Episode 4: No Kings

Send us a text

In Episode 4: "No Kings" of her podcast, Reagan Faulkner takes a critical and often skeptical look at the recent "No Kings" protest movement spreading across the U.S. Rather than joining in the enthusiasm of protestors rallying against supposed authoritarian threats, she scrutinizes their messaging, motivations, and the accuracy of their grievances. Faulkner opens the episode by questioning whether the movement’s rhetoric—invoking fears of kingship and tyranny—truly reflects political reality, or if it amounts to political theatre driven more by social media trends than by genuine threats to American democracy.

Faulkner dissects the core arguments put forth by "No Kings" supporters, noting inconsistencies and what she sees as overstatements in their claims of creeping autocracy. She interviews both participants and critics of the protests, highlighting how much of the movement’s energy appears rooted in dissatisfaction with the current administration, but she argues that such activism sometimes devolves into hyperbole or even hostility without a constructive agenda. Faulkner is especially pointed in her analysis of the performative aspects of recent rallies, calling attention to incidents where protestors’ conduct contradicted their calls for civility and order.

In her concluding reflections, Faulkner warns listeners against accepting protest messaging at face value and encourages deeper critical thinking about both current events and the lessons of U.S. history. She argues that honoring America’s tradition of rejecting monarchy means more than just chanting slogans—it requires responsible citizenship and respect for institutional checks and balances. Reaffirming her commitment to open debate and civil society, Faulkner invites her audience to engage with skepticism, urging them not to be swept up by crowd mentality or narratives that oversimplify complex political realities.