giving misinformation, and
I mean, it's not their fault one hundred percent, but
they could have done better.
Speaker 2 (23:23):
Of course, progressives should still fight for what they believe in,
but should the media liberals continue to attack Donald Trump
now months before he takes office. Here you see Rachel
Meadow is stand and fight, she tells the press.
Speaker 9 (23:36):
So I think there's a difference of criticizing Trump and
criticizing and continuing to fight. I think that the Democrats
need to take a hard look at themselves and looked
at the electorate is more moderate, and they need to
move more moderate if they want to win elections in
the the.
Speaker 3 (23:49):
Tug Or gang.
Speaker 4 (23:50):
First of all, I can't believe it was news to
her or the Democrats. The journalism is dead, the audience
size isn't there, It's been lost, the agenda has been revealed.
It's like total pulled the curtain. You can see the
wizard isn't big. It's a little man pulling knobs. But
they were so caught up in the matrix, so caught
(24:12):
up in the echo chamber and bubble. It really is
news to them. Now who will sensibly learn from it
and change?
Speaker 3 (24:21):
Now?
Speaker 4 (24:22):
As I've said all morning long, I want to reador
rate for those of you that are third party third
hour listeners on your way to work. The Democrats have
to figure this out.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
But so do you.
Speaker 4 (24:33):
You know, just as we said, Wow, who does the
party belong to? Can't be Joe they ran them off.
Can't be Kamala she just got beaten the landslide. Can't
be Nancy She's already gone and she orchestrated this bait
and switch. Can't be Chunky he's no longer the Senate leader.
Speaker 3 (24:50):
Who is it?
Speaker 4 (24:53):
Well, it's still John Podesta, George Soros and Barack Obama.
And their goal is still a global governance and an
administrative date complying with it in America. I will tell
if they succeed in that. But who has the Republican Party?
It's Donald Trump's party. And he's gone in four years.
Watch all the questions and all the discoveries the Left
(25:17):
is making them because you're going to be asking him
and forced to make them in four years. And that's
not me rating on your parade. That's the power of
me not being I think both parties are the problem.
But Donald Trump isn't a party. What is the future
(25:37):
of the Republican Party after Donald Trump? That's as difficult
of a question to answer a note as the Democrats
trying to figure out awakening from their echo chamber.
Speaker 3 (25:46):
It's going to be fun to keep an eye on both.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
It's Your Morning Show with Michael del Churno.
Speaker 4 (25:53):
I am Michael del journal, jeffres got the controls, read producing,
and you guys talking. This one comes from Catherine, who
I believe is Nashville, Tennessee. A lot of names that
are being thrown around are Republicans currently serving in the
House or the Senate. If these people get appointed, what
would happened to their seats? Well, I don't think you'll
se anybody get appointed that isn't in a state with
(26:14):
a Republican governor who would replace them, So they would
just be replaced by another Republican as the short answer
I said coming out of covid Man, it's going to
be a long haul to restore the credibility and trust
of the World Health Organization and the CDC. I don't
think they've made any strides to do that. It's been
a rough year for FEMA, and it got even rougher
(26:35):
over the weekend with the news and the investigation into
a supervisor who was instructing field workers to bypass Floridians
who had Trump yard signs. Roory O'Neil happens to be
at Floridian and one heck of a reporter has the
very latest time this she's gotten fired, right.
Speaker 6 (26:51):
Yeah, just a few hours after The Daily Wire first
broke the story on Friday, this supervisor had sent out
a memo, a best practices list to the people who
are going to be out in the field going to
homes that may have been damaged by a tornado that
got whipped up by Milton hitting a town called Lake
Placid in Highlands County. On the list of best practices
(27:15):
was stay hydrated, drink coconut water, oh and quote avoid
homes advertising Trump unquote. That's been the problem, some of
the field workers say about twenty homes had those kinds
of signs or flags and were passed over by the
on the ground inspection teams. So the FEMA is trying
to make sure that everyone is getting the help that
(27:36):
they're due, but they were probably already being taken care
of by the local and state teams that have responded there. Anyway,
in addition to you know, they could have applied on
the phone via the.
Speaker 4 (27:46):
Apple Yeah, you and you get that, and we've talked
about that before. But the problem is she put it
in a memo and apparently some people in the field
obeyed it. What about consequence for them? I mean, who
would walk by people in need based on their political affiliation?
Speaker 6 (28:02):
Well, there they would put so they have to do
a record of their inspections. So, for instance, the houses
were skipped over by the workers who wrote messages like
quote Trump signed no entry per leadership unquote.
Speaker 3 (28:15):
So essentially you'd had the workers out there saying, oh,
this is what we were told to do was not
to go to these houses. Wow.
Speaker 4 (28:26):
Could FEMA have asked for a worse finale to a
I mean that who' said a worst year? FEMA are boweling?
Speaker 6 (28:33):
I mean right, well, now, what they're trying to figure
out is if this is.
Speaker 3 (28:37):
A one off.
Speaker 6 (28:38):
You know, was this one lady doing this on her own,
this Marnie Washington, you know, was she an outlier here?
The governor of Tennessee has asked for an investigation to
make sure there are no similar circums, got Congressional Republicans
saying they want a full investigation and we need one.
Speaker 3 (28:56):
This isn't part of the FEMA culture. Yeah, we need to.
We need to clean that out.
Speaker 4 (29:00):
Politics is, it's ugly head everywhere, but when it comes
to people in need to be applying it, that's a
new low. Doesn't get any worse than that, good reporting
where we'll talk again tomorrow, all right, I want to
give the final say. We did a lot of different
sounds of the day, and we didn't do them all
at once. We kind of spread them out because it
just happened to be one of those days where they
(29:20):
were all very long examples. In fact, the longest example
is about four minutes and it was Megan Kelly just
destroying this goofball on a panel. Who by the way,
I say goofball, maybe knucklehead is probably more posh for
the left. Thanks to Tim walls. But the issue is
they don't understand what they're talking about. They're just doing
(29:44):
narratives and our one sound. We had AOC trying to
hammer Tom Holman, who, by the way, doesn't prepare for
a house hearing. This guy has been in charge of
the border, he's been in law enforcement.
Speaker 3 (30:00):
How your life.
Speaker 4 (30:01):
He doesn't need notes, he doesn't need a teleprompter. This
guy knows the law, he knows what he's talking about.
So he just destroyed her. But you know, not in
her defense, but just and clarifying. It's because that particular
representative AOC is standing there in a house hearing delivering
(30:26):
narratives to someone who lives in reality and truth of
the law. It just dies instantly. What do all narratives
die of reality and consequence truth? So I want to
sum it all up by saying this. All the Democrats
are trying to figure out why they lost. Perhaps they
(30:47):
should just listen to Megan Kelly. We give Megan Kelly
our final say.
Speaker 8 (30:51):
I can totally relate. I was open minded. I was
never a feminist, but I certainly was listening on where
women were in America, and then your absolute insanity radicalized me.
The other way to stand up against you, to fight
you with everything I have, because you're destructive and you're deeply,
(31:15):
deeply wrong, and my standing up for female empowerment, which
I've done my entire life, does not require me to
do all over American men.
Speaker 3 (31:24):
I'm sorry, but this is why I.
Speaker 8 (31:26):
Never called myself a feminist to begin with, because I knew.
Speaker 3 (31:29):
I knew what you.
Speaker 8 (31:31):
Left as thought of feminism. It meant abortion and crapping
on men, and most of us women over on the
side of the normies don't want that.
Speaker 3 (31:40):
We love our husband, we love.
Speaker 8 (31:42):
Our boys, our sons, our dads, our brothers, our male
friends and colleagues, and we are not ready to consider
this a zero sum game where we must advance at
their expense. Until you get that through your thick head,
you'll keep losing.
Speaker 1 (32:02):
We're all in this together.
Speaker 3 (32:04):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Del Jorno.
Hey, gang, it's me Michael. You can listen to your
morning show live. Make us a part of your morning
routine or your drive to work companion on great stations
like Talk Radio ninety eight point three and fifteen ten
WLAC in Nashville, Tuopelow's News and Talk one on one
point one and ten sixty WKMQ, and how about Talk
six fifty KSTE in Sacramento, California. Love to have you
(00:21):
listen live, but are grateful you're here now for the
podcast Enjoy Well.
Speaker 2 (00:25):
Two three, starting your morning off right, A new way
of talk, a new way of understanding.
Speaker 3 (00:33):
Because we're in this together.
Speaker 2 (00:37):
This is your morning show with Michael Bill Chordan.
Speaker 1 (00:41):
Along the lines that we're in this together.
Speaker 4 (00:44):
I'm a little spooked all morning long whenever for those
of you listening. Let's say I'm finishing my segment and
I want the transition music to begin. I usually point
at Jeffrey, and I've been pointing at him all morning
long and all more long. The music's been starting when
I point, and I just realized, at no point have
you been able to see me today? Yeah, it's just
(01:06):
what I do that's a little beyond what you do.
That's scary. Well, are we that much?
Speaker 3 (01:13):
Oh?
Speaker 4 (01:13):
My gosh, my soulmate is a man hookingy hook any
bookiny Eight minutes after the r We are that good?
Aren't We should get a weekend show? Eight minutes after
the hour. Welcome to Veterans Day. November the eleventh, twenty
twenty four, we did a salute to veterans to kick
off our second hour. If you missed it, just a
shameless plug for our podcast, which you can find on
the premiere site or in the iHeart Podcast section under
(01:35):
your Morning Show Michael del Journa.
Speaker 3 (01:37):
We encourage you to listen to that.
Speaker 4 (01:38):
We want to welcome AM eleven fifty The Patriot k
EIB Rush used to always say excellence in broadcasting. Station
was named after Rush. K EIB eleven fifty The Patriot
in Los Angeles. Welcome to your morning show kitchen table.
I presume, though I can't see you, Chris Walker.
Speaker 3 (02:00):
Is here still trying to get hold of Chris. Oh,
I assumed wrongly. We are having technical difficulty.
Speaker 4 (02:07):
Technical difficulties there, So wait a minute. I'm like al
Pacino incentive woman. I'm in a doc that you can sense,
but not the caller one of the things that we've
been exploring all day long is just this whole concept
of the Democrats trying to figure out what happened. Some
are honest about it, some are still defiant about it.
Like watching sixty Minutes yesterday, it was almost comedic to
(02:31):
me in the serious sixty minute style they're trying to
and they were. They were literally trying to figure it out.
I mean they were, they were open to understanding, and
it was it was eye opening to watch because you're like,
oh my gosh, they really have been in such a bubble.
Now what have we been saying all along? Well, there's
(02:52):
a lot of your voting blocks that you are disconnected with.
You think you could just take them for granted and
ignore them and get away with it. But things aren't
going well on campus, things aren't going well in the
indoctrination efforts of K through twelve. And guess what, Somewhere
along the line, you've lost the youth vote. Now, frankly,
you've lost it to campus outreach, you've lost it to TikTok,
(03:15):
and you've lost it to podcasting, and you've lost it
to X. They're able to figure out what's really going on.
Now you have some other problems. You went too far left,
too far woke. I can tell you this young generation
has no problem with gays. You start going to identifying
as an animal and wanting to wear a tail and whiskers,
(03:38):
they think you're nots. You want to put a six
foot four two and forty pound born man now identifying
as a woman in a boxing ring with a woman
or in a pool.
Speaker 3 (03:51):
They think that's too far.
Speaker 4 (03:54):
So you've lived so long in your silo, so long
in your bubble, that you have disconnect Your border went
so far that you alienated Hispanic voting blocks and Black
voting blocks. And while you bragged about your gender imbalance
and gap, you didn't realize you had a male gap.
And then, in your late hour desperation to tell women
(04:17):
to lie to their husbands, what you didn't realize is
there were a lot of husbands lying to their wives.
Maybe or maybe America's outside the bubble. Maybe there's an awakening.
We were saying all along, the media is dead. I
call it the death of journalism.
Speaker 5 (04:34):
Now.
Speaker 4 (04:34):
The funny thing, like the movie in the sixth sense,
they don't realize they're dead. I see dead people and
they're everywhere, But The best part of the line was
the next part.
Speaker 3 (04:43):
And they don't know they're dead.
Speaker 4 (04:47):
That's Fox, that's CNN, that's MSNBC, that's ABC, NBCCBS, they
don't The Washington Post, the New York Times, they don't
know they're dead. The notion that they were playing the
debate and appearances on MSNBC and CNN and ABC and
ignoring Megan Kelly, ignoring Tucker Carlson, ignoring Joe Rogan. How
(05:13):
out of touch are you and your matrix in bubble?
They are just starting to figure out I got a
clip for you coming up. Oh, maybe things aren't about
radio and television anymore. Maybe it's about podcasts and did hello?
And of course the biggest challenge for the left is
going to be it's all of the above. And if
(05:34):
you follow the thirty seven symptoms that led to your death,
you missed the disease that was the cause of the death.
How they handle this post mortem is everything for if
they have any shot of coming back and being relevant
in four years.
Speaker 3 (05:49):
Now.
Speaker 4 (05:49):
Let me end with a warning to you on the right.
You still have to live your post Trump years and
you're in a matrix two, so be careful death your
witnessing and celebrating could be your own in four years.
But meantime, the numbers are in, and Donald Trump did win,
and he did win big, by a number I actually predicted,
(06:12):
and everyone thought I was crazy. I get a free
trip to Washington, DC thanks to my bet with John Decker.
Donald Trump got three hundred and twelve Electoral College votes
Kamala Harris two twenty six. The Senate ends up plus four,
not three as I predicted, but fifty three to forty six,
plus vance if necessary, and the House sits at two
hundred and seventeen, one away from two eighteen control with
(06:33):
ten outstanding races. We think it's going to come in
somewhere around two twenty two. Republicans will control the House,
the Senate, and the White House by a mandate of
the American people, Which leaves the only relevant question what
is Donald Trump plan to surround himself with in order
to enact this mandate for change and create the change
(06:55):
the American people asked him to? Republican consultant Chris Walker
is joining us?
Speaker 3 (07:00):
So you're a morning.
Speaker 4 (07:00):
Show contributor, Well, I can tell you Tom Holman's a
great start.
Speaker 5 (07:05):
Yeah, that's great news. I mean, I love seeing the
clips going around social media on him just saying, you self,
deportation is a thing and it can happen, and you know,
just he's owning it.
Speaker 3 (07:18):
It's great.
Speaker 4 (07:19):
So he makes history with the first ever female chief
of staff, Pat Summerl's daughter. That's Susie helped me, Susie Wiles. Yeah,
Susie Wiles. That's a very strong pick. That shows you.
I want to say hit number one for Donald Trump
two point zero. He knows that he allowed a lot
(07:41):
of nonsense in his first term, a lot of as
she would call circus members with access to the Oval office,
that's not going to happen. This is a woman who
orchestrated this unimaginable, unthinkable, victorious campaign, and she knows to
keep how to keep him on the rails, and to
show you the priory already of the border making Tom
home and the borders are expect nothing short of law
(08:05):
and order, and that means deportation as well.
Speaker 5 (08:07):
Right, absolutely absolutely, I mean that's I got to listen
to Tom at the Republican Convention in Milwaukee. He was on
a panel discussion, and goodness, he's just he's a no
nonsense former cop who you know, knows knows what it
takes the law and order. I think, I think it's
a great pick.
Speaker 3 (08:25):
Susie.
Speaker 5 (08:26):
You know she she ran a great campaign. You know
she was she part of the White House, he was staff.
Role is going to be how to manage and function
of this White House. I think Trump was was poorly
served by a couple of its former chiefs of staff,
just in the sense that you know, he he didn't
he didn't have people who understood how to communicate with
him and how to manage how he wants to see
things done. Susie has proven that she can do that
(08:48):
through this campaign and managing all kinds of crises, and
so I think I think it's a great pick, and
I think it's the first good step to what we're
going to see in his administration.
Speaker 4 (08:55):
Shows you the priority of managing the administration. It shows
the priority of addressing the border. Second priority has got
to be the economy. What might we hear next?
Speaker 5 (09:06):
You know, I think foreign policy is being bandied around
a lot. I mean, who is he going to pick
for defense and State and national intelligence? I mean, there's
so many foreign policy issues that that's going to be
left on a door step, whether it's you know, the
Middle East or whether it's Ukraine or you know, the
continued kind of not ascendence, but you know, a new
issue of China. So foreign policy is going to be
a key part of this administration, a key part of
(09:28):
who we pay. So you thought over the weekend that
he said that Vicky Haley and Mike Pompeio will not be.
Speaker 3 (09:33):
Part of the administration.
Speaker 5 (09:34):
So he's he's already laying a marker of saying I'm
going to be doing stuff differently than I did in
my first term. And you know, we'll see how that
shakes out.
Speaker 4 (09:43):
I think there are there's a sea of voices, there's
a sea of information. In most cases we're void understanding
and uh and a lot of.
Speaker 3 (09:52):
The information is wrong.
Speaker 4 (09:54):
Of the voices I respect, the most outspoken against Pompeo,
the most revealingly OUTSI spokan has been Tucker Carlson about
the assassination attempt on Julian Massage, among other things concerning Pompeo.
The Pompeo. What's going to strike people the most shocking?
What's the message it sends to you? Nicki Haley? We
(10:15):
get she went too far in the end, she came
along to try to encourage her supporters because a lot
of Democrats were counting on the same votes that went
to Nicki Haley not voting for Donald Trump. And of
course they did, and they would have had she been
gone even in the primaries. So that didn't pan out
for them, but it wasn't enough to give her a
(10:36):
place in the new administration. But Pompeo, that's a big matter.
That's somebody people had for, you know, Secretary of Defense
or for very key positions.
Speaker 3 (10:45):
Why do you think he's out?
Speaker 5 (10:48):
You know, it's a marker of saying if you have
a lot of DC experience, or you have grown or
have been part of, you know, the status quo of
the last twenty five years, your voice isn't going to
be heard as much. I don't think it's not unwelcome.
It's just who are you going to pick to lead?
Speaker 6 (11:09):
Who is going to be.
Speaker 5 (11:10):
The voice that's going to represent you in these departments
and really enact change. If you're part of the Washington
establishment over the last thirty years, you're not going to
be part of that change. And I think that's you know,
Trump's coming in with this mandate and you mentioned earlier.
I think that's part of the partly right. It's about
affecting change. It's about listening to the American people rather
than the status quotes continued. The Washington status quo needs
to be shaken up. And that's what the American people
(11:31):
are trying to say multiple elections, even with the Joe
Biden election. To a certain degree, if you're an incumbent,
you have an issue. The American people don't want you
to be, you know, just doing everything as normal.
Speaker 3 (11:42):
And I think that's what Trump's kind of saying physically.
Speaker 4 (11:44):
Chris Walker, Republican consultant and analyst and your morning show contributor,
you got your ear to the wall with the glass
in your hand.
Speaker 3 (11:52):
What are you hearing? In terms of RFK?
Speaker 4 (11:55):
We know he's going to be in charge of fixing
our food and looking at examined vaccinations and our health administration.
Is it Health and Human Services? Is it some kind
of czar? What's the role of Elon Musk? He's going
to kind of be the Charles Grodin that comes in
like in the movie Dave and fixes the books.
Speaker 3 (12:13):
What other names are you hearing?
Speaker 4 (12:14):
Because they seem to be moving very quickly and from
my view in terms of so far very effectively, Yeah, No,
with r K, my sense.
Speaker 5 (12:30):
Is it will be a non cabinet function. I think
there'll be a little bit more of a wider portfolio
where you know, you can kind of let him do
a traveling road show and really talk about, you know,
kind of these health issues that America really is facing,
whether it's our food supply, whether it's you know, pharmaceuticals
or other things. You know, that's not just one cabinet position,
(12:51):
that's a broader health goal. I would see some type
of white house role where you know, health is kind
of his key portfolio. You know, running department could be confining,
and I think a Senate confirmation would be check challenging
and problematic in of its own self, so that that
probably would say that.
Speaker 4 (13:07):
As well, we know it's a priority the border, and
he's addressed that his administration, he's addressed that. Next becomes
the Economy and Justice Department. Who are we looking at
for Attorney general? And who are we looking at for
Commerce secretary you know or Treasury.
Speaker 5 (13:28):
Yeah, there's a couple of you know, Wall Street guys
that have kind of been key to to you know,
Trump's re election team and economic stuff. I would anticipate
some of his New York network connections would be kind
of where he would look at for Treasury when it
comes to, you know, attorney general. There are a lot
(13:48):
of state ags that are really impressive. You know, I
wouldn't necessarily kind of suggest I know too much yet,
but I mean somebody like Jason Mires in Virginia would
be really good. But I think you know, Jason's kind
of got his eye on Virginia governor, so that mean
may not be basis Chris Cobak in Kansas and others.
I think there's there's some potential for for several of
those to be to be on the short list. I'd
(14:11):
heard that, you know, the essentially Governor Abbott in Texas
would be somebody could be thought of it. I think
Governorrabbit likes the job that he has, so part of
it too is like, Okay, there's names we talked about,
but who who wants to go to Washington and serve
and who feels like they're better, you know, serving in
the roles that they have so that given take right now.
My final one is more of a statement than a question.
But you know, I was one of the few people
(14:31):
that had the gut feeling that Donald Trump was leaning
towards Marco Rubio and that maybe Donald Trump Junior talked
him into JD.
Speaker 3 (14:37):
Bans.
Speaker 4 (14:38):
Turned out to be a good move with j D. Bans,
But that tells me that Marco Rubio can have anything
he wants. That's how high Donald Trump views him. I
got Rubio's secretary of State and I got caught in
secretary of Defense.
Speaker 3 (14:50):
How do you think I'm going to do.
Speaker 5 (14:53):
Well? Cotton said he's not doing the administration. So I
think you got fifty to fifty on that one. I
agree with you on Rubio.
Speaker 3 (14:58):
I think Rubio has.
Speaker 5 (14:59):
Been kind of in the of the front pork, but
I would I would think Rick Ronell isn't is kind
of a somebody to keep your eye on for State
as well. I think, you know, he was former ambassador
of Germany, you know, former director of National Intelligence. I
think he's very, very plugged into both the Tucker and
you know, Don Junior world. But I think Marcos certainly
is on that list as well. Uh, you know, our
(15:19):
home state Senator Bill Haggerty is also on that list
for State. But you know, we'll see how it all
stakes out.
Speaker 3 (15:25):
But you know, I agree with you.
Speaker 5 (15:27):
I think Marco's good, but I think Tom Protton would
be a good Defense secretary, but he has said that
he wants to stay in the Senate.
Speaker 3 (15:32):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Del Chrono.
Speaker 7 (15:57):
Hi, my name is Bern Aaron, and my morning show
is your morning show with Michael del Jorno.
Speaker 4 (16:05):
You know, that's kind of been our big exploration today,
our journey of discovery. And I'm watching sixty Minutes and
they seem to be sensibly exploring how did this happen?
And you can hear for the first time the guy
on sixty Minutes, you know, asking questions like, you know,
how did we miss how important food prices were and
the border was? And of course it almost became comedic,
but they were genuinely trying to understand.
Speaker 3 (16:27):
I think they have to.
Speaker 4 (16:28):
I mean the media has to because what they're realizing
is their influence is dead. But it was dead going
into this election. They're just new to the table.
Speaker 5 (16:37):
You know.
Speaker 4 (16:38):
Red asked it a different way. He said, who heads
this party now? Can't be Joe he's gone. Can't be
Kamalas she just got demolished. Can't be Nancy. She's gone,
and she's the one that orchestrated Joe being gone and
anointed Kamala, and that was clearly a mistake. Schumer's not
in charge anymore. I mean, that'd be a lot to
(16:59):
give Hakeem Jeffries. He's just a minority leader in the
House that's headed to a Republican control of two twenty two.
Speaker 3 (17:05):
Who is it.
Speaker 4 (17:07):
Well, my answer is the same as who's been. It's
John Podesta, the same person that ran eight years of
the Clintons, eight years of the Obamas, in four years
of Kamala and Joe, and they're still cutting deals, still
trying to set up desperately an administrative state. They've ignored
the primary voters in three straight cycles now, twenty sixteen,
(17:32):
twenty twenty, and twenty four. They're parties at war with
itself and I think Podesta, Obama, Soros are still at
its head. They do have a player in Wes Moore.
So whether they really genuinely come to terms beyond symptoms
but with the disease that caused this defeat or not,
(17:56):
he's I think the play. As for who's really heading
it up, I assure you it's still John Podesta. Debbie's
in Arizona listening to k f YI.
Speaker 7 (18:05):
Hey Michael, this is Laura from Franklin, Tennessee. Was wondering
if you have any concerns about how easily the heads
of the Democratic Party have capitulated Trump's victory and if
you think they might have something planned to subvert it.
Speaker 8 (18:25):
Thanks for everything, all right.
Speaker 4 (18:27):
That's Laura, obviously not Debbie. I view these one on
one times as a time of just casual, intimate transparency.
I noticed when they were doing all the gambling and
as you were picking and buying these stocks if you will,
(18:49):
that you don't get paid until the vote is certified.
Could be just because that's not it's really technically not
real until that happens. It could be because they know something's common.
They have a way to win both ways early on
the Democrats led by Joe Biden. That's why, I mean,
(19:11):
you know the nonsense of Joe Biden stepping aside so
she can just shatter the gat glassying. There's gonna be
some great body language to watch today with Harrison Biden
at our Lincoln Cemetery.
Speaker 3 (19:22):
Uncomfortable, awkward. I don't think he's gonna do that. I
don't think.
Speaker 4 (19:29):
I really don't think that's the message they want to send,
that all we care about is gender. All we care
about is race. We don't care about serving the people,
providing prosperity, providing security, governing, leading. We just care about gender.
So we'll just do that so we have our first
female president. I think that would be far more revealing
than achieving. They seem to be very interested in a
(19:55):
peaceful transition, though there are symptoms otherwise, you know, as
Chuckie Schumer is not real interested in acknowledging Dave McCormick are.
There's still some votes to be counted in Philadelphia.
Speaker 3 (20:10):
Deny much.
Speaker 4 (20:14):
This little bit of nonsense over soda mayor, which is
just that nonsense. No, I think they're genuinely at a moment,
if they're honest with themselves, that they're looking at all
the reasons why they lost, to learn from it so
they don't lose next time. I still see them focused
on symptoms, not root cause they can't do. I think
(20:34):
they'll be Shenanigan. I don't know, we'll find out in
due time. I don't think it'd get very far, but
I always warn you it's very classic Sololenski classic Barack Obama.
Whatever they're accusing, they're planning to do, or are doing.
Speaker 3 (20:51):
Don't forget.
Speaker 4 (20:52):
In the Shadow Campaign to Save the Democracy, Time Magazine,
February fifteenth, twenty twenty one. Go read it, they brag
about how they stole the election, and in that plan
was insurrection because they had a struggle calling it off.
They were conditioning you with Antifa and Black Lives matters,
sort of an unnatural progression. And then they actually won
with an old man hiding in a basement, so they
(21:13):
had to call it off, and they pinned it on
Donald Trump. I think it would be a death blow.
I think they realized they got to take their loss
and learn from it and come back in four years.
How they learned from it, I have an eye on
I'm going to give you one final example in our
one on one time. This is a conversation on Media
(21:36):
Buzz on Fox, which is a show all about media bias,
and they're trying to explore how is it that these campaigns,
or the left, the Democrats campaign didn't see the transition
from legacy media to podcasting in digital.
Speaker 3 (21:56):
They're still playing an old game.
Speaker 4 (21:58):
That's usually something the Republicans do this time, the Democrats
did it. They still think everybody's getting their news from CNN, MSNBC, Fox, ABCNBCCBS.
Speaker 3 (22:06):
They don't.
Speaker 4 (22:08):
You could add them all up and it doesn't even
come to with one tenth of what Joe Rogan reaches,
and they chose not to be on Joe Rogan. So
this was the conversation with Megan Hayes. She's a former
Biden Harris operative. It's that same spirit of kind of
some are figuring it out, some are not. They still
(22:29):
don't understand it completely. They've been so living in the
matrix in bubble that they've been blind to this. It's
just dawning on them. Journalism is dead and the mainstream
media no longer has an audience or an influence. Listen
to Megan.
Speaker 9 (22:45):
So I think that there's a couple of things here.
I don't think that people are necessarily getting their news
anymore from mainstream media. I think they're getting it from podcasts.
So I think that we are talking to ourselves. We
are talking to an echo chamber. People who are lean
left and liberal tune into MS, people who lean right
tune into Fox. So we're not doing a service to
people to give people dissenting opinions on these different stations.
(23:05):
So I think that's part of the problem. I also
think that the media was reporting off what the polls
were saying. The polls were saying it was really close,
they were flawed, and they were also flowed to one
hundred percent, So I think that so when they were
reporting off the polls and they were giving misinformation, and
I mean, it's not their fault one hundred percent, but
they could have done better.
Speaker 2 (23:23):
Of course, progressives should still fight for what they believe in,
but should the media liberals continue to attack Donald Trump
now months before he takes office. Here you see Rachel
Meadow is stand and fight, she tells the press.
Speaker 9 (23:36):
So I think there's a difference of criticizing Trump and
criticizing and continuing to fight. I think that the Democrats
need to take a hard look at themselves and looked
at the electorate is more moderate, and they need to
move more moderate if they want to win elections in
the the.
Speaker 3 (23:49):
Tug Or gang.
Speaker 4 (23:50):
First of all, I can't believe it was news to
her or the Democrats. The journalism is dead, the audience
size isn't there, It's been lost, the agenda has been revealed.
It's like total pulled the curtain. You can see the
wizard isn't big. It's a little man pulling knobs. But
they were so caught up in the matrix, so caught
(24:12):
up in the echo chamber and bubble. It really is
news to them. Now who will sensibly learn from it
and change?
Speaker 3 (24:21):
Now?
Speaker 4 (24:22):
As I've said all morning long, I want to reador
rate for those of you that are third party third
hour listeners on your way to work. The Democrats have
to figure this out.
Speaker 1 (24:32):
But so do you.
Speaker 4 (24:33):
You know, just as we said, Wow, who does the
party belong to? Can't be Joe they ran them off.
Can't be Kamala she just got beaten the landslide. Can't
be Nancy She's already gone and she orchestrated this bait
and switch. Can't be Chunky he's no longer the Senate leader.
Speaker 3 (24:50):
Who is it?
Speaker 4 (24:53):
Well, it's still John Podesta, George Soros and Barack Obama.
And their goal is still a global governance and an
administrative date complying with it in America. I will tell
if they succeed in that. But who has the Republican Party?
It's Donald Trump's party. And he's gone in four years.
Watch all the questions and all the discoveries the Left
(25:17):
is making them because you're going to be asking him
and forced to make them in four years. And that's
not me rating on your parade. That's the power of
me not being I think both parties are the problem.
But Donald Trump isn't a party. What is the future
(25:37):
of the Republican Party after Donald Trump? That's as difficult
of a question to answer a note as the Democrats
trying to figure out awakening from their echo chamber.
Speaker 3 (25:46):
It's going to be fun to keep an eye on both.
Speaker 1 (25:49):
It's Your Morning Show with Michael del Churno.
Speaker 4 (25:53):
I am Michael del journal, jeffres got the controls, read producing,
and you guys talking. This one comes from Catherine, who
I believe is Nashville, Tennessee. A lot of names that
are being thrown around are Republicans currently serving in the
House or the Senate. If these people get appointed, what
would happened to their seats? Well, I don't think you'll
se anybody get appointed that isn't in a state with
(26:14):
a Republican governor who would replace them, So they would
just be replaced by another Republican as the short answer
I said coming out of covid Man, it's going to
be a long haul to restore the credibility and trust
of the World Health Organization and the CDC. I don't
think they've made any strides to do that. It's been
a rough year for FEMA, and it got even rougher
(26:35):
over the weekend with the news and the investigation into
a supervisor who was instructing field workers to bypass Floridians
who had Trump yard signs. Roory O'Neil happens to be
at Floridian and one heck of a reporter has the
very latest time this she's gotten fired, right.
Speaker 6 (26:51):
Yeah, just a few hours after The Daily Wire first
broke the story on Friday, this supervisor had sent out
a memo, a best practices list to the people who
are going to be out in the field going to
homes that may have been damaged by a tornado that
got whipped up by Milton hitting a town called Lake
Placid in Highlands County. On the list of best practices
(27:15):
was stay hydrated, drink coconut water, oh and quote avoid
homes advertising Trump unquote. That's been the problem, some of
the field workers say about twenty homes had those kinds
of signs or flags and were passed over by the
on the ground inspection teams. So the FEMA is trying
to make sure that everyone is getting the help that
(27:36):
they're due, but they were probably already being taken care
of by the local and state teams that have responded there. Anyway,
in addition to you know, they could have applied on
the phone via the.
Speaker 4 (27:46):
Apple Yeah, you and you get that, and we've talked
about that before. But the problem is she put it
in a memo and apparently some people in the field
obeyed it. What about consequence for them? I mean, who
would walk by people in need based on their political affiliation?
Speaker 6 (28:02):
Well, there they would put so they have to do
a record of their inspections. So, for instance, the houses
were skipped over by the workers who wrote messages like
quote Trump signed no entry per leadership unquote.
Speaker 3 (28:15):
So essentially you'd had the workers out there saying, oh,
this is what we were told to do was not
to go to these houses. Wow.
Speaker 4 (28:26):
Could FEMA have asked for a worse finale to a
I mean that who' said a worst year? FEMA are boweling?
Speaker 6 (28:33):
I mean right, well, now, what they're trying to figure
out is if this is.
Speaker 3 (28:37):
A one off.
Speaker 6 (28:38):
You know, was this one lady doing this on her own,
this Marnie Washington, you know, was she an outlier here?
The governor of Tennessee has asked for an investigation to
make sure there are no similar circums, got Congressional Republicans
saying they want a full investigation and we need one.
Speaker 3 (28:56):
This isn't part of the FEMA culture. Yeah, we need to.
We need to clean that out.
Speaker 4 (29:00):
Politics is, it's ugly head everywhere, but when it comes
to people in need to be applying it, that's a
new low. Doesn't get any worse than that, good reporting
where we'll talk again tomorrow, all right, I want to
give the final say. We did a lot of different
sounds of the day, and we didn't do them all
at once. We kind of spread them out because it
just happened to be one of those days where they
(29:20):
were all very long examples. In fact, the longest example
is about four minutes and it was Megan Kelly just
destroying this goofball on a panel. Who by the way,
I say goofball, maybe knucklehead is probably more posh for
the left. Thanks to Tim walls. But the issue is
they don't understand what they're talking about. They're just doing
(29:44):
narratives and our one sound. We had AOC trying to
hammer Tom Holman, who, by the way, doesn't prepare for
a house hearing. This guy has been in charge of
the border, he's been in law enforcement.
Speaker 3 (30:00):
How your life.
Speaker 4 (30:01):
He doesn't need notes, he doesn't need a teleprompter. This
guy knows the law, he knows what he's talking about.
So he just destroyed her. But you know, not in
her defense, but just and clarifying. It's because that particular
representative AOC is standing there in a house hearing delivering
(30:26):
narratives to someone who lives in reality and truth of
the law. It just dies instantly. What do all narratives
die of reality and consequence truth? So I want to
sum it all up by saying this. All the Democrats
are trying to figure out why they lost. Perhaps they
(30:47):
should just listen to Megan Kelly. We give Megan Kelly
our final say.
Speaker 8 (30:51):
I can totally relate. I was open minded. I was
never a feminist, but I certainly was listening on where
women were in America, and then your absolute insanity radicalized me.
The other way to stand up against you, to fight
you with everything I have, because you're destructive and you're deeply,
(31:15):
deeply wrong, and my standing up for female empowerment, which
I've done my entire life, does not require me to
do all over American men.
Speaker 3 (31:24):
I'm sorry, but this is why I.
Speaker 8 (31:26):
Never called myself a feminist to begin with, because I knew.
Speaker 3 (31:29):
I knew what you.
Speaker 8 (31:31):
Left as thought of feminism. It meant abortion and crapping
on men, and most of us women over on the
side of the normies don't want that.
Speaker 3 (31:40):
We love our husband, we love.
Speaker 8 (31:42):
Our boys, our sons, our dads, our brothers, our male
friends and colleagues, and we are not ready to consider
this a zero sum game where we must advance at
their expense. Until you get that through your thick head,
you'll keep losing.
Speaker 1 (32:02):
We're all in this together.
Speaker 3 (32:04):
This is your Morning Show with Michael Del Jorno.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Crime Junkie
Does hearing about a true crime case always leave you scouring the internet for the truth behind the story? Dive into your next mystery with Crime Junkie. Every Monday, join your host Ashley Flowers as she unravels all the details of infamous and underreported true crime cases with her best friend Brit Prawat. From cold cases to missing persons and heroes in our community who seek justice, Crime Junkie is your destination for theories and stories you won’t hear anywhere else. Whether you're a seasoned true crime enthusiast or new to the genre, you'll find yourself on the edge of your seat awaiting a new episode every Monday. If you can never get enough true crime... Congratulations, you’ve found your people. Follow to join a community of Crime Junkies! Crime Junkie is presented by audiochuck Media Company.
Ridiculous History
History is beautiful, brutal and, often, ridiculous. Join Ben Bowlin and Noel Brown as they dive into some of the weirdest stories from across the span of human civilization in Ridiculous History, a podcast by iHeartRadio.