US vs Venezuela | The War They’re Not Talking About - Investigate Earth Conspiracy Podcast

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:01):
Today is the beginning of the end, at the start
of a huge beginning. Time has come to find yourself
and lift well. If you miss your heads, that appens
you be kept hiving it for so long. It's time
to put the page and prove it wrong. It's a
time for weepers. Yeah, time stuff to staying bye to

(00:23):
all the haters, saturns and some believers and trying to
bring it down.

Speaker 2 (00:28):
Get the brink of an eye, you lie that there's
so much more to the foot of a page you
were stuck on. Finally, it would be for me to
live alive of living it that of the life.

Speaker 1 (00:40):
You think other people want you to live. And remember
I mean give the highest authority.

Speaker 3 (00:45):
When it comes to knowing what you want and what
you below.

Speaker 2 (00:49):
Its upstrating yourselfully approval from others, lay and gentlemen whereover,
making you would pay after me, I.

Speaker 4 (01:01):
Don't give them.

Speaker 5 (01:05):
Hello and welcome to Investigator Podcast. I'm your host Chad
alongside my beautiful wife Sherry. On tonight we're talking about Venezuela,
a place most people aren't paying attention to, but maybe
they should be. The Trump administration has deployed nearly ten
percent of the United States Navy to the region, launch
strikes on Venezuelan and drug boats, and move to be
fifty two bombers into position. On paper, it's all about

(01:26):
fighting cartels. But off the record, it looks like something
much deeper. Whispers say, China's knee deep in Madure's regime,
using Venezuela as a foothold in the Western hemisphere and
maybe even as a hub for trafficking, money laundering, and
covert operations tied to rogue intelligence networks.

Speaker 6 (01:42):
Is this just a drug war?

Speaker 5 (01:44):
Or is this the start of a global power shift
happening right under our noses? Welcome back to Investigator Earth.
It is October the twenty twenty five. The name of
that song is I Don't give a f We actually
decide to play the clean version tonight, that is by Death.
We actually played that song a while back. It's actually
a pretty good song. Yeah, we used to play it

(02:04):
a lot. I wanted to be our theme song because
I think it's awesome. I love the way the music
comes in after he announces that it's sure awesome. Well,
and then also too just you know, with everything and
all of the content creators are influencers now that it's
like if you say the wrong thing, if you're on
the wrong side of this, or if you don't agree
with a particular faction of people, you know, they say, oh,

(02:27):
you're not allowed to say that. You shouldn't be saying that.
Let's cancel this person, let's cancel that person. It's something
I got pretty tired of. So that is kind of
like a salute song to say, hey, look, if you
don't agree with us, we're just going to be ourselves
no matter what. And I think that's why a lot
of you listen to us. We definitely try to be
as middle of the road as possible. We try to
look at every single situation or issue from a lens

(02:48):
that is not biased towards one particular side except for
certain things.

Speaker 7 (02:52):
Erry Well, and I also have to say that Trump
basically came out and said, listen Venezuela.

Speaker 8 (02:59):
I don't give a yeah.

Speaker 6 (03:01):
Yeah, and we're gonna play that clip in just a moment.

Speaker 2 (03:03):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (03:03):
Trump When asked by reporters about the Venezuela situation and Maduro,
he responded like Trump only would. And what I will
say is, actually I've never heard Trump respond quite like this.
Trump's kind of in this realm to where he doesn't
give a f and he's on that f around.

Speaker 6 (03:19):
And find out train. I guess you can say.

Speaker 5 (03:21):
Now, there's still a lot of things obviously that I
don't agree with what the Trump administration has done up
until now, especially with the Epstein files, which we're going
to be covering here on a upcoming podcast very soon.
We're going to look at like where those files are,
what is the updates with that? You know, is the
Trump administration hiding that we do know that, you know,
particular congress people in particular that have called for the

(03:45):
release of these files are now being I guess ousted there.
And I'm literally talking about Thomas Massey for one. Everybody
wants Thomas Massey out because Thomas Massey was trying to
push a vote to get the Epstein files released. And
now the Trump minished has going hardcore against Thomas Massey
or basically anybody that is wanting these files released.

Speaker 7 (04:04):
So well, wasn't all the Republicans they voted no to
have them released just recently?

Speaker 5 (04:09):
Yeah, it's weird. So yeah, they voted along party lines.
Most Republicans voted no, with the exception of a few,
and then most Democrats voted yes. Now, obviously there are
a lot of people saying, well, you know, the Democrats
are the ones that have had these files for this long,
so they have likely been manipulated. You know, they're going
to try to pin it on Trump or his allies

(04:30):
or whoever.

Speaker 6 (04:31):
We don't know.

Speaker 5 (04:32):
All I do know is that even during the Democrat time,
they didn't care about the Epstein files, and they damn
sure and were not releasing the Epstein files during the
Biden Harris administration. So it's not just a Republican issue
and not releasing the files. It is obviously a faction
of elites or people that are over all of our Congress,
all of our government that is not allowing for the
release of the Epstein files.

Speaker 6 (04:53):
And I think it goes both sides. Unfortunately.

Speaker 5 (04:56):
The problem is is that when the Trump administration was
coming into office, and especially leading up to that year
leading up to the election, you know, you had people
like Cash, Mattel and Trump and everybody else saying that, hey,
on day one, we're going to make sure that this
is clear and transparent, We're going to release every file.
And then there was just a lot of blunders from
the Trump administration with a g Pam Bondi. She went

(05:17):
back and forth saying I have all the files. No,
I don't have all the files. And then you have
the infamous influencer meeting at the White House where they
all came out with binders that were empty with nothing
in them that says Epstein files. And so that was
a joke and everybody was like, what in the hell
is going on? And then even Pam Bondi said, oh,
I have all this on my desk. We have truckloads

(05:39):
of evidence. We have all of this. And then it
went from that to like, hey, we don't actually have it. Well,
and actually it's only just child pee or porn. It's
kind of been a shit show, right, So there's obviously
things that in any administration we're going to find that
we did not necessarily agree with. The Epstein thing is
definitely a big one. And I know a lot of
people have asked when are we going to be covering,

(06:02):
you know, any updates on the Epstein files release, And
we will be doing that probably this week. So just
hang with us, guys. We've been away for five or
six days. I've had some medical issues here and there.
I do have so a lot of people have asked,
we did announce this kind of yesterday, you know, hey,
we've been away for a little bit. I do have
a basically a stomach issue thing. It's diverticulitis. Really, I mean,

(06:23):
it's actually an old people thing, but I for some
reason have it. My whole family is hereditary. Yeah, and
so essentially it's like pockets in your intestinal lining that
can get infected, and once that happens, then it's like
hellish pain.

Speaker 8 (06:35):
It is terrible for him.

Speaker 6 (06:37):
It's bad.

Speaker 7 (06:37):
And really the first time we ever went to the
er with it and he didn't know what it was.
He kind of had an idea, but the er doctor
was looking at Chatt. He's like, dude, this is like
an old people like disease. You're not supposed to have
this so young. But unfortunately Chat is young and he
does have it, and it does frequently come back.

Speaker 8 (06:58):
That's why he does try to combat.

Speaker 7 (06:59):
It with what he eats and what he drinks, and
he has a very realistic, not realistic, yeah, ritualistic way
of eating. He has to have this fiber, he's got
to have Sauer Kraut, He's got to have this, he's
got to have this at certain times every day, so
you know, I would hate to have to live like that,
and it does suck when it flares up because he

(07:20):
is in so much pain. Like yesterday he felt like
he got stabbed in the side of his I.

Speaker 6 (07:24):
Still do actually today side.

Speaker 8 (07:26):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (07:26):
Yeah, I've been in the mergency room with it a
few times. Actually, my mom's had part of her colon
remove because of it. Both of my brothers also suffer
with it, and so I haven't had it actually in
a couple of years because the fiber, and then recently
i'd got off the you know, like probotic stuff. So anyways,
that's the update. It's nothing too crazy, but you know,
stuff like that can get serious if left untreated, so

(07:47):
I just wanted to And then also we've just kind
of been dealing with a lot of stuff the past
five days. But we are back. We are ready to
report for duty in this crazy world. And as I said,
there is so much to talk about that, I mean,
we're gonna we're gonna try our very best to do
episodes almost every night this week and then probably even
next week as well. There's just so much stuff on

(08:08):
the back burner. We got UFO topics to cover. There's
basically a civil war in the UFO community right now
with our friend Tupa and Red Panda against Lou Alexondo
and others literally to the point of death threats from
potentially Lou Alexando and others camp Onto.

Speaker 6 (08:25):
You know, Tupacabra and Red Panda.

Speaker 5 (08:28):
Yeah, And for those that don't know who Tupa and
Red Panda are, they are two of the biggest kind
of names I guess on the UFO x Twitter space.
They do a lot of documentaries, they Red pandas a filmmaker,
documentary filmmaker, and it seems like that, you know, they've
called out some stuff, you know, I guess that Lou
Alexando has has talked about or has presented in the past,

(08:50):
and this has got them a ton of backlash. And
we might have one or both of them on the
podcast very soon.

Speaker 7 (08:57):
So well, what's scary about that too, is is been
with the government, and once you're with the government, you're
always with the government. And these guys are kind of outsiders.
So that's what really makes me nervous for the two
outsiders is because you have government versus outsiders, and you
never know if something ever were to go wrong or

(09:18):
crazy and what would happen.

Speaker 6 (09:20):
To Oh yeah.

Speaker 5 (09:20):
On the podcast that Lou has been on lately, they've
literally been talking about, Yeah, you know, it would really suck,
you know for these two to you know, be suicidal
one day or something.

Speaker 6 (09:31):
And I'm like, are you crazy, bro?

Speaker 5 (09:32):
Like, you're yeah, And they go deeper and they just
keep you know, they keep up with the threats.

Speaker 6 (09:38):
That just kind of makes me wonder, like, what is
the official narrative of that?

Speaker 5 (09:41):
So we got that story coming up as well, probably
this week also. There's just so much going on, but
we're going to go ahead and get into this Venezuela story.
I'll go ahead and let's first start. I guess with
the Venezuela drug boats. Right there have been quite a
few Venezuelan drug boats that have been blown up, you know,
just over the past couple of months, and so if

(10:03):
you look at it right now, on September the second,
twenty twenty five, the US military struck a vessel alleged
to be departing Venezuela with drugs.

Speaker 6 (10:11):
Eleven people on board were killed.

Speaker 5 (10:13):
And then on September fifteenth, twenty twenty five, another strike
killed three people on a boat said to originate from Venezuela.
Then October third, twenty twenty five, a further strike killed
at least four people on a suspected Venezuela and linked
drug boat there Now, Reuters' piece dated October seventeenth reported
that there about six strikes on vessels near Venezuela alleged

(10:33):
drug smuggling boats had occurred as of October the seventeenth,
So at least six drug boats that we know of
have been struck, and I think recently there was another
one that appeared to be I.

Speaker 6 (10:44):
Guess, a drug submarine.

Speaker 5 (10:46):
Now there's a lot of South American drug cartels that
will use these kind of makeshift submarines. And when I
say makeshift, they're actually not that bad as far as
if you're thinking about a cartel making a submarine type vessel, well,
they do have these, and the reason they have these
is for this exact reason. Except for back in the day,
you know, before Trump administration came in, it was the

(11:08):
Coastguard that was always essentially I guess, patrolling the waters
and making sure that hey, if there was drug boats,
usually they would have their guns outside of their either
inmate sixty helicopters or maybe some of their dolphins, and
they would shoot out the engines of these boats. Then
they would board the boats, they would get the you know,
they would bring on the boats up next to the

(11:30):
boats or up next to the drug boats, and then
they would capture them. Usually they would have to release them,
put them back in the country, and you know, that
was it. And then guess what, another week or so
later they would be right back doing the exact same thing,
and in most cases they were not caught.

Speaker 6 (11:45):
So what the Trump administration decided to.

Speaker 5 (11:47):
Do this time around was they wanted to send a
very strong message by literally blowing up these drug boats
that they could identify without you know, I guess, without
much speculation, or I guess you can say without reasonable
or shadow of a doubt that these were in fact
cartel drug boats from Venezuela.

Speaker 6 (12:05):
And when they would.

Speaker 5 (12:06):
Identify these with the Department of War Pete Hegseth and others,
they would literally just blow these things up with missiles.

Speaker 8 (12:12):
Yeah. And it's a common theme for Trump fa fo.

Speaker 2 (12:15):
Yeah.

Speaker 7 (12:15):
And that's what he's saying to these people. He's like,
get it done, guys. That's what cash Betel and Dan
Brongina also said with everything they're doing, he said, you know,
as far as like the ice stuff going on and
bringing a National Guard into different states. He doesn't want
crime in America. He wants the streets to be safe.
So he's like, guys, whatever you gotta do to get

(12:37):
our streets straight, do it, go get them. Yeah, and
that this is his mentality at this point.

Speaker 4 (12:43):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (12:43):
And so Trump had actually just responded to a reporter
the other day about why not just stop the Narco
terrast boats from Venezuela with the Coastguard, right, That's that's
what he was asking.

Speaker 6 (12:52):
This is what he responded.

Speaker 5 (12:53):
And by the way, before I played this video, I
did want to also mention that we only have a
couple of days on our store investigators com for our
our last line of merchandise. I guess we've had it
out probably a month and a half now. We're going
to be switching all that over in a couple of days.
So if you want some some of the merchandise that
is currently on there right now, go to Investigate orstore

(13:15):
dot com and you can check that out. But anyways,
here's the clip from President Trump when he was asked,
why can we not just use the coastguard what we've
been doing forever, And here's what he had to say.

Speaker 9 (13:24):
Billings votes, I want to ask you, why not have
the Coastguard stopped them, which is empowered by a law
to do. You know, this way you can confirm who's
on the boat and the shore that they're doing what
they would.

Speaker 10 (13:36):
Suspect, because we've been doing that for thirty years and
it has been totally ineffective.

Speaker 4 (13:42):
They have faster boats.

Speaker 10 (13:44):
Some of these boats are seriously I mean, they're world
class speedboats, but they're not faster than missiles. But we've
been trying to do that for years, and so much
of the drugs twenty five thirty percent would come in
through the seas right now we have I would say
none coming.

Speaker 4 (14:00):
In through the seas.

Speaker 10 (14:01):
In fact, I don't know about the fishing in this
If you want to go fishing, there's a lot of
people aren't deciding to even go fishing. We've almost totally
stopped it by sea.

Speaker 4 (14:10):
Now we'll stop it by land. But it never worked.

Speaker 10 (14:14):
It never worked when when you know when you did
it in a very politically correct manner.

Speaker 5 (14:19):
All right, So, as he says, here. You know, when
we did it the way we used to do it
for thirty years, it never worked. And he's right, it
did never work. But you know, it also kind of
makes you cringe a little bit. He's like, yeah, there's
even fishermen that don't want to go out fishing in
the sea now, especially in this.

Speaker 6 (14:33):
Area, which kind of makes you worry a little bit.

Speaker 5 (14:35):
Is like, would you actually strike a fishing boat on accident?
You know, And that's what a lot of people are saying.
And there's also a lot of people that are saying, look,
this is not even legal. We're going to get into that,
but here's the bigger picture. I want everybody just to understand,
we're not on this podcast episode just going to talk
about this is a drug cartel war issue. There is
definitely something deeper and bigger behind the scenes that has
going on, and it involves other countries, possibly even Cia,

(14:58):
possibly even some drug tryrafficking, not just drug trafficking, but
human trafficking.

Speaker 6 (15:03):
There's a lot of stuff.

Speaker 5 (15:04):
That is being kind of ran through Venezuela under Maduro. Now,
a lot of people say that Maduro is not technically
the legal president because that election was stolen that is
what the Trump administration and many allies of Trump are
saying that he was an installed president on behalf of
basically Russia and China and other factions.

Speaker 6 (15:25):
But we're going to get into that.

Speaker 5 (15:27):
What I want to do first is I want to
I want to play what ran Paul had to say.

Speaker 6 (15:31):
Now, I always like what ran.

Speaker 5 (15:33):
Paul usually says, especially during the COVID thing, right when
he was questioning doctor Anthony Falci. He was one of
the only ones that really tore into doctor Falci like
crazy yeah. And so when these drug boats started being hit,
this is what ran Paul went on Meet the Press
and said to this reporter.

Speaker 11 (15:50):
Listen, Venezuela, obviously you've been very focused on this. President
Trump has authorized military strikes against suspected drug boats in
the Caribbean. As you know, so far, more than twenty people,
Senator have been killed in six different strikes. Do you
believe that these strikes against these suspected drug boats are legal?

Speaker 12 (16:16):
No, they go against all of our tradition.

Speaker 13 (16:18):
You know, when you kill someone, you should know if
you're not at war, not in a declared war, you
really need to know someone's name. At least you have
to accuse them of something, you have to present evidence.
So all these people have been blown up without us
knowing their name, without any evidence of a crime, and
for decades, if not centuries.

Speaker 12 (16:38):
When you stop people at sea, in international waters or
in your own waters, you.

Speaker 13 (16:42):
Announce that you're going to board the ship and you're
looking for contraband smuggling or drugs.

Speaker 12 (16:48):
This happens every day off of Miami.

Speaker 4 (16:50):
But we know from.

Speaker 13 (16:51):
Coastguard statistics that about twenty five percent of the time
the Coastguard boards the ship, there are no drugs. So
if our policy now is to blow up free ship
we suspect or accused of drug running.

Speaker 12 (17:03):
That would be a bizarre world.

Speaker 13 (17:05):
In which twenty five percent of the people might be innocent.
The other thing about these speed boats is there they
are two thousand miles away from us. If they have drugs,
they're probably peddling drugs to one of the islands of
Trinidad or Tobago off of Venezuela. The idea that they're
coming here is like, it's a huge assumption and really
shouldn't you have to present some proof. It is the

(17:28):
difference between war and peace and war. Though you don't
ask people's name. But if they want all out war
where we kill anybody and everybody that is in the
country of Venezuela are coming out, that has to have
a declaration of war. It's something that is not pretty,
very expensive. And I'm not in favor of declaring war
on Venezuela. But the Congress should vote. The President shouldn't

(17:48):
do this by himself.

Speaker 6 (17:50):
Yeah, So that's what rand Paul has a saying.

Speaker 5 (17:52):
Look, I agree with him in a large part here, right,
because he makes some good points. And what the media
often doesn't talk about is, well, how far is Venezuela
from US. It's actually quite a ways away. I mean
over two thousand plus miles. And these boats obviously there
that are allegedly carrying these drugs are coming off of
the Venezuelan coast. They are likely probably taking drugs somewhere

(18:16):
else besides the United States, because most of these boats
are not going to be able to travel from Venezuela
straight to the United States in any capacity because of
just the fuel reserves that they have on board. And
then better yet, like, how do we absolutely positively know.

Speaker 6 (18:30):
That what they are carrying on these boats or drugs?

Speaker 2 (18:33):
You know?

Speaker 6 (18:33):
How do we know that because we don't.

Speaker 5 (18:35):
I mean, yes, we absolutely have advanced camera systems on
either helicopters, drones, et cetera. But we also don't know
for sure that what's under tarps or maybe in compartments
are going to be drugs. And so it is a
little concerning that our military would just go and blow
up boats that are coming off of Venezuela coast that's
you know, obviously not going to be in America anytime

(18:57):
soon after leaving the coast of Venezuela. But it seems
like that we are declaring basically a war with Venezuela
and basically anybody coming from Venezuela anywhere close towards the
United States. And Ran Paul makes a good point here
he said, I don't believe that these boats are headed
directly for the United States.

Speaker 6 (19:15):
Could they be headed to Trinidad.

Speaker 5 (19:16):
Or some of these other islands you know that's closer
by to Venezuela, that then that they would take boats
from there to possibly in or to I guess you
can say traffic drugs to the United States, possibly, but
we don't even know that for sure, And so that
is the big question here, is like why are we
blowing up drug boats in my opinion or boats in general.
I think this is a statement of I guess power

(19:41):
by the United States and the Trump administration to say, look,
you know, this is what we're going to do. If
you even think that you're going to come off the
coast of Venezuela and we're going to pin it as
this is a drug cartel issue, this is what we're
really going after, then that's a power move more so
than this anything. And I just don't personally think that
these boats necessarily are all headed towards the United States.

(20:02):
And I also don't think with what we're going to
get into on the show tonight that this war that
we are about to get in with Venezuela basically we're
already in with Venezuela. Venezuela has anything to do with
drug cartels. Now, there are going to be people that
dispute that, but I think it goes deeper. And even
if it goes deeper, it still doesn't quite make sense
about why we would be blowing up boats coming off

(20:24):
the coast of Venezuela that are not going to directly
impact the United States right then and there.

Speaker 6 (20:28):
They would obviously have to go.

Speaker 5 (20:30):
Somewhere else to then transport those drugs, to put it
in another boat, then to take it from that place
onto the United States soil. So there's something else at
play here that we don't quite see, especially even with
the drug boats.

Speaker 6 (20:41):
And I think personally it's a power move.

Speaker 7 (20:43):
I agree with you, Chad, it is a power move.
But also, like Trump said, this has been going on
for thirty years, and now we have more powerful drugs
coming into this country that is killing or murdering Americans
way more than any other orders happening in America. Like
that is, we have a war on drugs right now.

(21:04):
And to me, these are terrorists, and anybody's a terrorists
we should be at war with.

Speaker 8 (21:10):
He said that maybe we're.

Speaker 7 (21:11):
Suspecting them or accusing them, But I think that we
do have technology that tells us what's inside those boats.
If they have license plate readers out there that can
read a license plate, or they can see somebody from
a drone what they look like and identify the person,
then I'm pretty sure we have pretty good intelligence of
what's on that boat. I don't think we're just blowing

(21:33):
up fishermen boats. I think they do have drugs, and
I think they are coming towards America, And this is
more of a power move to say, listen, if you're
going to do that, you're going to find out what
happens to you because we're not going to allow you
to do it. And if they are going to other countries,
well then damn we're helping other countries prevent drugs from
going into their country.

Speaker 6 (21:53):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (21:54):
Well, and you know a lot of people say, well,
how are we able to legally do this?

Speaker 6 (21:57):
And so what you know, essentially Ran Paul Will saying.

Speaker 5 (22:00):
Here is that you know this is illegal, and technically,
if you look at them on road doctrine, it's not
technically illegal.

Speaker 6 (22:07):
It depends on how you read it.

Speaker 5 (22:09):
And what I do want to say, Shery to your
point as well, is that I think it's more advanced
than just like as I said earlier, the MH sixty
or UH sixty black Hawk helicopters or drones. You know,
you have to understand the US spy satellites and the
advanced capabilities we have. We know anything that is moving
anywhere in the world at any given time, doesn't matter
what it is, and we can see everything and we

(22:30):
can see all real time. So do we see these
drug traffickers loading drugs from known drug locations in Venezuela
than putting them in these boats and that's why we
are attacking them. Possibly, But will we ever see evidence
of that? I don't know, because obviously that'll likely all
be classified, so we'll probably never see any evidence. You
know that it's backing that these boats are in fact

(22:50):
drug boats. This is how we saw it, this is
the technology we used to see it. We probably won't
ever see it. The only thing that ever worries me
about this, and kind of what it puts in my
mind is like how how powerful the government is even
without due process. And you know, there's a lot of
reasons why we have processes in government, especially when it
comes to killing people, and you know, wartime situations where

(23:12):
you've got to get the authority of Congress and so
on and so forth, because you want the elected officials
that us the people elect into power to approve or
disapprove of wartime activities, and especially when it comes to
killing people.

Speaker 6 (23:25):
And I know these people are from Venezuela.

Speaker 5 (23:26):
So it's like in this world today, it's like we
don't really care about anybody else besides you know, ourselves,
as long as it's whatever, unless it's for some political ideology.

Speaker 8 (23:35):
Well it's not a political ideology, though.

Speaker 7 (23:37):
We're trying to stop the crime in America, and we're
trying to stop the murder victims of Americans. I get that,
and I do take this personally. And I just want
to tell you a quick story. In third grade, I
met my best friend and she's been my best friend
my entire life. Chad knows. We used to talk two
three hours every single day. She had her life going

(24:00):
for her. She was a flight attendant with United Airlines.
She was flying internationally, had.

Speaker 8 (24:05):
Her life together.

Speaker 7 (24:06):
She was perfect, and somehow she got on these drugs
and she went from having a perfect life to now
she is homeless, toothless and a prostitute on drugs. And
this is my best friend I'm talking about. And this
is just one story you think about. I see these videos.
I'm in a group or a page that goes to Kensington,

(24:27):
Pennsylvania every day and films what's going on there. The
streets are littered with people that look like walking zombies.
They have no life, they can't even stand up straight.
They're overdosing. And dying daily, and something's got to be
done to stop this. It's horrific and this is murder
to me.

Speaker 4 (24:45):
Yeah.

Speaker 5 (24:46):
Well, and just for the statistics here, in twenty twenty two,
about seventy three thousand people died from a fentanyl overdose.
In twenty twenty three, a total number of drug overdose
desks was over one hundred and five thousand, and about
seventy five percent of those fentanyl. So the exact number
of pure fentanyl only dusks from twenty twenty three isn't clear,

(25:06):
but has been reported in some sources. Now the reason
why the fentanyl and stuff is even coming up, and
as far as Venezuela, I'm sure that many of you
have heard that a lot of the fentanyl is actually
coming from China. China actually creates a lot of the
base compounds for fentanyl to be either made, created or
in some cases just comes directly from China and the
form of fentanyl. Oftentimes China will use these cartels, whether

(25:29):
it be the Mexican drug cartels, but especially in South
America and especially it seems like maybe in Venezuela, because
we also understand that we're going to get into Russia
and China has a large steak in Venezuela. China and
Russia have a lot of involvement in not only their oil.
They are basically controlling Venezuela with what you would call

(25:49):
debt because they are they're loaning Venezuela all this money
for certain things, whether it be oil drilling and so on.
But they also are involved in a lot of trafficking exercises,
whether it be drugs or or maybe even human trafficking,
which I think what was a large part of that
during the open borders during the Biden Harris administration. I think,
in my opinion, this is an opinion, I think the
Biden Harris administration may have even possibly worked alongside China

(26:13):
or some of these other hostile nations to allow some
of this stuff to come in to destroy our country
from within. I know, like people like George Soros Open
Society Foundation, where you know, they are some of the
big NGOs that have pushed the open borders, that pushed
the human trafficking, and they are also the same people
that are funding a lot of these protests that are
pro illegal immigration, pro wide open borders, pro basically anything America.

(26:37):
So this all kind of comes back into kind of
almost like a game plan for the new world order,
and especially for people that hate America or the countries
that do. And so, what is thero doctrine? This is
what a lot of people were saying, This is how
this is legal. Well, the Monroe Doctrine was announced by
President James Monroe in eighteen twenty three and during the
early years of the US Republic. Its main purpose was

(26:59):
to warn European powers to stay out of Western Hemisphere,
and the key idea was that the Americans are for Americans,
and so in practical terms, it said that no new
European colonies in North or South America may happen, no
interference by Europe in the affairs of newly independent nations
of Latin America. In return, the US would state out
of European wars and politics. And so it became a

(27:21):
cornerstone of the US foreign policy, evolving over two centuries
into justification for a US dominance intervention in the Western hemisphere,
including in Latin America, the Caribbean and Pacific approaches.

Speaker 6 (27:33):
So then it evolved.

Speaker 5 (27:34):
By the twentieth century, presidents like Theodore Roosevelt expanded the
doctrine to include the Roosevelt Corollary, which said that the
US could intervene militarily in Latin American nations to stabilize
them if they threatened US interest or regional security. And
so that expansion gave the US the right in its
own eyes to conduct naval patrols and blockades toppel regimes

(27:55):
viewed as hostile and fight threats like communism, terrorism, or
narco trafficking. So this is kind of how this all
applies to the Trump and the drug boats thing. So
when you hear about the Trump administration blowing up all
these drug boats, that kind of ties directly to the
modern application of the Monroe doctrine in the context of
trans transnational crime and narcotics trafficking. So the US views

(28:16):
drug cartels, trafficking routes, and narco submarines essentially coming from Venezuela,
Colombia and the Caribbean as a regional security threat, not
just a criminal issue. And so that falls under the
no foreign or hostile influence in the Western Hemisphere idea
of the Monroe doctrine.

Speaker 6 (28:30):
And so then you think.

Speaker 5 (28:31):
About the foreign influence China, Russia, Iran if US intelligence
links Venezuelan drug operations to Chinese triads, Russian intelligence, or
Iranian smuggling networks. Then it becomes more than a drug issue.
It's then seen as a foreign power operating inside of
the Western Hemisphere, which the Monroe Doctrine directly opposes. Now
we've already seen this obviously with the Panama Canal. We've

(28:52):
seen that China essentially took over the Panama Canal completely
when we sold the Panama Canal, which is one of
the reasons why the United States and Trump and Marca Rubio,
Marco Rubio actually spent over i think a month down
near the Panama Canal and he just wanted to see
for himself, like how much influence does China actually have
in this port or in this canal? And they basically

(29:13):
own everything in Panama.

Speaker 7 (29:15):
That's what they said that that's only people that are
there now is Chinese people.

Speaker 5 (29:18):
Yeah, and so it's not just the Panama Canal. I
mean you have Venezuela, which has a huge Chinese influence.
And then you think about the southcom operations. The US
Southern Command operates under mandates consistent with that doctrine. So
when the US Navy or Coast Guard assets destroy cartel
or even Venezuela military linked vessels. It's framed as protecting
hemispheric security, which is a twenty first century enforcement of

(29:41):
the Monroe doctrine. Now we might think of like, okay, well,
are these just drug cartels or are these just drug traffickers?
Are these just you know, lowly people and the Venezuelan
I guess civilization that they're doing this.

Speaker 6 (29:52):
Well, we're going to play a clip in just.

Speaker 5 (29:54):
A little bit that kind of explains the aspect of
how does Venezuela actually operate. Well, Venezuela is very similar
to Mexico in the sense of the government and the
military is basically the cartel. It is the drug traffickers.
They are all one and the same, and especially under
this president that is in power now, Maduro. There's a

(30:17):
lot of people have also said, well, why have we
not went after Mexico, because obviously Mexico is right on
our border, they are one hundred percent controlled by the cartel.
I do have my own theories of while we have
not went after the Mexican drug cartel, but that's just
a whole nother conspiracy.

Speaker 6 (30:31):
Why I'll go ahead and say it. I think the
reason why.

Speaker 5 (30:35):
I think the reason why potentially we did not go
after Mexico first is because what I will say is
the Mexican president she is I think heavily Jewish influenced.
I'm not blaming us on Israel, but she is she is,
and she has been heavily funded by Israel and APAK
and all that stuff as well. I know they kind
of got all ties in there, but I don't understand,

(30:56):
and a lot of people to understand is like, why
did we not go into Mexico first? Why did we not,
especially knowing how the drug cartels and the amount of
the drug cartels that operated on our border over the
last four years that brought in millions of people, not
just not just regular people seeking asylum. We're talking about
people that were coming across their border that were Venezuela

(31:18):
and Trenda Uruagua that were metioned drug cartels, the Sinaloa cartels,
all the worst drug cartells. You had coyotes from these
drug cartels that would officiate the entire process of crossing,
and only that they would they would make these people
pay five, six, seven, ten thousand dollars. In some cases,
we're talking about poor broke Mexican families, and not just

(31:41):
Mexican families, but families from South America where they had
to pony up five or six thousand dollars and in
some cases they had to pony up their children to
the cartels so that the cartels could then child sex traffic.

Speaker 8 (31:52):
The pony them up. They took their children, yes.

Speaker 5 (31:56):
But they also but there were also families that you know,
voluntar haarly gave their kids up.

Speaker 7 (32:01):
That a lot of them were taken to. And I
also want to mention too, it's not just happening in America.
And thank God for Trump that we are we have
shut down our borders. Now we're just trying to remove
the violent people from America and taking them back to
their homeland or putting them in jail. But I also
want to mention that I was listening to a podcast
the other night with my brother's good friend that is

(32:23):
in Canada, and he was also mentioning that they have
something like I don't want to say they're the wrong number,
but like one hundred kilometers of kilometers probably kilometers, I
don't know, but anyway, yeah, they have a ton of
acreage where they have open borders still to this day
and with the new prime minister come in in, he said,

(32:46):
it's still not enough.

Speaker 8 (32:47):
They only have like.

Speaker 7 (32:48):
Two guys at each border and like one helicopter and
he said it's not enough.

Speaker 8 (32:54):
And they're they're borders, they're still wide open.

Speaker 5 (32:56):
Yes, absolutely, yeah, I mean, and look, you know that
is definitely some whoever the president or Prime Minister of
Canada is now. I remember when that was going on,
and we have a couple of and we have actually
a lot of Canadian listeners, but we have quite a
few that are in our telegram, and one in particular,
Chris shout out to Chris.

Speaker 4 (33:13):
Chris.

Speaker 5 (33:14):
But Chris always talks about kind of like what the
actual power struggle is in Canadian politics. And even this
guy that actually got in is not really a true
like conservative Republican. I think he's kind of a rhino.
He's just someone in there that kind of masqueraded in
there as a conservative, as a Republican an idiot too, yeah,
and so you know he's likely also someone that went

(33:35):
to the Young Leaders Conference and then you know World
Economic Forum, the globalist agenda narratives that they pushed to
the leaders.

Speaker 6 (33:43):
There's so many world leaders.

Speaker 5 (33:44):
That have went through this World Economic Forum Young Leaders conferences.

Speaker 6 (33:48):
I mean Justin Trudeau was one of them.

Speaker 5 (33:50):
There's been so many others, I mean, especially across Europe,
including or France's President Macrone. I mean, I think also
the guy in the UK I can't remember, Achior Starmer.
There's been so many of them, and you wonder why
all their policies look so much the same, which is
basically this new world order globalist agenda is because they

(34:10):
all go and get indoctrinated at the World Economic Forum
that is heavily funded by the globalists, and then the
globalist I believe, push and put them in power, whether
it be by still in elections or whether it be
by heavy money influenced by the world's richest people. And
so there's a reason why that nations across the world
have open borders, with the exception of places like Russia

(34:32):
and China and Hungary. I don't know if Hungary still does,
but I.

Speaker 8 (34:35):
Know that they were locked down.

Speaker 5 (34:37):
They were really fighting that and European Union was coming
down on them saying basically, we're gonna tear if everything
that comes in or out of your country, We're gonna
screw you over and that was all because Hungary just
wanted to stay out of it. They did not want
mass immigration across their borders. And so what did the
European Union do Well, they came down and tried to
destroy Hungary. And so I don't know, I've not looked
into the Hungry situation as of late, but I do

(35:00):
need to get back and look into that. But all
of that say this, you know, this is a this
is a deal where drug cartels do cause a ton
of damage and they are heavily used by outside forces,
whether it be the New World Order globalist, whether it
be Russia or China. And I think it's all of
the above. And I think for sure that you can
look at China and Russia to say that they do

(35:21):
have influence in Venezuela.

Speaker 6 (35:23):
And so is it?

Speaker 5 (35:24):
Is it maybe why the United States government is starting
to ramp up their operations in the Caribbean. Possibly, And
so Trump's administration basically resurrected the Monroe doctrine language openly.
Both John Bolton and Mike Pompeo explicitly invoked it when
addressed in Venezuela and Cuba, saying that the Monroe Doctrine
is alive and well, and that that was code for

(35:45):
we will not allow Chinese or Russian back Narco states
in our backyard. So the Manuroe doctrine basically gives the
US political and historical justification to take these actions that
we're seeing in the Caribbean.

Speaker 6 (35:57):
But it goes deeper than that. I want to play
a clip from Fox.

Speaker 5 (36:01):
And THEWS Jesse Waters where he talks about these B
fifty twos that are arriving in the Caribbean right outside
of Venezuela.

Speaker 6 (36:07):
And so you might think, we are we really going to.

Speaker 5 (36:09):
Use B fifty two bombers, the same bombers that actually
took out allegedly Iran's nuclear facilities. I mean, we're talking
about these bombers are capable of blowing up a lot
of shit. I mean, I'm talking about entire countries that
these bombers are capable of carrying our biggest weaponry. They
are carrying our biggest nuclear missiles or a nuclear bombs,
I guess you could say.

Speaker 6 (36:29):
And so this is a report from Jesse Water just
a few days ago.

Speaker 14 (36:33):
Listen, Fox shows alert B fifty two bombers are flying
off the coast of Venezuela. Trump's not bluffing Right now,
more than ten thousand US soldiers are built up in
the Caribbean on ships in Puerto Rico, locked and loaded
special operations helicopters we're just seeing flying ninety miles from
Venezuela's coast. The shopper units used by Delta Force Navy

(36:57):
seals in the Green Berets were spotted off the coast
of Trinidad. They're very important for search and rescue missions.

Speaker 15 (37:06):
Also spotted little birds.

Speaker 14 (37:07):
They're smaller but faster, designed for quick insertion of special
operators behind enemy lines. The Ghost was also confirmed to
be in the Caribbean. That's the nickname for MVY Ocean Trader.
It's the kind of ship that doesn't want to be found.
It's designed for black ops and special missions because it's.

Speaker 15 (37:26):
Dark and blends in with cargo.

Speaker 14 (37:28):
There's more ten percent of the US naval power is
now in the region.

Speaker 15 (37:33):
It's a major shift.

Speaker 14 (37:34):
There's subs, several destroyers, and F thirty five fighters in
Puerto Rico. That's on top of all the coke boats
getting smoked to pieces by the week. Kilos of cocaine
are washing ashore.

Speaker 15 (37:47):
Don't tell hunter.

Speaker 14 (37:48):
Dozens of bad ombres becoming shark bait.

Speaker 15 (37:51):
Scott Medoro's attention.

Speaker 14 (37:53):
He's the dictator of the Narco state, a very bad ombre,
and we.

Speaker 15 (37:57):
Just doubled the bounty on his head. It's now fifty mil.

Speaker 14 (38:00):
According to The New York Times, Maduro offered us a
dominant steak in Venezuela's oil, gold and mineral wealth and
promised to cut ties with Russia and China and Trump
and Rubio said no. That tells me the gunboat diplomacy
is going to end up with no. Maduro and of
Venezuela align with US, not putin or Chi. American action

(38:23):
in Latin America hasn't always ended well, look at the
Bay of Pigs. Other times it's a piece of cake.
It's our backyard. And Trump's just re establishing the Monroe
doctrine aka the Dunro doctrine.

Speaker 15 (38:36):
Hopefully of Venezuela in general.

Speaker 14 (38:38):
Does the right thing and collects the fifty million dollar bounty.
No one wants a messy conflict in South America. Meduro
controls drug traffickers who are pretty strapped. They have military
grade weapons, and Biden let hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans
into the country, they could be activated. But if Trump
can pull us off and kick China and Russia out

(38:58):
of Venezuela after what he did with the Iranians, it'll
give him a lot of power to deter Russia in
Ukraine and China and Taiwan.

Speaker 5 (39:07):
Now, when Trump was recently asked about Maduro and all
the things that he's willing to give up, right, he said,
I'm willing to give up everything, oil, you name it,
I am willing to give it up. And that's definitely
the wrong accent. This is not India, this is Venezuela.
I don't know how to do the accent.

Speaker 6 (39:23):
Very good, but.

Speaker 5 (39:25):
Come again, no less strong accent again. Yeah, I'm not
going to do that. But anyways, let's just move on.

Speaker 6 (39:33):
Let's move on.

Speaker 5 (39:34):
So yeah, So when he was recently asked by reporters
and he said, look, you know, he's willing to kind
of give up everything. You know, he's wanting to do this,
And Maduro himself said, look, I'm willing to cut ties
with China and Russia, which we're going to get into.
How much involvement does China and Russia actually haven't Venezuela,
Because is this the bigger mission, right, is this Trump's
bigger mission? Is it really about drugs or is it
about China and Russia influence? Because you have to think

(39:55):
about this. If we have ten percent of our navy
in the region, over ten thousand troops right now that
are deployed to that region as well, that are just
waiting for shit to pop up? Do you really think
that we have ten thousand troops and it's possible we
have ten thousand troops there for these drug cartels and
six trafficking that I think the bigger deal is here
is that how much is Russia and especially China going

(40:18):
to come to the defense of what they believe that
they are entitled to and own in Venezuela Because this
is almost like a battleground. It's like when you're bully
or you or your bully says, meet me across the
street from the school and we're going to fight, right, Well,
that's kind of a neutral playing ground. Both countries feel
like that they need influence here, and especially after the
Monroe doctor in the United States, this is on our

(40:41):
back door kind of similar to Ukraine to where it
is it's like a proxy. Is that a proxy country?

Speaker 4 (40:47):
Yes?

Speaker 6 (40:47):
And so for.

Speaker 5 (40:48):
Example, Russia felt like that the United States and NATO
was encroaching on their territory through Ukraine, although Ukraine was
not NATO. But what did the Biden Harris administration do.
We're leading up to the war with Ukraine saying no, no,
we're going to bring them into NATO. Russia, yeah, we are,
We're going to bring him in to NATO. Just wait,
just wait. And so Russia's like, oh, okay, fine, you

(41:09):
want to bring him to NATO, and we're not going
to talk anymore than fine. We're gonna invade them and
we're gonna make sure that shit doesn't happen. This is essentially,
in my opinion, kind of exactly what is happening in Venezuela.
This is an invasion that's probably going to happen on
behalf of the United States to keep out Russia and
China because you know, there's a reason why Russia and
China are besties now. Part of that is because of

(41:30):
the Biden Harris administration when we decided that we were
going to just completely take Ukraine side, not even talk
to Russia or China or anybody else, especially Russia during
this time.

Speaker 6 (41:39):
And so what did Russia and China do.

Speaker 5 (41:41):
Well, we essentially took everything from Russia the most, the
best we could. We tariffed everything, We took all their
elitist ships.

Speaker 7 (41:51):
Yeah, but guess who Russia is getting all our stuff
from China Sula too.

Speaker 4 (41:55):
Yeah.

Speaker 6 (41:55):
And Venezuela, no, no.

Speaker 8 (41:56):
No, they're getting their oil from yes.

Speaker 5 (41:57):
Yeah, well they're getting some of their old fro Venezuela.
But they're also you also have to understand that Venezuela
is getting arms from Russia. So there's kind of this
exchange or like, hey, give us weapons, we'll give you oil.
You know, we'll have this kind of exchange. Same thing
with China, same exact thing. And we're going to go
over that in a minute. But when Trump was asked
about this by reporter, this is what he had to say.
Listen offered everything in it in his country, all the

(42:23):
natural resources.

Speaker 6 (42:24):
He even reported a message to you in English recently.

Speaker 15 (42:27):
Offering mediation.

Speaker 4 (42:30):
That he has offered everything. He's offered everything.

Speaker 10 (42:33):
You're right, you know why, because he doesn't want to
fuck around with the United States.

Speaker 4 (42:39):
Thank everybody, thank you.

Speaker 5 (42:41):
So as you see there, Trump didn't really spare any
words when he said, uh, they're not going to fuck
around with the United States or they'll find out. That's
basically what he said, right, And that is the message
that he's been sending with the drug boat stuff. But
as I said, I don't think Trump is sending this
necessarily for the drug cartels.

Speaker 6 (42:59):
Particularly. I think that he knows and.

Speaker 5 (43:01):
Understands the involvement of China and Russia in this region,
which is why he has to make very strong stances.
But that's why I also go back and say, the
reason why we have ten percent of our navy, including
B fifty twos, F thirty five's, F twenty two's, all
of our most advanced ships, battle carriers, submarines, you name it,
we have them all.

Speaker 6 (43:20):
Not all there, but we have a lot of them there.

Speaker 5 (43:22):
I mean, this is literally more military hardware in the
area than we have had I believe during the entirety
of the Iran Israel conflict or the Iran Hamas conflict.
I mean, so that if that tells you anything what
the significance or importance of this is, it's very important.
So I want to talk about this. Also, who is Maduro?

(43:45):
Is it disputed that he's the president? Well, technically right
now he is exercise and power in Venezuela.

Speaker 6 (43:51):
This is Nicholas Maduro.

Speaker 5 (43:52):
He was officially declared the winner of the July twenty eighth,
twenty twenty four presidential election by the Venezuelan National Electoral
Council or CNE. He was sworn in for the next
presidential term beginning January tenth, twenty twenty five, and then
the election was widely viewed as deeply flawed. Many international observers,
opposition groups, and independent analysts as certain that in twenty

(44:12):
twenty four elections they failed to meet basic public standards
of fairness, transparency, and credibility. The specific criticisms were the
electoral authority or the CNE did not even release detailed
vote tallies or pre sing level results publicly, which departs
from past practices, and so the opposition collected and published
tally sheets from many voting centers, which they they and

(44:35):
outside analysts say that they show ed Mondo Gonzalez winning
by a very wide margin. This is the pro western president,
more conservative. He's kind of middle of the road. He's
not really right, he's not really he's definitely not left,
but he's more center right than anything. So the organization
of America States or OAS declared that the results announced
by the Venezuelan electoral authorities cannot be recognized. Other international

(44:59):
bodies include the EU European Union. Some Latin American nations
and analysts refused to accept the Maduro's claims victory has legitimacy,
while calling for audits or recounts. Now the opposition claims
and some governments have recognized Gonzales. The United States on
August first, twenty twenty four, it formally recognized ed Mondo
Gonzalez as the winner of the election, stating that the

(45:19):
evidence overwhelmingly indicated he got.

Speaker 6 (45:22):
More votes than Maduro.

Speaker 5 (45:23):
So some other governments and international actors also expressed recognition
of support for Gonzalez, or at least refusal to accept
Maduro's results, and so the opposition of many Venezuelans have
protested and repudiated Maduro's proclaimed to victory. Gonzales left the
country amid the dispute after a Venezuelan court issued an
arrest warrant for him. Gonzales sought refuge an asylum abroad

(45:45):
eg in Spain in September of twenty twenty four. Now,
what does this kind of remind you of, Right, this
reminds you of the twenty twenty US election. Right, So,
Donald Trump, a lot of people felt, including himself, that
he was rigged or the election was rigged, was stolen
from him. And what happened right after they allegedly stole
the election from Trump, well, he got brought up on

(46:06):
thirty four plus felony counts. He had everything come down
the pipeline of him. What they wanted to do was
prosecute him, put him in prison, for him to never
ever see the light of day. They never wanted this
Trump administration in right now, because there's a lot of
reasons why they didn't want it. Now, what a lot
of people are saying right now is like, oh, yeah,
well Trump promised Epstein and he promised this, and yes
he did, and I'm really waiting on this, and we're

(46:28):
going to do his show on that. But what a
lot of people are really waiting on is the indictments.
And we're starting to see some of them already come
down the pipeline of people that were involved in a
lot of the stuff that was kind of leading up
to we know we have Letitia James, which was heavily
involved in the thirty four felony accounts in New York.

Speaker 7 (46:43):
Yeah, and that's why she campaigned on that she was
going to put Trump away.

Speaker 8 (46:46):
Yeah, that was her campaign slogan.

Speaker 5 (46:48):
Yeah, so you have that, and now she's indicted, and
I think it's for like some kind of mortgage stuff.
But you know, I don't know exactly what will actually
happen or play out with that. You also have Bolton
this indicted, you have Comy to but indicted, and there's
likely a lot more to come, and hopefully we're going
to see the likes of Faulty and the people that
actually did crimes.

Speaker 8 (47:08):
Right, do you think fauc is gonna come?

Speaker 6 (47:10):
I don't know.

Speaker 8 (47:10):
I mean, I don't think so.

Speaker 6 (47:11):
I don't know because I think.

Speaker 5 (47:13):
Well, I think he's a free man only because if
you think about it, when Trump has all of these
meetings in the over office and he brings in the
Pfizer CEO and all these people that he's supposedly great
friends with, now trust me, they're all going to protect Faulty.
They're going to make sure that Trump administration does not
indict Faulty.

Speaker 8 (47:29):
Just why he didn't he pardon him for anything that
he did?

Speaker 5 (47:33):
Yeah, Yeah, he pardoned him. Well, the auto pen pardoned him. Right,
it wasn't Biden, that Potter. It wasn't Biden that pardoned it.
Like Biden literally didn't even sign anything. It was an
auto pen that signed every single thing to Biden did.
So whoever was behind Biden is the one that pardoned Faultcy. Hell,
it could have been Faulty for all we know. We
don't know who was technically behind Biden, who is pulling

(47:54):
the strings and controlling the government. But we know it
wasn't Biden. And there's still a faction of me in
my soul that believes that Trump's not fully in control
of our government.

Speaker 16 (48:03):
Right.

Speaker 5 (48:04):
I mean, there's a lot of things that I don't
think that Trump has control over, and I don't one
hundred percent know why. I think probably you know, if
you look back on his two past assassination attempts. Just
I think yesterday the Secret Service found a I guess
what you can a hunting a deer stand in the
woods that would have direct eyesight to Air Force one

(48:26):
when it lands in Palm Beach. But you know, is
that just an old stand maybe that wasn't taken down,
or is it a new one? They're they're going to
do all the forensics on that, but we don't know.
I think that Trump, as long as he behaves the
way that whoever is technically in control of our government
behaves the way they want him to, his life will
be spared. And I think, in my opinion that maybe

(48:48):
someone has communicated that with him by saying, look, you know,
there are some things you can do. Go to Venezuela, war,
go fight Russia, Go fight China, Go do this, go
fight Iran, do this. But you are not touching this,
and you're not touching that. And if you do, guess
what next time, We're not going to miss that. That's
what I genuinely think. And I think that no matter
how much we want to think that Trump is this

(49:08):
big and powerful man that he is, there's a lot
of things that he's done so far that kind of
leads a little bit of straight to that.

Speaker 7 (49:15):
So there is but I think overall, he's done a
great job.

Speaker 8 (49:19):
He's done a fabulous job.

Speaker 7 (49:21):
And I'm not all pro Trump, I know, and I
see some of the things on like oh god, oh God,
and I'm going to hear that now, wait and tell
what I'm going to see what Chad says about this
or that. You know, I know he's not perfect, but
no man is perfect except for me. Yeah, except for you, Chad,
of course. But I think that so far he's doing
a great job. And I do agree that there are

(49:43):
other influences on top of Trump, and I think you're
right that I think his life is on the line
is the only reason why he does some of the
things he does.

Speaker 5 (49:53):
And listen, I'll be one hundred percent very clear with
you on why I think Trump understands that he has
to obey whoever is really in control and in charge.
It's because think about it this way. Now, Trump was
not the president in Butler, Pennsylvania on that day that
he almost got assassinated. Then it was almost another Charlie

(50:14):
Kirk but on a much bigger level because this was
the leading candidate as the GOP front runner. And obviously
you saw what happened with the election. I mean, he
technically won in the landslide. So you know, if Trump
would have been assassinated that day, this country would look very,
very different than it already does. And the country already
looks different after the Charlie Kirks assassination. But I think,

(50:34):
if anything, the fact that they didn't kill him that
day is almost as bad in some.

Speaker 6 (50:41):
Ways as if they would have.

Speaker 5 (50:43):
And I say, and I say they, I'm saying that
he had Secret Service protection. And not only did he
have his own Secret Service protection or his own personal security,
he also had Secret Service and he had a lot
of the guys that were that were close to him
over the years, but there were also some people that
were inserted.

Speaker 6 (50:59):
He didn't have necessarily full protection like you should have.

Speaker 5 (51:02):
But I think it was a direct message to Trump
to say, even with Secret Service, you know, we can
make things happen to where you are not fully always protected.
And so going forward, just understand that even with your
Secret Service, even with the most highly advanced security you have,
we can still make things happen to where you just
mislap and little, one little thing and you're done, and

(51:25):
it can happen anywhere at any time.

Speaker 6 (51:26):
And he understands that.

Speaker 7 (51:28):
And I think it could happen even in his sleep
or something to that caliber.

Speaker 5 (51:32):
Well, yeah, I mean, listen, do I trust and believe
that every single person in Secret Service detail is one
hundred percent for the security and safety of Trump? No,
do I think that there are rats and moles in
the Secret Service. I guarantee you there are multiple Secret
Service agents that are put there on behalf of someone

(51:54):
at some faction that they're going to either make a call,
do something that they shouldn't do and and and the
reality is you might say, well, how would that even
be possible? Because sometimes, as Trump or the administration, who
you think that you trust, you just don't know what
their background is, You don't know who they're really working for,

(52:15):
You don't know what their influences. And even people that
you trust that you've probably had in the White House before,
Oh yeah, that the people that you've had in a
White House that you have shook hands with, that you've
done this, you've done that. Don't think that maybe someone
that they have and that they have infiltrated into your
Secret Service detail. Absolutely, I mean, I'm just saying, there
are really good intelligence agencies around the world.

Speaker 6 (52:37):
There are really good uh.

Speaker 5 (52:40):
Terrorists there, they're really good factions of bad actors around
the world that are really good at shit like that.

Speaker 7 (52:47):
Well, can you just think about Charlie Kirk for example,
you know, Candice Owen's coming out and basically saying the
people that you trusted, you shouldn't have trusted, because those
are the people that helped get you killed.

Speaker 5 (52:58):
Well those but those are usually people that will get
you killed, especially, you know, especially in in things that
we're talking about like presidencies. You know, it's not just
going to be a random lapse of I don't know,
I don't know what you can say just judgment or
or or.

Speaker 7 (53:18):
There's people coming out and accusing his wife to having
something to do with it, or the people in Turning
Point USA, the people that were closest to Charlie Kirk
had a role in This is what people are saying.
That is the truth. Then think about on the level
of Trump himself.

Speaker 5 (53:35):
Yeah, and especially think about the government. I mean, you
know the fact, I mean, Charlie Kirk's one thing. I mean,
it's it's in some ways, it might be it might
make less sense that all of that conspiracy could happen
in Turning Point USA, or Charlie Kirk or just things
around him because he's not the president. But think about
on a presidential level. Now, think about how corrupt and

(53:57):
how demonic in some way the deep state and government is.
Think about how advanced intelligence they are. Think about the
assets they have. Think about the AI now that they
can operate and utilize to do anything they want. And
it's not, in my opinion, it's not just US intelligence,
it's foreign intelligence that also has one hundred percent stake

(54:18):
in play and power in this thing as well. So
it goes back to even JFK. I mean JFK was
like I said, you butck the horse once and you
get back on. You know, it's like doing the same
thing over and over again expecting a different result is
called insanity. And so what they're kind of telling Trump,
I believe is you keep doing the same thing over
and over again. You think that you run this show,

(54:39):
Just keep on doing that and see what happens. And
I think that's why his hands are tied in some
in some ways. So I want to also talk about
the China and Russia involvement in this, right, because this
is obviously pretty big. Now we have to ask ourselves
like what is the Chinese Russia involved?

Speaker 2 (55:00):
Right?

Speaker 5 (55:00):
And China and Russia are the two most important foreign
backers of Nicholas Madua and so their support is multi dimensional, financial, military,
diplomatic intelligence, and it has helped Madua stay in power
obviously despite the deep domestic crisis that we're seeing in
Venezuela and across the region. And so here's some kind
of points of what Russia does or is strongly believed

(55:21):
to do in Venezuela. First of all, military and security. Now,
they do arm cells, they do training, they do intelligence advisors, deployments,
counterintelligence cooperation, all for their cartel. And when we get
into a video clip that we're going to play in
just a little bit, knowing and understanding how the cartel
essentially operates Venezuela, who's training those people, Well, it's Russia

(55:42):
and China, and we're starting with Russia first. Now, Russia
is among Venezuela's largest arms suppliers. In November twenty twenty four,
Venezuela and Russia signed intelligence gathering and counter espionage agreements.
In May of twenty twenty five, Madua and Putin signed
a Strategic Partnership treaty strengthened the military and energy cooperation.
Russia has provided logistical support to help Venezuela sell oil

(56:04):
abroad to skirt US sanctions, sometimes using obscure channels. Russia
business interests have also been involved in Venezuela's Petro oil
back cryptocurrency launches. Russia has also supplied intelligence, technical aid,
and possibly radio electronic interception capabilities to Venezuelan forces. Russia
mercenaries or contractors are frequently alleged to be in or

(56:27):
around Venezuela through Russian authorities often deny this. Obviously they
do because the United States does these exact same shit,
and they always have, I mean, that's what the United
States does as well. Then you think about energy, finance
and trade, so credit lines, oil deals helping Venezuela circumvent sanctions,
co investments, Russia helps Venezuela move oil two overseas buyers
to bypass US sanctions using alternative routes or intermediaries, and

(56:50):
Russia incities have backed or helped structure Petro and other
schemes tied to Venezuelan oil. So Russia recognizes Maduro as
the legitimate president in internet diplomacy, and so the Strategic
Partnership sign in twenty twenty five includes energy cooperation oil
gas trade as a core component to this whole thing.
And then you think about diplomacy, propaganda and political cover.

(57:12):
Russian media outlets like RT and Sputnik often amplify pro
Madura narratives. Russia uses its UN and international influence to
shield Maduro against US or Western condemnation. And then the
Strategic Partnership agreement includes coordination in international fora joint oppositions
to sanctions, and et cetera. So Russia has this kind

(57:33):
of geopolitic countering the US in Venezuela versus Russian or
with Russian it kind of a foothold in Western hemisphere.
Russia has a huge standing in Venezuela. They have a
lot of influence in Venezuela right on our back doorstep.
And then you think about the energy. Russia and Venezuela
are both oil producers. By cooperating Russia helps defend its

(57:54):
all energy strategy and influence global markets. So obviously with
the Ukraine and Russia wills when we have been trying
to basically kill off Russia as much as we possibly
could in large things by the way to the Biden
Harris administration, and it's something that the United States has
always done is try to destroy Russia, and they have.
You have to understand that, you know, Putin's gonna do

(58:16):
the same shit. The United States did in Ukraine. That's
exactly what he's doing in Venezuela.

Speaker 6 (58:20):
And he's saying, look, dude, look Trump, you remember when
you said you're gonna stop this war in twenty four hours?

Speaker 5 (58:26):
Bet, because that's exactly what Putin's saying to Trump now.
And now it's not so much a bromance anymore. It's like, hey,
you know what, I'm sick of your bullshit, and now
we're gonna play.

Speaker 8 (58:35):
This is a chess game now it is.

Speaker 5 (58:38):
And you think about economic games, the diplomatic allies, the
symbolic value of this supporting a anti US regime. It
kind of boosts Russia's image and self described fight against
Western I guess values or kind of especially the Western
I guess hatred towards Russia. So they have to kind
of boastore this up. And also China has this same

(59:00):
type of thing, and so this kind of Russia's ability
to deliver large scale support is kind of constrained by
its on economic pressure. And then the scale of support
may be more symbolic of tactical arms or advisors rather
than full scale intervention. And then you think about China
and their support from Maduro finance loans and investments, large loans,
infrastructure investments, oil for loan deals, development funding. China has

(59:23):
extended tens of billions of dollars in loans and credit
to Venezuela over many years, and so many of those
loans are backed by commitments to future oil deliveries. Chinese
firms have been involved in infrastructure projects in Venezuela. I
mean we're talking about energy, rail, telecommunications, et cetera. And
China has also participated in Venezuela's Belt and Road Initiative
cooperation and upgraded relations to all Weather partner status. In

(59:47):
twenty twenty five, President z said China will firmly support
Venezuela and safeguard and sovereignty and social stability.

Speaker 6 (59:54):
And then you think about the trade and energy in oil.

Speaker 5 (59:56):
Venezuela as a supplier of oil to China, Chinese markets
are important for Venezuela export strategy, and China has congratulated
Maurdua on his reelection in twenty twenty four and a
firm support for Diplomatically, China has in the past sold
military and dual use equipment radar surveillance tech to Venezuela,
and then China has also backed Venezuela's sovereignty claims and

(01:00:17):
condemned US bullying over military operations. China also maintains diplomatic
recognition of Maduro's government and congratulated his re election publicly.
So there are some people that believe that Russia and
China potentially was the ones that overthrew the probably duly
elected president Gonzales and put in Maduro, very similar to

(01:00:41):
what the United States has done, I believe.

Speaker 8 (01:00:43):
In Ukraine, yeah, absolutely, same as I also have.

Speaker 7 (01:00:46):
To remember Venezuela has not ever been a sweet little
sovereign country. They in fact operate with the elites getting
all the money and the rest of the country is poor.

Speaker 8 (01:00:59):
They don't give it money.

Speaker 7 (01:01:00):
Like there's a lot of people in Venezuela don't even
have electricity right now. They don't have roads, they're dirt roads.
They have like nothing, and only the top percent, the elites,
are getting any kind of money they're getting from oil.

Speaker 5 (01:01:13):
I one hundred percent agree with that. And so I
want to get to this clip also, and this is
a clip from Info Wars. But this guy the reason
I wanted to play this, Patrick Byrne. He told Alex
Jones exclusively about this doge bombshell discovery that verify kind
of what we already knew about election fraud worldwide.

Speaker 6 (01:01:31):
But he was the CEO of.

Speaker 5 (01:01:36):
Overstock dot Com and he was he actually fled the
country back during the Biden Harris administration. Overstock dot Com
was a huge company. I don't know if they still are.
I don't even know what they're doing nowadays, or if
they're even still in existence. But he said that this
investigation proved that a CIA and USI AID worked with
communist China George Soros open SAIDI Foundation and Venezuela to

(01:01:59):
still the twenty twenty election and establish an election fraud
control grid, which is what he claimed, which is why
he was basically ousted and had a They had a
twenty five million dollar bounty on this guy's head. This
was the CEO of overstock dot Com.

Speaker 8 (01:02:13):
Now I didn't even know that.

Speaker 5 (01:02:14):
Yeah, So this is what he has to say because
he has been heavily involved on this shit, especially with Venezuela.
So I want to play this part of Alex Jones.
We're going to break it down for you, but I
think this is important. We're trying we try not to
play as much like Alex Jones stuff as late, but
this one was important, especially what we're talking about.

Speaker 4 (01:02:30):
All right, folks.

Speaker 16 (01:02:31):
Patrick Burn has well until recently you know it's come out.
He didn't want to make a big deal, but worked
in US Intelligence and for the Jests Department and a
lot of high level international lespianizer. He is here in
studio with US now. He reached out and said, I'm
in town. I've got big updates on Venezuela and the
Democrats and how they're stealing elections that ties in everything.
I said, please come in. Then he gets here and

(01:02:53):
he says, oh, you're going to want to see these graphics.
That does just Scott. This hasn't broken yet, and this
proves that it's it's not just common as China with
Venezuela manipulating leccens to Democrats. It is the CIA and
the Soros Open Society Foundation with US AID.

Speaker 4 (01:03:10):
Which is the CIA on record. Now.

Speaker 17 (01:03:13):
Then I like boom topped, my head blows off.

Speaker 16 (01:03:16):
We were airing like a little three minute, you know, promo,
and I said, wait, we need to go get the
stuff from three weeks ago where Gabbard released and confirmed
the documents that in twenty twenty the communist Chinese were
shipping in planeloads of ballots only mark for Biden for
key battlegrounds. They got caught, whistleblowers came forward, you reported
at the time, but they never got in trouble, and

(01:03:36):
that the FBI knew about it, and THEI and the
PPI knew about it. You're the expert to tell us.
I'm just going for Remember, the FBI knew about it
low level. They tried to stop it and got told
to higher up shut it down. It's a joint CIA operation.
Now that's the director of the Office of National Intelligence.
That's just one of the huge things that's broke the
last month that got almost no attention, and that totally

(01:03:57):
backs what he's saying now with this dozed document that
we're breaking here showing where the funding everything comes from.

Speaker 4 (01:04:04):
So this is huge.

Speaker 16 (01:04:06):
And if you know the history, commis China and Shane
kaishek and forty nine, they double cross Congress sent weapons
to help the nationalists, but the CIAHD classified put now
in power, and that had this long secret, sickening relationship
and made them the most favored nation in all the
rest of this. Now Trump is completely breaking with that

(01:04:28):
and is cutting off China. And so this is all geopolitical.
It all ties together, So Patrick, start over, but we
should start here. This is why, and it's on record.
We built the Newsweek articles.

Speaker 4 (01:04:37):
Others.

Speaker 17 (01:04:38):
Venezuela put a twenty.

Speaker 16 (01:04:39):
Five million dollar bounty out on you because they're so
angry that you reverse engineered all this. Now Maduro's got
a fifty million boundy out on him by Trump.

Speaker 4 (01:04:48):
So you just walk through this.

Speaker 16 (01:04:50):
And then go through the dose exclusive documents, the CIA
under Biden, all the rest of this working with the
icoms of Venezuela to engage in this, and we have
the Gabberg documents on top of it backing it even further.

Speaker 4 (01:05:05):
So Patrick Berkle ahead.

Speaker 18 (01:05:06):
Okay, First, yes, they have the bounty on me because
you remember the Venezuelan election last July twenty eighth that,
like the whole world said, is nonsense, and they they
seventeen Latin American states said we won't recognize that Carter
all that stuff. Do you remember the at a handish
they think I hacked their election. And I'll tell you

(01:05:26):
why they think I hacked their election In a typical
Venezuelan election, What happens is the dictator gets two million votes,
the opposition gets seven million votes, and then they stuff
five and a half million ballots. So they tuned out
seven and a half million beat seven and they win
time and time and time again. Four years ago, they

(01:05:47):
introduced a new system. You have to give not just
your ID, but your thumbprint when you vote in Venezuela.
They say it's for security. What their system really does
is it ties your ballot. When you're in Venezuelan and
you vote, it ties your ballot to image to your thumbprint,
so they can look up how you voted, Alex and
go in and see how you voted and arrest the
right people.

Speaker 4 (01:06:06):
Now that creates a problem. How do you stuff five
and a.

Speaker 18 (01:06:09):
Half million ballots when you don't have those five and
a half million thumbs. They have a secret tool that
is in every precinct that there are people used to it. Basically,
it generates the nine digit code as if a valid
thumb was put in it and opens the machines who
can take it ballot and so that's how it works.
So they have this secret tool, and that tool was
working right up through Saturday, July twenty seventh at midnight,

(01:06:32):
but at twelve oh one their secret cheating tools started
spitting out random nine digit numbers.

Speaker 4 (01:06:38):
They couldn't stuff.

Speaker 18 (01:06:39):
By noon, they went crazy because all over the country
they weren't able to stuff.

Speaker 4 (01:06:43):
They canceled.

Speaker 18 (01:06:44):
Venezuela canceled all its normal normally have TV and as
the votes roll in all day, they say, oh, what
do you know, we just we just won by a
hair again.

Speaker 4 (01:06:53):
This time, they canceled all their television.

Speaker 18 (01:06:55):
They came out the next morning and we said, hey,
we won fifty one forty nine, screw you. And they
run up two thousand protest leaders and the whole world
is like, said, this is a garbage election. Well, ten
days later, when they opened up their secret cheating tool,
they discovered something that made them think that I might
know something about these facts, Alex, And they came to
the inclusion that I think I did it.

Speaker 4 (01:07:17):
So that's why they put the twenty five million dollars
bounty on me.

Speaker 18 (01:07:20):
Now going forward, I have for four years been saying
this all leads through Venezuela to the ultimate chairman of
the board of this operation is China. Of this whole system.
Iran is the paymaster. They are the secret paymaster. So
none of this shows up in bankwires the US can see.
But what we've learned going through doge elon Musk's doge data,

(01:07:42):
we have some researchers put together just like two weeks ago,
what I opened the show telling you in reality, this
garbage technology has spread through the world, not just because
of China, but because of the CIA. They have been
under the guise of modernizing elections. They've had the USAID
Fund and George Soro's staff and Arlington, Virginia NGO called Steps.

Speaker 4 (01:08:05):
Which you should probably look up Steps.

Speaker 18 (01:08:06):
What it's said, and that that's Steps. Its mission is
to modernize elections by spreading smart.

Speaker 4 (01:08:12):
Metic and all over the world.

Speaker 18 (01:08:14):
Now have to pull up the next graphic you will
see and you're putting alex is putting this up online.
You can see all the nations we have been funded
twenty six nations, from the Philippines you know, to Bolivia
and Estonia, everything to put in smart matters.

Speaker 17 (01:08:29):
This is all breaking right now at Real All shows.

Speaker 4 (01:08:31):
And I actually noticed this. We put this together two
weeks ago. The government has just received this data themselves.

Speaker 17 (01:08:35):
So where this has been posted at Real All Shows,
or Robs.

Speaker 18 (01:08:38):
The CIA was behind this with China, not the top
of the CIA. Mike Pompeo and his CIA was involved
in the twenty twenty hack. The top of the CIA
was and that's why they're going ballistic, and it's they.
They've been behind the spread of this technology through twenty
six and you know everywhere they put this technology. It

(01:08:59):
started July nine, which is six months after Obama came in.
Obama and Brennan everywhere they put this technology.

Speaker 4 (01:09:05):
We've researched, they've had.

Speaker 18 (01:09:06):
Within a few years, they get some election where suddenly
the elect an AOC or an Obama or some left
wing person that they never expected to elect. It's all
been on this technology that you, the taxpayer, paid for
this Arlington Virginia steps to spread through the world.

Speaker 16 (01:09:22):
Now I've known you a long time. You interviewed probably
the first time six seven years ago. But everything you've
talked about has been proven.

Speaker 6 (01:09:33):
Now you too, you're the most, the greatest.

Speaker 18 (01:09:36):
It's amazing the stuff you said twenty five years ago,
that's all come true.

Speaker 16 (01:09:39):
But I mean, you're the gal on the ground. So
the point is, without getting into it all, you're a
loyal American. You try to work with Democrats and Republicans,
but you've been in intelligence a long time. That's not
secret now, and so we're trying to loyally get to
control of the country. But the issue is here, Gabbert
just released three weeks ago, and they can pull the
shob that China was doing this with the CIA digitally

(01:10:05):
as you said in twenty twenty, and with the mail
in ballots shipping them filled out for Biden, and so
that is massive. And then now we've got this Doze investigation,
and of course it's the CIA that goes around the
world with the State Department for Election Integrity, and then
it came out that they helped steal the election from

(01:10:28):
Balsonaro under Biden, and we're advising them how to censor
and control.

Speaker 4 (01:10:33):
And that's again the CIA.

Speaker 16 (01:10:35):
Literally the CIA wanting to put communists in because they'll
work with them better. Same thing in Venezuela. So we
think our government's really against Venezuela. We really think it's
against you know, Lula in communists in Brazil, but they're
not as long as their clients and work with them.
And so this is a massive scandal. Added to what

(01:10:56):
Gabbard released and.

Speaker 4 (01:10:58):
It's beyond that.

Speaker 18 (01:10:59):
If I may, I think it's not just you're still
thinking the old paradigm. I think that they have a
new paradigm, which is that they're just globalist.

Speaker 4 (01:11:06):
Now there's a dispate or the count you.

Speaker 16 (01:11:08):
No, I agree, They parasitically just feed on the people
they wanted, the globalists.

Speaker 18 (01:11:13):
Some globalists want to make the capital of the globe
somewhere in Europe. Some globalists want to make it in Beijing.
But they share this globalist vision. And oh no, no, no,
that's right. No, definitely, China was part of the globalist order.
It's split off. It's a competing globalist transhumanist. Absolutely.

Speaker 4 (01:11:28):
What do you make of the fact like it looked
like they were aligned.

Speaker 18 (01:11:30):
Then we got through the twenty twenty election and within
a year or so, Sorous was coming out and saying
Shi Jinping's hitler, this friend of the greatest enemy of humanity,
blah blah blah.

Speaker 4 (01:11:40):
And then about a year ago he reversed and they're
tummy again.

Speaker 16 (01:11:43):
Right yeah, well, I mean, look, look, look the biggest
thing is the chi cooms agreed to a one child
policy in depopulation.

Speaker 4 (01:11:49):
They were to be given all the earth minerals. They
would be the.

Speaker 16 (01:11:51):
Industrial power, work with the globalist middleman to make them
have control of the West, leverage US out. But they
weren't supposed to expand into the South. China Sea said,
they've expanded everywhere. It was clear twenty years ago they
double cross. By fifteen years ago, we do the Asia pivot,
but they had so infiltrated us that it couldn't be
done even inside the global's corrupt order. And then just

(01:12:12):
finally enough American elites just out of survival mode and
Silicon Valley said, no, China's taking over and going to
win the AI race. We've got to do this out
of self preservation. So enough elits got behind Trump, not
even because they overall agreed with America first or what
he's doing, but because they knew the chi coms had
beaten them. And so this is out of desperation. That's

(01:12:33):
why you see the flip flopping and the gyrating that's
going on.

Speaker 5 (01:12:36):
All right, So that is the Alex Jones piece. And listen,
I think there's a lot to kind of break down here, right.
So this political insider, Patrick Burne, he joined Alex Jones.

Speaker 6 (01:12:47):
He talks about kind.

Speaker 5 (01:12:48):
Of his I guess you can say journey with trying
to figure out, like, what was the deal with the
twenty twenty election, how did China actually influence Venezuela. Then
Venezuela had this massive I guess you can say restructure
of elections globally China was involved in heavily. So if
you look at these electronic voting machines, all the stuff
that we had, we really started seeing during the twenty

(01:13:10):
twenty in election, where many people thought that there's no
way in hell that Biden could possibly receive the amount
of votes he did, especially being a guy that was.

Speaker 6 (01:13:19):
Already seen all at the time.

Speaker 5 (01:13:20):
And then we also know if you look at the
movie and the documentary two Thousand Mules, I think it's
the name of the movie, Yeah, where they expose all
the ballot harvesting, the ballot stuffing, the mules that would
go across the country.

Speaker 6 (01:13:36):
There were two thousand of them.

Speaker 5 (01:13:37):
Yeah, that essentially, besides just the electronic voting, they made
sure that Joe Biden won. And what we're starting to
find out is potentially some of these ballots were Chinese.

Speaker 7 (01:13:48):
And don't forget that's why Tucker basically was fired from
Fox TV. Oh absolutely snows is because he called out
the voting machine.

Speaker 8 (01:13:56):
I'm not even going to say their name.

Speaker 7 (01:13:58):
But that's why he got fired, and because they were
going to assume him.

Speaker 6 (01:14:02):
Yeah, well they did see them.

Speaker 5 (01:14:03):
They sued Fox News for seven hundred plus million dollars
that they had to pay, and from what we understand
is one of the stipulations is you have to get
rid of Tucker Carlson. So Tucker Carlson, by the way,
has not really talked a ton about the voting fraud
and all that stuff after he left Fox News, and
that's probably for a good reason. I'm sure they have
handcuffed him and saying this is part of the settlement.

(01:14:24):
Even after you leave Fox News, if you ever mentioned
this again, then we'll sue you to oblivion. And this
is all a globalist takeover. This is a coordinated system
of elitists that have full control over courts. We've seen
this with not only the the far left prosecutors and
ags and you name it, like Letitia.

Speaker 6 (01:14:44):
James and even the Alvin Bragg.

Speaker 5 (01:14:48):
Alvin Bragg, I mean even the guy out there in
California to where you know they would allow these these
violent riots to happen across the country. They would then,
by the way, all these prosecutors that were installed I
believe by Soros and the elitists and the globalist backed foundations,
all of these violent riots would typically happen in these

(01:15:10):
cities to where these prosecutors are already in place, to
where the people that would get arrested, if they would
get arrested, were just set out right on without bail.

Speaker 7 (01:15:18):
Yeah, without bail, and if they were arrested and had bailed,
and Kamala Harris was urging.

Speaker 8 (01:15:24):
People to help these people get out of jail exactly.

Speaker 5 (01:15:27):
So you know, I want to talk about this because
we're at a pivotal point in America. We're at pivotal
point in American politics and just our nation as a whole.
You know, you think about these no Kings protests, I
want to I want to break this down in my
mind kind of how I'm thinking about this, just especially
based on the clip we just listened to.

Speaker 6 (01:15:46):
If we know that protests are coordinated.

Speaker 5 (01:15:49):
And funded, right, we know that, we know that We've
seen that during the Biden Harrison minute. We saw it
with Black Lives Matter, we saw it with the Antifa protests.
We've seen it with the Ice protest. But if you
see these pro tests that are being heavily funded, they're
being coordinated, they're being organized by these NGOs that are
most of the time backed by the globalist foundations, and

(01:16:09):
you see all this stuff. And now we're starting to
see not just this the second No King's protest we
just recently had this past weekend, we also had another
one about six months ago where they said no Kings.

Speaker 6 (01:16:20):
You know, this was a whole agenda.

Speaker 5 (01:16:22):
They want to put it all over mainstream media because
in my mind, I think what is happening is that
this government, with DOJE, with Trump administration and with others
are starting to figure out the money lines and the
trails of who is doing what, how they're doing it,
how they're corrupting elections, how they're still in elections. They're

(01:16:43):
starting to see this massive global network of corruption.

Speaker 6 (01:16:49):
And so.

Speaker 5 (01:16:51):
There's a reason also I believe that the No King's
protest is being funded right now because the No King's
protests they want to go ahead and get ahead of
the curb by saying, oh no, we're not going to
have anyone that's going to circumvent what we created, which
is our election model, our modernize elections. We got to
make sure that we cannot we cannot back trace on
this whatsoever. We want to continue to use our modernize elections,

(01:17:14):
which means essentially to make sure that we can stay
that we can rig and still elections like we want to.
And the only reason that didn't happen, I believe during
the twenty twenty four election was because there was a
lot of lawsuits.

Speaker 6 (01:17:26):
There was a lot of few.

Speaker 7 (01:17:27):
Trump was in place too, and I think she was
a major player in the game to make sure that
there was no lying and cheating going on.

Speaker 5 (01:17:34):
Yeah, and so they they try to get ahead of
the game there. But like, you know, what is the
Trump administration going to do this time? The problem is
that we have to somehow keep the globalists and other
nations out of our elections. And you know, would that
at some point in time be that the rights start
still in elections in some way to where they say,
you know what, we're done with the globalist We're done

(01:17:55):
with all this shit. We're going to just go ahead
and forego elections. I mean, this is what But you know,
when we start seeing this no King stuff, I think
they're already kind of the globalist are already starting to see
potentially what's coming to where it's like the administration that's
in power right now, they see our power move, they
see our infrastructure behind the scenes. So we have to

(01:18:16):
start coordinating our factions of people behind the scenes to
protest the No Kings because maybe this is what this
administration believes is the only way that Republicans will ever
see the light of day again if we you know,
you know what I do. If their system takes over,
Republicans will never be able to control the United States again.
We will be like UK, will be like Australia, will

(01:18:37):
be like Canada, and we will never be a sovereign
nation again.

Speaker 7 (01:18:40):
But have you noticed a difference between the protests from now,
like the No Kings protests that have happened, there's been
I think two and the riots or their protests with
vl M and Antifa. I think a major difference that
we're seeing there is a shift in these protests, the
shift from the summer of love. You know, it was

(01:19:03):
a summer of love, but you saw buildings burning down
in the background, you saw major looting going on. You've
seen businesses being taken over and people stealing everything and
then burning them down. These protests that are going on,
they know kings protests have been extremely non violent in
my opinion.

Speaker 8 (01:19:23):
Yeah, And when.

Speaker 7 (01:19:24):
I see these people protesting, all I see is older
white people. So who is paying these older white people
or are they out there because they truly believe that.

Speaker 8 (01:19:36):
Trump is a king?

Speaker 7 (01:19:37):
Because let me just tell you, if Trump was a king,
he wouldn't let them protest in the beginning.

Speaker 6 (01:19:42):
Yeah, no, I get it.

Speaker 5 (01:19:44):
I mean, look, I think still is probably likely the
same funding an organization that we've seen would be a
Lamin and tief in all those But the question is
going to be what is this administration going to do
and how are they going to basically dismantle the fraud
and the instability of our elections for from foreign influence,
Because this is what we have to deal with coming

(01:20:06):
up in twenty twenty eight and even twenty twenty six.
And I think in some parts, you know, yes, the
Trump administration is kind of shooting ourselves in the foot
to some degree. And I think maybe that could be
also coordinated to make it look like, hey, there's a
reason why people like Mandmi or man Donnie whatever his
name is in New York is going to win this election,
probably in a landslide. I mean, the only person you
have to put up in New York is Cuomo. Literally,

(01:20:27):
the guy that basically.

Speaker 8 (01:20:28):
Say, came over a million dollars over the other dude.

Speaker 6 (01:20:30):
Well either way.

Speaker 5 (01:20:31):
But he also sent you know, elderly people to die
in nursing homes because he wanted to boost COVID numbers
because of Yeah, I mean we've talked.

Speaker 7 (01:20:39):
About the bit, I know, but do you think he
was on purpose murdering people, well, I mean I think
doing it to boost numbers.

Speaker 5 (01:20:47):
The Cuomo was a guy that you know, he he
let in all of these COVID patients into nursing homes.
He he had these massive ships outside of New York
City that Trump gave him to put in any code patients.
And instead of doing that because Trump sent him, he
put all these people back in nursing homes. I mean,
there's literally I can't even remember what the woman's name

(01:21:08):
is on Fox News.

Speaker 6 (01:21:09):
I think she is.

Speaker 5 (01:21:10):
I think she's the one that's the weather girl that
her family died because of that because of his BS
that happened in New York City, And the only person
New York City has to put in place over Mandami.

Speaker 6 (01:21:20):
Is Cuomo Cuomo?

Speaker 7 (01:21:22):
So what do you vote for? Though, if you are
in New York City, I think everyone's going to Clomo.

Speaker 5 (01:21:27):
Everyone's going to vote for MANDOMI because not only that,
you know a lot of Look, the New York thing
is Israel versus not Israel, and they they know and
believe that Cuomo is influenced heavily by Apak. If you
look at his funding, it is, and if you look
at Mandami, he is not that at all. And so
more people think that even though he is like basically

(01:21:48):
a communist and socialist, they feel like in their minds
that he's more American than Cuomo.

Speaker 6 (01:21:53):
And that's the sad thing.

Speaker 7 (01:21:54):
I just want to say that Cuomo has come up
ten points in the last month, is voters aren't concerned.

Speaker 6 (01:22:01):
I doubt he's gonna win though.

Speaker 5 (01:22:02):
I mean, you just can't present a guy that completely
screwed over New York during COVID and killed thousands and
thousands of people.

Speaker 7 (01:22:10):
Yeah, but I hate to see what New York City
comes to be if this other guy comes in.

Speaker 6 (01:22:16):
Well, New York City's been shipped for like ten years now.

Speaker 8 (01:22:18):
Yeah, but he's going to only get worse.

Speaker 6 (01:22:20):
It can't well maybe but maybe not.

Speaker 5 (01:22:22):
I mean, it is whatever, let it burn to the
ground if that's what it takes for people to finally
wake up. And I don't I'm not saying, by the way,
that that New Yorkers have a they don't have anyone
good to vote for.

Speaker 6 (01:22:33):
Unfortunately, they don't have MANDOMI, they don't.

Speaker 7 (01:22:35):
Have Swani or whatever guy by I have no idea.

Speaker 5 (01:22:39):
The problem, the problem with politics nowadays is that most
people just do not trust government or politics or politicians
in any faction at all. And it's because everywhere you look,
they're lying to you, no matter who it is, no
matter who you may have put support behind, at one
point in time, they're gonna lie to you about something,
and you don't ever know what the reason in they're
lying about that is. I mean, I go back to
the Trump thing, with that Epstein thing in particular, where

(01:23:01):
it's like he called it a hoax and all this stuff,
where we know it's not a hoax, we know that
is factually inaccurate.

Speaker 6 (01:23:07):
And yet and I even.

Speaker 5 (01:23:08):
Remember when Trump was, you know, when he was doing
press conference and said, you know what if anybody wants
to just go and ride this horse of Epstein and
say that we must do this and we must release this.

Speaker 6 (01:23:17):
We don't need those voters anyway. And I was like, dude,
these are literally the voters that voted for.

Speaker 5 (01:23:22):
You, Like, I mean, most of the people that voted
for you want the transparency on the Epstein files, unless
you're a boomer.

Speaker 7 (01:23:28):
Well, they did want the transparency, but more importantly, they
wanted our borders closed.

Speaker 5 (01:23:33):
Yeah, but they wanted the borders closed. But yes, he
ran on borders, but he also ran on Epstein files.
And this is something that seems like it should be
a very easy thing to release, and yet he has
not done so. But the question here is is that
what will happen with the election integrity going forward in
the United States? Will Trump become a king? Is that
something that he could potentially do? Or what will the

(01:23:54):
Republican Party or the people that are in power right now,
what will they do?

Speaker 6 (01:23:57):
And let me tell you why.

Speaker 5 (01:23:57):
I don't think Trump's going to become a king because
Number one, Trump himself or the Trump administration is not
the one that is reign and power in America.

Speaker 6 (01:24:07):
And that is the sad and scary thing because it's scary.
The scary thing is that whoever is in control.

Speaker 5 (01:24:11):
And if you if you listen to the Alex Jones
piece right there where the CIA potentially is heavily involved
with the Chinese Communist Party, then we know essentially who
is running the country. And so you know, the only
thing that that the I guess administration can do nowt
is figure out ways to stop China from any involvement
in our elections right and and somehow make elections fair again.

Speaker 6 (01:24:33):
Although even if we go back to.

Speaker 5 (01:24:34):
The most basics of election integrity, like you know, actually
going to the polls and voting, and unless you have
some type of you know, elms you're overseas or you
have an element to where you you know, you could
get a mail in ballot. Otherwise you need to show
up at poles to vote, not.

Speaker 7 (01:24:51):
Because you're going on vacation. I think that's a stupid excuse.

Speaker 5 (01:24:54):
No, And we need paper ballots, We don't need mass
mail in balloting. We don't need any of that. But
you know, and this isn't about election integrity or any
of that stuff, but it does somewhat tie into the
Venezuela thing. But what I want you guys to let
us know is that do you think that the official
narrative of the story of Venezuela, as far as the
way that the media is telling you it's all drugs?

(01:25:16):
Do you think that's true? Or do you think what
we're talking about true? Do you think that China and
Russia involvement is literally the or I guess I should
say likely the reasoning why we have so much military
build up in the region, and maybe we're just trying
to kick out Russia and China out of our back door,
just like we just like Russia. Did I believe with Ukraine?
Or do you think it's even just bigger than that?

(01:25:36):
Do you think it's something that we don't even see,
because that's a good question. We don't one hundred percent
know right now, but we did just want to talk
about this, cover this on tonight's episode. We're probably going
to play this episode out tonight with play.

Speaker 8 (01:25:50):
With my song I don't love it.

Speaker 6 (01:25:52):
Yeah, yeah, I love it.

Speaker 5 (01:25:54):
I would play it out with the original version, but
we won't do that because I'm trying to be more
Christian noadays and uh, you know, okay, we got to
do that. So guys, that's gonna do it for us.
We're gonna be back all this week and next week.
We're gonna have a lot to talk about. We've got
the Epstein thing. Candice Owns is about to release some
new info. And Charlie Kirk, she's been gone for about

(01:26:14):
two weeks I think now, and so she said what
she's about to unveil about what she's found out about
the people that backstopped him is going to blow it
wide open. We're looking forward to that also. Guys, we
love you so very much. Thank you for hanging out
with us until next time.

Speaker 8 (01:26:28):
Piece out, peace out, guys.

Speaker 1 (01:26:33):
So much living, Remember what you want and what you love.

(01:26:57):
Gentlemen after me.

Speaker 3 (01:27:04):
I don't kill him.

Speaker 19 (01:27:19):
I don't kill him. I don't kill him. I don't

(01:27:39):
kill him. I don't feel him. I don't feel him.

(01:28:02):
I don't fill up. I don't kill time.

Speaker 2 (01:28:17):
Start to do the right thing. Don't trust you anything,
to stop listing to other.

Speaker 10 (01:28:23):
People?

Speaker 2 (01:28:24):
Will oh she still what to do?

Speaker 1 (01:28:26):
I mean handing screen, the useful manners, moving him and.

Speaker 2 (01:28:31):
You plant and now start to cleaning time.

Speaker 19 (01:28:35):
Little will be I think no more, no more.

Speaker 2 (01:28:40):
Made loudly and proudly in the other worlds you.

Speaker 19 (01:28:53):
I don't kill Mrottle fettle fieldsttle Field,

All Episodes

US vs Venezuela | The War They’re Not Talking About

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Stuff You Should Know

Ruthie's Table 4

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}US vs Venezuela | The War They’re Not Talking About