CTP S2E94 Reclaiming Constitutional Authority: How Norton v Shelby County Challenges Unelected Bureaucracy

"GIVE FEEDBACK (no-reply-text (2-way comm: https://JosephMLenard.us/contact))"

CTP S2E94 before Audio edits 1h 07m 45s...
CTP S2E94 SHOW NOTES ( listen (Sat Apr 5 2025 and thereafter) at: 
https://www.buzzsprout.com/2210487/episodes/16901677-ctp-s2e94-reclaiming-constitutional-authority-how-norton-v-shelby-county-challenges-unelected-bureaucracy )... 
ChristiTutionalist Politics (S2E94) Norton v Shelby revisited and more    
See buzzsprout Transcript for fuller/extended Show Notes (inc. related links) and Transcript Bonus  
Transcript Bonus: Norton v Shelby TLB piece  
CTP S2E94 Reclaiming Constitutional Authority: How Norton v Shelby County Challenges Unelected Bureaucracy  
The 1886 Supreme Court case Norton v Shelby County establishes that unconstitutional acts are not laws and government offices created without proper authority never legally exist.
• Norton v Shelby declares "an unconstitutional act is not a law" and confers no rights or authority
• Judge Eileen Cannon cited Norton v Shelby in the Trump documents case questioning Jack Smith's authority
• NvS application to current Dept. Of Education discussions 
• Government "alphabet agencies" often exceed their constitutional and congressional authority
• The EPA has expanded far beyond its original purpose of handling cross-state environmental issues
• Constitutional limitations require federal agencies to have proper authority under the Constitution
• Government accountability requires questioning where agencies derive their power
• A republic differs from democracy by having constitutional limits on government powers
• Citizens must become politically active at local levels to restore constitutional governance
If you find this episode valuable, please share it with others concerned about constitutional governance    

Support the show

JLenardDetroit SUBSCRIBE-
Author, Blogger, Podcaster