President Trump’s Inner Circle Moves to Military Bases: What’s Really Going On? Conspiracy Podcast

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:33):
Hello, and welcome back to Investigator Podcast. I'm your host
chat alongside my beautiful wife Sherry. On tonight's episode, we're
diving into something that feels straight out of a classified briefing,
reports that President Trump has moved key members of his
administration onto military basis, with growing speculation that some may
even be operating from underground facilities. Now, this isn't just
about optics or politics. Trump is already back in the office.

(00:55):
This is maybe about security, survival or control.

Speaker 2 (00:58):
So what's really happening.

Speaker 1 (01:00):
Is this a strategic move that shield his inner circle
from potential threats foreign and domestic, or is it part
of a larger conspiracy plan that public isn't maybe meant
to see right now the time and end secrecy surrounding
all our raisin serious questions. And tonight we're gonna break
down the types of military bunkers there are, why they
would be used, and what it could mean for the
direction of this country under the new chapter of Trump's presidency. Guys,

(01:23):
welcome to the show. It is November of the second,
twenty twenty five. The name of the song is Earth
to Light It Up, because maybe that's what's about to happen.

Speaker 2 (01:31):
We don't one hundred percent know.

Speaker 1 (01:33):
What we do know is that over the past week,
there has been many articles that say that Trump has
moved key figures of his administration onto military basis.

Speaker 2 (01:44):
We're not talking about they're just hanging out there during
the day.

Speaker 1 (01:46):
We're talking about they are literally living on military basis
and likely underground. So we've talked about this in the
past before about certain military basis throughout the United States
that do have what is called dumbs or deep underground
military base.

Speaker 2 (02:01):
And what these bases are essentially.

Speaker 1 (02:03):
Made for is there are silos under some of these bases,
there are entire cities under some of these bases. And
what oftentimes this is used for is when there is
a threat of a nuclear or a world war. So
it's something that you have to get key members of
the administration into safe places so that if a nuclear
war happens, then they are able to emerge at some

(02:23):
point in time and still run the country and then
also be able to still fight back against a foreign
threat like Russia or China or whoever. But there's also
some speculation out there that maybe it's not about Russia,
maybe it's not even about China. There has also been
some talk that there are bounties on some of the
heads of Trump administration because of Venezuela, because of the
narco terrorist or narco drug cartels.

Speaker 2 (02:45):
We've also got that.

Speaker 1 (02:47):
But then you also think about this a couple of
months ago where jd Vance and Trump and all of
them announced, they said, you know what, we have to
start deploying these rapid action forces. And this is essentially
all across the country in every single state. They want
to be able to train up not only National Guard
but also reserve soldiers to where they can rapidly I

(03:07):
guess deploy in the event of a national crisis or emergency.
And so what we're going to talk about on tonight's
show is like, what is this really about. Is this
about a foreign threat? Is this about a domestic threat?
Is this about a threat at our back door like Venezuela.
Maybe China and Russia are utilize in Venezuela to be
able to either operate in Venezuela or also attack the

(03:28):
United States from very close by or in the craziest.

Speaker 2 (03:33):
Conspiracy of all these.

Speaker 1 (03:34):
Sherry is there's a lot of people saying, including your mom,
like you talked to your mom today and she's like,
Trump's going to be a dictator. He is a dictator.
That's what everybody's saying.

Speaker 3 (03:44):
Yes, she said, when are you going to get that
through your head that he's actually a dictator?

Speaker 4 (03:47):
Sharry? How do you not know this?

Speaker 2 (03:50):
Yeah, so we're going to talk about that. We're just
going to talk about all those possibilities.

Speaker 5 (03:54):
You know.

Speaker 1 (03:54):
It's kind of interesting because we've had so many videos,
you know, and we've talked about this with you guys,
but but we've had so many videos over the past
six months, I guess you can say, especially since Trump
has got an office over on Instagram, that have went viral,
and so we're getting a lot of new listeners, we're
getting a lot of new eyes, I guess on our show,
and just a lot of people are trying to figure out,
Like I've got so many messages Sherry over the past

(04:16):
couple of weeks, and they're in the messages say hey,
I just have a question, Like I listened to a
few of your podcasts. I even went back six months ago,
a year ago, and I'm still confused what your politics are.
That's literally what they're saying. And so some of these
people I've actually replied back to and I said, look,
this isn't about politics. We are not about a political

(04:38):
We're not a political show. Now, if you listen back
prior to the election of twenty twenty four, or even
prior to the election of twenty twenty you might think
that we are a political pundit, or we are political pundits.
We are someone that just wanted so desperately to get
Trump in. But at the time, like even leading up
to twenty twenty four and twenty twenty obviously with Biden

(04:58):
and Harris and that whole situation, obviously knowing what you know,
what Joe Biden has done in the past as once
a senator, then a vice president.

Speaker 2 (05:06):
Then a president.

Speaker 1 (05:08):
You know, the way we looked at this was especially
with the MAGA you know, the MAGA Agenda, which was
make America great Again.

Speaker 2 (05:15):
It was a great slogan.

Speaker 1 (05:16):
It was a great slogan for Americans because a lot
of Americans felt disenfranchised. A lot of Americans felt like
that our government no longer worked for the people. Instead
they worked for foreign nations. Instead, they worked for basically
anyone else besides the taxpayers, besides the people that were
actually putting these people in office and putting these people
in power. Most people just felt like that, you know what,

(05:37):
we're putting all these people in power, but no one's
actually working for us. And so when the Maga movement
came along and Trump came along, a lot of people
felt heard again, they felt seen. And there were things
that Trump would say, like, you know, they're only after
me to get to you. You know, if they defeat me,
then they're going to come after you next. And so
these were major moments of Trump's campaigns, Trump's first presidency,

(06:01):
especially the way the media attacked Trump, especially the way
the Democrats and basically everyone attacked Trump. This was something
that a lot of people felt like that, Hey, I
have to do something here, and I probably need to
vote for Trump. I think that's why you had such
a landslide type victory in twenty twenty four because people
just felt like, look, we're very close to a totalitarian state,

(06:22):
a dictatorship. We're sending our money to Ukraine billions and
billions of dollars. We think that if we bring Trump in,
We're not going to be sending money to Ukraine anymore.
We're not going to be supporting Israel. Maybe the way
that we are, we're not going to be in all
of these other foreign wars, and we're actually, for once
going to really make America great again this time, and
we're going to send it. We're going to bring all
the money back to America.

Speaker 3 (06:43):
Well, and I think some people weren't necessarily voting for Trump,
but they didn't have a better option. What was your
better option, Joe Biden and Kamala Harris? Yeah, was you know,
the only other pick, And that's not a better option
in a lot of people's eyes.

Speaker 4 (06:58):
So yeah, I think a lot of people voted.

Speaker 3 (07:00):
For Trump, but they weren't really voting for him, they
were voting against Joe Biden.

Speaker 1 (07:06):
Yeah, absolutely, one hundred percent agree with that. And then
you got to remember, you know, RFK was in the
running during this time. RFK obviously was not going to
become president because that's just not the way things work.
He he registered as an independent. There has never been
a independent or third party that to my knowledge, and
I could be wrong about this, that has won a presidency.

Speaker 3 (07:25):
Well, I know one for a fact that you used
to really love was parole or Ross prow Yeah, yes,
rosspro he was an independent, and he was like out
there and a lot of people did like him. And
I think with RFK a lot of people liked him too,
but like you were saying, he's not going to really
win as an independent. But I think also during his

(07:47):
campaign he did come out and say the Democrats did
not do him right at all.

Speaker 1 (07:53):
Of course not no, and so you know, so RFK
came in and then when RFK kind of took sides
with Trump and that whole I guess you can say
the Maga cabal. That is when likely you saw a
lot of these people that are kind of on the fence,
whether it was like look, even though I don't like
Trump at all, like do I really want to vote
for Harris? And so I think RFK swung so many

(08:16):
votes and it didn't swing unfortunately for the Democrats to
Democrats that swung to Trump, and especially as RFK said, look,
I'm going to work with Trump. I'm going to be
you know, I'm going to work with getting all of
the poison and the chemicals out of our food. This
is what we're going to do. So they had a
mass movement and RFK massively helped them because he just
brought on this whole other faction of people that would

(08:37):
have never otherwise voted for Trump. But then you started
having these influencers, including Ian Carroll by the way, which
was a huge rising influencer on social media, especially on TikTok,
to where you know, at one point in time, I
believe him, I'm not mistaken. But Ian was kind of
like a Bernie bro So was Joe Rogan back in
the day.

Speaker 4 (08:55):
Yeah, they were.

Speaker 1 (08:55):
So all of these people were starting to kind of
shift their their life to the right, and not even
the right, but they were just a little bit more
right than center, and so they had to go with Trump.

Speaker 2 (09:07):
And this is what created this mass movement. Now.

Speaker 1 (09:11):
The reason why I'm talking and saying all this stuff
is because there's a lot of people now that say, look,
Trump might be a dictator. Trump is not being transparent
about the Epstein files. There's a lot of people that
do not agree with how close now we are with Israel.

Speaker 2 (09:26):
We thought that we were.

Speaker 1 (09:27):
Close with Israel and Apak and all that stuff during
the Democrat presidency, like under Joe Biden or Obama or whoever.
But it just seems like now that it's just like
so tight knit that a lot of people were worried
about as well. But then you also have these hats
and these shirts that are selling, and Trump even, you know,
jokingly talking about a twenty twenty eight run. So Trump
twenty twenty eight is what everybody's saying, and they're like,

(09:49):
you know, maybe there could be a third term, although
constitutionally that's not realistic.

Speaker 3 (09:55):
But what happens when people think that the twenty twenty
election was stolen because if it was, that would have
took his term away. And since it took his term away,
he was before that to twenty sixteen and then twenty
twenty four. But you know, a president, it's hard to
get everything you want to get done in four years.

(10:15):
You need back to back terms in order to get
what you want accomplished. And maybe that's some of people's reasoning.
I don't know, I'm just putting it out there.

Speaker 1 (10:26):
Yeah, I mean, it could be, but either way, it's
unconstitutional regardless, right, I mean, regardless, it is unconstitutional. Do
I believe that the twenty twenty election was fair? No,
I absolutely do not think it was fair. I mean,
if you guys had listened to one of our I
guess two episodes ago when we talked about Venezuela, and
we talked about how kind of China and Russia and

(10:46):
some foreign nations had influence over how we created this
new voting system in America at all. A lot of
it came from Venezuela. So that's also very interesting. And
now we're you know, looking to you know, possibly attack Venezuela.
We don't know yet, but either way, I'm gonna go
ahead and in just a moment, we're going to read
the articles that are out about Trump's administration. A lot

(11:08):
of his key people, Marco Rubio, Christy Nome I believe,
also Stephen Miller, which is his chief of staff, I believe.

Speaker 2 (11:18):
Now I don't know if Tulsa gabbert I saw it.

Speaker 1 (11:20):
Okay, yeah, either way, a lot of his top Pete
Hegseth is another one Department of War or Secretary of War,
I guess you can say. But yeah, so we're starting
to see a lot of this, and we're everybody's asking
the question why would they be moving people to a
military basis but also potentially to underground bunkers. So there's
all there's all types of articles. One of the first

(11:42):
though I felt inter I found it pretty interesting, was
the Jerusalem Post, and it says some Trump officials leave
homes for US military bases amid political protest reports.

Speaker 2 (11:53):
So we also got to.

Speaker 1 (11:55):
Keep in mind, like how news is reporting it and
what their narrative is on this right, What is the
narrative and what is the thing that they're trying to
tell you of.

Speaker 2 (12:03):
Why this is happening, what are they saying?

Speaker 1 (12:05):
And so it says senior White House officials are swapping
their traditional homes to live on military bases as the
political climate grows more threatening, is what they're saying. And
it says several senior Trump administration officials are living in
or will soon be living in military based housing in
the Washington area. The Atlantic reported on Friday says, according

(12:26):
to their report, several US administration officials, including Stephen Miller,
Marco Rubio, and Christy Nome, have moved into houses that
hosted senior military officials on bases in the Washington area
to shield themselves from protests outside of their homes and
political violence. It says, however, the number of Trump officials
who have moved onto bases is now impacting housing for

(12:46):
the nation's top uniformed officers.

Speaker 2 (12:49):
So this is not just three.

Speaker 1 (12:51):
We're talking about massive amounts of the Trump administration are
kicking out generals and whoever, the top people, the top,
they're kicking them out of their houses, and they're putting
in the Trump Cabinet, the Trump administration, basically everybody into
these housings. It also says US Director of National Intelligence
Tulci Gabbard requested earlier this year to move on to
Fort McNair, but was denied based on the lack of availability.

Speaker 2 (13:14):
Oh okay, so she was denied.

Speaker 4 (13:16):
Okay, So I was wrong, but I was partly right.

Speaker 2 (13:19):
So isn't it Isn't it interesting? Though? Think about this
for a second.

Speaker 1 (13:23):
Well, and she was a Democrat, Yeah she was, But
either way, think about this. So Tulci Gabbard, the last
episode we did where we talked about the Charlie Kirk
assassination investigation, and there's a big fight, it seems like
from Tulsi Gabbard, D and I also Joe Kent, and
they're fighting with Cash Mattel the FBI, and it sounds

(13:44):
like maybe just the Trump administration in general over her
and D and I and basically that office want to
investigate foreign influence or foreign I guess connections to the
Charlie Kirk assassination. When you ask like who is the
foreign Well, obviously a lot of people have a members
of Israel and you know whoever. But either way, Tulsi Gabbart,

(14:04):
it just so happens that she is one that is
fighting on the inside. I've been seeing over the past
two or three weeks that everybody wants to cancel Tulci
Gabbard because they're like, oh, no, no, Tulsi Gabbard's a
rhino or not even rhino, because I mean she was
a Democrat and then kind of came over to the right.
But everyone's saying that you're not Maga, You're not this.
They're saying the same thing, by the way, about Marjorie

(14:24):
Taylor Green and we'll play that clip in just a moment,
but it says the threat level against administration officials has
changed recently, including Iranian backed attempted assassinations, which I which
is complete bullshit because you're hearing this from the Jerusalem Post.

Speaker 2 (14:40):
Yeah, they're literally no proof of that.

Speaker 4 (14:42):
No, they're not completely proof of that. There was proof
of that that I promised you, Chad.

Speaker 3 (14:46):
I saw the whole documentary or it wasn't a documentary, but.

Speaker 2 (14:50):
It was a piece was on the daily wire.

Speaker 3 (14:52):
No, but it was a piece about this guy that
went into this hotel room and he had all this
Iranian money. He is from Iran, and he was using
code words and he was talking to under cover law
enforcement and he was trying to get Trump assassinated before
he was elected president.

Speaker 2 (15:11):
Okay, well, and.

Speaker 4 (15:11):
Soon not remember that.

Speaker 2 (15:13):
I do, well.

Speaker 1 (15:13):
I remember that's what they were trying to pass off
as who tried to kill Trump and I and that
went away because most people called bullshit on it. But
either way, it goes on to say, however, there has
not been a record of this many political appointees living
on military basis ever reported on. The Atlantic also says
in a robust democracy, what you want is the military

(15:35):
to be for the defense of the country as a
whole and not just one party. Adria Lawrence, associate professor
of international studies and political science at John Hopkins University,
told The Atlantic. Stephen Miller will reportedly soon joined the
growing list. Katie Miller, his wife and mother of his
three children, told Fox News she was confronted outside of
her home by an unfamiliar woman who she believed engaged

(15:56):
in a form of protest that crossed the line, and
she said, I'm watching you.

Speaker 2 (15:59):
Quote the woman said to Miller.

Speaker 1 (16:01):
As reported by the Atlantic, This occurred on the day
after political activist Charlie Kirk was assassinated. The Miller family
had faced protests for weeks beforehand, including someone putting up
posters in their neighborhood calling them Nazis. Both Secretary of
State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth live at Fort.

Speaker 2 (16:18):
McNair, known as General Row.

Speaker 1 (16:20):
Army Secretary Dot Dan Driscoll shares a home on Joint
Base Meyer Henderson Hall with another senior.

Speaker 2 (16:27):
Political employee of the Army.

Speaker 1 (16:30):
And then it goes on to say another senior White
House official who was not named for security purposes, had
to swap live in a private home for in a
military base following Kirk's assassination. According to their report, So
do you start seeing like a lot of this stuff
is kind of revolving around the Charlie Kirk assassination. And
it goes on and says while the political officials duke

(16:50):
it out for the largest houses on the base, three
and four star level generals and their young families are
now crunched for housing in notoriously difficult Washington area housing market.
The Atlantic, citing an official familiar with the familiar with
the matter, reported that in some aspects, this would be
cheaper for the federal government than providing personal security to officials,
which requires agents to rent a secondary location nearby. Robert Gates,

(17:15):
defense secretary under President George Washington and Obama. Jim Mattis,
Trump's first Pentagon chief, lived in naval housing at Potomac
Bay Annex near the State Department. So they're trying to
just say, well, it's just because rising political I guess threats, right, that's.

Speaker 4 (17:30):
What your sign would be threatened.

Speaker 3 (17:32):
I would think it would be Steven Miller because of
how out there he is, especially on the news, because
he just does no filter at all.

Speaker 4 (17:39):
When he talks. He goes crazy.

Speaker 2 (17:41):
Yeah, he does. So I want to go ahead and
play a quick video.

Speaker 1 (17:44):
This was actually when it was announced on Fox News
on Fox in the morning. I think it was Saturday.
I think it was literally yesterday, and this is what
they had to say about it.

Speaker 2 (17:53):
Listen.

Speaker 6 (17:55):
Meanwhile, back in Washington, we talk about a sign of
the times, the administration officials increasingly are facing so many
very serious and violent threats that they find that the
only option they have is to actually move their families

(18:15):
and themselves onto military basis. Here's the list of some
of the notable acts of political motivated violence. Of course,
you had June twenty twenty two, the plot that was
thwarted against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh, that Paul Pelosi
was attacked in October of twenty twenty two. Obviously, you

(18:37):
have the assassination attempts on President Trump, both of them.
You have the arson at Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's home.

Speaker 7 (18:48):
Yeah, and you have, of course, the Charlie kirk assassination.
And I think the Charlie kirk asassination was such a
shock to especially to anybody who is in public life,
that you could go with secure to a university and
simply have open debate and you get shot in such
a horrific way in front of college students.

Speaker 2 (19:10):
I really I'm still not over it.

Speaker 7 (19:13):
I'm just surprised how in the liberal media it's just
kind of just gone away here a lot of conservatives,
and of course at Fox News, we have not forgotten.
We will not forget, but it has just gone off
the pages like oh, just another day. But the people
who are not forgetting, especially are those in the public eye.
And so one of them is Stephen Miller. This is

(19:33):
the Atlantic saying Stephen Miller joined a group growing list
of senior Trump administration and political appointees, at least six
by our count, living in Washington area military housing, where
they are shielded not just from potential violence but also
from protests. It is an ominous marker of the nation's polarization,

(19:53):
to which the Trump administration has itself contributed. I don't
know where they got that from. That some of those
top public servants have felt a need to separate themselves
from the public. These civilian officials can now depend on
the US military to augment their personal security, but so
many have made the move that they are now straining
the availability of housing for the nation's top uniformed officers.

(20:17):
So the Atlantic really worried about housing for officers. They
don't seem to care about the fact that well, military
aren't getting paid during the shutdown.

Speaker 8 (20:24):
But okay, so it's good on the Atlantic for pointing
this out, but they do miss the point, Rachel, I
mean Look, this is I cannot remember a time in
my adult life that the threat of political violence was higher,
and that is very sobering. And to see, you know,
we've had in the past some defense secretaries Bob Gates,

(20:46):
Jem Mattis live on military basis.

Speaker 2 (20:50):
That's not unusual.

Speaker 8 (20:51):
But now with people like Stephen Miller moving into the
military because of threats on his life, it is akin
to in twenty twenty three, the of Tijuana had to
move on to a Mexican military base because the cartel
was openly saying we are going to kill you. These
are the threats that Steven Miller and Katie Miller and

(21:11):
their children are getting. And it's really a moment that
seems unprecedented in terms of the political violence in our country.

Speaker 1 (21:19):
I think they kid, I want to stop there, because
you know, there's something that we keep hearing on all
these articles. If you guys go in right now you
look up Trump officials moved to military bases, and or
you just go and listen to any video clip from
any news source, especially on the right, especially like News
Nation or Fox News or any of the others. They

(21:40):
always talk about Charlie Kirk, right, they bring it back
to Charlie Kirk assassination. Right, And if this was, for example,
Charlie Kirk, Tyler Robinson, he's a lone gunman. He's just
this crazy psycho that you know, decided that he was
going to go and kill Charlie Kirk one day at
UVU out of the blue. Maybe he had been indoctrinated,

(22:01):
is what they try to tell you and all this stuff.
If that was just the case, it seems like for
some reason, maybe some of this is maybe going back
to the Charlie Kirk assassination. And it's weird because how
this administration is covering up.

Speaker 2 (22:16):
It seems like, in my opinion, they're covering up stuff.

Speaker 1 (22:18):
Right when you have the d and I Department of
National Intelligence, you have Tulcy Gabbard the director, which is
trying to get into the foreign potential connections to the assassination.
You have everyone that is talking if they even question it,
like Tucker Crosson and Candas Owens and whoever else is
there foreign involvement. They're all being canceled right now. Literally

(22:41):
Tucker cross trying to be canceled. Tucker Carlson is near extinction.
I mean, he's well, they're trying and listen, it's possible
because now he's going to get MAGA, which kind of
has all the control of all the social media, very
similar like how Biden Harris did it kind of during
their term. But now Tucker's kind of, you know, speaking
out like candas is. I'm sure that at some point

(23:03):
in time, people like Candace, people like Tucker, people like
Nick Fuinn says, they're all going to be banned, censored,
and silenced again, and it's going to be because of
something like whether it's anti Semitism, whether it's this, whether
it's that they're going to silence these people.

Speaker 3 (23:16):
But well, people like Alex Jones has been silenced and
he still speaks.

Speaker 1 (23:20):
So yeah, but he's not. No, no, But here's the thing.
Alex Jones has changed his tune. He's not speaking the
same stuff Tucker Carlson and Candice Owens are. No, absolutely not.
He is taken up for the Trump administration and making
sure that he toes that line where he does not
dare accuse the Trump administration of this or that or

(23:40):
this or that anymore. And we're actually going to have
a clip from Alex Jones in just a bit because
I think Tucker or being not Tucker. But I think
Alex Jones knows where the line is done that, yeah,
he knows where the line is, and he says, look,
if I start actually speaking an opinion based on the
MAGA movement, then I could also be Tucker and maybe
even worse, because unfortunately for Alex Jones, he's in a

(24:03):
very bad position. The only way that he gets out
of this multi billion dollar lawsuit that they put on
him because he questioned the Sandy Hook shooting.

Speaker 2 (24:12):
The only way he gets out.

Speaker 1 (24:13):
Of that or survives this at all going forward is
likely the Trump administration, and keeping also in mind from
what we understand, I guess the Trump administration or people
within the Trump I guess camp, has helped Alex Jones
already right to kind of find out some information about
the Onion which was trying to purchase Alex Jones stuff,

(24:35):
which actually links back to a Democrat led kind of
I guess NGO or non government organization.

Speaker 2 (24:42):
But what this kind of tells.

Speaker 1 (24:43):
Me is that the way all the articles are talking,
the way that the clips that you're going to hear
are talking, they keep mentioning Charlie Kirk. After the Charlie
Kirk assassination. We're now moving all of our high level
officials into bunkers on military basis. So if you're telling
me that's because Tyler Robinson is a loone freak that

(25:05):
was with a bisexual transvestite dude, which was Lance Twiggs
was Tyler Robinson's boyfriend's name, then what you're saying is
is that you're moving all these people, and a lot
of that is because of Charlie Kirk. I actually think
that there's a lot bigger things behind the scenes that
they know, and I think that they.

Speaker 2 (25:27):
Are in a very very, very desperate and bad spot.

Speaker 1 (25:30):
And I also think that's why there are certain people
that are really going against the Trump administration right now
because they're saying, look, you guys are not acting like MAGA.
You guys are not acting like make America Great Again
or America First. You guys are not acting like you
did in twenty sixteen or even in the campaign leading
up to twenty twenty four.

Speaker 2 (25:49):
You're lying to us. You're telling us lies about.

Speaker 1 (25:52):
Epstein, You're fighting with D and I about Charlie Kirk
assassination investigation. And so why are you doing that? And
and and so when we talk about like, is there
a bigger thing behind the scenes that it's going on there?

Speaker 2 (26:06):
Very well could be.

Speaker 1 (26:07):
But then also you you you watch Trump on TV
and the way he talks about certain things that a
lot of people don't agree with right now, it sounds
like he's definitely not under you know, necessarily under thread
of life that he either says this or doesn't. It
seems like he's willingly saying a lot of things. So
it's a very interesting situation that's going on. And I

(26:29):
don't necessarily think it's necessarily about Russia or China.

Speaker 2 (26:33):
I think this is much deeper, and I.

Speaker 1 (26:35):
Think that they are in a they are in a pickle,
the Trump administration.

Speaker 3 (26:40):
It could be, but it could be that what if
they did think Tyler Robinson was a lone wolf and
he was the only one, and if he was the
only one that went after Charlie Kirk, there are other
lone wolfs out there that they are being threatened by.
They just said Stephen Miller, his whole family, his children
are being threatened in their nameighborhood. They're calling him Nazis.

(27:02):
You know, they don't feel safe where they are. So
it could be just that at that surface level. But
I do agree with you that maybe they know something
that is deeper. Maybe Candice Owens is on the right track,
and they just don't want people to know that, and
that could be a possibility. But I think everything at
this point is a possibility.

Speaker 1 (27:20):
I agree, I agree. Yeah, we cannot throw anything out
right now. Two days ago, cash Betel posted this morning,
the FBI thwarted a potential terrorist attack and arrested multiple
subjects in Michigan who were allegedly plotting a violent attack
over Halloween weekend. More details to come. Thanks to the
men and women of FBI and law enforcement everywhere standing

(27:41):
guard twenty four to seven and crushing our mission to
defend the homeland. Okay, So that was that. And then
I was like, okay, well, let me find out about
this terror attack. And because it's not that I didn't
believe it, but then I started seeing some of these posts.

Speaker 3 (27:57):
Yeah I saw something, but there was nothing else about it.

Speaker 1 (28:00):
Now is very weird, But so I got this post
from AP and it says Michigan lawyer says a Halloween
terror plot that FBI director cash Betel described never existed.
So the reason why I want to get into this
because we got to start thinking about syops here. If
there is a syop going on, if there's something that
we are not seeing, we have to look into some

(28:20):
of these things. So it says a Michigan defense lawyer,
and yes he is a defense Journey is disputing FBI
Director Cash Betel's allegations at his twenty year old client
and four other young suspects were planning to carry out
a terror attack on Halloween weekend. Now announcing their arrest
on Friday, Betel said more information will be coming soon. However,
the FBI and Michigan authorities have offered few details about
the case. Spokesperson for the State and National FBI and

(28:43):
US attorney in Detroit did not immediately respond. The investigation
involved discussion in an online chat room involving at least
some of the suspects who were taken into custody. According
to two people briefed on the investigation who could not
publicly discuss the details, they spoke to the Associated Press
on condition of anonymy, The group allegedly discussed carried out
an attack around Halloween, referring to Pumpkin Day, according to

(29:06):
one of the people. The other person briefed on the
investigation confirmed and I just lost that real quick confirmed
that there had been a pumpkin reference. However, the lawyer
in the case, Emir Mackhled, who represents a man from
the suburb of Dearborn who was still detained on Saturday,
said federal authorities have given him haven't given him many

(29:29):
details about the investigation, but after reviewing the matter, he
concluded that the note there was no terror event ever planned.
He said he doesn't expect any charges will be filed
and that he thinks this is some type of false flagged.
He described this all male group of US citizens as
gamers and said they arrange in age from sixteen to twenty,
and he says if these young men were on forms

(29:50):
that they should not have been on things of that nature,
then we'll have to wait and see. But I don't
believe that there's anything illegal about any of the activity
that I have seen so far. So it's just strange, right,
I'm not saying that this wasn't a foiled terrorist attack,
but we also have to start looking. I'm starting to
see cash matel come out and saying, look at this

(30:11):
domestic problem, look at this domestic terror attack, Look at
what we're starting to.

Speaker 4 (30:14):
See domestically and not international.

Speaker 1 (30:17):
Yeah, we're going to have to start really clamping down
on some of this stuff, whether it's social media, because
as you just heard again, social media, that's what they're
trying to put.

Speaker 2 (30:25):
It back to.

Speaker 1 (30:26):
Well, someone was talking in social media group and we
found it, we intercepted it. Which is by the way,
for anybody that ever uses any app that they think
is encrypted for any reason whatsoever, just understand that the
government listens to and sees every single thing you do,
no matter what it is. And so the only reason
that would be bad unless you're a criminal, would be

(30:47):
one day that the government decides to be a dictatorship
or a a tyrannical state, and then they can just
access any dissenters and then just come and kill you.

Speaker 2 (30:56):
Right. That's why privacy matters.

Speaker 1 (30:58):
It's not about like, well, I don't ever do anything bad,
I'm not a terrorist, Okay, great, But if the government
ever turns to a totalitarian state, you want privacy, which
is why we can't erode our freedoms and our rights
because that's the only thing we have and the only
way that you could ever dissent against a totalitarian government
that is going to oppress the people and enslave people

(31:20):
or kill people their own citizens potentially is privacy.

Speaker 2 (31:23):
And so we've completely lost that.

Speaker 3 (31:27):
Page goes to that there's not going to be anything
like that. So you're going to be shit out of
luck on all forms.

Speaker 1 (31:34):
Yeah, all right, So and then you have articles like
the Hill Pentegon orders quick Reaction Force of five hundred
troops per state, and this is according to the multiple
news sources. Actually National Guard is building a Quick Reaction
Force or QRF of some twenty three thousand, five hundred
troops trained in crowd control and civil disturbance that can

(31:55):
be ready to deploy two US cities by early next year.
And according to eleaked to me reported by multiple outlets Wednesday,
the October eighth memo, signed by National Guard Bureau Director
of Operations, Major General Ronald Burkett, orders the Guard from
nearly every US state, Puerto Rico and Guam to train
five hundred service members. States with smaller populations such as

(32:16):
Delaware will have two hundred and fifty in its force,
while Alasko will have three hundred and fifty and Guam
will have one hundred and says a previous Pentagon MIMO,
issued on September and revealed by The Guardian, had mandated
that the Washington DC National Guard created specialized military police
battalion within it dedicated to insurance safety and public order
in the nationals capital as the circumstances may necessitate now.

(32:40):
The latest document also stipulates that the Pentagon will send
military trainers to the states and territories so the qrs
will be operational by January first.

Speaker 2 (32:48):
Twenty twenty six.

Speaker 1 (32:49):
Each state will also begin given one hundred sets of
crowd control equipment to be used to support this requirement,
such as tasers, pepper spray batons, and Shieldson did not
respond to your request for comment from the Hill, and
the Trump administration has concreasingly moved to the US military
to push his political agenda domestically be a sentin National
Guard troops into largely Democrat run cities under the claim

(33:12):
of helping fight crime. And it also goes on to
say that President Trump in August twenty fifth executive order
mobilize the dec National Guard to the nation's capital over
the objections of city leaders, and Trump at the time
claimed that the city's crime was out of control despite
data showing that the rates had dropped over the past
two years.

Speaker 2 (33:28):
That's what the Hill's saying now.

Speaker 1 (33:32):
To me, when you think about the QRF or Quick
Reaction Forces of the National Guard, and this is a
big thing where they're going to start training at least
five hundred and I almost guarantee you even though the
leaked memo, and it was probably intentionally leaked, I would
say there's probably going to be more people that are
trained than five hundred per state.

Speaker 2 (33:50):
But this does worry me. I mean it does.

Speaker 1 (33:53):
It worries me to the point because I understand that
there are cities and places in this country that are
overrun with crime in a lot of cases, and in
many cases because of you know what we've talked about
for years, as far as the outside involvement of people
like George Soros putting these far left globalist prosecutors in office,

(34:15):
putting judges in power in places to where they could
you know, burn down the cities and and you know,
literally businesses that people have worked their entire lives on,
and then they have these riots that are heavily funded
by the globalists, by these NGOs like the Open Society
Foundation and many others. That attend the World Economic Forum,

(34:35):
and I understand the fact that like we cannot have
globalist organizations overrunning America to you know, essentially put in
their own agendas and also just you know, powerful forces
that be like especially judges, right, and even during the
time that Trump was not president, Biden Harris was president.

(34:56):
That's how a lot of the charges probably were wrought
on Trump. That's how a lot of anybody that was
that you know, essentially the left or the globalist went
against They went against them based on the judges that
would take the cases, the prosecutors that the teacher James
Is and Alvin Braggs and the and and all of
these people. But it's like the problem is for us

(35:18):
as citizens is that I'm starting to kind of see
this shift the other way, right. So it's like it's
like Trump, Trump said, hold my beer. You thought that
you were going to be like authoritarian in some way
and you were going to like put your people under fire. Well,
let me just show you some shit. I'm going to
train the military to go into every state and every
city if we need to, and I'm going to create

(35:40):
my own police force, which technically is a police state
regardless of However, you look at this, you know, when
when there's been thousands of podcasts about police states, and
I mean we've talked about police states before.

Speaker 2 (35:55):
It is a worrisome thing to talk about. It is
something that we.

Speaker 1 (35:58):
Don't want as a as a as a country, as
a state, as any of that is a military police force,
we just don't want that.

Speaker 3 (36:06):
But you have to look at the Democratic led states
right now and what's going on in those states. For example,
in Portland, Oregon, where the ice facilities are being blocked
by all these protesters, and the police are being told
to stand by or stand down, to stand in corners,
and instead of enforcing the laws, they're told to shake

(36:27):
hands and make make light talk with people and not
do what their job is is to protect and keep
the community safe. They're not doing that because they're being
told to stand down. And if the police force and
Democrat ran cities are standing down and not doing their job,
then somebody has to come in behind them to know

(36:49):
and be trained how to.

Speaker 4 (36:51):
Do that job.

Speaker 3 (36:52):
And I think too that they need to be trained
in this because you can't just send out the National
Garden and say go to work. People have to be
trained and what they're doing. And that goes for law
enforcement too. How much training do they go into when
it has to do with protesting and duct and stopping
you know, federal agencies from doing their jobs and crowd

(37:15):
control and all that. Like, how much training is going
is involved in all this?

Speaker 9 (37:19):
Yeah? I don't.

Speaker 1 (37:19):
Yeah, I mean no, I one hundred percent understand what
you're saying. Look, I get the premise behind it, and
you make a good point, but you know also at
the same time, you know, there is like Devil's advocate
to this, and I will play Devil's advocate for a second,
And I one hundred percent, like I said, understand what
you're saying. And I think most people are probably listening
right now, especially people that support Trump, are going to feel.

Speaker 2 (37:39):
And think the same way.

Speaker 1 (37:41):
All I'm saying that we must look out for and
be careful of is that in the event that not
even necessarily Trump, Trump's getting old, right, I mean, he
is definitely getting old.

Speaker 2 (37:51):
He's in his eighties already.

Speaker 4 (37:52):
But he's nothing like Joe Biden.

Speaker 2 (37:53):
No he's not. But he still needs less.

Speaker 4 (37:56):
Than we do, and he worked way harder than we do.

Speaker 2 (37:58):
I know.

Speaker 1 (37:59):
But what I'm saying is that you're probably not gonna
have even if Trump wanted to run, you know, three
years from now, likely it wouldn't be Trump. But it's
the problem is not with Trump as a dictator or
a company else. It is someone else that he puts
in place, or whoever the case may be. And then
when there is an uprising of the citizens that finally
are like, no, hell no, you didn't tell us about Epstein.

Speaker 2 (38:18):
You remember that?

Speaker 5 (38:19):
Oh?

Speaker 1 (38:19):
Anawly, it's this and this and this and this and this,
and then he's like, well, guess what. Now you have
military and they're gonna fight back against you. You're not
gonna be able to do whatever hell you want to do.
You're not gonna uprise against their government. Now that could
be complete bullshit. I don't think Trump would do that,
but we always have to be careful. We always have
to be uh just just looking out to make sure
that doesn't happen, because I understand. Look, I'm definitely not

(38:41):
anywhere close to a Democrat. I have I am Republican
conservative values and beliefs as far as pretty much almost everything.
I mean, there's definitely some things that I could, you know,
get on board with. I guess you can say with
some of a little a little.

Speaker 2 (39:02):
Well no, not even abortion stuff.

Speaker 1 (39:03):
I don't really necessarily one hundred percent get on board
with that one hundred percent. But it's also I'm kind
of like with abortion things like it's not my body,
it's not.

Speaker 4 (39:12):
It's okay, you're not nick then no, that's a good thing.

Speaker 1 (39:16):
No, So, but my thing is like, the government is needed,
law and order is needed, but there has to be
aligned to that. There has to be a line of
how much control the government has over what we do
with our bodies.

Speaker 3 (39:29):
Well, that's not hurting other people, And that's why he
gave it to the states instead of the federal agencies.

Speaker 2 (39:35):
Right, and that was probably a good thing to do.

Speaker 1 (39:37):
So if you don't like the way that your state
doesn't go to another state if you can, right, that's
the big thing. But yeah, so there was there was
also this video which I wanted to play. And then
we're going to get into this other kind of narrative
and angle on this. Right, like, from what we have understood,
from what we are being told at least that there

(39:57):
has been bounties put on some of the top officials heads,
allegedly from Venezuelan. I don't know drug narco terrorists, that's
what we're hearing. I don't know. What we do know
is that Trump has blown the shit out of some
boats allegedly from Venezuela. So we don't one hundred percent
know the facts on the bounties that are put on
the Trump's head or whoever. But I do want to

(40:19):
play this real quick. This is about the quick reaction
forces and it kind of goes a little bit more
in detail, and then we're going to get to another
video in just a second, but we'll break this down
as well.

Speaker 5 (40:29):
Right now at the White House, we want to give
you this update here. A lot of headlines being made
right now is the Pentagon is moving forward on orders
from President Donald Trump to building National Guard quick reaction
force in each state for domestic use, through two US
officials that have confirmed that to Fox News. So we

(40:50):
want to continue to break that down. What does that
look like and what will it feel like in so
many of the major cities and states. So let's bring
in our next guest to help break that all down
for us. This is of Churstopher A. Nineway, my military
policy analyst. I thanks so much for joining us online
now and Yeah. I think first off, a lot of

(41:10):
people have the question of Okay, what will this look like?

Speaker 10 (41:15):
Absolutely, Mike, Well, you know, by time in the Army
and the Military Police Corps, a lot of training with
the National Guard, the Reserve, and the active component revolves
around in many cases combat field work. But then there's
also garrison and in this case civil disturbance are what
we call civil d which is essentially preparing for riots, crowds,
of variety of scenarios. So a QRF or a quick

(41:38):
reaction for US is really something that many folks that
have trained in this area are used to. It's not
uncommon for the President to want to make sure they're
ready for these capabilities. And one example of many is
just in crowds, there tend to be problematic actors, things
like snatch and grab techniques where the civil riot police
grab someone behind the line remove problems.

Speaker 2 (42:00):
It's all just kind of.

Speaker 10 (42:01):
Par for the course, and I think it's good that
they're showing that they're ready for any situations that may escalate.
They want to focus on de escalation.

Speaker 4 (42:08):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (42:08):
Absolutely, And let's talk and go back to twenty twenty.
We saw a lot of different protests happening across the country,
especially in the summer. Will the response sort of look
like that or will it be even escalated even more?

Speaker 11 (42:24):
Why?

Speaker 10 (42:24):
I think a lot of it is preparedness, force and
numbers I think we've seen in areas, and whether or
not to the extent some of these resources extend into
places like Chicago. There have been areas in the past,
for example on the Gold Coast where folks smashed up stores.
I think when you're looking at this presence, it tends
to prevent things and keep things a little bit more contained.
So in terms of escalation, I think it depends, but

(42:47):
you definitely want to be over prepared. It's like that
term and golf. You'd rather be hit the ball too
art and not get in then come up short. You
want to make sure you're ready. It's hard to scale
up after the fact, and that show of force reduce
some of those tensions in those areas. And it's just training, training, training, preparation, preparation,
preparation never never in, as they say in golf. So

(43:07):
we want to make sure we're prepared and have those
resources available.

Speaker 1 (43:11):
And I want to stop here for a second, because look,
you know, some of you might be thinking Chad's just
over sensitive to what's what's going on. But I understand that, well,
I once understood.

Speaker 4 (43:26):
I thought that, I think we get where you're coming from.

Speaker 2 (43:29):
I know.

Speaker 1 (43:29):
But what I'm saying is, I feel like this is
just my brain, and you guys can tell me if
this is your brain. I felt like, since doing this
podcast for eight years, that I had it figured out
for mostly, Like for the most part, I felt like
I had what was actually going on figured out. And
I got to say, especially over the past I don't know,
I would say at least a couple of years, but

(43:49):
especially the past year, like I feel like I've got
something wrong and I'm not one hundred percent sure what
exactly that is. And I don't know if any of
you like that as well. Like I understand that like
both parties, it's two wings of the same bird, right,
That's what we always hear. It's like they're they're they're
still flapping, they're doing different things, necessarily different motions or

(44:14):
or motions not really I guess centripucal of each other,
but either way, they're a part of the same bird.
Like whatever that moving force is, they're propelling the force.
Maybe this wing does something a little bit different than
this does. But that bird still moving forward. Now where
what that bird is? And you know, is is it

(44:34):
a is it a vulture? Or is it is it
an eagle?

Speaker 2 (44:37):
By the way, you.

Speaker 4 (44:39):
Taking my T shirt design away from me right now?

Speaker 1 (44:42):
Well no, but I'm just saying, like, you know, I
guess what I'm saying is I felt like for a
while I had it figured out until especially this term.
And I'm not saying I'm against Trump or anything. I
I I one hundred percent want the best for our presidence,
no matter who they are, including Biden and and Trump,
including everybody, because that's that's who's leading our country.

Speaker 2 (45:03):
But I just feel like I've missed something.

Speaker 1 (45:06):
And look, we definitely get messages where people think that
they have everything figured out because they're on this particular
side and or that particular side. And you know, it's
like if we don't talk about Epstein fast enough or
if we don't do this fast enough, they're like, oh, yeah,
you guys are just not talking about it because you're
hiding it. I'm like, no, because like we got other

(45:28):
stuff to talk about. Also, like it's not that we're
not talking about that, but my feeling is is that
I've missed something. And the big question is, and I
want this is a question for the audience, is a
question for you guys, like what.

Speaker 2 (45:42):
If I missed?

Speaker 1 (45:42):
I want you guys to send us a message wherever
you follow us, or if you don't follow us on
social media, which shame on you.

Speaker 2 (45:48):
If you do not send us, send us an email.

Speaker 1 (45:52):
Investigator Earth Podcast at Protonmeil dot com and let us
know your thoughts, Like what am I missing is? What
exactly is it? I mean I understand, like I said
that both parties can be corrupt, both parties can be
and I think are corrupt. I mean I think Republicans
and Democrats are both.

Speaker 3 (46:08):
Like I said, yeah, I agree, two wings of one bird.

Speaker 2 (46:12):
Yeah, absolutely, yeah.

Speaker 1 (46:14):
But I just think for me, it was just like,
you know, the Epstein thing has done something big for me.

Speaker 2 (46:21):
I don't know what is.

Speaker 4 (46:22):
It took them, burned you off.

Speaker 1 (46:24):
It took the wind out of my sales, a little
bit from my you know, I was going forward. I
was like, I think we got this figured out, We're
going to get this done. And it's not like I
the problem is that I don't believe their narrative on
the Epstein files at all, like zero percent. I know
they're lying. I know they are without question, So I

(46:45):
know they're lying to us.

Speaker 3 (46:46):
Well, why would Mike Johnson come out in front of
everyone and say, listen, we are still working on the files.

Speaker 4 (46:53):
There's one hundred thousand files to go through.

Speaker 2 (46:56):
Yeah, he said, there's thousands of victims.

Speaker 3 (46:58):
Yeah, and there's thousands of victims and we have to
be aware of the victims. He just said that like
two weeks ago. But why would he say that if
it was all a hoax? Yeah, you know, it's just
stuff like that, like get your party straight and have
the straight answers and the same answers because your answers
are not lining up with each other.

Speaker 4 (47:17):
I get that.

Speaker 1 (47:18):
And the problem too, is like if you have people
like Thomas Massey, the the you know, or or Marjorie
Taylor Green now, which was a huge supporter and I
want to talk about Marjorie Taylor Green for a minute,
and because we're going to get to a clip of
her in just a moment, but Marjorie Taylor Green was
one of the biggest supporters of Donald Trump as president

(47:38):
of anybody. I mean, that's literally why people hated Marjorie
Taylor Green until now. Now they hate her for another reason,
which is not has nothing new with Trump. Now they
hate her because they're saying that she's not Maga. Right, Oh,
well she's not Maga. And so if you look up,
I just want to read a couple things.

Speaker 3 (47:55):
Well, while you're looking it up, I'm going to say
that Democrats are taking to her and they really like her.
Is kind of like when Tulci gabbered crossed lines. Well,
it's the same thing with the dude in Pennsylvania. I
can't think of his name right now, the guy that
looks like Star Trek. He ran against Oz, doctor Oz,
I have no idea betterman Fetterman. Yeah, Yeah, it's kind

(48:16):
of the same thing. Like he's kind of in my
mind he's almost crossing lines. Like he got ditched because
he sat down with Donald Trump and had a conversation
with him, and he got in big trouble with his
party party because he had a conversation. He said, we're
sitting down and talking. That's what you're supposed to do.
Is you're supposed to talk and discuss things. You're not

(48:37):
supposed to be at war with each other.

Speaker 1 (48:40):
Yeah, and even on X, Like, if you look up
Bill Maher Marjorie Taylor Green. Right, So, Marjorie Taylor Green
recently went on to Bill Moore the actual show that's
on TV. I can't remember what it's called, but anyways,
she went on, and so if you look that up
on X, this is what I'm talking about as far
as coordinated post. The first one says, oh, look the

(49:00):
new darling other radical left Marjorie Taylor Green was invited
on Bill Maher last night, shocking look at radical leftists.
Bill Maher praising Marjorie Taylor Green for going against President
Trump and she's sitting there soaking it up like a
schoolgirl on a prom date. Here's another one, Bill Maher
praising Marjorie Taylor Green for going against President Trump and
she's sitting there soaking up like a schoolgirl on a

(49:21):
pont prom date. These are different accounts, different people.

Speaker 4 (49:25):
Yeah, and not to mention, she was on the view too.

Speaker 2 (49:27):
But listen, absolutely, but that's not what I'm saying.

Speaker 1 (49:29):
You got to hear me out, Okay, Sorry, These are
different people, different accounts saying the exact same thing. And
these and these posts have got huge numbers. These are
what it's called paid influencers. This is what it is.
Here's another one. Cat turd, Oh wow, cat turd. Marjorie
Taylor Green went on Bill Maher and threw every one

(49:50):
of us and Trump under the bus so she could
be popular on the left because she wants to be
a star. Then she went to this person's Hollywood party
and bragged about it. There's no words to describe how
much I despise Marjorie Taylor Green. This one disgusting look
at the radical leftist Bill Maher praising Marjorie Taylor Green
for going against President Trump, and she's sitting there soaking

(50:11):
up like a schoolgirl on a prom date.

Speaker 2 (50:14):
How many posts.

Speaker 4 (50:15):
Is this schoolgirl on her prom dates?

Speaker 1 (50:17):
But how many posts this so far? And these are
the top post for this topic? Go to the next one.
Congressman Marjorie Taylor Green went on real time Bill Maher
and he even knows Marjorie Taylor Green isn't Magga anymore.
She admits it too, in case she missed it. Marjorie
Taylor Green told Bill Maher she believes UFOs aren't extraterrestrials
at all, but fallen angels.

Speaker 2 (50:38):
She says, even.

Speaker 1 (50:39):
Members of Congress are being deliberately kept from leaving learning
the full truth about what they really are. According to
daw Farah some blah blah, Yeah, I think she is.
She also this one says she issues. She reads a
list of issues on which Marjorie Taylor Green has broken
with President Trump on and she says Marjorie to Taylor

(51:01):
Green is not maga at all, dumper, and he says,
Trump build a movement. Here's another one road. Marjorie Taylor
Green rode the Maga wave into Congress. You don't get
to attack Trump. And so this has just been constant, right,
this is and as we're reading stuff, what I have
to let you guys, or try to convince you to see,

(51:23):
is like when you look up certain things and there
is post after post after post literally almost identical text.

Speaker 2 (51:34):
Those are paid influencers.

Speaker 1 (51:35):
They are getting paid by a pack and they are
being influenced, and they're influencing you because you may not
necessarily see it the way we try to look certain
things up and look at the top post. But if
you're just scrolling your timeline and you see this person
say something, and then maybe the next day you'll see
it again, You'll see another one. Then all of a sudden,
your mind starts thinking, oh, man, you know what Marjorie

(51:55):
Taylor Green, she is at MAGA. She's a leftist.

Speaker 3 (51:59):
But they did the same thing in regular media during COVID.
Everyone was saying the same thing, and they were getting
paid to say the same thing. So people are getting
paid to say the same thing.

Speaker 4 (52:10):
That's clear.

Speaker 2 (52:12):
Yeah.

Speaker 3 (52:12):
What is clear to me, though, is why is she
going on I get Bill Maher, I mean President or
Vice President jd Vance went on Bill Maher, for example,
But why is she going on the view?

Speaker 9 (52:26):
I don't know.

Speaker 1 (52:27):
I mean, I don't know why she's going on the
view exactly right. I have no idea about that. But
what I can say is that it's all the same thing.

Speaker 5 (52:35):
You know.

Speaker 1 (52:36):
I think that Marjorie, and I think Thomas Massey and
the couple of other outliers that have been brave enough,
I will say, to challenge the Trump administration on the
Epstein stuff, right, that's a huge one.

Speaker 2 (52:50):
It is massive.

Speaker 1 (52:52):
And if you challenge the Trump administration, especially as a Republican,
on Epstein or Israel or any of that stuff, you
are going to be canceled. You are going to have
every single paid influencer period coming out against you, and
you know, I you know, I hate to say it.
I've seen Ashton Forbes saying the same shit about Marjorie

(53:12):
Taether Green, Tucker Carlson, Dave Smith, Nick quintez, Ian Carroll.
They're all doing the same thing. They're all mass attacking
the people that are going against the narrative on the
Epstein Files. And a lot of these people two years
ago would have said, oh my god, Joe Biden and
Kamala Harris are pedophiles. They're hiding the Epstein Files. And

(53:33):
now all of a sudden, oh, now that Trump said
as a hoax, Oh, you guys are psycho lunatic psychopaths
like Marjorie Taylor Green that really believes the Epstein Files
still exists. This is literally and people believe this shit
the reality of what the world is.

Speaker 2 (53:47):
In social media today.

Speaker 1 (53:48):
Guys, if this is not proven, it to you that
you are being influenced by liars. You're being influenced by
people that are literally taking a paycheck to influence you
into complete bullshit. We want you to forget about the
actual truth and the facts. They want you to forget
about all this stuff and the reason why if you
go on social media right now, that there is a
mass coordinated effort to cancel Tucker Carlson, cancel Marjorie Taylor Green.

(54:12):
Obviously they've been trying to cancel Nick Fuinn tes forever.
But there's a reason why that is because even people
like us or other podcasters that once this stuff goes
down the rabbit hole and it gets to the point
where they actually do accomplish canceling people like.

Speaker 4 (54:29):
Tucker Carlson, then we have a problem.

Speaker 2 (54:31):
We're done.

Speaker 3 (54:32):
Yeah, we have a definite problem because it cancels freedom
of speech. And my problem to this whole thing is
everyone has a right to freedom of speech, no matter
where you stand on the line. If you're on the line,
if you're against the grain, with the grain, it doesn't matter.
Everyone should have a right to say what they want
to say. And when people come out and say we

(54:53):
got to cancel this person, we got to cancel this person,
I'm looking at that person. I'm saying, why are they
wanting to cancel him? I need to listen to him
more closely.

Speaker 1 (55:01):
And as I said in the last episode, like all
these people, you know, misfit cat turd Ashton Forbes. I mean,
just name all the rest of them. You know, what's
the other one? Conservative, Barbie Insurrection, Barbie whoever, all of
these major influencers on social media, they're all pointing at
the people that are actually question things on in Trump

(55:22):
administration that we know they're lying about, and they're all
calling us woke.

Speaker 2 (55:26):
Right, like I said in the last.

Speaker 1 (55:28):
Episode, but you're literally calling for the cancelation of these
people because they have a different opinion than you. And
it's not a different opinion than you, because a lot
of these people don't even have an opinion on this shit.

Speaker 2 (55:37):
They're just getting paid for this. A lot of these
people never even got involved.

Speaker 1 (55:41):
Some of these people never got involved in politics, and
now all of a sudden, they're experts on politics and
they want to cancel you for shit that you say
in your opinion.

Speaker 2 (55:49):
This is just what I'm sick of.

Speaker 1 (55:51):
Right, And you know, even and I'll be honest, like
our podcast that when when Ashton came on and I
don't want to keep going back, that came on and
was going to debate Ian Carroll and I didn't really
say a lot. But then we did release an episode
where we kind of we had to essentially respond because
you know, he's basically calling anyone that has ever believed

(56:12):
in any conspiracy theory conspiratards and they're all idiots and
they have zero IQ and all this stuff. Obviously, I
had to respond to.

Speaker 3 (56:20):
That, well, wait a minute, because our name has conspiracy
in it.

Speaker 1 (56:23):
Well exactly, but I had to respond to that. And
even when I responded to that, there was a couple
of people, like I guess some of his loyalists that
came out was like, you know, f you guys, I'm
never listening to you again. I can't believe that you
guys would do that. I'm like, dude, you are so
off base with like all I'm all we're trying to
do on this podcast, and I say this as much

(56:45):
as I possibly can, is that we're trying our very
best to just tell you guys the best version of
the truth that we think is the truth what we
see it right now. And the other big problem with
that is is so hard to tell what the truth is.
So it's like actually hard to do podcasts now because
you've got to go through eighteen million layers and then

(57:07):
you've got to take all of that in and then
you have to be able to evaluate, like, Okay, what
do I think is the most likely bullshit? What do
I think is the most likely to be true? And
it's somewhere that's a very thor line in between.

Speaker 3 (57:20):
And you're peeling that onion back one layer at a
time and trying to figure out who's being paid, who's
being influenced, who's not, Who do you trust, who do
you not trust? And it's you know, you've heard of
reverse psychology, but I think in this day and age, it's.

Speaker 4 (57:38):
Reverse reverse reverse psychology. If you know what I'm talking about.

Speaker 3 (57:42):
It's like a reverse or reverse or reverse like and
then you're like, oh my god, let's back up to
the first reverse and figure out that, and then go
to the next reverse and try to figure that out.
It's like trying to figure out I don't even know,
but it's just crazy.

Speaker 1 (57:59):
Yeah, yeah, puzzle. But it's like it's like a really
hard puzzle and I hate puzzles. But you know, unfortunately,
we have to do this. We have to do this
now at this point because you know, things used to
be easier. I will say the things used to be easier,
and I'll be one hundred percent honest with you I
think things are easier for us as a podcast before
Trump has got an office in twenty twenty four. Now

(58:20):
it's just even more confusing. And now it's just like,
oh shit, like what are we?

Speaker 2 (58:24):
What how?

Speaker 1 (58:25):
Like? Okay, basically I just explained what we feel like,
what how what? Anyways, So I want to play this,
and the reason why I want to play this is
this is Alex Jones piece on the deep underground military
basis or essentially the administration moving their top.

Speaker 2 (58:44):
I guess appointees to military bases and Alex Jones.

Speaker 1 (58:51):
You know, Alex Jones has called a lot of stuff
in the past and all that, but also, as I
said earlier, Alex Jones is somewhat compromised a little bit,
I personally believe. But because you know, you have this
multi or I guess at least one billion dollar lawsuit
on you, they're going to end Alex Jones what you
probably knew of it eventually.

Speaker 2 (59:10):
But he is dependent heavily.

Speaker 1 (59:11):
On this administration to bail him out of this, and they,
like we've said already, they have before. So you got
to be careful. Also listen to Alex Jones. I'm not
saying Alex is trying to intention a lot to you.
But we're going to just hear this clip out and
let's break down how Alex Jones responds to this clip
as far as Bill Maher asking Marjorie Taylor Green about

(59:33):
the people being moved to military bases, and let's see
what Alex says about this, and maybe we can start
breaking down like where do we think Alex is with this?

Speaker 3 (59:41):
Like, yeah, but I already think that your opinion of
Alex Jones has changed a little bit. I can just
tell from our conversation, but.

Speaker 1 (59:48):
It's not changed nearly to the point of some people.
What I will say, I mean, I have moved a
little bit of my goalposts, you know, like as far
as Alex goes a little bit, but so far he's
not been off the reservation as far as the way
I've talked about some of these influencers and people out there.

Speaker 2 (01:00:06):
But let's listen to this clip. Here you go.

Speaker 9 (01:00:09):
I read this week that a number of the members
of the administration are now living on a military base.
What you didn't know this? No? Oh yeah, Stephen Miller
just moved there. Christy Noman lives on a military based
JD Vance. Oh no, no, Rubio, Pete Haig Sath. I mean,

(01:00:30):
for people who love America so much, they seem to
be scared of it.

Speaker 2 (01:00:34):
I'm one of those people they call a conspiracy theorist.

Speaker 11 (01:00:36):
When I hear things like that, I'm like, what do
they know that I don't know?

Speaker 9 (01:00:42):
Well, I don't think it's I don't think it's you know,
it's in the paper.

Speaker 2 (01:00:48):
But well, thank god, this information is breaking out there.

Speaker 11 (01:00:53):
I first sort of devising the White House before Trump
was even back in when he was president elect, that
they had to be ready for the left to try
to launch national uprisings and the culmination of the Cloward
and Piven Plan known in its modern parlance as the
Podesta Plan, and that they had to understand that they're

(01:01:14):
have hit list names they want to go after, using
drug cartels, hit me in, anti foot, communist and others to.

Speaker 2 (01:01:25):
Wipe out.

Speaker 11 (01:01:28):
Not just top people in the trumpministration and top advisors,
people that have courage, but also key law enforcement leaders,
key corporate leaders and others, and media leaders, thought leaders
around the country. Well, now you've seen what General Flynn
broke in March here, and I also got it from

(01:01:49):
a very respected national investigative journalist off record, even before
I got it from Flynn. We didn't know at the
time that Flynn was actually right at the top of
the list after the Trump family. I was right under him,
and want to put himself in the story. Remember, Flynn
came on and warned that there were major bounties through
the drug cartels, particularly of Venezuela. The real muscle the

(01:02:09):
Democratic Party TDA and others, as well as MS thirteen
to be the muscle of that operation. Since then, they've
arrested and indicted a whole bunch of people and gotten
the documents off their cell phones, you name it, of
up to fifty thousand dollars bounties just on ice and
border patrol, even mid level leaders. And so all of

(01:02:35):
that's now been proven. All of that's now been documented.
Just like I told you back in mid September, the
cash matel went into the White House, had a big
meeting with Tulsa Gabbard and said, we're not looking at
any accomplices foreign or domestic, even though there's evidence of them.
That all broke Thursday, The New York Times, Washington Post,
everywhere else in indeed that did happen. So and I

(01:02:56):
tell you, we have these sources. We have them and
most of the time, like in the case of Flint,
he called me up and he's normally very hard to
get on. He reached out DOSY saying to come on
right now, and they had Nessay intercepts that were also
provided to Central Command and Army Special Operations.

Speaker 1 (01:03:17):
By the way, I want to stop for a second,
because I really hope that they're not trying to blame
Venezuela on Charlie Kirk or because it's almost sounded like
that's the narrative they're starting to try to That's not
what I heard.

Speaker 3 (01:03:32):
What I heard is that the drug cartels have bounties
on the Trump administration and political influencers.

Speaker 2 (01:03:41):
Yes, but that's what I'm saying.

Speaker 1 (01:03:44):
Right, We've had this big talk about, you know, a
lot of stuff leading you know, like who was involved
in Charlie kirk'ssasination. Now they're starting to say, hey, look,
you know, Venezuela has these bounties. We're intercepting this stuff.
Even though we're never going to actually show you what
we actually have. We're going to just take people and
put them on podcasts and all these shows and tell
you that, hey, it's the it's the Narco drug terrorists

(01:04:05):
that have these bounties for the Trump administration level.

Speaker 3 (01:04:09):
It makes since though, Chad, in the last four years,
we've opened our borders to all of these cartels, to
all these game members that are good here. They're here,
they're domestic. Now, it's way easier to make an assassination
when you're here on the soil of America versus not
on those fool of America.

Speaker 4 (01:04:30):
Right.

Speaker 3 (01:04:31):
Yeah, it would be harder to attack. It's hard it's
easier to attack within.

Speaker 2 (01:04:35):
Yeah, I know. I'm just saying.

Speaker 1 (01:04:36):
I just hope that two months from now we're not
trying to blame Narco drug terrorists for Charlie Kirk assassination.

Speaker 2 (01:04:43):
I just hope. But we'll see. Let's listen to a
little more.

Speaker 11 (01:04:50):
Of these globalists on the phones known names Flynn won't
say who and near with my other sources, but Democrat
strategy talking about killing us. Well, you see them on
the news saying they want to kill Republicans and we
need to be violent and all the rest of it.
You see them pushing that. Imagine what they do behind
the scenes and saying we're going to use the drug

(01:05:12):
cartels to kick this off. So everybody's asking, oh, first
we learned it with six and then a dozen, and
now fifty and now one hundred. Trump administration officials like
Stephen Miller and his family living at hardened military bases.
That means bunkers in the Maryland DC area, And that's

(01:05:35):
not for a nuclear war, boys and girls. Steven Miller
is not in foreign policy. They have those bunkers as
well for the State Department and Pentagon officials. No, they've
moved into those above ground facilities that are above large
underground railway bunker complexes that are partially declassified. They have

(01:05:56):
sites like CIDAR in Maryland and others that a little
suba is railroad to survive during a nuclear war. So
the fact that they have activated the COOG system, that's
continuity of government system, shows you how serious the threat
is of the Podesta Plan and all these movies that
are out right now. So I don't really I should

(01:06:18):
follow Hollywood more because that's really the propaganda arm, even
more than the news, because they know the public doesn't
buy corporate media anymore, but they do kind of get
programmed by movies and TV shows. There are at least
eight current movies and TV shows out right now fantasizing
about mass murdering conservatives, white people, and Christians. And we've
had articles about that today, one battle after another and

(01:06:40):
assassination culture. Here's that article, one of the articles right
there today. So when you see Bill Maher even talking
about it last night with MGG, this is the first

(01:07:00):
story I'm going to get into because it ties in
and is the gateway to understanding everything else that's happening
that's so massive that we're going to be hitting today.
Not dozens, not one hundred, hundreds of Trump administration officials
that we know have bounties on their head by name
have moved in to military based bunkers. Now I'm right

(01:07:26):
up at the top of the list under the Trump
family and under flyint. We got the list, all right.
You've seen all these other government lists that come out
where I'm in the top twenty as well, Arctic Cross,
the latest Cross for Hurricane I'm always there because they
know I'm reaching millions of people, and when they're going
to pull some false flag or some dirty trick, they

(01:07:46):
don't want me coming up here with credibility and analysis
and talking to tens of millions of people. Now, I
don't have a military base bunker I can go to.
But I'll tell you this, and I told you this
a few months ago. I'm not living at my house,
but we do have some things there and people there,
and we picked up good intel. I'll just leave it

(01:08:06):
at that. So and I've been on here thirty one years.
I've never left my house. So if that just gives
you an idea of the temperature out there, just so
you know, and.

Speaker 2 (01:08:26):
That kind of.

Speaker 11 (01:08:28):
Helps me understand why Trump wants to seem change of
Venezuela is Venezuela is hand in glove with the Democrats,
laundering their money, is helping steal elections.

Speaker 1 (01:08:37):
And I don't want to pause for a second because
you know, Alex makes a good point here, right.

Speaker 2 (01:08:42):
You know, he's not living in his house. There's a
lot of stuff that.

Speaker 3 (01:08:46):
But what's scary is he's been living in his house
for thirty one years and now he had to move out.

Speaker 2 (01:08:51):
Yeah, but he's had security like twenty four to seven.

Speaker 4 (01:08:54):
Yeah, but now he's moved out of his house.

Speaker 2 (01:08:56):
Yeah.

Speaker 1 (01:08:56):
But I mean that's something that you know, even us,
that we do for because you know, you don't know,
I mean when you reach a lot of people on
a podcast and you talk about things that are as
factual as you can possibly, but you got to be careful.

Speaker 2 (01:09:10):
And we are careful.

Speaker 1 (01:09:11):
We try to be careful based on past things, based
on podcasts, based on whatever.

Speaker 2 (01:09:16):
We're very careful of.

Speaker 1 (01:09:17):
How we live, where we live, how is it is
shown on the internet, so on and so forth, and so.

Speaker 2 (01:09:25):
Unfortunately, in this day and age, you have to be like.

Speaker 1 (01:09:28):
That, right, you have to be like that because there
are a lot of crazy people out there. There are
a lot of people that do want to kill people
like Alex Jones, people like who whether it's Republicans or
just political activists or or not even just activists in general,
just people that are trying to speak to truth. I
mean Charlie Kirk for example. I mean that's obviously a
huge one. But you got to be careful nowadays. You

(01:09:51):
can't live the same way. If you are going to
go out there and you're going to speak, and you're
going to talk, and you're going to be in front
of a lot of people, no matter where it is
and who you are, you've got to be careful. I
got to be a lot more careful than anybody else.
You can't just assume that everything's fine and you're safe.

Speaker 4 (01:10:04):
And that goes for everyone.

Speaker 3 (01:10:06):
I remember when I was growing up as a little child,
we had locks on our doors, But do you think
we ever used them. No, we never locked our doors.
We never locked our car doors, we never locked anything.

Speaker 5 (01:10:18):
Like.

Speaker 3 (01:10:19):
I had no fears back when I was a child,
but now today, like even when my daughter was growing up,
I had more fears than when I was a child.
You know, I had to go watch her and make sure.
You know, stuff was even happening twenty years ago. But
now you think in the last ten years, how scary
it is for everyone.

Speaker 1 (01:10:39):
Yeah, but I mean yeah, for sure, Yeah, just for everyone. Absolutely.
But specifically, what we're talking about here is the people
that are actually out there talking.

Speaker 2 (01:10:48):
They have an audience, they have a platform.

Speaker 1 (01:10:51):
They're saying things that a lot of people are getting
very angry.

Speaker 2 (01:10:54):
About them saying. And this has happened time and time again.

Speaker 1 (01:10:56):
I mean even Nick Quintez, I mean he had someone
showed at his house with a gun that had just
murdered two people before he showed up, and Nick Fuinn
does his house and luckily Nick didn't answer the door.
In that particular instance, because he did answer a door.
One other time he maced a person. He got actually
arrested for Mason, the person that showed up.

Speaker 4 (01:11:14):
At his door inside his house.

Speaker 2 (01:11:15):
He was inside his house. He got arrested.

Speaker 1 (01:11:17):
But then what I think, if I'm not mistaken, the
girl that showed up that he maceed, I think that
happened before.

Speaker 4 (01:11:23):
It was some kind of crazy like white chick or something.

Speaker 1 (01:11:26):
Yeah, but either way, I think it was before the
guy showed up with the gun that was going to
kill him.

Speaker 2 (01:11:31):
If Nick would have answered the door, he would have
been killed.

Speaker 3 (01:11:33):
Yeah, or even going to the door, he could have
shot through the door.

Speaker 4 (01:11:37):
Like you just never know.

Speaker 1 (01:11:39):
So you got to be careful. You gotta be careful,
and you got to do things. You got to make
moves that are very different than a lot of people.
It can be weird, right, and you got to be
careful who you talk to, who you communicate with, who
you're friends with, who you're not friends with.

Speaker 2 (01:11:53):
You know, how much do you say to people online?
How much do you not even you know.

Speaker 1 (01:11:57):
Obviously we have a telegram, right, we have a telegram
where we talk to you guys.

Speaker 2 (01:12:00):
And for those that don't know.

Speaker 1 (01:12:02):
I mean, if you guys want to follow us and
go chat with us on live telegrams, we do lives
pretty often, but we're on there and we just have
live audio telegrams where you guys can talk to us,
we talk to you, but we still got to be
careful on telegram. I mean, even with you just never
know who's going to come in your telegram and be like, hey,
what's up and try to find out information or we

(01:12:22):
get a lot of emails. There are people that seem
like they're trying to be cool, but then it seems
like also they're trying to find out information or trying
to sway you or say something in this particular way.
Even people that are that reach out to us, that
want to come on the podcast because of a certain thing,
like a certain angle, you gotta be careful of those
because then are you going to let people on your

(01:12:44):
podcast that they are just trying to manipulate and sway
your audience in a certain way.

Speaker 3 (01:12:47):
Yeah, and there's some people that come on the podcast
that they're afraid for people to even know what city
they live in.

Speaker 4 (01:12:53):
You know, it goes is both sides.

Speaker 1 (01:12:56):
Yeah, I guess, and we you know, we've had a
couple of people I would say a few people in
the podcast. I would say a few people that have
been on our podcasts that are government employees, and not
just government employees, but they're high level government employees. I'm
talking about like some of the top level employees that
have been on this podcast. But there's probably two of

(01:13:17):
those people I trust. Two of those people I trust,
like without a doubt that they're not coming on our podcast. Yeah,
they're not coming on a podcast to spin a narrative.
I actually think it was the opposite. I think they're
coming on a podcast to disqualify some things of what
mainstream media and the global consensuses or the national consensus is.
Because they've been in the government, they understand what the

(01:13:38):
game plan is, they understand the playbook. They've seen it,
they've seen the playbooks. They know what the playbook is,
they've used it before. And in some conversations offline, like
off the podcast, where we've had with some of these
people where they're like, Dude, this is out of our playbook,
Like we have learned this, we have studied this, we
have we know exactly how they're doing this. And so

(01:14:00):
when I'm saying that to you guys that like, even
even now, I'm like the most confused ever. But there's
definitely been times when we've had people, high level people
through connections and whoever, that have come on, but not
just come on, We've talked to them outside of the podcast,
and it just blew my mind. It didn't blow my
mind because I wasn't surprised, but just to kind of

(01:14:20):
have confirmation on some of this stuff was the most
mind blowing. So that's all I'm saying. And you know,
for people like Alex Jones and what he's saying here
in this piece, don't think Alex Jones does not have
like crazy connections in the government on every single level.
And the thing for Alex it's going to be hard
for him going forward right now as well, is who

(01:14:42):
do you trust and who do you not like? Who
is giving you information? And if you used to trust
those people, can you still trust.

Speaker 2 (01:14:51):
Them and or are they going to get you in
some more shit?

Speaker 1 (01:14:57):
Because I think that for the Sandy Hook there were
government officials, from what I've been told about Alex Jones
and stuff, there were insiders in the whole Sandy Hook
thing that reached out to Alex telling him certain things
that then set him up for this billion dollar lawsuit
to where.

Speaker 2 (01:15:14):
Then now Alex Jones.

Speaker 1 (01:15:16):
In my opinion, if you ever want to control an
Alex Jones, it is the most opportune time to do that, because.

Speaker 2 (01:15:23):
You are you have a billion dollars over your head.

Speaker 1 (01:15:27):
And so as long as someone, a government agency or
entity comes in and says, look, Alex, we can make
this go away eventually, but you're going to play by
our rules and you're going to make sure that you
don't talk about this. You don't go into this like
we want you know. That's That's all I'm saying.

Speaker 4 (01:15:44):
Unless he could just file for bankruptcy and start over.

Speaker 2 (01:15:47):
Well, he's already done that.

Speaker 4 (01:15:48):
Yeah, and you only get that once.

Speaker 2 (01:15:49):
I think, yeah, he's already done it.

Speaker 1 (01:15:51):
But now they've still have that billion dollars because of
some stipulation, and you know, I don't know.

Speaker 4 (01:15:58):
I don't know why. It's crazy now there.

Speaker 1 (01:16:00):
Is, Yeah, they still have it over them. And I
think he did file for bankruptcy, but there's so many stipulations,
especially when you got something like a billion dollars and
you have a political motive and you have all these
other things, they're gonna they're gonna just circumvent whatever these.

Speaker 2 (01:16:15):
No, it doesn't, No, it absolutely doesn't.

Speaker 1 (01:16:17):
So and in most cases it doesn't unless you have
these high level people in power that helps you, then.

Speaker 2 (01:16:25):
It can go away. And so we kind of know a.

Speaker 1 (01:16:28):
Little bit about that. We do kind of heavily. I'm
not going to say politically motivated what we went through,
but it kind of was because of the people of
the group that was ahead of I guess our thing,
and which is literally the reason why we decided to
create this podcast.

Speaker 2 (01:16:45):
Because of what we went through back then.

Speaker 1 (01:16:47):
I can only imagine for people like Alex and others
that are that have this lawsuit or this thing over
and Candice is about to have the same thing.

Speaker 4 (01:16:55):
Oh yeah, well she's already been sued by.

Speaker 1 (01:16:57):
White Bridget Macron likely turning point, USA will drop some
multi million dollar lawsuits on her. They're gonna shut her
with the hell up. That's what you have to do.

Speaker 4 (01:17:07):
So why she went on vacation. You might as well
spend the money now, yeah.

Speaker 2 (01:17:10):
I mean, they're gonna shut her up. And I think Tucker.

Speaker 1 (01:17:14):
Tucker's playing a little safer because I think he knows, like,
if you want to silence someone into oblivion, and you
want to destroy everything they've ever worked for or had.
All you gotta to assume them and you just got
to have more money, more powerful lawyers, and a certain
faction of people on your side, and you can make
this shit last for years and years and years. But

(01:17:36):
during that time, though, you might be able to get
some motions that are restraining orders, he said, you know, that's.

Speaker 2 (01:17:42):
Basically what they are.

Speaker 1 (01:17:43):
To where it says to where it says you no
longer can talk about this ever again, or at least
until this lawsuits over, and maybe even after that, which
is why we can't really go into the stuff that
happened back We.

Speaker 2 (01:17:55):
Still lifetime, Yeah, we still can't.

Speaker 1 (01:17:58):
You know, it is what it is, and the way
the game is played is extremely dirty.

Speaker 4 (01:18:03):
Well, the game is who has the most money.

Speaker 1 (01:18:06):
Yes, I mean you always got to follow the money,
but also you got to follow the power. You get
to follow the influence. You got to follow who funds who,
because you know, even with Trump and you know Trump,
yeah he's a billionaire, but think about it, he has
a lot of political donors. So does every president that
gets into office. They all have political donors. That's how
they become president. If they don't have donors that are
influencing them or expecting influence, they are not going to

(01:18:29):
be president. And that's just the way it goes. So
I just wanted to talk about that for a second.
We're going to listen to a little more of this.

Speaker 11 (01:18:34):
Clip and and seeing the main hit teams with the
different drug cartels. And so Trump learned five six months ago,
and he already knew he was on a hit list.
But his whole family, his key people, his most hardcore
folks like Steven Miller and stuff that are for the

(01:18:55):
cracking out on drug cartels. Oh, Marco Rubio top of
the list. So so you understand, they're the ones that
put the bounties out on us. So when you see
Trump put a fifty million dollar bounty on Maduro and
you see Trump start blowing up the drug boats, Trump's
not the type of guy when people start doing stuff
like that and they've busted him, they've caught him, they've
caught him trying to come and kill people, and it

(01:19:17):
just barely blips in the news. So I have the
drug cartels with a gigantic bounty that I've been asked
not to say how much it is on me. And
I'm just so relaxed about all this. I'm making a
deal about the family, the crew, anybody. It's just now
you need to know. And it was already announced by
Flynn back in March. So this is a man's world,

(01:19:40):
This is a man's game. This is the real world here,
all right.

Speaker 1 (01:19:45):
All right, So, and I'm going to keep the first
piece I played of Alex. I need to write this
down because sometimes I always forget, because Alex, when he
was a heap, actually played the clip of Marjorie Tayl
Green on Bill Maher and then goes into similar topics
they talking about how much like you. But I did
want to talk briefly and too. You know, Alex Jones

(01:20:06):
had that employee that got murdered.

Speaker 4 (01:20:08):
Yeah, we did a podcast about it.

Speaker 2 (01:20:10):
Yeah we did.

Speaker 1 (01:20:11):
They never could necessarily tie that employee, I guess to
like a political hit. But it could have been a message.
It could have been a message to Alex. And you know,
Alex may never say that. I mean he kind of
did after the fact. Sometimes stuff like that happens and
there is a message to it. It's kind of like
an underlying message to where your brain as Alex Jones

(01:20:34):
or us or if that you know happened to us.
It's like, now you've got to start thinking differently.

Speaker 3 (01:20:39):
And Fox has never gone after that person, like Candace
has gone after whoever she's going after either. So they
must have not been the closest of friends.

Speaker 1 (01:20:49):
I don't know who knows, But so I want to
talk before we get off about the standard defensive infantry bunkers,
all the different bunkers and what they are. So now
the standard defensive and infantry bunkers are. They're kind of familiar,
small to medium structures designed to protect troops or assets

(01:21:11):
from artillery bombs or small arms.

Speaker 4 (01:21:12):
Are you talking about bunkers underground or what?

Speaker 9 (01:21:14):
Well?

Speaker 2 (01:21:15):
It can be both.

Speaker 1 (01:21:15):
It could be above ground that are concrete structures, or
it could be below ground. Then you have missile silos,
underground launch or strategic weapons facilities. And we actually you
can find some of these in places like Nevada and
Utah that have been decommissioned. Now they're literally making multi
million dollar apartment complexes or just underground structures to where

(01:21:37):
they're selling entire levels of these things.

Speaker 2 (01:21:40):
Yeah, they're completely.

Speaker 1 (01:21:41):
Remodeling them underground and they're selling them for like million
and a half dollars and people can go move in them,
and they're they're below ground. But so these things are
deeply hardened underground structures used to store, launch or support
strategic weapons. So you know, maybe you're talking about intercontinentaballistic missiles,
the underground missile silo as remaining the primary miss missile

(01:22:02):
basing system in the United States, and so these are
generally part of the nuclear deterrence or strategic strike forces
on a base, and they may be off limits to
most personnel, isolated or heavily secured. Then you also have
command to control or continuity of government bunkers, and this
is likely what we're going to see some of these
Trump officials that are actually in right now, and these

(01:22:23):
are facilities designed to ensure decision makers can survive and
operate during major attacks nuclear conventional cbre IN or chemical, biological, radiological,
and nuclear for example, Strategic bunkers or fortified underground structure
designed to protect the essential personnel, equipment operations, and a
high level official or group might be relocated to such

(01:22:43):
a facility if there's concerned about an attack and UPEVIL
or other extreme scenarios. These facilities often include living quarters, workspaces,
secure communications, and supplies.

Speaker 2 (01:22:55):
Now, the key features on these are deep.

Speaker 1 (01:22:56):
Underground or heavily shielded, multiple independent life support system power
air filtrations, secured entrances, were dundant communication links, possibly remote,
but you know, likely not an obvious place that you're
going to see them. Even on a military base, you
would probably not even see the entrance to this, to
these underground structures, and this is probably the most relevant

(01:23:17):
type when we're talking about the news reporting about officials
move into the military bases and so if so, this
is like a command and control bunker, and it would
make sense for station in continuity or secure operations, especially
if they know something that we do not know, right.
And then you obviously have like the storage munitions and
ammunition bunkers, which obviously you guys can kind of obviously

(01:23:42):
take from whatever you want to about that. That's that's
for munitions and ammunition and probably missiles. And then you've
got civil defense hardened shelters, fallout shelters or bases. We're
talking about places that maybe the elitists build.

Speaker 2 (01:23:54):
Bill Gates, you know, the founder of.

Speaker 1 (01:23:56):
Facebook, you know, all of these people are building these
underground bunkers. We know that they have some in Hawaii,
we know they have some in Utah. We also know
we they have some in Sweden, Switzerland. A lot of
these global elitists have these underground bunkers, and they've actually
started building these over the past eight years. We actually
talked about this during the Biden Harris administration. I think

(01:24:17):
it was the first year of the Biden presidency that
Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg, and I think it was
also Jack Dorsey. A lot of these elites went and
started moving into these underground bunkers. And not only that,
you know where they build him. We're talking about places
that were worth you know, two hundred three hundred million

(01:24:38):
dollars in some cases, if not more. And so we've
started to see this eight years ago, and now the
Trump administration is saying, hey, there's something going on. They
supposedly are saying this political violence and the risk of that.
You know, Alex Jones is saying, it's the bounties that
are on their heads. But is it it's something that

(01:25:00):
we don't know, because that's more likely the scenario than not.

Speaker 2 (01:25:04):
I don't think it's just the uprising in political violence.

Speaker 1 (01:25:07):
I think it's something bigger and I don't exactly know
what that is, but guys, I want you to tell
us what you think it is, like what is the
most likely scenario in that case? And before we get
off here, I do want to say we do have
all of our social media, but we also have a
merchandise store which Sherry did just design some cool Christmas
merchandise that is investigatorstore dot com.

Speaker 2 (01:25:28):
So on social media, go follow us there. We also
have a.

Speaker 1 (01:25:31):
Telegram and we're going to play out our song from
Revolution Code. I want you, guys to go follow us
on Spotify or wherever you listen to music, Go download
a song, go share it with people. This song is
literally about good versus evil and when Christ will come
back or in the very end, and I think we're
close that he's going to break the chains from the
totalitarian evil state that we live in.

Speaker 2 (01:25:53):
And I'm not saying state, I'm talking about the world
as it is. And so this is break the Chains
by Revolution Code. That is us.

Speaker 1 (01:26:00):
Go follow us, go find us, go share it, and guys,
until next time, we love you so very much.

Speaker 2 (01:26:05):
We will be back very soon. Peace out, guys, Peace out.

Speaker 12 (01:26:32):
Form in the shadows.

Speaker 13 (01:26:35):
Call sorny, they're right there.

Speaker 12 (01:26:43):
Logic, play the ol.

Speaker 14 (01:27:00):
You can't shame what was bold to leave? Read the
jews where the sun.

Speaker 2 (01:27:14):
Sto got in the door.

Speaker 12 (01:27:21):
The fire risteed on the knee on sky, where the
ray shade. They all said, the size, the sad, the

(01:27:49):
true in the die. The night racks through.

Speaker 13 (01:28:06):
The cham makers hide behind the veil, whispers.

Speaker 2 (01:28:17):
Of control in a silver trail.

Speaker 12 (01:28:25):
They bound to.

Speaker 14 (01:28:26):
The shadow for a crown of gold, but saw the
soul star story sols.

Speaker 2 (01:28:35):
The coding line.

Speaker 12 (01:28:38):
Begin to fall.

Speaker 2 (01:28:43):
Their eye on crown, can't stop.

Speaker 12 (01:28:52):
Handing n scy with hard again, break the change. They
are sad, They'll never silence the sound large him. The

(01:29:17):
dark lime rays to.

Speaker 2 (01:29:23):
The forum fase.

Speaker 15 (01:29:25):
The veil is torn. A new world rises where truth
is born. They dance with the serpent. They took his hand.
The fire consumed.

Speaker 12 (01:29:39):
They're stolen maund Their darkness falls beneath the same. The
king of kings will break their chain.

Speaker 2 (01:29:58):
Under kneel sca.

Speaker 12 (01:30:01):
We heard there a face fall bad. They don't have
a salas the second don't know. This is the natt

(01:30:25):
We ray gone through on the least escape.

Speaker 2 (01:30:41):
The architects, fall.

Speaker 5 (01:30:50):
O Kingdom.

Speaker 2 (01:30:55):
We'll ride shut against.

Speaker 12 (01:31:00):
The nection Nection Inc.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Ruthie's Table 4

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}President Trump’s Inner Circle Moves to Military Bases: What’s Really Going On? Conspiracy Podcast

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Stuff You Should Know

Ruthie's Table 4

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

President Trump’s Inner Circle Moves to Military Bases: What’s Really Going On? Conspiracy Podcast

Stuff You Should Know