12-12-24 YMS HR2

Sounds of the day

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:00):
Hi, it's me Michael. Your morning show can be heard
on great stations across the country like Talk Radio eleven
ninety in Dallas, Fort Worth, Freedom one oh four point
seven and Washington, DC and five point fifty k FYI
and Phoenix, Arizona. We'd love to be a part of
your morning routine or take us along on the drive
to work, but as we always say, better late than never.
Enjoy the podcast well two three, starting your morning off right,

(00:24):
A new way of talk, a new way of understanding,
because we're in this together.

Speaker 2 (00:30):
This is your Morning Show with Michael o'deil.

Speaker 1 (00:34):
Charnan, MBI director Christopher Ray resigning, paving the way for
Cash Pattel President elect Trump. He'll ring the opening bell
at the New York Stock Exchange on Wall Street, and
multi reports say he will also be Time Magazine's Person
of the Year. Twenty twenty four. NYPD says that the
gun found on Luigi man Joan the ballistic texts testing

(00:58):
with the shells found at the scene of the crime
were a match. Worse, his fingerprints that were on trash
at the Starbucks match his fingerprints. Looks like a pretty
open shut, hard evidence case against Luigi Maine Joan. New
Jersey Congressman Jeff Van Drew thinks the mysterious drone spotted
throughout the Garden State could possibly be from Iran. Oh my,

(01:21):
more on that later with Warrio O'Neil. John Decker's going
to join US. President Biden is threatening to veto a
bipartisan bill that would add fifty six judges to the
federal bench. Remember the scene in Jerk. He hates these cans.
Joe Biden hates these judges and Thursday Night Football, Tonight
Rams and forty nine ers. But first Sounds of the Day, smoke.

Speaker 3 (01:43):
Stopped.

Speaker 4 (01:44):
I really don't know what he said at the end
of this, and I don't think he knows what he
said either.

Speaker 1 (01:51):
It's got to be a big bit of understanding. I'm going, man,
how do you like my garbage? Yeah? They just turned
off a teleprompter. Sounds of the Day, Let's start with
Nancy Pelosi with Katie Kirk in New York City. And

(02:14):
the reason I start with this is there's an Old
Testament scripture. If my people second Chronicle seven fourteen will
humble themselves, confess their sins, I will hear their prayers
and I will hear their land, and I will heal
their land. Same God, yesterday, today and forever, Oh Covenant,
New Covenant, past, the present future. So his nature hasn't changed.

(02:39):
The first thing is my people, not everyone. If those
called by my name will humble themselves, confess their sin
and pray, I will hear. Then I will actually hear
their prayers, suggesting maybe when they're in wrong standing, he
doesn't even hear them, and I will. It says, if

(03:01):
there's been a healing, and we didn't even need the results,
we didn't even need the inaugural speech, we didn't even
need the oath of office, it's like it's already happened.
Donald Trump is in France the rededication of the Notre Dame,
sitting there like he's sitting president, and the sitting president

(03:21):
refuses to go, and his wife is two people down
gazing lovingly at Donald Trump. I mean, it's all so strange.
And then we're going through these perceptional studies. The percentage
of the American people not Republicans. The American people six
and ten are confident he's going to fix the border,

(03:41):
Confident he's going to fix the economy. Confident he's going
to solve the Ukrainian Russian War. It says if like
a healing took place and we didn't even know it.
And then there's the few that didn't get the memo

(04:03):
that the page has been turned, that we've moved on.
One is Nancy Pelosi in Our Sounds the Day with
Katie Kirk in New York City. The interview couldn't even
get under way because of the booing and heckling.

Speaker 5 (04:19):
Listen, I'll wait, I'll wait a second to continue.

Speaker 1 (04:35):
Nice, you're gonna wait two minutes and forty eight seconds, Katie.
I mean, it just goes on and on. Something's changed,
hasn't it, And in the end it'll be once again,
this is history repeating itself. Those who should be humbly

(05:01):
serving and representing and only for a short period of time,
who think now they are kings and queens governing for
a lifetime, lose touch with the people. And their biggest

(05:24):
mistake was underestimating them, thinking you could just narrative ize
and narrative ize and they would never figure it out.
They pander that they're against the rich and they'refore the poor,
but they're doing nothing for the poor while they're getting rich.

(05:45):
What a better example than Nancy Pelosi. Right now, there's
Joe Biden coming off her European trip with President Electrump.
She's home pulling a Kamala Harris of her own. Maybe
they loaded the wrong speech and the teleprompter.

Speaker 6 (06:02):
So I hope that you all feel that sense of
you know, peace and light, and that just for a
moment when you leave here today, that you feel, I
don't know, a little a sense of joy, because I
think we all need like this, you know, we all
need to feel joy now during this time of the season,

(06:23):
during just.

Speaker 1 (06:24):
During this time. I've heard this clip a lot, and
I have chosen to say something serious and it's a
challenge to me, and it's a challenge to you listening.
And nobody's going to know the challenge but us, because
I don't know, it didn't happen. I like to think

(06:46):
that if Kamala Harris had won the presidency, Tim Walls,
the vice presidency would touch my joy of a night's
so divine or eternal God found a way and took

(07:07):
the form of man and sent his only son. I
like to think, because that's what you're hearing with her
and Kamala, that somehow this election result that everybody, including Fetterman,
is celebrating, might somehow rob you of your seasonal joy. Well,

(07:29):
I hope it wouldn't happened to me, and I hope
it's not happening to them. There's the serious answer. I
keep making references to Fetterman even getting it. Here's Fetterment
on the view.

Speaker 7 (07:38):
I think it's undeniable that the case against Hunter Biden
was really politically motivated. But I also think it's true
that the trial in New York for Trump that was
political as well too. Now that and in both cases,
I think a pardon is appropriate, And I really think collectively,

(08:00):
you know, America's confidence and these kinds of institutions have
been damaged by these kinds of cases, and we cannot
allow these kinds of institutions to be weaponized against our
political opponents. I'm talking about the New York trial and
now the Democrats on our side were Now there were
sums that were gleeful calling la now he's a convicted

(08:23):
fella in.

Speaker 1 (08:24):
The weaponization of the Justice Department. Now, by the way,
and the Hunter Biden, you know, it may be true
that nobody cared about his weapon charge. Not nearly as
much as the deals he was cutting with China and
Russia and Barisma, and they were deals put together because
his father was vice president. So these lesser charges were

(08:47):
probably maybe trying to get him to the bigger charges.
But when it comes to the Hunter Biden pardon itself,
I think Fetterman's wrong, or at least I had worded
this way. He's completely out of touch with the American people.
The Associated Press did a piece of research. How many

(09:11):
Americans view President Biden's partning of his son? Do you
approve twenty two percent? Do you disapprove of the partning
of his son fifty one percent, Over twice as many disapprove.
This is the most interesting part when you break it

(09:32):
out partisanly, seven percent of Republicans approve, twelve percent of
Independence approve, Thirty eight percent of Democrats approve. This did
not go unnoticed by the American people. In fact, among Democrats,
thirty eight percent approve, twenty seven percent disapprove. That's not

(09:57):
a win even in your party. Fetterman stands alone on
that as a Democrat Independence twelve percent approved, fifty one
percent disapproved. Among Republicans, as you might guess, seven percent approved,
eighty percent disapproved. Make no mistake about it, the pardoning

(10:19):
of Hunter Biden was an American mistake, overwhelmingly by independence
and Republicans, but almost even among Democrats. Speaking of Democrats,
some presidents can live so long that well they tarnish

(10:39):
their legacy. Take Bill Clinton on the set of the
view on the topic of preemptive pardons.

Speaker 8 (10:50):
Listen, mister President Donald Trump will be returning to the
White House unburdened by the pressure of reelection, with sweeping
immunity granted to him, I believe, by the Supreme Court
and an alleged enemies list we're hearing. Do you think
it would be wise of President Biden to preemptively pardon

(11:14):
any potential targets? What about your wife, Hillary Clinton? She
apparently is on cash Betail's list.

Speaker 3 (11:22):
Yeah, well, they got a problem with her because first
she didn't do anything wrong, of course. A second, she
followed the rules exactly as they were written. Third, it
does depend on the definition of is well state department?

Speaker 1 (11:39):
Trump's state department? Why does he look like he's in
a constantine of about to hiccup found.

Speaker 3 (11:44):
Remember how the emails was such a big issue in
sixty Trump's State Department found that Hillary sent and received
exactly zero classified emails of life. It was a hole
that was a made up phony story. So you know,

(12:05):
I guess if Cashultell is determined to make one up,
he could do it.

Speaker 1 (12:09):
But I think.

Speaker 3 (12:12):
If President Biden wanted to talk to me about that,
I would talk to about it. But I don't think
I should be giving public advice on the pardon power.
I think it's too It's a very personal thing, but
it is. I hope he won't do that.

Speaker 1 (12:29):
Trump. You know, you most of us get out of.

Speaker 3 (12:34):
This world ahead of where we'd get if all we
got was simple justice. Yeah, and so it's normally a
fool's errand to spend a lot of time trying to
get even.

Speaker 1 (12:47):
So the guy that's probably all over the Black Book
of Jeffrey Epstein final sound of the day is the
most despicable of the day. There's just no excuse. This
kind of a quote should end a political career. This
should lead to a scandal, to a resignation speech, and
to never be seen or heard again. This is the

(13:08):
worst thing I heard yesterday. I don't think there's a
much audience for this narrative. Getting back to that has
there been a silent healing that we're unaware of. This
is how out of touch a former Democrat presidential candidate,
Elizabeth Warren is with not just the American people, but

(13:32):
the moral and legal reality. Listen, they're going to part
of the deal.

Speaker 9 (13:38):
And how we've kept this democracys economy of this country
on a fairly steady path for more than two hundred
years has been that those at the top pal a
little more in taxes, are a little less rich than
the otherwise.

Speaker 1 (13:52):
Not never mind the idiocy of this that the reason
liberty and freedom works is through progressive tax watch where
she goes with this, this.

Speaker 9 (14:04):
Might be and everybody else at least gets chance. And
what happens when you turn this into the billionaires run
at all is they get the opportunity to squeeze every
last penny. And look, we'll say it over and over.

Speaker 1 (14:19):
Violence is never the answer.

Speaker 9 (14:20):
This guy gets a trial who's allegedly killed the CEO
of United Health.

Speaker 1 (14:25):
But you can only.

Speaker 9 (14:26):
Push people so far and then they start to take
matters in their own hands. Yeah, we need regulation.

Speaker 1 (14:35):
You can only push people's all right, So typical Democrats,
right when it comes to this kind of thing. They
never feel that way. If this is how they feel
when it's Black Lives Matter, this is how they feel
when it's Antifa, this is how they feel when it's
Luigi me man Gion. Can you imagine Thompson's family listening

(14:56):
to that. You can only push people so far and
then they take matters into their own hand. In the words,
she says, we never condone violence, but then she justifies
it and it's a political weapon. It never applies to
the pro lifers, It never applied to anybody on January sixth.

(15:20):
You can only push them so far and then they're justified.
It is one of the most despicable things I have
ever heard come out of a United States Senator's mouth.
And the tragedy seems to be there'll be no consequence
for it. But I sense there's change in the air,

(15:40):
and there may be a day where there is such consequence.
Right now, it's just completely out of touch with the audience,
the American people. I'm late, late, late. Let me tell
you something. It's not just a really bright day for
Donald Trump in our future. It's a really dark day

(16:00):
for the Democrat Party. They may be extinct by the
end of the of the decade if they don't wise
up soon.

Speaker 2 (16:08):
Hey, this is Mike the Baptist in Cotton Down, Tennessee,
and my morning show is your Morning Show with Michael
bill Giorno.

Speaker 1 (16:21):
Hi, I'm Michael del Jorno and your morning show can
be heard live as it's happening five to eight am
Central at six to nine Eastern on great stations like
six point twenty WJDX and Jackson, Mississippi, or Akron's News
Talk six forty WHLO and AKRON Ohio and News Radio
five seventy WDAK and Columbus, Georgia. Love to be a
part of your morning routine. But we're glad you're here now.

(16:43):
Enjoyed the podcast. Some of those who Donald Trump has
picked for his administration were back on Capitol Hill Wednesday.
There are I think it was Ted Cruz that was
saying he thinks all these nominees are going to get
get through and get passed. Is there anybody's still on
the hot seat on the maybe list.

Speaker 10 (17:03):
I'd say Tulsi is sort of on the on the
fence a little bit.

Speaker 1 (17:08):
But again, what happens is.

Speaker 10 (17:11):
It tends to be that these nominees drop out now
because what you don't want is to have a member
of your own party in the Senate vote against them,
and that doesn't happen very often. And the sense is
that if there were to be one or two Republicans
then that want to vote no on heg Seth or
Gabbard or Patel or Bobby Kennedy Junior, then that would

(17:33):
unleash the floodgates. But it looks like today heg Seth,
for example, his chances are a whole lot better today
than they were one week ago.

Speaker 1 (17:43):
Hegseth would probably be the one that most people, you know,
if it was family feud, that'd be the number one answer,
the one that it seems to be on the bubble
more than anybody. And yet the momentum kind of seems
to have changed, hasn't it. Yeah, it really has.

Speaker 10 (17:57):
But again this is pending that we don't learn anything else,
that nothing else comes out in terms of scandal or
the whiff of a scandal. Eman, it looks like things
should hold. Joni Ernest is the one we're all paying
attention to. She said she wants to see the process
go forward. Not a huge endorsement, but it doesn't sound
like she's going to rally the troops against him, and look,

(18:19):
the Republicans have it will have a fifty three forty
seven majority, so you know, one or two could vote against,
but this is what we're talking about, a difference of
one or two votes. I'm trying to find the actual
clip so I get the number exactly right, and I'm
getting everything, but what I'm looking for, as you can imagine,

(18:40):
as usual. But CNN did some polling, and in the polling,
what was very very revealing was the percentage of Americans
that support and are optimistic and confident about President Trump.
And when it comes to fixing the economy, that was
the high sixty five percent, fixing the border with sixty
two percent solving the Ukraine issue. But what I thought

(19:03):
was very interesting were the two big narratives that somehow
Donald Trump was going to be a tyrant, he was
never going to leave, he was going to use the
military against his people, and yet fifty four percent of
Americans think he's going to use his leadership properly, and
nearly sixty percent like the nominees of the cabinet members
that he's brought forward. So I guess the perception is, well,

(19:26):
that's the American people's view of this team he's putting together.
What are the senators and their makeup and their view
and whether or not we listened to that or taken
accues from that. Well, we know there are forty seven
no votes for a couple of these, right, but there
will be by partnersan support for people like Marco Rubio.

Speaker 1 (19:47):
And we also haven't had the hearings yet.

Speaker 10 (19:49):
You know, a lot of this is all based on,
you know, the conversations they're having and what you're shouting
down the hall as they walk through the hallways of
Capitol Hill.

Speaker 1 (19:57):
So we haven't had the full hearings.

Speaker 10 (19:59):
You know, I think it's even premature to say what
do you think of the nominee when you know we
haven't heard anything yet.

Speaker 1 (20:04):
Right with an extensive interview Christopher Ray, I think I
think Donald Trump would have fired him. So I don't
know that it wasn't inevitable, but he sure makes it easy.
He steps aside, he resigns. That paves the way for
cash Patel. Now we have the same conversation about the
reception for cash Patel. Yeah, that seems to be going well.

Speaker 10 (20:25):
You know a lot of people wonder about his background,
whether or not he's qualified to manage things. That's been
the similar complaint though, or question anyway about hag Seth
and Gabbard that you know, everyone likes what they say,
but they're not sure they have the resume to back
up the job. And look, you know, Patel has been
out there saying I will shut down the FBI on
day one and kick everyone out of the office building

(20:46):
and send them across the country to go fight crime.
You know, how does he feel now now that he's
actually the nominae quick.

Speaker 1 (20:53):
Update, looks like the gun that was still on Luigi
main Man Joan matches the ballistics test to the shell
casings and his fingerprints on the trash from the Starbucks.
I mean, this is a hard evidence case at this point, right. Yeah.

Speaker 10 (21:09):
So now it's a question of how did the defense
attorneys put together something to try to get this to
a plea deal and try to you know, and doesn't
ever go to trial.

Speaker 1 (21:19):
Who's a question, Matt looking over the short list for
Time magazine Person of the Year, Mark Zuckerberg, that's a stretch.
Claudia Schinbaum, President of Mexico, Jerome Powell, FED Chair, Kate
Middleton Princess of Wales, I mean, lovely princess and having

(21:39):
a tough battle with cancer. But I mean then you
get to Joe Rogan, Okay, Kamala Harris really maybe had
she won, it really comes down to probably Elon Musk
and Donald Trump. And I can't think of any if
not Donald Trump. Who, Well it is Trump? Right?

Speaker 11 (21:55):
Well?

Speaker 1 (21:55):
Yeah, but I mean, but who? It is an obvious choice, though,
wasn't it? I mean, was there really anybody else it
could have possibly been? Yeah, I believe.

Speaker 10 (22:05):
You've picked because Trump's not Who cares? Who reads Time magazine?
Who cares? It's not nineteen seventy three, No one gives
a darn.

Speaker 1 (22:16):
Let me let me change that to nineteen seventy seven.
The last time I read Time Magazine. This is as
I stand before God, the honest truth. It was my
current events class and you had to read an article
out of Time or Newsweek and do a Christ's summary
and report. That is mister K's class at Westgate Elementary.

(22:36):
Is the last time I read Time mag I So
on that point we will jingle out, all right, the
main conversation I've saved for last. We always give away
the final story. What are are these drones? Whose drones
are they? You can't just shoot them down, there's laws
against that. But somebody ought to find out and confirm
their drones. And from where Roy'll be back with the

(22:57):
drones over New Jersey story coming up next hour, Rater
on your morning show. Thanks Rory. Who cares? Who's read
Time Magazine? I have not real quickly read. You may
be the most. When's the last time you've read Time Magazine? Well, no,
I take that back, because it really doesn't matter if
it's in pay per Former online. Right, So the manifesto

(23:21):
of the Shadow Campaign I read, but that was online.
I mean literally held the magazine in my hand and
read it.

Speaker 2 (23:28):
The actual magazine may have been the Jim Jones after
the seventies.

Speaker 1 (23:34):
I may have read that one too, now that you
mention it. But yeah, who reads Time Magazine anymore? All right?
If you're just waking up? The bottom line is the
Person of the Year from Time Magazine twenty twenty four.

Speaker 12 (23:47):
Is the official announcement will come Thursday. In conjunction with
the announcement, Trump is also set to ring the opening
bill at the New York Stock Exchange, as something he's
never done before.

Speaker 1 (23:57):
Despite decades as a New York businessman.

Speaker 12 (24:00):
Other candidates were the honor include Kamala Harris, Kate Middleton,
Elon Musk, Benjamin Netanyahu, Joe Rogan, and Mark Zuckerberg. Trump
was Times Person of the Year in twenty sixteen. I'm
Mark Meefield, So that's two for him. It could have
been two from Oscar. FBI director Christopher Ray has resigned.
That clears the way for President elect Trump to nominate
Cash Paatel to head up the FBI.

Speaker 1 (24:21):
Brian Shook reports.

Speaker 13 (24:22):
Trump recently told NBC News that Patel is perfect for
the job.

Speaker 1 (24:26):
Cash.

Speaker 4 (24:28):
I'll tell you, I thought Cash may be difficult because he's,
you know, a strong conservative voice, and I don't know
of anybody that's not saying his prizes.

Speaker 13 (24:38):
Battel is a former Justice Department prosecutor. Ray was under
increasing pressure from Republicans to quit now rather than force
Trump to replace him. Ray was appointed by Trump in
twenty seventeen. I'm Brian Shook.

Speaker 1 (24:52):
Well. Wednesday was a frustrating day for many on social media,
especially Facebook. Tammy Trehilo explains.

Speaker 14 (24:58):
Things are back to normal now, but that wasn't case
for hundreds of thousands of Instagram Facebook and Threads users.
The apps started having trouble about nine in the morning
Eastern Time, with issues including the inability to post in
some cases even access accounts, lasting into the afternoon. There
were also outages reported on WhatsApp. There's been no possible
cause of the outages reported, but in a post on

(25:19):
exit Meta apologized for the problems and thank users for
bearing with it while the issues were resolved.

Speaker 1 (25:25):
I'm Tammy trhio. I think it was Iranian drones over
New Jersey back and social media. President Biden I started
that rumor. President Biden is reportedly warning the incoming Trump
administration of a national security issue in a new classified
memo so classified. Michael Casser has the details.

Speaker 2 (25:45):
Reuter says the document was described by administration officials who
did not want to be identified to reporters in general terms,
but has not been independently reviewed. National security memo reportedly
states that Russia is giving fighter jets, missile defense, and
space technology to a Run in exchange for helping Russia
in its fight against Ukraine.

Speaker 1 (26:06):
Reuter says.

Speaker 2 (26:07):
It also states that Russia is giving fuel, money, and
technology to North Korea and is conducting joint patrols with
China in the Arctic. I'm Michael Kassner. Put again, it's
all classified.

Speaker 1 (26:19):
The holiday season is big business for buying, but it's
also a big time for returns. Pretennis has more.

Speaker 14 (26:26):
Between Black Friday and Cyber Monday, Americans dropped over thirteen
billion dollars according to Adobe Analytics, most of that gifts
for others, but the National Retail Federation says seventeen percent
of all holiday gifts will be returned. Gift givers beware
returns happen so include a gift receipt, and after the holidays,
consumers will have to navigate return policies, restocking fees, and

(26:50):
store credit only. I'm pre Tennis.

Speaker 1 (26:54):
This is your Morning show with Michael del Chono. FBI
Director Christopher is resigning. That paves the way for cash Mattel.
Big day for President elect Donald Trump. He will be
the Time Person of the Year twenty twenty four. Who else?
He'll also ring in the opening bell on the New
York Stock Exchange And what are all those drones over
New Jersey? This has got to be the talk back

(27:15):
of the day again. Back to w hl ohllo in Akron, Ohio.

Speaker 15 (27:20):
James, if you get time could you maybe explain one
thing to me that really bothers me? How is it
that Halsey Gabbert is such a hard sell for her
position that Trump nominated her for, but yet she was
good enough to run for president for the Democrats.

Speaker 1 (27:36):
Yeah? I mean, and then throw in he's a lieutenant
colonel as well. How is that not relevant to a
foreign policy advisor? Resume? But yeah, if he was qualified
to become editor in chief. John Decker is our White
House correspondent. He is also a Supreme Court bar attorney.
And we have President Biden threatening to veto bipartisan bills
that would add fifty six judges. All I could think

(27:59):
of or was the scene in the Jerk when the
sniper typical random son of it. He's shooting and and
and then Steve Martin goes, this guy really hates these cans.
He hates the cans. What's uh, what's the president have
against judges? There? He is? What's the president have against judges? Hey?

(28:24):
Good morning to you. How are you doing today? I'm
doing good. You missed that whole setup, didn't you.

Speaker 11 (28:29):
I did miss everything, he said, I'm sure it was brilliantly.

Speaker 1 (28:33):
Uh No, I just went through your checking account. We
had a couple of strange charges. No, I was just
I was talking about, you know, the scene and the
jerk where the random shooter and then then it dawns
on the jerk. Oh, he hates these cans. What's President
Biden got against judges?

Speaker 16 (28:49):
That's good that you know that you have risen so
much in my book. Now, Michael, that you know that
scene from the Jerk?

Speaker 1 (28:58):
Yep, Oh my god. That's good. So let me do
something real quick. We have three minutes. I can get
it in. Okay, you believe I'm here to help you, right?
Name that movie?

Speaker 11 (29:12):
I don't know that one's tough.

Speaker 1 (29:13):
I'm sorry. Oh good men, Yeah, I got read with
that one earlier. You didn't believe, Danny, I'm here to help, right, Okay.
I want you to stand there in that uniform and
ask me nicely. All right, So, what's what's the deal
with Biden and these judges?

Speaker 16 (29:28):
Well, the deal is is that the beginning of this Congress,
there was bipartisan support for this bill that would create
fifty six new federal judge ships. And the reason being
is because the increasing workload for the judiciary. Bipartisan support
earlier in the one hundred and eighteenth Congress, not so

(29:49):
much now, And the reason has to do with the
results of the November fifth election and the fact that
if this bill was approved, it was signed by President
Joe Biden, it was created enough opportunity.

Speaker 11 (30:00):
For Donald Trump to name.

Speaker 16 (30:03):
The fifty six federal judges to fill those vacancies because
of this bill, and that's not something that Democrats.

Speaker 1 (30:10):
Want to do.

Speaker 16 (30:11):
And so as a result, Democrats that once supported this
legislation are now against this legislation. And if this bill
gets to President Biden's desk for his signature, he will
veto it.

Speaker 1 (30:24):
Yeah, we talked about the kamikaze presidency on its way out,
this would fall under that. What would be the recourse
for this? Could Congress bring the bill back up and
then Donald Trump approve it and then appoint the judges.

Speaker 11 (30:38):
In a perfect world, that would be the recourse.

Speaker 16 (30:40):
You know. Obviously, even before you get to that, the
immediate response could be try to override that presidential veto,
but the numbers aren't there to do that. So in
the one hundred and nineteenth Congress, yes, Republicans could try
to resurrect this bill. Problem being is that procedurally, they
need sixty votes to move that bill forward in the Senate.
They will not get the sixty votes to do that.

(31:00):
So this was the one and only opportunity, and the
opportunity I think is going to fail because the White
House is indicated that President Biden will veto this legislation.

Speaker 1 (31:10):
This is pure partisan politics over governing, are they why
do we need these judges? By the way, they're all
well with what.

Speaker 11 (31:17):
Cases, the increase in case loads for so many.

Speaker 16 (31:20):
Judges across the country to deal with that. You know.
Also keep in mind there's going to be separately a
need for immigration judges given all of the mass deportations
that Donald Trump has planned for once he's sworn into office.
So there is a need for new judges, new federal judges,

(31:40):
certainly new immigration judges as well. Given what we will
see happen in twenty twenty five, we.

Speaker 1 (31:46):
Only have fifteen seconds. If not Donald Trump, and is
going to be Donald Trump, who else would have been
Time Person of the Year. I don't know.

Speaker 11 (31:53):
I mean, it seems to me it was just a slam.

Speaker 16 (31:56):
Dunk for Donald Trump. I mean, this history coming back
from losing in twenty twenty and coming back and winning
decisively the way he did.

Speaker 11 (32:04):
Tremendous and you know, I would be shocked if.

Speaker 1 (32:07):
He wasn't Time Toman of the Year and he will be.
John has always pleasure talking to you. Was talk again tomorrow.
We're all in this together. This is your Morning Show
with Michael Ndheld, Joano