We're going to put down the books now. Its time to review Harry Potter And The Sorcerer's Stone Movie!

What's different? What's the same? What are some behind the scenes moments? Most importantly (or not) what did we think about the movie?

Important notes to keep in mind:

-They emphasize the importance of not overloading on trivia during movie reviews.

-Chris Columbus directed 'Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone' and is known for other classics.

-Robin Williams wanted to play Hagrid but was not cast.

-Daniel Radcliffe was chosen for Harry Potter after a long audition process.

-The movie adaptation left out significant portions of the book.

-The film was a massive box office success, grossing nearly a billion dollars.

-The title 'Sorcerer's Stone' was used in the US for marketing reasons.

-Warwick Davis played multiple roles in the first film, showcasing his versatility. Wawrwick Davis did the voice for the character.

-Harry's eye color was changed due to irritation from contacts.

-J.K. Rowling declined a role in the film.

-Peeves was cut from the movie adaptation.

-The Dursleys' portrayal was spot on in the film.

-Many character backstories were omitted from the movie.-The film rushed through key plot points.

-Hagrid's entrance was a pivotal moment for Harry.

-Diagon Alley was a magical experience for Harry.

-The film adaptation left out significant details from the book. Hermione's character is often seen fixing things for others.

-The Sorting Hat's role in establishing house dynamics is crucial.

-Music, especially John Williams' compositions, enhances the film's atmosphere.

-Quidditch is a significant aspect of the wizarding world, yet its portrayal feels rushed.

-The absence of the Midnight Duel in the film is notable.-The Troll incident raises questions about character decisions and plot development.

-Harry's natural talent in Quidditch is evident but not fully explored in the film.

-Wizard chess serves as a metaphor for strategy and teamwork.Christmas morning scenes differ significantly between the book and film.

-The adaptation choices often leave out important character moments. The invisibility cloak is a crucial plot device.

-Harry's actions often reflect his character growth.

-The film adaptation made significant cuts to the story.

-Character interactions are key to understanding motivations.

-The chess game scene was well-executed in the film.

-The portrayal of Quirrell and Voldemort raises questions.

-The ending lacks the depth of the book's conclusion.-

The Dursleys' mistreatment of Harry is an important theme.

-Future adaptations should stay true to the source material.

-The series improves with each installment.

Squibscorner@gmail.com

Instagram.com/squibscorner

Youtube.com/@squibscorner

For Harry Potter merch unboxings follow: Youtube.com/acciopotterguy

Music provided by Soundstripe.com