Prosecutor Bible Study : Ganged Up : updated Follow the Finger

Send us a text

Washington State Supreme Court committing right rape, King County Prosecutor: Prosecutor Mark Larson, Prosecutor Lisa Johnson, Prosecutor Nicole Weston, Prosecutor Rich Anderson and Prosecutor Jason Simmons. Judge Beth M. Andrus, Judge Lori K. Smith, Prosecutor Leesa Manion, King County Prosecutors Office, City of Enumclaw.

www.consider.info

Episode Transcript

Speaker 1 (00:01):
Enumclaw Detective Grant McCall.
Setup Judge Beth M AndrusWhitewashing.
Hate Crime Prosecutor JasonSimmons and Prosecutors
Enshrining Lies.
Judge Lori K Smith's EmbraceRejection of Rights.
Title Follow the Finger.
Enumclaw Policeman Grant McCalland his co-conspirator created
lying accusations through amulti-level marketed hate crime.

(00:24):
A hate crime prosecutors andJudge Lori K Smith fully used to
create a lawfare against arighteous Christian church.
Reasonable individuals arepainfully aware of the fact that
the court and police systems inthe United States are
thoroughly corrupted.
Corrupt lawfare and hatefulrhetoric are now the norm.
Washington state prosecutorshave a long history of

(00:45):
corruption, which is detailed atConsiderinfo.
Everything discussed issupported by overwhelming
evidence, some of which arelocated at Considerinfo.
Enumclaw Police Detective GrantMcCall and his co-conspirator
framed up a false crime with thefull approval of King County
prosecutors of SeattleWashington.
Framed up a false crime withthe full approval of King County

(01:06):
prosecutors of SeattleWashington.
Combining favoritism towardspolice and the anti-Christian
radicalization of Washingtonstate, it was a perfect storm
for legal abuse.
Enumclaw Detective Grant McCallis a radical Baptist Believing
that only one version of theBible is God's word, namely the
1611 version of the King JamesBible, with its outdated these

(01:27):
and thous, combined with aself-righteousness that is
pathological, with the abuse ofpolice powers, this matter comes
easily into focus.
To quickly grasp the situation,consider a policeman with a
co-conspirator who plants drugsin order to frame an individual.
The two of them despise.
Co-conspirator who plants drugsin order to frame an individual

(01:47):
the two of them despise.
This is the same concept,except on a grander scale.
The co-conspirator had beengrooming a false accuser for
quite some time.
The co-conspirator, in her ownwords, is well known for being a
liar, a bully and a manipulator.
Many have suffered greatlyunder the sociopathic behaviors
of this individual.
It came as no shock to anyonethat she and Enumclaw Detective

(02:08):
Grant McCall had groomed theindividual to make lying
accusations.
This brings us now to the lawlynching courtroom in Washington
State by Judge Lori K Smith andJudge Beth M Andrus.
The setting is Seattle,washington State, king County
Court and the City of Enumclaw.
In the case of King CountySuperior Court State of

(02:28):
Washington, plaintiff v MalcolmFrazier, defendant Case no
12-1-0186-0, k&t.
It is essential to clarify thatthe true plaintiff in the King
County Superior Court State ofWashington was against Sound
Doctrine, church of Enumclaw orTimothy Williams.
Washington state prosecutorsengaged in abusive legal tactics

(02:52):
to pursue an impossible crimeaimed at eliminating Timothy
Williams or Sound DoctrineChurch from Enumclaw, because of
Washington state'swell-understood opposition to
Christians.
The defendant, malcolm Frazier,was the pawn used by King
County prosecutors and Enumclawpolice to proxy prosecute
Timothy Williams.
The co-conspirator and radicalBaptist policeman, grant McCall,

(03:15):
incited a hate crime by tappinginto decades of opposition from
others who had long resistedthe preaching of Timothy
Williams.
Combining the anti-Christianhostility of Washington State
officials, a flammable mixtureof hatred and prosecutor
corruption exploded.
Those who for decades had honedlies will pay a heavy price of
judgment by God for putting aninnocent man in prison.

(03:37):
This is why God commands in theBible do not go about spreading
slander among your people.
Do not do anything thatendangers your neighbor's life.
I am the Lord Leviticus 19.16.
Overwhelming evidence,including videos of the trial
and clarity of events, can befound at wwwconsiderinfo.

(03:57):
It is worth reading again thetranscript of Dr Ewell's expert
examination of the setup byDetective Grant McCall, the
setup that King Countyprosecutors and judges protected
and embraced.
Dr Ewell's credentials areimpeccable and he was one of the
founding members whoestablished the codes by which
an accuser was to be questionedby King County, codes that

(04:18):
Prosecutor Jason Simmons, judgeLori K Smith and Detective Grant
McCall ignored.
Partial transcript of Dr Ewell.
Every allegation comes from thedetective.
Well, my overall comment wasthat this is an absolute
terrible interview.
Did Detective McCall ever givean opportunity for a narrative
response?
No.
Does this interview adhere tothe basic tenets of the

(04:41):
Washington state guidelines?
No, I mean, this entireinterview is not acceptable.
Every single act alleged act issuggested first by the officer.
Every act, yes, every act, okay.
So the act I just.
He talks about touching thechest and touching the crotch

(05:01):
first.
He talks about him touching orexcuse me, the complainant,
touching the accused first.
Okay, let me slow you downthere.
He talks about anal penetrationfirst.
You said that he.
I would ask the counsel givethe witness an opportunity to
finish his answer before he asksanother question.
And every allegation comes fromthe detective.

(05:23):
He's the one who suggests allof the things that happen and
she either agrees or disagreeswith him.
But she's not.
She isn't Right from the get-go.
He tells her why she's thereand what the allegations are.
She says you've been molested,that it happened with somebody
living in your house.
It happened at a certain timeago.
He shouldn't say that.

(05:44):
This is how, if you wanted todo an interview to make
suggestions to a complainant.
This is how to do it.
End transcript.
Detective Grant McCall'sscripting of accusations.
The co-conspirator had alreadyprimed the manipulated accuser
and this is why EnumclawDetective Grant McCall knew what
the answers should be.
Court records prove that theaccuser initially insisted no

(06:07):
penetration had taken place.
See graphic at considerinfo.
When Enumclaw Detective GrantMcCall questioned her about
whether the defendant's fingerhad entered her vagina, she
repeatedly denied any form ofpenetration.
Her statement was unequivocalNever like penetrated me or

(06:30):
anything.
To escalate the charges to afelony, detective McCall needed
an allegation of penetration.
When he couldn't establishvaginal penetration, he shifted
his focus to anal penetration,introducing the idea himself.
He asked what about your anus?
The accuser hesitated,stumbling over her words.
Sensing this, detective McCallimmediately called for a break,

(06:52):
shutting off the recorder at acrucial moment.
This interruption convenientlyprovided an opportunity to
reshape the narrative Alone withher.
During this break.
He coached her, shaping heraccount to align with his
desired allegations.
When the session resumed, hertestimony had changed, aligning
perfectly with the detective'snarrative.
When the recorder was switchedback on, mccall simply said Okay

(07:15):
.
Immediately after the accuserbegan narrating a fabricated
account of the events, nowclaiming yeah, he did.
But it only happened for a fewminutes because I screamed
really loud.
This sudden shift in testimony,influenced by strategic
coaching, which the court choseto enhance, raises profound
questions of criminal activityby Washington state.

(07:39):
A direct transcript reveals howthis false narrative was
constructed.
Here is a portion of themanipulation and the key turning
point in the co-conspirator andGrant McCall's setup.
Detective Grant McCall, andyou're sure that his fingers
didn't penetrate your vagina?
Accuser.
Yes, detective Grant McCall,what about your anus?

(08:00):
It's okay if you want to take alittle break.
Accuser Unintelligible Break.
Detective Grant McCall Okay,manipulated accuser?
Yeah, he did, but it onlyhappened for a few minutes
because I screamed really loud.
End transcript.
There are so many examples ofcomplete corruption in this case

(08:23):
that we do not have time todiscuss them at the moment.
The larger agenda ProsecutorJason Simmons and the gang of
five jobs should have been thereto protect Sound Doctrine
Church or Timothy Williams fromsuch a hate crime.
Instead, for selfish andideological reasons, police,
prosecutors and judges used thehate crimes lying accusations to

(08:44):
prosecute a crime that wasimpossible to commit yes,
impossible to commit.
This is why Enumclaw DetectiveGrant McCall would not examine
the house where the allegedcrime took place.
You might correctly ask whyprosecutors, police and judges
refused, blocked and playedstone deaf toward every call for
an investigation.

(09:05):
Indeed again, enumclawDetective Grant McCall did not
examine the house where thealleged actions were to have
occurred, because it would havestopped the hate crime dead in
its tracks.
The reason for this is that itwould have proven the crime to
be literally impossible andexposed the setup that was in
progress at the time.
This case was not about anindividual defendant.

(09:26):
It was a proxy attack on theSound Doctrine Church and its
leadership, particularly TimothyWilliams.
Detective Grant McCall and hisco-conspirators sought to
dismantle the church throughlegal means, and the prosecution
was complicit in this effort.
The fabricated allegations werepart of a broader campaign with
a predetermined goal to destroythe church and its influence

(09:47):
Again.
See the website for proof.
Prosecutor Dan Satterberg'sdecision to assign five
prosecutors to a single casehighlights an unprecedented
level of bias.
Under his direction, theseprosecutors devoted significant
resources to targeting thechurch, not in pursuit of
justice, but to dismantle itsoperations.
The consequences weredevastating the destruction of a

(10:10):
business, church and bookstore,ultimately forcing the church
out of town.
Prosecutors Dan Satterberg andLisa Mannion clearly support
this unethical campaign,demonstrating a deliberate
intent to dismantle the churchrather than uphold the law,
perverts of jurisprudence.
We know that the law is good ifone uses it properly.

(10:31):
We also know that the law ismade not for the righteous, but
for lawbreakers and perverts,for liars and perjurers and for
whatever else is contrary to thesound doctrine.
1 Timothy 1.8-10.
Judge Beth M Andrus' favoritismtowards prosecutor Rich Anderson
came with a wink.
After reprimanding him for hisinappropriate, prejudicial and

(10:52):
offensive remarks, hewhitewashed the criminal actions
of the city of Enumclawdetective Grant McCall, which
contributed to a narrative aimedat undermining the church and
its operations within Enum Claw.
Eventually, it destroyed abusiness, church and bookstore,
while driving the church out oftown.
Though Ms Andrus was a pastor'sdaughter, she systematically

(11:12):
proved that she is not aChristian believer.
Judge Lori K Smith collaboratedwith King County prosecutors to
obstruct the defendant's rightto mount a defense.
She transformed the criminalcourt proceedings into a chaotic
family court environment thatenabled deceitful accusations to
make a mockery of justice.
Judge Lori K Smith, so bribedby being named Woman of the Year

(11:34):
, perverted justice to ensure aguilty verdict against a man.
Judge Lori K Smith andprosecutorcutor Jason Simmons
literally voided the Washingtonstate constitution's freedom of
religion, along with theconstitution of the United
States, right of association,religion and bill of rights
Prosecutor Dan Satterbergspecifically allocated five

(11:54):
prosecutors to target the church.
Prosecutor Lisa Mannionreceived backing from Satterberg
and takes sinful pride in beingthe first Korean woman to hold
a position in the prosecutor'soffice.
Ms Mannion actively supportsthe corrupt practices
established by Satterberg to theextent of rehiring Prosecutor
Rich Anderson.
Detective Grant McCall of thecity of Inumclaw was involved in

(12:16):
orchestrating a false hatecrime.
He deleted evidence and craftedaccusations while refusing to
investigate the claims.
Aware that examining the factswould reveal the deceit, king
County prosecutors obstructedand suppressed any attempts to
initiate an investigation.
The prosecutorial team includedProsecutor Mark Lawson,

(12:36):
prosecutor Lisa Johnson,prosecutor Nicole Weston,
prosecutor Rich Anderson andProsecutor Jason Simmons.
This deliberate reinforcementof the lie was not an oversight
but a calculated legal maneuver.
Multiple prosecutors, includingMark Larson, lisa Johnson,
nicole Weston and Rich Anderson,maintained direct and

(12:57):
continuous contact with theaccuser's family and extended
family, ensuring that the lyingnarrative remained reinforced
and unchallenged.
This was a concerted effort tocreate and sustain a falsehood
that would secure a convictionand destroy a church that
Washington stayed opposed.
Never would prosecutors, policeor judges use accusations

(13:18):
against a woman or gayindividual to attack a church or
association.
Ever heard of a public schooland its related clubs being
poxy-prosecuted.
Consider the fact that when apolice person is accused of a
crime, you never hear ofprosecutors and judges
poxy-prosecuting the policechief and fellow officers, while
asserting they do not associatewith others outside the police

(13:40):
cult.
If you are facing accusationsof a sexual offense in King
County, be aware that thejudicial system has demonstrated
a pattern of manipulatingtestimonies, implanting false
memories and enabling corruptpolice practices.
The reach of this corruptionextends far beyond the courtroom
.
Prosecutor Dan Satterberg, alongwith Prosecutor Lisa Mannion,

(14:02):
have compromised multiple facetsof the legal system, from
medical institutions such asHarborview Medical Center to
social services, kids' court andvarious non-profit
organizations.
These entities work in tandemto fabricate charges that will
lead to a guilty verdict,regardless of the evidence.
Their actions reflect a strong,if not aggressive, disregard

(14:25):
for factual integrity and therule of law, in order to further
their self-worth and agendas.
Indeed, the Washington StateSupreme Court, when presented
with the evidence and facts,responded that they would not
even consider it, that theywould not quote, even look at it
.
Keep in mind that this SupremeCourt has demonstrated bias

(14:47):
against Christians, as evidencedby their actions against a
Christian grandmother for herrefusal to arrange flowers for a
same-sex wedding.
Additionally, the policemisconduct occurred during the
peak of the Me Too movement,which is worth mentioning as it
parallels the circumstancesleading to the events involving
the manipulated accuser who hadbeen groomed to accuse.

(15:07):
The current Washington StateSupreme Court enshrining right
rape and complete policecorruptions are Justice Deborah
L Stevens, justice Charles WJohnson, justice Barbara Madsen,
justice Barbara A Madsen,justice Stephen C Gonzalez,
justice Cheryl Gordon-McLeod,justice Mary I Yu, justice

(15:32):
Raquel Montoya-Lewis, justice GHelen Wittner, justice Salvador
A Mungia.
Note not a single individual,group or official either
involved in or assisting withthe case objected when Detective
Grant McCall sat alone anddeleted evidence.
Nor did anyone raise concernwhen Judge Lori K Smith outright

(15:54):
stated that the WashingtonState Constitution's protections
of religious freedom did notapply.
These are just a couple ofexamples among many documented
violations of truth.
Thank you, and madnesswwwconsiderinfo.

Speaker 2 (16:31):
Every allegation comes from the detective.
Well, my overall comment wasthat this is an absolutely
terrible interview.
Did Detective McCall ever givean opportunity for a narrative
response?

(16:51):
No.
Does this interview adhere tothe basic tenets of the
Washington state guidelines?
No, I mean, this entireinterview is not acceptable.
Every single act, alleged act,is suggested first by the
officer and every act yes every.

(17:15):
So that's that just talks abouttouching the chest and touching
the crotch first.
He talks about him touching or,excuse me, the complainant
touching the accused first okay,let me say that ration.
First, you said you said that he.
I would ask that the councilgive the witness an opportunity
to finish his answer before heasks another question.

(17:37):
Every allegation comes from thedetective.
He's the one who suggests allof the things that happen and
she there agrees or disagreeswith them.
But she isn't Right from theget-go.

(17:57):
He tells her why she's thereand what the allegations are.
She says you've been molested,that it happened with somebody
living in your house.
It happened at a certain timeago.
He can say that this is how.
If you wanted to do aninterview to make suggestions to
a complainant, this is how todo it.