FLF: #7 Loosing the People from the Shackles of Rigged Elections

Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
message I got.
Okay, it looks like we're recording now.
Sorry.
Okay, here we go.
Welcome everyone.
Thank you for joining us today on For the Love of Freedom.
Thanks for ah not being too offended by the disruption of our tech.
We're trying not to be too offended by it.

(00:21):
But um just to say, For the Love of Freedom is where we get to meet extraordinary peoplewho are disrupting the world as we know it.
And here's a place that we dig into the stories that shape their perspectives and learnwhat's driving them to bring freedom to the world.
My guest today is Edward Solomon.
He's a mathematician who's been investigating election fraud since the steal of 2020.

(00:45):
And he has uncovered algorithmic election fraud in the Dominion machines.
If you're a state of freedom follower, you may have caught our interview with him a numberof months back, but he is currently the plaintiff in an ongoing case in Nevada.
that's aiming to expose the corruption of the Dominion systems.
And if and when he is successful, the jig is up for Dominion.

(01:08):
Edward, thank you so much for joining me today.
we gotta be careful of the fact check.
They'll say you're debunked because I'm the expert witness, not the plaintiff.
And therefore everything you said from here on out is a lie!
a lie.
That's right.
Well, thank you for the correction.
Thank you for keeping me on the straight and narrow.

(01:28):
Well, Edward, I like to start every show and frame it with a scripture for theconversation.
And the scripture for today is Psalm chapter 35 verse 8.
Let me just get it here.
It says,
Surprise them with your ambush Lord and catch them in the very trap they set for me Letthem be the ones to fail and fall into destruction now I chose that scripture because

(01:57):
Dominion along with the corrupt politicians and outside influences who installed thesemachines With a view to overthrow our Republican form of government, which they have done
in some ways, right?
are now finding themselves in the crosshairs and I pray that they're unable to escape thetrap of their own making, the trap that they set for the freedom loving people of America,

(02:20):
I'm claiming will be their own demise.
Edward, would you start out by giving us a quick overview in layman's terms, please, formy sake, um of how these machines have been falsifying election outcomes?
I wouldn't even call them election outcomes based on what happens.

(02:40):
They're just synthetically engineered elections.
They have nothing to do with how anybody actually voted.
Yeah, just totally fake, huh?
I mean, maybe the legitimate ballots have somehow survived it, have an effect on maybe thedifferences between maybe candidates of the same party, right?

(03:05):
So for instance, like if you have a never Trump or like Hogan running for the RepublicanSenate in Maryland, we do expect him to get a few more votes than Trump, right?
And we see that in the cast vote record because
Okay, but does that mean that the total number of votes that both Trump and Hogan receivedis legitimate?

(03:26):
Even if the difference between them is legitimate, there's a huge difference.
You know what I'm trying to say?
So I think the most effect that the legitimate ballots have is preserving the differencebetween candidates of the same party.
So maybe, you know, Hogan has a hundred thousand votes and Trump has 90,000 votes, butthey knocked them both down 50,000 votes.

(03:55):
So now it says Hogan has 40,000 and Trump has 30,000.
The difference is still the same, but they screw both of them.
I think that's the most, I think that's maybe the only legitimate uh thing left in ourelections these days is the general difference.
just disenfranchising the delta of people that their votes were flipped.

(04:21):
Now, let me see.
I had another question here for you that I wanted to bring up.
Okay, so you found that algorithm that you were just explaining.
How did you find that?
Well, you don't find it.
You just look at the certified CAS file record from the secretary of state.

(04:42):
I just look at their data and show them what their data says that they certified to betrue and authentic.
Now tell us a little bit about the case that you are a party to, an expert witness in, nota plaintiff.
um And it's in Nevada, right?
telling you about that case requires me to share my screen.

(05:03):
Okay, I don't know if you have that power on this platform.
Let me see.
You do?
If you have it, go for it.
Let me know when you see the galaxy.
I see the galaxy.
Now our case is about Nevada, okay.
However, there's a lot of things that come in to this case that's outside Nevada and thefirst one we want to look at is Maryland, okay.

(05:29):
Okay.
Danielle if 75 % of Trump voters oppose abortion in the early vote What percentage ofTrump voters you think would oppose abortion in the mail-in vote?
I would think roughly 70%.
Yeah, right?

(05:50):
How about on Election Day?
Yep, I think it would hold pretty close to that number.
Alright now I'm going show you what their data says.
Okay.
Their data says that in Maryland's 6th congressional district, now Perot is the Republicannominee in the 6th congressional district in 2024.

(06:15):
And his vote share is very similar to Trump's, that's almost identical.
But first let's look at Hogan, who's a never Trumper.
So you can see that Hogan gets about
66 % of the vote, okay?

(06:35):
While the Republican gets maybe the, like the MAGA guy gets about 55%.
And that's because I think there is a legitimate difference of 10 % difference betweenthese two Republicans, okay?
But Trump follows the, how Perot went over in Maryland, okay?

(06:58):
So he goes about 55 % of the vote.
But that being said, before I show you the abortion thing, I think that Hogan should beway up here, and Trump should be like here in Perot.
Get what I'm saying?
The purple line, I'll use the purple line, because that's the total Republican share ofthe vote.

(07:19):
Anyway, how do we know this is actually a rigged election?
Well, it says that people who voted for Hogan were 63 % against abortion in the earlyvote.
Okay.
And then for some reason, they magically dropped down to 50 % against abortion in theElection Day vote.
Okay.

(07:39):
And then they went even further down to 37 % against abortion and the mail-in vote.
Remember, these are only people voting for the Republican Senator.
I'm not talking about Kamala voters or people voting for Senator also Brooks.
Okay.
The Democrat senator, the people that voted for her, they just stated 5 % against abortionthe entire election.

(08:07):
I don't believe that number either.
I think it's probably more like 30 or 40 based on the polling.
But let's just say for the sake of the argument, the Democrats only voted 5 % againstabortion.
Okay.
Well then why are Republicans falling from 63, which is a 2 to 1 ratio, to 50%, which is a1 to 1 ratio, to 37, which is a 1 to 2 ratio?

(08:32):
And I would expect Edward uh that it seems like day of voters tend to be the moreconservative, less government trusting types.
So I would expect that number to be, it should be higher.
Right.
Yeah.
Now people go, well, Hogan's a never-Trump-er, maybe he got Democrats to vote for him onElection Day in the mail.

(08:53):
Right?
Okay, let's just say hypothetically that's true.
Well, Perot and Trump have the same numbers at all times.
Okay?
So it says that Trump and Perot voters are 75 % against abortion.
That's up from 63.
So that tells me that, yeah, Hogan did pull in a lot of Democrats in the early vote.

(09:17):
Okay.
Okay.
So that part's true.
But you know doesn't make sense?
That they both go down.
Bigly.
You
Now it says Trump and Perot voters are 60 % against abortion on election day.

(09:38):
And they're only 50 % against abortion.
I could say 48 if I wanted to, but I'll say 50, I'll round it to 50.
50 % against abortion in the second mail-in vote.
Because in the first mail-in vote, they were still 75 % against abortion.
Wow.
Okay?

(09:59):
So this is just rigged by definition.
You're not going to find any coherent excuse for why Trump voters would go from 75 to 60 %to 50%.
So that's a three to one ratio to a two to one ratio to a one to one ratio.
What is it over here?
It's a two to one ratio to a one to one ratio to a one to three ratio.

(10:23):
So yes, Hogan definitely picked up a lot of Democrats because the overall abortion numbersare lower for Hogan voters, which means that Democrats who didn't vote that way voted for
him.
Okay.
However, they're both going, this is insane, this can't be explained.

(10:44):
Do we see this anywhere else?
Well, now let's talk about Nevada.
I see the exact same thing in Nevada, from early to mail into election day.
So this is pattern recognition.
Yes, so let's go over to that and this is one of the main exhibits in our case.
Okay, I'm gonna pull this up.

(11:07):
Here we're just looking at Trump and Kamala voters.
So red again is how they voted uh for the Republicans.
This is only Trump and blue is only Democrats.
Okay.
Okay, let's first look at Democrats.
Do see that very low 5 % number again?

(11:28):
Yeah.
Now, for some reason, from the early vote to the mail-in vote, they go from 6 to 10percent.
This means for some reason their opposition to abortion increased.
It doubled in ratio.
It also happened in Clark County.

(11:49):
So in Clark and Wausau County, the proportion of Democrats against abortion magicallydoubles.
Interesting.
Strange but okay.
Just say let's just pretend it's legitimate for a moment.
Okay
still the same, uh so that's day of versus mail-in that we're looking at?
Okay.
So in terms of ratios, um 6 to 10 percent is a doubling of a ratio and 8 to 13 is actuallya doubling of a ratio.

(12:19):
A change in percentage is not the same as a change in ratio.
Okay, how about Republicans?
Well, in the early vote, Trump voters, so I look in the cast vote record, this is what Idefine as a Republican, if you voted for Trump in the cast vote record, I say on that same
ballot that voted for Trump, how do they vote on abortion?

(12:41):
Well, it that 70 % of Republicans in both counties, exactly 7.00, voted against abortion.
I think it's way higher, Danielle.
Yeah.
just say that's legitimate for the sake of the argument.
What happens on election day?
This we're not even in the mail-in vote.

(13:02):
Drops of 52 % in Washoe County and it drops of 52.00 % in Washoe County.
Wow, you're talking about some seriously like-minded voters in those two counties, huh?
Yep, and you can see that the the general the immediate shapes of the lines are different.

(13:22):
So it's not like I accidentally plaster the same graph, okay?
That's literally what it says!
Wow, so there's some kind of little randomization feature in there, but it ends up withthe same outcome.
Yes.
So in both counties, we go from 70 % against abortion to 52 % against abortion forRepublicans.

(13:43):
Now here's the thing, a lot of these abortion bills in 2020, 2022 and 2024, we're lookingat the 2024 lecture right now, in many states, things like, should we ban abortions in the
third trimester after 22 weeks of gestation or something, or 22 weeks after a missmenstrual cycle or something?

(14:07):
Most of my family members voted for Kamala and not a single one of them would support thetermination of a fetus over six months.
So here's the question.
How are we only getting 5 % opposed in two different states on opposite sides of on the,on the East and West coast basically?
Yeah.

(14:29):
I don't believe this is a real number.
I cannot believe that that's a real number.
And Edward, found, oh you were taking part, you were helping out someone else in thismovement, in the election integrity movement, and you found even more damning evidence
that you told me about.

(14:51):
Okay.
So if we talk about Colorado, okay, in every county in Colorado, you get the same pattern.
Yes, they don't have any significant earlier election day voting.
But if you look at the trajectory over time, okay, of every batch of ballots, Republicanspull this off.

(15:13):
fact, they go from 83%, which is like five to one to like
55 ish, which is almost one to one.
And like virtually every county in Colorado.
So what I want to know is why do we have, and I don't care what I say, I say it like itis, I don't care if they hit, if they threatened me with contempt charges.

(15:35):
Why do we have a bunch of demonic pedophiles that want to cut off children's genitals thatare killing babies in our elections, that are rigging our elections?
Because that's what it really comes down to at the end of the day.
Okay.
And I can show you more crazy things, but I'm about to in Colorado.
But this what we have, demonic pedophiles that kill babies rigging our elections.

(16:02):
That's the only conclusion that can be drawn.
Okay.
Nobody can explain why in every state on an abortion measure, Democrats vote almostvirtually, unanimously, 100 % virtually is what the gas vote record says on abortion.
And Republicans just go like this in every county, in every state, and in every precinct.

(16:25):
Yeah.
What's going on?
You know, all right
so many of those abortion ballot initiatives in the last, well, since Roe versus Wade wasoverturned.
And I saw specifically uh the state that really left me scratching my head and saying,this isn't real, was Ohio.

(16:51):
Ohio voted, believe, overwhelmingly to codify abortion as a constitutional quote unquoteright or something.
You see, when they put Democrats that low to virtually 0 % as far as I'm concerned, theonly reason they don't put it lower, Danielle, is because they know they can't make it
zero.
Okay?
If they could, they would.

(17:11):
Yeah, it could.
It would be a negative number.
You're right.
If they could get away with it.
So they put it at the lowest number possible that isn't zero and at least is larger thanfive.
So they choose five or six.
Okay?
Yeah.
Then they go, okay, well now we got to bring the Republicans down because they want tomanufacture a narrative.
It's not just about rigging the election result and just barely squeaking it through with51%.

(17:34):
It's about creating a false narrative that there's so many people that think like them.
And therefore you're crazy.
You're so right about that.
We see it every day.
But the truth is, mean, the mainstream media has no credibility.
So their ability to do that has waned, I think greatly.

(17:55):
But it doesn't stop them from trying for sure.
before anybody says that I'm some radical right wing neo-Nazi fascist, believe it or not,I know you probably don't agree with this, but I'm okay with up to three months because I
don't want women sticking themselves with clothes hangers.
So whatever.

(18:16):
So I'm not even the most ardent pro-lifer there is out there.
And I still know that this is rigged.
Nobody would vote.
for a third trimester abortion.
Everybody knows without a doubt, unless you're a satanic pedophile, that that isabsolutely 100 % the murder of a baby.

(18:40):
Yeah, it's true.
Now, what do you want to get into Colorado here first?
I mean, yeah, let's do that.
today, actually.
So let me share my screen on.

(19:03):
Colorado So one of the main exhibits that was entered in December into our court case,which is still ongoing Was this beauty?
So what does this say?
Well, there was something in Colorado in 2020 called Proposition B, which was the repealof the Gallagher constitutional amendment.

(19:30):
And that constitutional amendment capped everybody's property taxes.
So to repeal it would double or triple your property taxes.
now since exactly and now that it's been repealed, it's been turned out as even worse.
Some people got quadrupled and quintupled.
OK.
A lot of people had to sell their homes for pennies on the dollar.

(19:51):
It was so bad.
OK.
property tax is illegal to start with, right?
I mean, it really is.
You never own your home because of property tax if they can take it away.
That's debatable.
Well, that's how I view it.
The full libertarian view would be all taxation is theft.

(20:13):
um At the end of the day, there are some things that I do trust government to do thatothers won't do like build roads.
you know, another day.
Something just tells me Danielle that if we didn't have any taxes, there wouldn't be anyhighways still in America.

(20:34):
All right.
Okay.
some thoughts on that.
But it's an interest.
It's, uh I think income tax is totally illegal.
don't know why that I don't know how that ever got through the constitution.
But for me, I don't know by the way, we'll have that debate another day.
Like you said.
All right.
Anyway, so let's take a look at this, uh, Arapahoe County picture.

(21:00):
So what this says is red is how Trump voters voted on this proposition.
Right.
And blue is how Biden voters.
OK.
they just track perfectly in their view on increasing their property tax to the point ofextinct.
That's so crazy.
of ballots this is.

(21:23):
Okay.
Well, everybody knows that that can't be possible, especially since if you look atProposition B in any other county, okay, they still rigged it in the other counties, but
at least they did a better job, okay.
At least they were smart enough to put a 30 or 40 % difference between the Democrats andRepublicans on the issue.
Okay, so here's El Paso, okay.

(21:44):
even those lines are so obviously it can't be like that, right?
Well, yeah, so for instance, you see how Democrats never change their view on therepealing of this amendment?
Yeah, it looks exactly like the abortion line, huh?
Okay, well, no, actually you do expect flat lines in general.

(22:04):
I don't expect the time at which a Democrats vote is counted to affect how they voted onuh a ballot proposition.
In fact, in any fair election, especially ones prior to 2020, everything is a flat line.
Okay.
Now if that flat line is a 5%, that's a different story.
Okay.

(22:25):
But here it's...
Here this one is at 33%.
So roughly two Democrats are for this and one Democrat is against it.
Is that Trump lying flat, Danielle?
I mean, I wouldn't call it flat, no.
More generally, if the cumulative ratio moves like this, the laws of math say that it'sthe cumulative ratio plus time times the derivative of the cumulative ratio means that the

(23:00):
moving ratio has to go with twice the speed.
So that means at the end of the election, 45 % of Republicans are voting against thisamendment.
And I can actually show you that's not just pure theory.
I can actually go pull up El Paso.
Okay.

(23:21):
And show you that that's true.
Okay.
So here's the full graph of El Paso.
And you'll see here that at the start of the election, 63 % of Republicans were votingagainst it.
And at the end of it, about 45, 48 % were voting against it.

(23:42):
Okay.
Yeah.
Democrats pretty much stay at the same position in all times.
This is what you actually expect.
Okay.
But Republicans magically change how they vote on proposition being El Paso County, thelonger the election goes on because the state wants as many people to vote yes as
possible.

(24:03):
And since this is the percentage of people opposed, the opposition percentage is goingdown.
Okay.
It's getting closer to the Democrats.
On top of this, this beige line is what percentage of people voted for Trump in eachbatch.
Well, it says at the beginning of the election, only one third were voting for Trump, butat the end of the election, two thirds were voting for Trump.

(24:26):
That's what this says.
Why would the time at which a person's ballot is counted in the mail affect when they votefor Trump, Danielle?
I guess they needed to be really conservative in the front in case they were able to stealit, huh?
But anyway, let's just assume for the sake of the argument that there's actually nothingwrong with El Paso County.

(24:47):
Okay, let's just pretend for the sake of the argument.
There's nothing wrong with El Paso County.
Okay.
So regardless of what may or may not be wrong, their own data says that there is a 30 to40 % difference between how Democrats and Republicans voted on this issue in each county.

(25:07):
Okay.
see that 30 to 40 % difference?
Except the Rappahoe.
Can you see the difference?
No, not really.
So obviously something went wrong there.
eh
They programmed in an old algorithm.
wrong rig.
That's what happened.

(25:28):
They mixed up a variable in the rig somewhere.
Yeah, they didn't get the trust of Vilt.
Okay.
So then I said, well, okay, well, that's the cumulative, right?
Oh, what if I just look at every batch of ballots, right?
And that's where we get this other stupid picture, okay, where it's just some lockstepmotion.

(25:52):
the entire time and that's what we actually call in court, okay?
This lockstep motion where in every batch of ballots they're voting identically.
Okay?
Well, this was something that they couldn't find an expert witness to fight me on in thecourtroom, Danielle.
I can't do you think, especially since we have a judge who went who who studied math incollege, okay?

(26:20):
Do you think any judge could be fooled into believing that this happens naturally inelection where Democrats and Republicans vote the same in every batch of ballots?
I think if the judge wants to be fooled, they will be.
Anyway, he can't be fooled because he's a double major in mathematics and philosophy.

(26:43):
So he actually can't pretend to be fooled.
Okay.
It would actually probably get him a criminal indictment if he allowed this to pass in acourtroom.
Okay.
Yeah, the votes couldn't track that closely together.
Now you found something, okay.
So what happened?
They couldn't find an expert witness to rebut our argument about lock-set motion inArapahoe County, Colorado in our Nevada court case.

(27:13):
Why?
Because both the only thing Arapahoe has in common in Colorado in 2020 with Clark Countyin 2024, which also has parallel lock-set motion.
You see that on the ballot propositions is Dominion voting systems.
Wow.
So what did they do?
Well, on an April of 2025, half a decade after the 2020 election, they changed the castvote record of 2020 in Arapaho.

(27:44):
Wow.
and they did it without telling the court.
that's not gonna bode well for them.
So they went in, just to make sure we're clear on this, they went in and took out thatlockstep vote pattern and they replaced it with a fake record.

(28:05):
That's right.
The first one was fake because it was rigged.
The second one was fake because it was a fake version of the first one.
Yeah, yeah.
Well, we looked at the ballot images.
Show me those ballot images and I want to see those.
Yeah.
Okay?
Anyway, what's the point is that whatever the hell this original election is, it made itpast the gold standard of election integrity known as the risk limiting order.

(28:41):
Now, all I'm going to tell you, Danielle, is that no matter what, let's pretend that therewas a legitimate error.
said they had a redaction error and they sorted things wrong by accident.
Okay.
Let's pretend that's true for the sake of the argument.
Okay.
So everything got scrambled and decoupled.
So it affected Trump and Biden voters equally and made them generally vote the same at43%.

(29:06):
No, let's just say that's hypothetically true.
Okay.
Okay.
They still wouldn't vote in perfect lockstep on every batch of ballots, Danielle.
In fact, we know that because I can just go over here.
You see this picture?
And all I'm doing is scrambling the order of the existing ballots by a random number.

(29:27):
Yes, in general, they both vote 43%.
No.
But are they moving in perfect lockstep motion in every batch, Danielle?
If I zoom in.
One's going up, the other's going down.
They're, okay, they're weaving in and out.
There's no lock set motion here.
Okay.

(29:48):
When red is going down, okay, blue is going up.
Red is flat.
Blue is going down.
Red's going up.
Blue's going up.
Red's going down.
Sometimes they move together.
You get what I'm trying to say?
Half the time they move together, half the time they move opposite.
They're just weaving in and out of each other at random.

(30:09):
Yeah.
so if there was an actual legitimate error, like that something that mismatched thecolumns and the rows, then this is what you would get.
Mm-hmm.
Does this picture look like this picture?
No.
There you go.
Okay.
So they changed the cast vote record.

(30:30):
They didn't tell the judge.
They didn't tell the plaintiff.
They didn't tell me.
They're probably going to go change the Nevada one with its lock set motion as well.
And then when I went to testify under penalty of perjury, guess what they were going todo?
they were gonna hammer you.
That's right.
And then they were going to throw the book at me, probably have me arrested for perjury,throw out Andy Thompson's case to plaintiff and I'd be in a prison suit.

(30:57):
So let's, how did you even get to investigate the 2020 election in the first place?
What drew you to it?
I mean, you knew it was rigged.
So you just started digging into it.
You didn't know it was rigged.
I had a feeling that something happened in a few of the battleground states, but I didn'tthink it was this bad, Danielle, in all 50 states.

(31:23):
You can find lockstep parallel motion in all 50 states if you put in the correct ratios.
Not because that's an expected event.
That's why they changed the KSFOT record.
So...
What got me into this was I was getting ready to go to Weston Priory Monastery around thetime of the 2020 election to go play the clarinet and the church organ.

(31:51):
Okay.
while this election happened.
I said, my lord.
Is this what you need me for?
because if they did something, you know I'm gonna know right away.

(32:11):
The Lord said yes.
I said why?
Why me?
Well you're a convicted felon, you don't have a job, you don't have a wife, you don't havekids, you don't have a law license, you have nothing to lose, that's why it has to be you.
Well was he right?
Giuliani?
They slit his throat.
Sidney Powell wiped out.
John Eastman?

(32:32):
Gone.
Anybody that's gone after election fraud has been destroyed.
In fact, they're destroying Mike Lindell right now.
they are.
You know why I
to, I pray they're not.
Go try, I dare you to send this lockstep motion exhibit to every PhD in every mathdepartment in the United States.
Guess how many are gonna tell you that it's proof of a rigged election even after Arapahochanges the cast vote record to get rid of it?

(32:59):
Zero, because they're all gonna lose their jobs.
They're gonna lose their tenure.
They're gonna lose everything.
It's not that I'm the only smart person around, it's that I'm the only one that hasnothing to lose.
It says I was just about to take a vow of poverty and celibacy as I'm not really losinganything that I wouldn't have had anyway.
So that's how that worked out.

(33:21):
Wow.
tell us, let's back up a little bit further.
So you called yourself a convicted felon.
You mentioned to me before that you were a drug dealer and you told me that you were atwar with God.
How do you get from there to here?
first talk about how I ended up with a war with God.

(33:41):
That's his own story on its own.
We can go all the way back to I'm like three years old, okay?
I remember going out and seeing the grass grow and I was at my, at the Catholic schoolthing, whatever had them, and the teacher said, God is everywhere.
And I was just dancing around touching the grass.
God is everywhere.

(34:04):
And I developed a very strong relationship with God.
In fact, my favorite quote was the book of wisdom or Ben Sirah.
foolish are ye who study the works of nature and cannot discern the artisan who craftedthem.
Mm, so good.
And growing up, well, I grew up with my grandparents.

(34:26):
My grandmother and grandfather said that the kids would eventually grow out of it.
They wouldn't pick on you anymore and whatever.
So I believed them.
thought the promised land would come after high school.
When I'm playing my clarinet, my organ, writing my music, doing the math, whatever.
It didn't work out that way.

(34:47):
In I think it gets worse when you get out of high school if you don't have any socialskills.
Now, who was the problem?
Was it society or was it me?
It was actually me, but I didn't know that.
I didn't realize how important it was for a man to show testicular fortitude and stick upfor himself and have a backbone.

(35:11):
But I didn't know that that was a problem.
I thought that if you don't bother anybody, they won't bother you.
What I didn't realize is that life is a game of battleship diplomacy.
People have to think you'll retaliate even if you won't.
But I didn't know that.
took me, wasn't until I was long into selling drugs that I learned that.

(35:34):
So anyway, so what happens?
You have no friends that are guys other than guys that are gay who think you're gay.
So that was very insulting.
If I had two men come out of the closet thinking I was gay and like propose to marry mewhile I was going to college, it was very humiliating.
dear.

(35:56):
Then I try to go in the correctional officers, my uncle who was the warden said, you'renot cut out for that.
He was right.
And I'm to say what the hell happened.
It was so bad.
I left the first day.
Um, the Marine said the same thing.
You know, you have the, wasn't about toughening up as it was standing up to your ownpeers.
Like the Marine recruiter said, he said, actually, he I don't doubt your courage on thebattlefield, Mr.

(36:19):
Solomon.
He said, in fact, I think you would show too much courage for make up the courage that youdon't have against your own peers.
He'd probably get yourself hurt.
So, okay.
So come back in two years after you man up.
Then I went out with this beautiful Christian girl, flute player.
She left me on the first day because a guy caught us in line at Dunkin Donuts.

(36:39):
I didn't say anything.
You put it all together and you don't realize that you're the problem yet.
You got what I'm trying to say?
You don't realize how much it, how important it is to be a man and to stick up foryourself.
It did not yet occur to me.
So I went to some sorority parties at, you know, Stony Brook.
I finally want to know, what is the secret to not being a loser?

(37:02):
and well, saw all the drug dealers were very popular.
So at first I became a fake drug dealer.
I started buying drugs and reselling them at the same price.
It says I wasn't using them.
I was eventually able to buy them all and I became the main drug dealer.
At some point I became a real drug dealer and I got better connections and then I keptbuying my way towards better connections.
I kept elevating my clientele until it was all rich white people on the North Shore ofLong Island.

(37:26):
Okay.
That's how that happened.
And at that point I said, well, fuck God.
I went to war with God.
Well, I developed very good social skills in that setting.
Yes.
In fact, and I remember I realized, I said, okay, well, I'm not actually a violent guy,but I can't have people taking advantage of me.
So I would pay people to put out fake stories and wear a cast as if I had done somethingto them.

(37:52):
I'm not kidding.
I literally gave people drugs to pretend that I broke their leg for like six or sevenmonths.
Wow.
It worked quite well.
it actually came out in the pre-trial.
The guy said, no, he actually paid me.
He didn't do that to me.
He was the greatest guy I ever knew in private.

(38:14):
guy said, yeah.
What did I do?
I paid one guy to go to California.
I gave him like $20,000 because he stole something big from me and everybody knew aboutit.
I said, I want you to go away for two years.
By the time you come back, it'll blow over.
I gave him $20,000 after he sold for me to disappear for two years in California.

(38:35):
crazy.
Right?
And everyone was like, Oh, Ed Busser, who knows what Ed did to him?
uh He comes back two years later.
boy.
Good times, man.
So, but you, but you, took you to jail.
So at what point did you, you learn about the Manning Up piece?

(38:56):
Oh, I learned about that.
I would say near before I got arrested, probably about a year before back.
was so pathetic by that point.
said, I'm like, you're telling me I did all this dumb shit for no reason.
All I had to do was say no or punch a guy in the face least once in my life.
Wow.
This is terrible.
I mean, so once I got arrested, like I had no interest in even continuing that lifestylewhen I got out and it served its purpose in a good way, I guess.

(39:22):
But it didn't occur to me that it put me on the path of having nothing.
because if you had anything you wouldn't prosecute election fraud.
So that's how we're here today, Daniel.
Well, tell me about your war with God.
that was just during the selling of drugs.

(39:42):
was so, I would slap God in the face basically say, you know, why don't you stop me?
Right.
So what was...
wish a few weeks later after I said that.
Wow.
How much time elapsed from when you got out of jail to the 2020 election?

(40:08):
quite some time maybe.
uh
two and a half to three years.
So you had been on this path of not not climbing any longer, ah not selling drugs.
would come to visit I'd be sitting there playing Raided Battlegrounds of World ofWarcraft.

(40:29):
I mean...
Yeah.
And that was it, you know?
He would always come at night when he visited my job at the day, which I made fun of mefor, by the way.
I did demolition and swing set installation and Steve and Colbert did a whole hit job onme for installing some swing sets.

(40:50):
I don't understand.
Yeah, I would Google.
What...
um
So what does hearing from God for you sound like?
Other than the words I am, you don't actually hear from God in words.
Okay.

(41:12):
It's more like.
instantaneous vision that you see all at once and you know what it means.
don't know how else to explain that.
I feel the same way and sometimes the vision is active, right?
Like sometimes it's a scene for me.

(41:32):
It's not necessary.
Okay.
about solving a lecture fraud with a math equation.
Like I have dreams, I don't know if it's God or somebody else, but it's supposed to belike Leonardo da Vinci in his workshop.
And all he does is call me a dumb fucking bastard in the dream and says, why haven't youfigured out how to solve this yet?

(41:53):
While he's sitting there like moving these mirrors around and things.
and like reflecting lights all over the place.
And then, you know, what did that turn out to be?
Well, I can just show you what the significance of that dream turned out to be.
I go pull this open and we're look at Nevada real quick maybe some of victory slidepictures.

(42:18):
No of course not.
Why would it be there?
So uh Nevada.
And what you're going to see here in this picture, assuming this is it, not sure if it'sthe picture, I can pull up the Maryland one.
The Maryland one is going to.

(42:40):
So.
In this picture, what you're seeing is the better Trump does in the early vote, okay, thegreater the difference between Trump's early performance and his mail-in performance.
See how it keeps growing?

(43:02):
Yeah.
So like there's a 20 % difference here and the Super Democrat precincts is almost nodifference.
But when Trump gets 50 % of the vote, he's still only getting 22 % of the vote.
When Trump gets 80 % of the early vote, he's only getting 40 % of the mail-in vote.
It's like somebody's cutting his mail-in vote in half, okay?

(43:22):
In fact, this gray area was what Leonardo and my dream called the searchlight, okay?
I'm searching for Trump's missing votes.
That's what this gray area is.
Okay, I think that's something even weirder.
These are the exact same precincts in Maryland and it says the better Trump does in theearly vote Which would be this okay?

(43:45):
The more and more Democrats and Democrats only prefer to vote by mail in a Republicanprecinct does that make sense to you?
So they're going to vote harder.
Yeah, other words, Democrats vote by only vote by mail in Republican precincts.
That, yeah, well, that checks out, doesn't it?
So you go to a democrat precinct which would be in this region, Danielle And it saysthere's almost no real difference between democrats and republicans.

(44:14):
It says that 60 % of republicans prefer to vote early and 55 % of democrats even prefer tovote early, right?
But then you get out to where trump does the best Out here.
He's getting 70 80 percent of the vote
It says that 80 % of Republicans prefer to vote early and only 40 % of Democrats prefer tovote early.

(44:38):
We'll know what's really happening, Danielle.
It's actually 60-55 and they're flipping Republican mail-in votes to Democrat mail-invotes.
So every time you get rid of a Republican mail-in vote, right, the percentage ofRepublicans who voted early goes up.
And every time you flip a Republican mail-in vote to a Democrat mail-in vote, thepercentage of Democrats voting by mail goes up, which means the percentage of Democrats

(45:05):
voting early goes down.
You can only flip a Democrat ballot
Sorry, our Republican ballot into a Democrat ballot.
You can't flip a Democrat ballot to a Democrat ballot because it's already a Democratballot.
So, so where do they go?
They go to the Republican precincts where the most Republican mail-in ballots are and theyturn them to Democrat ones.

(45:29):
Now does that make sense?
that makes sense in a rigged election.
But this isn't why Leonardo da Vinci was calling me a dumb fucking bastard and reflectingthings yet.
Okay.
Let's look at Nevada, exact same pattern.

(45:52):
Was this a recurring dream?
Yes, it took a long time for me to figure out why he was reflecting laser beams in mydream.
So here we have Nevada again, okay?
Same thing, here's Trump's early share of the vote, okay?
This is the 2020 election.
The last one you saw was 2024 Maryland, okay?
This is 2020 Nevada.

(46:14):
Here in blue is Trump's mail-in percentage.
Do you see?
The better Trump does in the early vote, the greater the divide between his early andmail-in percentage.
Does that look similar?
looks very similar.
Well, we can put the whole searchlight pattern, thanks to Leonardo da Vinci.

(46:34):
Okay?
How about how they prefer to cast their ballot?
look at this.
The better Trump did in the early vote, the more Republicans prefer to cast their ballotsearly, and the overwhelmingly amount of Democrats decided to vote by mail.

(46:58):
Does that look like the same as Maryland?
All right, what causes this?
And it's actually pure geometry.
You see this thing?
This is what Leonardo was showing me.
He was shining an orange laser beam and then reflecting red lines and blue lines.
You see this orange line at 63.5 %?

(47:19):
This is Trump's early vote.
plus Biden's mail-in vote divided by the total amount of early and mail-in ballots castfor both of them.
And every single precinct, that's 63.5%.

(47:40):
Well, there's a problem when you do that to all the precincts.
Whether the election is fair or not, Danielle, it is geometrically forced
That Trump, that Biden's mail-in percentage right here, okay, in green, is themathematical reflection of Trump's early percentage over that orange line.

(48:05):
It has to be.
That's true in any election, whether it's fair or not.
But here's the thing, in a fair election, that ratio is not the same in every precinct.
It's random.
But when you make it the same in every precinct, the red line is then reflected over theorange line by the percentage of ballots that are early ballots, that's the scaling

(48:35):
factor.
So that's at 33%.
So you take the red line, you reflect it over the orange line at one third its height, andout comes Biden's mail-in percentage in every precinct.
Well, this has a crazy effect.
It means that now,
Trump has to get 63.5 % of the early vote before Biden can get less than 63.5 % of themail-in vote in the same geographic precinct.

(49:07):
And if Biden got 63 % in the mail, then the reverse is Trump got 37%.
In fact, the better Trump does,
the greater the difference will always be between his early and his mail-in percentagebecause of this geometric reflection.
The law is the exact same for how people decide to cast their ballot.

(49:33):
If Lambda is 63 point whatever percent in every precinct, then whatever percentage ofRepublicans prefer to cast their ballots early, Democrats will do the opposite to cast
their ballots by mail.
Wow.
Which is why you see this, Democrats do this while Republicans do this.

(49:54):
And how they prefer to cast their ballots in both Nevada and Maryland in 2020 and 2024.
And it's why you see this constantly increasing loss in the mail, the searchlight pattern.
And this is what Leonardo was showing me in my dreams, calling me a dumb fucking bastarduntil I figured it out.
About four months to figure that out.

(50:14):
Okay.
Would you mind going back to that first?
Okay.
it was.
I had no way of knowing what that was.
So it didn't come from my mind, it had to come from the mind of God.
Yeah, definitely.
Would you mind going back to that first um visual you showed with the gray, the one withthe gray, yeah.

(50:36):
Cause I wanna share this because I just read it.
I want you to flash that up there and then I'm gonna share my screen because this is kindof wild.
I just have to find it.
Let me see.
And here's the thing, Danielle, what does Nevada 2020 have in common with Maryland 2024?

(51:01):
Nothing.
They don't even have dominion voting systems in common, but you know what they do have incommon?
Computerized elections.
Yeah.
Why is geometry describing our elections, Danielle?
Is it because there's, yeah.

(51:22):
People don't vote this way.
No, people don't vote that way.
So when would you flash that little, that graph up, the Maryland one?
I'll tell you, I'll show you why.
I had the sorry I was leaning back because I thought I was sharing the screen.
I'm sorry about that.
That's all good.

(51:46):
Okay, see that?
Okay, see how it looks transparent on there?
Okay, I want to share this because uh when did you discover this?
well, this I look for very, very soon after the 2024 election, because you find this inall 50 states.
It's not just Maryland and Nevada, it's just the ones that I'm currently litigating,because they're so far apart and opposite sides of United States.

(52:12):
So this is the 2024 election.
Okay.
So, okay.
in the entire state of Maryland, all 1800 precincts.
So this is so cool.
So um I have a blog and you can stop sharing your screen now.
I wanted to just show this transparent thing again because I have a blog.

(52:34):
So I started this in 2021 shortly after the election is like February.
And basically I had started hearing the Lord speak to me about the election, about mylife, about world events.
And so I...
I was like, well, I would share some of it with friends and family kind of privately.

(52:59):
And my mom was like, I wish I could read this.
And I was like, well, it's in my journal, so you can't read it on paper.
But I said, so I told her, so I started this blog, right?
And I told the Lord, I was like, look, here's the deal.
If you tell me something, I'll put it out there, you know?

(53:19):
So he has been faithful for since
February 2021, I show up, he shows up every single day.
He tells me something different.
And this, let me share my screen.
This, just was reviewing this before we went on and this is so crazy.
And I think you will really appreciate this.

(53:41):
Okay, so.
This is June 3rd, the entry from June 3rd, 2023, what I heard from the Lord.
And I'll just read it because it's pretty incredible and how it tracks with what youuncovered, what he showed you.
So it's called, The Transparent White Dark Horse Will Win the Race.

(54:05):
And okay, I'll start out with the scripture.
Who has aroused one from the East whom he calls in righteousness to his feet?
He delivers up
Nations before him and subdues kings.
He makes them like dust with his sword as the wind driven chaff with his bow He pursuesthem passing on in safety by a way He had not been traversing with his feet who has

(54:27):
performed and accomplished it calling forth the generations from the beginning I the Lordam the first and with the last I am he Okay
The Spirit of the Lord says, this is a time, and this is what I heard, right?
This is a time where belief will beat the odds on favorite every time.
Belief is trumping those appointed for victory.

(54:50):
Belief will outrun, outwit, and outrace every man appointed victor.
Belief will outpace breeding.
These are days where belief will outpace breeding.
The appointed victors will fail, will fall, will come up short.
As the transparent dark horse, the transparent unseen unnoticed horse will trounce themall.

(55:13):
He's coming around from the outside undetected unnoticed and he will route the enemy.
He will route the opposition, the appointed victors, those strong horses of determinedbreeding.
And then another scripture.
Thus says the Lord to Cyrus, his anointed, whom I have taken by the right hand to subduenations before him and to loose the loins of Kings.

(55:36):
to open doors before him so that the gates will not be shut.
I will go before you and make the rough places smooth.
I will shatter the doors of bronze and cut through their iron bars.
I will give you the treasures of darkness and hidden wealth of secret places so that youmay know that it is I, the Lord, the God of Israel who calls you by name.

(55:56):
And then it continues, as he finishes in victory, the people will see that he standstaller, is stronger, is more powerful.
than these man appointed back room bred horses who had been appointed as winners.
The people will see that he is the one who deserved to win this race.
The people will see that he is the one, the only one who could have won that race.

(56:20):
And the man appointed victors will be seen as small, broken and weak.
They will be seen as they truly are.
This massive transparent white dark horse
will command the attention of all the spectators, the bet keepers, the jockeys, theofficials and the owners.
And he will say, I am owned by no man.

(56:40):
I am owned by the one true God and the people, all of the people, the innocent, theunaware, the despairing, the wicked, the complicit, the cheaters in the back room breeders
will know that he has won the race and he has won the day.
And then another scripture, behold, a king will reign righteously and princes will rulejustly.

(57:01):
Each will be like a refuge from the wind and a shelter from the storm, like streams ofwater in a dry country, like the shade of a huge rock in a parched land.
Then the eyes of those who see will not be blinded and the ears of those who hear willlisten.
The mind of the hasty will discern the truth and the tongue of the stammerers will hastento speak clearly." That's Isaiah chapter 32 verses one through four and it's almost done.

(57:28):
And then it goes on to say,
No contest, no outcry, no counterpoint will be raised.
It will be plain for all to see.
It will be what people have seen with their own eyes and the world will stare on in awe.
Silence will precede the raucous outbursts of celebration.
Silence will precede the great shocking panic that comes upon the wicked.

(57:50):
He has caught them all.
He has bested them all.
He is surprised and beat them all.
has trumped them all.
And I just think
How cool is that, that it's a transparent, it was that transparent piece that the Lord wastelling you about and on this day, two years ago, the Lord was talking to me about a

(58:13):
transparent, white, dark horse.
That's kind of wild.
Oh, think lockstep parallel motion might be that transparent.
Dark horse, right?
I think it might be.
Yeah.
How incredible.
How incredible.
So that's so amazing.
made them change a cast fault record and they got caught.
uh

(58:36):
let's um pick back up on your um case, well, on the case that you are involved in.
more to say about it until the 12th.
Long story short is they got caught changing the cast vote record.
They probably did that to trick a new slate of expert witnesses to testify against me andsay that I made it up and then hit me with a perjury.

(58:59):
Um
We have a judge who's a double major in math and philosophy.
So if they had anything on this judge, like they were saying, we're going to kill yourwife and children or something that's gone now because they screwed up in a rapper.
Hope so hard.
They tampered with evidence across state lines.
The FBI and the DOJ are most likely entering our case very soon.

(59:23):
So.
I mean, they're already asking their they already started their inquiries about this.
Why are you changing an election half a decade old in the middle when it's submitted inevidence of a court case?
It's kind of Right.
So I think this is truly the beginning of the end for them.
You know, and you had to have.

(59:43):
As I told you, they always attack me for the felony conviction.
Like I told the judge in the submitted writing, I haven't had yet time.
I haven't yet been allowed to address the judge in oral argument.
I said, listen, a New York State certified attorney and mayor Giuliani, the ballot cartel,he took down the mafia, but when he after the ballot cartel, they destroyed him.

(01:00:06):
Okay.
So he only said only a New York state certified convicted felon can bring down anenterprise of this magnitude.
What are they going to do to put me in jail?
My summer home?
What are they going to do?
So the 12th is your next court date.
uh Do you expect a decision on the 12th?

(01:00:26):
I think it's gonna get wild on the 12th.
I wish Mike Lindell's trial was like, oh, after hours.
You know, I feel so bad because I think they're still gonna railroad Mike in his case, youknow what mean?
Where they wouldn't be able to do that to Mike if his case was even like two or threeweeks after hours, you know what I mean?

(01:00:48):
Yeah, well I hope God intervenes.
Is Mike's case about defamate, is it a defamation case?
Yeah, so this guy, Edward Coomer, sues Mike Lindell.
Well, Mike Lindell didn't even know who Eric Coomer was, so.
Right.
I don't even know.
To me it's just, it's just scaring people to talk about, to not have them talk aboutelections.

(01:01:15):
Even after Trump won.
And don't be surprised that Trump won, they had to let him through, right?
The people never would have stood for that and they knew it.
That doesn't mean they didn't go rigging the abortion amendments across the country in2024 or the down-ballot in the Senate races, okay?
I I showed you that 75...
50, 37 on abortion.

(01:01:36):
Can somebody, can somebody just explain how that happened?
I just want to know.
In every state on abortion?
Yeah, come on.
Yeah.
demographics vote by man.
Not that different.
I could see maybe like a 70 to a 75 or maybe a 75 that most of like a 68 from early in themail.

(01:01:59):
Maybe you do have a few more people who are left leaning that one of the vote for Trumpthat voted in the mail and that brought the abortion down a hand a bit.
But right.
In other words, the only way that can happen is if Trump was so popular amongst Democratswho voted 5 % against abortion that all the pro-death Democrats voted for Trump and

(01:02:27):
brought that abortion rate down.
Like that's the only...
And if that was true, then why didn't Trump do good in the mail?
You get what I'm saying?
So it doesn't fucking make any sense.
First of all, you wipe out half of Trump's vote in the mail.
and then you take half of whatever's left of his abortion vote that's against it and youfucking slash that too so that they slashed it twice because when you slash half the Trump

(01:02:52):
votes you slash half the pro-life votes and then when you slash them again they bring itdown more like it's so fucking bad, it's so bad
you have you looked at any races since the twenty twenty four election or any or anyballot initiatives to know if either the algorithm has changed or if they shut it off.

(01:03:15):
They haven't really, they got a little more sophisticated, but the general paradigm is thesame.
Basically, you just have to find what ratio they made the same.
know how that, like Trump early post Biden and Malin was the same in every precinct inNevada?
The moment you find that invariant ratio across the precincts, that doesn't take verylong, by the way.

(01:03:38):
The moment you find that, it's only a matter of minutes if you know what you're doingbefore you find the whole rig.
Wow, okay.
ratios don't happen like that in a fair election.
Across thousands of precincts.
will your trial or the trial on the 12th be televised?

(01:03:58):
I don't know.
Okay, I would love for it to go on Lindell TV or something.
anytime you have an invariant ratio across the precincts as a flat line, we're no longertalking statistics.
Now we're talking geometry.
We're talking reflections over lines.
It's not how this I mean, it's all fake.

(01:04:19):
This can't be how anybody voted.
It has nothing to do with how anybody voted.
It's all fake.
It's all synthetically engineered.
None of it makes any sense.
The only impact.
possibly that the actual ballots have is preserving the general difference betweencandidates of the same party.

(01:04:39):
That's about it.
Well, how can people support your work, Edward, and how can we pray for you?
How can we be praying for you between now and the 12th then beyond?
Well, I did hit my GoFundMe ceiling.
I only put a $4,000 cap.
So, but a lot of people raise beyond that cap if I, so, um, I didn't raise the ceilingthough.

(01:05:07):
So anybody who donates beyond the cap does so with their own free will.
I needed about $4,000 to pay, to keep the lights on while I do this.
Okay.
Now that will poverty means I still have zero money after I pay my bills.
Okay.
So I gotta pay at least keep the lights on but this is the the GoFundMe here, okay?

(01:05:29):
um How do I share this in a chat message?
Put it in the chat and I can pop it up there.
Okay.
maybe the studio chat and I can grab it.
live stream to all participants okay but like i said i already hit the cap so you know itsays four thousand thirteen thousand was raised so it's up to you if you want to do it but

(01:05:55):
right now i don't need it the war said only i only get what i needed until i'm done withthis mission and then i get nothing more then then i continue going to west and priory
when this is over that's right
Amazing.
just, had a little blip along the way.
Amazing.
Well, we'll see where he takes you from here and I will, let me grab that real quick andI'll put it in the show notes so anybody watching this later can get that.

(01:06:25):
ah Let me do that before I lose it.
Okay, awesome.
Well, thank you so much, Edward, for your work, for letting God use you, for spending sometime with me today.
It's just such a blessing and encouragement.
and we are gonna have all eyes on June 12th.
I can't wait to see the sparks fly.
Danielle, did you need a PhD in mathematics to understand the absurdity of the things Iwas showing you today?

(01:06:51):
No, and I will reveal to the audience that I only took math for an education major tograduate from college.
did get my MBA, so it got harder from there, but I was too intimidated of math to eventhink about getting my MBA before God really put the screws to me.
If they want to go heavy into the math, I have the real, like the actual equations thatthey use to rig the elections with.

(01:07:18):
You know what I mean?
If they want to go that hard.
But just the surface level artifacts, 75 to 50 to 37 on abortion, everybody knows that'sfake, okay?
That's impossible.
All right.
the only answer is paper ballots, right?
The only answer is get rid of the computers.
on Election Day.
Okay, make it a national holiday.

(01:07:40):
paper paper records of uh voter rolls
Get rid of voter rolls.
Get rid of them completely.
Voter rolls require Democrats to be honest and maintain them.
Get rid of it.
You show up with your ID, a real ID, and you show up with proof of life that you livethere.
It could be, here's my electric bill.

(01:08:03):
ah Or if they say, you can't make someone show you a bill, it'll be a poll tax.
Okay, well, here's the money I received from welfare to prove that I live here.
Yeah.
People have to show up to the precinct with only 500 people per precinct.
You show up with proof of life basically and your ID and that's it.

(01:08:26):
And there's only 500 ballots printed for the whole precinct because most people in a fairelection don't turn out on 100 % anyway so you don't need any extra ballots.
Okay?
So you print out 500 ballots.
In a fair and honest world, only 40 to 50 % of the population actually shows up.

(01:08:48):
So you'll always have more ballots.
And that's it.
Show proof of life.
Right.
Oh, count them in public, on video, with a Democrat and a Republican observer uh rightthere.
And anybody can look.
You can't say you have to stand 80 feet away.
uh I'm allowed to walk up.

(01:09:10):
and go, you motherfuckers aren't counting it, right?
I'm calling the cops.
Awesome.
Well, thank you so much.
think you're exactly right.
And we have just accepted the premise for way too long.
So it's time to completely disrupt it.
You push a touch screen, a computer prints out a piece of paper for you, not even one thatyou filled out, meaning your computer can fill out another one when you're not looking.

(01:09:37):
That's right.
And it can fill out whatever it wants for you.
It can say you did what you said you did, but the machine counts totally different.
you go.
And by the way, I want to know, are you Neo from the Matrix?
Can you plug your brain into a computer and know what it's doing at that moment, Danielle?
Okay, so people go, well, if we made the software code open source instead of proprietary,like with the third party vendors of Dominion, then everything would be fine.

(01:10:10):
No, it wouldn't.
Because unless you're Neo from the Matrix and you can...
plug your brain into that computer at the moment of the election and understand what it'sdoing in that moment.
You have no way of knowing that the software they say that's on that machine that's opensource is the software actually being used.
Nobody's Neo from the matrix.
Therefore you can't have any Turing machines, which is a programmable machine.

(01:10:34):
No Turing machines at all ever again in elections.
That's it.
And the story.
You have to do something everybody can understand.
And therefore, if something goes wrong, everybody understands what went wrong and the copsin the courts know how to handle the problem without needing expert witnesses with PhDs in
math and computer science.
Yeah.

(01:10:55):
You're right.
You're right.
Well, I hope that we're seeing this very soon.
Well, I accept it.
matter is too intense for the average court, the average judge and the average citizen tounderstand, you need a technocracy of archons to tell you whether or not the elections are
being run right or not, that can't be used to account ballots.

(01:11:19):
You have to use something that everybody understands without needing a PhD.
Yeah, yeah, and without needing telepathy.
Yeah, or x-ray vision or, yeah, exactly.
I mean, actually, even Neo from the Matrix wouldn't know if the results are correct.
You know why?
Because they don't show him how they came out at the end until after it's all over.

(01:11:44):
So even if Neo from the Matrix plugged himself in, he can only see the inputs.
He can't see the outputs in the current system.
So even Neo can't do it.
Yeah, you have to be the Oracle, I guess.
m
Awesome.
Well, thank you so much, Edward.
You have a wonderful rest of your day and I look forward to hearing about the 12th prettysoon.

(01:12:08):
And then my final words are Article 4, Section 4, United States Constitution.
And the United States shall guarantee to every state in this union a Republican form ofgovernment.
And any election, any state whose elections are neither free nor fair, cannot beRepublican-informed.
And that which cannot be observed nor verified cannot ever assume to be fair, even if itwas.

(01:12:32):
That's how you get rid of the machines.
Article 4, Section 4, the guarantee clause.
That's what we're filing under in Nevada.
That's awesome.
Well, thank you again for your fight, sir.
Look forward to hearing from you.
Alright, how many contempt charges do I'm going to get hit with in a trial?
Well, it sounds like you have a friendly judge.
I know but you ever seen like my cousin Vinny?

(01:12:55):
Like I'm gonna probably you know you're not yeah I'm gonna probably call them like demonicpedophiles like straight to their face while I'm talking and I'm gonna hit with a contempt
charges up.
Well, try and control yourself for the sake of the case.
why are you killing babies?
Why are you baby killers?
And I can see everybody going baby killers, baby killers, baby killers.

(01:13:15):
And I get hit with a contempt charge.
No, no, no, you'll be okay.
have faith in your ability.
um I wouldn't be shocked if I get a few.
Because these people are so outrageous.
They want to cut off your sons' balls.
They want to kill babies that are six months old.

(01:13:37):
They want to raise your taxes all over the place.
They want to open your borders.
They want you to, I mean, is there anything sane that they want?
Anything normal and good?
No, no.
a fair election, and I know.
Yeah, you're right.
You're right.
It is evil.
It is evil.

(01:13:57):
But we'll overcome evil with good.
You and Leonardo.
That's right.
Awesome.
God bless you.
too.
Perfect.

All Episodes

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

.css-15opob5{left:0;position:absolute;top:0.8rem;} All Episodes

.css-14f5ked{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:2;overflow:hidden;}FLF: #7 Loosing the People from the Shackles of Rigged Elections

Episode Transcript

Popular Podcasts

.css-r6mb8g{margin:0;word-break:break-word;display:-webkit-box;-webkit-box-orient:vertical;box-orient:vertical;-webkit-line-clamp:1;overflow:hidden;}Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club

On Purpose with Jay Shetty

Dateline NBC

All Episodes

FLF: #7 Loosing the People from the Shackles of Rigged Elections

Bookmarked by Reese's Book Club