January 6th Pipe Bomb Suspect A Capitol Police Officer Turned CIA? Explosive New Details

Tonight on Investigate Earth Podcast, we break down a major development that could finally crack one of the biggest unsolved mysteries tied to January 6th. According to new reporting from The Blaze, federal sources may have identified the person behind the pipe bombs planted outside the RNC and DNC headquarters on the eve of the Capitol riot. For years, the so-called “January 6th pipe bomber” has remained a ghost, a figure caught on surveillance cameras but never brought to justice. What The Blaze uncovered may expose what really happenex that day. Was this an inside job? Was the pipe bomber meant to be a distraction or a catalyst? Join Chad and Sheri as they break down the evidence and the political implications. Subscribe and follow to stay ahead of the censorship.

Our Merchandise Store

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:13):
Maybe it's a new beginning. Then maybe it's a start. No,
it comes up to.

Speaker 2 (00:27):
This times for you.

Speaker 3 (00:28):
Briton, Hello and welcome to Investigators Podcast. I'm your host
chat alongside my beautiful wife Sherry. On tonight's episode, we're
getting into the biggest mystery from the January sixth, quote
unquote insurrection, which is the pipe bomber. And for years,
the FBI has said they have poured tons of resources
into finding out who planted those explosives near the RNC

(00:49):
and d NC headquarters the night before the Capitol riot,
And after nearly four years of silence, new reports are
claiming that the person responsible may have finally been identified.

Speaker 4 (00:59):
The pipe bomber has been one of the most elusive.

Speaker 3 (01:01):
Figures connected to that day, a ghost called on surveillance
cameras calmly walking through DC with a backpack with explosives,
planting them right under the noses of federal security.

Speaker 4 (01:11):
At least that's what they say.

Speaker 3 (01:13):
The FBI called this viable devices designed to kill and distract.
But the bigger question has always been who was behind
it and why did it happen the night before everything
unfolded at the Capitol. Guys, that's what we're going to
talk about on tonight's show. It is November the ninth,
and the name of this song is the Chase, which
is a great song. We've actually played this quite a

(01:34):
few times on the show, and so, yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:37):
This is not really surprising.

Speaker 3 (01:38):
There are new reports coming out that they think they
know who the January sixth pipe bomber is, and it
may surprise you that it is technically someone that is
in the CIA. Now, isn't that crazy, and was also
a Capitol Police officer during the time of the January
sixth riots or insurrection, however you want to call the thing.

(01:58):
And so not only has the FBI over the years
said that they have poured so much resources into trying
to figure out who the pipe bomber was, they didn't
necessarily have all of the surveillance footage they needed from
where the person came from.

Speaker 4 (02:15):
There were phone.

Speaker 3 (02:15):
Wreckers that they say they had lost, you know, kind
of like the moon landing technology.

Speaker 4 (02:21):
Somehow they also lost that.

Speaker 3 (02:23):
But this all seems like it was one big conspiracy
within the government to make Republicans look like a bunch
of terrorists. And although yes, there were absolutely violent people
that was at the Capitol Building that day on January sixth.
The problem is we don't necessarily know how many of
those people were just straight up you know, protesters, writers insurrectionists,

(02:46):
or how many of those were actually federal employees or
even law enforcement. And so this has been used since
twenty twenty one against the Republicans. They desperately tried to
use it against Trump, and I think more so they
wanted to kind of just put it on every that
was a conservative and Republican that we were terrorists and
that no one should vote for anybody that has anything
to do with Donald Trump. And then, of course, now

(03:08):
there is a new report that comes out that says
that they think they have found the person of interest,
the person that is in the videos, and they think
they know how this person did it, why they did it,
and the progression of their career afterwards. Right, so they were,
as we said, a Capitol police officer. They now apparently
work in the CIA or for the CIA in Langley,

(03:31):
Virginia or somewhere near there. And so all of this
kind of starts to add up. Now, this person, if
you look at this person on the picture, you know,
it kind of reminds you of something that you might
see from the DEI kind of phase right exactly.

Speaker 5 (03:47):
And it's just so weird to me that this whole
thing is coming out now. But what's even stranger is
the FBI are not the ones coming out with this information.
It's other people coming out with the information. Why is
the FBI holding back and why are they covering this up?

Speaker 3 (04:03):
Yeah, it seems like for sure that Cash, Mattel, Dan Bongino,
any of them, they likely would have known who this
person was, especially considering that it was a journalist that
actually came out with this information over the past couple
of days. And this said journalist was also arrested after
January sixth because of the fact that he was there

(04:24):
reporting what was actually going on.

Speaker 4 (04:26):
He was showing what was going on.

Speaker 3 (04:28):
He was then later arrested for his I guess involvement
in January sixth, And this guy had been out there
everywhere talking about can you believe that they were arresting me,
a journalist that was just covering what happened outside the
capitol that day. Not only was it him that was arrested,
but there were many others that were arrested after that.
I know, well, when Schroyer from Info Wars Enrico Tario.

(04:49):
They charged him with conspiracy, although he was pardoned.

Speaker 4 (04:52):
Obviously have Jake.

Speaker 3 (04:53):
Chansley who've had him on the podcast, although I'm not
exactly sure what's going on with Jake Chansley over the
past six months.

Speaker 4 (04:58):
Yeah, there's something very strange.

Speaker 3 (05:01):
He he kind of went off the deep end a
little bit and like a lot of what he's saying
is not making any sense.

Speaker 5 (05:06):
Yeah, but it makes complete sense in his mind. It does, Yeah,
because he's actually going out and trying to sue the
government for this and.

Speaker 3 (05:13):
That he's saying that he's the real president and he
even I mean, you know, we message back and forth
a decent amount and like some of the messages that
Jake Chansley aka.

Speaker 4 (05:22):
The QAnon Shaman for those that do not know who
Jake is.

Speaker 3 (05:25):
There were a lot of things that he would say
to me that he would be like, look, man, they
got mk Ultra on me, Like, you don't understand they've
had this on me before January sixth, and it was
just like a lot of the stories and a lot
of the things he says, it sounds so out there,
you know, because he didn't used to talk like this,
like when we had him on the podcast, he would
come on our live streams.

Speaker 6 (05:46):
You know.

Speaker 3 (05:46):
Yeah, he was a little out there as far as
some of his beliefs and you know, he was a
sham and he believes in that kind of whole thing.
But it's just weird how he completely changed. And I'm
not saying it necessarily for bad. I don't know what's
going on with him.

Speaker 5 (06:00):
Well, it's interesting because we were going to have him on
a podcast because he reached out to us. He's like, listen,
I want you guys to release this information that I
have to share. He's like, it's dire, We've got to
get it done. But it was so hard to get
in touch with him because he was constantly deactivating all
his social media and that was the only way that

(06:21):
we could even connect with him was through social media.
But during that time, I did dive into the rabbit
holes of Jake Chansley and you know, just going through
and reading his posts and reading what people were saying,
and it was really like, some of this stuff was
out landish, But you can't ever say that every show
just because it's outlandish, it's not true.

Speaker 4 (06:42):
Yeah, you're exactly right.

Speaker 3 (06:44):
I have learned over the past year that you know,
just because something sounds so crazy doesn't mean that it is.
And we've talked about so many subjects on this show,
and you know, it's especially over the past couple of months.
You know, there's been a lot of shows we've done
that it seems to have pissed off quite a few people.
And you know, the one thing I will say to

(07:05):
you guys listening, guys and girls out there listening to us,
and especially the ones that have been there for a while,
you know, if first of all, thank you for staying
with us and following us. Although I know that none
of us completely always agree with the same thing. I
think that our mission, as much as so many of
your missions out there, is to find the truth, and

(07:25):
that is really mostly what we want. That is all
we want, and sometimes we look at things differently.

Speaker 4 (07:31):
Some people are deeper than others.

Speaker 3 (07:33):
Holy right now, there is this mega faction that's going
out against Tucker Carlson, the canas So and is basically
anybody that stepping on line. And we've kind of felt
that a little bit over the past month or so.
It just seems like there's kind of been this shift
and with some of our audience just because we have
either talked about Israel too much, or we criticize Trump
in any way or or you know. And then there's

(07:54):
also people that say that we're not criticizing Trump enough,
and so it's just like we're always kind.

Speaker 4 (07:59):
Of on this battle.

Speaker 3 (08:00):
But the one thing that we can promise you guys,
just from us is that we're never going to try
to tell you something that we don't believe to be true.

Speaker 4 (08:08):
That is our entire goal, and we're trying to do.

Speaker 3 (08:10):
Our very best to figure out all this stuff and listen,
it is not easy. It is not easy having to
read through a million articles, watch a million videos, listen
to how people talk about this, or go back to
even the way they used to be for example, like
what did they used to talk about. Let's go back
on the wayback machine and look at five years ago
and see what they were saying. And that's what you
almost have to do now because it's hard to trust anybody.

(08:32):
It's hard to trust any information. It's hard to trust
news sources, and there are select few that we can trust.
And just like this episode today that we're going to
talk about Glenn Beck, which is one of the ones
that basically broke this story by the Blaze with Steve Baker,
Steve Baker being the journalist.

Speaker 4 (08:49):
You know, this is something.

Speaker 3 (08:50):
That I believe that, you know, this is the only
evidence we've got so far with the FBI hasn't come
out with any information Cash matel Dan Bongino, nor did
the other FBI come out with any information. There's a
lot of people now saying that they believe Cash Matell
and Dan Bongenio are covenors covering this up, and they're
trying to make it, you know, like, no, this Steve
Baker guy doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.

(09:12):
This has nothing to do with anything. So I do
want to go ahead and get into that. So the
article from Blaze Media says former Capitol Police officer a
forensic match for January six pipe bomber. Sources say, and
so a computer program that compared the bomb suspects gate
to that of Shannie Kirkhoff produced a ninety four percent match. Now,

(09:32):
a forensic analysis of a female former US Capitol Police
officers Gate is a ninety four to ninety eight percent
match to the unique stride of the long sought January
sixth pipe bombs suspect, according to a Blaze News investigation
confirmed by several intelligent sources. A source close to a
congressional investigation of January sixth additionally told Blaze News evan

(09:53):
has had emerged recently that pointed towards law enforcement possibly
being involved in planting of the pipe bombs. And here
is the actual quote they were effing in on it.

Speaker 4 (10:04):
It was the quote.

Speaker 3 (10:04):
A software algorithm that analyzes walking parameters including flexion which
is kneeband hip extension, speed, step length, cadence, and variants
rated Shannie Ray Kirkhoff thirty one of Alexandria, Virginia as
a ninety four percent match to the bomb suspect shown
on video from January fifth, twenty twenty one. So what

(10:25):
I do want to go ahead and get into is
the video. This is on Blaze. This is with Glenn
Beck and Steve the journalist, the guy that actually went
to prison for a while over his reporting. I guess
you can say of January sixth, So let's go ahead
and get into that video right now.

Speaker 7 (10:41):
There is a breaking news story that hopefully is coming
out tomorrow. You'll understand once you once you hear the
story This is one of the biggest stories. I think
it is the biggest scandal of my lifetime, maybe in
the last one hundred years. It is monstrous what Steve

(11:05):
Baker has is going to report on and and we're
going to give you some a little bit of background.
I can tell you this. There is a major development
in the January sixth pipe bomber investigation. Blaze News has
the exclusive because it is Steve's reporting that has brought

(11:26):
this to the attention, and unfortunately it leads its lead
suspect is at the highest levels of government. It is
a massive, massive scandal, and Steve joins me.

Speaker 4 (11:44):
Now, Hello, Steve, Hey.

Speaker 8 (11:46):
Glenn, good morning.

Speaker 7 (11:48):
So the reason why we're not breaking it today is because, well, first,
how long have you been working on this story.

Speaker 8 (11:59):
I've been pulled, pulling the threads on this for exactly
four years, but I finally pulled the correct thread exactly
weeks ago today.

Speaker 7 (12:13):
I have to tell you, if anybody ever wondered why
they made such a big deal out of arresting Steve,
this is why. Because you were pulling at these threads
the whole time, and you were relentless on this, and Steve,
when you you were working on another story, right, and

(12:36):
like just dots started to appear and you were like,
how did this come to you?

Speaker 4 (12:41):
Well, the.

Speaker 8 (12:44):
Genesis of this, let's be honest, goes back to much
of my work into examining the various players at Capitol Police.
Capitol Police seemed to have a much, much oversized participation
in how January sixth developed. And when I say that,

(13:05):
I'm not talking about the frontline officers. You know, many
of those frontline officers have become some of our most
trusted sources. And by the way, they love the Blaze,
they love our coverage. I last, just just this past
January sixth, I was there covering the certification of the election.

(13:25):
Think about the irony of that. And I was there.

Speaker 2 (13:29):
In the Capitol.

Speaker 8 (13:30):
I had three different officers, two plane clothes and one
uniform officer stopped me in the hallways of the Capitol
building to whisper to me and say, we love your work.

Speaker 7 (13:41):
I have to tell you the I mean because you're
rooting out the bad guys. You know, all of the
officers are not bad. There's a few. And your story
that came out what I think yesterday about the tear
gas and the devices that were shot into the faces
and heads of the protesters. Those guys who did this,

(14:03):
who they knew exactly what they were doing, and they're
on tape. That helps the average officer because you can
now go it was them.

Speaker 4 (14:13):
That's right.

Speaker 8 (14:14):
Look, Glenn, we have examined this, this particular story that
we released yesterday. We've been looking at this for years.
We've done updates, but finally Johannaman and myself what we
did is we started drilling down into identifying who these
officers were once we knew that they were taking deliberately,

(14:38):
criminally negligent shots. These are training officers, training officers in
use of less than lethal munitions, weapons, launchers, whatever they
want to call them. And what we discovered by going
straight to the manufacturers, by going straight to the certified,
the people that certify the training officers, who the training

(15:00):
officers is that they are told instructed. It's printed on
the sides of those weapons. You cannot aim them at
people's heads faces, next, they're growins their kidneys. They can
be deadly if you do so. And at the range

(15:21):
that these training officers were firing these weapons in the
first ten minutes of the riot, these were deliberate shots.
And one of our closest sources, a special operations guy
from the Army retired, very familiar with these devices, said
that if they are training officers, they have uttered these

(15:45):
words to their classes before. Oh, by the way, if
you want to start a riot, shoot them in the head. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (15:52):
And I want to talk about something real quick before
he goes on, because he's going to get into how
they found. The actual police officer that led you at
this time was the pipe bomber. Well, what I think
actually happened this day on January sixth, is that not
only was the government completely taken over. If you want
to talk about insurrection, I don't think it was an

(16:12):
insurrection by Donald Trump. I don't think it was an
insurrection by Republicans or the rioters, protesters, whatever you want
to call them. There was an insurrection that day and
someone took over every single department, and especially the Capitol
police because Srey.

Speaker 4 (16:28):
You remember we did a podcast left.

Speaker 5 (16:30):
Down the interview, Yeah, several of them about steven Son,
the police chief at the Capitol, and he was basically
clueless and they wouldn't tell him anything.

Speaker 3 (16:39):
No, And we actually have a clip of him that
we're going to play in just a minute. When he
was talking to Tucker Carlson about what actually went on
that day from his perspective, And keep in mind, he
was supposed to be the guy that was over everything
during this day and they left him out to dry.

Speaker 5 (16:54):
But it was interesting when this guy was just talking
about how the first ten minutes they just fired the
bullets at people. Do you remember I think the guy's
name was Tommy Boy that he also went to prison
over this, over the insurrection.

Speaker 4 (17:09):
We had him on the show.

Speaker 5 (17:10):
Yeah, we had him on the show. We came and
interviewed him. But it was interesting because he got shot
several times with those rubber bullets in the first ten
minutes when he wasn't even doing anything.

Speaker 3 (17:20):
Yeah, and he was actually on the ground because he
had some medical experience. So as you guys know, like
if you look at Antiva BLM, any of the riots,
there's always these medical personnality I guess you could say
or medics.

Speaker 4 (17:32):
They'll call them like protest medics, riot medics. But there are.

Speaker 3 (17:34):
People that show up to places like this that do
have medical training or medical background. And this was him,
you know, he had actually tended to some of these
people that were shot in the face, right, And these
rubber bullets were literally coming through some people's cheeks. So,
if you're shooting the people in the face at close
range with these less than lethal or non lethal devices,

(17:55):
especially to rubber bullets, if you're hitting them close enough,
it was going through some people's cheeks, through their necks,
into some of their arms, into their legs. And we're
talking about actual penetration. Now, a lot of these bullets
can't necessarily penetrate all the way through. It depends on
how close you actually fire them, because you could actually
fire some a rubber bullet at someone fifteen feet away

(18:16):
and it could potentially penetrate to a vital organ that
would kill you. And so this was happening to these
protesters to where it started to infuriate these people to
the point where they were getting shot point blank in
the face from thirty yards away. And so we had
a first hand account of this. But what I'm saying
is I feel like January sixth, it wasn't insurrection, but

(18:37):
the Democrats or the deep state at that time, had
taken over the Capitol police. They had taken over the
National Guard because they were not going to allow the
National Guard into Washington DC. They already kind of had
that planned even I think it was three days prior
to January sixth, when the National Guard was supposed to
be training on crowd control tactics and all this stuff.

(18:58):
They actually took away control devices from the National Guard
and they refused to train on this particular type of
a riot or protest. So it was like planned in advance,
and the FBI, keeping in mind to Sherry, you remember
like three or four days prior to January sixth, the
FBI knew every single person that was in Washington, d C. Yes,

(19:18):
if they were coming from another state or whatever, they
had your phone. They were geo tracing everybody that came
in and out of Washington, DC, and especially people that
were in groups or that were gathering around, and that likely,
in my opinion, I think that they were screening people's
text messages, phone calls, emails, all of this, and then
they were basically just putting all these people in groups,

(19:39):
so they knew every person that was there to do
or to go to the protest, to go to the
speech that Donald Trump gave, and then obviously then go
to the Capitol Building.

Speaker 5 (19:49):
But if you remember, Donald Trump called Nancy Pelosi and said, listen,
we're going to have to have backup on January sixth,
I'm afraid things are going to go bad and we
have to have people out there. Capitol police alone are
not going to be able to handle the crowd. And
now that we go back in time, we know it
wasn't just the crowd. There was a lot of people

(20:10):
that were bad actors that were.

Speaker 4 (20:12):
In law enforcement.

Speaker 5 (20:13):
Yeah, that were in law enforcement standing in as Republicans,
And these were the people that also started the chaos.
But if you remember Tommy Boy's interview, he said the
chaos really started when they started shooting the bullets at
the crowd.

Speaker 4 (20:31):
Yeah, for sure, it did.

Speaker 3 (20:32):
I mean, and that is when all the violence really
did start because it was pissing people off, it was
exciting people. And as Steve right here says, he's like,
you know, if you want to start a riot, this
is how you do it. You would just start shooting
people with non lethal piss them off enough to where
they want to fight back.

Speaker 4 (20:47):
And that's exactly what they did.

Speaker 3 (20:49):
Now with what Sherry said too, you know, when Trump
was trying to get Nancy Pelosi and the government to
make sure that National Guard was there, and especially in
the days leading into January sixth, and I think that
the Democrats had already kind of been planning this.

Speaker 4 (21:04):
I think they were setting up everything perfectly.

Speaker 3 (21:06):
And then especially when Trump and maybe some of Trump's
allies went out and reached out and said, look, this
is what I think we're going to need for crowd
control or whatever. I think they saw that as a
golden ticket, a golden opportunity to say, Hey, however, we
got to do this, guys.

Speaker 4 (21:19):
We have to take over Capitol Police. We got to
do this.

Speaker 3 (21:21):
We got to make sure National Guard isn't there, and
we have to entice this riot to the point where
we literally opened doors for people, we let them in
the Capitol building, and we claim it as an insurrection.

Speaker 4 (21:31):
And that's exactly what they did.

Speaker 3 (21:32):
But I think they took over government completely that day,
to the point where even as we were talking about
Chief stephen Son with the Capitol Police had no idea
he was locked out of his official duties to be
able to actually coordinate anything. And this is the guy
that is supposed to be the number one guy you
would go to in an event like this, and this
is also the guy that should be recommending the National Guard,

(21:55):
as he did that day, and they refused, and he
was even trying to call everybody up the chain. Yeah,
everybody was basically ignoring him and saying, stay in your
freaking lane, dude. Yeah, and he's like, no, I'm the
Capitol police chief and they were like, well, we don't
really give a shit what you are. And so it
was like in his mind in that moment, I think
it was like a reality check. He was like, oh shit,

(22:17):
I think I know what's happening, which is exactly why
he went on Tucker Cross and told his story, which
we're going to play a clip of that in just
a moment, because this kind of explains, you know, this
very well could be one of the biggest cover ups
in the United States government history, especially considering how that
the Democrats tried and did he use that against Republicans
Trump and conservatives and just just a conservative movement in general.

Speaker 5 (22:40):
Yeah, it just ticks me off that they still to
this day, when was that twenty twenty one, they still
use a January sixth insurrection as their talking points.

Speaker 7 (22:51):
Okay, so you were working on that story and I
don't want to get into what you found. But it's
in that story that people will see why I encouraged
them to read this story, because that story is connected
to the next one. So when you started to find
the individual, you you were, you were buttoned up, you

(23:15):
had video and everything else.

Speaker 4 (23:17):
And then you you brought it to the government.

Speaker 8 (23:21):
Yeah, for the for our next story, uh, the follow
up to this one. I did put some breadcrumbs in
this story on purpose. Uh. But what we discovered was
a character that high degree of probability is involved in
the biggest scandal, as you mentioned earlier, not just of

(23:45):
January sixth, but possibly our governments.

Speaker 4 (23:50):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (23:50):
Yeah, and and it's uh and it's at the highest levels.

Speaker 4 (23:56):
And you are going to name names. Uh and uh,
I don't even know what I can ask you.

Speaker 8 (24:08):
What is? Let me let me let me just tell
you this. When I stumbled on what I stumbled on,
And because as I said, I've been pulling these threads
for years, and I pulled one last Wednesday, a week
two weeks ago today. Rather and when I pulled this thread,
I was so shocked by what I saw. I immediately took

(24:30):
it to a source in one of the most important,
highest level investigative federal agencies in the country. I immediately
took it to our sources there and I said.

Speaker 4 (24:42):
You have to see this.

Speaker 8 (24:44):
After they looked at it for about two hours, the
response that I got back was Holy f And then
the follow up response was he's one of us.

Speaker 7 (25:06):
And when you find out the position, I mean, this
is going to lead. It's not just this one person.
This now will implicate so many people at the highest
levels that had to have known because of what happened
after January sixth. I mean, it's it's I mean, how

(25:29):
big does this net get?

Speaker 8 (25:32):
I don't know, but you know I will tell you.
There's a reason why. Look, there's a five hundred thousand
dollars reward on that, and there's a reason why I
didn't take it to the people offering for the agency
or the bureau offering the reward. It's because we believe
that they were actively engaged in the cover up. There's
no look, Glenn, Glenn, I don't have as a investigative

(25:57):
journalist for the Blaze, I have no subpoena power. I
don't have the ability to do what a an eleven
billion dollar a year Bureau of Investigation has. I don't
have the resources, I don't have the time, and yet

(26:17):
I discovered this and they didn't after five years of investigation.

Speaker 4 (26:22):
I don't believe that. I aren't either.

Speaker 7 (26:25):
I know who you brought it to and the right
move exactly the right move on that one. So today
there's another briefing because this apparently just has to be
done right because of national security. I'm gathering, is that right?

Speaker 8 (26:43):
Correct?

Speaker 7 (26:44):
That's kind of what's happening now, and so they've got
to take care of things they've got to take care of.
And when that's taken care of, then the story will
be released. And I think it's going to be shocking
interested to see how the left, how the Democrats, how

(27:04):
the mainstream media dismissed this one, because again it is
if it's true, how.

Speaker 4 (27:12):
How confident? What's your confidence level in this story? I
can give you.

Speaker 8 (27:18):
Forensic estimates. I will tell you that from Gate analysis,
that's the analysis of the hoodied bomber on the evening
of November fifth, compared to the Gate analysis of this
individual in private life and at work, that the actual

(27:39):
software hit at a ninety four percent accuracy. Then human
analysis from the experts in intelligence is much higher. They
looked at it and went, my god, that's it. You've
got it, and put things in motion as a result
of that. And uh, you know, you can tell I'm

(28:07):
dancing around a lot right now.

Speaker 4 (28:09):
I know, I know, I know, I know, I know. Well,
we'll holpefully talk to you about to say this.

Speaker 8 (28:14):
Yeah, I'll just say I'll say this, Glenn. Kind of
in closing here is that it's a high, high degree
of certaintude coming from some of the top people in
our intelligence community, okay, and they have already started making
moves related to that. There's also a political aspect to

(28:36):
this too, because as you know, there's some interagency uh
you know, uh things going on.

Speaker 4 (28:44):
Has the president been brief yet? Do you know?

Speaker 8 (28:48):
I can tell you that my meeting with a pop
presidential advisor on Monday is that they're taking this to
the president's chief of staff to arrange a briefing there
as well.

Speaker 7 (29:04):
Well, it's gonna be a lot of activity in Washington
today and hopefully we'll be able to make that announcement
and release this news. This is I mean, this is
all the president's men. This is as big as anything
there in a world not gone mad. This would be

(29:25):
a best selling book and a major blockbuster movie because
it's it's going to be when when this is all,
when it all comes out.

Speaker 4 (29:36):
This is going to involve everybody. I mean, this is
really bad, really really bad. Yeah.

Speaker 3 (29:43):
So there is the report by Glenn Beck and Steve
Baker USA over on X if you guys want to
follow at Steve Baker USA, that is actually the journalist
that has been working on this pretty much non stop.
And you can't really blame him considering that he went
to jail over this just for cover the January sixth insurrection,

(30:03):
you know.

Speaker 4 (30:03):
And the other thing was is.

Speaker 3 (30:05):
There was a five hundred thousand dollars reward for anyone
that had information on who this pipe bomber could be.
And as Steve Baker says, I obviously did not bring
it to them because he might not be alive today,
or he could still be in prison or something. Something
would have happened if he would have brought information to

(30:27):
whoever it was, which I guess at the time was
the FBI and other I guess you can say intelligence
operations within the United States of America, Like who were
they being operated by the problem with this whole scenario
in my mind, and there's a lot of people right
now because of Epstein, because of the way cash Matel
and Pam Bondi has handled everything up to now, there's

(30:48):
a lot of people that think that they're maybe going
to cover this up as well, and.

Speaker 4 (30:52):
We don't know. I mean what it sounds like.

Speaker 3 (30:54):
It sounds like they're not I mean, to me, it
sounds like Steve Baker is actively engaging with Trump's you know,
close confidence, and they're kind of working it up the chain.
And especially if you have someone now that is in CIA,
which we're gonna read.

Speaker 5 (31:08):
It, doesn't it sound bad that is coming from an outsider,
a journalist that has come up with this information and
found out who the pipe bomber is, the person that
planted the bomb is coming from a journalist and not
the FBI. I mean, do you not think that sounds
a little crazy?

Speaker 4 (31:25):
Well, you're exactly right, and you know it is.

Speaker 3 (31:28):
The weird thing is like the I think it was
like two or three episodes ago when we talked about
the Charlie Kirk assassination, for example, and we talked about
all these high level FBI guys that were involved in
Operation Arctic Frost, which was essentially the FBI and the
intelligence agencies that were spying on Trump and many others

(31:50):
in the lead up to, I believe, the twenty twenty election.
So they were be inspired on there was this massive
intelligence operation to try to basically dig up dirt and
put it on Trump and blame Russia for the stolen election,
or even just Trump or any of his allies saying
that the election in twenty twenty was stolen. It was
an intelligence operation that was trying to tell you that

(32:11):
that didn't happen. And even furthermore, I think not only
did they use intelligence, they also use legal warfare. When
you're talking about people like Mike Lindell that got sued
for billionaire or multi millions, and he's still fighting for
his life right now. There's been so many others that
are that have been sued. Fox News themselves were sued
for seven hundred plus million dollars. They made Fox News

(32:32):
fire Tucker Carlson, and then of course now you see
everybody's against Tucker Carlson because he just had Nick Fuintes on,
which literally Tucker kind of, you know, I guess, talked
back to Nickquintez and kind of called him on some
of the stuff that he said in the past, but
it doesn't matter because Tucker is such a big name,
they cannot have him be incredible anymore, especially now that

(32:53):
he's not controlled by mainstream media. And I think the
more that we start to understand and really like who
really controls everything, they control everything, and I believe they
still control this administration. I believe they still control Cash,
Mattel and Dan Bongino and Trump and all of his allies,

(33:14):
Pam BONDI. There are some in the Trump circle, you know.
For example, I think Tulci Gabbert's trying to do certain things,
but I have a feeling that she probably won't last
very long as d and I Director of National Intelligence.
Anybody that kind of pushes back and I'm not even
saying pushes back against Trump, okay, and I'm not even

(33:35):
being critical necessarily when I even say this, I'm saying
that anybody that pushes back against the big cabal of
the deep state, which still exists in our government. They
still run everything in our government, and anyone that pushes
back on what that deep state wants that current administration
to do, they are going to be ousted, and they
will use certain people around Trump to make sure it

(33:57):
gets in his ear and make sure that you know.
And by the way, I think ever since probably George W. Bush,
we had done an episode on this when the White
House daily briefing was basically taken over by the CIA,
and that was not the behest of George Bush Senior,
as he was the FBI director at that time. That

(34:18):
was when really the daily briefing to the President of
the United States was taken over by intelligence rather than
actual his close confidants. So you may think that Trump's
in the OV Office and he's getting all these briefings
from like Steven Miller and Cash Mattel and Pam Bondi
his appointees. But actually the most critical pieces of information
that Trump gets is from the CIA, from the massive

(34:41):
intelligence And these are people that are working within the
intelligence organizations or agencies. I guess I can say these
are the people that are controlling what Trump knows, doesn't know, believes,
or doesn't believe. Because you know, Trump's a patriot, he
wants to do the best for America, according to the
Trump administration. And so who is the best people you

(35:02):
can go to for information, Well, it's your intelligence that
is literally how countries win wars. That is how countries
take over other countries. That is how countries calls or
create insurrections in other countries. This has been done for years,
but yeah, it wasn't. I think the CI really had
no involvement in the presidential Daily brief and until Bush

(35:23):
came in and made that a thing. So I want
to go a little bit more so. This was a
veteran analyst who ran the analysis for Blaze News and
Steve and they said, based on the visual observations that
the program can struggle with. He personally pegged the match
at closer to ninety eight percent. Kirkhoff, who was a

(35:43):
Capitol Police officer for four and a half years, left
the department in mid twenty twenty one for a security
detail at Central Intelligence Agency, sources told Blaze News. CIA
spokeswoman Liz Lyons stated that the subject worked in campus security.
Kirkof's resident in Alexandria, Virginia, appear to be under the
watch of law enforcement officers. On Friday night, Blaiz's news

(36:06):
editor in chief, Christopher Bedford, was pulled over by local
police after thopping to observe the home.

Speaker 4 (36:12):
He was then allowed to leave.

Speaker 3 (36:14):
So now they are watching this girl's house like they
have shit all over anywhere in that area. They're watching
anybody that comes near her house. They got to protect
her right now, they feel like because she is an
intelligence asset, and no matter how you look at this,
you know they're trying to pass it off like, well,
now you've got to leave the Capitol Police that you
worked at for four years. We're going to give you
a job at CI headquarters as a security person. Essentially,

(36:38):
although probably they just wanted to get her the hell
out of the Capital.

Speaker 4 (36:42):
Well, her cover has been blown.

Speaker 3 (36:43):
Yeah, exactly, but that happened in twenty twenty one. I
think that they likely knew that eventually this would happen.
Eventually they're going to figure out who it is, and
if they do, then we got to protect her. And
I get almost guarantee you that wherever she actually lives
is not where she's really living. But the FBI, which
failed to solve the case in nearly five years of investigating,

(37:04):
but indicated that it was closing in after Blaze News
brought its investigation to intelligence sources and was feet from
falls church address of the pipe bomb suspect days after
January sixth, and former FBI special agent Kyle Serafin realized
Friday that he was doing surveillance next door to the
woman now suspected of being the January sixth pipe bomber.
The FBI put us a one door away from the

(37:26):
pipe bomber within days of January sixth, and we were
deliberately pulled away for no logical investigative reasons, Sarafin told
Blaze News Friday. And everything about that tells me that
they were involved in a cover up and have been
since day one. And Kyle Serafin actually went on Alex
Jones today and he said pretty much exactly the same thing.
We were actually put into a house initially right next

(37:49):
to where this girl lives, and then we were pulled
away from it immediately, probably about a day later. So
obviously once the deep stay or the higher ups knew that,
oh shit, that we got people at the pipe bomber's house,
we got to pulled them out. And that's what they did.
That's what Saraphin said. They were fing in on it.
And Sarafin proposed doing a knock and talk at the
door of an Air Force civilian employee whose address was

(38:09):
tied to a vehicle that picked up the bomb suspect
in Falls Church, Virginia on January fifth, twenty twenty one. Now,
Saraphin's team spent two days watching the man, but Saraphin's
request to go face to face with the person of
interest was denied. The team was pulled off of the
case the same night, he said. Saraphin said he had
given the same details publicly since twenty twenty one, and

(38:30):
he says there's a personal reaction to it, which is
the complete vindication that things I've been saying and my
recollection of being briefed on this stuff has been accurate
for years and I've never changed my tune. Now, the
FBI tied a DC Metrorail Smart trip card allegedly used
by the pipe bomb suspect to the Air Force civilian employee,

(38:50):
but determined that while the man purchased a card, he
did not use it. Now, the suspect allegedly used the
card to travel from DC to a stop in Falls
Church after planting the pipe bombs. The Air Force civilian
employee had purchased the smart trip card a year earlier.
So are we thinking maybe that this thing had been
planned for a year prior potentially, Well.

Speaker 5 (39:10):
It just sounds fishy to me because they're talking about
a man that they were investigating, but it was actually
a woman. So that tells me there's a red flag
somewhere right here.

Speaker 4 (39:20):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (39:21):
So the forensic study arranged by Blaze News revealed that
Kirkhoff is up to a ninety eight percent match to
a gate of the pipe bomb suspect. The findings were
confirmed by several current intelligence sources who viewed the study results.
The source who did the comparison said the software rated
the match at ninety four percent. He put the figure
it closer to ninety six to ninety eight percent match
including a combination of human intelligence and software analysis.

Speaker 4 (39:44):
Also, want to go to this.

Speaker 3 (39:46):
Clip of Tucker cross and talking to the Capitol Police
chiefs Stephen sund This is where he's talking about the
National Guard restrictions.

Speaker 2 (39:53):
Listen Juary fourth. What does Miller do?

Speaker 6 (39:57):
He puts out a mellow restricting the National Guard from
carrying the very weapons, any weapons, any civil disobedience equipment
that would be utilized for the very demonstrations or violence
that he sees coming. It just doesn't make any sense.

Speaker 9 (40:10):
Wait, Wait, so the military says, we're so concerned about
potential imminent violence that we were considering shutting down the city.
But at the very same time they decide that the
National Guard can't adopt an aggressive posture.

Speaker 6 (40:27):
Right they're deployed, because they're going to be deploying National
Guard to assist washingt DC with crowd control at metros
and some of the traffic control areas.

Speaker 2 (40:34):
But they put this out on January fourth, specific to
January fifth and sixth, and this direction affected the National
Guard in Virginia and Maryland. When I was calling begging
for assistance on January sixth, they weren't allowed to respond.
At first, you look at Governor Hogan. He did a
press conference saying he was begging to respond and he
was not being denied by the Pentagon all because of
the memo.

Speaker 6 (40:57):
So why, know, you begin to wonder why, and especially
when you look at things like something that I recently
came across, when you talk about the military, General Millie,
you know, we're now finding out and it's not not
for me.

Speaker 2 (41:10):
This is from carol Leinning.

Speaker 6 (41:11):
You know, investigative reporter with the Washington Post has found
that he was using data Minor on his own coming
across intelligence, tell us what data Minor.

Speaker 4 (41:19):
So.

Speaker 2 (41:19):
Data Minor is.

Speaker 6 (41:20):
An intelligence platform. It's not something your average citizen would
have on their computer. I guess it goes in and
does crawling across webs I'm not really sure how it works,
but it's not your it's a it's an intelligence platform.
He's picking up intelligence talking about killing members of Congress
and attacking the United States capital, and he's not telling me.
He's telling select members of Congress. I mean Carolining writes

(41:41):
about in her book.

Speaker 4 (41:43):
And Data Minor.

Speaker 3 (41:44):
By the way, for those who do not understand what
I was talking about earlier, where the FBI and Intelligence
had basically everyone that was coming in and out of Washington,
what they were talking about, who they were talking to,
who they were with, this is Data Minor.

Speaker 4 (41:56):
So if you guys want to know if.

Speaker 3 (41:58):
The FBI or Intelligence can listen or see every single
thing you do, this is what they use. And it's
so much more advanced now than it probably was then,
especially when you have companies like Oracle and Palenteer and
all these other companies that are centralizing all this information
and now they're using this very very advanced AI system
to be able to look at any and everything. So

(42:19):
even as a government, you could look at people that
you know, like us, or a podcast that maybe criticizes
the government or criticizes another government or whatever. And then
you put all these people in a group and you say,
all right, well, these are the people that are kind
of maybe our enemies.

Speaker 4 (42:33):
And you're almost on a watch list already.

Speaker 8 (42:35):
You know.

Speaker 3 (42:35):
You think back to like the nine to eleven stuff
and when there were people that were put on watch
lists for various reasons. But now I think there are
so many different lists that our intelligence has people on.
So if you do a podcast, or maybe you're talking
to your friend, or if you guys, have ever been
talking to someone in your house about something, or maybe
your friend is talking to you about something, and then

(42:57):
there's an ad that comes up on your phone literally
ten minutes later on Facebook or Instagram or something else,
well they kind of used data minor the same way.
If your phone. If Facebook and Instagram and all these
software programs can utilize your microphone to listen to everything
that you're saying and doing and then utilize that for
marketing conversions, then think about how much our intelligence actually

(43:22):
is able to listen to or see. They can listen
and see every single thing we are doing, and we
have zero privacy in this country. The only way you're
going to have privacy anymore is if you go in
the middle of the woods, probably in a cave, because
I almost guarantee you there are satellites that can also
listen and probably read your text matches as your texted to.

Speaker 5 (43:41):
Yeah they could, right, But January sixth, everybody that was
coming in and out of Washington, DC, they had, you know,
the triangular cell phone data of every phone. And don't
think they weren't listening to phone calls of those people as.

Speaker 3 (43:57):
Well, Yeah they were. I mean this was a Geofenne
type deal. This is why it makes you know, being
a killer anymore very hard. You know, if you're someone
that's going to kill somebody and you have any trace
of your phone near you during that time or whatever
the case is, or if you just do something differently.

Speaker 4 (44:14):
Maybe you just left your phone off, yeah or whatever.

Speaker 3 (44:17):
They can use that as evidence, right, and they say, well, look, guys,
you've never done this until this night that this happened, right,
So whereas you may not have taken your phone to
the scene of the crime, but maybe the way that
you utilized your phone during that time was different and
they could literally use that as evidence in a case
against you. And these are all the things that we

(44:38):
have to think about now. In some ways, that's good.
We want technology like this to be able to go
after people that are in our country that want to
kill Americans or kill our or destroy our government, or
you know, foreign actors.

Speaker 4 (44:51):
Like China, Russia, spies, you name it.

Speaker 3 (44:54):
But I think what this January sixth thing does more
than anything, it shows that CIA, for example, which is
supposed to not operate within the United States of America,
although we know that, you know since JFK and many
other you know, I even believe that you know, Operation
Northwoods also during JFK, where we wanted to tack her
own Americans in terrorist attacks and blame it on Cuba,

(45:17):
then to go and invade These are false flag events.
But CIA is supposed to actually go work abroad to
protect the homeland. But I think what this shows likely
is with the January sixth case, CIA was very likely involved.
I think that they were obviously operating within US soil,
and I think that that is why they move this

(45:39):
Capitol police officer that if she is the one, and she,
by the way, there's been some people refer to this
person as a as a guy, but it's because she
has very short hair.

Speaker 4 (45:51):
She looks like a.

Speaker 3 (45:52):
Lot of there's a lot of women police officers that
have very very short hair, kind of that more manly
build and that manly look.

Speaker 4 (45:59):
This is what she looks like.

Speaker 3 (46:00):
So I just wanted to point that out because there
is some articles out there talking about that they were
on to a potential mail suspect in this, but she
does kind of look like a mail The other thing
I want to also talk about is the fact that
what Steve said here earlier, where he was talking about,
you know, I'm just a journalist. It's not like I
have billions of dollars in resources and technology to be

(46:24):
able to figure out who this person is. It's just
that he has basically every waking moment of his life,
and especially since his arrest, and because of his arrest
and because of the way that he felt the government
was screwing him over, he desperately felt like he needed
to get to the bottom of some of this stuff
and prove like was this a setup, wasn't an inside

(46:45):
job or was it not?

Speaker 4 (46:46):
And so he busted his ass.

Speaker 3 (46:48):
He did have some contacts within certain parts of the
government that also helped him with this. That should tell you, though,
that the FBI, Cash Mattel, Dan Mangino in them and
Pam Bondy. You know, they've been in office now over
a year or close to a year, I guess now,
I mean coming up on January.

Speaker 4 (47:05):
He was elected in November.

Speaker 3 (47:07):
But you know, we've not heard anything about the January
sixth pipe bomber. And I would assume that if you
have the full authority and power of the FBI, as
you do Cash Betel, that we would be able to
figure this out. We'd be able to either make an
arrest or release a story or a suspect or something.
And we've seen nothing. We've seen nothing from them the

(47:28):
same thing, the same way as January sixth. And a
lot of people are saying, well, this just kind of
makes me think that all of them are the same.
You know, just because we have a cash matel in,
does that mean that he is working really on behalf
of the American people And a lot of people just
do not believe that. Now it's going to be interesting
It's going to be very interesting to see how cash

(47:49):
MATEL and them come out about this, right, because what
is he going to say. Is he going to verify
this story? Is he going to take the credit for
this story? Because that's what a lot of people think.
They're going to somehow figure out a way to flip
it and take the credit, and they're going to say,
because of our amazing women and men of the FBI,
we were able to track down the pipemarm suspect.

Speaker 4 (48:10):
I can already hear it now.

Speaker 5 (48:12):
Yeah, I can hear it too. And I have to
say that he has been worn very thin. You know,
he's in this place, in that place, in this place,
but he's actually not in charge of any of these
places that he's doing the job.

Speaker 4 (48:25):
You know, there's other people that are in charge, but.

Speaker 5 (48:27):
He shows up and he kind of stands in the
back and lets everyone else talk. I don't ever see
him take charge of really anything going on. And you know,
I just thought that he would do better than this. Yeah,
and what he's doing. And I would think on behalf
of President Trump, President Trump, out of anybody, would want

(48:49):
to get to the bottom of the January sixth thing.

Speaker 3 (48:52):
Yeah, Well, and I think what you're saying too is
just all the stuff. I mean, even with the Charlie
Kirk assassination and some of the other I guess things
that have happened since Casptol's been in.

Speaker 4 (49:02):
Yeah, it's weird. He kind of lets everybody else else
take charge.

Speaker 3 (49:05):
And then he'll usually get up there have some kind
of pre written speech that says a bunch of crazy stuff,
like and he's talking about.

Speaker 4 (49:12):
Valhalla and whatever.

Speaker 3 (49:14):
But you know, it's always speeches rather than trying it
almost seems like rather than being a leader of the FBI.

Speaker 4 (49:20):
And that's very transparent. I think a lot of people
are not seeing that right now.

Speaker 3 (49:22):
But I want to get to some more of this
interview with steven Son because he goes a little deeper.
This is all very important to what we're talking about
on the January sixth pipe bomber.

Speaker 6 (49:31):
That's concerning as hell, because as the chief of police,
you know, there's a duty to warn there and I
should be told so I can take the necessary action.

Speaker 2 (49:38):
I don't know who else he was telling, but he
sure wasn't telling me.

Speaker 9 (49:43):
Again, what could possibly be the explanation for that?

Speaker 2 (49:47):
You know, I'm not really sure you know, you've done
this for over thirty years. You're very familiar.

Speaker 9 (49:53):
You've been law enforcement in DC specifically for over thirty years,
so you know how the city runs. You know, the
FED agencies respond to protests. This is not the first
violent protests, not at all. There been many.

Speaker 6 (50:04):
I've done many national special security events, and this was
handled differently. No the intelligence, no JIB, no coordination, no
discussion in advance. It's almost like they wanted to be
watered down, the intelligence to be watered down for some reason.

Speaker 4 (50:19):
You know.

Speaker 6 (50:19):
I talked about a little bit in the book that
maybe they were concerned for the Trump invoking the Insurrection
Act and they're worried about that. But I've had people,
you know, there's those other you know, thoughts out there.
But you know, luckily we still have people investigating this
because I still think there's puzzle pieces missing. Someone's going
to find out what's really behind all this, because it
it wasn't right the way the intelligence was handled, and

(50:40):
way out we're set up on the hill.

Speaker 9 (50:42):
Big picture, just to restate, you've seen many things like this,
and as you just said, this was very different. This
was handled very differently by whom.

Speaker 2 (50:52):
By by the intelligence.

Speaker 6 (50:54):
I'd say one by the intelligence agency, two by the military.
So the reason why I say the military, think of this.

Speaker 2 (51:00):
By federal law.

Speaker 6 (51:01):
You know, Congress passed a law that requires me to
go to the sarge Arms Capitol Police Board in advance
of an event and to request federal resources such as
the National Guard. So Congress passed the laws to US
Code nineteen seventy.

Speaker 2 (51:16):
Look it up.

Speaker 6 (51:17):
Just make sure you look it up before December twenty
two when they changed it. So what was an effect
on the six that requires me to go and get
approval for bringing in National Guard or federal assistance in advance.
I have to go to the Capitol Police Board and
get approval from Congressional leadership in advance, like I did
on January third. I'm denied twice because of optics and
because I want to pause.

Speaker 3 (51:36):
For a second, because, as he said, not very long
after that, they changed this to where he could have
done this, but it was just like a week or
two later.

Speaker 4 (51:44):
What they wanted it to look like was he could
have done it.

Speaker 3 (51:47):
He just did it, but that was not in the
law during the time that he was actually in He
could not just call the National Guard upon himself. He
had to go through this chain of command, and then
they changed it like two or three weeks after this,
of course they did.

Speaker 2 (52:01):
But intelligence didn't support it. So think about that, mean
asking it was who made that decision? Who denied you?

Speaker 6 (52:06):
I was denied by Paul Irving House Sergeant Arms and
also Mike Stinger, Senate Sergeant Arms.

Speaker 2 (52:11):
And who's on January three did they work for?

Speaker 6 (52:14):
I would have been working for Pelosi on the House side,
and that police was the number one boss.

Speaker 2 (52:18):
And then McConnell on the Senate side.

Speaker 9 (52:20):
Ah, So effectively, Mitch McConnell and Nancy Pelosi shut down
your request.

Speaker 6 (52:27):
My request was shut down one because of optics, which
is interesting, You're can hear that term come up a
couple more times optics over the look of the National
Guard on the hill?

Speaker 2 (52:36):
But yeah, and the Capitol Police Board.

Speaker 6 (52:38):
I mean, it's unbelievable that I'm the only chief of
police in the United States that has a law preventing me,
not just regulations rules that say I got to go
and neet approval to.

Speaker 2 (52:46):
Bring in the National Guard, a law.

Speaker 6 (52:48):
So that's crazy that Congress is going to pass a
law that controls what I can do to protect the capital,
and even in emergency, so think of this, even while
we're under attack, I have to go to those same
two people to request the National.

Speaker 2 (53:00):
Guard to be brought in. I have three hundred and
forty National Guard that have been activated.

Speaker 6 (53:04):
At least one hundred and fifty to one hundred and
eighty of those are in the city, many of them
within eyesight of the Capitol.

Speaker 2 (53:10):
Okay, we get to come under attack.

Speaker 6 (53:12):
At twelve fifty three, twelve fifty five, I called the
Washington DC Police Department. I talked to their assistant chief,
Jeff Carroll.

Speaker 2 (53:17):
Thanked God.

Speaker 6 (53:18):
I had talked to him at ten fifty nine in
the morning and asked him if he could possibly put
some additional resource on Constitution Avenue and he had some
cdu platoons up there. Called him, said hey, please send
those in right away, because we knew as soon as
they came up to their west front they started attack,
it was going to be bad. Twelve fifty eight, I
make my first call to the Sergeant Arms asking saying, hey,
it's bad, we need assistance. I need a declaration of emergency.

(53:38):
I need to bring in the military immediately and federal resources.
I'm told by Paul earing quote, I'm going to run
up the chain. I'll get back to you the number
run Pelosi. The chain is chain would be up to
Nancy Pelosi. He didn't have to do that, but he
wouldn't give me authorization that the law says, and in
mercy he can grant me authorization.

Speaker 2 (53:56):
But he didn't.

Speaker 6 (53:57):
He said he'd run up the chain. My next call
was over to Mike's stinger. He's now with the chairman
of the Capitol Police Board. Told him the same thing.
We're getting our asses handed to us on the wet front.
I need federal resources. He said, what did Paul Tay said,
He's run up the chanines. Let's wait to hear what
we hear from Paul. Sorry, So for the next seventy
one minutes, I make thirty two calls. I'm in the

(54:18):
command center. I'm calling my partner agencies. And by law,
you know, one of the first people offer assistance was
United States Secret Service, and by law I shouldn't have
requested their assistance, you know, I shouldn't be until I
had approval. But I'm looking at my men and women
having their asses handed to them, and my first thought was,
fuck it. I will take whatever discipline there is, send
me whatever you got. And that's the one tech Secret

(54:39):
Service turned over. You know how they lost all their text? Yes,
it's the text between their chief chief Sullivan and myself.

Speaker 2 (54:45):
Thank God for him. I don't know, it's just so.
So you make this call immediate, immediately.

Speaker 9 (54:51):
So the house sergeant Arms, who reports mister Irving, who
reports Dancy Pelosi.

Speaker 2 (54:55):
He says, I'll call Pelosi.

Speaker 6 (54:57):
He says, I'm gonna running up chain, running up the chain.
But that is the here what I got. I want
to tell you exactly.

Speaker 2 (55:02):
So what happens then does he get back to you?

Speaker 6 (55:06):
So for the next seventy one minutes, and makes the
thirty two calls to tie on a number of agencies.
Eleven of those calls or follow up calls. And look
in the Senate Combined Report from from two thousand and one,
they have a great infographic of the call after call
after call after call, eleven times. I call in next
seventy one minutes, going where are we on the approval?
Where are we in the approval? Just any minute now,
any minute, and gonna get in any minute. Finally, at
two oh nine seventy one minutes later two oh nine,

(55:30):
I'm finally given approval.

Speaker 2 (55:32):
Think about that.

Speaker 6 (55:33):
Seventy one minutes later, I immediately call Mike Stinger say
we've got approval. I was so pissed off. I made
sure that the watch commander. I'man Lec Mahnsoner. I yelled
to John, wish him the lieutenant. That's my watch commander,
I said, John, Mark the time as two ten, I
finally got approval for the National Guard.

Speaker 4 (55:47):
I was that mad.

Speaker 2 (55:49):
So what is the I just want to pause on
this for a minute. That's like almost unbelievable.

Speaker 9 (55:53):
So this is an event that Pelosi herself is likened
to Pearl Harbor at nine to eleven, you know, the
worst thing that's ever happen and on American soil. And
she's in charge of allowing the National Guard to commit
and respond.

Speaker 2 (56:06):
But she doesn't for seventy one minutes. What is that?

Speaker 8 (56:10):
You know?

Speaker 6 (56:11):
I can't fathom why. I mean, they had to have
known what was going on. I was telling them how
bad it was.

Speaker 2 (56:15):
It was on TV.

Speaker 6 (56:17):
It was right outside of Mike Stinger's office, and they
had a meeting in his office saying, hey, where's the
National Guarden.

Speaker 2 (56:23):
They're like, how we were trying to make.

Speaker 6 (56:25):
The fighting is going on right outside his office, and
I'm still getting delayed.

Speaker 2 (56:28):
This is an unbelievable story. Oh it is, now, get
a kick out of it. Has anyone ever explained this?
It's verbatim in my book.

Speaker 6 (56:35):
I have details. The whole chapter on January six is
almost one hundred pages long. But I don't understand.

Speaker 9 (56:41):
So they were only ten minutes into this, and you've
told me two things. One the other federal agencies with
held critical information from you in charge of security at
the Capitol before January sixth, and once it started and
things got out of control for seventy one minutes, Pelosi
refused to allow you to bring.

Speaker 2 (57:00):
In the National Guard.

Speaker 9 (57:01):
So those are just those are two of the biggest
questions from January sixth. And my question is why don't
we have answers to why that happened.

Speaker 6 (57:08):
It doesn't seem like people really want to get to
the bottom of it. It really, it really doesn't. And
it just gets worse. It gets worse from there.

Speaker 9 (57:17):
I'm sorry to step on your story. I just yeah,
it is.

Speaker 3 (57:20):
It is shocking to think it is shocking, actually, and
you know, with what he's saying here, Chief Stephen Sound
And that's why we had to do a podcast on
this back in the day, because it was an obvious
inside job. I think there were people at the US
Capitol building that didn't one hundred percent understand the gravity
of the situation that then once the doors were open,

(57:43):
kind of once that initial line had been breached, where
Capitol police was hitting people in the face with rubber
bullets and there were people breaking windows, and you know,
you've got to think about how many people or at
this at this event, this protest riot, whatever you want
to call it. There there were a lot of people
that once the doors were open, and literally there are

(58:03):
videos of cops just ushering people in, ushered.

Speaker 5 (58:06):
On the red carpet with the little gold bars where
they walked in between on the red carpet line by line.
It was like they were rushing the Capitol. They were
being like a tour. Yeah, they were being ushered in.

Speaker 4 (58:21):
Is exactly what it was. And that's but that's not
how the media portrayed it, right. The media portrayed it
as a violent insurrection. And although I do believe that there.

Speaker 3 (58:30):
Was a lot of violence that day, I mean I
think that there were you know, clashes with Capitol police.

Speaker 4 (58:36):
I think that there were windows broken.

Speaker 3 (58:38):
I think there were things that happened that looked very
bad for the people that were there. But how many
of those people that were violently reacting at this protest,
breaking the windows, you know, getting through the windows, fighting
with police, how many of those were plants? How many
of those people were actual government employees, CIAFBI, whoever? From

(58:59):
what we have found out, I guess over the past
like six months to a year that we know that
there was at least I believe one hundred and eighty
FBI informants in the crowd, likely more. And we're just
talking about FBI. We're not even talking about CIA assets.
We're not talking about other potentially even security contracted assets
from the federal government. We just don't know. We have

(59:21):
no idea. And this is not just you know, Republicans
are not just immune to this. It happens in Black
Lives Matter protests and riots, it happens in ANTIFA riots.
And I don't even think in all cases where you
would see these massive palettes of bricks show up at
some of these protests across the country that we saw
during the BLM in the Summer of Love. Yes, a

(59:43):
lot of that was being heavily funded and organized by
the Soros Open Saudi Foundation other globalist agencies, but I
also believe that potentially the government had a part in
play in that coordination and effort as well.

Speaker 4 (59:56):
And I'll tell you one of their ways that they
used to do it.

Speaker 3 (59:58):
I remember during the BLM riots and stuff, where if
you were a Republican or conservative, or someone that was
pro Trump or anti vaccine or just trying to call
out the bullshit on COVID or any of this stuff,
you know, you were banned or censored on social media.
But yet if you were Antifa or a Black Lives
Matter group that was planning a violent protest or a

(01:00:19):
burning down of cities across the country, Facebook and Instagram
would literally let you have groups to where you could
go and coordinate all this shit together. And yet if
you had groups about pro Trump or conservative movements or
any of that stuff, you were banned or censored. No
one will be able to find your group. This is
how they utilized social media. This is how to utilize
mainstream media. This is how they utilized everybody. The government

(01:00:42):
always controls the narrative, so whereas we of course understand
and completely agree that the Open Society Foundation, NGOs and
the globalists one hundred percent have a stake in what
happens in our country. They fund a lot of our
our far left, whether it be prosecuted or judges. But
keeping in mind, the government also assist these globalists, They

(01:01:06):
assist this. It's not like they're they're working against the
George Soroses. It's not like they're working against the Open
Saidi Foundation. There's a reason why George Soros's son visited
the White House. I think it was forty two times
during the Biden Harris administration.

Speaker 4 (01:01:20):
Forty two times.

Speaker 3 (01:01:22):
And then also you have you know the picture of
a Sourus's son, you have a picture of.

Speaker 4 (01:01:26):
Him with Mandami.

Speaker 3 (01:01:27):
He's always there where he wants to up in and
destroy America, right, That's where he's at, and that's where
he was at in the White House forty something times.

Speaker 4 (01:01:36):
Forty meetings at the White House with someone.

Speaker 3 (01:01:39):
Likely wasn't Biden because obviously Biden didn't understand what the
hell it was going on. Probably wasn't even Kamala because
she would just sit there and laugh and have no
idea what was going on. Whoever that Sorus was meeting
with in the White House was whoever the leader of
the Deeps thing probably is, and they don't want to again.

Speaker 5 (01:01:54):
And they had a plan, and that plan was to
do what they did. And even going back to where
some of this stuff was violent, for example, the doors
where Ashley Babbitt was going through the window shot by
Chuck Schumer security as she was like halfway in the
window and halfway out the window.

Speaker 3 (01:02:13):
Yeah, but they you know, and it was like a
you know, if you go to a concert and there
shots fired or someone how everybody's trying to leave.

Speaker 4 (01:02:19):
This is kind of what was happening to her. She
was being pushed up the stairs.

Speaker 3 (01:02:22):
She was at the very end of the very top
part of the stairs where the if you get to
the top of the stairs you go left or straight ahead.
Is that like kind of window that has the that
has kind of like the barrier in between it and
she being pushed up there. She wasn't even really climbing,
I don't necessarily think, but she had to kind of
get out of the way because she was about to
be crushed. And as she did that, that's when Chuck

(01:02:45):
Schumer I guess we find out now that Chuck Schumer's
security guard actually shot and killed her.

Speaker 5 (01:02:49):
And I just want to remind everybody on that day,
January sixth, that was the only person that lost their
life due to violence.

Speaker 3 (01:02:58):
Yeah, that was I mean there was other people like
us at Strokes or whatever they say after the fact.
We don't one hundred percent know, But what we do
seem to know is that this was one hundred percent
inside job. Now I want to play this very very
quick clip. This was Dan Bongino back in the day
talking about this. Actually it was literally right before that
he became the debut director of the FBI because cash

(01:03:21):
Hotel was already in But this is what he had
to say about it.

Speaker 4 (01:03:23):
Listen on his show.

Speaker 10 (01:03:25):
It seems bizarre to me that the FBI continues to
manipulate the American public about this case. They the phone records,
saying they didn't have the phone records, that they were corrupted,
when the phone company said they weren't corrupted. They have
all this video that appears to be manipulated, and you
seem to hint that they may know the identity of
this person, they just don't want you to know. I
believe that is the case. Can we get an answer

(01:03:47):
between you, Pam Bondi, and hopefully Cash Pttel on who
this person is and have the FBI open the books
because I believe this is a huge scandal and a
mess of cover up.

Speaker 8 (01:03:57):
I think we will, and I think we're going to
find out about ray Epps, and I think we're going
to find it out about scaffold Man.

Speaker 2 (01:04:02):
You know who scaffold Man is, right guy?

Speaker 4 (01:04:05):
Scream?

Speaker 6 (01:04:05):
Yeah?

Speaker 8 (01:04:06):
There go.

Speaker 3 (01:04:06):
So that was Dan Bonga talking to Trump and this
was before that he was actually put in as deputy director.
So I also want to play Ryan Matta. And this
is what Ryan Matt had to say about the FBI
cover up, but in specific I guess Ryan Ryan's kind
of been with candae O Ones, especially during this Charlie
Kirk investigation, and so Ryan Matta has one hundred percent

(01:04:27):
completely lost any faith in this administration at all. So
I always want to kind of play every angle, right.
We have one side of it that we hope and
pray that Trump and his administration in Cashtell and Pambonni
and everybody's going to do the right thing and make
sure that we see this through this investigation with Steve's work.

Speaker 4 (01:04:45):
Here's what Ryan Matta had to say about this.

Speaker 11 (01:04:47):
Here you go, lsh homie, You ain't covering this one
up no matter how hard you try. This is the
biggest intelligence operation, the biggest si op ever carried out
on the American people. Let me tell you the scale
and what type of cover up we're talking about. This
just blows water Gate out of the gosh damn water.
You're talking about the CIA, the FBI, the DOJ, and
our DoD, the Department of War, if you will, Okay,

(01:05:11):
So when I tell you that kre Cash Mattel had
the opportunity to put all of this in Biden's lap,
and he had the opportunity to take down the entire
deep state. When Trump finds out about this cover up,
holy shit, he is going to lose his shit because
we're talking about the Department of Defense using directed energy weapon.
Steve Baker broke that. Remember they were using the frequencies
to attack and rile up the crowd. Then you have
the DC Capitol police officers who opened fire on the crowd.

(01:05:33):
Then you have the FBI who was dressed up. They
were carrying out busloads, delivering bus loads of people. Two
hundred and forty five agents undercover addressed as Trump supporters
to go and insinuate violence and rile up the crowd,
while at the same time they had the DOJ Merrick
Garland and then prosecuting innocent American citizens, And then they
had the Ajacix pipe bomber herself, the agent who planted

(01:05:53):
that pipe bomb was testifying in court hearings and sentencing
our board to insanely linked amount of prison time. They
put Tarrio in prison for twenty two years, and he
wasn't even there because this was all one big mastermind.
Remember it was a January sixth insurrection to overthrow a government.
And these people, some of them, haven't even been pardoned yet. Trump,

(01:06:15):
So maybe you should think about pulling your head out
of your ass and holding this asshole accountable. He should
be charged right there with Merrick Karlan, Chris Ray when
this thing all blows up, Cash, Mattel and Bongino should
be getting charged right along with all the other scumbags
who are involved in this. They are no different. They
don't get a fucking pass. I'm so pissed off right now.
These scumbags are out here going in I sis to
terrors attacks. Hold the FBI. When I tell you that

(01:06:36):
the false flag is coming in, it's gonna be at
a monumental fucking scale. You have no fucking idea how
big it's going to be. It has to be because
this shit, this cover up now on top of the
Charlie Kirk assassination.

Speaker 2 (01:06:45):
Holy shit.

Speaker 12 (01:06:46):
You go to the clip from Max Jones Collas Massey.
When will the FSCI capa police? The rest of scandal
today would be good. So the good news is the
blaze broke this Thursday. We already knew it. They were
willing to do it.

Speaker 4 (01:07:02):
Now. Oh we're gonna wait till next week.

Speaker 12 (01:07:05):
They ain't getting out of this, and there's much worse
stuff about to come out.

Speaker 4 (01:07:10):
I mean, look at this person.

Speaker 12 (01:07:12):
This video featuring her was uploaded on YouTube No remember
twenty twenty fourteen when she was playing soccer for Temple.
Obviously autistic in my opinion. Another Marinus Vanderlub who did
the firebombing of the Rashtag in February twenty seventh, ninety thirty.

Speaker 4 (01:07:30):
Three to bring Hitler to power.

Speaker 12 (01:07:31):
It's a Mariness vanderluinb but the bomb was planted right
where Kamala Harris was obviously to make her a victim,
but it didn't happen.

Speaker 4 (01:07:40):
Why did that happen?

Speaker 12 (01:07:43):
And then we've got all the photos right here, So
this is the story, not oh, we can't wait for
the White House to cover it up.

Speaker 4 (01:07:53):
I can assure you Trump doesn't know about us.

Speaker 2 (01:07:56):
Yeah, there you go.

Speaker 3 (01:07:57):
And she was a patsy, that's what this person likelywise.
She played soccer for Temple University. There have been reports,
like Ryan Atta does say that she is potentially autistic.
She then left Temple University, went up through the ranks,
and it sounds like they utilized her for this special
mission to plant pipe bombs. Now, I would tell you
that I think they meant for these pipe bombs to

(01:08:19):
go off.

Speaker 4 (01:08:20):
I don't know why it didn't happen.

Speaker 3 (01:08:22):
I know that they reported that these were perfectly viable
pipe bombs, But I think they meant for these to
go off.

Speaker 4 (01:08:28):
They didn't go off. This is a battle, guys.

Speaker 3 (01:08:31):
You know when we talk about on the podcast all
the time that there is a battle going on right
now and is still going on. And there's a lot
of people that reach out to us and say, look,
you know, I hope and pray that Trump is just
you know, he's got all this stuff.

Speaker 4 (01:08:44):
Working behind the scenes and we're going to see it.
But you know, as Alex.

Speaker 3 (01:08:48):
Jones just says there, and Alex Jones is, as we've
talked about many times, is not someone to go against
Trump or criticize Trump because Trump did help him so far.
I don't know how much he's going to help him,
but Trum has helped him a decent amount. He does
have a direct ear into Trump. Alex Jones has had
that for many, many years. But now even Alex Jones
is starting to have to come out and start to

(01:09:08):
say things about that. And we are at a pivotal
moment in the history of the United States of America,
our two hundred and fifty year anniversary coming up. That
will democracy last more than that or not. Everybody's against everybody.
They're turning everybody against everybody, and there's gonna be some
people that are gonna pay some heavy prices. Charlie Kirk

(01:09:29):
was one of them. Jfk was one of them back
in the day. But I think there's about to be
a lot more people that are speaking out that have
huge platforms that better really really start watching their ass
and It's not just because of Israel or because of whatever.
There's this battle and you see it. You see it
with one side of the Republicans versus the other. You
see obviously with Democrats versus the right. We're going to

(01:09:52):
see how it unfolds. You know, will it unfold the
way that we hope it will, which is that Cash Bettel, Pambondi,
and Trump they hold this person to CA Dountable and
they release actual information. They are transparent with America. They
have an opportunity right now. You know, you have you
have Steve, and you have the Blaze, and you have
all of these guys that have presented this report.

Speaker 4 (01:10:13):
The official article is out.

Speaker 3 (01:10:15):
Now you have the article out there, you have the
high degree of certainty that it was this person and
that the CI potentially was involved. But one hundred percent
Capitol Police an inside job. What will Cash MATEL and
Dan Bongino and Pambondi and Trump do. How will they
handle this or will they just cover it up? Because

(01:10:38):
I think it's going to be very hard for them
to cover it up at this point.

Speaker 5 (01:10:41):
But I would think if I were Trump, I would
want to get to the bottom of it.

Speaker 3 (01:10:44):
Yeah, absolutely knows no, absolutely, but but this is where
we're going to find out.

Speaker 4 (01:10:50):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (01:10:51):
Is that like, is is cash MATEL really being controlled
or are they going to pivot it to where it's
like cash Mattel and the FBI are going to try
to take credibility for this report or for this finding
of who it was.

Speaker 5 (01:11:04):
Are they going to say there's nothing to see here.

Speaker 4 (01:11:06):
Yeah, or are they going to say that right?

Speaker 3 (01:11:07):
Or are they going to say, no, we don't believe
this because this isn't happening and this hasn't happen. If
you see that, then obviously the FBI is still covering
for their own ass the CIA that you know, the
deep state is still covering and they still control these people.
Or are they going to have no choice but to
come out and say, you know, Cash Motel says, look,
because of the incredible men and women of the FBI,

(01:11:28):
we have found the pipe bomber. Finally, we have been
investigating this for months. We didn't want to move on
it yet, but now this reports out. Now we're going
to show you everything. This is what our investigators uncovered.

Speaker 4 (01:11:39):
Are they going to do that? I don't know.

Speaker 3 (01:11:41):
We will all be ready to see what they say.
I would think probably maybe this week they're going to
have to respond. I think the next episode Cherry we're
going to do is the we have to do the
Feral People, because we've tried to do this like three times.
We've talked about another podcast. There's some people out there
that kind of reach out and they say, we're kind
of tired of politics, and I was like, I get it.

(01:12:03):
I mean, I one hundred percent get it. But we've
covered a lot of the Charlie Kirk stuff and although
yes it's somewhat does go back to politics, it is
you know, we also can't overlook this stuff. We can't
quit talking about the Charlie Kirk assassination because you know,
it was a couple of months ago. Now, you know,
we can't say, well, that's that's done for and over with.
I mean, yeah, we're going to move past that right now,

(01:12:25):
but just keep it in mind. Any new information that
we have or we see, we're going to talk about it.
The same thing with the Epstein stuff, which we do
actually have new information on the Epstein files on the
Epstein case, and I want to talk about that very
soon because I think it's huge.

Speaker 4 (01:12:39):
And then I also want to get.

Speaker 3 (01:12:41):
Into feral people because we didn't really do a lot
of like Halloween spooky stuff. I kind of want to
still do that now, as you guys know, and especially
as much as we see on mainstream media and in
podcasts and even in podcasts like ours, you know, talking
about politics and talking about all the corruption and all
the crazy stuff that goes on on every day, it
gets tiring, It gets tough, it gets mentally draining in

(01:13:04):
some ways, and it does for us for sure. I
know it's very important. I know it's important to talk about,
but also sometimes we've got to have a little fun.
We got to get into some of the stuff that like,
really we love doing on this podcast, you know, like
whether it be aliens or ancient civilizations or all of
this stuff. So we want to get more involved and
back into some of that as well.

Speaker 5 (01:13:24):
So, Chad, are you saying that potentially hikers that get
murdered by feral people is fun?

Speaker 4 (01:13:32):
No, that's my type of well fun.

Speaker 3 (01:13:34):
Well, sure, I mean you do watch like serial killer
stuff all the time, but yeah, I mean there's a
lot of weird stuff that happens in the place that
I grew up in, and not just in the Ablatcha Mountains,
but also you know out west and out in some
of these desert canyons and places that people will go
hiking and they disappear, never to be seen again. Now
I'm not saying there's necessarily feral people out there. If
you go kind of follow the Missing four one one series,

(01:13:57):
I think a lot of what they potentially believe is
that maybe sufl related.

Speaker 5 (01:14:02):
Right, But I think around our area in the South,
they blame it on feral people.

Speaker 3 (01:14:08):
Yeah, there's a lot of old tells in the mountains
of Appalachian Mountains where the people that live in the hallers,
the people that live very far out of civilization. You know,
I have family that lives in some of these hollers
in some of these places, and it's a different world there.
It is a completely different world. And there are people
that I know or sometimes maybe even related to, that

(01:14:31):
might be closer to farrel than you would imagine. But
there is tales of actual feral people that just once
escaped civilization and live on their own and they don't
want anybody at all to come into their territory.

Speaker 4 (01:14:43):
And there are or.

Speaker 5 (01:14:43):
Do they want people to come in there so they
can kidnap them.

Speaker 3 (01:14:46):
Well there's you know, well there's tells they're cannibals, right,
And this is really no different in some ways than
some of the tribes out in the Amazon Rainforest in
South America or some of the tribes in Africa. Don't
think that there isn't potentially tribes that actually still exist
in the Appalachians where there are thousands of acres to
where nobody ever goes to. You know, And the more

(01:15:08):
I've thought about it, and the more I've looked into stuff,
there's a lot of reasoning behind national parks. Oftentimes, national
parks are created to hide things to where they can
control that land. They can't necessarily build on that land,
but they want to control it. They want to hide
certain parts of it from you. And so we'll get
into that on a very near episode. So make sure
you hit follow, make sure you share your episode far

(01:15:30):
and wide with anybody you possibly can, because right now
we are kind of going through a little bit of
a battle. People do not necessarily agree if we criticize
this or criticize that, but we're doing our very best
to try to get the truth out there, and we
do appreciate every single one of you for following us
and your support. It means the world to us, to
us completely, we are on all the social media's.

Speaker 4 (01:15:50):
Please go follow us. If you want to reach out.

Speaker 3 (01:15:51):
To as please do as long as it's nice, because
if it's not nice, then I'm not going to respond
to you, and so it doesn't matter.

Speaker 4 (01:15:56):
I'll just block. We're kind of past that, you know.

Speaker 5 (01:16:00):
Well, That's what I was going to tell you earlier
on the podcast is when we're talking about, you know,
some of the hate that we get, we're always going
to get hate. And if you don't get hate, that
means you're not doing your job. But the hate we
do get, you have to sometimes just ignore it. I
was listening to Joe Rogan a long time ago and
he said he has not read one message that people

(01:16:22):
have set him because of that fact, because he just
can't deal with it. He's not gonna deal with it. Yeah,
he lets his staff do that. Unfortunately, we don't have
a big staff to do that. But I'm just going
to tell you, Chad, if you see in the first
set and something mean or whatever, yeah.

Speaker 4 (01:16:36):
Just don't open it.

Speaker 3 (01:16:37):
No, it's all good, I mean. And that's the thing,
like we're here to provide a service. Not everybody's going
to agree with us all the time, for sure, But
the one thing I hope that people take from us
is that we're doing our very best to try to
be as truthful as we possibly can, and we're not
trying to We're actually trying to be the least bias
as possible, even though sometimes it's hard. And when it
is hard, you guys know it. I mean, you guys

(01:16:57):
know it. You guys always tell us like, well, you're
biased on this and your bisas and when we are,
we at least admit that, right. So that's all I'm
gonna say. We're gonna play it out with the chase
and until next time, guys, we love you.

Speaker 4 (01:17:10):
Peace out, peace out, guys.

Speaker 1 (01:17:19):
Maybe it's a new beginning, Maybe it's the start where
it is no, no, it comes up to nothing this
times for you can't reason, you know, you know.

Speaker 2 (01:17:39):
The closing and I don't want to miss.

Speaker 1 (01:17:42):
Shidd So give it everything that don't stop.

Speaker 13 (01:17:51):
In your eyes. I see best.

Speaker 14 (01:17:57):
Begin some I can amoche where you go, I fall
giving up hidden the first there also going back in
loving of the chase, O.

Speaker 13 (01:18:18):
Lena giving up that was hidden first there wasn't going back.

Speaker 14 (01:18:22):
In a Love Lo Love the.

Speaker 1 (01:18:23):
Chase, I can hear my every habby.

Speaker 2 (01:18:27):
I can feel the blood which through mom. You know,
you know.

Speaker 1 (01:18:34):
Somewhere in the day this stuns coming up.

Speaker 13 (01:18:37):
Everything is blowing the trees from my side, my side
before ahead the resume, I ever saves the close sky's
red when not IM losing to.

Speaker 2 (01:18:53):
Know don't start.

Speaker 13 (01:18:57):
In your eyes, I see not better getting.

Speaker 14 (01:19:03):
Away, also going back in the load.

Speaker 13 (01:19:06):
In the chaser where you go, I saw not giving
up those didn't face.

Speaker 2 (01:19:15):
It wasn't going back.

Speaker 13 (01:19:16):
In another load of the cheese.

Speaker 14 (01:19:30):
Choice. In your eyes, I.

Speaker 13 (01:20:00):
See our side not asn't getting.

Speaker 14 (01:20:03):
Away as we're going back. In the mothering chase where
you go, I fall love when I'm gonna not never
was given the birds, because there's some going back in
a mother ud and chase where I'm giving up. Never

(01:20:25):
was given the birds. There's I'm going back and then
out and chase