November 27, 2025 • 15 mins
Send your questions for Nationals Leader David Littleproud to hello@thedailyaus.com.au
Late yesterday, former Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce announced he's leaving his current political party, The Nationals. It comes after months of speculation about the move, and could have major implications for the strength of the current Coalition opposition, and the longer-term electoral success of the Nationals in key regional parts of the country. On today’s podcast, we'll break down who Barnaby Joyce is, why he's done this, and what it could mean for the balance of power in Canberra.
Listen: Why Pauline Hanson wore a burqa (again)
Hosts: Sam Koslowski and Billi FitzSimons
Producer: Orla Maher
Want to support The Daily Aus? That's so kind! The best way to do that is to click ‘follow’ on Spotify or Apple and to leave us a five-star review. We would be so grateful.
The Daily Aus is a media company focused on delivering accessible and digestible news to young people. We are completely independent.
Want more from TDA?
Subscribe to The Daily Aus newsletter
Subscribe to The Daily Aus’ YouTube Channel
Have feedback for us?
We’re always looking for new ways to improve what we do. If you’ve got feedback, we’re all ears. Tell us here.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Mark as Played
Transcript
Episode Transcript
Available transcripts are automatically generated. Complete accuracy is not guaranteed.
Speaker 1 (00:00):
Already and this is this is the Daily This is
the Daily OS. Oh, now it makes sense.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Good morning and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Friday,
the twenty eighth of November. I'm Sam Kazlowski.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
I'm Billy fitz Simon's.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
Late yesterday, former Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce stood up
in the House of Representatives and announced he is leaving
his current political party, the Nationals, after thirty years of membership.
It comes after months of speculation about a move and
could have major implications for the strength of the current
coalition opposition and the longer term success of the Nationals
(00:44):
in some really key regional parts of Australia. On today's podcast,
we're going to break down who Barnaby Joyce is, why
he's made this announcement, and what it could all mean
for the balance of power in Canberra on the last
sitting day of the year.
Speaker 1 (01:02):
Sam Barnaby Joyce, I think is a very recognizable name
in Australian politics. He has been around politics for a
very long time. But for anyone who isn't familiar with him,
what do we need to know about him?
Speaker 2 (01:15):
So Barnaby Joyce has been the MP for New England,
which is a seat in the lower House in northern
New South Wales since twenty thirteen. Before that, he was
a Senator for Queensland, and in twenty sixteen he became
the leader of the National Party and he also became
Deputy Prime Minister under Malcolm Turnbull. So he had that
(01:35):
job until twenty eighteen when he stepped down after a
personal relationship with his former staffer became public.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
If anyone's heard of the Bonk Ban, I'm saying that
in quotation marks in Canberra. It came about in twenty
eighteen after this relationship that he had with his former
staffer came to light, and it is a band that
still stands that politicians cannot have intimate relationships with their staffers.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
Yeah, and I think from that point in twenty eighteen
he really has taken kind of a back seat and
quite literally been on the back bench of his party,
partly because of all of the personal dramas that have
surrounded his political career. So he hasn't really had a
senior role in any of the kind of key portfolios
over the last couple of years, but nonetheless is a
(02:24):
very influential figure of Australian politics and particularly of conservative
politics in this country.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
And so throughout his whole time in politics up until now,
he has been part of the National Party. If anyone's
just getting across the National Party, give us some very
quick context. What actually is the National Party.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
So they're the party that represents the interests of rural
and regional Australians. Federally, they have this formal alliance with
the Liberal Party and together they're called the Coalition. There's
actually three parties in the coalition because there's the Liberal
National Party of Queensland. But at a top line, the
coalition is the Liberals and the Nationals. So when the
Coalition wins government like they did under you know, Malcolm
(03:08):
Turbule or Scott Morrison, the Nationals leader usually becomes the
Deputy prime Minister as part of that coalition agreement. And
so right now the Nationals are led by David little Proud,
who you're sitting down with next week, and Joyce leaving
Little Proud's party is a really big deal because he
isn't just a backbencher, he is a former leader. He's
(03:29):
a former Deputy Prime minister. So it's a big loss
to the party. Identity, but it does also strengthen the
numbers and political pool of whatever party he chooses to join.
And all signs indicate that he is set to join
One Nation, which is kind of a competitor in that
rural and regional interests category to the Nationals.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
He doesn't definitely need to join another party, though he
could sit as an independent.
Speaker 2 (03:55):
Definitely he can remain as an independent. And you know,
so he got up yesterday and he made a short
statement announcing he would be leaving the Nationals. He didn't
go as far as confirming he would join One Nation
in that speech, which we were all expecting. To be honest,
there was so much speculation. There was a photo released
earlier this week of him and the leader of One Nation,
(04:16):
Pauline Hanson, having dinner together. We'll get to the menu
of that dinner in a minute. But then he walked
out of the chamber and within thirty seconds was at
a press conference that he held in the gardens outside,
and he expanded on why he was leaving. Still no
official confirmation that he would be joining One Nation. We're
expecting that announcement soon. And at the core of why
(04:38):
he was leaving, I think was twofold. From one perspective,
I think it was the fact that he has been
kind of relegated to the backbench. He said he hasn't
had any kind of speaking opportunities in Parliament in the
last eighteen months. He's clearly feeling a bit neglected by
his party. But also he talked a lot about the
failures that he perceives from his party in representing the
(05:00):
regional Australians and he said that the Coalition as a
whole is spending too much time focusing on how to
win back Teal seats, so seats currently held by Independence
that are part of the Teal kind of movement or umbrella,
mainly metropolitan city seats, and they need to refocus on
the heartland. And he gave an example of Tamworth, a
(05:21):
town in central New South Wales, and said that there
are more card holding members of One Nation in Tamworth
than there were Nationals and that was traditionally a very
dominant location for the Nationals Party.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
One thing that also stood out to me from that
press conference he held was he seemed to mention quite
a few times that he doesn't seem to have a
good relationship with the leader of the Nationals. Who is
David Little Proud. Yeah, And he pretty much just said
they don't have a good relationship and so therefore they
can't work together.
Speaker 2 (05:52):
He is known to use metaphors about romantic relationships and
the way he talks about politics. I remember there were
a number of press conferences when he he was the
Deputy Prime Minister where he would talk about it the
coalition is like a romantic relationship, and that metaphor came
up a lot yesterday in the way that he was
talking about the Nationals and David Little Proud and said
that any breakup is hard and all of that kind
(06:13):
of language. So he's clearly somebody who felt very passionately
for the party that he spent thirty years as a
serving member of and that all ended yesterday.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
One thing I want to talk about is when I
think about the Australian political landscape, I always think of
it as being quite different to the US in the
sense that, in my mind, we're not voting for people,
we are voting for parties. So when it comes to
the Leader of Australia, the leader is who leads the
party that Australia has elected in the House of representatives.
(06:45):
And that's different to in the US, where you are
directly voting for a.
Speaker 2 (06:48):
Person there's a name on the ticket.
Speaker 1 (06:50):
Yes, And so what's interesting here is when a politician
says I am leaving my party and going to another party.
In my head, I think, can you just do that?
Because aren't we more focused on voting for parties as
opposed to people?
Speaker 2 (07:03):
Does that make sense totally?
Speaker 1 (07:05):
But then with this, what I have found out from
the research that the Daily Oss has done is that
that's actually not quite the case, because what Barnaby Joyce
did yesterday is well within the rules.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
There's no rules at all that stops a politician from
changing parties or sitting as an independent once they are
in Parliament. So under the constitution, MPs are serving as individuals.
So they're elected to represent an electorate, but they're serving
still as the person. And this is not you know,
this is not without precedent. Fatima Payman, she left the
(07:37):
Labor Party last year. She remains in the Senate as
an independent. One interesting quirk with Barnaby Joyce's announcement when
he was asked about this, you know, what do you
say to the people of New England who voted for
you as a National's member, and now you're not a
member there anymore. He did make the point that he
has already announced that he's not contesting that seat at
(07:58):
the next federal election, so the Nationals we're going to
have to pick somebody new anyway. There is a rumor though,
that he is going to contest a Senate seat, so
he wants to go back into the Senate and represent
New South Wales this time in the Senate, and we
don't know yet in what capacity he'll be doing that.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
All right, we're going to take a quick break to
hear a message from today's sponsor. Can you just explain
You just mentioned that Joyce will not be recontesting his
seat of New England, but to be clear, he will
remain in that seat until the next election.
Speaker 2 (08:37):
Yeah, exactly. So he still has two and a half
years of the parliamentary term to serve as the Member
of New England. That is his as long as he
wants it and as long as he doesn't quit his
job entirely. But he can do that in either the
capacity of being a member of another party, probably one nation,
or as an independent one hundred percent safe.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
Okay, So let's talk about One Nation is rumored to
be joining One Nation. At the time of recording, he
has not announced that. We've actually already spoken about One
Nation on the podcast. It's a great episode because it's leader,
Pauline Hanson wore a burker in the Senate this week.
But for anyone who missed that episode, do you want
to just give us a quick overview of One Nation
(09:19):
and why Barnaby Joyce might be interested in joining that party?
Speaker 2 (09:23):
So I think we'll link to the episode so you
can have a proper listen about the history of the party.
But all you need to know really is that it
was founded by Pauline Hanson back in nineteen ninety seven
and the party, similarly to the National says that it
represents everyday Australians who feels like the major parties has
left them behind. They are very popular. The main popularity
(09:44):
they see is in the rural and regional areas and
they're campaigning pretty heavily on things like immigration, economic nationalism
and what they call a pushback against wokeness or political correctness.
I wanted to talk quickly about the polls because I
think Barnaby Joyce's potential move to one nation has significance
when you look at the direction of popularity of these
(10:05):
two parties. So one nation has its highest primary vote
in the poll. So polsters will ask who would you
vote for if the election was today. They've got a
record high primary vote of fourteen percent, which is its
highest result in the poll since the late nineties.
Speaker 1 (10:22):
What does primary vote mean there?
Speaker 2 (10:24):
So who would you vote for in the first position
on your on your numbering one to six leaving no
box unchecked? Kind of vibe at the poll, and so
you only get to pick one because it's the which
party would you put as number one? And fourteen percent
of the population says one nation. The Greens in Independence
are on twelve point five and thirteen point five percent.
To put that in perspective, so you know one nation
(10:46):
is based on the polls, they are more popular than
the Greens, and they are more popular than Independence. There
is still some room between them and the coalition though.
The coalition's latest numbers are twenty seven percent, but that
number has slipped a lot in the last twelve months.
So you've got one party in the coalition that's kind
of trending down. You've got one nation that's trending up,
(11:07):
and that's a very interesting change of dynamics and almost
a wave that Barnaby Joyce will likely ride.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
I want to talk about that decline in popularity for
the Coalition because I think one thing that is interesting is,
like you said, one nation is on the rise and
the Coalition is on the decline. There is a big
gap between them, but it's an interesting trend to look at. Hypothetically,
if one nation was to overtake the Coalition in popularity,
(11:33):
not just in polls, but at an actual election, could
they become the new opposition?
Speaker 2 (11:39):
Well, they could if they formed a new coalition essentially,
because remember there's one hundred and fifty seats in the
House of Representatives. You need seventy six of them to govern.
And so if Barnaby Joyce joins one Nation in the
House of Reps, that's their only member right now, so
they would need to find seventy five other members to join.
Speaker 1 (12:00):
So to be clear, one nation currently has no politicians
in the House of Representatives. All of their members who
are elected, all of their elected members are in the Senate.
Speaker 2 (12:10):
Exactly, so they have a lot of grounds to have
a have a long way to go, but what it
does mean is it could destabilize the current coalition makeup
and then once you have kind of a bunch of
minor parties. We see this in other countries around the
world where there's maybe a group of four or five
minor parties. Let's say that they all of the seventy six,
(12:32):
they can all contribute between ten and fifteen. You then
could see a world where a party with ten members
could actually be the leader of a broader coalition. And
that's where you see some of the parties that have
traditionally fringe interests of minor interests suddenly become in positions
of power. So it's definitely not within the next five years,
(12:53):
but it's definitely not a totally hypothetical notion.
Speaker 1 (12:57):
And just before we go, how has the National Party
responded to this news from Barnaby Joyce.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
Well, understandably they're not happy. So just before Barnaby Joyce's announcement,
the Senate Leader of the Nationals, Bridget Mackenzie, she said
the move by Joyce would quote trash his legacy, saying
Joyce had a choice between being part of a party
of government to get things done, being the Nationals, or
join a protest party where you won't be able to
(13:24):
do that type of thing being one nation. So some
strong words there. It's clear that the relationship is totally
broken down as per him leaving, so not surprised that
that was the response. But for the Nationals, politically, they
lose a vote and they lose a number, and that
makes a big difference in the world of politics.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
I also reached out to the team of National's leader
David Little Proud to see if they had anything to say,
and they said, we're not commenting on it, which is
super interesting. I mean, like we said at the start,
this is a very high profile member of the Nationals
and for the leader to not even comment on the
fact that he's departing is quite significant.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
It's almost like you might put that to him. Next
week is when he's sitting in the chair that I'm
in right now.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
And that is a very good place to leave this conversation.
But I do want to say, like Sam said, I
will be interviewing David Little Proud, who is, as we
have said many times, he's the leader of the National Party.
I'll be interviewing him next week. If you do have
any question suggestions that you would like me to put
to him. You can email us at Helloatthdalios dot com
(14:30):
dot au. I'll be having a look at any question
suggestions that are sent there. I think it will be
a particularly interesting time now to be talking to him.
That is all we have time for today, Sam, thank
you for taking us through that. Thanks Billy, and thank
you so much for listening to this episode of the
Daily Ods. We'll be back this afternoon with your evening headlines,
but until then, have a great day.
Speaker 2 (14:56):
My name is Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Aarunda
Bunjelung good in woman from Gadigol Country.
Speaker 1 (15:02):
The Daily oz acknowledges that this podcast is recorded on
the lands of the Gadigol people and pays respect to
all Aboriginal and Torrestrate island and nations. We pay our
respects to the first peoples of these countries, both past
and present.
Already and this is this is the Daily This is
the Daily OS. Oh, now it makes sense.
Speaker 2 (00:14):
Good morning and welcome to the Daily OS. It's Friday,
the twenty eighth of November. I'm Sam Kazlowski.
Speaker 1 (00:19):
I'm Billy fitz Simon's.
Speaker 2 (00:21):
Late yesterday, former Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce stood up
in the House of Representatives and announced he is leaving
his current political party, the Nationals, after thirty years of membership.
It comes after months of speculation about a move and
could have major implications for the strength of the current
coalition opposition and the longer term success of the Nationals
(00:44):
in some really key regional parts of Australia. On today's podcast,
we're going to break down who Barnaby Joyce is, why
he's made this announcement, and what it could all mean
for the balance of power in Canberra on the last
sitting day of the year.
Speaker 1 (01:02):
Sam Barnaby Joyce, I think is a very recognizable name
in Australian politics. He has been around politics for a
very long time. But for anyone who isn't familiar with him,
what do we need to know about him?
Speaker 2 (01:15):
So Barnaby Joyce has been the MP for New England,
which is a seat in the lower House in northern
New South Wales since twenty thirteen. Before that, he was
a Senator for Queensland, and in twenty sixteen he became
the leader of the National Party and he also became
Deputy Prime Minister under Malcolm Turnbull. So he had that
(01:35):
job until twenty eighteen when he stepped down after a
personal relationship with his former staffer became public.
Speaker 1 (01:43):
If anyone's heard of the Bonk Ban, I'm saying that
in quotation marks in Canberra. It came about in twenty
eighteen after this relationship that he had with his former
staffer came to light, and it is a band that
still stands that politicians cannot have intimate relationships with their staffers.
Speaker 2 (02:02):
Yeah, and I think from that point in twenty eighteen
he really has taken kind of a back seat and
quite literally been on the back bench of his party,
partly because of all of the personal dramas that have
surrounded his political career. So he hasn't really had a
senior role in any of the kind of key portfolios
over the last couple of years, but nonetheless is a
(02:24):
very influential figure of Australian politics and particularly of conservative
politics in this country.
Speaker 1 (02:30):
And so throughout his whole time in politics up until now,
he has been part of the National Party. If anyone's
just getting across the National Party, give us some very
quick context. What actually is the National Party.
Speaker 2 (02:44):
So they're the party that represents the interests of rural
and regional Australians. Federally, they have this formal alliance with
the Liberal Party and together they're called the Coalition. There's
actually three parties in the coalition because there's the Liberal
National Party of Queensland. But at a top line, the
coalition is the Liberals and the Nationals. So when the
Coalition wins government like they did under you know, Malcolm
(03:08):
Turbule or Scott Morrison, the Nationals leader usually becomes the
Deputy prime Minister as part of that coalition agreement. And
so right now the Nationals are led by David little Proud,
who you're sitting down with next week, and Joyce leaving
Little Proud's party is a really big deal because he
isn't just a backbencher, he is a former leader. He's
(03:29):
a former Deputy Prime minister. So it's a big loss
to the party. Identity, but it does also strengthen the
numbers and political pool of whatever party he chooses to join.
And all signs indicate that he is set to join
One Nation, which is kind of a competitor in that
rural and regional interests category to the Nationals.
Speaker 1 (03:50):
He doesn't definitely need to join another party, though he
could sit as an independent.
Speaker 2 (03:55):
Definitely he can remain as an independent. And you know,
so he got up yesterday and he made a short
statement announcing he would be leaving the Nationals. He didn't
go as far as confirming he would join One Nation
in that speech, which we were all expecting. To be honest,
there was so much speculation. There was a photo released
earlier this week of him and the leader of One Nation,
(04:16):
Pauline Hanson, having dinner together. We'll get to the menu
of that dinner in a minute. But then he walked
out of the chamber and within thirty seconds was at
a press conference that he held in the gardens outside,
and he expanded on why he was leaving. Still no
official confirmation that he would be joining One Nation. We're
expecting that announcement soon. And at the core of why
(04:38):
he was leaving, I think was twofold. From one perspective,
I think it was the fact that he has been
kind of relegated to the backbench. He said he hasn't
had any kind of speaking opportunities in Parliament in the
last eighteen months. He's clearly feeling a bit neglected by
his party. But also he talked a lot about the
failures that he perceives from his party in representing the
(05:00):
regional Australians and he said that the Coalition as a
whole is spending too much time focusing on how to
win back Teal seats, so seats currently held by Independence
that are part of the Teal kind of movement or umbrella,
mainly metropolitan city seats, and they need to refocus on
the heartland. And he gave an example of Tamworth, a
(05:21):
town in central New South Wales, and said that there
are more card holding members of One Nation in Tamworth
than there were Nationals and that was traditionally a very
dominant location for the Nationals Party.
Speaker 1 (05:34):
One thing that also stood out to me from that
press conference he held was he seemed to mention quite
a few times that he doesn't seem to have a
good relationship with the leader of the Nationals. Who is
David Little Proud. Yeah, And he pretty much just said
they don't have a good relationship and so therefore they
can't work together.
Speaker 2 (05:52):
He is known to use metaphors about romantic relationships and
the way he talks about politics. I remember there were
a number of press conferences when he he was the
Deputy Prime Minister where he would talk about it the
coalition is like a romantic relationship, and that metaphor came
up a lot yesterday in the way that he was
talking about the Nationals and David Little Proud and said
that any breakup is hard and all of that kind
(06:13):
of language. So he's clearly somebody who felt very passionately
for the party that he spent thirty years as a
serving member of and that all ended yesterday.
Speaker 1 (06:22):
One thing I want to talk about is when I
think about the Australian political landscape, I always think of
it as being quite different to the US in the
sense that, in my mind, we're not voting for people,
we are voting for parties. So when it comes to
the Leader of Australia, the leader is who leads the
party that Australia has elected in the House of representatives.
(06:45):
And that's different to in the US, where you are
directly voting for a.
Speaker 2 (06:48):
Person there's a name on the ticket.
Speaker 1 (06:50):
Yes, And so what's interesting here is when a politician
says I am leaving my party and going to another party.
In my head, I think, can you just do that?
Because aren't we more focused on voting for parties as
opposed to people?
Speaker 2 (07:03):
Does that make sense totally?
Speaker 1 (07:05):
But then with this, what I have found out from
the research that the Daily Oss has done is that
that's actually not quite the case, because what Barnaby Joyce
did yesterday is well within the rules.
Speaker 2 (07:17):
There's no rules at all that stops a politician from
changing parties or sitting as an independent once they are
in Parliament. So under the constitution, MPs are serving as individuals.
So they're elected to represent an electorate, but they're serving
still as the person. And this is not you know,
this is not without precedent. Fatima Payman, she left the
(07:37):
Labor Party last year. She remains in the Senate as
an independent. One interesting quirk with Barnaby Joyce's announcement when
he was asked about this, you know, what do you
say to the people of New England who voted for
you as a National's member, and now you're not a
member there anymore. He did make the point that he
has already announced that he's not contesting that seat at
(07:58):
the next federal election, so the Nationals we're going to
have to pick somebody new anyway. There is a rumor though,
that he is going to contest a Senate seat, so
he wants to go back into the Senate and represent
New South Wales this time in the Senate, and we
don't know yet in what capacity he'll be doing that.
Speaker 1 (08:17):
All right, we're going to take a quick break to
hear a message from today's sponsor. Can you just explain
You just mentioned that Joyce will not be recontesting his
seat of New England, but to be clear, he will
remain in that seat until the next election.
Speaker 2 (08:37):
Yeah, exactly. So he still has two and a half
years of the parliamentary term to serve as the Member
of New England. That is his as long as he
wants it and as long as he doesn't quit his
job entirely. But he can do that in either the
capacity of being a member of another party, probably one nation,
or as an independent one hundred percent safe.
Speaker 1 (08:57):
Okay, So let's talk about One Nation is rumored to
be joining One Nation. At the time of recording, he
has not announced that. We've actually already spoken about One
Nation on the podcast. It's a great episode because it's leader,
Pauline Hanson wore a burker in the Senate this week.
But for anyone who missed that episode, do you want
to just give us a quick overview of One Nation
(09:19):
and why Barnaby Joyce might be interested in joining that party?
Speaker 2 (09:23):
So I think we'll link to the episode so you
can have a proper listen about the history of the party.
But all you need to know really is that it
was founded by Pauline Hanson back in nineteen ninety seven
and the party, similarly to the National says that it
represents everyday Australians who feels like the major parties has
left them behind. They are very popular. The main popularity
(09:44):
they see is in the rural and regional areas and
they're campaigning pretty heavily on things like immigration, economic nationalism
and what they call a pushback against wokeness or political correctness.
I wanted to talk quickly about the polls because I
think Barnaby Joyce's potential move to one nation has significance
when you look at the direction of popularity of these
(10:05):
two parties. So one nation has its highest primary vote
in the poll. So polsters will ask who would you
vote for if the election was today. They've got a
record high primary vote of fourteen percent, which is its
highest result in the poll since the late nineties.
Speaker 1 (10:22):
What does primary vote mean there?
Speaker 2 (10:24):
So who would you vote for in the first position
on your on your numbering one to six leaving no
box unchecked? Kind of vibe at the poll, and so
you only get to pick one because it's the which
party would you put as number one? And fourteen percent
of the population says one nation. The Greens in Independence
are on twelve point five and thirteen point five percent.
To put that in perspective, so you know one nation
(10:46):
is based on the polls, they are more popular than
the Greens, and they are more popular than Independence. There
is still some room between them and the coalition though.
The coalition's latest numbers are twenty seven percent, but that
number has slipped a lot in the last twelve months.
So you've got one party in the coalition that's kind
of trending down. You've got one nation that's trending up,
(11:07):
and that's a very interesting change of dynamics and almost
a wave that Barnaby Joyce will likely ride.
Speaker 1 (11:12):
I want to talk about that decline in popularity for
the Coalition because I think one thing that is interesting is,
like you said, one nation is on the rise and
the Coalition is on the decline. There is a big
gap between them, but it's an interesting trend to look at. Hypothetically,
if one nation was to overtake the Coalition in popularity,
(11:33):
not just in polls, but at an actual election, could
they become the new opposition?
Speaker 2 (11:39):
Well, they could if they formed a new coalition essentially,
because remember there's one hundred and fifty seats in the
House of Representatives. You need seventy six of them to govern.
And so if Barnaby Joyce joins one Nation in the
House of Reps, that's their only member right now, so
they would need to find seventy five other members to join.
Speaker 1 (12:00):
So to be clear, one nation currently has no politicians
in the House of Representatives. All of their members who
are elected, all of their elected members are in the Senate.
Speaker 2 (12:10):
Exactly, so they have a lot of grounds to have
a have a long way to go, but what it
does mean is it could destabilize the current coalition makeup
and then once you have kind of a bunch of
minor parties. We see this in other countries around the
world where there's maybe a group of four or five
minor parties. Let's say that they all of the seventy six,
(12:32):
they can all contribute between ten and fifteen. You then
could see a world where a party with ten members
could actually be the leader of a broader coalition. And
that's where you see some of the parties that have
traditionally fringe interests of minor interests suddenly become in positions
of power. So it's definitely not within the next five years,
(12:53):
but it's definitely not a totally hypothetical notion.
Speaker 1 (12:57):
And just before we go, how has the National Party
responded to this news from Barnaby Joyce.
Speaker 2 (13:03):
Well, understandably they're not happy. So just before Barnaby Joyce's announcement,
the Senate Leader of the Nationals, Bridget Mackenzie, she said
the move by Joyce would quote trash his legacy, saying
Joyce had a choice between being part of a party
of government to get things done, being the Nationals, or
join a protest party where you won't be able to
(13:24):
do that type of thing being one nation. So some
strong words there. It's clear that the relationship is totally
broken down as per him leaving, so not surprised that
that was the response. But for the Nationals, politically, they
lose a vote and they lose a number, and that
makes a big difference in the world of politics.
Speaker 1 (13:44):
I also reached out to the team of National's leader
David Little Proud to see if they had anything to say,
and they said, we're not commenting on it, which is
super interesting. I mean, like we said at the start,
this is a very high profile member of the Nationals
and for the leader to not even comment on the
fact that he's departing is quite significant.
Speaker 2 (14:03):
It's almost like you might put that to him. Next
week is when he's sitting in the chair that I'm
in right now.
Speaker 1 (14:09):
And that is a very good place to leave this conversation.
But I do want to say, like Sam said, I
will be interviewing David Little Proud, who is, as we
have said many times, he's the leader of the National Party.
I'll be interviewing him next week. If you do have
any question suggestions that you would like me to put
to him. You can email us at Helloatthdalios dot com
(14:30):
dot au. I'll be having a look at any question
suggestions that are sent there. I think it will be
a particularly interesting time now to be talking to him.
That is all we have time for today, Sam, thank
you for taking us through that. Thanks Billy, and thank
you so much for listening to this episode of the
Daily Ods. We'll be back this afternoon with your evening headlines,
but until then, have a great day.
Speaker 2 (14:56):
My name is Lily Maddon and I'm a proud Aarunda
Bunjelung good in woman from Gadigol Country.
Speaker 1 (15:02):
The Daily oz acknowledges that this podcast is recorded on
the lands of the Gadigol people and pays respect to
all Aboriginal and Torrestrate island and nations. We pay our
respects to the first peoples of these countries, both past
and present.
Popular Podcasts
Stuff You Should Know
If you've ever wanted to know about champagne, satanism, the Stonewall Uprising, chaos theory, LSD, El Nino, true crime and Rosa Parks, then look no further. Josh and Chuck have you covered.
Dateline NBC
Current and classic episodes, featuring compelling true-crime mysteries, powerful documentaries and in-depth investigations. Follow now to get the latest episodes of Dateline NBC completely free, or subscribe to Dateline Premium for ad-free listening and exclusive bonus content: DatelinePremium.com
The Male Room with Dr. Jesse Mills
As Director of The Men’s Clinic at UCLA, Dr. Jesse Mills has spent his career helping men understand their bodies, their hormones, and their health. Now he’s bringing that expertise to The Male Room — a podcast where data-driven medicine meets common sense. Each episode separates fact from hype, science from snake oil, and gives men the tools to live longer, stronger, and happier lives. With candor, humor, and real-world experience from the exam room and the operating room, Dr. Mills breaks down the latest health headlines, dissects trends, and explains what actually works — and what doesn’t. Smart, straightforward, and entertaining, The Male Room is the show that helps men take charge of their health without the jargon.