Ep. 5487: More from D.O.G.E.

This is the full episode of The Morning Show with Preston Scott for Tuesday, November 4th 

Our guests today include:
-U.S. Rep. Kat Cammack





Follow the show on Twitter @TMSPrestonScott. Check out Preston’s latest blog by going to wflafm.com/preston. 
Listen live to Preston from 6 – 9 a.m. ET and 5 – 8 a.m. CT!
WFLA Tallahassee Live stream: https://ihr.fm/3huZWYe
WFLA Panama City Live stream: https://ihr.fm/34oufeR Follow WFLA Tallahassee on Twitter @WFLAFM and WFLA Panama City @wflapanamacity and like us on Facebook at @wflafm and @WFLAPanamaCity.

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:18):
How you doing, everybody? Good morning, Tuesday, November fourth, election
day for some state offices. No congressional elections. That happens
next year, the mid terms, but there are some state
races and some intrigue. We'll touch on that a little
bit today. That we will be force fed a narrative

(00:41):
no matter what, I'll predict what that will be. But
that is then. This is now, And we always start
the program, The Morning Show with Preston Scott. Hi, I
am he, I am Preston. And that is Jose wearing
the shroud of Can you see? The man takes blankets

(01:03):
and makes them into ponchos and they are a thing
of beauty. And this one is just I mean, he
just looks like he's wearing the shroud. It's incredible. It
looks like a little kind of got the Franciscan monk
thing going right now with the top and the layers

(01:24):
and the hood at the back, with the I mean, yeah,
he's rolling man. Good stuff. All right. So we're here,
and we always begin with scripture, because you should begin
with scripture. And look, I'm just being being very candid
with you. Your day's gonna get away from you. I
hope you have time in a break or at lunch

(01:46):
that you make to spend a little time with God's Word.
I know that for most the end of the day
and before you go to bed is a tough time.
But even if you do, I still think while there's
great benefit to meditating on God's Word when you go

(02:07):
to bed, there is for a lot of people, just
reading scripture causes it just I mean, it's like a
a legible version of sominex. Some people just it's a
spiritual battle. It's a spiritual battle to read scripture. It is.

(02:31):
That's why, among other reasons, I think it's best to
start the day with it, because a you're not likely
to go back. You're up, you're at it, you've done
your thing, You're ready to go. But maybe more importantly
than that, I just think it sets the stage and
offers perspective for your day. If you read, for example,

(02:53):
words like today's verse one John two, verse six, whoever
says he abides in him ought to walk in the
same way in which he walked. Now, what a great
example of a scripture that says, put a filter on

(03:19):
yourself today. I mean, that's a great scripture to start
every single day, whoever says he abides in him ought
to walk in the same way in which he walked.
I've got risk bands that I had produced and they're

(03:39):
just I made him. I had a maid and I
asked for these embossed little rubbers slip on wrisk bands
that I didn't want WWJD. Because I don't like the
question what would Jesus do? No, no, no, I like
the statement do what Jesus did? So mind say d

(04:06):
wj D do what Jesus did. Now I'm not talking
about I mean he does, he's son of God. But
anyone with an ounce of understanding knows what I'm talking about.
It's this verse. Whoever says he abides in him ought
to walk in the same way in which he walked.

(04:27):
So the idea here is that by starting your day
with this verse right here, it then influences how you're
going to react when something starts to go south on
you today. If something does, if something just it starts,
deep breath, your boss. Maybe he is being a little unreasonable.

(04:52):
It's all right, it's your boss, deep breath. I don't
wrestle against flesh and blood, but against I'm fighting us
spiritual battle here I'm gonna I'm gonna walk as Jesus
walks because I'm I. I claim to abide in Him.

(05:12):
That's why I believe in starting the day with God's
word ten past the hour. Inside the American Patriots Almanac,
we go find out the special nature of the day
and more here on the Morning Show with Preston Scott.

Speaker 2 (05:28):
M A D.

Speaker 1 (05:29):
You get it.

Speaker 3 (05:30):
You know, try to make a positive influence upon others,
you know, you know, be a good person with the
Morning Show Preston Scott.

Speaker 1 (05:46):
We're coming to Instagram. We're fine tuning. We're not there yet.
You know me well enough to know I don't like
I don't like being bad. I am sometimes, but I
don't like it. So if I can avoid it, I

(06:06):
try my best. It's November fourth, you know, at the
outset of the Revolutionary War, America had no navy. Of
course we didn't. We weren't a nation yet. Some colonies
kept armed vessels, but the Continental government had no fighting ships.
So as the war got underway, Congress launched a small

(06:26):
continental Navy, voting to purchase and equip eight ships of war.
So on November fourth, seventeen seventy five, it acquired a
swift three masted merchantmen called the Black Prince, and ordered
that the vessel be converted into a warship with thirty cannons. Okay.

(06:49):
The Black Prince was soon re christened the Alfred, named
after Alfred the Great, the ninth century British king regarded
as the father of the Royal Navy. Historians consider Alfred
the first ship of the US Navy. The Alfred was
soon joined by the Briggs, Columbus, Andrew, Doria and Cabot,
the Schooner's Wasp and Fly, and the Sloops, Hornet and Providence.

(07:14):
In early seventeen seventy six, with the Alfred serving as
the flagship, the Little Fleet sailed to the Bahamas and
rated two British forts, seizing their cannons mortars in gunpowder
look at us. Meanwhile, George Washington was one step ahead
of Congress. Realizing the need for a naval force that
could intercept British ships sailing into Boston with supplies for

(07:37):
the King's army, he chartered the armed schooner Hannah, and
on September second, seventeen seventy five, ordered it to see
in search of British cargo shipping became the first in
a squadron of eleven vessels known as Washington's Navy. So
there go. Some naval historians agreed and regard the Hannah
as the first ship of the American Navy. But there's

(07:59):
the back story on this date. Two hundred and fifty
years ago, a nice round number. We acquired the Black
Prince and renamed it the Alfred Well Done. Eighteen eighty four,
Democrat Grover Cleveland narrowly defeats Republican James Blaine in a

(08:20):
presidential contest. Lots of mudslinging, Yeah. Nineteen twenty four. Nelt Ross, Wyoming,
first woman elected governor. Nineteen thirty nine. In Detroit, A Packard,
the Packard Motor Car Company exhibits the first air conditioned
car nineteen thirty nine. Imagine what that had to be like?

(08:43):
Whoa air conditioning in a car? No way? Let's see
nineteen fifty two, computer called Univac successfully predicts Dwight D.
Eisenhower would defeat Adlie Stevenson for president in a landslide.
Nineteen seventy nine in Tehran, militant ses the US embassy
sixty six American hostages, and so it began nineteen eighty

(09:06):
Ronald Reagan defeats Jimmy Carter to become the fortieth US president,
and in two thousand and eight, Barack Obama becomes the
first half African American to be elected President's he's just
as much white as he is black, and so whatever,
it just it is what it is. Let's see today

(09:28):
we got much mostly nothing. It is National Candy Day. Now,
why would that be? How in the world I would
buy November first because all the Halloween candy goes on sale,
and you might think, well, I can buy it and
save it for next year. Yeah, let me know how
that tastes. Uh, that won't work. That is a perishable

(09:55):
product right there, and it will just taste like cardboard
a year from now. But I would think leftover Halloween candy.
To me, that would make a lot of sense. If
you don't name candy Day. I'm the thirty first. It
ought to be November first, It ought to be if
not October thirty first, But I think October thirty first
makes the most sense anyway. It's like doorbell Day, Doorbell

(10:18):
Day and candy Day. They just go together. Sixteen past
the hour when we come back a new era of aviation.
Are you old enough to remember the Concord? Oh? Yeah,
I remember the Concorde. It was retired in two thousand

(10:40):
and three. For those of you that may not remember,
the Concord was the supersonic jet passenger jet. It had
a couple of mishaps in its storied brief service, but
it was limited because US It could only go supersonic

(11:03):
over the ocean. It was not allowed to go supersonic
over land because it was the sonic boom was considered
too disruptive to people. So manufacturers have been chasing the

(11:25):
speed of sound without the sonic boom ever since. And
so we come to the X fifty nine, which had
its debut flight. It was a NASA Lockheed Martin design

(11:46):
with research that attempted to eliminate sonic booms. And they're
trying to do something called a sonic thump. They believe
that they can create an aircraft and in fact have

(12:10):
that is the equivalent to the slamming of a car
door at distance a thump. And so this particular plane
features a pinocchio like nose this, according to Flying Magazine,
that extends about a third of the length of its

(12:31):
one hundred foot length, So this nose extends thirty three
feet thirty feet or so, and the idea is to
disperse or break up the shock waves that form in
front of an aircraft moving its supersonic speeds by penetrating
at a very small degree and then slowly expanding back

(12:54):
to the aircraft, they think they can eliminate the forces
that create the sonic boom. Now, also unusual is the
cockpit window isn't The pilot uses an external vision system
that feeds imagery from high resolution cameras to monitor, so

(13:17):
the pilot is not really seeing anything other than what
he's seeing on screen. And so it's a window list designed,
a window list design, and its purpose is to reduce noise.
Another innovation on this particular aircraft is they mounted the

(13:38):
engine and F four fourteen GE one hundred engine to
the top, so the underside has no engine mounts whatsoever,
giving it a smoother underside that present prevents shockwaves from
merging behind it. And so the potential of a new

(14:05):
era of supersonic flight is here. They're going to do
a series of flights to confirm safety and airworthiness. Then
they're going to attempt mock one point four to try
to get to nine hundred and twenty five miles per hour.
If that's achieved, then NASA is going to do its

(14:28):
own testing at Edwards. Edwards Air Force Base being worked
on elsewhere right now at a facility, skunk works facility
in Palmdale, California. It's thirty miles away from Edwards. There's
a company out there called Boom Supersonic. It is one

(14:52):
of a handful of companies developing a successor to the Concord.
They are looking to do a sixty four to eighty
eight eighty passengers supersonic jet. Could you imagine, I mean,
what do we looking coast to coast four thousand miles?

(15:18):
Maybe something like that, maybe a little less. So if
we say, just for giggles, four thousand miles. Maybe if
you win a diagonal flight coast to coast, you're looking
at four thousand miles and you're going nine hundred and
twenty five miles per hour. You're going coast to coast

(15:38):
in just over three hours, four four hours. That's hauling.
That is hauling. You imagine going NonStop wherever you're going.

(15:59):
That's crazy. Anyway, there's your did you know and an
interesting story all wrapped up in one. Would you fly
on a supersonic jet? No? Because safety? Yeah you know what?
Uh yeah, probably not no surviving anything that goes wrong

(16:19):
at that speed. Hunh Well yeah, but if it hits something,
at least he's having Boy, that's fast. That's fast. Twenty
eight past the hour, come back. Big stories in the
fresh box are standing by here in the Morning.

Speaker 4 (16:31):
Show with Preston Scott, Leave me Alone, The Morning Show
with Preston Scott on News Radio one hundred point seven
Double UFLA or on NewsRadio Double UFLA. Panama City dot
Com thirty.

Speaker 1 (16:53):
Six pass not scheduled to be a big story in
the press box today, but breaking news. Former Vice President
Dick Cheneys asked Way at the age of eighty four,
condolences too, He and his family big stories in the
press box, three of them. State Representative Shane Abbott his

(17:18):
House Joint Resolution two oh seven said, it's it's meant
to give Florida homeowner's consistent long term savings, not confused
voters or undermine local government services. It is not going
on the ballot. It is a resolution that would call
for a reduction of the assessed value of a home

(17:39):
by twenty five percent after the initial homestead exemption. He's
a Republican from Defuniac Springs. He said, you have some
folks who say we should never pay any property taxes.
My response is, do you like driving on paved roads
to be safe when you call nine to one one?
Do you want an ambulance to show up? That is

(18:00):
such a canard. I gotta get him on the show
because that's faulty logic. I don't know him. I don't
know that he's a conservative or if he's just kind
of a moderate. I don't know anything about him. I'm
going to take him at his word that it's not

(18:21):
meant to confuse and all that. That's not going to
get it done.

Speaker 5 (18:24):
Now.

Speaker 1 (18:25):
If you want to put a proposal out there that
says we're going to reduce what can be charged to
you in the form of property tax, so that's fine.
I want the provision removed where the government can take
your home if I don't pay, take me to court,

(18:45):
send me to collection, whatever. But you're not touching my home.
I'm over that. I'm over my property being held hostage
by the government. Period. It's just no, I didn't borrow
from the government. I bought the land. It's mine or

(19:07):
yours or whoever's. You should not be you should not
be forced to pay the government for the rest of eternity.
Then you don't own it. It's just that simple. At
that point, we're no different than buying season tickets at
a football game or a basketball game. We're leasing, you're

(19:27):
not owning, and so this isn't good enough. Second big
story in the press box, Ted Cruz has an answer
for why he thinks the government's going to reopen tomorrow
or Thursday. I'll let him tell you what he told
Maria Bartiromo on Sunday.

Speaker 6 (19:46):
She asked the question to open Wednesday or Thursday of
this week. The Democrats will wait until after election day
because they think a shutdown is good for energizing the
crazies in their party. But I think it'll be either
late this week or early next week.

Speaker 1 (19:59):
There you go. He thinks the election today is the
reason they're holding out, believing that they get some mileage
out of it. Look, everyone's going to tell you this
is an indictment on Trump or it's or see the
Trump thing is carrying on. It's neither. These are state
races and they're either good candidates or weak candidates, or

(20:22):
candidates or their Democrat states or I don't put a
lot of stock in some of these races. Now Virginia,
you know, you could put some stock in that governor's race,
because if they're going to a governor, the governor that's
a Democrat and a Flamer whatever. And then the illegal
immigrants on SNAP estimate says that seventeen percent of illegal

(20:46):
immigrant households use SNAP. An estimated fifty nine percent of
illegal households, the illegal alien led households use one or
more welfare programs that would be cash, food assistants, medicator housing.
I think there's some waste there. Forty minutes past the hour.

(21:06):
Come back, speaking of waste, little Doze.

Speaker 3 (21:10):
Updating Ever, you may be from Florida Sunshine State to
Washington State.

Speaker 1 (21:16):
No, No, not Washington.

Speaker 3 (21:18):
Sorry, Washington's also hopeless for crying out loud, Is this
the only bastion of physical wealth and mindset goodness?

Speaker 1 (21:27):
Yeah? And this is the Morning Show with Preston Scott.
Even though it's an acronym, it is become a word
Doze the Department of Government Efficiency, right, it's officially in

(21:48):
the lexicon. It is part of our vernacular. Couldn't you
call it the word of the year. I think you
could make the argument that dose is the word of
the year. Now, whether websters will go that route, I
don't know, but you could make the argument. They have

(22:14):
found another one hundred and three wasteful contracts in the
last five days. The sealing value meaning if they had
run their course four point four billion and immediate savings
of one hundred and three million. So that gives you
an idea of the type of contracts that routinely get
signed and ignored. For example, they canceled a contract valued

(22:35):
at thirteen point four million for the VA Consulting for
coaching support and dashboard services, forty three thousand State Department
Educational Training contract for Crucial Influence and Getting Things Done
courses forty four thousand at the State Department Educational Training

(22:58):
contract for Crucial Conversation and Power of Habit courses. If
we're hiring people that we have to then train on
getting things done, I'd submit we're hiring the wrong people. Now,

(23:20):
I can understand bringing somebody into a situation and saying
there are efficient There are efficiencies found in doing things
a certain way inside of this department that's internal training,
outside contracts to do this stuff. They have thus far

(23:40):
saved two point sorry, two hundred and fourteen billion dollars
as of October fourth. Just so you know, that adds
up to thirteen hundred and twenty nine dollars per American taxpayer.
Just for a second, extrapolate that. Imagine getting to all

(24:11):
of the waste in our government and what that does
to our tax burden. And we're not even dealing with
the immoral rate of taxation. But you right there on
the surface have the reason to drop the tax rate.

(24:32):
It's like, right now, if these limited savings bring thirteen
hundred and twenty nine dollars of savings to an American taxpayer,
doesn't that, by extension, reduce the marginal tax rate that
ought to be charged by that amount. So we're dropping

(24:53):
some percentage points. Then you look at other things, for example,
a six hundred and twenty thousand dollars grant for a
adopting an LGBT inclusive teen pregnancy prevention program for transgender boys,
and an eight hundred and forty one thousand dollars grant
to examine the influence of intersectional stigma on blood pressure.

(25:19):
Do you ever watch the movie Dave. You have to
watch the movie Dave if you've not seen the movie Dave.
Dave is with Kevin Klein and Sigourney Weaver. It is
a brilliant movie about a guy who's a presidential impersonator
and then the president. He's a dead ringer for the president.

(25:42):
The president has a stroke and they keep the charade
up hiring Dave to be the president, and so he
goes on a crash course and pretends to be the president.
While the president's sitting beneath the White House in some
hidden medical room waiting to see if he'll survive the stroke,

(26:04):
Dave's out there being president. And it's hilarious because Dave
actually runs a temporary employment agency, but he's now taken
leave of absence. And there's a scene in there where
they've got everybody as his cabinet and agency heads around
a table and they're talking about the budget and he's

(26:24):
finding money. He's saving money, because that's that's how you
he's a new man as president, right. So Dave comes
in there and there's this scene where this guy says, well,
mister President, because he's asking about this huge expenditure on
an ad campaign by the government on cars that have

(26:47):
already been purchased. And he said, so, wait a minute,
we're spending this amount of money to convince people that
a car they've already bought was a good idea, Yes,
mister President, in stilling confidence in their purchase. But they
already bought the vehicle. No, we're cutting that And this

(27:09):
is this is it? This is that scene from day
being played out over and over and over. Wait, we're
doing pregnancy programs for transsexual boys meaning girls. Wait, we're
spending money on the intersectional stigma on blood pressure. What
there's a stigma on blood pressure? You have it right, low, moderate, normal, high, whatever,

(27:39):
you have blood pressure. There you go, end of the
need to spend nearly a million dollars on that. It's insane.
Dose needs to be the word of the year. Forty
eight minutes after you, we come back and update on
the tate a domiac case, leans and boots and bands.

(28:08):
Oh yeah, Kat Camick in the third hour, US congresswoman
from Florida's third district, we'll have a manly minute next hour.
Lots of fun to talk about next hour as well, well.
Lots to discuss with Kat got an update here from
Lee Williams on Patrick Tata Domiak. If you do not know,
Patrick was ready to be a Navy Seal officer. Young

(28:31):
man was a hobbyist, a gun. Hobbyist bought and sold parts,
and somebody sent the ATF in his direction. Despite not
one thing he had possessed was illegal. Nothing all of
it to this moment can be purchased legally online. Will

(28:54):
He now as an attorney Matthew who is an expert
in the Second Amendment and in such cases, he is
asking to present a case to the entire US Court
of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit. He only got a panel.
The panel was foolish because it did not consider the

(29:17):
the the vast scope of what's involved here. There are
three back up here, Patrick is serving twenty years in
federal prison. He was about to be a Navy seal officer.

(29:38):
That's the quality of young man we're talking about here.
This is insane. We are in a judicial system that
lets attempted murder suspects, rapists, pedophiles loose. He's in and

(30:03):
everything that the ATF did was illegal. They framed him.
There are three main issues here that he is presenting quoting.
The panel overlooked or misapprehended the undisputed record evidence that
all items underlying Appellant's convictions were non function functional relics

(30:23):
requiring material alteration and fabrication, not mere assembly to become
NFA's subject weapons. This renders the evidence legally insufficient. Two,
the panel misapprehended and failed to address the appellants preserved
Second Amendment challenge, short circuiting the Bruin test and treating

(30:44):
the challenge conduct as categorically valid without conducting the required inquiry. Three,
the panel insisted that a bill of particulars would have
cured the notice of issues of the in the indictment.
But it is a settled rule that a bill of
particulars cannot save an invalid indictment. He puts it this way.

(31:05):
These issues are exceptionally important because the government is applying
the statutes improperly. That's the bottom line, and so we're
gonna hopefully get a full peering. Alright, let's do it.

(31:36):
The second hour of the radio program yesterday, I just
I caught myself I pretty much finished prepping. It's watching
the guys from des Elite and Diesel Concrete codings are
are They're resurfacing our backyard pool area and it's and

(31:57):
boy did they had a job in front of them
because we had such the home I bought many twenty
years ago, beautiful backyard, but a lot of cement patching
had been done around the backyard swimming pool, and so
it was a mixture of all kinds of things. So
we've been working for years to try to find the

(32:20):
perfect solution, and we found it. This will be the
perfect solution, and so I'm very, very excited. But I
just I was watching the guys work. I'd finished prepping
for the show for the most part, and then I
got caught watching something on YouTube the Brian brothers and
the young man named Grant Horvat playing golf, and they

(32:41):
were doing speed golf, and I just laughed so hard.
I just laughed so hard I was in tears because
it was so funny. And that has absolutely nothing to
do with this show. I just I'm still laughing at it,

(33:01):
and I'm not even looking at it, and I'm still
laughing at it. It's great fun and I'm and I'm
gonna get to watch the rest of it sometime today. Uh,
these these moments that we have where we can just
you know, have a laugh. They offset and help us

(33:23):
deal with a story like this. Representative Jim Heimes of
of Connecticut and responding to the the Department of War,

(33:45):
the president taking on drug traffickers in the oceans, and
and I'll be honest with you, I can only hope
they have adequate intelligence to confirm what's going on. Now.

(34:07):
These guys aren't fishermen, you know. The Democrats are trying
to paint these people as Now. The boats they're using,
there's no fishing gear on board. They're not even pretending
to be fishermen. These are high speed boats designed to
run drugs. We're taking them out. I don't know enough

(34:32):
about the legality of it all, other than there is,
of course going to be people that think the President
is being a dictator and just killing these poor innocent
people without due process, without congressional authority. But this is
what was interesting. On one of the talk shows, one

(34:57):
of the cable networks, Representative Heymes proposed a scenario where
Representative Alexandria at Costio Cortez becomes president. I can't even

(35:18):
go there, can you? This will be a demo, This
will there will be a democratic president someday, and all
my MAGA friends cheering on these illegal killings need to
imagine who gets killed. When President Alexandria at Casio Cortez says,
it doesn't matter what the law says, She's going to
do what she's going to do, he says, so look,

(35:40):
I work here. I understand the complete abnegation. I have
to look that word up of principle. That probably means
the ignoring of principle and the complete thumbing of the
nose at the rule of law. But I'd hope people
like Lindsey Graham might not go that path because it's
a very, very dangerous path for this country to go down.

(36:03):
On one hand, he may have a point. This is
where the president needs to make sure his eyes are
dotted and his teaser crossed. I don't care what other
people do. Is it legal. If it's legal, fine, go
get them. It's like, I don't necessarily know if it's

(36:28):
legal for us to send drones across the Mexican border
to just target the cartels. But if it can be done,
do it kill them all. But anyway, this is not
this is not a fantasy I care to entertain. AOC

(36:52):
is president. You know, of course she's gonna run for
She is gonna run against Chuck Schumer. She's gonna test this.
And if New York City go socialist, if Minneapolis goes socialist,
you just watch. New York would be would be socialist,

(37:17):
Minneapolis would be Marxist. This is not an unimportant development.
Eleven passed the hour. Someone confronted John Brennan. I'll tell
you what happened, and this is the Preston Scott Show.

(37:46):
There was a conference at George Mason University a couple
of nights ago, back last Thursday, and former CIA director
John Brennan was there, part of a casual kind of
panel with a big crowd, and a guy named Thomas
Speciale or Special showed up and he took quite a

(38:15):
bit of time to give his credentials because he said
he felt it was necessary to give his bonafides in
order to establish the the the importance of the question
and to paraphrase it all, he was an employee of

(38:40):
the National of National Intelligence Department, and he was questioning
as a member of the of the National Intelligence Department.
He was questioning the Steele dossier and why Brennan said
it was a legit, and he quoted emails and he

(39:02):
quoted I mean, he nailed John Brennan nailed him. And
as he was talking, you can just watch Brennan seethe
with the hate that that vile man has in his heart.
And he asked him about the fake dossier. I can't

(39:27):
play the response because John Brennan's response is with profanities,
and I just don't want to go there. Brennan lied,
under oath, members of the United States Senate were spied upon,

(39:52):
they manufactured evidence. And this, oh, by the way, was
at the direction of Barack Obama. This happened, not this
was done under the direction of Obama, because Hillary wasn't president.
She couldn't order such things. This was Barack Obama. James Comey,

(40:15):
the whole Steele dossier thing. But I've invited this guy
to come on the show.

Speaker 4 (40:21):
Now.

Speaker 1 (40:21):
Whether he will or not, I don't know. I have
made my effort. You can see the exchange on our
ex page where you can hear the man give his credentials.
Ask the question you decide, because John Brennan's response is
who put you up to this? Because what you shared

(40:42):
is nothing but unadulterated BS and he said the words,
oh no, no, you listen to the man. He is
speaking with great confidence and knowledge, and Brennan is done.
Brennan is going to face criminal charges. The question becomes

(41:04):
will the rest of them? We'll see, but it is
it is worth watching and you can see it on
the X page at TMS. Preston Scott sixteen past the hour,
Racking along here Tuesday on the Morning Show. Yeah, as

(41:32):
we're talking about the actions of the administration to deal
with drug traffickers coming out of Venezuela, and it would
appear Maduro's days in charge in Venezuela are numbered. The
countries collapsed years ago, and he is just hanging on
by a thread. No idea. This is when you watch

(41:57):
these events in these third world countries, you begin to
understand why the founders of this nation insisted on you
and I having the right to bear arms. Not only
does it keep the country safe from invasion, because we
don't have just a military of the United States government.

(42:21):
We have men and women in this country that Carrie
concealed that Carrie legally, that have firearms, that hunt, that
are very proficient with them. There's no other nation like it.
It is in my opinion, one of the key reasons
why we are kept safe. But all you need to
do is look at these socialist governments. What they do

(42:45):
is they disarm the citizenry. And so you have Venezuela,
you have Cuba, you have these oppressive nations. If Russia
give many of the nations surrounding Israel, the Middle East,
you have China. If weaponry is in the hands of civilians, firearms,

(43:12):
you have a massive problem. If you're an authoritarian government
that said, targeting the Venezuelan drug traffickers is an issue,
the cartel's an issue. What about Nigeria. Attention is finally

(43:35):
being focused on Nigeria and the massive executions that have
been going on for years of Christians inside Nigeria. Nigeria
used to be roughly fifty to fifty Christian Islamic. The
weapons were in the hands of the Islamis. They're killing Christians,

(43:56):
they're driving them out, they're burning their churches, are murdering them,
they're taking their daughters and they're raping them, and they're
holding hostage and they're forcing them to become Islamis. This
is happening. It's the most it's singularly the most dangerous
nation in the world to be in if you're a Christian,

(44:19):
and so the President now posted on true on his website,
if the Nigerian government continues to allow the killing of Christians,
the USA will immediately stop all aid and assistance to Nigeria,
good diplomatic pressures and may very well go into that
now disgraced country guns ablazing his words, not mine, to

(44:43):
completely wipe out the Islamic terrorists who are committing these
horrible atrocities. I am hereby instructing our Department of War
to prepare for possible action. If we attack, it will
be fast, vicious, and sweet. Not sure those words go together,
just like the terrorist thugs attack our terroist Christians. Warning
the Nigerian government better move fast. Pete Hegsith responded, Yes, sir,

(45:07):
the killing of innocent Christians in Nigeria and anywhere must
end immediately. The Department of War is preparing for action.
Either the Nigerian government protects Christians or we will kill
the Islamic terrorists we're committing these horrible atrocities. Okay, okay,

(45:28):
but is that legal?

Speaker 5 (45:35):
No?

Speaker 1 (45:36):
I mean, we have laws and I don't have the
answer to the question. I mean best case scenario. This
is in a piece written for Red State by an
anonymous writer goes by the handle Banchi. Best case here
is that the Nigerian government steps up takes action so

(45:56):
that major innoventions aren't necessary. Yes, you could use victual forces,
intelligent as at intelligence assets and drones to exact a
toll on these Islamis at least as quick as a
quick reaction to stop the imminent slaughter. But while that
might be part of the short term solution, without Nigeria
playing ball and doing the work on the ground, there's
a little path to protect these Christians from being targeted.

(46:21):
Perhaps diplomatic pressure can lead there, at least I pray
it can. And then inside the piece, he goes on
to set context for the whole thing and what's gone
on and how this is, you know, a slaughter of
one hundred thousand Christians, and then we see the ridiculous

(46:41):
framing of what's going on in Gaza. And oh, by
the way, Hamas is still stealing aid. There's video of it.
Drones have video of it. So look, I want Donald
Trump to keep things legally in their proper place, but
I also have no objection to taking on missions like

(47:05):
that to protect people that are otherwise being slaughtered because
they are unarmed. And that is the underscored point that
I want to make here. This is why our founders
gave us a second Amendment. It was to ensure we
do not have a tyrannical government. And sadly we're seeing

(47:25):
some cities picked off by socialism. It started on the
left coast up in Portland and Seattle. It has spread
to small communities. It is happening, my friends, It is happening.
Twenty seven minutes past where youset the big stories in
the press box here.

Speaker 2 (47:41):
In the morning show, The Morning Show at Preston Scott
on News Radio one hundred point seven WFLA, thirty six.

Speaker 1 (47:57):
Past the hour. US Congressman at kat Chemick in a
little bit only minute first, but now the big stories
in the press box. Let's go to Sunday Fox News Channels.
Maria Bartaromo, who has been on this program, wrapping up
an interview with US Senator Ted Kruz Soaturd before you go,
will the government open this upcoming week? This is getting

(48:19):
seriously impacting the US economy.

Speaker 3 (48:21):
What's your tape?

Speaker 6 (48:24):
I think it's likely to open Wednesday or Thursday of
this week. The Democrats will wait until after election day
because they think a shutdown is good for energizing the
crazies in their party. But I think it'll be either
late this week or early next week.

Speaker 1 (48:37):
There you go, we'll see the numbers of people jamming
on the Democrats are growing. Even the young man from
the what is it the breakfast club kind of the

(48:58):
urban show, Charlemagne, I will not say the rest of
his ridiculous name. It's an insult. And here's the thing.
He's a thoughtful guy. I'd love to have a conversation
with him, but the name's insulting to me. But that said,

(49:18):
even he's saying, man, get this done. Everybody's addressing the Democrats.
Isn't that interesting? And then you've got David Hogg on
CNN trying to call it the Republican shutdown, and Scott
Jennings just eviscerated him. That was like fighting an unarmed army.

(49:42):
You know, it was just that was an unfair fight.
Having Scott Jennings sit next to David Hogg that said,
it's it's it's gonna be interesting if if they actually
you know, They're really in a tough spot because if
they do it like after the election, it ends and
then they just end it suddenly get a conscience. We've

(50:03):
made our point, really really okay. Illegals are taking up
a tremendous amount of resources in this country, including SNAP benefits.
Seventeen percent of illegal immigrant households use SNAP, according to
the Center for Immigration Studies. In total, fifty nine percent

(50:25):
of illegal alien led households use one or more welfare program.
How is that possible? How is it possible that people
that have broken into this country are legally using resources
of this government? How the equivalent would be someone breaking

(50:46):
into your home and just setting up residents in like
the spare bedroom and availing themselves of your WiFi, your
cable TV, your utility, food, and the fridge, and you've
got nothing to say. You can't do anything about that.

(51:08):
That's what are you kidding me? Third big story in
the press box. Representative Shane Abbott, state representative from the
Funiac Springs, I believe it is here in Florida. He
has introduced a proposal to its House. Joint Resolution two
seven reduces the assessment value of a home by twenty

(51:30):
five percent after the initial homestead exemption, he said, you
gotta still keep money flowing to the local governments, and
I say, you do, but not this way. Not this way.
We need to do what we've done so far in Florida.
We need to reimagine how government and its intersection with

(51:53):
the private sector needs to function, how the citizenry pays
for government. We need to re exam and what's government doing.
And in Florida we have the opportunity to do that
by abolishing property tax. I'm going to try to get
Representative Abbott on the show to talk about it, but
his plan is not even remotely good enough. Until we

(52:15):
get to a place where you own your property and
you don't have to fear the government taking it from you.
If not, we don't own it, we lease it. That's
not good enough. I'm energized on this because I've been
talking about this issue since two thousand and two. That's

(52:36):
how long it's taken before someone's come into office with
the courage to say, let's try this. It's been twenty
one year's because Desandas started spinning this a couple of
years ago, started floating this forty one minutes past. We

(52:58):
come back brace yourselves.

Speaker 4 (53:01):
My news radio one hundred point seven WUFLA.

Speaker 1 (53:21):
This comes from USA today. All right. Apparently millennials give
or take, frustrated with the dating scene, have turned to
a new concept that is at least happening in Los Angeles.
Are you ready? I should have mood music, but I don't.

(53:44):
I didn't think about it until just this moment. It's
called the Fields. I'm not making any of this up.
A gal named Ali Hoffman masters in psychology with a
focus in spirituality from Columbia University. Now, I will tell

(54:05):
you on the front end. When I hear spirituality, my
discernal meter goes full red. It's clicking big time. That
does not mean Christian, Okay, in any way, shape or
form what. I'm a spiritual person, Okay, enjoy those mushrooms,
my man. Here's what it is. It's modern dating becoming

(54:34):
even more modern because the dating scene is broken and
it feels so hard out there, we're really believing it's
our fault. I don't believe that's true. I think there's
some macro level forces that are affecting us, that are
creating what we're in right now. And I'm here to
unwind a lot of that her plan to get singles

(54:57):
to engage in deep eye contact, spiritually centered conversations with
consent touching, lots and lots of touching. Now hold on.
Level one event costs you ninety to one hundred bucks
and no surveying, no personalized matching, But a level two

(55:20):
event costs two hundred dollars a person, and she's launching
these across the country. The culprit for the mess of
modern dating is capitalism, technology, pop culture. There's some truth
to some of that if you dissected, but the antidote

(55:47):
eye contact, gentle, non erotic touching. Hoffman pairs singles multiple
times with matches based on their survey results. The final
pairing of the night, however, is called a wild card.
People can match with anybody that they want. The pairing
kicks off with a discussion of a prompt. It's not

(56:11):
what do you do where are you from? It's where
in your life do you currently feel like you're in
the depths and why are you there? Or what's something
you're grateful to have learned from your parents and what's
something you've had to unlearn from your parents? Okay? An
exercise follows each discussion in one pairs gaze into each

(56:31):
other's eyes for minutes on end. Okay, we're just going
to gaze. Ose, let's gaze. Yeah. In another they finger
trace each other. No, we're not doing that, which involves
gently gliding their fingers over the other's body. They also
hold each other in long embraces. Sometimes they hug in

(56:56):
as they stand, sometimes in chairs. Sometimes they're just hugging
as they sit on the floor. Each night, persons share
a few words about their experience. One says I feel seen,
Another says at e's in my body. Another says warmly renewed.
Did anyone fall in love? Only time will tell. So

(57:19):
there it is, friends, That's where we're going with dating.
Now the feels okay, there you go. Look, I'm the messenger.
I'm just telling you we are on the cutting edge
of Wait. Was it Glenn Beck or was it Rush
that talked about societal evolution? I don't know, but here

(57:45):
we are because I am the mayor of Real phil
forty seven minutes after the hour, and this is what's
happening across the country, and we talked about it here
in the Morning Show with Preston Scott. This edition of

(58:06):
The Manly Minute inspired by true events on the Morning
Show with Preston Scott, in this case an email. Yeah,
if you're new to the program, we take a little
time every week, well most weeks to help you raise
a man. If you've got a boy, they're mail by birth.

(58:32):
Being a man is a choice. Now. I got this
meme sent to me yesterday and it showed a young
fella in his blue jeans helping his mama on the farm,
and it said the following words, sent to me by
a listener. Being male is a matter of birth. Being

(58:53):
a man is a matter of age. But being a
gentleman is a matter of choice. And I say, nay,
that is wrong. Being a man includes being a gentleman.

(59:14):
Being a man is not a matter of age, because
I know plenty of men who aren't. They're males, they're
not men. There's a difference there are it is. Today's

(59:41):
Manly Minute is about making the choice to be a man.
And if you, if you'll indulge me broadening this entire
thing that I've been doing for years and and explaining

(01:00:02):
to your son, I'm raising you so that you will
have values, skills, ideals, mindsets that will enable you to
navigate this world as a man, and part of being
a man is having etiquette, understanding decorum, being able to

(01:00:32):
take social cues, to read the room. Those are all
traits encompassed in being a gentleman. You get to being
a gentleman by making decisions that enable you. As part

(01:00:57):
of that, you are a man. You cannot be a
man without being a gentleman. So I, while I understand
the point of this note, I do not embrace this
idea that being a man as a matter of age. No,
it is not truth be told. I know a lot

(01:01:18):
of fifteen year olds that are more men and more
of a man than thirty five year olds. Age has
nothing to do with it. So the Manly Minute this
week is about helping your son understand what encompasses being

(01:01:43):
a man and why you as a dad, why you
as a mom, why you are teaching him these skills,
so that he will be be treasured, wanted, embraced that
in fact, as a man in society, he will be
looked to as a leader because he's a man, and

(01:02:06):
as part of that on display are traits of a gentleman.
That's part of it. It is not the pinnacle, it
is part of the package. There's your mainly minute. More
than a minute, granted, but still when we come back,

(01:02:29):
US Congresswoman Cat Camick will join us on The Morning
Show with Preston Scott, spiriting our way through another radio
program known as The Morning Show with Preston Scott. Common
sense amplified in your ears yet again, wherever, however you
are listening to us, thank you very much for sharing time.
We consider it a privilege, and indeed it is a

(01:02:51):
privilege to share time with this lady. She is the
congressional representative for Florida's third district. US Congresswoman Kat Camick, Kat,
how in the world are you and your family?

Speaker 5 (01:03:03):
Good morning greetings from Chile, Washington, d c our Nation's capital,
and we're doing all right.

Speaker 1 (01:03:09):
How are you doing, Preston, I'm doing well. We missed
our last visit because you were on the left coast.
What's it like visiting the Communist Republic of California?

Speaker 5 (01:03:22):
Well, the crazy part is is that in Orange County alone,
they have more registered Republicans I think than some states,
just in one county. But they're so outnumbered. They're basically,
you know, in their front lawns in rocks, putting so
os and you know they're doing the smoke signals please

(01:03:42):
send help, and it's crazy. It is every bit as
bad as you see on TV. We we drove through
an ice protest, crashed a No King's rally while we
were out there. We've done all kinds of things. But
I think at the end of the day, and I legitimately,
I think California can be saved. I really do believe it.

(01:04:04):
And if we can do that, then anything is possible.
I think the Republic has a shot. But as things
go in California, that's kind of how the rest of
the country goes. And so it's important that we're keeping
our eye not just on Florida, of course in our backyard,
but look across the country at what's happening, because there's

(01:04:24):
so many things that can happen and impact us if
we're not paying attention. So always vigilant.

Speaker 1 (01:04:30):
We have not spoken since the shutdown really got rolling
here and unfurled. So let me get your thirty thousand
foot view of things and then tag onto that your reaction.
Ted Cruz predicted Sunday on Fox News he thinks the
shutdown will end. The Democrats will vote amazingly interestingly enough,

(01:04:52):
coincidentally enough, once the elections end today across the country
that they'll vote to open things back up.

Speaker 5 (01:04:59):
So give me your thoughts on all of it, you know,
I don't think anyone really knows candidly. I saw a
handful of my Democrat colleagues in the House last night
kind of roaming around Capitol Hill. But to that point,
I've also seen an equal number of my Republican colleagues
roaming around the Hill. Of course, I think today's elections

(01:05:22):
are going to have an impact of where things go
and the outcome of those elections. But we've heard this
since the shutdown began. It was Oh, we're waiting for
this moment. Then it was the No King's rally. Then
it was oh, no, we're going to wait for November
one for snap benefits to roll out. At the end
of the day, the only thing that people need to

(01:05:42):
really understand is that the Democrats, particularly in the Senate,
are willing to starve Americans, and they are willing to
shut down the government, hold hostage the government for a
one point five trillion dollars shakedown, with the highlight, the
highlight of the whole thing being free healthcare to the

(01:06:03):
tune of two hundred billion dollars to illegals. That's what
it is. They're willing to put American glass to keep
illegals first. That's what it comes down to. And they
can't run away from their record, and they can't run
away from the fact that they are demanding these things.
It's in black and white, page fifty seven, section twenty
one to forty one, where they're demanding premium healthcare for illegals.

(01:06:27):
And at the end of the day, they really can't
say that they didn't vote to shut the government down,
that they're keeping the shut it down. They did, and
they're going to have to answer for that. So it'll
be interesting to see.

Speaker 1 (01:06:41):
Kat Camick with us. Cat stand by, it's ten minutes
past the hour, take a quick check of weather and traffic,
and back with our our friend and the one member
of Florida's Republican Caucus that does not accept earmarks. And
for that she deserves a place in the Hall of
Fame of the Morning Show with President Scott and she

(01:07:03):
has it back with more. Back with you, as Congresswoman
Cat Camick, Kat, I want to pick up on this

(01:07:24):
Obamacare subsidy issue a little bit more because I've been
trying to remind everybody on this program as often as
possible that this is a problem created in part. If
we set aside the Supreme Court ruling, which was ridiculous
that allowed it in the first place, this is still,
if not the most subsidized healthcare program or program of

(01:07:47):
any kind that government has out there. It is now
the additional subsidies that we're talking about, which are in
the grand scheme of things, minuscule that they're doing this for.
And this was all authored by Democrats. They put the
COVID subsidies in place, they put the expiration date in place.
This is their program, this is their baby. They own

(01:08:09):
all of this.

Speaker 5 (01:08:11):
MH yeah, I mean, let us not forget that it
was in fact the Democrats that obviously created Obamacare. We
all remember that. And then through the years they have
continued to increase the cost of the program. As healthcare
quality has gone down, access has been more restricted than ever.
And the answer that the Left has is throw more

(01:08:34):
money at it, throw more money at a broken program
that perpetuates a sick care system. That's really what it was.
And we said back then, you know, twenty ten, twenty eleven,
twenty twelve, twenty thirteen, all those times you said this
is just a stepping stone to single payer systems. Absolutely,
this is where they want to head to. They want
socialized medicine. And then they'll always point to Canada. Of course,

(01:08:57):
I always have to then remind them that Canadians are
the ones that are coming to the United States for
their procedures because they can't get them in Canada. You know,
you look at the UK that everyone has a private
plan on top of their subsidized plan because it is
such a broken system. But the thing is, if you
just look at the politics of what is going on here,

(01:09:18):
because part of what this shakedown is is four hundred
billion dollars not to people, but to insurance companies. Insurance companies,
by the way, that are making two hundred and thirty
seven percent profits, that's what they logged last year. And
so I cannot act in good conscience vote to throw
more money at a broken system that is literally propped

(01:09:42):
up by insurance companies that, God bless them, they're log
they're making an incredible amount of money, and yet premiums
are still going to increase, and so it is something
that we have to get fixed. Because single pair isn't
the answer. Throwing money a broken ste them isn't the answer.
There are real reforms that we could do to bring

(01:10:03):
down those costs, but the Democrats don't want to hear
it because they would have to admit that Obamacare or
the Affordable Care Act isn't so affordable. It's actually unaffordable,
and it's a broken system with worst outcomes. And they
set this whole thing up. They couldn't make them permanent,
the payments, the subsidies to insurance companies permanent. They set

(01:10:23):
up this deadline. It's totally artificial and concocted by the Democrats.
So this is a crisis of their own making and
they're leaving it to us to fix it. But we
actually have to get the government opening in order to
do that.

Speaker 1 (01:10:35):
One of the things we've talked about this morning is
Center for Immigration Studies talked about the numbers of the
illegal immigrants that are on one form of a US
subsidy or another, and they estimates fifty nine percent of
illegal alien led households are using one or more welfare program.
I likened it to breaking into your house, taking up

(01:10:56):
a room in the spare bedroom, and using all of
your resources in your home and not being charged for it.
This is absurd what's going on. But yet we don't
see an end to what to me is low hanging fruit.
Just stop giving them benefits. Why are the Democrats so insistent?

(01:11:17):
Is it the victim class that they need for voters?

Speaker 5 (01:11:21):
Well, I mean it makes you this is one of
those things that again you put it all together and
it just kind of makes you cock your head a
little bit and say, huh, because let us not forget
it wasn't too long ago that Nancy Pelosi had made
HR one, I believe, of the one hundred and seventeenth Congress,
which was the first year that I got in, which
was twenty twenty one, to serve They made the number

(01:11:45):
one priority of the Democrat agenda for those two years
for the one hundred and seventeen Congress. They made before
the Politicians Act HR one, And what it did was
it completely eliminated voter id in order to vote, no
mention of having to be a citizen. They wanted publicly

(01:12:06):
funded campaigns, so six to one match, so you and
I would be on the hook to finance AOC or
Bernie Sanders campaign and match small dollar donations. It was
an absolute play in order to make it legal for
non legal individuals to vote. And then you couple that

(01:12:26):
with open borders and you start to say, well, they've
got the borders wide open, they don't want voter ID,
they're giving away all these programs. What is it that
they're after? And I come back to this time and
time again. This is not a conspiracy and there's not
a single policy that the Left is holding up. It
is a combination of things that add up to one mission,
and that mission is dependency and control. The Left has

(01:12:48):
always been about growing the size of government to make
people dependent on government programs so that they the big
government program advocates stay in charge. And they started seeing
people waking up around the country with the election of
President Trump and saying, we don't like this big government
thing that tells us how we're going to live our
lives and then make us pay for it. Right, So
they just import their voters and you see it in

(01:13:11):
states and cities across the country. Dependency and control. That's
what's always been about.

Speaker 1 (01:13:16):
US congress Woman Cat Camick with Us one more segment
next on The Morning Show, Back with US congress Woman
Cat Camick, and I promised discipline, and so I want
to stay with a topic that I know is very
important to you, Cat and it is something I talked

(01:13:38):
about last week and it is from zero Hedge. And
the question is what can we do about the agrarian collapse?
And the argument being made is it's you got to
support the local farms, you got to support the farmers' markets,
et cetera, et cetera. But the federal government, whether we
like it or not, has to play a role in
saving small farms. And the question is is there any

(01:14:02):
any discussion in Congress to help save small farms in
this country?

Speaker 5 (01:14:10):
Who I'm going to try to be as concise as
humanly possible and if I'm out of breathas because I
was just dancing for the baby, making her smile. So
a couple things here. Yes, the Farm Bill, which happens
every five years, that is a huge part of establishing
certainty in the ag community. The problem is is that
we've got chicken crap politicians that won't advance a bill

(01:14:34):
that is actually for our producers, for our farmers and ranchers.
They're more concerned about rocking the boat because eighty three
percent of the Farm Bill is the SNAP and EDT program.
The nutritional side is married to the actual food production side,
and that is a and that has been a longstanding

(01:14:55):
thing with the Farm Bill. And so there's things within
the Farm Bill that, of course are meant to support
our producers. But when you look at input costs across
the board, you're seeing high diesel, high fertilizer, labor costs,
lack of labor. We aren't in a place where you
can mechanize everything across the board. And the regulatory regime,

(01:15:17):
the regulatory regime, and this is not just for ag
but across the entire economy of the United States, that
is what is going to either make or break us
because as taxpayers, we're paying two point five trillion dollars
every year in enforcement and compliance of regulations, and those
regulations are strangling us. They are literally crushing us. If

(01:15:38):
we're going to survive as a republic for the next
two hundred and fifty years, we have to have a
major overhaul of the regulatory regime. That is, in fact,
how you drain the swamp. And in the ag industry,
you have a crushing amount of regulation that make absolutely
no sense. It doesn't make food any safer. It doesn't
improve anything. Really, it's just giving jobs to beer crats

(01:16:00):
that are sitting on their hands, So you have that element.
Another part of it is I dropped a bill called
the Ffact, a nod to the future Farmers of America.
The farms are going under, but what it stands for
is farmers feeding Americans. If you are on SNAP and
EEDT and you're using taxpayer dollars in order to purchase

(01:16:20):
your food, it should be American food that you're consuming,
So not any of the imported fruits and vegetables from
Mexico or Canada or anywhere else abroad. It should be
domestic produced fruits, vegetables, dairy products, meats, things like that.
And when I went to the USDA to get the
data of how much of the food we're importing is
going towards the SNAP programs, guess what, they wouldn't give

(01:16:44):
it to me. And then the grocers didn't want to
give me that information. And everyone is up in arms
saying we can't do this, and I'm saying we have
to do this because a nation that can't feed itself
is not secure. As we're very close to teetering on
the edge of not being able to feed our because
they're all going under.

Speaker 1 (01:17:02):
At the end of this particular piece, they offer this,
Fanny May and Freddie Mack allow first time home buyers
to purchase homes with as little as three percent down.
Veterans can access zero percent down, no mortgage insurance, and
low interest rates. As a society, we've decided that helping
families and veterans is worth supporting with government backed loans.

(01:17:23):
Why don't we have a product like this for farmland.

Speaker 5 (01:17:27):
That's one of the things that I've been meeting with
a lot of young farmers around not just our state,
but the country. It is virtually impossible to compete now
with the high price of land because the final crop
in Florida is looking more and more like it's going
to be a housing development. Right got multi generational family

(01:17:49):
operations where one of the kids is now turning into
a real estate agent or a broker and selling off
pieces of the family farm. Because why wouldn't you do
that when you can get fifty thousand an acre for
a developer from a developer versus all the input costs
and labor just to break even or even take a
loss if you are going to farm that acre. It's

(01:18:13):
a sad state of affairs. But I agree with you.
We have to do something pretty radical if we're going
to turn this around. And I do think you're one
hundred percent right, there needs to be some acknowledgment and
adjustment in the program. I don't want more money going
towards spending on this because we just crossed over into
the thirty eight trillion dollars threshold of national debts. But

(01:18:35):
we should be able to reshuffle and make it so
that there is a way for young farmers and ranchers
to actually purchase farmland and make it productive. Right they
have to actually they have to put it into production,
but it should be a lot easier than it is now,
because right now it is virtually impossible.

Speaker 1 (01:18:55):
You're the best, Kat, Thanks very much, and I hope
we'll get a chance to talk talk again this month.
If not, Happy Thanksgiving, appreciate it so much.

Speaker 5 (01:19:04):
Happy Thanksgiving and appreciate the time as always.

Speaker 1 (01:19:08):
Thank you. Kat Camick with US US Congress going from
third Congressional District of the Sunshine State, our guest twice monthly. Again,
we're hoping for another visit this month. But sometimes things happen,
so we'll have to see how the month unfolds. It's
the Morning Show with Preston Scott Alight making progress on

(01:19:43):
one of the big stories in the press box. Got
an email from a listener that has a friendship knows
Shane Abbott, state representative from the Funiac Springs, speaks highly
of him. Like I said, I'm gonna take the man
at his word. Don't know anything about him, but want
to discuss his proposal on property tax. It's one of

(01:20:06):
the big stories in the press box. It would cut
assessed home values by twenty five percent but maintain quote
essential services. See. I believe that that is just and
I'm the idea maintaining essential services suggests that the only
way to maintain them is to keep property taxes, and
I just patently disagree. You have to You've got to

(01:20:32):
step away. And I don't necessarily think you have to
do this in one fell swoop. I think you go
twenty five percent, twenty five percent, twenty five percent, twenty
five percent, and five years you're done. You cut it
back and gradually replace that income. WHOA, wait, what are
you talking about? Well, you know the truth of the matter. Is.

(01:20:55):
I'm kind of talking about a fair tax model, but
for that to work, government has to be here comes
right sized. That's where the state CFO needs to come
in and look at all city and county budgets and say, wait,

(01:21:17):
what are you spending this for? Why are you doing that?
You don't need to do that. That's duplicative that you're
doing that there, and you're doing that there. Why are you?
Why are we stop the cities Republican? This is not
just a Democrat problem. Republican and Democrat cities across the

(01:21:38):
state have ballooned their budgets since twenty nineteen, they've doubled. No.
Any model that allows the government to take your home
for not paying property taxes is a failed is a

(01:22:02):
failed proposal. You have to be able to own your Look,
they can't take your car. Maybe you can't drive it.
They can't take it if you don't pay the registration fee.

(01:22:23):
That registration fees pays for road maintenance and who knows
what else. Right you have to pay that, But they
can't repossess your car. The bank does that if you
don't pay them back, just like they can repossess a
house if you don't pay them there you go. But

(01:22:46):
whether you start with the people that have paid their
mortgages and they are now done, and you there's your
starting point, people that have paid off their mortgages, they
no longer pay property taxes, and then you expanded from there.
I don't know what that final model looks like. What
I know is leaving it as it is means you
will never ever own your home or property and that

(01:23:08):
is unacceptable period. Fundamentally, it's just wrong. So that is
the big story in the press box. We'll see if
we can get Shane Abbott on the program and talk
about it. Happy to do that because it is an
issue with statewide implications. Forty minutes past the hour follow

(01:23:29):
up from What's the Beef coming up next? Last week?

(01:23:56):
I think Jose if he can unmuffle himself, can answer
this question. I believe it was Wesley who called in,
Oh and look that's sixty five year old guys, got
your true take that cod liveral And he talked about

(01:24:21):
reparations and that there was a fund it was legally
established to pay It's called the Freedmen Reparations Fund Trust.
I looked it up at Freedmen Nation Transparency and Education
court everything we do to help our communities the public
understand how the Freedman Reparations Trust Fund works. We've released

(01:24:44):
an updated FAQ May twenty twenty five. Here's a high
level breakdown. The fr FT is a private, irrevocable legal
trust created to provide economic reparations, land access, and financial
empowerment for verified freedmen individuals whose ancestry traces back to
US chattel slavery. Importantly, this is not race based program. Instead,

(01:25:09):
it is a status based requiring genealogical documentation to verify
historical connection to US slavery. Verification is free. Donations, payments,
services are not required to qualify or participate. Where does
the money come from. It comes from licensee and no
government funding, licensing agreements, civil litigation recoveries, land acquisition, economic zones,

(01:25:35):
trust owned credit systems, and private donations. Projected payouts range
from four hundred and five dollars to six hundred and
eighty eight dollars a month, depending on the size of
the fund and the total number of verified freedmen it is.
Can it be taken away or shut down? Absolutely not.
It is structured under private trust law, not government control

(01:25:55):
or political whim. It is legally binding and irrevocable. So
there you go. What makes this different. The Trust is
not a charity, a nonprofit or church, nor is it
a pyramid scheme or go fund me. It is a
sovereign legal instrument of economic justice created by the federal

(01:26:18):
government failed for over one hundred and fifty years. Because
the federal government failed for one hundred and fifty years
to deliver what was promised. The trust does not replace
the fight for federal reparations. It exists because the fight
has been stalled. The Trust was built on the principle
of autarchy, the ability to self govern, self fund, and
self protect our future. So there you go. Now, I

(01:26:42):
would simply say, now the fight of reparations is over
because everybody has been enslaved. And if we really want
to get technical, some of the enslavers happened to be
of the same ancestry as the slaves, and that's just
you know, I would just simply say that to those
rare cases that may exist on someone that can point

(01:27:04):
to their past and say ever since then, we haven't
had a chance. Okay, make the argument, but I would
say that the evidence of success across the country across
all fields renders that argument moot. But that's just me,

(01:27:25):
you know. But I appreciated the phone call, and I
wanted to do appropriate diligence and say well done. Caller
was correct. It does exist. It is out there. I
don't agree with all of the principles established, but that
does exist. It is there. So there you go, Moses brother,

(01:27:45):
here you go, reach out and do your thing. Forty
six minutes past the hour, finish up the Morning Show
with Preston Scott last week. I think Jose if he

(01:28:21):
can unmuffle himself, can answer this question. I believe it
was Wesley who called in, Oh and look that's sixty
five year old guys. Got you true? True, take that
cod liver Or. And he talked about reparations and that

(01:28:47):
there was a fund it was legally established to pay.
It's called the Freedmen Reparations Fund Trust. I looked it
up at Freedmen Nation, Transparent and Education Court. Everything we
do to help our communities the public understand how the
Freedman Reparations Trust Fund works. We've released an updated FAQ

(01:29:08):
May twenty twenty five. Here's a high level breakdown. The
FrFT is a private irrevocable legal trust created to provide
economic reparations, land access, and financial empowerment for verified freedmen
individuals whose ancestry traces back to US chattel slavery. Importantly,

(01:29:29):
this is not race based program. Instead, it is a
status based requiring genealogical documentation to verify historical connection to
US slavery. Verification is free. Donations, payments services are not
required to qualify or participate. Where does the money come from.
It comes from licensee and no government funding, licensing agreements,

(01:29:54):
civil litigation recoveries, land acquisition, economic zones, trust owned credit systems,
and private donations. Projected payouts range from four hundred and
five dollars to six hundred and eighty eight dollars a month,
depending on the size of the fund and the total
number of verified freedmen it is. Can it be taken
away or shut down? Absolutely not. It is structured under

(01:30:16):
private trust law, not government control or political whim. It
is legally binding and irrevocable. So there you go. What
makes this different. The trust is not a charity, a
nonprofit or church, nor is it a pyramid scheme or
go fund me. It is a sovereign legal instrument of

(01:30:39):
economic justice created by the federal government failed for over
one hundred and fifty years. Because the federal government failed
for one hundred and fifty years to deliver what was promised.
The Trust does not replace the fight for federal reparations.
It exists because the fight has been stalled. The Trust
was built on the principle of autarchy, the ability to
self govern and self fund and self protect our future.

(01:31:02):
So there you go. Now, I would simply say, no,
the fight of reparations is over because everybody has been enslaved.
And if we really want to get technical, some of
the enslavers happened to be of the same ancestry as
the slaves, and that's just you know. I would just
simply say that to those rare cases that may exist

(01:31:25):
on someone that can point to their past and say
ever since then, we haven't had a chance. Okay, make
the argument, but I would say that the evidence of
success across the country, across all fields, renders that argument moot.
But that's just me, you know. But I appreciated the

(01:31:52):
phone call, and I wanted to do appropriate diligence and say,
well done. Caller was correct. It does exist, is out
there I don't agree with all of the principles established,
but that does exist. It is there. So there you go,
Moses brother, Here you go, reach out and do your thing.

(01:32:12):
Forty six minutes past the hour, finish up the Morning
Show with Preston Scott all Right, Roseville, Ohio. Guy forgot

(01:32:38):
his fifty dollars winning lottery ticket at home, decided to
buy another of the same scratch off game. Went to
the South sixty market in Zanesville, intending to cash in
his fifty dollars winning best of seven scratch off, but

(01:32:58):
he realized he ah left the ticket at home. Hey
decided to go into store anyway, bought another ticket of
the same game, scratched it off in his car. What
would you have done? Would you have gone back home? Well,
it worked out for him because he scratched off a

(01:33:20):
five hundred thousand dollars ticket. So he's won five hundred
thousand and fifty dollars on that scratch off game. That's
just that is nuts. He said, he's gonna go h
He's gonna pay off his house, buy a new car,

(01:33:40):
cut back his workday so he can spend a little
more time with his family. Here you go, invest that money, friend,
pay off that house, buy that car, cash and invest.
That's what you do right there? Those would would that
be called forgotten riches. I'm just curious. I mean that
that is fortuitous right there.

Speaker 3 (01:34:03):
Now.

Speaker 1 (01:34:03):
You know what's interesting though, when you talk about, you know,
the the lotteries around the world, people that earn I
think it's twelve thousand dollars or less a year are
among the highest percentage of people that play the lottery. Boy,
I don't you're not making much money. I don't know
if playing the lottery makes a lot of sense. I mean,

(01:34:25):
do you really want to use your bread money? I mean,
a lottery ticket is is food. I mean, it's it's
some soup, it's a ramen, it's something. I mean, granted,
it doesn't I mean a two dollar a dollar. Most

(01:34:46):
tickets are two dollars now right, A two dollar lottery
ticket doesn't buy you much at the grocery store anymore.
It barely buys you a candy bar. But it's still
you know. It's one of my personal challenges is helping
people on the street that are like smoking heaters, because
I'm thinking, man, how much money are you spending on smokes?

(01:35:11):
That's just bad stewardship of whatever limited resources you have.
Right anyway, that's just me tomorrow Lieutenant Governor Jay Collins
and from the Talent Training Group, Jad Johnson, brought to
you by Barno Heating and Air. It's the Morning.

Speaker 4 (01:35:26):
Show one on WFLA really good one.

Speaker 1 (01:35:31):
Today. We started with the first John twenty six. Now,
the devotional itself was really good and encompassing, and it
speaks to why it might be worthwhile to start your
day with some scripture, even if it's just a few minutes,
to start with just a minute, you know, reading a verse,

(01:35:52):
praying over it, ask God to use you for the day,
Let you be an instrument for His purposes. And of
if you go into your and you start small, you
start with it's like your spiritual muscles are no different
than your other muscles. You don't start by running a mile.

(01:36:13):
You start by walking a lap, and then you walk
two laps, and then three and four, and then you
jog part of a lap, and then you jog half
of a lap, and then you jog a whole lap,
and then you walk. You see my point, it's the
same thing with your spiritual muscles. You start and you

(01:36:33):
accomplish something. Don't say I'm going to read the book
of John today unless you've got the time and are
devoted to doing it. Start with John three sixteen and
think about that and then expand to the rest of it.
You see my point. Anyway, talked about property tax today

(01:36:55):
in the state of Florida, what its future looks like.
At some point we'll take some calls we'll set aside.
Had some time illegal aliens. They're accessing welfare benefits fifty
nine percent of head of households. Ted Cruz said the shutdown.
He thinks it's going to end this week early next.
He said, Democrats are waiting for the election. Today we

(01:37:17):
talked about the fields. Don't know what I'm talking about. Oh,
you got to listen to the podcast. Talked about the
guy who confronted John Brennan. We've reached out to him
and gave you an update on Tata Domiac and his story.
So we'll do it again tomorrow. Friends, have an awesome day.