If Everyone’s Using the Same Model, What Are We Even Building?

Hi I’m Angela 🧸A product growth marketer who exists in the space between caffeine highs and retention lows.

For more: Anchor | instagram | X

Building Products in the AI Era:

The Deep Logic of Speed, Content, and Data Ownership

In a world shaped by AI-native platforms and infinite noise, the way you build is as strategic as what you build. In 2025, traditional feature stacking and superficial differentiation won’t cut it any

Building a product today means moving forward without a clear map. Users don’t wait around for perfect features. Markets shift faster than roadmaps. Teams face signals that are often incomplete or conflicting.

Who should read this

Anyone struggling to build products while facing unclear user needs and shifting market demands.

Why read this

If you want to survive and win in today’s AI era.

Key takeaways

* Product development happens amid constant uncertainty with incomplete user signals.

* Traditional roadmaps fail in fast-changing markets.

* Content distribution and deep community engagement create essential feedback loops and build real user trust.

* Success today depends on teams maintaining alignment and an adaptable working rhythm amid the rapid iteration cycles of the AI era.

How AI-native platforms are rewriting product strategy

AI-native platforms have become the gravitational center of product innovation

Today, every startup fights with the same tools: GPT, Claude, Midjourney. What used to be your “edge” is now the default.

What changed? AI-native platforms created a new gravity field. You're not building a product in isolation anymore, you're orbiting foundation models that control speed, quality, and distribution. Every startup, like it or not, has been pulled into this orbit.

This strategic dependency forces a new question:"If the model updates tomorrow, will my product feel outdated?"

* Startup development pace is no longer fully autonomous; it depends heavily on the release schedules and capability limits of model APIs (e.g., context length, embedding quality, cost efficiency)

* Platform asymmetries in data access, model iteration speed, and built-in user distribution (such as ChatGPT Plugins or Gemini Apps) concentrate innovation opportunities unevenly

Building different features won’t set you apart anymore. What matters is your position in the AI supply chain.

We’re operating inside the “gravity well” of giant AI foundation models that own the core capabilities.

They’ve become gravitational centers in the tech ecosystem.

Innovation today involves more than starting from zero. Success depends on moving in step with these foundational models while maintaining independence from their full control.To avoid being swallowed whole, products must strategically bet on speed, content, community, iteration, execution, and data control.

Most teams focus on features.

Feature differentiation no longer works; users care about platform fit

* Early users don’t care about clever features. They care about whether you work with the tools they already trust.

* As user behavior centers around AI platforms, single-point feature innovation struggles to shift user habits

* So-called “new features” can actually become onboarding friction, especially in enterprise contexts where workflow consistency is critical

* Case studies of major products like Notion AI and Figma AI prioritizing platform integration over standalone feature differentiation

But the best ones are optimizing six invisible levers, levers that separate products that survive from those that just ship.

Here’s the framework.

(And what you’re really betting on when you prioritize them.)

1. Content-Product Fit: When Content Becomes the Prototype of Product Perception

Historically, content was an afterthought, a marketing add-on designed to educate or persuade. Today, content itself is the product experience that users engage with before they even open the app. It no longer just explains what the product does; it embodies the product’s va