September 27, 2025 • 43 mins
In this episode, I talk about what I believe to be another one of the biggest fake things since the fake moon landing. Fake nuclear reactors on the moon.
Melchizedek Chronicles Truth Seekers Ministries by Dr. Kenny Williamson
If you are considering donating to Truth Seekers Ministries, please understand that your contribution is a 'gift' and is not tax deductible. As a non-501c3 organization, we rely on the generosity of individuals like you to cover the costs of producing more Podcasts and paying the hosting fees, which are crucial for us to continue sharing the truth.
All of our materials are Copyright-free, and WE ARE NOT MONETIZED. Our main desire is, and has always been, to show people the truth according to God's Holy word, the King James Version. We now have t-shirts for sale on our website if you want to support us by purchasing some merch. Please note that this is not a commercial venture but a way for you to show your support for our cause.
https://patreon.com/MelchizedekChronicles
https://tithe.ly/give?c=6960112
Itsflatbro.com
truthseekersministry.org
kennywilliamson.com
truthseekers2012@gmail.com
Hello. My name is Kenny Williamson. I am a Christian and a King James Bible-only believer. My focus is on getting the truth to those who seek it. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Thanks, Kenny
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
(00:00):
Welcome to the Militant Day Chronicles contact.
We are glad you are here. Well, a funny thing happened on
(00:28):
the way to the moon. That's the title of a video that
I watched on YouTube. You can see astronauts hanging
from wires, proving that astronauts are natural liars.
They analyze photos and highlight mistakes.
With the moon landing missions, they show it was fake.
You can see them faking the photos of Earth they use around
(00:49):
windows to fake the curves. That's suspicious, don't you
think? Yeah, Listen up.
I watched another. Documentary called Hello, this
is Kenny Williamson and welcome back to another episode of the
Kills Death Chronicles. I hope you like that a little
(01:11):
intro I put together there for you that has kind of something
kind of unique that, you know, ahead of this podcast here.
So yes, as you probably, you know, read in the title here,
going to talk a little bit aboutreactors on the moon and exactly
(01:35):
what that entails. So obviously, if you've listened
to the show before, you know, it's a as a disclaimer, I I
don't believe that we ever landed on the moon, OK?
I believe that that is a fake hoax.
(01:55):
And I think that you will find that most people believe that or
lots of people believe that. I mean, you even have Joe Rogan,
you know, who says he believes that.
He even has podcast talking about how fake it is.
And you know, you know, anybody that has a podcast like that is
(02:16):
being propped up by the government and I'm probably told
what to say and he's even talking about it.
It's so fake. But The funny thing is, is no
matter how ridiculously fake, and it is, no matter the
mainstream media and our government and NASA, they
(02:40):
pretend that it's real, OK? All this does is prove how big
of liars they really are. OK, So consider that fact.
Anytime you believe anything that you hear from NASA or from
(03:01):
any of this stuff, I mean, these, these are the same
people, and I've said this over and over.
These are the same people, the same so-called scientists who
teach Big Bang evolution. They teach you came from a
monkey. You know, they teach the whole
evolutionary process, even though you know, the missing
links are all missing. There's no such thing.
(03:23):
You know, they teach that the earth is billions of years old
when the Bible says it's only 6000.
So again, you know, everything opposite of what your Bible says
is what they teach. And the reason for that is
because they're satanic. You can trace them all the way
(03:43):
back to the 50s when they started.
Every one of them was either fake, claimed to be Nazis, you
know, devil worshippers, occultists.
That's why everything they do issatanic.
OK, every planet other than Earth, which Earth is not a
(04:06):
planet, but every so-called planet, which is actually just
luminaries, according to the Bible that they've named, is all
named after Pagan gods. OK.
And you know the, the lunar project Apollo, that you know,
that's a Pagan God. And so now what we have is we
(04:29):
have the new moon project. OK, so now it's called Artemis,
which is yet again another PaganGod.
In fact, I believe. Let's see, Artemis is Greek.
It's out of Greek mythology and Artemis was a woman.
(04:51):
She was the daughter of Zeus andLeto, the twin sister of Apollo.
So, you know, the original moon,the fake moon stuff was under
the Apollo, and now it's going to go over Artemis, under
Artemis. And these two are sisters, say
Pagan sisters, fake Pagan sisters from Greek mythology.
(05:17):
So yeah, that's where we get allof our names for everything.
OK is paganism. So, yeah.
So these guys here, that's that's all they do.
That's all they talk about. I mean, that's just a fact.
(05:38):
So what we have now is we had iswe have a new thing where Trump,
our current president, the Trumpadministration, OK, you know, we
founded, we've got this new thing out called space, you
know, Space Force. Now we've got SpaceX from Musk
(06:00):
and now we've got Space Force. And you have to realize there is
no such thing as outer space as as you were taught, OK?
So everything that they're claiming I believe to be fake.
And the reason for that is, is money laundering.
(06:22):
And then of course, the Satanic agenda.
Satan again teaches everything opposite the Bible.
So we have to keep that constantly going.
So kids believe it. You know, that way they discount
everything the Bible says. So there was a news article that
I found and read. It's called Trump Administration
(06:43):
to fast track lunar nuclear reactor.
OK, think about that for a second.
Now I don't have all the stuff on it to to show you or to tell
you about it at the moment, but there's a high, high number of
(07:04):
people that believe this nuclearstuff is fake.
Now, there is obviously your nuclear out there, but you know,
they have people that have shownthat this nuclear stuff is is
not, is not, it's not as dangerous what they claim.
And they had a guy out here and I've got his, I've seen his
videos where he was drinking thewater out of a nuclear reactor
(07:25):
and he's playing with the stuff in his hands.
And he said this stuff is not dangerous.
So I don't even really know thatthey're doing half the stuff
they claim they're doing OK. But according to the news, OK,
the fake news, you know, we've had explosions in Chernobyl,
(07:46):
which is a nuclear disaster, andwe've had the Fukushima,
Fukushima, whatever it is over there in Japan or wherever it
was at, you know, it exploded and, you know, radiation
everywhere. I don't know if any of that's
true, OK, Because anything you see on the news like that is at
(08:07):
best fake. And it's funny because here
while back here where where I live here in Arkansas, there's a
college right up the road here. It's called the University of
Arkansas. OK, Lots of people have heard of
that. And they've got the, you know,
they've got a big football team they call the Hogs.
(08:29):
And so it's the Razorbacks. So, you know, go Hogs, all that
stuff. Well, they actually had, and it
was in the paper on on the news here while back.
It's been a few years ago. They actually had a little
nuclear reactor there on campus or right off campus that they
(08:49):
had been doing stuff with for years, some kind of a class on
it, I guess, I don't know. But they had decided to abandon
this thing, OK. And so this thing was in some
kind of a concrete building, andapparently the roof was leaking.
And the roof was leaking supposedly for years.
And so they finally decided to dispose of this nuclear reactor.
(09:14):
OK. And what they did is, is it said
that they went in there and thisthing was completely full of
water, rainwater. I mean, like this whole building
was concrete full of, of water that has accumulated over the
past 20 years on a nuclear reactor.
(09:35):
They supposedly, according to the according to the news, they
took a pump truck, a city truck and sucked all that water out of
a nuclear reactor and drove it into downtown Fayetteville, AR
by the university and opened up the dump valves and dumped it
into the drains. Those drains drain directly into
(09:59):
the water supply into their little water deal where they
clean up the water for drinking water.
Now think about that for a second.
OK, this this was in the news. You can search it out.
I don't have the articles handy,but I remember reading it.
(10:21):
I remember when it happened. I was thinking to myself, well,
I thought that the water in a nuclear reactor is horrible,
radioactive and will kill you. But these city guys with no type
of protection at all pumped it out and dumped it in the drains.
So is it as dangerous as they say or did these people, are
(10:47):
they so stupid over here that they handled all of this
radioactive material and water and just dumped it right into
the drinking water, dumped it into the into the drains right
by the schools, right by all your children, which, which is
it? OK, if it's really that
dangerous, why did nobody get introuble for dumping radioactive
(11:07):
water? But you know, hey, according
again to the news, the fake news, you can't get anywhere
near this stuff. It'll kill you.
Now, we've got scientists that say otherwise, but they they
shut them up real quick and theyban them.
So which is it? But I tell you what, let's
pretend because, you know, most people are living in Cartoon
(11:32):
Network, OK? They're living in a fantasy
land. If you believe anything that
NASA tells you, you're you mightas well turn on the Looney Tunes
and believe what it says too, OK?
You might as well believe the little Roadrunner running around
with a coyote chasing it. I mean, it's, it's almost as
(11:54):
realistic. So let's pretend in Cartoon
Network that this stuff is real,and these nuclear reactors are
real, and they're very dangerous.
They explode all the time. Any little thing happens, bang,
they blow up. And then of course, it pollutes
supposedly huge amounts of area,right?
(12:19):
So let's pretend that's true. So if that's true, let's stick
one on the moon, OK? And not only us, but China and
Russia are going to stick a few on the moon to see because that
way, I mean, there's nobody there to maintenance them.
(12:42):
So if this thing is real and it needs tons of maintenance and
tons of stuff, and any little thing can go wrong at any
moment, well, put it up on the moon.
Because, you know, we've got people up there running around
all the time fixing things, right?
So what, what most likely would happen?
Well, it's going to fail if it was real and it's going to blow
(13:06):
up and then 'cause something on the moon, supposedly, I'm sure.
So I don't believe any of it. I think it's all fake.
OK, but if you pretended it was real, if you believed it was
real, how could you believe it'sa good idea to stick nuclear
reactors on the moon when you can't even run them down here on
(13:27):
Earth? OK, you've got all these
scientists running around and all these people running around
that are maintaining them and these militaries running around
doing all this stuff and they still blow up and kill a bunch
of people. So I mean, how you going to keep
track of it on the moon? Ridiculous.
(13:48):
So anyway, according to this news article, it says with an
eye on beating Russia and China to the punch, the Trump
administration is about to announce plans to fast track the
building of a nuclear fission reactor on the moon.
(14:08):
OK, so we have to beat Russia and China to the punch.
So we need to hurry up. We need to hurry up and spend
lots of money. OK, so the NASA administrator,
Sean Duffy, is his name. He's expected to announce this
(14:31):
expedited program later on this week.
Now, this article came out in August of 2025.
Yeah, and it's September now. So.
OK, so this article is less thanone month old, and.
And maybe they have announced something, I don't know.
(14:51):
So let's see, they're saying they need to properly advance
this critical technology in order to be able to support a
future lunar economy. OK, a lunar economy, OK, lunar
(15:13):
economy, high-powered energy generation on Mars as well.
So they need these reactors on the moon because they're also
going to need high-powered energy generation on Mars.
And all this is in order to strengthen our national security
in outer space. OK.
(15:37):
And according to this, you know,it's imperative that this agency
move quickly, of course, you know, wrote Duffy in this
directive that was issued. Of course it is.
How many billions or trillions is it going to cost?
You know, NASA is already getting like 73 between 70 and
(15:58):
75,000,000 a day, every day of the week, you know, for their
astronauts hanging on wires and they're fake this and they're
fake that and their balloons, they have, you know, and all
their CGI. That's how much money they're
getting for that. But see, that's not enough.
So now we're going to put fake reactors on the moon at a cost
(16:21):
of, I don't know, trillion bucks?
Who cares? Who cares what it cost?
We've got to get it done. OK.
And let's see, here's why. The the NASA guy Duffy.
He points to a Russian Chinese plan to build a lunar nuclear
(16:45):
reactor of their own. So Russia and China are going to
put a reactor on the moon. See.
So we need to beat them, of course, that, you know, does
this sound anything kind of like, you know, the moon landing
way back when? Well, Russia, Russia put a
satellite in outer space called Sputnik.
(17:08):
So now what we need to do is we need to hurry up and send some
astronauts to the moon. We have to beat Russia.
We're in a space race. We've got to beat them there.
You see, in 1969. We've got to beat them there
because we, we can't possibly let, let somebody else go to the
moon because, you know, then, then, then, then, then, then,
(17:30):
then they're going to. Yeah, they didn't, we didn't go
to the moon. OK?
It's fake. It's a what you call money
laundering. OK, so let's see here.
So according to this, these countries signed a memorandum of
(17:51):
cooperation, which they're all going to collaborate together to
build this reactor and it's called the International Lunar
Research Station, ILRS, OK, which they hope to have an
operation by 2036. So we've got about 11-10 or
eleven years here before they'regoing to have this thing in
operation. Now, I don't know if you know
(18:14):
this or not, but they've been talking about going back to the
moon and they always keep pushing it forward and pushing
it forward. If they ever have a date like I
was going, we're going to be about back to the moon in the
year 2000. Well, it looks like it's going
to be about about 2010. Well, it looks like it's going
to be about 2020. Well, it looks like it's going
(18:36):
to be about 2020250. It's 2025.
Looks like about 2036. It never ends.
They're going to have to come upwith some awfully good CGI or AI
to fool anybody to believe at this time.
I mean, you know they ain't fooling anybody now.
Well, there's a few there's a few sheeple out there that
(18:59):
they'll believe anything they say, but majority of people know
that it's fake. OK, so let's see, according to
this, this thing is going to be led by the Chinese.
So you know it's real, right? Have you ever seen their little
fake lunar low Rover that landedon the on the moon?
Or how about the one from what was it Pakistan that looks like
(19:21):
something like an arcade game. I mean, it looks absolutely a
child could do something better.It it's the fakest thing you've
ever seen in your entire life. But but it's real, according to
the news. OK, So some of these other
countries that are getting in bed here with China, with China
(19:42):
to put nuclear reactors on the moon is Venezuela, Venezuela,
Venezuela is putting going to help put a reactor on the are
you kidding me? OK, OK.
South Africa, maybe Pakistan. Right.
(20:06):
Egypt, you know what, the pyramids, I mean, you go over
there, you see all the stuff they're running around over
there. They don't have much going on
over there as far as tech. I mean, but they're worried
about a nuclear reactor on the moon.
(20:26):
Sure they are. Sure they are.
Kazakhstan, They're they're they're interested in nuclear
reactors on the moon. Yeah.
Anyway, this facility is supposedly a 62 mile radius of
circle and they're going to put it on the South Pole of the
moon. And of course, there are other
outposts to follow over the decades.
(20:48):
So every 10 years, you know, we're going to get some more
outposts on the moon. But the reason that we need to
hurry up and do all this stuff with Project Artemis is because
if China and Russia beat the United States, OK, in
establishing their lunar station, they could potentially
(21:13):
declare a keep out zone. So I guess, you know, now these
different countries are going tobe able to take control of the
moon. It's their moon keep out.
Yeah. So it says right here, Let's
(21:37):
see. Of course, the rival, which is
the US lunar program is called Artemis, which I've already
said, let's see. And it's its first major
milestone is supposed to return American astronauts to the moon
in 2027, right? It says, you know, hey, so
another, that's one of those targets.
(21:58):
Hey, 2027, we'll have them there.
It's 2025 right now, almost 2026.
We're going to have them there in 2027.
But there's little chance of hitting that target, you see, as
critical components are still indevelopment.
And China, they're they're they're shooting for 2030.
(22:18):
So yeah, here we go. I mean, it's the same old, same
old junk over and over and over.Let's see here.
Nuclear reactor on the moon. Let's see here.
(22:38):
Basically what this is. OK, these announcements for this
is designed to. And of course, if they actually
start doing it is to flush trillions of dollars of taxpayer
money literally down the drain. That's what it's for.
Or actually into the bank accounts of people who are
(22:59):
already filthy rich. That's where this money will go.
So it's it's like the Musk deal.OK, SpaceX, he comes up with a,
he says he's got rocket ships now.
You can see these things supposedly going up and down,
probably CGI a lot. They're fake.
They're not really going to outer space.
(23:21):
They're shooting them off and they're going right into the
ocean. In fact, you can see videos of
the the Heavy 2 or whatever he calls it sinking in the ocean
and it crumbles up and it looks like a piece of cardboard.
I mean, it's fake as it's fake as can be, but it's in the
water. Of course, they always end up in
the ocean. That's where they're shooting
(23:42):
them to. So what they do is they shoot a
rocket ship and it goes up, up, up, up, up like it's going to
outer space. But then it turns and then it
turns, turns, turns, turns, turns and comes right back down.
And you can see it and people, oh, what, why does it do that?
Looks like it's going back down.Oh, no, no, no.
(24:03):
It's, it's going out and it's following the curvature of the
Earth and eventually it goes into outer space.
It has to do that, right? You can't just go straight up.
That would make too much sense. So we have to shoot it out
towards Bermuda, you know, to the Bermuda Triangle.
(24:26):
And of course, that's where it ends up is in the ocean out by
the Bermuda Triangle. But that's only after you see
all of the fake CGI where it flies up and docks with the
space station at a cost of, you know, 500 million or 100 million
or whatever this is costing the taxpayers.
(24:48):
So, I mean, you talk about a good business.
He sits there, has some fake rockets, you know, that cost a
fraction because they're not really doing anything but the
shooting out into the ocean. And then we've got ACGI team
working on the CGI and it looks really cheesy and fake because
it is. And so then we just have the
(25:09):
head of the head of the organization say, hey, we know
it's real because it looks so fake.
And people are like, yeah, that's how we know it's real is
because it looks so fake. So what they do is they try to
get you to not, you know, not believe your own eyes and ears,
(25:30):
your own senses. It's like, I can see that it's
not going up, that it's going over.
And now I can see it going down.Well, it's not really going
down. It's going into outer space.
It's like, but down space is up.Why is it over here going down?
Well, it's going to, it's going to enter outer space on the
(25:52):
other side of the of, of the globe.
See, remember, you're on a globeanyway.
So they're shooting these thingsout into out into the ocean and
they show every once in a while they'll show you a picture of
the thing out there and like theone they just showed here while
(26:12):
back, which you can, you can Google it.
It literally looks like tinfoil and cardboard all it just kind
of wads up and it's standing up and just sink straight down.
But that that's a superior high end $100 million rocket right
there. You can tell that it's a piece
(26:32):
of garbage. OK, it's garbage.
You can tell that it's fake. And yeah, they may have shot it
up in the air, all right? Or either that or they dropped
it out of an airplane. I don't know how it got out
there to the ocean. Maybe it did.
Maybe they did shoot it up and it came down, you know, but it
didn't go in outer space, and itdidn't even go very far before
(26:54):
it's laying out there in the ocean.
So, yeah, we're going to flush trillions of dollars into
putting nuclear reactors on the moon.
If you believe that there's where your money's going, OK Not
to clean up the area or not to make any things better, you
know, around here, not to fix all the potholes in the road and
(27:17):
the electrical grid problems and, you know, all the stuff
that actually matters. Now we've got to get a nuclear
reactor on the moon. Yeah, nobody's ever going to see
that reactor, but trust us, it'sthere.
It's there. Of course, we've also got like
this article here was saying, we've got fake golden Dome and
(27:42):
we've got fake AI data centers as well coming up, and I'll talk
about those later. Why?
There's lots of people that think these AI data centers are
fake. OK, They've got these huge
buildings and they claim they'refull of servers.
So AI, because AI is so powerful, it takes all this
(28:03):
energy to run it and all this money.
But you know, the AI we've got here on like Google and stuff,
it's no different than any othersearch engine.
You type it in and all it does is scrape the Internet and give
you back answers. It's the same as Google has
always done. You ask a question and it pops
up websites. That's all this is doing.
(28:23):
It's answering from different websites and it's wrong a very
high percentage of the time. OK, this is not some super
technology that's like wonderful.
It's it's a hunk of junk for themost part.
In fact, you know, I Googled something the other day on some
(28:44):
torque specifications for a bearing assembly to go on the
front of a pickup truck. Well, it gave me the torque.
It said based on our findings, which all it did was scrape the
Internet and it found a couple of websites that was talking
about it, which I could have Googled it and they were there
and it tells you the torque specs.
All it did was scrape it and give me the answer.
(29:05):
But then it turns around and tells me what the torque specs
are for the nut in the middle. You know that goes the bearings.
It's got all the nuts, you know,the nut and the bearing and the
for the on the spindle. But the problem is, is these new
style bearings and everything. This bearing assembly doesn't
have a spindle with a nut or anything, OK?
(29:27):
They don't have that anymore. This thing literally has four
bolts and the whole assembly comes off.
You put a new assembly on, it already has everything.
It's non serviceable, OK, And this was searched on that
particular vehicle. So it came back with partly
information that was correct andthe other part was all
incorrect. There was nothing on there that
was correct other than it it didsay something about the torque
(29:50):
specs and it did get it right. Everything else was wrong
because it starts putting up information from a car from the
50s when I'm Googling something from the late 2000s.
OK, 2015, but it's showing me stuff from 1957.
So what's wrong? And I was watching a deal.
(30:11):
The fact I watched it this morning is born again barbarian
and he's talking about how AI isthe devil and how fake it is.
And you know, he has a thing that he held up, he bought some
property and he holds up this thing and has a handle.
It's a weird looking thing. And he said hey, can anybody
tell me what this is? Well, a listener came back and
(30:35):
said, I know exactly what that is.
It's a big thing. You know, this thing is this
big, OK. And it clips onto a giant saw
blade and it sets on there and tightens down and it has a
handle and it has a little grinder on it and it sharpens a
saw blade. And we're not talking about a
saw blade this big. We're talking about a saw blade
that's like 6 foot around huge for a sawmill.
(30:57):
So it it sharpens gigantic saw blades, OK.
And a bunch of the readers or readers, listeners, they all
thought, well, I'm going to jumpthe gun here and I'm going to
figure out what that is because he asked.
And So what they did is they took a picture or a still shot
of this item he's holding up andthey ran it through AI.
(31:19):
And guess what AI said that thing was AI says it's a can
opener. And so he had people replying
back thinking they really had the right answer, saying it's a
can opener because that's what AI says it is.
AI has no clue what it is. So that again, if you think you
(31:44):
can rely on that, you're wrong. So these AI data centers, I'm
not really sure what they're doing, but I've got an article
on it that says that they're fake.
OK. But anyway, we'll talk about
some other day 'cause this, thisis more about the moon deal
here. So again, China and Russia are
already supposedly ahead of us on this moon deal, which is one
(32:06):
of those, you know, wink, wink. That way we have to hurry up.
So get, get busy and gets to spending that money 'cause we
wouldn't want anybody to get ahead of us.
You know, we have to hurry up and of course we have to earmark
billions of of dollars in order for this, you know, to be first.
(32:29):
In order for to make this work, we have to have billions of
dollars set aside. Otherwise China or Russia, they
might claim the moon. I mean, I thought we went to the
moon in 1969. We supposedly went like 5 more
times after that. How many, how many times have we
(32:51):
got to go to the moon before it's our moon?
But I guess, I guess I don't count.
Maybe they don't believe we everwin.
I don't know. I sure don't.
So so we're going to put nuclearreactors on the moon.
It's, it's kind of like what this guy, he said, he says,
well, maybe we should hurry up and put a Holocaust Memorial on
(33:14):
the moon as well. I mean, why not?
Maybe we should put a dinosaur museum on the moon.
How about a vaccine lab? You've got to have those
vaccines. You're going to need vaccines on
the moon. I mean, God only knows what kind
of bacteria or or viruses are floating around on the moon.
(33:35):
You better get your vaccines. We're going to vaccine lab on
the moon. Why not?
You get a nuclear reactor supplying all the power.
Yeah. So anyway, so I've got you a
couple images here, what people thought about it.
One of the guys in the some magazine, he drew this little
(33:58):
deal here. Oops, that's the wrong one.
This one, if you see here, it's a artist, OK?
It's an artist rendering, which all these things are artist
renderings, OK? Every time you see anything like
this on the moon or anywhere, it's always one of these fake
(34:19):
drawings. And this says America is winning
the race to produce the all important superior artists
rendering. OK?
What that means is every time wespend all this money to do this
stuff, you get back a bunch of fake CGI or fake pictures, and
underneath it says, you know, artist conception or artist
(34:43):
rendering. So we spend all this money and
that's what we get. We get a very high quality, or
in this case, a superior artist's depiction.
You don't get a picture of the real thing and you never will,
OK, Because they're not doing any of it, OK.
And the other one here is, I thought this is the one I
accidentally put up. I think you'll find this funny
(35:04):
here. OK, this, Corey, if you've
listened to this on a podcast and can't see this, it shows
Trump and it shows Vance. And their heads have been put on
the bodies of all the guys that used to have the, what is it
called, the pawn shop Pawn Stars, you know, and they're
(35:24):
like, well, the best we can do is this, you know, somebody,
somebody wants to get some moneyand they're like, the best I can
do is this. So it shows them on their bodies
and it says, can we see the Epstein files?
And Trump is like, the best I can do is an imaginary nuclear
reactor on the moon. So yeah, that's where we're at.
(35:46):
Hey, can we see this? Can we see that the best I can
do is a fake nuclear reactor on the moon?
That's the best I can do. So that's that's where it's
headed. So anyway, I thought that was
pretty interesting, But you know, it's the same old, it's
the same old thing all the way back to 1969.
(36:09):
Fake. OK.
But what they're doing now is they're upping, they're upping
the ante to spend more money. Somebody's getting rich off this
thing. It's like I said, like I
started, I don't know if I ever finished my thought on that.
But like, like Musk, you know, it must be nice to own a company
that the government is paying billions of dollars to do things
(36:31):
that aren't even there. You know, last I heard, he got
the contract to dismantle the space station.
I guess they finally decided to get rid of that CGI fakery
because, I mean, there's so manypeople on X that don't believe
it now that show all of their pictures.
I mean, everything that they're doing, you know, they're filming
everything. They're always filming
(36:51):
everything on these live streamsand people are watching this
stuff and seeing the wires, theysee the CGI glitches, they see
all the fakery and they record it and then they post it.
And so now what you've got to have is you literally have to
have these, these scientists arelike, and you'll see the videos
(37:14):
of it. They're they're showing the
video and you can tell it's a fake.
It's fake as can be, and so theyhave to actually put a
disclaimer out. They're like, now I know this
looks really cheesy and fake, but I'm here to tell you this is
real. And people are like, 'cause
they're like of. Course it is of.
Course it is because you said itis.
(37:36):
Now even, you know, it looks really fake, but so you always
have to put the disclaimer out. Oh, it's real.
I know it looks fake. Fake is all.
Get out. But don't worry, it's real.
You can trust us. Wink, wink.
It's real. And it's costing a fortune of
(37:57):
your money, of your tax dollars.You know what?
What kind of a constitutional Republic is this where I don't
want to have anything on the moon, I don't want to have
anything on Mars, but my tax dollars still go to it.
I don't have any vote on any of that.
Why? Why don't these, you know, we're
(38:18):
supposedly all they talk about is democracy and how come nobody
ever gets a vote on spending billions of dollars on the moon?
I know that it's fake and most lots of people else, not in
everybody, but lots of people know it's fake.
So why are we spending the money?
Where? Who's getting it?
(38:39):
Even if it was real, why do we need to do it?
Rush is going to put a reactor on.
Let's pretend in Cartoon Networkthat it was real.
Let them let them put a nuclear reactor on the moon.
Who cares? But you know, anyway, now we're
not going to do that, but we will spend your money on it.
(39:01):
You know, we're going to give somany billion to Elon Musk
because he's going to dismantle the space station.
That's going to be an awful easyjob.
Any sense. There's no such thing.
Wow, can I have part of that money?
I'll dismantle it right now. Boom, done.
Quit filming your fake stuff over there in Houston, in your
(39:22):
fake place underwater. Just quit doing it.
Dismantle. That was easy.
That's the best, the easiest money I've ever made right
there. Yeah.
Anyway, I guess that's all I really wanted to talk about on
that thing. I'm gonna I've got some others
coming up too, all all differentsubjects.
(39:46):
But that's that was the newest is the Artemis, you know, fake
reactors on the moon. Let me know what you think about
that. Do you, do you believe that
we're putting reactors on the moon?
Do you believe that? Does anybody believe that?
(40:07):
I don't know. I don't believe it.
I don't see how anybody can believe it.
But then again, I'm a flat earther, OK?
I'm a biblical cosmologist, and I don't believe you can get to
the moon. I believe that it's inside the
firmament exactly like the Biblesays.
OK, so you ain't getting there. It is not a planet you can land
(40:28):
on. It's something that's in the
firmament, probably made out of plasma.
So that's why you can see through it and see stars behind
it. It's not an actual lump of rock
floating around, OK? But hey, you can believe
whatever you want. And if you want your tax dollars
to go to it, hey, donate some more, you know, maybe you can
(40:51):
get a little plaque with your name on it right on the side of
the reactor on the moon. I don't know, just a thought.
Anyway, I guess I'll wrap this thing up.
Thanks for listening. If you have any questions or
comments, head over to itsflatbro.com or let's see
(41:13):
here, Truth Seekers ministry.orgor you can get to the same one
on kennywilliamson.com. So go check any of that stuff
out and I'm going to play the rest of this song here from Cat.
Can you believe you went to the moon?
I think it's I think it's funny.Any questions or anything, hit
(41:34):
me up on the website and let me know.
And I think that's it for today.So thanks again for listening
and God bless you. You're the one who said you
walked on the moon when you didn't.
And how about those moon rocks they gave to museums?
(41:55):
And thousands and thousands of people did see them.
But one museum took a closer look.
They soon realized that something's afoot.
The rock they were given turned out to be a fake.
Just a piece of old wood, not a rock from space.
Yeah, when God made the moon, hesaw it was good, but apparently
made it from petrified wood. Yeah, that's suspicious.
(42:21):
Listen, up in another museum sits an astronaut suit.
Take a good look at the tread onthe boot.
It doesn't match up with the Prince on the moon.
And y'all still believe what they're telling you?
Or how about that phone call that Nixon made to the moon
that's a quarter million miles away when I can't get a signal
(42:43):
on my cell phone line. I guess phones were better in
69. Well, do you still believe we
went to the moon? Do you still believe what
they're telling you? Just connect the dot set.
Pretty soon you'll find out whatI found out too.
(43:03):
But if you question this stuff, you'll be labeled loon.
You'll be called a conspiracy theory for film.
But I don't care man. I'm still going to make this too
because I know that we didn't go.
Welcome to the Militant Day Chronicles contact.
We are glad you are here. Well, a funny thing happened on
(00:28):
the way to the moon. That's the title of a video that
I watched on YouTube. You can see astronauts hanging
from wires, proving that astronauts are natural liars.
They analyze photos and highlight mistakes.
With the moon landing missions, they show it was fake.
You can see them faking the photos of Earth they use around
(00:49):
windows to fake the curves. That's suspicious, don't you
think? Yeah, Listen up.
I watched another. Documentary called Hello, this
is Kenny Williamson and welcome back to another episode of the
Kills Death Chronicles. I hope you like that a little
(01:11):
intro I put together there for you that has kind of something
kind of unique that, you know, ahead of this podcast here.
So yes, as you probably, you know, read in the title here,
going to talk a little bit aboutreactors on the moon and exactly
(01:35):
what that entails. So obviously, if you've listened
to the show before, you know, it's a as a disclaimer, I I
don't believe that we ever landed on the moon, OK?
I believe that that is a fake hoax.
(01:55):
And I think that you will find that most people believe that or
lots of people believe that. I mean, you even have Joe Rogan,
you know, who says he believes that.
He even has podcast talking about how fake it is.
And you know, you know, anybody that has a podcast like that is
(02:16):
being propped up by the government and I'm probably told
what to say and he's even talking about it.
It's so fake. But The funny thing is, is no
matter how ridiculously fake, and it is, no matter the
mainstream media and our government and NASA, they
(02:40):
pretend that it's real, OK? All this does is prove how big
of liars they really are. OK, So consider that fact.
Anytime you believe anything that you hear from NASA or from
(03:01):
any of this stuff, I mean, these, these are the same
people, and I've said this over and over.
These are the same people, the same so-called scientists who
teach Big Bang evolution. They teach you came from a
monkey. You know, they teach the whole
evolutionary process, even though you know, the missing
links are all missing. There's no such thing.
(03:23):
You know, they teach that the earth is billions of years old
when the Bible says it's only 6000.
So again, you know, everything opposite of what your Bible says
is what they teach. And the reason for that is
because they're satanic. You can trace them all the way
(03:43):
back to the 50s when they started.
Every one of them was either fake, claimed to be Nazis, you
know, devil worshippers, occultists.
That's why everything they do issatanic.
OK, every planet other than Earth, which Earth is not a
(04:06):
planet, but every so-called planet, which is actually just
luminaries, according to the Bible that they've named, is all
named after Pagan gods. OK.
And you know the, the lunar project Apollo, that you know,
that's a Pagan God. And so now what we have is we
(04:29):
have the new moon project. OK, so now it's called Artemis,
which is yet again another PaganGod.
In fact, I believe. Let's see, Artemis is Greek.
It's out of Greek mythology and Artemis was a woman.
(04:51):
She was the daughter of Zeus andLeto, the twin sister of Apollo.
So, you know, the original moon,the fake moon stuff was under
the Apollo, and now it's going to go over Artemis, under
Artemis. And these two are sisters, say
Pagan sisters, fake Pagan sisters from Greek mythology.
(05:17):
So yeah, that's where we get allof our names for everything.
OK is paganism. So, yeah.
So these guys here, that's that's all they do.
That's all they talk about. I mean, that's just a fact.
(05:38):
So what we have now is we had iswe have a new thing where Trump,
our current president, the Trumpadministration, OK, you know, we
founded, we've got this new thing out called space, you
know, Space Force. Now we've got SpaceX from Musk
(06:00):
and now we've got Space Force. And you have to realize there is
no such thing as outer space as as you were taught, OK?
So everything that they're claiming I believe to be fake.
And the reason for that is, is money laundering.
(06:22):
And then of course, the Satanic agenda.
Satan again teaches everything opposite the Bible.
So we have to keep that constantly going.
So kids believe it. You know, that way they discount
everything the Bible says. So there was a news article that
I found and read. It's called Trump Administration
(06:43):
to fast track lunar nuclear reactor.
OK, think about that for a second.
Now I don't have all the stuff on it to to show you or to tell
you about it at the moment, but there's a high, high number of
(07:04):
people that believe this nuclearstuff is fake.
Now, there is obviously your nuclear out there, but you know,
they have people that have shownthat this nuclear stuff is is
not, is not, it's not as dangerous what they claim.
And they had a guy out here and I've got his, I've seen his
videos where he was drinking thewater out of a nuclear reactor
(07:25):
and he's playing with the stuff in his hands.
And he said this stuff is not dangerous.
So I don't even really know thatthey're doing half the stuff
they claim they're doing OK. But according to the news, OK,
the fake news, you know, we've had explosions in Chernobyl,
(07:46):
which is a nuclear disaster, andwe've had the Fukushima,
Fukushima, whatever it is over there in Japan or wherever it
was at, you know, it exploded and, you know, radiation
everywhere. I don't know if any of that's
true, OK, Because anything you see on the news like that is at
(08:07):
best fake. And it's funny because here
while back here where where I live here in Arkansas, there's a
college right up the road here. It's called the University of
Arkansas. OK, Lots of people have heard of
that. And they've got the, you know,
they've got a big football team they call the Hogs.
(08:29):
And so it's the Razorbacks. So, you know, go Hogs, all that
stuff. Well, they actually had, and it
was in the paper on on the news here while back.
It's been a few years ago. They actually had a little
nuclear reactor there on campus or right off campus that they
(08:49):
had been doing stuff with for years, some kind of a class on
it, I guess, I don't know. But they had decided to abandon
this thing, OK. And so this thing was in some
kind of a concrete building, andapparently the roof was leaking.
And the roof was leaking supposedly for years.
And so they finally decided to dispose of this nuclear reactor.
(09:14):
OK. And what they did is, is it said
that they went in there and thisthing was completely full of
water, rainwater. I mean, like this whole building
was concrete full of, of water that has accumulated over the
past 20 years on a nuclear reactor.
(09:35):
They supposedly, according to the according to the news, they
took a pump truck, a city truck and sucked all that water out of
a nuclear reactor and drove it into downtown Fayetteville, AR
by the university and opened up the dump valves and dumped it
into the drains. Those drains drain directly into
(09:59):
the water supply into their little water deal where they
clean up the water for drinking water.
Now think about that for a second.
OK, this this was in the news. You can search it out.
I don't have the articles handy,but I remember reading it.
(10:21):
I remember when it happened. I was thinking to myself, well,
I thought that the water in a nuclear reactor is horrible,
radioactive and will kill you. But these city guys with no type
of protection at all pumped it out and dumped it in the drains.
So is it as dangerous as they say or did these people, are
(10:47):
they so stupid over here that they handled all of this
radioactive material and water and just dumped it right into
the drinking water, dumped it into the into the drains right
by the schools, right by all your children, which, which is
it? OK, if it's really that
dangerous, why did nobody get introuble for dumping radioactive
(11:07):
water? But you know, hey, according
again to the news, the fake news, you can't get anywhere
near this stuff. It'll kill you.
Now, we've got scientists that say otherwise, but they they
shut them up real quick and theyban them.
So which is it? But I tell you what, let's
pretend because, you know, most people are living in Cartoon
(11:32):
Network, OK? They're living in a fantasy
land. If you believe anything that
NASA tells you, you're you mightas well turn on the Looney Tunes
and believe what it says too, OK?
You might as well believe the little Roadrunner running around
with a coyote chasing it. I mean, it's, it's almost as
(11:54):
realistic. So let's pretend in Cartoon
Network that this stuff is real,and these nuclear reactors are
real, and they're very dangerous.
They explode all the time. Any little thing happens, bang,
they blow up. And then of course, it pollutes
supposedly huge amounts of area,right?
(12:19):
So let's pretend that's true. So if that's true, let's stick
one on the moon, OK? And not only us, but China and
Russia are going to stick a few on the moon to see because that
way, I mean, there's nobody there to maintenance them.
(12:42):
So if this thing is real and it needs tons of maintenance and
tons of stuff, and any little thing can go wrong at any
moment, well, put it up on the moon.
Because, you know, we've got people up there running around
all the time fixing things, right?
So what, what most likely would happen?
Well, it's going to fail if it was real and it's going to blow
(13:06):
up and then 'cause something on the moon, supposedly, I'm sure.
So I don't believe any of it. I think it's all fake.
OK, but if you pretended it was real, if you believed it was
real, how could you believe it'sa good idea to stick nuclear
reactors on the moon when you can't even run them down here on
(13:27):
Earth? OK, you've got all these
scientists running around and all these people running around
that are maintaining them and these militaries running around
doing all this stuff and they still blow up and kill a bunch
of people. So I mean, how you going to keep
track of it on the moon? Ridiculous.
(13:48):
So anyway, according to this news article, it says with an
eye on beating Russia and China to the punch, the Trump
administration is about to announce plans to fast track the
building of a nuclear fission reactor on the moon.
(14:08):
OK, so we have to beat Russia and China to the punch.
So we need to hurry up. We need to hurry up and spend
lots of money. OK, so the NASA administrator,
Sean Duffy, is his name. He's expected to announce this
(14:31):
expedited program later on this week.
Now, this article came out in August of 2025.
Yeah, and it's September now. So.
OK, so this article is less thanone month old, and.
And maybe they have announced something, I don't know.
(14:51):
So let's see, they're saying they need to properly advance
this critical technology in order to be able to support a
future lunar economy. OK, a lunar economy, OK, lunar
(15:13):
economy, high-powered energy generation on Mars as well.
So they need these reactors on the moon because they're also
going to need high-powered energy generation on Mars.
And all this is in order to strengthen our national security
in outer space. OK.
(15:37):
And according to this, you know,it's imperative that this agency
move quickly, of course, you know, wrote Duffy in this
directive that was issued. Of course it is.
How many billions or trillions is it going to cost?
You know, NASA is already getting like 73 between 70 and
(15:58):
75,000,000 a day, every day of the week, you know, for their
astronauts hanging on wires and they're fake this and they're
fake that and their balloons, they have, you know, and all
their CGI. That's how much money they're
getting for that. But see, that's not enough.
So now we're going to put fake reactors on the moon at a cost
(16:21):
of, I don't know, trillion bucks?
Who cares? Who cares what it cost?
We've got to get it done. OK.
And let's see, here's why. The the NASA guy Duffy.
He points to a Russian Chinese plan to build a lunar nuclear
(16:45):
reactor of their own. So Russia and China are going to
put a reactor on the moon. See.
So we need to beat them, of course, that, you know, does
this sound anything kind of like, you know, the moon landing
way back when? Well, Russia, Russia put a
satellite in outer space called Sputnik.
(17:08):
So now what we need to do is we need to hurry up and send some
astronauts to the moon. We have to beat Russia.
We're in a space race. We've got to beat them there.
You see, in 1969. We've got to beat them there
because we, we can't possibly let, let somebody else go to the
moon because, you know, then, then, then, then, then, then,
(17:30):
then they're going to. Yeah, they didn't, we didn't go
to the moon. OK?
It's fake. It's a what you call money
laundering. OK, so let's see here.
So according to this, these countries signed a memorandum of
(17:51):
cooperation, which they're all going to collaborate together to
build this reactor and it's called the International Lunar
Research Station, ILRS, OK, which they hope to have an
operation by 2036. So we've got about 11-10 or
eleven years here before they'regoing to have this thing in
operation. Now, I don't know if you know
(18:14):
this or not, but they've been talking about going back to the
moon and they always keep pushing it forward and pushing
it forward. If they ever have a date like I
was going, we're going to be about back to the moon in the
year 2000. Well, it looks like it's going
to be about about 2010. Well, it looks like it's going
to be about 2020. Well, it looks like it's going
(18:36):
to be about 2020250. It's 2025.
Looks like about 2036. It never ends.
They're going to have to come upwith some awfully good CGI or AI
to fool anybody to believe at this time.
I mean, you know they ain't fooling anybody now.
Well, there's a few there's a few sheeple out there that
(18:59):
they'll believe anything they say, but majority of people know
that it's fake. OK, so let's see, according to
this, this thing is going to be led by the Chinese.
So you know it's real, right? Have you ever seen their little
fake lunar low Rover that landedon the on the moon?
Or how about the one from what was it Pakistan that looks like
(19:21):
something like an arcade game. I mean, it looks absolutely a
child could do something better.It it's the fakest thing you've
ever seen in your entire life. But but it's real, according to
the news. OK, So some of these other
countries that are getting in bed here with China, with China
(19:42):
to put nuclear reactors on the moon is Venezuela, Venezuela,
Venezuela is putting going to help put a reactor on the are
you kidding me? OK, OK.
South Africa, maybe Pakistan. Right.
(20:06):
Egypt, you know what, the pyramids, I mean, you go over
there, you see all the stuff they're running around over
there. They don't have much going on
over there as far as tech. I mean, but they're worried
about a nuclear reactor on the moon.
(20:26):
Sure they are. Sure they are.
Kazakhstan, They're they're they're interested in nuclear
reactors on the moon. Yeah.
Anyway, this facility is supposedly a 62 mile radius of
circle and they're going to put it on the South Pole of the
moon. And of course, there are other
outposts to follow over the decades.
(20:48):
So every 10 years, you know, we're going to get some more
outposts on the moon. But the reason that we need to
hurry up and do all this stuff with Project Artemis is because
if China and Russia beat the United States, OK, in
establishing their lunar station, they could potentially
(21:13):
declare a keep out zone. So I guess, you know, now these
different countries are going tobe able to take control of the
moon. It's their moon keep out.
Yeah. So it says right here, Let's
(21:37):
see. Of course, the rival, which is
the US lunar program is called Artemis, which I've already
said, let's see. And it's its first major
milestone is supposed to return American astronauts to the moon
in 2027, right? It says, you know, hey, so
another, that's one of those targets.
(21:58):
Hey, 2027, we'll have them there.
It's 2025 right now, almost 2026.
We're going to have them there in 2027.
But there's little chance of hitting that target, you see, as
critical components are still indevelopment.
And China, they're they're they're shooting for 2030.
(22:18):
So yeah, here we go. I mean, it's the same old, same
old junk over and over and over.Let's see here.
Nuclear reactor on the moon. Let's see here.
(22:38):
Basically what this is. OK, these announcements for this
is designed to. And of course, if they actually
start doing it is to flush trillions of dollars of taxpayer
money literally down the drain. That's what it's for.
Or actually into the bank accounts of people who are
(22:59):
already filthy rich. That's where this money will go.
So it's it's like the Musk deal.OK, SpaceX, he comes up with a,
he says he's got rocket ships now.
You can see these things supposedly going up and down,
probably CGI a lot. They're fake.
They're not really going to outer space.
(23:21):
They're shooting them off and they're going right into the
ocean. In fact, you can see videos of
the the Heavy 2 or whatever he calls it sinking in the ocean
and it crumbles up and it looks like a piece of cardboard.
I mean, it's fake as it's fake as can be, but it's in the
water. Of course, they always end up in
the ocean. That's where they're shooting
(23:42):
them to. So what they do is they shoot a
rocket ship and it goes up, up, up, up, up like it's going to
outer space. But then it turns and then it
turns, turns, turns, turns, turns and comes right back down.
And you can see it and people, oh, what, why does it do that?
Looks like it's going back down.Oh, no, no, no.
(24:03):
It's, it's going out and it's following the curvature of the
Earth and eventually it goes into outer space.
It has to do that, right? You can't just go straight up.
That would make too much sense. So we have to shoot it out
towards Bermuda, you know, to the Bermuda Triangle.
(24:26):
And of course, that's where it ends up is in the ocean out by
the Bermuda Triangle. But that's only after you see
all of the fake CGI where it flies up and docks with the
space station at a cost of, you know, 500 million or 100 million
or whatever this is costing the taxpayers.
(24:48):
So, I mean, you talk about a good business.
He sits there, has some fake rockets, you know, that cost a
fraction because they're not really doing anything but the
shooting out into the ocean. And then we've got ACGI team
working on the CGI and it looks really cheesy and fake because
it is. And so then we just have the
(25:09):
head of the head of the organization say, hey, we know
it's real because it looks so fake.
And people are like, yeah, that's how we know it's real is
because it looks so fake. So what they do is they try to
get you to not, you know, not believe your own eyes and ears,
(25:30):
your own senses. It's like, I can see that it's
not going up, that it's going over.
And now I can see it going down.Well, it's not really going
down. It's going into outer space.
It's like, but down space is up.Why is it over here going down?
Well, it's going to, it's going to enter outer space on the
(25:52):
other side of the of, of the globe.
See, remember, you're on a globeanyway.
So they're shooting these thingsout into out into the ocean and
they show every once in a while they'll show you a picture of
the thing out there and like theone they just showed here while
(26:12):
back, which you can, you can Google it.
It literally looks like tinfoil and cardboard all it just kind
of wads up and it's standing up and just sink straight down.
But that that's a superior high end $100 million rocket right
there. You can tell that it's a piece
(26:32):
of garbage. OK, it's garbage.
You can tell that it's fake. And yeah, they may have shot it
up in the air, all right? Or either that or they dropped
it out of an airplane. I don't know how it got out
there to the ocean. Maybe it did.
Maybe they did shoot it up and it came down, you know, but it
didn't go in outer space, and itdidn't even go very far before
(26:54):
it's laying out there in the ocean.
So, yeah, we're going to flush trillions of dollars into
putting nuclear reactors on the moon.
If you believe that there's where your money's going, OK Not
to clean up the area or not to make any things better, you
know, around here, not to fix all the potholes in the road and
(27:17):
the electrical grid problems and, you know, all the stuff
that actually matters. Now we've got to get a nuclear
reactor on the moon. Yeah, nobody's ever going to see
that reactor, but trust us, it'sthere.
It's there. Of course, we've also got like
this article here was saying, we've got fake golden Dome and
(27:42):
we've got fake AI data centers as well coming up, and I'll talk
about those later. Why?
There's lots of people that think these AI data centers are
fake. OK, They've got these huge
buildings and they claim they'refull of servers.
So AI, because AI is so powerful, it takes all this
(28:03):
energy to run it and all this money.
But you know, the AI we've got here on like Google and stuff,
it's no different than any othersearch engine.
You type it in and all it does is scrape the Internet and give
you back answers. It's the same as Google has
always done. You ask a question and it pops
up websites. That's all this is doing.
(28:23):
It's answering from different websites and it's wrong a very
high percentage of the time. OK, this is not some super
technology that's like wonderful.
It's it's a hunk of junk for themost part.
In fact, you know, I Googled something the other day on some
(28:44):
torque specifications for a bearing assembly to go on the
front of a pickup truck. Well, it gave me the torque.
It said based on our findings, which all it did was scrape the
Internet and it found a couple of websites that was talking
about it, which I could have Googled it and they were there
and it tells you the torque specs.
All it did was scrape it and give me the answer.
(29:05):
But then it turns around and tells me what the torque specs
are for the nut in the middle. You know that goes the bearings.
It's got all the nuts, you know,the nut and the bearing and the
for the on the spindle. But the problem is, is these new
style bearings and everything. This bearing assembly doesn't
have a spindle with a nut or anything, OK?
(29:27):
They don't have that anymore. This thing literally has four
bolts and the whole assembly comes off.
You put a new assembly on, it already has everything.
It's non serviceable, OK, And this was searched on that
particular vehicle. So it came back with partly
information that was correct andthe other part was all
incorrect. There was nothing on there that
was correct other than it it didsay something about the torque
(29:50):
specs and it did get it right. Everything else was wrong
because it starts putting up information from a car from the
50s when I'm Googling something from the late 2000s.
OK, 2015, but it's showing me stuff from 1957.
So what's wrong? And I was watching a deal.
(30:11):
The fact I watched it this morning is born again barbarian
and he's talking about how AI isthe devil and how fake it is.
And you know, he has a thing that he held up, he bought some
property and he holds up this thing and has a handle.
It's a weird looking thing. And he said hey, can anybody
tell me what this is? Well, a listener came back and
(30:35):
said, I know exactly what that is.
It's a big thing. You know, this thing is this
big, OK. And it clips onto a giant saw
blade and it sets on there and tightens down and it has a
handle and it has a little grinder on it and it sharpens a
saw blade. And we're not talking about a
saw blade this big. We're talking about a saw blade
that's like 6 foot around huge for a sawmill.
(30:57):
So it it sharpens gigantic saw blades, OK.
And a bunch of the readers or readers, listeners, they all
thought, well, I'm going to jumpthe gun here and I'm going to
figure out what that is because he asked.
And So what they did is they took a picture or a still shot
of this item he's holding up andthey ran it through AI.
(31:19):
And guess what AI said that thing was AI says it's a can
opener. And so he had people replying
back thinking they really had the right answer, saying it's a
can opener because that's what AI says it is.
AI has no clue what it is. So that again, if you think you
(31:44):
can rely on that, you're wrong. So these AI data centers, I'm
not really sure what they're doing, but I've got an article
on it that says that they're fake.
OK. But anyway, we'll talk about
some other day 'cause this, thisis more about the moon deal
here. So again, China and Russia are
already supposedly ahead of us on this moon deal, which is one
(32:06):
of those, you know, wink, wink. That way we have to hurry up.
So get, get busy and gets to spending that money 'cause we
wouldn't want anybody to get ahead of us.
You know, we have to hurry up and of course we have to earmark
billions of of dollars in order for this, you know, to be first.
(32:29):
In order for to make this work, we have to have billions of
dollars set aside. Otherwise China or Russia, they
might claim the moon. I mean, I thought we went to the
moon in 1969. We supposedly went like 5 more
times after that. How many, how many times have we
(32:51):
got to go to the moon before it's our moon?
But I guess, I guess I don't count.
Maybe they don't believe we everwin.
I don't know. I sure don't.
So so we're going to put nuclearreactors on the moon.
It's, it's kind of like what this guy, he said, he says,
well, maybe we should hurry up and put a Holocaust Memorial on
(33:14):
the moon as well. I mean, why not?
Maybe we should put a dinosaur museum on the moon.
How about a vaccine lab? You've got to have those
vaccines. You're going to need vaccines on
the moon. I mean, God only knows what kind
of bacteria or or viruses are floating around on the moon.
(33:35):
You better get your vaccines. We're going to vaccine lab on
the moon. Why not?
You get a nuclear reactor supplying all the power.
Yeah. So anyway, so I've got you a
couple images here, what people thought about it.
One of the guys in the some magazine, he drew this little
(33:58):
deal here. Oops, that's the wrong one.
This one, if you see here, it's a artist, OK?
It's an artist rendering, which all these things are artist
renderings, OK? Every time you see anything like
this on the moon or anywhere, it's always one of these fake
(34:19):
drawings. And this says America is winning
the race to produce the all important superior artists
rendering. OK?
What that means is every time wespend all this money to do this
stuff, you get back a bunch of fake CGI or fake pictures, and
underneath it says, you know, artist conception or artist
(34:43):
rendering. So we spend all this money and
that's what we get. We get a very high quality, or
in this case, a superior artist's depiction.
You don't get a picture of the real thing and you never will,
OK, Because they're not doing any of it, OK.
And the other one here is, I thought this is the one I
accidentally put up. I think you'll find this funny
(35:04):
here. OK, this, Corey, if you've
listened to this on a podcast and can't see this, it shows
Trump and it shows Vance. And their heads have been put on
the bodies of all the guys that used to have the, what is it
called, the pawn shop Pawn Stars, you know, and they're
(35:24):
like, well, the best we can do is this, you know, somebody,
somebody wants to get some moneyand they're like, the best I can
do is this. So it shows them on their bodies
and it says, can we see the Epstein files?
And Trump is like, the best I can do is an imaginary nuclear
reactor on the moon. So yeah, that's where we're at.
(35:46):
Hey, can we see this? Can we see that the best I can
do is a fake nuclear reactor on the moon?
That's the best I can do. So that's that's where it's
headed. So anyway, I thought that was
pretty interesting, But you know, it's the same old, it's
the same old thing all the way back to 1969.
(36:09):
Fake. OK.
But what they're doing now is they're upping, they're upping
the ante to spend more money. Somebody's getting rich off this
thing. It's like I said, like I
started, I don't know if I ever finished my thought on that.
But like, like Musk, you know, it must be nice to own a company
that the government is paying billions of dollars to do things
(36:31):
that aren't even there. You know, last I heard, he got
the contract to dismantle the space station.
I guess they finally decided to get rid of that CGI fakery
because, I mean, there's so manypeople on X that don't believe
it now that show all of their pictures.
I mean, everything that they're doing, you know, they're filming
everything. They're always filming
(36:51):
everything on these live streamsand people are watching this
stuff and seeing the wires, theysee the CGI glitches, they see
all the fakery and they record it and then they post it.
And so now what you've got to have is you literally have to
have these, these scientists arelike, and you'll see the videos
(37:14):
of it. They're they're showing the
video and you can tell it's a fake.
It's fake as can be, and so theyhave to actually put a
disclaimer out. They're like, now I know this
looks really cheesy and fake, but I'm here to tell you this is
real. And people are like, 'cause
they're like of. Course it is of.
Course it is because you said itis.
(37:36):
Now even, you know, it looks really fake, but so you always
have to put the disclaimer out. Oh, it's real.
I know it looks fake. Fake is all.
Get out. But don't worry, it's real.
You can trust us. Wink, wink.
It's real. And it's costing a fortune of
(37:57):
your money, of your tax dollars.You know what?
What kind of a constitutional Republic is this where I don't
want to have anything on the moon, I don't want to have
anything on Mars, but my tax dollars still go to it.
I don't have any vote on any of that.
Why? Why don't these, you know, we're
(38:18):
supposedly all they talk about is democracy and how come nobody
ever gets a vote on spending billions of dollars on the moon?
I know that it's fake and most lots of people else, not in
everybody, but lots of people know it's fake.
So why are we spending the money?
Where? Who's getting it?
(38:39):
Even if it was real, why do we need to do it?
Rush is going to put a reactor on.
Let's pretend in Cartoon Networkthat it was real.
Let them let them put a nuclear reactor on the moon.
Who cares? But you know, anyway, now we're
not going to do that, but we will spend your money on it.
(39:01):
You know, we're going to give somany billion to Elon Musk
because he's going to dismantle the space station.
That's going to be an awful easyjob.
Any sense. There's no such thing.
Wow, can I have part of that money?
I'll dismantle it right now. Boom, done.
Quit filming your fake stuff over there in Houston, in your
(39:22):
fake place underwater. Just quit doing it.
Dismantle. That was easy.
That's the best, the easiest money I've ever made right
there. Yeah.
Anyway, I guess that's all I really wanted to talk about on
that thing. I'm gonna I've got some others
coming up too, all all differentsubjects.
(39:46):
But that's that was the newest is the Artemis, you know, fake
reactors on the moon. Let me know what you think about
that. Do you, do you believe that
we're putting reactors on the moon?
Do you believe that? Does anybody believe that?
(40:07):
I don't know. I don't believe it.
I don't see how anybody can believe it.
But then again, I'm a flat earther, OK?
I'm a biblical cosmologist, and I don't believe you can get to
the moon. I believe that it's inside the
firmament exactly like the Biblesays.
OK, so you ain't getting there. It is not a planet you can land
(40:28):
on. It's something that's in the
firmament, probably made out of plasma.
So that's why you can see through it and see stars behind
it. It's not an actual lump of rock
floating around, OK? But hey, you can believe
whatever you want. And if you want your tax dollars
to go to it, hey, donate some more, you know, maybe you can
(40:51):
get a little plaque with your name on it right on the side of
the reactor on the moon. I don't know, just a thought.
Anyway, I guess I'll wrap this thing up.
Thanks for listening. If you have any questions or
comments, head over to itsflatbro.com or let's see
(41:13):
here, Truth Seekers ministry.orgor you can get to the same one
on kennywilliamson.com. So go check any of that stuff
out and I'm going to play the rest of this song here from Cat.
Can you believe you went to the moon?
I think it's I think it's funny.Any questions or anything, hit
(41:34):
me up on the website and let me know.
And I think that's it for today.So thanks again for listening
and God bless you. You're the one who said you
walked on the moon when you didn't.
And how about those moon rocks they gave to museums?
(41:55):
And thousands and thousands of people did see them.
But one museum took a closer look.
They soon realized that something's afoot.
The rock they were given turned out to be a fake.
Just a piece of old wood, not a rock from space.
Yeah, when God made the moon, hesaw it was good, but apparently
made it from petrified wood. Yeah, that's suspicious.
(42:21):
Listen, up in another museum sits an astronaut suit.
Take a good look at the tread onthe boot.
It doesn't match up with the Prince on the moon.
And y'all still believe what they're telling you?
Or how about that phone call that Nixon made to the moon
that's a quarter million miles away when I can't get a signal
(42:43):
on my cell phone line. I guess phones were better in
69. Well, do you still believe we
went to the moon? Do you still believe what
they're telling you? Just connect the dot set.
Pretty soon you'll find out whatI found out too.
(43:03):
But if you question this stuff, you'll be labeled loon.
You'll be called a conspiracy theory for film.
But I don't care man. I'm still going to make this too
because I know that we didn't go.
Popular Podcasts
On Purpose with Jay Shetty
I’m Jay Shetty host of On Purpose the worlds #1 Mental Health podcast and I’m so grateful you found us. I started this podcast 5 years ago to invite you into conversations and workshops that are designed to help make you happier, healthier and more healed. I believe that when you (yes you) feel seen, heard and understood you’re able to deal with relationship struggles, work challenges and life’s ups and downs with more ease and grace. I interview experts, celebrities, thought leaders and athletes so that we can grow our mindset, build better habits and uncover a side of them we’ve never seen before. New episodes every Monday and Friday. Your support means the world to me and I don’t take it for granted — click the follow button and leave a review to help us spread the love with On Purpose. I can’t wait for you to listen to your first or 500th episode!
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
The Joe Rogan Experience
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.