From Lusitania to Iran: The Pretext Machine

THIS PODCAST IS HIGHLY ADDICTIVE AND SERIOUSLY GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH

SUPPORT DOC MALIK HONEST HEALTH

100% Supported By The People - Zero Corporate Sponsors - Zero paid Ads - 100% Working For The People

A powerful voice for freedom, truth, and fearless dialogue - born in the UK, heard worldwide

Doc Malik Honest Health is a reader-listener supported publication. To support my work, and help fight back against the evil bastards, upgrade to Paid and join the clan of freedom loving dissidents!

A big thanks to my existing subscribers for sticking with me and continuing to support the show. Thank you to all the new subscribers, welcome to the tribe.

Thanks for the Apple reviews folks!! Keep them coming please x

The Pattern of War: What Will Be the Next Pretext?

My dear readers,

History doesn’t just rhyme, it repeats with military precision.

Again and again, the American public has been drawn into war not through careful debate or sober reflection, but through shock, outrage, and trauma. Whether manufactured or exploited, these moments create the emotional surge needed to overcome resistance, silence dissent, and justify destruction.

They are the spark that lights the fuse. The goal? To manufacture public consent for wars that ordinary Americans would never otherwise support.

If you don’t believe me, let’s take a closer look at the pattern.

⚓ 1915 — Lusitania

Official story: A British passenger ship was sunk by a German U-boat, killing 1,198 people, including 128 Americans.Narrative use: Outrage in the US helped shift public opinion toward entering World War I.Controversy: The Lusitania was carrying munitions, making it a legitimate military target. Some argue British and American officials were aware of the risks but allowed the disaster to rally support. The result? America’s slow march toward war sped up.

🛩️ 1941 — Pearl Harbor

Official story: A surprise attack by Japan on the US naval base in Hawaii killed over 2,400 Americans.Narrative use: The attack crushed isolationist opposition and unified the country behind entering World War II.Controversy: Intelligence warnings were allegedly ignored or suppressed. What if Roosevelt’s administration not only had ample warnings, but deliberately provoked Japan? Allowed or enabled, the attack wiped out anti-war sentiment overnight.

⚓ 1964 — Gulf of Tonkin

Official story: North Vietnamese boats allegedly attacked US destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin.Narrative use: President Johnson used the event to push through the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, granting him sweeping war powers in Vietnam.Controversy: Declassified documents and whistleblower accounts later confirmed the second attack never happened. It was a fabricated pretext. A lie. But it worked. Congress gave Johnson a blank cheque, and America plunged into a bloody, catastrophic war.

🏙️ 2001 — 9/11

Official story: Al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked planes and attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.Narrative use: Justified the launch of the War on Terror, including the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.Controversy: There are too many questions to ignore. The implausibility of the towers collapsing due to fire, the mysterious collapse of Building 7, the missing plane at the Pentagon. How did a few men with minimal flight experience pull off such coordinated precision? Why did NORAD stand down? Why the sudden rush to surveillance, endless war, and the Patriot Act?

I and many others believe 9/11 was either a false flag or an event that was deliberat