08 28 2023 the SC Gen Ass Whine O's ...

None

Episode Transcript

(00:00):
Welcome to the Jonathan and Kelly Show. Jonathan Rush, you wanna know why
I'm here to support Brosident Trump becauseit undea. Black men like this for
decades makeup charging the pull say Iknow Trump is innocent. I support Trump.
I guess this corrupt two tiered justices. That's why I'm here to show
my support. That's a black manfor Trump, Kelly Nash. Fanny Willis,

(00:21):
she's a puppet for the white liberal. It's controlling everything. She's in
front, but the white liberal backthere pulling old screens telling her what to
do. And the Jonathan and KellyShow woc Wow, he's a little out
spoken on the streets of Georgia,wearing his T shirt. Well, and
as we speak, Fanny Willis mightbe having her prosecutorial dreams and fantasies dashed

(00:47):
because Mark Meadows is in a courtroomright now. So if if he can
win his his hearing, it's allover for Fanny. They'll be moving at
the Federal Court, as a lotof people think it should be. I'm
you know something, I don't evenknow why this thing isn't going to be
dismissed immediately. The girl ran herentire campaign. Well, we'll just get

(01:08):
tell you what. Let's just letthis play out today with Martin Meadows and
then hopefully this will be a nonissue and it'll move on to a federal
prosecution. Okay, all right,now, let's talk about some of the
things that happened over the weekend.I saw an interesting poement. This was
on Fox, and I didn't seeat the bottom before the screen went down
exactly who was releasing the poll?Seventy seven percent of Americans say Joe Biden's

(01:30):
too old to run for office.You know it is August the twenty eight
October or September October. Wow,you got fourteen months, brother, you
think he's going to be at atfourteen months from now? Do you think
if he does some stretching and maybea little if he starts doing some puzzles
and stuff to get his brain goingagain, he'll be at the bounce back

(01:53):
from what seems to be a littlebit of mental slippage. Or do you
think he will continue to display thathe's really not mentally there? And you
get fourteen more months before you goto the polls. It's interesting because when
you look at national polls, conservativesand particularly libertarians like myself like to use

(02:15):
the phrase, we're not a democracy, the democracy is a mob rule mentality
that we are a republic. Andso when you see a poll like that
seventy seven percent of Americans think thatJoe Biden's too old to be the president,
Yeah, then you have to startwondering, well, what does it
look like in Michigan or Wisconsin,or Ohio or Florida or Georgia someplace that

(02:44):
can go because we already know California, Joe Biden could literally be declared dead.
And if he's the if he's thenominee, we're voting for him rue
Massachusetts. He's already lacked that up. You know what I'm saying. There
are certain there's a about you know, twenty states that Joe Biden can't lose,

(03:04):
and there's like twenty states or sothat whoever the Republican nominee is couldn't
lose it. But I would Iwould tend to think that if anybody was
to take a serious look at JoeBiden, you would come to the conclusion,
maybe not that he's too old,but he's too corrupt. I mean,
when you hear there's a whole differentPoe for that one brother. You

(03:27):
know, the whole idea that wenow can document nine different Biden family members
receiving cash payments from foreign entities andit was through Yeah, they're through shell
companies and sent to offshore accounts,nine different family members. How do you

(03:49):
explain that. He hasn't even attemptedto explain. Nobody from the Biden family
has attempted to explain this. That'sjust one of those things. And it's
not about what if is him,but what if some anybody was receiving those
payments, If Barack Obama was receivingfifty million dollars in payments, Yeah,

(04:15):
somebody would have to ask why,why? Why did China send you that
money? Why did the Russian oligarchssend that money? You have to ask
the questions the fact, and somebodyhas to answer it. Nobody has offered
an explanation. They haven't denied it, which is odd. You haven't come
for all, Joe Biden says,as nobody said that. Oh they did

(04:36):
was clarify it. Nobody. Joe'snot in business with his son. Yeah,
he didn't know what's going on overthere. He's not the big guy
in business with his son, No, the big guy, somebody else?
Okay, could you just tell uswho the money pops up in my account
all the time. I don't eventake a time. I don't even take
the time to go look up howdid how did that money pop up on
my account? If we could justget I mean, I know it's not

(04:57):
about Hunter Biden, but if HunterBiden would offer a name as to who
the big guy was, who wasthe big guy? Not your dad?
We know it wasn't Joe, right. We just want to be able to
do the accounting that shows where thatten percent went, because it looks like
the ten percent going to your dad, and of course we got to clear
his name. So give us aname, any name that we can trace

(05:18):
the ten percent went to them.And then, although it's totally an ethical
and illegal for you to share abanking account with your son where you possibly
could have actually benefited from the moniesthat he generated through his hard work and
I would say his management and guidancefor Barisma, I'm sure that you didn't
spend any of that money, nordid Hunters spend any on your properties.

(05:40):
So well, yeah, you can'tdo that, nor should you, nor
is it legal for your son toactually well, see, now we get
back into the legal gray area.Okay, that's where we like to live.
Plausible deniability. Well, and that'swhat they're trying to trying to provide
Joe with. But it's one ofthose things when you know, in life

(06:05):
or just about any detective will tellyou whatever looks like it probably happened.
You start talking about odds of thingshappening, and you say, well,
what is the chance that Joe Biden'sbank account that wasn't registered in Joe Biden's
name, but we can now traceit back to Joe Biden? What are

(06:27):
the chances that roughly ten percent ofthe Hunter Biden earnings would end up in
his account from a different revenue sourcethat that was a book sale that we
don't have a record on, thatwas a speech thing that he gave.
Yeah, it's as speeches, itwas books, it was whatevers. But
it just turned out to be almostidentical to what you would expect ten percent

(06:50):
to look like. Maybe it wasjust those clever little fortune cookies sayings then
offers an you know, is thisa possibility, Joe, he writes the
words of wisdom you read in yourfortune cookies that pays good money. All
right. So yesterday, by theway, when I was at church,

(07:12):
and I can't believe I did notgo click on this headline immediately afterwards.
But I was intently listening to thepreacher and Joe Biden is trying to distract
me? Did he did? Whenyou're a headline that I actually said,
Now, we're looking for Congress toauthorize not only the development, but the
production and distribution for what will bethe next mandatory COVID vaccine. Oh,

(07:35):
I would assume. So I meanthat was starting to call for that on
Friday. Okay, So we're dealingwith the worst ever COVID outbreak in the
history of man. Release the crackand called the kraken, called that from
professors Yale. They want to scarethe crap audio. The death rate is

(07:56):
still like hovering just above zero percent. We cancel football games here Friday night,
Yes, And I just don't knowif I hope. Let me just
put it that way. I prayerfullyhope that Americans will not tolerate government crackdowns
with the Bank of America Stadium bea super spreader, I hope. So

(08:20):
here's why, Because the more peoplewho get this new strain of COVID,
the more people who become immune toit, you have to fight through it.
There is no defense. There isno vaccine, nor will there ever
be a vaccine. Doctor Fauci neverrecognized that type of immunity from exposure.
Doctor Faucci, unfortunately for a lotof Americans and people around the world,

(08:43):
wanted to try. First off,wanted to get gain a function, got
it, got it, then spreadit, then put through different types of
vaccines or what he called vaccines,change the definition of vaccines in order to
protet a theory which apparently has failedmiserably and may in fact have killed a

(09:05):
bunch of people. That is thethat is going to be the legacy of
doctor Fauci. The lab rats aregoing, oh, thank goodness, they
released it on the people. Wedodged a bullet with that one. Yeah,
the vaccine has done more harm thangood. Well, actually, I
could say I don't know that it'sdone any good. You know, you
hear it's kind of like today andsomewhat related because it's only political. I

(09:31):
was telling you before we went onthere. Debbie Dingle, the representative from
Michigan, was complaining about the salariesof the United Auto Workers in Michigan.
She represents Michigan, and she wassaying, there's a big possibility they're going
to strike because so many of theseplant workers are only getting paid sixteen seventeen
dollars an hour, and you couldmake more Adam McDonald's here in Michigan.

(09:52):
And my first thought was a JoeBiden would tell me that's a good paying
union job. He's the one who'sgot the doorsement of the United Auto Workers
and all unions. Why is itso crappy with the pay b That should
have been enough money, and itwas enough money for somebody to live off
of up until biden Omics got here. Bidenomics cost the average of South Carolina

(10:15):
family an extra seven hundred and twentydollars a month. Same lifestyle before Joe
Biden was seven hundred and twenty dollarsa month cheaper than it is right now.
So unless you've got a pay increaseof seven and twenty dollars a month,
you're going backwards in a biden economy. So you know, the Inflation
Reduction Act. I was thinking aboutthis, that's like the low fat Caesar

(10:37):
salad dressing. It sounds healthy,but it's the exact opposite of healthy.
Right When you get low fat caesarsalad, you just get more carbohydrates,
more fat in your system. TheInflation Reduction Act actually drives inflation up.
Well. I liked it that Bidenstarted saying, we actually shouldn't have called
it the Inflation Reduction Act, didhe? They came out and said I

(11:01):
did not hear this. It cameout and said that. So so now
it gives them an opportunity to writeanother bill. They're going to call the
Inflation Reduction Act, are you becauseI'm sure it will, because now the
first one they admit was just jobs, jobs, jobs, because that's what
Joe sees when he talks about greenenergy. He sees jobs. Okay,

(11:22):
And you can ask Bernie Sanders.He was all over television touting it over
the weekend. How the jobs numbers, the unemployment numbers the lowest it's ever
been since ma'am first swung a hammer. So we got that going for us.
When he says the jobs numbers,does he is he talking about the
unemployment rate? Is talking about allright? So he at no point wants

(11:45):
to factor in job participation. No, no, no, no, no,
look at you trying to group inanother set of numbers. Well,
because I extrapulated the answer we wantI have heard for years, and I
remember bringing it up on our oldAfternoon show that I mean we haven't done
that since what twenty fifteens? Thatso I mean we're going back. You

(12:09):
know quite a number of years,eight, nine, ten years ago that
Americans were not willing to take certainjobs, which was why, and I
remember you were very upset. Youdidn't believe it at the time, in
like twenty twelve, that they're comeon, Americans are going to work farm
jobs if given the opportunity. Andthen it turned out that it would appear
now from our own I don't wantto call it research, just driving around

(12:33):
looking there's a bunch of Americans whowon't work, they don't want a job,
You can't give them a job.And so I guess those people were
right. But Joe, so ifthey're not looking for a job, they're
not considered unemployed. So you're thirtyyears old, we're talking about the E

(12:54):
sixth number, the U six number, not the U three. You're unemployed.
You're living with somebody like your mom, and you're receiving some sort of
government benefits. You are considered aproductive member of society in the Biden administration,
although all you do is take.Have you ever ever been to Trenton,

(13:16):
New Jersey? If you ever goto Trenton, New Jersey, one
of the funnier signs tick me offas a I don't want to take off
as the right way. But ifyou're driving on ninety five into Trenton,
New Jersey, there's a sign overa railroad bridge that says something like,
what Trenton makes and the world takes, Like Trenton was the bread basket of

(13:37):
the world, and so everybody inTrenton is the great provider. It's like
we should all go to the peopleof Trenton and thank them for making whatever
it is that you've got right.And I feel like, at least be
the fact that the people of Trentonat that time were proud that they produced
something is a somewhat of a goodthing. In retrospect, you should feel

(13:58):
like you contributed to society. Sure, all you're doing is taking. At
some point you got to ask yourself, why am I even taking air?
I'm giving nothing back, which seemsto be a large swath of the American
population doesn't want to contribute a damnthing. Now, we have definitely used

(14:18):
our government in ways that are hideous, that have played on the humanistic trait
of a laziness, and the Biblewarns against it. A little folding of
the hands, oh yeah, so, and a little was an extra rest

(14:39):
of the eyes, extra rest ofthe eyes. It's human nature, you
know. And unfortunately, and thisgoes how many different examples that we want
to use where the government steps in. You know, is you get more
money from the federal government if yourhusband doesn't. Isn't your husband and you
certainly can't let them know that helives in the residents. I mean,

(15:01):
it's just a wink. Is asgood as in mid to a blind horse.
We don't even have people nobody atDSS or I'll excuse me, any
of the entitlement offices even ask thosequestions anymore. I'm just looking at unemployment
rate by year, and I wouldpoint out that it's still not as low
as what Trump had in twenty nineteen. It's also nowhere near as low as

(15:24):
it was in nineteen sixty nine,not that anybody remembers nineteen sixty nine as
being an awesome year, and it'scertainly not as low as nineteen fifty three
when we were at about two percentunemployment. So they're lying about that.
And I wish you would actually bringin the actual jobs numbers. How many

(15:46):
people are actually participating in the economy, how many people in the typical I
don't forgotten the ages they use inthe work ages of your life, are
actually working. That would be theparticipation rate. But you know, we're
getting all this information from a guykeeps telling you he cut one point seven
trillion out of the national debt.He loves to play word games. I

(16:10):
don't think he's that stupid, andI don't think he's that out of it.
I think he's playing word games.And you know, that's what politicians
do. And so Joe Biden andthe Democrat Party continues to manipulate things as
best they can. The job participationrate for July of twenty twenty three was
sixty two point six percent. Ifwe look back in January and February of

(16:33):
twenty twenty, which is right beforeCOVID, we were still at over sixty
three percent, So we're about afull point short of where we were,
but if you go back, ifyou go back to two thousand six,
two thousand, right around two thousandand seven is where the drop started.
We were at sixty six percent.So we're down to sixty two percent now,
so four percent of the American populationthat is of him. The working

(16:57):
age group said blanket, I canmake more don't want to work, don't
need a job. Well, withJoe Biden trending the way that he's trending,
the threat of Kamala as Nikki Haleycontinues to point out, becoming more
and more of a threat, andthat I perceive it to be the Democrats

(17:18):
now are it seems like their finalstraw and the one they're going to keep
grasping. And they've got a deathgrip on no pun intended is abortion,
and they want to make sure thatabortion drives their voters to the polls.
We have got women who want youcannot stop them from killing babies here in
South Carolina, and I'm sure somevote some guys have vote for this as

(17:42):
well. Here in South Carolina.This effort is being led by five female
State House senators and they renew theirlong shot for a ballot question. Now,
this is two different issues here,So we're gonna try to separate it
as we does not commingle them.They have a ballot question on abortion now
in order to do that, theydon't want the referendum to be abortion.

(18:07):
They want it to be an amendmentto the state constitution that will guarantee abortion
rights by making sure that the SupremeCourt's ruling is nullified, because that becomes
a privacy issue. So it willbe worded in such a way that becomes
an amendment that they need to pushthrough the legislate tours, which any issue

(18:33):
that the legislators find it too hotto handle, like the lottery, they
will end up putting on a referendum. In this case, if you want
to try to change the state constitution, you have to have a supermajority in
order to get that voted in bythe legislaturs. Well, first of all,
there's a couple of thoughts there.One, politicians are weak and they

(18:56):
hide behind referendums. You're kind ofmaking that point. It would be great
if people would just do what theysaid they were going to do, vote
the way you said you would vote. When given an opportunity to represent a
divisive issue, you've probably campaigned onone side of that issue. You didn't

(19:17):
just go down the middle and say, and when given the opportunity, I'll
make sure we have a ballot referendum. Say y'all can get to the ballot
box and vote on you said I'mgonna be pro life or you're gonna be
pro pro death. I call itnot pro choice, pro death. It's
very funny to me that the Democratsimagine themselves as taking the moral high ground

(19:37):
by promoting the slaughter of babies.That's the moral high ground that they take.
Never in history could that have everbeen done. But they're doing it.
They're very clever with it. Ialso just feel like, because you
know that we can replace anybody,these people, the specifically the Republicans,

(20:02):
are putting themselves in great peril here. If you are, if you're waffling
on an abortion's bill, then youare putting yourself in great peril. And
because the Republican Party is overwhelmingly prolife, and when you're given the opportunity
to support life and you say,well, we got to get another update
from the people. You got thatupdate when you got elected. The other

(20:26):
issue of courses, according to theSisters an imbalanced political body should not decide
the fate of South Carolina's women andgirls, wrote, the five females in
a chamber of forty one men.See now this is where they start their
push for we have to elect morewomen. I remember when the Civil Rights

(20:52):
legislation was actually codified by law.If it hadn't been for the overwhelming number
of African Americans irving in the Houseand the Senate, plainly that would have
never passed. Kelly, am Iremembering the history correctly on that. I
think there were a lot of pastywhite guys and a couple of white girls

(21:12):
who voted to make sure that theCivil Rights Amendment was in fact codified.
So I'm not sure what happened.Maybe we've maybe now it's that's a day
gone by. Let me just continuereading. Likewise, judicial elections in ruling
should never be politicized. You wantto read that in front of a mirror

(21:36):
the next time you say it outloud. Instead, we believe these deeply
personal decisions are best left to thosewho are most impacted. The guys aren't
impacted by this. Well, Ithink you'd find out if you go back
to Roe v. Wade, Asthey were. We trust the people of
South Carolina and do not believe ourjudgment is superior to theirs. We sit

(22:00):
you there, ladies. Somebody votedfor you to go there to use your
judgment to represent them. We can'tput everybody in the General Assembly to place
it in that damn big The fourto one decision by the newly all male
High Court prompted the Senate's sister Senators, as they call themselves, to jointly
issue their call to action. Thewomen accused the High Court of selling itself

(22:23):
with an unexplainable or excuse me,soiling itself with an unexplainable, completely contradictory
opinion seven months after the Justice hasrejected the last six week band. I'm
sure that we could line up attorneysto help you understand that paragraph is not
all accurate, nor is it evenprobably deserving to be in this article.

(22:45):
But it is so now we gotto go back. Now, they go
back in the article talking about thereferendument and these two thirds of the House
and the Senate in order to rewritethe state Constitution or making amendment to the
state Constitution. Liberals love to playidentity politics, and Republicans Conservatives are supposed
to be above that. Again,Republicans are supposed to be the smarter of

(23:07):
the two parties. Right. TheDemocrats are about emotions, Republicans are about
logic. So when you say I'mrepresenting the district, you're representing all of
the people, not just your ownpersonal feelings. And like we said,
you ran on certain issues and that'show the district voted that they want to
be represented. Now, if you'rejust going to go by identity politics,

(23:30):
let's take a look at the RichlandCounty Council. The Richland County Council should
be forty seven percent white, becausethat's the district is forty seven percent white,
and it's forty nine percent black.But when I look at the Richland
County Council, there's three whites andthere's the rest are black. So that's

(23:51):
we need to fire some black Countycouncil members. Then how can they represent
us? They can't? Right,Oh, that's racist. So because it
is racist if it's sexist when yousay that a man cannot represent a female
vice versa, if us a afemale can't represent me. Did Nicky Haley
represent South Carolina when she was thegovernor or no, all the males feelings

(24:18):
and thoughts were we were excluded becausewe had a damn female representing us at
the governorship. Of course she representedall of us. But wait, the
insults continue. Oh my gosh,this is why I call them the whineos.
We got plenty of rhinos, Nowthese are the winos. If we
only have more female senators in theSenate, then we wouldn't be looking at

(24:38):
these problems because we wouldn't have tobe fighting this ballot issue. So what
you're saying is is every woman inthe state of South Carolina supports abortion up
to and I'm sure just a fewminutes after un let's say, up to
the first breath. So every womanin the state of South Carolina, according
to your description, would kill achild up to the point in South Carolina

(25:00):
where they took their first breath.Well, not only that, but I
mean, I think you made thepoint earlier. If you don't feel that
way in the words of Joe Biden, and you ain't a woman, that's
what we learned from Joe Biden,and I've a part of this monolithic block
in the thought process and the descriptionsthat we set out as the party,

(25:21):
and in this case, Katrina,which should believe the Republican Party or maybe
this is a nonpartisan issue, sincewe're willing to kill Democrat and Republican babies,
we don't even know which party they'reassociated with. Well, and when
you introduced the word winos, Iinitially thought we were going to be talking
about the Dylan mulvaney's of the world, the women in name only, and
I you know, I'm sure thatthe vast majority of women in name only

(25:42):
would support abortion as well. We'rewhining because we can't get a reference,
we can't get a couple of things. We can't get a referendum to get
the amendments added to the state constitutionthat would allow then abortions to be performed
up to the first breath. We'regonna whine because we know we can't do
just a straight up referendum on abortionbecause that would never pass in South Carolina.

(26:04):
So now we're gonna wind that wedon't have enough females in the Senate
because any female females, I'm surethey carry around knitting needles, not to
knit themselves, but to kill babiesin the uterus. I'm sure that's why
they carry them. I'll ask mymom. I think she's got some knitting
needles. So every woman in thestate of South Carolina wants to kill babies.

(26:26):
There's no other way to read.But they just said, what excuse
me to read? But they justwhined about without coming to the conclusion that
we don't have we don't have.We have. Women in South Carolina need
to be serving, so they'll makesure that we kill babies. Yep,
and well, in any way,in any of the three splinters, we'll

(26:47):
take it out as a win ifwe get only elect more women. So
I don't know, I'm not sureif I even want to see the posters
of the women who are supposed tobe running next time that we'll win over
the hearts and minds of South Carolinia. Are they standing there, like,
what's her name, Kathy? What'sher name? The head? They Alison
Terracio, who is dancing at theabortion clun Oh, that'd be great.

(27:10):
We need and we need to includethe House members. And she's one of
the three white people who represent RichlandCounty exactly. She's doing the abortion dance,
happy dance.