April 25, 2024 • 30 mins
Deputy DA John Lewin Comes on to talk about one of Gascon's DAs is being charged with 11 Felonies. USC Cancels their Graduation Ceremony. Supreme Court Homeless Rights Case.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Can't. I am six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
You're listening to the John Cobel Podcast on the iHeartRadio app.
We're on from one until four after four o'clock. If
you missed the show, you can hear it again. John
Cobel Show on demand. It's the podcast on the iHeart app.
Eight seven seven Moist eighty six. Hot is the moistline
number eight seven seven moist eighty six. We're playing that
(00:22):
back tomorrow. The Los Angeles County District Attorney George gascon
another scandal in his office seems to happen constantly, and
this involves someone in his administration at the very highest level,
the Assistant District Attorney Diana Tehran. Diana Tehran is being
(00:42):
charged by the California Attorney General Rob Bonte with eleven felonies.
You know, she's also the chief of Ethics and Integrity,
except she's being charged with illegally looking into officer personnel
files and then using that information to prosecute them, and
that is a clear violation of the law. We are
(01:05):
now going to get John lewinon a Deputy DA and
he's going to explain what all this is about. Oh oh,
and one more thing we got Steve Garvey coming in
studio in an hour. Steve Garvey running as the Republican
candidate for Senate. In an hour, he's going to be here,
so be ready for that. Okay, let's get John Lewin
on here. John, how are you?
Speaker 3 (01:26):
John?
Speaker 1 (01:27):
I'm good?
Speaker 2 (01:28):
So explain what did this chief of Ethics and Integrity,
Diana Tehran do. Now she's a former public defender and
Gascone bumped her up to an assistant district attorney, and
what was her crime according to the Attorney General?
Speaker 3 (01:45):
As you're aware, John, let me quickly say that obviously
I'm not speaking on behalf of George gast going to
the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office. So let me
start with this. Diana Turan was a career public defender
who was brought in by George Gascon. She was brought
in well after back in two thousand and nineteen, before
(02:09):
Gascon ever took office. There were articles in the paper
and on the media. I'm looking at one from Channel
seven from August fourteenth of twenty nineteen. Lasd has criminal
investigation into its own watchdog and names Diana Turan by name.
So George Gascone takes over December seventh, twenty twenty. And
(02:33):
what does he do. He brings in Diana Turan, someone
to be investigated for serious, serious criminal conduct, brings her
in and immediately starts promoting her. It's like she had
a rocket attached to her rear end in the way
that she just climbed the office. Eventually she becomes the
(02:54):
assisted DA, a promotion that was made in the last
few months. Well into this investment instigation, she's promoted and
she has put in charge of get this, the prosecution
of police officers. Now, this is a woman, by the way,
who's misconduct eleven felonies. I am unaware in the history
of the office of an indidividual being charged with felony
(03:18):
conduct for actions that relate to their responsibilities as a prosecutor.
So what was she doing. She was illegally accessing police
records that she was not supposed to have. We don't
know what she did with those records, but coincidentally records
that she should not have had or excuse it should
(03:41):
not have been passed on. In for instance, the Torrents
police officer bout a voluntary maslaughter case were given to
the two million dollar prosecutor George handled to take over
that case, and all of a sudden he had confidential
materials that a judge had given to to Brand's investigative
(04:01):
unit who was prosting these police officers with instructions that
they could not be turned over to anybody, and all
of a sudden he had them. So what's the bottom
line do all this? Diana Turan, who is supposed to
be investigating and charging police officers, is illegally accessing information that,
apparently the reasonal inference would be she is using to
(04:24):
make determinations on those charges of police officers. Now, as prosecutors,
we not only have an obligation to try in vigorously
and ethically prosecute our cases, but we have to do
so in a legal manner. And she's been charged with
eleven felonies. Now that brings up this question, when did
(04:46):
George Gascone find out this information and what specifically did
he know? I send him a long email today which
I'm sure he won't answer.
Speaker 2 (04:55):
Yeah, I've been looking through it. Yes, I'm reading this.
Speaker 3 (05:00):
You know. What is important is to find out, first
of all, what exactly when did he find out there
was this investigation? Now, what is absolutely striking is Remember
rob Bonta is Gascone's political ally. If you remember, Gascone's
inexperienced chief of staff, a Gray two, who had four
felony trials at the time he was made the second
(05:22):
highest position in the office, was arrested for an alcohol
intoxication incident, and the ag Bontus people sat on that
case until the statue of the litations expired. So how
horrible must this case be for Rob Bonta, George Gascone's
(05:43):
political ally, to have filed these eleven felony charges. This
is the tip of the iceberg. Diana Turan is being
charged for conduct which appears to specifically be directed at
aiding George Gascone and improperly prosecuting police officers. Now, if
(06:04):
George Gascon had ever tried to case himself, he has
never tried a case. He is barely a lawyer, much
less a prosecutor. He would understand the ethics involved, but obviously,
given who he is who he serves, which are the
basically incarcerated people of California, he doesn't care about any
victims in our cases. He doesn't care. And by the way,
(06:28):
Diana Turan, as far as I know George Gascon has
marched two different people, lawyers in our office, out of
the office when there were allegations of misconduct, allegations which
turned out to result in no discipline. I'm unaware of
Diana Turan being marched out when she was charged with
(06:48):
eleven felonies. So that's kind of the basics, and it
is beyond disturbing. What does George Gascaux know, when did
he know it? And what other shoes are going to drop?
Speaker 2 (07:02):
Well, you have laid out quite the case here, and
I've got the same questions too. I don't know how
he could not have known this was going on when
you do something eleven times and involving by eleven police
officers and all of them had some kind of legal
action against them.
Speaker 3 (07:21):
Well we don't They're right, they're right now named as
John Doe, So we don't know who those deputies are.
But if you look back what she was accused of
doing in this article would also named the Inspector General,
Max Huntsman, and all of them. Huntsmen and the Board
of Supervisors came forward and said this investigation by the
(07:41):
Sheriff's Department is it's unethical and it's not accurate, and
it's a bunch of garbage. Well, Rob Bonta is one
of the most liberal liberal Democrats in this state. He
just charged his buddy, Gascone's top advisor with eleven felonies.
So apparently where there are smoke, there was fire, and
this is an inferno.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
All right, we'll see where this goes next. John, maybe
come back on. We'll talk some more when we get
some further details. But this is quite shock all right,
very good. John Lewin, a deputy DA laying out what's
going on with this is the top of Gascones administration,
the Assistant District Attorney, Diana Tarn She's charged with eleven
felonies by the Attorney General Rob Bonta, who's Gascones buddy.
(08:28):
Remember Bonta is Gascones buddy Newsome is Gascones buddy. Newsom
appointed gascon to be San Francisco District Attorney and got
him his start in his career as being a DA.
And they're all very left wing, very progressive, very pro criminal.
So for Bonta to turn on one of the Gascones
(08:50):
top lieutenants with eleven felonies means there's something really rotten
going on in Gascon's office. But hey, that's why Nathan
Hockman is running. And we've got some some reaction from
Nathan Hockman. We're going to pass along too.
Speaker 4 (09:04):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI A
M six forty.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
It is true.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
We mentioned this a little bit ago, and we've got
some more details.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
USC.
Speaker 2 (09:16):
What is with these universities. They are so cowardly and
weak and they are.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
They're there. They've canceled the graduation ceremony.
Speaker 5 (09:28):
Which is so unfair, so unfair to these students.
Speaker 2 (09:33):
You know, people as soon as children are born in
a lot of families, parents start worrying about what college.
Speaker 1 (09:42):
They're going to go to.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
Right absolutely, and you go somewhere like USC that costs
a fortune. So people have to work a lot to
for that sort of thing, or the kids have to
do extraordinarily well to get some kind of a scholarship
or a grant, and and and it's tough work, and
they can't help it if the universities teach you a
(10:04):
lot of nonsense that you have to suck up to.
But to finally get to graduation day and not have
a graduation, I mean they should be if they were
college administrators. I realized there's some special breed of psychopath.
They're not capable of feeling shame. They're not capable of
understanding all the emotions that go into this, and they
(10:25):
always hide this hide behind something like safety. You know,
it was crap that they closed all the graduation ceremonies
down for COVID because in one of those ceremonies could
have been done outdoors, and that was completely bogus. It
was an overreaction. It was just childish. And now this
is a huge overreaction. You know, every public facility has
(10:49):
to deal with possible outside agitators causing a problem. Right
every stadium, every arena, every shopping mall, any kind of
public facility that draws those of people can put together
measures to make sure that nothing bad happens. And why
USC can't do that. The first thing you do is
(11:11):
if you punish the agitators right from the start, all
the students that are illegally you just declare protesting off
limits on the campus, and you do that on day one,
and you suspend the kids, and you expel the kids
if necessary, and then they know you get rid of
all the bad apples, you get rid of all the troublemakers.
Speaker 1 (11:31):
Nobody goes to college to hear.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
Other people screaming about some boutique issue of the day.
Because if it isn't the Israel Hamas thing, it's something else.
You know, it's trans rites, or it's Black lives matter,
or it's whatever. And all this stuff comes and goes
and comes and goes, and it's really important for about
five minutes, and then everybody gets tired of it and
on to something else. All right, these issues are a
(11:53):
dime a dozen these days, and it's the same people
shouting and yelling and blah blah blah. And they do
it in order to perform. They do it because they
have their own psychological dysfunction going on.
Speaker 5 (12:03):
Well look what they did today, John, Right, they closed
campus to non right to the general public.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
Yeah, so why don't you do.
Speaker 5 (12:11):
Something like that? Obviously parents and family members, but do
something do It's just ridiculous that these innocent students that
are graduating and that have no part in these protests
now don't have they don't know, they don't get to
they don't get to enjoy their hard work.
Speaker 2 (12:30):
Why can't why can't us open a graduation ceremony just
for the students and their families. Use IDs, use special tickets,
let them walk through metal detectors, make sure nobody's bringing
in any metal weapons or signs. And if anybody acts up,
tell them you act up just once, and you're not going.
Speaker 1 (12:49):
To graduate exactly.
Speaker 2 (12:50):
You'll be immediately expelled right at the ceremony and your
four years worth of your parents' money goes in the toilet.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
You'll be walked right off the stag.
Speaker 2 (12:57):
That's right. So there's no graduation. And as in previous years,
the Universe I'm going to read from their press release here,
As in previous years, the university will host dozens of
commencement events, but we will not be able to host
the main stage ceremony that brings sixty five thousand students,
(13:19):
family and friends to our campus. And we understand this
is disappointing, but they don't care. We're adding many new
activities and celebrations to make this commencement meaningful, memorable, and
uniquely usc Oh.
Speaker 1 (13:31):
I hate that fake cheerlead.
Speaker 5 (13:33):
How do you know that those events aren't going to
be comprised of all these protesters figuring out what's happening
and trying.
Speaker 1 (13:40):
To ruin that here.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
Tickets will be required to access all campus and commencement
events taking place from May eight to eleven. You'll be
able to reserve free charge tickets for themselves up to
eight named guests. Tickets not transferable. So I don't understand
if you're going to go through this for all the
smaller events, why can't you have the big event? People
wait all their lives, parents wait all their child's life
for the moment where they're walking across the stage and
(14:04):
getting the diploma and having their name announced. You can't
make that. You can't get security to make that crazy proof.
Speaker 5 (14:13):
Usc you can't afford you a CD security.
Speaker 1 (14:16):
What was there and what's their endowment down to? You
could do it.
Speaker 2 (14:21):
You could set up an intimidating presence and and and
say there's gonna be absolute consequences. We're gonna charge you
immediately with a crime, and we're gonna kick you out
of school and you'll never get a diploma, and we're
going to erase your records and come sue us. But they,
you know, they never want all you. You have to
be really tough and aggressive with with these screaming toddlers,
(14:43):
because you can you can control screaming toddlers. You have
to be firm enough. Any every parent knows that that
has had a screaming toddler. If you're tough enough, they'll
stop screaming.
Speaker 4 (14:53):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from kf I
am six forty.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
Yes, the yellow bellied cowards in the US, the administration
has canceled the graduation ceremony, punishing thousands of students who
showed up every day and went to class and didn't
stand out on the lawn and act like spoiled toddlers.
So the spoiled toddlers win. Normal students lose. You know
(15:20):
who all riot next? The rest of the students and
the parents. They ought to start a big riot at
USC for taking away the graduation ceremony, but they wouldn't
because they're normal. They're not mental patients like the toddlers
we saw on TV last night. One more thing, This
is funny, and then I want to get to something
a little more serious. I just I want to do
(15:44):
this now because otherwise I'll forget. I want to play
cut seven. This is well. You know, the Trump trials
going on right, and it's drawing all kinds of characters
in Manhattan, And Newsmax had a reporter there asking a
construction worker in Manhattan about Trump and Joe Biden. So
(16:07):
here's a real New York construction worker giving his opinion.
Speaker 4 (16:11):
What's it like seeing so many Republicans in Manhattan, so
many Trump supporters in Manhattan.
Speaker 1 (16:15):
Is that surprise you? No, not at all. It's turning
out Trump's turn again. What's your message to Joe Biden?
Speaker 2 (16:21):
You it's a little better way you can hear the
whole word. But it was a big f you from
the big Burley construction worker. And you know, in one
line that explains the appeal of Trump to tens of
millions around the country. If you ever run into somebody
who says, I don't understand, it's what he said. It's
(16:45):
a big f you to everything, to the establishment, the
Republican Party, the Democratic Party, the media, the elite universities,
the whole thing. It's Trump is f you. That's the
beginning an end of the message. Now, part of the
(17:06):
insanity I just explained it that these college protests is
that most of those screaming toddlers are ignorant. They don't
know that they're fighting for Hamas and Palestine and Iran,
who are all governed by Sharia law, and would stone
and lash women who violated any of their religious principles,
(17:28):
who would execute just murder any gays and lesbians, and
many of those groups are out protesting against the war.
A lot of ignorance too, about the role of the
Supreme Court. And you heard this a lot when the
Supreme Court issued its ruling on abortion, and they didn't
make abortion illegal, they just said there's no constitutional right
(17:51):
to it, and the states have to decide on their
own because abortion is not in the constitution, it doesn't
exist right, and so that was the decision. But most
people are ignorant of the law and of Supreme Court rulings.
They don't understand it. The same thing is happening now
that the Supreme Court held a hearing on whether we
can start getting the homeless off the street, because the
(18:13):
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals had created a fake right
that the homeless can sleep on in public places, and
to threaten them with any kind of civil or criminal
penalty if they don't move is a violation of the
Eighth Amendment Cruel and unusual punishment, And you can see
a lot of the justices on the Supreme Court said, well,
(18:35):
that's a lot of horsecrap, because there's nothing in the
Eighth Amendment that gave you a permanent right to sleep
in a public place.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
It's not cruel and unusual to say.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
Move along or eventually you're going to suffer some kind
of penalty. People are just ignorant of what the amendments
say in the Constitution and of what's not listed in
the county Constitution. Well, so many people in California, especially
in the media, especially activists and politicians, have invested so
(19:05):
heavily in the rights of the homeless for the last
ten years. They've totally forgotten the law and the Constitution.
And now there's this frightening story in the La Times
by some weasel named Kevin Rector. The headline is the
Supreme Court's homelessness decision could backfire on California. Oh, no, backfire,
(19:26):
And it highlights this whack job progressive Lindsay Horvath, who's
an LA County supervisor. She replaced Sheila Cule on the
West side. She's my supervisor, and she is a progressive
looney to and Rector writes that as the Court heard
(19:46):
arguments this week in a case expected to shape homeless policies.
Lindsay Horvath listened angrily. The Board of Supervisors actually voted
to throw its support behind the case, as did Gavin Newsom.
(20:07):
This is the Grant's pass case, and Grant's passed in.
Newsom and three of the members of the Supervisors said,
you know, we ought to have the right to coerce
people off public spaces by threatening with some kind of penalty. Well,
Horror of Ath is very angry. She voted against that
supervisor's resolution. And here's her reasoning. Saying that the only
(20:29):
way we can get ourselves out of this problem is
by citing people for having a blanket on the ground
or for daring to sleep on a park bench is absurd,
just absurd, And I would also say immoral. All we'll
be doing is pushing people from one place to another,
and we've been doing that for decades. Horror of Ath,
like a lot of these progressives, when they have to
give a public argument, give one that is so misleading.
Speaker 3 (20:53):
So.
Speaker 1 (20:56):
Just just wrong.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
What they do is they minimize what's going on out
in the street, which of course is crazy people who
are screaming and yelling, and they're acting violent. They're under
all kinds of drugs, all kinds of mental illness. They're
stabbing people to death. They're running in the streets or
(21:23):
they're passed out on the sidewalk. They're defecating and urinating
and vomiting all over the place. They're very aggressive. That's
what's going on. Instead, she reduces it to having a
blanket on the ground or gearing to sleep on a
park bench. That's not what people are upset about. And
besides that, the Constitution doesn't give you the right to
sleep on a park bench twenty four hours a day
(21:44):
or lay a blanket on the ground forever.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
You don't have that right. It's a public space. You
have that right in your backyard.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
The risk, according to Horvathis and others, is that the
Supreme Court could enable laws hostile to homeless people across
the American West.
Speaker 1 (22:03):
Hillvisals.
Speaker 2 (22:04):
The other supervisor said if Grant's pass wins, it would
open a can of worms.
Speaker 1 (22:10):
The ruling would be implemented unevenly.
Speaker 2 (22:13):
Some cities who have some cities who have shelter beds
would end up with most of the homeless, while the
ones without shelter beds would not have homeless. And I
don't think any city has to take homeless. Really, I
don't think any city, any county has any state has
(22:35):
the moral right to accept homeless from all the other
counties and cities and states. What should be done is
you build a psychiatric hospital network and a drug treatment network,
and it's mandated that when you find people in the
streets acting insane, they be forced into those treatment centers.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Period. End of story.
Speaker 2 (22:56):
Michael Schellenberger wrote about this today, and I'm going to
get to his because every once in a while I
run across somebody who thinks exactly like I do. And
everything he wrote about today, we've talked about on the air.
And sometimes you feel like you're talking in a closet
and you're crazy because nobody else seems to see what
you say. Well, Michael Schellenberger sees it. And we have
(23:17):
to just bust through this mentality that we're responsible for
all these homeless people because it's society and these people
have been oppressed. It's like, no, they're not oppressed, they're
mentally ill or they're drug addicted, and there's way way
way more drugs destructive drugs now than there were decades ago,
and that's why we have all the homeless ed We've
put up with it. And I'm going to get into
what Schellenberger wrote about when we come back. And then
(23:38):
after three o'clock we got Steve Garvey coming in the studio.
Steve Garvey is here. He is running as a Republican
for a US Senate and he wants to speak out
about all the pro Hamas, anti Jewish demonstrations going on
at the college campuses and elsewhere.
Speaker 1 (23:54):
So Steve's coming on after three.
Speaker 4 (23:56):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KIA.
Speaker 2 (24:00):
Steve Garvey coming in after three o'clock. Steve Garvey, the
Great Dodger, running to be the Great Senator as a
Republican against Adam Schiff, and he wants to talk about
all the all the spoiled toddlers at USC and u
c l A whining and complaining about a war that
they have no effect on, and now USC has canceled
(24:22):
graduation ceremonies. You believe that you believe that that is
that is disgusting, that that's absolutely shameful and disgusting that
they caved into a few hundred lunatics and outside agitators
and jew haters and Hammad.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
How come?
Speaker 2 (24:37):
How come you support terrorists and you create such a
ruckus and the normal people who don't support terrorists, they
lose their graduation ceremony that they worked so many years for.
Speaker 1 (24:46):
How does that happen?
Speaker 3 (24:49):
All Right?
Speaker 2 (24:50):
I want to follow up on what I was talking
about about homelessness because Michael Schellenberger, who we've had on
the show a number of times, and he he's a
great substat column. Actually would pay money for his substack
holm It's about the only one I paid for. And
the name of his column is called public And he
go to piece today, the Dirty Little Secret about homelessness,
(25:12):
and it spun off this Supreme Court case that was
heard this week, and he wrote stuff which I believed
and talked about on the air before I met Michael Schellenberger.
And then after we met and we had a number
of interviews and I read his writings.
Speaker 1 (25:28):
It turns out he's got exactly the.
Speaker 2 (25:30):
Same thoughts and I'm right, and he's right, and it's
just a matter of when the public will is going
to force these idiot politicians and activists to stop their
destructive policies because it's really worth reading. It's called the
dirty Little Secret about homelessness is the key to ending it,
(25:52):
and he says that many homeless advocates claim homelessness exists
because we don't have enough homes and poverty has increased,
but neither is true. Do you know, poverty has steadily
declined since the nineteen eighties, and that's what homeless This
first really popped up. And he writes that very few
people are on the street simply because they can't afford
(26:14):
the rent. The evidence is overwhelming that the majority of
people on the street are there because of untreated mental
illness or addiction, and it leads people to use all
their money to support their drug habit and get high
rather than work. There you go, that's it, that's it.
Most of the people are drug addicts. The rest are
(26:35):
mental patients, he writes. The people who can't afford the
rent but are able to work, and who are not
in the grip of addiction or untreated mental illness.
Speaker 1 (26:47):
You know what they do. We said this hundred times.
Speaker 2 (26:50):
People who can't afford the rent find a cheaper place
to live, or move somewhere cheaper, or live with family
and friends. Yes, that's what a rational person does, even
if their rent is raised. Getting your rent raised is
not a deadly disease. It means you can't afford the rent,
so you move somewhere cheaper, or move in with someone,
(27:14):
or move.
Speaker 1 (27:14):
To another town. Now, he says, it's true there aren't enough.
Speaker 2 (27:18):
Shelter beds and case workers and group homes in psychiatric hospitals.
But that's because for forty years, the homeless activists and
the politicians demanded that the funding is to give people
private studio apartments rather than shelter beds. They call it
housing first, and its record is awful. And it's true
(27:41):
because very few actually stay in the housing, and many
of them die quickly anyway, because they're still addicted, they
still have untreated mental illness. Not having a house is
not the cause of their drug addiction and mental illness,
he writes, it's the symptom. And studies have found that
(28:04):
cities that give basic shelter over expensive housing reduced the
deaths by threefold. Yes, in La, homeless die at a
rate three times higher than New York. Because when you
live inside, it protects you from murder, drug overdose, and
car accidents. That's why we have more pedestrians dying in
LA That's why we don't need roague diets because the
(28:25):
increase of pedestrian deaths are drug addicted, mentally a homeless
people stumbling into traffic in the dark.
Speaker 1 (28:32):
Well, this is all connected.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
All the weird changes in the last ten years are
all interwoven. But of course the homeless advocates have exposed
expanding psychiatric hospitals and mandatory care. They think it's bad
to mandate hospitalization for psychotic people, but it's not. One
hundred and twelve thousand Americans died from drug overdose last
(28:54):
year because we didn't mandate treatment, and these these homeless
advocates would rather people die on the street than be
forced into treatment. The number of drug deaths Schollenberger Rights
quintupled in twenty twenty two to one hundred and twelve
thousand last year. How about that? What that's fentanyl and
(29:16):
that's more people dying per year than died in Hiroshima,
He writes, how about that? And the ideology behind this
is that people suffering from addiction and mental illness are
victims of society or the system. We're just fundamentally evil.
So we have to give the victims of the evil
whatever they want, including the right to camp anywhere and
use hard drugs, even if it results in their death.
(29:41):
That's it, That's all you need to know. You force
them into treatment for either their drug addiction or mental illness.
You build them a cheap shelter, and you will have
less people homeless, less people dying in the streets. You
don't have to give them a hundred. You don't have
to give him a one billion dollar apartment, which is
(30:02):
what they're doing in Santa Monica. Now, you know, years ago,
you didn't have fentanel, you didn't have the supercharged version
of meth. The drugs and there's all kinds of boutique,
weird drugs out there, and that's why you see things
in recent years you never saw before in your life.
And so you have to mandate that they get off
the drugs, or yeah, you put them in jail. I
(30:24):
mean going back to repealing Prop forty seven. All right,
Steve Garvey waiting in the wings. He's coming in next
he's going to be running. He is running for a
senator against Adam Schiff, and he wants to talk about
all the pro terrorism, pro hamas nonsense going on on
the campus is Hey, you've been listening to The John
Cobalt Show podcast. You can always hear the show live
(30:45):
on KFI AM six forty from one to four pm
every Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime on demand
on the iHeartRadio app.
Can't. I am six forty.
Speaker 2 (00:02):
You're listening to the John Cobel Podcast on the iHeartRadio app.
We're on from one until four after four o'clock. If
you missed the show, you can hear it again. John
Cobel Show on demand. It's the podcast on the iHeart app.
Eight seven seven Moist eighty six. Hot is the moistline
number eight seven seven moist eighty six. We're playing that
(00:22):
back tomorrow. The Los Angeles County District Attorney George gascon
another scandal in his office seems to happen constantly, and
this involves someone in his administration at the very highest level,
the Assistant District Attorney Diana Tehran. Diana Tehran is being
(00:42):
charged by the California Attorney General Rob Bonte with eleven felonies.
You know, she's also the chief of Ethics and Integrity,
except she's being charged with illegally looking into officer personnel
files and then using that information to prosecute them, and
that is a clear violation of the law. We are
(01:05):
now going to get John lewinon a Deputy DA and
he's going to explain what all this is about. Oh oh,
and one more thing we got Steve Garvey coming in
studio in an hour. Steve Garvey running as the Republican
candidate for Senate. In an hour, he's going to be here,
so be ready for that. Okay, let's get John Lewin
on here. John, how are you?
Speaker 3 (01:26):
John?
Speaker 1 (01:27):
I'm good?
Speaker 2 (01:28):
So explain what did this chief of Ethics and Integrity,
Diana Tehran do. Now she's a former public defender and
Gascone bumped her up to an assistant district attorney, and
what was her crime according to the Attorney General?
Speaker 3 (01:45):
As you're aware, John, let me quickly say that obviously
I'm not speaking on behalf of George gast going to
the Los Angeles County District Attorney's office. So let me
start with this. Diana Turan was a career public defender
who was brought in by George Gascon. She was brought
in well after back in two thousand and nineteen, before
(02:09):
Gascon ever took office. There were articles in the paper
and on the media. I'm looking at one from Channel
seven from August fourteenth of twenty nineteen. Lasd has criminal
investigation into its own watchdog and names Diana Turan by name.
So George Gascone takes over December seventh, twenty twenty. And
(02:33):
what does he do. He brings in Diana Turan, someone
to be investigated for serious, serious criminal conduct, brings her
in and immediately starts promoting her. It's like she had
a rocket attached to her rear end in the way
that she just climbed the office. Eventually she becomes the
(02:54):
assisted DA, a promotion that was made in the last
few months. Well into this investment instigation, she's promoted and
she has put in charge of get this, the prosecution
of police officers. Now, this is a woman, by the way,
who's misconduct eleven felonies. I am unaware in the history
of the office of an indidividual being charged with felony
(03:18):
conduct for actions that relate to their responsibilities as a prosecutor.
So what was she doing. She was illegally accessing police
records that she was not supposed to have. We don't
know what she did with those records, but coincidentally records
that she should not have had or excuse it should
(03:41):
not have been passed on. In for instance, the Torrents
police officer bout a voluntary maslaughter case were given to
the two million dollar prosecutor George handled to take over
that case, and all of a sudden he had confidential
materials that a judge had given to to Brand's investigative
(04:01):
unit who was prosting these police officers with instructions that
they could not be turned over to anybody, and all
of a sudden he had them. So what's the bottom
line do all this? Diana Turan, who is supposed to
be investigating and charging police officers, is illegally accessing information that,
apparently the reasonal inference would be she is using to
(04:24):
make determinations on those charges of police officers. Now, as prosecutors,
we not only have an obligation to try in vigorously
and ethically prosecute our cases, but we have to do
so in a legal manner. And she's been charged with
eleven felonies. Now that brings up this question, when did
(04:46):
George Gascone find out this information and what specifically did
he know? I send him a long email today which
I'm sure he won't answer.
Speaker 2 (04:55):
Yeah, I've been looking through it. Yes, I'm reading this.
Speaker 3 (05:00):
You know. What is important is to find out, first
of all, what exactly when did he find out there
was this investigation? Now, what is absolutely striking is Remember
rob Bonta is Gascone's political ally. If you remember, Gascone's
inexperienced chief of staff, a Gray two, who had four
felony trials at the time he was made the second
(05:22):
highest position in the office, was arrested for an alcohol
intoxication incident, and the ag Bontus people sat on that
case until the statue of the litations expired. So how
horrible must this case be for Rob Bonta, George Gascone's
(05:43):
political ally, to have filed these eleven felony charges. This
is the tip of the iceberg. Diana Turan is being
charged for conduct which appears to specifically be directed at
aiding George Gascone and improperly prosecuting police officers. Now, if
(06:04):
George Gascon had ever tried to case himself, he has
never tried a case. He is barely a lawyer, much
less a prosecutor. He would understand the ethics involved, but obviously,
given who he is who he serves, which are the
basically incarcerated people of California, he doesn't care about any
victims in our cases. He doesn't care. And by the way,
(06:28):
Diana Turan, as far as I know George Gascon has
marched two different people, lawyers in our office, out of
the office when there were allegations of misconduct, allegations which
turned out to result in no discipline. I'm unaware of
Diana Turan being marched out when she was charged with
(06:48):
eleven felonies. So that's kind of the basics, and it
is beyond disturbing. What does George Gascaux know, when did
he know it? And what other shoes are going to drop?
Speaker 2 (07:02):
Well, you have laid out quite the case here, and
I've got the same questions too. I don't know how
he could not have known this was going on when
you do something eleven times and involving by eleven police
officers and all of them had some kind of legal
action against them.
Speaker 3 (07:21):
Well we don't They're right, they're right now named as
John Doe, So we don't know who those deputies are.
But if you look back what she was accused of
doing in this article would also named the Inspector General,
Max Huntsman, and all of them. Huntsmen and the Board
of Supervisors came forward and said this investigation by the
(07:41):
Sheriff's Department is it's unethical and it's not accurate, and
it's a bunch of garbage. Well, Rob Bonta is one
of the most liberal liberal Democrats in this state. He
just charged his buddy, Gascone's top advisor with eleven felonies.
So apparently where there are smoke, there was fire, and
this is an inferno.
Speaker 2 (08:03):
All right, we'll see where this goes next. John, maybe
come back on. We'll talk some more when we get
some further details. But this is quite shock all right,
very good. John Lewin, a deputy DA laying out what's
going on with this is the top of Gascones administration,
the Assistant District Attorney, Diana Tarn She's charged with eleven
felonies by the Attorney General Rob Bonta, who's Gascones buddy.
(08:28):
Remember Bonta is Gascones buddy Newsome is Gascones buddy. Newsom
appointed gascon to be San Francisco District Attorney and got
him his start in his career as being a DA.
And they're all very left wing, very progressive, very pro criminal.
So for Bonta to turn on one of the Gascones
(08:50):
top lieutenants with eleven felonies means there's something really rotten
going on in Gascon's office. But hey, that's why Nathan
Hockman is running. And we've got some some reaction from
Nathan Hockman. We're going to pass along too.
Speaker 4 (09:04):
You're listening to John Cobelt on demand from KFI A
M six forty.
Speaker 1 (09:10):
It is true.
Speaker 2 (09:11):
We mentioned this a little bit ago, and we've got
some more details.
Speaker 1 (09:15):
USC.
Speaker 2 (09:16):
What is with these universities. They are so cowardly and
weak and they are.
Speaker 1 (09:24):
They're there. They've canceled the graduation ceremony.
Speaker 5 (09:28):
Which is so unfair, so unfair to these students.
Speaker 2 (09:33):
You know, people as soon as children are born in
a lot of families, parents start worrying about what college.
Speaker 1 (09:42):
They're going to go to.
Speaker 2 (09:42):
Right absolutely, and you go somewhere like USC that costs
a fortune. So people have to work a lot to
for that sort of thing, or the kids have to
do extraordinarily well to get some kind of a scholarship
or a grant, and and and it's tough work, and
they can't help it if the universities teach you a
(10:04):
lot of nonsense that you have to suck up to.
But to finally get to graduation day and not have
a graduation, I mean they should be if they were
college administrators. I realized there's some special breed of psychopath.
They're not capable of feeling shame. They're not capable of
understanding all the emotions that go into this, and they
(10:25):
always hide this hide behind something like safety. You know,
it was crap that they closed all the graduation ceremonies
down for COVID because in one of those ceremonies could
have been done outdoors, and that was completely bogus. It
was an overreaction. It was just childish. And now this
is a huge overreaction. You know, every public facility has
(10:49):
to deal with possible outside agitators causing a problem. Right
every stadium, every arena, every shopping mall, any kind of
public facility that draws those of people can put together
measures to make sure that nothing bad happens. And why
USC can't do that. The first thing you do is
(11:11):
if you punish the agitators right from the start, all
the students that are illegally you just declare protesting off
limits on the campus, and you do that on day one,
and you suspend the kids, and you expel the kids
if necessary, and then they know you get rid of
all the bad apples, you get rid of all the troublemakers.
Speaker 1 (11:31):
Nobody goes to college to hear.
Speaker 2 (11:32):
Other people screaming about some boutique issue of the day.
Because if it isn't the Israel Hamas thing, it's something else.
You know, it's trans rites, or it's Black lives matter,
or it's whatever. And all this stuff comes and goes
and comes and goes, and it's really important for about
five minutes, and then everybody gets tired of it and
on to something else. All right, these issues are a
(11:53):
dime a dozen these days, and it's the same people
shouting and yelling and blah blah blah. And they do
it in order to perform. They do it because they
have their own psychological dysfunction going on.
Speaker 5 (12:03):
Well look what they did today, John, Right, they closed
campus to non right to the general public.
Speaker 1 (12:09):
Yeah, so why don't you do.
Speaker 5 (12:11):
Something like that? Obviously parents and family members, but do
something do It's just ridiculous that these innocent students that
are graduating and that have no part in these protests
now don't have they don't know, they don't get to
they don't get to enjoy their hard work.
Speaker 2 (12:30):
Why can't why can't us open a graduation ceremony just
for the students and their families. Use IDs, use special tickets,
let them walk through metal detectors, make sure nobody's bringing
in any metal weapons or signs. And if anybody acts up,
tell them you act up just once, and you're not going.
Speaker 1 (12:49):
To graduate exactly.
Speaker 2 (12:50):
You'll be immediately expelled right at the ceremony and your
four years worth of your parents' money goes in the toilet.
Speaker 1 (12:55):
You'll be walked right off the stag.
Speaker 2 (12:57):
That's right. So there's no graduation. And as in previous years,
the Universe I'm going to read from their press release here,
As in previous years, the university will host dozens of
commencement events, but we will not be able to host
the main stage ceremony that brings sixty five thousand students,
(13:19):
family and friends to our campus. And we understand this
is disappointing, but they don't care. We're adding many new
activities and celebrations to make this commencement meaningful, memorable, and
uniquely usc Oh.
Speaker 1 (13:31):
I hate that fake cheerlead.
Speaker 5 (13:33):
How do you know that those events aren't going to
be comprised of all these protesters figuring out what's happening
and trying.
Speaker 1 (13:40):
To ruin that here.
Speaker 2 (13:43):
Tickets will be required to access all campus and commencement
events taking place from May eight to eleven. You'll be
able to reserve free charge tickets for themselves up to
eight named guests. Tickets not transferable. So I don't understand
if you're going to go through this for all the
smaller events, why can't you have the big event? People
wait all their lives, parents wait all their child's life
for the moment where they're walking across the stage and
(14:04):
getting the diploma and having their name announced. You can't
make that. You can't get security to make that crazy proof.
Speaker 5 (14:13):
Usc you can't afford you a CD security.
Speaker 1 (14:16):
What was there and what's their endowment down to? You
could do it.
Speaker 2 (14:21):
You could set up an intimidating presence and and and
say there's gonna be absolute consequences. We're gonna charge you
immediately with a crime, and we're gonna kick you out
of school and you'll never get a diploma, and we're
going to erase your records and come sue us. But they,
you know, they never want all you. You have to
be really tough and aggressive with with these screaming toddlers,
(14:43):
because you can you can control screaming toddlers. You have
to be firm enough. Any every parent knows that that
has had a screaming toddler. If you're tough enough, they'll
stop screaming.
Speaker 4 (14:53):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from kf I
am six forty.
Speaker 2 (14:59):
Yes, the yellow bellied cowards in the US, the administration
has canceled the graduation ceremony, punishing thousands of students who
showed up every day and went to class and didn't
stand out on the lawn and act like spoiled toddlers.
So the spoiled toddlers win. Normal students lose. You know
(15:20):
who all riot next? The rest of the students and
the parents. They ought to start a big riot at
USC for taking away the graduation ceremony, but they wouldn't
because they're normal. They're not mental patients like the toddlers
we saw on TV last night. One more thing, This
is funny, and then I want to get to something
a little more serious. I just I want to do
(15:44):
this now because otherwise I'll forget. I want to play
cut seven. This is well. You know, the Trump trials
going on right, and it's drawing all kinds of characters
in Manhattan, And Newsmax had a reporter there asking a
construction worker in Manhattan about Trump and Joe Biden. So
(16:07):
here's a real New York construction worker giving his opinion.
Speaker 4 (16:11):
What's it like seeing so many Republicans in Manhattan, so
many Trump supporters in Manhattan.
Speaker 1 (16:15):
Is that surprise you? No, not at all. It's turning
out Trump's turn again. What's your message to Joe Biden?
Speaker 2 (16:21):
You it's a little better way you can hear the
whole word. But it was a big f you from
the big Burley construction worker. And you know, in one
line that explains the appeal of Trump to tens of
millions around the country. If you ever run into somebody
who says, I don't understand, it's what he said. It's
(16:45):
a big f you to everything, to the establishment, the
Republican Party, the Democratic Party, the media, the elite universities,
the whole thing. It's Trump is f you. That's the
beginning an end of the message. Now, part of the
(17:06):
insanity I just explained it that these college protests is
that most of those screaming toddlers are ignorant. They don't
know that they're fighting for Hamas and Palestine and Iran,
who are all governed by Sharia law, and would stone
and lash women who violated any of their religious principles,
(17:28):
who would execute just murder any gays and lesbians, and
many of those groups are out protesting against the war.
A lot of ignorance too, about the role of the
Supreme Court. And you heard this a lot when the
Supreme Court issued its ruling on abortion, and they didn't
make abortion illegal, they just said there's no constitutional right
(17:51):
to it, and the states have to decide on their
own because abortion is not in the constitution, it doesn't
exist right, and so that was the decision. But most
people are ignorant of the law and of Supreme Court rulings.
They don't understand it. The same thing is happening now
that the Supreme Court held a hearing on whether we
can start getting the homeless off the street, because the
(18:13):
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals had created a fake right
that the homeless can sleep on in public places, and
to threaten them with any kind of civil or criminal
penalty if they don't move is a violation of the
Eighth Amendment Cruel and unusual punishment, And you can see
a lot of the justices on the Supreme Court said, well,
(18:35):
that's a lot of horsecrap, because there's nothing in the
Eighth Amendment that gave you a permanent right to sleep
in a public place.
Speaker 1 (18:42):
It's not cruel and unusual to say.
Speaker 2 (18:44):
Move along or eventually you're going to suffer some kind
of penalty. People are just ignorant of what the amendments
say in the Constitution and of what's not listed in
the county Constitution. Well, so many people in California, especially
in the media, especially activists and politicians, have invested so
(19:05):
heavily in the rights of the homeless for the last
ten years. They've totally forgotten the law and the Constitution.
And now there's this frightening story in the La Times
by some weasel named Kevin Rector. The headline is the
Supreme Court's homelessness decision could backfire on California. Oh, no, backfire,
(19:26):
And it highlights this whack job progressive Lindsay Horvath, who's
an LA County supervisor. She replaced Sheila Cule on the
West side. She's my supervisor, and she is a progressive
looney to and Rector writes that as the Court heard
(19:46):
arguments this week in a case expected to shape homeless policies.
Lindsay Horvath listened angrily. The Board of Supervisors actually voted
to throw its support behind the case, as did Gavin Newsom.
(20:07):
This is the Grant's pass case, and Grant's passed in.
Newsom and three of the members of the Supervisors said,
you know, we ought to have the right to coerce
people off public spaces by threatening with some kind of penalty. Well,
Horror of Ath is very angry. She voted against that
supervisor's resolution. And here's her reasoning. Saying that the only
(20:29):
way we can get ourselves out of this problem is
by citing people for having a blanket on the ground
or for daring to sleep on a park bench is absurd,
just absurd, And I would also say immoral. All we'll
be doing is pushing people from one place to another,
and we've been doing that for decades. Horror of Ath,
like a lot of these progressives, when they have to
give a public argument, give one that is so misleading.
Speaker 3 (20:53):
So.
Speaker 1 (20:56):
Just just wrong.
Speaker 2 (20:59):
What they do is they minimize what's going on out
in the street, which of course is crazy people who
are screaming and yelling, and they're acting violent. They're under
all kinds of drugs, all kinds of mental illness. They're
stabbing people to death. They're running in the streets or
(21:23):
they're passed out on the sidewalk. They're defecating and urinating
and vomiting all over the place. They're very aggressive. That's
what's going on. Instead, she reduces it to having a
blanket on the ground or gearing to sleep on a
park bench. That's not what people are upset about. And
besides that, the Constitution doesn't give you the right to
sleep on a park bench twenty four hours a day
(21:44):
or lay a blanket on the ground forever.
Speaker 1 (21:47):
You don't have that right. It's a public space. You
have that right in your backyard.
Speaker 2 (21:53):
The risk, according to Horvathis and others, is that the
Supreme Court could enable laws hostile to homeless people across
the American West.
Speaker 1 (22:03):
Hillvisals.
Speaker 2 (22:04):
The other supervisor said if Grant's pass wins, it would
open a can of worms.
Speaker 1 (22:10):
The ruling would be implemented unevenly.
Speaker 2 (22:13):
Some cities who have some cities who have shelter beds
would end up with most of the homeless, while the
ones without shelter beds would not have homeless. And I
don't think any city has to take homeless. Really, I
don't think any city, any county has any state has
(22:35):
the moral right to accept homeless from all the other
counties and cities and states. What should be done is
you build a psychiatric hospital network and a drug treatment network,
and it's mandated that when you find people in the
streets acting insane, they be forced into those treatment centers.
Speaker 1 (22:54):
Period. End of story.
Speaker 2 (22:56):
Michael Schellenberger wrote about this today, and I'm going to
get to his because every once in a while I
run across somebody who thinks exactly like I do. And
everything he wrote about today, we've talked about on the air.
And sometimes you feel like you're talking in a closet
and you're crazy because nobody else seems to see what
you say. Well, Michael Schellenberger sees it. And we have
(23:17):
to just bust through this mentality that we're responsible for
all these homeless people because it's society and these people
have been oppressed. It's like, no, they're not oppressed, they're
mentally ill or they're drug addicted, and there's way way
way more drugs destructive drugs now than there were decades ago,
and that's why we have all the homeless ed We've
put up with it. And I'm going to get into
what Schellenberger wrote about when we come back. And then
(23:38):
after three o'clock we got Steve Garvey coming in the studio.
Steve Garvey is here. He is running as a Republican
for a US Senate and he wants to speak out
about all the pro Hamas, anti Jewish demonstrations going on
at the college campuses and elsewhere.
Speaker 1 (23:54):
So Steve's coming on after three.
Speaker 4 (23:56):
You're listening to John Cobels on demand from KIA.
Speaker 2 (24:00):
Steve Garvey coming in after three o'clock. Steve Garvey, the
Great Dodger, running to be the Great Senator as a
Republican against Adam Schiff, and he wants to talk about
all the all the spoiled toddlers at USC and u
c l A whining and complaining about a war that
they have no effect on, and now USC has canceled
(24:22):
graduation ceremonies. You believe that you believe that that is
that is disgusting, that that's absolutely shameful and disgusting that
they caved into a few hundred lunatics and outside agitators
and jew haters and Hammad.
Speaker 1 (24:36):
How come?
Speaker 2 (24:37):
How come you support terrorists and you create such a
ruckus and the normal people who don't support terrorists, they
lose their graduation ceremony that they worked so many years for.
Speaker 1 (24:46):
How does that happen?
Speaker 3 (24:49):
All Right?
Speaker 2 (24:50):
I want to follow up on what I was talking
about about homelessness because Michael Schellenberger, who we've had on
the show a number of times, and he he's a
great substat column. Actually would pay money for his substack
holm It's about the only one I paid for. And
the name of his column is called public And he
go to piece today, the Dirty Little Secret about homelessness,
(25:12):
and it spun off this Supreme Court case that was
heard this week, and he wrote stuff which I believed
and talked about on the air before I met Michael Schellenberger.
And then after we met and we had a number
of interviews and I read his writings.
Speaker 1 (25:28):
It turns out he's got exactly the.
Speaker 2 (25:30):
Same thoughts and I'm right, and he's right, and it's
just a matter of when the public will is going
to force these idiot politicians and activists to stop their
destructive policies because it's really worth reading. It's called the
dirty Little Secret about homelessness is the key to ending it,
(25:52):
and he says that many homeless advocates claim homelessness exists
because we don't have enough homes and poverty has increased,
but neither is true. Do you know, poverty has steadily
declined since the nineteen eighties, and that's what homeless This
first really popped up. And he writes that very few
people are on the street simply because they can't afford
(26:14):
the rent. The evidence is overwhelming that the majority of
people on the street are there because of untreated mental
illness or addiction, and it leads people to use all
their money to support their drug habit and get high
rather than work. There you go, that's it, that's it.
Most of the people are drug addicts. The rest are
(26:35):
mental patients, he writes. The people who can't afford the
rent but are able to work, and who are not
in the grip of addiction or untreated mental illness.
Speaker 1 (26:47):
You know what they do. We said this hundred times.
Speaker 2 (26:50):
People who can't afford the rent find a cheaper place
to live, or move somewhere cheaper, or live with family
and friends. Yes, that's what a rational person does, even
if their rent is raised. Getting your rent raised is
not a deadly disease. It means you can't afford the rent,
so you move somewhere cheaper, or move in with someone,
(27:14):
or move.
Speaker 1 (27:14):
To another town. Now, he says, it's true there aren't enough.
Speaker 2 (27:18):
Shelter beds and case workers and group homes in psychiatric hospitals.
But that's because for forty years, the homeless activists and
the politicians demanded that the funding is to give people
private studio apartments rather than shelter beds. They call it
housing first, and its record is awful. And it's true
(27:41):
because very few actually stay in the housing, and many
of them die quickly anyway, because they're still addicted, they
still have untreated mental illness. Not having a house is
not the cause of their drug addiction and mental illness,
he writes, it's the symptom. And studies have found that
(28:04):
cities that give basic shelter over expensive housing reduced the
deaths by threefold. Yes, in La, homeless die at a
rate three times higher than New York. Because when you
live inside, it protects you from murder, drug overdose, and
car accidents. That's why we have more pedestrians dying in
LA That's why we don't need roague diets because the
(28:25):
increase of pedestrian deaths are drug addicted, mentally a homeless
people stumbling into traffic in the dark.
Speaker 1 (28:32):
Well, this is all connected.
Speaker 2 (28:33):
All the weird changes in the last ten years are
all interwoven. But of course the homeless advocates have exposed
expanding psychiatric hospitals and mandatory care. They think it's bad
to mandate hospitalization for psychotic people, but it's not. One
hundred and twelve thousand Americans died from drug overdose last
(28:54):
year because we didn't mandate treatment, and these these homeless
advocates would rather people die on the street than be
forced into treatment. The number of drug deaths Schollenberger Rights
quintupled in twenty twenty two to one hundred and twelve
thousand last year. How about that? What that's fentanyl and
(29:16):
that's more people dying per year than died in Hiroshima,
He writes, how about that? And the ideology behind this
is that people suffering from addiction and mental illness are
victims of society or the system. We're just fundamentally evil.
So we have to give the victims of the evil
whatever they want, including the right to camp anywhere and
use hard drugs, even if it results in their death.
(29:41):
That's it, That's all you need to know. You force
them into treatment for either their drug addiction or mental illness.
You build them a cheap shelter, and you will have
less people homeless, less people dying in the streets. You
don't have to give them a hundred. You don't have
to give him a one billion dollar apartment, which is
(30:02):
what they're doing in Santa Monica. Now, you know, years ago,
you didn't have fentanel, you didn't have the supercharged version
of meth. The drugs and there's all kinds of boutique,
weird drugs out there, and that's why you see things
in recent years you never saw before in your life.
And so you have to mandate that they get off
the drugs, or yeah, you put them in jail. I
(30:24):
mean going back to repealing Prop forty seven. All right,
Steve Garvey waiting in the wings. He's coming in next
he's going to be running. He is running for a
senator against Adam Schiff, and he wants to talk about
all the pro terrorism, pro hamas nonsense going on on
the campus is Hey, you've been listening to The John
Cobalt Show podcast. You can always hear the show live
(30:45):
on KFI AM six forty from one to four pm
every Monday through Friday, and of course, anytime on demand
on the iHeartRadio app.
The John Kobylt Show News
Popular Podcasts
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations.
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Nikki Glaser Podcast
Every week comedian and infamous roaster Nikki Glaser provides a fun, fast-paced, and brutally honest look into current pop-culture and her own personal life.